2019-2020 bill 560: judge qualifications - south carolina ...  · web viewthose voting in favor of...

3
South Carolina General Assembly 123rd Session, 2019-2020 S. 560 STATUS INFORMATION Joint Resolution Sponsors: Senators McLeod, Fanning and M.B. Matthews Document Path: l:\council\bills\nl\13807sd19.docx Companion/Similar bill(s): 3941, 3942, 4031 Introduced in the Senate on February 26, 2019 Currently residing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary Summary: Judge qualifications HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS Date Body Action Description with journal page number 2/26/2019 Senate Introduced and read first time (Senate Journal - page 11 ) 2/26/2019 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary (Senate Journal - page 11 ) View the latest legislative information at the website VERSIONS OF THIS BILL 2/26/2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Upload: others

Post on 10-Sep-2019

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2019-2020 Bill 560: Judge qualifications - South Carolina ...  · Web viewThose voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after

South Carolina General Assembly123rd Session, 2019-2020

S. 560

STATUS INFORMATION

Joint ResolutionSponsors: Senators McLeod, Fanning and M.B. MatthewsDocument Path: l:\council\bills\nl\13807sd19.docxCompanion/Similar bill(s): 3941, 3942, 4031

Introduced in the Senate on February 26, 2019Currently residing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary

Summary: Judge qualifications

HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS

Date Body Action Description with journal page number 2/26/2019 Senate Introduced and read first time (Senate Journal - page 11 )2/26/2019 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary (Senate Journal - page 11 )

View the latest legislative information at the website

VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

2/26/2019

123456789

10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031

Page 2: 2019-2020 Bill 560: Judge qualifications - South Carolina ...  · Web viewThose voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after

A JOINT RESOLUTION

PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 15, ARTICLE V OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS OF JUSTICES AND JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT, THE COURT OF APPEALS, AND THE CIRCUIT COURT, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT IN ADDITION TO THE QUALIFICATIONS FOR JUSTICES AND JUDGES CONTAINED IN THIS SECTION, NO PERSON MAY BE ELECTED AS THE CHIEF JUSTICE OR AS AN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OR AS A JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS WHO HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY SERVED AS A JUDGE OF A COURT OF RECORD IN THIS STATE.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION 1. It is proposed that Section 15, Article V of the Constitution of this State, be amended by adding a new paragraph at the end to read:

“In addition to the qualifications for justices and judges contained in this section, no person may be elected as the Chief Justice or as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court or as a judge of the Court of Appeals who has not previously served as a judge of a court of record in this State.”

SECTION 2. The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the ballots:

[560] 1

123456789

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041

Page 3: 2019-2020 Bill 560: Judge qualifications - South Carolina ...  · Web viewThose voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after

“Must Section 15 of Article V of the Constitution of this State relating to qualifications for justices of the Supreme Court and judges of the Court of Appeals and the circuit court be amended so as to provide that in addition to the qualifications for justices and judges contained in this section, no person may be elected as the Chief Justice or as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court or as a judge of the Court of Appeals who has not previously served as a judge of a court of record in this State?

Yes

No

Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word ‘Yes’, and those voting against the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word ‘No.”

----XX----

[560] 2

123456789

1011121314151617181920