2013 spring forum on retention addressing shifting demographics : fostering student success
DESCRIPTION
2013 Spring Forum on Retention Addressing Shifting Demographics : Fostering Student Success. Karla Sanders & Kimberlie Moock Co-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts (CORE). Agenda. Eastern’s Retention and Graduation Rates CORE Initiatives Breakout Discussions - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Karla Sanders & Kimberlie MoockCo-chairs, Committee on Retention Efforts
(CORE)
Eastern’s Retention and Graduation Rates CORE Initiatives Breakout Discussions
◦ Faculty Sharing: Practices for Student Achievement & Development
◦ Strengthening the Advisee/Mentee Connection◦ Making Individual Connections: Strategies for
Support Staff
Committee on Retention Efforts◦ Joint committee of academic and student affairs◦ Chaired by Karla Sanders, Center for Academic
Support & Assessment, & Kimberlie Moock, New Student Programs
◦ Charged by V.P. Lord & V.P. Nadler in Spring 2006
Selectivity Type First to Second Year Retention
6-Year Graduation Rates
Highly Selective (Top 10%; ACT 25-30)
95% 86%
Selective (Top 25%; ACT 21-26)
81.6% 60.5%
Traditional Selective (Top 50%; ACT 18-24)
69.3% 43.9%
Liberal Selective (Bottom 50%; ACT 17-22)
62.4% 38.5%
Open (No %; ACT 16-21 67.3% 36.8%
ALL Master’s Granting Public
71.1% 44.4%
Institutional Characteristics
6 Year Grad
EIU
6 Year Grad
Nat’l*
(+/-) Fresh to Soph
Retention EIU
Fre to Soph
Retention National*
(+/-)
All Public Master’s Granting
59%+ 43.9% +15.1% 79% 71.1% +9.3%
Traditional Selectivity Public **
59% 44.4% +14.7% 79% 69.3% +9.7%
*Source: ACT Institutional Data File, 2012** Defined as mean entering cohort ACT of 18-24+For Fall 2005 entering class
National Retention
RateIL Public
Retention Difference
National Graduation
RateIL Public
Graduation Difference
Highly Selective (Top 10%; ACT 25-30) 95% UI-UC 93% -2% 86%
UI-UC 82% -4%
Selective (Top 25%; ACT 21-26) 81.60% ISU 85% 3.60% 60.50% ISU 71% 10.50%
Selective (Top 25%; ACT 21-26) 81.60% UI-Ch 79% -2.60% 60.50% UI-Ch 54% -6.50%
Traditional Selective (Top 50%; ACT 18-24) 69.30% NIU 71% 1.70% 43.90% NIU 56% 12.10%
Traditional Selective (Top 50%; ACT 18-24) 69.30% WIU 71% 1.70% 43.90% WIU 53% 9.10%
Traditional Selective (Top 50%; ACT 18-24) 69.30% SIU-C 66% -3.30% 43.90%
SIU-C 45% 1.10%
Traditional Selective (Top 50%; ACT 18-24) 69.30% SIU-E 70% -0.70% 43.90% SIU-E 52% 8.10%
Traditional Selective (Top 50%; ACT 18-24) 69.30% EIU 79% 9.70% 43.90% EIU 59% 15.10%
69.3%
79%
85%
43.9%59%
70%
Retention
Graduation
Time to Degree
Graduation
First Year To Second Year
2011
All First-Time 79%
Minority First-Time 76%
First Generation 78%
Zero EFC* 74%
First-time Cohort Rate 2011
Six Year 59%
Five Year 54%
Four Year 32%
Minority
Six Year 45%
Five Year 40%
Four Year 17%
First Generation
Six Year 56%
Five Year 50%
Four Year 27%
Retention
All First-Time Students
2007 4.42
2011 4.79
Email Reminders about Registration Unregistered List to Departments Survey (not registered at 10th day)
◦ FA11-SP12, 496/9657 – 5% 24.4% holds
◦ SP12-FA12, 585/8777 - 7% 25.6% holds
◦ FA12-SP13, 494/8975 - 6% 34.6% holds
Why have you not yet registered for classes?• 36.2% hold• 20.69% not seen advisor to receive pin• 15.5% not gotten around to it• 6.9% financial aid/insufficient funds• 20.69% other reason
Why do you not intend to register?• 26.67% transferring to a community college• 13.3% transferring to a 4-year institution• 13.3% family issues that prevent attending• 8.89% going to work• 6.67% cannot afford it• 31.1% other reason
Early Alert System◦ Began in FA11◦ ITS developed to work with PAWS
FA11 FA12 Difference
# Alerts 852 965 +113
# Students 585 642 +57
# Faculty 102 101 -1
Noel Levitz Recommendation◦ History◦ Data◦ Context◦ Inniatitives
Living Document http://castle.eiu.edu/~core/
Connecting Recruitment to Retention Pre-Arrival Initiatives Financial Support
78% of our students rely on financial aid 6%
48.65% of our students are first-generation 7.65%
45.8% of the entering class are transfer students 6.8%
21.7% of our students are an ethnic minority 8% 20% of the entering freshman class were admitted through a
special admission program 11%
Faculty Sharing: Practices for Student Achievement & Development
Strengthening the Advisee/Mentee Connection
Making Individual Connections: Strategies for Support Staff
Graduation Rates: National Center for Education Statistics, http://nces.ed.gov/
National Retention and Graduation Benchmarks & Selectivity: ACT Institutional Data File, http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/retain_2010.pdf
EIU Retention and Graduation Rates: Planning and Institutional Studies, http://castle.eiu.edu/~planning/