20th annual santander latin american conference

8/20/2019 20th Annual Santander Latin American Conference

1/79

FIBRIA APP WITH THIS PRESENTATION IS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD AT APPLE STORE AND GOOGLE PLAY.

20th Annual Santander Latin American ConferenceJanuary, 2016


2/79

2

The information contained in this presentation may include statements whichconstitute forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S.

Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange

Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking statements involve a certain degree of

risk and uncertainty with respect to business, financial, trend, strategy and other

forecasts, and are based on assumptions, data or methods that, although considered

reasonable by the company at the time, may turn out to be incorrect or imprecise, or

may not be possible to realize. The company gives no assurance that expectations

disclosed in this presentation will be confirmed. Prospective investors are cautioned

that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance

and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from

those in the forward-looking statements, due to a variety of factors, including, but not

limited to, the risks of international business and other risks referred to in the

company’s filings with the CVM and SEC. The company does not undertake, and

specifically disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, which

speak only for the date on which they are made.

Disclaimer


3/79

3

Company Overview1Pulp and Paper Market2Financial and Operational Highlights3

Agenda

Final Remarks

4


4/79

4

Company Overview


5/79

5

A Winning Player

Port Terminal Pulp Unit

Três Lagoas

Santos

AracruzPortocel

Caravelas

BelmonteVeracel

Jacareí

Superior Asset Combination Main Figures – 3Q15 LTM

Pulp capacity million tons 5.300

Net revenues US$ billion 3.000

Total Forest Base(1) thousand hectares 967

Planted area(1) thousand hectares 539

Net Debt US$ billion 2.411

Net Debt/EBITDA (in Dollars)(2) X 1.58

Source: Fibria

(1) Including 50% of Veracel, excluding forest partnership areas and forest bases linked to the sales of Losango and forest assets in Southern Bahia State.(2) For covenants purposes, the Net Debt/EBITDA ratio is calculated in Dollars.


6/79

6

Fibria’s Units Industrial Capacity

* Veracel is a joint venture between Fibria (50%) and Stora Enso (50%) and the total capacity is 1,120 thousand ton/year


7/79

7

Worldwide presence

Strong global customer base

Long-term relationships

Focus on customers with stable business

Customized pulp products and services

Sound forestry and industrial R&D

Focus on less volatile end-use markets such as tissue

Efficient logistics set up

Low dependence on volatile markets such as China

Low credit risk

100% certified pulp (FSC and PEFC/Cerflor)

Sales Mix by End Use - Fibria Highlights

Fibria’s Commercial Strategy

Net Revenues by Region - Fibria

Region - 3Q15 End Use - 3Q15

44% 44% 42% 37%43% 43%

35% 36%46% 42% 39% 40%

47% 42% 42%

18%26%

26%30% 22%

29%31% 31%

19% 23% 27% 27%17% 24% 25%

29%20% 22% 25% 26%

21%25% 26% 26% 27% 24% 23% 26% 26% 25%

9% 9% 10% 9% 10% 8% 9% 8% 10% 9% 10% 10% 10% 9% 8%

1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15

Europe North America Asia Other

50%

36%

14%

Printing &Writing

Specialties

TissueEurope

42%

N.America

25%

Asia25%

LatAm8%


8/79

8

Pulp Supply Agreement: Puma Project

► Pulp volumes:► Minimum of 900 kt of hardwood for the first 4 years

► 75% of 900 kt for the fifth year (phase out 1)

► 50% of 900 kt for the sixth year (phase out 2)

► Selling price based on the average net price charged byFibria at the Port of Paranaguá (FOB Paranaguá)

►

Sales destination: Globally, except for South America► Operational startup: Mar/2016

► Agreement benefits:

Puma Project

Mutual value creation, with better servicing for both Companies customer’s base

Logistics and commercialstructure synergies;

Ensure sales volumes;

Ensure pulp market access withKlabin brand.

Logistics and commercialoptimization and synergies;

Support customers’ growth andenhance customers’ needs;

Potential development of new customers.


9/79

9

Shareholder Structure and Corporate Governance

(1) Controlling group (2) Free Float 41.44% + Treasury 0.06%

Votorantim

Industrial S.A.

(1)

29.42%

BNDES

Participações

(1)

29.08%

Free

Float

(2)

41.50%

► Only 1 class of shares →100% voting rights

► 100% tag along rights (Brazilian corporate lawestablishes 80%)

► Board of Directors with minimum 20% independent

members

► Financial Statements in International Standards – IFRS

► Adoption of Arbitration Chamber

► SEC Registered ADR Level III program

Listed on Novo Mercado,highest level at BM&FBovespa:

Policies approvedby the Board of Directors:

FiscalCouncil

Board ofDirectors

20% independentmembers

Role of CEO andchairman is split

Personneland

Remuneratio

n Committee

StatutoryAudit

Committee

FinanceCommittee

SustainabilityCommittee

InnovationCommittee

30%independent

members

100%independent

members

50%independent

members

45%independent

members-

GeneralMeeting

► Indebtedness and Liquidity

► Market Risk Management

► Risk Management► Corporate Governance

► Related Parties Transactions

► Anti-Corruption

► Information Disclosure

► Securities Trading

► Antitrust

► Genetically Modified Eucalyptus

► Dividend Policy NEW


10/7910

Approval of Dividend Policy

►Proposed dividends based on cash generation, taking into considerationthe company’s strategic planning and in line with its policies, notably the

Indebtness and Risk Management policies.

