2020-2021 budget & district report card€¦ · malone central school district 42 husky lane,...

2020-2021 BUDGET & DISTRICT REPORT CARD

A remote public hearing on the school district budget will be held on May 26, 2020. For the upcoming vote there will be no physical polling sites. Instead it is to be held entirely through the use of absentee ballots. Malone CSD District will mail qualified voters an absentee ballot to be returned via a postage pre-paid return envelope. Absentee ballots must be received by the district clerk by 5 PM on June 9, 2020.

The following matters will be considered by the voters of the district:

1) The 2020-2021 school budget.

2) Bus Proposition—Purchase of five (5) school buses

3) Two ( 2) vacancies on the Board of Education, one, five-year term and one, three-year term

QUESTIONS REGARDING 2020-2021 SPENDING PLAN CAN BE ADDRESSED TO:

CINDY REYOME, SCHOOL BUSINESS EXECITUVE II

MALONE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 42 HUSKY LANE, P.O. BOX 847

MALONE, NY 12953

518-483-7800

In this booklet you will find:

1. Complete spending plan for the 2020-2021 district budget by administrative, capital, and program components.

2. Summary of estimated revenues for 2020-2021 district budget.

3. Election of Board of Education Members

4. Salary: Administrative Compensation Information

5. Property Tax Report Card

6. New York State Fiscal Accountability Supplement

7. New York State School Report Card

8. Exempt Property Report

Philip Hans, President Wayne Walbridge, Vice-President

Christine Crossman-Dumas Stephen Dupree

Penny Gardner Donna Kissane

Terrance Maguire

Wayne Rogers

MALONE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

42 Husky Lane Malone, NY 12953 Tel: (518) 483-7800 Fax (518) 483-3071 www.malonecsd.org

Jerry Griffin Cynthia Reyome Rhonda Poirier Philip Hans Superintendent Business Manager District Treasurer Board President

Dear District Resident, I hope that you and your family are in good health. We are operating in uncharted waters during the COVID-19 crisis. I thank all of you for your support of our district during these troubling times. During the crisis, our district has remained committed to provide remote instruction to our students, foodservice delivery to families and childcare for first responders and health care professionals. We are brokenhearted that we could not end the 19-20 school year on a normal schedule. We look forward to and are actively planning for our students to return after this crisis is behind us. The Board of Education has completed its work on the 2020-2021 budget. This was a difficult budget to prepare as our State Aid was frozen at last year’s levels while our expenses continue to rise. We have modified our budget in order to trim expenses where we could and consolidate services to improve efficiency. Our district enjoys a strong productive working relationship among the dedicated administrators, teachers, support staff and Board of Education. In addition, it thrives on great community support. The Board of Education is committed to delivering the best possible education to every student in our community by offering a rigorous course of study delivered by a highly competent staff. We are proud that we are able to continue supporting the many opportunities our students have to participate in co-curricular and extra-curricular activities as we feel it leads to a more well-rounded experience. We are presenting our total budget of $54,741,777, which is an actual decrease in our budget from last year. Our board members are aware of the economic troubles in our country and for that reason we are setting the tax levy at a 0% increase. The format of this newsletter has been prepared to provide an overview of the proposed budget, and to answer what we believe will be your most important questions about that document. It is not our intention to present all the details of the 2020-2021 spending plan in this publication. Please be assured that, should you desire additional details, you may visit our website at www.malonecsd.org and click on Budget and Finance. You may also contact our Superintendent Jerry Griffin or our Business Manager Cynthia Reyome at 483-7800. According to Governor Cuomo’s Executive Order all voting will be done by mail in ballot this year. Enclosed in this mailing is the ballot along with a prepaid postage envelope for your convenience. The ballot must be received in our district office by 5:00 p.m. on June 9. I speak for the entire board of education in thanking you for your continued support of the Malone Central School District. Sincerely, Philip Hans President Board of Education

Budget Budget2019-2020 2020-2021

1) Board of Education 20,033$ 20,347$ 2) District Clerk 535$ 578$ 3) District Meetings 2,800$ 2,988$ Total Board of Education 23,368$ 23,913$

B. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE

Budget Budget2019-2020 2020-2021

1) Superintendent's Office 218,248$ 223,280$ 2) Business Office 439,896$ 512,202$ 3) Auditing Services 17,400$ 19,500$ 4) Treasurer's Office 61,780$ 63,531$ 5) Tax Collection 17,326$ 17,937$ 6) Legal Service 5,500$ 3,000$ 7) Personnel & Negotiations 34,291$ 36,269$ 8) Central Printing & Mailing 300,750$ 174,990$ 9) Inst. Improvement & Adm. 2,126,824$ 1,910,426$ TOTAL CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION 3,222,015$ 2,961,135$ AND FINANCE SERVICES

2020-2021 BUDGET

ADMINISTRATIVE

A. BOARD OF EDUCATION

The Malone Central School Districts Board of Education's job is to determine the policies by which theSchool District will function. The Board consists of nine (9) members who serve without salary for term offive (5) years each. The Board of Education has to deal with a broad range of matters relating to the entireoperation of the School District. A major responsibility is described in the following proposed annual schoolbudget. The Board of Education budget category is comparatively small in amount to the entire budget.There are certain expenditures required for the yearly operation of the Board and District Clerk. Theseexpenses include general materials and supplies, the cost of the annual meeting and any special meetings,attendance at seminars and workshops, school board association dues and other related cost items.

This expense category contains a large number of expenditures that deal with the day-to-day operations andadministrative functions of the District. The budget sub-divisions enumerated below contain the costs for allstaff members within the Superintendent and Business Office. In addition, expenses for the mandatedauditing of financial accounts, the treasurer's office, tax collection, district-wide purchasing, financialplanning and reporting, legal affairs, labor contract negotiations, central printing and mailing, and otherbusiness administration responsibilities are provided in this area of the budget.

Full disclosure rules require us to indicate that the salary budgeted for the Superintendent of Schools is $165,256 and related fringe benefits for this salary approximate $38,009.

C. SPECIAL ITEMS

Budget Budget2019-2020 2020-2021

1) Insurance 178,900$ 163,750$ 2) BOCES Administrative Charges 681,077$ 721,982$ 3) BOCES Capital Project 2,599,377$ 1,739,885$ TOTAL SPECIAL ITEMS 3,459,354$ 2,625,617$

D. FRINGE BENEFITS-ADMINISTRATIVE Listed here are fringe benefits related to administrative salaries.

Budget Budget2019-2020 2020-2021

1) NYS Employee Retirement 123,994$ 130,910$ 2) NYS Teacher Retirement 122,329$ 122,312$ 3) Social Security 174,172$ 177,427$ 4) Worker's Compensation Insurance 13,797$ 12,360$ 5) Employee Insurance 674,198$ 656,303$ 6) Life Insurance/Dental/Optical 27,767$ 25,631$ 7) SAANYS Dues 11,000$ 11,000$ TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS-ADMIN. 1,147,257$ 1,135,943$

TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE (A through D) 7,851,994$ 6,746,608$

This segment of the proposed budget consists of two major items of expenditures: district-wide insuranceand the District's share of BOCES operating costs. The insurance referred to here is for catastrophic andgeneral liability, fire insurance for buildings and contents, student accident, and boiler liability. BOCESoperating costs are those costs attributed to all aspects of the BOCES operation excluding educational costsfound in the instructional portion of the budget. Central Administration insurance and debt service expensesincurred by BOCES are also provided in this budget category.

E. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Budget Budget2019-2020 2020-2021

1) Custodial & Maintenance Salaries 1,395,248$ 1,379,904$ 2) Equipment 62,880$ 64,080$ 3) Custodial & Maintenance Supplies 295,400$ 284,000$ 4) Electricity/Fuel Oil/Propane/Wood Pellets 1,056,550$ 940,686$ 5) Contracted Expenses 387,890$ 391,329$ 6) Judgements/Refunds on Real Property Taxes 3,000$ 3,000$ TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE 3,200,968$ 3,062,999$

F. FRINGE BENEFITS-DEBT SERVICE, TRANSFERS

Budget Budget2019-2020 2020-2021

1) NYS Employee Retirement 289,318$ 305,457$ 2) NYS Teacher Retirement 3,150$ 3,336$ 3) Social Security 139,338$ 141,942$ 4) Worker's Compensation Insurance 68,986$ 61,800$ 5) Employee Insurance 757,440$ 995,302$ 6) Debt Service-Bus Bonds -$ -$ 7) Debt Service-RANS/BANS 162,282$ 264,218$ 8) Debt Service-Building Bonds 3,608,972$ 3,620,123$ 9) Installment Debt-Buses 227,641$ 127,442$ 10) Transfer to Capital** 100,000$ 100,000$ TOTAL SPECIAL ITEMS 5,357,127$ 5,619,620$

TOTAL CAPITAL (E & F) 8,558,095$ 8,682,619$

Refunds on real property taxes reflect court ordered refunds, which follow the grievance and tax certiorariprocess. The transfer to Capital Fund of $100,000 is for capital expenses for replacement, repair and/orreplace exterior and interior doors, hardware, framing, glazing, ADA accessibility and security access.Repair and/or replace exterior steps, ramps, guardrails at Franklin Academy and costs relating to the SmartSchools Pre-K project at Davis Elementary School.

**Expenses for 20-21 are attributable to the door and stair repair/replacement for Franklin Academy andDavis Pre-K projects as referenced above in the "Capital" description.

While the primary function of the district is to educate students, having facilities that are clean, comfortableand properly maintained is a priority for the Board of Education. Included in this section are utility costs,expenses for cleaning, custodial and maintenance staff as well as costs necessary to maintain life safetydevices and contractual obligations for fire alarm, heating/cooling, and security systems.

The district allocates monies each year for maintenance projects to keep the buildings safe and efficient. Each year operational costs are tracked closely and initiatives to lower our energy consumption are aprimary focus.

This budget also reflects bond and other debt payments payable for previous capital projects approved bydistrict voters. These projects include the 2009 District-wide project, and the Transportation Facility projectas well as other various smaller capital initiatives.

