2012 sustainability reporting of the world’s largest food ......example, nestle’s report details...
TRANSCRIPT
Ajinomoto, Archer Daniels Midland,Associated British Foods BRF Brasil
Olam International, Saputo, Smithfield Foods, Tyson Foods, Unilever, and W i l m a r I n t e r n a t i o n a l
2012 Sustainability Reporting of the World’s Largest Food Processing Companies
Pacific Sustainability Index Scores:
A benchmarking tool for online sustainability repor ng
Contents Topics Page Company Rankings 3 Lead Analyst’s Commentary 4 PSI Overview 6 PSI Scoring in a Nutshell 7 Sector Performance 8 Visual Cluster Analysis 9 Environmental Topics 10 Social and Human Rights Topics 11 Environmental Intent Scores Ranking 12 Environmental Reporting Scores Ranking 13 Environmental Performance Scores Ranking
14
Social Intent Scores Ranking 15 Social Reporting Scores Ranking 16 Social Performance Scores Ranking 17 Human Rights Reporting Element 18 Performance by Country 19 Relationship Between PSI Scores and Financial Variables
20
Explicit numerical goals Reported 23 Topics Showing Performance Improvement over Previous Year Data
28
Topics in which Performance was Better than Sector Average
35
Commentaries alphabetically listed by company name
37
Appendix: PSI Questionnaire 130 Questions should be addressed to: Dr. J. Emil Morhardt, Director ([email protected], 909-621-8190) Elgeritte Adidjaja, Research Fellow ([email protected], 909-621-8698) Roberts Environmental Center Claremont McKenna College 925 N. Mills Ave. Claremont, CA 91711-5916 USA
The Roberts Environmental Center has been the foremost analyst of corporate sustainability reporting for over a decade. We analyze corporate online disclosure using our Pacific Sustainability Index (PSI) and publish the results online. The goal of corporate report analysis conducted by the Roberts Environmental Center is to acquaint students with environmental and social issues facing the world’s industries, and the ways in which industry approaches and resolves these issues. The data presented in this report were collected by students at the Roberts Environmental Center:
Lead Analyst Hilary Haskell
Simone Berkovitz
Sustainability Management Analyst Katherine Recinos
Environmental Analyst
Samuel Kahr
Social and Human Rights Analyst Isabel Lane
Special Project Manager
Lucas Van Houten
Media/Public Relation Quinn Chasan Sierra Gibson Jacob Shimkus
Copyright 2013 © by J. Emil Morhardt. All rights reserved.
www.roberts.cmc.edu 2 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
6.0912.49
14.41
15.18
15.30
20.08
23.24
24.88
25.81
30.63
31.19
31.88
32.30
36.76
37.30
38.39
39.27
41.52
43.03
45.04
46.64
47.18
48.55
48.88
49.56
50.93
50.94
50.95
51.59
0 20 40 60 80 100
JBS
BRF-Brasil Foods
McCormick & Co
Hillshire Brands.
Saputo
J. M. Smuckers
Olam International
Kerry Group
Corn Products Inc.
Archer Daniels
Bunge
Dean Foods
Wilmar International
Grupo Bimbo
General Mills
Associated British
Tyson Foods
Hormel Foods
Kraft Foods
Hershey
ConAgra Foods
Golden Agri
Kellogg
Nestlé
H.J. Heinz Company
Ajinomoto
Smith�ield Foods
Unilever
Campbell Soup Co.
Danone Group
Company Rankings
Grade Company Name Cou
A+ Danone Group FranceA- Campbell Soup Co. United StatesB+ Unilever NetherlandsB+ Smithfield Foods United StatesB+ Ajinomoto JapanB+ H.J. Heinz Company United StatesB+ Nestlé SwitzerlandB+ Kellogg United StatesB+ Golden Agri-Resources SingaporeB+ ConAgra Foods United StatesB Hershey United StatesB Kraft Foods United StatesB- Hormel Foods Corporation United StatesB- Tyson Foods United StatesB- Associated British Foods United KingdomB- General Mills United StatesC+ Grupo Bimbo MexicoC Wilmar International SingaporeC Dean Foods United StatesC Bunge BermudaC Archer Daniels Midland United StatesC- Corn Products Inc. United StatesC- Kerry Group IrelandC- Olam International SingaporeD+ J. M. Smuckers United StatesD Saputo CanadaD Hillshire Brands. United StatesD McCormick & Co United StatesD- BRF-Brasil Foods BrazilF J lizarBSB
61.86
www.roberts.cmc.edu 3 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Lead Analyst’s Commentary Simone Berkovitz ‘14
orporate social and
environmental responsibility is extremely important for companies in the food processing sector
due to direct health impacts on consumers and the environmental impacts from production and sourcing. According to our 2012 Pacific Sustainability Index (PSI) Scoring, the food processing sector overall was very competitive, with many of the companies receiving similar scores. The top scoring companies were Danone Group and Campbell Soup Co. due to clear, detailed, and comprehensive reporting. While the lowest scoring companies BRF-Brasil Foods and JBS failed to demonstrate a commitment to environmental and social responsibility. The top reported environmental topics included environmental vision statements, energy usage, green food purchasing, and sustainable agriculture. The top reported social topics included occupational health and safety, access to health care for employees, and community development. Green food purchasing is an extremely important topic in the food processing sector. “Green food purchasing” is defined by food purchased that comes from organic sources or sustainable farms or sustainable fisheries. Green food purchasing is both an environmental and health concern. Almost all of the reports addressed nutrition, health, and green issues, in which green food purchasing initiatives fell under both categories. Danone names health and nature as its top strategic priorities, under
which several green food purchasing initiatives are outlined. For example, the “sustainable milk program” includes local organic milk as well as farm assessments in order to ensure health and environmental benefits. Campbell Soup Co. recently developed organic, and all-natural products in order to promote health and wellness as well as better environmental practices. Similarly, top scoring company, Unilever outlines green food purchasing practices as part of their “Sustainable Living Plan” which includes both health and environmental impact initiatives. Across the food processing sector, companies have recognized the importance of green food purchasing due to a rise in consumer demand for these products. In conjunction with green food purchasing, sustainable agriculture and food sourcing are critical issues in the food processing sector. In particular, one of the biggest environmental concerns is sourcing of palm oil. Palm oil is an edible vegetable oil derived from the fruit of oil palms, found mostly in the tropics of Africa, Southeast Asia, and parts of Brazil. The use of palm oil in the food processing industry has risen in the past years due to its use as a replacement for trans fats. However, palm oil production poses a significant environmental threat due to widespread deforestation. Specifically in parts of Indonesia, natural forests are being removed in order to make space for oil-palm monoculture and as a result the Sumatran Orangutan has become critically endangered. Due to these serious environmental concerns many companies that use palm oil have reported changing their practices to be more sustainable. For example, Nestle’s report details a commitment to use traceable sustainable palm oil in order to minimize deforestation. Nestle emphasizes a commitment to
C
www.roberts.cmc.edu 4 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
sustainability across the supply chain for both agricultural commodities and packaging products. When sourcing raw materials, food processing companies directly impact the local communities and often indigenous populations. Local communities can be both positively and negatively affected by the food processing sector. Communities often benefit from the increased agricultural exports, but can also be hurt by externalities such as deforestation or toxic waste. 52% of the companies we scored discussed local community development initiatives and 20% of companies mentioned measures regarding indigenous people. Companies reported a wide range of development initiatives both company sponsored and in partnership with local NGOs, such as access to drinking water, educational programs, farmer capacity building, entrepreneurship development, reforestation, and more. Additionally, several companies discussed working to protect the rights of indigenous people, violations, and actions taken to avoid future violations. It is apparent across the sector that corporations recognize their impact on local communities and are taking steps to internalize negative externalities. One of the most pressing environmental issues in the food processing sector is waste management. Most companies presented data on waste and discussed recycling efforts. 37% of companies we scored presented “Zero Waste” policies and initiatives in order to demonstrate a commitment to waste management and recycling. “Zero Waste” means the routine manufacturing waste is recycled or converted to energy, instead of taken to a landfill. One notable “Zero Waste” initiative was Hershey’s waste-to-energy food waste incinerators, which not only decrease waste taken to landfills, but
also provide a valuable energy source, reducing fossil fuel reliance. ConAgra reported similar approaches, along with a partnership with a local hunger NGO where food was donated instead of going to waste. Overall, the food processing sector has shown great improvement in both social and environmental responsibility. CSR reports are significantly longer and more detailed than in previous years. Driven by rising social and environmental standards and consumer demand, corporations have recognized the necessity to change their practices.
www.roberts.cmc.edu 5 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
The Pacific Sustainability Index (PSI) Overview
The PSI Scoring System
The Paci�ic Sustainability Index (PSI) uses a systematic questionnaire to analyze the quality of the overall industry corporate sustainability reporting (CSR), as well as the individual companies' CSRs. Sample companies are the largest corporations listed by the current Forbes list. This report provides a summary �indings of CSR analyses conducted by a team of undergraduate students of the Claremont Colleges--mostly of Claremont McKenna College of which Roberts Environmental Center was founded--for a semester-long research--typically a four month period. The assigned team pre-selected the topics for current analysis from the preliminary review of the downloaded reports, based on the topic's prevalence to the sector and relevance to the current issues faced by the industry.
The Roberts Environmental Center
The Roberts Environmental Center is an environmental research institute at Claremont McKenna College (CMC). Its mission is to provide students of all the Claremont Colleges with a comprehensive and realistic understanding of today’s environmental issues and the ways in which they are being and can be resolved--beyond the con�ines of traditional academic disciplines and curriculum--and to identify, publicize, and encourage policies and practices that achieve economic and social goals in the most environmentally benign and protective manner. The Center is partially funded by an endowment from George R. Roberts (Founding Partner of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Co. and CMC alumnus), other grants and gifts, and is staffed by faculty and students from the Claremont Colleges.
MethodologyThe team downloads revelant English languages web pages from the main corporate website for the �irst month of analysis and convert them into a PDF format, then a survey of topics for inclusion in the questionnaire is underway. Data exclusively and independently available outside the main corporate website are omitted to keep transparancy score only to include innate information provided by the company. Although we aim to be objective in our analysis, our analysts are encouraged to expressed their subjective view of what they see in the report, allowing creativity to permeate in the individual analyzes of companies and the industry-wide reporting of topics.
Scores and RanksWe offer the opportunity for all companies/institutions analyzed in this report to give answers to the PSI questionnaire we are using, as long as the source of information provided are publicly available online. Our analysts would go through the website analyzing the same questionnaire, irrespective of the response, and merge the results. After scoring is �inalized, we issue a draft report and make it available for companies’ review. We encourage all companies to provide feedback and should it put out additional new online materials within the publication timeline, we will incorporate the new information into our analysis. We will use the contact information speci�ied online or provided in the report for these purposes, however, if the contact information is not provided, we will write a letter to the Public Relation Staff of the company requesting a review our report prior to publication. When response is not received in the time, usually within four weeks, we will publish the results without company’s review.
What do the Score Means?
We normalize all the scores to the potential maximum score. Scores of subsets of the overall score are also normalized to their potential maxima. The letter grades (A+, A, A-, B+, etc.), however, are normalized to the highest scoring company analyzed in the report. Grades of individual companies in the report might be different from grades posted online on the Roberts Environmental Center's website, since the normalization of scores of an individual company online is not limited to the companies analyzed in the sector report, but also includes other companies of the same sector irrespective of the year of analysis.
