2019 legislative vote analysis · 2020-01-06 · 3 indiana general assembly 2019 legislator vote...

2019 LEGISLATIVEVOTE ANALYSIS

35th EDITION

Letter From Chamber President 2Legislator Vote Scores 3Priority Legislation 4Voting Records Legend 6

House Voting Record 8Senate Voting Record 12Senators and Representatives by County 14Indiana Chamber Lobbyists 16

2

Before the start of each legislative session, the Indiana Chamber announces its priority policies and areas of focus These are matters that would have wide impact on businesses and citizens throughout the state All are tied to goals in the Chamber’s Indiana Vision 2025 long-term economic development plan for the state, which has 37 goals under four drivers: Outstanding Talent, Attractive Business Climate; Superior Infrastructure, and Dynamic and Creative Culture

On page 4 are the bills that contain those priority goals, their outcome and why they are good policies for the state

It’s important to note that one of our priorities – smoking reform – was once again ignored at the Statehouse, with no floor votes being taken on increasing the cigarette tax or raising the legal purchase age from 18 to 21 So unfortunately, there is no opportunity to score legislators on this issue

For the 39 bills that are included in this report, you can see if your legislators supported a pro-jobs, pro-economy agenda by viewing their scores on page 3

We also encourage you to review Indiana Vision 2025 (and the new Report Card) at www indianachamber com/2025; we believe the report will prove insightful for all engaged in efforts to make Indiana an even better, more prosperous place for its citizens

A Variety of Wins But One Glaring OmissionBy Kevin Brinegar, President and CEO

Developing the Business AgendaThe Indiana Chamber provides more information on important pro-jobs, pro-economy issues to legislators and businesspersons than any other organization in the state In preparation for each legislative session, the Indiana Chamber’s numerous policy committees study the various public policy issues impacting businesses and their employees and formulate positions on these issues

Following review and adoption by the Indiana Chamber’s board of directors, a publication titled Legislative Business Issues is sent to all legislators, Chamber members, local chambers of commerce and coalition members This publication outlines the Indiana Chamber’s position on important public policy issues and provides invaluable analysis

During the legislative sessions, lawmakers are kept advised on key business issues through various editions of the Legislative Agenda report and other communications that detail the Indiana Chamber’s position on every bill that has a pro-jobs, pro-economy impact The 2019 Legislative Vote Analysis measures the voting performance of individual legislators on bills that best reflect the Chamber’s policy positions

Indiana Chamber lobbying team

3

Indiana General Assembly2019 Legislator Vote Scores

*Legislators with a voting record of less than four years ***Senator Mrvan was excused from all Chamber votes during the 2019 legislative session

Indiana House

2019 Score

4-Year Agg. %

Indiana House

2019 Score

4-Year Agg. %

IndianaSenate

2019 Score

4-Year Agg. %

Abbott, David* 89% 90% Judy, Chris 79% 82% Alting, Ron 83% 85%Austin, Terri Jo 64% 64% Karickhoff, Michael 100% 98% Bassler, Eric 89% 94%Aylesworth, Mike 90% 92% Kirchhofer, Cindy 92% 96% Becker, Vaneta 78% 73%Bacon, Ronald 90% 94% Klinker, Sheila 66% 64% Bohacek, Mike* 88% 88%Baird, Beau* 89% 89% Lauer, Ryan* 95% 95% Boots, Philip 73% 83%Barrett, Bradford* 89% 89% Lehe, Don 89% 95% Bray, Rodric 90% 93%Bartels, Steve* 95% 95% Lehman, Matt 95% 97% Breaux, Jean 60% 55%Bartlett, John 47% 50% Leonard, Daniel 92% 97% Brown, Liz 91% 94%Bauer, B Patrick 50% 53% Lindauer, Shane* 81% 88% Buchanan, Brian* 89% 91%Beck, Lisa* 51% 51% Lucas, Jim 85% 91% Buck, James 89% 95%Behning, Robert 96% 98% Lyness, Randy 92% 97% Busch, Justin* 89% 89%Borders, Bruce 79% 84% Macer, Karlee 54% 59% Charbonneau, Ed 90% 97%Bosma, Brian 100% 100% Mahan, Kevin 88% 94% Crane, John* 83% 79%Boy, Pat* 50% 50% Manning, Ethan* 89% 89% Crider, Michael 84% 91%Brown, Timothy 92% 97% May, Chris* 92% 91% Doriot, Blake* 89% 93%Burton, Woody 89% 96% Mayfield, Peggy 84% 92% Ford, J D * 65% 65%Campbell, Chris* 57% 57% McNamara, Wendy 95% 96% Ford, Jon 88% 89%Candelaria Reardon, Mara* 41% 54% Miller, Doug 89% 96% Freeman, Aaron* 83% 83%Carbaugh, Martin 90% 97% Moed, Justin 55% 63% Garten, Chris* 89% 89%Cherry, Robert 100% 98% Morris, Robert 80% 83% Gaskill, Mike* 80% 80%Chyung, Chris* 56% 56% Morrison, Alan 78% 88% Glick, Susan 86% 85%Clere, Edward 100% 95% Moseley, Charles 58% 58% Grooms, Ronald 83% 83%Cook, Anthony 91% 95% Negele, Sharon 100% 97% Head, Randall 73% 82%Davisson, Steven 89% 90% Nisly, Curt 63% 71% Holdman, Travis 88% 95%Deal, Ross* 66% 66% Pfaff, Tonya* 61% 61% Houchin, Erin 88% 89%DeLaney, Edward 51% 55% Pierce, Matt 58% 53% Koch, Eric* 79% 85%DeVon, Dale 88% 95% Porter, Gregory 55% 54% Kruse, Dennis 83% 91%Dvorak, Ryan 43% 49% Prescott, J D * 82% 82% Lanane, Timothy 65% 57%Eberhart, Sean 89% 92% Pressel, Jim* 90% 92% Leising, Jean 86% 82%Ellington, Jeff 90% 95% Pryor, Cherrish 50% 49% Melton, Eddie* 61% 57%Engleman, Karen* 92% 95% Saunders, Thomas 89% 89% Merritt, James 93% 96%Errington, Sue 52% 55% Schaibley, Donna 92% 94% Messmer, Mark 93% 90%Fleming, Rita* 59% 59% Shackleford, Robin 53% 53% Mishler, Ryan 87% 92%Forestal, Dan 46% 57% Smaltz, Ben 89% 94% Mrvan, Frank *** 62%Frizzell, David 95% 97% Smith, Vernon 27% 46% Niemeyer, Rick 83% 84%Frye, Randall 84% 92% Soliday, Edmond 96% 98% Niezgodski, David* 69% 62%GiaQuinta, Philip 55% 57% Speedy, Mike 81% 92% Perfect, Chip 89% 94%Goodin, Terry 62% 60% Steuerwald, Gregory 95% 97% Raatz, Jeff 89% 95%Goodrich, Chuck* 89% 89% Stutzman, Christy* 82% 82% Randolph, Lonnie 59% 55%Gutwein, Doug 90% 94% Sullivan, Holli 90% 95% Rogers, Linda* 91% 91%Hamilton, Carey* 59% 59% Summers, Vanessa 56% 52% Ruckelshaus, John* 89% 89%Harris Jr , Earl* 60% 61% Thompson, Jeffrey 95% 96% Sandlin, Jack* 86% 87%Hatcher, Ragen* 39% 39% Torr, Jerry 97% 97% Spartz, Victoria* 89% 90%Hatfield, Ryan* 60% 60% VanNatter, Heath 93% 91% Stoops, Mark 55% 48%Heaton, Robert 92% 95% Wesco, Timothy 82% 88% Tallian, Karen 63% 60%Heine, Dave* 89% 96% Wolkins, David 83% 91% Taylor, Greg 61% 59%Hostettler, Matt* 79% 79% Wright, Melanie 53% 57% Tomes, James 71% 74%Huston, Todd 95% 99% Young, John* 79% 87% Walker, Greg 77% 91%Jackson, Carolyn* 58% 58% Zent, Dennis 92% 97% Young, Michael 72% 78%Jordan, Jack* 92% 89% Ziemke, Cindy 100% 99% Zay, Andy* 84% 90%

