2014 form 990: what’s new, what’s important march 20, 2015 deborah g. kosnett, cpa
TRANSCRIPT
2014 Form 990: What’s New, What’s Important
March 20, 2015
Deborah G. Kosnett, CPA
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
What We’ll Talk About Today . . .
Overall changes to Form 990 for 2014 (there aren’t many)
Major changes to the 2014 Schedule A2014 Schedule L: definitional changesSpecial focus: Schedule J, page 1Form 990-T, Form 1023-EZ, other topics of interest
2
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 20153
Form 990 2014: Form and Instruction Update
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
2014 Form 990 Core Form
Part VII – instructions clarify that reportable compensation should not be treated as deferred, if the deferral is not more than 2.5 months after the end of the calendar year from which it was deferred.
Part XI – clarifying instructions have been added for lines 5, 6 and 8
Appendix E (instructions) – new instructions are provided for group returns that include supporting organizations
4
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 20155
Form 990 2014: Changes to Schedule A
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
MAJOR Addition to Schedule A for 2014
FIVE additional pages for Schedule AALL pages focus on supporting organizations (SO’s)
New Part IV covers Types I, II and III (functionally integrated) SO’s
New Part V covers Type III non-functionally integrated SO’s
Result of temporary and final regs issued in December 2012, which take effect 2014
6
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
What Is a Supporting Organization?
A special type of public charity – no need to pass the “support test”
Supports one or more other exempt organizations- Usually supports a §501(c)(3) charity . . . BUT- May also support a § 501(c)(4), (5) or (6) organization
Supported non-charities have to look like a charity, in terms of funding pattern
7
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Supporting Org Types At a Glance . . .
Type I• “Operated,
supervised or controlled by”
• Parent/sub – SO board controlled by supported org
• Most common type
Type II• “Supervised or
controlled in connection with”
• Brother/sister – overlapping boards
• Less common type
Type III• “Operated in
connection with”
• Loose affiliation (sometimes a real stretch)
• Two sub-types: functionally integrated and non-functionally integrated
8
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Due to Perceived Abuses . . .
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 added stricter requirements for ALL SO’s . . .
But especially for Type III’sA supporting organization is now a lot more like a private foundation, in terms of restrictions
9
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Type of Relationship Test
Type I
Type II
Type III
Organizational Test
Operational TestNo Disqual
Persons Control Test
Purposes Limitation
Charity Specification
AND AND AND
AND
AND
Permissible Beneficiaries
Permissible Activities
Adapted from DiRusso, “Supporting the Supporting Organization”
OR OR
SO Structure at a Glance – Level 1
10
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Type I Type II
Adapted from DiRusso, “Supporting the Supporting Organization”
Type III
Responsiveness Test
Integral PartTest
AND
Significant Voice
Charitable Trust
OR OR
“But For” Activities
Substantially All Income
“Greater Prong” “Lesser Prong”
“Prongs” are important concept, post-PPA
SO Structure at a Glance – Level 2
11
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 201512
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 201513
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
One Additional Change . . .
Schedule A instructions now indicate that a charity that has a public charity status other than section 170(b)(1)(a)(vi) may complete the Part II support test to demonstrate that it also qualifies under this section.
The advantage? Charities that qualify can use the Schedule B “special rule” that allows them to list only donors who gave > 2% of total contributions for the year.
14
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 201515
Form 990 2014: Changes to Schedule L
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Focus on Schedule L The 2014 instructions
provide for a more uniform definition of “interested persons” for Parts II – IV (no change for I)
Parts I – III, report transactions regardless of amount
Part IV – reporting thresholds
16
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Simplified ‘Interested Person’ Definitions
Schedule L, Part I: disqualified person under §4958 Schedule L, Parts II – IV:
- Part VII current or former officers, directors, trustees, or key employees
- Creator or founder of the organization- Substantial contributor- Grant selection committee member (Part III)- Family member of any of the above- A 35% controlled entity of any of the above, in the
aggregate . . . there’s a change to what this means!
17
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
How To Determine “More than 35%” Control
An entity that is owned, directly or indirectly (for example, under constructive ownership rules of §267(c)), by a given person, such as the organization's current or former officers, directors, trustees, or key employees listed in Form 990, Part VII, Section 1, or the family members thereof (listed persons) as follows:• 1. A corporation in which listed persons own more than 35% of the total
combined voting power;• 2. A partnership in which listed persons own more than 35% of the profits
interest; or• 3. A trust or estate in which listed persons own more than 35% of the
beneficial interest.