►Preserving Investment Grade.

Commitment to Corporate Governance best practices.

Extraordinary dividend if Policy criteria are met.


11/7911Pulp and Paper Market


12/7912

The “better than expected scenario” has become a reality again in

2015…

BHKP CAPACITY CHANGES

EXPECTED SCENARIO FOR 2015 IN DEC’14 YEAR-TO-DATE SCENARIO IN 2015

1095

-315

-65

115

85

30

200

750

265

750

400

BEKP demand growth**

Net

Possible closures*

Ence Huelva

April Rizhao

Sappi Cloquet

Old Town (Expera)

Portucel Cacia

Eldorado

CMPC Guaiba II

Oji Nantong

Montes del Plata

Suzano Maranhão

-400 to -800

1,415 to 1,815

*Based on annual closures average (400,000 to 800,000 t/yr)

**Source: PPPC Outlook for Eucalyptus Market Pulp December 2014

1500

1450

-385

-315

-190

115

40

40

30

200

500

265

750

400

Estimated BEKP demand growth**

Net

Unexpected Downtimes

Ence Huelva

April Rizhao

Sappi Cloquet

Ence Navia

Old Town (Expera)

Portucel Cacia

Eldorado

CMPC Guaiba II

Oji Nantong

Montes del Plata

Suzano Maranhão

Indonesia, China,Uruguay and Brazil

**Source: Fibria estimates based on PPPC Market Pulp World 20 (BEKP

9M15: + 1.105 kt )


13/7913

… and so has been the price scenario

BHKP Delivered to Europe (USD/t)

735

721

709

738

726

750

781

804 808*

784*

1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 Annual 2015

Consultants average at the end previous year Realized PIX/FOEX price

* Average until 12/21/15

Consultants: Hawkins Wright, RISI and Brian McClay (published in the end 2014 for 2015 prices)


14/7914

But this time, demand has been the “good surprise”


EXPECTED SCENARIO FOR 2015 IN DEC’14 YEAR-TO-DATE SCENARIO IN 2015

1,095

-315

-65

115

85

30

200

750

265

750

400


Net

Possible closures*

Ence Huelva

April Rizhao

Sappi Cloquet

Old Town (Expera)

Portucel Cacia

Eldorado

CMPC Guaiba II

Oji Nantong

Montes del Plata

Suzano Maranhão

-400 to -800

1,415 to 1,815

*Based on annual closures average (400,000 to 800,000 t/yr)

**Source: PPPC Outlook for Eucalyptus Market Pulp December 2014

1,500

1,450

-385

-315

-190

115

40

40

30

200

500

265

750

400

Estimated BEKP demand growth**

Net

Unexpected Downtimes

Ence Huelva

April Rizhao

Sappi Cloquet

Ence Navia

Old Town (Expera)

Portucel Cacia

Eldorado

CMPC Guaiba II

Oji Nantong

Montes del Plata

Suzano Maranhão

Indonesia, China,Uruguay and Brazil

**Source: Fibria estimates based on PPPC Market Pulp World 20 (BEKP

9M15: + 1,105 kt )


15/7915

Better worldwide macroeconomics are the key drivers… But thespecial focus is on Europe

Real GDP % Annual Growth

Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, October 2015

3,4

-0,8

2,2

7,7

3,3

-0,3

1,5

7,7

3,4

0,9

2,4

7,3

3,1

1,5

2,6

6,8

3,6

1,6

2,8

6,3

World Euro Area USA China

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


16/7916

But the special focus is on Europe

Hardwood and Eucalyptus Shipments (000 t and % annual growth and YTD)

*YTD: 9M15 vs. 9M14Source: PPPC World 20

-0.3%

-0.8%

3.3%3.7%

-0.8% -0.6%

6.0%

5.0%

-200

0

200

400

2012 2013 2014 YTD 2015*

BHKP BEKP


17/7917

So, what can we expect for 2016?


EXPECTED SCENARIO FOR 2016 IN NOV’15 FIBRIA’S EXPECTED SCENARIO FOR 2016

930

-120

-55

-90

-40

30

660

800


Net

Possible closures*

APRIL Kerinci

Verso Wickliffe

Woodland

Old Town (Expera)

Altri Celbi

Klabin

CMPC Guaiba II

-400 to -800

385 to 785

1500

*Based on annual closures average (400,000 to 800,000 t/yr)**Source: PPPC Outlook for Eucalyptus Market Pulp May 2015 (930kt) andFibria’s estimates

1500

985

-200

-120

-55

-90

-40

30

660

800


Net

Possible closures*

APRIL Kerinci

Verso Wickliffe

Woodland

Old Town (Expera)

Altri Celbi

Klabin

CMPC Guaiba II

Positive Supply/Demand Balance!


