2016 04-06 clp's graduation-results and lessons
TRANSCRIPT
Chars Livelihoods Programme
Graduation: Results & Lessons
CLP’s Graduation Criteria
Graduation criteria: why?
• Wage labour • Plinth• Access to water/ sanitation• Cash savings (Taka 2,400)• Assets of Taka 60,000
• Wage labour• NO plinth• NO access to water/ sanitation• Cash savings (Taka 500)• Assets of Taka 10,000
Can potentially still be
above the poverty line
1
Can potentially still be
below the poverty line
2
Developing CLP’s criteria (Timeline)
April 2010Second Phase of CLP begins
March 2011Annual Review team recommends CLP develop graduation criteria
September 2011CLP presents a two-step approach to graduation
March 2012Annual Review team recommends changes (one-step process)
March 2013Annual Review team tasked with reviewing graduation criteria
March 2014Annual Review team tasked with reviewing graduation criteria
March 2014Final graduation criteria and methodology agreed
November 2014First report published documenting graduation rates
Version 1LogFrame
Impact
Weighting
Definition Score, if
met
40% HH on raised plinth 14
Access to improved water 13
Access to sanitary latrine 13
30% Has productive assets Tk. 30,000 20
Member of VSL or other social group/committee 5
Savings Tk. 3,000 5
10% Knowledge of dowry law 5
Ash/soap visible at latrine 5
Annual reviews impact approach
March 2011:
Recommendation
March 2012:
2-step process
March 2013:
BMI, FCS, Assets
March 2014:
Assets/ cash,
water seals
% of HHs graduating, by cohort
66.781.3 86.7 91.1 98.7 98.8
89.7
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Overall
Target 85%
% of HHs meeting criteria
17.6
52.3 59.5 65.284.7 85.8 89.7 93.5 94.5 96.6
High High High
Low
LowLow
Cas
h s
avin
gs
Imp
rove
d w
ater
Pro
du
ctiv
e as
sets
Inco
me
sou
rces
Rai
sed
plin
th
San
itar
y la
trin
e
Infl
uen
ce d
ecis
ion
s
Ash
/ so
ap
Gro
up
mem
ber
3 m
eals
% of HHs graduating, by cohort, years after
CLP support ends
2.9
0 0 0 0.5
0.3
66
.7
81
.3 86
.7 91
.1 98
.7
88
81
.9
84
.1
92
.7
88
.4
96
.4
90
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 OVERALL
% o
f H
OU
SE H
OLD
S
Baseline End of Support At 2015
Pros and cons
• Multi-dimensional view of poverty
• Context specific
• People have different views• Time consuming to achieve
agreement• Difficult to change
Pros Cons
Lessons
• Early consultation important
• CLP criteria good but by no means perfect (cash savings, assets)
• They were over-reviewed• Community involvement• Think through data
collection, analysis and reporting framework early
Thank youwww.clp-bangladesh.org