291 lisicamina

Upload: david-sco

Post on 03-Jun-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 291 lisicamina

    1/8

    The Constituents of Lindera glauca

    Yuh-Chwen Chang

    a,b

    ( ), Fang-Rong Chang

    b

    ( ) and Yang-Chang Wu*

    b

    ( )aDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Kao Yuan Institute of Technology, Kaohsiung county, Taiwan, R.O.C.

    bGraduate Institute of Natural Products, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C.

    Twenty-eight compounds including seven alkaloids, (+)-3-chloro-N-formylnornantenine (1), (+)-N-

    formylnornantenine (2), (+)-boldine (3), (+)-norboldine (4), (-)-norboldine (5), lycicamine (6), and tetrahydro-

    berber ine (7); four flavonoids, kaempferol (8), kaempferol-3-O-arabinoside (9), quercetin (10), and

    quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (11); one butanolide, akolactone A (12); onep-quinone, 2,6-dimethoxy-p-quinone

    (13); one cyclohex-2-en-1-one, blumenol A (14); six benzenoids, methylparaben (15),p-hydroxybenzoic acid

    (16), vanillic acid (17), syringic acid (18), 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoic acid (19), and 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)

    propionic acid (20); one diterpene, phytol (21); one triterpene, squalene (22); six steroids, -sitosterol (23),

    -sitostenone (24), stigmasta-4,22-dien-3-one (25), 6 -hydroxy- -sitostenone (26), 6 -hydroxystigmasterone

    (27), and -sitosteryl-D-glucoside (28) were isolated from the aerial part ofLindera glauca. These compoundswere characterized and identified by physical and spectral method. All compounds were isolated for the first

    time from this plant. Among them, (+)-3-chloro-N-formylnornantenine (1) is a new one.

    INTRODUCTION

    Lindera glauca Sieb.& Zucc.(Lauraceae) is a small de-

    ciduous tree growing in the forests at low altitudes in Japan,

    China and Taiwan.1

    Previously, three alkaloids, nineteen fatty

    acids, eight monoterpenes, five sesquiterpenes, two naph-

    thalenes, and eleven butanolideshave been reported from this

    plant.2-8 As part of our continuing investigation of the phyto-

    chemical and bioactive compounds of Formosan Lauraceous

    plants, the methanol extract of this plant was subjected to sol-

    vent partition and chromatographic separation to characterize

    twenty-eight pure compounds. Among them, 1is a new com-

    pound, and known compounds 2~28were isolated for the first

    time from this species. The present paper deals with the isola-

    tion and characterization of the isolated components.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    A methanolic extract ofL. glaucawas concentrated to

    obtain a residue and then partitioned between CHCl3and H2O.

    The aqueous layer was partitioned with n-BuOH. Each layer

    was concentrated and subjected to chromatography. Fifteen

    compounds including five alkaloids, (+)-3-chloro-N-formyl-

    nornantenine (1), (+)-N-formylnornantenine9(2), (+)-nor -

    boldine10

    (4), (-)-norboldine11,12

    (5), and lysicamine13

    (6); one

    butanolide, akolac tone A (12); one benzenoid, methyl-

    paraben14

    (15); one diterpene, phytol (21); one triterpene,

    squalene (22); and five steroids, -sitosterol13,15 (23), -

    sitostenone13 (24), stigmasta-4,22-dien-3-one13 (25), 6 -

    hydroxy- -sitostenone13 (26), 6 -hydroxystigmasterone13

    (27), and -sitosteryl-D-glucoside13

    (28) were obtained from

    Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, 2000, 47, 373-380 373

  • 8/11/2019 291 lisicamina

    2/8

    374 J. Chin. Chem. Soc., Vol. 47, No. 2, 2000 Chang et al.

  • 8/11/2019 291 lisicamina

    3/8

    the chloroform layer. Thirteen compounds including two al-

    kaloids, (+)-boldine11,12

    (3) and tetrahydroberberine16

    (7);

    four flavonoids, kaempferol17 (8), kaempferol-3-O-

    arabinoside18 (9), quercetin17 (10 ), and quercetin-3-O-

    rhamnoside19 (11 ); one p-quinone, 2,6-dimethoxy-p-

    quinone20 (13); one cyclohex-2-en-1-one, blumenol A21,22

    (14); five benzenoids,p-hydroxybenzoic acid14

    (16), vanillic

    acid14

    (17), syringic acid14

    (18), 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoic

    acid14 (19), and 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl) propionic acid23