18/7918

1,106 kt

80 kt247 kt

593 kt

186 kt

9%

6%5%

19%

5%

Total North

America

Western

Europe

China Others

Shipments of Eucalyptus Pulp

(1) Source: PPPC World 20 – January/2015

Global Market BEKP Demand

Paper Capacity increase in China

2014 2015 Total

FORECAST REALIZEDPREVIOUSFORECAST

LATESTFORECAST

PREVIOUS LATEST

Woodfree 256 256 760 760 1,016 1,016

Tissue 1,390 1,278 727 1,365 2,117 2,643

Cartonboard 2,100 1,326 380 730 2,480 2,056

Total 3,746 2,860 1,867 2,855 5,613 5,715

Source: Fibria and Independent Consultants

9M2015 vs. 9M2014(2)

(1) Source: PPPC World 20 – December/2014

2014 vs. 2013(1)

1,734 kt

92 kt

386 kt717 kt

537 kt

11%

5%

6%

20%13%

Total North

America

Western

Europe

China Others

(2) Source: PPPC World 20 – Sep/2015


19/7919

Nominal Chinese GDP vs. Eucalyptus Shipments to China(Sept-09 = base 100)

203

-

50

100

150

200

250

China GDP Eucalyptus Shipments

76

Source: Bloomberg and PPPC.


20/7920

Commodities Differentiation

China GDP breakdown

China commodity demand - basis 100

49% 49% 48% 49% 49% 50% 50% 52% 51% 53% 53%

44% 47% 48% 48% 48% 48% 48% 46% 47%45% 45%

8% 4% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%

2008A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E

Consumption Investment Net Exports

2008A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E

Corn Soybeans Wheat Crude oil Iron ore Sugar BHKP

100

248

201194172

152

124115

Source: Itaú Macroeconomic Department and PPPC – Oct/15


21/7921

Technical Age and Scale in the Market Pulp IndustryFurther closures are expected due to lack of adequate investments in the industry…

Hardwood (BHKP) Market Pulp Softwood (BSKP) Market Pulp

STRONGWeighted average

technical age 12.3 years

Weighted average

capacity 1,277,000 t/a

Aracruz

Três Lago as

Veracel

Jacareí

0

500

1.000

1.500

2.000

2.500

3.000

051015202530

PM Capacity, 1000 t/a

Technical Age, years

WEAK

STRONGWeighted average

technical age 21 years

Weighted average

capacity 527,000 t/a

North American Pulp Mills Other Pulp Mills Closures Grade Switch On & Off

WEAK0

500

1.000

1.500

2.000

2.500

3.000

0102030

PM Capacity, 1000 t/a

Technical Age, years

More than 7.7 million tons of capacity above 25 years and with annual capacity below 500,000 t/y.

Old

Town

Ence

Huelva


22/7922

Source: PPPC and Fibria

Closures of Hardwood Capacity Worldwide

(000 ton)

Capacity closures DO happen

-910

-85

-1,260

-1,180

-540-500

-105

-1,085

-445

-315

-580

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016-2017 E (1)

(1) As of January 2016 | 2016: -40kt Old Town (USA), -90kt Woodland (USA), -55kt Verso Wickliffe (USA), -120 April Kerinci (Indonesia) | 2017: -275kt Arauco Valdivia (Chile)

G it dditi h ld t b t d th l f t


23/7923

Gross capacity addition should not be counted as the only factorinfluencing pulp price volatility….(1)

List Price bottoming at US$650/t in 2011 and US$724/t in 2014

C a p a c i t y ( 0 0 0 t o n )

0,0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1,0

1,2

1,4

1,6

1,8

2,0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1.000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Valdivia

APP

Hainan

Veracel Nueva Aldea

Santa Fé

Mucuri

Fray

Bentos

Kerinci

PL3

Três

Lagoas

Rizhao

APP Guangxi

Chenming

Zhanjiang

EldoradoMontes

del Plata

Maranhão

Guaíba II

APP South

Sumatra(2)

Klabin

Oji

Nantong

Horizonte II

B H K P p r i c e s - C I F E u r o p e

( U S $ / t o n )

(1) Source: Hawkins Wright , Poyry and Fibria Analysis. Pulp price estimates according to Hawkins Wright (July/15), Brian McClay (Sept./15) and RISI (May/15)

(2) Partially integrated production.


24/79

In the last 15 years, pulp volatility has been just 8%...why?

► Market price closer to producer’s marginal cost

► The marginal cost producers are based in Europe and North America

► Flattish industry cost curve

► Higher flexibility to adjust supply side during imbalanced market

► Lower dependency on Asian market (~25%) compared to hard commodities (70%+)

► Market end users are linked to consumer goods, such as tissue

► Incipient pulp price futures market and low liquidity

Source: Bloomberg – January 5, 2016

0

40

80

120

160

D e c - 9 9

M a y - 0 0

O c t - 0 0

M a r - 0 1

A u g - 0 1

J a n - 0 2

J u n - 0 2

N o v - 0 2

A p r - 0 3

S e p - 0 3

F e b - 0 4

J u l - 0 4

D e c - 0 4

M a y - 0 5

O c t - 0 5

M a r - 0 6

A u g - 0 6

J a n - 0 7

J u n - 0 7

N o v - 0 7

A p r - 0 8

S e p - 0 8

F e b - 0 9

J u l - 0 9

D e c - 0 9

M a y - 1 0

O c t - 1 0

M a r - 1 1

A u g - 1 1

J a n - 1 2

J u n - 1 2

N o v - 1 2

A p r - 1 3

S e p - 1 3

F e b - 1 4

J u l - 1 4

D e c - 1 4

M a y - 1 5

O c t - 1 5

BHKP - FOEX Europe (base 100) CPI (base 100)


