2014 system capacity plan - hydro ottawa...2014 system capacity plan annual planning report...

54
2014 System Capacity Plan Annual Planning Report

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 2014 System Capacity Plan Annual Planning Report

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    2

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    3

    2014 System Capacity Plan Annual Planning Report

    Executive Summary Hydro Ottawa’s system capacity is lagging behind the load growth – currently 15% of substations are above

    their specified planning rating. Over the next 20 years significant investment will be necessary to ensure that

    sufficient and reliable supply is maintained throughout the city to support the 1050 MVA of forecasted load

    growth over this period.

    Growth in the city is currently being driven by new residential development in previously rural areas, infill

    and intensification in many established areas, as well as major projects like the Ottawa Light Rail Transit

    (OLRT) system. Investment of approximately $230 Million in capacity upgrades will be required over the next

    20 years to supply the growing demand within HOL’s service territory.

    The forecasts, on which this recommendation is based, have been

    developed by drawing from developer and City of Ottawa plans

    and forecasts, as well as historical growth patterns. System

    capacity needs have been identified through internal regional

    study, and full system studies such as the ongoing Ottawa Region

    Planning Study being completed with participation from Hydro

    Ottawa Limited, Hydro One Networks Incorporated – Distribution

    and Transmission, the Ontario Power Authority and the

    Independent Electrical System Operator.

    Hydro Ottawa’s 2014 System Capacity Plan identifies milestones for required system upgrades. This plan has

    identified the need to upgrade 13 existing substations, build two new substations and invest in five (5)

    transmission upgrades over the next 10 years. These upgrades include projects which are currently being

    completed such as the construction of the Terry Fox MTS substation that will supply growth in Kanata and

    Stittsville and the expansion of Hinchey TH substation to meet the needs in the core in combination with new

    load as the result of the OLRT. Failure to meet these milestones has the potential to increase outage duration

    because of the operational challenges created by inadequate supply and operability. Also, such capacity

    deficits may cause accelerated equipment deterioration due to overloading at system peak.

    If the identified increases in capacity investment are achieved, HOL will be able to keep pace with the City’s

    significant growth, while maintaining our high standards of system reliability, safety and operability.

    An investment of $230

    Million is required to

    accommodate an anticipated

    load growth of 1050 MVA

    over the next 20 years

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    4

    Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 3

    1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 6

    2 System Performance and Statistics .................................................................................................... 7

    2.1 Key Measures ....................................................................................................................................... 7

    2.2 System Statistics ................................................................................................................................... 8

    2.3 System Demand and Energy Statistics ................................................................................................. 9

    3 System Study .................................................................................................................................. 11

    3.1 Outlook ............................................................................................................................................... 11

    3.2 System Evaluation: Method and Criteria ........................................................................................... 13

    3.3 13kV System ....................................................................................................................................... 14

    3.4 South 28kV ......................................................................................................................................... 18

    3.5 South-East 28kV ................................................................................................................................. 20

    3.6 East 8kV & 28kV ................................................................................................................................. 22

    3.7 West 28 kV ......................................................................................................................................... 24

    3.8 Nepean Core 8 kV ............................................................................................................................... 26

    3.9 West Nepean 8 kV .............................................................................................................................. 28

    3.10 West 8 kV ........................................................................................................................................... 30

    3.11 West 12 kV ......................................................................................................................................... 32

    3.12 Citywide 44 kV .................................................................................................................................... 33

    4 Distributed Generation Capacity ..................................................................................................... 39

    4.1 Core 13kV ........................................................................................................................................... 40

    4.2 East 13kV ............................................................................................................................................ 41

    4.3 West 13kV .......................................................................................................................................... 42

    4.4 South 28kV ......................................................................................................................................... 43

    4.5 South-East 28kV ................................................................................................................................. 43

    4.6 East 8kV & 28kV ................................................................................................................................. 44

    4.7 West 28kV .......................................................................................................................................... 44

    4.8 Nepean Core 8kV ............................................................................................................................... 45

    4.9 West Nepean 8kV ............................................................................................................................... 45

    4.10 West 8kV ............................................................................................................................................ 46

    4.11 West 12kV .......................................................................................................................................... 46

    4.12 City Wide 44kV ................................................................................................................................... 47

    5 Bulk System Investments ................................................................................................................ 48

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    5

    5.1 Kanata Area ........................................................................................................................................ 48

    5.2 South Nepean ..................................................................................................................................... 49

    5.3 Downtown Core ................................................................................................................................. 49

    5.4 Orleans ............................................................................................................................................... 50

    6 Hydro One Networks CCRA ............................................................................................................. 51

    6.1 Kanata MTS Phase 1 (2001)................................................................................................................ 52

    6.2 Kanata MTS Phase 2 (2003)................................................................................................................ 52

    6.3 2005 Hawthorne 115 kV Lines ........................................................................................................... 52

    6.4 2008 Cyrville MTS ............................................................................................................................... 52

    6.5 2010 Ellwood MTS .............................................................................................................................. 52

    6.6 2012 Hinchey TH ................................................................................................................................ 52

    6.7 2013 Terry Fox MTS............................................................................................................................ 53

    6.8 2013 Marchwood MTS ....................................................................................................................... 53

    6.9 2014 Limebank MTS ........................................................................................................................... 53

    6.10 2015 Epworth DS ................................................................................................................................ 53

    6.11 2016 Lisgar TL ..................................................................................................................................... 53

    6.12 2017 Merivale DS ............................................................................................................................... 53

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    6

    1 Background

    Hydro Ottawa routinely assesses the capability and reliability of the distribution system in an effort to

    maintain adequate and reliable supply to customers. Where gaps are found, appropriate plans for additions

    and modifications consistent with all regulatory requirements and with due consideration for safety,

    environment, finance and supply system reliability/security are developed.

    In this regard, the supply needs in the City of Ottawa have been assessed to determine if additions and/or

    modifications are required to maintain an adequate and reliable/secure system capacity.

    The Hydro Ottawa distribution system is composed of several subsystems, which are segregated by operating

    voltage, geographical boundaries, and historic political boundaries. This document summarizes the results of

    these studies.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    7

    15% of substations above planning

    rating

    97.4% of energy purchases

    delivered

    3.2% of circuits above

    planning rating

    TABLE 2.1 - KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES

    Measure Target 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

    Stations Exceeding Planning Capacity

    ≤ 5% 23% (21)

    26% (23)

    24% (22)

    20% (18)

    15% (14)

    Feeders Exceeding Planning Capacity

    ≤ 10% - 3.5% (28)

    3.4% (27)

    3.3% (26)

    3.2% (23)

    Stations Approaching Rated

    Capacity zero

    1.1% (1)

    4.4% (4)

    2.2% (2)

    2.2% (2)

    3.3% (3)

    Feeders Approaching Rated

    Capacity zero -

    0.4% (3)

    0.5% (4)

    0.5% (4)

    0.3% (2)

    System losses ≤ 4% 2.88% 3.12% 3.13% 3.60% 2.63%

    2 System Performance and Statistics

    2.1 Key Measures

    System capacity is currently trailing load growth in the city; this has resulted in fifteen percent of the stations

    owned by HOL operating above their planning rating. This planning rating is set to ensure adequate capacity

    is reserved for reliable operation during system contingency.

    In 2013, three stations were

    loaded above their equipment

    ratings at system peak:

    Richmond North DS, Nepean

    TS and Hawthorne TS. Work to

    increase capacity at Richmond

    South DS is scheduled to begin

    in 2015 and will allow for

    better load balancing between

    Richmond North and South to

    alleviate the overload

    condition. The Hawthorne TS

    units are currently planned for

    replacement by Hydro One

    and load balancing at Nepean

    TS should resolve the slight

    overload seen in 2013. There is

    a positive trend being shown

    in the data: as capacity

    projects progress the system is

    seeing less stress since 2009.

    Losses remained within the acceptable range of between 2% to 4%. Hydro Ottawa continues to work to

    reduce system losses through better system planning and the updating or replacement of equipment.

