2017 baja sae competition - university of...
TRANSCRIPT
2017 Baja SAE Competition
Meet the Team
Enrique DeLeon Manjula Hodekar Keith Hernandez
Mechanical & Fabrication Lead
Public Relations & Logistics
Team & DesignLead
2
Instructor:Raresh PascaliUH Professor
Alumni Advisor:Sean VanVactorUH MET Graduate
Undergraduate Colleague:Joshua ContrerasUH Industrial Design
Faculty Advisor:Marcus GaminoUH Dynamics Instructor
Project Scope
History & Events
Suspension Design
Vehicle Components
Project Management
Comments & Questions
Outline
3
4
To design and build a vehicle that meets the rules and regulations of the 2017 Baja SAE competition and participate in the competition that will take place in Pittsburg, Kansas on May 25-28, 2017
Objective
5
https://www.flickr.com/photos/auburnengineers/sets/72157629892864365/
• Continue and complete the original design and fabrication idea that was started by the Baja Brigade senior design team in 2015
• Use the fabricated frame and some of the parts available to complete the suspension design and fabrication in the early stages of the project
• Ensure that the original frame and suspension design complies with the rules and regulations of the 2017 Baja SAE Competition and the deliverables proposed
The Challenge
6
Deliverables
7
• Register for the 2017 Baja Competition in Pittsburg, Kansas
• Have a Baja vehicle that is mechanically complete with a functioning suspension assembled by December 2016
• Manufacture carbon fiber uprights for the suspension
• Achieve a vehicle weight under 400 lbs.
• Pass the Baja SAE inspection for the competition
• Achieve a top speed of 30 mph on a flat surface
• Design a vehicle that can achieve a flat jump of 7 ft.
• Implement instrumentation that is capable of data acquisition
8
9
Baja SAE History
• First competition – 1976
• University of South Carolina
• Number of teams in the first competition – 10
• Number of teams in 2016 – 100
• 2017 total competitions - 7
• East, Midwest, and West - North America
10
Dynamic 700 Points
Acceleration 75
Land Maneuverability 75
Hill Climb 75
Suspension & Traction 75
Endurance Race 400
https://www.facebook.com/michiganbajaracing/photos
https://www.facebook.com/
Michiganbajaracing/photos
Event scoring
Static 300 Points
Design 150
Cost 100
Presentation 50
11
2016 2015 2014
University Univ. of Michigan Cornell University Cornell University
Team Michigan Baja Racing Big Red Racing Big Red Racing
Dynamic 696.40/700 683.35/700 672.87/700
Static 311.03/300 293.70/300 257.16/300
Overall score 1007.43/1000 977.05/1000 930.03/1000
Teams with high scores
• Continuous vehicle improvement from previous competition
• Maximum points in static event
• University/college funded vehicle
• Vehicle weight – Less than 400 lbs.
12
• Kingpin Inclination
• The angle between the steering axis and the centerline of the wheel
• 10-15 degrees is common in Baja SAE
• Scrub Radius
• The distance between the kingpin angle and the tire centerline when they intersect the ground
• Minimizing the scrub radius improves the vehicles steering and handling
• Roll Center
• Minimizing the distance between the roll center and C.G. will reduce body roll
Suspension Geometry
14
Optimum Kinematics
13
Front Track Width: • 50”
Rear Track Width: • 47”
Wheel Base: • 75”
Kingpin Inclination: • 15.40 ̊
Scrub Radius: • 1.10”
Roll Center Height: • 3.95”
Ride Height: • 9”
15
Frame
16
• Currently using the frame designed by the Baja Brigade senior design team
• Material:
• A513-5 DOM
• 1.25” OD Tube
• 0.120” Thickness
Suspension Material Selection
17
Multiplier Characteristic1020 DOM
Steel4130
Chromoly Carbon Fiber
4 Cost 5 3 1
3 Weight 2 4 5
2 Strength 3 4 5
1 Workability 5 4 2
Total 37 36 31
(1 – Least Favorable, 5 – Most Favorable)
http://www.acpsales.com/OnlineStore.php?cat=4663http://fbmbmx.com/blog/stedfast-frames/http://derbo-group.en.made-in-
china.com/product/ZormvQhVgCGJ/China-ASTM-A519-1018-
1020-Dom-Steel-Pipe-Seamless-Steel-Pipe.html
Front Suspension Components
18
Fox Racing Air Shocks•
Mud Wolf Tires•Honda TRX• 250 brake rotors, knuckles, & wheel hubs
Knuckle assembly will serve as a •blueprint for fabricating the carbon fiber uprights
Steering
19
• Thin Line Rack & Pinion
• 11 in. from center of eye to center of eye
• Spline Shaft - 3/8 in. x 36 Spline
• Gear Ratio – 1.5:1
• Travel – 4.5 in.
