28th december 2015 eia presentation:

119
Proceedings of the 156 th Meeting of the SEAC held on 28 th ,29 th and 30 th December 2015 28 th December 2015 Members Present in the meeting: The Chairman, SEAC, Karnataka welcomed the members of the Committee and others present. The following proposals listed in the agenda were appraised in accordance of the provision of EIA Notification 2006. The observation and decision of the Committee are recorded under each of the agenda items. Confirmation of the proceedings of 155 th SEAC meeting held on 10 th and 11 th December 2015. The State Expert Appraisal Committee, Karnataka perused the proceedings of 155 th meeting of SEAC held on 10 th and 11 th December 2015 and confirmed the same. EIA Presentation: 156.1 Modification & Expansion of Residential Apartment Project at Sy. No. 80/1, 80/2, 80/3, 80/4, 80/6, 84/7, 85/2, 87/2, 89/1 & 89/2 of Veerasandra Village and Sy. No. 121/1 to 121/10 of Hebbagodi Village, Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. Sriram Properties Pvt Ltd.(SEIAA 129 CON 2015) M/s. Sriram Properties Pvt Ltd,have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Modification & Expansion of Residential Apartment Project at Sy. No. 80/1, 80/2, 80/3, 80/4, 80/6, 84/7, 85/2, 87/2, 89/1 & 89/2 of Veerasandra Village and Sy. No. 121/1 to 121/10 of Hebbagodi Village, Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 147 th meeting of SEAC held on 4 th and 5 th September 2015 to request for issue of TOR’s. Shri. N. Naganna - Chairman Prof. D.L. Manjunath - Member Dr. S. Manjappa - Member Dr. B.S. Jayaprakash Member Dr. M.I Hussain - Member Shri. B. Chikkappaiah - Member Dr. N. Krishnamurthy - Member Dr. S. Prashanth - Member Dr. K.C. Jayaramu - Member Sri H. Srinivasaiah - Member Dr. K.B. Umesh - Member Sri. M. Subramany. M - Member Sri. Vijaya Kumar - Secretary, SEAC

Upload: hoangkhuong

Post on 14-Feb-2017

258 views

Category:

Documents


13 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of the 156th Meeting of the SEAC held on 28th,29th and 30th December 2015

28th December 2015 Members Present in the meeting:

The Chairman, SEAC, Karnataka welcomed the members of the Committee and others present. The following proposals listed in the agenda were appraised in accordance of the provision of EIA Notification 2006. The observation and decision of the Committee are recorded under each of the agenda items.

Confirmation of the proceedings of 155th SEAC meeting held on 10th and 11th December 2015.

The State Expert Appraisal Committee, Karnataka perused the proceedings of 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 and confirmed the same.

EIA Presentation:

156.1 Modification & Expansion of Residential Apartment Project at Sy. No. 80/1, 80/2, 80/3, 80/4, 80/6, 84/7, 85/2, 87/2, 89/1 & 89/2 of Veerasandra Village and Sy. No. 121/1 to 121/10 of Hebbagodi Village, Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. Sriram Properties Pvt Ltd.(SEIAA 129 CON 2015)

M/s. Sriram Properties Pvt Ltd,have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Modification & Expansion of Residential Apartment Project at Sy. No. 80/1, 80/2, 80/3, 80/4, 80/6, 84/7, 85/2, 87/2, 89/1 & 89/2 of Veerasandra Village and Sy. No. 121/1 to 121/10 of Hebbagodi Village, Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 147th meeting of SEAC held on 4th and 5th September 2015 to request for issue of TOR’s.

Shri. N. Naganna - Chairman Prof. D.L. Manjunath - Member Dr. S. Manjappa - Member Dr. B.S. Jayaprakash Member Dr. M.I Hussain - Member Shri. B. Chikkappaiah - Member Dr. N. Krishnamurthy - Member Dr. S. Prashanth - Member Dr. K.C. Jayaramu - Member Sri H. Srinivasaiah - Member Dr. K.B. Umesh - Member Sri. M. Subramany. M - Member Sri. Vijaya Kumar - Secretary, SEAC

Page 2: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

2

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to appraise the proposal as B1 as the built up area is more than 1,50,000 Sqm and decided to issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in accordance with EIA Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines. The committee also decided to prescribe the following additional ToR.

1. The structural stability certificate of the building from a reputed third party agency to

ascertain the load bearing capacity of the predesigned structure in view of the proposed construction above the already approved structure by the competent authorities.

In addition to above, the proponent is to submit the compliance to earlier issued Environmental Clearance. Accordingly the ToR was issued vide letter dated 26.09.2015. The project proponent have submitted the EIA report vide letter dated 02.12.2015. The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed the committee that, in the earlier issued EC, they have taken approval for three basements and now, since they have obtained additional land to achieve more FAR, they are now proposing two basements instead of three and accordingly the structure was redesigned. The committee observed that, since the source of water is from Hebbagodi Gramapanchayat (i.e., from bore wells), the proponent was asked to explore the possibility of providing separate treatment for sewage & sullage and use more recycled water to reduce the intake of fresh water. Also, the proponent has not taken approval from ground water authority for drawing of water from bore wells.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance with the following conditions.

1. The proponent shall treate sewage and sullage separately 2. Ground water shall be treated to portable level before supplies to the project.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 3: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

3

156.2 Expansion and modification of existing IT Park, Hotel and to add software development centre and MLCP at Sy.No.27(p), 28/1(p), 28/2(p), 29/1, 29/2, 29/3A, 29/3B, 32, 33, 34/1, 34/2, 34/3, 34/4, 35, 36, 37/1, 37/2, 42(p), 43, 44/1, 44/2, 45(p), 46/3 of Devarabisanahalli village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk of M/s. Supreme Build Cap Pvt. Ltd., (SEIAA 86 CON 2015)

M/s. Supreme Build Cap Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Expansion and Modification of Existing IT Park, Hotel and to add Software Development centre and MLCP at Sy.No’s. 27(p), 28/1(p), 28/2 (p), 29/1, 29/2, 29/3A, 29/3B, 32, 33, 34/1, 34/2, 34/3, 34/4, 35, 36, 37/1, 37/2, 42(p), 43, 44/1, 44/2, 45(p), 46/3 of Devarabisanahalli Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost is 300 Crores.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 60553.24 Sq.mts. The project consists of 3 Blocks consisting (Block – A and B 2B + G +11UF) and Block –C is (2B + G + 7 UF) and Hotel (2B + G + 8 UF) with Total Built up area is 1,52,281.08 Sqm. Modifying to 2,68,983.28 Sq.mts, with addition of 2 Blocks, Block D and Block E of configuration (B +6+11UF) and MLCP (G + 13 UF). Ht. of Building is 40.00 M.

Landscape area (proposed): 1,9869.57 Sq.mts (32.81 % )

Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 984 KLD (Includes both proposed and Existing) The source of water is BWSSB. Copy of NOC is submitted.

Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 909 KLD (Includes existing w/w generation is 669 KLD and proposed is 240 KLD) and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 270 KLD for Hotel 330 KLD for Block A and B and 85 KLD for Block C with SBR Technology.

Excavated Earth Management:- Total Excavated Earth is 27,000 m3 will be used within the Project site for, Landscaping of Gardens and road making etc.

Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 5360 Kg/day; where 3216 kg/day (proposed 1206 kg/day and existing quantity is 2010 kg/day) is the organic waste and 2144 kg/day(existing 1340 kg/day and proposed 804 kg/day) is inorganic waste, Organic waste will be treated in organic waste convertor, Sludge generated will be used as manure.

Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 30 MVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG set of 6 X 2000 KVA (Existing for Hotel is 1500 KVA X 2 No’s. Block A and B is 2000 KVA X 5 no’s and Block C is 1125 KVA X 3 no’s.

Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 3354. Nos.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 144th meeting of SEAC held on 5th and 6th August 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

Page 4: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

4

The Committee decided to appraise the proposal as B1 as the built up area is more than 1,50,000 Sqm. Committee after discussion decided to issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in accordance with EIA Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines. The committee also decided to prescribe the following additional ToR.

1. The structural stability certificate for Block A, Block B and MLCP buildings

from a reputed third party agency to ascertain the load bearing capacity of the predesigned structure in view of the proposed construction above the already approved structure by the competent authorities.

2. Justification with regard to violation of MLCP building 3. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an

appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 4. Scheme for usage of maximum treated water from STP within the project site only. 5. Scheme for providing dual fuel generators for backup power with provision for CNG. 6. Scheme for utilisation of entire Rain Water harvested in the project site (both from the

roof top and from the surface runoff) within the Project premises only. 7. Details of excavated earth and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated

earth with details of the disposal site 8. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow. 9. Security plan and disaster management plan for MLCP building.

Accordingly the ToR was issued vide letter dated 10.09.2015. The project proponent have submitted the EIA report vide letter dated 08.12.2015. The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed the committee that, they have not violated any conditions put forth in earlier issued EC. The committee observed that, the certificate for structural stability has not given required technical inputs.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after submission of the revised structural stability certificate.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Deferred Subjects: 156.3 Establishment of industry for manufacturing of Bulk Drugs at Plot No:66E & 66F

Gadwanthi Village, KIADB Industrial Area, Humnabad, Bidar District of M/s GPR Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., (SEIAA 15 IND 2015)

M/s. GPR Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental Clearance from SEIAA for their new proposed Bulk Drugs Unit. This is a project falling under the category 5(f)

Page 5: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

5

of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006, Under Category – B. The total Plot area is 7543.50 Sq.mts (1.86 Acres) Built up area is 5,043.5 Sq.mts (1.25 Acres) and Green Belt area 2,500.0 Sq.Mts. (0.62 Acres @ 33%)

SiteLocation: The proposed project located at Plot No. 66E & 66F, of notified KIADB Industrial area of Gadwanthi Village, Humnabad Taluk, Bidar District.

Proposed Activity: The proposed activity will involve in the manufacturing of Bulk Drugs (APIs)

Raw Materials: The raw materials used for the proposed project as follows:

Sl.No. Name of the Raw material Quantity/Month in Kg 1 Methyl 5-(Chloroacetyl)-2-hydroxy Benzoate 250 2 Teritary butyl amine 125 3 Sodium boro hydrate 50 4 Sulphuric acid 36 5 Methanol 1000 6 Activated carbon 5 7 Ethyl acetate 200

Production Capacity and Products Manufactured:

Sl.no. Name of the Drugs Quantity in MTPA 1 Metformin HCL 7200.00 2 Paracetamol 3600.00 3 Fexofenadine HCL 60.00 4 Cetirizine 96.00 5 Salbutamol Sulphate 96.00

Total 11052.00 Capital Investment: Rs.5,81,71,278.00

(Rupees: 5.81 Crores Only)

Water Requirement: The total water required for the project is 48 KLD. The source of the water is Borewell.

Waste Water Management: Total quantity of waste water generated is about 15 KLD. This is a non-process effluent generating unit. The effluent generated from washings and utilities will be treated in the proposed ZLD treatment system of 20 KL of Multiple Effect Evaporator (MEE), (20 KL) Biological Treatment (BT) System and RO, and then the treated water will be used for cooling tower makeup and domestic purposes.

Energy Requirement: The proposed power requirement of the plant is 200 KVA sourced from KPTCL. Backup power proposed is DG sets of 200 x 1 KVA.

Page 6: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

6

The proponent was invited for the 144th meeting of SEAC held on 5th and 6th August 2015 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee had decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are invited to attend the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent.

The committee observed that, since it is an industry project, that too Bulk drugs industry, to issue ToRs and site specific ToRs, the proponent should be present to receive the same. But, he remained absent for the second time. The proponent is not showing any interest to receive ToRs and to conduct EIA studies on critical matter, since it is a bulk drug unit.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal for closure since it is not possible to appraise the proposal in the absence of the proponent and for the above said reasons.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.4 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.23 of Thammanayakanahalli Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban Dist. (4-20 Acres) of Sri K.S. Rohith S/o. Srinivas Roa, 7th Main Road, 16th Cross, Lakkasandra, Bangalore -560030 (SEIAA 421 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri K.S. Rohith, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone Quarry in an area of 4.20 Acres at Sy.No.23 of Thammanayakanahalli Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District. It is a Govt.Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006. The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Dr.C.P.Prasanna Kumar. and approved by

Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore. Capacity of mining is Av. 2,13,696 T/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 143rd meeting of SEAC held on 24th to 29th July 2015 to give clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The committee observed that, the quarry site is very near to the Bannergatta National Park and the proponent have not submitted the NOC from the Wild Life Authority.

Page 7: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

7

The committee therefore had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

The proponent appeared before the committee during the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 and had sought some more time to submit the information sought by the committee.

The committee after discussion had decided to provide final opportunity to the proponent to submit the information or otherwise the proposal will be appraised in his absence and decision will be taken as per merits.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are invited to attend the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the proposed quarry is with- in 5 Km from BNP, which is a Eco Sensitive Zone. In this village, proposals to an extent of 5 ha has already recommended for EC by the committee and since threshold limit of 5 ha is reached, as per EIA notification 2006, further proposals will be considered as category – A projects which attracts general condition and the proponent is advised to approach MOEF for further EC purpose.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.5 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.598/3 of Srinivas Saradagi Village, Gulbarga Taluk & District (4-0 Acres) of Sri Md. Abdul Rasheed (SEIAA 1347 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Md. Abdul Rasheed seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 4-00 Acres¸ at Sy.No.598/3 of Srinivas Saradagi Village, Gulbarga Taluk & District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri.B.M.Sudheendra Kumar and approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Gulburga. Capacity of mining is 13,361 TPA.

The Proponent was invited for the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. The proponent remained absent.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, in the absence of the proponent.

Page 8: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

8

The Committee after discussion had decided to provide one more opportunity to the proponent since it is not possible to appraise the proposal in the absence of the proponent, and the following information’s are to be submitted.

1. Revised Geological & Mineable reserve calculation 2. Copy of RTC 3. Revised EMP Budget with a provision of check dams & CSR provision 4. Scheme of disposal of quarry waste

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are invited to attend the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan in the absence of the proponent. The committee observed the following points.

1. The DMG has approved the quarry plan putting a condition that, after obtaining EC further processing of lease will be taken.

2. The mineable reserve calculation is wrong 3. Distance from the human habitat and water bodies not indicated 4. The quarry is surrounded by agricultural fields for which mitigation proposal

not given. 5. Top soil management not shown. 6. Approach road details not given.

In the absence of the above information, the appraisal cannot be done. Hence, the

Committee decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.6 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.Nos.138/1A & 138/1B of Ainapur Village, Bijapur Taluk & Dist. (2 Acres) of Sri Basavaraj G Patil (SEIAA 546 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri.Basavaraj.G.Patil, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone Quarry in an area of 2.00 Acres at Sy.Nos.138/1A & 138/1B of Ainapur Village, Bijapur Taluk & District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.M.Sudheendra Kumar and approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bijapura. Capacity of mining is Av. 20,938 T/annum

The proponent was invited for the 145th meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th August 2015 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

Page 9: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

9

The proponent was invited for the 150th meeting of SEAC held on 7th, 8th and 9th October

2015 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent. The Committee decided to provide final opportunity to proponent with intimation that

the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The Proponent was invited for the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. The proponent remained absent.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan. The committee made the following observations:

1. The proponent has not submitted the Mines and Geology Notification 2. Since it is a patta land approach road details not submitted 3. District Task Force proceedings not submitted 4. Provision of check dams, dust suppression measurements taken for nearby villages

are not considered in EMP

The Committee had decided to provide final opportunity to proponent and also asked to submit the above information.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are invited to attend the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan in the absence of the proponent. The committee observed the following points.

1.The quarry area is a patta land and also surrounded by patta lands and details of connecting road is not given.

2.The approach road runs in patta lands for which details not submitted. 3.Management of top soil & mitigation measures to protect adjoining agricultural fields

not submitted.

In the absence of the above information, the appraisal cannot be done. Hence, the Committee decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 10: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

10

Reconsideration Subjects: 156.7 Mixed Use Development at Site No.2, Khata No.1-56-2, Sy.No.11, New Ward No.16 (Old

Ward 1), HMT (PID No.1-56-2), MES Road, Jalahalli, Thanneranahalli Village, Yeshwanthpur Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk of M/s. TRIL Constructions Limited (SEIAA 95 CON 2014 )

Name of the Applicant: Sri. Anand G. Mutalik

Name of the Consultancy Firm: M/s. Aqua Tech Enviro Engineers

1. M/s. TRIL Constructions Limited have applied for Environmental Clearance from SEIAA for their New proposed mixed use development project at Site No.2, Khata No.1-56-2, Sy.No.11, New Ward No.16 (Old Ward 1), HMT (PID No.1-56-2), MES Road, Jalahalli, Thanneranahalli Village, Yeshwanthpur Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore Urban District under 8(b) of Schedule of EIA Notification- 2006 under Category-B. Total project cost is Rs. 853 Crores.

2. Land details: Total Plot Area is 52,677 Sqm. Area for road widening- 3371 sqm; Net Plot Area – 49,036 sqm; ; project site is located in Hitech zone as per RMP-2015. Khatha Certificate from BBMP obtained. Sale deed and purchase agreement submitted.

3. The Project consists of retail ( 1B+G+21UF), Commercial ( 2B+ G+ 2UF) and residential in 5 towers ( B+2 Stilt+ 27 UF in 3 Towers and B+ 2 stilt+ G+23 UF in 2 Towers) totally having 440 flats. Total Built Up Area is 2,26,504 Sqm.

4. Landscape area proposed is 10,236 Sqm; ( which works out to 20.76% of plot area). The project site has 333 trees out of which 49 trees are cut and 87 retained. About 197 trees are proposed to be relocated and 150 new trees planted.

5. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 674 KLD; Fresh water requirement is 515 KLD and is sourced from BWSSB.

6. Wastewater Management: Total quantity of Wastewater generated is about 540 KLD and treated in proposed 2 STP’s of design capacity 1x270 and 1x290 KLD with MBBR Technology.

7. Excavated Earth Management: Total quantity of excavated earth generated in the project is about 1,33,000 Cum; Backfilling quantity: 30,000Cum; Landscaping quantity: 15,000 Cum; Road Leveling/Formation quantity: 20,000 Cum; the remaining quantity of 68, 000 Cum will be disposed to pre-identified site.

8. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 2932 kg/day; Organic waste of 1760 kg/day will be treated in organic waste convertor and the product used as manure. Inorganic waste of 1172 kg/day will be sent for recycling.

9. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 10189 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup Power proposed is DG sets of 1x1000 and 4x2000 KVA.

10. Traffic Details: Parking proposed is 2420 PCU.

11. Other Details: Rain Water Harvesting is proposed. Height of the Building is 87 m; ROW in front of the project site is 18 m;

Page 11: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

11

The project proponent and environment consultant explained the proposed ToRs. The

committee after deliberations, decided issue model TORs along with the following additional TORs for preparation of EIA from an accredited environmental consultant:

1. Chapter on due diligence to be included. 2. Disposal of dismantled material of earlier structures with location details and

quantification 3. NOC from Defence Department since the site is surrounded by defence

establishments. 4. List of species of existing trees and species wise details of trees retained and

explore the possibility of enhancement of greenery. 5. Attenuation of noise by planting trees on the periphery and internal areas. 6. Impact of brewery and other industries located 400m away from the project. 7. Details of EWS proposed along with calculation 8. Traffic impact and management study under worst case scenario of connecting

roads along with ambient air quality modelling studies for the vehicular traffic.

9. Green building aspects considered for the project and its implementation.

Accordingly the ToR was issued vide letter dated 02.09.2014.

The project proponent have submitted the EIA report vide letter dated 15.07.2015.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 146th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th August 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed the committee that, the proposed BDA underpass to NH-4 and continuation of ORR is coming behind the proposed project and they have already relinquished about 181 Sqm of their land for this purpose and the BDA is approving the plan after receiving the letter of relinquishment from the proponent.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Commitment with regard to adopting Bi-fuel DG sets (CNG and diesel) 2. Break up of ground coverage area showing individual coverage for

commercial, retail & residential area. 3. Revised land use plan increasing the landscape area to 33%. 4. Scheme for preservation of top soil for a minimum period of three years. 5. Revised List of trees to be planted by considering fruit breeding & local

species. 6. Revised soil analysis report, since the quantity of organic solids is more than

the prescribed limit.

Page 12: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

12

7. An under taking for not receiving any communication regarding relinquishment of land for road widening purpose.

8. Revised traffic study considering the annual growth rate of 10% instead of 4%.

9. NOC from Defence Department since the site is surrounded by defence establishments.

10. Explore the possibility of using eco friendly materials for construction. 11. Quantification of the terrace area available for harvesting solar energy and an

appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 12. Revised quantification of the excavated earth and specific plan for disposal of

excess excavated earth without any adverse impact on the environment. 13. A copy of letter issued by forest department regarding permission for tree

cutting. 14. Revised water balance chart since provision of 87 KLD of water for

landscaping is on a higher side and needs to be revised. 15. Disastrous management plan regarding fire emergency and possibility of

providing in house primary fire station. [

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent vide letter dated 02.10.2015 during the 151st SEAC meeting held on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2015.

