2016 pr collection tool - hma€¦ · web view2017/04/26 · support (i.e. minor limitations in...
TRANSCRIPT
THE SURVEY MUST BE SUBMITTED ONLINEBased on your responses, the online survey may not necessarily ask you all of the questions in this document.
2017 Annual and Preparedness Report
Capability SurveyEMA QUESTIONS
Introduction
What is the name of your organisation
Please enter the details of your organisation's contact personNamePosition Phone Email
To see a full copy of the survey, download document here:
This survey document will allow you to see the range and type of questions asked prior to final completion. This will allow you to plan and organise input from the relevant areas within your organisation. Feel free to browse the document before you begin. Note: Based on your responses, the online survey may not necessarily ask you all of the questions in the downloaded document.
The survey must be submitted online.
You should be considering all relevant hazards when answering survey questions.
A.1. Risk assessment
1. To what extent does your organisation have the skills to conduct emergency management risk assessments (ISO 31000/NERAG/Western Australia Emergency Risk Management Guide compliant)?Unsure No
skillsVery limited skills(i.e. EXTENSIVE limitations inresources,and/or capacity etc.)
Limitedskills(i.e.MAJOR limitations inresources,and/or capacity etc.)
Someskills(i.e. MODERATE limitations inresources,and/or capacity etc.)
Substantial skills(i.e.MINOR limitations inresources,and/or capacity etc.)
Comprehensive skills(i.e. sufficient resources, and capacity at all levels)
1-. Comment
2.1. For which hazards has your organisation conducted and documented emergency management risk assessments?
YesAir CrashAnimal and Plant BiosecurityBushfireBrookfield Rail Crash EmergenciesCollapseCycloneEarthquakeElectricity Supply DisruptionFloodGas Supply DisruptionHazardous Materials Emergencies [HAZMAT]HeatwaveHuman EpidemicLand SearchLiquid Fuel Supply DisruptionMarine Oil PollutionMarine Transport EmergencyMarine Search and Rescue [MARSAR]Nuclear Powered WarshipsRail Crash PTARoad CrashSpace Re-entry Debris [SPRED]StormTerrorist ActTsunamiOther (please describe)2_1-. Comment
3. To what extent are the findings of these risk assessments used (e.g. to improve your processes or implement treatments)?Unsure Not
usedVery limiteduse
Limiteduse
Someuse
Substantial use
Comprehensive use
3-. Comment
B.1. Sector information sharing
5.1.1. Does your organisation share information about the individual risks with these stakeholders:StakeholdersOther State government agencies
Unsure No sharing
Very limited sharing
Limited sharing
Some sharing
Substantial sharing
Comprehensive sharing
Local governments
Unsure No sharing
Very limited sharing
Limited sharing
Some sharing
Substantial sharing
Comprehensive sharing
Industry Unsure No sharing
Very limited sharing
Limited sharing
Some sharing
Substantial sharing
Comprehensive sharing
Communities Unsure No sharing
Very limited sharing
Limited sharing
Some sharing
Substantial sharing
Comprehensive sharing
5.1.1-. Comments
5.2.1. Does your organisation share information about vulnerable elements (e.g. social groups, infrastructure, economy, natural environment) with these stakeholders:StakeholdersOther State government agencies
Unsure No sharing
Very limited sharing
Limited sharing
Some sharing
Substantial sharing
Comprehensive sharing
Local governments
Unsure No sharing
Very limited sharing
Limited sharing
Some sharing
Substantial sharing
Comprehensive sharing
Industry Unsure No sharing
Very limited sharing
Limited sharing
Some sharing
Substantial sharing
Comprehensive sharing
Communities Unsure No sharing
Very limited sharing
Limited sharing
Some sharing
Substantial sharing
Comprehensive sharing
5.2.1-. Comments
5.3.1. Does your organisation share information about treatment options with these stakeholders:StakeholdersOther State government agencies
Unsure No sharing
Very limited sharing
Limited sharing
Some sharing
Substantial sharing
Comprehensive sharing
Local governments
Unsure No sharing
Very limited sharing
Limited sharing
Some sharing
Substantial sharing
Comprehensive sharing
Industry Unsure No sharing
Very limited sharing
Limited sharing
Some sharing
Substantial sharing
Comprehensive sharing
Communities Unsure No sharing
Very limited sharing
Limited sharing
Some sharing
Substantial sharing
Comprehensive sharing
5.3.1-. Comments
C.1. Horizon Scanning
6.1. To what extent does your organisation keep informed of best practice through review of recent hazard information (such as research, journal articles or reports) that may affect your area of operation/jurisdiction?Unsure No
reviewVery limited review
Limited review
Some review
Substantial review
Comprehensive review
6.1-. Comment
7. To what extent does your organisation monitor incidents and/or events occurring interstate or overseas that may be relevant to your organisation/region?Unsure No
monitoringVery limited monitoring
Limited monitoring
Some monitoring
Substantial monitoring
Comprehensive monitoring
7-. Comment
C.2. Lesson Management
8. Do you evaluate your organisation's performance following an incident, emergency or exercise? Yes No Unsure
8-. Comment
9. Do you assess and/or amend your plans, processes or procedures based upon the findings of the:
Yes No N/ARecent hazard information
Incident Emergency
Exercise NOTE: As suggested in the State EM Policy 4.12.1
9-. Please provide an example.