25/7925

Lowest volatility among commodities

Source: Bloomberg – January 5, 2016

2535455565758595

105

115125135145155165175185195205215

225

J a n - 1 2

F e b - 1 2

M a r - 1 2

A p r - 1 2

M a y - 1 2

J u n - 1 2

J u l - 1 2

A u g - 1 2

S e p - 1 2

O c t - 1 2

N o v - 1 2

D e c - 1 2

J a n - 1 3

F e b - 1 3

M a r - 1 3

A p r - 1 3

M a y - 1 3

J u n - 1 3

J u l - 1 3

A u g - 1 3

S e p - 1 3

O c t - 1 3

N o v - 1 3

D e c - 1 3

J a n - 1 4

F e b - 1 4

M a r - 1 4

A p r - 1 4

M a y - 1 4

J u n - 1 4

J u l - 1 4

A u g - 1 4

S e p - 1 4

O c t - 1 4

N o v - 1 4

D e c - 1 4

J a n - 1 5

F e b - 1 5

M a r - 1 5

A p r - 1 5

M a y - 1 5

J u n - 1 5

J u l - 1 5

A u g - 1 5

S e p - 1 5

O c t - 1 5

N o v - 1 5

D e c - 1 5

J a n - 1 6

Iron Ore Soy Bean Crude Oil Sugar BHKP - FOEX Europe Exchange Rate (R$/US$)

120

215

72

63

31

Low volatility of hardwood pulp price, even thoughnew capacities have come on stream during the period.

36

100 = January 1, 2012


26/79

The only commodity with lower volatility than FX

Historical Volatility of Commodities (US$)

Since 2009

26

35% 35% 34%

27% 26%24% 24% 24%

16%

14%

6%

WTICrude Oil

Sugar Nickel Copper Soy Iron Ore LMEMetals

Ibovespa Cattle FX FOEX PIXBHKP


27/7927

Financial and Operational Highlights

Each 5% depreciation of the Real increases EBITDA by around


28/7928

Each 5% depreciation of the Real increases EBITDA by aroundR$403m (11%) and FCF by R$482 m (45%)

815

1,488

1,173 1,153

1,295

1,185

1,540

438

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 LTM 3Q15 3Q15

Exchange Rate

Average (R$/US$)

EBITDA Margin

EBITDA (US$ million)

Fibria net pulp price(US$/t)

Fibria net pulp price(R$/t)

2.00 1.76 1.67 1.95 2.162.35

3.014.13(1)

456

670 639 581 610 572 573 561 (2)

29%

40%34% 36%

40% 39%

51% 56%

912 1,179 1,067 1,1331,311 1,344 1,725

2,317

(1) According to Focus Report (Br azilian Central Bank – December 29, 2015) I (2) 2016 market consensus

2016 E


29/79

Free Cash Flow

29(1) Before expansion capex

US$ million

EBITDA Margin

39%

Average FX

182

-256

-77

-7

125

2977

194

84113

53

329

4

111

51103 130

112

317(1)

1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15

34% 33% 28% 30% 37% 37% 41% 39% 39% 41% 42% 41% 35% 35% 45% 50% 50% 56%

1.67 1.60 1.63 1.80 1.77 1.96 2.03 2.06 2.00 2.07 2.29 2.27 2.37 2.23 2.27 2.55 2.87 3.07 3.54


30/79

30

Free Cash Flow(1) – LTM 3Q15

US$ million(4)

(1) Not considering dividend payment of R$149 million.

(2) Not considering capex related to the Horizonte 2 project.

(3) Includes other financial results.

(4) Converted by LTM average FX – R$/US$3.01

1,535

763 714(517)(115)

(124) (24)

8

(49)

AdjustedEBITDA

Capex(ex-H2 project)

Net Interest WorkingCapital

Taxes Others(3) FCF(ex-H2 project)(2)

Capex H2 FCF


31/79

31

ROE and ROIC (US$)

(1) Adjusted EBITDA – CAPEX – Net Interest – Taxes

(2) International accounting standards for biological assets.(3) Adjusted EBITDA – CAPEX – Taxes

1.0%

4.7%

7.7%6.1%

23.5%

31.7%

2011 2012 2013 2014 LTM 3Q15 Annualized3Q15

3.6%

7.2%

10.2%8.6%

23.3%

29.4%

2011 2012 2013 2014 LTM 3Q15 Annualized3Q15

1.67AverageFX

1.95 2.16 2.35 3.01 3.54 1.67AverageFX

1.95 2.16 2.35 3.01 3.54

ROE = Adjusted EBIT(1)/Equity before IAS 41(2)

ROIC = Adjusted EBIT(3)/Invested Capital before IAS 41(2)


32/79

32

Cash Production Cost (US$/t) – 3Q15

221

200187

170

14

(70) 5 13

113 3 (13)

(17)

3Q14 Inflation FX Lower energyprice

Maintenancedowntimes

Non recurringwood

Non recurringinput

consumption

Non recurringfixed costs

Total Managementinitiatives

Cash cost3Q15

Total nonrecurring

3Q15 recurringcash cost

Management initiatives gains mostly offset the inflation impact


33/79

Fibria Cash Production Cost(1) (US$/ton)

Consistently

controlling theproductioncash cost

33

Cash Production Cost in dollars saw a decrease over the past 6 years

231

264281

242

234 220

190

2009 (2) 2010 (2) 2011 2012 2013 2014 LTM 3Q15

(1) Constant Currency (2) Excludes Conpacel


34/79

34

Net Results (US$ million) – 3Q15

438

(170)(622) 145(102)

(27)

(137)

(10)(59)

203

AdjustedEBITDA

Exchangevariationon debt

Otherexchangevariation

MtMhedge

Hedgesettlement

NetInterest

Deprec.,amortiz. and

depletion

IncomeTaxes

Others Net Income(Loss)

deffered

swapZCC

(1)

current

3T15 3T15

(1) Includes non-recurring expenses/non-cash and other financial income/expenses.

