2015 bioa klimanskaya_irina
TRANSCRIPT
BIOASSAY DEVELOPMENT FOR HUMAN EMBRYONICSTEM CELL-DERIVED RETINAL PIGMENTEPITHELIUM: PROGRESS AND CHALLENGES
Irina Klimanskaya, Ph.D.
March 23, 2015
1
Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE)
2
Structure of the Retina
photoreceptor
RPE
Visual Physiology
4
Visual Physiology: Macular Degeneration
5
Photo by Vlad Chertikhinchertphotography.com
Age Related Macular Dissociation
6
Photo by Vlad Chertikhinchertphotography.com
Normal Vision
7
RPE Transplantation
8
Thesis of RPE Transplantation: Restoration of Anatomy & Function
Neural signal restored
9
Generation of RPE from Human ES CellsA blastomere was removed from a morula stage embryo
hESC MA09 line was established
hESC differentiate to RPE
Pigmented clusters are isolated
10
RPE Transdifferentiation in Culture
Adapted from: B. A. Pfeffer and N. J. PhilpExp. Eye Res.,126 (2014) 1-4
dissociation
dissociation
pigmented cluster cell culture
11
RPE undergoes dedifferentiation during culture expansionand matures after reaching confluence
freshly dissociated clusters Day 1
early confluence mature
12
Post-Thaw Survival is Higher in Less Pigmented Cells
21 h post plating 3 days in culture
13
RPE Cells are Harvested Before They Fully MatureGrowing stage Polarized but not fully mature
mature
cryopreservationin vitro – assessment
in vivo – post-transplantation
14
In Vitro vs. In Vivo Limitations
in vitro2D surfaceformulated extracellular matrixformulated mediaformulated growth factorspassaging – enzymes, proliferation
in vivo3D environmentphysiological matrix with growth factorsphysiological microenvironmentsignals from blood and surrounding cellsno or very slow renewal throughout life
15
In Vitro vs. In Vivo Limitations
in vitro2D surfaceformulated extracellular matrixformulated mediaformulated growth factorspassaging – enzymes, proliferation
in vivo3D environmentphysiological matrix with growth factorsphysiological microenvironmentsignals from blood and surrounding cellsno or very slow renewal throughout life
16
RPE Multitasking
adapted f from O. Strauss Physiol Rev 85: 845–881, 2005;doi:10.1152/physrev.00021.2004
bestrophin 1MCT3
claudin 19 ZO-1
barrier
melanintyrosinase
STRA6RPE65 LRAT
αvβ5 integrinMFG-E8CD36MerTKFAKGas6Myosin II and VIIa
17
as a Potency Assay for a Relevant Physiological Function of hESC-RPE
Phagocytosis
18
Phagocytosis by RPE
particle
from wikipedia.org
binding of OS
engulfment, formation of phagosomes
fusion of phagosomes with lysosomes
degradation of OS
recycling
excretion
DHAVitamin A
19
Phagocytosis: Heavy Work Load and High Pace
From B.M. Kevany and K.Palczewski Physiology (Bethesda). 2010 February ; 25(1): 8–15
rod cone
RPE cells apical surface microvilliEach RPE cell serves approximately 25-30 photoreceptor cells, each of which sheds ~7% of its outer segment mass per day
Each RPE cell must completely dispose of 25,000 to 30,000 OS disksevery day
20
1st Generation Potency Assay: Phagocytosis of Latex Beads by Electron Microscopy
DBlatex beads
melanosome
21
Current Phagocytosis Assay: Quantitative pHrodo-Bioparticle Uptake
37oC phagocytosis
4oC controlRPE phagocytosis with pHrodo
bioparticles
pHrodo fluorescence is pH-sensitive
control
neutral acidic
4oC37oC
bioparticles only
22
pHrodo Bioparticles Demonstrate the Completion of Several Phagocytosis Steps
particlebinding of OS
engulfment, formation of phagosomes
fusion of phagosomeswith lysosomes
degradation of OS
recycling
excretion
23
OS Phagocytis clearance: Recognition and Binding
αVβ5
FAK
photoreceptor OS
CD36MerTK
MFG-8
Gas6
RPE apical surface
OS phagosome
24
OS Recognition and Binding Defects
αVβ5
CD36MerTK
MFG-8
Gas6
RPE apical surface
debris in subretinal space photoreceptor damage
XFAK
photoreceptor OS
XX
25
OS Phagocytis clearance: Degradation
OS phagosome
RPE apical surface
RPE basal surface
OS phagolysosome
lysosome
lysosomal pHcathepsin Dprotease activity