CAPITAL

G. INSTRUCTION

1) St. Joseph’s/Flanders/Davis/ Budget BudgetMiddle School/Franklin Academy 2019-2020 2020-2021a. Salaries & Subs 11,238,197$ 11,435,916$ b. Equipment 57,084$ 69,350$ c. Contractual 216,105$ 188,498$ d. Supplies 133,416$ 164,628$ e. BOCES Services 138,157$ 115,629$ f. Textbooks 165,802$ 165,000$ 2) Distance Learning (BOCES Svcs.) 186,889$ 183,714$ 3) Programs for Students w/Disabilitiesa. Salaries & Subs 4,206,562$ 4,717,417$ b. Equipment 4,260$ 7,760$ c. Contractual 166,000$ 166,000$ d. Supplies 26,900$ 31,400$ e. Tuition 1,100,000$ 1,065,583$ f. BOCES Services 1,281,203$ 1,271,761$ 4) Occ. Ed./Alt. Ed/Summer School (BOCES) 2,597,613$ 2,655,999$ 5) Driver Education/Summer DL 34,625$ 67,502$ 6) Instructional Mediaa. Audiovisual 13,250$ 11,000$ b. Audiovisual (BOCES Svcs.) 117,284$ 133,748$ c. School Libraries 384,799$ 399,280$ d. Computer Assisted Instr. 235,395$ 186,426$ e. Computer Assisted Instr. (BOCES svcs.) 905,146$ 1,125,248$ 7) Pupil Servicesa. Attendance 20,679$ 21,554$ b. Attendance (BOCES Svcs.) 77,846$ 79,873$ c. Guidance 641,659$ 609,015$ d. Health Services 477,833$ 491,842$ e. Psychological Services 119,624$ 123,168$ f. Co-Curricular Services 308,749$ 320,841$ g. Interscholastic Athletics 709,614$ 704,621$ TOTAL INSTRUCTION 25,564,691$ 26,512,773$

PROGRAM

This category is the largest of the budget and includes the direct costs of doing our primary function -educating District students.

H. PUPIL TRANSPORTATION

Budget BudgetDistrict Transportation Services: 2019-2020 2020-20211) Salaries 1,192,644$ 1,222,911$ 2) Equipment 2,500$ 2,500$ 3) Contractual Expenses 131,600$ 133,669$ 4) BOCES 8,460$ 8,478$ 5) Materials & Supplies 306,400$ 301,360$ Garage Building:1) Salary - Custodial 50,960$ 54,892$ 2) Equipment 10,000$ 10,000$ 3) Contractual Expenses 97,975$ 83,200$ 4) Supplies 55,500$ 50,500$ TOTAL TRANSPORTATION * 1,856,039$ 1,867,510$

*Does not include bus purchase debt service (see page 3)

I. COMMUNITY SERVICES

Budget Budget2019-2020 2020-2021

1) Community Recreation 118,354$ 100,835$ 2) HSC Travel and Contractual 1,000$ 1,000$ TOTAL COMMUNITAC SERVICES 119,354$ 101,835$

The District's buses transport approximately 2,300 pupils daily to the five public schools. The buses log acombined annual mileage in excess of a half million miles. The District receives 90% reimbursement on allapproved expenses, including debt service on Bus Bonds shown on page 3. The District plans to purchase5 new buses for 2020-21.

This section includes costs incurred for services rendered for the community use of the school facilities.

J. UNDISTRIBUTED ALLOCATIONS

Budget Budget2019-2020 2020-2021

1) NYS Employee Retirement 413,312$ 436,367$ 2) NYS Teacher Retirement 1,430,780$ 1,551,402$ 3) Social Security 1,428,210$ 1,454,905$ 4) Worker's Compensation Insurance 147,170$ 131,840$ 5) Employee Insurance 7,208,260$ 6,959,153$ 6) Legal Service 67,771$ 56,765$ 7) Transfer to Spec. Aid Fund 175,000$ 190,000$ 8) Transfer to Cafeteria 20,000$ 20,000$ 9) Unemployment 10,000$ 30,000$ TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ALLOCATIONS 10,900,503$ 10,830,432$

TOTAL PROGRAM (G through J) 38,440,587$ 39,312,550$

TOTAL GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS 54,850,676$ 54,741,777$ (Total-Sections A through J)

The final expenditure category of the budget is employee benefits related to the program. Employeebenefits are items that are either mandated by law or through contractual obligations. Many of these costsare associated with employee salaries, both instructional and non-instructional. Retirement benefits, socialsecurity, health/dental/vision insurance and workmen's compensation are contained in this category.

ADOPTED PROPOSEDACCOUNT CODE 2019-2020 2020-2021

BOARD OF EDUCATION 1099 23,368 23,913CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION 1299 218,248 223,280FINANCE 1399 536,402 613,170LEGAL SERVICE 1420 5,500 3,000PERSONNEL 1430 34,291 36,269CENTRAL SERVICES 1699 300,750 174,990OTHER SPECIAL ITEMS 1998 3,459,354 2,625,617CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT 2010 157,447 124,616SUPPORT REGULAR SCHOOL 2020 1,969,377 1,785,810EMPLOADEE BENEFITS 9097 1,147,257 1,135,943

7,851,994 6,746,608

INSTRUCTION 2999 25,564,691 26,512,773DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION 5510 1,641,604 1,668,918GARAGE BUILDING 5530 214,435 198,592COMMUNITAD SERVICE 8998 119,354 101,835EMPLOADEE BENEFITS 9098 10,705,503 10,620,432OTHER TRANSFERS 9951 195,000 210,000

38,440,587 39,312,550

OPERATION OF PLANT 1620 2,536,136 2,362,864MAINTENANCE OF PLANT 1621 661,832 697,135EMPLOADEE BENEFITS 9099 1,258,232 1,507,837DEBT SERVICE/TRANSFERS 9898 4,101,895 4,114,783

8,558,095 8,682,619

54,850,676$ 54,741,777$

PROGRAM

CAPITAL

MALONE CENTRALSCHOOL DISTRICT

2020-2021

ADMINISTRATIVE, PROGRAM, & CAPITAL BUDGET

ADMINISTRATIVE

Write-in candidates are allowed and ballots will permit a name to be submitted in this manner.

ONE (5) FIVE-YEAR TERM EXPIRING JUNE 30, 2025 AND ONE (3) THREE-YEAR TERM EXPIRINGJUNE 30, 2023 ON THE BOARD OF EDUCATION. THE TOP VOTE GETTER WILL RECEIVE THE FIVE-YEAR TERM AND THE SECOND VOTE GETTER WILL RECEIVE THE THREE-YEAR TERM.FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF INDIVIDUALS RUNNING FOR THE OPEN BOARD SET:

DAVID MERRICK

ELECTION OF BOARD MEMBERS

JACQUE LEDUCCATHY HOLLINSHEAD

��

!��"��#��$��$��#��%��$��&��!��'��%��()�*�'+�,(��-��'.�+++/0+��/�+ .�/

1232456789:;:<=42=:>?@A9B?;<2=:A;C;DA492=:A; EFGHIEFEFIJ2K?GGLGMFGIN7OPQR@1S PDD:T:23I2<ADFMUFVUEFEFFV6GG7NWA49SX?N25GGYEFEF EFEFIEFEG123245Z[4?<[A38\]GGYFFF*��_��_��#��))��!��#��#��_��_��#��#��)��!��!��#��))��!��!_��!��!��))��)��!��!��_��$��!�!��!��_��)��!�)��!��!�� !�!��!�!��__a��!��#��)))��!��_��b��.$*)��__a��!��_��!��!�� !��c�a�c$*)��__a��!��!��#��))��d��a��_��_��e�fg�h��$��#��!��_��)�!��))�� __��!��!�� #�_#��!��b�!��$ijklmnmopklqrksktpulmsvwujkoxwyzkslmupwsokzwoukvpsujktwoyljw{nvoktnkxuwsn|ujktpsmsxpmnl{zzwouwoxwyypuyksuujmu|w{ovpluopxu}pnnrkym~ps��ijk|ljw{nv��oktnkxuujkuwumnmyw{sulr{v�kukvuwrkzmpvr|mnnzmoupxpzmups�vpluopxulw�koujklxjwwn|kmo��_��!��)��!��b��.��!��_��.,�+��.�.,�)�!��_��!��)��a�)��_��!��)��$ Z:=3? 123245 R9B3A5??�?;?D:=< P=[?4�?9X;?42=:A;.$ ��)��!��_� .,��, �+��0�_��_��!��!�!��!��__a��!��)��_��a_� " ��c��_�g��_��"��)��*��)��$ �$�$/$�$,$�$+$0$.�$..$.�$.�$./$.�$.,$.�$.+$.0$��$�.$��$��$�/$��$�,$��$�+$�0$

��

!��"��#��$��$��#��%��$��&��!��'��%��()�*�'+�,(��-��'.�+++/0+��/�+ ��/

1�$1.$1�$11$1/$1�$1,$234356789:;<;=>53>;?@AB:C@<=3>;B<D<EB5:3>;B< FGHIJFGFGJK3L@FHMHNGHJO8PQRSA2T QEE;U;34J3=BEGNVGWVFGFGGW7HH8OX;>4@ 234356 S:C4B6@@Y@<@E;>= Q>Z@5[@:\<@53>;B<1�$1+$10$/�$/.$/�$/1$//$/�$/,$/�$/+$/0$��$�.$��$�1$�/$��$�,$��$�+$�0$,�$,.$,�$,1$,/$,�$,,$,�$,+$,0$��$234356789:;<;=>53>;?@AB:C@<=3>;B<D<EB5:3>;B< FGHIJFGFGA43;:]@35JK3L@HMHNGHJO8PQRSA2T QEE;U;34J3=BEGNVGWVFGFGGW7HH8O_�!��#��#��!��a��#�b./.c��.$ ��$ �1$ �/$ ��$ �,$ ��$ �+$ �0$ +�$ +.$ +�$