D.1. Public Information
10. Does your organisation provide emergency and/or hazard information to the public? Yes No If No Is Selected, Then Skip To Risk awarenes...
10.a. How does your organisation provide EM and/or hazard information to the public:
10.a.2. Traditional MediaPrevention, preparedness, recovery
Yes NoRadio
Television Newspapers
SMS/ Text messaging Bulk email
10.a.2-. Comment
10.a.4. Social MediaPrevention, preparedness, recovery
Yes NoFacebook
Twitter Instagram YouTube
RSS 10.a.4-. Comment
10.a.5. WebsitesYes No
Factsheets Information
10.a.5-. Comment
10.a.6. LocalYes No
Billboards Roadside Indicators
Signage Newsletters
Pamphlets/brochures Public talks/meetings
10.a.6-. Other/comment
10.b. Are procedures in place to ensure that the emergency and/or hazard information provided is:
Yes No UnsureCoordinated with other agencies
Timely Reliable
Actionable 10.b-. Comment
10.c. What does your organisation do to ensure this information is reliable?
10.d. Is the public information provided:Yes No Unsure
Clear Consistent Accessible
If ‘Yes’ or ‘Unsure’ then display the appropriate sub question10.d-. Comment
10.d.a. How does your organisation ensure the public information is clear?
10.d.b. How does your organisation ensure the public information is consistent?
10.d.c. How does your organisation ensure the public information is accessible?
10.e. To what extent does the public information cater for:Culturally and linguistically diverse groups
Unsure None Very limited
Limited Some Most All
People with a disability/special needs
Unsure None Very limited
Limited Some Most All
People with lower skills in literacy and numeracy
Unsure None Very limited
Limited Some Most All
The elderly Unsure None Very limited
Limited Some Most All
Tourists Unsure None Very limited
Limited Some Most All
D.2. Risk awareness and understanding
11.2. What level of understanding do you estimate community members have of:
Hazards that may affect them
Unsure None Very limited
Limited Some Substantial
Comprehensive
Vulnerable elements (e.g. social groups, infrastructure, economy, natural environment)
Unsure None Very limited
Limited Some Substantial
Comprehensive
Actions they should take in an emergency
Unsure None Very limited
Limited Some Substantial
Comprehensive
11.2-. Comment
12.2. How do you ensure that the community knows what to do during an emergency?
13. What proportion of the community do you estimate:have emergency action plans
Unsure0% 1-24% 25-
49%50-74%
75-99% 100%
monitor emergency messaging
Unsure0% 1-24% 25-
49%50-74%
75-99% 100%
understand emergency messaging
Unsure0% 1-24% 25-
49%50-74%
75-99% 100%
respond to emergency messaging
Unsure0% 1-24% 25-
49%50-74%
75-99% 100%
13-. Comment
E.1. Land use planning
14. Is your organisation involved in land use planning? Yes No
14-. CommentIf No Is Selected, Then Skip To Ecosystem m...