    Feeders exceeding their planning ratings are within target (≤ 10%), but careful review and planning is being

    undertaken to ensure adequate backup is maintained to allow for secure and reliable delivery of power for

    Hydro Ottawa Limited’s Customers.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    8

    2.2 System Statistics

    TABLE 2.2 - SYSTEM SUPPLY STATISTICS

    2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

    Service Area (km2) 1,104 1,104 1,104 1,104 1,104

    Total Metered Customers 296,007 300,664 305,059 309,543 314,866

    Total Un-Metered Supply Points 55,791 57,619 58,281 59,019 58,973

    Total # of Substations Used by HOL

    HOL Owned/Co-owned

    Used & not owned/co-owned

    92

    841

    8

    92

    84

    8

    93

    852

    8

    93

    853

    8

    93

    854

    8

    Total # of Station Transformers

    Transmission

    Sub-Transmission

    166

    255

    141

    166

    25

    141

    167

    25

    1426

    169

    277

    142

    169

    298

    1409

    Notes: 1, 5

    Cyrville MTS Energized (2 transmission transformers) 2,6

    Janet King DS 28kV Energized (1 sub-transmission transformer)3, 7

    Ellwood MTS Energized (2

    transmission transformers) & Uplands DS Decommissioned (1 transmission transformer) 4,8,9

    Kilborn UP Decommissioned (2 sub-transmission transformers) & Terry Fox MTS Energized (2

    transmission transformers)

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    9

    2.3 System Demand and Energy Statistics System Load has remained relatively constant over the last five years. The system wide actual summer peak

    has grown at an average rate of 1.2% annually since 2009, while winter actual peak has increased at an

    average rate of 0.3% annually over the same period. The weather normalized summer peak has shown

    modest average annual increase from 2009 to 2013 of roughly 0.1% and the weather normalized winter peak

    is in line with the winter actual, showing an average increase of 0.2% over the five year period. The overall

    Hydro Ottawa system peak occurs in the summer.

    Despite continued increases in connected distribution generation capacity on the system, the contributions

    to system energy and peak demand have not grown (Table 2.3).

    FIGURE 2.1 –ACTUAL AND WEATHER CORRECTED PEAK DEMAND

    FIGURE 2.2 - ANNUAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION

    1,000

    1,100

    1,200

    1,300

    1,400

    1,500

    1,600

    2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

    Pe

    ak D

    em

    and

    in M

    We

    Summer Actual Summer Weather Normalized

    Winter Actual Winter Weather Normalized

    7,000

    7,100

    7,200

    7,300

    7,400

    7,500

    7,600

    7,700

    7,800

    7,900

    2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

    GW

    Ho

    urs

    Total Energy Purchased from Bulk System

    Total Energy Supplied to HOL Customers

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    10

    TABLE 2.3 - SYSTEM DEMAND AND ENERGY STATISTICS

    2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

    Peak Load-Summer (MW) 1,364 1,518 1,502 1,459 1,427

    Peak Load-Winter (MW) 1,268 1,239 1,306 1,242 1,283

    Total Energy Supplied to HOL Customers

    (Sold, GWh)

    7,560 7,595 7,608 7,570 7,519

    Total Energy Purchased from Bulk System

    (Purchased, GWh)

    7,785 7,840 7,851 7,856 7,722

    Capacity Utilization 78% 84% 83% 77% 76%

    Load Factor 63% 57% 58% 59% 60%

    Total Embedded Generation Connected (MW) 29 30 31 55 58

    2.3.1 Definitions Peak Load (MW) is defined as the peak electrical demand of the system (in MW).

    Total Energy Supplied to HOL Customers (GWh) is the cumulative electrical energy supplied by the

    distribution system to the load as measured at the supply point each year.

    Total Energy Purchased from Bulk System (GWh) is the cumulative electrical energy purchased by HOL as

    metered at the designated supply points each year.

    Capacity Utilization (System Peak MW/ Total Station Transformer MVA) is defined as the peak electrical

    demand of the system (in MW) divided by the total combined station transformation capacity (in MVA). The

    total combined transformation capacity is the sum of all energy delivery points.

    Load Factor (Avg. MW/Peak MW) is defined as the average electrical demand of the system (in MW) divided

    by the annual system peak demand (in MW).

    Total Distributed Generation Connected (MW) is defined as the coincidental peak electrical supply (in MW)

    from distributed generation within Hydro Ottawa Limited’s service territory.

    % Distributed Generation Supplying Peak is defined as the ratio between the coincidental peak electrical

    supply (in MW) from distributed generation within Hydro Ottawa Limited’s service territory and the peak

    electrical demand of the system (in MW).

    Embedded Generation Energy Production (GWh) is defined as the cumulative electrical energy supplied (in

    GWh) from distributed generation within Hydro Ottawa Limited’s Service Area.

    % Distributed Generation Energy Production is defined as the ratio between the Distributed Generation

    Energy Production (in GWh) and the Total system energy supplied (in GWh).

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    11

    3 System Study

    3.1 Outlook Overall, the City of Ottawa continues to grow in population and

    developed lands, primarily focused in five regions: the downtown

    core, Nepean & Riverside South, South Kanata & Stittsville, the

    village of Richmond and Orleans. This growth is being seen

    through the development of new mixed commercial/residential

    communities and intensification of existing communities. Moving

    forward, significant investment in capacity for the system, at both

    the station and distribution level, will be to catch up to and

    maintain pace with the growth in system load. The sidebar

    indicates the required station capacity investments over the next

    20 years. In addition, there are a number of required distribution

    expansions which will be required to bring power from the

    substations to the customer site.

    There are several necessary upgrades of transmission interties

    within the City which will be necessary over the next 20 years to

    maintain adequate and reliable supply from the bulk system.

    Hydro Ottawa is currently involved in a joint planning study with

    Hydro One Networks Inc. (HONI), the Independent Electricity

    System Operator (IESO) and the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) to

    evaluate the transmission capacity and infrastructure

    requirements within the Ottawa region. Preliminary findings

    indicate required upgrades to the transmission system in all four

    regions of the City: west to Terry Fox MTS, south to Richmond

    South DS and Fallowfield DS or a new station, east to supply a

    new HONI station (Orleans TS), and to the downtown core to

    support load growth across the central 13kV substations.

    Figure 3.1 shows the forecasted spending requirements based on

    identified system need date. This outlook may not represent

    actual annual budgeting and includes forecasted distribution,

    station and transmission capacity investments.

    2014

    •Hinchey TH - 57 MVA

    •Limebank MS - 40 MVA

    •Startop MS - 5 MVA

    •Terry Fox MTS - 100 MVA

    •Borden Farm DS - 8 MVA

    •Orleans TS (HONI) - 16 MVA

    2016

    •Lisgar- 53 MVA

    •Leitrim MS - 5 MVA

    •Overbrook TO - 55.6 MVA

    2017 •Merivale MS - 12 MVA

    2018 •Uplands DS - 40 MVA

    •Bayshore T1- 5 MVA

    2019

    •Richmond South DS - 67 MVA

    •King Edward TK - 56 MVA

    •New South 28 kV - 100 MVA

    2021 •Limebank MS - 46 MVA

    •Bells Corners DS - 4 MVA

    2022 •Bridlewood MS - 50 MVA

    •Marchwood MS - 33 MVA

    2024 •Russell TB - 67 MVA

    2026 • QCH DS - 4 MVA

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    12

    FIGURE 3.1 - PROJECTED CAPACITY UPGRADE INVESTMENTS

    $0

    $5

    $10

    $15

    $20

    $25

    $30

    $35

    $40

    $45

    2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031

    Mill

    ion

    s

    Stations New Capacity Bulk System Line Extensions

    Voltage Conversion Levelized

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    13

    3.2 System Evaluation: Method and Criteria

    Hydro Ottawa plans system capacity based on contingency peak loading and single (N-1) Contingency. The

    station and area contingency is considered to be the loss of the largest element, typically either substation

    transformer or supply circuit. Under a single contingency, the system is planned to maintain the loading

    within the remaining equipment’s top rating (either 10 day Limited Time Rating (LTR) or allowable Flat

    Rating).

    Each substation supplying Hydro Ottawa customers is forecasted separately using the previous year’s

    summer coincident peak as the starting point for the forecast. An average annual load growth rate is

    calculated using the station’s historic load level. This rate is used to predict the baseline load growth over the

    next twenty years and reflects typical addition of new customers and the load maturation of existing

    customers. Additional adjustments are made to the forecast to account for known City of Ottawa and

    developer plans, forecasted load transfers and other local knowledge. Loading is weather normalized and a

    one in ten year heat wave adjustment is used as a worst case planning scenario.

    The supply territory has been divided into separate regions of study based on distribution voltage and

    geographic constraints as shown in Figure 3.2. The substation load forecasts are amalgamated to develop

    the regional study area forecasts.

