2012 powerpoint template version 2.1
TRANSCRIPT
Common PQ Issues and Solutions
Mark Stephens, PE, CEM, CP EnMS Senior Project Manager
Industrial PQ and Energy EfficiencyElectric Power Research Institute
Phone 865.218.8022 [email protected]
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Duration (4 Cycle)
Magnitude (50% of nominal)
2© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
EPRI Semiconductor PQ Experience
Semiconductor Plant PQ Audits1. Albany Nanotech, Albany, NY2. Asahi Kasei Microsystems, Japan3. AUO, Hsinchu, Taiwan4. Chartered Semiconductor, Singapore5. ChiMei Optoelectronics Corp, Tainan, Taiwan6. Confidential Semiconductor Site, Chandler, AZ7. Confidential Semiconductor Site, Philippines8. HP, Singapore9. IBM, Burlington, VT10. IBM, East Fishkill, NY11. International Rectifier, Temecula12. Kyocera,Kagoshima,Japan13. Lucent Technologies, Allen Town, PA14. LSI Logic, Colorado15. Freescale/Motorola, Ed Bluestien, Austin, TX
16. Freescale/Motorola, Oak Hill , Austin, TX
17. Motorola, Irvine, CA
18. Motorola, Mesa, AZ 19. Philips Semiconductor, San Antonio
20. Qimonda, Sandston, VA
21. Sony Semiconductor, San Antonio, TX
22. SSMC, Singapore 23. ST Microelectronics, San Diego
24. ST Microelectronics, Singapore
25. Winbond Semiconductor Plant, Hsinchu, Taiwan
OEMs (SEMI F47 Testing)1. ABB Robotics2. Accent Optical3. Advanced Energy4. Alcatel5. Rockwell Automation6. Applied Materials7. ASM8. ASML9. Axcelis10. Carrier11. CFM Technologies12. CTI13. Densei-Lambda14. Durr Automation15. ESI16. Fanuc Robotics17. FSI International18. Ibis19. Johnson Controls20. Johnson Controls, York, PA21. KLA-Tencor22. Kuka Robotics23. Lambda EMI24. Mattson Technologies25. McQuay International26. Meiden Power Solutions
OEMs (SEMI F47 Testing)27. Mitsubishi28. Novellus29. Phoenix Contact30. Powertron31. PULS Power32. Reliability, Inc.33. Rudolph Technologies34. Schlumberger35 Schneider Electric35. SCP Global Technologies36. SEMATECH37. Semitool38. Siemens39. SVG Lithography40. SVG Thermco41 Tokyo Electron Austin (TEA)42. Tokyo Electron Kyushu (TKL)43. Tokyo Electron Massachusetts
(TEM)44. Trane45. Varian Semiconductor Equipment
Associates, Inc.46. York
3© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Importance of Power Quality
•What happens to this Ion Implanter process when a power quality problem occurs?•Who is to blame?•How do we work together to fix the problems?
4© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Interrelated Processes
Air Compressor
PowerSource
ProcessExhaust
PCWPump
PowerProcess
Mechanical
AutomatedProcess
InterlockedAutomated
Process
Is CompressedAir Present?
Is ProcessCooling Water
Present?
Are the ExahaustSystems Running?
Is PowerPresent?
Is InterlockedProcess Running?
Ok to RunAutomated
Process
CONTINUALLYREPEATED
StopAutomated
Process
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
5© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Outage or Sag ?
Utility Substation
Customer A
Customer B
Fault
Sag
Outage
6© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Typical Recloser Schemes
TD 1 TD 2
Initial Fault
Reclose Attempt 2
TD 3
Reclose Attempt 3
Reclose Attempt 1
Time
RM
S Vo
ltage
TD 1 TD 2
From Initial Fault Reclose Attempt 2
TD 3
Reclose Attempt 3
Reclose Attempt 1
Sag Event Sag Event Sag Event Sag Event
Time
RM
S Vo
ltage
Customer “A” Feeder
Customer “B” Feeder
7© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Targeting by Cause
One Phase
68%
Two Phases
19%
Three
Phases
13%
Source: EPRI Distribution Power Quality Study
8© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
9© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Is it the Plant Equipment’s Fault?
