201225 salmon, jan driver's of change in darwin's hinterland

Upload: nt-spatial

Post on 06-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    1/13

    Drivers of change inDarwins hinterland

    Jan Salmon

    Masters CandidateResearch Institute for the Environment and

    Livelihoods

    Charles Darwin University

    N

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    2/13

    March 2012

    Research Aims

    Analysis of development of

    Darwin and its hinterland

    Litchfield = hinterland

    Analysis of changes in landtenure

    Darwins development was

    different

    Rural residential was thekey driver of development

    LitchfieldDarwin

    Palmerston

    20km

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    3/13

    March 2012

    Why did counter-urbanism occur?Counter-urbanism

    Migration of people into

    rural areas from the city

    (seachange/treechange)

    Holmes (2010) counter-

    urbanism only occurred in

    Darwins tropical savannas

    low productive potential ...

    in pastoral lands

    urban population growth

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    4/13

    March 2012

    Theoretical Framework

    Multifunctionality

    Production

    Consumption

    Protection

    ProductionPrimary production

    Faming

    Mining

    ConsumptionRural residential

    ProtectionConservation

    Parks

    Modes ofoccupance

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    5/13

    March 2012

    Method

    ArcGIS of Northern

    Territory cadastral data

    base

    Archival documents

    Census data

    Face to face interviews

    of long term residents

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    6/13

    March 2012

    First survey

    Goyder survey 1869

    Town lots and plantation

    lots (320 acres)

    Small farmer was locked out

    Sold to speculators but not

    occupied

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    7/13March 2012

    1958 Cadastre

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    8/13March 2012

    Darwin 1958

    Arrested

    growth

    Hinterlandnot altered

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    9/13March 2012

    Subdivisions 1950-1974Extent of urban Darwin 1958

    Mainly 2 ha lots

    Rural

    residential

    Development

    not contiguous

    with the city

    Aligned to road

    access

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    10/13March 2012

    Subdivisions 1950-1974

    Compulsory acquisition 1946

    All land within 144 square kilometers became leasehold

    Housing crisis

    Shortage of materials

    Shortage of surveyed land

    Non-public servants had limited

    access to land

    Counter-urbanism occurred

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    11/13March 2012

    Post Tracy

    Opportunity to rebuild Darwin

    To remedy past planning

    mistakes

    Planned from Canberra and

    Melbourne

    Indifference to local housing

    needs

    Promoted an exodus into the

    hinterland

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    12/13March 2012

    Subdivisions 1975-1990 Again counter-urbanism

    Emergence of horticulture

    Conservation

    Aboriginal Land Rights Act

    Rural

    Other

    Commonwwealth

    Conservation

    Future development

    Rural residential

    Water Management

    Aboriginal Land

  • 8/2/2019 201225 Salmon, Jan Driver's of Change in Darwin's Hinterland

    13/13March 2012

    Conclusions

    So why counter-urbanism in Darwin and not the other savannas? Absence of pastoral industry

    Absence of agriculture

    BUT subdivided freehold land

    Commonwealths control of land