2012 summer bridge-winter2013 final - foothill college · 2013. 11. 25. ·...
TRANSCRIPT
2012 Summer Bridge Math Program: Enrollment and Course Success Rates
Basic Skills Workgroup February 7, 2013
E. Kuo and M. Navi FHDA IR&P
Overview
• Two week summer program: July 9-‐19, 2012 – Emphasis on Math – Goal: provide a refresher course to help boost math placement
– Coupled with Counseling 50 • 73 students began program • 66 completed program
Overview
• 66 enrolled in fall 2012 – 61 completed Summer Bridge – 42 enrolled in a math course (69%) – NCBS takers (N=13) have been omi]ed from success rate data analysis because there were no final grades • 8 took NCBS 401A • 5 took NCBS 405
– None of the non completers enrolled in math (N=5)
Overview Fall 2012 Enrollment
• Out of 61 students, roughly half of student enrollment were in PSME and LA divisions (53%)
• 35 students enrolled in English and Math (57%)
1PS26%
1LA27%
1FA13%
1PE12%
1SS9%
1BH6%
1GU4%
1SE3%
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Fall 2012 Enrollment by Division (N=185)
Fall 2012 Course Success
• LA had 88% course success rate • PSME had 50% course success rate
3 PHED courses were excluded due to missing grades.
6
17
8
43
16
24
5
11
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1BH 1FA 1GU 1LA 1PE 1PS 1SE 1SS
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Fall 2012 Students Performance by Division (N=182)
Fall 2012 English
• 45 students out of the 61 students who completed Summer Bridge enrolled in an English course (74%)
• Majority of students passed their English course (90%)
English 242A is corequisite with English 1S, so two students were double counted.
Success90%
NonSuccess8%
Withdrew2%
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program CohortFall 2012 English Course Success (N=47)
ENGL-F209.60%ENGL-F001A
13%
ENGL-F110.11%
ENGL-F001B8%
ENGL-F001S4%
ENGL-F242A4%
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Fall 2012 Enrollment in English Department (N=47)
Fall 2012 Math
• Out of the 21 students who didn’t pass their math course, the highest nonsuccess rates were in: Math 10: 38% Math 105: 24% Math 220: 24%
Charts include all students who finished the SB program and enrolled in math.
MATH-F010.26%
MATH-F220.29%
MATH-F105.21%
MATH-F235.12%
MATH-F108.5%
MATH-F217.5%
MATH-F048A2%
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Fall 2012 Enrollment in Math Department (N=42)
Success50%
NonSuccess36%
Withdrew14%
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program CohortFall 2012 Math Course Success (N=42)
Math Course Success
• Students enrolled in Math 108, 217, 220 and 235 had higher success rates, where over half of students passed the course.
• Over half of the students who were not successful in their math course experienced success in their other courses (13 out of 19 students).
Math Course N % N % N % N %F010. 3 27% 4 36% 4 36% 11 100%F048A 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 1 100%F105. 4 44% 3 33% 2 22% 9 100%F108. 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%F217. 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%F220. 7 58% 5 42% 0 0% 12 100%F235. 3 60% 2 40% 0 0% 5 100%
NonSuccessSuccess Withdrew
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Cohort (N=42)Math Course Success Rate
Total
Course Success by Placement
• Half the students were successful in the math course, regardless of whether their placement level increased.
Students with no pretest data were excluded.
4 10
4 11
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
No level change or decrease 1 Level and more increase
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program CohortMath Course Success Rate by
Math Placement Level Change (N=29)
Success NonSuccess
4 3 2
3
2
0
4 4 3
1
2
1
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
No level change or decrease
1 level increase
2 level increase
3 level increase
4 level increase
5 level increase
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program CohortMath Course Success Rate by
Math Placement Level Change (N=29)
Success NonSuccess
NCBS 405
• 5 Students enrolled in NCBS 405 – 4 students took NCBS 405 and F010 concurrently with: • 50% Success • 25% Nonsuccess • 25% Withdrew
– 1 student didn’t take any Math course
Overview Winter 2013 Enrollment
• Compared to Fall 2012, where enrollment was centered in the Language Arts and PSME divisions, enrollment is now more evenly distributed among Language Arts, Social Sciences and PSME divisions.
