3.0 summary of impacts and mitigation measures · a number of project impacts identified in the eir...

37
Del Rio Hills Planned Unit Development 3-1 Draft Environmental Impact Report December 2008 P:\Projects - WP Only\51244.00 Del Rio Hills\!DEIR\3.0 Summary.doc 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES INTRODUCTION This chapter provides an overview of the Del Rio Hills Planned Unit Development (DRHPUD) project and its potential impacts. This chapter also provides a brief discussion of potentially viable development alternatives to the DRHPUD project. A detailed discussion of these alternatives can be found in Chapter 5 of this EIR. Table 3-1, at the end of this chapter, provides a summary of the environmental effects of the DRHPUD project identified in each technical issue section of Chapter 4. The table consists of the environmental impacts, the significance of the impacts prior to mitigation, the proposed mitigation measures, and the significance of the impacts after mitigation measures are implemented. PROJECT UNDER REVIEW The DRHPUD consists of approximately 505 acres of land located west of downtown Rio Vista, and south of SR 12. The project area is bounded to the west by Amerada Hess Road, to the south by unincorporated Solano County. The surrounding area is typified by rolling hills and agricultural activities, surrounded by rural residential uses. The DRHPUD would allow for a mix of residential neighborhoods, a SR commercial center, a proposed K-6 school, neighborhood parks, public facilities, recreation areas, and an extensive open space and trail network. The project would be developed over three phases, the first phase of which could begin as early as 2009. POTENTIAL AREAS OF CONCERN Comments received in response to the NOP and at the Scoping Meeting included the following: Flood risk and drainage issues Safety issues related to gas wells and gas pipelines Traffic and circulation impacts along SR-12 and existing City roadways during construction and operation Air quality impacts related to project construction and project generated vehicle operation Hazard impacts related to former on-site agricultural production Land use compatibility Project and mitigation funding mechanisms Visual quality of the proposed project Sewer and water infrastructure Safe and accessible pedestrian pathways to and from the project site Soil erosion Availability of adequate public service facilities

Upload: others

Post on 20-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

Del Rio Hills Planned Unit Development 3-1 Draft Environmental Impact Report

December 2008 P:\Projects - WP Only\51244.00 Del Rio Hills\!DEIR\3.0 Summary.doc

3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

INTRODUCTION

This chapter provides an overview of the Del Rio Hills Planned Unit Development (DRHPUD) project and its potential impacts. This chapter also provides a brief discussion of potentially viable development alternatives to the DRHPUD project. A detailed discussion of these alternatives can be found in Chapter 5 of this EIR. Table 3-1, at the end of this chapter, provides a summary of the environmental effects of the DRHPUD project identified in each technical issue section of Chapter 4. The table consists of the environmental impacts, the significance of the impacts prior to mitigation, the proposed mitigation measures, and the significance of the impacts after mitigation measures are implemented.

PROJECT UNDER REVIEW

The DRHPUD consists of approximately 505 acres of land located west of downtown Rio Vista, and south of SR 12. The project area is bounded to the west by Amerada Hess Road, to the south by unincorporated Solano County. The surrounding area is typified by rolling hills and agricultural activities, surrounded by rural residential uses. The DRHPUD would allow for a mix of residential neighborhoods, a SR commercial center, a proposed K-6 school, neighborhood parks, public facilities, recreation areas, and an extensive open space and trail network. The project would be developed over three phases, the first phase of which could begin as early as 2009.

POTENTIAL AREAS OF CONCERN

Comments received in response to the NOP and at the Scoping Meeting included the following:

Flood risk and drainage issues

Safety issues related to gas wells and gas pipelines

Traffic and circulation impacts along SR-12 and existing City roadways during construction and operation

Air quality impacts related to project construction and project generated vehicle operation

Hazard impacts related to former on-site agricultural production

Land use compatibility

Project and mitigation funding mechanisms

Visual quality of the proposed project

Sewer and water infrastructure

Safe and accessible pedestrian pathways to and from the project site

Soil erosion

Availability of adequate public service facilities

Page 2: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

Del Rio Hills Planned Unit Development 3-2 Draft Environmental Impact Report

December 2008 P:\Projects - WP Only\51244.00 Del Rio Hills\!DEIR\3.0 Summary.doc

ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT

The EIR analyzes the following alternatives to the proposed project:

No Project/ No Build Alternative: The No Project/No Build Alternative assumes that the proposed project would not be developed and agricultural development would continue to occur on the DRHPUD site. This alternative assumes the existing residence and outbuildings would remain and the rest of the site would not be altered relative to existing conditions.

