2012.08.17 employee silence - a critical review and prognosis

3
10/09/2012 1 Employee Silence: A Critical Review and Prognosis Niall Cullinane Queen’s University Belfast Research Area Employee voice ‘Employee silence’ A motivation to withhold ideas, opinions and knowledge about workrelated improvements (Morrison and Miliken, 2000; Van Dyne et al. 2003) Why do employees engage in silence? What can employers do to resolve it?

DESCRIPTION

Dr. Niall Cullinane, Queen's University Belfast presented this seminar "Employee Silence - A Critical Review and Prognosis" as part of the Visiting Fellows Seminar Series at the Whitaker Institute on 17th August 2012.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2012.08.17 Employee Silence - A Critical Review and Prognosis

10/09/2012

1

Employee Silence: A Critical Review and Prognosis

Niall Cullinane

Queen’s University Belfast

Research Area

• Employee voice

• ‘Employee silence’

– A motivation to withhold ideas, opinions and knowledge about work‐related improvements (Morrison and Miliken, 2000; Van Dyne et al. 2003)

– Why do employees engage in silence?

– What can employers do to resolve it? 

Page 2: 2012.08.17 Employee Silence - A Critical Review and Prognosis

10/09/2012

2

Employee silence: the causes

• Management literature identifies

– Senior management influence (Piderot and Ashford, 2003)

– Organisational culture influence (Huang et al. 2005)

– Employee peer influence (Bowen and Blackmon, 2003)

Employee silence: problems

• Assumption that silence can be addressed by enlightened management policy

• Assumption that employees want ‘engagement’

• Ignores silence as a product of the ‘wage‐effort bargain’ (c.f. Baldamus, 1961)

• Silence as benefit to employee for reasons like labour market power, autonomy and effort expenditure

Page 3: 2012.08.17 Employee Silence - A Critical Review and Prognosis

10/09/2012

3

Employee silence: the craft tradition

• Recognition by scientific management that craft tradition was barrier to valorisation of labour power

• Rule‐of‐thumb tradition enabled craft workers to withhold knowledge from management (Montgomery, 1978)

Employee silence: regulation of output

• Use of social norms to obfuscate production capabilities

• Common under piecework and payment by results type schemes (c.f. Roy, 1952; Lupton, 1963; Burawoy, 1978)