14.a.1. Is land use planning used to manage and minimise the impacts from these hazards:Hazards Yes No Hazard can NOT impact area of
operation/jurisdictionUnsure
Bushfire o o o oCyclone o o o oEarthquake o o o oFlood o o o oHeatwave o o o oLandform collapse (e.g. landslide)
o o o o
Storm (e.g. storm surge, coastal erosion)
o o o o
Tsunami o o o oUse display logic to display the following questions provided ‘Yes’ is given for the relevant hazard 14.a-. Comment
14.a.a. What land use planning strategies does your organisation use to manage and/or minimise the risk from bushfire?
14.a.b. What land use planning strategies does your organisation use to manage and/or minimise the risk from cyclone?
14.a.c. What land use planning strategies does your organisation use to manage and/or minimise the risk from earthquake?
14.a.d. What land use planning strategies does your organisation use to manage and/or minimise the risk from flood?
14.a.e. What land use planning strategies does your organisation use to manage and/or minimise the risk from heatwave?
14.a.f. What land use planning strategies does your organisation use to manage and/or minimise the risk from landform collapse (e.g. landslide)?
14.a.g. What land use planning strategies does your organisation use to manage and/or minimise the risk from storm (e.g. storm surge, coastal erosion)?
14.a.h. What land use planning strategies does your organisation use to manage and/or minimise the risk from tsunami?
E.2. Ecosystem management
15. Does your organisation have a role in managing the natural environment? Yes No
15-. Comment
If No Is Selected, Then Skip To Infrastructure protection
*Note: The natural environment can provide natural buffers that mitigate the impacts of hazards and protect the community. Examples include:
bushland or wetlands that mitigate flooding vegetation that protects against slope instability dune systems that mitigate coastal erosion
15.a. To what extent are natural buffers* that may aid community protection:
Identified Unsure None Very limited
Limited Some Substantial Comprehensive
Protected Unsure None Very limited
Limited Some Substantial Comprehensive
Maintained and/or enhanced
Unsure None Very limited
Limited Some Substantial Comprehensive
Monitored Unsure None Very limited
Limited Some Substantial Comprehensive
15.a- Describe
E.3. Infrastructure protection
16.2. Does your organisation identify the likely impact hazards might have on: Yes No N/A Unsure
Critical infrastructure Important community assets
16.2-. Describe
17.2. Does your organisation have plans in place to protect:Unsure No
plans in place
Plans are either old, OR in the early stages of development, OR have considerable doubts about their current viability
Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the organisation
Informal and/or untested plans in place, but with a high degree of confidence they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested plans but with further work identified as needed
Formalised plans, tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the organisation
Formalised plans, tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the organisation
Critical infrastructureImportant community assetsIndividual housing17.2-. Describe
18.2. Does your organisation ensure building protection through: Yes No N/A Unsure
Building code standards Insurance
18.2-. Other
E.4. Essential services protection
19. Does your organisation have plans to protect the continuity of:Yes No N/A Unsure
Power
Telecommunications
Water
Sewerage
Road networks
Fuel
Food distribution
Shelter/accommodation
Local Government Services
E.5. Minimise single points of failure
*Note: ‘Single points of failure’ are the parts of a system for which no backup (redundancy) exists and their failure will severely affect the entire system. This may include matters such as choke points, one-road accesses, critical systems, expertise etc.
20. Has your organisation identified potential single points of failure* in its area of operation/jurisdiction? Yes No
20-. CommentIf No Is Selected, Then Skip To Remoteness ...
20.a. Has your organisation identified potential single points of failure* in these areas: Yes No N/A Unsure
Power
Telecommunications
Water
Sewerage
Road Networks
Critical assets
Key personal/expertise
IT
Other 20.a-. Describe
20.b. Does your organisation have redundancy planning to address potential single points of failure* to restore services in these areas:
Yes No N/A Unsure
Power (e.g. generators)
Telecommunications (e.g. radio, satellite phones)
Water (e.g. water tanks)
Sewerage (e.g. portable toilets)
Road Networks
Critical assets (e.g. backup assets)
Key personal/expertise (e.g. ensuring multiple people are trained)
IT (e.g. external backup of data)
Other
20.b-. Please describe how your organisation addresses these potential single points of failure.