4

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT / INNOVATION / TECHNOLOGYOur Priority: Support Indiana adopting a meaningful bias crimes statute, with the overriding goal being to remove Indiana from the short list of states without one Legislation: Senate Bill 198 – Establishes sentencing guidelines, including for hate crimes; signed by the Governor

Authorizes a judge to increase a defendant’s sentence if the defendant committed the crime because of the defendant’s bias toward the victim Passing a hate/bias crimes law was essential for Indiana and the business community because we are in such an intense battle for attracting and retaining talent as employers struggle to find enough skilled workers

Our Priority: Support increased investment/efforts to deploy broadband in rural parts of the state Legislation: Senate Bill 460 – Broadband development expansion; signed by the Governor

The expansion of broadband is critical to long-term economic development This legislation promotes a higher level of broadband deployment in unserved and underserved portions of the state

Our Priority: Support maintaining and enhancing our attractive tax climate

Legislation: Senate Bill 563 – Economic development, including the venture capital investment tax credit (VCI) transferability; signed by the Governor

Makes a variety of positive changes to tax policy and incentive programs intended to promote and enhance economic development Of note, the bill allows an investor to transfer all or part of a VCI tax credit, subject to certain limitations, beginning in 2020

EDUCATIONOur Priority: Support better alignment of the state’s various education and workforce programs, with overall efforts inclusive of business community needsLegislation: House Bill 1002 – Career and technical education matters; signed by the Governor

The measure includes a number of recommendations from the Governor’s Workforce Cabinet, including strengthening career-technical education programming for Indiana high school students and increasing the state’s investment in the Next Level Jobs training grants for individuals and employers

Vote Selection Criteria and ScoringThe Indiana Chamber has well-established criteria for selecting votes to be included in the Legislative Vote Analysis (LVA) Bills included meet the following four criteria:

1 Votes on all subject matter used in LVA are based on and best reflect the Chamber’s legislative policy as determined by the Chamber’s board of directors and expressed in Legislative Business Issues, Legislative Agenda or other Chamber communications to legislators

2 Each member of the Indiana General Assembly is informed of all bills the Chamber is following, including the Chamber’s position on each, the reasons for the position and the name and contact information of the specific Chamber issue expert to contact for more information

3 Each member of the Indiana General Assembly is informed of the Chamber’s position on the issue and bill prior to the vote This notification was provided in editions of the Legislative Agenda or other communications with legislators

4 Only floor votes for which there is a public record are used

Base scores for each legislator are calculated as a percentage of votes cast in agreement with the Chamber’s position on the bills included in LVA Select pro-economy, pro-jobs legislation has been double-weighted to reflect its importance A modest adjustment factor (positive or negative) has been added to the LVA scoring model to factor in very important legislative activities outside of floor votes on bills the Chamber has taken a position on, including whether a legislator sponsored/authored these bills and whether committee chairs held hearings or killed these bills This adjustment factor is applied as a net positive or negative number of additional scored votes and is capped at +/- 10 votes

2019 Priority Legislation

The Chamber’s Mike Ripley (l) worked with Rep. Steve Davisson (R-Salem) to make the new state guidelines for substance use and treatment more meaningful for all Hoosier employers.

5

School accountability and workforce development efforts also included

Our Priority: Support moving up the effective date for making the state superintendent of public instruction an appointed position to 2021 instead of 2025 Legislation: House Bill 1005 – State superintendent of public instruction; signed by the Governor

The new secretary of education role will ensure that the Governor and superintendent are in agreement on the key education objectives, which is so important for the state’s future workforce

Our Priority: Support suitable testing for students and accountability measures for all involved in the education processLegislation: House Bill 1404 – School accountability improvements; signed by the Governor

We applaud the move to integrate meaningful outcome measures into the state’s A-F school accountability system, including student completion of industry-recognized credentials and student enrollment in postsecondary education and training programs This moves to bridge the disconnect between what we measure and the outcomes we expect to see by acknowledging the critical role Indiana high schools play in preparing students for success in work and in life

Our Priority: Support the fiscally-responsible expansion of publicly-funded preschool initiatives for children from low-income families Legislation: House Bill 1628 – Pre-K expansion; signed by the Governor

After June 30, 2019, in addition to the counties currently participating in the pre-kindergarten pilot program, it will now include eligible providers in any county in Indiana The Chamber supports efforts to expand student access to quality early childhood education as proven drivers of student achievement and economic development

ENVIRONMENT / INFRASTRUCTUREOur Priority: Support significant investment in Indiana’s water infrastructure and prudent planning for the future Safe, affordable and reliable water supplies are critical for health, safety and economic development Legislation: House Bill 1406 – Water infrastructure assistance fund and program; signed by the Governor

Annually appropriates $20 million to the Water Infrastructure Assistance Fund The measure promotes sustainability of water resources and attempts to keep costs as low as possible

Our Priority: Support significant investment in Indiana’s water infrastructure and prudent planning for the future Safe, affordable and reliable water supplies are critical for health, safety and economic development Legislation: Senate Bill 4 – Water and wastewater utilities and runoff; signed by the Governor

This bill establishes study areas and requires the Indiana Finance Authority to conduct annual meetings in the study areas with water utilities The goal is to set priorities and needs for investment in infrastructure as well as the prudent management of water resources This builds on the Chamber’s 2014 water study

TAXATION Our Priority: Support maintaining and enhancing our attractive tax climate Legislation: Senate Bill 233 – Business personal property tax exemption; signed by the Governor

This bill increases the acquisition cost threshold for the business personal property tax exemption from $20,000 to $40,000, which will significantly raise the number of taxpayers who qualify for the exemption The average tax liability of taxpayers exempted under this is $145; it costs them more to prepare or pay for the preparation of a return than they ultimately owed in tax

NOTE: A policy we continue to actively engage on when needed – sales tax on services – was once again not even introduced in legislation. This is in part due to our dogged efforts explaining why this would be bad for Indiana’s tax climate. Sales tax on services would be very detrimental and harm our overall attractive tax structure.

Water policy – including funding for the Water Infrastructure Assistance Program – often brought the Chamber’s Greg Ellis (l) and Rep. Ed Soliday (R-Valparaiso) together this session.