The committee not satisfied with the following replies furnished by the proponent:

1. Terrace area calculation for harnessing solar energy is not convincing and it has to be reworked

2. Only 10% of the total excavated earth generated is shown to be used in the project site which cannot be acceptable and it has to be reworked and submitted with back up calculation.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the above information and concerned consultant has to be come and explain the above information.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 18.11.2015.

The proponent and the Environmental Consultant attended the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 to provide required clarification/information.

The committee reviewed and accepted the reply submitted by the proponent except the utilization of the excavated earth within the project site which could not be explained by the proponent satisfactorily. The committee observed that only 10% to 20% of the total excavated earth generated is shown to be used in the project site which cannot be acceptable.

The committee therefore decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the above information with the backup calculation along with the supporting documents if necessary.

Page 13: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

13

The proponent and the Environmental Consultant attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th December 2015 to provide required clarification/information.

The proponent has failed to convince the committee regarding utilization of excess earth work quantity (about 80%). He informed the committee that as per BDA guide lines, the basement should be kept below ground level and not higher than 1.2 m above average ground level, and due to this constraint, it is not possible to fully utilize the excavated earth within the project site only. But, the committee observed that, since there is a level difference of 6.00 in the project site and utilization of entire earth within the project site can be done if properly managed. The proponent informed that, he will re work out the earth work quantity and will submit to the committee.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal providing final opportunity to the proponent to submit the above information.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of above information.

156.8 Residential Apartment at Sy.No.116/6 & 116/7, , Hoodi Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District of M/s DSR Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., (SEIAA 59 CON 2015)

M/s DSR Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Residential apartments at Sy.No.116/6 & 116/7, , Hoodi Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 7,688.96 Sqm. The project consists of 173 units B+G+14 UF in two blocks with a total Built up area is 30,959.16 Sqm. Ht. of Building is 44.85 M

Landscape area (proposed): 2,575.8 Sqm (33.5%)

Water Requirement: - Total water requirement is 129 KLD. The source of water is BWSSB. BWSSB NOC not submitted.

Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 103.2 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 120 KLD with SBR technology

Excavated Earth Management: Total quantity of excavated earth generated in the project is about 23670 Cum. It is fully utilized in the site only.

Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 300 Kg/day; Organic waste of 165 Kg/day will be treated in organic waste convertor, balance 135 kgs will be disposed off to authorized vendors or recycling. Sludge generated will be used as manure.

Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1000 KW is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG set of 2x200 KVA.

Car Parking provided 199 PCU.

Page 14: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

14

The proponent was invited for the 142nd SEAC meeting held on 13th and 14th July 2015 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 150th meeting of SEAC held on 7th, 8th and 9th October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, septic tanks are used for labours during construction phase and also while calculating the FAR, total plot area is considered, though the proponent has relinquished about 600 Sqm of land to BDA for road widening. The proponent informed that, as per Municipality planning bylaw, they have calculated the FAR.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. Copy of Municipality planning Bylaw 2. Replacement of septic tank by mobile STP for labour use. 3. Fruit bearing & ornamental species to be planted and their list.

The subject was placed before the SEAC during the 154th meeting held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent received on 19.11.2015.

The committee not satisfied with the replies made by project proponent. The committee opined that the concerned consultant may come and clarify the above. The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal in the subsequent meeting.

The Environmental Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification/information.

The consultant has informed the committee that, they will replace the septic tank by mobile STP. The list of fruit bearing and ornamental species submitted and also he informed that, the achieved FAR is with- in the allowable FAR of 3.00.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.9 Proposed ITBT/Commercial Building at Plot No.1, Veersandra Industrial Estate, Veerasandra, Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore of M/s Welcome Foods Ltd.,(SEIAA 111 CON 2015)

M/s. Welcome Foods. Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Development of Proposed ITBT/Commercial Building at Plot No.1,

Page 15: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

15

V0eerasandra Industrial Estate, Veerasandra, Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru, Total Project cost is 49.23 Crores.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 12,018 Sq.mts (6 Acres, 24 Guntas. 2. The project consists of 2BF + GF + 5 UF with Total Built up area is 54,555.213

Sq.mts. Ht. of Building is 23.85 M.

3. Landscape area (proposed): 2388 Sq.mts (19.87%)

4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 195 KLD. Fresh water requirement is 130 KLD The source of water is from Village Panchayat. Copy of letter from Panchayat is not submitted. 65 KLD from Recycles water

5. Wastewater Management:- The total quantity of waste water generated is 156 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 160 KLD with SBR Technology.

6. Excavated Earth Management:- - Total Excavated Earth is 66,933.139 m3. The entire earth will be utilized within the project site only.

7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 531 Kg/day; where 133 Kg/day is the biodegradable waste, 398 kg/day non biodegradable waste & 16 Kg/day STP Sludge.

8. Hazardous waste Management: Waste oil from the DG sets will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers.

9. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 2675 Kw is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG set of 3 X 1010 KVA.

10. Traffic Details: The road considered is Hosur Road(Service Road). The traffic scenario is B-C-C Parking proposed:685. Nos.

11. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted

12. Other details: Prtovision of Rain water Harvesting is made. Total power savings per annum is 22.24%.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 149th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed the committee that though the land is in KIADB area, KIADB transferred the area under consideration to BDA and the plan of the proposed construction is to be sanctioned by BDA. The source of water is from Gram panchayat.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Letter from KIADB regarding transfer of land to BDA

Page 16: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

16

2. The source of water is to be from KIADB only. 3. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an

appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 4. Quantification of earth and scheme for safe and scientific management of

excess excavated earth within the project site only

The subject was placed before the SEAC during the 154th meeting held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent vide letter dated 9.11.2015.

The committee not satisfied with the replies made by project proponent. The committee opined that the concerned consultant may come and clarify the above. The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal in the subsequent meeting.

The Environmental Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification/information.

The consultant has informed the committee that, KIADB has not transferred the land to BDA, however, the plan is sanctioned by BDA, since BDA is the planning authority. The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after the submission of the following information.

1. Approval letter from ground water authority for drawing underground water. 2. NOC from Gramapanchayat regarding supply of water.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.10 Building Stone Quarry Project of Sy.No.122/3K/2 of Ainapur Village, Bijapur Taluk & Dist. (2-0 Acres) of Sri Vivekananda Virappa Gunari, Neelaganagai, Plot No.77, Aishwarya Nagar, Bijapur District. (SEIAA 385 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri. Vivekananda Virappa Gunari, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.122/3K/2 of Ainapur Village, Bijapur Taluk & District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The Quarry plan has been prepared by RQP Sri.B.M.Sudheendra Kumar and approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bijapur District. Capacity of mining is Avg. 20,938 T/Annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 143rd meeting of SEAC held on 24th to 29th July 2015 to give clarification/additional information.

The committee made the following observations:

1. The proponent have not submitted the land conversion document

Page 17: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

17

2. The proponent have not submitted the DMG approved quarry plan

The committee directed the proponent to submit the above information.

The committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 07.11.2015.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted by the proponent. The committee is not satisfied with the replies.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the information sought in the earlier meeting.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 18.12.2015.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted and observed that, the proponent have not submitted the land conversion document. The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance with a condition that, before execution, the proponent must obtain land conversion from the competent authority.

The Committee also decided to recommend imposing the following conditions in addition to Standard Conditions that are being imposed.

1. Safe drinking water has to be provided at the quarry site. 2. The project proponent should construct the compound wall all along the

lease boundary before the quarrying activity is initiated 3. Dust suppression measures have to be strictly followed. 4. Project Proponent to plant fruit yielding and shade bearing tree species

namely Pongamia pinneata (Honge), Jatorpha,Ficus riligiosa(Arali) Ficus bengaliensis as agreed by project proponent on the day of meeting in the areas outside the lease.

5. Project Proponent shall prevent damage to adjoining government land from fire due to activities during quarrying operation.

6. Haulage approach road should not be through villages till the main road is reached.

7. As agreed by Project Proponent plantation to an extent of 33% in the project area has to be carried out.

8. The drilling machines Employed shall be fitted with dust extraction unit while undertake quarrying activity.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 18: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

18

156.11 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.123 (P) of Bilakundi Village, Gokak Taluk & Belagavi Dist. (16-0 Acres) of Sri Gopal Durgappa Harijan, #180, Kalliguddi Village, Gokak Taluk, Belagavi Dist. (SEIAA 738 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri.Gopal Durgappa Harijan, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 16-00 Acres at Sy.No.123 (P) of Bilakundi Village, Gokak Taluk & Belagavi District. It is a Govt. Gyrana Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006. The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri.Ganapati.S.Hegde approved by Deputy

Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Belagavi. Capacity of mining is Avg.45,713 T/annum. The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee

in the 147th meeting of SEAC held on 4th and 5th September 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The committee observed that, in Bilakundi village of Gokak Tq. & Belagavi Dist. only already five (5) proposals to a total extent of 40.50 Acres in Sy. No’s 2,2(P) & 76(P) are considered in the 146th SEAC meeting. And also a proposal of 8.00 Acres at agenda No. 147.44 is already considered and the total extent considered is 48.50 acres. if the total area of mining exceeds 25 Ha or 52 Acres, the mining activity as per EIA Notification 2006, should be treated as B1 category and General Conditions shall apply.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission the combined sketch covering all the quarry leases sanctioned by DMG in this village and total extent of mining duly approved by DMG. Since if this quarry area and other quarry leases already considered are fall within 500 m radius, and then the area will exceed 25 Ha.

The proposal was placed before the 151st meeting of SEAC held on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2015.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent vide letter dated 09.10.2015.

The committee observed that as per the joint sketch furnished by the proponent, The quarry leases in the Sy. No. 76 and 2 of Bilakundi village form one cluster and the quarry leases in the Sy. No. 123 forms another difference cluster whereas the combined sketch; there is no mention of distance substituting these two clusters. Therefore the proponent is asked to submit the same.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission

of the above information. The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 09.12.2015 The proponent has submitted combined sketch of Bilakundi village duly signed by

DMG. In the combined sketch, it was shown that, Sy.no. 126 forms one cluster and Sy.nos. 76 & 2 forms another cluster and these two clusters are separated by 705 m. The proposed

Page 19: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

19

proposal is in Sy. No. 123, and in this cluster, a total of 81.00 Acres lease area is there as per the drawing submitted. However, the Deputy Director, Dept. of mines & geology, Belagavi, through letter No. UÀ̈ sÀÆE:G¤ É̈«/PÀUÀUÀÄ Cfð 156/2015-16/7118 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 16-11-2015, has cancelled one quarry lease of sri. Balappa Hanumantha Goudar, having an extent of 23.00 acres and after cancelling this quarry lease of 23.00 Acres, the total area including the proposal No. SEIAA 738 MIN 2015 and SEIAA 741 MIN 2015 is about 58.00 acres, which is less than the threshold, limit of 62.12 Acres, and hence the present proposal is considered under category B2.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.12 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.123 (P) of Bilakundi Village, Gokak Taluk, Belagavi Dist. (23 Acres) of Sri Shivappa Venkappa Kuddemmi S/o Sri. Venkappa Kuddemmi # 170/D, Badigswad Village, Gokak Taluk, Belagavi District (SEIAA 741 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri. Shivappa Venkappa Kuddemmi, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 23-00 Acres at Sy.No.123 (P) of Bilakundi Village, Gokak Taluk & Belagavi District. It is a Govt. Gyrana Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006. The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri.Ganapati.S.Hegde approved by Deputy

Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Belagavi. Capacity of mining is Avg.62,570 T/annum.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee in the 147th meeting of SEAC held on 4th and 5th September 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The committee observed that, in Bilakundi village of Gokak Tq. & Belagavi Dist. only already five (5) proposals to a total extent of 40.50 Acres in Sy. No’s 2,2(P) & 76(P) are considered in the 146th SEAC meeting. And also a proposal of 8.00 Acres at agenda No. 147.44 is already considered and the total extent considered is 48.50 acres. if the total area of mining exceeds 25 Ha or 62 Acres, the mining activity as per EIA Notification 2006, should be treated as B1 category and General Conditions shall apply.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission the combined sketch covering all the quarry leases sanctioned by DMG in this Sy. No. and adjacent Sy. No.s of this village and total extent of mining duly approved by DMG. Since if

Page 20: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

20

this quarry area and other quarry leases already considered are fall within 500 m radius, and then the area will exceed 25 Ha.

The proposal was placed before the 151st meeting of SEAC held on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2015.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent vide letter dated 09.10.2015.

The committee observed that as per the joint sketch furnished by the proponent, The quarry leases in the Sy. No. 76 and 2 of Bilakundi village form one cluster and the quarry leases in the Sy. No. 123 forms another difference cluster whereas the combined sketch; there is no mention of distance substituting these two clusters. Therefore the proponent is asked to submit the same.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of

the above information.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 09.12.2015

The proponent has submitted combined sketch of Bilakundi village duly signed by DMG. In the combined sketch, it was shown that, Sy.no. 126 forms one cluster and Sy.nos. 76 & 2 forms another cluster and these two clusters are separated by 705 m. The proposed proposal is in Sy. No. 123, and in this cluster, a total of 81.00 Acres lease area is there as per the drawing submitted. However, the Dy.Director, Dept. of mines & geology, Belagavi, through letter No. UÀ̈ sÀÆE:G¤ É̈«/PÀUÀUÀÄ Cfð 156/2015-16/7118 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 16-11-2015, has cancelled one quarry lease of sri. Balappa Hanumantha Goudar, having an extent of 23.00 acres and after cancelling this quarry lease of 23.00 Acres, the total area including the present proposal No. SEIAA 738 MIN 2015 and SEIAA 741 MIN 2015 is about 58.00 acres, which is less than the threshold, limit of 62.12 Acres, and hence the present proposal is considered under category B2.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Recalled Subjects:

156.13 Ordinary Clay Quarry Project, Sy.No.98/2 of Ramagurwadi Village, Khanapura Taluk & Belagavi Dist. (1 Acre) (QL No.1450) of Sri Vinayaka H Punage S/o.Sri.Hanumanth, 30/B, Sai Residency Angol, 1st Cross, Tilakwadi, Belagavi (SEIAA 850 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri Vinayaka H Punage, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Ordinary Clay Quarry in an area of 1-00 Acres at Sy.No.98/2 of Ramagurwadi Village, Khanapura Taluk & Belagavi District. It is a Patta Land.

Page 21: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

21

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.Ramasubba Reddy approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Belgaum District. Capacity of mining is Av. 7,200 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 150th meeting of SEAC held on 7th, 8th and 9th October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that since it is ordinary clay, as per MOEF memorandum dated 24.12.2013, the depth of quarrying should not be more than 2 m below general ground level. The proponent has already removed 6000 Cum of clay and already depth excavated is 2 m below general ground level.

The Committee after discussion opined that it is not possible for further mining as per MOEF guide lines decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the modified land use plan limiting the production.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 08.12.2015.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted. The committee observed that, since already mining has been done to a depth of 2 m and, the same was not shown in the approved geological cross sectional plan. In the approved C/s plan, it was shown that, mining will be carried from the ground level only.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the revised cross sectional plan duly approved by DMG.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of above information.

156.14 Ornamental Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.145/2 of Maniyambal Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara Dist. (13-23 Acres) of H.A.Iqbal Hussain (SEIAA 1204 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri.H.A.Iqbal Hussain seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Ornamental Stone in an area of 13-23 Acres¸ at Sy.No.145/2 of Maniyambal Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara Dist. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri.B.N.Krishnamurthy approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore. Capacity of mining is Avg. 4,254 cu.m/annum.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 151st meeting of SEAC held on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

Page 22: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

22

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. NOC from Bannergatta National Park 2. Distance from the safe zone of BNP to the quarry boundary.

The committee perused and agreed with the reply submitted by the proponent vide letter dated 23.11.2015. The committee noted that the proposed quarry site is about 1,500 m distance from BNP.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of all the leases & Notifications issued of Maniyambal village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

Replies submitted on 11.12.2015.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted. The committee observed that, the proponent has submitted the modified quarry plan reducing the lease area to 3-20 acres from 13-13 Acres. the proposed quarry lease is within 5 Km from BNP & also noted that, in Maniyambal village, the total extent for which already recommended for EC is not exceeding 5 ha & the proponent has also informed the committee that the total extent of lease area in this village is less than 5 ha. The proponent informed the committee that, the quarry waste will be utilized as building material for which already permission from DMG has been obtained. And also regarding preservation of top soil, the proponent informed that, the top soil will be deposited in the buffer zone and will be utilized for afforestation.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.15 Black Granite Quarry Project, Sy.Nos. 641 & 642 of Gumballi Village, Yelandur Taluk, Chamarajanagara Dist. (2 Acres). (QL No.240) of M/s. Hind Nippon Rural Industries (P) Ltd. 460, 11th Main, RMV Extension, Bengaluru -560080 (SEIAA 547 MIN 2015)

This is a Operating proposal submitted by M/s.Hind Nippon Rural Ind.Pvt.ltd, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Black Granite Quarry in an area of 2.00 Acres at

Page 23: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

23

Sy.Nos. 641 & 642 of Gumballi Village, Yelandur Taluk, Chamarajanagara District. It is a Govt. Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.M. Sudheendra Kumar and approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore. Capacity of mining is Av. 351.56 T/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 145th meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th August 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the opinion from the Wild Life Authority.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 150th meeting of SEAC held on 7th, 8th and 9th October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, already many no. of proposals from this village have been cleared by the committee. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Gumballi village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the information as above.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 30.10.2015.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted. The committee observed that, the proposed quarry lease is within 5 Km from BRT & also noted that, in the sketch submitted by the proponent, the total extent considered including this proposal in Gumballi & Yeragamballi village is 12-08 Acres and it is equal to 12-12 Acres (the threshold limit for wild life boundary within 5 Kms.). The proponent informed that, there is a typographical error in the sketch approved by DMG, where, for one D. Nagaraju, the lease area shown is 10-08 Acres, but actually it was 2-08 acres. The committee asked the proponent to correct the same and submit the corrected copy duly approved by DMG.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the corrected combined sketch duly approved by DMG.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal to SEAC after submission of

Page 24: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

24

above informatition.

156.16 Black Granite Quarry Project, Sy.No.640 of Gumballi Village, Yelandur Taluk, Chamarajanagara Dist. (2-10 Acres) (QL No.239) of M/s. Hind Nippon Rural Industries (P) Ltd. 460, 11th Main, RMV Extension, Bengaluru -560080 (SEIAA 551 MIN 2015)

This is a Operating proposal submitted by M/s. Hind Nippon Rural Industries (P) Ltd, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Black Granite Quarry in an area of 2.10 Acres at Sy.No.640 of Gumballi Village, Yelandur Taluk, Chamarajanagara District. It is a Govt. Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.M.Sudheendra Kumar and approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore. Capacity of mining is Av. 375 Cu.m/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 145th meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th August 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the opinion from the Wild Life Authority.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 150th meeting of SEAC held on 7th, 8th and 9th October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, already many no. of proposals from this village have been cleared by the committee. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Gumballi village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the information as above.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 31.10.2015.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted. The committee observed that, the proposed quarry lease is within 5 Km from BRT & also noted that, in the sketch submitted by the proponent, the total extent considered including this proposal in Gumballi & Yeragamballi village is 14.18 Acres and it exceeds 12.12 Acres (the threshold limit for wild life boundary

Page 25: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

25

within 5 Kms.) and the proposal attracts general condition and it should be considered as category A project.. The proponent informed that, there is a typographical error in the sketch approved by DMG, where, for one D. Nagaraju, the lease area shown is 10.08 Acres, but actually it was 2.08 acres. The committee asked the proponent to correct the same and submit the corrected copy duly approved by DMG.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the corrected combined sketch duly approved by DMG.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal to SEAC after submission of above informatition.

Fresh Subjects:

156.17 Proposed 2 MMTPA Cement Grinding Plant at Sy. No. 262/3,262/5B, 262/6, 262/10, 262/13, 262/9, 262/8, 262/7, 262/12, 262/5A, 262/4, 262/11, 350/1, Kudathini Village, Bellary District of M/s. Jai Bhole Cement Combine Pvt. Ltd. B-105,Kalpataru Plaza, 224 Bhavani Peth, Pune (SEIAA 32 IND 2015)

M/s. Jai Bhole Cement Combine Pvt. Ltd have applied for Environmental Clearance from SEIAA for their new proposed Cement Grinding Plant of capacity Two Million Metric tons per annum. This is a project falling under the category 3(b) of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006, Under Category – B. The total Plot area is 40 Acres.

2. SiteLocation: The proposed project located Sy.No’s. 262/3, 262/5B, 262/6, 262/10, 262/13, 262/9, 262/8, 262/7, 262/12, 262/5A, 262/4, 262/11, 350/1 of Kudathini Village, Bellary Taluk, Bellary District. 3. Proposed Activity: The proposed activity will involve in cement grinding 4. Raw Materials: The raw materials used for the proposed project as follows:

5. Production Capacity and Products Manufactured: The products manufactured are cement of proposed capacity 2,00,000 MTPA

6. Capital Investment: Rs.300 Crores.

7. Solid Waste management: Office waste: 2-3 Kg/day, Packing f& other wastw:5-8 kg/day, Domestic waste: 3-4 kg/day.

8. Water Requirement: The total water required for the project is 100KLD. The source of the water is Tungabhadra reservoir at about 45 km from the proposed plant site. Water

Page 26: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

26

will be required for cooling of equipment, for dust suppression by water spray and drinking, firefighting etc.

