21-07-0261-00-0000-wgsession21_opening_notes.ppt july 2007 vivek gupta, chair, 802.21slide 1 ieee...

July 2007

Vivek Gupta, Chair, 802.21Slide 1

21-07-0261-00-0000-WGsession21_Opening_Notes.ppt

IEEE 802.21Session #21

San Francisco, CaliforniaOpening Plenary

Vivek Gupta

[email protected]

July 2007



WG OfficersOffice OfficerChair Vivek Gupta

Vice Chair Michael Williams

Secretary Xiaoyu Liu

Editor Qiaobing Xie

802.11 Liaison David Hunter

802.16 Liaison Peretz Feder

IETF Liaison Yoshihiro Ohba

• The WG has 69 voting members as of this meeting

July 2007



IEEE 802.21Meeting Server Details

External website: http://www.ieee802.org/21

Local: Meeting website: http://802server/21 Meeting website: http://10.128.0.11/21

During meetings post documents at local serverGet DCNs from Chair:

July 2007



Attendance• Electronic Attendance ONLY• Electronic Attendance

– http://ieee802.facetoface-events.com/groups/802.21/attendance.php– http://newton.events.ieee.org/– Enter your personal information and profile– Mark attendance during every session

• Total number of sessions: 14 • 11 sessions for 75% attendance to be counted towards voting

membership• Room reserved for evening sessions:

– 7:30 – 9:30 pm or later in case we need to use it– Extra credit for evening sessions

• All attendance records on the 802.21 website– Please check the attendance records for any manual errors

July 2007



Voting Membership• 802.21 Voting Membership described in

– DCN#: 21-06-0075-02-0000

• Maintenance of Voting Membership– Two Plenary sessions out of four

consecutive Plenary sessions on a moving window basis

– One out of the two Plenary session requirement could be substituted by an Interim session

July 2007



Voting Membership• Reciprocal Voting Rights (Under Review)• Attendance credit policy with other 802 WG

– 802.16 - only during Joint LMSC Plenary sessions– 802.20 - both during Interim and Joint LMSC Plenary

sessions – To get credit for attendance in the above WG meetings

send email to the Chair with a copy to Secretary

July 2007



Voting Membership Issues

• If an 802.21 member does NOT attend 802.21 sessions for a (Very Long Time.. 16+ months) and maintains rights in 802.21 by attending other groups only (802.20/802.16), should that be allowed?

• Can members gain attendance credit in multiple groups for attending a single session/meeting, or just one of the groups of their choice only?– E.g. (gain Attendance credit in both 802.21 and 802.20 by

attending 75% sessions in 802.21 ONLY)

July 2007



WG Letter Ballot

• IEEE 802 Rules specify:– Working Group Membership shall be lost if

two consecutive, or two of any three consecutive, Working Group letter ballots are not returned or are returned with an abstention other than for 'lack of technical expertise

July 2007



Miscellaneous Meeting Logistics

• Breaks– 802.21 WG would break as follows:

• AM Coffee break: 10:00-10:30 am• Lunch:12.00 noon until 1.00 pm• PM Coffee break: 3:00 – 3:30 pm

• Wednesday Evening Social– 6.30 pm - 9.00 pm

http://ieee802.face2face-events.com/wireless/attendee.html

July 2007



Registration and Media Recording

• Each Attendee must provide contact information and pay conference fee

• Conference fee has to be paid through the registration desk at the hotel or through sponsor

• Failure to pay conference fee results in loss of credit for voting rights

• Photography not permitted unless approved by WG Chair

• Audio taping of IEEE 802.21 meetings is NOT allowed

• Media – Press and Analyst briefings– Only the 802.21 WG Chair and WG Vice-Chair are allowed

to give verbal statements/interviews to the media on behalf of the IEEE 802.21 working group

July 2007



Membership & Anti-Trust

• Individual membership– In all IEEE standards meetings, membership is

by individual, hence you do not represent a company or organization.

• Anti-Trust laws– The Anti-Trust laws forbid the discussion of

prices within our meetings.

July 2007



The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the Chair or a designee:

– Show slides #1 through #5 of this presentation– Advise the WG attendees that:

• The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws;

• Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is encouraged;

• There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development.

– Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting:

• That the foregoing information was provided and the five slides were shown; • That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent

claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that the participant believes may be essential for the use of that standard;

• Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom.

• It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in the Standards Companion on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by normative reference.

Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees.

July 2007



Highlights of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards

– Participants have a duty to tell the IEEE if they know (based on personal awareness) of potentially Essential Patent Claims they or their employer own

– Participants are encouraged to tell the IEEE if they know of potentially Essential Patent Claims owned by others

• This encouragement is particularly strong as the third party may not be a participant in the standards process– Working Group required to request assurance– Early assurance is encouraged– Terms of assurance shall be either:

• Reasonable and nondiscriminatory, with or without monetary compensation; or,• A statement of non-assertion of patent rights

– Assurances• Shall be provided on the IEEE-SA Standards Board approved LOA form• May optionally include not-to-exceed rates, terms, and conditions• Shall not be circumvented through sale or transfer of patents• Shall be brought to the attention of any future assignees or transferees• Shall apply to Affiliates unless explicitly excluded• Are irrevocable once submitted and accepted• Shall be supplemented if Submitter becomes aware of other potential Essential Patent Claims

– A “Blanket Letter of Assurance” may be provided at the option of the patent holder– A patent holder has no duty to perform a patent search– Full policy available at http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6

Slide #1

July 2007



6.2 Policy

IEEE standards may be drafted in terms that include the use of Essential Patent Claims. If the IEEE receives notice that a [Proposed] IEEE Standard may require the use of a potential Essential Patent Claim, the IEEE shall request licensing assurance, on the IEEE Standards Board approved Letter of Assurance form, from the patent holder or patent applicant. The IEEE shall request this assurance without coercion.

The Submitter of the Letter of Assurance may, after Reasonable and Good Faith Inquiry, indicate it is not aware of any Patent Claims that the Submitter may own, control, or have the ability to license that might be or become Essential Patent Claims. If the patent holder or patent applicant provides an assurance, it should do so as soon as reasonably feasible in the standards development process. This assurance shall be provided prior to the Standards Board’s approval of the standard. This assurance shall be provided prior to a reaffirmation if the IEEE receives notice of a potential Essential Patent Claim after the standard’s approval or a prior reaffirmation. An asserted potential Essential Patent Claim for which an assurance cannot be obtained (e.g., a Letter of Assurance is not provided or the Letter of Assurance indicates that assurance is not being provided) shall be referred to the Patent Committee.

A Letter of Assurance shall be either:

a) A general disclaimer to the effect that the Submitter without conditions will not enforce any present or future Essential Patent Claims against any person or entity making, using, selling, offering to sell, importing, distributing, or implementing a compliant implementation of the standard; or

b) A statement that a license for a compliant implementation of the standard will be made available to an unrestricted number of applicants on a worldwide basis without compensation or under reasonable rates, with reasonable terms and conditions that are demonstrably free of any unfair discrimination. At its sole option, the Submitter may provide with its assurance any of the following: (i) a not-to-exceed license fee or rate commitment, (ii) a sample license agreement, or (iii) one or more material licensing terms.

IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards

Slide #2

July 2007



Copies of an Accepted LOA may be provided to the working group, but shall not be discussed, at any standards working group meeting.

The Submitter and all Affiliates (other than those Affiliates excluded in a Letter of Assurance) shall not assign or otherwise transfer any rights in any Essential Patent Claims that are the subject of such Letter of Assurance that they hold, control, or have the ability to license with the intent of circumventing or negating any of the representations and commitments made in such Letter of Assurance.

The Submitter of a Letter of Assurance shall agree (a) to provide notice of a Letter of Assurance either through a Statement of Encumbrance or by binding any assignee or transferee to the terms of such Letter of Assurance; and (b) to require its assignee or transferee to (i) agree to similarly provide such notice and (ii) to bind its assignees or transferees to agree to provide such notice as described in (a) and (b).

This assurance shall apply to the Submitter and its Affiliates except those Affiliates the Submitter specifically excludes on the relevant Letter of Assurance.