6

Bill Number Bill Description

House Roll Call Used

House Roll Call #

Senate Roll Call Used

Senate Roll Call #

Author/Sponsor Position Outcome

HB 1001 State's two-year budget

Amendment 37

271 Huston/Mishler

Oppose Passed

HB 1002 Career and technical education matters

CCR 601 CCR 581 Sullivan/Perfect

Support Passed

HB 1003 School corporation expenditure targets

CCR 597 CCR 574 Devon/Mishler

Support Passed

HB 1005 State superintendent of public instruction

3rd Reading 30 3rd Reading 277 Bosma/Bray Support Passed

HB 1008 Teacher career ladders 3rd Reading 44 3rd Reading 419 Behning/Crane Support Passed

HB 1180 Pharmacy benefit managers

3rd Reading 480 Carbaugh/Holdman

Oppose Passed

HB 1181 Asbestos litigation 3rd Reading 205 Lehman Support Failed

HB 1182 Worker's compensation

Concurrence 412 3rd Reading 286 Lehman/Boots Support Passed

HB 1278 Various environmental matters

CCR 650 CCR 618 Wolkins/Messmer

Support Passed

HB 1344 Nurse licensure compact Concurrence 547 3rd Reading 329 Clere/Zay Support Passed

HB 1362 Peer-to-peer vehicle sharing

CCR 605 CCR 586 Eberhart/Crider

Support Passed

HB 1404 School accountability improvements

3rd Reading 248 Cook/Raatz Support Passed

HB 1405 Taxation of data centers

CCR 557 CCR 544 Soliday/Messmer

Support Passed

HB 1406 Water infrastructure assistance fund and program

3rd Reading 195 3rd Reading 331 Soliday/Charbonneau

Support Passed

HB 1444 Taxation of e-liquids 3rd Reading 155 Brown/Charbonneau

Support Passed

HB 1470 Utility transmission improvements and cost

3rd Reading 112 3rd Reading 334 Soliday/Messmer

Support Passed

HB 1518 Alcoholic matters and tobacco certificates

CCR 622 CCR 603 Smaltz/Alting Support Passed

HB 1628 Pre-kindergarten program expansion

CCR 606 CCR 579 Behning/Holdman

Support Passed

HB 1629 Various education matters

CCR 655 CCR 623 Behning/Raatz Support Passed

HB 1650 Elimination of township advisory boards

3rd Reading 147 Ziemke Support Failed

Voting Records LegendRoll Calls Used for House Votes

*CCR = Conference Committee Report

7

Bill Number Bill Description

House Roll Call Used

House Roll Call #

Senate Roll Call Used

Senate Roll Call #

Author/Sponsor Position Outcome

SB 7 Marion County Capital Improvement Board

3rd Reading 499 Concurrence 558 Mishler/Huston

Support Passed

SB 12 Sentencing and bias crimes

Amend 2 148 Bohacek/Steuerwald

Support Passed

SB 99 Wage assignments for clothing rental and tool purchase

3rd Reading 349 3rd Reading 75 Boots/Vannatter

Support Passed

SB 131 Sales tax on recreational vehicles

3rd Reading 430 3rd Reading 182 Doriot/Cherry Support Failed

SB 198 Sentencing guidelines, including for hate crimes

3rd Reading 347 Concurrence 382 Bohacek/Steuerwald

Support Passed

SB 233 Business personal property tax exemption

CCR 609 CCR 582 Freeman/Speedy

Support Passed

SB 322 Marketplace facilitator for online sales tax collection

3rd Reading 437 3rd Reading 157 Holdman/Huston

Support Passed

SB 358 Worker's compensation

3rd Reading 229 Tallian/Lehman

Oppose Failed

SB 438 Various education matters

3rd Reading 439 3rd Reading 48 Zay/Behning Support Passed

SB 460 Broadband development expansion

3rd Reading 514 3rd Reading 143 Messmer/Soliday

Support Passed

SB 471 Offenses involving critical infrastructure

3rd Reading 343 Concurrence 366 Koch/Soliday Support Passed

SB 472 Utility rates and acquisitions

Amend 1, CCR

502, 625 CCR 590 Koch/Soliday Support Passed

SB 507 Education matters 3rd Reading 162 Raatz/Cook, Anthony

Support Passed

SB 535 Extraterritorial powers of cities and towns

3rd Reading 444 CCR 598 Boots/Davisson

Support Passed

SB 563 Economic development (VCI tax credit transferability)

3rd Reading 484 3rd Reading 201 Holdman/Huston

Support Passed

SB 567 Education matters/virtual education

3rd Reading 518 3rd Reading 250 Raatz/Behning

Support Passed

SB 606 Teacher salaries 3rd Reading 447 3rd Reading 116 Raatz/Cook, Anthony

Support Passed

SB 607 Workforce diploma reimbursement program and fund

CCR 643 CCR 601 Raatz/Sullivan Support Passed

SB 623 Property tax matters 3rd Reading 254 Buchanan/Schaibley

Oppose Passed

Voting Records LegendRoll Calls Used for Senate Votes

*CCR = Conference Committee Report

8

Vote Designators + SUPPORTS Chamber Position – OPPOSES Chamber Position

E or NV Excused from voting or no vote cast; not counted in calculating vote percentages

House Voting Record

* Legislators with a voting record of less than four years** Speaker of the House; as a general rule, the Speaker does not cast votes on all legislation

2019 Score

7 99 131 198 198 233 322 438 460 471 472 472 472 535 563 567 606 607 1001 1002 1003 1005 1008 1181 1182 1278 1344 1362 1404 1405 1406 1444 1470 1518 1628 1629 1650 1650499 349 430 347 347 609 437 439 514 343 502 502 625 444 484 518 447 643 271 601 597 30 44 205 412 650 547 605 248 557 195 155 112 622 606 655 147 147

Abbott* 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + NV + + Abbott* + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Austin 64% + + + - - + + + + E + + + - + + + + Austin - - E + + - - + + + - + + - E + + - - -Aylesworth 90% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Aylesworth + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Bacon 90% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Bacon + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Baird* 89% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Baird* + + + + + - + + + + - E + + + + + + - -Barrett* 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Barrett* E + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Bartels 95% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Bartels + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + - -Bartlett 47% - + - - - - + + + - + + - - + + + + Bartlett - - - - + - - + + + - + + - - + + - - -Bauer 50% - + + - - - + + + - + + + - E + + + Bauer - - - - + - - + + + - + + - - + + - - -Beck 51% - + + - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Beck - - - - + - - + NV + - - + - + + + - - -Behning 96% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Behning + + + + + + + + + + + E + + + + + + + +Borders 79% + + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + Borders + + + + + + + - + + + + + - + - - + - -Bosma** 100% E NV NV + + NV NV NV NV E E E NV NV NV NV + E Bosma** + + + + + + E NV NV NV NV NV + NV NV NV NV + NV NVBoy 50% + + - - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Boy - - - - + - - + + + - + + - - + + - - -Brown, T 92% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Brown, T + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + E + + + +Burton 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Burton + + + + + + + + + + E + + + E E + + - -Campbell* 57% + E - E E - + + + - + + + - + NV + + Campbell* - - - - + - - + + + - + + + - + + - - -Candelaria Reardon

