228-ftir reviewws12

Upload: ashley-shockley

Post on 06-Apr-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    1/39

    FTIR Review

    Chem 228

    WS/2012

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    2/39

    The Electromagnetic Spectrum

    Radiation in the infrared region (IR) corresponds to

    stretching, bending, etc. of chemical bonds.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    3/39

    Modeling of IR Absorption

    Bonded atoms can be modeled as masses on springs.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    4/39

    k is proportional to the bond strength.

    m is the atomic mass of the bonded atoms.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    5/39

    IR Spectra IR frequencies which cause resonance of the

    masses/springs are absorbed selectively.

    IR absorption measurements are therefore

    useful for determination of organic functional

    groups. (~4000-400 cm-1)

    Symmetrical groups may NOT show up in IR

    due to requirement for a bond dipole moment.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    6/39

    Fingerprint IR Absorptions In addition to the fundamental resonance

    frequencies, absorptions corresponding to

    harmonics (overtones, combinations) occur inthe fingerprint region of the IR spectrum

    (~1500-400 cm-1).

    Pattern matching in the IR fingerprint region

    is useful to identify the specific compound

    involved.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    7/39

    Grating IR Spectrometer

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    8/39

    FTIR Spectrometer

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    9/39

    Nicolet 750M

    agna-IR This is the FTIR in the organic lab.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    10/39

    FTIR of Liquid Samples NaCl plates are used for liquids since glass

    would absorb in the IR.

    A thin layer of liquid is sandwiched betweentwo NaCl plates and placed in the beam path.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    11/39

    Liquid Samples-Sealed Cells Sealed cells allow IR of volatile liquids

    and quantitative measurements, since

    the sample thickness can be controlled.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    12/39

    Liquid or Solid Samples-ATR ATR=Attenuated Total Reflectance

    IR beam is reflected off surface of

    sample via a high RI prism (ZnSe).

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    13/39

    FTIR of Solid Samples Solids are usually run as KBr disks or Nujol (mineral oil) mulls.

    KBr disk is prepared by grinding the sample with KBr and

    pressing in a die to form a transparent disk.

    Nujol mull is prepared by grinding the sample in mineral oil.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    14/39

    FTIR of Solid Samples KBr disks can be hard to make well.

    Spectral artifacts (extra peaks) may occur

    if the disk is poorly made.

    Nujol mulls show hydrocarbon IR

    spectrum superimposed on sample

    peaks.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    15/39

    FTIR of Solid Samples KBr disk holder.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    16/39

    FTIRM

    icroscope Microscope uses mirrors to avoid the need for

    NaCl lenses.

    (We do not currently have one of these.)

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    17/39

    FTIRM

    icroscopy

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    18/39

    Fiber Optic FTIR Dip Probe Useful for continuous process monitoring.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    19/39

    FTIR Spectral Interpretation Most organic functional groups absorb

    somewhere between 4000-400 cm-1.

    Most organic compounds contain C-H

    single bond absorptions, which make a

    convenient visual reference.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    20/39

    FTIR Spectral Interpretation Normal organic IR range is 4000-400 cm-1

    Energy is directly related to cm-1

    E=(k/m)0.5, so going from C-C to C=C to triple

    bonds should shift peak location to left

    (higher energy) on plot. Substituting D for H would shift peak location

    to right (lower energy) on plot.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    21/39

    FTIR Spectral Interpretation Table (visual)

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    22/39

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    23/39

    2,3-dimethylbutane

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    24/39

    n-hexane vs 2,3-dimethylbutane IRs are very similar-not the best method to

    identify, since C skeleton is the main difference.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    25/39

    13C NMR would be best for

    n-hexane vs 2,3-dimethylbutane n-hexane 2,3-dimethylbutane

    1H

    13C

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    26/39

    toluene

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    27/39

    1-hexene

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    28/39

    1-heptyne

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    29/39

    Heptyl cyanide

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    30/39

    3-heptanone

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    31/39

    heptaldehyde

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    32/39

    1-hexanol

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    33/39

    1-propanol vs 2-propanol IR shows OH group.

    Pattern matching in the fingerprint region or

    NMR could determine which alcohol.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    34/39

    1-hexylamine

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    35/39

    Heptanoic acid

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    36/39

    Ethyl acetate

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    37/39

    Butyric anhydride

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    38/39

    IR-Problems Impurities also absorb, making spectral

    interpretation difficult or misleading.

    (eg. moisture in sample)

    Film thickness for liquids may alter

    relative intensity of peaks.

    KBr disk technique for solids maygenerate artifacts.

  • 8/2/2019 228-FTIR ReviewWS12

    39/39

    Sample Thickness Effect on FTIR

    Too thick

    Thickness OK