10. Energy Requirement: The proposed power requirement of the plant is 30 MW sourced from GESCOM (Gulburga Electricity Supply Company Limited).

11. Other Details: The proponent have submitted Form-1, along with Pre-feasibility Report and proposed Environmental Management Plan.

Enclosures: Land conversion certificate, Google map, Location map. Process Flow Sheet:

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to

provide required information/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, pre-feasibility report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the proposal was approved by Commerce and Industries Department, Government of Karnataka to establish “2 MMTPA Capacity Slag Base Grinding Unit with 24 MW Thermal Power Plant” whereas the proponent has submitted the application to SEIAA only for 2 MMTPA Cement Grinding Unit.

The committee after discussion decided to appraise the proposal as categoty B1 and decided to issue ToRs in accordance with EIA Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines after duly incorporating outcome of the public consultation. The committee also prescribe the following additional ToRs.

1. Details of resource/ raw materials required for the industry and its availability to be 0established

2. Explore the possibility to get the fly ash and slag from nearby thermal power plant with the necessary MOU

Page 27: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

27

3. Impact on the nearby railway line and agriculture land due to this activity and measures taken for the same.

4. Cumulative impact on account of various industries around the proposed project (10 km radius).

5. In view of the approvals obtained through the State High Level Clearance Committee for establishment of thermal power plant and cement grinding unit, the proponent shall submit a firm commitment for having shelved the power plant at the proposed site.

6. Distance from the Dharoji Sloth bear sanctuary from the competent authority.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for issue of ToRs.

156.18 Manufacturing of Bulk Drugs and Intermediates Facility at Sy. No. 106 & 107, Plot No.197/2, Raichur Growth Centre, Wadloor Cross,Chicksugar 584134 of M/s. Venus Chemicals and Drugs Pvt Ltd, Plot No 197/2, Raichur Growth Centre Wadloor Cross Chicksugar (SEIAA 33 IND 2015)

M/s. Venus Chemicals & Drugs Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental Clearance from SEIAA for their new proposed Establishment of Bulk Durgs and Intermediates Manufacturing Industry at Sy.No’s: 106 & 107, Plot No. 197/2,Raichur Growth Centre, Wadloor Cross, Chicksugar. The project site is located at KIADB Industrial estate

Latitude: 16012’0”N Longitude: 77022’0”E

This is a project falling under the category 5(f) of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006. The total Plot area is 4028 Sq.mtrs and builtup area is 1600 Sq.meters.

1. Proposed Activity: The proposed activity will involve in the manufacture of Bulk durgs and Intermediates.

2. Project Cost: Rs.110 Lakhs

3. Energy Requirement: The proposed power requirement for the project is 250 KVA. The required power will be drawn from KPTCL, GESCOM. D.G set of 250 KVA is proposed to meet emergency power requirement of the plant.

4. Landscape area: 1,340 Sq.mtrs

5. Land form, Land use & Land Ownership: The proposed land comes under Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB)

6. Hazardous waste details: Table shows of the list of Hazardous solid waste

generated from various sources.

Page 28: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

28

7. Raw Materials: All the rawmaterial required for manufacturing of above products will be sourced from local market. The products wise required rawmaterials and quantities are shown in below tables:

Page 29: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

29

Page 30: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

30

8.Solid waste details:

8. Water Requirement: The total water required for the proposed project 77 KLD The source of water supply is ground water. Table shows the water requirement for the project.

9. Waste Water Generation Management: The total effluent generated from the

proposed project is 51.64 KLD.

Waste Water Generation and Treatment Method

Page 31: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

31

Products Manufactured:

List of By-Products:

Connectivity: The nearest habitation from the site is distance of 5 Kms The nearest Railway station is 12Kms from the site. The nearest airport is Airport at a distance of 250Kms at

Hyderabad.

10. Other Details: The proponent has submitted Form-1, along with Pre-feasibility Report.

11. Enclosures: Land Documents, Site plan.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, pre-feasibility report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the boiler and solvent storage are adjoining which is not compactable.

The Committee after discussion decided to appraise the proposal as B1 and decided to issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in accordance with EIA Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines. The committee also prescribe the following additional ToRs.

Page 32: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

32

1. Layout plan with justification with the necessary approvals from the competent authority

2. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow 3. Scientific assessment of the ground water both quality and quantity 4. Explore the possibility to replace the reney nickel with other catalyst 5. Explore the possibility to reduction of MDC with other alternative solvents 6. Due diligence study of the site with scientific disposal of dismantled debris 7. Mass balance, material balance and energy balance to be explained in detail 8. Fire NOC to be submitted. 9. Green chemistry adopted in the process 10. 33% of the area for development of green belt proposed along with the design

details of the species to be proposed to plant.

Action:Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for issue of ToRs

156.19 Proposed residential apartment project at Sy. No. 28,m Kenchenahalli Village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore of Mr. Bharath P. Shah & Mrs. Veena Hasmukh Shah (SEIAA 195 CON 2015)

Name of Applicant: Mr.Bharath.P.Shah & Mrs. Veena Hasmukh Shah Latitude: 130 7’10.98”N Longitude: 770 34’53.02”E

Mr.Bharath.P.Shah & Mrs. Veena Hasmukh Shah have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Residential apartment Project at Sy.No.28, Kenchenahalli Village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 13,153.00 Sq.mts 1. The proposed project consists of total builtup area of 33,946.59 Sq.mts comprising

of 167 number of residential units with building configuration B + GF +4 UF + Terrace Total cost of the project is Rs. 40 Crores.

2. Landscape area (proposed): 6,317.33 Sq.mts (48.03%)

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 78.93 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met BWSSB. Copy of NOC is not submitted.

4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 99 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 116 KLD with SBR Technology.

5. Excavated Earth Management: The quantity of earthwork involved on-site is estimated to be about 18,462.71 Sq.mts [ [[

6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 334 Kg/day; where 200 kg is organic waste and 133kg is inorganic waste. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers.

Page 33: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

33

7. Hazardous Waste Management: waste oil from DG sets, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 752 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 1 x 450 KVA. Total energy savings is not mentioned.

9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 217No’s of ECS. 10. Environment sensitivity: Bannerghatta National Park at a distance of 36 Kms.

Yelhanka Lake: 0.51 Kms(W Direction) Puttanahalli Lake 0.65 Kms(E Direction)

Other details: Height of the building is 14.90 M.

11. Connectivity: The project site is connected by 10 m wide Kenchnahalli road which connects to Doddaballapur road.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of the Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.20 Mixed use development project “Mandavi Prince Palace” at Sy. No. 84/4A, 4B1, 4B2, 18A1, 18A2B2, 18A2B3, 18B, No.68, Puttur Village, Udupi Taluk, Udupi District of by M/s. Mandavi Real Estate Developers (SEIAA 196 CON 2015)

Name of Applicant: Jerry Dias Partner M/s. Mandavi Real Estate Developers

Latitude: 130 21’52.32”N Longitude: 740 44’51.25”E

M/s. Mandavi Real Estate Developers have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of “Mandavi Prince Palace” mixed use development Project at Sy. No. 84/4A, 4B1, 4B2, 18A1, 18A2B2, 18A2B3, 18B, No.68, Puttur Village, Udupi Taluk, Udupi District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 11,456.77 Sq.mts 1. The proposed project consists of total builtup area of 48,288.41 Sq.mts comprising

of Commercial building having GF + 2 UF and Residential building having

Page 34: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

34

5 towers, building configuration is B + G +14UF’s with 364 number of residential units. Total cost of the project is Rs. 90 Crores.

2. Landscape area (proposed): 3,780.73 Sq.mts (33.00%)

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 253 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met by Udupi CMC. Copy of NOC is not submitted.

4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 215 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 250 KLD.

5. Excavated Earth Management: The quantity of earthwork involved on-site is estimated to be about 10,531.04 Sq.mts. [ [[

6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 728Kgs/day; where 436.8 kg is organic waste and 291.2 kg is inorganic waste. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers.

7. Hazardous Waste Management: waste oil from DG sets, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1,950 KVA is sourced from MESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 4 x 125 KVA. Total energy savings is not mentioned.

9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 388 No’s of ECS. Road width infront of project site is 30 meters.

10. Environment sensitivity: Swarna River: 2.0 Kms(N Direction) Udupi Coast: 5.6 Kms (W Direction)

Other details: Height of the building is 49.98 M.

11. Connectivity: The project site is connected by 30 m wide Kalsanka Ambagilu road which connects to NH 66.

*Out of Five Residential Towers, Two towers already built, One Commercial building works not yet started (Photograph Enclosed)

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the proponent has already started the construction activity and out of five residential towers, two towers already built and it is at the finishing level.

The Committee after discussion decided to report the violation and recommend the proposal to SEIAA to take credible action in this regard.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 35: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

35

156.21 Pink Granite Quarry Project, Sy.No.32/2/1 of Bandargal Village, Kustagi Taluk & Koppala District (2-0 Acres) (QL No.774) of Sri Rekhappa L Rathod (SEIAA 1445 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri Rekhappa L Rathod, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Pink Granite in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.32/2/1 of Bandargal Village, Kustagi Taluk & Koppala District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.N.Krishnamurthy approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 5,544 Cu.m/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.22 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.372/c of Dashamapura Village, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Bellary District (6.25 Acres) of M/s. Sri Raghavendra Transport Company, #23, Dam Road, Near Saibaba Circle, Hospet Town & Taluk, Bellary District - 583201. (SEIAA 1481 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Raghavendra Transport Company, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 6.25 Acres at Sy.No.372/c of Dashamapura Village, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Bellary District. It is a Government Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sanjay Kumar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bellary District. Capacity of mining is Av. 50,000 TPA

The representative of the proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information without proper authorization letter.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 36: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

36

The committee therefore decided to defer the proposal providing one more opportunity to the proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised and decision will be taken based on the merit if he remains absent.

156.23 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.75 of Varavukaval Village, Challakere Taluk, Chitradurga District (1-0 Acre) (QL No.503) of Sri R. Tipperudraiah, Chitrayyanahatti Village, Challakere Taluk, Chitradurga District - 577522. (SEIAA 1482 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri R. Tipperudraiah, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-00 Acres at Sy.No.75 of Varavukaval Village, Challakere Taluk, Chitradurga District. It is a Government Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP SanjayKumar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Chitradurga District. Capacity of mining is Av. 3,000 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.24 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.263 of Nannivala Village, Challakere Taluk, Chitradurga District (1-03 Acre) (QL No.509) of Sri R. Tipperudraiah, Chitrayyanahatti Village, Challakere Taluk, Chitradurga District - 577522. (SEIAA 1483 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri R. Tipperudraiah, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-03 Acres at Sy.No.263 of Nannivala Village, Challakere Taluk, Chitradurga District. It is a Government Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sanjay Kumar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Chitradurga District. Capacity of mining is Av. 4,000 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

Action Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal in the subsequent meeting.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 37: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

37

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.25 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.58/A (P) of Seethalahari Village, Gadag Taluk & District (2-0 Acres) (QL No.707) of Sri N.H.V. Ramarao, #5/26, Shirahatti Taluk, Gadag District - 582120. (SEIAA 1484 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri N.H.V. Ramarao, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.58/A (P) of Seethalahari Village, Gadag Taluk & District.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP S.B.Naganur approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Gadag District. Capacity of mining is Av. 13,635 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that there is a discrepancy in the land use plan as per the approved quarry plan and presentation made. The proponent is asked to submit the revised land use plan duly approved by the DMG.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the above information.

156.26 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.58/A (P) of Seethalahari Village, Gadag Taluk & District (2-0 Acres) (QL No.708) of Sri N.H.V. Ramarao, #5/26, Shirahatti Taluk, Gadag District - 582120. (SEIAA 1485 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri N.H.V. Ramarao, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.58/A (P) of Seethalahari Village, Gadag Taluk & District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Action Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

Page 38: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

38

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP S.B.Naganur approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Gadag District. Capacity of mining is Av. 15,020 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that there is a discrepancy in the land use plan as per the approved quarry plan and presentation made. The proponent is asked to submit the revised land use plan duly approved by the DMG.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the above information.

156.27 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.18 of Shanubhoganahalli Village, Nagamangala Taluk, Mandya District (5-0 Acres) (QL No.627) of Sri Devaraju C K. No.4600, 22nd Cross, V.V.Nagar, Kallahalli Town, Mandya District. (SEIAA 1486 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri Devaraju C K, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 5-00 Acres at Sy.No.18 of Shanubhoganahalli Village, Nagamangala Taluk, Mandya District. It is a Government Gomala Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.M.Sudheendra Kumar approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Mandya District. Capacity of mining is Av. 8015 Cu.m/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee made the following observations:

1. It is an existing quarry proposal and lease has been granted in 2003. The proponent has submitted the audit report for 2009-2014.

2. In the approved quarry plan, minable reserve calculations, geological calculations and five year productions are wrong.

3. No land use plan in the quarry plan. 4. There are lot of inconsistency between the quarry plan and the presentation made.

The Committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after submission of the revised quarry plan after incorporating the above information along with the mining audit report from 2003 to 2009.

Action Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

Action Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

Page 39: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

39

156.28 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.542 (P) of Danayakanakere Villag, Hospet Taluk, Bellary District (2-0 Acres) (QL No.384) of Sri Gurubasavaraj, No.1710/B, 10th Cross, M.J.Nagar, Govt. Hospital Road, Hospet Taluk, Ballari District - 583203. (SEIAA 1487 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri Gurubasavaraj, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.542 (P) of Danayakanakere Villag, Hospet Taluk, Bellary District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP S.B.Naganur approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bellary District. Capacity of mining is Av. 16,067 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee observed that there is a discrepancy in the land use plan as per the approved quarry plan and presentation made. The proponent is asked to submit the revised land use plan duly approved by the DMG.

The Committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

156.29 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.461/3 (P) of Hiremallanakere Village, Hoovinahadagali Taluk, Bellary District (4-0 Acres) (QL No.317) of Sri K. Vasanthkumar, #169, Ward No.6, Kudligi Taluk, Ballari District - 583 134. (SEIAA 1488 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri K. Vasanthkumar, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 4-00 Acres at Sy.No.461/3 (P) of Hiremallanakere Village, Hoovinahadagali Taluk, Bellary District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP S.B.Naganur approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bellary District. Capacity of mining is Av. 25,028 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee observed that there is a discrepancy in the land use plan as per the approved quarry plan and presentation made. The proponent is asked to submit the revised land use plan duly approved by the DMG.

Action Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

Page 40: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

40

The Committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

156.30 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.95 (P) of Halagera Village, Yadgir Taluk & District (7-0 Acres) of Sri Nagappa, Kotagarwad, Ward No.10, Yadgir Town & Taluk, District - 585201. (SEIAA 1489 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Nagappa, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 7-00 Acres at Sy.No.95 (P) of Halagera Village, Yadgir Taluk & District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP S.B.Naganur approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Yadgir District. Capacity of mining is Av. 25,021 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee observed that there is a discrepancy in the land use plan as per the approved quarry plan and presentation made. The proponent is asked to submit the revised land use plan duly approved by the DMG.

The Committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

156.31 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.372/c of Dashamapura Village, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Bellary District (12-0 Acres) of M/s. Travancore Minerals & Transport Co., #610, Sree Vilasa, 15th Ward, Bharathi Nagar, Amravathi, Hospet - 583201. (SEIAA 1490 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by M/s. Travancore Minerals & Transport Co, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 12-00 Acres at Sy.No.372/c of Dashamapura Village, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Bellary District. It is a Government Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sanjay Kumar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bellary District. Capacity of mining is Av. 1,20,000 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

Action Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

Action Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

Page 41: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

41

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of an undertaking that the approach road to be made pucca.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

29th December 2015 Members Present in the meeting:

EIA Presentation:

156.32 Residential apartment at Sy.No,59/1,59/2,59/3,59/4,59/5,59/6A,59/18,59/19,60,6162, 63, 64,65,66/1,66/2,66/4, 66/5, 66/6,66/7, 67,57/1A,57/1B,57/3,57/4,57/5, 57/6,57/7,57/857/9, 57/10, 57/11,57/12,57/13,57/14,58/1, 58/2,58/3A,58/3B,58/3C, 58/3D,58/4,58/5,58/6, 58/758/11, Hoskerehalli Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of Sri Ramesh N, Senior Vice President, M/s. G Corp Spaces Pvt. Ltd., #21/19, Craig Park Layout, Off M.G.Road, Bangalore - 560001. (SEIAA 211 CON 2014)

This is a proposal submitted by M/sag Corp Spaces Pvt. Limited Seeking Environmental Clearance for Construction of Residential Apartment Project on a plot area of 97,123.74 Sqmts at Sy.No’s. 59/1,59/2,59/3,59/4,59/5,59/6A,59/18,59/19,60, 6162,63,64,65,66/ 1,66/2,66/ 4,66/ 5,66/ 6,66/ 7,67,57/ 1A,57/ 1B,57/ 3,57/ 4,57/5,57/ 6,57/ 7,57/857/9,57/ 10,57/ 11,57/12,57/13,57/ 14,58/1,58/ 2,58/ 3A,58/ 3B,58/ 3C,58 /3D,58/4,58/5,58/6,58/758/11 of Hosakerehalli Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urban District. It is proposed to construct 1298 Units with total built up

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Shri. N. Naganna - Chairman Prof. D.L. Manjunath - Member Dr. S. Manjappa - Member Dr. B.S. Jayaprakash Member Shri. B. Chikkappaiah - Member Dr. N. Krishnamurthy - Member Dr. S. Prashanth - Member Dr. K.C. Jayaramu - Member Sri H. Srinivasaiah - Member Dr. K.B. Umesh - Member Sri. M. Subramany. M - Member Sri. Vijaya Kumar - Secretary, SEAC

Page 42: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

42

area of 2,98,502.57 Sqmts. The proposed construction has a building configuration of 14 Towers out of which 6 towers will be having 2Basements + Ground + 21 UF with 528 units, 1 Tower will be having 2 Basements + GF + 23 floors with 48 units, 6 towers will have 2 Basements + GF + 27 Floors with 672 units, 1 tower with 2 Basements + GF + 24 Floors with 50 units.

Total water requirement of project is 902.79 KLD. 767.37 KLD of waste water expected is proposed to be treated in a STP of 550 KLD & 250 KLD capacity with SBR Technology.

Municipal Solid waste of 2,596 Kg/day is proposed to be handled Insitu

Parking facility for 2000 Nos.vehicle is proposed to be provided.

Total energy requirement of 3,495 KW is proposed to obtained from BESCOM. It is proposed to establish 3 x 750 KVA No’s. of DG sets to meet the energy requirement in case of non-supplies. It is proposed to develop a Greenbelt of 40%.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 129th meeting of SEAC held on 9th, 10th and 11th February 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion had decided to appraise the proposal as B1 as the built up area is more than 1,50,000 Sqm and decided to issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in accordance with EIA Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines. The committee also decided to prescribe the following additional ToR.

1. Ecological service that is being rendered by the Kharab land and the measures

proposed to protect the same. 2. Impact of the proposed activity on vrishabavathi valley. 3. Quantification of the terrace area available for harness solar energy and an

appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 4. Quantification of the excavated earth and specific plan for disposal of excess

excavated earth without any adverse impact on the environment. 5. Scheme of treating sewage and sullage separately and use of treated water

within the project site. 6. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow. 7. Use of CNG for the generator.

Accordingly the ToR was issued vide letter dated 03.03.2015.

The project proponent has submitted the EIA report vide letter dated 03.12.2015.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

Page 43: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

43

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that there is a karab land in the proposed project premises and the proponent is advised to make available this karab land for the public use. The Proponent informed the committee that, they are planning to treat sewage & sullage separately. Also they are going for green building certificate.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issuing of Environmental Clearance after submission of the following information.

1. The kharab land to be made accessible to public. 2. An additional treatment plant to be installed to treat the treated water &

recycled the same for use, to reduce the intake of fresh water. 3. Three rows of plants (tall, medium & shrubs) to be planted in the green belt

area and species design 4. They are advised to go for green building certificate.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.33 Expansion of Residential Apartment at Sy. No. 146/1, 147/1, 147/2, 145 and 144 , Kudlu Village, Sarjapur Hobli, Halrul Road, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of Sri Nikhil Agarwal, M/s. SNN Properties LLP, No.3761, Raj Lake View Apartment, 29th main, N.S.Palya Main Road, 2nd Stage, BTM Layout, Bangalore-560 076. (SEIAA 83 CON 2015)

M/s. SNN Properties LLP, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Expansion of Residential Apartments Project at Sy.No’s.146/1, 147/1, 147/2, 145/1 and 144 of Kudlu Village, Sarjapur Hobli, Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost is 250 Crores.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 6,7076.11 Sq.mts. The project consists of 3 Blocks (12 wings) consisting of 2B + G + 14 UF with 576 no of units modifying to 2B + G + 19UF with 909 no’s. of units with Total Built up area is 1,42,820.99 Sq.mts modifying to 1,88,764.36 Sq.mts. Ht. of Building is 59.90 M.