Capital Structure: Fibria has achieved the lowest leverage ratio among


35/79

35

Capital Structure: Fibria has achieved the lowest leverage ratio amongits Latin American peers

Net Debt/EBITDA (x)(1)

Fibria Arauco CMPC Klabin Suzano

S&P BBB-/Stable BBB-/Stable BBB-/Stable BBB-/Negative BB+/Stable

Moody’s Baa3/Stable Baa3/Stable Baa3/Negative - Ba2+/Stable

Fitch BBB-/Stable BBB/Stable BBB+/Stable BBB-/Stable BB/Positive

(1) Fibria’s historical data in BRL.

2.1

3.0

6.2

3.5

2.9

5.0

4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15

Fibria Suzano Klabin CMPC Arauco Eldorado

( )


36/79

36

One of the best performances among Brazilian corporate issuers(1)

(1) G-spread on December 29, 2015

387 393 401 406474 475 492

695

795

914

Fibria BRF Globopar Embraer Klabin Suzano Brazil Braskem Vale Gerdau

I t t G d b ll ti i


37/79

37

200

400

600

800

1.000

1.200

1.400

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Fibria 2020 Fibria 2021 Fibria 2024

BBB-

Interest expense, leverage and average cost of debt in US$ Historical G-spread (bps)

BBB- Baa3

Obtaining of Investment Grade from the three rating agencies

Investment Grade by all rating agencies

7.29

4.11 4.25

3.32

2.602.41

1.58

Leverage

6.3 5.95.5

5.24.6

3.4 3.3(1)

Cost of debt

473414 408

350268

200149

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 LTM

3Q15

Interest Expense(US$ million)


38/79

38Horizonte 2 Project


39/79

39

• Follow the growth of strategic customers

• Developing new customers

• Distribution to new geographic markets

• Efficiency and competitiveness gains in logistics

• Higher quality in customer service

• Greater ability to capture new expansion market windows

• Strong M&A position

Competitiveness

Commercialpositioning

Long-term growthpotential

What is the importance of growth for Fibria?

• Wider fixed costs dilution

• Cost curve position improvement

• Greater bargaining power with suppliers


40/79

40

Why expand Três Lagoas?

• Brownfield Project, synergies with currentoperations

• Modern plant, prepared for potentialexpansion

• Availability of wood and low average

distance from forest to mill

• Forest based on the optionality concept andprioritizing lease and partnership models

• Additional energy surplus of 120 MWh

Start-up: 4Q2017

Capacity: 1.75 million tons

ESTIMATED BHKP CAPACITY RANKING 2017 (000T)

Source: Poyry and Fibria Analysis (as of May 2015)

0 2000 4000 6000 8000

OthersKlabin

Domtar

Pulp Mill Holding

Lwart

Portucel Soporcel

Georgia-Pacific

Resolute

Verso

Nippon Paper

Mondi

Oji

MitsubishiMarubeni

IP

Altri

ENCE

Cenibra

Arauco

Stora Enso

UPM

Eldorado

APP

Suzano

RGE/APRILCMPC

Fibria 7,950

Current Capacity

New Capacity

New Capacity – Klabin Agreement

New Capacity – Horizonte II Project


41/79

41

Pulp sales destination: Fibria growing where the market grows

(1) Considers 3Q15 last twelve months. | (2) Includes Klabin’s sales volume

37%

36%

42%

25%

19%24%

4%9%

Total sales volume distributionafter H2 start up(2)

Current net revenue distribution(1)


42/79

42

Schedule

Startup

Utilities clearanceand commissioningL1 interconnections

during maintenancedowntime

Initial hiring of harvestworkers

Hiring of operationalteam

Negotiations withconcession holders and

Port of Santos tendering

2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17

2015 2016 2017

Beginning ofinfrastructure and

purchase of the TGs

Purchase of theindustrial plants

Beginning of construction

Beginning of assembly

Beginning of forest

machinery deliveries

Beginning ofharvest

Definition of outboundlogistics formats


43/79

43Forestry base

H2 Project will have the forest base ready for the start up


44/79

44

H2 Project will have the forest base ready for the start-up

Forestry base required:

H1: 120,000 ha

H2: 174,000 ha

Total: 294,000 ha


45/79

45Logistics

Forestry Logistics


46/79

46

Low average distance from forest to mill

FOREST MILL

95 km

H1 + H2 consolidated

Outbound logistics


47/79

47

Fibria has logistical alternatives on a competitive basis

Ports Highways Railroads Waterways

Data Collection / Preliminary

Analysis Logistics Costs Opex - Rates Capex

Qualitative Modal conditions

Analysis

Mato Grosso

Mato

Grosso do

Sul

Goiás

Brasilia


48/79

48Financials

Even more competitive cash production cost w/ H2


49/79

49

BHKP (US$/t)

Source: Hawkins Wright (Price Forecast October 2015) and Fibria’s 3Q15 Earnings Release - FX considered by the consultant at R$/US$3.86. H2

cash cost was estimated according to weighted average cost, after mill balance, converted at R$3.86. Includes energy sales.