Companies with scores in the highest 4% get an A+ and any in the bottom 4% get an F. We assign these by dividing the maximum PSI score obtained in the sector into 12 equal parts then rounding fractional score up or down. This means that A+ and F are under-represented compared to the other grades. The same technique applies to the separate categories of environmental and social scores. Thus, we grade on the curve. We assume that the highest score obtained in the sector and any scores near it represent the state-of-the-art for that sector and deserve an A+.
www.roberts.cmc.edu 6 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental, Qualitative
2%
Social, Quantitative
10%
Social, Qualitative
11%
Social, Human Rights
16%
Social, Intent19%
Environmental, Intent22%
Environmental, Quantitative
20%
Distribution of Scores by Topics
PSI Scoring in a Nutshell
Types of InformationOur analysis of sustainability reporting are divided into environmental and social categories—the latter including human rights—and into three types of information: 1) intent, 2) reporting, and 3) performance.3. PerformanceFor each “Reporting” topic, two performance points are available. For quantitative topics, one point is given for improvement from the previous reporting period, and one point for better performance than the sector average (based on the data used for this sector report normalized by revenue). For qualitative topics, we give one point for any indication of improvement from previous reporting periods, and one point for perspective.The “human rights” topics are scored differently, with five “reporting” points; 2.5 points for formally adopting a policy or standard and 2.5 points for a description of monitoring measures. In addition, there are two “performance” points; one point for evidence of actions to reinforce policy and one point for a quantitative indication of compliance.
2. ReportingThe “Reporting” topics are each worth five points and are either quantitative (for which we expect numerical data) or qualitative (for which we don’t). For quantitative topics, one point is available for a discussion, one point for putting the information into perspective (i.e. awards, industry standards, competitor performance, etc., or if the raw data are normalized by dividing by revenue, number of employees, number of widgets produced, etc.), one point for the presence of an explicit numerical goal, one point for numerical data from a single year, and one point for similar data from a previous year. For qualitative topics, there are three criteria summed up to five points: 1.67 points for discussion, 1.67 points for initiatives or actions, and 1.67 points for perspective.
1. IntentThe “Intent” topics are each worth two points; one point for a discussion of intentions, vision, or plans, and one point for evidence of specific actions taken to implement them.
www.roberts.cmc.edu 7 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Sector Performance
Each vertical-line—sorted by the companies with the highest to lowest overall PSI scores—illustrates the range of the total environmental and social score of each company, divided right in the center with a tick-mark, which is also the PSI overall score. The longer the line, shows the larger discrepancies between the amount of the environmental or social topics reported.Discriptive Statistics of
the Overall Environmental, Social, and PSI Scores
-55
1525
3545
5565
75
Dan
one
Gro
upC
ampb
ell S
oup
Co.
Uni
leve
rSm
ithfie
ld F
oods
Ajin
omot
oH
.J. H
einz
Com
pany
Nes
tléK
ello
ggG
olde
n A
gri-R
esou
rces
Con
Agr
a Fo
ods
Her
shey
Kra
ft Fo
ods
Hor
mel
Foo
ds C
orpo
ratio
nT
yson
Foo
dsA
ssoc
iate
d Br
itish
Foo
dsG
ener
al M
ills
Gru
po B
imbo
Wilm
ar In
tern
atio
nal
Dea
n Fo
ods
Bung
eA
rche
r D
anie
ls M
idla
ndC
orn
Prod
ucts
Inc.
Ker
ry G
roup
Ola
m In
tern
atio
nal
J. M
. Sm
ucke
rsSa
puto
Hill
shir
e Br
ands
.M
cCor
mic
k &
Co
BRF-
Bras
il Fo
ods
JBS
E n v iro n m e n ta l S o c ia l O v e ra l l
Environmental Score Social Score Overall Score
61.86
6.09
14.39
35.73
56.67
9.17
14.54
33.85
1.97
67.05
16.11
37.61
Minimum Score
Standard Deviation
Average Score (mean)
Maximum Score
www.roberts.cmc.edu 8 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Visual cluster analysis multivariate data of the sort produced by the PSI are difficult to summarize. Here we have created radar diagrams of the performance of each company analyzed in the sector by its environmental and social intent, reporting, and performance sorted by company ranking. Maximum scores will match the outer sides of the hexagon, which total up to 100 percent. A proportional spider-web shape suggests a balance of reporting in all areas. Visual Cluster Analysis
EI = Environmental Intent, ER = Environmental Reporting, EP = Environmental PerformanceSI = Social Intent, SR = Social Reporting, SP = Social Performance
Danone Group
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Campbell Soup Co.
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Unilever
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Smithfield Foods
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Ajinomoto
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
H.J. Heinz Company
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Nestlé
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Kellogg
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Golden Agri-Resources
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
ConAgra Foods
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Hershey
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Kraft Foods
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Hormel Foods Corporation
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Tyson Foods
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Associated British Foods
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
General Mills
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Grupo Bimbo
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Wilmar International
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Dean Foods
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Bunge
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Archer Daniels Midland
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Corn Products Inc.
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Kerry Group
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Olam International
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
J. M. Smuckers
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Hillshire Brands.
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
Saputo
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
McCormick & Co
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
BRF-Brasil Foods
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
JBS
- 1 E
+2 6
3
E R
E P
SP
SR
SI
E I
www.roberts.cmc.edu 9 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
0.37
0.52
0.48
0.47
0.12
0.03
0.19
0.43
0.38
0.43
0.50
0.24
0.33
0.33
0.50
0.20
0.33
0.77
0.47
0.37
0.17
0.60
0.52
0.43
0.41
0.36
0.29
0.24
0.09
0.52
0.410.31
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Zero Waste PolicyWater used
Waste recycled: solid wasteWaste (solid) disposed of
Waste (office) recycledWaste (hazardous) released to the environment
Waste (hazardous) producedStakeholder consultation
Report contact personRenewable energy used
Reforestation (environmental )Notices of violation
Locally grown organic foodHabitat/ecosystem conservation
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), totalGreen transportation initiatives
Green purchasingGreen food purchasing
Genetically modified foodFood Waste
(environmental )Fines Environmental visionary statement
Environmental policy statementEnvironmental management system
Environmental management structureEnvironmental impediments and challenges
Environmental expenses and investmentsEnvironmental education
Environmental accounting (total )Energy used
Climate change/global warmingBiodiversity
Percentage of Companies Addressing Environmental Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu 10 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
0.260.22
0.120.28
0.260.80
0.470.45
0.340.21
0.400.40
0.430.21
0.310.52
0.400.20
0.330.070.09
0.360.31
0.100.43
0.240.41
0.240.22
0.340.360.36
0.240.41
0.520.41
0.340.34
0.53
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Workforce profile: genderWorkforce profile: ethnicities/race
Workforce profile: ageWomen in management
Third-party validationSustainable agriculture
/Supplier screening based on social or environmental performancesupplier management
Social visionary statement Social policy statement
Social impediments and challengesSocial community investment
Sexual harassmentRecordable incident/accident rate
Reasonable working hoursPolitical contributions
Occupational health and safety protectionLost workday case rate
Indigenous peopleHealth and safety, or social organizational structure
Health and safety finesHealth and safety citations
Free association and collective bargaining of employeesFair compensation of employees
Employment for individuals w ith disabilitiesEmployee volunteerismEmployee turnover rate
Employee training for career developmentEmployee satisfaction surveys
Emergency preparedness programElimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory laborEffective abolition of child labor
Degrading treatment or punishment of employeesCommunity education
Community developmentCode of conduct or business ethics
BriberyAnti-corruption practices
Access to health care for employees
Percentage of Companies Addressing Social and Human Rights Topics
www.roberts.cmc.edu 11 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
9.38
15.63
18.75
18.75
25.00
40.6343.75
43.75
46.88
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
56.25
59.38
62.50
62.50
68.7568.75
68.75
68.75
71.88
71.88
78.13
78.13
78.13
78.13
81.25
81.25
0 20 40 60 80 100
Hillshire Brands.
BRF-Brasil Foods
JBS
McCormick & Co
Saputo
Hormel Foods
Corn Products Inc.
Kerry Group
Tyson Foods
Olam International
Bunge
Grupo Bimbo
J. M. Smuckers
Archer Daniels
Dean Foods
Wilmar
Nestlé
Golden Agri
Unilever
Smith�ield Foods
Kraft Foods
Kellogg
Associated British
Campbell Soup Co.
ConAgra Foods
Ajinomoto
Hershey
General Mills
H.J. Heinz Company
Danone Group
Environmental Intent Rankings
Grade Company Name Count
A+ Danone Group FranceA- General Mills United StatesA- H.J. Heinz Company United StatesA- Ajinomoto JapanA- Campbell Soup Co. United StatesA- ConAgra Foods United StatesA- Hershey United StatesB+ Associated British Foods United KingdomB+ Kellogg United StatesB Golden Agri-Resources SingaporeB Kraft Foods United StatesB Smithfield Foods United StatesB Unilever NetherlandsB- Nestlé SwitzerlandB- Wilmar International SingaporeB- Dean Foods United StatesB- Archer Daniels Midland United StatesC+ Bunge BermudaC+ Grupo Bimbo MexicoC+ J. M. Smuckers United StatesC+ Olam International SingaporeC Tyson Foods United StatesC Corn Products Inc. United StatesC Kerry Group IrelandC- Hormel Foods Corporation United StatesD Saputo CanadaD- J lizarBSBD- McCormick & Co United StatesD- BRF-Brasil Foods BrazilF Hillshire Brands. United States
93.75
www.roberts.cmc.edu 12 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
8.75
8.75
8.75
10.00
11.25
11.67
14.17
15.42
17.92
17.92
20.00
27.92
28.75
30.42
31.67
35.42
37.92
38.75
40.00
41.25
44.17
44.17
44.58
44.58
45.83
49.17
50.42
51.25
55.42
0 20 40 60 80 100
BRF-Brasil Foods
JBS
Kerry Group
McCormick & Co
Corn Products Inc.
Saputo
Olam International
Hillshire Brands.
Wilmar International
J. M. Smuckers
Archer Daniels Midland
Tyson Foods
Kraft Foods
Unilever
Grupo Bimbo
Bunge
Associated British Foods
Golden Agri-Resources
Dean Foods
Hormel Foods
ConAgra Foods
General Mills
Hershey
Kellogg
Nestlé
H.J. Heinz Company
Campbell Soup Co.
