2015 03 08 draft lawsuit miller v utrecht

8/19/2019 2015 03 08 Draft Lawsuit Miller v Utrecht

1/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

J R. M3053 F S. S 245S F, CA 94123: (415) 9330269F: (415) 8741992E: @.

P I P P

C A CAA

C A ACC C

J M, ) C . C16 P S )C P A ) COMPLAIN IN LA & EQI

G, ) FOR DAMAGES, DECLARAOR) AND EQIABLE RELIEF FOR:P ) 1. F F D C

) P A 15 SC 1692 ... ) 2. C RR

) D C P A & L, LLP, C ) C C 1788 ..L L C, N ) 3. FL, E. S B ) 4. C C, R D. S, ) 5. SF H S S B C, ) 37() SF A CC C K, ) 6. CA C C C C K ) 7. & D B P

L SC K R ) 8. AA R M 2007, ) 9. EC K, R D. S, ) 10. DDOES 1500 . ) 11. P A G A

) 12. D RDefendants. ) 13. I R

) 14. R P D ) 15. O R C D A) E J)) JR RIAL REQESED

)

P J R. M

P S C P A G :

1. P

C C S F. P

P

- 1 -

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, DECLARATORY & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF


2/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

S C P A G

C & D B P A 17200

C B & P C.

2. P J R. M .S.F F D C P A 15 S

C 1692 .. C RR F D

C P A C C C 1788 . .

3. D & L, LLP C

L L P S S

S F F D. D

F C

S F S C.

4. D N L &

L, LLP D &

L, LLP. D F C ,

C

C C ,

&

.

5. D R D. S, E.

S B C

D & L, LLP. D

S C .

P

3 C

- 2 -



3/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 15 SC 1692(),

30

,

. ,

, ,

6068() C B &

P C

C.

6.

F F

D C P A C RR F D C

P A,

3

F .

7. ,

D

A, 1692().

. S C

, 3

C. A , C

- 3 -



4/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

, . FDCPA

.

C 30

.

C E J

17204 & .

8. I C

& D B P A, P

17204

D

, D

D C, 1692

F M R,

3

C

3 ,

C,

F

C S C

S . L F K,

D D ,

,

- 4 -



5/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

H, E

E J N

E C 451() ..

3. I P AG, P A P

A G

3 F

C C

, ,

E J C.

C & BAC AC

1. P J M C D,

D & I R

C,

3 F M

R F S, 15 SC 1692()

15 SC,

30

. F ,

D D ,

A L F

. O ,

3

D ,

L J K

- 5 -



6/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

$500

D .

I , P :

1. I D & L, LLP D A,

S , 3

C ,

3

D

3 , ,

F F D

C A, 15

SC 1692() F M M

:

3 .S. F F

D C P A 15 S C

S 1692 .. S

F R C O C 37 S F

A C

F F D C P A,

C RR D C P A,

S F R C O

C 37 S F A C,

- 6 -



7/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

,

R O

A D. J M

E A , E B

.

FACS COMMON O ALL CONS.

P J M D J K 14

M 2008. A

E A. $6,500

.

I 2013, P

& L L F. P

L J

2008 R R S

A. J

. A E

P & L LLP

D J M A F

A N 16 2015 C O

N 9 2015 D S M S

D A 5 N 9

2015 O. D A C D

P C C K J K O 13 2015

:

2. P C J N

S C S F CD15

- 7 -



8/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

E A C

D

J M L J K,

D

,

D

P C C K

, L SC

K M. C K /

, C C K L

SC K. D C

K

.

.P $20,451 O 13 , 2015 3

. .

A P D , P 1

, L

P F

,

,

$20,451 3

. I, D, K

D C R

$6,617,

- 8 -



9/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RBO

F $700 , $5,500

$22,000 .

P 3 O 13

2015 3

.

O F O 13 2015, J M & L

LLP S S S F F D

D A R D. S, E, $20,451

3 3 . O , P

. ,

. P

, ,

.

,

D

P C R

C S C S . L F K,

D C.

P

F F D C P A H

- 9 -



10/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

D E .

1. COLLECION OF ILLEGAL LAE FEES REBLE DAMAGES2. OFFSE FOR IOLAIONS OF ENAN HARASSMEN 37.10B

3. OFFSE FOR IOLAIONS OF CIIL CODE 1940.24. OFFSE FOR IOLAIONS OF CIIL CODE 789.35. OFFSE FOR CONERSION OF 2008 RANGE ROER SPOR

D A D OD, :

1. C I L F SF RO , ;

2. A D O H S F R O, P M 2008 C 37.10B S

F A C $1,000 H, ,

3. A D O C C C 1940.2 $2,000 C C C 1940.2;

4. A D O $100 C E G C CC 789.3.

A A D O I R I

L F C C P S S

O R N M (1985) 169 C.A.3

169

A D J M A

F C M N 16 2015,

O J Q D S M S

N 9 2015, C D A

C 5 O S M S.

A N 16 2015, D M J N

D 10 2015 9:30 .. D. 501 C S

- 10 -



11/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

M R C N 9 2015 O

D S M S C CCP 425.16,

F D 11 2015 9:30 .. D. 501

C. D, C , A C J C F M N

16 2015. A, M N 16 2015, D N

A C O D S M S

CCP 425.16(I). N F M R

CCP 1008 93 E

D J M P, M. C K

,

& M.