��

!��"��#��$��$��#��%��$��&��!��'��%��()�*�'+�,(��-��'.�+++/0+��/�+ 1�/

+1$ +/$ +�$ +,$ +�$ ++$ +0$ 0�$ 0.$ 0�$ 01$ 0/$ 0�$ 0,$ 0�$ 0+$ 00$ .��$ .�.$ .��$ .�1$ .�/$ .��$ .�,$ .��$ .�+$ .�0$ ..�$ ...$ ..�$ 234356789:;<;=>53>;?@AB:C@<=3>;B<D<EB5:3>;B< FGHIJFGFGA43;:K@35JL3M@NHOHPGHJQ8RSTUA2V SEE;W;34J3=BEGPXGYXFGFGGY7HH8Q..1$ ../$ ..�$ ..,$ ..�$ ..+$ ..0$ .��$ .�.$ .��$ .�1$ .�/$ .��$ .�,$ .��$ .�+$ .�0$ .1�$ .1.$ .1�$ .11$ .1/$ .1�$ .1,$ .1�$ .1+$ .10$ ./�$ ./.$ ./�$

��

!��"��#��$��$��#��%��$��&��!��'��%��()�*�'+�,(��-��'.�+++/0+��/�+ /�/

./1$ .//$ ./�$ ./,$ ./�$ ./+$ ./0$ .��$ .�.$ .��$ .�1$ .�/$ .��$ .�,$ .��$ 234356789:;<;=>53>;?@AB:C@<=3>;B<D<EB5:3>;B<FGHIJFGFGJK3L@MHNHMGHJO8PQRSA2T QEE;U;34J3=BEGMVGWVFGFGGW7HH8O.�+$ .�0$ .,�$ .,.$ .,�$ .,1$ .,/$ .,�$ .,,$ .,�$ .,+$ .,0$ .��$ .�.$ .��$ .�1$ .�/$ .��$ .�,$ .��$ .�+$ .�0$ .+�$ .+.$ .+�$ .+1$ .+/$ .+�$ .+,$ .+�$ .++$ .+0$ .0�$

��

!��"��#��$��$��#��%��$��&��!��'��%��()�*�'+,�(��-��'.�+++��.�,� .�,

/0123045678932104:70; <=>?@<=<=@/7A3>>B>C=>@DEFGHI:JK GLLMNM7O@7P1L=CQ=RQ<=<==RS>TEDUUUU/O37P3VP3:W01X310YM03L18Z01[P30P[W3\3\430M\A4W3]VPM\3PP/1047O41N1X2O3434W3/69:_\430\34I82O1030MPHG603N1XX3\;3;UUUUUH143SJ1X3;7473O3X3\4P1L4W3/0123045678932104:70;W73Z33\03MP3;1003\7X3;41X103NO1P3O5L1OO1[4W3/0123045678:72N7ONVO74M1\P;MP40MN4PN1X2O3431\4W3GLLMN31L4W3J4743:1X2401OO30[3ZPM43/O37P3P334W3a3O243847Z13L10;3LM\M4M1\PE;;M4M1\7OAVM;7\N31\4W3/0123045678F35FMXM4MP77MO7ZO31\4W3GLLMN31LI;VN74M1\7OD7\7A3X3\4J30MN3P[3ZPM43S!��"��$�.�$��$��#��#��b��b��/O37P37OP1PVZXM47\3O3N401\MN30PM1\c/KY10d10;e1L51V0PNW11O;MP40MN4fP<=<=@<>]V;A34H14MN341S3XPNXA4Pg\5P3;A1 6WMP[MOO3\7ZO3VP41W3O2N1003N47\5L10XVO710;7473\405;MPN0327\N5hVMNiO5H14MN3S6W3I\7N43;]V;A347OO1[PPNW11O;MP40MN4P413P47ZOMPW703P303LV\;L10HjJ637NW30Pf934M03X3\4J5P43X:1\40MZV4M1\Pk3LL3N4M3MXX3;M743O56WMP03P303kML722OMN7ZO3kPW1VO;Z30321043;M\4W3JNW3;VO31L93P303PV\;30fG4W3093P303f7\;[M4W7;3PN0M24M1\4W74P75PSl61LV\;3X2O1530034M03X3\4N1\40MZV4M1\P414W3H3[j10iJ4743637NW30Pf934M03X3\4J5P43Xc69JelY10XKV3@E20MO<Rk<=<=%��m��" n�op*�q�r��m��s�o�t��!��u��" �.+vw+,v�+��JW7;3;YM3O;PdMOO:7ONVO743 ]V;A343;<=>?@<=cEe /0121P3;]V;A34<=<=@<>c]e /30N3\4:W7\A3c:eo��tx��y��t��m�� wy+��yz�z �wy�w.y�� v�$�� {�$m��o�b|�#��!�o��tx��> .,y�w.y��} .,y�w.y��}x$o�b|�#��|�u��u�y�)��t��ut�n$o�b|�#�)��v�b�t��ut�m��y�)��t��ut�<�$o��to�bn��q��#��~��q��n��|�#�y�)��t��ut��$o��tm��!��t��o�b|�#��x�nv� .,y�w.y��} .,y�w.y��} �$�� {%$m��ut��b�t��!��!��to�b|�#�|�� ,�}y�.� w��y+++�$��!��to�b|�#�|��y�b�t��|�#�)��m��ut��b�t�� .,y},}yz�� .,y+�}ywz�p$o��tm��o�b|�#�)��!��tm��y�b�t��m��ut��b�t��|�#�)��|�u��u�ymt��m��o�bn��q��#��vxv%�� .,yw.�y�.} .,y,.,yzw.*$��))��"��vp ��#�#�t��z�$�{#��#�t < ��y.,z �z�y+�zm�ut��!��t��tt�� y,�, �y,.w �$w+ {n��m��*��b .$+. {>*��t��#�)��b��bt�#�y��t��$<o�bt�#��!��t��#��t��ut�)��b�t��!��!��to�b|�#�|��))��#��#�t��$

��

!��"��#��$��$��#��%��$��&��!��'��%��()�*�'+,�(��-��'.�+++��.�,� ��,

/%��0�.1��2��#��)��.30��4�2��42�#�)��2�5��5��#�)��4��42�#�1��2��$ 6789:;<=>?@<=ABC DE8FG:8HI<=<=@<>ADC��J��K��%��L�2�� 1M��1M�, +1��.1.3��%��L�2�� 1,++1�,� �1�,�1��J��N��%��L�2�� O1.,�1.++ �1MOM1��J��N��%��L�2��P��)�!�Q��2L�� ..$.3R 3$3+RS7THI9;HUVWHEHXYHZ9[IEWHEHXYH\]H WHEHXYH_:GH WHEHXYHBHE7XF8FU[ /a/>a<=6789:;b:;:[7H ca/=a<=DE8FG:8HID[IF[db:;:[7H e[8H[IHIfEHUV8THWHEHXYHF[8TH<=<=@<>S7TUU;gH:XAhFGF8<==iT:X:78HXEC_U8HjbHE9XH8U7;F7kU[8THS:YHl988U[:88THlU88UG:V8HXH:7T:IIF8FU[:;WHEHXYH]U9:II9[IHXi:F8:;mnXUHX8]hUEEmhF:lF;F8]mUXo8THXWHEHXYHpq��2 %�q*r*Q*��(Pr��*�sq�P*Q�rK��Kt %��!��)��5J��)��!��!5��5��$ .1��1�� ,1��1�� K��(��#��)��2��K�� %��!��)��2��#��u��$v�� q�� %��2)0��v�� q��5��)��$N��2��*�� N��Prw��Q*��NK��q�K��Kt� %��5��!��N��2��*��%��$.��1�� M��1�� q�#��)��q�#��.3K��#�)��Q�4K�� %��!��2��)�!��)�!��2��)��!��2��2��$��K��#�)��5��#�� %��)��!��2��)��2��#��1��5��#��$*�� %��2��5�2��1��2��1��

��

!��"��#��$��$��#��%��$��&��!��'��%��()�*�'+,�(��-��'.�+++��.�,� ,�,

��!��)��/��$0��1��2�� 3��#��/��$1��4�/�� 3��#��/��4�/��/��$3�56�� 7��78�%973�:6�73*97�7* %��5��/��$ �;�<�� ;�<�� 0��3�56��7��#�)��*��7��#�� %��5��)��#��)��/��$��/��=��)��1��4�/�� 7�78��01=��%*3��6671*�=*1*3%��>��/��4��)��>��/��)��#��$ �<?��<+;+ ,<,��<�� 6�#��)��/��4��)��7��6��4�� 7�3*7��369�37*=7��78� %��/��4��!��1��/��/��>7��$ ��<�� .<��<�� 7��7�7��#�)��@��//��3�5�� %��5��!��/��4��4��!��/�!�)�//��)��/��$��/�9�!��7��#� 7��78�7�3*7��369�37*=��37� %��/��4��!��37�7�� ,A<�� ,+;<.?� 7��37�BCDEFGHIJIKLIMNOPQRSITUVVWTXXYYYZW[\ZR]JIPZ_LX VJIKLXQSS_NRVORXP_SJXKIJIKLIabNRPJZWPbcEdHIJIKLIMNOPQRSITUVVWTXX_JSZJVQVIZR]ZNJXe_SQe_LXWNfJXeOJVQSSVZUVgKIJIKLIbNRPJBBhK_LOPIQfKOIbifNVJWISObOSiJVQVI IRV_bVUIWeQRRIPNJIQRPQWWK_WKOQVO_Rb_KVUIKIJIKLIORED\j\jk\[ZlIRVO_RQR]SQWOVQeImWIRPOVNKIJVUQVYOeeRIIPV_fIL_VIPNW_RORVUINWS_ ORnNPIVo_VIZ��#� 7�� #�(7��

INFORMATION ABOUT EXPENDITURE RATIOS (2017 - 18)

(Data are lagged a year.)

Commissioner's Regulations require that certain expenditure ratios for general-education and special-education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districts and all public schools. The required ratios for this district are reported below.

The numbers used to compute the statistics on this page were collected on the State Aid Form A, the State Aid Form F, the School District Annual Financial Report (ST-3), and from the Student Information Repository System (SIRS).

THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT

$24,882,502

2,267

$10,976

GENERAL EDUCATION

$10,828,500

325

$33,318

SPECIAL EDUCATION

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP

FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY SUMMARY (2018 - 19)

INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES

PUPILS

EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL


PUPILS


HIGH NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY RURAL

$1,639,861,015

143,319

$11,442

GENERAL EDUCATION

$716,341,463

24,901

$28,768

SPECIAL EDUCATION


PUPILS



PUPILS


ALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS

$35,199,223,413

2,632,781

$13,370

GENERAL EDUCATION

$15,660,696,162

485,151

$32,280

SPECIAL EDUCATION

Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-12 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding Special Education) plus a proration of building level administrative and instructional support expenditures. These expenditures include amounts for instruction of students with disabilities in a general-education setting. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.