    Figure 3.2 - Regional Study Areas

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    14

    FIGURE 3.3 - 13KV SUPPLY AREA

    3.3 13kV System 3.3.1 Study Area The Hydro Ottawa Limited (HOL) 13kV supply region is composed of 3 main areas:

    1. The West 13kV supply region covers from Bayview Yards and west of Preston Street to Bayshore Drive, north of Baseline Road. This region is supplied by Hinchey TH, Carling TM, Woodroffe TW and Lincoln Heights TD. Hinchey TH also supports the Core 13kV supply region.

    2. The Core 13kV area follows the Rideau River to the East and covers to LeBreton Flats in the West. This region is supplied by King Edward TK, Slater TS, Lisgar TL, Hinchey TH, and Riverdale TR. Riverdale TR and King Edward TK also support the East and Core 13kV supply regions. Hinchey TH also supports the West 13kV supply region.

    3. The East 13kV supply region includes the eastern portion of the Old City of Ottawa. This region is supplied by the Russell TB, Albion TA, Ellwood TS, Overbrook TO, Riverdale TR and King Edward TK. Riverdale TR and King Edward TK also support the East and Central 13kV supply regions.

    Much of the residential load in this region is not directly supplied from the 13kV system, but rather from a

    total of thirty-five 4kV substations, which are supplied from the 13kV system.

    1

    .

    2

    3

    .

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    15

    Capacity Projects

    Committed:

    (a) Hinchey TH – 57MVA (2014)

    Proposed:

    (b) Lisgar TL – 53MVA (2016)

    (c) Overbrook TO – 55.6MVA (2016)

    (d) King Edward TK – 56MVA (2019)

    (e) Slater TS – 50MVA (2025)

    3.3.2 Forecasted Growth Through the Official Plan, the City of Ottawa is promoting new growth by means of intensification. This

    impacts the 13kV system as it covers mostly established areas. Many new developments are trading in low-

    rise apartments for larger high density condos. This will reduce the load of the 4kV through conversion onto

    the 13kV system but may be taxing with the requirement of new transmission supply.

    The majority of the load growth on the 13kV is from new infrastructure projects and City driven community

    intensification plans:

    The West 13kV new loads include the Ottawa Light Rail Transit (OLRT), Tunney’s Pasture, Bayview Yards, Centrepointe, Richmond Road, and Preston-Carling Area Design Charette.

    The Core 13kV is seeing large new loads such as the Ottawa Light Rail Transit (OLRT), the Cliff Street Heating/Cooling Plant (CHCP), Lansdowne Park, LeBreton Flats, Bayview Yards and Transit Oriented Development (TOD).

    The East 13k new loads include the Ottawa Light Rail Transit (OLRT), the reconstruction of Rockliffe CFB, Transit Oriented Intensification (TOD), the Bank Street CDP and the Beechwood CDP.

    In the short term, there is a requirement for capacity upgrades and the construction of station

    interconnections to transfer load at opportune times in order to manage the growth. Longer term planning

    will deal with transmission upgrade plans.

    3.3.3 Distribution System Analysis Areas of concern for circuit capacity within the region are:

    West

    New infill projects such as Bayview Yards, LeBreton Flats, Centrepointe and Algonquin College;

    Intensification of Richmond Road, Carling-Champagne, Preston-Carling Area; and

    West OLRT stations

    FIGURE 3.4 - CORE 13KV LOAD FORECAST

    800

    900

    1000

    1100

    1200

    1300

    1400

    2014 2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032

    Current LTR Rating Proposed LTR Rating

    Forecast Average Growth

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    16

    Core

    The lack of distribution interconnection points from Hinchey TH and Riverdale TR to other stations in

    this area;

    New infill projects such as Bayview Yards, LeBreton Flats, Main Street, Lansdowne Park, and Lees

    TOD will stress existing circuit capacity; and

    Intensification of Rideau Street and Catherine Street.

    East

    Overbrook TO has limited distribution interconnections limiting system operability and the ability to

    manage station loading;

    Existing Circuit ties to north east Langs Road area is at capacity; and

    Existing Circuit supply to the south east area is approaching capacity (Ages and Hawthorne road

    area).

    In the short term, there is a requirement for capacity upgrades and the construction of distribution station

    interconnections to transfer load at opportune times in order to manage the growth. Longer term planning

    will deal with transmission upgrade plans.

    3.3.4 System Needs In the short term, there is a need to increase the capacity in the east and core stations to support new

    developments and to transfer load from the downtown stations. To perform the required load transfer to

    the west, new feeder expansions and inter-station ties will be required.

    3.3.5 Major Infrastructure Upgrades

    Hinchey TH Expansion

    The capacity expansion of Hinchey TH substation began in 2012. The two transformers at Hinchey TH will

    have their tertiary winding brought out and allow for the installation of a new bus. The capacity at Hinchey

    TH will increase from 42 MVA to 99 MVA and will provide 12 new breaker positions. The project is expected

    to be completed in 2014. Feeder expansions out of Hinchey TH will also be required to transfer load from

    Lisgar TL to accommodate new growth. Currently 4 feeder expansions are planned for 2014-2015, more will

    proceed as necessary.

    Hinchey TH is currently limiting generation connection capacity based on its minimum load. This expansion

    will allow for increased generation capacity by providing the ability to transfer more load to the station, plus,

    the nature of the power transformers will allow some reverse flow capability.

    Lisgar TL Upgrade

    To accommodate the new load to the west of downtown, upgrading the capacity at Lisgar TL is required to

    support Hinchey TH. This project will increase the limited time rating (LTR) capacity from 83 MVA to 133

    MVA. Project completion, based on proposed timelines, is expected by 2016.

    This upgrade will allow for increased generation capacity availability by upgrading the equipment capacity

    which currently has a thermal restriction for any new generation connections.

    Overbrook TO Upgrade

    The total transformer capacity at Overbrook TO will be upgraded to 144MVA from 82MVA. The transmission

    supply to the substation will need to be upgraded to facilitate the increased capacity of this station. This is

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    17

    currently being studied under the Joint Regional Supply Study being conducted by HONI, HOL and the OPA.

    This upgrade will be required in or about 2016.

    King Edward TK Upgrade

    The two transformers at King Edward TK substation are currently mismatched in capacity, limiting the overall

    available capacity. This project would see the replacement of the undersized transformer thereby increasing

    the available LTR of the station from 80 MVA to 136 MVA. The increased capacity will relieve Slater TS and

    support the Light Rail Transit (LRT) project. The timelines for this project may be affected by the on-going

    joint planning study with the OPA and Hydro One. The study is currently reviewing the A4K 115kV

    transmission line which has been identified as having a thermal overload in N-1 contingency loss of the A5RK.

    The project need has been identified for 2021.

    King Edward TK is currently limiting generation connection capacity based on its minimum load. This

    expansion will allow for increased generation capacity by providing the ability to transfer more load to the

    station. Also, generation connection capacity can be increased if the power transformers are specified for

    reverse flow capability.

    Russell TB Upgrade

    Russell TB will need to be upgraded to 144MVA from the current 77MVA. There are no known transmission

    limitations that should cause delays in this project and will be required in or about 2024.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    18

    3.4 South 28kV 3.4.1 Study Area The South 28kV supply region

    includes the southern portions

    of Nepean. This region is

    supplied by the Fallowfield DS

    and Longfields DS 28kV

    substations as well as two

    feeders from Limebank MS

    28kV substation. Despite the

    physical barrier of the river

    between Nepean and

    Gloucester, the Limebank MS

    station plays an essential role

    in supplying both sides of the

    river.

    3.4.2 Forecasted Growth Growth in the south supply

    region is driven by the ongoing

    expansion of suburban

    residential developments, the

    Nepean Town Centre and the

    Strandherd Business Park. In

    addition, rural areas south of

    the Jock River which are currently fed by the 8KV system will be transferred to the 28kV system as 28kV

    feeders are introduced in the area to supply new suburban developments.

    Based on the projected load growth, an additional station is required to supply the expected load in the South 28kV area.

    Capacity Projects

    Proposed:

    (a) Added Capacity from Limebank- 16MVA(2016)

    (b) New 28kV Station – 100 MVA (2019)

    FIGURE 3.5-SOUTH NEPEAN 28KV STUDY AREA

    FIGURE 3.6-SOUTH NEPEAN 28KV LOAD FORECAST

    (a)

    (b)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031

    MV

    A

    Current Rating Proposed Rating Forecast

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    19

    3.4.3 Distribution System Analysis Overall, the existing south 28kV area is supplied by a strong network of trunk feeders. However, there is the

    need to expand the system to cover areas seeing growth, as well as strengthen the interconnections to the

    south of the Jock River. These issues will be addressed by the introduction of a new substation that will

    support the growth in the Fallowfield DS supply area for the expected load growth.