M $20,451 ,

D J M ,

$100 D 2014,

$150 M 2015, $200 J 2015, $300

S 2015. I , P

D 2008 R R S, M.

M $80,000 , D

2012. M. M $20,000

, $10,000 $4,000

R R . F

$10,000 , $1,000 $400

, . I

, D J M

- 11 -



12/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

S F R C O, S 37

O $20,451

D 3 . F, S

F R O S F R C O A D

D ,

CC

,

C C 3294

P P C

, .

E A F A

A 10

D J M (415) 9330269,

D C K (209) .

D J M D

D $6,500 2011,

$12,000 , 2

D P RBO

ABNB

S F. I, C K,

$5,000

D ,

822 N P S., C D

- 12 -



13/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

.

C C S 1940.2 ,

C P C

484() P C P C 518 $500

,

S F A C

3 . I

$1,000

S F P M 2008

C 37.10B S F A C

$1,000 .

C , S

F

S F , C C

S. .S.

K . H, .S.

.S.

.S. C

B R A .

SA,

- 13 -



14/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

S

. E

K

. N

,

P

C

&

,

C.

2. I 1977, ,

.S. C F F D C P A

15 .S. C 1692 . . FDCPA D & L LLP

C L C E C

& D B P A 17200 C B

& P C E C. S

3

,

. F

3

C . I , 3

- 14 -



15/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

FDCPA,

15 SC 1692()

3 C 3

C P

P E P

5

30

3

15 SC 1692(), F M

F , E B

S F S

C C

F , C J,

P . A , P

.

A D C O

N 9 2015 D A C C

D S M S C

D J M

F F D C P A 15 SC 1692(). I

,

- 15 -



16/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

P

F ,

.S. C A , H

E , D D . D J

M

,

F ,

P

15 J M 93

P C

D.

A 93

S F R C

O, H

P M S F A C 37.10B D

,

D A D O

. S S F R C O

R

O A D, D

S 37.9

O, $1,000

H S 37.10B $2,000

C C C 1940.2 I

- 16 -



17/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

, $100

L C

D

D

, . (S P A E

L E C D.

D A C C

N 9 2015 N 16 2015 M J N

M R C O SLAPP

CCP 1008

P

D F

P

, . I, , D

D

F . D A

A D , E D

H, 3 15 SC

1692()(11) FDCPA

D

,

D . D

15 SC 1692()(11) 3

A D D.

P

- 17 -



18/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

D ,

,

E J. I

, D E ,

E J D. J N P

E D H. E

H, P J N P

E J M:

H , H

: , , , , , , , , ; , , 1

CC CCA CA

D C CC

. C S C 1975

. C C C R A C C C S 51.

,

R C O, D C

P C RR F D C P A,

F F D C P A, &

C & D B P A

S 17200 .. C B & P C

, B &

1Footnote b to this excerpt from volume 1 of Pomeroy’s Equity Jurisprudence § 307 page 738 cites2 California cases: Allstead v. Laumeister, 16 Cal. App. 59 and Miller v. Kraus (Cal.App.) 155 Pac.834

- 18 -



19/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

P C 17203. D R

$500

C C C 1671(),

. A , D $500 , D

,

D .

A O D,

F A A, P

D $4,935

.

L M 2015 $3,000

, $2,500 J 26

2015 $100

L, D J 27 2015. F,

E

8102015 9102015, $17,000 D C $3,000 J,

$15,000 S 10 2015,

$5,000 A 2015.

F, D

2008 R R S

D

R R S

, D J M . A ,

M. M J 20 2015

C C 1940.2

S F R O

- 19 -



20/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C C 3294

D CC D

F A A C. A,

D CC C C S F S C ,

F A A ,

& .

D F A A A

D,

P ,

P E H. S C

D , E

,

.

A C D

, E J E

A D H,

, .

,

,

.

40 S

F $300,000 D

M 2011 . E K

- 20 -



21/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

$500

M. M

M. M ,

D 2014 $100 , 2015, $150 M 2015,

$200 J 2015 $300

S 2015. A

D 2014 O

2015 D J M M (415) 9330269,

D C C K C K (209)

. D J M 93

C M R

C O SLAPP .

A A A E A

D 2014

P D J M 2008 R R

S M. M 2008 $80,000 $20,000 . I

P P $10,000 $4,000

M. M

, M. M M.

C C K . I

, M. M

P ,

RBO ,

M. M 2 M 2011.

N, M. M $6,500 F ,

P S/H S C C $12,000. I,

- 21 -



22/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C K , C

M. M

$5,000 .

D

C E

, , , S F R

B P

P .

D D

A F , M.

M 2008 R R S

P

,

,

& C E P

D .

BAC AC

2 M 19 2011

$6,500, $500

D 10 . B M 2011

N 2014, D J M $308,000

$22,000 .

D

C

, 1889 S C C

- 22 -



23/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

S . L, E

C E C S 451() D S M

S O 2015 .

, D 3 $20,451

D $51,000 ,

P D .

AA A BC CA, A A C A A C

, $10,000 ,

, D

, P C

D J M $2,500 A L M.

M 2008 R R S. D A

D D

S F A CS . D O $20,451

3 O 13 2015,

, S F R O O

H S 37.10B S F A

C $1,000 , O

$2,000 C C C

1940.2 $100

C C C 789.3 D

P E

E

C D.