447 421338 358

280 279

174 171 151

68 86

102 25

60 47

58 49

515 507

440

383340 326

2323518313

342

China USA Canada Iberia Chile/Uruguay Indonesia Brazil Fibria 3Q15 Fibria w/ H2

Cash Cost (US$/t) Delivery CIF Europe

BHKP (US$/t)

Interest

Capex

SG&A

Income Tax

Working capitalrelease: US$10/t

1,825 1,460 1,035 2,200 4,645 3,470 14,045 Total: 28,680BHKP

capacity(000’ t)

Expansion CAPEX update$ $


50/79

50

From US$2.5 bi to US$2.2 bi

0.65

0.32

0.05

0.20

2.5

2.2

Original Revised

BRL EUR USD and others

72%

26%

2%

72%

19%

9%

FX and inflation partially offset by the negotiation with suppliers

CAPEX (US$ billion)

3%

60%

33%

3%1%

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 andthereafter

Timetable

Funding


51/79

51

Funding

Amortization Schedule – 3Q15 Proforma with TLS II – US$ million

104204 321

576

1,111

481

673

139 119

715

115 10345 13

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028

BNDES Bond PPE NCE ACC/ACE

3Q15 3Q15 + H2

Average Cost (US$ p.a)

Average Maturity (years)

3.3%

4.3

2.8%

5.0

Cost and maturity:

H2

2.0%

6.3

revolver

Cash (2)

494

742

1,236

Liquidity

Capex H2 66 1.320 726 66 22

(1) Debt FX 3Q15: 3.9729 / FX considering new funding for the TLS II Project: 3.90 (2) Cash on hands: US$ 994 million

Rating agencies understand that the Project will not jeopardize


52/79

52

Fibria’s credit metrics

“We expect Fibria to continue benefiting from higher operating cash flows whichwould allow it to enlarge its Três Lagoas industrial complex while keeping its debt at

reasonable levels for a low investment-grade rating”

“Fitch’s base case, which assumes that the company builds a new pulp mill (TrêsLagoas II) starting in 2015 and uses net pulp prices of between USD575 and USD675

per ton during the construction period, results in net leverage reaching 3.5x

(1)

. Netleverage would quickly decline to around 2.5x(1) once the mill becomes operationalin the second half of 2017”

(1) According to rating agency methodology

Project financials at a glance


53/79

53

Project financials at a glance

UNIT R$ US$

Pulp production/year k tons 1,850 1,850

Expansion capex(1) $ billion 8.7 2.2

Expansion capex(1) $/t 4,702 1,189

Sustaining capex(2) $/t 193 48

Cash cost(3) $/t 341 85

Energy surplus MWh 120 120

(1) Includes chemical leasing and investments in order to increase capacity to 1,850 kt/year.

(2) Estimated sustaining capex in perpetuity considering capacity of 1,850 kt/year.

(3) Estimated weighted average cost, after mill balance. Includes energy sales.

We don’t think that such competitiveness is easily replicable, since the


54/79

Although some potentialbrownfields are listed,

there are significantchallenges.

scenario is becoming more complex…

Land

Infrastructure/Logistics

Certified wood availability

Environmental requirements

Public funding constraints

Governance standards

Cost of capital

Credit rating


55/79

55Final Remarks

Fibria’s structural fundamentals drive the leading return metrics


56/79

56

Fibria s structural fundamentals drive the leading return metrics

►Less volatile commodity in US$

►Costs in BRL

►The highest forest productivity

worldwide

►Operational excellence

► Unique customer base with steady

sales volumes through long-term

contracts

►Low cost of debt

►Strong corporate governance

High ROE/ROIC in the long-term

Extraordinary Dividend of R$2 billion approved


57/79

57

Extraordinary Dividend of R$2 billion approved

* Considering dividend of R$149 million paid in May and the proposed payment of R$ 2 billion on Market Cap. on September 30th, 2015.

TIMELINE:

► Record date: Nov 30th

►

Payment dates: BM&FBovespa: Dec. 9, 2015. NYSE: Dec. 16, 2015.

Dividend yield* = 7%

DRIVERS

► Strong cash generation

► Cash position aboveminimum cash

► Low leverage level

► Low average cost of debt

► Funding status of Horizonte 2 project

► Capital discipline

Fibria is able to create value for its shareholders with capital discipline


58/79

58

Fibria is able to create value for its shareholders with capital discipline

INDUSTRY

CONSOLIDATION ?

PULP

Growth with discipline

Best portfolio of projects

DIVIDENDS

BIO-ENERGY AND

OTHER OPPORTUNITIES

Complementary to pulp

Portocel

Land and forest

FREE CASH FLOW

WITHOUT JEOPARDIZING CREDITMETRICS


59/79

59Backup

Structural Competitiveness


60/79

60

p

1. Third-party wood reduction

2. Forestry operations productivity

3. Industrial

NPV: US$0.4 billion

NPV: US$0.6 billion

NPV: US$0.1 billion

Total : US$1.1 billion



61/79

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

p y

Wood supply recovering to normal condition

► Peaking in 2016;

► Returning to 2012’s levels by the end of 2017;

► NPV of R$1.4 billion from peak to normalized level.