41% E + - - - - + + + - E E + - E + + E Candelaria Reardon

- - - - + - - E + + - E E E + - E - E E

Carbaugh 90% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Carbaugh + + + + + + + + + + - + + + - + + + - -Cherry 100% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Cherry + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + + + E EChyung* 56% - + + - - + + + + - + + + + + + + + Chyung* - - - - + - - E + + - - + E - + + - E EClere 100% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Clere + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Cook 91% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Cook + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Davisson 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + E + + Davisson + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Deal 66% + + + - - - + + + + + + + - + + + + Deal - - - + + - - + + + + + + - + + + - - -DeLaney 51% + + - - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + DeLaney - - - + + - - + + + - + + - - + + - - -DeVon 88% + + + + + + + + + + - - + - + + + + DeVon + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Dvorak 43% - + + - - + + + + - + + E + E + - + Dvorak - - - - + - - - - E + - + - - + E - - -Eberhart 89% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Eberhart + + + + + - + + + + - E + - + E - + + +Ellington 90% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Ellington + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Engleman 92% + + + + + + + + + E - - + + + + + + Engleman + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Errington 52% + + + - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Errington - - - - + - - + + + - + + + - + + - - -Fleming* 59% + + + - - - + + + - + + + - + NV + + Fleming* - - + - + - - + + + - + + + - + + - - -Forestal 46% E + E - - E E E E + E E E E E E E E Forestal - E E + + - E E E E + E + - E E E E - -Frizzell 95% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Frizzell + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Frye 84% + + + + + E + + + + - - + + + + + + Frye + E E + + - + + E E + E + + + + E + - -GiaQuinta 55% + + - - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + GiaQuinta - - - - + - - + + + - + + + - + + - - -Goodin 62% + E + E E + + + + + + + + + E + + + Goodin - - - - + - - + + + + - + - + - - - - -Goodrich* 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Goodrich* + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Gutwein 90% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Gutwein + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Hamilton 59% + + - - - + + + + - + + + - + + + + Hamilton - - - + + E - + + + - + E + - + + - - -Harris Jr 60% + + + - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Harris Jr - - - - + - - + + + - + + E - + + - E EHatcher* 39% - + E - - - E E E - + + + E + E E + Hatcher* - - - - + - - + + + - - + - - + + - - -Hatfield 60% + + - - - + + + + - + + + NV + + + + Hatfield NV + - - E - - + - + - + + - + + + - - -Heaton 92% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Heaton + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Heine 89% + + + + + + NV NV + + - - + + + + + + Heine + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Hostettler* 79% - + + - - + + + + + - - + + + + + + Hostettler* + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + - -Huston 95% + E + E E E + + + + - - + + + + + E Huston + + + E + + + + E E + + + + + E E + + +Jackson* 58% + + + - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Jackson* - - - - + - - + + + - + + - + + + - - -

Bill #Roll Call# Senate Bills

9

House Voting Record

* Legislators with a voting record of less than four years** Speaker of the House; as a general rule, the Speaker does not cast votes on all legislation

2019 Score

7 99 131 198 198 233 322 438 460 471 472 472 472 535 563 567 606 607 1001 1002 1003 1005 1008 1181 1182 1278 1344 1362 1404 1405 1406 1444 1470 1518 1628 1629 1650 1650499 349 430 347 347 609 437 439 514 343 502 502 625 444 484 518 447 643 271 601 597 30 44 205 412 650 547 605 248 557 195 155 112 622 606 655 147 147

Abbott* 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + NV + + Abbott* + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Austin 64% + + + - - + + + + E + + + - + + + + Austin - - E + + - - + + + - + + - E + + - - -Aylesworth 90% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Aylesworth + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Bacon 90% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Bacon + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Baird* 89% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Baird* + + + + + - + + + + - E + + + + + + - -Barrett* 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Barrett* E + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Bartels 95% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Bartels + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + - -Bartlett 47% - + - - - - + + + - + + - - + + + + Bartlett - - - - + - - + + + - + + - - + + - - -Bauer 50% - + + - - - + + + - + + + - E + + + Bauer - - - - + - - + + + - + + - - + + - - -Beck 51% - + + - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Beck - - - - + - - + NV + - - + - + + + - - -Behning 96% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Behning + + + + + + + + + + + E + + + + + + + +Borders 79% + + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + Borders + + + + + + + - + + + + + - + - - + - -Bosma** 100% E NV NV + + NV NV NV NV E E E NV NV NV NV + E Bosma** + + + + + + E NV NV NV NV NV + NV NV NV NV + NV NVBoy 50% + + - - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Boy - - - - + - - + + + - + + - - + + - - -Brown, T 92% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Brown, T + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + E + + + +Burton 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Burton + + + + + + + + + + E + + + E E + + - -Campbell* 57% + E - E E - + + + - + + + - + NV + + Campbell* - - - - + - - + + + - + + + - + + - - -Candelaria Reardon

41% E + - - - - + + + - E E + - E + + E Candelaria Reardon

- - - - + - - E + + - E E E + - E - E E

Carbaugh 90% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Carbaugh + + + + + + + + + + - + + + - + + + - -Cherry 100% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Cherry + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + + + E EChyung* 56% - + + - - + + + + - + + + + + + + + Chyung* - - - - + - - E + + - - + E - + + - E EClere 100% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Clere + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Cook 91% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Cook + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Davisson 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + E + + Davisson + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Deal 66% + + + - - - + + + + + + + - + + + + Deal - - - + + - - + + + + + + - + + + - - -DeLaney 51% + + - - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + DeLaney - - - + + - - + + + - + + - - + + - - -DeVon 88% + + + + + + + + + + - - + - + + + + DeVon + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Dvorak 43% - + + - - + + + + - + + E + E + - + Dvorak - - - - + - - - - E + - + - - + E - - -Eberhart 89% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Eberhart + + + + + - + + + + - E + - + E - + + +Ellington 90% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Ellington + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Engleman 92% + + + + + + + + + E - - + + + + + + Engleman + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Errington 52% + + + - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Errington - - - - + - - + + + - + + + - + + - - -Fleming* 59% + + + - - - + + + - + + + - + NV + + Fleming* - - + - + - - + + + - + + + - + + - - -Forestal 46% E + E - - E E E E + E E E E E E E E Forestal - E E + + - E E E E + E + - E E E E - -Frizzell 95% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Frizzell + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Frye 84% + + + + + E + + + + - - + + + + + + Frye + E E + + - + + E E + E + + + + E + - -GiaQuinta 55% + + - - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + GiaQuinta - - - - + - - + + + - + + + - + + - - -Goodin 62% + E + E E + + + + + + + + + E + + + Goodin - - - - + - - + + + + - + - + - - - - -Goodrich* 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Goodrich* + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Gutwein 90% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Gutwein + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Hamilton 59% + + - - - + + + + - + + + - + + + + Hamilton - - - + + E - + + + - + E + - + + - - -Harris Jr 60% + + + - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Harris Jr - - - - + - - + + + - + + E - + + - E EHatcher* 39% - + E - - - E E E - + + + E + E E + Hatcher* - - - - + - - + + + - - + - - + + - - -Hatfield 60% + + - - - + + + + - + + + NV + + + + Hatfield NV + - - E - - + - + - + + - + + + - - -Heaton 92% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Heaton + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Heine 89% + + + + + + NV NV + + - - + + + + + + Heine + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Hostettler* 79% - + + - - + + + + + - - + + + + + + Hostettler* + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + - -Huston 95% + E + E E E + + + + - - + + + + + E Huston + + + E + + + + E E + + + + + E E + + +Jackson* 58% + + + - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Jackson* - - - - + - - + + + - + + - + + + - - -



House BillsBill #Roll Call#

10

2019 Score

7 99 131 198 198 233 322 438 460 471 472 472 472 535 563 567 606 607 1001 1002 1003 1005 1008 1181 1182 1278 1344 1362 1404 1405 1406 1444 1470 1518 1628 1629 1650 1650499 349 430 347 347 609 437 439 514 343 502 502 625 444 484 518 447 643 271 601 597 30 44 205 412 650 547 605 248 557 195 155 112 622 606 655 147 147