- 23 -



24/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

F, S F R O

O A

D D C. A , D

A D, O E R P , $1,000

H S 37.10B S F

R O, $2,000

C C C 1940.2

.

B C ACA

L C K

D

$5,000

D. P 2 D

RBO

ABNB

$400 . A , F AA

D

C C C S 1940.2

$2,000 .

S F R O,

. I ,

3

$20,451,

$39,000 ,

O 2015 $25,000 3 .

- 24 -



25/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3 D

A R D. S, 3 D N

15 SC 1692 ()(11)

. D

3

FDCPA. F

3

D C

3 C . I

, 3

C C

. D

A D D P 15 SC 1692 ()

FDCPA, 3

. F,

D A D, P

D

J M

,

C S

C 1889 S . L, 1978 F K .

DC, A D C

D. D

- 25 -



26/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

, ,

P D

F A S M S D

. D P

,

L

2013, M

2015. L $2,500

$100/ J 26, 2015,

L J K $2,500 D

J M $12,500 D J M

J 27 2015. P

M. M 2008 R R S J 20 2015

D J M

.CC C AA

F, , D

,

D

C K

D A F

C K.

C C C S 1954 A D

C D $100

- 26 -



27/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A D O ,

H P P

I C C

C S 1940.2. $1,000

S F R O 37() H

$2,000 C I

C C C 1940() 137

M E 5 C D

J M

H

I

10

S F A C.

P 2008 R R S P N 2008 R R S.

, ,

.

M. M D 10

P L C C K C

, , ,

, , , , ,

D .

H O :

- 27 -



28/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Sec. 37.10B Tenant Harassment.

[Added by Proposition M, effective December 19, 2008; revised by Larson v.CCSF (2011) 192 Cal. App. 4th 1263, in which the Court of Appeal struck sections37.10B(a)(7) and 37.10B(c)(6), and limited Rent Board remedies under section37.10B(c)(1) to violations of sections 37.10B(a)(1)-(3)]

(a) No landlord, and no agent, contractor, subcontractor or employee of the landlord shalldo any of the following in bad faith:

(1) Interrupt, terminate or fail to provide housing services required by contract or byState, County or local housing, health or safety laws;

(2) Fail to perform repairs and maintenance required by contract or by State, Countyor local housing, health or safety laws;

(3) Fail to exercise due diligence in completing repairs and maintenance onceundertaken or fail to follow appropriate industry repair, containment orremediation protocols designed to minimize exposure to noise, dust, lead, paint,

mold, asbestos, or other building materials with potentially harmful healthimpacts;

(4) Abuse the landlord’s right of access into a rental housing unit as that right isprovided by law;

(5) Influence or attempt to influence a tenant to vacate a rental housing unit throughfraud, intimidation or coercion;

(6) Attempt to coerce the tenant to vacate with offer(s) of payments to vacate whichare accompanied with threats or intimidation;

(7) Continue to offer payments to vacate after tenant has notified the landlord in

writing that they no longer wish to receive further offers of payments to vacate; (8) Threaten the tenant, by word or gesture, with physical harm;

(9) Violate any law which prohibits discrimination based on actual or perceived race,gender, sexual preference, sexual orientation, ethnic background, nationality,place of birth, immigration or citizenship status, religion, age, parenthood,marriage, pregnancy, disability, AIDS or occupancy by a minor child;

(10) Interfere with a tenant’s right to quiet use and enjoyment of a rental housing unitas that right is defined by California law;

(11) Refuse to accept or acknowledge receipt of a tenant’s lawful rent payment;

(12) Refuse to cash a rent check for over 30 days;

(13) Interfere with a tenant’s right to privacy;

(14) Request information that violates a tenant’s right to privacy, including but notlimited to residence or citizenship status or social security number;

(15) Other repeated acts or omissions of such significance as to substantiallyinterfere with or disturb the comfort, repose, peace or quiet of any person

- 28 -



29/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

lawfully entitled to occupancy of such dwelling unit and that cause, are likely tocause, or are intended to cause any person lawfully entitled to occupancy of adwelling unit to vacate such dwelling unit or to surrender or waive any rights inrelation to such occupancy.

(b) Nothing in this Section 37.10B shall be construed as to prevent the lawful eviction of a

tenant by appropriate legal means.(c) Enforcement and penalties.

(1) Rent Board. Violation of Sections 37.10B(a)(1) – (3) is a substantial andsignificant decrease in services as defined in Section 37.2(g) and tenants mayfile a petition with the Rent Board for a reduction in rent.

(2) Criminal Penalty. Any person who is convicted of violating this Section shall beguilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of notgreater than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment in the County Jail for notmore than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

(3) Civil Action. Any person, including the City, may enforce the provisions of thisSection by means of a civil action. The burden of proof in such cases shall bepreponderance of the evidence. A violation of this Chapter may be asserted asan affirmative defense in an unlawful detainer action.

(4) Injunction. Any person who commits an act, proposes to commit an act, orengages in any pattern and practice which violates this Section 37.10B may beenjoined therefrom by any court of competent jurisdiction. An action for injunctionunder this subsection may be brought by an aggrieved person, by the CityAttorney, or by any person or entity who will fairly and adequately represent theinterest of the protected class.