    3.4.4 System Needs There is a need in the short term for a new 28KV station in this region. Based on the forecasted growth it is

    proposed to build the new station with 2 X 75 MVA transformers. The proposed new station will solve the

    overloading issues in normal operating conditions as well as the N-1 contingency situations to the end of the

    study period. Currently, capacity in this area is being evaluated under the Bulk Supply study which will

    determine the location of the new station.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    20

    FIGURE 3.8 - SOUTH EAST LOAD GROWTH

    (a) (b) (c)

    (d)

    (e)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    2014 2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032

    MV

    A

    Current Rating Proposed Rating Forecast

    Capacity Projects

    Committed:

    (a) Limebank MS –40MVA (2014)

    Proposed:

    (b) Leitrim (2nd Tx) – 5 MVA (2016)

    (c) Uplands (2nd Tx) – 40MVA (2018)

    (d) Limebank MS – 46MVA (2021)

    (e) South 28kV Support (2026)

    3.5 South-East 28kV 3.5.1 Study Area The South-East 28kV supply region includes

    the southern portions of Gloucester. This

    region is supplied by the Limebank MS,

    Uplands MS and Leitrim MS 28kV

    substations, as well as a small pocket of 8kV

    currently supplied from the Hydro One

    South Gloucester substation. Despite the

    physical barrier of the river between

    Nepean and Gloucester, the Limebank MS

    station plays an essential role in supplying

    both sides of the river, creating

    interdependence between the South 28kV

    and the South East 28kV systems.

    3.5.2 Forecasted Growth New Load growth in this area is driven by

    commercial development in the land

    surrounding the airport and residential and

    mixed-use developments in the Riverside

    South and Leitrim community areas.

    FIGURE 3.7 - SOUTH EAST 28KV SUPPLY AREA

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    21

    3.5.3 Distribution System Analysis Both Uplands MS and Leitrim MS substations have single supplies and single transformers. With such

    configurations it is paramount that sufficient distribution circuit ties are maintained to transfer load to

    adjacent stations under contingency. Circuit ties exist for Uplands MS, although station capacity is currently a

    limitation to adequately backup capacity for the loss of transformers or supply at Uplands MS.

    Given the long reach of the Leitrim MS circuits, back up from Limebank MS or Uplands MS would be a

    challenge to maintain voltage at the end-of-line within proper limits. This will be addressed through the

    addition of voltage regulators to maintain end-of-line voltage within appropriate limits. The increase of

    capacity at Limebank MS will also help in this respect, as it will increase the capability to offload feeders

    during contingency.

    3.5.4 System Needs Regional capacity will require significant increase in order to keep pace with forecasted growth. Upgrades are

    currently underway at Limebank MS to add a third transformer and make provisions for a 4th transformer,

    currently projected to be required between 2018 and 2021. In or about 2018, Uplands MS will require an

    additional transformer to support growth in the region as well. Supply capacity in the region is anticipated to

    lag growth through the second half of the planning period. The load growth during this period is expected to

    be met by planned additional upgrades in the South 28kV Region.

    While it only results in minor increases to the overall firm capacity in the area, additional transformers are

    required at both Leitrim MS and Uplands MS in 2016 and 2018 respectively. These units will improve the

    specific region contingencies and station capacity. As load continues to grow in the Leitrim MS supply area

    the potential of creating a new transmission connected substation should be evaluated as the existing 44kV

    supply is limited and it will be costly to add a second 44kv supply.

    Capacity in the South 28kV and the South-East 28kV is currently under study as part of the Bulk System

    Supply Study currently underway (see Section 5). This study will impact the final location where new capacity

    is located. It is anticipated that the final solution will include increased capacity on the West Side of the river

    which will ultimately help support the stations on the East side.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    22

    FIGURE 3.9 - EAST 8KV & 28KV STUDY AREA

    3.6 East 8kV & 28kV 3.6.1 Study Area The East 28kV and 8kV supply

    area is bounded by the old

    Gloucester & Ottawa

    municipal boundary and

    Highway 417 in the south.

    Supply to the region includes

    28kV transmission connected

    stations: Cyrville MTS, Bilberry

    TS and Moulton MS as well as

    44kV sub transmission

    supplied 8kV substations:

    Startop MS, Blackburn MS

    and Beaconhill MS.

    3.6.2 Forecasted Growth

    The East 28/8kV system is

    seeing two main pockets of

    growth: the East Urban

    Community, a combination of

    residential and mixed-use

    areas, and LRT related load

    developing in the vicinity of

    the split between highways

    417 and 174.

    FIGURE 3.10 - EAST 8KV & 28KV LOAD GROWTH

    (a)

    (b)

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    220

    240

    260

    2014 2017 2020 2023 2026 2029 2032

    MV

    A

    Current Rating Proposed Rating Forecast

    Capacity Projects

    Committed:

    (a) Startop MS – 5MVA (2014)

    (b) Orleans TS – 16MVA (2014)

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    23

    3.6.3 Distribution System Analysis The 28kV & 8kV trunk network provides acceptable coverage of

    the region; however, expansion of the Cyrville trunk to the east

    (currently underway) will be required to supply the south of

    Orleans as it develops.

    3.6.4 System Needs From a regional point of view there is sufficient capacity to

    address forecasted load growth. Minor changes to address

    localized load growth will be required over the next 20 years.

    Startop MS Transformer Upgrades

    While overall regional capacity is sufficient for future load

    growth, the local loading on the Startop MS substation is

    currently above the station rating. Due to the distance between

    substations this load cannot be effectively supplied from the

    other 8kV stations in the area. The upgrade of these

    transformers will be coordinated with primary protection

    upgrades and automation work occurring on the 44kV

    subtransmission in the east. The new station transformers will

    increase the station capacity from 15MVA to 20MVA and will be

    completed in 2014.

    HONI Orleans TS Construction

    HONI is constructing a new 28kV station in the vicinity of Mer

    Bleue Road and Innes Road. HOL has requested ownership of a single circuit, providing for 16MVA of

    capacity. The new Orleans TS feeder will tie into the system currently supplied from the Cyrville F1, reducing

    the load on Cyrville MTS and possibly Bilberry TS. The new feeder will be tied into the Mer Bleue Road line

    and open points introduced along Renaud Road and Navan Road. It is anticipated that this circuit will be in

    service in 2014.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    24

    3.7 West 28 kV 3.7.1 Study Area The West 28kV supply region

    includes Kanata and Stittsville.

    The region is bounded by

    HOL’s service boundary in the

    west, south and north.

    Eagleson Road has been

    utilized as the main boundary

    to the east, with the exception

    of the Bridlewood Area. The

    majority of this service

    territory is fed at 28kV;

    however, there are pockets

    fed at 12kV and 8kV. The 28kV

    region is supplied by the

    Kanata MTS, Marchwood MS,

    Bridlewood MS, Alexander DS,

    Janet King DS and the Terry

    Fox MTS 28kV substations.

    3.7.2 Forecasted Growth

    Growth in the west supply

    region is driven by the

    ongoing expansion of

    suburban residential

    developments, and associated

    mixed-use centres.

    Projected load growth in the

    Kanata and Stittsville areas is

    expected to be supplied from

    the recent addition to the

    system, Terry Fox MTS. Terry

    Fox MTS is located on Michael

    Cowpland Drive along the

    230kV right-of-way and will mainly supply the areas of new growth, and act as a backup for Bridlewood MS

    and Janet King DS. Terry Fox MTS will also be used to off-load the Stittsville load from the Hydro One owned

    substation Alexander DS which will allow Hydro One to have available capacity for growth in their service

    territory.

    The anticipated growth in the Village of Richmond has prompted the upgrade and voltage conversion of the

    Richmond South DS substation. Construction is anticipated to begin in 2016 and will increase capacity to

    accommodate the expected growth and will increase the capacity of Richmond South DS by 1100%.

    FIGURE 3.11 - WEST 28KV STUDY AREA

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    25

    FIGURE 3.12 - WEST 28KV LOAD GROWTH

    (a)

    (b)

    (c)

    (d)

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031

    MV

    A

    Current Rating Proposed Rating Forecast

    3.7.3 Distribution System Analysis Overall, the existing west 28kV area is supplied by an adequate network of trunk feeders. There is however

    the need to expand the system to cover areas seeing growth, as well as to off-load the Hydro Ottawa load on

    Alexander DS. Back-up solutions are also required in the south section of the Stittsville community as well as

    create a backup loop across the south-western part of the region including Richmond. These issues will be

    addressed by the introduction of six feeders from Terry Fox MTS and the four new feeders planned from

    Richmond South DS.