Jordan 92% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Jordan + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + - -Judy 79% + + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + Judy + + + + + + + - + + + + + - + + - + - -Karickhoff 100% NV + + + + + + + + + NV NV + + + + + + Karickhoff + NV + + + + + + + NV + + + + + + NV + + +Kirchhofer 92% E + + + + - + + + + E E + + E E + + Kirchhofer + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Klinker 66% + + + - - - + + + - + + + + + + + + Klinker - - - - + - E + + + - + + + + + + - - -Lauer* 95% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Lauer* + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + +Lehe 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Lehe + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + - -Lehman 95% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Lehman + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + + +Leonard 92% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + Leonard + + + + + + + + + E - + + + + + + + - -Lindauer 81% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + E + + Lindauer + + + + + + + - + + + + + - + + - + - -Lucas 85% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Lucas + + + + + + + + + + NV + + - + + + + - -Lyness 92% + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + Lyness + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Macer 54% + + - - - + + + E - + + + - + E + + Macer - - - - + - - + + + - + + E - + + - E EMahan 88% + + + + + E + + + + - - + + + + + + Mahan + E E + + + + + + E + + + + + + E + - -Manning* 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Manning* + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -May 92% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + May E + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Mayfield 84% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Mayfield + + + + + + + + + + - + + - + + E + - -McNamara 95% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + McNamara + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Miller 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Miller + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + + - -Moed 55% - + - - - E E + + - E E + - E + + + Moed - - + - + - - + + + NV + + - + + + - - -Morris 80% + + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + Morris + + + + + + + - + + - + + - + + - + - -Morrison 78% + + + + + + + + + + - - E + + + + + Morrison + + + + + + + E + + - + + - + - - + - -Moseley 58% + + + - - - + + + + + + + - + + + + Moseley - - - - + - - E E + - + + - + + + - - -Negele 100% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Negele + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Nisly 63% - + + - - + + + + + - - + - + + + + Nisly + + + - + - + - + + - + + - + + - + - -Pfaff* 61% + + + - - + + + + - + + + - + + + + Pfaff* - - - - + - - + + + - + + - + + + - - -Pierce 58% - + - - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Pierce - - - - + - - + + + - + + + - + + - - -Porter 55% + NV - - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Porter - - - - + - - + + + - E + - + + + - - -Prescott* 82% - + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + Prescott* + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - + - -Pressel 90% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Pressel + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Pryor 50% + + - - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Pryor - - - - + - - + + E - + + - - + E - - -Saunders 89% + + + + + - + + + + - - + + + + + + Saunders + + + + + + + + + + - + + E + + + + E ESchaibley 92% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Schaibley + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Shackleford 53% + + - - - - + + + - + + + - + NV + + Shackleford - - - - + - - + + + - + + - NV + + - - -Smaltz 89% - + + + + + + + E + + + + + + E + + Smaltz + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + - -Smith 27% E + E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E Smith - E E - + - E E E E - E + - E E E E - -Soliday 96% + E + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Soliday + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Speedy 81% + + + - - + + + + + - - + + + + + + Speedy E + + + E + E - + + + + + + + + + + - -Steuerwald 95% E + + + + + + + E + E E + + E E + + Steuerwald + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Stutzman 82% + + + - - + + + + + - - + + + + + + Stutzman + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + - -Sullivan 90% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Sullivan + + + + + + + - + + + E + - + + + + + +Summers 56% + + - - - - + + + - + + + + + + + + Summers - - - - + - - + + + - + + - + + + - - -Thompson 95% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Thompson + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Torr 97% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Torr + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + +VanNatter 93% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + VanNatter + + + + + E + + + + + + E - + + + + - -Wesco 82% - + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Wesco + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + - + + - -Wolkins 83% E + + - - + + + + + E E E + + + + + Wolkins E E + + + + + + + + - + + - + E + + - -Wright 53% + + + - - + + + + - + + + - + + + + Wright - - - - + - - + - + - - + - - + + - - -Young, J 79% + + + + + + + + E + + + + + + NV + + Young, J + + + + + - + + + + + + + - - + - + - -Zent 92% + + + + + + + + E + + + + + + E + + Zent + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Ziemke 100% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Ziemke + + + + + + + + E + + + + + + + + + + +

House Voting Record

* Legislators with a voting record of less than four years



Bill #Roll Call# Senate Bills

11

2019 Score

7 99 131 198 198 233 322 438 460 471 472 472 472 535 563 567 606 607 1001 1002 1003 1005 1008 1181 1182 1278 1344 1362 1404 1405 1406 1444 1470 1518 1628 1629 1650 1650499 349 430 347 347 609 437 439 514 343 502 502 625 444 484 518 447 643 271 601 597 30 44 205 412 650 547 605 248 557 195 155 112 622 606 655 147 147

Jordan 92% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Jordan + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + - -Judy 79% + + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + Judy + + + + + + + - + + + + + - + + - + - -Karickhoff 100% NV + + + + + + + + + NV NV + + + + + + Karickhoff + NV + + + + + + + NV + + + + + + NV + + +Kirchhofer 92% E + + + + - + + + + E E + + E E + + Kirchhofer + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Klinker 66% + + + - - - + + + - + + + + + + + + Klinker - - - - + - E + + + - + + + + + + - - -Lauer* 95% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Lauer* + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + +Lehe 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Lehe + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + - -Lehman 95% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Lehman + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + + +Leonard 92% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + Leonard + + + + + + + + + E - + + + + + + + - -Lindauer 81% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + E + + Lindauer + + + + + + + - + + + + + - + + - + - -Lucas 85% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Lucas + + + + + + + + + + NV + + - + + + + - -Lyness 92% + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + Lyness + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Macer 54% + + - - - + + + E - + + + - + E + + Macer - - - - + - - + + + - + + E - + + - E EMahan 88% + + + + + E + + + + - - + + + + + + Mahan + E E + + + + + + E + + + + + + E + - -Manning* 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Manning* + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -May 92% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + May E + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Mayfield 84% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Mayfield + + + + + + + + + + - + + - + + E + - -McNamara 95% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + McNamara + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Miller 89% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Miller + + + + + + + + + + + + + + E + + + - -Moed 55% - + - - - E E + + - E E + - E + + + Moed - - + - + - - + + + NV + + - + + + - - -Morris 80% + + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + Morris + + + + + + + - + + - + + - + + - + - -Morrison 78% + + + + + + + + + + - - E + + + + + Morrison + + + + + + + E + + - + + - + - - + - -Moseley 58% + + + - - - + + + + + + + - + + + + Moseley - - - - + - - E E + - + + - + + + - - -Negele 100% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Negele + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Nisly 63% - + + - - + + + + + - - + - + + + + Nisly + + + - + - + - + + - + + - + + - + - -Pfaff* 61% + + + - - + + + + - + + + - + + + + Pfaff* - - - - + - - + + + - + + - + + + - - -Pierce 58% - + - - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Pierce - - - - + - - + + + - + + + - + + - - -Porter 55% + NV - - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Porter - - - - + - - + + + - E + - + + + - - -Prescott* 82% - + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + Prescott* + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - + - -Pressel 90% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Pressel + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Pryor 50% + + - - - - + + + - + + + - + + + + Pryor - - - - + - - + + E - + + - - + E - - -Saunders 89% + + + + + - + + + + - - + + + + + + Saunders + + + + + + + + + + - + + E + + + + E ESchaibley 92% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Schaibley + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Shackleford 53% + + - - - - + + + - + + + - + NV + + Shackleford - - - - + - - + + + - + + - NV + + - - -Smaltz 89% - + + + + + + + E + + + + + + E + + Smaltz + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + - -Smith 27% E + E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E Smith - E E - + - E E E E - E + - E E E E - -Soliday 96% + E + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Soliday + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +Speedy 81% + + + - - + + + + + - - + + + + + + Speedy E + + + E + E - + + + + + + + + + + - -Steuerwald 95% E + + + + + + + E + E E + + E E + + Steuerwald + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Stutzman 82% + + + - - + + + + + - - + + + + + + Stutzman + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + - -Sullivan 90% + + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Sullivan + + + + + + + - + + + E + - + + + + + +Summers 56% + + - - - - + + + - + + + + + + + + Summers - - - - + - - + + + - + + - + + + - - -Thompson 95% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Thompson + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Torr 97% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Torr + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + +VanNatter 93% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + VanNatter + + + + + E + + + + + + E - + + + + - -Wesco 82% - + + + + + + + + + - - + + + + + + Wesco + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + - + + - -Wolkins 83% E + + - - + + + + + E E E + + + + + Wolkins E E + + + + + + + + - + + - + E + + - -Wright 53% + + + - - + + + + - + + + - + + + + Wright - - - - + - - + - + - - + - - + + - - -Young, J 79% + + + + + + + + E + + + + + + NV + + Young, J + + + + + - + + + + + + + - - + - + - -Zent 92% + + + + + + + + E + + + + + + E + + Zent + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - -Ziemke 100% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Ziemke + + + + + + + + E + + + + + + + + + + +