(5) Penalties and Other Monetary Awards. Any person who violates or aids or incites

another person to violate the provisions of this Section is liable for each andevery such offense for money damages of not less than three times actualdamages suffered by an aggrieved party (including damages for mental oremotional distress), or for statutory damages in the sum of one thousand dollars,whichever is greater, and whatever other relief the court deems appropriate. Inthe case of an award of damages for mental or emotional distress, said awardshall only be trebled if the trier of fact finds that the landlord acted in knowingviolation of or in reckless disregard of Section 37.9, 37.10A, or 37.10B herein. Inaddition, a prevailing plaintiff shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees andcosts pursuant to order of the court. The trier of fact may also award punitivedamages to any plaintiff, including the City, in a proper case as defined by CivilCode Section 3294. The remedies available under this Section shall be inaddition to any other existing remedies which may be available to the tenant or

the City.F, D A D O

$2,000

C C 1940.2. D

- 29 -



30/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

S F R O

D .

O :AA C A ACA

D J M A D O

D

S 1940.2 C C C

:

A S A D, D

A D P

C K

. M

M J , , E

D

C H S C C C 1940.2. F, D

C $ . I ,

D J M

,

SMS

.

CAA C C 1940.2

C A A ACA

D S D, D

L

. I , D

- 30 -



31/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

P

E D J M

A .

California Civil Code Section 1940.2 - Influencing a Tenant to Vacate(a) It is unlawful for a landlord to do any of the following for the purpose of influencing a

tenant to vacate a dwelling:

(1) Engage in conduct that violates subdivision (a) of Section 484 of the PenalCode2.

(2) Engage in conduct that violates Section 5183 [Extortion] of the PenalCode.

(3) Use, or threaten to use, force, willful threats, or menacing conductconstituting a course of conduct that interferes with the tenant's quiet

enjoyment of the premises in violation of Section 1927 that would createan apprehension of harm in a reasonable person. Nothing in thisparagraph requires a tenant to be actually or constructively evicted in

2California Penal Code § 484 (a) Every person who shall feloniously steal, take, carry, lead, or driveaway the personal property of another, or who shall fraudulently appropriate property which hasbeen entrusted to him or her, or who shall knowingly and designedly, by any false or fraudulentrepresentation or pretense, defraud any other person of money, labor or real or personal property,or who causes or procures others to report falsely of his or her wealth or mercantile character andby thus imposing upon any person, obtains credit and thereby fraudulently gets or obtainspossession of money, or property or obtains the labor or service of another, is guilty of theft. Indetermining the value of the property obtained, for the purposes of this section, the reasonableand fair market value shall be the test, and in determining the value of services received thecontract price shall be the test. If there be no contract price, the reasonable and going wage for theservice rendered shall govern. For the purposes of this section, any false or fraudulentrepresentation or pretense made shall be treated as continuing, so as to cover any money,property or service received as a result thereof, and the complaint, information or indictment maycharge that the crime was committed on any date during the particular period in question. Thehiring of any additional employee or employees without advising each of them of every labor claimdue and unpaid and every judgment that the employer has been unable to meet shall be primafacie evidence of intent to defraud.

3 518. Extortion is the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, or the obtaining of an officialact of a public officer, induced by a wrongful use of force or fear, or under color of official right.

519. Fear, such as will constitute extortion, may be induced by a threat of any of the following:1. To do an unlawful injury to the person or property of the individual threatened or of a third

person.

522. Every person who, by any extortionate means, obtains from another his signature to any paper orinstrument, whereby, if such signature were freely given, any property would be transferred, or anydebt, demand, charge, or right of action created, is punishable in the same manner as if the actualdelivery of such debt, demand, charge, or right of action were obtained.

523. Every person who, with intent to extort any money or other property from another, sends ordelivers to any person any letter or other writing, whether subscribed or not, expressing orimplying, or adapted to imply, any threat such as is specified in Section 519, is punishable in thesame manner as if such money or property were actually obtained by means of such threat.

.

- 31 -



32/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

order to obtain relief.

(4) Commit a significant and intentional violation of Section 1954.

(b) A tenant who prevails in a civil action, including an action in small claims court, toenforce his or her rights under this section is entitled to a civil penalty in an amount not

to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000) for each violation.D

S A D C

D

P

$2,000 . F,

H S 37.10B S

F A C, D

$6,000 .

D

. S

, D

. I C D , D

S F S C, SF R

B S D C N D C

F L F F D C P A,

,

S F C

.S. D C.

A. A A CA B A:

I 7102013, C C K J

K

O . S

- 32 -



33/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

F R O.

- 33 -



34/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C A:M O C I L F F A

D D

, S F R CO, H S

37.10(B) $1,000 ,

$2,000 C C C 1940.2

I , $100

E .

F, D J M

2008 R R S

J 2003 D .

A E M B 204 E

M D J M

C K.

A 93

S F R C

O, H

P M S F A C 37.10B

D

,

D A D O

. S S F R C O

R

O A D, D

- 34 -



35/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

S 37.9

O, $1,000

H S 37.10B $2,000

C C C 1940.2 I , $100

L C

D

D

, . (S P A E

L E C D.

D A

A D , E D

H, 3 15 SC

1692()(11) FDCPA

D

, D

. D

15 SC 1692()(11) 3

A D D.

