250440967 lab report convefction
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/25/2019 250440967 Lab Report Convefction
1/7
Introduction and Background
Natural convection is a mechanism, or type of heat transport, in which the fluid motion is not
generated by any external source (like a pump, fan, suction device, etc.) but only by density
differences in the fluid occurring due to temperature gradients. Forced convection is a
mechanism, or type of transport in which fluid motion is generated by an external source (like
a pump, fan, suction device, etc.). It should be considered as one of the main methods of
useful heat transfer as significant amounts of heat energy can be transported very efficiently.
Objective
o measure thermal resistance for flat plate, finned heatsink, and pinned heatsink under
natural and forced convection conditions.
Pre-Lab Questions
Lowest Tp Middle Tp Hottest Tp!inned Finned Flat !late
Methodolog
!"peri#ent $ %&orced 'onvection(
$) he fan is placed assembly on the top of the duct.
*) he finned heatsink is placed into the duct.
+) he heater switch is turned on.
,) he heater power control is set to "# $atts (the control knob is turned clockwise).
) he air flow velocity is set to %.# m&s (the control knob is turned clockwise).
.) 'eatsink temperature is recorded in every " minute. $hen the temperature does not
change in " minute, it can be considered that the system reached steady state.
/) Finned and pinned heatsink geometry is measured and their approximate surface areas is
calculated.
0) teady state and ambient temperatures is recorded.
1) he fan speed control knob is set to give a reading of ".%, ".#, and %.% m&s air speed.
$2) tep and * is repeated.
$$) he same experiment for pinned heatsink and flat plate is repeated only for %.#m&s air
velocity case.
$*) he flat plate si+e is measured and its surface are is calculated.
he heatsink temperature is affected by not only natural&forced convection but also
conduction and radiation heat transfer. till, the effect from conduction and radiation heat
transfer is considered negligible for this experiment.
3esults
-
7/25/2019 250440967 Lab Report Convefction
2/7
4ata sheets
mbient temperature-
urface areas- finned heatsink (%."%m/), pinned heatsink (%.%#m/), flat plate (%.%""m/)
Finned 'eatsink ( c)
'eatsink emperature, p ( c) mbient emperature, p0a ( c)
ime (min) %.# (m&s) ".% (m&s) ".# (m&s) %.# (m&s)
% .# #." ". 1.2
" .* #.% "." *./
/ 3./ 3.1 %.* *.
3.# 3.3 %. *.2
3 3.1 3." %.3 2."
# 3.2 .2 %./ 2.
#." .1 %." 2.#
1 #./ .# %." 2.* #.3 .3 %." 2.*
2 #.1 ./ %." "%."
"% .% .% "%.3
"" ./ /.2 "%.
"/ ./ /.1 "%.
" ./ /. "%.
"3 /.3
"# /.
" /./
"1 /.""* /.%
"2 ".2
/% ".*
/" ".1
// ".
/ ".
/3 ".
!"peri#ent $
Finned heatsink, Input power- "#$
ir velocity
(m&s)
'eatsink
emperature, p
(c)
mbient
emperature, a
(c)
emperature
4ise, p 0 a
(c)
hermal
4esistance
(p5 a)&6
(c&$)
%.% #1. /3.2 /.1 /."*
%.# ./ /#. "%. %.1"
".% /.# /3.1 1.* %.#/
".# ".# /3./ 1. %.32
!inned heatsink, Input power- "# $
-
7/25/2019 250440967 Lab Report Convefction
3/7
ir velocity
(m&s)
'eatsink
emperature, p
(c)
mbient
emperature, a
(c)
emperature
4ise, p 0 a
(c)
hermal
4esistance
(p5 a)&6
(c&$)
%.% 3*.# /3.* /.1 ".#*
%.# 1.3 /3.# "/.2 %.*
".% ".1 /3./ 1.# %.#%
".# "./ /#." ." %.3"
Flat plate, Input power- "# $
ir velocity
(m&s)
'eatsink
emperature, p
(c)
mbient
emperature, a
(c)
emperature
4ise, p 0 a
(c)
hermal
4esistance
(p5 a)&6
(c&$)%.% 1*.1 /#." #. .#1
%.# 1". /3.2 3.1 .""