No Project/ General Plan Buildout Alternative: The No Project General Plan Buildout Alternative assumes that the DRHPUD site would be developed consistent with the existing land use designations and zoning as identified in the current General Plan. The DRHPUD site would be developed using the midpoint of the allowable residential densities under this alternative.

General Plan Minimum Density Alternative: The General Plan Minimum Density Alternative assumes that the DRHPUD site would be developed consistent with the existing land use designations and zoning as identified in the current General Plan, using the lowest allowable residential and commercial densities.

Detailed descriptions and analysis of potential impacts of these alternatives are presented in Chapter 5.

SUMMARY OF IMPACTS

Table 3-1 provides a complete list of all impacts and mitigation measures for the topics evaluated in this EIR. For each impact, the table presents the significance of the impact before mitigation, applicable mitigation measures, and the level of significance of the impact after implementation of the mitigation measures.

Effects Found to be Less Than Significant

A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation. These impacts are found in Chapter 4, Environmental Analysis, and are summarized in this Chapter in Table 3-1, Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures.

Significant Impacts

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15382, a significant effect on the environment is defined as a substantially or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project, including, land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significant (CEQA Guidelines Section 15382). Implementation of the proposed project would result in significant impacts to some of these resources, which are fully analyzed in Chapter 4, Environmental Analysis, and are summarized in this Chapter in Table 3-1, Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures.

This EIR discusses mitigation measures that could be implemented by the City and/or the project applicant to reduce potential adverse impacts to a level that is considered less than significant. Such mitigation measures are noted in Chapter 4 of the EIR. A summary of these mitigation measures can be found in Table 3-1. The mitigation measures presented in this EIR form the basis of the Mitigation Monitoring Program, which is included in the Final EIR document.

Page 3: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

Del Rio Hills Planned Unit Development 3-3 Draft Environmental Impact Report

December 2008 P:\Projects - WP Only\51244.00 Del Rio Hills\!DEIR\3.0 Summary.doc

Significant and Unavoidable Impacts

However, even with the application of feasible mitigation measures, some impacts could not be reduced to less-than-significant levels. The significant and unavoidable impacts that were identified for both project-level and cumulative impacts in Chapter 4, Environmental Analysis, and are summarized in this Chapter in Table 3-1, Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures.

SUMMARY TABLE

Table 3-1 (Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures), has been organized to correspond with the environmental issues discussed in Chapter 4. The summary table is arranged in four columns:

1. Environmental impacts (“Impact”).

2. Level of significance without mitigation (“Significance”).

3. Mitigation measures (“Mitigation Measure”).

4. The level of significance after implementation of mitigation measures (“Residual Significance”).

If an impact is determined to be significant or potentially significant, mitigation measures are identified, where appropriate and feasible. More than one mitigation measure may be required to reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level. This EIR assumes that all applicable plans, policies, and regulations would be implemented, including, but not necessarily limited to, City General Plan Policies, laws, City Ordinances, and requirements or recommendations of the City of Rio Vista. Applicable plans, policies, and regulations are identified and described in the Regulatory Setting of each issue area and within the relevant impact analysis. A description of the organization of the environmental analysis, as well as key foundational assumptions regarding the approach to the analysis, is provided in Section 4.0, Introduction to the Analysis.

Page 4: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-4

D

raft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

4.1

Ae

sth

eti

cs

an

d V

isu

al R

eso

urc

es

4.1

-1

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

ha

ve

a

su

bsta

nti

al ad

ve

rse e

ffect

on

a s

cen

ic v

ista

o

r su

bsta

nti

ally d

eg

rad

e t

he e

xis

tin

g v

isu

al

ch

ara

cte

r o

r q

uality

of

the s

ite a

nd

its

su

rro

un

din

gs.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.1

-2

Th

e p

rop

os

ed

pro

jec

t c

ou

ld c

rea

te a

new

so

urc

e o

f su

bsta

nti

al o

f lig

ht

or

gla

re t

hat

wo

uld

ad

ve

rse

ly a

ffe

ct

da

y o

r n

igh

ttim

e

vie

ws in

th

e a

rea.

PS

4.1

-2

a)

All

str

eet lig

hting s

hall

be d

ow

ncast and s

hie

lded to p

revent

light spill

to s

urr

oundin

g p

ropert

ies, sky g

low

, a

nd g

lare

to the

exte

nt

fea

sib

le.

