2013 / 2014 transport asset management plan amp transport... · 2013 / 2014 transport asset...

CITY OF PLAYFORD – TRANSPORT - ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN (Endorsed by Council – 23/7/2013)

CITY OF PLAYFORD

2013 / 2014

Transport

Asset Management Plan


Document Control

Document ID: 59_04_070905_lgasa_iamp template v11

Rev No Date Revision Details Author Reviewer Approver

1 March 2010 Version 1 Andy Slager Paul Alberton Peter Oye

2 March 2011 Version 2 Andy Slager Paul Alberton Peter Oye

3 April 2013 Version 3 Paul Alberton Paul Alberton Mal Hemmerling

© Copyright 2012 – All rights reserved.

The Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia.

www.ipwea.org.au/namsplus

http://www.ipwea.org.au/namsplus


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. 1 What Council Provides ........................................................................................... 1 What does it Cost? ................................................................................................. 1 Plans for the Future ................................................................................................ 1 Measuring our Performance ................................................................................... 1 The Next Steps ....................................................................................................... 2

2. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Background ...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Goals and Objectives of Asset Management .................................................... 4 2.3 Plan Framework ............................................................................................... 4 2.4 Core and Advanced Asset Management .......................................................... 6 2.5 Community Consultation .................................................................................. 6

3. LEVELS OF SERVICE ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Customer Research and Expectations ............................................................. 7 3.2 Strategic and Corporate Goals ....................................................................... 11 3.3 Legislative Requirements ............................................................................... 11 3.4 Current Levels of Service ............................................................................... 12 3.5 Desired Levels of Service .............................................................................. 15

4. FUTURE DEMAND ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 4.1 Demand Drivers ............................................................................................. 16 4.2 Demand Forecast .......................................................................................... 16 4.3 Demand Impact on Assets ............................................................................. 16 4.4 Demand Management Plan............................................................................ 17 4.5 Asset Programs to meet Demand .................................................................. 18

5. LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................................................................................................... 20 5.1 Background Data ........................................................................................... 20 5.2 Risk Management Plan .................................................................................. 23 5.3 Routine Operations and Maintenance Plan .................................................... 24 5.4 Renewal / Replacement Plan ......................................................................... 29 5.5 Creation/ Acquisition / Upgrade Plan .............................................................. 32

6. FINANCIAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 34 6.1 Financial Statements and Projections ............................................................ 34 6.2 Funding Strategy ............................................................................................ 40 6.3 Valuation Forecasts ....................................................................................... 40 6.4 Key Assumptions made in Financial Forecasts .............................................. 41

7. PLAN IMPROVEMENT AND MONITORING ................................................................................................................... 43 7.1 Status of Asset Management Practices .......................................................... 43 7.2 Improvement Program ................................................................................... 44 7.3 Monitoring and Review Procedures ................................................................ 44 7.4 Performance Measures .................................................................................. 44

8. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................... 45 9. APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................................................ 46

E ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................... 47 F GLOSSARY .................................................................................................. 48

- 1 -


1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

What Council Provides

City of Playford has a significant portfolio of community assets under its care and control. These assets form an integral part of providing services to the community which support the governance and accountability of Council. These services are provided in partnership with end users to enable a systematic process of capturing, organising, sharing and using information to enable us to meet our strategic objectives and deliver services to our Community.

A significant proportion of City of Playford’s Assets have been in existence for many years. These assets have originated from a combination of City of Playford construction as well as from development activity within the area. As a significant proportion of these assets are near the end of their useful life, the cost of their renewal is a financial challenge for City of Playford.

What does it Cost?

The projected outlays necessary to provide the services covered by this Asset Management Plan (AM Plan) includes operations, maintenance, renewal and upgrade of existing assets over the 10 year planning period is $148.05m or $14.80m on average per year.

Estimated available funding for this period is $128.85m or $12.88m on average per year which is 87% of the cost to provide the service. This is a funding shortfall of -1.92m on average per year.

Plans for the Future

City of Playford plans to operate and maintain the stormwater network to achieve the following strategic objectives.

1. Ensure the transport network is maintained at a safe and functional standard as set out in this Asset Management Plan.

2. Provide rapid response to transport problems.

3. Ensure compliance with the road traffic acts and regulations.

4. Ensure compliance with the Disability & Discrimination Act (DDA).

5. Reduce the level of risk exposure to Council and ensure the network compliments Council’s strategies.

6. Meet community expectations in a financially sustainable manner via improved risk management, legislative compliance and management processes.

Measuring our Performance

Quality Transport assets will be maintained in a reasonably usable condition. Defects found or reported that are outside our service standard will be repaired. See our maintenance response service levels (Appendix A) for details of defect prioritisation and response time.

Function

Our intent is that an appropriate Transport Drainage System is maintained in partnership with other levels of government and stakeholders to provide rapid response to transport problems, and protect flood-prone habitable buildings and receiving environments.

Transport assets attributes will be maintained at a safe level and associated signage and equipment be provided as needed to ensure public safety. We need to ensure key functional objectives are met:

Programmed Asset renewal.

Implement solutions to tree root, vehicle and service authority damage.

Improve DDA compliance for all new and renewed roads.

Use of environmentally sustainable materials and processes.

Connecting communities.

Providing a robust and safe driving environment.

The main functional consequence of the ongoing condition inspection regimes,

- 2 -


improving feedback from maintenance contractors so that asset data can be verified in the field, developing condition and performance information for assets and improving data auditing processes and enhancing the quality of the GIS data such that it is a key tool for operational staff to locate assets in the field and develop one centralised project register management system and develop further analysis and reporting tools to support user requirements which will lead to overall improvement of Council’s assets. City of Playford service delivery strategy is based upon following questions:

Can service delivery be made less asset dependent.

Are existing assets fully utilised.

Are existing assets appropriately located for effective service delivery.

Is the capacity of existing assets sufficient to provide the required services.

Are the assets suitable for the effective delivery of the services they are intended to support.

The main functional consequence of the service delivery strategy is:

Council-wide acceptance and understanding of life cycle management.

Improvement in the collection, distribution and use of information.

Smarter design solutions.

Consistency in Council’s approach to customer requests.

Appropriate maintenance of the transport network

A longer useful life for the road network.

Prioritised reseal/rehabilitation of roads rated condition 1 & 2.

Safety We monitor all Transport and prioritise and repair defects in accordance with our inspection schedule to ensure they are safe and fully operational.

The Next Steps

The actions resulting from this Asset Management Plan are:

Review data management quality procedures.

Maintain Geographic Information System data regarding transport drainage assets.

Develop criteria for risk treatment.

Assess asset capacity and condition rating.

A longer useful life for the road network.

Prioritised reseal/rehabilitation of roads rated condition 1 & 2.

Develop an education and consultation framework.

Communicate public responsibilities with respect to environmental care.

Research international best practice.

- 3 -


2. INTRODUCTION

2.1 Background

This Asset Management Plan is to demonstrate responsive management of assets (and services provided from assets), compliance with regulatory requirements, and to communicate funding required providing the required levels of service.

The asset management plan follows the format for AM Plans recommended in Section 4.2.6 of the International Infrastructure Management Manual1.

The asset management plan is to be read with the organisation’s Asset Management Policy, Asset Management Strategy and the following associated planning documents:

The Long Term Financial Plan.

Economic Prosperity Plan.

Environmental Goal Plan.

Organisational Excellence Plan.

The Council Plan.

Community Wellbeing Goal Plan.

This assets covered by this asset management plan are shown in Table 2.1. These assets are used to provide the transport network to its community.

Table 2.1: Assets covered by this Plan

SUBCATEGORY Assets RENEWAL $

Carparks 66ea 7,126,663

Kerb 1,057,300 m 59,534,334

Transport Structures 516ea 7,007,583

Sealed Roads 5,700,047 m² 142,552,155

Unsealed Roads 489,493 m² 4,548,681

These assets have a renewal value of $220,769,416.

Assumptions This Plan is based on current service level and 2012/2013 dollars. It does not take into consideration any new equipment or systems that may be implemented over the coming year.

Due to financial system change during the reporting period, operating and maintenance costs have been extrapolated from values used for the last plan and indexed representing 2 cycles of CPI (eg taken to be 3%).

Exclusions

NA

1 IPWEA, 2011, Sec 4.2.6, Example of an Asset Management Plan Structure, pp 4|24 – 27.

- 4 -


Key stakeholders in the preparation and implementation of this are:

Asset Strategy Governance and Asset Management Strategies

Councillors/Board Members Represent needs of community/shareholders.

Allocate resources to meet the organisation’s objectives in providing services while managing risks

Ensure organisation is financially sustainable.

CEO/General Manager Manage organisation operational activities and future planning strategic direction.

Operational Teams Design, documentations, capital work projects.

Operational and service levels, data information and analysis.

Finance Team Long Term Financial Plans and operational financial data.

Community & Ratepayers End user of services.

2.2 Goals and Objectives of Asset Management

The Council exists to provide services to its community. Some of these services are provided by transport and associated assets. Council has acquired assets by ‘purchase’, by contract, construction by City of Playford staff and by donation of assets constructed by developers and others to meet increased levels of service.

Council’s goal in managing transport assets is to meet the defined level of service (as amended from time to time) in the most cost effective manner for present and future consumers. The key elements of transport asset management are:

Taking a life cycle approach.

Developing cost-effective management strategies for the long term.

Providing a defined level of service and monitoring performance.

Understanding and meeting the demands of growth through demand management and Technology investment.

Managing risks associated with asset failures.

Sustainable use of physical resources.

Continuous improvement in asset management practices.2

2.3 Plan Framework

Key elements of the plan are:

Levels of service – specifies the services and levels of service provided by Council.

Future demand – how this will impact on future service delivery and how this is to be met.

Life cycle management – how Council will manage its existing and future assets to provide the required services.