Myosin VIIa
excretion26
OS Degradation Defects
OS phagosome
RPE apical surface
RPE basal surface
OS phagolysosome
lysosome
lysosomal pHcathepsin Dprotease activity
Myosin VIIa
drusen
X
XX
lipofuscin incomplete OS digestionlipofuscin accumulationdrusen formationretinal degeneration
X
27
Vision Diseases Related to Phagocytosis Defects
retinal degeneration Retinitis pigmentosaStargardt’s disease Age Related Macular Degeneration
Loss of the synchronized phagocytosis and diurnal cycle
Disruption of OS internalization
Disruption of phagosometrafficking to the basal surface
Impaired degradation of OS and lipofuscin accumulation
Accumulation of undigested phagosomesand lipofuscin
28
with pHrodo OSpHrodo-OS
Phagocytosis Assay Using Bovine Photoreceptor OS –The Next Generation
control4oC
37oC
29
RPE cells continue to mature after injection
Sclera
photoreceptorcells
choroid
RPE RPE
Sclera
photoreceptorcells
choroid
RPE
Mouse retina 9 months after RPE transplantation
anti-human mitochondria anti-human bestrophin merged
30
Vision Rescue in RCS Rats
b
Apreservation of photoreceptor ONL
area with loss of ONL
anti-human nuclei
anti-human nuclei
31
Vision Improved and Sustained At 1 Year
Persistent signal of efficacy in treated eyes & lack of improvement in untreated eyes
SMD
• *1 subject excluded due to cataract formation• *1 subject excluded due to <6 months follow-up
0.0
9.9 9.1
11.9 12.4
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
0 31 60 91 121 152 182 213 244 274 305 335
Mea
n (w
ith S
EM)
Cha
nge
from
Bas
elin
e in
BC
VA (l
ette
rs)
Days After Transplant
8 Subjects with 12 Months Follow-up*
Treated Eye Untreated Eye
*5 subjects excluded due to cataract formation; 1 subject excluded due to <6 months follow-up
AMD
0.02.0
3.5 3.5
6.0 6.5
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
Mea
n C
hang
e (+
/-SE
M) f
rom
Bas
elin
e in
B
CVA
(le
tters
)
Days After Transplant
4 Subjects with 12 Months Follow-up*
Treated Eye
32
Human Clinical Trials Show Vision Improvement
33
AMD: BCVA Improved and Sustained At 1 Year
Persistent signal of efficacy in treated eyes & lack of improvement in untreated eyes
• *1 subject was excluded due to cataract formation
• *Month 6 BCVA result was carried forward to Month 12 for 2 subjects
December 2014Lancet publication: May 2014
• *1 subject excluded due to cataract formation• *1 subject excluded due to <6 months follow-up
0.0
9.9 9.1
14.0 14.3
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
0 31 60 91 121 152 182 213 244 274 305 335 366
Mea
n C
hang
e fr
om B
asel
ine
in B
CVA
(le
tters
)
Days after transplant
8 Subjects with 12 Months Follow-up*
Treated Eye Untreated Eye
Difference Between Eyes
0.0
9.9 9.1
11.9 12.4
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
0 31 60 91 121 152 182 213 244 274 305 335
Mea
n (w
ith S
EM)
Cha
nge
from
Bas
elin
e in
BC
VA (l
ette
rs)
Days After Transplant
8 Subjects with 12 Months Follow-up*
Treated Eye Untreated Eye
34
SMD: BCVA Improved and Sustained At 1 Year
*3 subjects excluded due to cataract formation; 1 subject excluded due to <6 months follow-up
December 2014May 2014 - The Lancet publication
0.0 0.42.6
4.8 5.2
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
0 31 60 91 121 152 182 213 244 274 305 335
Mea
n C
hang
e (+
/-SE
M) f
rom
Bas
elin
e in
BC
VA (l
ette
rs)
Days After Ttransplant
5 Subjects with 12 Months Follow-up*
Treated EyeUntreated Eye
*5 subjects excluded due to cataract formation; 1 subject excluded due to <6 months follow-up
0.02.0
3.5 3.5
6.0 6.5
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
Mea
n C
hang
e (+
/-SE
M) f
rom
Bas
elin
e in
B
CVA
(le
tters
)
Days After Transplant
4 Subjects with 12 Months Follow-up*
Treated Eye
35
CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
1. RPE phagocytosis of photoreceptor outer segments (OS) is a physiologically relevant potency assay; QC friendly, relatively simple, and quantitative.