LS

b)

Low

-level outd

oor

lighting s

hall

be incorp

ora

ted into

new

hom

es p

art

icula

rly a

long t

he h

illsid

e r

idges.

c)

Reflective s

urf

aces in p

ublic

are

as s

hall

be k

ept to

a m

inim

um

usin

g n

on-r

eflective m

ate

rial w

here

ver

possib

le.

d

) L

an

dscap

ing

sha

ll b

e in

co

rpo

rate

d a

lon

g in

tern

al ro

ad

s a

nd

near

off-s

ite h

om

es to r

educe s

pill

lig

ht em

anating fro

m

ve

hic

les a

nd

bu

ildin

gs.

4.1

-3

Th

e p

rop

os

ed

pro

jec

t, in

co

nju

nc

tio

n w

ith

o

ther

pro

jects

in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, co

uld

h

ave a

su

bsta

nti

al ad

ve

rse e

ffect

on

a

sc

en

ic v

ista

or

su

bs

tan

tia

lly

de

gra

de

th

e

exis

tin

g v

isu

al

ch

ara

cte

r o

r q

uality

of

the

sit

e a

nd

its

su

rro

un

din

gs.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.1

-4

Th

e p

rop

os

ed

pro

jec

t, in

co

nju

nc

tio

n w

ith

o

ther

pro

jects

in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, co

uld

cre

ate

a n

ew

so

urc

e o

f su

bsta

nti

al o

f lig

ht

or

gla

re t

hat

wo

uld

ad

vers

ely

aff

ect

day o

r n

igh

ttim

e v

iew

s in

th

e a

rea.

PS

4.1

-4 Im

ple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.1

-2(a

) th

rough (

d).

LS

4.2

Air

Qu

ality

4.2

-1

Imp

lem

en

tati

on

of

the p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

resu

lt in

new

so

urc

es o

f air

em

issio

ns t

hat

co

uld

im

pair

im

ple

men

tati

on

o

f th

e A

QM

P.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.2

-2

Co

nstr

ucti

on

acti

vit

ies a

sso

cia

ted

wit

h t

he

pro

po

sed

pro

jec

t w

ou

ld g

en

era

te

em

issio

ns o

f cri

teri

a p

ollu

tan

ts.

S

4.2

-2

a)

Prior

to a

ll phases o

f pro

ject constr

uction, th

e a

pplic

ant and

City s

hall

ensure

that constr

uction c

ontr

acts

inclu

de the

follo

win

g s

pe

cific

atio

ns:

SU

Page 5: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-5

D

raft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

A

fter

revie

w a

nd a

ppro

val by th

e Y

SA

QM

D, th

e

develo

per,

if re

quired, shall

apply

appro

ved c

hem

ical

soil

sta

bili

zers

accord

ing to m

anufa

ctu

rers

specific

ations, to

all

inactive c

onstr

uction a

reas

(pre

vio

usly

gra

ded a

reas w

hic

h r

em

ain

inactive for

96

hours

).

R

educe tra

ffic

speeds o

n a

ll unpaved s

urf

aces to 1

5

mile

s p

er

hour

or

less.

C

rea

tion

of a

du

st co

ntr

ol p

lan

fo

r a

pp

rova

l b

y Y

SA

QM

D.

N

o o

pen b

urn

ing o

f vegeta

tion d

uring p

roje

ct

constr

uction.

R

eesta

blis

hm

ent of gro

und c

over

as s

oon a

s p

ossib

le

after

constr

uction.

S

uspensio

n o

f gra

din

g a

ctivitie

s w

hen w

inds e

xceed 2

5

mph.

E

nclo

se

, co

ve

r, o

r w

ate

r a

t le

ast tw

ice

da

ily a

ll so

il pile

s

and e

xposed s

urf

aces.

K

eep a

ll desig

nate

d h

aul ro

ute

s c

lean o

f any loose s

oil

or

oth

er

mate

rials

associa

ted w

ith tra

nsport

ation o

f soil

and o

ther

constr

uction r

ela

ted m

ate

rials

.