Danone Group
Smith�ield Foods
Ajinomoto
Environmental Reporting Rankings
Grade Company Name Country
A++ Ajinomoto JapanA+ Smithfield Foods United StatesA Danone Group FranceA Campbell Soup Co. United StatesA H.J. Heinz Company United StatesA- Nestlé SwitzerlandA- Hershey United StatesA- Kellogg United StatesB+ ConAgra Foods United StatesB+ General Mills United StatesB+ Hormel Foods Corporation United StatesB Dean Foods United StatesB Golden Agri-Resources SingaporeB Associated British Foods United KingdomB- Bunge BermudaC+ Grupo Bimbo MexicoC+ Unilever NetherlandsC+ Kraft Foods United StatesC Tyson Foods United StatesD+ Archer Daniels Midland United StatesD+ J. M. Smuckers United StatesD+ Wilmar International SingaporeD Hillshire Brands. United StatesD Olam International SingaporeD- Saputo CanadaD- Corn Products Inc. United StatesD- McCormick & Co United StatesD- BRF-Brasil Foods BrazilD- J lizarBSBD- Kerry Group Ireland
57.08
www.roberts.cmc.edu 13 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
0.000.00
3.13
3.13
3.13
3.13
3.13
6.25
6.25
6.25
9.38
9.38
9.38
12.50
12.50
15.63
15.63
15.63
15.63
18.75
18.75
18.75
18.75
21.88
21.88
25.00
28.13
28.13
31.25
0 20 40 60 80 100
Kerry Group
Corn Products Inc.
Wilmar International
JBS
McCormick & Co
Olam International
BRF-Brasil Foods
Tyson Foods
Archer Daniels Midland
ConAgra Foods
Hillshire Brands.
Saputo
J. M. Smuckers
Bunge
General Mills
Dean Foods
Hershey
Kellogg
Nestlé
Grupo Bimbo
Kraft Foods
Unilever
H.J. Heinz Company
Golden Agri-Resources
Hormel Foods Corporation
Danone Group
Smith�ield Foods
Associated British Foods
Ajinomoto
Campbell Soup Co.
Environmental Performance Rankings
Grade Company Name Country
A+ Ajinomoto JapanA+ Campbell Soup Co. United StatesA Associated British Foods United KingdomA Smithfield Foods United StatesA- Danone Group FranceB Golden Agri-Resources SingaporeB Hormel Foods Corporation United StatesB- Grupo Bimbo MexicoB- H.J. Heinz Company United StatesB- Kraft Foods United StatesB- Unilever NetherlandsC+ Dean Foods United StatesC+ Hershey United StatesC+ Kellogg United StatesC+ Nestlé SwitzerlandC Bunge BermudaC General Mills United StatesC- Hillshire Brands. United StatesC- J. M. Smuckers United StatesC- Saputo CanadaD Archer Daniels Midland United StatesD ConAgra Foods United StatesD Tyson Foods United StatesD- BRF-Brasil Foods BrazilD- J lizarBSBD- McCormick & Co United StatesD- Olam International SingaporeD- Wilmar International SingaporeF Corn Products Inc. United StatesF Kerry Group Ireland
31.25
www.roberts.cmc.edu 14 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
0.00
15.38
26.92
30.77
30.77
30.7734.62
38.46
42.31
42.31
46.15
50.00
50.00
50.00
53.8553.85
53.85
61.54
61.54
69.23
69.23
69.23
73.08
73.08
73.08
73.08
73.08
73.08
0 20 40 60 80 100
J. M. Smuckers
JBS
BRF-Brasil Foods
Hillshire Brands.
Dean Foods
Saputo
Bunge
McCormick & Co
Corn Products Inc.
Kerry Group
Archer Daniels
Associated British
Olam International
Tyson Foods
Kraft Foods
Grupo Bimbo
Hershey
Hormel Foods
General Mills
Wilmar International
Golden Agri-Resources
Smith�ield Foods
Unilever
Ajinomoto
ConAgra Foods
Campbell Soup Co.
Kellogg
Nestlé
H.J. Heinz Company
Danone Group
Social Intent Rankings
A Danone Group FranceB Ajinomoto JapanB Campbell Soup Co. United StatesB ConAgra Foods United StatesB H.J. Heinz Company United StatesB Kellogg United StatesB Nestlé SwitzerlandB Golden Agri-Resources SingaporeB Smithfield Foods United StatesB Unilever NetherlandsB- General Mills United StatesB- Wilmar International SingaporeC+ Grupo Bimbo MexicoC+ Hershey United StatesC+ Hormel Foods Corporation United StatesC Kraft Foods United StatesC Olam International SingaporeC Tyson Foods United StatesC Associated British Foods United KingdomC- Archer Daniels Midland United StatesC- Kerry Group IrelandC- Corn Products Inc. United StatesD+ McCormick & Co United StatesD+ Bunge BermudaD+ Dean Foods United StatesD+ Saputo CanadaD Hillshire Brands. United StatesD- BRF-Brasil Foods BrazilF J. M. Smuckers United StatesF J lizarBSB
Grade Company Name Country
0.00
88.46
www.roberts.cmc.edu 15 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
5.90
11.15
16.15
16.66
18.33
22.43
28.07
31.41
33.58
34.74
35.38
35.89
35.89
37.17
38.33
41.28
43.58
48.20
48.71
49.74
51.53
53.07
53.33
53.71
57.30
58.84
65.50
68.07
68.45
0 20 40 60 80 100
JBS
Saputo
McCormick & Co
General Mills
Olam International
BRF-Brasil Foods
Hillshire Brands.
Kerry Group
J. M. Smuckers
Associated British
Bunge
Archer Daniels
Dean Foods
Wilmar
Corn Products Inc.
Grupo Bimbo
ConAgra Foods
H.J. Heinz
Ajinomoto
Campbell Soup Co.
Kellogg
Hershey
Smith�ield Foods
Golden Agri-
Kraft Foods
Hormel Foods
Nestlé
Tyson Foods
Danone Group
Unilever
Social Reporting Rankings
Grade Company Name Country
A+ Unilever NetherlandsA Danone Group FranceA Tyson Foods United StatesA Nestlé SwitzerlandB+ Hormel Foods Corporation United StatesB+ Kraft Foods United StatesB Golden Agri-Resources SingaporeB Smithfield Foods United StatesB Hershey United StatesB Kellogg United StatesB Campbell Soup Co. United StatesB Ajinomoto JapanB- H.J. Heinz Company United StatesB- ConAgra Foods United StatesC+ Grupo Bimbo MexicoC+ Corn Products Inc. United StatesC Wilmar International SingaporeC Dean Foods United StatesC Archer Daniels Midland United StatesC Bunge BermudaC Associated British Foods United KingdomC J. M. Smuckers United StatesC- Kerry Group IrelandC- Hillshire Brands. United StatesD+ BRF-Brasil Foods BrazilD Olam International SingaporeD General Mills United StatesD- McCormick & Co United StatesD- Saputo CanadaF J lizarBSB
70.50
www.roberts.cmc.edu 16 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
0.00
1.923.85
3.85
3.85
7.69
9.62
9.62
9.62
11.54
11.54
17.31
23.08
23.08
23.08
23.0825.00
25.00
26.92
26.92
30.77
30.77
30.77
32.69
34.62
34.62
34.62
36.54
44.23
0 20 40 60 80 100
JBS
Hillshire Brands.
McCormick & Co
Saputo
Olam International
General Mills
BRF-Brasil Foods
J. M. Smuckers
Dean Foods
Wilmar International
Associated British
Ajinomoto
Corn Products Inc.
Bunge
Archer Daniels
Kerry Group
Grupo Bimbo
Hershey
Campbell Soup Co.
H.J. Heinz Company
Golden Agri-Resources
Nestlé
Smith�ield Foods
Hormel Foods
Kellogg
Kraft Foods
ConAgra Foods
Tyson Foods
Danone Group
Unilever
Social Performance Rankings
A+ Unilever NetherlandsA Danone Group FranceB+ Tyson Foods United StatesB+ ConAgra Foods United StatesB+ Kellogg United StatesB+ Kraft Foods United StatesB Hormel Foods Corporation United StatesB Golden Agri-Resources SingaporeB Nestlé SwitzerlandB Smithfield Foods United StatesB- Campbell Soup Co. United StatesB- H.J. Heinz Company United StatesC+ Grupo Bimbo MexicoC+ Hershey United StatesC+ Archer Daniels Midland United StatesC+ Bunge BermudaC+ Corn Products Inc. United StatesC+ Kerry Group IrelandC- Ajinomoto JapanD+ Associated British Foods United KingdomD+ Wilmar International SingaporeD BRF-Brasil Foods BrazilD Dean Foods United StatesD J. M. Smuckers United StatesD General Mills United StatesD- McCormick & Co United StatesD- Olam International SingaporeD- Saputo CanadaF Hillshire Brands. United StatesF J lizarBSB
Grade Company Name Country
48.08
www.roberts.cmc.edu 17 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Human Rights Topics Adoption Reinforcement Monitoring Compliance
Human Rights Reporting Elements of the PSI Scores
Percent of Companies Reporting*
Anti-corruption practices 66.67% 46.67% 16.67% 3.33%
Bribery 66.67% 50.00% 16.67% 0.00%
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees
46.67% 16.67% 6.67% 3.33%
Effective abolition of child labor 70.00% 50.00% 30.00% 16.67%
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
70.00% 46.67% 23.33% 13.33%
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
66.67% 36.67% 16.67% 10.00%
Fair compensation of employees 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 13.33%
Free association and collective bargaining of employees
70.00% 53.33% 33.33% 30.00%
Political contributions 56.67% 40.00% 13.33% 3.33%
Reasonable working hours 40.00% 16.67% 10.00% 3.33%
Sexual harassment 66.67% 46.67% 20.00% 0.00%
We assign one point for adoption of a policy standard or for an explicit discussion of an organization’s stance on each of 11 human rights principles.
Adoption
We assign one point for a description of reinforcement actions to make a policy stronger, such as providing educational programs, training, or other activities to promote awareness.
Reinforcement
We assign one point for a description of monitoring measures including mechanisms to detect violations at an early stage, providing systematic reporting, or establishment of committee structure to oversee risky activities.
Monitoring
We assign one point for a quantitative indication of compliance, such as a description of incidences of failure of compliance, or a statement that there were no such incidences.
Compliance
Basis of Scores
www.roberts.cmc.edu 18 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Average Overall, Environmental, and Social PSI Scores Performance by Country
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Brazil
Brazil
Brazil
Canada
Canada
Canada
France
France
France
Ireland
Ireland
Ireland
Japan
Japan
Japan
Mexico
Mexico
Mexico
Netherlands
Netherlands
Netherlands
Singapore
Singapore
Singapore
Switzerland
Switzerland
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United States
United States
United States
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Social
Environmental
Overall
This graph illustrates the average PSI in three categories--overall, environmental, and social--breakdown by countries. Since our sample size follows the world's largest companies from the Forbes list, several countries have only one company score to represent the whole country's sustainability reporting in the sector.