2. hESC-RPE are capable of OS phagocytosis and show normal progression through the stage of phagolysosome formation.
3. Mechanism of Action can be addressed by examining specific steps in the cascade of phagocytic events including: OS binding processing, and export.
1.How does the stage of maturity/pigmentation affect the phagocytosis rate? 2.Which rate of phagocytosis is physiologically appropriate? 3. Can we set quantitative parameters?4. What is the OS phagocytosis capacity of hESC-RPE?5. is there OS clearance and lipofuscin accumulation in cultured RPE?6. How to correlate the in vitro data with anticipated in vivo performance of these cells?
CONCLUSIONS
OPEN QUESTIONS
36
Aknowledgements
Ocata Therapeutics
Robert LanzaEddy AngladeRoger GayEd Mickunas
Julie CarsonTong LiRutika PradhanDeb PeakBryan PadovanoJen ShepardJudson Ratliff Lucy VilnerChris MalcuitLinda Lemieux
Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University/Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Ray LundShaomei WangBin LuSergej GirmanToby HolmesYves Sauvé
37
Molecular Markers in RPE Transdifferentiation and Re-Differentiation
βIII tubulin
βIII tubulin HMCPax6 merged
mergedphasePax6dividing cells – early after passaging
mature culture
38
Function-Related Molecular Markers of RPEMorphology and pigmentation
up-regulation of RPE genes and down-regulation of hESC genes
best Pax6 MITFRPE65
Sox-2Oct-4NANOG
bestrophin – late marker, transport
Polarity/tight junctions: ZO-1
39
Key signature proteins for mature functional RPE.
Function Protein Distribution Testlight absorption melanin melanosomes Morphology, absorbance
visual cycle STRA6RPE65
basolateral membranecytoplasmic
Q-PCR, enzyme activity, immunostaining
barrier claudin 19 ZO-1
apical tight junctional complex
transepithelial resistance,immunostaining
transport bestrophin 1MCT3
basolateral Transwell assay,immunostaining
metabolism ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase core protein II
mitochondria Q-PCR, enzyme activity, immunostaining
phagocytosis MERTK αvβ5 integrin
apical membrane light and Electron Microscopy, FACS
melanogenesis tyrosinase melanosome light and Electron Microscopy
secreted PEDF extracellular, apical ELISA, Western blot
40
Preservation of Vision in Elovl4 Mouse
41
Vision Rescue in RCS Rats – Functional Tests Luminance threshold
hESC-RPE, 100K untreated eye
- - - - - - - - - -- 1.9 1.7 2.0 - - 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.1
1.4 1.2 1.0 1.6 - - 3.9 3.5 3.7 3.81.6 1.1 0.8 0.9 - - 3.6 2.3 3.2 3.41.3 0.9 0.7 1.0 - - 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.3
- - - - - - - - - -- 2.6 2.4 2.5 - - NR NR NR -
2.1 1.9 2.1 1.6 - - NR NR NR NR2.4 1.6 1.4 1.9 - - 4.1 4.4 4.6 NR2.1 1.3 1.0 1.2 - - 4.6 4.7 4.8 NR
42
age 187days
age 98 Days
functional sensitivity to light across the visual field of the eye. The topographical map depicts the luminance threshold responses(measured in log units) relative to background illumination
<2.0 log units >2.3 log units
<2.6 log units >4.6 0 log units
42
Vision Improved and Sustained At 1 Year
Persistent signal of efficacy in treated eyes & lack of improvement in untreated eyes
SMD
• *1 subject excluded due to cataract formation• *1 subject excluded due to <6 months follow-up
0.0
9.9 9.1
11.9 12.4
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
0 31 60 91 121 152 182 213 244 274 305 335
Mea
n (w
ith S
EM)
Cha
nge
from
Bas
elin
e in
BC
VA (l
ette
rs)
Days After Transplant
8 Subjects with 12 Months Follow-up*
Treated Eye Untreated Eye
*5 subjects excluded due to cataract formation; 1 subject excluded due to <6 months follow-up
AMD
0.02.0
3.5 3.5
6.0 6.5
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
Mea
n C
hang
e (+
/-SE
M) f
rom
Bas
elin
e in
B
CVA
(le
tters
)
Days After Transplant
4 Subjects with 12 Months Follow-up*
Treated Eye
43