    3.7.4 System Needs There is a need in the short term to increase capacity in the Richmond area as well as increase the

    transformation at Bridlewood MS and Marchwood MTS to meet the N-1 planning criteria at the station level.

    Distribution transfer capabilities can however be maintained allowing station transformers to remain below

    capacity in an N-1 situation delaying the need date for capacity upgrades. Due to the future anticipated

    capacity demand expected from the Richmond area, Richmond South DS will require an upgrade with voltage

    conversion to be capable of meeting this demand. The rebuild is proposed to replace the existing 8kV

    transformer with two 28kV 45/60/75 MVA units. Based on the forecasted station growth and the assumed

    ability to maintain feeder transfer during a station N-1 contingency it is proposed to completely rebuild the

    Bridlewood MS substation by replacing the existing four transformers supplying both 8kV and 28kV, with two

    75 MVA units supplying solely 28kV in 2019. In order to maintain supply capacity within the north 28 kV

    supply territory it is proposed to replace the 33 MVA transformers at Marchwood MS with 30/40/50 MVA

    units (with an assumed LTR of 66 – 1.33 x 50) by 2026.

    It is also recommended to consider implementation of one of the

    options brought up within the Joint Planning study being conducted

    with the Ontario Power Authority and Hydro One Networks Inc. for

    bringing a second 230 kV supply into Terry Fox MTS so that it can be

    operated as a DESN station. With Terry Fox supplied solely from the

    M29C it is not practical to utilize distribution ties to transfer all 6

    feeders during a loss of supply. For similar practicalities, a second

    supply to Richmond South DS will also be considered.

    Capacity Projects

    Committed:

    (a) Terry Fox MTS – 100MVA (2014)

    Proposed:

    (b) Richmond South DS – 67MVA (2016)

    (c) Bridlewood MS – 50MVA (2019)

    (d) Marchwood MS – 33MVA (2022)

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    26

    3.8 Nepean Core 8 kV

    3.8.1 Study Area The South 8kV supply

    region includes the

    northern portions of

    Nepean. This region is

    supplied by the

    Manordale DS,

    Centrepointe DS,

    Woodroffe DS, Epworth

    DS, Merivale DS,

    Parkwood Hills DS,

    Borden Farms DS and

    Rideau Heights DS 8kV

    substations.

    3.8.2 Forecasted Growth

    Growth in the 8kV

    Nepean supply region is

    driven by ongoing

    commercial developments and associated mixed-use centers, two major areas of development are the

    Nepean Employment Area (located around Hunt Club Road between Merivale Road and Prince of Wales

    Drive) and Centrepointe that involves the expansion of Algonquin College and the relocation of the existing

    Transit Station.

    FIGURE 3.13-NEPEAN CORE 8KV STUDY AREA

    Capacity Projects

    Proposed:

    (a) Borden Farm DS – 8MVA (2015)

    (b) Merivale MS – 12MVA (2017)

    (c) New 27KV Feeders – 15MVA (2021)

    FIGURE 3.14 - NEPEAN 8KV LOAD GROWTH

    (a) (b)

    (c)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031

    MV

    A

    Current Rating Proposed Rating Forecast

    Nepean Employment Area

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    27

    3.8.3 Distribution System Analysis The existing 8kV Nepean area is above the capacity limitations. The area of main concern is the Nepean

    employment area in which the trunk feeders are approaching their capacity limitations and the existing

    circuit interconnections are weak.

    3.8.4 System Needs Over the next 20 years, significant growth is expected for the employment area in the Nepean region. The

    expected growth will push the stations and feeders to their capacity limits. The transformers at Merivale DS

    and Borden Farm DS are at the end of their useful lifetime, work at Borden Farm is currently in progress and

    expected to be completed by 2015. By 2021, new 28KV feeders will need to be introduced in this area along

    Hunt Club Road and Prince of Wales Drive where a high concentration of load is expected. In addition, major

    circuit reconfiguration and new interconnection ties need to be built in order to maintain a reliable system

    for this area.

    Borden Farm DS Transformers Replacement The transformers at this station have reached the end of their life and are in need of immediate replacement.

    In 2013, a project was started to replace the transformers and it will be completed by 2015. As mentioned in

    this report, the exiting transformer size would not be able to supply the additional proposed load in the next

    8 years. It is recommended that the transformation at the station be upgraded to 2 x 15MVA.

    New Merivale DS Station

    This station is at the end of its life and it is planned for replacement starting in 2014 with duration of 5 years

    due to its complexity. The current physical conditions at the station would not allow replacing the

    transformers and switchgear at the existing location. A new Merivale 8kV station would need to be rebuilt in

    a more accessible location close to the 115kV transmission line. Additional capacity is required in order to

    service the proposed additional load. It is proposed that the transformation be upgraded to 2x20 MVA

    transformers and four feeders per bus.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    28

    FIGURE 3.15- WEST NEPEAN 8KV STUDY AREA

    3.9 West Nepean 8 kV

    3.9.1 Study Area The West Nepean 8kV supply

    region includes the north-west

    portions of Nepean. This region

    is supplied by the Bayshore DS,

    QCH DS, Stafford Road DS and

    Bells Corners DS 8kV

    substations.

    3.9.2 Forecasted Growth Growth in the 8kV West Nepean

    supply region has been very slow

    in the last couple of years. This

    trend is expected to continue

    since no major projects for this

    area have been identified, except

    for the Bayshore mall expansion

    which is expected to bring an

    additional demand of 2MVA in

    the next 1-2 years.

    3.9.3 Distribution System Analysis The existing 8kV West Nepean area is below the capacity limitations. No major issues have been identified in

    this area of Nepean; however, the transformers at these stations are approaching end of life and will need

    replacement during the duration of this study period.

    Capacity Projects

    Proposed:

    (a) Bayshore T1 – 5MVA (2018)

    (b) Bells Corners DS–

    4MVA (2020)

    (c) QCH DS – 4MVA (2026)

    FIGURE 3.16 - NEPEAN 8KV LOAD GROWTH

    (a) (b)

    (c)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031

    MV

    A

    Current Rating Proposed Rating Forecast

    0.5% Average Growth Rate

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    29

    3.9.4 System Needs Over the next 20 years, very little growth is expected for the west area of the Nepean region. The expected

    growth will not push the stations and feeders to their capacity limits. The transformers at Bayshore DS, Bells

    Corners DS and QCH DS will reach the end of their useful lifetime during the length of the study period and

    have been identified for replacement in the next 5-15 years.

    Bayshore T1 The T1 transformer at this station will be reaching end of life by 2018. Currently, the transformers at this

    location do not match in size. It is recommended that the transformation at the station be upgraded to

    15MVA. The proposed capacity upgrade will improve the supply availability under a contingency scenario.

    Bells Corners DS

    The transformers at this station will be reaching end of life by 2020. It is recommended that the

    transformation at the station be upgraded to 2 x 12MVA.

    QCH DS

    The transformers at this station will be reaching end of life by 2026. It is recommended that the

    transformation at the station be upgraded to 2 x 12MVA.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    30

    FIGURE 3.17 - WEST 8KV STUDY AREA

    3.10 West 8 kV 3.10.1 Study Area The West 8 kV supply region

    includes South Kanata, Stittsville,

    The Village of Richmond and

    Munster Hamlet. This region is

    supplied by the Bridlewood MS,

    Janet King DS, Munster DS,

    Richmond North DS and

    Richmond South DS 8 kV

    Substations as well as by the 28

    kV Substations Alexander DS,

    Beckwith DS and Janet King DS

    through the use of distribution

    step-down transformers (28 kV

    to 8 kV).

    3.10.2 Forecasted Growth Growth in the west 8kV supply

    region is driven primarily by the

    growth in the Village of

    Richmond. Based on the Village

    of Richmond, City of Ottawa

    plans and available information

    from other agencies, the key

    developments which will

    continue to drive growth in this

    supply region are all centered in

    Richmond and detailed in the

    Village of Richmond Community

    Design Plan (CDP). The Village of

    Richmond CDP outlines the

    expansion of industrial and

    commercial areas as well as an

    increase of 2,850 – 3,950

    dwelling units.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    31

    Capacity Projects

    Proposed Voltage

    Conversions:

    (a) Richmond South DS Reduction of 6 MVA (2016)

    (b) Bridlewood MS Reduction of 8MVA (2019)

    FIGURE 3.18 - WEST 8KV LOAD GROWTH

    (a)

    (b) -20

    -10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031

    MV

    A

    Current Rating Proposed Rating Forecast

    3.10.3 Distribution System Analysis Overall, the existing west 8 kV area is supplied by an adequate network of trunk feeders. There is however

    the need to expand the system to cover areas seeing growth. As there are very few 8 kV feeders (9) that span

    a vast geographic region there are limits to capacity as well as the ability to restore under contingency.