Landscape area (proposed): 1,2605.8 Sq.mts (20.0 % )

Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 613 KLD. The source of water is BWSSB.

Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 490 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 300 KLD and 180 KLD with SBR Technology.

Excavated Earth Management:- Total Excavated Earth is 127,000 m3 will be used within the Project site for, Landscaping of Gardens and road making etc.

Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 2045 Kg/day; where 1227 kg/day is the organic waste and 818 kg/day is inorganic waste, Organic waste will be treated in organic waste convertor.

Page 44: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

44

Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 6000 KVa is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG set of 6 X 500 KVA.

Traffic Details: The project site is connected to Bangalore Hosur main road, and road adjacent to NH -7. The existing, projected & modified LoS is not submitted. Parking proposed:1118. Nos.

Other details: Rain water Harvesting is proposed. Height of the building is 59.90 M. The ROW is 18 Meter.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 144th meeting of SEAC held on 5th and 6th August 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The Committee decided to appraise the proposal as B1 as the built up area is more than 1,50,000 Sqm. Committee after discussion decided to issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in accordance with EIA Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines. The committee also decided to prescribe the following additional ToR.

1. The structural stability certificate of the building from a reputed third party

agency to ascertain the load bearing capacity of the predesigned structure in view of the proposed construction above the already approved structure by the competent authorities.

2. The certified copy of the lake details from the competent authority showing the exact location of the boundary (water spread area) and the extent of area of the lake

3. Scheme for usage of maximum treated water from STP within the project site only. 4. To provide fire escape chutes at appropriate places for easy escape of trapped

persons. 5. Explore the possibility to provide for separate treatment of sewage and

sullage 6. Hydrological study of the lake which is very close to the project site

influencing the surface water flow duly marking the ridges. 7. NOC from Storm water wing of BBMP.

Accordingly the ToR was issued vide letter dated 10.09.2015.

The project proponent has submitted the EIA report vide letter dated 08.12.2015.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee

Page 45: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

45

observed that, in the water balance chart, 85% sewage generation is considered, also in the buffer zone left for the nala running in the project site, drive ways have been provided. For this, the proponent informed the committee that as per the BDA bylaw, they have provided driveways in the buffer area left in the nala portion. While issuing EC earlier, the land including nala is considered as built up area, and at that time the mandatory buffer area has been left for nala portion and the proponent informed that plan was sanctioned by BDA. The present plan was sanctioned by BBMP. The proposal has not passed through sensitive zone committee. But now, in the revised master plan (RMP) it is not declared as sensitive zone, as stated by the proponent. The committee observed that, the structural stability certificate given is not by an expert. Also, regarding the classification of the nala (primary, secondary & tertiary), the proponent informed that, they have left the buffer of 15 m considering it as primary nala and as per bylaw, but according to bylaw, the buffer to be left is 50m, 25m & 15m from the centre of the nala for primary, secondary & tertiary nalas. The proponent failed to explain the type of nala passing through the project site.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. Revised water balance chart considering 95% sewage generation. 2. The BDA/BBMP bylaw showing the nala classification & buffer to be left for

each type of nala. 3. Structural stability copy certified from the third party agency. 4. The classification of the nala regarding primary, secondary & tertiary,

passing through the project site & the same should be ascertained by competent authority.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

Deferred Subjects:

156.34 Development of Residential Apartment at Khatha No. 1609/94/8, SY. NOS. 94/4, 94/6, 94/7 & 94/8, Kodigehalli Village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, Bengaluru of M/S. Unique Infrastructure and Homes Pvt Ltd. NO. 34/1, 1st Floor, G-Block, Sahakara Nagar, Bengaluru – 560092.(SEIAA 166 CON 2015)

M/s. Unique Infrastructure and Homes Pvt Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Residential development Project at Khatha No. 1609/94/8, Sy. No’s. 94/4, 94/6, 94/7 & 94/8, Kodigehalli Village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, Bengaluru under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 9,380.10 Sq.mts (2A, 13 G) 1. The proposed project consists of total builtup area 28,693.10 Sq.mts comprising

185 No’s of residential units with building configuration 2B + GF +4UF. Total cost of the project is 40 Crores.

2. Landscape area (proposed): 2,972.00 Sq.mts (33%)

Page 46: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

46

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 125 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met by BWSSB. Copy of NOC is not submitted.

4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 110 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 110 KLD with SBR Technology.

5. Excavated Earth Management: Total Excavated Earth is 28,206 m3 For Back Filling in foundation 4,231 m3 For Landscaping - 4,458 m3 For Roads and walkway formation– 5,000 m3 Site Formation is 10,074 m3

[

Preparation of soil cement blocks & landscape undulations – 6,436 m3 [[

6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 416 Kg/day; where 250 kg/day is the organic waste and 166 kg/day is inorganic waste, organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers.

7. Hazardous Waste Management: waste oil from DG sets to the amount of 0.243l/running hour of DG, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1,000 Kw is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 1 X 500 KVA.

9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 204 No’s of cars. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted

11. Other details: For the proposed project rain water harvesting facility will be implementing with a roof rain water collection sump of capacity 120 Cu.m and also provided 10 no’s of recharge pits. Height of the building is 14.95 M. The ROW is not mentioned. Total energy savings is 21%.

The Proponent was invited for the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. The proponent remained absent.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, in the absence of the proponent. The committee observed the following.

1. Details of excavated earth and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal site

2. Detailed Hydrological study of the influencing the area 3. Scientific assessment of water for both quantity & quality, taking into

consideration of all the sources of water and its impact on competitive users. 4. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an

appropriate plan thereof with due calculations.

Page 47: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

47

5. Bi fuel Gen sets to be provided 6. Revised land use plan by increasing the green belt area to 33% 7. Detailed traffic study and its impact

The Committee after discussion had decided to provide one more opportunity to the proponent since it is not possible to appraise the proposal in the absence of the proponent, after submission of the above information.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed the committee that, in the project site, a portion of the land is earmarked for the road widening purpose, though it was not officially communicated. Also as per the bylaw, in the buffer zone is left for the nala running in the project site. Regarding the classification of the nala (primary, secondary & tertiary), the proponent failed to explain the type of nala passing through the project site.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. An undertaking regarding no activity in the land earmarked for road widening purpose.

2. The BDA/BBMP bylaw showing the nala classification & buffer to be left for each type of nala.

3. The classification of the nala regarding primary, secondary & tertiary, passing through the project site & the same should be ascertained by competent authority.

4. Minimum 6 m width drive way to be provided.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

156.35 Development of Residential Apartment and Commercial Building at Sy. No. 15/2,

Geddalahalli Village, K. R. Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru of M/s. Unishire Housing LLP, No. 36, Railway Parallel Road, Nehru Nagar, Kumarapark (West), Bengaluru – 560 020 (SEIAA 149 CON 2015)

M/s.Unishare Housing LLP., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed development of Residential Apartment Project at Sy. No. 15/2, Geddalahalli Village, K. R. Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost is 35 Crores.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 5,211.68 Sq.mts

2. The proposed project consisting of 2B + G + 20 UF with 144 no of units with Total Built up area is 24,840.09 Sqm. Ht. of Building is 62.99 M.

Page 48: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

48

3. Landscape area (proposed): 1,730.19 Sq.mts (35.30% ) 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 109 KLD. The source of water is

BWSSB. Copy of NOC is submitted.

5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 98 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 110 KLD with SBR Technology.

6. Excavated Earth Management: - Total Excavated Earth is 9,450 m3 Back Filling in Foundation is 1,418 m3 For Landscaping - 1,384 m3 Roads and walkways – 2,731 m3 Preparation of soil cement blocks- 1,100 m3

For site formation - 2,817 m3 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 437 Kg/day;

where 239 kg/day is the biodegradable waste and 198 kg/day is non biodegradable waste.

8. Hazardous waste Management: Waste oil from DG sets to the amount of 0.243l/running hour of DG, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers.

9. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 923 Kw is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG set of 1 X 500 KVA.

10. Traffic Details: The approach road infront of the project site is 28m wide, termed as collector road as per standards, connecting outer ring road to Hennur-Byrathi, Kalkere, Kannur & Chickgubbi. LoS of service road connecting site is C/D-C-B. Parking proposed: 160 Nos.

11. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted 12. Other details: Rain water Harvesting will be implementing with roof rain water

collection sump of capacity 40 cu.m and also provided 8 no’s of recharge pits. The ROW is 28 M. Total Energy savings from the project is 20%.

The Proponent was invited for the 151st meeting of SEAC held on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. The proponent remained absent and proponent has given letter informing the committee that he is unable to attend the meeting and will attend the next meeting.

The Committee decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The Proponent was invited for the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent. The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, in the absence of the proponent. The committee observed the following points.

1. Details of excavated earth (with calculations) and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal site

2. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow

Page 49: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

49

3. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an appropriate plan thereof with due calculations

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission

of the above information.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, for the commercial shop users’ vehicles, separate parking space is not earmarked in the parking area, and NOC from BWSSB not submitted. Detailed earthwork calculation and disposal of the same is not submitted.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. Details of excavated earth(with calculations) and scheme of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal

2. Earmark separate parking space for commercial shop users’ vehicles. 3. NOC from BWSSB regarding supply of water.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the

above information.

156.36 M-Sand Quarry Project, Sy.No.121 of Anekallu Village, Chintamani Taluk, Chikkaballapura District (10-0 Acres) of Sri Munivenkatappa Jagannath (SEIAA 1430 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri.Munivenkatappa Jagannath seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of M-Sand in an area of 10-0 Acres¸ at Sy.No.121 of Anekallu Village, Chintamani Taluk, Chikkaballapura District. It is a Govt Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri.H.Sanjeevegowda and approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Chikkaballapura. Capacity of mining is 1,47,000 TPA.

The Proponent was invited for the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. The proponent remained absent.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan, in the absence of the proponent.

The Committee after discussion had decided to provide one more opportunity to the proponent since it is not possible to appraise the proposal in the absence of the proponent, and the following information’s are to be submitted.

Page 50: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

50

1. Revised Geological & Mineable reserve and five year production calculation 2. Copy of RTC 3. Revised EMP Budget with a provision of CSR 4. Scheme of disposal of quarry waste 5. Distance from interstate boundary

The proponent was invited for the meeting to provide required clarification/ additional

information. The proponent has given a letter on 25-12-2015, requesting to consider his proposal in the subsequent meeting since he is unable to attend this meeting.

The committee considered the request of the proponent and decided to give final opportunity to the proponent with an intimation that the proposal will be appraised in his absence and appropriate decision will be taken.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

156.37 Building Stone / M-Sand Quarry Project, Sy.No.01 of Narasapura Village, Chintamani Taluk, Chikkaballapura District (10-0 Acres) of Sri B. Hemachandra Babu (SEIAA 1439 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri B. Hemachandra Babu, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 10-00 Acres at Sy.No.01 of Narasapura Village, Chintamani Taluk, Chikkaballapura District.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP H.Sanjeeve Gowda approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Chikkballapur District. Capacity of mining is Av. 147000 TPA

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are invited for the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information. The proponent remained absent.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan, in the absence of the proponent.

The Committee after discussion decided to provide one more opportunity to the proponent since it is not possible to appraise the proposal in the absence of the proponent, and the following information’s are to be submitted.

1. Revised Geological & Mineable reserve and five year production calculation 2. Copy of RTC 3. Revised EMP Budget with a provision of CSR 4. Scheme of disposal of quarry waste 5. Approach road details 6. Distance from interstate boundary to the quarry site

The proponent was invited for the meeting to provide required clarification/ additional

information. The proponent has given a letter on 25-12-2015, requesting to consider his proposal in the subsequent meeting since he is unable to attend this meeting.

Page 51: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

51

The committee considered the request of the proponent and decided to give final opportunity to the proponent with an intimation that the proposal will be appraised in his absence and appropriate decision will be taken.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

Reconsideration Subjects:

156.38 Belvedere by UKN - Airport District, Residential Group Housing at Sy No's 7/1 and 20/1, Navarathna Agrahara Village, Jala Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore of Sri Gautam U. Nambisan, 10th Floor, Gamma Block, Sigma Soft Tech Park, No.7, Whitefiel- Varthur Main Road, Varthur Post, Bengaluru- 560066.(SEIAA 135 CON 2015)

Mr. Gautam U. Nambisan,have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for Development of Residential apartment at Sy No's 7/1 and 20/1, Navarathna Agrahara Village, Jala Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost = Rs. 149.87 Cr.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 37,433 Sq.mts 2. The proposed residential apartment consists No.of Units 844, Consisting of 2

Buildings that Building 1 & Building 2. Building 1 Consists of Block A,B,C and D and Building 2 Consists of Block E,F,G and H. Block B in Building 1 Will be Provided for Commercial and Sports Facilities Consisting of G+5UF and Blocks A,C,D,E,F,G and H is for residential houses Consisting of 2B+G+16UF with Total Built up area of 1,14,369.60 Sq.mts height is 49.95m.

3. The permissible FAR is 2.499 out of 2.5 Submitted.

4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 546 KLD. The source of water is BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB not submitted.

5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 172 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 322 KLD with SBR Technology.

6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generated = ------- Cum. All the earth generated will be utilised within the project site for landscaping & road making.

7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 1.89 MT/day; where 0.78 MT/day is the organic waste and 1.18 MT/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers.

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 3191.46 KW is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 1X400 KVA for Commercial Block, 7X500 KVA and 1X250 KVA for residential blocks and 5X500 KVA Capacities of D.G Sets.

9. Traffic Details: Not submitted. Parking proposed: 985 Nos.

Page 52: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

52

10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted

11. Other details: Rain water harvesting is proposed.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 150th meeting of SEAC held on 7th, 8th and 9th October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the following points.

1. The excess treated water is allowed for ground recharge. 2. The excess excavated earth is being carted out of the project site. 3. There are no records available in the proposal with regards BIAPPA approved DP

plan

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information

1. Revised water balance chart with scheme of disposal of excess treated water. 2. BIAPPA approved DP plan & corresponding letter. 3. Scheme for safe and scientific management of excess excavated earth within the

project site only and detailed calculation of earth work quantity. 4. Scheme of Avenue plantation on either side of the land left in the middle of the

project site.

The proposal was placed before the SEAC during the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent vide letter dated 13.11.2015.

The committee not satisfied with the replies made by project proponent. The committee opined that the concerned consultant may come and clarify the above. The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal in the subsequent meeting.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted. The consultant informed the committee that, they will raise the basement by about 1.20 m from the ground level and there -by reducing the generation of earth and whatever earth generated will be managed within the project site only.

Page 53: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

53

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to condition that, the excess earth will be managed within the project site only.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.39 Software Office Building Project at Plot No.86A & 86B, Sy.Nos. 12 & 10 (P) of Konappana Agrahara & Sy.Nos. 161, 62 of Doddathogur Village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk Bangalore Urban Dist of M/s. NRN Holdings Private Limited, #703, Tathagata, 9th main, 47th A cross, 5th block, Jayanagar, Bengaluru -560041(SEIAA 136 CON 2015)

M/s. NRN Holdings Private Limited, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA

for Proposed Office Building at Plot No.86A & 86B, Sy.Nos. 12 & 10 (P) of Konappana Agrahara & Sy.Nos. 161, 62 of Doddathogur Village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost = Rs. 89 Cr.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 6,376.71 Sq.mts 2. The proposed residential apartment consists 2B+G+11UF with height of 48.2m

with Total Built up area of 24,468.81 Sq.mts. 3. Landscape area (proposed): not submitted 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 39.5 KLD. The source of water is

ELCITA.

5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 46 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 50 KLD with MBR Technology.

6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generated = 38,809 Cum. The excavated earth will reused for Plinth filling of about 9930 Cum and top soil will be used for landscaping.

7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 282.25 Kgs/day; where 112.9 kgs/day is the organic waste and 169.35 kgs/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers.

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 753 KW is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 2X250 KVA,1X500 KVA

9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 293 Nos. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are invited to attend the 150th meeting of SEAC held on 7th, 8th and 9th October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. But the proponent remained absent.

The Committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent for appraisal and if remains absent, the proposal will be appraised based on the information and will be disposed off with merits.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

Page 54: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

54

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that construction of three floors has been already in progress, which is clear violation of EIA Notification 2006. The proponent informed the committee that, the plan was sanctioned by Electronic City Improvement Trust Authority (ELCITA) and while sanctioning, the Authority has given permission for construction up to 15 m height (G+ 3UF) and for construction beyond 15 m, Environmental Clearance is required. Based on this, the construction of three floors is taken up.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of Certificate with regard to structural safety certificate from third party to know whether the existing structure can take additional load to accommodate the proposed structure over the structure already designed.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 07.12.2015.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted. The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.40 Pink Porphery Granite Quarry Project at Sy.No.44, Kengal Village, Nelamangala Taluk, Bangalore Rural District 4-0 Acres (Q.L.No.464) of M/s. Vijay Enterprises (SEIAA 1213 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by M/s. Vijay Enterprises seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Pink Porphery Granite in an area of 4-00 Acres¸ at Sy.No.44, Kengal Village, Nelamangala Taluk, Bangalore Rural District. It is a Govt. Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri.Subban.H.V and approved by Senior Geologist, Dept of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is 8,265 Cubic meter/annum.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 151st meeting of SEAC held on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee made the following observations:

Page 55: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

55

1. The proponent have not submitted compliance to the earlier EC issued 2. Discrepancy in the land use plan

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of

the following information.

1. Compliance to the earlier EC issued 2. Revised land use plan

The proposal was placed before the SEAC during the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent vide letter dated 17.11.2015.

The committee not satisfied with the replies made by project proponent. The committee opined that the concerned consultant may come and clarify the above. The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal in the subsequent meeting.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted. The committee observed that, the revised land use plan submitted is not signed by DMG. The proponent informed the committee that, the quarry waste will be utilized for refilling the quarry pit.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance with a condition that, the proponent should strictly follow the conditions stipulated in the earlier issued EC and also further EC conditions also and after submission of revised land use plan duly signed by DMG.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.41 Black Rock (Dolorite) Quarry Project, Sy.No.81/4, Andagove Village, Somwarpet Taluk, Kodagu Dist. (2-0 Acres) (QL No.845) of Sri S K Raj Kumar, Reliance Stationary Mart, #55, Commercial Street, Bengaluru, Karnataka (SEIAA 770 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri.S.K.RajKumar seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Black Rock (Dolorite) Quarry in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.81/4, Andagove Village, Somwarpet Taluk, Kodagu District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

Page 56: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

56

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri.B.M.Sudheendrakumar and approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore, Capacity of mining is Avg.608.373 m3/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 148th meeting of SEAC held on 21st, 22nd and 23rd September 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the Harangi reservoir is very near to the quarry and the proponent has not given any mitigation measures to avoid erosion and siltation of the reservoir and also scheme of disposal of quarry waste is not given.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. Scheme of disposal of quarry waste. The top soil to be preserved separately and rocky waste to be dumped separately.

2. Mitigation measures taken to avoid erosion & siltation of soil

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated08.12.2015.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted. The committee observed that, the scheme of disposal of quarry waste given is not satisfactory. Also, since the Harangi backwater (FRL) is about 1.60 Km from the quarry site and sufficient mitigation measures to be taken to avoid siltation of the reservoir.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after submission of the following information.

1. Scheme of disposal of quarry waste 2. Provision of garland drain all along the periphery of the quarry boundary

with gully plugs and series of check dams in the lowest level of the quarry area.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.42 Black Granite Quarry Project, Sy.No.27/6 (P) of Yaragamballi Village, Yelandur Taluk, Chamarajanagar Dist. (2-31 Acres) of Sri Syed Travasul Ahmed S/o. Syed Abdul Ajej

Page 57: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

57

Sahe, Yaragamballi Village, Yelandur Taluk, Chamrajanagar District (SEIAA 808 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri Syed Travasul Ahmed, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Black Granite in an area of 2-31 Acres at Sy.No.27/6 (P) of Yaragamballi Village, Yelandur Taluk, Chamarajanagar District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.N.Krishnamurthy approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 1,120 Cu.m/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 149th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th September 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, the quarry area is within 5 Km from the BRT wildlife zone which is a eco sensitive zone and also already many no. of proposals from this village have been cleared by the committee. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Yaragamballi village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the combined sketch of leases & Notifications as explained above.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee observes that, in the letter given by wild life authority, it was mentioned that the quarry lease boundary is at a distance of 1.60 Km from BRT wild life which is a Eco Sensitive Zone. But the proponent informs the committee that, it was wrongly mentioned as1.60 Km, but the actual distance is more than 11.00 Km.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the clarification from the wild life authority regarding distance from BRT to quarry leas boundary.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 02.12.2015.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted. The committee observed that, the proposed quarry lease is within 5 Km from BRT & also noted that, in the sketch submitted by the

Page 58: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

58

proponent, the total extent considered including this proposal in Gumballi & Yeragamballi village is 12-08 Acres and it is equal to 12-12 Acres (the threshold limit for wild life boundary within 5 Kms.). The proponent informed that, there is a typographical error in the sketch approved by DMG, where, for one D. Nagaraju, the lease area shown is 10-08 Acres, but actually it was 2-08 acres. The committee asked the proponent to correct the same and submit the corrected copy duly approved by DMG.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the corrected combined sketch duly approved by DMG.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal to SEAC after submission of above informatition.