18
Schedule L’s intrinsic “35% control” definition is gone; you now look to the definition in the Form 990 glossary:
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
EO’s Are Now No Longer “Interested Persons”
19
Under the new 35% control definition, control has to do with ownership.
Also included in the Schedule L instructions (SALY)- “An interested person for purposes of Parts II-IV does not
include a section 501(c)(3) organization, an exempt organization with the same tax-exempt status (for example, section 501(c)(3) or 527 status) as the filing organization, or a governmental unit or instrumentality.” (pre-existing)
- As the“35% controlled entity” definition now references the 990 glossary (per the prior slide) . . .
Because you cannot have a “35% OWNED” nonprofit, we no longer have to worry about reporting related nonprofits
with overlapping boards!
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
A Couple More Key Exceptions to Part IV
20
Do not report, in Part IV of Schedule L:- “Transactions with publicly-traded companies in the
ordinary course of the publicly-traded company’s business, on the same terms as it generally offers to the public (or more favorable for the filing organization).” (new this year)
- Deposits into or withdrawals from a bank account (when the bank is an interested person) in the ordinary course of business, on the same terms as the bank offers to the general public. (pre-existing)
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Harmonized “Reasonable Effort” Definition
21
For all parts of Schedule L, EO’s need only make a “reasonable effort” to obtain potentially reportable information
Example: distribute an annual questionnaire to each potentially “interested person”
You may rely on the information so obtainedPresumably, if some questionnaires are not returned, you have done your best
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 201522
SPECIAL FOCUS: SCHEDULE J, PAGE 1 QUESTIONS
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
A Few Tips for Filling Out Schedule J, Page 1
23
Questions 1, 2, 3*, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are answered only by the organization that pays and/or sets compensation for reportable employees.
Question 3 is starred (*) because an explanation is required regarding how a related organization establishes compensation of reportable employees, if the reporting organization has none
Question 4 is answered whether the organization or a related organization sets compensation.
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
A Few Tips for Filling Out Schedule J, Page 1
24
Questions 8 and 9 are concerned with what is sometimes called the “first bite of the apple” rule
Fixed payments made to an employee under an initial contract are not subject to the section 4958 “intermediate sanctions” rules- There must be a binding written contract between the EO and a
person who was not a disqualified person immediately prior to the contract signing
Nevertheless, in Question 9 IRS asks if the initial contract was reviewed and approved following the section 4958 rebuttable presumption procedures
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
A Few Tips for Filling Out Schedule J, Page 1
25
Questions 5 – 9 are filled out only by section 501(c)(3) and (4) organizations.*
Questions 5 and 6 relate to “contingent compensation” based on:- Organization revenues (Q5)- Organization net earnings (Q6)
Question 7 asks about any other non-fixed payments not covered in Q5 or Q6- What’s included here? Bonuses that are not based on
fixed formulas . . . those that involve discretion
* And also section 501(c)(29)’s – Qualified Nonprofit Health Insurance Issuers
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Other Miscellaneous Changes
26
Cosmetic changes to Form 990 and its schedules- Addition of section 501(c)(29) organizations- Some minor wordsmithing:
Heading, Item B: changed “Terminated” to “Final return/terminated”
Part IV, Line 22: replaced “other assistance to individuals in the United States” with “other assistance to or for domestic individuals”
Part V, Line 8: asks if a donor-advised fund maintained by a sponsoring organization has excess business holdings
* And also section 501(c)(29)’s – Qualified Nonprofit Health Insurance Issuers
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Form 990-EZ – 2014 Changes
27
There are not many! Mostly cosmetic- Added section 501(c)(29) organizations- Changed “terminated” to “final return/terminated”
We might see IRS add more questions to the EZ in future years, though, as a result of the greatly abbreviated Form 1023-EZ exemption application(more about 1023-EZ later)
* And also section 501(c)(29)’s – Qualified Nonprofit Health Insurance Issuers
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Form 990-T – 2014 Changes
28
No real changes to the formRelevant instructional changes:
- Definition of “trade or business” clarifies that an activity must be conducted with the intent to make a profit to qualify as such (clarification/reminder; not new)
- Exclusion from UBI for qualifying specified payments under section 512(b)(13)(E) was extended through December 31, 2014 . . . This “extender” lives on another year but is currently not in effect for 2015
Form 990-T has not changed since 1971
* And also section 501(c)(29)’s – Qualified Nonprofit Health Insurance Issuers
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Unrelated Activities Have Multiplied Over the Years
29
1971 . . .• Magazines• Newsletters• Show guides(all printed, of course)
2015 . . .• Magazines• Newsletters• Internet• Phone/tablet apps• Social media
• Facebook• Twitter• Linked-In
• YouTube• Podcasts
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Form 990-T – What To Report and Where
30
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
What Is a Periodical?