Financial summary – what funds are required to provide the required services.

Asset management practices.

Monitoring – how the plan will be monitored to ensure it is meeting Council’s objectives.

Asset Management Improvement Plan.

A road map for preparing an Asset Management Plan is shown below.

2 IIMM 2006 Sec 1.1.3, p 1.3

- 5 -


Road Map for preparing an Asset Management Plan Source: IIMM Fig 1.5.1, p 1.11

IS THE PLAN

AFFORDABLE?

CORPORATE PLANNING

Confirm strategic objectives and establish AM

policies, strategies & goals.

Define responsibilities & ownership.

Decide core or advanced AM Pan.

Gain organisation commitment.

REVIEW/COLLATE ASSET INFORMATION

Existing information sources

Identify & describe assets.

Data collection

Condition assessments

Performance monitoring

Valuation Data

ESTABLISH LEVELS OF SERVICE

Establish strategic linkages

Define & adopt statements

Establish measures & targets

Consultation

LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Develop lifecycle strategies

Describe service delivery strategy

Risk management strategies

Demand forecasting and management

Optimised decision making (renewals, new works,

disposals)

Optimise maintenance strategies

FINANCIAL FORECASTS

Lifecycle analysis

Financial forecast summary

Valuation Depreciation

Funding

IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Assess current/desired practices

Develop improvement plan

ITERATION

Reconsider service statements

Options for funding

Consult with Council

Consult with Community

DEFINE SCOPE &

STRUCTURE OF PLAN

INF

OR

MA

TIO

N M

AN

AG

EM

EN

T, a

nd

DA

TA

IM

PR

OV

EM

EN

T

AM PLAN

REVIEW AND

AUDIT

IMPLEMENT

IMPROVEMENT

STRATEGY

ANNUAL PLAN /

BUSINESS PLAN

INF

OR

MA

TIO

N M

AN

AG

EM

EN

T, a

nd

DA

TA

IM

PR

OV

EM

EN

T

- 6 -


2.4 Core and Advanced Asset Management

This Transport Asset Management Plan is prepared as a ‘core’ asset management plan in accordance with the International Infrastructure Management Manual. It is prepared to meet minimum legislative and organisational requirements for sustainable service delivery and long term financial planning and reporting. Core asset management is a ‘top down’ approach where analysis is applied at the ‘system’ or ‘network’ level.

Future revisions of this will move towards ‘advanced’ asset management using a ‘bottom up’ approach for gathering asset information for individual assets to support the optimisation of activities and programs to meet agreed service levels.

2.5 Community Consultation

This ‘core’ asset management plan is prepared to facilitate community consultation initially through feedback on public display of draft asset management plans prior to adoption by the Council/Board. Future revisions of the asset management plan will incorporate community consultation on service levels and costs of providing the service. This will assist the Council/Board and the community in matching the level of service needed by the community, service risks and consequences with the community’s ability and willingness to pay for the service.

- 7 -


3. LEVELS OF SERVICE

3.1 Customer Research and Expectations

The City of Playford has been undertaking an independent evaluation of Council services through a Resident Satisfaction Survey since 2001.

In 2012, Newfocus Research successfully tendered for this task and was commissioned to undertake the Resident Satisfaction Survey.

Council representatives and Newfocus consultants worked together to develop a new instrument which was pilot tested a number of times, with final approval provided by the Executive.

Objectives

The broad objectives of the Resident Satisfaction Survey were to:

Aid an understanding of customers’ needs and expectations in order to assist in the design and delivery of Council services.

Measure resident perceptions of the City as a place to live.

Understand what could be done to improve perceptions and presentation of the City.

Evaluate the effectiveness of Council services and programs. Methodology

Quantitative research among the broad population within suburbs of the City of Playford.

A sample of 600 residents were interviewed by telephone. We interviewed 100 residents in each ward.

Fieldwork was conducted between 8 and 21 August 2012.

Key Findings:

Awareness of services provided by Council

Rubbish collection / kerbside garbage and recycling (76%) was named unprompted as the main service provided by Council.

…which services the Council provides to residents? (Q9)

% response

2010 2011 2012

Rubbish collection/kerbside garbage and recycling collection 62 56 76

Parks and reserves 26 32 36

Roads 33 32 29

Libraries (fixed not mobile) 30 28 28

Verge maintenance 20 23 28

- 8 -


Usage of services provided by Council

Rubbish collection / kerbside garbage and recycling is the service that most residents use in the City of Playford (73% up from 53%).

Claimed usage of other services, however, declined in comparison to 2011.

Council Strategic Goals - Community Wellbeing

Most aspects of Community Assets and Recreation & Leisure continue to be rated well among residents.

Community Assets Mean score (0-10)

2010 2011 2012

Parks and gardens are well maintained 7.2 7.2 7.4

Playgrounds are well maintained 7.2 7.1 7.5

Recreation & Leisure Mean score (0-10)

2010 2011 2012

The provision and maintenance of bicycle paths

is excellent 5.9 6.4 6.2

Ovals and sporting grounds are well maintained 7.4 7.5 7.8

Council supports a range of local sporting clubs* 6.9 6.8 7.5

Council supports a range of community groups

and programs in Playford* 6.9 6.8 7.5

Crime & Safety

Mean score (0-10)

2010

(n~399)

2011

(n~552)

2012

(n~592)

I feel safe in the City of Playford 6.2 6.4 6.4

Graffiti and vandalism control is effective 5.8 5.8 6.2

- 9 -


Council Strategic Goals:

Environmental Care

There have been increases in all the Liveable Environment and City Presentation items assessed in the survey.

Environment & City

Mean score (0-10)

2010 2011 2012

The City of Playford is well presented - 6.5 6.7

Verges are well maintained 6.2 5.5 6.0

The appearance of the City of Playford is very pleasant 6.8 6.8 6.9

The Council is environmentally responsible 7.0 7.0 7.4

Satisfaction with kerbside garbage collection continues to be high. Agreement with streets being clean has remained steady at a lower rating.

Waste Management

Mean score (0-10)

2010 2011 2012

The streets are clean 6.8 6.8 6.8

I am satisfied with the kerbside garbage collection

service 8.2 8.0 8.4

I am satisfied with the hard waste collection service 6.7 7.1 7.5

Illegal dumping is an issue in the Playford area - - 7.1

City Infrastructure

Although showing low averages agreement with City Infrastructure items assessed in the survey has mainly increased in comparison to the 2011 results.

Mean score (0-10)

2010 2011 2012

Footpaths are well maintained 5.4 5.2 5.6

The street lighting is adequate 6.4 6.4 6.6

Storm water drainage in your street is adequately

maintained 6.7 6.4 6.7

The local streets are well maintained 5.7 5.5 6.0

The rural roads are well maintained - 5.9 5.6

- 10 -


Organisational Excellence

Agreement with Council’s communications items assessed in the survey are at a medium level.

Communications

Mean score (0-10)

2010 2011 2012

The Council's goals and vision are clear and

communicated to residents 6.2 5.9 6.2

The Council communicates well with its residents 6.0 6.2 6.0

Agreement with Governance and Strategy items remain in line with previous results

Government & Strategy

Mean score (0-10)

2010 2011 2012

The Council is responsive to community needs 6.3 6.3 6.2

The Council invites residents to participate in decision-

making 5.0 5.7 5.9

The Council is open and accountable to the community 5.5 6.4 6.2

The Council provides value for money in return for the

rates I pay each year 5.5 5.4 5.1

The Council plans for the future 5.6 6.8 6.7

Elected Members do their job of representing my views

well 6.1 5.5 5.7

Overall Satisfaction with Council

Overall Satisfaction with Council stood at 68 out of 100 in 2012. This represented a slight decrease in comparison to the previous results.

Satisfaction score Total Male Female 40 or

under 41 to 60

Age 61

+

Overall satisfaction with the

Council 68 67 68 69 65 71

Value for Money

Mean score (0-10)

2010 2011 2012

The Council provides value for money in return for the

rates I pay each year 5.5 5.4 5.1

- 11 -


Council uses this information in developing the Strategic Management Plan and in allocation of resources in the budget.

3.2 Strategic and Corporate Goals

This is prepared under the direction of Council’s vision, mission, goals and objectives.

Our vision is:

The City of Playford is committed to the sustainable provision of built and natural assets that contribute to community wellbeing. We will achieve this through community driven service levels and asset wise application of integrated knowledge management and financial systems.

Our mission is:

“To improve and support the wellbeing health and safety of the Playford community”.

Relevant Council goals and objectives and how these are addressed in this Asset Management Plan are:

Table 3.2. Council Goals and how these are addressed in this Plan

3.3 Legislative Requirements

Council has to meet many legislative requirements including Australian and State legislation and State regulations. These include those listed in Table 3.3 below:

Table 3.3. Legislative Requirements

Legislation Requirement

Local Government Act Sets out role, purpose, responsibilities and powers of local governments including the preparation of a Long Term Financial Plan supported by Asset Management Plans for

Goal Objective How Goal and Objectives are addressed in AMP

Community Wellbeing

To improve and support the wellbeing, health and safety of the Playford community. Asset Management Strategy. Effective community involvement in asset investment decision making.

The section of this AMP dealing with future demand, analyses future cash flows required to maintain the City expanding transportation network. Capital Works are programmed and funded. Data on forward works programs is available to the community for comments and suggestions. Staff have a significant input into the development of the plan.

Economic Prosperity To improve economic prosperity of the region. To achieve sustainable infrastructure within the Long Term Financial Plans.

Methodologies are documented.

Environmental Care To Secure a sustainable future for Playford’s community and environment through leadership innovation, collaboration and engagement.

Required physical and monetary resources are minimised through the development of least life cycle cost techniques. Maintenance works are optimised against the capital works program.