Recalled Subjects:

156.43 Building Stone Quarrry Project at Sy.No.69, Shivanahalli Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District 2.0 Acres (0.80 Ha) of M/s. Kushal Stone Crushers, Sri. R.D. Rajanna, No.165, Ragihalli Village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District. (SEIAA 1208 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by M/s. Kushal Stone Crushers seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres¸ at Sy.No.69, Shivanahalli Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District. It is a Govt. Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri.Ramachandra.K.T. approved by Senior Geologist, Dept of Mines & Geology, Bangalore Urban District. Capacity of mining is Avg. 30,000 TPA.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 151st meeting of SEAC held on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the proposed quarry area is falls within 5 km from the interstate boundary. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued to Shivanahalli Village, Anekal Taluk with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the combined sketch of leases & Notifications as explained above.

Page 59: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

59

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the proposed quarry is with- in 5 Km from BNP, which is a Eco Sensitive Zone. In this village, already proposals to an extent of 5 ha are already recommended for EC by the committee and since threshold limit of 5 ha is reached, as per EIA notification 2006, further proposals will be considered as category – A projects which attracts general condition and the proponent is advised to approach MOEF for further EC purpose.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.44 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.57 of Matadakurubarahatti Village, Chitradurga Taluk, Chitradurga Dist. (2-0 Acres) of Sri A R Abhishek (SEIAA 1292 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri A R Abhishek, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.57 of Matadakurubarahatti Village, Chitradurga Taluk, Chitradurga District. It is a Government Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP S.Kameswara Rao approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Chitradurga District. Capacity of mining is Av. 25006 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre-Feasibility Report, Approved mining plan and additional information/clarification provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after submission of the following information.

1. Revised Geological & Mineable reserve calculation 2. Corrected copy of RTC 3. Revised EMP Budget with a provision of check dams & CSR provision 4. Scheme of disposal of quarry waste

[

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 05.12.2015.

Page 60: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

60

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee observed that the replies submitted were not signed by DMG. The proponent has been asked to get the documents approved by DMG and then submit the same for consideration.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the above information.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after receiving the above information.

156.45 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.1118/4 of Bangaramakki Bengre II Village, Bhatkal Taluk & Uttara Kannada Dist. (0-20 Acre) of Sri Sunil B Naik (SEIAA 1370 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Sunil B Naik, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 0-20 Acre at Sy.No.1118/4 of Bangaramakki Bengre II Village, Bhatkal Taluk & Uttara Kannada District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP M.C.Dinesh approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Uttara Kannada District. Capacity of mining is Av. 13818 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee perused the letter issued by the DMG, Uttara Kannada District, vide letter No. UÀ̈ sÀÆE/GPÀf/PÀæµÀgï/PÀUÀUÀÄ/2015-16/1320 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 22.07.2015.

The committee also noted that a letter has been issued by Deputy Deirector, DMG, Uttara Kannada vide letter No. UÀ̈ sÀÆE/GPÀf//PÀUÀUÀÄ/2015-16/1509 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 07.08.2015 informing that they have withdrawn the exemption given vide his letter No. UÀ̈ sÀÆE/GPÀf/PÀæµÀgï/PÀUÀUÀÄ/2015-16/1320 ¢£ÁAPÀ: 22.07.2015 for utilizing the buffer zone. The proponent submitted that he will get permission from the Mines and Geology Department for undertaking quarrying in the buffer zone also and he will get the land near the proposed lease area for dumping of waste, storing of minerals and other related activities.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after obtaining of

the exemption letter from the Mines and Geology Department to undertake mining activity in the buffer zone and with the details of additional land available for the quarry related activities.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 05.12.2015.

Page 61: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

61

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted. The committee observed that, through letter no. UÀ̈ sÀÆE/GPÀf/PÀUÀUÀÄ/2015-16/2673, ¢£ÁAPÀ 02.12.2015, the Dy. Director, Dept. of

Mines & Geology, Karwar, Uttara kannada Dist., has issued an order, exempting buffer zone area and utilization of additional 0.07 acre land. The proponent informed the committee that, there is no other activities going on in & around this quarry area.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.46 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.168 (P) of Varlakonda Village, Gudibande Taluk, Chikkaballapura Dist. (5-0 Acres) (QL No.128) of M/s. Pravahi Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd., #1238, 7th B Cross, B Sector, Yelahanka, Bangalore - 560106. (SEIAA 961 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by M/s. Pravahi Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 5-00 Acres at Sy.No.168 (P) of Varlakonda Village, Gudibande Taluk, Chikkaballapura District. It is a Government Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri. Ganapati S. Hegde approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Chikkaballapur District. Capacity of mining is Av. 1,00,000 TPA .

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 149th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th September 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, many quarry leases are considered in this village and cleared by committee. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Varalakonda village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

Page 62: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

62

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the combined sketch showing all the leases and notifications issued by DMG.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee

during the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, many quarry leases are considered in this village and cleared by committee. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Varalakonda village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the combined sketch showing all the leases and notifications issued by DMG.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 04.08.2015.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, the proposed quarry area is falling in a different cluster other than the cluster which was considered in the earlier meetings. Though, it is falling in a different cluster, the committee has taken a decision that, not to consider any more proposals in this area, based on the recommendations of the subcommittee.

The Committee after discussion had decided to defer the proposal till next meeting to take further decision.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The Committee noted that many proposals have been cleared in this area and the proposed area is likely to result in to a cluster situation with a total lease area exceeding 25 Ha and, as per the O.M dated 24.12.2013 issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, the proposal has to be appraised category B1. In this cluster, the threshold limit of 62 Acres of area has been recommended for EC and remaining proposals in this village is to appraised as B1 project under EIA Notification 2006.

Page 63: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

63

The Committee after discussion decided to appraise the proposal under B1 category and issue Standard TOR.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for issue of ToRs.

Fresh Subjects:

156.47 “Sattallite Commercial Complex” project at L.G.F. A/22, Satellite complex, Koppikar Road, Hubli -580020 of Mansun Builders and Developers, L G F A/22, Koppikar Road, Hubli, Karnataka (SEIAA 197 CON 2015)

M/s. MAN-SUN Builders and Developers have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of “Sattallite Commercial Complex” commercial building development Project at CTS No.2877 & 2920 of Ward No.1, Koppikar road, Hubli Taluk, Dharwad District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 12,843.95 Sq.mts (3.17 Acres) 1. The proposed project consists of total builtup area of 38,771.38 Sq.mts comprising

of Commercial building having B +UG+G+4UF’s with height of 20.65 meter. Total cost of the project is Rs. 50.85 Crores.

2. Landscape area (proposed): 4,244.92 Sq.mts (33.05%)

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 166 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met from KUWS & D, HDSS (Hubli Dharwad water supply system) Board. Copy of NOC is submitted.

4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 141 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 150 KLD treated with SBR Technology.

5. Excavated Earth Management: The total quantity of excavation from the proposed project is 19,200 m3

[. The excavated earth will be reused for plinth filling of about 12,500 m3 and top soil will be used for landscaping is about 1,550 m3 and remaining soil will be used for driveway formation. During the excavation, the surrounding area will be kept wet, so that there is no dust pollution in the air. [[

6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 969 Kgs/day; where 388 kg is organic waste and 581 kg is inorganic waste. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers.

7. Hazardous Waste Management: waste oil from DG sets, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.

Page 64: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

64

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1,607 Kw is sourced from HESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 1 x 150 KVA. Total energy savings is 25.77%.

9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 204 No’s of Cars.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, already construction work has begun and structural work (Except walls) up to 4 UF is completed. It is a clear violation of EIA Notification 2006.

The committee after discussion decided to report the violation to the authority and recommend the proposal to SEIAA to take credible action in this regard.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.48 Proposed residential building apartment project at Sy. No. 412, 416/1, 416/2 of Devanahalli village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk Bangalore Rural District of M/s. Sanchaya Land and Estate Pvt Ltd., No. 482, 3rd Floor, 80 ft. Road, HMT Layout, Near R.T. Nagar Bus Depot, Above Cuppa Restaurant, Bangalore – 560032. (SEIAA 198 CON 2015)

M/s. Sanchaya Land and Estate Pvt Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Residential Apartment Project at Sy. No. 412, 416/1, 416/2 of Devanahalli village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk Bangalore Rural District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details:- Total Plot area is 30,065.87 Sq.mts 1. The proposed project consists total builtup area of 82,954.79 Sq.mts comprising of

B+GF+12UF+TF with 1173 Flats. Total cost of the project is Rs. 176 Crores.

2. Landscape area (proposed): 10523 Sq.mts (35%)

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 792 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met from Gramphanchayat. Copy of NOC is submitted.

4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 712 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 720 KLD treated with SBR Technology.

5. Excavated Earth Management: The total quantity of excavation from the proposed project is 5,900 Cu.m[. Backfilling to be done between foundations is about 2,900 Cu.m. Backfilling to be done on the backside of retaining walls & underground tanks is about 2,000 Cu.m. [[

Page 65: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

65

6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 2838 Kgs/day; where 1703 kg/day is organic waste and 1135 kg/day is inorganic waste is worked out as per guidelines of IS 6924-1973.

7. Hazardous Waste Management: Around 3KL/annum waste oil from DG sets, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.

8. Energy Requirement: Total connected load shall be 4,700 KVA, Demand load shall be 3,500 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 3 x 1000 KVA and 500 x 1 KVA.

9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 665 No’s of Cars. Note: Proposed to provide only 665 number of cars for 1173

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed the following points.

1. The spacing of the buildings is very close and there will be no cross ventilation between buildings.

2. The nearest fire station mentioned as Airport fire station. 3. The height limit of the building (45 m) is as per the Airport authority directions. 4. Water balance chart is wrong 5. Quality of RO reject not given 6. Disposal of inorganic waste & solid waste management not properly addressed. 7. Availability of sustainable water quantity is not submitted.

The committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the following information.

1. The nearest fire station location to be changed 2. Revised concept plan ensuring cross ventilation to all the units 3. RO reject quality to be rechecked and revised water balance chart 4. The width of fire safety stair case to be kept @ 1.50 m 5. Scheme of disposal of inorganic waste & proper management of solid waste 6. Establishing the availability of sustainable water supply and its impact on competitive

users

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after receiving the above information. [

Page 66: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

66

156.49 Modification of Group Housing Project at Sy. No. 29/1, 30/3, 31/5, 32/1, 32/2, 32/3, 33/1, 33/2, 34/1, 34/2, 34/3, 35/1, 35/2, 42/2, 43/1, 43/2 and 43/3, Rachenahalli Village, K.R. Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore of M/s. Mantri Technology Constellation Pvt. Ltd (SEIAA 199 CON 2015)

M/s. Mantri Technology Constellation Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed modernization of Residential Apartment Project at Sy.No’s 29/1, 30/3, 31/5, 32/1, 32/2, 32/3, 33/1, 33/2, 34/1, 34/2, 34/3, 35/1, 35/2, 42/2, 43/1, 43/2 and 43/3, Rachenahalli Village, K.R. Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details:- Total Plot area is 56,048.48 Sq.mts 1. The proposed project consists total builtup area of 2,25,501.71 Sq.mts. Height of

the building 126 Meters.

2. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 173 KLD for Mantri Sun 5, 171KLD for Mantri Sun 6 and 398 KLD for Mantri Lithos. Water requirement for the project will be met from BWSSB. Copy of NOC is submitted.

3. Wastewater Management: Total waste water generated is 154 KLD for Mantri Sun 5, 154 KLD for Mantri Sun 6 respectively. STP of design capacity of 155 KLD treated with SBR Technology.

4. Landscape area: 17,557.62 Sq.mtrs (33.01%)

5. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 2316 Kgs/day; which includes biodegradable waste and non biodegradable waste.

6. Energy Requirement: The power required is 4,690.05 Kva for Mantri Sun 5 and 6 5,188.88 Kva for Mantri Lithos. The back power will be 4 x 100 KVA and 1x 500 KVA and 3 x 1010 kva for Mantri Lithos respectively.

7. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 1291 No’s of Cars. 8. Excavated Earth Management:

Page 67: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

67

Page 68: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

68

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion had decided to appraise the proposal as B1 as the built up area is more than 1,50,000 Sqm and decided to issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in accordance with EIA Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines. The committee also decided to prescribe the following additional ToR.

1. Classification of Nala w.r.t. primary, secondary & tertiary nalas 2. Hydrological study of the influencing area of the project in order to ascertain surface

water drainage pattern.

Page 69: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

69

3. The structural stability certificate of the building from a reputed third party agency to ascertain the load bearing capacity of the predesigned structure in view of the proposed construction above the already approved structure by the competent authorities & also stability with respect to earthquake (as per condition no.37 of earlier issued EC)

4. Increase in green belt area 5. Baseline data – comparative statement with present & earlier condition 6. Changes in the environmental parameters 7. Seismic zone details

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for issue of ToRs.

156.50 Proposed Formation of Composite Housing Scheme at Sy. No. 21/1, 21/2, 21/3, 21/4, 21/5, 21/6, 21/7, 21/8, 21/9, 21/10, 22/1, 22/2, 22/3, 22/4, 22/5, 22/6, 22/7, 22/8, 22/9, 22/10, 23/1, 23/3, 23/4, 24, 25, 26/1, 26/2, 26/3, 26/4, 26/5, 26/6P, 26/7, 27/1, 27/2, 27/3, Rayasandra Village Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District, Karnataka of Karnataka Housing Board, 3rd & 4th floor, Cauvery Bhavan,K.G road, Bangalore-560009 (SEIAA 200 CON 2015)

Name of Applicant: Executive Engineer, Karnataka Housing Board Name of the Consultant: M/s. Ramky Enviro Engineers Ltd.,

Karnataka Housing Board have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed formation of composite Housing scheme at Rayasandra Village Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District. under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total cost of the project is 306.58 Crores.

Latitude: 120 35’44.13”N Longitude: 77026’17.26”E

Land details: - Net area for Land use is 146 A, 5.2 G (59.13 Ha)

Sl.No Description Sq.m Acres % 1 Residential 306207.00 75.66 51.78 2 Commercial 15188.90 3.75 2.57 3 Civil Amenities 31,707.50 7.83 5.36 4 Roads 156227.76 38.60 26.42 5 Parks & open spaces 82035.90 20.27 13.87 Total 591367.06 146.12 100

1. The proposed project comprising of 2592 No’s of plots.

Sl.No Category Plot Size (M) Total No. of Plots 1 EWS 6x9 427 2

LIG

9x12

1154 3

MIG

9x15

682 4 HIG 12 x18 329 TOTAL 2592

Page 70: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

70

2. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 2018 KLD. The source of water supply is KUWSDB (Permission yet to be taken).

3. Wastewater Management:- The total quantity of waste water generated is 1636 KLD and treated is STP of design capacity of 1.5 MLD.

4. Excavated Earth Management:-The proposed project is an area development project, there will be no cellars & basements hence no earthworks are involved. [

5. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 8080 Kg/day; which includes 7,776 Domestic waste and 304 kg/day of Commercial waste.

6. Hazardous Waste Management: Oil sludge of 25 ltrs/annum generated, will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.

7. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 9,116 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power details not mentioned.

8. Traffic Details: Traffic details not mentioned

9. Environment sensitivity:

Arkavali River is 3 Km(W) Mavathur Reservoir 3 Km (SW) Bannerghatta National Park 19 Km (NE)

10. Connectivity: The project is located at a distance of 20km (NNW) from

Ramanagara city. The Ramanagaram railway station is located at a distance of 21.24 km(NNW) from the project site. The project site is adjacent to the Kanakapura to Bangalore road.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion had decided to appraise the proposal as B1 as the built up area is more than 1,50,000 Sqm and decided to issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in accordance with EIA Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines. The committee also decided to prescribe the following additional ToR.

1. Since the project area is abetting to NH-209, and considering the expansion of

the highway, as per the law, the distance from the highway to be left 2. Revised land use plan – allocating 33% for green belt area 3. All round the plot area, min 7.50 m width green belt to be proposed 4. Approval from competent authority regarding the plan approval

Page 71: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

71

5. NOC from Municipal authority for supply of water & study of impact on the competitive users is to be conducted.

6. Protective measures taken to protect adjoining lakes & nala running in the site area.

7. Sewage waste should not be discharged into the lake situated in the D/s of the project area.

8. Classification of Nala w.r.t. primary, secondary & tertiary nala & Protection of existing nala, present condition, measures taken to protect them & required buffer to be left based on the classification.

9. No. of trees existing and no. Of trees proposed to be cut along with names list and no. & list of trees proposed to be planted. (in the ratio of 1 (cut): 3 (planted)

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for issue of ToRs.

156.51 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.372/c of Dashamapura Village, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Bellary District (12-0 Acres) of M/s. Clariya Enterprises, #610, Sree Vilasa, 15th Ward, Bharathi Nagar, Amravathi, Hospet - 583201. (SEIAA 1491 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by M/s. Clariya Enterprises, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 12-00 Acres at Sy.No.372/c of Dashamapura Village, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Bellary District. It is a Government Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sanjay Kumar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bellary District. Capacity of mining is Av. 1,20,000 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, in this village & sy. No., total 3 quarry leases with a total extent of 30-25 Acres, and the production of mineral is heavy, and correspondingly, the transportation of the mineral through trucks, the approach road may not take that much load and will be damaged. The committee directed the proponent to conduct traffic impact study and accordingly design the pavement. The committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the following information.

1. Combined impact study of all the three QL’s regarding transportation of quarry material and accordingly design of pavement with crust thickness

Page 72: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

72

2. Revised EMP budget with provision for CSR activities. 3. Historical back ground of the area if any to be studied

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal to SEAC after the submission of the above information.

156.52 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.66 of Gabbadi Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District (2-0 Acres) (QL No.1178) of M/s. Sri Venkateshwara Stone Crushing Company, Yelethotadapalya Village, Anjapura Post, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urban District-560062. (SEIAA 1492 MIN 2015)

This is a Working Quarry proposal submitted by M/s. Sri Venkateshwara Stone Crushing Company, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.66 of Gabbadi Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Lakkanna approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Ramanagara District. Capacity of mining is Av. 32,271 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, the proponent has not submitted complete audit report. However, for the purpose of calculation of quantity, for the balance years, latest production quantity is considered and quantity is assessed.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of complete audit report.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.53 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.66 of Gabbadi Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District (1-0 Acre) (QL No.1222) of M/s. Sri Venkateshwara Stone Crushing Company, Yelethotadapalya Village, Anjapura Post, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urban District-560062. (SEIAA 1493 MIN 2015)

This is a Working Quarry proposal submitted by M/s. Sri Venkateshwara Stone Crushing Company, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an

Page 73: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

73

area of 1-00 Acres at Sy.No.66 of Gabbadi Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Lakkanna approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Ramanagara District. Capacity of mining is Av. 20,007 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, the proponent has not submitted complete audit report. However, for the purpose of calculation of quantity, for the balance years, latest production quantity is considered and quantity is assessed. And based on the elevation of the quarry site above ground level (Difference in level. 25.00 m), depth proposed, area of quarrying (as per land use plan), and with the available area, it is not possible to go that depth, because lifting of quarrying material from that depth & movement of vehicles will be very difficult.

The Committee after discussion decided to limit the production to 80%(Restricting the depth of mining to 10m below lowest level in the quarry area) of the total estimated production keeping the minable area quantity and the sustainability of the mine in the mind and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of audit report, modified quarry plan for the above quantity approved by DMG and an undertaking to make approach road pucca.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.54 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.28/A of Bingapur Village, Hangal Taluk, Haveri District (1-0 Acre) of Sri Shivappa Puttappa Basapur, Bingapur Village, Hangal Taluk, Haveri District. (SEIAA 1498 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Shivappa Puttappa Basapur, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-00 Acres at Sy.No.28/A of Bingapur Village, Hangal Taluk, Haveri District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Ganapathi.S.Hegde approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Haveri District. Capacity of mining is Av. 9,047 TPA

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 74: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

74

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.55 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.28/A of Bingapur Village, Hangal Taluk, Haveri District (1-0 Acre) of Sri Basavaraj Kuravatti, Bingapura Village, Hangal Taluk, Haveri District. (SEIAA 1499 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Basavaraj Kuravatti, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-00 Acre at Sy.No.28/A of Bingapur Village, Hangal Taluk, Haveri District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Ganapati.S.Hegde approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Haveri District. Capacity of mining is Av. 9021 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, the proponent has not submitted complete audit report. However, for the purpose of calculation of quantity, for the balance years, latest production quantity is considered and quantity is assessed.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of complete audit report.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 75: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

75

156.56 Multi Colour Granite Quarry Project at Sy.No.94 of Gerahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District (3-0 Acres) (QL No.858) of M/s. Sree Murugan Granites, #196, 11th Main, Nagendra Block, Bangalore - 560050. (SEIAA 1500 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by M/s. Sree Murugan Granites, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Multi Colour Granite in an area of 3-00 Acres at Sy.No.94 of Gerahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Dr.C.P.Prasanna Kumar and N.Sham Sundar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 4,200 Cu.m/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, the lease deed submitted in the quarry plan is not signed by the DMG. And based on the elevation of the quarry site above ground level (Difference in level.), depth proposed, area of quarrying (as per land use plan), and with the available area, it is not possible to go that depth, because lifting of quarrying material from that depth & movement of vehicles will be very difficult.