House Voting Record




House BillsBill #Roll Call#

12

Senate Voting Record

Senate Bills


2019 Score

7 12 99 131 198 198 233 322 358 438 460 471 472 507 535 563 567 606 607 623 1002 1003 1005 1008 1180 1182 1278 1344 1362 1405 1406 1470 1518 1628 1629

558 148 75 182 382 382 582 157 229 48 143 366 590 162 598 201 250 116 601 254 581 574 277 419 480 286 618 329 586 544 331 334 603 579 623

Alting 83% + + + + - - + + - + + + + + + + - Alting + + - + + + + - + + + + + + - + + +Bassler 89% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + Bassler + + + + + + + - + + + + NV + + + + +Becker 78% - + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + - Becker + + - + - - + - + + + + + + - + + +Bohacek 88% + + + + + + + + - + + + + + - + + Bohacek + + + + + - + - + + + + + + - + + +Boots 73% + - + + - - + + - + + + + + + + + Boots + - - - - + + - + + + + + + - + - -Bray 90% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Bray + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Breaux 60% + + + + - - - NV - + + - + NV - + - Breaux + + - - - E + + E + E + + E E + + +Brown, L 91% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Brown, L + + + + + + + - + + + + NV + + + + +Buchanan 89% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Buchanan + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Buck 89% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Buck + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Busch 89% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Busch + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Charbonneau 90% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Charbonneau + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Crane 83% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Crane + + - + + - + - + + + + + + + - - +Crider 84% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Crider + + - + - + + - + + + + + + + + - +Doriot 89% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + - + Doriot + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Ford, J D * 65% + + + + - - - NV - + + - + NV - + - Ford, J D * + + - + - - + + + + + + + + - + + +Ford, Jon 88% + - + + + + + + - + + + NV + + + + Ford, Jon + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Freeman 83% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + Freeman + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + - + -Garten* 89% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + Garten* + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Gaskill* 80% + - + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + Gaskill* + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + - - +Glick 86% + - + + + + - + - + + + + + + + + Glick + + + + + - + - + + + + + + + + + +Grooms 83% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + - + + Grooms + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Head 73% + - + + + + + + - + + + - + - + + Head + + - + - - + - + + + + + + - - + +Holdman 88% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + E Holdman + + - + + + + - + + + + NV + + - + +Houchin 88% + - + + E E + + + + + + + + - + + Houchin + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Koch 79% + - + + - - + + - + + + + + + + + Koch + + - + + - + - + + + + + + + + - +Kruse 83% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Kruse + + - + + + + - + + + + + + - - + +Lanane 65% + + + + - - - NV - + + - + NV + + + Lanane + + - - - - + - + + + + + + - + + +Leising 86% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Leising + + - + + - + - + + + + + + + + + +Melton 61% + + + + - - - NV - + + E NV NV + + - Melton + + - - - - + - + + + + E + E + + +Merritt 93% + + + + + + + + - + + E + + + + + Merritt + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Messmer 93% + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Messmer + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Mishler 87% + - + + + + + + - + + NV + + + + + Mishler NV + - + + - E - + + + + NV + + + + +Mrvan *** E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E Mrvan E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E ENiemeyer 83% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Niemeyer + + - + + - + - + + + + + + + + + +Niezgodski 69% + + + + - - - NV - + + + + NV + + - Niezgodski + + - - - + + - + + + + + + + + + +Perfect 89% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + Perfect + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + - +Raatz 89% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Raatz + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + - + +Randolph 59% + + + + - - - NV - + + - + NV - + - Randolph + + - - - - + - + + + + + + - + + +Rogers* 91% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Rogers* + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Ruckelshaus 89% + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Ruckelshaus + + - + + + + - + + + + + + - + + +Sandlin 86% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + - + + Sandlin + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Spartz 89% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + Spartz + + + - + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Stoops 55% + + + + - - - NV - + + - + NV - + + Stoops + + - - - - + - + + + + + + - + + +Tallian 63% NV + + + - - NV NV - + + - + NV + + + Tallian + + - NV NV - + - + + + NV + + - + NV +Taylor 61% + + + + - - - NV - + + - + NV - + - Taylor + + - - - - + - + + + + + + - + + +Tomes 71% - - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + - Tomes + + - + - - + - + + - + + + + + - +Walker 77% - - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Walker + + - + - + + - + + + + + + - - + +Young, M 72% - - + + - - + + - + + + + + + + + Young, M + + - + + - + - + + - + + + + - + +Zay 84% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + Zay + + - + + - + - + + + + + + + + - +

Bill #Roll Call#



***Senator Mrvan was excused from all Chamber votes during the 2019 legislative session

13

House Bills

Senate Voting Record


2019 Score

7 12 99 131 198 198 233 322 358 438 460 471 472 507 535 563 567 606 607 623 1002 1003 1005 1008 1180 1182 1278 1344 1362 1405 1406 1470 1518 1628 1629

558 148 75 182 382 382 582 157 229 48 143 366 590 162 598 201 250 116 601 254 581 574 277 419 480 286 618 329 586 544 331 334 603 579 623