• At the department level, enrollment is more concentrated in ENGL (23%), MATH (19%) and PHED (12%).
1LA24%
1SS22%
1PS21%
1PE15%
1FA10%
1BH4%
1GU3%
1SE1%
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Winter 2013 Enrollment by Division (N=183)
Winter 2013 English
• 45 students out of the 61 students who completed Summer Bridge enrolled in an English course in fall (74%).
• 39 students out of 56 students who completed Summer Bridge enrolled in an English course in winter (70%).
• Students appear to be progressing through English sequence.
ENGL242A is a corequisite with ENGL1S, and ENGL242B is a corequisite with ENGL1T, so two students are double counted in fall and three students were double counted in winter. Note that out of the 7 students enrolled in ENGL 209 in W13, 3 are repeaeng the course.
ENGL-F209.60%ENGL-F001A
13%
ENGL-F110.11%
ENGL-F001B8%
ENGL-F001S4%
ENGL-F242A4%
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Fall 2012 Enrollment in English Department (N=47)
ENGL-F11050%
ENGL-F20917%
ENGL-F001A14%
ENGL-F001B5%
ENGL-F001T5%
ENGL-F242B5%
ENGL-F001S2%
ENGL-F242A2%
2012 Foothil College Summer Bridge ProgramWinter 2013 Enrollment in English Department (N=42)
Winter 2013 Math
• Fall 2012: 42 students out of the 61 students who completed Summer Bridge enrolled in a Math course (69%) – 35 students enrolled in English and Math (57%)
• Winter 2013: 34 students out of the 56 students who completed Summer Bridge enrolled in a Math course (61%) – 24 students enrolled in English and Math (43%)
MATH-F10535%
MATH-F01024%
MATH-F23518%
MATH-F2309%
MATH-F0576%
MATH-F2206%
MATH-F048A3%
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge ProgramWinter 2013 Enrollment in Math Department (N=34)
MATH-F010.22%
MATH-F220.24%
MATH-F105.18%
NCBS 401A16%
MATH-F235.10%
MATH-F108.4%
MATH-F217.4%
MATH-F048A2%
2012 Foothill College Summer Bridge Program Fall 2012 Enrollment in Math Department (N=42)
½ of NCBS401A students in F12 enrolled in MATH 235 in W13
Fall 2012 and Winter 2013 Enrollment
66 enrolled
61 completed Summer Bridge
42 enrolled in
Math
6 Fall only 3 with Math,
3 without Math
61 enrolled
56 completed Summer Bridge
34 enrolled in
Math
1 Winter only
The three who enrolled in math were unsuccessful (10, 220, 235)
Enr. In Eng 209, no math Math placement: NCBS 401A
55 students enrolled in fall and winter
27 students enrolled in Math in fall and winter
5 non-‐completers enrolled in fall and winter (same students), No math. One enrolled & successfully Passed English 1A in fall
Summer Bridge Cohort Math Course Progress
73 66
42
21 17
21
10
Enrolled in next course Repeated fall courseMath 10 4 4Math 48A 1 0Math 57 2 0Math 105 7 4Math 108 0 0Math 217 0 0Math 220 0 1Math 230 3 0Math 235 0 1Total 17 10
7 N
Math 105 1Math 220 1Math 235 5Total 7
Total num
ber e
nrolled in th
e program
Completers
Enrolled in m
ath
Success
Non
Success
Next course enr.
Repeaters
Winter only
Summary
• Majority of students who succeeded in their math course are taking next level math in winter (81%).
• Almost half of the students who didn’t pass their math course are repeaeng in winter (48%).
• Increase in Math placement levels does not appear to necessarily translate into higher success at the math courses.
• Lower level math courses had higher level of success.
Implicaeons
• Consider the effect of placing students at a higher math level and whether they are successful in this course
• Consider interveneon aher Summer Bridge • Consider math skills needed in Math 10 (staesecs) compared to other math courses
• Consider students who only need Math 105/108