Country N
United States 16
United Kingdom 1
Switzerland 1Singapore 3
Netherlands 1
Mexico 1Japan 1
Ireland 1France 1
Canada 1
Brazil 2Bermuda 1
www.roberts.cmc.edu 19 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
llarevOemaNynapmoCScore
Sales ($B) Log Sales Profits ($B)
Log Profits
Assets ($B)
Log Assets
Market Value
($B)
Log Market
Value
Relationship Between Overall PSI Score and Financial Indicators
Kraft Foods 42.35 54.40 1.74 3.50 0.54 93.80 1.97 67.90 1.83
Danone Group 60.94 25.00 1.40 2.20 0.34 39.40 1.60 44.80 1.65
Archer Daniels Midland 30.08 88.20 1.95 1.50 0.18 41.50 1.62 21.00 1.32
Wilmar International 31.69 43.20 1.64 1.50 0.18 39.40 1.60 25.10 1.40
General Mills 36.99 15.80 1.20 1.60 0.20 21.50 1.33 25.00 1.40
Bunge 30.70 58.70 1.77 0.90 -0.05 23.30 1.37 9.90 1.00
Associated British Foods 37.69 17.20 1.24 0.80 -0.10 15.70 1.20 14.90 1.17
Kellogg 47.85 13.20 1.12 1.20 0.08 11.90 1.08 18.80 1.27
H.J. Heinz Company 48.76 11.50 1.06 1.00 0.00 12.00 1.08 17.10 1.23
BRF-Brasil Foods 12.34 13.70 1.14 0.50 -0.30 15.40 1.19 18.20 1.26
JBS 5.90 33.10 1.52 0.00 0.00 25.40 1.40 13.70 1.14
ConAgra Foods 45.87 12.80 1.11 0.70 -0.15 11.50 1.06 10.90 1.04
Tyson Foods 38.82 33.00 1.52 0.60 -0.22 11.20 1.05 7.30 0.86
Ajinomoto 50.16 14.50 1.16 0.40 -0.40 12.90 1.11 8.00 0.90
Golden Agri-Resources 46.51 5.80 0.76 1.20 0.08 11.80 1.07 7.20 0.86
Hillshire Brands. 15.09 9.00 0.95 0.50 -0.30 8.20 0.91 12.70 1.10
Campbell Soup Co. 50.82 7.70 0.89 0.80 -0.10 6.70 0.83 10.40 1.02
Grupo Bimbo 36.27 9.60 0.98 0.40 -0.40 9.50 0.98 10.90 1.04
Hershey 44.27 6.10 0.79 0.60 -0.22 4.40 0.64 13.60 1.13
Hormel Foods Corporation 41.12 8.00 0.90 0.50 -0.30 4.30 0.63 7.60 0.88
J. M. Smuckers 19.59 5.40 0.73 0.50 -0.30 9.20 0.96 8.70 0.94
Smithfield Foods 50.26 13.00 1.11 0.40 -0.40 7.10 0.85 3.70 0.57
Corn Products Inc. 25.38 6.20 0.79 0.40 -0.40 5.30 0.72 4.30 0.63
Saputo 15.06 6.60 0.82 0.50 -0.30 3.70 0.57 8.60 0.93
Dean Foods 31.30 13.10 1.12 0.00 0.00 5.80 0.76 2.20 0.34
McCormick & Co 14.23 3.70 0.57 0.40 -0.40 4.10 0.61 6.90 0.84
Kerry Group 24.45 6.90 0.84 0.50 -0.30 6.80 0.83 8.00 0.90
Olam International 22.75 12.90 1.11 0.40 -0.40 10.20 1.01 4.60 0.66
Nestlé 48.27 89.20 1.95 10.10 1.00 119.40 2.08 205.40 2.31
Unilever 50.28 60.20 1.78 5.50 0.74 61.50 1.79 102.40 2.01
www.roberts.cmc.edu 20 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Log MarketValue #Name?
R2 = 0.0463
0
10
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
0 0 .5 1 1.5 2 2 .5
Log Sales ($B)
Ove
rall
PSI S
core
s
R2 = 0.0767
0
10
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
0 0 .5 1 1.5 2 2 .5
Log Assets ($B)
Ove
rall
PSI S
core
s
www.roberts.cmc.edu 21 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
R2 = 0.1794
0
10
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
- 0 .6 - 0 .4 - 0 .2 0 0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0 .8 1 1.2
Log Profits ($B)
Ove
rall
PSI S
core
s
R2 = 0.1055
0
10
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
0 0 .5 1 1.5 2 2 .5
Log Market Value ($B)
Ove
rall
PSI S
core
s
www.roberts.cmc.edu 22 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
73
107
27
1446
46
4155
3565
166
2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Wilmar InternationalUnilever
Tyson FoodsSmithfield Foods
NestléMcCormick & Co
Kraft FoodsKerry Group
KelloggJ. M. Smuckers
Hormel Foods CorporationHershey
H.J. Heinz CompanyGrupo Bimbo
Golden Agri-ResourcesGeneral MillsDean Foods
Danone GroupConAgra Foods
Campbell Soup Co.Bunge
Associated British FoodsArcher Daniels Midland
Ajinomoto
Number of Explicit Numerical Goals Reported
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Energy used (total) Archer Daniels MidlandCampbell Soup Co.Danone GroupDean FoodsGeneral MillsGrupo BimboH.J. Heinz CompanyHormel Foods CorporationKelloggKraft FoodsMcCormick & CoNestlé
www.roberts.cmc.edu 23 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Energy used (total) Smithfield FoodsFood Waste Danone GroupNestléGreenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total AjinomotoBungeConAgra FoodsDanone GroupDean FoodsGeneral MillsGrupo BimboH.J. Heinz CompanyHersheyHormel Foods CorporationJ. M. SmuckersKelloggKerry GroupKraft FoodsNestléSmithfield FoodsTyson FoodsUnileverWilmar InternationalIndigenous people Tyson FoodsLost workday case rate AjinomotoArcher Daniels MidlandBungeCampbell Soup Co.Kraft FoodsSmithfield FoodsNotices of violation (environmental) Smithfield FoodsRecordable incident/accident rate Ajinomoto
www.roberts.cmc.edu 24 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Recordable incident/accident rate Archer Daniels MidlandBungeCampbell Soup Co.Grupo BimboH.J. Heinz CompanyJ. M. SmuckersKraft FoodsNestléSmithfield FoodsUnileverReforestation ConAgra FoodsGeneral MillsKraft FoodsNestléWilmar InternationalRenewable energy used Campbell Soup Co.H.J. Heinz CompanyUnileverSocial community investment Hormel Foods CorporationSmithfield FoodsWaste (hazardous) produced Smithfield FoodsUnileverWaste (hazardous) released to the environment Smithfield FoodsWaste (office) recycled UnileverWaste (solid) disposed of AjinomotoArcher Daniels MidlandAssociated British FoodsBungeConAgra FoodsDean Foods
www.roberts.cmc.edu 25 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Waste (solid) disposed of General MillsGolden Agri-ResourcesH.J. Heinz CompanyHersheyHormel Foods CorporationJ. M. SmuckersKelloggKraft FoodsMcCormick & CoNestléSmithfield FoodsUnileverWaste recycled: solid waste AjinomotoArcher Daniels MidlandCampbell Soup Co.ConAgra FoodsDean FoodsHersheyHormel Foods CorporationWater used AjinomotoArcher Daniels MidlandBungeCampbell Soup Co.ConAgra FoodsDean FoodsGeneral MillsGrupo BimboH.J. Heinz CompanyHersheyHormel Foods CorporationJ. M. SmuckersKelloggKraft FoodsNestléSmithfield Foods
www.roberts.cmc.edu 26 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Water used Tyson FoodsUnilever
www.roberts.cmc.edu 27 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
135
1241
91
911
15
84
810
68
5711
310
166
39
69
5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Wilmar InternationalUnilever
Tyson FoodsSmithfield Foods
SaputoOlam International
NestléMcCormick & Co
Kraft FoodsKellogg
JBSJ. M. Smuckers
Hormel Foods CorporationHillshire Brands.
HersheyH.J. Heinz Company
Grupo BimboGolden Agri-Resources
General MillsDean Foods
Danone GroupCorn Products Inc.
ConAgra FoodsCampbell Soup Co.
BungeBRF-Brasil Foods
Associated British FoodsArcher Daniels Midland
Ajinomoto
Number of Topics Showing Performance Improvement Over Previous Year Data
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Access to health care for employees UnileverCommunity development Archer Daniels MidlandCampbell Soup Co.ConAgra FoodsGeneral MillsKelloggKraft FoodsOlam InternationalSmithfield FoodsUnilever
www.roberts.cmc.edu 28 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Community education Campbell Soup Co.NestléTyson FoodsUnileverWilmar InternationalEmployee satisfaction surveys Associated British FoodsDanone GroupKelloggSmithfield FoodsUnileverEmployee turnover rate ConAgra FoodsDanone GroupGolden Agri-ResourcesTyson FoodsEmployee volunteerism BRF-Brasil FoodsCampbell Soup Co.ConAgra FoodsKraft FoodsSmithfield FoodsEnergy used (total) AjinomotoArcher Daniels MidlandAssociated British FoodsCampbell Soup Co.ConAgra FoodsDanone GroupGeneral MillsGrupo BimboH.J. Heinz CompanyHillshire Brands.J. M. SmuckersKelloggKraft FoodsSaputo
www.roberts.cmc.edu 29 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Energy used (total) Smithfield FoodsUnileverEnvironmental expenses and investments AjinomotoCampbell Soup Co.Danone GroupFines (environmental) Associated British FoodsGolden Agri-ResourcesH.J. Heinz CompanyHersheyFood Waste KelloggGreen food purchasing Associated British FoodsCampbell Soup Co.Kraft FoodsGreen transportation initiatives AjinomotoGreenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total Associated British FoodsBungeCampbell Soup Co.Danone GroupDean FoodsGeneral MillsGolden Agri-ResourcesHersheyHormel Foods CorporationJ. M. SmuckersKelloggKraft FoodsNestléSmithfield FoodsUnileverHealth and safety citations AjinomotoLost workday case rate
www.roberts.cmc.edu 30 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Lost workday case rate Archer Daniels MidlandConAgra FoodsCorn Products Inc.Danone GroupDean FoodsHersheyJ. M. SmuckersKelloggKraft FoodsNestléSaputoSmithfield FoodsWilmar InternationalNotices of violation (environmental) Associated British FoodsGolden Agri-ResourcesGrupo BimboH.J. Heinz CompanyHersheyHormel Foods CorporationOccupational health and safety protection AjinomotoArcher Daniels MidlandBRF-Brasil FoodsBungeCampbell Soup Co.ConAgra FoodsCorn Products Inc.Danone GroupDean FoodsGolden Agri-ResourcesGrupo BimboH.J. Heinz CompanyHersheyHormel Foods CorporationKelloggKraft Foods
www.roberts.cmc.edu 31 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Occupational health and safety protection NestléSmithfield FoodsUnileverWilmar InternationalRecordable incident/accident rate Archer Daniels MidlandAssociated British FoodsBRF-Brasil FoodsCampbell Soup Co.ConAgra FoodsCorn Products Inc.Danone GroupDean FoodsH.J. Heinz CompanyHersheyHillshire Brands.Hormel Foods CorporationJ. M. SmuckersKelloggNestléSaputoSmithfield FoodsTyson FoodsUnileverRenewable energy used Associated British FoodsH.J. Heinz CompanyUnileverSocial community investment Campbell Soup Co.ConAgra FoodsHormel Foods CorporationKelloggSmithfield FoodsSustainable agriculture AjinomotoArcher Daniels Midland
www.roberts.cmc.edu 32 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Sustainable agriculture BungeCampbell Soup Co.Golden Agri-ResourcesH.J. Heinz CompanyNestléUnileverWaste (hazardous) produced BungeWaste (hazardous) released to the environment Smithfield FoodsWaste (office) recycled Campbell Soup Co.Smithfield FoodsWaste (solid) disposed of AjinomotoAssociated British FoodsBungeCampbell Soup Co.ConAgra FoodsDanone GroupDean FoodsGeneral MillsGrupo BimboH.J. Heinz CompanyHersheyHillshire Brands.Hormel Foods CorporationKelloggKraft FoodsNestléTyson FoodsUnileverWaste recycled: solid waste AjinomotoCampbell Soup Co.Danone Group
www.roberts.cmc.edu 33 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Waste recycled: solid waste Dean FoodsGolden Agri-ResourcesGrupo BimboHormel Foods CorporationWater used AjinomotoBungeCampbell Soup Co.Dean FoodsGeneral MillsGolden Agri-ResourcesGrupo BimboH.J. Heinz CompanyHersheyHillshire Brands.Hormel Foods CorporationJ. M. SmuckersJBSKelloggKraft FoodsMcCormick & CoNestléSaputoSmithfield FoodsTyson FoodsUnileverWilmar InternationalWomen in management Campbell Soup Co.ConAgra FoodsDanone GroupH.J. Heinz CompanyNestléUnileverWilmar International
www.roberts.cmc.edu 34 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
1
5
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
1
2
1
4
1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
UnileverTyson Foods
Smithfield FoodsSaputo
Olam InternationalNestlé
Kraft FoodsKerry Group
KelloggHormel Foods Corporation
H.J. Heinz CompanyGrupo Bimbo
Golden Agri-ResourcesDanone Group
Corn Products Inc.ConAgra Foods
Campbell Soup Co.BRF-Brasil Foods
Associated British FoodsArcher Daniels Midland
Ajinomoto
Number of Topics in which Performance was Better than Sector Average*
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Energy used (total) Campbell Soup Co.Hormel Foods CorporationEnvironmental expenses and investments AjinomotoAssociated British FoodsCampbell Soup Co.Danone GroupNestléOlam InternationalSaputoSmithfield Foods
www.roberts.cmc.edu 35 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics reported: Companies reporting: Reforestation Grupo BimboSmithfield FoodsRenewable energy used AjinomotoAssociated British FoodsBRF-Brasil FoodsDanone GroupGolden Agri-ResourcesNestléSmithfield FoodsUnileverSocial community investment AjinomotoArcher Daniels MidlandCampbell Soup Co.ConAgra FoodsCorn Products Inc.Golden Agri-ResourcesH.J. Heinz CompanyHormel Foods CorporationKelloggKerry GroupKraft FoodsSmithfield FoodsTyson FoodsWaste (office) recycled AjinomotoSmithfield Foods
www.roberts.cmc.edu 36 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B+
Environmental Grade: A++Social Grade: B-
Overall Grade: B+
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA S46% E
54%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
A jinomoto
78 735 7 49
3 117
Sustainability Management Topics
Ajinomoto
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 100
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 100
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 37 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 50
Workforce profile: gender 50
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 100
Third-party validation 100
Employment for individuals with disabilities 100