P

D ,

,

E J. I

, D E

,

E J D. J N P

- 35 -



36/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

E D H. E

H, P J N P

E J M:

H , H :

, , ,

, , ,

, ,

; ,

, 4

C A 42 C 1983 C CA

C P

F F D

C P A, 3

, C

. 3 15 SC 1692(),

30

15 SC . P

F

,

D , 3

D

4Footnote b to this excerpt from volume 1 of Pomeroy’s Equity Jurisprudence § 307 page 738 cites2 California cases: Allstead v. Laumeister, 16 Cal. App. 59 and Miller v. Kraus (Cal.App.) 155 Pac.834

- 36 -



37/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

P C E

:

C S C 1975

C C C R A C C C S

51. ,

R C O,

D C P C RR F D

C P A, F F D C P A,

&

C & D B P A S

17200 .. C B & P C

, B &

P C 17203. D R

$500

C C C 1671(), . A , D

$500 ,

D ,

D

. A , D $22,000 $500

$500

C

. $20,451

P C D.

A O D,

F A A, P

- 37 -



38/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

D $4,935

.

L M 2015

$3,000 , $2,500 J 26 2015 $100

L, D

J 27 2015. F, E

8102015 9

102015, $17,000 D

C $3,000 J,

$15,000 S 10 2015,

$5,000 A 2015.

F,

D 2008 R R S

D

R

R S , D J M . A , M. M

J 20 2015

C C 1940.2

S F R O

C C 3294 D CC

D F A A

C. A, D C

C C C S F S

C , F A

A , &

- 38 -



39/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

.

D F A A

A D,

P , P E H.

S C D ,

E ,

.

A C D

, E J

E A D H,

,

.

,

,

.

40 S

F $300,000 D

M 2011 . E

K $500

M. M

M. M ,

D

- 39 -



40/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2014 $100 , 2015, $150

M 2015, $200 J 2015

$300 S 2015. A

D 2014 O 2015 D

J M M (415) 9330269,

D C C K C K (209) .

D J M 93

C M

R C O SLAPP

.

A A A E A

D

2014

P D J M 2008 R

R S M. M 2008 $80,000

$20,000 . I P P

$10,000 $4,000

M. M ,

M. M M. C C K

. I ,

M. M P

,

RBO ,

M. M 2 M 2011. N,

M. M $6,500 F , P

S/H S C C $12,000. I,

- 40 -



41/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C K E , C

M. M

$5,000 .

D

D A F ,

M. M 2008 R R S

P

,

,

& C E

P

D .

BAC AC

2 M 19 2011

$6,500, $500 D 10 . B M

2011 N 2014, D J M $308,000

$22,000 .

D

C

, 1889 S C

C S . L, E

C E C S 451()

D S M S O 2015 .

, D 3

$20,451

- 41 -



42/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

D $51,000

, P D

.

CC CACA CAI A D ,

, P

D O 2015

, 3

, $25,000 O 2015,

$39,000 P

D J M

.

AA A BC CA, A A CA A C

, $10,000 ,

, D , P

C D J M $2,500 A L

M. M 2008 R R S. D

A D

D

S F A C S . D

O $20,451 3 O

13 2015, ,

S F R O O

H S 37.10B S F A C

$1,000 , O

- 42 -



43/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

$2,000 C C C

1940.2 $100

C C C 789.3

D PE

E C D.

F, S F R O

O

A D D C. A , D

A D, O E R

P ,

$1,000 H

S 37.10B S F R O, $2,000

C C C 1940.2

.

B C ACA L C K

D

$5,000

D. P 2

D

RBO ABNB

$400 . A ,

F A A

D

C C C S

1940.2 $2,000 .

- 43 -



44/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

S F R O,

. I ,

3 $20,451,

$39,000 ,

O 2015 $25,000

3 . 3

D A R D. S, 3 D N

15 SC 1692

()(11)

. D

3

FDCPA. F

3

D C

3 C . I

, 3

C C

. D

A D D P

15 SC 1692

() FDCPA, 3

- 44 -



45/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

. F, D

A D, P

D J M

,

C S

C 1889 S . L , 1978 F K

. DC, A D C

D. D

,

, P

D

F A S M S

D . D

P

, L

2013, M

2015. L

$2,500 $100/ J 26, 2015,

L J K $2,500

D J M $12,500

D J M J 27 2015.

P M. M 2008 R R S

J 20 2015 D J M

.

CC C AA

- 45 -



46/100


47/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

: 1. SF A C 37.10B ; 2. C C

1940.2 , 3. C C 789.3 ,

$25,000.

I , C M $39,000 ( 2015

M. M R R,

$25,000 3 . I P

M. M ,

,

,

,

D A F,

M. M M. F .

A

C & D B P A,

C RR F D C P A,

F F D C P A

S F R C O

C 37 S F A C,

A D A A

, ,

. I, S F

S C P M. C C K

- 47 -



48/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

J K 2 ,

1999 2002.

D F A

A CC D, D & I R, S F R

C O C 37 S F A

C

F F D C P A, C

RR D C P A,

S F R C O C 37

S F A C,

,

R O A

D. J M

E A .

- 48 -



49/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

AA :

1. CC A A B AA2. A A AA 37.10B

3. A C C 1940.24. A C C 789.3

5. C 2008 A D A D O

D, :

1. C I L F SF RO , ;

2. A D O H S F R O, P M 2008 C 37.10B SF A C $1,000

H, ,

3. A D O C C C 1940.2 $2,000 C C C 1940.2;

4. A D O $100 C E G C CC 789.3.

A A D O I R IL F C C P S S

O R N M (1985) 169 C.A.3

169

A D J M A

F C M N 16 2015,

O J Q D S M S

N 9 2015, C D A

C 5 O S M S.