The pupil count for General Education is K-12 average daily membership plus K-12 pupils for whom the district pays tuition to another school district. This number represents all pupils, including those classified as having disabilities and those not classified, excluding only students with disabilities placed out of district. Pupils resident in the district but attending a charter school are included. For districts in which a county jail is located, this number includes incarcerated youth to whom the district must provide an education program.


PUPILS



PUPILS


Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-12 expenditures for students with disabilities (including summer special education expenditures) plus a proration of building-level administrative and instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.

The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-12 students with disabilities for the school year plus students for whom the district receives tuition from another district plus students for whom the district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the State schools at Rome and Batavia, private placements and out-of-state placements are included.

Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The total cost of instruction for students with disabilities may include both general- and special-education expenditures. Special-education services provided in the general-education classroom may benefit students not classified as having disabilities.

TOTAL EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL

$22,383 $24,206$25,845

Total Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total Expenditures include district expenditures for classroom instruction, as well as expenditures for transportation, debt service, community service and district-wide administration that are not included in the Instructional Expenditure values for General Education and Special Education. As such, the sum of General Education and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does not equal the Total Expenditures.



NY STATE

INFORMATION ABOUT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (2018 - 19)

Commissioner's Regulations require reporting students with disabilities by the percent of time they are in general education classrooms and the classification rate of students with disabilities. These data are to be compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The required percentages for this district are reported below.

STUDENT PLACEMENT (PERCENT OF TIME INSIDE REGULAR CLASSROOM)

212 66.9%

42 13.3%

43 13.6%

16 5.1%


58.2%

18.6%

20.1%

2.5%

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPHIGH NEED/RESOURCE

CAPACITY RURAL

58.7%

11.5%

19.0%

5.3%

NY STATE

80% OR MORE

40% - 79%

LESS THAN 40%

SEPARATE SETTINGS

OTHER SETTINGS

80% OR MORE

40% - 79%

LESS THAN 40%

SEPARATE SETTINGS

OTHER SETTINGS

80% OR MORE

40% - 79%

LESS THAN 40%

SEPARATE SETTINGS

OTHER SETTINGS

4 1.3%

0.6%

5.6%

The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and verified in Verification Report 5. The counts are numbers of students reported in the least restrictive environment categories for school-age programs (ages 6-21) on BEDS Day, which is the first Wednesday of the reporting year. The percentages represent the amount of time students with disabilities are in general-education classrooms, regardless of the amount and cost of special-education services they receive. Rounding of percentage values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from 100%.

SCHOOL-AGE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES CLASSIFICATION RATE

14.2% 15.9%14.7%

This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-21) to the total enrollment of all school-age students in the school district, including students who are parentally placed in nonpublic schools located in the school district. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district has Committee on Special Education (CSE) responsibility to ensure the provision of special-education services. The denominator includes all school-age students who reside in the district. In the case of parentally placed students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students who attend the nonpublic schools located in the school district. Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the Basic Education Data System (BEDS).

Similar District Groups are identified according to the Need-to-Resource-Capacity Index. More information is available on our NRC capacity categories page.



NY STATE

© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: MARCH 27, 2020, 9:38 AM EST

MALONE CSD - NEW YORK STATE REPORT CARD [2018 - 19]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents’ effort to create educational equity and raise learning standards for all students. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school’s or district’s strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. The report card provides information to the public on school/district staff, students, and measures of school and district performance as required by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). Fundamentally, ESSA is about creating a set of interlocking strategies to promote educational equity by providing support to districts and schools as they work to ensure that every student succeeds. New York State is committed to ensuring that all students succeed and thrive in school no matter who they are, where they live, where they go to school, or where they come from.

TARGET DISTRICT

NO

The link below provides a list of all Local Education Agencies and public schools that received section 1003 school improvement funds, including the amount of funds each school received and the types of strategies implemented in each school with such funds.

Section 1003 School Improvement Funds Data (54.71 kilobytes)

For information on the use of Title I School Improvement funds, see:

• 2017-18 Title I SIG 1003 Basic Application and Addendum for 2018-19 Extension

• 2018-19 Title I SIG 1003 Basic Planning

• 2019 NYSIP-PLC Phase II

• SIG Cohort 5, 6 and 7 Schools Funded with SIGA in 2018-19

2019-20 ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS BASED ON 2018-19 DATA

MADE PROGRESS

SECTION 1003 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS (2018-19)

Subgroup Status Made Progress

All Students Comprehensive Support and Improvement No

American Indian or Alaska Native Good Standing NA

Hispanic or Latino Good Standing NA

White Targeted Support and Improvement No

Students with Disabilities Targeted Support and Improvement No

Economically Disadvantaged Targeted Support and Improvement No

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE STATUSES BY SUBGROUP

SubgroupComposite

PerformanceGrowth

Composite Performance & Growth Combined

English Language Proficiency (ELP)

ProgressChronic

Absenteeism

All Students 1 1 1 — 1 3

American Indian or Alaska Native 1 — 1 — — —

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

— — — — — —

Black or African American — — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino 1 — 1 — — —

Multiracial — — — — — —

White 1 1 1 — 1 1

English Language Learners — — — — — —

Students with Disabilities 1 1 1 — 1 3

Economically Disadvantaged 1 1 1 — 1 2

Subgroup Level

All Students 1

American Indian or Alaska Native 1

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander —

Black or African American —

Hispanic or Latino 1

Multiracial —

White 1

Students with Disabilities 1

Economically Disadvantaged 1

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE INDICATOR LEVELS

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE

Subgroup Subject Cohort Index Level

All Students

ELA 468 79

1Math 475 82 1

Science 140 189 1

Combined 1,083 95 1

American Indian or Alaska Native

ELA 3 —

—Math 5 60 —

Science 2 — —

Combined 10 — —


ELA 3 —

—Math 4 — —

Science 2 — —

Combined 9 — —

Black or African American

ELA 5 20

—Math 4 — —

Science — — —

Combined 9 — —

Hispanic or Latino

ELA 6 17

1Math 9 78 1

Science — — 1

Combined 15 53 1

Multiracial

ELA 4 —

—Math 3 — —

Science — — —

Combined 7 — —

White

ELA 454 82

2Math 461 84 2

Science 137 190 2

Combined 1,052 97 2

Students with Disabilities

ELA 67 22

1Math 63 18 1

Science 41 122 1

Combined 171 44 1

Economically Disadvantaged

ELA 253 54

1Math 241 55 1

Science 72 181 1

Combined 566 70 1

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE CORE SUBJECT PERFORMANCE

Subgroup Subject Cohort Index Level

All Students

ELA 962 39

1Math 960 41 1

Science 293 90 1

Combined 2,215 46 1


ELA 20 0

1Math 20 15 1

Science 7 64 1

Combined 47 16 1


ELA 10 10

—Math 10 10 —

Science 3 — —

Combined 23 — —


ELA 10 10

—Math 10 0 —

Science 1 — —

Combined 21 — —

Hispanic or Latino

ELA 14 7

1Math 14 50 1

Science 2 — 1

Combined 30 27 1

Multiracial

ELA 12 8

—Math 12 25 —

Science 1 — —

Combined 25 — —

White

ELA 928 40

1Math 926 42 1

Science 285 91 1

Combined 2,139 48 1


ELA 145 10

1Math 144 8 1

Science 115 44 1

Combined 404 19 1


ELA 546 25

1Math 544 24 1

Science 173 75 1

Combined 1,263 32 1

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE WEIGHTED AVERAGE PERFORMANCE

Subgroup Sum Of SGPs Number Of SGPs Index Level

All Students 53,830 1,279 42.1 1

American Indian or Alaska Native — 6 — —

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander — 12 — —

Black or African American — 3 — —

Hispanic or Latino — 9 — —

Multiracial — 2 — —

White 52,585 1,247 42.2 1

English Language Learners — 0 — —

Students with Disabilities 3,941 100 39.4 1

Economically Disadvantaged 24,049 558 43.1 1

Subgroup Level

All Students 1

American Indian or Alaska Native 1

Hispanic or Latino 1

White 1



ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE GROWTH (2016-17, 2017-18, AND 2018-19)

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE AND GROWTH COMBINED

Subgroup Subject Baseline Cohort IndexDistrict

MIPState MIP

Long-Term Goal

Exceed Long-Term

Goal

Met Sh Target

Met Ag Target

End Goal

LevelAverage

Of Levels

All StudentsELA 32 962 39 46 105 122 161 N — 200 1

1Math 42 960 41 55 107 124 162 N — 200 1 1


ELA — 20 — — — — — — — — ——

Math — 20 — — — — — — — — — —


ELA — 10 — — — — — — — — ——

Math — 10 — — — — — — — — — —


ELA — 10 — — — — — — — — ——

Math — 10 — — — — — — — — — —

Hispanic or LatinoELA — 14 — — — — — — — — —

—Math — 14 — — — — — — — — — —

MultiracialELA — 12 — — — — — — — — —

—Math — 12 — — — — — — — — — —

WhiteELA 32 928 40 46 102 119 160 N — 200 1

1Math 43 926 42 55 110 126 163 N — 200 1 1


ELA 11 145 10 26 61 85 142 N — 200 11

Math 14 144 8 29 61 85 142 N — 200 1 1


ELA 20 546 25 35 95 113 157 N — 200 11

Math 26 544 24 40 94 112 156 N — 200 1 1

Subgroup BaselineStudents Enrolled

Students Chronically

Absent

Chronic Absenteeism

Rate

District MIP

State MIP

Long-Term Goal

Exceed Long-Term

Goal

Met Sh Target

Met Ag Target

End Goal

Level

All Students 10.7 1,377 174 12.6% 10.3% 14.6% 12.8% 8.9% — — 5% 3


— 29 — — — — — — — — — —


— 20 — — — — — — — — — —


— 16 — — — — — — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino — 27 — — — — — — — — — —