- 12 -


Legislation Requirement

sustainable service delivery.

Local Government Act-Annual Reporting Section 428(2)(d)

(d) A report of the condition of the public works, under the control of City of Playford as at the end of that year together with:

(i) An estimate (at current values) of the amount of money required to bring the works up to a satisfactory standard: and

(ii) An estimate (at current values) of the annual expense of maintain the works at that standard; and

(iii) The City of Playford’s programme for maintenance for that year in respect of the works.

Australian Accounting Standards Set out the financial reporting standards relating to. Inter alia, the (re)valuation and depreciation of Assets.

Civil Liability Act, 1936 Liability of road authorities - Section 42, May 2004 inclusion in the Act to provide a replacement for the nonfeasance defence consequent to May 2001 High Court judgement.

OHS&W Act 1986 To secure the health, safety and welfare of persons at work.

To eliminate, at their source, risks to the health, safety and welfare of persons at work.

To protect the public against risks to health or safety arising out of or in connection with the activities of persons at work, or the use of operation of various types of plant.

Code of Technical Requirements for the Legal Use of Traffic Control Devices

Details the design and construction parameters to which traffic management devices installed by City of Playford must comply.

Highway Act 1926 Set out the Legislative framework for drainage of roads and road authorities’ In SA.

Land Administration Act, 2002 Standard for land acquisition and management of land.

Road Traffic Act 1961 Contains powers for City of Playford to install and remove traffic control devices.

3.4 Current Levels of Service

City of Playford has defined service levels in two terms.

Community levels of service relate to how the community receives the service in terms of safety, quality, quantity, reliability, responsiveness, cost / efficiency and legislative compliance.

Supporting the community service levels are operational or technical measures of performance developed to ensure that the minimum community levels of service are met.

Asset managers plan, implement and control technical service levels to influence the customer service levels.3

Council’s current service levels are detailed in Table 3.4.

3 IPWEA, 2011, IIMM, p 2.22

- 13 -


Table 3.4. Current Service Levels

SEALED ROADS

Key Performance Measure

Level of Service Performance Measure Process

Performance Target Current Performance

COMMUNITY LEVELS OF SERVICE

Quality Drive ability Minimum delay

Customer Service Requests in regards to pot holes, patching and repairs to transport infrastructure

< 100 per month No Current Measure

Function Meets user requirements for: Geometry (road width, turning radiuses, gradient) Accessibility Adequate traffic control devices

Customer Service Request Austroads technical specifications and guidelines Customer satisfaction survey

No of CRS received per annum Compliance with current standards and specs

No Current Measure

Safety Increase road safety

Accident reports, Customer Requests

No per annum No Current Measure

TECHNICAL LEVELS OF SERVICE

Condition Minimum potholes, cracks, surface deformation and / or texture deficiencies

Length of resealed / reconstructed roads per annum Condition rating. Average age of seals

8 km resealed and 2 km of roads reconstructed per year

No Current Measure

Function Adequate capacity Quality of Transport network

Annual inspection % of transport network per annum

No Current Measure

Cost Effectiveness

Proactive scheduled maintenance Re-use of materials Use highly productive road construction machinery

Percent of maintenance done by proactive repairs 30% of road base material to be obtained from existing road (before reconstruction) Use advanced technology methods and new materials

70% of proactive maintenance activities

No Current Measure

Safety Provide legible signage, line-marking, sight distance. Maintain traffic control devices

Regular road safety audits Customer Request Service

Less number of accidents and public complaints

No Current Measure

CAR PARKS



Performance Target

Current Performance


Quality Provide comfortable and secure parking for

Customer Service Requests In regards to parking conditions

< 25 per annum No current Measure

- 14 -




Performance Target

Current Performance

Playford citizens and visitors

Community forums feedback

Function Meets user requirements for: Geometry, sight distance, turning radiuses Accessibility Adequate line-marking signage and furniture

Customer Requests Service Austroads technical specifications and guidelines

Minimum CRS received. Compliance with current standards and Specs

No current Measure

Safety Crime free parking areas.

Customer Requests Complaints about break ins, or damage of property

Minimum customer complaints

No current Measure

TRANSPORT STRUCTURES



Performance Target Current Performance


Quality Provide reliable and safe access and connectivity

Customer Service Requests In regards to bridges Community forums feedback

< 20 complaints per annum

No Current Measure

Function Meets user requirements for: Geometry (minimum width of 2.0 m) Accessibility

Customer Requests Service Austroads technical specifications and guidelines

Compliance with current standards and Specs

No Current Measure

Safety Increase public safety

Accident reports, Customer Requests

< 25 CRS received per annum

No Measure

TECHNICAL LEVELS OF SERVICE

Condition Free from tripping hazards

Number of bridges reconstructed roads per annum Condition rating. Average age of bridge

2 off pedestrian bridges reconstructed per year

No Current Measure

Function Adequate capacity and structural strength

Regular compliance inspection

All Bridges inspected annually

No Current Measure

Cost Effectiveness

Proactive scheduled maintenance

Percent of maintenance done by proactive repairs

> 70% pro-active work

No Measure

Safety Provide vandal proof decking balustrade and lighting

Regular inspections Customer Request Service

Less number of accident reports and public complaints. Replace all timber decking with concrete

No Current Measure

- 15 -


3.5 Desired Levels of Service

At present, indications of desired levels of service are obtained from various sources including the LGASA Customer Satisfaction survey, resident’s feedback to Councillors and staff, service requests and correspondence. Council has yet to quantify desired levels of service. This will be done in future revisions of this plan but:

A significant portion of Councils sealed road network was designed and constructed in 1950’s and 1960’s. Unfortunately, many of these roads have not had regular maintenance since being constructed and are now in a poor state.

Traditional maintenance treatments would comprise of a spray seal over the existing seal. However due to the current surface condition on many of Councils sealed roads (eg; pot holes, trenches, rough surface) this treatment is no longer suitable.

Excavation of the seal and road pavement is now required to prepare a suitable base to lay a new seal surface. This type of treatment less than 5 years ago would have resulted in the road being closed for an extended period of time and would have caused major disruption to residents and motorists.

The Asphalt Industry and Technology is now driving alternative treatments where the existing seal and pavement is now removed (nominally 50 mm – 100 mm thick) quickly and effectively with little disruption to residents and motorist. Asphalt is then relayed within the excavated area providing a thicker, smoother and stronger seal. This type of treatment is known as a “Deep Lift”, although more expensive than traditional treatments Industry believes that the reduction in traffic delays, dust, noise and time must be factored into the overall cost of resealing a road.

Proposed Treatments

Deep Lift (stabilisation process produces bound pavement layers of sufficient thickness to satisfy the structural design requirements of heavily trafficked pavements). It is proposed to apply 100 mm Deep Lift treatment to all Main Connector Roads that have a condition rating 1-2 at a rate of $38/m². This approach assumes that roads with a condition rating 1 & 2 the pavement has failed and major failures are apparent.

Overlay (The addition of one or more courses of material to an existing road surface, generally to increase strength / stiffness and / or improve riding quality). Condition 3 - 5 roads will be treated by applying a 50 mm Deep Lift or 50 mm Overlay at a unit rate of $19 m². Roads that have a condition rating of 3 – 5 are generally.

Sprayed Seal (chip seal) A thin layer of binder sprayed onto a pavement surface with a

layer of aggregate incorporated and which is impervious to water.

This treatment will still be used on Rural Roads that have a condition rating of 3 – 5. Roads with a condition rating of 1 – 2 may require a Deeplift or Overlay treatment.

- 16 -


4. FUTURE DEMAND

4.1 Demand Drivers

Drivers affecting demand include population change, changes in demographics, seasonal factors, vehicle ownership rates, consumer preferences and expectations, technological changes, economic factors, agricultural practices, environmental awareness, etc.

4.2 Demand Forecast

Factors affecting demand include population change, changes in demographics, seasonal factors, consumer preferences and expectations, economic factors, environmental awareness, technological developments, etc. Playford continues to experience new residential development, most recently in Andrews Farm, Craigmore, Hillbank and Blakeview. The most significant gains in population are expected in Andrews Farm, Angle Vale, Blakeview, Craigmore, Munno Para - Munno Para West - Munno Para Downs, Virginia - Waterloo Corner -Buckland Park and Smithfield. Elizabeth East and Elizabeth Downs are expected to the most significant population decreases during this period, with both areas expected to have little growth in housing stock. The forecast population growth rates are lower than household growth in most areas as a result of the decreasing number of people per household. The two obvious exceptions to this pattern are Munno Para - Munno Para West - Munno Para Downs, which are expected to have a relatively stable household size as a result of the in-migration of families during this period and Elizabeth where the average household size is already very low and the existing household structure is likely to be maintained.

There is a need to resolve a range of issues to manage the growth in a way that it retains City of Playford as a desirable location in which to live. Such issues include land availability, infrastructure, regional facilities, industrial land, employment opportunities, transport, etc.

4.3 Demand Impact on Assets

Demand factor trends and impacts on service delivery are summarised in Table 4.3

Table 4.3. Demand Factors, Projections and Impact on Services

Demand factor Present position Projection Impact on services

Population Resources are allocated to what we can fund or provide, not service driven.

The population increase is projected to 157,932 persons over 20 years.

Population growth will increase traffic volumes and demand for more shared use paths and transport assets.

New land Divisions

Rapid increase in demand for residential land and infrastructure

15,000 blocks of land development is expected in Buckland Park. Playford North is another significant future land development.

Increase in demand for maintenance of stormwaters and associated infrastructure.

Climate Change

Temperature rise. Rainfall decrease. Rise in sea level.

Potential for decrease in rainfall to affect ground movements in reactive soils and therefore potentially increase transport hazards or defects.