C

over

loads o

f all

haul/dum

p tru

cks s

ecure

ly.

b)

Prior

to a

ll phases o

f pro

ject constr

uction, th

e a

pplic

ant and

City s

hall

ensure

that constr

uction c

ontr

acts

inclu

de the

follo

win

g s

pe

cific

atio

ns:

C

ontr

acto

rs s

hall

pro

vid

e a

pla

n for

appro

val by t

he

YS

AQ

MD

dem

onstr

ating that th

e h

eavy-d

uty

(>

50

hors

epow

er)

off-r

oad v

ehic

les to b

e u

sed in the

constr

uction p

roje

ct, inclu

din

g o

wned, le

ased a

nd

su

bco

ntr

acto

r ve

hic

les, w

ou

ld a

ch

ieve

a p

roje

ct-

wid

e

fleet avera

ge 3

0 p

erc

ent N

Ox r

eduction a

nd 4

5 p

erc

ent

part

icula

te r

eduction c

om

pare

d to the m

ost re

ce

nt

CA

RB

fle

et avera

ge. A

ccepta

ble

options for

reducin

g

em

issio

ns m

ay inclu

de u

se o

f la

te m

odel engin

es, lo

w-

em

issio

n d

iesel pro

ducts

, altern

ative fuels

, engin

e

retr

ofit te

chnolo

gy, afte

r-tr

eatm

ent pro

ducts

, and/o

r oth

er

options a

s the

y b

ecom

e a

vaila

ble

.

Page 6: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-6

D

raft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

T

o the e

xte

nt

feasib

le, m

anage o

pera

tion o

f heavy-d

uty

equip

ment to

reduce e

mis

sio

ns s

uch a

s m

ain

tain

h

ea

vy-d

uty

ea

rth

mo

vin

g, sta

tio

na

ry a

nd

mo

bile

equip

ment in

optim

um

runnin

g c

onditio

ns.

M

inim

ize idlin

g tim

e to

fiv

e (

5)

min

ute

s w

hen

constr

uction e

quip

ment is

not in

use, unle

ss p

er

engin

e

manufa

ctu

rer’s s

pecific

ations o

r fo

r safe

ty r

easons m

ore

tim

e is r

equired.

U

se low

sulfur

fuel fo

r sta

tionary

constr

uction

equip

ment, if fe

asib

le.

U

tiliz

e e

xis

ting p

ow

er

sourc

es (

e.g

., p

ow

er

pole

s)

or

cle

an fuel genera

tors

rath

er

tha

n tem

pora

ry p

ow

er

genera

tors

.

U

se low

em

issio

n o

n-s

ite s

tationary

equip

ment.

C

on

tro

l vis

ible

em

issio

ns e

xce

ed

ing

40

pe

rce

nt o

pa

city

to n

o m

ore

than 3

min

ute

s in a

ny o

ne h

our,

wh

ich

inclu

des a

ll (o

n-r

oad a

nd o

ff-r

oad)

die

sel-pow

ere

d

equip

ment, in a

ccord

ance w

ith Y

SA

QM

D R

ule

2.3

.

c)

During c

onstr

uction o

f th

e p

roposed p

roje

ct, th

e p

roje

ct

co

ntr

acto

r sh

all

follo

w th

e g

uid

elin

es e

sta

blis

he

d b

y Y

SA

QM

D

Ru

les, in

clu

din

g th

e fo

llow

ing

:

C

om

ply

with Y

SA

QM

D R

ule

2.1

4, A

rchitectu

ral

Coatings, fo

r arc

hitectu

ral coatings a

nd s

olv

ents

used a

t th

e p

roposed p

roje

ct.

In

the e

vent th

at an

y o

pen b

urn

ing is r

equired, obta

in

appro

val and issuance o

f a b

urn

ing p

erm

it fro

m

YS

AQ

MD

and p

erf

orm

burn

ing in c

om

plia

nce w

ith

YS

AQ

MD

Rule

2.8

, O

pen B

urn

ing, G

enera

l.

C

utb

ack a

nd

em

uls

ifie

d a

sp

ha

lt a

pp

lica

tio

n s

ha

ll b

e

conducte

d to a

ccord

ance w

ith Y

SA

QM

D R

ule

2.2

8,

Cutb

ack a

nd E

muls

ifie

d A

sphalt P

avin

g M

ate

rials

.

4.2

-3

Op

era

tio

n o

f th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

g

en

era

te e

mis

sio

ns o

f R

OG

an

d N

Ox.

S4.2

-3

Prior

to b

uild

ing p

erm

it,

the a

pplic

ant shall

imple

ment

these, or

equally

effective m

easure

s, in

consultation w

ith

the Y

SA

QM

D:

Im

pro

ve

th

e th

erm

al in

teg

rity

of

no

nre

sid

en

tial build

ings,

and r

educe the therm

al lo

ad w

ith a

uto

mate

d tim

e c

locks

or

auto

mate

d s

ensors

.