    3.10.4 System Needs Based on the load growth predicted in the Village of Richmond as well as

    capacity demand for Trans Canada’s Energy East Pumping Station, there is a

    need in the short term to increase capacity with voltage conversion at

    Richmond South DS. The rebuild is proposed to replace the existing 8kV

    transformer with two 28kV 45/60/75 MVA units.

    Due to aging infrastructure in the Glen Cairn community and at Bridlewood

    MS substation, reliability has been greatly impacted and has prompted a

    station rebuild. This project is proposed to completely rebuild the substation

    by replacing the existing four transformers supplying both 8kV and 28kV,

    with two 75 MVA units supplying solely 28kV in 2019.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    32

    FIGURE 3.21 - WEST 12KV STUDY AREA

    Capacity Projects

    None

    FIGURE 3.22 - WEST 12KV LOAD GROWTH

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031

    MV

    A

    Current Rating Proposed Rating Forecast

    0.5% Average Growth Rate

    3.11 West 12 kV 3.11.1 Study Area The West 12 kV supply region is

    located in central Kanata,

    including the communities of

    Katimavik and Beaverbrook. This

    region is supplied by the

    Beaverbrook MS, and South March

    MS substations.

    3.11.2 Forecasted Growth The West 12 kV area is bounded

    by 28kV supplied areas on all sides

    and is anticipated that all future

    growth will be supplied from 28 kV

    sources.

    3.11.3 Distribution System Analysis

    Overall, the existing West 12 kV

    area is supplied by an adequate

    network of trunk feeders and can

    be recovered in N-1 contingency

    circumstances.

    3.11.4 System Needs Based on only infill load growth

    predicted in the west 12kV supply

    area, the system will only require

    regular inspection and maintenance to continue providing the demanded capacity.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    33

    3.12 Citywide 44 kV 3.12.1 Study Area The 44 kV system spans the entire service area and is supplied from three stations: Hawthorne TS, Nepean TS

    and South March TS. The following map outlines the trunk circuit routing from each of these three stations.

    FIGURE 3.19 - 44KV STUDY AREA

    Each station area is essentially independent of the others with limited connections between South March TS

    and Nepean TS and between Hawthorne TS and Nepean TS.

    The following figures outline the trunk feeder network as well as the substations supplied by the three 44 kV

    stations.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    34

    FIGURE 3.20 - HAWTHORNE TS STATION SUPPLY AREA

    Stations supplied by Hawthorne TS:

    Beaconhill MS – 44 / 8.32 kV

    Blackburn MS – 44 / 8.32 kV

    Borden Farm DS – 44 / 8.32 kV

    Leitrim MS – 44 / 27.6 kV

    Startop MS – 44 / 8.32 kV

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    35

    FIGURE 3.21 - NEPEAN TS STATION SUPPLY AREA

    Stations supplied by Nepean TS:

    Barrhaven DS – 44 / 8.32 kV

    Bayshore DS – 44 / 8.32 kV

    Bells Corner DS – 44 / 8.32 kV

    Jockvale DS – 44 / 8.32 kV

    Longfields DS – 44 / 27.6 kV

    Merivale DS – 44 / 8.32 kV

    Parkwood Hills DS – 44 /8.32 kV

    Q.C.H. DS – 44 / 8.32 kV

    Rideau Heights DS – 44 /8.32 kV

    Stafford Road DS – 44 /8.32 kV

    Woodroffe DS – 44/8.32 kV

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    36

    FIGURE 3.22 - SOUTH MARCH TS STATION SUPPLY AREA

    Stations supplied by South March TS:

    Alexander DS – 44 / 27.6 kV

    Beaverbrook MS – 44 / 12.4 kV

    Bridlewood MS – 44 / 8.32 kV & 44 / 27.6 kV

    Janet King DS – 44 / 8.32 kV & 44 /27.6 kV

    Munster DS – 44 /8.32 kV

    Richmond North DS – 44 /8.32 kV

    South March MS – 44 / 12.4 kV

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    37

    Capacity Projects

    Proposed:

    (a) Hawthorne TS – 51MVA (2016)

    There are no capacity issues

    forecasted at Nepean TS. The

    load forecast shows a

    decreasing trend based on the

    conversion of 8kV load (fed

    from 44/8kV stations) to the

    28kV system.

    There are no capacity issues

    forecasted at South March TS

    during the study period. The

    load forecast shows a

    decreasing trend based on

    load transfers to transmission

    connected stations.

    3.12.2 Forecasted Growth Based on the vast area that these stations cover and their independent nature, they have been studied as

    separate stations as opposed to as a single region. Through the Joint Planning Study currently under way with

    the OPA and HONI, the load forecast for each of the stations has been developed.

    FIGURE 3.23 - HAWTHORNE TS LOAD GROWTH

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031

    MV

    A

    Current Rating Proposed Rating Forecast

    FIGURE 3.24 - NEPEAN TS LOAD GROWTH

    130

    135

    140

    145

    150

    155

    160

    165

    2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031

    MV

    A

    Current Rating Proposed Rating Forecast

    FIGURE 3.25 – SOUTH MARCH TS LOAD GROWTH

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031

    MV

    A

    Current Rating Proposed Rating Forecast

    (a)

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    38

    3.12.3 Distribution System Analysis In order to improve reliability performance in the East end of the city the loop of feeders from Hawthorne TS

    will be automated, the details of which can be found in the Reliability Plan Report.

    The Nepean TS 44kV system is built in a network configuration and at this time there are no significant issues

    identified with the distribution arrangement.

    The 44kV trunk network from South March TS is adequate, except for the single radial feeder (A9M3) that

    runs south of Maple Grove Road. The radial section of A9M3 supplies three 44/8kV stations: Janet King DS,

    Richmond North DS and Munster DS. In order to improve reliability performance the 22M25 out of Nepean

    TS will be extended into the southern part of the West service territory to serve as a backup to these stations.

    Construction is anticipated and to begin in 2015 and be operational in 2017.

    3.12.4 System Needs Additional capacity is required at Hawthorne in the near term and at South March TS in the long term, after

    the end of the study period. HOL must formally apply to HONI for additional capacity at Hawthorne TS, the

    logistics of which will be jointly discussed. It is currently assumed that a total station capacity of 150 MVA is

    feasible with a timeframe for completion around 2016. An additional 44kV station is being proposed in the

    Richmond area which will create dual supplies to some of the rural 44kV supplied substations, create

    additional feeder ties for contingency operability and will help off-load the heavily loaded feeders from South

    March TS and Nepean TS.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    39

    4 Distributed Generation Capacity System capacity to connect distributed generation can be limited by several factors such as:

    1. Station loading – some station transformers have limited or no capability for reverse power flow. At these stations, total connected generation cannot exceed either 60% of top transformer rating plus minimum loading, or in the most restrictive case where there is no reverse flow capability, generation is limited to the minimum station loading.

    2. Feeder Thermal Rating – the feeder ampacity rating must be respected to not overheat the conductors and connected equipment. Unlike when planning for N-1 feeder load restoration contingency, for distributed generation, the available thermal capacity is the full feeder ampacity rating less contingency.

    3. Short Circuit Rating – connection of distributed generation will increase the available current that flows through the system during faults. The total available current during faults cannot exceed the system rating.

    4. Power Quality – four concerns arise when connecting distributed generation: a. harmonics caused by inverter based generation; b. phase imbalance caused by single-phase generators; c. voltage instability caused by generators connected at various points along a feeder, or

    by induction generators requiring reactive power; and d. flicker caused by generators intermittently turning on and off - they can affect the

    voltage on the circuit impacting the quality of supply to Hydro Ottawa customers. The generation connected to both feeders and station must be managed to prevent adverse impact to HOL load customers.

    Hydro Ottawa Limited’s Service Area was under a transmission constraint due to the short circuit rating of

    115kV transmission breakers located at the Hydro One Networks Inc. (HONI) owned Hawthorne TS. As a

    result, no generation project larger than 10kW was permitted to connect after FIT1.0. However, since HONI’s

    breaker upgrade is largely completed and scheduled for final completion by June 2014, the OPA has allowed

    for up to 150MW made available now for generation applications in the region. The remaining 150MW will

    be made available upon project completion. Despite this, some stations remain restricted from any

    generation connection regardless of size.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    40

    4.1 Core 13kV The substations in the Core 13kV region are co-owned by Hydro Ottawa and Hydro One Networks

    Incorporated. Currently, there are connection restrictions at the Slater TS, and one bus at Lisgar TS. Slater TS

    is limited due to short circuit levels at the station, whereas Lisgar TS is currently limited by the minimum

    normal loading on the station bus. The proposed upgrades at Lisgar TS substation will allow loading at this

    station to increase which is anticipated to alleviate the current restriction at this location.