Multiracial — 19 — — — — — — — — — —

White 10 1,324 167 12.6% 9.6% 10.5% 9.3% 7.2% N — 5% 1

English Language Learners

— 2 — — — — — — — — — —


23 225 44 19.6% 21.6% 21.5% 18.5% 11.8% — — 5% 3


14.6 813 140 17.2% 13.8% 19.9% 17.1% 11.1% — N 5% 2

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE PROGRESS

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM

SubgroupTested 95% In Current Year

Or 2 Years CombinedCurrent Year

EnrollmentCurrent Year

Participation RateCurrent Year + Previous

Year EnrollmentCurrent Year + Previous Year

Participation Rate

All Students ✘ 1,042 46.3% 2,076 40.5%


— 12 — — —


— 4 — — —

Black or African American — 6 — — —

Hispanic or Latino — 9 — — —

Multiracial — 7 — — —

White ✘ 1,004 46.6% 1,999 40.9%

English Language Learners — 2 — — —

Students with Disabilities ✘ 161 44.7% 330 34.6%

Economically Disadvantaged ✘ 595 44% 1,175 37.1%


Or 2 Years CombinedCurrent Year

EnrollmentCurrent Year

Participation RateCurrent Year + Previous

Year EnrollmentCurrent Year + Previous Year

Participation Rate

All Students ✘ 1,042 47.4% 2,073 42.9%


— 12 — — —


— 4 — — —




White ✘ 1,004 47.8% 1,997 43.2%


Students with Disabilities ✘ 158 43% 328 33.5%

Economically Disadvantaged ✘ 595 42.7% 1,173 36.9%

Subgroup Status Made Progress

All Students Good Standing NA

White Good Standing NA

Students with Disabilities Good Standing NA

Economically Disadvantaged Good Standing NA

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE ELA PARTICIPATION RATE

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE MATHEMATICS PARTICIPATION RATE

SECONDARY STATUSES BY SUBGROUP

SubgroupComposite

PerformanceGraduation

RateComposite Performance &

Graduation Rate CombinedEnglish Language Proficiency (ELP)

ProgressChronic

Absenteeism

College, Career, & Civic Readiness

(CCCR)

All Students 2 4 3 — 1 4 4


— — — — — — —


— — — — — — —

Black or African American — — — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino — — — — — — —

Multiracial — — — — — — —

White 2 3 2 — 1 2 2

English Language Learners — — — — — — —

Students with Disabilities 2 3 2 — 1 4 4


1 3 2 — 1 2 3

SECONDARY INDICATOR LEVELS

Subgroup Subject Cohort Index Combined Index Level

All Students

ELA 182 169

162 2Math 182 117 161.5 2

Science 182 201 161.5 2

Social Studies 182 194 161.5 2


ELA 4 —

— —Math 4 — — —

Science 4 — — —

Social Studies 4 — — —


ELA 4 —

— —Math 4 — — —



Hispanic or Latino

ELA 3 —

— —Math 3 — — —



White

ELA 178 169

161 2Math 178 117 161.3 2

Science 178 201 161.3 2



ELA 35 81

94 2Math 35 69 93.5 2

Science 35 141 93.5 2



ELA 88 138

139 1Math 88 101 138.9 1

Science 88 181 138.9 1


SECONDARY COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE

Subgroup Cohort BaselineNumber

In CohortGrad Rate

District MIP

State MIP

Long-Term Goal

Exceed Long-Term Goal

Met Sh Target

Met Ag Target

End Goal

Level By Cohort

Level By Subgroup

All Students

4-Year 81.9% 180 87.8% 82.9% 82.8% 85% 90% — — 95% 4

45-Year 80.2% 182 87.4% 81.4% 85% 86.8% 91.4% — — 96% 4 4

6-Year 79.8% 185 84.3% 81.2% 85.1% 87.3% 92.2% — Y 97% 3 4


4-Year — 2 — — — — — — — — —

—5-Year — 0 — — — — — — — — — —

6-Year — 3 — — — — — — — — — —


4-Year — 5 — — — — — — — — —

—5-Year — 4 — — — — — — — — — —

6-Year — 6 — — — — — — — — — —


4-Year — 2 — — — — — — — — —

—5-Year — 0 — — — — — — — — — —

6-Year — 3 — — — — — — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino

4-Year — 4 — — — — — — — — —

—5-Year — 3 — — — — — — — — — —

6-Year — 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Multiracial

4-Year — 2 — — — — — — — — —

—5-Year — 1 — — — — — — — — — —

6-Year — 0 — — — — — — — — — —

White

4-Year 82.7% 170 87.6% 83.7% 90.2% 91% 93% — Y 95% 3

35-Year 81.3% 177 87% 82.5% 91.5% 92.3% 94.2% — Y 96% 3 3

6-Year 79.9% 177 84.2% 81.3% 91.2% 92.4% 94.7% — Y 97% 3 3


4-Year — 0 — — — — — — — — —

—5-Year — 0 — — — — — — — — — —

6-Year — 0 — — — — — — — — — —


4-Year 50% 39 66.7% 53.6% 59.7% 66.1% 80.6% — — 95% 4

35-Year 61.5% 38 71.1% 64.3% 63% 69% 82.5% — — 96% 4 3

6-Year 48.7% 40 50% 52.5% 61.4% 67.8% 82.4% N — 97% 1 3


4-Year 70.8% 98 83.7% 72.8% 76.9% 79.9% 87.5% — — 95% 4

35-Year 69.2% 87 80.5% 71.4% 80.4% 83% 89.5% — — 96% 3 3

6-Year 65.8% 87 74.7% 68.2% 80.7% 83.5% 90.3% — Y 97% 3 3

Subgroup Level

All Students 3

White 2



SECONDARY GRADUATION RATE

SECONDARY COMPOSITE PERFORMANCE & GRADUATION RATE COMBINED

Subgroup Subject Baseline Cohort IndexDistrict

MIPState MIP

Long-Term Goal

Exceed Long-Term

Goal

Met Sh Target

Met Ag Target

End Goal

LevelAverage

Of Levels

All StudentsELA 177 182 169 180 191 194 204 N — 215 1

1Math 139 182 117 144 151 158 179 Y — 200 2 1


ELA — 4 — — — — — — — — ——

Math — 4 — — — — — — — — — —


ELA — 4 — — — — — — — — ——

Math — 4 — — — — — — — — — —

Hispanic or LatinoELA — 3 — — — — — — — — —

—Math — 3 — — — — — — — — — —

WhiteELA 176 178 169 179 208 209 212 N — 215 1

1Math 138 178 117 143 168 172 186 Y — 200 2 1


ELA 105 35 81 113 120 133 174 N — 215 11

Math 71 35 69 82 91 105 153 Y — 200 2 1


ELA 149 88 138 154 171 177 196 N — 215 11

Math 107 88 101 114 131 140 170 N — 200 1 1

Subgroup BaselineStudents Enrolled

Students Chronically

Absent

Chronic Absenteeism

Rate

District MIP

State MIP

Long-Term Goal

Exceed Long-Term

Goal

Met Sh Target

Met Ag Target

End Goal

Level

All Students 18.6 707 119 16.8% 17.6% 22.6% 19.8% 12.4% — — 5% 4


— 6 — — — — — — — — — —


— 8 — — — — — — — — — —


— 14 — — — — — — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino — 9 — — — — — — — — — —

Multiracial — 12 — — — — — — — — — —

White 18.2 685 114 16.6% 17.2% 15.6% 14% 9.5% — N 5% 2


32.5 154 43 27.9% 30.3% 32.8% 28% 16.5% — — 5% 4


29 375 102 27.2% 27% 30.2% 25.8% 15.4% — N 5% 2

SECONDARY PROGRESS

SECONDARY CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM

Subgroup Baseline IndexDistrict

MIPState MIP

Long-Term Goal

Exceed Long-Term Goal

Met Sh Target

Met Ag Target

End Goal

Level

All Students 135.5 147.2 138.7 130.2 137.8 156.4 — — 175 4


— — — — — — — — — —

Black or African American — — — — — — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino — — — — — — — — — —

White 134.8 146.2 138 149.7 154.1 164.6 — N 175 2

Students with Disabilities 97.4 107.3 103.6 76.5 93.5 134.3 — — 175 4

Economically Disadvantaged 111.4 120.4 116.4 112.9 123.7 149.4 — — 175 3

Subgroup Cohort Count Annual Biliteracy 2.0 Weight 1.5 Weight 1.0 Weight 0.5 Weight 0.0 Weight

All Students 199 0 126 0 38 6 29

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 4 0 — — — — —

Black or African American 4 0 — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino 3 0 — — — — —

White 195 0 122 0 38 6 29

Students with Disabilities 41 0 14 0 13 6 8

Economically Disadvantaged 103 0 50 0 21 6 26


Or 2 Years CombinedCurrent Year 12th Grade Enrollment

Current Year Participation Rate

Current Year + Previous Year 12th Grade Enrollment

Current Year + Previous Year Participation Rate

All Students 176 98.9% 347 98.9%


— 0 — — —


— 1 — — —




White 172 98.8% 334 98.8%


Students with Disabilities — 27 — — —

Economically Disadvantaged 82 97.6% 175 97.7%

SECONDARY CCCR LEVELS

SECONDARY CCCR COUNTS

SECONDARY ELA PARTICIPATION RATE


Or 2 Years CombinedCurrent Year 12th Grade Enrollment

Current Year Participation Rate

Current Year + Previous Year 12th Grade Enrollment

Current Year + Previous Year Participation Rate

All Students 176 99.4% 347 99.1%


— 0 — — —


— 1 — — —




White 172 99.4% 334 99.1%


Students with Disabilities — 27 — — —

Economically Disadvantaged 82 98.8% 175 98.3%

SECONDARY MATHEMATICS PARTICIPATION RATE

All Students 199 165 83% 67 34% 72 36% 26 13% 5 3% 7 4% 0 0% 22 11%

Female 92 80 87% 32 35% 37 40% 11 12% 2 2% 3 3% 0 0% 7 8%

Male 107 85 79% 35 33% 35 33% 15 14% 3 3% 4 4% 0 0% 15 14%

Multiracial 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%


0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%


— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

White — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —


— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

General-Education Students

159 139 87% 67 42% 62 39% 10 6% 0 0% 5 3% 0 0% 15 9%

Students with Disabilities 40 26 65% 0 0% 10 25% 16 40% 5 13% 2 5% 0 0% 7 18%

Non-English Language Learners

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —


— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Economically Disadvantaged

96 93 97% 44 46% 38 40% 11 11% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 2 2%