SU

Page 7: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-7

D

raft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

P

rovid

e e

ffic

ient heating a

nd o

ther

applia

nces, such a

s

wa

ter

heate

rs, cookin

g e

quip

ment, r

efr

igera

tors

, fu

rnaces, and b

oile

r units.

E

lectr

ical outlets

shall

be insta

lled o

n the e

xte

rior

walls

of both

the fro

nt and b

ack o

f a r

esid

ence o

r all

com

merc

ial build

ings to p

rom

ote

the u

se o

f ele

ctr

ic

lan

dsca

pe

main

ten

an

ce

eq

uip

me

nt.

In

sta

ll a

ga

s o

utle

t in

th

e b

ackya

rd o

f re

sid

en

tial

build

ings for

use w

ith o

utd

oor

cookin

g a

pplia

nces, such

as g

as b

urn

ing b

arb

eques.

If feasib

le, in

sta

ll a g

as o

utlet w

ith c

era

mic

logs in a

ny

pro

po

se

d fire

pla

ce

s, in

clu

din

g o

utd

oo

r re

cre

ation

al

fire

pla

ces o

r pits.

In

sta

ll lo

w n

itro

ge

n o

xid

e (

NO

x)

hot

wate

r heate

rs.

(Beyond Y

SA

QM

D R

ule

Requirem

ents

)

H

VA

C u

nits s

hall

be e

quip

ped w

ith P

rem

Air (

or

oth

er

manufa

ctu

rer)

cata

lyst syste

m if availa

ble

and

econom

ically

feasib

le a

t th

e tim

e b

uild

ing p

erm

its a

re

issued. T

he P

rem

Air c

ata

lyst can c

onvert

up to 7

0

perc

ent of gro

und level ozone that passes o

ver

the

condenser

coils

into

oxygen. T

he P

rem

Air s

yste

m is

consid

ere

d feasib

le if th

e a

dditio

nal cost is

less than 1

0

perc

ent of th

e b

ase H

VA

C u

nit c

ost.

R

equire a

ll flat ro

ofs

in the n

onre

sid

ential la

nd u

se

are

as to h

ave a

wh

ite o

r silv

er

cap s

heet to

reduce

energ

y d

em

and.

If feasib

le, purc

hase b

attery

po

were

d o

r ele

ctr

ic

landscape m

ain

tenance e

quip

ment fo

r ne

w r

esid

ences.

C

onfigure

park

ing to m

inim

ize tra

ffic

inte

rfere

nce a

nd

de

lays.

In

clu

de w

ide p

ark

ing s

paces o

r vanpool only

spaces to

acco

mm

od

ate

va

np

ool ve

hic

les in

em

plo

ym

en

t a

rea

s

(e.g

., c

om

munity c

om

merc

ial, b

usin

ess-p

rofe

ssio

nal,

industr

ial) a

s d

ete

rmin

ed b

y Y

SA

QM

D.

P

rovid

e p

refe

rential park

ing for

carp

ools

and v

anpools

in

em

plo

ym

ent

are

as (

e.g

., c

om

munity c

om

merc

ial,

busin

ess-p

rofe

ssio

nal, a

nd industr

ial are

as).

Page 8: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-8

D

raft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

E

quip

all

truck loadin

g a

nd u

nlo

adin

g d

ocks w

ith o

ne

11

0/2

08

vo

lt p

ow

er

ou

tle

t fo

r e

ve

ry t

wo

do

ck d

oo

rs.

Die

se

l tr

ucks s

ha

ll b

e p

rohib

ite

d fro

m id

ling

mo

re th

an

five m

inute

s a

nd s

hall

be r

equired to c

onnect to

the

110/2

08 v

olt p

ow

er

to r

un a

ny a

uxili

ary

equip

ment.

Sig

na

ge

ad

dre

ssin

g th

ese

re

quire

me

nts

sh

all

be

pro

vid

ed a

t th

e loadin

g d

ocks.

V

ehic

le a

nd b

icycle

all

day p

ark

ing lots

near

transit

sto

ps, and fre

ew

ay a

ccess p

oin

ts.

P

erm

it p

ark

& r

ide lots

in b

usin

ess v

illage a

rea.

P

rovid

e r

ide

sharin

g in

form

ation

in

a h

om

eo

wn

ers

associa

tion p

ackage.

C

ontr

ibute

to a

n a

rea tra

nsit fund to h

elp

build

, m

ain

tain

, and e

nhance tra

nsit s

erv

ices/facili

ties/

am

enitie

s.

S

ub

sid

ize

d s

cho

ol b

us s

erv

ice

.

