261 the nature s of healing: w e the modern i v practice ...€¦ · foundational nature of...

1
This is a wonderful book because Eric Cassell has thought deeply about medicine and makes us re-examine and question our day-to-day practice. It is such a pleasure to explore with a master what we are trying to do in our work and to benefit from his wisdom, excellent practical advice, appo- site clinical vignettes and stimulating questions. The book’s basic thesis is that “persons are sick who are unable to pursue their goals and pur- poses because of impairments of function that they believe are in the domain of medicine.” Our job as medical practitioners is to focus on the pur- poses, goals, and well-being of the patient as we attempt to restore function. Cassell’s position is clearly stated and well explained. We have no doubt that if pursued with vigor this changed per- spective will have a beneficial effect on all aspects of medicine. We find that we agree with almost every point that Cassell makes throughout the 13 chapters of the book. Our favorite chapters are 2, 5, 10 and 12. In chapter 2 Cassell explores in depth what it means to have a medicine centred on the person. In chapter 5 he emphasizes and illustrates the foundational nature of listening in the relationship with the patient and guides the reader with rele- vant examples and useful advice on how to actively listen. In chapter 10 he examines the process of healing and points out that it is the patient’s resources that are tapped to produce healing. He emphasizes the importance of explor- ing and managing the meaning that patients attrib- ute to their illness and its symptoms. And in chapter 12 he examines what it means to respect a patient’s autonomy, which is completely different than the common reaction of simply deferring to the patient’s wishes. There is, however, one important idea with which we disagree. Cassell’s definition of healing is that “healing returns a patient to well-being by improving impediments to function that impair the person’s ability to pursue purposes and goals.” But in our experience healing is not pri- marily a linear and mechanistic process deter- mined by conscious purposes and goals. One per- sonal example: A man in his 30s with metastatic lung cancer was deteriorating rapidly: short of breath, delirious, expected to die within hours or days. But the primary reason the palliative care team was called was for the patient’s mother, who was desperate for her son to survive. She questioned and followed the nurses so doggedly that they considered banning her from the floor to protect other patients. She told us that “bad thinking” caused illness and her son’s would dis- appear if he just changed his thinking. Reminding myself that I had entertained a similar thought in other contexts, I expressed genuine respect for her idea but wondered if in her son’s case it might not be too late. And would not his care be better on a palliative care unit, whatever happened next? The palliative care team, empathically present primarily for the patient’s mother, talked with her for 20 minutes. The result was that, with his mother’s agreement, the patient was transferred to the palliative care unit where he died later that day. The team allowed the son’s body to remain on the unit overnight and helped the mother, at her request, to find appropriate Buddhist rituals to mark her son’s death. When I saw her the next morning, she was strikingly different – seemingly at peace with her son’s death. Did this represent healing in the mother? We believe so but it did not appear related to the purposes and goals expressed or implied when we first saw her. It was more that in the process of healing, she discovered her true purpose and goal: to see her son at peace. We are reminded of Cecily Saunders’ statement, “The way care is given can reach the most hidden places and give space for unexpected development” (1). Overall, Cassell’s proposed shift in medical focus to the patient’s function is a worthy idea that will contribute to the transformation of medical practice. This is a thoughtful and beauti- ful book and we believe that Eric Cassell is right; medicine is in the process of profound change, as profound, perhaps, as the change in the visual arts in the early 20th century epitomized by Marcel Duchamp’s painting on the cover. If you care about medical practice, read it and discover your own agreements and disagree- ments. You owe it to yourself! Reviewed by Thomas A. Hutchinson, Professor of Medicine and Oncology, and Director, McGill Programs in Whole Person Care, McGill University, and Samantha Balass, McGill Medical School, Class of 2014. RefeRence 1. Saunders C. Foreword in: Kearney M. Mortally wounded. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 1997. p. 14. BOOK REVIEWS 261 The Nature of Healing: The Modern Practice of Medicine Eric J. Cassell. Oxford University Press, 2013; ISBN 978-0-19-536905-2, 304 pp, hardcover, US$49.99

Upload: others

Post on 06-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 261 The Nature S of Healing: W E The Modern I V Practice ...€¦ · foundational nature of listening in the relationship with the patient and guides the reader with rele - vant examples

This is a wonderful book because Eric Cassell hasthought deeply about medicine and makes usre-examine and question our day-to-day practice.It is such a pleasure to explore with a master whatwe are trying to do in our work and to benefitfrom his wisdom, excellent practical advice, appo-site clinical vignettes and stimulating questions.