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 29
Green food purchasing 20
Green transportation initiatives 100
Reforestation 14
Energy used (total) 71
Renewable energy used 57
Water used 86
Waste recycled: solid waste 86
Waste (office) recycled 43
Waste (solid) disposed of 86
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 43
Environmental expenses and investments 86
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 71
www.roberts.cmc.edu 38 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 40
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 60
Anti-corruption practices 0
Bribery 0
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 14
Fair compensation of employees 0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 50
Reasonable working hours 14
Effective abolition of child labor 50
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 60
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 71
Lost workday case rate 71
Health and safety citations 29
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 43
Employee turnover rate 29
Women in management 60
Sexual harassment 50
www.roberts.cmc.edu 39 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
C
Environmental Grade: CSocial Grade: C
Overall Grade: C
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESAS
55%
E45%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
A rcher DanielsMidland
5 642
2 036
623
Sustainability Management Topics
Archer Daniels Midland
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 0
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 0
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 100
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 100
Social policy statement 0
Code of conduct or business ethics 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 40 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 100
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 50
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 50
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 50
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 0
Report contact person 100
Environmental visionary statement 100
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 80
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 43
Renewable energy used 14
Water used 43
Waste recycled: solid waste 29
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 29
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 0
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 41 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Social and Human Rights TopicsTopics Percent Coverage Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 100
Anti-corruption practices 0
Bribery 0
Political contributions 50
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 0
Fair compensation of employees 0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 60
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 71
Lost workday case rate 71
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 43
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 20
Sexual harassment 0
Access to health care for employees 80
www.roberts.cmc.edu 42 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B-
Environmental Grade: A-Social Grade: C-
Overall Grade: B-
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESAS
40%E
60%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
A ssoc iatedBritish Foods
7 246 3 8 35 28
1 2
Sustainability Management Topics
Associated British Foods
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 100
Zero Waste Policy 50
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 0
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 0
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 50
Social impediments and challenges 100
Social policy statement 0
Code of conduct or business ethics 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 43 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 50
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 50
Emergency preparedness program 50
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 50
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 100
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 60
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 57
Renewable energy used 86
Water used 29
Waste recycled: solid waste 14
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 71
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 57
Environmental expenses and investments 43
Fines (environmental) 71
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 71
www.roberts.cmc.edu 44 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 40
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 40
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 50
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 0
Fair compensation of employees 0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 0
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 0
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 60
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 80
Employee volunteerism 0
Recordable incident/accident rate 71
Lost workday case rate 29
Health and safety citations 14
Health and safety fines 43
Social community investment 14
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 45 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
D-
Environmental Grade: D-Social Grade: D-
Overall Grade: D-
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
S63%
E37%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
BRF-Bras ilFoods
16 1 59
2 2
310
Sustainability Management Topics
BRF-Brasil Foods
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 50
Environmental impediments and challenges 0
Environmental policy statement 50
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 0
Biodiversity 0
Green purchasing 0
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 0
Environmental management system 50
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 0
Social visionary statement 0
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 0
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 46 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 0
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 0
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 0
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 14
Renewable energy used 57
Water used 0
Waste recycled: solid waste 14
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 0
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 0
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 29
www.roberts.cmc.edu 47 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 80
Anti-corruption practices 0
Bribery 0
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 0
Fair compensation of employees 0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 0
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 0
Community development 80
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 0
Occupational health and safety protection 60
Employee volunteerism 60
Recordable incident/accident rate 29
Lost workday case rate 29
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 29
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 48 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
C
Environmental Grade: B-Social Grade: C-
Overall Grade: C
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA S48%
E52%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Bunge
50
31 35 3 5
132 3
Sustainability Management Topics
Bunge
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 0
Environmental management system 50
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 50
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 0
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 49 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 0
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 50
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 50
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 14
Energy used (total) 57
Renewable energy used 14
Water used 71
Waste recycled: solid waste 14
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 86
Waste (hazardous) produced 71
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 0
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 86
www.roberts.cmc.edu 50 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 100
Anti-corruption practices 0
Bribery 0
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 14
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 14
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 29
Lost workday case rate 57
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 0
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 51 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
A-
Environmental Grade: A+Social Grade: B
Overall Grade: A-
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA S48%
E52%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Campbell SoupCo.
7 8 735 0 50
31 27
Sustainability Management Topics
Campbell Soup Co.
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 100
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 50
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 50
Environmental accounting 100
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 100
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 52 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 100
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 100
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 100
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 29
Green food purchasing 60
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 100
Renewable energy used 29
Water used 86
Waste recycled: solid waste 86
Waste (office) recycled 29
Waste (solid) disposed of 71
Waste (hazardous) produced 29
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 29
Environmental expenses and investments 71
Fines (environmental) 29
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 71
www.roberts.cmc.edu 53 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 60
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 14
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 14
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 100
Employee satisfaction surveys 20
Community education 60
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 100
Recordable incident/accident rate 86
Lost workday case rate 71
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 71
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 60
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 54 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B+
Environmental Grade: B+Social Grade: B
Overall Grade: B+
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESAS
54%
E46%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
ConA gra Foods
7 8 7344 44
6
35
Sustainability Management Topics
ConAgra Foods
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 100
Zero Waste Policy 100
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 0
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 50
Environmental accounting 50
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 100
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 55 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 50
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 100
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 50
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 100
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 29
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 29
Energy used (total) 71
Renewable energy used 0
Water used 71
Waste recycled: solid waste 43
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 86
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 43
Environmental expenses and investments 14
Fines (environmental) 29
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 71
www.roberts.cmc.edu 56 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 80
Anti-corruption practices 0
Bribery 0
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 64
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 64
Community development 100
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 60
Recordable incident/accident rate 57
Lost workday case rate 57
Health and safety citations 29
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 71
Employee turnover rate 71
Women in management 100
Sexual harassment 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 57 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
C-
Environmental Grade: D+Social Grade: C
Overall Grade: C-
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
S64%
E36%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Corn Produc tsInc .
4 4 38
1 1
38
0
23
Sustainability Management Topics
Corn Products Inc.