    We are presently aware of over 29.35MW of proposed large generation within the Core 13kV region for

    connection within the next three years. Ideally, for better utilization and load relief, this generation would

    connect to the High Voltage Distribution Stations HVDSs in the Core rather than those in West 13kV.

    Specifically, rather than connect to the capacity available Carling TS, connecting to Hinchey TS and Lisgar TS

    would better benefit HOL’s Grid management. HOL is pursuing the options with HONI and the OPA.

    Please note that the information in the tables in this section may change at any time as HOL may, for better

    operational performance, reconfigure the Grid or offer Proponents alternate connections, or as a project

    connection opportunity may expire. Also, micro-generation projects are not included in the “potential”

    column given the 30% likelihood of connecting before contract offer expiry. The generation connected, in-

    process or proposed may be of various energy source, capacity or connection/contract type.

    TABLE 4.1 – CORE 13KV EMBEDDED GENERATION CONNECTIONS

    Station

    Connected In-Process Proposed

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    King Edward TK

    JY bus 8 2.62 1 0.035 0 0

    King Edward TK

    QZ bus 8 0.074 0 0 1 0.135

    Lisgar TL

    JY bus 6 16.76 Restricted due to thermal constraint

    Lisgar TL

    QZ bus 11 0.0708 0 0 0 0

    Slater TS

    B1B2 bus 1 0.010 Restricted due to short circuit constraint

    Slater T

    J1J2 bus Restricted due to short circuit constraint

    Slater TS

    Q1Q2 bus Restricted due to short circuit constraint

    Hinchey TH 19 2.13 0 0 0 0

    Riverdale TR

    JY bus 11 0.0789 1 0.050 0 0

    Riverdale TR

    QZ bus 25 0.194 0 0 1 0.050

    Total 89 21.9377 1 0.05 2 0.185

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    41

    4.2 East 13kV There are currently no regional substation restrictions for the connection of distributed generation at the

    East 13kV substations. The proposed upgrades at King Edward TK substation may lower the available

    connection capacity due to increased available fault current from the larger substation transformers.

    TABLE 4.2 - EAST 13KV EMBEDDED GENERATION CONNECTIONS

    Station

    Connected In-Process Proposed

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    Russell TB

    BY bus 8 0.343 2 0.400 2 0.350

    Russell TB

    QZ bus 11 0.540 6 0.580 1 0.750

    Albion TA

    BQ bus 13 0.117 0 0 1 0.100

    Albion TA

    JY bus 33 0.468 6 0.400 2 0.200

    Ellwood TS 0 0 1 0.250 0 0

    Overbrook TO

    J1J2 bus 12 0.099 3 0.700 2 0.150

    Overbrook TO

    Q1Q2 bus 25 0.174 3 0.525 0 0

    Riverdale TR

    JY bus 11 0.0789 1 0.050 0 0

    Riverdale TR

    QZ bus 25 0.194 0 0 1 0.050

    King Edward TK

    JY bus 8 2.62 1 0.035 0 0

    King Edward TK

    QZ bus 8 0.074 0 0 1 0.135

    Total 154 4.7079 23 0.05 10 1.735

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    42

    4.3 West 13kV Presently, the Lincoln Heights TS B1B2 bus pair is restricted to allow connection of only renewable micro-

    generation.

    The OPA has approved a 29.35MW large hydro generation facility in the downtown core. At the time of

    project application, Carling TS was the readily available station with capacity. However, now that HONI and

    HOL confidently project completion of the Hinchey TS transformer and switchgear upgrade by Q4, 2015, HOL

    is pursuing normal connection of this new generation facility to Hinchey TS and perhaps one or two units on

    occasion to Lisgar TS. This would provide HOL with greater benefit to its Grid management strategy. As per

    the manufacturer’s recommendation, HONI is presently restricting reverse flow through the existing Hinchey

    TH transformers to the minimum station load. The station upgrade will allow for more loading of Hinchey TS,

    and reverse flow of 60% of the top transformer rating plus minimum load with the requirement to keep the

    loading (with and without generation) on the secondary windings balanced. HOL has not yet included the

    proposed new generation capacity in Table 3.3 below, but will included it in the appropriate generation table

    once it receives a formal project application and confirms the connection station .

    TABLE 4.3 - WEST 13KV EMBEDDED GENERATION

    Station

    Connected In-Process Proposed

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Carling TS

    KY bus 26 0.278 0 0 1 0.100

    Carling TS

    QZ bus 12 0.090 2 0.200 0 0

    Hinchey TH 19 2.130 0 0 0 0

    Lincoln Heights

    TD

    B1B2 bus

    16 0.132 Restricted due to thermal constraint

    Only micro-generation connections allowed

    Lincoln Heights

    TD

    Y1Y2 bus

    9 5.060 0 0 1 0.100

    Woodroffe TW

    BJ bus 6 0.051 0 0 0 0

    Woodroffe TW

    QZ bus 10 0.156 2 0.100 0 0

    Total 98 7.897 4 0.300 2 0.200

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    43

    4.4 South 28kV Currently, half of Fallowfield MTS is restricted due to thermal limitations. Plasco Energy Demo and Energy

    Ottawa’s Trail Road generation facilities are connected to this station and capacity for up to 16MW has been

    reserved for a Plasco Energy production generation facility.

    TABLE 4.4 - SOUTH 28KV EMBEDDED GENERATION

    Station

    Connected In-Process Proposed

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Fallowfield DS

    J bus 2 10.950 1 16

    Restricted due to thermal

    constraint

    Fallowfield DS

    Q bus 6 0.131 0 0 0 0

    Longfields DS The HVDS is HONI’s South March TS - included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Limebank MS

    B1 bus 7 0.061 0 0 0 0

    Limebank MS

    B2 bus 19 0.313 0 0 0 0

    Total 34 11.455 1 16 0 0

    4.5 South-East 28kV There are currently no regional substation restrictions for the connection of distributed generation at the

    South-East 28kV stations.

    TABLE 4.5 - SOUTH-EAST 28KV EMBEDDED GENERATION

    Station

    Connected In-Process Proposed

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Limebank

    MS

    B1 bus

    7 0.061 0 0 0 0

    Limebank

    MS

    B2 bus

    19 0.313 0 0 0 0

    Uplands MS 9 0.238 0 0 0 0

    Leitrim DS The HVDS is HONI’s Hawthorne TS. included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Total 35 0.612 0 0 0 0

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    44

    4.6 East 8kV & 28kV There are currently no regional station restrictions for the connection of distributed generation at the East

    28kV & 8kV stations.

    TABLE 4.6 - EAST 8KV & 28KV EMBEDDED GENERATION

    Station

    Connected In-Process Proposed

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Cyrville MTS 7 65.80 3 0.7420 0 0

    Bilberry Creek TS 23 0.7150 1 0.1000 0 0

    Moulton MS

    B1 bus 10 0.0794 0 0 0 0

    Moulton MS

    B2 bus 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Total 40 66.5944 4 0.842 0 0

    4.7 West 28kV There are currently no regional station restrictions for the connection of distributed generation at the West

    28kV stations.

    TABLE 4.7 - WEST 28KV EMBEDDED GENERATION

    Station Connected In-Process Proposed

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Kanata MTS 19 0.1690 2 0.942 0 0

    Marchwood MS

    J bus

    13 0.1710 0 0 0 0

    Marchwood MS

    Q bus

    2 0.0150 0 0 0 0

    Bridlewood MS

    B1 bus

    6 0.0385 0 0 0 0

    Bridlewood MS

    Q bus

    6 0.0535 1 0.150 0 0

    Alexander DS HONI station. The HVDS is HONI’s South March TS - included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Janet King DS The HVDS is HONI’s South March TS - included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Terry Fox MTS

    J bus

    0 0 0 0 0 0

    Terry Fox MTS

    Q bus

    0 0 0 0 0 0

    Total 46 0.4470 3 1.092 0 0

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    45

    4.8 Nepean Core 8kV Connection of generation to one bus at Centrepointe DS is restricted due to short-circuit ratings, affecting 3

    of the 6 feeders from this substation.

