2017/18BUDGET

LOCAL CONTROL & ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN

June 8, 2017

AGENDA

State Budget May Revision Update

Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF)

Minimum Proportionality Percentage (MPP)

Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP)

Multi‐Year Assumptions and Projections

Concerns / Next Steps

MAY REVISION HIGHLIGHTS Governor continues to signal that the next recession is just around 

the corner

May Revision proposes to lower Prop 98 beginning in 2018‐19

Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) increased from 1.48% to 1.56%

Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) gap funding increased and now estimated at 43.97% Implementation through 2017/18 now projected to be 97% complete

Proposes that one‐time funding of $173 per ADA be delayed until May 2019

Base GrantAll Districts in 

California receive same amount per 

studentK‐3 =   $7,1934‐6 =   $7,3017‐8 =   $7,5189‐12 = $8,712

Adjustment Grade Level

K‐3 = $7484‐6 =   n/a7‐8 =   n/a9‐12 = $227

AdjustmentDemographics(Low income, English Learner, Foster Youth)SupplementalK‐3 = $1,5884‐6 = $1,4607‐8 = $1,5049‐12 = $1,788ConcentrationK‐3 = $3,9714‐6 = $3,6517‐8 = $3,7599‐12 = $4,470

LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA (LCFF) For 2017‐18 . . . Same for all districts in California

$2020‐2021 TARGET

CYPRESS SCHOOL DISTRICT & LCFF

For 2017/18, Average Daily Attendance (ADA) based on 2016/17 P2 ADA

2017/18 LCFF receives a 1.56% COLA

Cypress School District funding GAP = $1,635,154 2017/18 GAP funding rate is 43.97% = $718,977

ADA Base Grade Span Supplemental Concentration Target 2020/21

Grades K‐3 2,164.52 $7,193 $748 $1,588 n/a $18,593,833

Grades 4‐6 1,705.10 $7,301 n/a $1,460 n/a $13,466,554

TOTAL BASE 3,869.62 $28,018,327 $1,619,060 $2,423,001 n/a $32,060,387

Total projected LCFF funding for 2017/18  =  $31,371,533

$ 1,839,691$ 1,839,691

$ 29,531,842$ 29,531,842

MINIMUM PROPORTIONALITY PERCENTAGE2017/18 SCHOOL YEAR

Other LCFF  $$

S & C  $$

Base program services

Increased or improved services

MPP requirement is satisfied in the Cypress School District LCAP

Supplemental & Concentration Grants (S&C) LCFF provides additional funding based on the unduplicated count of low‐income, English learner, and foster youth

Districts must increase or improve services to these students in proportion to the increase in funds

LCAP STORYTIME!

LCAP PROCESS

S T A K E H O L D E R   E N G A G E M E N T

LCAPBoard 

Staff

Parents Students

Committees

ACT  & CSEA Leadership 

C O N T I N U O U S   C Y C L E   O F  I M P R O V E M E N T

Plan

Implement

Review

Improve

LCAP DEMOGRAPHIC NUMBERS*

EnrollmentSocioeconomicallyDisadvantaged

EnglishLearners Unduplicated Count

Arnold 756 263 34.8% 140 18.5% 350 46.3%

King 555 337 60.7% 109 19.6% 375 67.6%

Landell 745 67 9.0% 122 16.4% 176 23.6%

Luther 498 217 43.6% 68 13.7% 244 49.0%

Morris 725 205 28.3% 100 13.8% 272 37.5%

Vessels 682 187 27.4% 55 8.1% 272 39.9%

District 3969 1,276 32.1% 595 15.0% 1649 41.5%

*October 5, 2016 (Fall I CALPADS)

CaliforniaAccountability Model

State Indicators

Chronic Absenteeism

SuspensionRate

English Learner Progress

Graduation Rate

College CareerIndicator

Academic IndicatorsELA/Math

Local Indicators

Basic Conditions of Schools

Academic Standards Implementation

Parent Engagement School 

Climate

1. The Dashboard System is currently in a  “pilot preview.”  Chronic absenteeism is not yet available on the Dashboard

2. The Dashboard System will be complete in the fall (estimated) with updated data  

STATE INDICATORS FOR CYPSDState Indicators All Student Performance Status Change

Chronic Absenteeism N/A N/A N/A

Suspension Very Low0.2%Declined‐0.4%

English Learner Progress Very High85.3%Maintained+.01 points

English Language Arts High36.9 points above level 3Maintained+2.6 points

Mathematics High20.4 points above level 3Increased+9.7 points

LOCAL INDICATORS

Measures Met/Not MetBasic Conditions of Schools: Access to quality teachers, instruction, materials and facilities Met