103 72 70% 23 22% 34 33% 15 15% 5 5% 6 6% 0 0% 20 19%

Not Migrant — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Migrant — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Parents not in Armed Forces

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Parents in Armed Forces — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 193 161 83% 67 35% 69 36% 25 13% 5 3% 6 3% 0 0% 21 11%

Homeless 6 4 67% 0 0% 3 50% 1 17% 0 0% 1 17% 0 0% 1 17%

Not in Foster Care 194 165 85% 67 35% 72 37% 26 13% 4 2% 6 3% 0 0% 19 10%

Foster Care 5 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 20% 1 20% 0 0% 3 60%

SubgroupTotal

GRAD RATE

REGENTS WITH ADVANCED

DESIGNATION

REGENTS DIPLOMA

LOCAL DIPLOMA

NON DIPLOMA

CRED

STILL ENROLLED

GED TRANSFER

DROPOUT#% #%#%#%#%#%#%#%

GRADUATION RATE

GRADES 3-8 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS SUMMARY RESULTS (2018-19)

District

NY State

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grades 3-8

Percent Proficient

0%

20%

40%

60%

Grade Not Tested TestedLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Proficient (Levels 3 & 4)

# % # % # % # % # %

Grade 3 50 135 46 34% 63 47% 26 19% 0 0% 26 19%

Grade 4 53 86 40 47% 33 38% 13 15% 0 0% 13 15%

Grade 5 73 117 66 56% 32 27% 14 12% 5 4% 19 16%

Grade 6 112 51 28 55% 4 8% 10 20% 9 18% 19 37%

Grade 7 138 48 23 48% 12 25% 12 25% 1 2% 13 27%

Grade 8 143 40 13 33% 17 43% 3 8% 7 18% 10 25%

Grades 3-8 569 477 216 45% 161 34% 78 16% 22 5% 100 21%

MEAN SCORE: 587

GRADE 3 ELA RESULTS

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient

Percentage Scoring at Levels

0%

20%

40%

60%

Subgroup Not Tested TestedLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Proficient (Levels 3 & 4)

# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 50 135 46 34% 63 47% 26 19% 0 0% 26 19%

General Education 42 117 36 31% 55 47% 26 22% 0 0% 26 22%

Students with Disabilities 8 18 10 56% 8 44% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

American Indian or Alaska Native 1 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Black or African American 1 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino 0 4 — — — — — — — — — —

White 48 128 39 30% 63 49% 26 20% 0 0% 26 20%

Multiracial 0 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Small Group Total 2 7 7 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Female 15 59 17 29% 30 51% 12 20% 0 0% 12 20%

Male 35 76 29 38% 33 43% 14 18% 0 0% 14 18%

Non-English Language Learners 49 135 46 34% 63 47% 26 19% 0 0% 26 19%

Economically Disadvantaged 29 82 38 46% 37 45% 7 9% 0 0% 7 9%

Not Economically Disadvantaged 21 53 8 15% 26 49% 19 36% 0 0% 19 36%

Migrant 1 4 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 49 131 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 0 5 4 80% 1 20% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Not Homeless 50 130 42 32% 62 48% 26 20% 0 0% 26 20%

In Foster Care 1 4 — — — — — — — — — —

Not in Foster Care 49 131 — — — — — — — — — —

Parent Not in Armed Forces 50 135 46 34% 63 47% 26 19% 0 0% 26 19%

MEAN SCORE: 586

GRADE 4 ELA RESULTS

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

20%

40%

60%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 53 86 40 47% 33 38% 13 15% 0 0% 13 15%



White 51 86 40 47% 33 38% 13 15% 0 0% 13 15%

Female 28 43 21 49% 17 40% 5 12% 0 0% 5 12%

Male 25 43 19 44% 16 37% 8 19% 0 0% 8 19%




Migrant 1 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 52 85 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 0 4 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 53 82 — — — — — — — — — —

In Foster Care 1 3 — — — — — — — — — —



MEAN SCORE: 588

GRADE 5 ELA RESULTS

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

20%

40%

60%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 73 117 66 56% 32 27% 14 12% 5 4% 19 16%





White 72 114 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 27 50 25 50% 17 34% 7 14% 1 2% 8 16%

Male 46 67 41 61% 15 22% 7 10% 4 6% 11 16%




Migrant 2 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 71 116 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 0 2 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 73 115 — — — — — — — — — —

In Foster Care 0 1 — — — — — — — — — —



MEAN SCORE: 587

GRADE 6 ELA RESULTS

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

20%

40%

60%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 112 51 28 55% 4 8% 10 20% 9 18% 19 37%



White 105 50 — — — — — — — — — —

Multiracial 3 1 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 44 26 14 54% 3 12% 6 23% 3 12% 9 35%

Male 68 25 14 56% 1 4% 4 16% 6 24% 10 40%




Migrant 1 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 111 50 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 1 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 111 50 — — — — — — — — — —

Not in Foster Care 111 51 28 55% 4 8% 10 20% 9 18% 19 37%


MEAN SCORE: 590

GRADE 7 ELA RESULTS

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

20%

40%

60%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 138 48 23 48% 12 25% 12 25% 1 2% 13 27%

General Education 116 44 — — — — — — — — — —

Students with Disabilities 22 4 — — — — — — — — — —


White 130 47 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 69 22 4 18% 7 32% 10 45% 1 5% 11 50%

Male 69 26 19 73% 5 19% 2 8% 0 0% 2 8%




Migrant 0 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 138 47 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 4 2 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 134 46 — — — — — — — — — —



MEAN SCORE: 590

GRADE 8 ELA RESULTS

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

20%

40%

60%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 143 40 13 33% 17 43% 3 8% 7 18% 10 25%



Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0 1 — — — — — — — — — —


White 139 38 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 67 13 3 23% 8 62% 1 8% 1 8% 2 15%

Male 76 27 10 37% 9 33% 2 7% 6 22% 8 30%




Not Migrant 137 40 13 33% 17 43% 3 8% 7 18% 10 25%

Not Homeless 138 40 13 33% 17 43% 3 8% 7 18% 10 25%

In Foster Care 2 2 — — — — — — — — — —



Advanced grade 7 and 8 students who take a Regents math test in lieu of the grade 7 and/or 8 math test are reported in the Regents 7 and Regents 8 rows. Combined 7 and Combined 8 are students who took either the grade 7 or 8 math test or a Regents math test in lieu of the grade 7 or 8 math test.

GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS SUMMARY RESULTS (2018-19)

District

NY State

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Regents 8 Combined 8 Grades 3-8

Percent Proficient

0%

50%

100%

Grade Not Tested TestedLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 & Above Proficient (Levels 3 & Above)

# % # % # % # % # %

Grade 3 54 131 62 47% 36 27% 26 20% 7 5% 33 25%

Grade 4 60 81 37 46% 28 35% 11 14% 5 6% 16 20%

Grade 5 86 104 64 62% 20 19% 16 15% 4 4% 20 19%

Grade 6 111 52 27 52% 13 25% 11 21% 1 2% 12 23%

Grade 7 136 48 22 46% 13 27% 13 27% 0 0% 13 27%

Grade 8 155 26 26 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Regents 8 — 48 0 0% 0 0% 17 35% 31 65% 48 100%

Combined 8 155 74 26 35% 0 0% 17 23% 31 42% 48 65%

Grades 3-8 602 490 238 49% 110 22% 94 19% 48 10% 142 29%

MEAN SCORE: 587

GRADE 3 MATH RESULTS

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

20%

40%

60%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 54 131 62 47% 36 27% 26 20% 7 5% 33 25%






White 52 124 58 47% 33 27% 26 21% 7 6% 33 27%

Multiracial 0 1 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 19 55 29 53% 14 25% 8 15% 4 7% 12 22%

Male 35 76 33 43% 22 29% 18 24% 3 4% 21 28%




Migrant 1 4 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 53 127 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 0 6 4 67% 2 33% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Not Homeless 54 125 58 46% 34 27% 26 21% 7 6% 33 26%

In Foster Care 2 3 — — — — — — — — — —



MEAN SCORE: 588


District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

20%

40%

60%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 60 81 37 46% 28 35% 11 14% 5 6% 16 20%



White 57 81 37 46% 28 35% 11 14% 5 6% 16 20%

Female 32 39 19 49% 14 36% 5 13% 1 3% 6 15%

Male 28 42 18 43% 14 33% 6 14% 4 10% 10 24%




Migrant 1 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 59 80 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 1 4 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 59 77 — — — — — — — — — —

In Foster Care 1 3 — — — — — — — — — —



MEAN SCORE: 587

GRADE 5 MATH RESULTSDistrict

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

50%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 86 104 64 62% 20 19% 16 15% 4 4% 20 19%





White 84 102 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 32 45 29 64% 9 20% 6 13% 1 2% 7 16%

Male 54 59 35 59% 11 19% 10 17% 3 5% 13 22%




Migrant 2 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 84 103 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 0 2 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 86 102 — — — — — — — — — —

In Foster Care 0 1 — — — — — — — — — —



MEAN SCORE: 588


District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

20%

40%

60%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 111 52 27 52% 13 25% 11 21% 1 2% 12 23%



White 103 52 27 52% 13 25% 11 21% 1 2% 12 23%

Female 43 27 15 56% 7 26% 5 19% 0 0% 5 19%

Male 68 25 12 48% 6 24% 6 24% 1 4% 7 28%




Migrant 1 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 110 51 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 1 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 110 51 — — — — — — — — — —



MEAN SCORE: 593

GRADE 7 MATH RESULTSDistrict

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

20%

40%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 136 48 22 46% 13 27% 13 27% 0 0% 13 27%




White 127 47 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 65 25 8 32% 10 40% 7 28% 0 0% 7 28%

Male 71 23 14 61% 3 13% 6 26% 0 0% 6 26%




Migrant 0 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 136 47 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 3 2 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 133 46 — — — — — — — — — —



MEAN SCORE: 573


District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

50%

100%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 155 26 26 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%





White 151 24 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 69 9 9 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Male 86 17 17 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%




Migrant 5 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 150 25 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 4 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 151 25 — — — — — — — — — —

In Foster Care 3 1 — — — — — — — — — —



Advanced grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the grade 8 science test are reported in the Regents 8 row.