- 17 -


4.4 Demand Management Plan

Demand for new services will be managed through a combination of managing existing assets, upgrading of existing assets and providing new assets to meet demand and demand management. Demand management practices include non-asset solutions, insuring against risks and managing failures.

Non-asset solutions focus on providing the required service without the need for the organisation to own the assets and management actions including reducing demand for the service, reducing the level of service (allowing some assets to deteriorate beyond current service levels) or educating customers to accept appropriate asset failures4. Examples of non-asset solutions include providing services from existing infrastructure such as aquatic centres and libraries that may be in another community area or public toilets provided in commercial premises.

Opportunities identified to date for demand management are shown in Table 4.4. Further opportunities will be developed in future revisions of this plan.

Table 4.4. Demand Management Plan Summary

Service Activity Demand Management Plan

Community demand for reconstruction and reseal of roads and car parks

Study road condition rating from this plan and prioritise a list of roads to be included in the annual reseal / rehabilitation program.

Investigate alternative treatments to lower life cycle costs ie seal types, rejuvenation.

Community demand for new foot bridges and upgrading the old ones

Inspect and evaluate the condition of old foot bridges and compile timber decking replacement program.

Undertake a community survey for future need of foot bridges.

Upgrading of Unsealed Roads Progressive sealing of all unsealed roads.

New land Divisions Implement enhanced quality control measures for donated assets.

Planning Revise planning controls to increase population density and decrease the extent of new road network. Encourage industry to be near State controlled roads.

Capital Works Schedule long-term capital works program and investigate partners with the adjacent Councils to achieve economies of scale and cost savings. New projects will need to be assessed with a balance between competing demands for investment to renew existing Assets such as roads, bridges and drainage, as well as providing expenditure for new Assets to meet growing service delivery demand.

4 IPWEA, 2011, IIMM, Table 3.4.1, p 3|58.

- 18 -


4.5 Asset Programs to meet Demand

Changes to the size and scope of City of Playford’s Transport network is an ongoing issue that can be driven by changes in work practices, technology, and growth. Acquiring these new assets will commit City of Playford to fund ongoing operations and maintenance costs for the period that the service provided from the assets is required. City of Playford would need to increase annual maintenance budgets by 0.50% of the cost of all new capital expansion projects to ensure sufficient maintenance funds over the life cycle of all newly created assets.

Figure 1. Upgrade and New Assets to meet Demand

- 19 -


This graph shows a linear growth over the 20 year period. Acquiring these new assets will commit the organisation to fund ongoing operations, maintenance and renewal costs for the period that the service provided from the assets is required. These future costs are identified and considered in developing forecasts of future operations, maintenance and renewal costs in Section 5.

- 20 -


5. LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN The Lifecycle Management Plan details how Council plans to manage and operate the assets at the agreed levels of service (defined in Section 3) while optimising life cycle costs.

5.1 Background Data

This data covers currently owned assets. Many of City of Playford’s Assets are nearing the end of their useful life. Therefore careful monitoring of those assets with low condition rating at a detailed component level is necessary to manage appropriate service provision and associated risk.

5.1.1 Physical parameters

The Council owned assets covered by this are shown in Table 2.1.

The useful life of an asset is defined as a period over which a depreciable asset is expected to be fully utilised. This period can be significantly impacted by City of Playford’s maintenance practices.

The age profile of Council’s assets is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Asset Age Profile

- 21 -


As can be seen from this graph much of Council’s transport network was initially constructed in the 1960s and 1970s. Steady growth is observed in the later years due to land being released for development in a progressive manner. Due to the long anticipated life of transport assets it is therefore anticipated that renewal of these assets will be not be a major challenge facing Council over the term of this AMP.

- 22 -


5.1.2 Asset capacity and performance

Council’s services are generally provided to meet design standards where these are available.

Locations where deficiencies in service performance are known are detailed in Table 5.1.2.

Table 5.1.2. Known Service Performance Deficiencies

Category Service Deficiency

Kerbs Damaged sections of kerb obstruct stormwater runoff and cause ponding and road safety hazard.

Asphalt surface Oxidation and increased traffic loads create cracking, moisture penetration and subsequent pavement failure and safety risk.

Unsealed roads During wet season, large potholes appear and create risk and unscheduled maintenance.

Car parks Unsealed car parks deteriorate rapidly and require expensive treatment.

Foot bridges Timber deck bridges attract vandalism. Many get burnt and need to be replaced with concrete structures. Upgrade to meet the DDA requirements is necessary.

The above service deficiencies were identified from Customer Requests and regular safety and technical inspections undertaken by City of Playford employees.

5.1.3 Asset condition

The condition profile of Council’s assets is shown below.

Figure 3. Asset Condition Profile

Condition profiling of the transport network is still under development.

- 23 -


Condition is measured using a 1 to 5 rating system for these Plans,.5

Rating Description of Condition

1 Excellent condition: Only planned maintenance required. 2 Very good: Minor maintenance required plus planned

maintenance. 3 Good: Significant maintenance required. 4 Average: Significant renewal / upgrade required. 5 Poor: Unserviceable.

5.1.4 Asset valuations

The value of assets as at 2012/2013 covered by this is summarised below. Assets were last reindexed at 2012/2013. Assets are replacement rates.

Current Replacement Cost $142,755,000

Depreciable Amount $133,794,000

Depreciated Replacement Cost $83,408,000

Annual Depreciation Expense $6,570,000

Council’s sustainability reporting reports the rate of annual asset consumption and compares this to asset renewal and asset upgrade and expansion.

Various ratios of asset consumption and expenditure have been prepared to help guide and gauge asset management performance and trends over time.

Rate of Annual Asset Consumption 4.90% (Depreciation/Depreciable Amount)

Rate of Annual Asset Renewal 4.50% (Capital renewal exp/Depreciable amount)

Rate of Annual Asset Upgrade/New 0.0% (Capital upgrade exp/Depreciable amount)

Rate of Annual Asset Upgrade/New 4.10% (including contributed assets)

In 2013/2014 the organisation plans to renew assets at 92% of the rate they are being consumed and will be increasing its asset stock by 4.10% in the year.

5.2 Risk Management Plan

An assessment of risks6 associated with service delivery from Transport assets has identified critical risks to Council. The risk assessment process identifies credible risks, the likelihood of the risk event occurring, the consequences should the event occur, develops a risk rating, evaluates the risk and develops a risk treatment plan for non-acceptable risks.

Critical risks, being those assessed as ‘Very High’ - requiring immediate corrective action and ‘High’ – requiring prioritised corrective action identified in the Risk Management Plan are summarised in Table 5.2.

5 IIMM 2006, Appendix B, p B:1-3 (‘cyclic’ modified to ‘planned’)

6 Reference to Councils’ Risk Management strategies and controls

- 24 -


Table 5.2. Critical Risks and Treatment Plans

Asset at Risk What can Happen Risk Rating (VH, H)

Risk Treatment Plan

Unsealed roads Rough surfaces causing traffic hazard / accidents and excessive dust

Medium Continue current practices with CRS, Maintenance grading and sealing programs as per AMPs

Sealed Roads Potholes and Pavement failure causing risk of traffic accidents and vehicle damage

High Investigate the need for additional pothole patching crew and proactive repair procedure for defects identified via condition inspections

Kerbing Damage to vehicles and local ponding

High Continue current practices with CRS, Maintenance and sealing programs and Tree maintenance and proactive repair procedure for defects identified via condition inspections

Footbridges Bridge collapse High Replace Timber bridges with Metal and Concrete structure when due to be replaced

5.3 Routine Operations and Maintenance Plan

Routine maintenance is the regular ongoing work that is necessary to keep assets operating, including instances where portions of the asset fail and need immediate repair to make the asset operational again.

5.3.1 Operations and Maintenance plan

Operations activities affect service levels including quality and function through street sweeping and grass mowing frequency, intensity and spacing of street lights and cleaning frequency and opening hours of building and other facilities.

Maintenance includes all actions necessary for retaining an asset as near as practicable to an appropriate service condition including regular ongoing day-to-day work necessary to keep assets operating, eg road patching but excluding rehabilitation or renewal. Maintenance may be classifies into reactive, planned and specific maintenance work activities.

Reactive maintenance is unplanned repair work carried out in response to service requests and management/supervisory directions.

Planned maintenance is repair work that is identified and managed through a maintenance management system (MMS). MMS activities include inspection, assessing the condition against failure/breakdown experience, prioritising, scheduling, actioning the work and reporting what was done to develop a maintenance history and improve maintenance and service delivery performance.

Specific maintenance is replacement of higher value components/sub-components of assets that is undertaken on a regular cycle including repainting, replacing air conditioning units, etc. This work falls below the capital/maintenance threshold but may require a specific budget allocation.

Actual past maintenance expenditure is shown in Table 5.3.1.

- 25 -


Table 5.3.1. Maintenance Expenditure Trends

Year Maintenance Expenditure

Reactive Planned/Specific

2009/2010 $1,092,000 $1,973,000

2010/2011 $838,000 $756,000

2012/2013 $889,000 $803,000

Planned maintenance work is 47% of total maintenance expenditure.

Maintenance expenditure levels are considered to be adequate to meet projected service levels, which may be less than or equal to current service levels. Where maintenance expenditure levels are such that will result in a lesser level of service, the service consequences and service risks have been identified and service consequences highlighted in this AM Plan and service risks considered in the Risk Management Plan.

Assessment and prioritisation of reactive maintenance is undertaken by Council staff using experience and judgement.