Implementation of Academic Standards: Adherence to state approved standards Met

Parent Engagement: Engage parent in decision making and participation in programs Met

School Climate: Suspension/ expulsion rates and a sense of safety and school connectedness

Met

ANALYSIS & REFLECTION:  STRENGTHS

• STEM education• Music education• Thinking Maps/Write from the Beginning • Least Restrictive Environment (Special Education)• Bring your own device• Professional development• Parent education• Emergency response

ANALYSIS & REFLECTION:  AREAS OF NEED

Behavior support for both inside and outside the classroom

Updated English Language Arts/English Language Development curriculum 

Continued professional development Additional parent education  Homework alignment

DISTRICT GOALS AND ACTIONS OVERVIEW

MAJOR PRIORITIES

STEM and Arts

Thinking Maps/Write from the Beginning

English Language Arts/English Language Development  adoption

Professional development

Positive behavior supports and common discipline plan

Learning Center and Least Restrictive Environment

Homework alignment 

Parent education

SUPPORTS FOR UNDUPLICATED STUDENTS

Before/after school intervention for English Learners Translation and interpretation  English Language Development  Aides Professional development on English Language 

Development Instructional Learning Coaches Title I teacher at King State preschool

LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY PLAN

Local Educational Agency Plan (LEAP)• The LCAP currently does not meet the Federal Standards 

for the LEAP. • The LEAP has been reviewed and is compliant.• CDE currently  has a draft plan for public comment.• Staff will attend a regional stakeholder meeting to 

review the contents of the draft State Plan and provide input, as appropriate.

MULTI‐YEAR ASSUMPTIONS

2017/18 2018/19 2019/20

Enrollment 3,915 3,915 3,915

ADA Percentage 97.0% 97.0% 97.0%

LCFF COLA 1.56% 2.15% 2.35%

LCFF Gap Funding Rate 43.97% 71.53% 73.51%

Unduplicated Count 40.89% 40.89% 40.89%

CalPERS Rate 15.531% 18.10% 20.80%

CalSTRS Rate 14.43% 16.28% 18.13%

Step/Column – Classified 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%

Step/Column – Certificated 2.50% 2.50% 2.50%

MULTI‐YEAR PROJECTIONS – GENERAL FUND

2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20

Beginning Fund Balance $10,464,079 $8,561,652 $7,201,440 $5,335,876

Revenues $41,133,043 $40,711,866 $41,644,879 $42,537,606

Expenditures $41,742,869 $42,072,078 $43,510,443 $44,997,981

Projected Ending Balance $8,561,652 $7,201,440 $5,335,876 $2,875,501

Reserve for Economic Uncertainties (3%) $1,291,064 $1,262,163 $1,305,314 $1,349,940

Restricted/Assigned Reserve $6,214,490 $5,350,491 $3,536,736 $1,502,608

Unappropriated Amount $1,041,098 $573,786 $478,832 $5,953

AREAS OF FUTURE CONCERNWaiver of Proposition 98 3B statute The May Revision would suspend Test 3B payments through 2020/21, which lowers the minimum funding guarantee Suspended payments would accrue to the maintenance factor

Delaying the release of One‐Time moniesGovernor proposes to hold all of the funds until May 2019Goes against all generally accepted accounting rules.

Pension cost increases and employer contribution obligations The $6 billion one‐time payment by the State provides no relief to increased costs imposed on all districts.

2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21

CalPERS Employer Rate 11.77% 12.60% 13.888% 15.800% 18.70% 21.60% 24.90%

CalSTRS Employer Rate 8.88% 10.73% 12.58% 14.43% 16.28% 18.13% 19.10%

Total Additional Dollars  $88,382 $641,032 $606,917 $492,908 $616,787 $643,609 $519,882

Change from 2013/14 +$88,382 $729,414 $1,336,332 $1,829,240 $2,446,027 $3,089,636 $3,609,517

PROPOSED 2017/18 BUDGET & LCAPaccomplishes the following . . .

Maintains financial stability

Provides competitive salaries for all our employees

Promotes communication with all stakeholders

Maximizes student achievement through implementation of cutting‐edge, world‐class education

QUESTIONS?