The Committee after discussion decided to limit the production to 80%(Restricting the depth of mining to 10m below lowest level in the quarry area) of the total estimated production keeping the minable area quantity and the sustainability of the mine in the mind and decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information. Modified quarry plan for the above quantity approved by DMG

1. A copy of the original lease deed. 2. Revised EMP budget with a provision for mitigative measures to protect

adjoining land from fire. 3. Revised soil test reports 4. Green belt to be provided in the outside the lease area.

156.57 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.29(P) of Huluvenahalli Village, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District (1-10 Acres0 (QL No.749) of Sri R Praveen Kumar, No.11, 1st Main Cross, Govindarajnagara, Bengaluru - 560040. (SEIAA 1501 MIN 2015)

Action Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

Page 76: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

76

This is a Operating proposal submitted by Sri R Praveen Kumar, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-10 Acres at Sy.No.29(P) of Huluvenahalli Village, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. It is a Government Gomala Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP P.S.Gopalkrishnappa approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore Urban District. Capacity of mining is Av. 5,000 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The Committee noted that many proposals have been cleared in this area and the proposed area is likely to result in to a cluster situation with a total lease area exceeding 25 Ha and, as per the O.M dated 24.12.2013 issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, the proposal has to be appraised category B1. In this cluster, the threshold limit of 62 Acres of area has been recommended for EC and remaining proposals in this village is to appraised as B1 project under EIA Notification 2006.

The Committee after discussion decided to appraise the proposal under B1 category and issue Standard TOR.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for issue of ToR.

156.58 Shahabad Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.100/7 of Miriyan Village, Chincholi Taluk, Kalaburgi District (1-0 Acre) of Sri Sudhakar, H.No.36, R/o Miriyan, Chincholi Taluk, Kalaburagi District. (SEIAA 1502 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Sudhakar, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Shahabad Stone in an area of 1-00 Acre at Sy.No.100/7 of Miriyan Village, Chincholi Taluk, Kalaburgi District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.M.Sudheendra Kumar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Gulbarga District. Capacity of mining is Av. 67,752 Cu.ft/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

Page 77: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

77

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, based on the elevation of the quarry site above ground level (Difference in level.1.00 m), depth proposed, area of quarrying (as per land use plan), and with the available area, it is not possible to go that depth, because lifting of quarrying material from that depth & movement of vehicles will be very difficult.

The Committee after discussion decided to limit the production to 80%(Restricting the depth of mining to 10m below lowest level in the quarry area) of the total estimated production keeping the minable area quantity and the sustainability of the mine in the mind and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after the submission of the modified quarry plan for the above quantity approved by DMG

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.59 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.168 (P) of Varlakonda Village, Gudibande Taluk, Chikkaballapura District (4-20 Acres) (QL No.181) of M/s. Anil Metal Crusher, #3-8-141-1, 3-7-1 to 3-10-228, Bakarapuram, Pulivendla Mandal, Kadapa District, Andhrapradesh State. (SEIAA 1503 MIN 2015)

This is a Operating proposal submitted by M/s. Anil Metal Crusher, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 4-20 Acres at Sy.No.168 (P) of Varlakonda Village, Gudibande Taluk, Chikkaballapura District. It is a Government Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Ganapati.S.Hegde approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Chikkballapur District. Capacity of mining is Av. 1,03,607 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The Committee noted that many proposals have been cleared in this area and the proposed area is likely to result in to a cluster situation with a total lease area exceeding 25 Ha and, as per the O.M dated 24.12.2013 issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, the proposal has to be appraised category B1. In this cluster, the threshold limit of 62 Acres of area has been recommended for EC and remaining proposals in this village is to appraised as B1 project under EIA Notification 2006.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 78: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

78

The Committee after discussion decided to appraise the proposal under B1 category and issue Standard TOR.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for issue of ToR.

156.60 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.29 (P) of Hulivenahalli Village, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District (6-20 Acres) (QL No.647) of M/s. Aishwarya Enterprises, No.387, 3rd Cross, 1st Main, Girinagara, Avalahalli, Bangalore Urban District. (SEIAA 1504 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by M/s. Aishwarya Enterprises, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 6-20 Acres at Sy.No.29 (P) of Hulivenahalli Village, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. It is a Government Gomala Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP P.S.Gopalkrishnappa approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore Urban District. Capacity of mining is Av. 57,000 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The Committee noted that many proposals have been cleared in this area and the proposed area is likely to result in to a cluster situation with a total lease area exceeding 25 Ha and, as per the O.M dated 24.12.2013 issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, the proposal has to be appraised category B1. In this cluster, the threshold limit of 62 Acres of area has been recommended for EC and remaining proposals in this village is to appraised as B1 project under EIA Notification 2006.

The Committee after discussion decided to appraise the proposal under B1 category and issue Standard TOR.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for issue of ToR.

156.61 Grey Granite Quarry Project, Sy.Nos.70/3 & 70/4 of Chendur Village, Yelburga Taluk, Koppala Taluk (5-0 Acres) (2.023 Ha) of Sri Suresh Yankanagouda Patil, No.4610/A/72, Joshigalli, Ilkal, Hunagunda Taluk, Bagalkot District - 567125. (SEIAA 1505 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Suresh Yankanagouda Patil, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Grey Granite in an area of 5-00 Acres at Sy.Nos.70/3 & 70/4 of Chendur Village, Yelburga Taluk, Koppala District. It is a Patta Land.

Page 79: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

79

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP N.Sham Sunder and A.Kalaivendhan approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 7,050 Cu.m/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed the committee that, the quarry waste will be utilized as building material with the permission of the DMG.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after the submission of an undertaking to utilize the quarry waste as building material with the permission of DMG.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

30th December 2015 Members Present in the meeting:

Deferred Subjects:

156.62 Proposed Residential & Commercial Building at Sy.No.119/1, 119/2D, 119/3D, 119/4B, 119/5B, 119/6B, 120/1, 120/2, 120/3B, 120/4B, 120/5B, 120/6B, 123/1, 123/2, 123/3, 125/5 and 126 of Pantharapalya Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urbna

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Shri. N. Naganna - Chairman Prof. D.L. Manjunath - Member Dr. S. Manjappa - Member Dr. B.S. Jayaprakash Member Dr. M.I Hussain - Member Shri. B. Chikkappaiah - Member Dr. K.C. Jayaramu - Member Sri H. Srinivasaiah - Member Dr. K.B. Umesh - Member Sri. M. Subramany. M - Member Sri. Vijaya Kumar - Secretary, SEAC

Page 80: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

80

District of Sri. P.K. Mishra, Vice President, M/s. Salarpuria Properties Pvt. Ltd., #3, 4th floor, Salarpuria Windsor, Ulsoor Road, Bangalore-560 042. (SEIAA 21 CON 2015)

This is a proposal submitted by M/s. Salarpuria Properties Pvt. Ltd., seeking Environmental Clearance for Construction of Residential and Commercial Building Project on a plot area of 44009.22 Sq.mts at Sy.No’s 119/1, 119/2D, 119/3D, 119/4B, 119/5B, 119/6B, 120/1, 120/2, 120/3B, 120/4B, 120/5B, 120/6B, 123/1, 123/2, 123/3, 125/5 and 126 of Pantharapalya Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urban District. The total built up area of 17,8200 Sq.mts.

Total water requirement of for Residential & Club House is 580 KLD. 464 KLD of waste water expected is proposed to be treated in a STP of 475 KLD capacity. For Commercial Building the total water requirement is 200 KLD 160 KLD of waste water expected is proposed to be treated in a STP of capacity 160 KLD .

Municipal Solid waste of 2637 Kgs/day (Includes 1747 Kgs/day Residential + 890 Kgs/day Commercial ) is proposed to be handled Insitu

Parking facility for 405 Nos.vehicle is proposed to be provided.

Total energy requirement for Residential Building and Club House is 6364 KVA and for Commercial Building is 1721 KVA proposed to obtained from BESCOM. It is proposed to establish 750 KVA x 2 Nos and 2 x 500 KVA of DG Sets for Residential Building and Club House and 750 KVA x 3 No’s for Commercial Building to meet the energy requirement in case of non-supplies.

Total Estimated excavated earth is 52995 Cum. Filling done to fill up low lying areas at site is about 25200 Cum.

It is proposed to develop a Greenbelt of 22.8%.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 133rd meeting of SEAC held on 19th and 20th March 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion had decided to appraise the proposal as B1 as the built up area is more than 1,50,000 Sqm and decided to issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in accordance with EIA Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines. The committee also decided to prescribe the following additional ToR.

1. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an

appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 2. Scheme for providing dual fuel generators for backup power with provision for

CNG. 3. Scheme for utilisation of entire Rain Water harvested in the project site (both from the

roof top and from the surface runoff) within the Project premises only.

Page 81: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

81

4. Details of excavated earth and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal site

5. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow. 6. Explore the possibility to increase greenery in the ground itself 7. Explore the possibility of increasing the use of treated water in order to reduce the

fresh water demand 8. Scheme of treating sewage and sullage separately and use of treated water within the

project site 9. Due diligence report

Accordingly the ToR was issued on 31.03.2015.

The project proponent has submitted the EIA report vide letter dated 08.09.2015.

The proponent was invited for the 152nd meeting of SEAC held on 2nd and 3rd November 2015 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent with intimation.

The Committee had decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

Some of the committee members have expressed that they have not received the materials. Since it is an EIA project without the materials, it is not possible to appraise the proposal.

The committee after discussion decided to defer the proposal providing one more opportunity to the proponent in the subsequent meeting.

The proponent and the Environmental Consultant are invited to attend the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification/information. But they remained absent.

The committee observed that, the proponent remained absent for the third time after submitting the EIA report. Since it is an EIA project, the committee felt that, it cannot be appraised in the absence of the proponent & consultant.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal for closure

156.63 M-Sand Quarry Project, Sy.No.63 of Sujjanahalli Village, Chintamani Taluk, Chikkaballapura District (10-0 Acres) of Sri Munivenkatappa Jagannath (SEIAA 1429 MIN 2015)

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 82: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

82

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri.Munivenkatappa Jagannath seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of M-Sand in an area of 10-0 Acres¸ at Sy.No.63 of Sujjanahalli Village, Chintamani Taluk, Chikkaballapura District. It is a Govt Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri. H. Sanjeevegowda and approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Chikkaballapura. Capacity of mining is 1,47,000 TPA.

The Proponent was invited for the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. The proponent remained absent.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan, in the absence of the proponent.

The Committee after discussion had decided to provide one more opportunity to the proponent since it is not possible to appraise the proposal in the absence of the proponent, and the following information’s are to be submitted.

1. Revised Geological reserve, Mineable reserve and five year production calculation 2. Copy of RTC 3. Revised EMP Budget with a provision of CSR 4. Scheme of disposal of quarry waste 5. Distance from interstate boundary

The proponent has given a letter on 25-12-2015, requesting to consider his proposal in

the subsequent meeting since he is unable to attend the 156th SEAC meeting.

The committee considered the request of the proponent and decided to give final opportunity to the proponent and the proposal will be appraised in his absence and appropriate decision will be taken.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

156.64 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.346 of Kalingeri Villag, Sandur Taluk, Bellary District (3-0 Acres) of Sri. B. Shivamurthy, H.No.97A, Ward No.3, Taranagar, Sandur Taluk, Bellary-560001. (SEIAA 1461 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri. B. Shivamurthy, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 3-00 Acres at Sy.No.346 of Kalingeri Villag, Sandur Taluk, Bellary District.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

Page 83: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

83

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Vinodh.S approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bellary District. Capacity of mining is Av. 40000 TPA

The Proponent was invited for the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. The proponent remained absent.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan, in the absence of the proponent. The committee observed already many no. of proposals in this village has been cleared by the committee. The committee therefore asked the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Kalingeri village Sy. No. 346 and adjacent Sy. Nos with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

The Committee had decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent. The committee also asked the proponent to submit the combined sketch as mentioned above to ascertain for issue of ToR.

The proponent and the Environmental Consultant are invited to attend the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification/information. But they remained absent.

The committee observed that, the proponent has not submitted the required information. The proponent has been given sufficient time to submit the required information. Already many proposals in this village has been cleared by the committee. Therefore in the absence of the details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Kalingeri village Sy. No. 346 and adjacent Sy. Nos with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority, it is not possible to appraise the proposal.

The committee after discussion decided to give final opportunity to the proponent to submit the information otherwise, the proposal will be appraised in his absence and appropriate decision will be taken.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the information.

156.65 Shahabad Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.80/1 of Miryan Village, Chincholi Taluk, Gulbarga District (1-0 Acre) (QL No.409) of Sri. Venkatram Reddy S/o N. Shivareddy, Plot No.30, C/o Somashekhara Rao, Shanthappa Conlony, Tandur (AP) (SEIAA 1476 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri. Venkatram Reddy, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Shahabad Stone in an area of 1-00 Acres at Sy.No.80/1 of Miryan Village, Chincholi Taluk, Gulbarga District. It is a Patta Land.

Page 84: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

84

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.N.Krishnamurthy approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Kalaburagi District. Capacity of mining is Av. 64,336.2 Sq.m/annum

The Proponent was invited for the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. The proponent remained absent.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan, in the absence of the proponent.

The Committee after discussion had decided to provide one more opportunity to the proponent since it is not possible to appraise the proposal in the absence of the proponent, and the following information’s are to be submitted.

1. Revised Geological & Mineable reserve and five year production calculation 2. Copy of RTC 3. Revised EMP Budget with a provision of CSR 4. Scheme of disposal of quarry waste 5. Distance from interstate boundary

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, in the reserve calculation submitted, the depth of reserve considered is 5 m.

The Committee after discussion decided to limit the production to 50%(Restricting the depth of mining to 5m considering the depth of reserves submitted in the quarry plan as 5 m only) of the total estimated production and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after the submission modified quarry plan for the above quantity approved by DMG.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Reconsideration Subjects:

156.66 Residential apartment project at Sy. No. 7/2 of Tirupalya Village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of Sri Abdul Razzak Sharief, No.12/8, Kutty colony, Lalbagh Siddaapura, Jayanagara 1st Block, Bangalore - 560011(SEIAA 168 CON 2015)

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 85: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

85

Sri.Abdul Razzak Sharief has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Residential development Project at Sy No 7/2, Tirupalya Village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 12,140 Sq.mts 12. The proposed project consists of total builtup area of 39,371.00 Sq.mts comprising

377 No’s of residential units with building configuration B + GF +12UF+Terrace Total cost of the project is Rs. 48 Crores.

13. Landscape area (proposed): 5,963.07 Sq.mts

14. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 311 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met by Gramapanchayat. Copy of NOC is not submitted.

15. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 280 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 290 KLD.

16. Excavated Earth Management: During the construction , there will be excavation, cutting and filling due to the formation of foundation and Basements, total Excavated Earth is 9,000 m3 [ [[

17. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 942 Kg/day; where 565 kg/day is the organic waste and 377 kg/day is inorganic waste, organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers.

18. Hazardous Waste Management: waste oil from DG sets, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.

19. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1,700 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 1300 KVA ( 2 X 500 KVA & 1 X 300 KVA)

20. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 344 No’s of cars. 21. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted

22. Other details: Height of the building is not mentioned. The ROW is not mentioned. Total energy savings is not mentioned.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that in the water balance chart 135 LPCD is considered for quantification of requirement of water and Base line data submitted is incomplete.

Page 86: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

86

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Revised water balance calculating fresh water demand at the rate of 55 LPCD as per the norms prescribed for rural water supply and the scheme for meeting the additional requirement with the scientific analysis of availability and quality.

2. Base line data details in full manner

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 07.12.2015.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted by the proponent. Committee observed that, the proponent has not submitted the scientific analysis of availability of water and quality. Without this information, the committee felt that, when the basic information like availability of water is not there, it is not wise to appraise the proposal.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the above information.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the information.

156.67 Residential apartment at Khatha No 1365/47, Sy No 38, Pattandur Agrahara, KR Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore of Sri.P.C.Gurubaran & Others, #21, Dwaraka Mai, 2nd Street, 1st Block, Prakruthi Layout, Bangalore (SEIAA 154 CON 2015)

Sri.Gurubaran have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Residential Apartment Project at Khatha No 1365/47, Sy No 38, Pattandur Agrahara, KR Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total cost of the project is 50 crores.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 9334.78 Sq.mts 2. The proposed project having building configuration of 2B + GF + 13 UF +

Terrace with 274 units inclusive of commercial and clubhouse with Total Built up area of 42,156.41 Sqm.

3. Landscape area (proposed): 3019.15 Sq.mts (34.63%)

4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 204 KLD. The source of water is BWSSB. Copy of NOC is not submitted.

5. Wastewater Management:- The total quantity of waste water generated is 184 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 190 KLD.

6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total earth work estimated is 10,000 Cu.m used for internal roads and filling low-lying areas inside the project premises and for landscaping.

7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 617 Kg/day; where 370 kg/day is the organic waste and 247 kg/day is inorganic waste,

Page 87: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

87

Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor; inorganic waste will be handed over to authorized recyclers.

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1500 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG set of 1000 KVA (2 X 500 KVA)

9. Traffic Details: The project site is connectivity from Channasandra main road (N) SH -35 -300 mts (W) NH -209 -3 Km (E) projected & modified LoS road connecting site is not mentioned. Parking proposed: 320. No’s of cars.

10. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted

11. Other details: Rain water Harvesting is proposed. Height of the building is 45 M. The ROW is not mentioned. Total energy savings is not mentioned.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 151st meeting of SEAC held on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. Provide separate entry and exit 2. Proposed fruit bearing tree species to be planted 3. Copy of the BWSSB demand note 4. Commitment/MOU with regard to disposal of excess treated water 5. Revised storm water management calculation 6. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow. 7. Revised quantification of the terrace area available for harvesting solar energy

and an appropriate plan thereof with due calculations.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 09.11.2015.

The committee reviewed the replies and agreed with the replies made by the proponent.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action

156.68 Residential Development Project at Sy. No. 145 & 146, Bommenahalli Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk M/s. Brigade Enterprises Limited, 29th and 30th Floor, World Trade Centre, Brigade Gateway Campus, 26/1, Dr. Rajkumar Road, Malleswaram - Rajajinagar, Bangalore - 560 055. (SEIAA 170 CON 2015)

Page 88: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

88

M/s. Brigade Enterprises Ltd.., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Residential development Project at Sy. No. 145 & 146, Bommenahalli Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore, under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 40,266.26 Sq.mts (9Acres, 38 Guntas) 1. The proposed project consists of total builtup area 1,40,931.91 Sq.mts comprising

900 No’s of flats with building configuration 2B + GF +25 UF’s.(Residential Block) -4, interconnected buildings and 2B + G + 3UF’s(Club House Building)

2. Landscape area (proposed): 8,826.33 Sq.mts

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 608 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met by Borewell + Rooftop rainwater + Treated water.

4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 203 KLD and 385 KLD Grey water generation treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 390 KLD for grey water generation and 205 KLD for waste water generation.

5. Excavated Earth Management: Total Excavated Earth is 79,194 m3 For Back Filling and Levelling 26,398 m3 For Landscaping - 13,199 m3 For Roads and walkway formation– 19,317 m3 Remaining 20,280 m3

of earth shall be used for Construction of the CDP road within the project site earmarked for road widening. [[

6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 2025 Kg/day; where 1125 kg/day is the organic waste and 900 kg/day is inorganic waste, organic waste is will be composted within the development. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers.

7. Hazardous Waste & E-Waste Management: The E-waste generated will be about 100 kg/annum while Hazardous waste is waste oil from DG sets will be stored separately and handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 4,500 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 2 X 750 KVA + 500 KVA X 2 No’s

9. Traffic Details: Traffic details not mentioned. Connectivity is 14km from Railway station, Old Madras road – 2.5 Km, CBD -26 Km, Kempegowda International Airport -37 Km. Parking proposed: 990 No’s of cars.

10. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted. Hoskote Lake 2.7 KM (NE) Yellama Lake at a distance of 3.2 Km SW of the project.

11. Other details: For the proposed project rain water harvesting facility will be implementing with a roof rain water collection sump and reused for domestic purpose. Height of the building is 78 M. Total energy savings is 30.67%.