A N 16 2015, D M J N

D 10 2015 9:30 .. D. 501 C S

M R C N 9 2015 O

- 49 -



50/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

D S M S C CCP 425.16,

F D 11 2015 9:30 .. D. 501

C. D, C ,

A C J C F M N16 2015. A, M N 16 2015, D N

A C O D S M S

CCP 425.16(I). N F M R

CCP 1008 93 E

D J M P, M. C K

,

& M.

M $20,451 ,

D J M ,

$100 D 2014,

$150 M 2015,

$200 J 2015, $300 S 2015. I , P

D 2008 R R S, M.

M $80,000 , D

2012. M. M $20,000

, $10,000 $4,000

R R . F

$10,000 , $1,000 $400

, . I

, D J M

S F R C O, S 37

- 50 -



51/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

O $20,451

D 3 . F, S

F R O

S F R C O A D D ,

CC

,

C C 3294

P P C

, .

E A F A

A 10

D J M (415) 9330269,

D C K (209) .

D J M

D

D $6,500 2011,

$12,000 , 2

D P RBO

ABNB

S F. I, C K,

$5,000

D ,

822 N P S., C D

.

- 51 -



52/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C C S 1940.2 ,

C P C

484() P C P C 518

$500 ,

S F A C

3 . I

$1,000

S F P M 2008

C 37.10B S F A C

$1,000 .

H O :

S. 37.10B H.

A P M, D 19, 2008; L .CCSF (2011) 192 C. A. 4 1263, C A 37.10B()(7) 37.10B()(6), R B 37.10B()(1) 37.10B()(1)(3)

() N , , ,

:

(1) I, S, C , ;

(2) F S,C , ;

(3) F , , , , ,, , ;

(4) A ;

(5) I , ;

(6) A () ;

- 52 -



53/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(7) C ;

(8) , , ;

(9)

, , , , ,, , , , ,, , , , AIDS ;

(10) I C ;

(11) R ;

(12) R 30 ;

(13) I ;

(14) R , ;

(15) O , , , , .

() N S 37.10B .

() E .

(1) R B. S 37.10B()(1) (3) S 37.2() R B .

(2) C P. A S C J , .

(3) C A. A , C,

S . . A C .

(4) I. A , , S 37.10B . A , C A, .

- 53 -



54/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(5) P O M A. A S ( ), , , . I

, S 37.9, 37.10A, 37.10B . I, . , C, CC S 3294. S C.

F, D A D O

$2,000

C C 1940.2. D

S F R O

D .

O :

AA C A ACA

D J M A D O

D

S 1940.2 C C C

:

A S A D, D

A D P C K

. M M

J , , E D

C

- 54 -



55/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

H S C C C 1940.2. F,

D C

$2,000 . I , D J M

, SMS

.

C C C 1940.2

() I :

(1) E () S 484 P C

5

.(2) E S 5186 E P

5California Penal Code § 484 (a) Every person who shall feloniously steal, take, carry, lead, or driveaway the personal property of another, or who shall fraudulently appropriate property which hasbeen entrusted to him or her, or who shall knowingly and designedly, by any false or fraudulentrepresentation or pretense, defraud any other person of money, labor or real or personal property,or who causes or procures others to report falsely of his or her wealth or mercantile character andby thus imposing upon any person, obtains credit and thereby fraudulently gets or obtainspossession of money, or property or obtains the labor or service of another, is guilty of theft. Indetermining the value of the property obtained, for the purposes of this section, the reasonableand fair market value shall be the test, and in determining the value of services received thecontract price shall be the test. If there be no contract price, the reasonable and going wage for theservice rendered shall govern. For the purposes of this section, any false or fraudulentrepresentation or pretense made shall be treated as continuing, so as to cover any money,property or service received as a result thereof, and the complaint, information or indictment maycharge that the crime was committed on any date during the particular period in question. Thehiring of any additional employee or employees without advising each of them of every labor claimdue and unpaid and every judgment that the employer has been unable to meet shall be primafacie evidence of intent to defraud.

6 518. Extortion is the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, or the obtaining of an officialact of a public officer, induced by a wrongful use of force or fear, or under color of official right.

519. Fear, such as will constitute extortion, may be induced by a threat of any of the following:1. To do an unlawful injury to the person or property of the individual threatened or of a third

person.

522. Every person who, by any extortionate means, obtains from another his signature to any paper orinstrument, whereby, if such signature were freely given, any property would be transferred, or anydebt, demand, charge, or right of action created, is punishable in the same manner as if the actualdelivery of such debt, demand, charge, or right of action were obtained.

523. Every person who, with intent to extort any money or other property from another, sends ordelivers to any person any letter or other writing, whether subscribed or not, expressing orimplying, or adapted to imply, any threat such as is specified in Section 519, is punishable in thesame manner as if such money or property were actually obtained by means of such threat.

- 55 -



56/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

C.

(3) , , , , ' S 1927 . N

.

(4) C S 1954.

() A , , ($2,000) .

D

S A D C

D P

$2,000 . F,

H S 37.10B S

F A C, D

$6,000 .