Estimated level for

2015

Third-party wood decrease will benefitopex and capex

10



62/79

► Most part of the standing wood was already paid

► Despite the higher forest to mill distance, the wood from Losango is less expensive than the

available wood from around Espírito Santo and Bahia States

► Positive impact over industrial costs due to better productivity

11

Losango



63/79

The distribution costs by classes helps us to apply resources

in order to optimize wood production

10%

20%

40%

20%

10%10%

36%33%

15%

6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

01 - Diamond 02 - Gold 03 - Silver 04 - Bronze 05 - Lead

Current effective area Future effective area


CLASSIFYING THE FOREST BASE BY CATEGORIES

12

Structural change improving competitiveness



64/79

Possible Restrictions

Declivity

0: Higher than 35°

1: Btw 24°and 35°

2: Btw 0° and 24°

ConservationAreas

0: Within CAs(1)

1: Within EPA(2) and

EBZ(3)

2: Out of EPAs and

EBZ

MunicipalRestrictions

0: Total restrictions

1: Partial restrictions

2: No restrictions

EPA Altitude

0: Higher than1800m

1: Lower than

1800m

Urban Zones

0: Urban Zones

1: Outside urban

areas

Remnants of native

vegetation

0: Remnants areas

1: Outside remnants

areas

Possible Impediments

Possible combinations

X 0, 1 and 2, removed;

4 e 8, high potential(1) ConservationAreas

(2) EnvionmentalProtection Areas

(3) Environmental Buffer Zones

13

Identifying opportunities based on these combinations



65/79

Roads

Transportation

SilvicultureHarvest

14

Cost and Capex KPI’s were also included in this geo-model



66/79

Mixed Harvest Mechanization (Hilly areas)

► Mixed cutting operation with high

demand for MO and high risk to safety;

► Harvest limitations in areas above

24 degrees;

► Increase annual capacity to harvest in

areas up to 35 degrees , previously "locked up" by

harvesting capacity of manual staff;

► NPV: R$71 million

► Capex: R$5 million

► Operational since Aug 2015

PROJECT DESCRIPTION (JACAREÍ UNIT)

15

Harvest



67/79

PIFF

► Freight cost reduction;

► Increased load box for timber/woodchiptransport

► Use of lightweight steel;

► Operational risk reduction (flipping);

► Investment: R$33 million


► Startup: 2015 / 2016

PROJECT DESCRIPTION (ARACRUZ, JACAREÍ AND TRÊS LAGOAS UNITS)

Timber transportation Woodchip transportation

16

Transportation



68/79

Maritime Wood Shipping Project

► Capex and Opex reduction;

► Increase in cargo handling due to increase in

stack height volume

► Reduction in heavy truck road traffic



► Startup: Jan/2017

PROJECT DESCRIPTION (ARACRUZ UNIT)

17

Transportation

2 St t l h i f t ti d ti it


69/79

10%

30%

50%

70%

90%

100%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

2. Structural change in forestry operations productivity

• Structural cost reduction of R$170 million per year (Capex + Opex) in 2020;

• NPV of approximately R$2 billion

• Seek opportunities for purchase / lease of more attractive areas, divest from unattractive land/forest, as well as the implementation of

technologies that will lead us to the structural cost

NPV Expected Curve

18

3 I d t i l i t d ti h d l h


70/79

3. Industrial: maintenance downtimes schedule change

► Regulatory Standard 13 (Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspection) extended the maximum period between

recovery boiler inspections from 12 to 15 months.

► Fibria was the first company to use the extended period benefit


2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18

Mills

Aracruz A No maintenance downtime

Aracruz B No maintenance downtime

Aracruz C

Jacareí No maintenance downtime

Três Lagoas No maintenance downtime

Veracel No maintenance downtime

19

3 Ind strial Biological Sl dge Dr er


71/79

Biological Sludge Dryness Process

3. Industrial: Biological Sludge Dryer

► Variable cost reduction associated

with the disposal of sludge operations

in external landfill



► Startup: Dec./2016

PROJECT DESCRIPTION (JACAREÍ UNIT)

Operational Flow –

Conditioning and biological sludge burn

•00Effluent+Sludge

Aeration Tank

Biological

Sludge Tank

•00Biomass Pile

Sludge Dryer

Biomass

Boiler

Sludge drying and burn in biomass boiler

20

Fibria’s tax structure


72/79

72

Fiscal - annual adjustment

Benefit Amount Maturity

Goodwill(Aracruzacquisition)

Annual tax deduction:US$30 million (tax)

Remaining Balance Sept/15:US$ 0.266 billion (base)

2018

Forestry Capexin Mato Grossodo Sul state

2015 tax deduction relatedto depletion: US$7.7 million

Undefined

Tax loss carry forward and tax credits

Benefit Amount

Tax losscarryforward

Balance up to set. 15: US$93million (base)

Accumulated taxcredits

Balance set/2015:- PIS/COFINS: US$161 million

- Withholding tax (IR and CSLL):R$205 million

- Befiex: US$98 million

- Reintegra: US$20 million

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

US$ 9 million US$ 2 million US$ 8 million US$ 14 million US$ 12 million US$ 16 million