Page 89: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

89

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, scientific assessment of the availability of the water from the bore well in the project site is not done, Original test reports for soil & water is not submitted and in the water balance chart, to seepage pond all the treated waste will be letting in to it. The proponent informed the committee that, the distance from NH – 4 to the project boundary is about 2.50 Km.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Scientific assessment of the availability of the water from the bore well in the project site

2. Original test reports 3. Revised water balance chart, allowing only the treated grey water to the

seepage pond.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 05.12.2015.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted by the proponent. Committee observed that, the report is not signed by the consultant. The committee asked the proponent to obtain signature of the consultant in each page of the report.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after submitting the signed copy of the hydrological report.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.69 Proposed Residential Apartments project at Survey No. 156 Kannur Village. Bidarahalli Hobli. Bangalore East Taluk. Bangalore of M/s. Goyal Hariyana Realty, # 206, Barton Centre, #84, M.G.Road, Bangalore - 560001. (SEIAA 177 CON 2015)

M/s. Goyal Hariyana Realty., has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Residential apartments Project at Survey No. 156 Kannur Village. Bidarahalli Hobli. Bangalore East Taluk. Bangalore under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 11,128.77 Sq.mts 2. The proposed project consists of total builtup area of 35,678.08 Sq.mts comprising

222 No’s of residential units with building configuration B + GF +14 UF and a Clubhouse .Total cost of the project is Rs. 40 Crores.

3. Landscape area (proposed): 3,440.8 Sq.mts (33%) 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 150 KLD. Water requirement for

the project will be met Gramapanchayat. Copy of NOC is not submitted.

Page 90: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

90

5. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 135 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 150 KLD.

6. Excavated Earth Management: The quantity of earthwork involved on-site is estimated to be about 22000 Sq.mts will be used within the project site for, Landscaping of gardens and road making etc.,

7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 500 Kg/day; where 300 kg/day is the organic waste and 200 kg/day is inorganic waste, organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers.

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1000 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 2 x 220 KVA.

9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 271 No’s of ECS. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted 11. Other details: Height of the building is 44.95 M. Rain water harvesting system

proposed. The ROW is 12.5 meters.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. Scientific analysis of the availability of bore-well water for quality & quantity. 2. Scheme of treatment for reusing treated water. 3. Baseline data

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 10.12.2015.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted by the proponent and agreed with the replies.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.70 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No. 61 of Ajjagowdana Valse Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District (8-20 Acres) (QL No.1261) of Sri Mohan Kumar S N (SEIAA 1287 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri Mohan Kumar S N, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 8-20 Acres at Sy.No. 61 of Ajjagowdana Valse Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District. It is a Government Gomala Land.

Page 91: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

91

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP M.Azeezulla approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Ramanagara District. Capacity of mining is Av. 339123 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the proposed quarry boundary is closer to BNP.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of

the Letter from BNP regarding the distance from BNP to the quarry lease boundary. The proposed mineable production for five years is OK and in the EMP budget, provision for check dams to be made.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 09.12.2015.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted by the proponent. Committee observed that, the proposed quarry area is near to Gangadharaguuda forest. The proponent informed the committee that, there is no wildlife area within 5 Kms of the proposed quarry area boundary.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.71 Limestone & Dolomite Mining Project, Sy.Nos.45/1A & 47/1 of Kamkeri Village, Ramadurga Taluk, Belgaum Dist. (4.12 Ha) of Sri R S Pujari Jadar Aralikatti Village, Lokapur Post, Mudhol Taluk,Bagalkot District -587122 (SEIAA 519 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri.R.S.Pujari, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Limestone & Dolomite Mine Quarry in an area of 4.12 Acres at Sy.Nos.45/1A & 47/1 of Kamkeri Village, Ramadurga Taluk, Belgaum District.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Dr.S.K.Myageri. and approved by Indian Bureau of Mines, Bangalore. Capacity of mining is Av. 75,000 T/annum

Page 92: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

92

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 143rd meeting of SEAC held on 24th to 29th July 2015 to provide clarification /additional information.

The committee made the following observations:

1. Proponent has not submitted the mining audit report from 2004 to 2009. 2. RTC not submitted.

The committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of

the following information:

1. Mining audit report from 2004 to 2009 2. RTC copy 3. Revised Form 1 4. Compliance to the earlier CFE conditions 5. Revised production plan calculations

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 19.10.2015

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 152nd meeting of SEAC held on 2nd 3rd November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted by the proponent and observed the following points.

1. Compliance to earlier issued EC is not convincing and also is incomplete 2. End use of the limestone is not mentioned 3. Based on the elevation of the quarry site above ground level, depth proposed,

area of quarrying (as per land use plan), and with the available area, it is not possible to extract the required quantity of mineral.

The Committee after discussion decided to limit the production to 70%(Restricting the depth of mining to 20m) of the total estimated production keeping the minable area quantity and the sustainability of the mine in the mind and decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. Full compliance to earlier issued EC 2. An undertaking regarding the end use of lime stone

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 01.12.2015

The committee reviewed the replies submitted by the proponent. The proposed mineral is a major mineral and the quarry plan was approved by IBM. The committee observed that, the cross sections & drawings were not signed by IBM.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to condition that, the cross sections & drawings should be got signed by IBM.

Page 93: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

93

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

156.72 Ganajur Gold Mines, Sy.Nos.33, 54, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 81, 82, 83, 100, 103, 104, 105, Ganajur Village, Haveri Tehsil and District. 48 Ha. (Lease area-29.14 Ha) of Sri Saradchandra Rao Peshwa, M/s. Deccan Exploration Services Private Limited, #89/1, 4th Floor, Raja Ikon Building, Marathahalli, Outer Ring Road, Bangalore - 560 037. (SEIAA 188 MIN 2012) (Extension of ToR validity)

Project Proponent: Sri. Saradchandra Rao Peshwa, Director Environmetnal consultant: M/s. B. S. Envitech, Hyderabad

M/s. Deccan Exploration Services Private Limited have applied for EC from SEIAA for their New Ganajur Gold Mining of 2000 TPD Gold ore production at .Sy.Nos.33, 54, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 81, 82, 83, 100, 103, 104, 105, Ganajur Village, Haveri Tehsil and District over an area of 29.14 Ha and additional area of 18.86 Ha outside lease area for dumping ( totaling 48 Ha ) of Private Patta Land under Schedule 1 (a) of EIA Notification, 2006 read with O.M. dated 18.05.2012 of MoEF under Category- B. Proposed Method of Mining: open-pit mining project with processing of ore as an integral part of these mines for beneficiation of the ore and recovery of gold metal. Man Power: 218 (500 people would be indirectly employed through ancillary industries); Total Project Cost: Rs.87 Crores.

The Project Proponent has submitted the Pre-Feasibility Report; Survey of India Topo-sheet duly marking the project site. The proponent has submitted copies of the long term lease agreement with the farmers of the Ganajur Village who are the owners of the land in the proposed mining area along with consent for mining activities.

Project Surrounding details: Karajgi Reserve Forest – 1.5km and Varada River – 3.6km. Other details: SLHCC cleared and signed MoU with GoK at GIM.

The proponent and the environmental consultant were present and explained the project and the proposed ToRs during the 96th meeting of SEAC held on 4th January 2013. The road diversion will be done with the permission of the Government. The project site is a private patta land and the present land use is dry agricultural activity. The Karnataka State has recommended for mining lease and they are awaiting approval from Ministry of Mines, GoI. The land will be acquired through KIADB. The ultimate depth of mining is 98 m with a life of 30 years. The water requirement of 300 KLD is obtained from Kolur-Kalasur Barrage built across Varadha River and the water will be stored ponds in the project site.

After deliberation, the Committee had decided to issue the model ToRs along with the following additional ToRs for preparation of EIA by the proponent along with public consultation done by KSPCB:

1. Water quality analysis report of Varadha River. 2. Ambient air quality studies including PM2.5. 3. Hydrological studies of ground water. 4. Low flow analysis of seepage.

Page 94: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

94

The proponent has submitted a letter dated 14.10.2015, requesting for extension of validity

of ToR.

The proposal is therefore placed before the SEAC for decision.

The committee observed that, the ToR’s were issued 3 years back and there is a change in the present scenario compared to what it is in three years back. Now regarding extension of validity of ToR can be taken up only after ascertaining the present scenario. In this regard, the proponent is asked to come and explain the proposal.

The committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent to explain the present scenario & reasons for extension of ToR’s validity.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in the subsequent meeting. Fresh Subjects:

156.73 Proposed residential apartment project at Sy. No. 265, Panchayat Khatha No. 1029/1029/265, Doddajala Village, Jala Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk of Sri. Shivakumar, No. 109, 4th Main, H.V. Rangappa Layout, Magadi Main Road, Bangalore (SEIAA 201 CON 2015)

Mr.Shivakumar has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of residential apartment project at Sy. No. 265, Panchayat Khatha No. 1029/1029/265, Doddajala Village, Jala Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details:- Total Plot area is 8,093.60 Sq.mts (Net site area after leaving road widening area is 6,669.58 Sq.mtrs)

1. The proposed project consists of total builtup area of 21,194.87 Sq.mts comprising of 174 units with building configuration having B+G+6UF’s+TF. Total cost of the project is Rs. 50 Crores. Height of the building is 20.85 Meters.

2. Landscape area (proposed): 2,206.93 Sq.mts (33.09%)

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 121 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met from Gramphanchayat. Copy of NOC is not submitted.

4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 103 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 115 KLD treated with SBR Technology.

5. Excavated Earth Management: The total quantity of excavation from the proposed project is 7,147.14 m3. The excavated earth from footings will be used for backfilling between the retaining wall, underground sumps/tanks, between foundations. Fertile soil will be used for landscaping. [[

6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 348 Kgs/day; where 208.80 kg is organic waste and 139.20 kg is inorganic waste. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers.

Page 95: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

95

7. Hazardous Waste Management: waste oil from DG sets, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 783 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 1x450 KVA. Total energy savings is not mentioned.

9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 193 No’s of Cars.

10. Environment sensitivity: Doddajala Lake – 1.8 Kms (SW Direction) Bannerghatta National Park- 30 Kms to S.

11. Connectivity: The project site is connected by 18.29m wide Sadarahalli Shettigere road which connects to Bangalore Hyderabad highway.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, since the proposed project site lies in the panchayat limit, for availability of water, which is basic need of the hour, scientific analysis of availability of water for both quantity & quality and its impact on the competent users is a must for the appraisal of the proposal. But the proponent has not submitted the same, and in its absence it is not possible to appraise the proposal.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of scientific analysis of availability of water for both quality & quantity report.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

156.74 “Sethna Power Tower” Residential Apartment at Khatha No. 11, Sy. No. 50, Chelekere Village, K.R. Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru of M/s. Bramhall Developers Pvt. Ltd, No. 13, Kensington Gardens, Kensington Road, Ulsoor, Bengaluru (SEIAA 202 CON 2015)

M/s. Bramhall Developers Pvt. Ltd, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of “Sethna Power Tower” residential apartment project at Khatha No. 11, Sy. No. 50, Chelekere Village, K.R. Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details:- Total Plot area is 14,647.84 Sq.mts (3 Acres 24.8 Guntas) 1. The proposed project consists of total builtup area of 35,789.92 Sq.mts consisting

of 172 units sprawled across B+G+14UF in Block A & B +G+4UF in Block – B with a maximum height of 44.85m. The construction work for Block- A has been completed and it is occupied. The work is yet to start for Block –B. The total cost of the project is 49.65 Crores.

Page 96: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

96

2. Landscape area (proposed): 4,370.02 Sq.mts (37.29%)

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 120 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met from BWSSB. Copy of NOC is submitted.

4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 108 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 115 KLD treated with SBR Technology.

12. Excavated Earth Management: Total Excavated Earth is 6,250 m3 For Back Filling and Levelling 4,000 m3 For Landscaping - 2,000 m3 For Roads and walkway formation–250 m3 [[

5. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 387 Kgs/day; where 232 kg/day is organic waste and 155 kg/day is inorganic waste. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers.

6. Hazardous Waste Management: 0.243 liter/ running hour of waste oil from DG sets, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.

7. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1000 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 2x250 KVA. Total energy savings is 20%.

8. Traffic Details: Approach road infront of the project site is 15m wide termed as collector road connecting ORR to Bidrahalli, kalkere & Aduru. L.O.S is B-B-B Parking proposed: 236 No’s of Cars.

9. Environment sensitivity: Chelekere Lake – 500 meters Jarkabandi State Forest- 12 Kms.

10. Other Details: Rainwater harvesting facility has been implemented with a roof rain water collection sump of capacity 100 cu.m and also 20 no’s recharge pits.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are invited to attend the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, in the absence of the proponent. The committee observed the following points.

1. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an

appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 2. Scheme for utilisation of entire Rain Water harvested in the project site (both

from the roof top and from the surface runoff) within the Project premises only. 3. Details of excavated earth and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess

excavated earth with details of the disposal site 4. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow.

Page 97: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

97

5. Explore the possibility to increase greenery in the ground itself 6. Explore the possibility of increasing the use of treated water in order to reduce

the fresh water demand 7. Scheme of treating sewage and sullage separately and use of treated water

within the project site 8. Scientific analysis of ground water foe quantity & quality and its impact on

competitive users. The committee after discussion decided to provide final opportunity to the

proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent and the proponent is asked to submit the above information.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the

above information. 156.75 Development of Commercial Building Project “Prestige Star Tech” at Municipal Khatha No.

140, Industrial Layout, Koramangala, Hosur Road, Bengaluru of M/s Prestige City Properties (SEIAA 203 CON 2015)

M/s. Prestige City Properties, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Development of Commercial Building Project “Prestige Star Tech” at Municipal Khatha No. 140, Industrial Layout, Koramangala, Hosur Road, Bengaluru under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B1.

Land details:- Total Plot area is 34,296.83 Sq.mts (8 Acres 19 Guntas) 1. The proposed project consists of total builtup area of 1,72,972.67 Sq.mts,

sprawled across 2B+G+9UF with a maximum height of 39.45m. The total cost of the project is 253.87 Crores.

2. Landscape area (proposed): 11,317.96 Sq.mts (33%)

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 600 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met from BWSSB. Copy of NOC is not submitted.

4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 480 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 480 KLD treated with SBR Technology.

5. Excavated Earth Management: Not mentioned. [[

6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 3.26 MT/day; where 0.65 MT/day is organic waste and 2.61 kg/day is inorganic waste. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers.

7. Hazardous Waste Management: 4.2 liter/ running hour of waste oil from DG sets, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 9,380 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 5x1500 KVA and 1x1010 KVA Total energy savings is 17.2%.

9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 2,468 No’s of Cars.

Page 98: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

98

10. Environment sensitivity: Madiwala Lake – 1.9 Km in the South direction from the project site.

Turahalli State Forest- 10.5 Km in the South west direction from the project site.

11. Other Details: Rainwater harvesting facility has been implemented with a roof rain water collection sump of capacity 260 cu.m and also 15 no’s recharge pits.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, the proposed project is having a built up area of 1,72,972.67 sq.m, which is more than 1,50,000 Sq. m and this falls under category B1 as per EIA Notification 2006 and the general condition attracts.

The committee after discussion decided to appraise the proposal under B1 category project and decided to issue Standard ToR’s along with the following additional ToR’s.

Additional ToR’s

1. Locate one air, water & noise station @ St. Jhon’s hospital and collect data 2. Material management- regarding transportation of construction material 3. Excess earth management 4. Location of STP & DG set to be indicated 5. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an

appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 6. Scheme for usage of maximum treated water from STP within the project site only. 7. Scheme for providing dual fuel generators for backup power with provision for CNG. 8. Scheme for utilisation of entire Rain Water harvested in the project site (both from the

roof top and from the surface runoff) within the Project premises only. 9. Details of excavated earth and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated

earth with details of the disposal site 10. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for issue of ToRs.

156.76 Proposed Formation of Composite Housing Scheme at Sy. No. 13, 13/2, 18/1, 18/2, 19, 20, 22/1, 22/2, 24, 26, 28, 30/1, 30/2, 30/3, 30/4, 31/P, 33/AP, 34, 38/1, 38/2, 39/1, 39/2, 43, Hire Malligvad, Chik Malligvad, Kelgeri & Mommigatti Villages of Dharwad Taluk and District, Karnataka of M/s Karnataka Housing Board, 3rd & 4th Floor, Cauvery Bhavan, K. G. Road, Bangalore – 560 009 (SEIAA 204 CON 2015)

Name of Applicant: Executive Engineer, Karnataka Housing Board Name of the Consultant: M/s. Ramky Enviro Engineers Ltd.,

Karnataka Housing Board have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed formation of composite Housing scheme at Hire Malligvad,

Page 99: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

99

Chik Malligvad, Kelgeri & Mommigatti Villages of Dharwad Taluk and District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total cost of the project is 11038.64927 Lakhs.

Latitude: 150 29’29.84”N Longitude: 74057’11.65”E

Land details: - Total area is 290.65 Acres (117.62 Ha)

Sl.No Description Sq.m Acres % 1 Residential 600075.633 148.2 51.02 2 Commercial 17444.85 4.3 01.48 3 Parks & open

Spaces 121393.50 30.0 10.32

4 CivicAmenity (Public & Semi Public)

44460.79 11.0 03.78

5 Traffic & Transportation

392869.33 97.1 33.40

Total 1176244.11 290.6 100

1. The proposed project comprising of 4066 No’s of plots and 172 no of houses.

Sl.No Category Plot Size (M) Total No. of Plots

Total No of Houses

1 EWS 6x9 621 - 2

LIG

9x12 1178 90

3

MIG

9x15 1555 80

4 HIG I 12 x18 641 02 5 HIG II 15 x 24 71 - Total 4066 172

2. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 2939 KLD. The source of water supply is KUWSDB.

3. Wastewater Management:- The total quantity of waste water generated is 2645 KLD and treated is STP of design capacity of 3 MLD.

4. Excavated Earth Management: Not mentioned [

5. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 13063 Kg/day; which includes 12,714 kg/day is Domestic waste and 349 kg/day of Commercial waste.

6. Hazardous Waste Management: Oil sludge of 25 ltrs/annum generated, will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.

7. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 15,777 KVA is sourced from HESCOM; Backup power details not mentioned.

Page 100: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

100

8. Traffic Details: Traffic details not mentioned

9. Connectivity: The project is located at a distance of 6km (SSE) from Dharwad city. The Dharwad railway station is located at a distance of 7.3 kms(SSE) and Kyaarkoppa Railway station is located at a distance of 3.4 Kms(S) from the project site. The project site is adjacent to the NH4 at East direction and is well connected to SH 73 at a distance of 0.83 kms (E).

10. Environment sensitivity:

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, the proposed project is having a built up area of 11,76,244.11 sq.m, which is more than 1,50,000 Sq. m and this falls under category B1 as per EIA Notification 2006 and the general condition attracts.

The committee after discussion decided to appraise the proposal under B1 category project and decided to issue Standard ToR’s along with the following additional ToR’s.

Additional ToR’s 1. There are 5 HT lines passing in the project site. Precautionary measurements like

leaving buffer area to be indicated. 2. Provision of dual plumbing system 3. Green belt all round the project boundary 4. Create water bodies (eco pond) 5. Scientific analysis of ground water foe quantity & quality and its impact on

competitive users and approval from ground water authority. 6. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an

appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 7. Scheme for usage of maximum treated water from STP within the project site only. 8. Scheme for providing dual fuel generators for backup power with provision for CNG. 9. Scheme for utilisation of entire Rain Water harvested in the project site (both from the

roof top and from the surface runoff) within the Project premises only. 10. Details of excavated earth and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated

earth with details of the disposal site 11. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for issue of ToRs.

156.77 Grey Granite Quarry Project at Sy.No.101/2 Killarhatti Village, Lingasugur Taluk, Raichur District (11-10 Acres) of Sri Govindappa T. Pulpatli, #4265/J, Ilkal, Hunagunda Taluk, Bagalkot District - 587125. (SEIAA 1506 MIN 2015)

Page 101: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

101

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Govindappa T. Pulpatli, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Grey Granite in an area of 11-10 Acres at Sy.No.101/2 Killarhatti Village, Lingasugur Taluk, Raichur District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP N.Sham Sunder and A.Kalaivendhan approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 8,640 Cu.m/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed the committee that, the quarry waste will be reused as Khandas & building materials with the permission of DMG. The committee observed that the quarry is surrounded by patta lands with agricultural activities.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after the following.