D

. S

, D

. I C D

, D

S F S C, SF R

B S D C N D C F L F F D C P A,

,

S F C

.

- 56 -



57/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

.S. D C.

A. A A CA B A:

I 7102013, C C K J

K O . S

F R O.

CACA AA AA

Date Description of Offense Damages Total

04-10-2013 Charging illegal late fee of $500 $ 500 x 3 $ 1,500

for the second time for March

2013 - Damages Trebled pursuant

to Section 37.9 of Rent Ordiance

05-10-2013 Charging illegal late fee of $500 $ 500 x 3 $ 1,500

(See Statement dated 7-3-2013

Damages Trebled

06-11-2013 Charging illegal fees of $1,000 $1,000 x 3 $ 3,000

07-10-2013 Charging illegal fees of $1,500 $1,500 x 3 $ 4,500

07-15-2013 Promissory note contains $5000

in illegal late fees $5,000 x 3 $ 15,000

- 57 -



58/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

12-24-2014 Text message from Coleman

“How much do you think is fair for

extension until Friday?” - Violation

of § 37.10B(5): $ 1,000and Civil Code § 1940.2 $ 2,000

12-24-2014 Text message from Coleman - You will

have $10K + $1500? (illegal late fee)

§ 37.10B(5) Statutory Damages: $ 1,000

§ 1940.2 - Statutory Damages: $ 2,000

12-29-2014 Text message from Coleman: “I will need

to start adding late fees if I don’t get money

at the end of the day”


§ 1940.2 - Statutory Damages $ 2,000

12-29-2014 Text message from Coleman: “The late fee

is $100 a day”



12-29-2014 Text message from Coleman demanding

illegal late fee: “...$1600 if tomorrow”




- 58 -



59/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

illegal late fee: “Should I not expect money today?

$1700 as late fee.”



- 59 -



60/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


Illegal late fee: “I will be available today to cash

the check with you. If not, the fee will be $1,800

§ 37.10B(5) Statutory Damages: $ 1,000§ 1940.2 - Statutory Damages $ 2,000

01-01-2015 New Years Text message from Coleman demanding

Illegal Late Fee: “Happy New Year! I assume I will

not get money today. You get a pass today. The

late fee is still $1800"



01-02-2015 Text Message from Coleman demanding illegal late

fee: “If not fund by end of today, it will be $2100 by

Mon. So, please get me the money”


01-03-2015 Text message constituting Tenant Harassment in violation

of SF Rent Ordinance § 37.10B(5), (10), and (15)

“We need to meet no matter if you have cash or not.”



01-03-2015 Text message constitutiing Tenant Harassment in

requesting a meeting to collect illegal late fees:

“The mood of the meeting will depend if I get paid or not.”

- 60 -



61/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

“What is the chance we will get money today?”



01-05-2015 Tenant Harassment in demanding meeting to collect

illegal late fees as well as constituting unlawful influencing

a Tenant to vacate based upon threats intimidation and

coercion: “We still ned to meet today. When?”

“My patience is running real thin...”

“I guess you are ready to be evicted.”



01-05-2015 Tenant Harassment in violation of § 37.10B(5) in

influencing or attempting to influence a tenant to vacate

through fraud, intimidation or coercion. The demands for

illegal late fees constitutes fraud, and the repeateddemands by texting Defendant’s mobile phone repeatedly

constitutes intimidation and coercion. Furthermore, the

collection of illegal late fees is a crime under the Rent

Ordinance and Civil Code § 1940.2 references Penal Code

§§ 484(a) Theft and § 518 Extortion. Defendants contend

that the demand for illegal late fees constitutes both extortion

and Theft under the penal code. Text message from

Coleman: “Late fee is $2200 today”



01-07-2015 Text message from Coleman: “Late fee today is $2,300"

- 61 -



62/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28



01-08-2015 Text message from Coleman: “Late fee today is $2400.I pray you have money tomorrow.”



01-09-2015 Text message from Coleman: “Late fee is $2500. When

and where can I pick up the money. You know the

consequences.



01-09-2015 Text message from Coleman: “You don’t have money for

me today?!”


01-09-2015 Text message from Coleman: “$12,500 on Mon or nothing!”



01-14-2015 Text message from Coleman: “Skip the liquor. Make the

Penalty $2800.”



- 62 -



63/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

01-15-2015 Text message from Coleman requesting money including

illegal late fees: “You have my money? Do you have my

money?”


01-16-2015 Text message from Coleman: “What is the chance I will get

money tomorrow?”



01-24-2015 Text message from Coleman referencing $2,500 in

illegal late fees charged and referenced in a spreadsheet

prepared by Coleman’s father and Defendants’ landlord

Chung Cheng Kao for $100 in daily illegal late fees imposed

and collected in cash on 1-27-2015 by Coleman at the

SF Ferry Building. This text message gives rise to liabilityfor Tenant Harassment under § 37.10B(5) of the Rent

Ordinance as well as influencing the tenant to vacate by

intimidation and coercion in violation of Civil Code § 1940.2

“$12,500 will keep the lawyers away for now.”



- 63 -



64/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

01-26-2015 Text message from Coleman: “Do you have the cash yet?”



01-27-2015 After delivering $12,500 in cash to Coleman at the

San Francisco Ferry Building ($10,000 credited towards

back rent owed, and $2,500 credited to illegal late fees)

Coleman demands: “Go get me another $500.”