5 Year Data Example Fed from
Dedicated SubstationFrom Transmission
Network
4 Year Data Example Fed from
Dedicated DistributionNetwork
10© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Important Realization
• Utilities Share Responsibility– Tree Trimming, Lighting Arrestors, Grounding,
Maintenance, Provide PQ information to industrials, etc– Understand PQ Environment of Grid
• Industrials Share Responsibility– Understanding Equipment Vulnerability, PQ Specifications,
Power Conditioning, Proper Wiring/Grounding, etc– Understand PQ Environment at Site
• Most effective solutions are reached when both sides work together to see what can be done
12© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Protecting Equipment Against Voltage SagsInstalled Process Equipment
• The goal of improving installed process equipment is to improve the overall voltage sag tolerance of the machine
• Four common approaches have been proven to to be effective at protecting installed process equipment
• Facility Level• Panel Level• Equipment/Machine Level• Control Level
13© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Protecting Equipment Against Voltage SagsInstalled Process Equipment
Economics Drive the Approach
14© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Protecting Equipment Against Voltage SagsInstalled Process Equipment• Facility-level Solutions are targeted at protecting an entire
facility and can be very costly ($500k - $$M+)
Dynamic Voltage RestorerLarge FlywheelLarge UPS
15© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Protecting Equipment Against Voltage SagsInstalled Process Equipment• Panel-level Solutions are targeted at protecting loads fed from
a common circuit (Panel or Branch) $100k - $500+
16© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Protecting Equipment Against Voltage SagsInstalled Process Equipment• Machine-level Solutions are targeted at protecting one
machine ($20k - $200k)
17© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Protecting Equipment Against Voltage SagsInstalled Process Equipment• Control-level solutions are targeted at protecting only the
most sensitive components, most cost effective solution ($100 - $5,000)
18© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Generalized Example: Control Level to Equipment/Machine Level Cost vs. Coverage
+
+
20© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Techniques to Improve Voltage Sag Tolerance of Process Equipment
New Equipment in Design Phase• Specify Compliance to PQ Standards (such as SEMI F47)• Design with DC Power • Use Sag-Tolerant Components • Select Appropriate Trip Curves for Circuit Breakers Existing Equipment• Provide Conditioned Power for AC Control Circuits • Provide Backup Power for DC Buses Either Existing or New Equipment• Apply Custom Programming Techniques • Drive Configuration Settings
21© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Specify Voltage Sag Standards in Purchase Specs ( such as SEMI F47)
22© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Design with DC Power
• Utilize SEMI F47 compliant DC Power Supplies.• Whereas control power transformers (CPTs) and AC components do not
have inherent energy storage to help them ride through voltage sags.
23© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Design with DC Power
• One of the best methods of increasing the tolerance of control circuits is to use direct current (DC) instead of alternating current (AC) to power control circuits, controllers, input/output devices (I/O), and sensors.
• DC power supplies have a “built-in” tolerance to voltage sags due to their ripple-correction capacitors, whereas control power transformers (CPTs) and AC components do not have inherent energy storage to help them ride through voltage sags
• Many OEMs are moving in this direction to harden their equipment designs
DC Powered Emergency Off Circuit
DC Powered PLC Circuit
24© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Use Sag-Tolerant Components
• Require that all electrical components and subsystems meet SEMI F47 or other recognized voltage-sag standards
25© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Ride-Through Adjustments on AC Drives
• Depending on the setting of the drive’s undervoltage trip point and the severity of the sag, the drive may trip after the DC bus decreases below the undervoltage trip point.
• Sometimes, the voltage-sag tolerance of drives can be increased through parameter settings, including restart options
• Example AC Drive Parameters that could improve ride-through are;
• Automatic Reset and Restart Functions
• Motor- Load Control Functions (Flying Restart)
• Phase-Loss and DC Bus Undervoltage Functions
• Acceleration / Deceleration / Current / Torque - Limits
26© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Reported Approaches for Semiconductor Plant Voltage Sag Mitigation Strategies
• Facility Wide – Centralized UPS for critical loads in the fab.
• Distributed Approach - mitigate voltage sags on a tool-by-tool basis. Local UPS ranging from of 30 to 80kVA.
• Control Level Approach - This approach requires that the OEM/fab conditions the sensitive circuits that need power conditioning within each tool or subsystem.
• No Organized Approach – No plan. • Partnership with Utility - key to
making iterative improvements.
REF: Impact of SEMI F47 on Utilities and Their Customers, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2004. 1002284.
27© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
Summary• It’s a team effort to solve these problems, the utility, industrial/commercial, and sometimes consultants need to come together.
• Understanding why your equipment is vulnerable is paramount. You can’t fix a problem without understanding the true cause.
• Moving forward (sometimes with some simple modifications) you can make production systems more robust.
• Don’t forget including PQ standards in your purchase specs.
• Don’t assume battery based systems are required.
28© 2013 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
NYSDPS Power Quality Technical Conference 12/12/2013
For More Information Contact
Mark Stephens, PE, CEM, CP EnMSEPRI | Senior Project Manager
Industrial PQ & Energy Efficiency942 Corridor Park Blvd, Knoxville, TN 37932
Desk: 865-218-8022 Mobile: 865-773-3631
www.epri.com http://f47testing.epri.com
http://mypq.epri.com