A

subsid

y for

ad

ded tra

nsit s

erv

ices.

C

lass II and III o

n-s

treet bik

ew

ay s

yste

m.

C

lass I b

ike

wa

y s

yste

m th

at co

nn

ects

re

sid

en

tial,

com

merc

ial and p

ark

uses o

f th

e S

pecific

Pla

n.

D

esig

n s

treets

to m

axim

ize p

edestr

ian a

ccess to tra

nsit

sto

ps.

S

ite d

esig

n to m

axim

ize a

ccess to tra

nsit lin

es.

S

ite d

esig

n to a

ccom

modate

bus tra

vel.

S

ite d

esig

n to p

rovid

e lig

hte

d s

helters

at tr

ansit a

ccess

poin

ts.

P

repara

tion o

f a T

ransport

ation S

yste

m M

anagem

ent

Pla

n fo

r e

mp

loye

rs w

ith

50

or

mo

re e

mp

loye

es.

P

rovid

e s

ecu

re b

icycle

sto

rag

e a

t p

ub

lic p

ark

ing

fa

cili

ties.

O

nly

U.S

. E

PA

Ph

ase

II ce

rtifie

d w

oo

db

urn

ing

de

vic

es

should

be a

llow

ed in s

ingle

-fam

ily r

esid

ences. T

he

em

issio

n p

ote

ntial fr

om

each r

esid

ence s

hall

not exceed

7.5

gra

ms p

er

hour.

Page 9: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-9

D

raft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

W

oodburn

ing o

r P

elle

t applia

nces s

hall

not be p

erm

itte

d

in m

ulti-fa

mily

develo

pm

ents

. O

nly

natu

ral gas o

r pro

pane fired firepla

ce a

pplia

nces a

re p

erm

itte

d.

4.2

-4

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

gen

era

te

incre

ased

tra

ffic

vo

lum

es t

hat

co

uld

in

cre

ase c

on

cen

trati

on

s o

f C

O a

t lo

cal

inte

rsecti

on

s.

LS

No

ne

re

quire

d.

NA

4.2

-5

Th

e p

rop

os

ed

pro

jec

t c

ou

ld e

xp

ose

sen

sit

ive

recep

tors

in

clo

se p

roxim

ity t

o t

he

pro

ject

sit

e t

o T

AC

s.

LS

No

ne

re

quire

d.

NA

4.2

-6

De

velo

pm

en

t o

f th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h o

ther

exis

tin

g a

nd

fu

ture

d

eve

lop

me

nt

wit

hin

th

e S

VA

B c

ou

ld h

ave

a

cu

mu

lati

ve

ozo

ne im

pact.

LS

No

ne

re

quire

d.

NA

4.2

-7

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

gen

era

te

inc

rea

sed

tra

ffic

vo

lum

es

un

de

r c

um

ula

tive

co

nd

itio

ns t

hat

co

uld

in

cre

ase

co

ncen

trati

on

s o

f C

O a

t lo

cal

inte

rsecti

on

s.

LS

No

ne

re

quire

d.

NA

4.3

Bio

log

ical R

eso

urc

es

4.3

-1

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

no

t re

su

lt in

th

e lo

ss o

f sta

te a

nd

/or

fed

era

lly p

rote

cte

d

wetl

an

ds.

LS

No

ne

re

quire

d.

NA

4.3

-2

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

will n

ot

resu

lt in

th

e

loss o

f ri

pari

an

or

oth

er

sen

sit

ive h

ab

itats

.

LS

No

ne

re

quire

d.

NA

4.3

-3

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

resu

lt in

th

e

loss o

f fo

rag

ing

hab

itat

for

Sw

ain

so

n’s

h

aw

k, w

hit

e-t

ailed

kit

e, an

d o

ther

pro

tecte

d

rap

tors

.

S

4.3

-3 T

he p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

ensure

that agricultura

l la

nd,

annual gra

ssla

nds o

r oth

er

suitable

rapto

r fo

ragin

g h

abitat are

pre

serv

ed e

ither

on s

ite, or

a c

om

bin

ation o

f on s

ite a

nd o

ff

site p

reserv

ation o

f habitat

within

Sola

no C

ounty

at a 0

.5:1

ra

tio. T

he fin

al acre

age a

mount shall

be a

ppro

ved b

y the C

ity.