Alting 83% + + + + - - + + - + + + + + + + - Alting + + - + + + + - + + + + + + - + + +Bassler 89% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + Bassler + + + + + + + - + + + + NV + + + + +Becker 78% - + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + - Becker + + - + - - + - + + + + + + - + + +Bohacek 88% + + + + + + + + - + + + + + - + + Bohacek + + + + + - + - + + + + + + - + + +Boots 73% + - + + - - + + - + + + + + + + + Boots + - - - - + + - + + + + + + - + - -Bray 90% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Bray + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Breaux 60% + + + + - - - NV - + + - + NV - + - Breaux + + - - - E + + E + E + + E E + + +Brown, L 91% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Brown, L + + + + + + + - + + + + NV + + + + +Buchanan 89% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Buchanan + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Buck 89% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Buck + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Busch 89% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Busch + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Charbonneau 90% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Charbonneau + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Crane 83% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Crane + + - + + - + - + + + + + + + - - +Crider 84% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Crider + + - + - + + - + + + + + + + + - +Doriot 89% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + - + Doriot + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Ford, J D * 65% + + + + - - - NV - + + - + NV - + - Ford, J D * + + - + - - + + + + + + + + - + + +Ford, Jon 88% + - + + + + + + - + + + NV + + + + Ford, Jon + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Freeman 83% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + Freeman + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + - + -Garten* 89% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + Garten* + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Gaskill* 80% + - + + - - + + + + + + + + + + + Gaskill* + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + - - +Glick 86% + - + + + + - + - + + + + + + + + Glick + + + + + - + - + + + + + + + + + +Grooms 83% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + - + + Grooms + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Head 73% + - + + + + + + - + + + - + - + + Head + + - + - - + - + + + + + + - - + +Holdman 88% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + E Holdman + + - + + + + - + + + + NV + + - + +Houchin 88% + - + + E E + + + + + + + + - + + Houchin + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Koch 79% + - + + - - + + - + + + + + + + + Koch + + - + + - + - + + + + + + + + - +Kruse 83% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Kruse + + - + + + + - + + + + + + - - + +Lanane 65% + + + + - - - NV - + + - + NV + + + Lanane + + - - - - + - + + + + + + - + + +Leising 86% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Leising + + - + + - + - + + + + + + + + + +Melton 61% + + + + - - - NV - + + E NV NV + + - Melton + + - - - - + - + + + + E + E + + +Merritt 93% + + + + + + + + - + + E + + + + + Merritt + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Messmer 93% + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Messmer + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Mishler 87% + - + + + + + + - + + NV + + + + + Mishler NV + - + + - E - + + + + NV + + + + +Mrvan *** E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E Mrvan E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E ENiemeyer 83% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Niemeyer + + - + + - + - + + + + + + + + + +Niezgodski 69% + + + + - - - NV - + + + + NV + + - Niezgodski + + - - - + + - + + + + + + + + + +Perfect 89% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + Perfect + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + - +Raatz 89% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Raatz + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + - + +Randolph 59% + + + + - - - NV - + + - + NV - + - Randolph + + - - - - + - + + + + + + - + + +Rogers* 91% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Rogers* + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Ruckelshaus 89% + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Ruckelshaus + + - + + + + - + + + + + + - + + +Sandlin 86% + - + + + + + + - + + + + + - + + Sandlin + + - + + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Spartz 89% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + Spartz + + + - + + + - + + + + + + + + + +Stoops 55% + + + + - - - NV - + + - + NV - + + Stoops + + - - - - + - + + + + + + - + + +Tallian 63% NV + + + - - NV NV - + + - + NV + + + Tallian + + - NV NV - + - + + + NV + + - + NV +Taylor 61% + + + + - - - NV - + + - + NV - + - Taylor + + - - - - + - + + + + + + - + + +Tomes 71% - - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + - Tomes + + - + - - + - + + - + + + + + - +Walker 77% - - + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Walker + + - + - + + - + + + + + + - - + +Young, M 72% - - + + - - + + - + + + + + + + + Young, M + + - + + - + - + + - + + + + - + +Zay 84% + - + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + Zay + + - + + - + - + + + + + + + + - +

Bill #Roll Call#



Senate Bills

14

County Representatives Senators

Adams Lehman (79) Holdman (19)

Allen Abbott (82) Brown (15)Carbaugh (81) Busch (16)GiaQuinta (80)* Kruse (14)Judy (83)Lehman (79)Leonard (50)Morris (84)Heine (85)Smaltz (52)

Bartholomew Eberhart (57) Koch (44)Lauer (59) Perfect (43)Lucas (69) Walker (41)

Benton Negele (13) Niemeyer (6)

Blackford Mahan (31) Holdman (19)

Boone T Brown (41) Boots (23)Schaibley (24) Buchanan (7)Thompson (28) J D Ford (29)*

Brown May (65) Koch (44)

Carroll Lehe (25) Buchanan (7)VanNatter (38) Head (18)

Cass Lehe (25) Head (18)Manning (23)VanNatter (38)

Clark Davisson (73) Garten (45)Engleman (70) Grooms (46)Fleming (71)*Goodin (66)*

Clay Baird (44) Bassler (39)Heaton (46) Jon Ford (38)Morrison (42)

Clinton Lehe (25) Buchanan (7)VanNatter (38) Buck (21)

Crawford Bartels (74) Houchin (47)

Daviess Borders (45) Bassler (39)Ellington (62)Lindauer (63)

Dearborn Frye (67) Perfect (43)Lyness (68) Raatz (27)

Decatur Frye (67) Leising (42)Ziemke (55) Perfect (43)

DeKalb Smaltz (52) Glick (13)Kruse (14)

Delaware Cook (32) Gaskill (26)Errington (34)* Lanane (25)*Mahan (31)Prescott (33)Wright (35)*

Dubois Bartels (74) Houchin (47)Lindauer (63) Messmer (48)


Elkhart Abbott (82) Doriot (12)Miller (48) Mishler (9)Nisly (22) Rogers (11)Stutzman (49)Wesco (21)

Fayette Ziemke (55) Leising (42)Raatz (27)

Floyd Clere (72) Grooms (46)Engleman (70)

Fountain Morrison (42) Boots (23)Negele (13)

Franklin Lyness (68) Leising (42)Ziemke (55) Raatz (27)

Fulton Gutwein (16) Head (18)Jordan (17)Manning (23)

Gibson Hostettler (64) Messmer (48)Tomes (49)

Grant Cook (32) Buck (21)Karickhoff (30) Holdman (19)Mahan (31) Zay (17)Wolkins (18)

Greene Borders (45) Bassler (39)Ellington (62)

Hamilton Bosma (88) Buck (21)Cook (32) J D Ford (29)*Goodrich (29) Merritt (31)Huston (37) Ruckelshaus (30)Schaibley (24) Spartz (20)Torr (39)

Hancock Bosma (88) Crider (28)Cherry (53)Eberhart (57)

Harrison Davisson (73) Houchin (47)Engleman (70)

Hendricks Behning (91) Crane (24)Steuerwald (40) Young (35)Thompson (28)

Henry Saunders (54) Gaskill (26)Leising (42)

Howard Cook (32) Buck (21)Karickhoff (30)VanNatter (38)

Huntington Leonard (50) Holdman (19)Zay (17)

Jackson Davisson (73) Garten (45)Lucas (69) Koch (44)May (65) Perfect (43)

Jasper Gutwein (16) Buchanan (7)Negele (13) Charbonneau (5)


Jay Prescott (33) Holdman (19)

Jefferson Frye (67) Garten (45)Goodin (66)*Lucas (69)

Jennings Frye (67) Perfect (43)Lucas (69)

Johnson Burton (58) Bray (37)Frizzell (93) Sandlin (36)May (65) Walker (41)J Young (47)

Knox Borders (45) Bassler (39)Hostettler (64) Messmer (48)

Kosciusko Nisly (22) Doriot (12)Wolkins (18) Head (18)

Mishler (9)

LaGrange Abbott (82) Glick (13)Zent (51)