E.6. Remoteness planning
*Note: Remote areas are those places that are difficult to access. They can include remote aboriginal communities, pastoral stations, offshore communities etc.
21. Are emergencies that occur in remote areas* considered when conducting your organisation's emergency planning? Yes No N/AIf ‘Yes’ display 21a.
21-. Comment
21.a. To what extent does your organisation consider emergencies that occur in remote areas* when conducting emergency planning?Unsure No
arrangements in place
Arrangements are either old, OR in the early stages of development, OR have considerable doubts about their current viability
Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the organisation
Informal and/or untested arrangements in place, but with a high degree of confidence they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested arrangements but with further work identified as needed
Formalised arrangements, tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the organisation
Formalised arrangements, tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the organisation
21.a-. Comment
E.7. Business continuity planning
22. Does your organisation have a business continuity plan? Yes No
22-. Comment
If No Is Selected, Then Skip To: 23. Do you engage with business/industry to encourage them to have business continuity plans
22.a. Does your business continuity plan considerYes No N/A Unsure
EM hazard specific risks
strategies for fatigue management
22.a-. Comment
22.b. How effective is your organisation’s business continuity plan:Unsure No plans in
placePlans are either old, OR in the early stages of development, OR have considerable doubts about their current viability
Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the organisation
Informal and/or untested plans in place, but with a high degree of confidence they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested plans but with further work identified as needed
Formalised plans, tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the organisation
Formalised plans, tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the organisation
22.b-. Comment
23. Does your organisation engage with business/industry to encourage them to have business continuity plans Yes No Unsure
23-. Comment
E.8. Community activities
25. Does your organisation have plans for the rapid re-establishment of community activities (e.g. cultural and community events, sporting activities, schools) following an emergency?Unsure No plans in
placePlans are either old, OR in the early stages of development, OR have considerable doubts about their current viability
Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the organisation
Informal and/or untested plans in place, but with a high degree of confidence they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested plans but with further work identified as needed
Formalised plans, tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the organisation
Formalised plans, tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the organisation
25-. Comment
F.1. People
27.5. To what extent are the emergency management personnel in your organisation trained:Unsure
No training
Very limited training(i.e. EXTENSIVE limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.)
Limited training (i.e. MAJOR limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.)
Some training(i.e. MODERATE limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.)
Substantial training (i.e. MINOR limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.)
Comprehensive training(i.e. sufficient resources, skills, and capacity at all levels)
27.5.-. Comment
27.6. To what extent are the emergency management personnel in your organisation capable:Unsure
Nocapability
Very limited capability(i.e. EXTENSIVE limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.)
Limited capability (i.e. MAJOR limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.)
Some capability(i.e. MODERATE limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.)
Substantial capability (i.e. MINOR limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.)
Comprehensive capability(i.e. sufficient resources, skills, and capacity at all levels)
27.6-. Comment
27.7. To what extent are the emergency management personnel in your organisation supported: Unsure
No support
Very limited support(i.e. EXTENSIVE limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.)
Limited support (i.e. MAJOR limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.)
Some support(i.e. MODERATE limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.)
Substantial support (i.e. MINOR limitations in resources, skills, and/or capacity etc.)
Comprehensive support(i.e. sufficient resources, skills, and capacity at all levels)
27.7-. Comment
27.8. To what extent does your organisation have sufficient numbers of emergency management personnel:Unsure
No personnel
Very limited personnel(i.e. EXTENSIVE limitations in capacity)
Limited personnel(i.e. MAJOR limitations in capacity)
Some personnel(i.e. MODERATE limitations in capacity)
Substantial personnel (i.e.MINOR limitations in capacity)
Sufficient personnel(i.e. sufficient capacity at all levels)
27.8-. Comment
28. Do you have interstate/national plans that can be called upon to assist during large-scale emergencies? Yes No
28-. Comment
29.1. Do you have MOUs with local governments that can be called upon to assist during large-scale emergencies? Yes No
29.1-. Comment
F.2. Volunteering
30. Does your organisation use/manage volunteers? Yes No
30-. Comment
If No Is Selected, Then Skip To Volunteering 31 Does your organisation have a clear strategy/policy during an emergency to manage
30.a. How many EM volunteers do you manage (approximately)?