If, after providing a Letter of Assurance to the IEEE, the Submitter becomes aware of additional Patent Claim(s) not already covered by an existing Letter of Assurance that are owned, controlled, or licensable by the Submitter that may be or become Essential Patent Claim(s) for the same IEEE Standard but are not the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance, then such Submitter shall submit a Letter of Assurance stating its position regarding enforcement or licensing of such Patent Claims. For the purposes of this commitment, the Submitter is deemed to be aware if any of the following individuals who are from, employed by, or otherwise represent the Submitter have personal knowledge of additional potential Essential Patent Claims, owned or controlled by the Submitter, related to a [Proposed] IEEE Standard and not already the subject of a previously submitted Letter of Assurance: (a) past or present participants in the development of the [Proposed] IEEE Standard, or (b) the individual executing the previously submitted Letter of Assurance.


Slide #3

July 2007



The assurance is irrevocable once submitted and accepted and shall apply, at a minimum, from the date of the standard's approval to the date of the standard's withdrawal.

The IEEE is not responsible for identifying Essential Patent Claims for which a license may be required, for conducting inquiries into the legal validity or scope of those Patent Claims, or for determining whether any licensing terms or conditions are reasonable or non-discriminatory.

Nothing in this policy shall be interpreted as giving rise to a duty to conduct a patent search. No license is implied by the submission of a Letter of Assurance.

In order for IEEE’s patent policy to function efficiently, individuals participating in the standards development process: (a) shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of the holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware and that are not already the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance, owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents; and (b) should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed) of any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims that are not already the subject of an existing Letter of Assurance.


Slide #4

July 2007



Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings

• All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.

• Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.

• Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.

– Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.

• Technical considerations remain primary focus

• Don’t discuss fixing product prices, allocation of customers, or dividing sales markets.

• Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.

• Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object.---------------------------------------------------------------

If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at [email protected] or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html

See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.

This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt

Slide #5

July 2007



Copyright• Under the current US copyright law — the

author of information is deemed to own the copyright from the moment of creation

• The IEEE Bylaws require copyright of all material to be held by the IEEE– Must consult with IEEE for re-use of copyright

material

• The IEEE Standards accomplishes transfer of copyright ownership through the Project Authorization Request (PAR) process

July 2007



IEEE SA News• Changes to the IEEE Standards Association

Operations Manual and Standards Board Bylaws– http://standards.ieee.org/board/pro/2006changes.pdf

• Changes to the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws and IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual (July - December 2006) including affiliation declarations– http://standards.ieee.org/resources/index.html#guides

July 2007



New Members• New Member Count =

July 2007



New PARs under Consideration

• http://ieee802.org/16/meetings/mtg50/lmsc/pars.html

• 802.3 : P802.3az: Energy Efficient Ethernet• 802.11:P802.11s: Extended Service Set Mesh

Networking [PAR Modification]• 802.11: P802.11z: Extensions to Direct Link

Setup (DLS)• 802.11:P802.11n PAR Extension Request• 802.15: P802.15.4c: Amendment to 802.15.4

supporting the WPAN needs in China

July 2007



Summary of Completed Work• Draft Specification (P802-21-D01) confirmed – May 2005• WG Letter Ballot Progress

– LB #1 Completed (April 30, 2006) , Return Ratio: 81%, Approval Ratio: 26%– LB #1a Recirculation Completed (Oct 23, 06), Return Ratio: 85%, Approval Ratio 30%– LB #1b Recirculation Completed (Jan 04, 07), Return Ratio: 86%, Approval Ratio 46%– LB #1c Recirculation Completed (Feb 19, 07), Return Ratio: 86%, Approval Ratio 66%– LB #1d Recirculation Completed (Apr 30, 07), Return Ratio: 86%, Approval Ratio 75%– LB #1e Recirculation Completed (Jul 15, 07), Return Ratio: 85%, Approval Ratio 95%

• Ad hoc Meeting at ETRI, Korea June 13-15– Discussion of various contributions for comment resolution for LB#1d

• Requirements submitted to ITU through 802.18 for IMT-Advanced

• Interaction with other 802 groups and other SDOs– 802.16: MIH solution incorporated in 802.16g in Nov 2005– 802.11: MIH solution incorporated in 802.11u in Sep 2006– 3GPP: Requirements for IS Accepted at SA2#52 in May-2006, Concept of

Information Service accepted at SA2# 58 in Orlando

July 2007



Objectives for the July Meeting• Complete LB Recirculation #1e Comment Resolution