The book’s basic thesis is that “persons are sickwho are unable to pursue their goals and pur-poses because of impairments of function thatthey believe are in the domain of medicine.” Ourjob as medical practitioners is to focus on the pur-poses, goals, and well-being of the patient as weattempt to restore function. Cassell’s position isclearly stated and well explained. We have nodoubt that if pursued with vigor this changed per-spective will have a beneficial effect on all aspectsof medicine.

We find that we agree with almost every pointthat Cassell makes throughout the 13 chapters ofthe book. Our favorite chapters are 2, 5, 10 and 12.In chapter 2 Cassell explores in depth what itmeans to have a medicine centred on the person.In chapter 5 he emphasizes and illustrates thefoundational nature of listening in the relationshipwith the patient and guides the reader with rele-vant examples and useful advice on how toactively listen. In chapter 10 he examines theprocess of healing and points out that it is thepatient’s resources that are tapped to producehealing. He emphasizes the importance of explor-ing and managing the meaning that patients attrib-ute to their illness and its symptoms. And inchapter 12 he examines what it means to respect apatient’s autonomy, which is completely differentthan the common reaction of simply deferring tothe patient’s wishes.

There is, however, one important idea withwhich we disagree. Cassell’s definition of healingis that “healing returns a patient to well-being byimproving impediments to function that impairthe person’s ability to pursue purposes andgoals.” But in our experience healing is not pri-

marily a linear and mechanistic process deter-mined by conscious purposes and goals. One per-sonal example: A man in his 30s with metastaticlung cancer was deteriorating rapidly: short ofbreath, delirious, expected to die within hours ordays. But the primary reason the palliative careteam was called was for the patient’s mother,who was desperate for her son to survive. Shequestioned and followed the nurses so doggedlythat they considered banning her from the floorto protect other patients. She told us that “badthinking” caused illness and her son’s would dis-appear if he just changed his thinking. Remindingmyself that I had entertained a similar thought inother contexts, I expressed genuine respect for heridea but wondered if in her son’s case it mightnot be too late. And would not his care be betteron a palliative care unit, whatever happenednext? The palliative care team, empathicallypresent primarily for the patient’s mother, talkedwith her for 20 minutes. The result was that,with his mother ’s agreement, the patient wastransferred to the palliative care unit where hedied later that day. The team allowed the son’sbody to remain on the unit overnight and helpedthe mother, at her request, to find appropriateBuddhist rituals to mark her son’s death.

When I saw her the next morning, she wasstrikingly different – seemingly at peace withher son’s death. Did this represent healing inthe mother? We believe so but it did not appearrelated to the purposes and goals expressed orimplied when we first saw her. It was more thatin the process of healing, she discovered her truepurpose and goal: to see her son at peace. We arereminded of Cecily Saunders’ statement, “The waycare is given can reach the most hidden placesand give space for unexpected development” (1).

Overall, Cassell’s proposed shift in medicalfocus to the patient’s function is a worthy ideathat will contribute to the transformation ofmedical practice. This is a thoughtful and beauti-ful book and we believe that Eric Cassell is right;medicine is in the process of profound change, asprofound, perhaps, as the change in the visual artsin the early 20th century epitomized by MarcelDuchamp’s painting on the cover.

If you care about medical practice, read it anddiscover your own agreements and disagree-ments. You owe it to yourself!

Reviewed by Thomas A. Hutchinson, Professor of

Medicine and Oncology, and Director, McGill Programs

in Whole Person Care, McGill University, and Samantha

Balass, McGill Medical School, Class of 2014.

RefeRence

1. Saunders C. Foreword in: Kearney M. Mortally wounded. New

York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 1997. p. 14.

BOOK REVIEWS

261

The Nature of Healing: The Modern Practice of MedicineEric J. Cassell. OxfordUniversity Press, 2013;ISBN 978-0-19-536905-2,304 pp, hardcover,US$49.99