30.a-. Comment
30.b. Do you have a clear strategy/policy for volunteers which addresses:Yes No Unsure
Recruitment Retention Training
Motivation Barriers
30.b-. Comment
31. Does your organisation have a clear strategy/policy during an emergency to manage: Yes No Unsure
Spontaneous volunteers Donated goods
31-. Comment
F.3. Finance and administration
32. Does your organisation have the ability to track expenditure for particular emergencies (e.g. individual cost codes)? Yes No
32-. Comment
33. Is funding for proactive measures and mitigation:Yes No N/A
Available Sufficient
Accessible
33-. Comment/Barriers
34. Is funding for response activities for an emergency that requires a multi-agency coordinated response (moderate consequence or higher):
Yes No N/AAvailable Sufficient
Accessible 34-. Comment/Barriers
35. Is funding for recovery activities for an emergency that requires a multi-agency coordinated response (moderate consequence or higher):
Yes No N/AAvailable Sufficient
Accessible 35-. Comment/Barriers
F.4. Equipment/critical resources
36.3. Does your organisation have or can readily access appropriate infrastructure (e.g. operations centre) during an emergency? Yes No
36.3-. Comment
36.4. How many incidents can be simultaneously managed using existing infrastructure?Level 2Level 3
37.3. Does your organisation have or can readily access appropriate equipment (e.g. operations centre) during an emergency? Yes No
37.3-. Comment
37.4. How many incidents can be simultaneously managed using existing equipment?Level 2Level 3
38. Are plans for equipment in place to address:Unsure
No plans in place
Plans are either old, OR in the early stages of development, OR have considerable doubts about their current viability
Some work completed but requires further work to develop, test, verify and/or embed in the organisation
Informal and/or untested plans in place, but with a high degree of confidence they will be effective, OR, formal and/or tested plans but with further work identified as needed
Formalised plans, tested, mostly effective, mostly reliable, and largely embedded within the organisation
Formalised plans, tested, effective, reliable, and embedded within the organisation
MobilisationPre-DeploymentPeak surgesRedundancies for outages
38-. Comment
G.1. Command, control and coordination
39. Do pre-established protocols and structures exist that:Yes No
Define the interrelationships between stakeholders Facilitate effective command, control and co-ordination (C3)
Are understood
39-. Comment
G.2. Situational assessment
40. Does your organisation carry out situational assessments during emergencies? Yes No
40.1-. How
If No Is Selected, Then Skip To Evacuation
40.a. Do these situational assessments determine the:Yes No
Nature and extent of hazard
Vulnerable elements (e.g. social groups, infrastructure, economy, natural environment)
What resources are required
40.b. Are the situational assessments effective Yes No
40.b-. Comment
40.c. Do you have any suggestions that may improve situational assessments
G.3. Evacuation
41. Is your organisation involved in evacuations? Yes No 41-. CommentIf No Is Selected, Then Skip To Public protection
41.a. Do you have the ability to coordinate/support:Yes No N/A
Directed evacuations (compulsory) Recommended evacuations (voluntary)
Evacuations of animals
41.b. Do you have plans to coordinate/support:Yes No N/A
Directed evacuations (compulsory) Recommended evacuations (voluntary)
Evacuations of animals NOTE: As required in Section 5.7 of the State EM Policy
41.c. Do you have sufficient resources to coordinate/support:Yes No N/A
Directed evacuations (compulsory) Recommended evacuations (voluntary)
Evacuations of animals
43. Have suitable welfare centres been identified? Yes No Unsure If No Is Selected, Then Skip To Public protection
43.a. Do these welfare centres have redundancies to maintain the provision of essential services such as:
Yes No UnsureFood
Potable water Shelter Power
43.a-. Comment
43.b. How many welfare centres can be simultaneously managed using existing resources?43.b-. Comment?