– Technical Comment Resolution– Discuss submitted contributions– Plan for going to Sponsor Ballot

• Discussion on future WG activities– Security Signaling– Multi-radio Power Management

• Interaction with other 802 groups and external SDOs– Update from IETF and discussion of various proposals– 3GPP next steps discussion

• Next Steps on IMT-Advanced

July 2007



Revised 802.21 Timeline (Jan 2007)

• IEEE 802.21 ECSG formed – March 2003• IEEE 802.21 WG formed – March 2004• Requirements development – September 2004• Call for Proposals – October 2004• Harmonized Single Proposal Confirmed by the WG – May 2005• Ongoing WG Comment Resolution started – July 2005• WG Comment Resolution completed – January 2006• Start of WG Letter Ballot – March 2006• Start of IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot – Sept 2006 (March 2007) (July-07)• IEEE 802 Draft Standard Approved – 2nd Half 2007 ???• Ongoing Interaction with Other Standards Organization (3GPP,

3GPP2, IETF, 802.11, 802.16, 802.3) - adoption of it depends on the timeline of work items within these groups

July 2007



Plan to meet 802.21 Timeline• Start of IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot – (July 2007)• For EC Approval in July 2007

– => Draft Approval Rating > 90% (minimum), preferably >95%• LB #1:

– Starts March 31, Ends April 30: Return Ratio: 81% Approval Ratio 26%– Comment Resolution for LB #1 (May, June ad hoc, Sep) =>Recirculation

• LB #1a (recirculation): – Starts Oct 06, Ends Oct 23: Return Ratio: 85%, Approval Ratio: 30%– Comment Resolution for LB #1a (Ad Hoc in Oct, Nov meeting) =>Recirculation

• LB #1b (recirculation): – Starts Dec 10, Ends Jan 03: Return Ratio: 86%, Approval Ratio: 46%– Comment Resolution for LB #1b (Jan meeting) => Recirculation

• LB #1c (recirculation): – Starts Feb 04, Ends Feb 19: Return Ratio: 86%, Approval Ratio: 66% – Comment Resolution for LB #1c (Ad hoc in Feb, March meeting…)

• LB #1d (recirculation): – Starts Apr 13 , Ends Apr 27: Return Ratio: 86%, Approval Ratio: 75% – Comment Resolution for LB #1d (May meeting, Ad hoc in June:…)

• LB #1e (recirculation): – Starts June 30 , Ends July 14: Return Ratio: 85%, Approval Ratio: 95% – Comment Resolution for LB #1e (July meeting)

• LB #1f (Confirmation recirculation): – Starts July ?? , Ends July ??

July 2007



Future Sessions - 2007

• Interim: Sept 16th – 21st,2007, Hawaii, Big Island– Meeting co-located with 802.11/15/18/19/20/22

• Plenary: Nov 11th – 16th,2007, Atlanta– Co-located with all 802 groups

July 2007



Future Sessions - 2008• Interim: Jan 13th – 18th , 2008 (Taipei, Howard Plaza Hotel)

– Meeting co-located with all 802 groups

• Plenary: March 16th – 21st ,2008, Orlando, Florida– Co-located with all 802 groups

• Interim: May 11th – 16th , 2008 (Jacksonville)– Meeting co-located with 802.11/15/18/19/20/22

• Plenary: July 13th – 18th,2008, Denver, Colorado– Co-located with all 802 groups

• Interim: Sept 7th – 12th ,2008, (Salt Lake City/Minneapolis ??)– Meeting co-located with 802.11/15/18/19/20/22

• Plenary: Nov 9th – 14th,2008, Dallas, TX– Co-located with all 802 groups

July 2007



Future Sessions - 2009• Interim: Jan ????

– Meeting co-located with 802.11/15/18/19/20/22

• Plenary: March Oahu-Hawaii/Rome– Co-located with all 802 groups

• Interim: May ????– Meeting co-located with 802.11/15/18/19/20/22

• Plenary: July ????– Co-located with all 802 groups

• Interim: Sept ????– Meeting co-located with 802.11/15/18/19/20/22

• Plenary: Nov ????– Co-located with all 802 groups

21-07-0261-00-0000-wgsession21_opening_notes.ppt july 2007 vivek gupta, chair, 802.21slide 1 ieee...

Documents