• Reliable – less chance of failure compared to other steering systems
Transmission Selection
20
Multiplier CharacteristicCVTech
AABPolaris P-90
CVT
Comet Magnum 44
CVT
3 Cost 4 4 5
2 Workability 5 3 2
1 Performance 5 4 5
Total 14 11 12
(1 – Least Favourable, 5 – Most Favourable)
http://forums.bajasae.net/forum/preferred-
cvt_topic140_page2.html
https://www.minibuggy.net/forum/driveline/14719-1000-cvt-
questions-3.html
CVTech AAB Polaris P-90 Comet Magnum 44
Engine
21
All teams in the competition use the •same engine
Briggs & Stratton Model • 19
Horsepower: • 10 HP
Engine displacement: • 305 cc
Any modifications to the engine are •STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND WILL RESULT IN DISQUALIFICATION
Project Progress
22
• Front suspension – Assembly
• Fabricated control arms with adjustable ball joints which allow for increase or decrease in camber
• Achieved negative camber – Less than 5 degrees
• Better cornering stability as well as better traction
• Too much negative camber has adverse effect on steering response and suspension geometry
Original Assembly Adjusted Assembly
Project Progress
23
Submitted required •documents to SAE for competition
Completed front right •suspension
Waiting on ball joints and •bushings to complete assembly for entire front suspension
Acquired material for rear •suspension fabrication
24
25
BudgetComponent: Estimated Cost 9/15/16: Adjusted Cost 2/23/2017:
Chassis $1,000 $200
Suspension $2,000 $350
Steering $650 $350
Engine $250 $250
Transmission $1,000 $250
Brakes $400 $215
Tires and rims $900 $0
Seat $60 $0
Safety equipment $400 $250
Instrumentation/electrical $350 $270
Registration fees $1,250 $1,250
Travel & lodging $1,500 $1,500
Total: $9,760 $4,885
Contingency 20%: $1,952 $489
Total with contingency: $11,712 $5,374
26
Semester 1 Timeline:
Semester 2 Timeline:
28
Baja Vehicle
Research
Rules/safety
requirements
Major
components
Materials
Cost analysis
Design Part I
Chassis design
Suspension
design
Design analysis
Fabrication Part I
Chassis
fabrication
Suspension
fabrication
Design Part II
Braking
Steering
Powertrain
Instrumentation
Fabrication
Part II
Braking
Steering
Powertrain
Instrumentation
Testing
Mechanical
Electrical
Instrumentation
Completed
In progress
Not started
29
7 3
6 5
1 2 3 4 5
1
2
Severity1
23
45
Pro
ba
bili
ty
ID Risk Mitigation
1 Funding Continue talking to potential sponsors and use donated parts
2 Manufacturing Recruit industry advisor for composite material manufacturing
3 Fabrication Recruit experienced welder
4 Time Management Increase working hours and create weekly short term goals
5 Meet SAE Requirements Consult with previous teams and review rulebook
6 Vehicle Weight Implement lightweightcomposite materials on components
7 Defective Parts Reorder parts needed ina timely manner
4
4
4
30