5.3.2 Operations and Maintenance Strategies

The organisation will operate and maintain assets to provide the defined level of service to approved budgets in the most cost-efficient manner. The operation and maintenance activities include:

Scheduling operations activities to deliver the defined level of service in the most efficient manner,

Undertaking maintenance activities through a planned maintenance system to reduce maintenance costs and improve maintenance outcomes. Undertake cost-benefit analysis to determine the most cost-effective split between planned and unplanned maintenance activities (50 – 70% planned as measured by cost),

Maintain a current asset risk register for assets and present service risks associated with providing services from assets and reporting Very High and High risks and residual risks after treatment to management and Council/Board,

Review current and required skills base and implement workforce training and development to meet required operations and maintenance needs,

Review asset utilisation to identify underutilised assets and appropriate remedies, and over utilised assets and customer demand management options,

Maintain a current hierarchy of critical assets and required operations and maintenance activities,

Develop and regularly review appropriate emergency response capability,

Review management of operations and maintenance activities to ensure Council is obtaining best value for resources used.

Asset hierarchy

An asset hierarchy provides a framework for structuring data in an information system to assist in collection of data, reporting information and making decisions. The hierarchy includes the asset class and component used for asset planning and financial reporting and service level hierarchy used for service planning and delivery.

The organisation’s service hierarchy is shown is Table 5.3.2.

Table 5.3.2: Asset Service Hierarchy

Service Hierarchy Service Level Objective

To be reviewed in future plans

- 26 -


Critical Assets

Critical assets are those assets which have a high consequence of failure but not necessarily a high likelihood of failure. By identifying critical assets and critical failure modes, organisations can target and refines investigative activities, maintenance plans and capital expenditure plans at the appropriate time.

Operations and maintenances activities may be targeted to mitigate critical assets failure and maintain service levels. These activities may include increased inspection frequency, higher maintenance intervention levels, etc. Critical assets failure modes and required operations and maintenance activities are detailed in Table 5.3.2.1.

Table 5.3.2.1: Critical Assets and Service Level Objectives

Critical Assets Critical Failure Mode Operations & Maintenance Activities

To be reviewed in future plans

Standards and specifications

Maintenance work is carried out in accordance with the following Standards and Specifications.

AS1160-1990 Bituminous emulsions for construction and maintenance of pavements

AS2436-1981 Guide to noise control on construction maintenance and demolition sites

AS4283-1995 Cold mixed asphalt for maintenance patching

AS4919-2003 General Conditions of contract for the provision of asset maintenance and services

AS51.1-2004 Bridge design-scope and general principles

AS2008-1997 Residual Bitumen for pavements

AS3727-1993 Guide to residential pavements

5.3.3 Summary of future operations and maintenance expenditures

Future operations and maintenance expenditure is forecast to trend in line with the value of the asset stock as shown in Figure 4. Note that all costs are shown in current 2012/2013 dollar values.

- 27 -


Figure 4. Projected Operations and Maintenance Expenditure

- 28 -


Deferred maintenance, ie works that are identified for maintenance and unable to be funded are to be included in the risk assessment process in the transport Risk Management Plan.

Maintenance is funded from Council’s operating budget and grants where available. This is further discussed in Section 6.2.

- 29 -


5.4 Renewal / Replacement Plan

Renewal expenditure is major work which does not increase the asset’s design capacity but restores, rehabilitates, replaces or renews an existing asset to its original service potential. Work over and above restoring an asset to original service potential is upgrade / expansion or new works expenditure.

5.4.1 Renewal plan

Assets requiring renewal are identified from estimates of remaining life obtained from the asset register through the ‘Renewal Model’. Candidate proposals are inspected to verify

accuracy of remaining life estimate and to develop a preliminary renewal estimate.

Assets requiring renewal/replacement are identified from one of three methods provided in the ‘Expenditure Template’.

Method 1 uses Asset Register data to project the renewal costs using acquisition year and useful life to determine the renewal year, or

Method 2 uses capital renewal expenditure projections from external condition modelling systems (such as Pavement Management Systems), or

Method 3 uses a combination of average network renewals plus defect repairs in the Renewal Plan and Defect Repair Plan worksheets on the ‘Expenditure template’.

Method 1 was used for this asset management plan.

The useful lives of assets used to develop projected asset renewal expenditures are shown in Table 5.4.1. Asset useful lives were last reviewed on 2012/2013.7

Table 5.4.1: Useful Lives of Assets

Sub Category Useful Life Comments

Car parks 20-50

Kerbs 80

Transport Structures 5-80

Sealed Road 15-40

Unsealed Road 50-80

5.4.2 Renewal and Replacement Strategies

The organisation will plan capital renewal and replacement projects to meet level of service objectives and minimise infrastructure service risks by:

Planning and scheduling renewal projects to deliver the defined level of service in the most efficient manner,

Undertaking project scoping for all capital renewal and replacement projects to identify:

o The service delivery ‘deficiency’, present risk and optimum time for renewal/replacement,

o The project objectives to rectify the deficiency, o The range of options, estimated capital and life cycle costs for each options

that could address the service deficiency, o and evaluate the options against evaluation criteria adopted by Council, and o select the best option to be included in capital renewal programs,

7 Standard annual review

- 30 -


Using ‘low cost’ renewal methods (cost of renewal is less than replacement) wherever possible.

Maintain a current infrastructure risk register for assets and service risks associated with providing services from infrastructure assets and reporting Very High and High risks and residual risks after treatment to management and Council.

Review current and required skills base and implement workforce training and development to meet required construction and renewal needs.

Maintain a current hierarchy of critical assets and capital renewal treatments and timings required.

Review management of capital renewal and replacement activities to ensure Council is obtaining best value for resources used.

Renewal ranking criteria

Asset renewal and replacement is typically undertaken to either:

Ensure the reliability of the existing infrastructure to deliver the service it was constructed to facilitate (eg replacing a bridge that has a 5 t load limit), or

To ensure the infrastructure is of sufficient quality to meet the service requirements (eg roughness of a road).8

It is possible to get some indication of capital renewal and replacement priorities by identifying assets or asset groups that:

Have a high consequence of failure,

Have a high utilisation and subsequent impact on users would be greatest,

The total value represents the greatest net value to the organisation,

Have the highest average age relative to their expected lives,

Are identified in the AM Plan as key cost factors,

Have high operational or maintenance costs, and

Where replacement with modern equivalent assets would yield material savings.9 The ranking criteria used to determine priority of identified renewal and replacement proposals is detailed in Table 5.4.2.

Table 5.4.2. Renewal Priority Ranking Criteria

Criteria Weighting

Road section containing pavement deformations is prioritised for reconstruction

No Weighting

Road section containing cracks, surface texture deficiencies or edge defects is prioritised for reseal / rehabilitation program

No Weighting

Road segment containing kerb defects is considered for treatment before resurfacing take place

No Weighting

Footbridges subject to vandalism are considered for replacement with concrete decking

No Weighting

8 IPWEA, 2011, IIMM, Sec 3.4.4, p 3|60. 9 Based on IPWEA, 2011, IIMM, Sec 3.4.5, p 3|66.

- 31 -


Renewal and replacement standards

Renewal work is carried out in accordance with the following Standards and Specifications.

AS1160-1990 Bituminous emulsions for construction and maintenance of pavements.

AS2436-1981 Guide to noise control on construction maintenance and demolition sites.

AS4283-1995 Cold mixed asphalt for maintenance patching.

AS4919-2003 General Conditions of contract for the provision of asset maintenance and services.

AS51.1-2004 Bridge design-scope and general principles.

AS2008-1997 Residual Bitumen for pavements.

AS3727-1993 Guide to residential pavements. Renewal work is carried out in carried out in accordance with consideration of industry current best practice and user or system requirements.

5.4.3 Summary of future renewal expenditure

Projected future renewal expenditures are forecast to increase over time as the asset stock ages. The costs are summarised in Figure 5. Note that all costs are shown in current 2012/2013 dollar values.

The projected capital renewal program is shown in Appendix B.

Figure 5. Projected Capital Renewal and Replacement Expenditure

Deferred renewal, ie those assets identified for renewal and not scheduled for renewal in capital works programs are to be included in the risk assessment process in the Risk Management Plan.

- 32 -


Renewals are to be funded from Council’s Capital Works Program and grants where available. This is further discussed in Section 6.2.

5.5 Creation/ Acquisition / Upgrade Plan

New works are those works that create a new asset that did not previously exist, or works which upgrade or improve an existing asset beyond its existing capacity. They may result from growth, social or environmental needs.

5.5.1 Selection criteria

New assets and upgrade / expansion of existing assets are identified from various sources such as councillor or service requests, proposals identified by strategic plans or partnerships with other organisations. Candidate proposals are inspected to verify need and to develop a preliminary renewal estimate. Verified proposals are ranked by priority and available funds and scheduled in future works programmes. The priority ranking criteria is detailed below.

Table 5.5.1. New Assets Priority Ranking Criteria

Criteria Weighting

Alignment with Council Plan and Goal Committee Priorities 30%

Funding within 10 Year Financial Plan 20%

Current Service Level 30%

Legislative OHS&W 20%

5.5.2 Capital Investment Strategies

The organisation will plan capital upgrade and new projects to meet level of service objectives by:

Planning and scheduling capital upgrade and new projects to deliver the defined level of service in the most efficient manner,

Undertake project scoping for all capital upgrade/new projects to identify: o the service delivery ‘deficiency’, present risk and required timeline for delivery

of the upgrade/new asset, o the project objectives to rectify the deficiency including value management for

major projects, o the range of options, estimated capital and life cycle costs for each options

that could address the service deficiency, o management of risks associated with alternative options, o and evaluate the options against evaluation criteria adopted by

Council/Board, and o select the best option to be included in capital upgrade/new programs,

Review current and required skills base and implement training and development to meet required construction and project management needs,

Review management of capital project management activities to ensure Council is obtaining best value for resources used.

Standards and specifications for new assets and for upgrade/expansion of existing assets are the same as those for renewal shown in Section 5.4.2.

5.5.3 Summary of future upgrade / new assets expenditure

Planned upgrade / new asset expenditures are summarised in figure 6. The planned upgrade/new capital works program is shown in Appendix C. All costs are shown in current 2012/2013 dollar values.