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 0
Environmental policy statement 50
Climate change/global warming 0
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 0
Biodiversity 0
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 100
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 50
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 50
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 58 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
50
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 100
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 100
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 0
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 29
Renewable energy used 0
Water used 29
Waste recycled: solid waste 29
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 14
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 0
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 29
www.roberts.cmc.edu 59 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 40
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 14
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 14
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 80
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 60
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 57
Lost workday case rate 57
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 57
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 60 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
A+
Environmental Grade: A++Social Grade: A
Overall Grade: A+
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESAS
54%
E46%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Danone Group
9 4 8 8
5 168
2 544
Sustainability Management Topics
Danone Group
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 100
Zero Waste Policy 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 100
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 100
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 61 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 0
Workforce profile: age 100
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 100
Emergency preparedness program 50
Third-party validation 100
Employment for individuals with disabilities 100
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 50
Environmental visionary statement 100
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 29
Green food purchasing 80
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 14
Energy used (total) 86
Renewable energy used 57
Water used 57
Waste recycled: solid waste 71
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 71
Waste (hazardous) produced 14
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 29
Environmental expenses and investments 71
Fines (environmental) 29
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 86
www.roberts.cmc.edu 62 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Social and Human Rights TopicsTopics Percent Coverage Indigenous people 14
Sustainable agriculture 80
Anti-corruption practices 64
Bribery 0
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
64
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 64
Fair compensation of employees 64
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 64
Reasonable working hours 64
Effective abolition of child labor 64
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 100
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 71
Lost workday case rate 71
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 14
Employee turnover rate 71
Women in management 100
Sexual harassment 14
Access to health care for employees 80
www.roberts.cmc.edu 63 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
C
Environmental Grade: BSocial Grade: D+
Overall Grade: C
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESAS
40%E
60%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Dean Foods
59
31 40 3 616 1 0
Sustainability Management Topics
Dean Foods
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 100
Zero Waste Policy 100
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 50
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 0
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 50
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 50
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 50
Social visionary statement 0
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 0
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 64 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
0
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 50
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 100
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 14
Green food purchasing 80
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 43
Renewable energy used 29
Water used 71
Waste recycled: solid waste 43
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 57
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 43
Environmental expenses and investments 29
Fines (environmental) 43
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 71
www.roberts.cmc.edu 65 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 40
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 0
Fair compensation of employees 0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 0
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 0
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 40
Community education 0
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 57
Lost workday case rate 57
Health and safety citations 14
Health and safety fines 43
Social community investment 0
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 40
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 66 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B-
Environmental Grade: A-Social Grade: C-
Overall Grade: B-
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
S38%
E62%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
General Mills
8 162
44
1 7 13 8
Sustainability Management Topics
General Mills
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 100
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 50
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 100
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 100
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 67 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 0
Workforce profile: age 50
Workforce profile: gender 50
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 50
Third-party validation 50
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 50
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 29
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 43
Energy used (total) 86
Renewable energy used 29
Water used 86
Waste recycled: solid waste 29
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 86
Waste (hazardous) produced 29
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 14
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 86
www.roberts.cmc.edu 68 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 0
Anti-corruption practices 0
Bribery 0
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 0
Fair compensation of employees 0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 0
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 0
Community development 100
Employee satisfaction surveys 40
Community education 80
Occupational health and safety protection 40
Employee volunteerism 80
Recordable incident/accident rate 0
Lost workday case rate 0
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 0
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 69 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B+
Environmental Grade: B+Social Grade: B
Overall Grade: B+
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESAS
54%
E46%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Golden A gri-Resources
6 9 69
3954
2 2 31
Sustainability Management Topics
Golden Agri-Resources
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 50
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 0
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 0
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 100
Social policy statement 0
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 70 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 50
Emergency preparedness program 100
Third-party validation 50
Employment for individuals with disabilities 50
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 100
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 14
Green food purchasing 80
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 43
Energy used (total) 14
Renewable energy used 43
Water used 57
Waste recycled: solid waste 57
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 57
Waste (hazardous) produced 14
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 57
Environmental expenses and investments 0
Fines (environmental) 57
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 43
www.roberts.cmc.edu 71 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 80
Indigenous people 14
Sustainable agriculture 60
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 64
Fair compensation of employees 64
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 14
Effective abolition of child labor 50
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 80
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 29
Lost workday case rate 29
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 57
Employee turnover rate 29
Women in management 60
Sexual harassment 50
www.roberts.cmc.edu 72 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
C+
Environmental Grade: B-Social Grade: C+
Overall Grade: C+
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESAS
54%
E46%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Grupo Bimbo50 54
32 4 11 9 25
Sustainability Management Topics
Grupo Bimbo
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 0
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 0
Biodiversity 50
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 73 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 50
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 57
Energy used (total) 86
Renewable energy used 29
Water used 57
Waste recycled: solid waste 71
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 43
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 14
Environmental expenses and investments 0
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 43
www.roberts.cmc.edu 74 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 0
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 64
Fair compensation of employees 64
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 0
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 80
Recordable incident/accident rate 57
Lost workday case rate 43
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 29
Employee turnover rate 43
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 75 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B+
Environmental Grade: ASocial Grade: B
Overall Grade: B+
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA S50%
E50%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
H.J. HeinzCompany
81 73
4 9 48
1 9 27
Sustainability Management Topics
H.J. Heinz Company
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 100
Zero Waste Policy 100
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 0
Biodiversity 0
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 100
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 76 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 100
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 50
Emergency preparedness program 100
Third-party validation 100
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 100
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 29
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 86
Renewable energy used 71
Water used 86
Waste recycled: solid waste 29
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 71
Waste (hazardous) produced 14
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 57
Environmental expenses and investments 29
Fines (environmental) 57
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 71
www.roberts.cmc.edu 77 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 80
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 60
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 64
Fair compensation of employees 0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 0
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 40
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 86
Lost workday case rate 43
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 57
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 100
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 78 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B
Environmental Grade: A-Social Grade: B-
Overall Grade: B
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA S49%
E51%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Hershey
785 4 45 53
1625
Sustainability Management Topics
Hershey
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 100
Zero Waste Policy 100
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 50
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 50
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 79 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 100
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 50
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 40
Reforestation 29
Energy used (total) 14
Renewable energy used 29
Water used 57
Waste recycled: solid waste 43
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 71
Waste (hazardous) produced 29
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 57
Environmental expenses and investments 14
Fines (environmental) 57
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 86
www.roberts.cmc.edu 80 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 40
Indigenous people 14
Sustainable agriculture 40
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 14
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 50
Reasonable working hours 14
Effective abolition of child labor 50
Community development 80
Employee satisfaction surveys 40
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 60
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 57
Lost workday case rate 57
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 14
Employee turnover rate 14
Women in management 80
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 81 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
D
Environmental Grade: D-Social Grade: D
Overall Grade: D
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
S62%
E38%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Hillshire Brands .9
27
15
28
92
Sustainability Management Topics
Hillshire Brands.
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 50
Environmental impediments and challenges 0
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 0
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 0
Biodiversity 0
Green purchasing 0
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 0
Environmental management system 0
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 0
Social visionary statement 50
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 82 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 0
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 0
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 0
Green transportation initiatives 40
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 29
Renewable energy used 0
Water used 43
Waste recycled: solid waste 43
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 43
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 14
Environmental expenses and investments 0
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 83 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 0
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 14
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 0
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 0
Occupational health and safety protection 40
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 57
Lost workday case rate 0
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 14
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 84 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B-
Environmental Grade: B-Social Grade: B-
Overall Grade: B-
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
S58%
E42%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Hormel FoodsCorporation
415 4
4 15 9
22 33
Sustainability Management Topics
Hormel Foods Corporation
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 0
Environmental policy statement 50
Climate change/global warming 50
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 50
Biodiversity 0
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 50
Environmental management structure 0
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 50
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 50
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 85 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 100
Emergency preparedness program 100
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 80
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 86
Renewable energy used 14
Water used 86
Waste recycled: solid waste 71
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 86
Waste (hazardous) produced 14
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 57
Environmental expenses and investments 0
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 71
www.roberts.cmc.edu 86 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 40
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 0
Anti-corruption practices 50
Bribery 50
Political contributions 64
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
64
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 64
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 80
Employee satisfaction surveys 80
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 0
Recordable incident/accident rate 71
Lost workday case rate 57
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 86
Employee turnover rate 29
Women in management 40
Sexual harassment 50
www.roberts.cmc.edu 87 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
D+
Environmental Grade: CSocial Grade: D-
Overall Grade: D+
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
S36%
E64%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
J. M. Smuckers
5 0
0
1 8
3 4
9 10
Sustainability Management Topics
J. M. Smuckers
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 0
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 50
Environmental accounting 50
Stakeholder consultation 50
Social visionary statement 0
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 0
Code of conduct or business ethics 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 88 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
0
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 0
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 0
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 57
Renewable energy used 14
Water used 43
Waste recycled: solid waste 14
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 29
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 0
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 43
www.roberts.cmc.edu 89 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 40
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 50
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 14
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 40
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 43
Lost workday case rate 43
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 14
Employee turnover rate 29
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 90 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
F
Environmental Grade: D-Social Grade: F
Overall Grade: F
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
E
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
JBS
19
0
96
30
Sustainability Management Topics
JBS
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 50
Climate change/global warming 0
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 0
Biodiversity 0
Green purchasing 0
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 0
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 0
Social visionary statement 0
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 0
Code of conduct or business ethics 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 91 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
0
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 0
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 0
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 0
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 14
Renewable energy used 14
Water used 29
Waste recycled: solid waste 0
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 14
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 14
Environmental expenses and investments 14
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 92 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 0
Anti-corruption practices 0
Bribery 0
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 0
Fair compensation of employees 0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 0
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 0
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 0
Occupational health and safety protection 40
Employee volunteerism 0
Recordable incident/accident rate 14
Lost workday case rate 0
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 0
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 93 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B+
Environmental Grade: A-Social Grade: B
Overall Grade: B+
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESAS
55%
E45%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Kellogg
72 73
45 5 2
163 5
Sustainability Management Topics
Kellogg
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 100
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 50
Biodiversity 50
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 94 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 100
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 100
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 50
Employment for individuals with disabilities 100
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 43
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 40
Reforestation 29
Energy used (total) 86
Renewable energy used 14
Water used 86