G.4. Public protection
44. Does your organisation have measures to verify identity and control access of people seeking entry to Restricted Access Areas or Exclusion Zones? Yes No N/A
NOTE: As articulated in section 5.3.3 of the State EM Plan
44-. Comment
*NOTE: Unwanted activity may include curious observers, accessing dangerous areas, looting, unauthorised or unsafe access.
45. Does your organisation have the ability to protect against unwanted activity* within impacted areas? Yes No N/A
45-. Comment
If ‘Yes’ then display scale
45.a. To what extent does your organisation have the ability to protect against unwanted activity* within impacted areas?Unsure No ability Very limited
ability(i.e. EXTENSIVE limitations inresources, skillsand/or capacity etc.)
Limitedability(i.e. MAJOR limitations inresources, skillsand/or capacity etc.)
Someability(i.e. MODERATE limitations inresources, skillsand/or capacity etc.)
Substantial ability(i.e. MINOR limitations inresources, skillsand/or capacity etc.)
Comprehensive ability(i.e. sufficient resources, skills and capacity at all levels.
G.5. Agency interoperability
46. During an emergency are the communication structures (including IMT, ISG, OASG):Yes No Unsure
Effective Interoperable with other agencies
Functional Manageable/serviceable
46-. Comment
47. During an emergency are the communication systems (radios, phones, IMS etc.) of your organisation:
Yes No UnsureEffective
Interoperable with other agencies
47-. Comment
48. Which (if any) relevant organisations would be challenging to maintain effective communications with during an emergency:
Yes Yes
ATCO Gas AustraliaDepartment of Transport - Marine Safety
Australian Defence Force Horizon PowerBrookfield Rail Housing AuthorityBureau of Meteorology Insurance Council of AustraliaDampier Bunbury Pipeline Main Roads Western AustraliaDepartment for Child Protection and Family Support nbn™Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia Public Transport AuthorityDepartment of Education Australia Red CrossDepartment of Environment Regulation St John AmbulanceDepartment of Finance, PUO, Office of Energy Telstra
Department of Fire & Emergency ServicesWA Local Government Association
Department of Health Water CorporationDepartment of Parks and Wildlife Western Australian PoliceDepartment of Planning Western PowerDepartment of the Premier and Cabinet Other (please describe)
48-. Describe
49. Has your organisation identified any impediments to internal and/or interagency effectiveness during an emergency? Yes No
49-. Comment
If No Is Selected, Then Skip To Mass casualty ma...
49.a. How are these impediments to internal and/or interagency effectiveness being managed/addressed?
G.6. Mass casualty management
50. Is your organisation involved in mass casualty management? Yes No If No Is Selected, Then Skip To Mass fatality management
50a. Which elements of mass casualty management is your organisation involved in:Services YesFirst AidAmbulanceAero medical retrievalPre hospital medical teamsHospital medical teamsUse display logic to display appropriate ordinal scale below provided ‘YES” is selected.*Note: A critical injury poses an immediate life-threatening condition if not treated adequately and expeditiously. Examples include uncontrolled bleeding, a punctured organ, other internal injuries, spinal column injuries or crush syndrome.
50.a.a. Are First Aid services available to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 people with critical injuries*MajorUp to 261 people with critical injuries*CatastrophicUp to 2,620 people with critical injuries*
50.a.b. Are First Aid services timely for an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 people with critical injuries*MajorUp to 261 people with critical injuries*CatastrophicUp to 2,620 people with critical injuries*50.a.b-. Comment.
*Note: A critical injury poses an immediate life-threatening condition if not treated adequately and expeditiously. Examples include uncontrolled bleeding, a punctured organ, other internal injuries, spinal column injuries or crush syndrome.
50.a.c. Are Ambulance services available to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 people with critical injuries*MajorUp to 261 people with critical injuries*CatastrophicUp to 2,620 people with critical injuries*
50.a.d. Are Ambulance services timely for an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 people with critical injuries*MajorUp to 261 people with critical injuries*CatastrophicUp to 2,620 people with critical injuries*50.a.d. Comment
*Note: A critical injury poses an immediate life-threatening condition if not treated adequately and expeditiously. Examples include uncontrolled bleeding, a punctured organ, other internal injuries, spinal column injuries or crush syndrome.