- 33 -


Figure 6. Planned Capital Upgrade / New Asset Expenditure

New assets and services are to be funded from Council’s capital works program and grants where available. This is further discussed in Section 6.2. 5.6 Disposal Plan Disposal includes any activity associated with disposal of a decommissioned asset including sale, demolition or relocation. Assets identified for possible decommissioning and disposal are shown in Table 5.6, together with estimated annual savings from not having to fund operations and maintenance of the assets. These assets will be further reinvestigated to determine the required levels of service and see what options are available for alternate service delivery, if any. Any revenue gained from asset disposals is accommodated in the organisation’s long term financial plan.

Where cashflow projections from asset disposals are not available, these will be developed in future revisions of this asset management plan.

Table 5.6. Assets identified for Disposal

Asset Reason for Disposal Timing Cashflow from disposal

No Assets Identified in this Version of the Plan

- 34 -


6. FINANCIAL SUMMARY

This section contains the financial requirements resulting from all the information presented in the previous sections of this plan. The financial projections will be improved as further information becomes available on desired levels of service and current and projected future asset performance.

6.1 Financial Statements and Projections

The financial projections are shown in figure 7 for planned operating (operations and maintenance) and capital expenditure (renewal and upgrade/expansion/new assets).

Figure 7. Planned Operating and Capital Expenditure

- 35 -


- 36 -


Note that all costs are shown in current 2012/2013 dollar values.

6.1.1 Sustainability of service delivery

There are four key indicators for service delivery sustainability that have been considered in the analysis of the services provided by this asset category, these being the asset renewal funding ratio, long term life cycle costs/expenditures and medium term projected/budgeted expenditures over 5 and 10 years of the planning period.

Asset Renewal Funding Ratio

The Asset Renewal Funding Ratio10is the most important indicator and reveals that over the next 10 years, the organisation is forecasting that it will have 100% of the funds required for the optimal renewal and replacement of its assets.

Long term - Life Cycle Cost

Life cycle costs (or whole of life costs) are the average costs that are required to sustain the service levels over the asset life cycle. Life cycle costs include operations and maintenance expenditure and asset consumption (depreciation expense). The life cycle cost for the services covered in this asset management plan is $12.11m per year (average operations and maintenance expenditure plus depreciation expense projected over 10 years).

Life cycle costs can be compared to life cycle expenditure to give an initial indicator of affordability of projected service levels when considered with age profiles. Life cycle expenditure includes operations, maintenance and capital renewal expenditure. Life cycle expenditure will vary depending on the timing of asset renewals. The life cycle expenditure over the 10 year planning period is $12.88m per year (average operations and maintenance plus capital renewal budgeted expenditure in LTFP over 10 years).

A shortfall between life cycle cost and life cycle expenditure is the life cycle gap. The life cycle gap for services covered by this asset management plan is $0.78m per year (-ve = gap, +ve = surplus).

10 AIFMG, 2009, Financial Sustainability Indicator 8, Sec 2.6, p 2.18

- 37 -


Life cycle expenditure is 106% of life cycle costs.

The life cycle costs and life cycle expenditure comparison highlights any difference between present outlays and the average cost of providing the service over the long term. If the life cycle expenditure is less than that life cycle cost, it is most likely that outlays will need to be increased or cuts in services made in the future.

Knowing the extent and timing of any required increase in outlays and the service consequences if funding is not available will assist organisations in providing services to their communities in a financially sustainable manner. This is the purpose of the asset management plans and long term financial plan.

Medium term – 10 year financial planning period

This asset management plan identifies the projected operations, maintenance and capital renewal expenditures required to provide an agreed level of service to the community over a 10 year period. This provides input into 10 year financial and funding plans aimed at providing the required services in a sustainable manner.

These projected expenditures may be compared to budgeted expenditures in the 10 year period to identify any funding shortfall. In a core asset management plan, a gap is generally due to increasing asset renewals for ageing assets.

The projected operations, maintenance and capital renewal expenditure required over the 10 year planning period is $13.84m on average per year.

Estimated (budget) operations, maintenance and capital renewal funding is $13.88m on average per year giving a 10 year funding shortfall of $-0.96m per year. This indicates that Council expects to have 93% of the projected expenditures needed to provide the services documented in the asset management plan.

Medium Term – 5 year financial planning period

The projected operations, maintenance and capital renewal expenditure required over the first 5 years of the planning period is $12.67m on average per year.

Estimated (budget) operations, maintenance and capital renewal funding is $12.39m on average per year giving a 5 year funding shortfall of $-0.28m. This indicates that Council expects to have 98% of projected expenditures required to provide the services shown in this asset management plan. Asset management financial indicators

Figure 7b shows the asset management financial indicators over the 10 year planning period and for the long term life cycle.

- 38 -


Figure 7b: Asset Management Financial Indicators

The above graph reflects that Council is in a strong sustainable position as the results are close to the 100% target for these measures. Providing services from assets in a sustainable manner requires the matching and managing of service levels, risks, projected expenditures and financing to achieve a financial indicator of approximately 1.0 for the first years of the asset management plan and ideally over the 10 year life of the Long Term Financial Plan.

Figure 8 shows the projected asset renewals in the 20 year planning period from the asset register. The projected asset renewals are compared to planned renewal expenditure in the capital works program and capital renewal expenditure in year 1 of the planning period as shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8. Projected and Planned Renewals and Current Renewal Expenditure

Report 4, Table 6.1.1 shows the shortfall between projected renewal and replacement expenditures and expenditure accommodated in long term financial plan

- 39 -


Table 6.1.1: Projected and LTFP Budgeted Renewals and Financing Shortfall

Playford CC - Report 4 - Table 6.1.1 Renewals Financing (TRRD All 2013_S1_V1)

Year End

Projected LTFP Renewal Financing Cumulative Shortfall($'000)

Jun-30

Renewals Renewal Budget

Shortfall ($'000) (- gap, + surplus)

($'000) ($'000) (- gap, + surplus)

2014 $5,948 $6,047 $99 $99

2015 $7,285 $7,283 -$2 $97

2016 $8,079 $8,127 $48 $144

2017 $8,836 $9,358 $522 $667

2018 $8,551 $8,707 $156 $823

2019 $9,104 $9,182 $78 $901

2020 $7,053 $7,047 -$6 $895

2021 $8,437 $8,439 $2 $898

2022 $10,025 $10,025 $0 $897

2023 $9,763 $9,793 $30 $927

Providing services in a sustainable manner will require matching of projected asset renewal and replacement expenditure to meet agreed service levels with the corresponding capital works program accommodated in the long term financial plan.

A gap between projected asset renewal/replacement expenditure and amounts accommodated in the LTFP indicates that further work is required on reviewing service levels in the AM Plan (including possibly revising the LTFP) before finalising the asset management plan to manage required service levels and funding to eliminate funding gaps.

We will manage the ‘gap’ by developing this asset management plan to provide guidance on future service levels and resources required to provide these services, and review future services, service levels and costs with the community.

Table 6.1.2 shows the projected expenditures for the 10 year long term financial plan.

Table 6.1.2: Projected Expenditures for Long Term Financial Plan ($000)

Playford CC - Report 5 - Table 6.1.2 Long Term Financial Plan (TRRD All 2013_S1_V1)

Year Operations Maintenance Projected Capital

Disposals Capital Renewal Upgrade/New

2014 $2,791.97 $1,692.03 $5,947.64 $0.00 $0.00

2015 $2,899.65 $1,761.66 $7,285.47 $1,200.00 $0.00

2016 $3,054.27 $1,861.64 $8,079.43 $1,200.00 $0.00

2017 $3,208.89 $1,961.62 $8,835.82 $1,200.00 $0.00

2018 $3,363.51 $2,061.60 $8,550.88 $1,200.00 $0.00

2019 $3,518.13 $2,161.59 $9,103.69 $1,200.00 $0.00

2020 $3,672.75 $2,261.57 $7,052.59 $0.00 $0.00

2021 $3,780.44 $2,331.20 $8,436.61 $1,200.00 $0.00

2022 $3,935.06 $2,431.18 $10,025.40 $1,200.00 $0.00

2023 $4,089.68 $2,531.16 $9,763.01 $1,200.00 $0.00

2024 $4,244.30 $2,631.14 $7,857.46 $960.00 $0.00

2025 $4,389.53 $2,725.05 $9,063.94 $960.00 $0.00

2026 $4,534.76 $2,818.96 $8,015.01 $960.00 $0.00

2027 $4,680.00 $2,912.87 $7,828.96 $960.00 $0.00

2028 $4,825.23 $3,006.78 $8,869.07 $960.00 $0.00

2029 $4,970.46 $3,100.70 $8,097.32 $960.00 $0.00

2030 $5,115.69 $3,194.61 $8,737.37 $960.00 $0.00

2031 $5,260.93 $3,288.52 $10,374.58 $960.00 $0.00

2032 $5,406.16 $3,382.43 $9,755.38 $960.00 $0.00

2033 $5,551.39 $3,476.34 $7,845.66 $960.00 $0.00

- 40 -


6.2 Funding Strategy

Projected expenditure identified in Section 6.1 is to be funded from Council’s operating and capital budgets. The funding strategy is detailed in the Council’s 10 Year Long Term Financial Plan.

Achieving the financial strategy will require informing the Long Term Plan, and link our Asset Provision to the Service Delivery and developing Growth and future demand Modelling.

6.3 Valuation Forecasts

Asset values are forecast to increase as additional assets are added to the asset stock from construction and acquisition by Council and from assets constructed by land developers and others and donated to Council. Figure 9 shows the projected replacement cost asset values over the planning period in current 2012/2013 dollar values.

Figure 9 shows the projected replacement cost asset values over the planning period.