TAX BENEFITS (R$)

TAX PAYMENT (cash basis)

Capex Fibria, except H2 Project(2) – US$ million


73/79

73

604(1)

520516(1)

2015 Guidance FX ∆ Inflation Capex

reduction

2015 Guidance

Update

Trucks Purchase

(2nd phase)

Higher non-

recurring

sustaining

investments

Higher

investments in

other

modernization

projects

Higher third part

wood

participation

∆ FX Inflation 2016 Guidance

ManagementInitiatives

External Factors

(1) Converted by3Q15 end ofperiodFX -USD/BRL 3.97

(2) Subject t o b oard approval

Capex Fibria, except H2 Project – US$ million(1)


74/79

74

516

424406

2016 Guidance Modernization IndustrialMaintenance

/ Forestequipment

Losango Higher Spendingon

turbogenerator overhaul in 2016

WoodPurchase

Structural Capex EstructuralWood CostReduction

Structural Capex


(2) Subject t o b oard approval

Forestry

operations

productivity

increase

Capex Fibria, except H2 Project – US$ million


75/79

75


509

424(1)406(1)

Structural Capex (asshown last year) Inflation and Δ FX Structural Capex Estructural WoodCost Reduction Structural Capex

Leadership Position


76/79

76

Recycled Fiber

238 million t

46% 54%

59%

18% 82%

59% 41%

41%

33% 67%

26%74%

Fiber Consumption

406 million t

Pulp

168 million t

Chemical

138 million t

Mechanical

30 million t

Integrated Mills

82 million t

Market Pulp

56 million t

Hardwood

30 million t

Other Eucalyptus

Pulp producers:

15 million t

Softwood/Other

26 million t

Acacia/Other

10 million t

Eucalyptus

20 million t

Industry Outlook(1)

(1) Fiber Consumption, Recycled Fiber and Pulp: RISI | Market Pulp, Hardwood and Eucalyptus: PPPC Global 100 Report December 2014

Global Market Pulp Demand


77/79

77

Demand growth rateHardwood (BHKP) vs. Softwood (BSKP) (000 ton)

Hardwood demand will continue to increase at a faster pace than Softwood

Source: PPPC report (Sept. 2015) Source: PPPC reports. Excludes Sulphite and UKP market pulp (Sept./15)

0

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

25.000

30.000

35.000

40.000

1 9 9 8

1 9 9 9

2 0 0 0

2 0 0 1

2 0 0 2

2 0 0 3

2 0 0 4

2 0 0 5

2 0 0 6

2 0 0 7

2 0 0 8

2 0 0 9

2 0 1 0

2 0 1 1

2 0 1 2

2 0 1 3

2 0 1 4

2 0 1 5

2 0 1 6

2 0 1 7

2 0 1 8

2 0 1 9

Hardwood Softwood

2014 - 2019 CAGR:Hardwood: +2.5%Softwood: +0.8%

000 ton 1999 2009 2019Growth1999-2009

Growth2009-2019

Hardwood 16.3 24.8 33.8 52% 36%

Eucalyptus 6.0 15.9 24.1 165% 52%

Softwood 19.0 21.4 24.9 13% 16%

Market Pulp 35.3 46.2 58.7 30% 27%

Paper Production – Runnability with BHKP

Source: RISI conference, August 2014.

Benefiting From China’s Growth


78/79

78

World Tissue Consumption, 1991-2013 (3)

Per Capita Consumption of Tissue by World Region (3)China's Share of Market Pulp (2)

24

15 15

12

7 65

1

N.

America

West

Europe

Japan Oceania East

Europe

LatAm China Africa

10% 10%

12%14%

21%

17%

22%23% 23% 23%

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Eucalyptus Hardwood Total % Compared to the global Market Pulp

(Kg/capita/year)

(million t) (kg/person/year)

Between 2005 and 2014,

the Chinese market share

of eucalyptus shipments

increased by 19 p.p. (total

market pulp: + p.p.)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1991 1996 2001 2006 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

N.America W.Europe E.Europe L.America

Middle East Japan China Asia FE

Oceania Africa

LTM GrowthRate +4.2%

(1) PPPC – Pulp China – Flash Report – September 2015

(2) PPPC – W20. Coverage for chemical market pulp is 80% of world capacity

(3) RISI

(million t)

6.334

3.087

1.593 1.486

129 26 13

6.876

3.680

1.5581.342

139 151 6

BHKP Total Latin

America (1)

Indonesia Others(2) USA Canada Western

Europe

9M2014

9M2015

Latin America is the

leading exporter of BHKP

to China, accounting to

approximately 54% ofChina's total imports in

9M15.

(‘000s t)

(1) includes South Africa and New Zealand. | (2) Includes China, Japan, Malaysia, Russia, Thailand and Vietnam.

China’s Hardwood Imports of BHKP by Country (1)

Global Paper Consumption


79/79

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Developed Markets Emerging Markets

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

CAGR 1996 – 2006Developed Markets: + 1.7%Emerging Markets : + 6.0%

85,291

117,611

15,548

37,474

P&WConsumption(000 tons)(1)

TissueConsumption(000 tons)(1)

114,507

CAGR 2007 – 2016Developed Markets: - 4.0%Emerging Markets : + 4.1%



26,877

20th annual santander latin american conference

Documents