50.a.e. Are Aero Medical Retrieval services available to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 people with critical injuries*MajorUp to 261 people with critical injuries*CatastrophicUp to 2,620 people with critical injuries*
50.a.f. Are Aero Medical Retrieval services timely for an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 people with critical injuries*MajorUp to 261 people with critical injuries*CatastrophicUp to 2,620 people with critical injuries*50af-. Comment
*Note: A critical injury poses an immediate life-threatening condition if not treated adequately and expeditiously. Examples include uncontrolled bleeding, a punctured organ, other internal injuries, spinal column injuries or crush syndrome.
50.a.g. Are Pre Hospital Medical team services available to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 people with critical injuries*MajorUp to 261 people with critical injuries*CatastrophicUp to 2,620 people with critical injuries*
50.a.h. Are Pre Hospital Medical team services timely for an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 people with critical injuries*MajorUp to 261 people with critical injuries*CatastrophicUp to 2,620 people with critical injuries*50ah-. Comment
*Note: A critical injury poses an immediate life-threatening condition if not treated adequately and expeditiously. Examples include uncontrolled bleeding, a punctured organ, other internal injuries, spinal column injuries or crush syndrome.
50.a.i. Are Hospital Mass Casualty services available to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 262 people with critical injuries*MajorUp to 2,623 people with critical injuries*CatastrophicUp to 26,242 people with critical injuries*
50.a.j. Are Hospital Mass Casualty services timely for an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 262 people with critical injuries*MajorUp to 2,623 people with critical injuries*CatastrophicUp to 26,242 people with critical injuries*50.a.j-. Comment
H.1. Mass fatality management
51. Is your organisation involved in mass fatality management? Yes No If No Is Selected, Then Skip To Welfare
51.a. Which elements of mass fatality management is your organisation involved in:Services YesBody RecoveryDisaster Victim IdentificationMortuaryBurial and CremationManagement of informationUse display logic to display appropriate ordinal scale below provided ‘YES” is selected.
51.a.a. Are Body Recovery services available to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 deathsMajorUp to 261 deathsCatastrophicUp to 2,620 deaths
51.a.b. Are Body Recovery services timely to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 deathsMajorUp to 261 deathsCatastrophicUp to 2,620 deaths51.a.b-. Comment
51.a.c. Are Disaster Victim Identification services available to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 deathsMajorUp to 261 deathsCatastrophicUp to 2,620 deaths
51.a.d. Are Disaster Victim Identification services timely to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 deathsMajorUp to 261 deathsCatastrophicUp to 2,620 deaths51.a.d-. Comment
51.a.e. Are Mortuary services available to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 deathsMajorUp to 261 deathsCatastrophicUp to 2,620 deaths
51.a.f. Are Mortuary services timely to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 deathsMajorUp to 261 deathsCatastrophicUp to 2,620 deaths51.a.f. Comment
51.a.g. Are Burial and Cremation services available to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 deathsMajorUp to 261 deathsCatastrophicUp to 2,620 deaths
51.a.h. Are Burial and Cremation services timely to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 deathsMajorUp to 261 deathsCatastrophicUp to 2,620 deaths
51.a.i. Are management of information services available to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 deathsMajorUp to 261 deathsCatastrophicUp to 2,620 deaths
51.a.j. Are management of information services timely to manage an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 26 deathsMajorUp to 261 deathsCatastrophicUp to 2,620 deaths
H.2. Welfare
52. Is your organisation involved in providing welfare and community services during or after a major emergency? Yes No
52-. Comment
If No Is Selected, Then Skip To Impact assessment
52.a.1. Are the welfare and community services that your organisation provides available for an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0% 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 262 displaced peopleMajorUp to 2,623 displaced peopleCatastrophic26,232 displaced people52.a.1- Comment
52.a.2. Are the welfare and community services that your organisation provides timely for an emergency resulting in these consequences:Consequence Unsure 0% 1-24% 25-49% 50-74% 75-99% 100%ModerateUp to 262 displaced peopleMajorUp to 2,623 displaced peopleCatastrophic26,232 displaced people52.a.2-. Comment
H.3. Impact assessment
54. Does your organisation have the ability to contribute to a comprehensive impact assessment? Yes No
54-. Comment
54.a. Are the findings of a comprehensive impact assessment used to inform:Yes No
Recovery coordination EM planning
Prevention/Mitigation priorities
54.a-. Comment
H.4. Recovery coordination and rehabilitation
55. Is your organisation involved in recovery activities during and/or after an emergency? Yes No
55-. Comment
If No Is Selected, Then Skip To Exercising and Reporting
55.a. Does your organisation have the resources to support reconstruction/restoration in these environments:
Environments:
Unsure
N/A
No resources
Very limited resources(i.e. EXTENSIVE limitations in capacity etc.)