    TABLE 4.8 - NEPEAN CORE 8KV EMBEDDED GENERATION

    Station Connected In-Process Proposed

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Manordale DS

    B1 bus

    3 0.0240 0 0 0 0

    Manordale DS

    B2 bus

    4 0.0344 0 0 0 0

    Centrepoint DS

    B1 bus

    4 0.0380 0 0 0 0

    Centrepoint DS

    B2 bus

    3 0.0400 0 0 0 0

    Woodroffe DS The HVDS is HONI’s Nepean TS - included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Epworth DS

    B bus

    2 0.0190 0 0 0 0

    Epworth DS

    Q bus

    2 0.0116 0 0 0 0

    Merivale MS

    B1 bus

    1 0.0100 1 0.075 0 0

    Merivale MS

    B2 bus

    2 0.0220 0 0 0 0

    Parkwood Hills DS The HVDS is HONI’s Nepean TS - included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Borden Farms DS The HVDS is HONI’s Nepean TS - included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Rideau Heights DS The HVDS is HONI’s Nepean TS included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Total 14 0.1364 0 0 0 0

    4.9 West Nepean 8kV There are currently no regional station restrictions for the connection of distributed generation at the West

    Nepean 8kV stations. All these stations are supplied from HONI HVDSs, either South March TS or Nepean TS.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    46

    4.10 West 8kV There are currently no regional station restrictions for the connection of distributed generation at the West

    8kV stations.

    TABLE 4.9 - WEST 8KV EMBEDDED GENERATION

    Station

    Connected In-Process Proposed

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Bridlewood MS

    Q bus 6 0.0535 1 0.150 0 0

    Bells Corners

    DS The HVDS is HONI’s Nepean TS – included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Janet King DS The HVDS is HONI’s South March TS – included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Munster DS The HVDS is HONI’s South March TS– included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Richmond

    North MS The HVDS is HONI’s South March TS– included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Richmond

    South DS 6 0.0510 1 0.250 0 0

    Alexander DS HONI station. The HVDS is HONI’s South March TS– included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    Beckwith DS HONI station.

    Total 12 0.1045 2 0.4 0 0

    4.11 West 12kV There are currently no regional station restrictions for the connection of distributed generation at the West

    12kV stations.

    TABLE 4.10 - WEST 12KV EMBEDDED GENERATION

    Station

    Connected In-Process Proposed

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Beaverbrook

    MS The HVDS is HONI’s South March TS - included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

    South March

    DS The HVDS is HONI’s South March TS - included in Section 4.12 City Wide 44kV.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    47

    4.12 City Wide 44kV There are currently no regional station restrictions for the connection of distributed generation at the 44kV

    Stations.

    TABLE 4.11 - CITY WIDE 44KV EMBEDDED GENERATION

    Station

    Connected In-Process Proposed

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Number of

    Connections

    Nameplate

    Capacity

    (MW)

    Hawthorne

    TS 32 10.81 10 0.460 0 0

    Nepean TS 55 2.270 8 1.200 4 0.475

    South March

    TS 25 0.217 6 0.535 0 0

    Total 112 13.297 24 2.195 4 0.475

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    48

    FIGURE 5.1 - KANATA AREA EXISTING TRANSMISSION ARRANGEMENT

    5 Bulk System Investments A joint planning study of the bulk supply to the city is

    currently underway with participation from the Ontario

    Power Authority, Hydro One Networks Inc. transmission

    and distribution, and the Independent Electricity System

    Operator. This study began November 2010 and the

    purpose was to evaluate the transmission system needs for

    the next 20 years based on the forecasted load growth at

    transmission connected distribution stations. Two scenarios

    are being considered, a reference case and a high growth

    case that assumes that load growth accumulates at a faster

    rate. As the study is still ongoing, the following section

    outlines the issues that have been identified through this study, but not the solutions currently in discussion.

    The outcome of the study will be the optimal solution to resolve the issues, taking into consideration the

    impacts to both the transmission and distribution systems. For the purposes of the study, four regions of

    concern are being considered: Kanata, South Nepean, Downtown Core and Orleans.

    5.1 Kanata Area The Kanata Area considers the load growth at five stations: Bridlewood MS (115kV connected transformers

    BRDT1 & BRDT2), Kanata MTS, Marchwood MS, Terry Fox MTS and South March TS.

    The issues identified for this

    station grouping are the thermal

    overload on the 115 kV S7M as

    well as the violation of the

    Ontario Resource and

    Transmission Assessment Criteria

    (ORTAC) load loss criteria (> 150

    MW loss during contingency) for

    the high growth case. Currently,

    the S7M (115kV) supplies

    Marchwood MS, Bridlewood MS,

    Richmond South DS and

    Fallowfield DS or approximately

    25,000 customers, 9% of HOLs

    customer base. With the 230kV

    connection of Terry Fox MTS to

    the single circuit M29C, an issue

    was identified with the reliability

    of the circuit, and contingency if and when maintenance is performed on this line. To address this issue,

    solutions to bring a second 230kV line to Terry Fox MTS are under review.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    49

    FIGURE 5.2 - SOUTH NEPEAN AREA EXISTING TRANSMISSION ARRANGEMENT

    5.2 South Nepean The South Nepean area is defined by the grouping of nine stations: Fallowfield DS, Limebank MS, Uplands

    MS, Nepean TS, Epworth DS, Manordale, Centrepointe DS, Richmond South DS and Manotick DS (HONI

    owned). The driving issue in the South Nepean area is the sparse transmission supply and the amount of load

    growth being seen in the area. There is a need to increase the capacity in the south to supply the new

    developments, a number of options are being considered, including upgrades at Limebank MS, Fallowfield DS

    and/or a new 28kV station, all of which require upgrades to the transmission system.

    5.3 Downtown Core The stations in the downtown core were subdivided into three categories to align with the station

    distribution territory and the transfer capabilities between them. The three areas are broken down as

    follows:

    Group “A” – Carling TM, Lincoln Heights TD and Woodroffe TW

    Group “B” – Hinchey TH, Slater TS, Lisgar TL and King Edward TK

    Group “C” – Russell TB, Overbrook TO, Albion TA, Ellwood MTS and Riverdale TR

    Table 5.1 summarizes the needs in each of the three groups as well as at the transmission level.

  • 201

    4 S

    yste

    m C

    apac

    ity

    Pla

    n

    50

    TABLE 5.1 - DOWNTOWN CORE NEEDS

    Needs Reference Forecast High Growth Forecast

    Transformation

    Capacity Needs

    Group A No need as a group No need as a group

    Carling overloaded starting 2019

    Group B Capacity shortfall in 2016

    55 MW additional capacity needed

    in 2030

    Capacity shortfall in 2013

    108 MW additional capacity

    needed in 2030

    Group C Capacity shortfall in 2026

    20 MW additional capacity needed

    in 2030

    Capacity shortfall in 2018

    80 MW additional capacity

    needed in 2030

    Circuit Needs A4K N-1 thermal overload on loss

    of A5RK starting 2017

    A4K N-1 thermal overload on

    loss of A5RK starting 2015

    M5G N-1 thermal overload on

    loss of M4G starting 2030

    5.3.1 Group “A” There are no major capacity concerns with this group; therefore there is no impact on the transmission

    system that supplies these stations.

    5.3.2 Group “B” The load pocket described as Group “B” is seeing significant load growth, and as such will require capacity

    upgrades. The transmission in this area is currently constrained by thermal overload under N-1 contingency

    and any upgrades at the station level will trigger transmission upgrades. A number of upgrade options were

    considered and included possible capacity increases at Hinchey TH, Lisgar TL and/or King Edward TK. After

    further review it was decided to start moving forward with transformer replacement at Lisgar TL to increase

    the capacity.

    5.3.3 Group “C” The load pocket described as Group “c” is seeing significant load growth, and as such will require capacity

    upgrades. The transmission in this area is currently constrained by thermal overload under N-1 contingency

    and any upgrades at the station level will trigger transmission upgrades. A number of upgrade options are

    being considered and include possible capacity increases at Russell TB and/or Overbrook TO.

    5.4 Orleans The Orleans area considers the load growth at four stations: Moulton MS, Cyrville MTS, Bilberry Creek TS and

    a new HONI owned station being proposed – Orleans TS. The major concern in this pocket is creating a

    reliable supply to Orleans TS. Currently, it is proposed to supply Orleans TS at two different voltages, one tap

    off of 115kV and one tap from 230kV. In order to improve the reliability of this station a number of

    transmission upgrades are being considered the impact on the supplies to both Bilberry Creek TS and