1. An agreement with surrounding patta land owners for utilizing their land

for transportation of quarry material. 2. Mitigation measures to protect the adjoining agricultural fields. 3. Copy of RTC 4. An under taking to make approach road pucca.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the

conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.78 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.17 of Udarahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District (5-0 Acres) of M/s. Aprameya Granites Pvt. Ltd., No.981, 18th Main Road, 66th Cross, 5th Block, Rajajinagara, Bangalore - 560010.(SEIAA 1507 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by M/s. Aprameya Granites Pvt. Ltd, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 5-00 Acres at Sy.No.17 of Udarahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District. It is a Government Gomala Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP M.Azeezulla approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Ramanagara District. Capacity of mining is Av. 2,50,211 TPA

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 102: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

102

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance with a condition to make approach road pucca.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.79 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.81 (P) of Chikkanahalli Village, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District (5-12 Acres) (QL No.510 & 511) of M/s. Jagajyothi Crusher, #712, Gowramma Nilaya, 15th Main Road, 22nd Cross, HSR Layout, Bangalore - 560102. (SEIAA 1508 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by M/s. Jagajyothi Crusher, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 5-12 Acres at Sy.No.81 (P) of Chikkanahalli Village, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. It is a Government Gomala Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.N.Krishnamurthy approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 62,730 TPA

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are invited to attend the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan in the absence of the proponent. The committee observed the following points.

1. Details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Chikkanahalli village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

2. The lease sketch was not by DMG.

The committee after discussion decided to give final opportunity to the proponent to submit the above information & to attend the meeting, otherwise the proposal will be appraised in his absence and disposed off on merits.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 103: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

103

156.80 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.222/5 (P) of Marikatti Village, Bailahongal Taluk, Belagavi District (4-0 Acres) of Sri Akshykumar D Kulkarni, Plot No.637, D.D. Nagara, Belagavi Town, Taluk & District. (SEIAA 1509 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Akshykumar D Kulkarni, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 4-00 Acres at Sy.No.222/5 (P) of Marikatti Village, Bailahongal Taluk, Belagavi District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.M.Sudheendra Kumar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Belagavi District. Capacity of mining is Av. 96,444 TPA

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are invited to attend the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan in the absence of the proponent. The committee observed the following points.

1. DMG has not issued Notification. 2. Land conversion record not submitted 3. In the approved quarry plan, the sanctioned sketch was signed by DMG.

The committee after discussion decided to give final opportunity to the proponent to submit the above information & to attend the meeting, otherwise the proposal will be appraised in his absence and disposed off on merits.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

156.81 Black Granite Quarry Project at Sy.Nos.148/2 & 148/3 of Nanjadevanapura Village, Chamarajanagara Taluk & District (1-28 Acres) of Sri R M Rajappa, M/s. Nanjadevanapura Cluster Association, #713, Ramasamudra, Chamarajanagara Taluk & District -571313. (SEIAA 1510 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri R M Rajappa, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Black Granite in an area of 1-28 Acres at Sy.Nos.148/2 & 148/3 of Nanjadevanapura Village, Chamarajanagara Taluk & District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP N.Sham Sunder and A.Kalaivendhan approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 800 Cu.m/annum

Page 104: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

104

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, the proposed quarry lease is surrounded by another quarry lease on three sides, and since there is a common boundary on three sided, the DMG has exempted buffer area in common boundary portion.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.82 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.203/4 (P) of Theerthkunde Village, Khanapur Taluk, Belgaum District (5-0 Acres) of Sri A K Savanth, PL No.678, Subhas Chandra Nagar, Tilakwadi, Belgaum District. (SEIAA 1511 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri A K Savanth, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 5-00 Acres at Sy.No.203/4 (P) of Theerthkunde Village, Khanapur Taluk, Belgaum District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.M.Sudheendra Kumar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Belgaum District. Capacity of mining is Av. 1,16,000 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, based on the elevation of the quarry site above ground level (Difference in level. 10.00 m), depth proposed, area of quarrying (as per land use plan), and with the available area, it is not possible to go that depth, because lifting of quarrying material from that depth & movement of vehicles will be very difficult.

The Committee after discussion decided to limit the production to 70%(Restricting the depth of mining to 10m below lowest level in the quarry area) of the total estimated production keeping the minable area quantity and the sustainability of the mine in the mind and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of audit report, modified quarry plan for the above quantity approved

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 105: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

105

by DMG, Mitigation measures taken to protect adjoining agricultural fields and an undertaking to make approach road pucca.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.83 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.545/2 of Tabakada Honalli Village, Khalghatgi Taluk, Dharwad District (6-0 Acres) of Smt. Mangala M Challamarad, Plot No.34, 8th Cross, Vishweshwara Nagar, Hubli - 32 & Sri Bheemanna H Ghanti, Masalagara Oone, Sarswathapura, Dharwad. (SEIAA 1512 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Smt. Mangala M Challamarad, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 6-00 Acres at Sy.No.545/2 of Tabakada Honalli Village, Khalghatgi Taluk, Dharwad District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP M.Azeezulla approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Dharwad District. Capacity of mining is Av. 90,037 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of measures taken to preserve top soil and with a condition that, mining should be started only after taking written consent from the adjoining patta land owners for using their land as approach road for transportation of quarry material.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.84 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.2 (P) of Bilkundi Village, Gokak Taluk, Belgaum District (2-0 Acres) (QL No.1566) of Sri Ramesh Karepa Utagi, Avaradi Village & Post, Gokak Taluk, Belagavi District. (SEIAA 1513 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri Ramesh Karepa Utagi, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.2 (P) of Bilkundi Village, Gokak Taluk, Belgaum District. It is a Government Land.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 106: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

106

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.M.Sudheendra Kumar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Belagavi District. Capacity of mining is Av. 11,799 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of an undertaking to make approach road pucca.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.85 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.1/D1 of Ucchangidurga Village, Harapanahalli Taluk, Davanagere District (1-0 Acre) of Sri Manjunatha R Patil (SEIAA 1514 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Manjunatha R Patil, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-00 Acre at Sy.No.1/D1 of Ucchangidurga Village, Harapanahalli Taluk, Davanagere District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.N.Krishnamurthy approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Davangere District. Capacity of mining is Av. 16,584 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of an undertaking to make approach road pucca.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 107: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

107

156.86 Grey Granite Quarry Project at Sy.Nos.296/1, 296/2 & 297/2 of Kallur Village, Yelburga Taluk, Koppal District (10-34 Acres) of Sri Mahesh Nemanna Melsakri (SEIAA 1515 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Mahesh Nemanna Melsakri, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Grey Granite in an area of 10-34 Acres at Sy.Nos.296/1, 296/2 & 297/2 of Kallur Village, Yelburga Taluk, Koppal District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP N.Sham Sunder and A.Kalaivendhan approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 10,200 Cu.m/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed the committee that, the top soil will be dumped in the buffer area and will be utilized for afforestation.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after submission of an agreement with adjoining patta land owners for using their land as approach road for transportation of quarry material.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.87 Pink Granite Quarry Project at Sy.No.14/3 of Kadur Villag, Kustagi Taluk, Koppal District (0-26 Acre) (QL No.806) of Sri Ashok Mahantappa Bhogapur (SEIAA 1516 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri Ashok Mahantappa Bhogapur, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Pink Granite in an area of 0-26 Acre at Sy.No.14/3 of Kadur Villag, Kustagi Taluk, Koppal District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri. S.K.Myageri approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 1000 Cu.m/year.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 108: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

108

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant are invited to attend the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form 1, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan in the absence of the proponent. The committee observed that, in the surface geological plan submitted, already mined area is not shown and also in the five year production calculation, already mined area is also considered and quantity is calculated.

The Committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after submission of the revised surface geological plan and five year production plan.

156.88 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.885/3B of Amminabhavi Villag, Dharwad Taluk & District (1-0 Acre) (QL No.723) of Sri Jyotiba M. Kadam (SEIAA 1517 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri Jyotiba M. Kadam, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-00 Acre at Sy.No.885/3B of Amminabhavi Villag, Dharwad Taluk & District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General cond itions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Dr. S.K.Myageri approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Dharwad District. Capacity of mining is Av. 5,000 Cu.m/year.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, in the land use plan, the buffer area left is less than the required (0.197 ha). Considering the actual buffer area, for the balance mining area, the quantity is calculated and the five year production quantity approved by DMG is agreed with. (The proponent has proposed less quantity for the mining area as per approved quarry plan)

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after submission of revised land use plan duly approved by DMG.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal to SEAC after the submission of the above information.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 109: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

109

156.89 Limestone & Dolomite Mine Project at Sy.No.76/2 of Naganapur Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District (2.78 Ha) (ML No.2425) of Smt. Rajeshwari M. Viraktamath (SEIAA 1518 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Smt. Rajeshwari M. Viraktamath, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Limestone & Dolomite in an area of 2.78 Ha at Sy.No.76/2 of Naganapur Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Dr. S.K. Myageri approved by Indian Bureau of Mines. Capacity of mining is Av 15,000 TPA.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after submission of Letter from IBM for approval of quarry plan.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.90 Multi Color Granite Quarry Project at Sy.No.208/1 of Chikkagangawadi Village, Ramanagara Taluk & District (2-22.08 Acres) of Sri Rudresh (SEIAA 1519 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Rudresh, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Multi Color Granite in an area of 2-22.08 Acres at Sy.No.208/1 of Chikkagangawadi Village, Ramanagara Taluk & District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri. M.C.Dinesh approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 2,610 Cu.m/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed the

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 110: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

110

committee that, the quarry waste will be utilized as building material with the permission of the DMG.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after submission of surface geological plan and an undertaking to utilize the quarry waste as building material with the permission of DMG.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.91 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.23 of Bokkepura Village, Chamarajanagara Taluk & District (3-0 Acres) of Sri G Kumar (SEIAA 1520 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri G Kumar, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 3-00 Acres at Sy.No.23 of Bokkepura Village, Chamarajanagara Taluk & District.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP M.C.Dinesh approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Chamarajanagara District. Capacity of mining is Av. 25,650 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after submission of mitigation measures taken to protect adjoining fields from fire.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.92 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.23 of Bokkepura Village, Chamarajanagara Taluk & District (3-10 Acres) of Sri G Kumar (SEIAA 1521 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri G Kumar, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 3-10 Acres at Sy.No.23 of Bokkepura Village, Chamarajanagara Taluk & District. It is a Government Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 111: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

111

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP M.C.Dinesh approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Chamarajanagara District. Capacity of mining is Av. 27,189 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after submission of mitigation measures taken to protect adjoining fields from fire and revised EMP budget with a provision for fencing & fire protection measures.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.93 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.Nos.252 & 13 of Urugahalli Village & Ivavilu Village, Ramanagara Taluk & District (7-0 Acres) (QL No.1231) of M/s. Sri Chowdeshwari Enterprises (SEIAA 1522 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri Chowdeshwari Enterprises, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 7-00 Acres at Sy.Nos.252 & 13 of Urugahalli Village & Ivavilu Village, Ramanagara Taluk & District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.N.Krishnamurthy approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Ramanagara District. Capacity of mining is Av. 91,685 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed the committee that, there are three clusters in this area and they are separated by more than 500 m.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after verification by the office regarding the combined sketch showing all the clusters duly approved by DMG for ascertaining the existence of three clusters.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 112: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

112

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Subject taken with the permission of the Chair

156.94 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.25 (P) of Bennahalli Village, Ramanagara Taluk & Dist. (7 Acres) (QL No.1244) of Smt. Pankaja Neelakanta, No.71/01, Pantara Palya, Near Old Check Post, Mysore Road, Bangalore -560 039 (SEIAA 845 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Smt. Pankaja Neelakanta, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 7-00 Acres at Sy.No.25 (P) of Bennahalli Village, Ramanagara Taluk & District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.N.Krishna Murthy approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Ramanagara District. Capacity of mining is Av. 34,975 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The proponent has informed the committee that no mining has been so far. The committee observed that geological and mineable reserves and five year production calculation are wrong.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

1. Audit reports (dead rent paid) for the previous years 2. Revised geological and mineable reserves and five year production calculation 3. Revised EMP budget by making provision for compound wall, fire protection and

CSR activities 4. Distance from the forest to the quarry boundary.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 18.12.2015.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, there are two different clusters, one comprising Manchegowdanapalya & Urugalli village and another cluster comprising Manchegowdanapalya & Bramhalli, & these two clusters are separated by more than 500 m. The present proposal falls in Manchegowdanapalya & Bramhalli cluster and the total area including this one considered for clearance is less than 25 ha (threshold limit).

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 113: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

113

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the

conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.95 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.88 (P) of Manchegowdanapalya Village, Ramanagara Taluk & Dist. (2-20 Acres) (QL No.1246) of Smt. Suman Krishnappa No.1662/A, "Avva", 16th "A" main Road, 2nd Stage, J.P.Nagar, Bangalore -560078. (SEIAA 846 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Smt. Suman Krishnappa, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-20 Acres at Sy.No.88 (P) of Manchegowdanapalya Village, Ramanagara Taluk & District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.N. Krishnamurthy approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Ramanagara District. Capacity of mining is Av. 20,851 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee had observed the following points.

1. The geological and mineable reserves and five year production calculation are wrong. 2. Audit report not submitted. 3. The lease period is expired and renewal application not submitted 4. There is a difference in latitude and longitude in approved quarry plan.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

1. Audit reports for the previous years 2. Revised geological and mineable reserves and five year production calculation 3. Revised EMP budget by making provision for compound wall, fire protection and

CSR activities 4. Corrected latitude and longitude

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 18.12.2015.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, there are

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 114: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

114

two different clusters, one comprising Manchegowdanapalya & Urugalli village and another cluster comprising Manchegowdanapalya & Bramhalli, & these two clusters are separated by more than 500 m. The present proposal falls in Manchegowdanapalya & Bramhalli cluster and the total area including this one considered for clearance is less than 25 ha (threshold limit).

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.96 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.88 (P) of Manchegowdanapalya Village, Ramanagara Taluk & Dist. (5-0 Acres) (QL No.1245) of Smt. Suman Krishnappa No.1662/A, "Avva", 16th "A" main Road, 2nd Stage, J.P.Nagar, Bangalore -560078. (SEIAA 872 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Smt. Suman Krishnappa, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 5-00 Acres at Sy.No.88 (P) of Manchegowdanapalya Village, Ramanagara Taluk & District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.N.Krishnamurthy approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Ramanagar District. Capacity of mining is Av. 35,074 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee had observed the following points.

1. The geological and mineable reserves and five year production calculation are wrong.

2. Audit report not submitted. 3. The lease period is expired and renewal application not submitted 4. There is a difference in land use plan between approved quarry paln and the

presentation.

The Committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

1. Audit reports for the previous years 2. Revised geological and mineable reserves and five year production calculation

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 115: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

115

3. Revised EMP budget by making provision for compound wall, fire protection and CSR activities

4. Corrected land use plan 5. Copy of lease renewal

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 18.12.2015.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, there are two different clusters, one comprising Manchegowdanapalya & Urugalli village and another cluster comprising Manchegowdanapalya & Bramhalli, & these two clusters are separated by more than 500 m. The present proposal falls in Manchegowdanapalya & Bramhalli cluster and the total area including this one considered for clearance is less than 25 ha (threshold limit).

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as

at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.97 Grey Granite Quarry Project at Sy. No. 17 of Chikkagollahalli village, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District (0-18 Acres) of Sri. Kanakapeetha, Shakha Matha. (SEIAA 1596 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri. Kanakapeetha, Shakha Matha, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of 156.97 Grey Granite Quarry in an area of 0-18 Acres at Sy.No.17, of Manchegowdanapalya Chikkagollahalli village, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.N.Krishnamurthy approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is 2700 Cum.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the Statutory Applicaiton Form-1 , pre-feasibility report, approved mining plan and the additional information provided in the file in the absence of the proponent.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance since the quarry proposal is for a statue of Shree Kanaka Guru Peetha.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 116: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

116

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 156.10 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

156.98 300,000 tpa coal tar distillation plant at Sy. No. 28/A/1, 29/2, 29/3, 30/2, 30/3, 30/4, 31, 32/3, 34/2, 34/3, 41, 42, 43, 44/1, 44/2 & 45, Toranagall, Bellary District, Karnataka at of Director & CEO, Epsilon carbon Private Ltd, (SEIAA 29 IND 2015)

M/s. Epsilon Carbon Private Limited (ECPL) have applied for Environmental Clearance from SEIAA for their new proposed Coal Tar Distillation Plant at Sy.No’s. 28/A/1, 29/2, 29/3, 30/2, 30/3, 30/4, 31, 32/3, 34/2, 34/3, 41, 42, 43, 44/1, 44/2 & 45 of Musinayakanahalli Village (near Sultanpur Village) Sandur Taluk, Bellary District.

Latitude: 15009’40”N – 15010’ 30”N

Longitude: 76042’00”E – 76042’30’’E

This is a project falling under the category 4(b) of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006, Under Category – B. The total Plot area is 34.65 Acres.

1. Proposed Activity: The proposed activity will involve in the Installation of Coal tar distillation plant of capacity 300,000 TPA.

2. Raw Materials: The raw materials used for the proposed project as follows: Sl.No. Name of the Raw material Quantity in TPA

1 Coal Tar 300,000 2 High QI Pitch 40,000 3 Sodium Hydroxide (30%) 8,068 4 Sulfuric Acid (98%) 3,061 5 Formaldehyde (37%) 2,703 6 Crude Benzene 72 7 Sodium Chloride 80

3. capital Investment: Rs.350 Crores

4. Water Requirement: The total water required for the proposed project is 60 m3/hr.

5. Waste Water Generation Management: Surface effluent generated during process will be treated in Effluent Treatment Plant using unit operations like extraction, aeration, sedimentation, Flocculation and will be reused as makeup water in cooling tower. Blow down water of boilers & cooling towers will be treated to reduce TDS & maintain pH and then will be reused either as makeup water in cooling tower or in greenbelt & harvesting. The sources of wastewater are given in the following table:

6. Energy Requirement: The proposed power requirement of the plant is 3500 kwh/hr. The required power will be drawn from nearest power grid.

Action Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Page 117: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

117

7. Land form, Land use & Land Ownership: The proposed land comes under Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) and will be leased from JSW to Epsilon Carbon Private Limited.

8. Connectivity: The site is at about 29 Km away from nearest city Bellary. The national highway NH 63 runs at 3 km. Toranagallu railway station is at about 10 km from the site. Nearest airport is at Hubli 195 km from site.

10. Other Details: The proponent have submitted Form-1, along with Pre-feasibility Report.

11. Enclosures: Land lease documents.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, Conceptual Plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. Since the project falls in the category B1, the committee decided to appraise the proposal under B1 category. The proponent requested the committee to utilise the available environment quality data which were regularly monitored and conducted by JSW. The committee permitted to use the same.

The Committee after discussion decided to issue following additional TOR’s along with Standard TOR’s.

1. Hazop identification study

2. Models study with cumulative impact in the project area

3. For the nearest village, i.e., Sultanpur, Ambient air quality studies to be conducted. 4. An undertaking regarding, for any variation in ambient air quality, JSW will be

responsible.

The Sub-committee visited the site on 21.12.2015 as per the discussion held in the 152nd meeting of SEAC held on 2nd and 3rd November 2015 and submitted the following site inspection report and the committee accepted the same.

Date of Visit: 21.12.2015

Members Visiting:

1 Sri Naganna Chairman 2 Dr. D.L. Manjunath Member 3 Dr. S. Manjappa Member 5 6 7

Sri Srinivasaiah Dr. B. Manoj Kumar Dr. M.I. Hussain

Member Member Member

8 Dr. K.C. Jayaramu Member

Page 118: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

118

Officials of Environment and Ecology Department accompanying the committee

Sri. B.S. Chandrashekar, Scientific Officer, SEAC

Representatives of the Industry present:

1. Mr. Prasad - JSW 2. Dr. Srinivas Rao - JSW 3. CEO of Epsilon Carbon

Observations

1. The proposed industry site falls within the JSW industrial area 2. The proposal is for production of

Ammonia cal water Light oil Phenol oil Naphthalene Anthracene oil Wash oil Pitch

The coal tar which is a by-product of coke over plant of JSW.

3. During the visit, proponent reiterated their statement given during the presentation before SEAC ie., water requirement will be met from the sanctioned quantity of water to JSW, and energy will be procured from the JSW source.

4. Land was levelled. Fencing was done. 5. Proposed industry site is well connected by road. 6. No human habitations were observed in the vicinity of the proposed site.

Suggestions/Additional ToRs

1. Explore the possibility to transfer of coal tar from the coke ovens to the proposed site may be carried out in a pipeline instead of road transport.

2. The proposal generates about 3 KLD of cyanide bearing wastewater. The proponent has proposed to treat it onsite. JSW from where coal tar, ie., raw material is sourced also generates cyanide bearing waste and it is being treated in their ETP. The proposed site EPSILON can explore the possibility of transporting their effluent with proper MOU if the ETP of JSW can take this load.

3. Specification for storage of raw material in the premises including MOC of the storage tanks to be provided

4. Material and energy balance of the proposed project has to be provided 5. Water and energy requirement – documents regarding commitment for

providing water and energy by JSW to be provided

Page 119: 28th December 2015 EIA Presentation:

Proceedings of 156th SEAC meeting 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015

119

6. MOU between proposed industry and JSW for providing land from their approved industrial area to be provided

7. The proponents have to provide documentary evidence to the effect that the proposed site (Sy.No.) is included in Public Hearing while establishing the JSW.

Meeting ended with thanks to the Chair.

Sd/- Sd/- Secretary, SEAC Chairman, SEAC Karnataka Karnataka