Lake Aylesworth (11) Melton (3)*Beck (19)* Mrvan (1)*Chyung (15)* Niemeyer (6)Harris, Jr (2)* Randolph (2)*Hatcher (3)*Jackson (1)*Reardon (12)Smith (14)*

LaPorte Boy (9)* Bohacek (8)Dvorak (8)* Charbonneau (5)Pressel (20) Tallian (4)*

Lawrence Davisson (73) Koch (44)May (65)

Madison Austin (36)* Gaskill (26)Cherry (53) Lanane (25)*Cook (32)Wright (35)*

Marion Bartlett (95)* Breaux (34)*Behning (91) Crider (28)Bosma (88) J D Ford (29)*DeLaney (86)* Freeman (32)Forestal (100)* Merritt (31)Frizzell (93) Sandlin (36)Hamilton (87)* Schneider (30)Kirchhofer (89) Taylor (33)*Macer (92)* Young (35)Moed (97)*Porter (96)*Pryor (94)*Shackleford (98)*Speedy (90)Summers (99)*

Marshall Jordan (17) Head (18)Mishler (9)

Martin Lindauer (63) Bassler (39)Ellington (62)

Senators and RepresentativesAlphabetically by County * Indicates Democrats; all others Republican

15


Miami Manning (23) Head (18)Wolkins (18)

Monroe Ellington (62) Koch (44)Heaton (46) Stoops (40)*May (65)Mayfield (60)Pierce (61)*

Montgomery T Brown (41) Boots (23)Negele (13)

Morgan Baird (44) Bray (37)Mayfield (60)J Young (47)

Newton Gutwein (16) Niemeyer (6)Negele (13)

Noble Abbott (82) Glick (13)

Ohio Fry (67) Perfect (43)Orange Bartels (74) Houchin (47)

Davisson (73)

Owen Baird (44) Bassler (39)Heaton (46) Bray (37)

Parke Baird (44) Boots (23)Morrison (42)

Perry Bartels (74) Houchin (47)

Pike Bacon (75) Messmer (48)Hostettler (64)Lindauer (63)

Porter Aylesworth (11) Charbonneau (5)Beck (19)* Tallian (4)*Boy (9)*Moseley (10)*Soliday (4)

Posey Hostettler (64) Tomes (49)McNamara (76)

Pulaski Gutwein (16) Charbonneau (5)

Putnam Baird (44) Bray (37)


Crane (24)

Randolph Prescott (33) Raatz (27)

Ripley Frye (67) Leising (42)Ziemke (55) Perfect (43)

Rush Saunders (54) Leising (42)Ziemke (55)

Scott Goodin (66)* Garten (45)

Shelby Eberhart (57) Crider (28)Leising (42)

Spencer Bacon (75) Messmer (48)Bartels (74)

St. Joseph Bauer (6)* Bohacek (8)Deal (7)* Mishler (9)DeVon (5) Niezgodski (10)*Dvorak (8)* Rogers (11)Wesco (21)

Starke Gutwein (16) Bohacek (8)Pressel (20) Charbonneau (5)

Steuben Smaltz (52) Glick (13)Zent (51)

Sullivan Borders (45) Bassler (39)

Switzerland Frye (67) Garten (45)

Tippecanoe T Brown (41) Alting (22)Campbell (26)* Buchanan (7)Klinker (27)*Lehe (25)Negele (13)

Tipton Cook (32) Buck (21)

Union Lyness (68) Raatz (27)

Vanderburgh Hatfield (77)* Becker (50)Hostettler (64) Tomes (49)McNamara (76)Sullivan (78)


Vermillion Morrison (42) Boots (23)

Vigo Borders (45) Jon Ford (38)Heaton (46)Morrison (42)Pfaff (43)*

Wabash Wolkins (18) Zay (17)

Warren Morrison (42) Boots (23)Negele (13)

Warrick Bacon (75) Becker (50)Sullivan (78) Messmer (48)

Washington Davisson (73) Houchin (47)

Wayne Barrett (56) Raatz (27)Saunders (54)

Wells Lehman (79) Holdman (19)Leonard (50)Mahan (31)

White Lehe (25) Buchanan (7)Negele (13)

Whitley Abbott (82) Busch (16)Judy (83) Zay (17)

Senators and RepresentativesAlphabetically by County * Indicates Democrats; all others Republican

16

Indiana Chamber Lobbyists

115 W Washington St , Suite 850S, Indianapolis, IN 46204

www indianachamber com

@indianachamber

Indiana Chamber of Commerce115 West Washington Street, Suite 850SIndianapolis, IN 46204

p 317-264-3110f 317-264-6855www.indianachamber.com

Kevin Brinegar | President & CEO• State and local government issues• General business issues• Political affairs• State and local government financeContact: (317) 264-6882 or [email protected]

Our Team Working for You

Jason Bearce | Vice President, Education & Workforce Development Policy• Preschool and K-12 education• Higher education• Workforce developmentContact: (317) 264-6880 or [email protected]

Greg Ellis | Vice President, Energy & Environmental Policy & Federal Relations• Air, water and solid/hazardous waste issues• Environmental permitting concerns• Energy matters• Infrastructure• Congressional affairsContact: (317) 264-6881 or [email protected]

Bill Waltz | Vice President, Taxation & Public Finance• State tax and local government finance• Business property taxation• Regulatory reform• Tax and budgetary reviewContact: (317) 264-6887 or [email protected]

Mike Ripley | Vice President, Health Care Policy & Employment Law• State health care issues and legislation• OSHA regulations and safety in the workplace• Worker’s compensation insurance• Employment law and general labor mattersContact: (317) 264-6883 or [email protected]

Adam H. Berry | Vice President, Economic Development & Technology• Economic development• Innovation and technology• Small business and entrepreneurshipContact: (317) 264-6892 or [email protected]

For additional copies of the 2019 Legislative Vote Analysis, please visit www.indianachamber.com/lva

17

Investing in Indiana Business for Responsive Government is the single most effective thing you can do to help elect business-endorsed candidates.

LEADING THROUGH POLITICAL ACTION

Since 1990, over 85% of IBRG-backed candidates have won their state legislative elections. Forty-two (42) incumbents who didn’t support the Chamber agenda have been defeated with IBRG help.

A RECORD OF SUCCESS

Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG) is the non-partisan

political action program of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce. IBRG is

the business community’s most sophisticated and comprehensive program

for electing endorsed candidates to the Indiana General Assembly.

IBRG’s mission is to drive “real change” by holding legislators accountable

for their voting records. That means getting directly involved in elections to

help elect pro-jobs, free-enterprise candidates and to challenge

incumbents who don’t support a pro-growth reform agenda for our state.

100% of investments in IBRG fund campaigns, not administrative or

fundraising efforts. A professional team of campaign experts work “in the

trenches” with candidates to win.

Leading Indiana businesses and individuals support IBRG because they

know it works and know what’s at stake in the elections.

Paid for by the Indiana Chamber of Commerce. Contributions or gifts to Indiana Business for Responsive Government are not deductible for federal income tax purposes.

IBRG-Ad.indd 1 6/10/19 4:06 PM

18

The Indiana Chamber and its many statewide partners are working today to ensure that by the year 2025 “Indiana will be a global leader in innovation and economic opportunity where enterprises and citizens prosper.”

Learn more at www.indianachamber.com/2025.

IN-Vision2025-Ad_2017.indd 1 5/16/19 3:48 PM

2019 legislative vote analysis · 2020-01-06 · 3 indiana general assembly 2019 legislator vote...

Documents