Limitedresources (i.e. MAJOR limitations in capacity etc.)
Someresources(i.e. MODERATE limitations in capacity etc.)
Substantial resources(i.e. MINOR limitations in capacity etc.)
Comprehensive resources (i.e. sufficient capacity at all levels)
Built
Social
Economic
Natural
55.a-. Comment
55.b. Does your organisation have the skills to support reconstruction/restoration in these environments:
Environments:
Unsure
N/A No resources
Very limited resources(i.e. EXTENSIVE limitations in capacity etc.)
Limitedresources(i.e. MAJOR limitations in capacity etc.)
Someresources
(i.e. MODERATE limitations in capacity etc.)
Substantial resources(i.e. MINOR limitations in capacity etc.)
Comprehensive resources (i.e. sufficient capacity at all levels)
Built
Social
Economic
Natural
55.b-. Comment
55.c. Does your organisation’s recovery plans include input from:Yes No N/A
HMAs EMAs
Local Government NGOs
Industry Communities
55.c-. Comment
I.1. Exercising and Reporting
56. When was your most recent emergency that required a multi-agency coordinated response (i.e. level 2 or level 3):
Month (e.g. 12) Year (e.g. 2016)Air CrashAnimal and Plant BiosecurityBushfireBrookfield Rail Crash EmergenciesCollapseCycloneEarthquakeElectricity Supply DisruptionFloodGas Supply DisruptionHazardous Materials Emergencies [HAZMAT]HeatwaveHuman EpidemicLand SearchLiquid Fuel Supply DisruptionMarine Oil PollutionMarine Transport EmergencyMarine Search and Rescue [MARSAR]Nuclear Powered WarshipsRail Crash PTASpace Re-entry Debris [SPRED]StormTerrorist ActTsunamiOther (please describe)56-. Describe
59. Please provide details of the exercises that your organisation held during the 2016-2017 financial year:
Note: If more than 12 exercises were held, please use the text box below.Month(e.g. 11)
Year(e.g. 2016)
Hazard exercised Exercise type
Exercise 1Exercise 2Exercise 3Exercise 4Exercise 5Exercise 6Exercise 7Exercise 8Exercise 9Exercise 10Exercise 11Exercise 1259.1. If more than 12 exercises were held, please enter the additional information here:
60. In 2016-2017 financial year how many exercises was your organisation a participant:
61. Please provide details of the exercises that your organisation plans to hold during the 2017-2018 financial year:
Note: If more than 12 exercises were held, please use the text box below.
Month(e.g. 11)
Year(e.g. 2017)
Hazard exercised Exercise type
Exercise 1Exercise 2Exercise 3Exercise 4Exercise 5Exercise 6Exercise 7Exercise 8Exercise 9Exercise 10Exercise 11Exercise 1261.1. If more than 12 exercises are planned, please enter the additional information here:
J.1. Governance - Legislation
63. Have you identified any issues or barriers within the current EM legislation? Yes No
63-. Describe
J.2 Governance - Policies
64. Have you identified any issues with the State EM Policy suite? Yes No
64-. Describe
65. Are your organisation’s emergency management arrangements consistent with the State EM Policy? Yes No Unsure
65-. Comment
J.3 Governance - EM plans
67. Does your organisation have internal measures to monitor compliance with relevant EM legislation and policies? Yes No Unsure
67-. Describe
K.1 Evaluation
75. What EM activities or achievements over the last 12 months are you most proud of?
76. If your organisation could change two things about how the EM sector currently operates what would it change?
77. Do you have any comments about this survey