01-27-2015 Coleman requests again a further $500 illegal late fee:

“But I do need my $500 before then”



01-29-2015 Coleman took Defendant’s 2008 Range Rover Sport on1-20-2015 without any notice and in violation of a written

Agreement signed in 2014providing for the use of the

Range Rover as collateral. The taking of the vehicle was

done in violation of the terms of the agreement. In this text,

Coleman states: “I will only credit you $10K for your RR

given it has salvage title”

Damages of $10,000 for undercrediting RR x 3 $ 30,000



- 64 -



65/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

01-29-2015 Coleman demands an additional illegal payment of $500:

“Give me $500 for weekend.”



01-29-2015 Coleman makes a further demand for the illegal $500 payment:

“$500 in my pocket will help me erase this morning’s

conversation.”



01-30-2015 Tenant Harassment in threatening to revoke the Defendants’

Parking Agreement and take back garage remote control:

“Next time I see the garage door open, I will take back the

remote.”

` § 37.10B(5) Statutory Damages: $ 1,000


01-30-2015 Demand by Coleman in text message for illegal payment:

“Got Cash?”



02-02-2015 Further demands for illegal cash payments by Coleman:

“Got my money?”



02-02-2015 Demand for illegal $500 late fee in violation of SF

- 65 -



66/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rent Ordinance: “Just get me the whole $500 before

end of the week.”



02-04-2015 Further demands by Coleman for payment of illegal

$500 late fee: “Good. When will I get my $500?”



02-06-2015 Further demands by Coleman of payment of illegal

$500 late fee: “You got $500 for me?!”



02-07-2015 Further demands by Coleman that Defendant John Miller

pay him illegal late fees of $500: “Give me the cashtomorrow. When will money be ready today? Don’t make

me chase you for $500!”



02-09-2015 Use of threats intimidation and coercion to collect payment

including illegal late fees: “You better have $7500 in cash by

end of tomorrow or we release the dogs next day. No joke!”



- 66 -



67/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

02-10-2015 Demand for payment including illegal late fees by Coleman:

“$7500. Not a penny lessess!”



02-10-2015 Coleman increases the demand and requests an additional

illegal payment of $100: “$7600 by noon!!!”



02-11-2015 Coleman increases the amount by an additional illegal

amount of $100: “No money... I brought you one day

reprieve. $7700 tomorrow.”



02-12-2015 Coleman memorializes his request for illegal daily latefees: “...$100 a day penalty unless you rather deal with

my lawyer”



02-13-2015 A further illegal late charge is being demanded by Coleman:

“$7800 today!”



02-13-2015 Coleman adds to his latest demand: “Or else $8000

- 67 -



68/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

by Mon.”



02-16-2015 Demand for amounts that include illegal late fees:

“You tab will still be $8000 tomorrow.”



02-16-2015 Demand for increased daily late fee penalties by Coleman:

“It will be $8100 tomorrow”



02-18-2015 Coleman keeps illegally increasing the amount due:

“$8200 today.” “Wait, It is still $18008 today. $8100"


02-19-2015 Further illegal late fees being charged by Coleman:

“$8200 today”



02-20-2015 More illegal late fees being charged by Coleman:

“$8300 today”



- 68 -



69/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

02-20-2015 Further illegal late fees demanded by Coleman:

“Or else it will be $8500 on Mon. I am sure you don’t

want that”


02-20-2015 Delivery of bottle of Rum constituting “excessive rent”

pursuant to SF Rent Ordinance

$40 x treble damages $ 120

02-24-2015 Coleman is illegally increasing the late fees in violation

of SF Rent Ordinance: “$8600... tic tac tic tac...”



02-25-2015 Additional illegal late fees demanded by Coleman:

“$8700..”§ 37.10B(5) Statutory Damages: $ 1,000


02-26-2015 Increase in amount demanded to include an additional

illegal late fee from Coleman: “$8800 TODAY!”



02-26-2015 Demand for an increase in daily penalties from $100 per day

to $150 per day by Coleman: “Remember starting next week

is $150 a day of penalty. You can always choose to vacate.

- 69 -



70/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No need for 30 days notice. This is clearly a violation of the

Tenant Harassment Statute § 37.10B as well as evidence of

unlawful influence to vacate pursuant to Civil Code § 1940.2


02-27-2015 Demand for a further $100 in illegal late fees by Coleman:

“$8900.. It’s Fri!”



02-27-2015 Additional penalties imposed by Coleman in the form of a

demand for Lorna Jane clothing line samples to be given

to Coleman in lieu of his receipt of alcohol constituting an

excessive rent payment under the SF Rent Ordinance


02-27-2015 Coleman considers limiting his illegal daily penalties to

$100 per day from the $150 he threatened to impose if

he likes the Lorna Jane clothing samples that he has

requested the Defendants to provide him with:

“What do you have for me? Then you will know the

penalty after the weekend.

This constitutes Tenant Harassment and undue influence

to vacate



- 70 -



71/100

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1718

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

02-28-2015 Coleman increases the demand by adding an additional

illegal and unlawful late fee of $100 demanded:

“$9000!”

§ 37.10B(5) Statutory Damages: $ 1,000§ 1940.2 - Statutory

2015 03 08 draft lawsuit miller v utrecht

Documents