Figure 9. Projected Asset Values

Depreciation expense values are forecast in line with asset values as shown in Figure 10. Figure 10. Projected Depreciation Expense

- 41 -


The depreciated replacement cost (current replacement cost less accumulated depreciation) will vary over the forecast period depending on the rates of addition of new assets, disposal of old assets and consumption and renewal of existing assets. Forecast of the assets’ depreciated replacement cost is shown in figure 11.

Figure 11. Projected Depreciated Replacement Cost

6.4 Key Assumptions made in Financial Forecasts This section details the key assumptions made in presenting the information contained in this Asset Management Plan and in preparing forecasts of required operating and capital expenditure and asset values, depreciation expense and carrying amount estimates. It is presented to enable readers to gain an understanding of the levels of confidence in the data behind the financial forecasts.

Key assumptions made in this Asset Management Plan and risks that may change are shown in Table 6.4:

Table 6.4: Key Assumptions made in AM Plan and Risks of Change

Key Assumptions Risks of Change to Assumptions

Reducing expenditure on unplanned transport maintenance and using these funds for planned reconstruction, rehabilitation, and reseal programs

Steady state condition of transport network as identified by condition surveys

Normal weather conditions

Expected and adopted asset useful life will be achieved

- 42 -


Accuracy of future financial forecasts may be improved in future revisions of this transport Asset Management Plan by the following actions:

Monitoring of the useful life of the existing pipe network via CCTV inspection.

Undertaking regular defect surveys on the transport assets.

Undertake analysis of the increase of defects with time, and build this into future revisions of this Asset Management Plan.

Improved tracking of operation / maintenance and rehabilitation costs.

Centralised asset management and data analysis.

Asset audit and improved data collection.

Ongoing review and identification of limitations and application of improved processes

Undertaking regular surveys on the road pavement, surface and kerb conditions.

Undertaking regular defect surveys on foot bridges.

Reducing expenditure on unplanned road maintenance and using these funds for planned reconstruction, rehabilitation and reseal programs.

- 43 -


7. PLAN IMPROVEMENT AND MONITORING

7.1 Status of Asset Management Practices

7.1.1 Accounting and financial systems

The City of Playford uses the Technology One, One Council, financial system. This system has an Asset Database module and a General Ledger module.

Accountabilities for financial systems

The finance module is the responsibility of the Finance function and asset module is the responsibility of the Asset Strategy function. There is joint responsibility for ensuring the integrity of the system and asset financial information overall.

Accounting standards and regulations

The City of Playford prepares general purpose financial reports in accordance with Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS) as they apply to not-for-profit entities, other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board, Urgent Issues Group Interpretations (UIGs) and relevant South Australian legislation.

Capital/maintenance threshold

Accounting for Property, Plant, Equipment and Infrastructure Policy, the objective of this policy is to provide guidance around identifying, classifying, valuing, recording and disposing of non-current physical assets. This will provide for greater understanding and accuracy of City of Playford’s capital requirements and depreciation expenses in the context of financial sustainability and intergenerational equity as well as ensuring that City of Playford is meeting its statutory reporting obligations.

Required changes to accounting financial systems arising from this AM Plan

Any changes to our current financial systems will be driven from the Service review and the asset strategy framework.

7.2.1 Asset management system

Asset registers

The City of Playford uses the Technology One, One Council, financial system. This system has an Asset Database module and a General Ledger module.

Linkage from asset management to financial system

The GL module references transactions from the Asset module through an asset number field. Transfer of financial information from the Asset to the GL module is automatic via system posting transactions.

Accountabilities for asset management system and data maintenance

The finance module is the responsibility of the Finance function and asset module is the responsibility of the Asset Strategy function. There is joint responsibility for ensuring the integrity of the system and asset financial information overall.

- 44 -


Required changes to asset management system arising from this AM Plan

Any changes to our current financial systems will be driven from the Service review and the asset strategy framework.

7.2 Improvement Program

The asset management improvement plan generated from this Plan is shown in Table 7.2.

Table 7.2. Improvement Plan

Task No

Task Responsibility Resources Required

Timeline

1. Develop service levels for all infrastructure categories.

Corporate No On going

2. Revalue Assets. Corporate No On going

3. Undertake yearly condition assessments of the roadwork network with view to 100% coverage every 4 years.

Corporate Yes On going

4. Develop priority ranking system for reseal/rehabilitation program.

Corporate Staff On going

5. Undertake a major review of this Asset Management plan on a 2 year cycle.

Corporate Staff Next review 2014

6. Section 5.4.1 – Renewal priority criteria. Civil Staff 2014/15

7. Develop distinction between maintenance and Capital works; consider in this assessment the distinction between maintenance and renewal works from a job responsibility consideration.

Civil Staff 2014/15

8. Develop a plan for proactive maintenance and renewal works, including recording all costs against each job.

Civil Staff 2013/14

9. Review of risk management plan detailed in Section 5.2.

Civil Staff On going

7.3 Monitoring and Review Procedures

This asset management plan will be reviewed during annual budget planning processes and amended to recognise any material changes in service levels and/or resources available to provide those services as a result of budget decisions.

The AM Plan will be updated annually to ensure it represents the current service level, asset values, projected operations, maintenance, capital renewal and replacement, capital upgrade/new and asset disposal expenditures and projected expenditure values incorporated into the Council’s long term financial plan.

The AM Plan has a life of 4 years (Council election cycle) and is due for complete revision and updating within 12 months of each Council election.

7.4 Performance Measures

The effectiveness of the asset management plan can be measured in the following ways:

The degree to which the required projected expenditures identified in this asset management plan are incorporated into the organisation’s long term financial plan.

The degree to which 1-5 year detailed works programs, budgets, business plans and organisational structures take into account the ‘global’ works program trends provided by the asset management plan.

The degree to which the existing and projected service levels and service consequences (what we cannot do), risks and residual risks are incorporated into the organisation’s Strategic Plan and associated plans.

The Asset Renewal Funding Ratio achieving the target of 1.0.

- 45 -


8. REFERENCES

IPWEA, 2006, ‘International Infrastructure Management Manual’, Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia, Sydney, www.ipwea.org.au/IIMM

IPWEA, 2008, ‘NAMS.PLUS Asset Management’, Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia, Sydney, www.ipwea.org.au/namsplus.

IPWEA, 2009, ‘Australian Infrastructure Financial Management Guidelines’, Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia, Sydney, www.ipwea.org.au/AIFMG.

IPWEA, 2011, ‘International Infrastructure Management Manual’, Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia, Sydney, www.ipwea.org.au/IIMM

Organisation, ‘Strategic Plan 20XX – 20XX’,

Organisation, ‘Annual Plan and Budget’.

http://www.ipwea.org.au/IIMM



http://www.ipwea.org.au/AIFMG

http://www.ipwea.org.au/IIMM

- 46 -


9. APPENDICES

Appendix A Maintenance Response Levels of Service

Appendix B Projected 10 year Capital Renewal and Replacement Works Program

Appendix C Projected 10 year Capital Upgrade/New Works Program

Appendix D Budgeted Expenditures Accommodated in LTFP

Appendix E Abbreviations

Appendix F Glossary

- 47 -


E ABBREVIATIONS

AAAC Average annual asset consumption

ARI Average recurrence interval

BOD Biochemical (biological) oxygen demand

CRC Current replacement cost

CWMS Community wastewater management systems

DA Depreciable amount

DoH Department of Health

EF Earthworks/formation

AMP Asset Management Plan

RMP Risk Management Plan

MMS Maintenance management system

PCI Pavement condition index

RV Residual value

SS Suspended solids

vph Vehicles per hour

- 48 -


F GLOSSARY

Annual service cost (ASC) An estimate of the cost that would be tendered, per annum, if tenders were called for the supply of a service to a performance specification for a fixed term. The Annual Service Cost includes operating, maintenance, depreciation, finance / opportunity and disposal costs, less revenue.

Asset class Grouping of assets of a similar nature and use in an entity's operations (AASB 166.37).

Asset condition assessment The process of continuous or periodic inspection, assessment, measurement and interpretation of the resultant data to indicate the condition of a specific asset so as to determine the need for some preventative or remedial action.

Asset management The combination of management, financial, economic, engineering and other practices applied to physical assets with the objective of providing the required level of service in the most cost effective manner.

Assets Future economic benefits controlled by the entity as a result of past transactions or other past events (AAS27.12).

Property, plant and equipment including infrastructure and other assets (such as furniture and fittings) with benefits expected to last more than 12 months.

Average annual asset consumption (AAAC)* The amount of a local government’s asset base consumed during a year. This may be calculated by dividing the Depreciable Amount (DA) by the Useful Life and totalled for each and every asset OR by dividing the Fair Value (Depreciated Replacement Cost) by the Remaining Life and totalled for each and every asset in an asset category or class.

Brownfield asset values** Asset (re)valuation values based on the cost to replace the asset including demolition and restoration costs.

Capital expansion expenditure Expenditure that extends an existing asset, at the same standard as is currently enjoyed by residents, to a new group of users. It is discretional expenditure, which increases future operating, and maintenance costs, because it increases Council’s asset base, but may be associated with additional revenue from the new user group, eg extending a drainage or road network, the

provision of an oval or park in a new suburb for new residents.

Capital expenditure Relatively large (material) expenditure, which has benefits, expected to last for more than 12 months. Capital expenditure includes renewal, expansion and upgrade. Where capital projects involve a combination of renewal, expansion and / or upgrade expenditures, the total project cost needs to be allocated accordingly.

Capital funding Funding to pay for capital expenditure.

Capital grants Monies received generally tied to the specific projects for which they are granted, which are often upgrade and / or expansion or new investment proposals.

Capital investment expenditure See capital expenditure definition.

Capital new expenditure Expenditure which creates a new asset providing a new service to the community that did not exist beforehand. As it increases service potential it may impact revenue and will increase future operating and maintenance expenditure.