".% *. /3.# 33." /.23
".# ." /3.3 *.1 /.#*
-
7/25/2019 250440967 Lab Report Convefction
4/7
0 0.5 1 1.5 20
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Thermal Resistance(c/W) Vs Air Velocity (m/s)
Finned heatsink
Pinned heatsink
Flat plate
Air Velocity (m/s)
Thermal Resistance (c/W)
Figure "- hermal 4esistance against ir 7elocity
8ased on the experiment, figure " shows thermal resistance against air velocity. For %.#m&s
air velocity case, it shows that flat plate thermal resistance is the highest which is ."" ( 9&$)
compare to pinned heatsinks and finned heatsinks which are %.* ( 9&$) and %.1" ( 9&$)
respectively. he thermal resistances for pinned and finned heatsinks are almost same as
compared to flat plate. he relationships between air flow velocity and thermal resistance are
linear for finned heatsinks. s the air flow velocity increase, the thermal resistance decreases.
It shows that air flow velocity and thermal resistance are linear for finned heatsinks. From the
graph, as the air velocity increase, the thermal resistance decrease. It is the same for all of the
three cases which are finned and pinned heatsinks and flat plate. ir velocity % m&s means the
heatsinks is cooled by natural convection. $hen the velocity is % m&s, flat plate shows the
highest thermal resistance which is .#1 ( 9&$) followed by finned heatsinks which is /."*
( 9&$) and pinned heatsinks which is ".#* ( 9&$). he forced convection means that the air
flow velocity is more than % m&s. It shows that the thermal resistance decreased because of
higher air flow velocity. Forced convection was more efficient compared to natural
convection at dissipating heat.
-
7/25/2019 250440967 Lab Report Convefction
5/7
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (min) Vs Temperature Rise (c)
Finned Heatsinks
Time (min)
Temperature Rise (c)
Figure /- emperature 4ise ( 9) against ime (min)
8ased on the experiment, figure / shows temperature rise against time for finned heatsinks.
he relationships between time (min) and temperature rise (9) are not linear. he system has
reached steady state when the temperature rise was constant. he temperature decrease as the
time progress.
-
7/25/2019 250440967 Lab Report Convefction
6/7
4iscussion
8ased on the experiment, thermal performance (temperature) for pinned heatsinks, pinned
heatsinks and flat plate are different. his is due to the different surface area. he larger the
surface area, the lower the thermal resistance. 8y comparing the three cases which are finned
heatsinks, pinnd heatsinks and flat plate, finned heatsinks is the larger surface area which is
%."% m/as compared to pinned heatsinks and flat plate which are %.%# m /and %.%"" m/
respectively. 8asically, the larger the surface area, the more heat energy is needed to heat the
surface and it needs more time to reach the heatsinks temperature. he plate or heatsinks will
become hot when temperature rise within the time. !reviously, my pre0lab prediction is flat
plate has the hottest heatsink temperature. Followed by finned heatsink as the middle heatsink
temperature and lastly pinned heatsink as the lowest heatsink temperature. he experiment
result agrees with the pre0lab prediction. he heatsinks temperature changes as air velocity
changes because of the heat transfer. 8esides, heat will dissipate faster when the air velocity
contacting the surface of the heatsinks increases. 'igher velocity causes the heat transfer to
the surface lower and the temperature of the heatsink also lower. $hen air temperature has
essentially reached the heatsinks temperature, no cooling take place. fter certain condition,
the air temperature inside finned and the finned surface temperature are same, heat transfer
did not occurs. here are some errors occurs during the experiment. he possible causes of
error in temperature measurement is because of the power is not consistent. It changes
throughout the experiment. It is set to be "# $, but during the experiment it changes to
1. his may happen due to the surrounding and machine itself. he other causes of
errors are the air flow velocity that we set on the machine. he velocity is not consistent
throughout the experiment. It is set to be at a certain value, but during the experiment it
change to 2. :f this cause of error, I supposed that the most significant error was it is
hard to set the power of the heater.
-
7/25/2019 250440967 Lab Report Convefction
7/7
'onclusions
In conclusions, the larger the surface area, the lower the thermal resistance. 8etween the three
cases which are finned heatsinks, pinned heatsinks and flat plate, finned heatsinks has the
largest surface area. 'ence that, thermal resistance of the finned heatsinks is the lower than
the others. s the air velocity changes, the temperature also changes. Forced convection was
more efficient compared to natural convection at dissipating heat.
3e5erences
http-&&en.wikipedia.org&wiki&Natural;convection
http-&&en.wikipedia.org&wiki&Forced;convection
http-&&www.dummies.com&...&transferring0heat0through0convection0natural0vers...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_convectionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_convectionhttp://www.dummies.com/.../transferring-heat-through-convection-natural-vershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_convectionhttp://www.dummies.com/.../transferring-heat-through-convection-natural-vershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_convection