Waste recycled: solid waste 29
Waste (office) recycled 14
Waste (solid) disposed of 86
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 14
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 86
www.roberts.cmc.edu 95 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 80
Anti-corruption practices 0
Bribery 14
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 64
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 100
Employee satisfaction surveys 100
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 71
Lost workday case rate 57
Health and safety citations 14
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 86
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 40
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 96 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B+
Environmental Grade: A-Social Grade: B
Overall Grade: B+
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESAS
55%
E45%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Kellogg
72 73
45 5 2
163 5
Sustainability Management Topics
Kellogg
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 100
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 50
Biodiversity 50
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 97 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 100
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 100
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 50
Employment for individuals with disabilities 100
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 43
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 40
Reforestation 29
Energy used (total) 86
Renewable energy used 14
Water used 86
Waste recycled: solid waste 29
Waste (office) recycled 14
Waste (solid) disposed of 86
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 14
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 86
www.roberts.cmc.edu 98 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 80
Anti-corruption practices 0
Bribery 14
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 64
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 100
Employee satisfaction surveys 100
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 71
Lost workday case rate 57
Health and safety citations 14
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 86
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 40
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 99 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
C-
Environmental Grade: D+Social Grade: C-
Overall Grade: C-
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
S65%
E35%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Kerry Group
44 4 2
9
3 1
0
23
Sustainability Management Topics
Kerry Group
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 50
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 0
Biodiversity 0
Green purchasing 50
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 50
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 100 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 50
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 50
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 0
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 14
Renewable energy used 0
Water used 14
Waste recycled: solid waste 14
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 14
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 14
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 29
www.roberts.cmc.edu 101 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 20
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 40
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 14
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 14
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 20
Occupational health and safety protection 40
Employee volunteerism 0
Recordable incident/accident rate 0
Lost workday case rate 0
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 14
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 102 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B
Environmental Grade: BSocial Grade: B-
Overall Grade: B
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESAS
55%
E45%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Kraf t Foods
6 950
29
57
1935
Sustainability Management Topics
Kraft Foods
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 50
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 100
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 103 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 0
Workforce profile: age 50
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 0
Report contact person 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 100
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 43
Energy used (total) 57
Renewable energy used 14
Water used 57
Waste recycled: solid waste 29
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 43
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 14
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 57
www.roberts.cmc.edu 104 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Social and Human Rights TopicsTopics Percent Coverage Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 80
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 14
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 64
Reasonable working hours 14
Effective abolition of child labor 64
Community development 100
Employee satisfaction surveys 40
Community education 0
Occupational health and safety protection 60
Employee volunteerism 60
Recordable incident/accident rate 43
Lost workday case rate 71
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 71
Employee turnover rate 14
Women in management 80
Sexual harassment 14
Access to health care for employees 80
www.roberts.cmc.edu 105 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
D
Environmental Grade: D-Social Grade: D
Overall Grade: D
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
S63%
E37%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
McCormick & Co1 9
35
101 6
3 4
Sustainability Management Topics
McCormick & Co
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 0
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 0
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 0
Biodiversity 0
Green purchasing 0
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 0
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 0
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 0
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 106 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 0
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 50
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 0
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 29
Renewable energy used 0
Water used 29
Waste recycled: solid waste 29
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 29
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 0
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 107 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 40
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 0
Fair compensation of employees 0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 0
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 0
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 20
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 0
Lost workday case rate 0
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 14
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 108 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B+
Environmental Grade: B+Social Grade: B+
Overall Grade: B+
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
S58%
E42%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Nes tlé
6 3 73
4666
1631
Sustainability Management Topics
Nestlé
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 0
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 100
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 100
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 109 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 50
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 50
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 100
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 43
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 40
Reforestation 29
Energy used (total) 57
Renewable energy used 57
Water used 86
Waste recycled: solid waste 14
Waste (office) recycled 14
Waste (solid) disposed of 71
Waste (hazardous) produced 14
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 43
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 71
www.roberts.cmc.edu 110 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 40
Indigenous people 14
Sustainable agriculture 60
Anti-corruption practices 50
Bribery 50
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 50
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
50
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 14
Fair compensation of employees 50
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 50
Reasonable working hours 50
Effective abolition of child labor 50
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 40
Community education 60
Occupational health and safety protection 60
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 71
Lost workday case rate 43
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 14
Employee turnover rate 43
Women in management 60
Sexual harassment 50
www.roberts.cmc.edu 111 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
C-
Environmental Grade: C-Social Grade: D+
Overall Grade: C-
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA S52%
E48%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
OlamInternational
50 50
14 18
3 4
Sustainability Management Topics
Olam International
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 100
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 50
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 0
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 0
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 100
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 50
www.roberts.cmc.edu 112 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 100
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 14
Energy used (total) 29
Renewable energy used 14
Water used 14
Waste recycled: solid waste 14
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 14
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 14
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 113 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 40
Indigenous people 14
Sustainable agriculture 80
Anti-corruption practices 0
Bribery 0
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 0
Fair compensation of employees 0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 0
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 60
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 40
Employee volunteerism 0
Recordable incident/accident rate 0
Lost workday case rate 14
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 14
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 114 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
D
Environmental Grade: DSocial Grade: D-
Overall Grade: D
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA S50%
E50%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Saputo
2 531
12 1 1 94
Sustainability Management Topics
Saputo
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 0
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 0
Biodiversity 0
Green purchasing 0
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 100
Environmental management system 0
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 0
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 50
Code of conduct or business ethics 0
www.roberts.cmc.edu 115 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 0
Workforce profile: age 50
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 0
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 0
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 0
Green transportation initiatives 40
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 29
Renewable energy used 14
Water used 29
Waste recycled: solid waste 0
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 0
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 43
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 116 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 20
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 0
Anti-corruption practices 0
Bribery 0
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
0
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 0
Fair compensation of employees 0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 0
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 0
Community development 40
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 0
Occupational health and safety protection 40
Employee volunteerism 20
Recordable incident/accident rate 29
Lost workday case rate 29
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 0
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 0
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 117 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B+
Environmental Grade: ASocial Grade: B
Overall Grade: B+
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA S50%
E50%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Smithf ield Foods
69 695 5 53
2 8 31
Sustainability Management Topics
Smithfield Foods
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 100
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 50
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 50
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 118 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 0
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 100
Emergency preparedness program 100
Third-party validation 50
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 0
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 14
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 43
Energy used (total) 71
Renewable energy used 29
Water used 71
Waste recycled: solid waste 14
Waste (office) recycled 71
Waste (solid) disposed of 29
Waste (hazardous) produced 43
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 86
Notices of violation (environmental) 57
Environmental expenses and investments 57
Fines (environmental) 43
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 86
www.roberts.cmc.edu 119 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 0
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 60
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 14
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 14
Fair compensation of employees 14
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 60
Employee satisfaction surveys 60
Community education 40
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 60
Recordable incident/accident rate 86
Lost workday case rate 86
Health and safety citations 43
Health and safety fines 43
Social community investment 71
Employee turnover rate 29
Women in management 20
Sexual harassment 14
www.roberts.cmc.edu 120 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B-
Environmental Grade: CSocial Grade: B
Overall Grade: B-
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
S66%
E34%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Tyson Foods4 7 50
2 8
6 8
6
3 7
Sustainability Management Topics
Tyson Foods
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 100
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 0
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 0
Biodiversity 0
Green purchasing 0
Environmental education 0
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 0
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 121 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 0
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 50
Emergency preparedness program 100
Third-party validation 50
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 100
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 0
Energy used (total) 14
Renewable energy used 14
Water used 71
Waste recycled: solid waste 14
Waste (office) recycled 14
Waste (solid) disposed of 57
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 14
Fines (environmental) 43
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 57
www.roberts.cmc.edu 122 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 40
Indigenous people 29
Sustainable agriculture 40
Anti-corruption practices 50
Bribery 50
Political contributions 50
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 14
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
50
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 64
Fair compensation of employees 64
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 64
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 64
Community development 80
Employee satisfaction surveys 0
Community education 60
Occupational health and safety protection 80
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 57
Lost workday case rate 43
Health and safety citations 29
Health and safety fines 29
Social community investment 57
Employee turnover rate 29
Women in management 20
Sexual harassment 50
www.roberts.cmc.edu 123 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
B+
Environmental Grade: BSocial Grade: A-
Overall Grade: B+
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
S61%
E39%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
Unilever
69 69
3 0
71
19
4 8
Sustainability Management Topics
Unilever
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 50
Environmental visionary statement 100
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 0
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 100
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 100
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 100
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 124 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Social and Human Rights Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 50
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 100
Emergency preparedness program 0
Third-party validation 100
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 100
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 29
Energy used (total) 29
Renewable energy used 86
Water used 71
Waste recycled: solid waste 14
Waste (office) recycled 29
Waste (solid) disposed of 43
Waste (hazardous) produced 29
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 0
Notices of violation (environmental) 0
Environmental expenses and investments 0
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 57
www.roberts.cmc.edu 125 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Topics Percent Coverage Access to health care for employees 60
Indigenous people 0
Sustainable agriculture 100
Anti-corruption practices 50
Bribery 50
Political contributions 50
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 64
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
64
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 64
Fair compensation of employees 50
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 64
Reasonable working hours 50
Effective abolition of child labor 64
Community development 100
Employee satisfaction surveys 60
Community education 60
Occupational health and safety protection 100
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 71
Lost workday case rate 0
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 0
Employee turnover rate 14
Women in management 60
Sexual harassment 50
www.roberts.cmc.edu 126 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
C
Environmental Grade: C+Social Grade: C
Overall Grade: C
0 2 5 50 75 10 0
E
ESA
S57%
E43%
Comparison with sector averages Source of points Distribution of pointsE=Total Environmental Score, ESA=Environmental Sector Average Score, EI=Environmental Intent, ER=Environmental Reporting, EP=Environmental Performance, S=Total Social Score, SSA=Social Sector Average Score, SI=Social Intent, SR=Social Reporting, SP=Social Performance
EI SI ER SR EP SP
WilmarInternational
63 62
183 7
3 12
Sustainability Management Topics
Wilmar International
Topics Percent Coverage Genetically modified food 0
Locally grown organic food 0
Zero Waste Policy 0
Environmental impediments and challenges 100
Environmental policy statement 100
Climate change/global warming 100
Habitat/ecosystem conservation 100
Biodiversity 100
Green purchasing 0
Environmental education 100
Environmental management structure 50
Environmental management system 100
Environmental accounting 0
Stakeholder consultation 100
Social visionary statement 50
Social impediments and challenges 0
Social policy statement 50
Code of conduct or business ethics 100
www.roberts.cmc.edu 127 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Environmental Topics
Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
100
Health and safety, or social organizational structure 50
Workforce profile: age 0
Workforce profile: gender 100
Workforce profile: ethnicities/race 50
Emergency preparedness program 100
Third-party validation 100
Employment for individuals with disabilities 0
Employee training for career development 100
Report contact person 100
Environmental visionary statement 50
Topics Percent Coverage Food Waste 0
Green food purchasing 40
Green transportation initiatives 0
Reforestation 29
Energy used (total) 0
Renewable energy used 14
Water used 57
Waste recycled: solid waste 14
Waste (office) recycled 0
Waste (solid) disposed of 0
Waste (hazardous) produced 0
Waste (hazardous) released to the environment 14
Notices of violation (environmental) 14
Environmental expenses and investments 0
Fines (environmental) 0
Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total 29
www.roberts.cmc.edu 128 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
Social and Human Rights TopicsTopics Percent Coverage Indigenous people 14
Sustainable agriculture 40
Anti-corruption practices 14
Bribery 14
Political contributions 0
Degrading treatment or punishment of employees 0
Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
14
Free association and collective bargaining of employees 14
Fair compensation of employees 0
Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor 14
Reasonable working hours 0
Effective abolition of child labor 14
Community development 80
Employee satisfaction surveys 20
Community education 100
Occupational health and safety protection 60
Employee volunteerism 40
Recordable incident/accident rate 14
Lost workday case rate 43
Health and safety citations 0
Health and safety fines 0
Social community investment 14
Employee turnover rate 0
Women in management 60
Sexual harassment 0