Capital renewal expenditure Expenditure on an existing asset, which returns the service potential or the life of the asset up to that which it had originally. It is periodically required expenditure, relatively large (material) in value compared with the value of the components or sub-components of the asset being renewed. As it reinstates existing service potential, it has no impact on revenue, but may reduce future operating and maintenance expenditure if completed at the optimum time, eg resurfacing or resheeting a material part of a road network, replacing a material section of a drainage network with pipes of the same capacity, resurfacing an oval. Where capital projects involve a combination of renewal, expansion and / or upgrade expenditures, the total project cost needs to be allocated accordingly.

Capital upgrade expenditure Expenditure, which enhances an existing asset to provide a higher level of service or expenditure that will increase the life of the asset beyond that which it had originally. Upgrade expenditure is discretional and often does not result in additional revenue unless direct user charges apply. It will increase operating and maintenance expenditure in the future because of the increase in the Council’s asset base, eg widening the sealed area of an existing road, replacing drainage pipes with pipes of a greater capacity, enlarging a grandstand at a sporting facility. Where capital projects involve a combination of renewal, expansion and / or upgrade

- 49 -


expenditures, the total project cost needs to be allocated accordingly.

Carrying amount The amount at which an asset is recognised after deducting any accumulated depreciation / amortisation and accumulated impairment losses thereon.

Class of assets See asset class definition.

Component An individual part of an asset which contributes to the composition of the whole and can be separated from or attached to an asset or a system.

Cost of an asset The amount of cash or cash equivalents paid or the fair value of the consideration given to acquire an asset at the time of its acquisition or construction, plus any costs necessary to place the asset into service. This includes one-off design and project management costs.

Current replacement cost (CRC) The cost the entity would incur to acquire the asset on the reporting date. The cost is measured by reference to the lowest cost at which the gross future economic benefits could be obtained in the normal course of business or the minimum it would cost, to replace the existing asset with a technologically modern equivalent new asset (not a second hand one) with the same economic benefits (gross service potential) allowing for any differences in the quantity and quality of output and in operating costs.

Current replacement cost “As New” (CRC) The current cost of replacing the original service potential of an existing asset, with a similar modern equivalent asset, ie the total cost of replacing an existing asset with an as NEW or similar asset expressed in current dollar values.

Cyclic maintenance** Replacement of higher value components / sub-components of assets that is undertaken on a regular cycle including repainting, building roof replacement, cycle, replacement of air conditioning equipment, etc. This work generally falls below the capital / maintenance threshold and needs to be identified in a specific maintenance budget allocation.

Depreciable amount The cost of an asset, or other amount substituted for its cost, less its residual value (AASB 116.6).

Depreciated replacement cost (DRC) The current replacement cost (CRC) of an asset less, where applicable, accumulated depreciation calculated on the basis of such cost to reflect the already consumed or expired future economic benefits of the asset.

Depreciation / amortisation The systematic allocation of the depreciable amount (service potential) of an asset over its useful life.

Economic life See useful life definition.

Expenditure The spending of money on goods and services. Expenditure includes recurrent and capital.

Fair value The amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties, in an arms length transaction.

Greenfield asset values ** Asset (re)valuation values based on the cost to initially acquire the asset.

Heritage asset An asset with historic, artistic, scientific, technological, geographical or environmental qualities that is held and maintained principally for its contribution to knowledge and culture and this purpose is central to the objectives of the entity holding it.

Impairment loss The amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount.

Infrastructure assets Physical assets of the entity or of another entity that contribute to meeting the public's need for access to major economic and social facilities and services, eg roads, drainage, stormwaters and cycleways. These are typically large, interconnected networks or portfolios of composite assets. The components of these assets may be separately maintained, renewed or replaced individually so that the required level and standard of service from the network of assets is continuously sustained. Generally the components and hence the assets have long lives. They are fixed in place and often have no market value.

Investment property Property held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both, rather than for: (a) use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes; or (b) sale in the ordinary course of business (AASB 140.5)

Level of service The defined service quality for a particular service against which service performance may be measured. Service levels usually relate to quality, quantity, reliability, responsiveness, environmental, acceptability and cost).

- 50 -


Life cycle cost ** The life cycle cost (LCC) is average cost to provide the service over the longest asset life cycle. It comprises annual maintenance and asset consumption expense, represented by depreciation expense. The life cycle cost does not indicate the funds required to provide the service in a particular year.

Life Cycle Expenditure ** The life cycle expenditure (LCE) is the actual or planned annual maintenance and capital renewal expenditure incurred in providing the service in a particular year. Life cycle expenditure may be compared to life cycle expenditure to give an initial indicator of life cycle sustainability.

Loans / borrowings Loans result in funds being received which are then repaid over a period of time with interest (an additional cost). Their primary benefit is in ‘spreading the burden’ of capital expenditure over time. Although loans enable works to be completed sooner, they are only ultimately cost effective where the capital works funded (generally renewals) result in operating and maintenance cost savings, which are greater than the cost of the loan (interest and charges).

Maintenance and renewal gap Difference between estimated budgets and projected expenditures for maintenance and renewal of assets, totalled over a defined time (eg 5, 10 and 15 years).

Maintenance and renewal sustainability index Ratio of estimated budget to projected expenditure for maintenance and renewal of assets over a defined time (eg 5, 10 and 15 years).

Maintenance expenditure Recurrent expenditure, which is periodically or regularly required as part of the anticipated schedule of works required to ensure that the asset achieves its useful life and provides the required level of service. It is expenditure, which was anticipated in determining the asset’s useful life.

Materiality An item is material if its omission or misstatement could influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial report. Materiality depends on the size and nature of the omission or misstatement judged in the surrounding circumstances.

Modern equivalent asset A structure similar to an existing structure and having the equivalent productive capacity, which could be built using modern materials, techniques and design. Replacement cost is the basis used to estimate the cost of constructing a modern equivalent asset.

Non-revenue generating investments Investments for the provision of goods and services to sustain or improve services to the community that are not expected to generate any savings or revenue to the Council, eg parks and playgrounds, stormwaters, roads and bridges, libraries, etc.

Operating expenditure Recurrent expenditure, which is continuously required excluding maintenance and depreciation, eg power, fuel, staff, plant equipment, on-costs and overheads.

Pavement management system A systematic process for measuring and predicting the condition of road pavements and wearing surfaces over time and recommending corrective actions.

Planned maintenance** Repair work that is identified and managed through a maintenance management system (MMS). MMS activities include inspection, assessing the condition against failure / breakdown criteria / experience, prioritising scheduling, actioning the work and reporting what was done to develop a maintenance history and improve maintenance and service delivery performance.

PMS score A measure of condition of a road segment determined from a Pavement Management System.

Rate of annual asset consumption* A measure of average annual consumption of assets (AAAC) expressed as a percentage of the depreciable amount (AAAC/DA). Depreciation may be used for AAAC.

Rate of annual asset renewal* A measure of the rate at which assets are being renewed per annum expressed as a percentage of depreciable amount (capital renewal expenditure/DA).

Rate of annual asset upgrade* A measure of the rate at which assets are being upgraded and expanded per annum expressed as a

percentage of depreciable amount (capital upgrade / expansion expenditure / DA).

Reactive maintenance Unplanned repair work carried out in response to service requests and management / supervisory directions.

Recoverable amount The higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell and its value in use.

- 51 -


Recurrent expenditure Relatively small (immaterial) expenditure or that which has benefits expected to last less than 12 months. Recurrent expenditure includes operating and maintenance expenditure.

Recurrent funding Funding to pay for recurrent expenditure.

Rehabilitation See capital renewal expenditure definition above.

Remaining life The time remaining until an asset ceases to provide the required service level or economic usefulness. Age plus remaining life is economic life.

Renewal See capital renewal expenditure definition above.

Residual value The net amount which an entity expects to obtain for an asset at the end of its useful life after deducting the expected costs of disposal.

Revenue generating investments Investments for the provision of goods and services to sustain or improve services to the community that are expected to generate some savings or revenue to offset operating costs, eg public halls and theatres, childcare centres, sporting and recreation facilities, tourist information centres, etc.

Risk management The application of a formal process to the range of possible values relating to key factors associated with a risk in order to determine the resultant ranges of outcomes and their probability of occurrence.

Section or segment A self-contained part or piece of an infrastructure asset.

Service potential The capacity to provide goods and services in accordance with the entity's objectives, whether those objectives are the generation of net cash inflows or the provision of goods and services of a particular volume and quantity to the beneficiaries thereof.

Service potential remaining* A measure of the remaining life of assets expressed as a percentage of economic life. It is also a measure of the percentage of the asset’s potential to provide services that are still available for use in providing services (DRC/DA).

Strategic Management Plan (SA)** Documents Council objectives for a specified period (3-5 years), the principle activities to achieve the objectives, the means by which that will be carried out, estimated income and expenditure, measures to assess performance and how rating policy relates to the Council’s objectives and activities.

Sub-component Smaller individual parts that make up a component part.

Useful life Either: (a) the period over which an asset is expected to be

available for use by an entity, or (b) the number of production or similar units expected to

be obtained from the asset by the entity. It is estimated or expected time between placing the asset into service and removing it from service, or the estimated period of time over which the future economic benefits embodied in a depreciable asset, are expected to be consumed by the council. It is the same as the economic life.

Value in use The present value of estimated future cash flows expected to arise from the continuing use of an asset and from its disposal at the end of its useful life. It is deemed to be depreciated replacement cost (DRC) for those assets whose future economic benefits are not primarily dependent on the asset's ability to generate new cash flows, where if deprived of the asset its future economic benefits would be replaced.

Source: DVC 2006, Glossary Note: Items shown * modified to use DA instead of CRC Additional glossary items shown **