Pre

serv

e a

reas m

ust be e

sta

blis

hed p

rior

to p

roje

ct

constr

uction, and m

ay o

ccur

thro

ugh e

ither:

a)

Paym

ent o

f a m

itig

ation fee to a

habitat develo

pm

ent and

managem

ent com

pany s

uch a

s the C

ente

r fo

r N

atu

ral Lands

Managem

ent, W

ildla

nds, In

c., o

r to

the C

DF

G. If an

esta

blis

hed m

itig

ation b

ank is n

ot availa

ble

in the a

rea, th

e

fees s

hall

be h

eld

in a

tru

st fu

nd, and u

sed to d

evelo

p a

m

itig

ation b

ank in S

ola

no C

ounty

thro

ugh the p

urc

hase,

monitoring, m

ain

tenance, and r

em

edia

tion o

f la

nds in S

ola

no

LS

Page 10: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-1

0

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

County

that support

suitable

fora

gin

g h

abitat fo

r S

wain

son’s

haw

k, and o

ther

rapto

rs. T

hese lands w

ould

becom

e

incorp

ora

ted into

the m

itig

ation b

ank, ow

ned a

nd o

pera

ted b

y

the h

abitat develo

pm

ent and m

anagem

ent com

pany, and

pro

tecte

d in p

erp

etu

ity. T

he lands m

ust be w

ithin

10 m

iles o

f th

e p

roje

ct site (

consis

tent

with C

DF

G g

uid

elin

es);

or

b)

Purc

hase o

f conserv

ation e

asem

ents

or

fee title

in S

ola

no

County

. T

his

mitig

ation s

hall

occur

within

10 m

iles o

f th

e

pro

ject site (

consis

tent w

ith

CD

FG

guid

elin

es)

or

at anoth

er

dis

tan

ce

app

rove

d b

y C

DF

G. A

lth

ou

gh

th

e p

rim

ary

fo

cu

s o

f th

ese m

itig

ation m

easure

s is o

n S

wain

son’s

haw

k,

pre

serv

ation o

f fo

ragin

g h

abita

t fo

r oth

er

pro

tecte

d b

ird

sp

ecie

s in

clu

din

g r

ed

-ta

iled

ha

wk, re

d-s

ho

uld

ere

d h

aw

k,

nort

hern

harr

ier,

ferr

ugin

ous h

aw

k, A

merican k

estr

el, g

reat

horn

ed o

wl, a

nd loggerh

ead s

hrike w

ould

be a

ccom

plis

hed

concurr

ently.

4.3

-4

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

resu

lt in

th

e

loss o

f n

esti

ng

hab

itat

for

Sw

ain

so

n’s

h

aw

k, w

hit

e-t

ailed

kit

e, an

d o

ther

pro

tecte

d

rap

tors

.

S4.3

-4

a)

If c

onstr

uction is to o

ccur

betw

een M

arc

h 1

5 thro

ugh A

ugust

30, th

e p

roje

ct applic

ant, s

hall

reta

in a

qualif

ied b

iolo

gis

t to

conduct a p

re-c

onstr

uction b

reedin

g-s

eason s

urv

ey o

f th

e

pro

ject site w

ithin

30 d

ays o

f w

hen c

onstr

uction is p

lanned to

begin

, to

dete

rmin

e if any b

ird

s a

re n

esting o

n o

r directly

adja

cent to

the p

roje

ct site. T

he s

urv

ey r

esults s

hall

be

subm

itte

d to the C

DF

G for

their r

evie

w.

LS

b)

The p

roje

ct applic

ant, c

onsis

tent

with C

DF

G g

uid

elin

es, shall

avoid

all

bir

ds n

est sites locate

d in the p

roje

ct site d

uring the

bre

edin

g s

eason (

appro

xim

ate

ly M

arc

h 1

5 thro

ugh A

ugust

30)

wh

ile the n

est is

occupie

d w

ith a

dults a

nd/o

r young. T

his

avoid

ance c

ould

consis

t of dela

yin

g c

onstr

uction to a

void

the

nesting s

eason. A

ny o

ccupie

d n

est shall

be m

onitore

d b

y a

qualif

ied b

iolo

gis

t to

dete

rmin

e w

hen the n

est is

no longer

used. If

the c

onstr

uction c

annot be d

ela

yed, avoid

ance s

hall

inclu

de the e

sta

blis

hm

ent of a n

on-d

istu

rbance b

uffer

zone

aro

und the n

est site. T

he s

ize o

f th

e b

uffer

zo

ne w

ill b

e

dete

rmin

ed in c

onsultation w

ith t

he C

DF

G. T

he b

uffer

zone

shall

be d

elin

eate

d b

y h

ighly

vis

ible

tem

pora

ry c

onstr

uction

fencin

g.