    (20) were obtained from the n-Butanol layer. Among them 1is

    a new compound, and others are known compounds which

    were isolated for the first time from this plant and character-

    ized by comparison of their physical and spectral data (UV,

    IR, NMR and MS) with values previously reported in the liter-

    ature.

    The alkaloid 1was recrystallized from methanol as col-

    orless needles. Its molecular formula was established as

    C20H18O5NCl by HREI mass spectrometry m/z M+

    (found

    387.0867, calcd 387.0874), with a mp over 300 C. The IR

    spectrum with peaks at 1660 and 1620 cm-1, was suggestive of

    an amidic functional group. The UV absorptions showed max

    at 272sh, 281, 302, and 312sh nm, indicating alkaloid 1pos-

    sessed a 1, 2, 3, 9, 10-substituted aporphine24

    . EI-MS spec-

    trum showed that one chlorine is bonded to alkaloid 1with a

    spectrum of 3 to 1 ratio at m/z (rel. int %): 387(23, M+)/389;

    351(52, [M-Cl]+)/353; 329(100)/331. The molecular ion m/z

    387(23, M+)/389, and base peak m/z329(100)/331 are due to

    loss of (CH2-N-CHO+H) from the molecular ion. It followed

    that the amidic function was in the shape of an N-formyl

    group. Moreover, the two species were actually present in so-

    lution, due to isomerism about the amidic bond could be im -

    mediately derived from the 1H-NMR spectrum. Broad down-

    field singlets at 8.25 and 8.36 represented theN-formyl pro-

    ton. The integrals of these peaks indicated that the isomers

    were present in a ratio of 2:1.

    The spectra for the two isomers could be clearly differ-

    entiated, even though the two isomers could not be separated.

    While the differences in chemical shifts were minimal in the

    case of the methoxyl and methylenedioxy signals, they were

    clearly noticeable for the aromatic protons, with signals at

    6.78 (H-8) and 7.91 (H-11) for the major isomer 1a, and at

    6.76 and 7.92 for the minor isomer 1b . The divergence be-

    tween the two isomers was quite prominent in the aliphatic

    range. Some of the more salient differences in chemical shifts

    occurred in the resonances for the hydrogens bonded to C-5,

    C-6a and C-7. For the major isomer 1a, the signals for H-6a

    The Constituents ofLindera glauca J. Chin. Chem. Soc., Vol. 47, No. 2, 2000 375

  • 8/11/2019 291 lisicamina

    4/8

    and H-7 were downfield at 4.91 and 2.97, respectively. On

    the other hand, for 1b, these two protons are relatively upfield

    at 4.45 and 2.75, respectively. For both isomers, the H-7

    signals were characterized by small coupling constants withH-6a (ca. 4.0 Hz), but the H-7 signals were denoted by large

    constants (ca. 14.0 Hz).

    The disparity in geometry between the two isomers also

    came to the fore when NOESY measurements were obtained.

    In particular, the proximity of the formyl proton to H-5 (

    3.86) in the major isomer and to H-6a ( 4.45) in the minor iso-

    mer was clearly evident. With both isomers, a strong nOe

    could be observed between H-7 and H-8 (see Fig. 1). A simi-

    lar observation for alkaloid 2has been found in the literature.9

    In view of alkaloid 2, the H-3 signal disappeared in

    those of 1. It strongly indicates that the chlorine atom was sub-

    stituted at 3-position. Since neither chlorine gas nor HCl was

    even used during extraction or chromatography, an artifact is

    excluded. On the basis of the result mentioned above, the

    structure was thus determined as (+)-3-chloro-N-formyl-

    nornantenine. In addition, the biological activities of these

    compounds are currently under investigation.

    EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

    General Methods

    Uncorrected melting points were determined on a

    Mel-Temp II apparatus. Optical rotation was taken on a Jasco

    DIP-370 digital polarimeter. Ultraviolet (UV) and infrared

    (IR) spectra were obtained using a Hitachi U-2000 spectro-

    photometer and a Hitachi 260-30 spectrophotometer, respec-

    tively. NMR spectra were recorded with a Varian Gemini

    NMR Spectrometer (200 MHz) and a Varian Unity Plus NMR

    Spectrometer (400 MHz) using TMS as an internal standard.

    Mass Spectra (MS) were recorded on a JEOL JMS-HX 110

    mass spectrometer. Active charcoal (Wako) and silica gel 60

    (E. Merck, 230-400 mesh) were used for open column chro-

    matography and precoated silica gel plates (E. Merck,

    Kieselgel 60 F-254, 0.25 mm) were used for preparative TLC.

    Plant MaterialL. glauca Sieb. Zucc.(Lauraceae) was collected from

    Taipei county, Taiwan in July 1996. A voucher specimen is on

    deposit in the Graduate Institute of Natural Products,

    Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic

    of China.

    Extraction and Separation

    Air-dried, aerial parts (9.8 Kg) of L. glauca were ex-

    tracted repea tedly with MeOH at room temperature. The

    methanolic extracts were concentrated and partitioned be-

    tween chloroform and water to form a chloroform layer and an

    aqueous layer. The chloroform layer was concentrated to

    leave a brownish viscous residue (8.8 g). The residue was

    placed on a silica gel column and eluted with CHCl3 which

    was gradually enriched with MeOH to afford eleven fractions.

    Fr.2 (2.1 g) eluted with a gradient of n-hexane/CHCl3/EtOAC

    was separated using silica gel CC and prep. TLC and gave

    (+)-3-chloro-N-formylnornantenine (1) (3 mg), (+)-N-

    formylnornantenine (2)(5 mg),akolactone A (12) (3 mg),

    phytol (21) (20 mg) and squalene (22) (20 mg), respectively.

    Fr.5 (1.4 g) eluted with CHCl3 was isolated using repeatedly

    silica gel CC and prep. TLC (CHCl3) and gave -sitosterol

    (23) (50 mg). (+)-norboldine (4) (10 mg), (-)-norboldine (5) (4

    mg)andmethylparaben (15) (10 mg) were obtained from Fr.7

    (1.3 g) by means of repea tedly silica gel CC eluting with

    CHCl3-MeOH (20:1). Fr.8 (0.6 g) eluted with CHCl3-MeOH

    (15:1) was further separated using silica gel CC and prep.

    TLC and gave lysicamine (6) (5 mg). Fr.10 (0.8 g) eluted with

    CHCl3-MeOH (10:1) was separated using silica gel CC and

    prep. TLC and gave -si tostenone (24) (10 mg), stigmasta-

    4,22-dien-3-one (25)(15 mg), 6 -hydroxy- -sitostenone (26)

    (10 mg) and 6 -hydroxystigmasterone (27) (10 mg), respec-

    tively. Fr.11(1.1 g) eluted with CHCl3-MeOH (8:1) was fur -

    ther separated using silica gel CC and gave -sitosteryl-D-glucoside (28) (30 mg).

    The aqueous layer was partitioned with n-Butanol to

    give a n-Butanol layer and an aqueous layer. The n-Butanol

    layer was concentrated (4.8 g) and chromatographed over sil-

    ica gel using CHCl3/EtOAC/MeOH as an eluent to produce

    ten fractions. Fr.3 (0.8 g) eluted with CHCl3was further puri-

    fied in silica gel column using the same solvent to obtain com-

    pound 2,6-dimethoxy-p-quinone (13) (10 mg). Fr.4 (2.3 g)

    eluted with CHCl3-MeOH (10:1) was further separated using

    silica gel CC and prep. TLC and gave kaempferol (8) (10 mg),

    quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (11) (50 mg); blumenol A (14) (30

    mg),p-hydroxybenzoic acid (16) (20 mg), vanillic acid (17)

    376 J. Chin. Chem. Soc., Vol. 47, No. 2, 2000 Chang et al.

    Fig. 1. NOESY correlations for 1.