GRADES 4 & 8 SCIENCE SUMMARY RESULTS (2018-19)

District

NY State

Grade 4 Grade 8 Regents 8 Combined 8 Grades 4&8

Percent Proficient

0%

50%

100%

Grade Not Tested TestedLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Proficient (Levels 3 & 4)

# % # % # % # % # %

Grade 4 56 85 2 2% 8 9% 44 52% 31 36% 75 88%

Grade 8 154 27 9 33% 14 52% 4 15% 0 0% 4 15%

Regents 8 — 29 0 0% 0 0% 9 31% 20 69% 29 100%

Combined 8 154 56 9 16% 14 25% 13 23% 20 36% 33 59%

Grades 4&8 210 141 11 8% 22 16% 57 40% 51 36% 108 77%

MEAN SCORE: 78

GRADE 4 SCIENCE RESULTS

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

50%

100%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 56 85 2 2% 8 9% 44 52% 31 36% 75 88%



White 53 85 2 2% 8 9% 44 52% 31 36% 75 88%

Female 30 41 1 2% 4 10% 23 56% 13 32% 36 88%

Male 26 44 1 2% 4 9% 21 48% 18 41% 39 89%




Migrant 1 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 55 84 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 1 4 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 55 81 — — — — — — — — — —

In Foster Care 1 3 — — — — — — — — — —



MEAN SCORE: 53

GRADE 8 SCIENCE RESULTS

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

20%

40%

60%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 154 27 9 33% 14 52% 4 15% 0 0% 4 15%




White 149 26 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 72 6 2 33% 4 67% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Male 82 21 7 33% 10 48% 4 19% 0 0% 4 19%




Migrant 5 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 149 26 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 149 27 9 33% 14 52% 4 15% 0 0% 4 15%

In Foster Care 3 1 — — — — — — — — — —



Annual Regents examination results include those from August, January, and June of the reporting year. If a student takes the same Regents examination multiple times during the reporting year, only the highest score is included in these results.

ANNUAL REGENTS EXAMINATION IN ELA (2018-19)

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 5 Proficient


0%

50%

100%

Subgroup TestedLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Proficient (Levels 3 & Above)

# % # % # % # % # % # %

All Students 158 12 8% 11 7% 34 22% 26 16% 75 47% 135 85%

General Education 127 6 5% 5 4% 24 19% 22 17% 70 55% 116 91%

Students with Disabilities 31 6 19% 6 19% 10 32% 4 13% 5 16% 19 61%

American Indian or Alaska Native 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

White 155 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Multiracial 2 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Small Group Total 158 12 8% 11 7% 34 22% 26 16% 75 47% 135 85%

Female 85 8 9% 7 8% 15 18% 14 16% 41 48% 70 82%

Male 73 4 5% 4 5% 19 26% 12 16% 34 47% 65 89%

Non-English Language Learners 158 12 8% 11 7% 34 22% 26 16% 75 47% 135 85%

Economically Disadvantaged 75 7 9% 7 9% 21 28% 12 16% 28 37% 61 81%

Not Economically Disadvantaged 83 5 6% 4 5% 13 16% 14 17% 47 57% 74 89%

Migrant 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 157 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 6 1 17% 0 0% 4 67% 0 0% 1 17% 5 83%

Not Homeless 152 11 7% 11 7% 30 20% 26 17% 74 49% 130 86%

In Foster Care 2 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Not in Foster Care 156 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Parent Not in Armed Forces 158 12 8% 11 7% 34 22% 26 16% 75 47% 135 85%

ANNUAL REGENTS EXAMINATION ALGEBRA I (2018-19)District

NY State



0%

50%


# % # % # % # % # % # %

All Students 203 21 10% 38 19% 96 47% 27 13% 21 10% 144 71%



American Indian or Alaska Native 3 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Black or African American 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino 2 — — — — — — — — — — — —

White 196 21 11% 38 19% 89 45% 27 14% 21 11% 137 70%

Multiracial 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —


Female 83 10 12% 12 14% 39 47% 12 14% 10 12% 61 73%

Male 120 11 9% 26 22% 57 48% 15 13% 11 9% 83 69%




Migrant 3 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 200 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 6 1 17% 0 0% 5 83% 0 0% 0 0% 5 83%

Not Homeless 197 20 10% 38 19% 91 46% 27 14% 21 11% 139 71%

In Foster Care 3 — — — — — — — — — — — —



ANNUAL REGENTS EXAMINATION GEOMETRY (2018-19)District

NY State



0%

50%


# % # % # % # % # % # %

All Students 132 19 14% 18 14% 62 47% 15 11% 18 14% 95 72%



Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Black or African American 2 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino 2 — — — — — — — — — — — —

White 127 19 15% 18 14% 58 46% 15 12% 17 13% 90 71%


Female 76 12 16% 9 12% 33 43% 10 13% 12 16% 55 72%

Male 56 7 13% 9 16% 29 52% 5 9% 6 11% 40 71%




Migrant 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 131 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 2 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 130 — — — — — — — — — — — —

In Foster Care 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —



ANNUAL REGENTS EXAMINATION ALGEBRA II (2018-19)

District

NY State



0%

50%

100%


# % # % # % # % # % # %

All Students 74 8 11% 11 15% 24 32% 22 30% 9 12% 55 74%

General Education 73 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Students with Disabilities 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

White 72 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Multiracial 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —


Female 46 6 13% 7 15% 15 33% 13 28% 5 11% 33 72%

Male 28 2 7% 4 14% 9 32% 9 32% 4 14% 22 79%




Not Migrant 74 8 11% 11 15% 24 32% 22 30% 9 12% 55 74%

Not Homeless 74 8 11% 11 15% 24 32% 22 30% 9 12% 55 74%

Not in Foster Care 74 8 11% 11 15% 24 32% 22 30% 9 12% 55 74%


ANNUAL REGENTS EXAMINATION NEW FRAMEWORK GLOBAL HISTORY & GEOGRAPHY II (2018-19)

District

NY State



null

null

0%

50%

100%


# % # % # % # % # % # %

All Students 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Students with Disabilities 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

White 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Small Group Total 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Male 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Non-English Language Learners 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Economically Disadvantaged 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —


Parent Not in Armed Forces 1 — — — — — — — — — — — —

ANNUAL REGENTS EXAMINATION LIVING ENVIRONMENT (2018-19)District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

50%

Subgroup TestedLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Proficient (Levels 3 & 4)

# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 183 18 10% 24 13% 89 49% 52 28% 141 77%

General Education 140 5 4% 15 11% 69 49% 51 36% 120 86%

Students with Disabilities 43 13 30% 9 21% 20 47% 1 2% 21 49%

American Indian or Alaska Native 4 — — — — — — — — — —

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 2 — — — — — — — — — —

Black or African American 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino 1 — — — — — — — — — —

White 172 16 9% 23 13% 85 49% 48 28% 133 77%

Multiracial 3 — — — — — — — — — —

Small Group Total 11 2 18% 1 9% 4 36% 4 36% 8 73%

Female 85 11 13% 11 13% 44 52% 19 22% 63 74%

Male 98 7 7% 13 13% 45 46% 33 34% 78 80%

Non-English Language Learners 183 18 10% 24 13% 89 49% 52 28% 141 77%

Economically Disadvantaged 100 18 18% 15 15% 51 51% 16 16% 67 67%

Not Economically Disadvantaged 83 0 0% 9 11% 38 46% 36 43% 74 89%

Migrant 3 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 180 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 5 0 0% 1 20% 4 80% 0 0% 4 80%

Not Homeless 178 18 10% 23 13% 85 48% 52 29% 137 77%

In Foster Care 2 — — — — — — — — — —

Not in Foster Care 181 — — — — — — — — — —

Parent Not in Armed Forces 183 18 10% 24 13% 89 49% 52 28% 141 77%

ANNUAL REGENTS EXAMINATION PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE (2018-19)District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

50%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 173 36 21% 30 17% 61 35% 46 27% 107 62%






White 169 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 78 18 23% 9 12% 28 36% 23 29% 51 65%

Male 95 18 19% 21 22% 33 35% 23 24% 56 59%




Migrant 2 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 171 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 2 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 171 — — — — — — — — — —

Not in Foster Care 173 36 21% 30 17% 61 35% 46 27% 107 62%


ANNUAL REGENTS EXAMINATION PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY (2018-19)District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

50%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 76 13 17% 25 33% 32 42% 6 8% 38 50%

General Education 72 — — — — — — — — — —

Students with Disabilities 4 — — — — — — — — — —



White 74 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 51 13 25% 17 33% 17 33% 4 8% 21 41%

Male 25 0 0% 8 32% 15 60% 2 8% 17 68%




Not Migrant 76 13 17% 25 33% 32 42% 6 8% 38 50%

Homeless 2 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 74 — — — — — — — — — —



ANNUAL REGENTS EXAMINATION PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS (2018-19)

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

50%

100%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 12 0 0% 3 25% 6 50% 3 25% 9 75%


White 12 0 0% 3 25% 6 50% 3 25% 9 75%

Female 4 — — — — — — — — — —

Male 8 — — — — — — — — — —


Economically Disadvantaged 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Economically Disadvantaged 11 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 12 0 0% 3 25% 6 50% 3 25% 9 75%

Not Homeless 12 0 0% 3 25% 6 50% 3 25% 9 75%



ANNUAL REGENTS TRANSITIONAL EXAM IN GLOBAL HISTORY & GEOGRAPHY (2018-19)District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

50%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 189 43 23% 38 20% 62 33% 46 24% 108 57%





White 184 42 23% 37 20% 60 33% 45 24% 105 57%

Multiracial 1 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 90 21 23% 19 21% 29 32% 21 23% 50 56%

Male 99 22 22% 19 19% 33 33% 25 25% 58 59%




Migrant 3 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 186 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 4 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 185 — — — — — — — — — —

In Foster Care 3 — — — — — — — — — —

Not in Foster Care 186 — — — — — — — — — —


ANNUAL REGENTS EXAMINATION U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT (2018-19)District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

50%


# % # % # % # % # %

All Students 163 28 17% 37 23% 61 37% 37 23% 98 60%



American Indian or Alaska Native 1 — — — — — — — — — —


White 159 — — — — — — — — — —

Multiracial 2 — — — — — — — — — —


Female 91 19 21% 18 20% 36 40% 18 20% 54 59%

Male 72 9 13% 19 26% 25 35% 19 26% 44 61%




Migrant 1 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 162 — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 3 — — — — — — — — — —

Not Homeless 160 — — — — — — — — — —



A High School Cohort consists of all students who first enter grade 9 anywhere or, in the case of ungraded students with disabilities, reach their seventeenth birthday in a particular school year (July 1 - June 30). The "year" used to identify the cohort is the year in which the July 1 - December 31 dates fall. Results are reported four years after these students first enter grade 9.