Access to health care for employees 40
www.roberts.cmc.edu 129 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Food Processing Companies
EI4Report contact person
-Discussion: identifies the person specifically designated to answer questions about the report or sustainability issues. Investor relations or public relations contact representatives are not valid contacts for this question. -Initiatives/actions: to facilitate such contact, i.e. providing email address, phone number, or a link for feedback and questions.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
1
Links:
5Environmental visionary statement
-Discussion: includes a clear visionary statement expressing an organizational commitment to good environmental performance. -Initiatives/actions: include measures to fulfill that commitment.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
2
Links:
6Environmental impediments and challenges
-Discussion: of impediments and challenges faced by the organization in attempting to realize its environmental vision and commitments.-Initiatives/actions: include measures to overcome them.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
3
Links:
9Environmental policy statement
-Discussion: includes a formal statement of the organization's environmental policy or plan.-Initiatives/actions: include a description of how the policy is being implemented.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
4
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 1 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 130 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
10Climate change/global warming
-Discussion: of the organization's position on climate change and/or global warming.-Initiatives/actions: include measures taken by the organization to decrease its contribution to climate change.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
5
Links:
11Habitat/ecosystem conservation
-Discussion: of the organization's position on conserving natural ecosystems and habitat.-Initiatives/actions: taken to increase conservation of natural ecosystems either associated with or separate from the organization's business activities.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
6
Links:
12Biodiversity
-Discussion: of the organization's position on biodiversity.-Initiatives/actions: taken by to the organization to foster biodiversity.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
7
Links:
13Green purchasing
-Discussion: about preferential purchasing of eco-friendly (non-polluting, recycled, recyclable, etc.) products.-Initiatives/actions: taken to implement such purchasing.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
8
Links:
16Environmental education
-Discussion: of efforts to promote environmental education and awareness of employees, the general public, or children.-Initiatives/actions: taken to provide such education.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
9
Links:
19Environmental management structure
-Discussion: of the organization's environmental management structure or staffing.-Initiatives/actions: include identification of individuals currently holding the staff positions.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
10
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 2 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 131 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
20Environmental management system
-Discussion: includes a statement of adoption of ISO 14001 or other formal environmental management system. -Initiatives/actions: include information on the extent to which the system has been implemented.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
11
Links:
21Environmental accounting
-Discussion: of environmental expenditures.-Initiatives/actions: include detailed accounting of such expenditures.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
12
Links:
23Stakeholder consultation
-Discussion: of consultation and dialogue with stakeholders about the organization's environmental aspects or impacts.-Initiatives/actions: include identification of specific consultation activities.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
13
Links:
207Genetically modified food
Discussion of the company's position or policy on genetically modified food
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
14
Links:
303Zero Waste Policy
-Discussion: the city has adopted a formal Zero Waste plan-Initiatives/actions: the plan has resulted in a decrease in the city's volume of waste going to landfills and incinerators.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
15
Links:
316Locally grown organic food
-Discussion: the company has implemented a program to encourage the use of locally grown organic food-Initiatives/actions: the company has a numerical goal for the percentage of locally grown organic foods used and a stated time frame for achieving it.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
16
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 3 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 132 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
SI17Workforce profile: ethnicities/race
-Discussion: of racial or ethnic distribution of workforce.-Initiatives/actions: taken to avoid racial or ethnic discrimination.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
1
Links:
18Workforce profile: gender
-Discussion: of gender distribution of workforce.-Initiatives/actions: taken to avoid gender discrimination and achieve appropriate balance
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
2
Links:
42Social visionary statement
-Discussion: includes a clear visionary statement expressing an organizational commitment to good social performance.-Initiatives/actions: include measures taken to fulfill that commitment.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
3
Links:
43Social impediments and challenges
Discussion: of impediments and challenges faced by the organization in attempting to realize its social vision and commitments.Initiatives/actions: include measures taken to overcome them.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
4
Links:
45Social policy statement
-Discussion: includes a formal statement of the company's social policy or plan.-Initiatives/actions: include a description of how the policy is being implemented.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
5
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 4 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 133 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
47Code of conduct or business ethics
-Discussion: includes a formal organizational code of conduct or of ethical behavior.-Initiatives/actions: include measures to assure that the code of conduct is followed.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
6
Links:
49Supplier screening based on social or environmental performance/ supplier management
-Discussion: or description of procedures to evaluate and select suppliers on their ability to meet the requirements of the company's social or environmental policy and principles.-Initiatives/actions: include measures to implement or assure such screening or selection.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
7
Links:
51Health and safety, or social organizational structure
-Discussion: of organizational structure or staffing for ensuring health and safety or social responsibility.-Initiatives/actions: include identification of the individuals currently holding the staff positions.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
8
Links:
52Workforce profile: age
-Discussion: of age distribution of workforce.-Initiatives/actions: include measures taken to avoid age discrimination or to encourage a balanced age structure.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
9
Links:
53Emergency preparedness program
-Discussion: of emergency preparedness programs to prepare employees or the public to cope with potential emergencies at the organization's facilities.-Initiatives/actions: include measures taken to implement such programs.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
10
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 5 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 134 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
54Third-party validation
-Discussion: of the value (or lack thereof) of third-party auditing or validation. -Initiatives/actions: include formal auditing or validation by a qualified external third-party source.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
11
Links:
80Employment for individuals with disabilities
-Discussion: of appropriate actions to accommodate employees with disabilities.-Initiatives/actions: taken to implement such accommodations.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
12
Links:
82Employee training for career development
-Discussion: of training, skills and learning programs appropriate to support employees' upward mobility.-Initiatives/actions: taken to implement such training.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
13
Links:
ER
Programs to encourage carpooling, mass transit or other reductions in total commuting.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
163Green transportation initiatives1
Links:
Amount of food purchases come from local or organic sources, sustainable farms, or sustainable fisheries.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
166Green food purchasing2
Links:
ER
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 6 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 135 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Efforts to plant trees to restore a natural ecosystem of a disturbed forest
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
186Reforestation1
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Disposal of food material
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
228Food Waste2
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 7 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 136 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
The sum of all greenhouse gases released, which could include CO2, CH4 (methane), N2O (nitrous oxide), SF6 (Sulphur hexafluoride), PFCs (Perfluorocarbons) and HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons).
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
83Greenhouse gases (or CO2 equivalents), total3
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Government imposed fines for environmental infractions.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
40Fines (environmental)4
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 8 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 137 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
An accounting of money spent or invested specifically to decrease environmental damage or to benefit the environment.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
39Environmental expenses and investments5
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Notices of violation (NOVs) for environmental infractions.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
38Notices of violation (environmental)6
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 9 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 138 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Amounts of hazardous materials released into the environment, total (TRI, PRTR, HAP (Hazardous Air Pollutants), and similar indices), may include mercury or lead. Depending on the nationality of the organization, this could be labeled "TRI" (Toxic Release Inventory), "substance releases," or something else.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
37Waste (hazardous) released to the environment7
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Sum of all hazardous materials remaining after production, irrespective of final disposition. Hazardous wastes include items identified as TRI, PRTR, HAP (Hazardous Air Pollutants), and similar indices, and may include mercury or lead. Depending on the nationality of the organization, this could be labeled "TRI" (Toxic Release Inventory,) "substance releases" , or something else.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
35Waste (hazardous) produced8
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 10 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 139 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Includes solid hazardous and non-hazardous waste landfilled, incinerated, or transferred.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
34Waste (solid) disposed of9
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Office recycling of paper, cardboard, metal, or plastic.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
32Waste (office) recycled10
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 11 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 140 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Sum of all solid waste recycled, including hazardous waste.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
30Waste recycled: solid waste11
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Sum of all water used during operations.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
29Water used12
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 12 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 141 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Energy used from renewable sources such as wind, solar, hydroelectric, or other renewable sources.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
27Renewable energy used13
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Sum of the energy used by the organization in all different forms, including electricity, fuel, natural gas and others.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
26Energy used (total)14
Year Data Values Units
Links:
SR
Efforts to promote sustainable agriculture programs
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
272Sustainable agriculture1
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 13 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 142 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Efforts to provide access to employees, especially those who are working off-shores
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
185Access to health care for employees2
Links:
Relative numbers of women in management.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
2Women in management3
Links:
Efforts to promote employee volunteerism in social or environmental projects.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
72Employee volunteerism4
Links:
Efforts to provide a safe and healthy working environment at all sites.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
70Occupational health and safety protection5
Links:
Efforts to support education in the communities where the company is located.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
68Community education6
Links:
Surveys to monitor employee satisfaction.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
67Employee satisfaction surveys7
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 14 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 143 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Efforts to participate in social activities that improve the quality of life of communities including that of indigenous people, where the organization operates.
Discussion
Initiatives/Actions
Context
Improvement Over Previous
66Community development8
Links:
SR
Total number of operations in or adjacent to Indigenous Peoples' territories, and number and percentage of operations or sites where there are formal agreements with Indigenous Peoples' communities.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
279Indigenous people1
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Annual employee turnover rate.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
3Employee turnover rate2
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 15 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 144 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Amount of money spent on community outreach, including education grants, donations, and relief effort funds.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
81Social community investment3
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Fines levied against a company for health and safety violations.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
77Health and safety fines4
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 16 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 145 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Number of health and safety citations or notices of violation. If it is stated that there were none, check lines 1,2,3, 4, and 6.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
76Health and safety citations5
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Number of employee injuries or illnesses that resulted in one or more lost workdays.
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
75Lost workday case rate6
Year Data Values Units
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 17 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 146 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Number of employee incidents or accidents, such as: “total case incident rate,” “incident rate,” or "accident rate."
Discussion
Context
Goal
Current Period Quantitative Dat
Previous Quantitative Data
Improvement Over Previous
74Recordable incident/accident rate7
Year Data Values Units
Links:
SR
Rejection of any form of sexual harassment.
Adoption of PolicyAction to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of Compliance
1Sexual harassment1
Links:
Rejection of illegal child labor by the company or its affiliates.
Adoption of PolicyAction to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of Compliance
65Effective abolition of child labor2
Links:
Compliance with applicable laws and industry standards on working hours, including overtime.
Adoption of PolicyAction to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of Compliance
64Reasonable working hours3
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 18 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 147 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Assurance that all employees enter employment with the company of their own free will, not by compulsion.
Adoption of PolicyAction to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of Compliance
63Elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labor
4
Links:
Assurance that wages paid meet or exceed legal or industry minimum standard.
Adoption of PolicyAction to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of Compliance
62Fair compensation of employees5
Links:
Efforts to respect the right of employees to form and join trade unions of their choice and to bargain collectively.
Adoption of PolicyAction to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of Compliance
61Free association and collective bargaining of employees
6
Links:
Commitment not to engage in any kind of discrimination based on ethnicity, caste, religion, disability, sex, age, sexual orientation, union membership, or political affiliation in hiring practices or employee treatment.
Adoption of PolicyAction to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of Compliance
60Elimination of discrimination in respect to employment and occupation
7
Links:
Commitment to oppose any corporal/hard labor punishment, mental/physical coercion, or verbal abuse.
Adoption of PolicyAction to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of Compliance
59Degrading treatment or punishment of employees8
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 19 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 146 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Policy about political contributions.
Adoption of PolicyAction to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of Compliance
7Political contributions9
Links:
Rejection of bribery
Adoption of PolicyAction to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of Compliance
8Bribery10
Links:
Efforts to uphold the highest standards of business ethics and integrity. May be found under a Code of Conduct.
Adoption of PolicyAction to Reinforce Policy
Monitoring
Quantiative Indication of Compliance
58Anti-corruption practices11
Links:
Appendix 1: PSI Questionnaire, Page 20 of 20www.roberts.cmc.edu 147 Sustainability Reporting of the World's
Largest Food Processing Companies
Ajinomoto, Archer Daniels Midland,Associated British Foods, BRF-Brasil F o o d s , B u n g e , C a m p b e l l S o u p , C o n A g r a F o o d s , C o r n P r o d u c t s International, Danone, Dean Foods, General Mills, Golden Agri-Resources, Grupo Bimbo, Hershey, Hillshire Brands, HJ Heinz, Hormel Foods, J. M.Smuckers, JBS, Kellogg, Kerry Group, Kraft Foods, McCormick & Co, Nestlé, Olam International, Saputo, SmithfieldFoods, Tyson Foods, Unilever, andW i l m a r I n t e r n a t i o n a l
Contact InformationContact Information
Roberts Environmental CenterRoberts Environmental Center
The Roberts Environmental Center is a research institute at Claremont McKenna College, endowed by George R. Roberts, Founding Partner, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. The Center is managed by faculty and staff, and its research, including the material in this report, is done by students at the Claremont Colleges.
Dr. J. Emil Morhardt, Director, Phone: 909-621-8190, email: [email protected] Adidjaja, Research Fellow, Phone: 909-621-8698, email: [email protected] Environmental Center, Claremont McKenna College, 925 N. Mills Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711-5916, USA.
Claremont McKenna College, a member of the Claremont Colleges, is a highly selective, independent, coeducational, residential, undergraduate liberal arts college with a curricular emphasis on economics, government, and public affairs.
Claremont McKenna CollegeClaremont McKenna College
The Claremont CollegesThe Claremont CollegesThe Claremont Colleges form a consortium of five undergraduate liberal arts colleges and two graduate institutions based on the Oxford/Cambridge model. The consortium offers students diverse opportunities and resources typically found only at much larger universities. The consortium members include Claremont McKenna College, Harvey Mudd College, Pitzer College, Pomona College, Scripps College, Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences, and the Clremont Graduate University which—includes the Peter F. Drucker and Masatoshi Ito Graduate School of Management.