3. bh - policies to control cannabis use and supply
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Policies to control cannabis use and supply – legal and illegal
Brendan HughesPrincipal Legal Analyst, EMCDDA
Presentation to GPS meetingLisbon: 6 June 2017
![Page 2: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
WHAT IS
CANNABIS?
2
![Page 3: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
“Cannabis” might differ by:
Industrial
Medical
Recreational
None
CBD
THC
Seed
Fibre
FlowerResin
Oil
Intendeduse
Physical format
Predominant chemical
3
![Page 4: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Incarceration for minorconsumption / personal possession ?
Note: In Spain – if in public place
Hughes (2017) Cannabis legislation in Europe – An ov erview
4
![Page 5: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Sentences for supply of 1kg cannabis (laws and expert opinion)
5EMCDDA (2017) Drug trafficking penalties across the European Union – a survey of expert opinion
![Page 6: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Tough on supply, but not personal possession?
EMCDDA (2017) Drug trafficking penalties
across the European Union – a survey of
expert opinion
No incarceration for minor personal possession of:
CannabisAny illicit drug
6
![Page 7: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
WHY change the law?
Reducing penalties:• Encourage addicts to treatment
• Save law enforcement resources
• Bring law closer to practice (credibility)
• Non-drug related reasons
Increasing penalties:• Send a message
• Give law enforcement more powers
Legalisation:• Concentrate on serious crime• Save law enforcement
resources• Raise tax revenue (?)• Limit access for children• Product quality control
7
![Page 8: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Cannabis use before and after changes in legislatio n in selected countries: use in previous 12 months among young adults (age 1 5-34)
With many caveats, the best available evidence shows no clear impact of penalty changes on cannabis use.
Hughes (2017) Cannabis legislation in Europe – An overview
8
![Page 9: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Legalisation
An authorised / non -punished system of supply
Supply models include:
� permission to grow and consume in a private place only
� shared growing among a group of club members (cannabis social clubs), no sale
� Government growing and public sale, non-profit
� Commercial growing and public sale, for profit…
9
![Page 10: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Legalisation may vary by the “10 Ps” [RAND / Kilmer 2015]
Production (OH)
Profit motive
Promotion (CA)
Prevention
Policing and Law Enforcement
Penalties
Potency
Purity
Price and taxation
Permanence
Place? Many allow municipalities to prohibit outlets…
10
![Page 11: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
USA vs EU: 4 legal differences
1. Caregiver medical cannabis system since ±2000, commercial since 2009 (= available for most adults)
2. Direct to consumer advertising of prescription medicines
3. Commercial freedom of speech
4. Ballot initiatives [24 states] vs. parliamentary / technical debate1996-2004; 7/8 states passed medical cannabis by ballot initiatives.
11
![Page 12: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
In the near future?
� Spain: social clubs are “illegal” – but 2015 law only penalises personal growing or use in public / visible space
� Netherlands: proposal to formalise production and coffeeshops
� Italy: two proposals (parliament/citizens) for commercial legalisation
12
![Page 13: 3. BH - Policies to control cannabis use and supply](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070103/62bc46d176efab17f531ac6a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
For more information:
EC study 2016: Kruithof et al.
Interactive: ELDD; Penalties at a glance
YouTube: What is decriminalisation?
13