2015 TOTAL COHORT REGENTS EXAMINATION IN ELA

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 & Above Proficient


0%

50%

100%

Subgroup Cohort

Not Tested

Tested Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Level 4 &

AboveProficient (Levels 3 &

Above)

# % # % # % # % # % # % # %

All Students 199 22 11% 177 89% 4 2% 9 5% 48 24% 116 58% 164 82%

General Education 159 10 6% 149 94% 2 1% 2 1% 37 23% 108 68% 145 91%

Students with Disabilities 40 12 30% 28 70% 2 5% 7 18% 11 28% 8 20% 19 48%


1 0 — 1 — — — — — — — — — — —

Black or African American 2 0 — 2 — — — — — — — — — — —

Hispanic or Latino 1 0 — 1 — — — — — — — — — — —

White 195 22 — 173 — — — — — — — — — — —

Small Group Total 199 22 11% 177 89% 4 2% 9 5% 48 24% 116 58% 164 82%

Female 92 10 11% 82 89% 1 1% 4 4% 16 17% 61 66% 77 84%

Male 107 12 11% 95 89% 3 3% 5 5% 32 30% 55 51% 87 81%

Non-English Language Learners 199 22 11% 177 89% 4 2% 9 5% 48 24% 116 58% 164 82%

Economically Disadvantaged 103 21 20% 82 80% 2 2% 8 8% 26 25% 46 45% 72 70%

Not Economically Disadvantaged 96 1 1% 95 99% 2 2% 1 1% 22 23% 70 73% 92 96%

Migrant 3 2 — 1 — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 196 20 — 176 — — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 6 1 17% 5 83% 0 0% 0 0% 4 67% 1 17% 5 83%

Not Homeless 193 21 11% 172 89% 4 2% 9 5% 44 23% 115 60% 159 82%

In Foster Care 5 3 60% 2 40% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 40% 2 40%

Not in Foster Care 194 19 10% 175 90% 4 2% 9 5% 48 25% 114 59% 162 84%

Parent Not in Armed Forces 199 22 11% 177 89% 4 2% 9 5% 48 24% 116 58% 164 82%

2015 TOTAL COHORT REGENTS EXAMINATIONS IN MATH

District

NY State



0%

50%

100%

Subgroup Cohort

Not Tested



Above)

# % # % # % # % # % # % # %

All Students 199 14 7% 185 93% 6 3% 13 7% 114 57% 52 26% 166 83%




1 0 — 1 — — — — — — — — — — —



White 195 14 — 181 — — — — — — — — — — —


Female 92 7 8% 85 92% 1 1% 6 7% 53 58% 25 27% 78 85%

Male 107 7 7% 100 93% 5 5% 7 7% 61 57% 27 25% 88 82%




Migrant 3 1 — 2 — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 196 13 — 183 — — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 6 0 0% 6 100% 1 17% 0 0% 4 67% 1 17% 5 83%

Not Homeless 193 14 7% 179 93% 5 3% 13 7% 110 57% 51 26% 161 83%

In Foster Care 5 2 40% 3 60% 0 0% 1 20% 2 40% 0 0% 2 40%



2015 TOTAL COHORT REGENTS EXAMINATIONS IN GLOBAL HISTORY & GEOGRAPHYDistrict

NY State



0%

50%

Subgroup Cohort

Not Tested



Above)

# % # % # % # % # % # % # %

All Students 199 17 9% 182 91% 19 10% 20 10% 95 48% 48 24% 143 72%




1 0 — 1 — — — — — — — — — — —



White 195 17 — 178 — — — — — — — — — — —


Female 92 7 8% 85 92% 8 9% 10 11% 46 50% 21 23% 67 73%

Male 107 10 9% 97 91% 11 10% 10 9% 49 46% 27 25% 76 71%




Migrant 3 2 — 1 — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 196 15 — 181 — — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 6 1 17% 5 83% 0 0% 1 17% 3 50% 1 17% 4 67%

Not Homeless 193 16 8% 177 92% 19 10% 19 10% 92 48% 47 24% 139 72%

In Foster Care 5 3 60% 2 40% 0 0% 1 20% 0 0% 1 20% 1 20%



2015 TOTAL COHORT REGENTS EXAMINATIONS IN SCIENCE

District

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

50%

100%

Subgroup CohortNot Tested Tested Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Proficient (Levels 3 & 4)

# % # % # % # % # % # % # %

All Students 199 10 5% 189 95% 5 3% 14 7% 103 52% 67 34% 170 85%



Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 1 0 — 1 — — — — — — — — — — —



White 195 10 — 185 — — — — — — — — — — —


Female 92 5 5% 87 95% 3 3% 6 7% 45 49% 33 36% 78 85%

Male 107 5 5% 102 95% 2 2% 8 7% 58 54% 34 32% 92 86%




Migrant 3 1 — 2 — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 196 9 — 187 — — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 6 1 17% 5 83% 0 0% 0 0% 4 67% 1 17% 5 83%

Not Homeless 193 9 5% 184 95% 5 3% 14 7% 99 51% 66 34% 165 85%

In Foster Care 5 2 40% 3 60% 0 0% 0 0% 2 40% 1 20% 3 60%



New York State Alternate Assessments (NYSAA) are administered to ungraded students with severe cognitive disabilities whose ages are equivalent to graded students in grades 3 through 8 and high school level.

2015 TOTAL COHORT REGENTS EXAMINATION IN U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENTDistrict

NY State

1 2 3 4 Proficient


0%

50%

Subgroup CohortNot Tested Tested Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Proficient (Levels 3 & 4)

# % # % # % # % # % # % # %

All Students 199 25 13% 174 87% 10 5% 17 9% 74 37% 73 37% 147 74%



Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 1 0 — 1 — — — — — — — — — — —



White 195 25 — 170 — — — — — — — — — — —


Female 92 10 11% 82 89% 3 3% 7 8% 36 39% 36 39% 72 78%

Male 107 15 14% 92 86% 7 7% 10 9% 38 36% 37 35% 75 70%




Migrant 3 2 — 1 — — — — — — — — — — —

Not Migrant 196 23 — 173 — — — — — — — — — — —

Homeless 6 1 17% 5 83% 2 33% 1 17% 2 33% 0 0% 2 33%

Not Homeless 193 24 12% 169 88% 8 4% 16 8% 72 37% 73 38% 145 75%

In Foster Care 5 4 80% 1 20% 0 0% 0 0% 1 20% 0 0% 1 20%



NEW YORK STATE ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT (2018-19)

Grade/Subject Not Tested Tested Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Grade 8 ELA 0 4 — — — —

Grade 8 Math 0 4 — — — —

Grade 8 Science 0 4 — — — —

National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) are reported for statewide (New York State) and national results only. District- and school-level results are not reported for NAEP.

NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATION PROGRESS (NAEP) RESULTS (2018-19)

READING MATH

SUBGROUP BELOW BASIC BASIC PROFICIENT ADVANCED BELOW BASIC BASIC PROFICIENT ADVANCED

All Students 34 31 26 8 24 40 29 8

Students with Disabilities 73 18 7 1 61 30 7 2

American Indian or Alaska Native * * * * * * * *

Asian 21 27 34 17 8 23 43 26

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander * * * * * * * *

Black or African American 53 31 14 2 43 40 16 1

Hispanic or Latino 45 32 19 4 33 45 19 2

White 24 32 33 11 14 39 38 9

Multiracial 24 23 35 18 15 42 31 12

Limited English Proficient 78 17 4 * 51 40 8 1

Economically Disadvantaged 49 31 17 3 33 43 21 3

READING MATH


All Students 30 38 28 4 34 32 22 11


American Indian or Alaska Native * * * * * * * *

Asian 21 33 36 10 15 25 29 31

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander * * * * * * * *



White 20 39 35 6 23 33 29 15

Multiracial * * * * * * * *

Limited English Proficient 83 16 1 * 88 10 2 *


NEW YORK STATE NAEP GRADE 4

NEW YORK STATE NAEP GRADE 8

*There are not sufficient data for this subgroup.

Civil Right Data Collection (CRDC) data are reported to the United States Department of Education by districts and include data on measures of school quality, climate, and safety as well as enrollment in preschool programs and accelerated coursework to earn postsecondary credit. For more information, visit the CRDC homepage.

CRDC Data (13.06 megabytes)Glossary of Terms

© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: MARCH 27, 2020, 9:34 AM EST

READING MATH


All Students 35 31 26 9 20 40 32 9


American Indian or Alaska Native 50 30 17 3 32 43 22 4

Asian 18 25 35 22 7 23 41 29

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 45 31 20 4 30 40 24 5



White 24 31 32 12 12 36 40 12

Multiracial 28 32 29 11 17 40 34 10

Limited English Proficient 65 25 8 1 41 43 15 1


READING MATH


All Students 28 39 29 4 32 35 23 10


American Indian or Alaska Native 40 41 19 1 48 37 13 3

Asian 13 30 43 13 12 24 31 33

Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 38 38 23 2 47 34 15 4



White 19 39 36 5 21 36 30 13

Multiracial 24 40 31 5 28 36 25 11

Limited English Proficient 73 24 3 * 73 22 4 1


CIVIL RIGHTS DATA COLLECTION (CRDC) (2015-16)

NATIONAL NAEP GRADE 4

NATIONAL NAEP GRADE 8

2020-2021 budget & district report card€¦ · malone central school district 42 husky lane,...

Documents