  • 8/11/2019 291 lisicamina

    5/8

  • 8/11/2019 291 lisicamina

    6/8

  • 8/11/2019 291 lisicamina

    7/8

  • 8/11/2019 291 lisicamina

    8/8

    2113-M-037-009)

    Received August 4, 1999.

    Key Words

    Lindera glauca; Alkaloids; Flavonoids;

    Benzenoids; Diterpenes; Triterpens; Steroids;

    (+)-3-Chloro-N-formylnornantenine.

    REFERENCES

    1. Chang, C. E. In Flora of Taiwan; Li, H. L.; Liu, T. S.;

    Huang, T. C.; Koyama, T.; Devol, C. E. Eds.; Epoch Pub-

    lishing Co.; Taipei, 1976, Vol. II, p. 429.

    2. Mutsuo, K.; Masahiko, S. J. Nat. Prod.1984, 47, 1066.

    3. Nii, H.; Furukawa, K.; Iwakiri, M. Nippon Nogei Kagaku

    Kaishi 1983, 57, 725.

    4. Nii, H.; Furukawa, K.; Iwakiri, M. Nippon Nogei Kagaku

    Kaishi 1983, 57, 733.

    5. Nii, H.; Hanafusa, M.; Furukawa, K. Yukagakyu1983, 32,

    277.

    6. Komae, H.; Hayashi, N. Phytochemistry 1972, 11, 853.

    7. Sasaki, T.; Haga, K.; Kaneko, R. Phytochemistry1994,

    36, 949.

    8. Hatsura, S.; Takayuki, S.; Satoshi, W.; Kazuo, H.; Ryohei,

    K. Phytochemistry 1995,40, 1175.

    9. Bamrung, T.; Tharadol, P.; Mataya, P. J. Nat. Prod.1989,

    52, 652.

    10. Borthakur, N.; Rastagi, R. C. Phytochemistry 1979, 18,

    910.

    11. Hema, U.; Bhakuni, D. S.; Dhar, M. M. Phytochemistry

    1972, 11, 3057.12. Torrero, Y. M.; Docon, M. P. J. Nat. Prod.1990, 53, 503.

    13. Chen, C. Y.; Chang, F. R.; Wu, Y. C. J. Chin. Chem. Soc.

    1997, 44, 313.

    14. Chen, C. Y.; Chang, F. R.; Teng, C. M.; Wu, Y. C. J. Chin.

    Chem. Soc.1999,46, 77.

    15. Chen, K. S.; Chang, F. R.; Chia, Y. C.; Wu, T. S.; Wu, Y. C.

    J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 1998, 45, 103.

    16. Malhotra, S.; Taneja, S. C.; Dhar, K, L. Phytochemistry

    1989, 28, 1998.

    17. Shimizu, M.; Ito, T.; Terashima, S.; Hayashi, T.; Arisawa,

    M.; Morita, N.; Kurokawa, S.; Ito, K.; Hashimoto, Y.

    Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 1885.

    18.Nakano, K.; Takatani, M.; Tomimatsu, T.; Nohara , T.

    Phytochemistry 1983, 22, 2831.

    19. Markham, R.; Ternai, B.; Stanley, R.; Geiger, H.; Mabry,

    T. J. Tetrahedron1978, 34, 1389.

    20. Kokpol, U.; Warinthom, C.; Vallapa, C.; Marc, B.;

    Cunningham, G. N. Phytochemistry 1993, 33, 1129.

    21. Bhakuni, D. S.; Josh, P. P.; Uprety, H.; Kapil, R. S.

    Phytochemistry 1974, 13, 2541.

    22. Galbraith, M. N.; Horn, D. H. S. J. Chem. Soc ., Chem.

    Comm., 1972, 113.

    23. Meselhy, M. R.; Nakamura, N.; Hattori, M. Chem. Pharm.

    Bull.1977, 45, 888.

    24. Shamma, M. The Isoquinoline Alkaloids, Academic

    Press: New York, 1972;Vol. 25, pp.194-314.

    380 J. Chin. Chem. Soc., Vol. 47, No. 2, 2000 Chang et al.