Regularly scheduled and printed material . . .
. . . not associated with a specific event!Periodical rules are specific – little ‘wiggle room’If periodical rules do not apply, the publication is reported in 990-T, Schedule I, not Schedule J If periodical rules do not apply, an “ad” may not actually be taxable . . .- ‘Ad’ vs. ‘acknowledgement’
31
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Non-Periodical Flow Chart – ‘Ad’ vs. ‘Acknowledgement’
32
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Potential Attachments to Form 990-T
33
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
In Other News . . .
Senate Finance is considering a bill (S. 400) that would require IRS to provide notice of prospective revocation after an org’s failure to file after two consecutive years- Notice would have to be provided no later than 300 days after
the date of 2nd failure; provide compliance instructions- Would provide for possible reinstatement if org can
demonstrate it did not receive notice and makes a current year 990-series filing
Similar bill in the House (H.R. 811), now in Ways and Means
34
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Tax Exemption, Re-Examined?
Trade and business league exemption- “Taxing the Unheavenly Chorus: Why Section 501(c)(6) Trade
Associations are Undeserving of Tax Exemption”
The NFL and other sports leagues- H.R. 3965, S. 1524 – PRO Sports Act – would prohibit major
professional sports leagues from gaining exempt status and would revoke The NFL’s exemption (prior Congress; died in committees)*
Nonprofit hospital systems- Last March, Pittsburgh filed a lawsuit against U of Pittsburgh Medical
Center, seeking to pull exempt status- Lawsuit was dropped, but Pittsburgh keeps trying to get PILOTs out of
its large nonprofits* A search of Thomas.gov turned up a reintroduced PRO Sports Act, H.R. 547
35
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
TE/GE 2014 ACT Report
The ACT (Advisory Committee on TE/GE) met last June; released a number of EO recommendations
Focused on UBI, post-College and University Study (UBI under-reporting):- Regulations project to formalize the “commensurate in scope test”
of Rev. Rul. 64-182- Formal guidance on allocation of indirect costs, w/safe harbor and
ID of unreasonable methods- Comprehensive revenue ruling on UBI issues affecting colleges:
dual use facilities, catering/food service, technology transfers, bookstores
- Web-based Form 990-T (we don’t even have e-file yet!)
36
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Are EO Audits Increasing?We are seeing uptick in audits of our clients
- Employee plan audits- Form 990, 990-T or both
Most are “field audits’ involving agent visit / tour of facilities
IRS is reportedly no longer using market segments or exam projects- Audits are data-driven and issue-focused- Metrics derived from analysis of filed 990s- Focus areas: gaming, PF excise taxes, UBI
37
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Treasury Priority Guidance PlanNumerous tax projects for 2014/15A few of the more important EO-related:
- Proposed regulations for section 501(c) organizations, related to political campaign intervention (supposedly early 2015!)
- Additional guidance on supporting organizations- Guidance under section 512 relating to allocation of expenses to
dual use facilities- Guidance on excise taxes on donor-advised funds and fund
management
Also authorized new Form 1023-EZ – new online-only streamlined application process for very small charities . . .
38
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
This is Form 1023-EZ . . . All Of It
39
Contents: contact info, officer/director listing, questions about organizational status, classification, and planned activities.
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Form 1023-EZ Quick Facts Filed entirely online; $400 application fee Turnaround is very fast - days Only new charities with planned gross receipts < $50K and
total assets < $250K may use it Lowers the filing barrier for very small ‘plain vanilla’ charities Cannot file if: foreign org, LLC, successor entity, church,
school, hospital, or a supporting org Filers should walk thru educational instructions, fill out
eligibility worksheet, and possibly expect greater scrutiny down the road
IRS has instituted “Lean Six Sigma Organization” processes to streamline approvals of regular Forms 1023
40
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
AICPA Tax Proposal Compendium
This week, AICPA sent to 34 tax proposals to the Congressional taxwriting committees
Exempt organization recommendations:- Allow for a single six-month automatic extension for the entire Form
990 series- Make permanent the “tax extender” FMV exception for section
512(b)(13); remove the binding contract requirement- Expand the secton 509(f)(2) exception for supporting organizations
under section 509(a)(3) (having to do with qualifying for SO status if SO accepts gifts from certain persons)
These have been requested before; no guarantee of consideration
41
© Copyright Tate & Tryon 2015
Questions??
42