Page 11: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS =

Les

s th

an S

igni

fican

t P

S =

Pot

entia

lly S

igni

fican

t S

= S

igni

fican

t S

U =

Sig

nific

ant a

nd U

navo

idab

le

NA

= N

ot A

pplic

able

N

I = N

o Im

pact

Del

Rio

Hill

s P

lann

ed U

nit D

evel

opm

ent

3-11

D

raft

Env

ironm

enta

l Im

pact

Rep

ort

Dec

embe

r 20

08

P:\P

roje

cts

- WP

Onl

y\51

244.

00 D

el R

io H

ills\

!DE

IR\3

.0 S

umm

Tab

le.d

oc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F IM

PA

CT

S A

ND

MIT

IGA

TIO

N M

EA

SU

RE

S

Imp

act

Lev

el o

f S

ign

ific

ance

Pri

or

to M

itig

atio

n

Mit

igat

ion

Mea

sure

(s)

Lev

el o

f S

ign

ific

ance

Aft

er

Mit

igat

ion

4.

3-5

Th

e p

rop

ose

d p

roje

ct w

ou

ld n

ot

resu

lt in

lo

ss o

f n

esti

ng

hab

itat

fo

r tr

ico

lore

d

bla

ckb

ird

.

LS

Non

e re

quire

d.

NA

4.3-

6 T

he

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

wo

uld

no

t re

sult

in

inte

rru

pti

on

s to

wild

life

corr

ido

rs o

r lo

ss o

f w

ildlif

e n

urs

ery

site

s.

LS

Non

e re

quire

d.

NA

4.3-

7 T

he

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

wo

uld

no

t re

sult

in

imp

acts

to

sp

ecia

l sta

tus

pla

nt

spec

ies.

LS

N

one

requ

ired.

N

A

4.3-

8 T

he

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

in c

om

bin

atio

n w

ith

o

ther

cu

rren

t an

d p

rop

ose

d p

roje

cts

in t

he

vici

nit

y co

uld

res

ult

in a

reg

ion

al lo

ss o

f ri

par

ian

or

oth

er s

ensi

tive

hab

itat

s.

LS

Non

e re

quire

d.

NA

4.3-

9 T

he

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

in c

om

bin

atio

n w

ith

o

ther

cu

rren

t an

d p

rop

ose

d p

roje

cts

in t

he

vici

nit

y co

uld

res

ult

in a

reg

ion

al lo

ss o

f fo

rag

ing

hab

itat

fo

r S

wai

nso

n’s

haw

k,

wh

ite-

taile

d k

ite,

an

d o

ther

pro

tect

ed

rap

tors

.

PS

4.

3-9

Impl

emen

t Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re 4

.3-3

(a)

and

(b).

LS

4.3-

10

Th

e p

rop

ose

d p

roje

ct in

co

mb

inat

ion

wit

h

oth

er c

urr

ent

and

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

s in

th

e vi

cin

ity

cou

ld r

esu

lt in

a r

egio

nal

loss

of

nes

tin

g h

abit

at f

or

Sw

ain

son

’s h

awk,

wh

ite-

taile

d k

ite,

an

d o

ther

pro

tect

ed r

apto

rs.

LS

4.3-

10

Impl

emen

t Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re 4

.3-2

(a),

and

if n

eces

sary

(i.

e., i

f nes

ting

rapt

ors

are

pres

ent)

, Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re

4.3-

2(b)

.

LS

4.3-

11

Th

e p

rop

ose

d p

roje

ct in

co

mb

inat

ion

wit

h

oth

er c

urr

ent

and

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

s in

th

e vi

cin

ity

cou

ld r

esu

lt in

a r

egio

nal

loss

of

nes

tin

g h

abit

at f

or

tric

olo

red

bla

ckb

ird

.

LS

Non

e re

quire

d.

LS

4.3-

12

Th

e p

rop

ose

d p

roje

ct in

co

mb

inat

ion

wit

h

oth

er c

urr

ent

and

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

s in

th

e vi

cin

ity

cou

ld r

esu

lt in

a r

egio

nal

loss

of

wild

life

corr

ido

rs o

r lo

ss o

f w

ildlif

e n

urs

ery

site

s.

LS

Non

e re

quire

d.

LS

Page 12: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-1

2

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

4.4

Cu

ltu

ral R

es

ou

rces

4.4

-1

Th

e p

rop

os

ed

pro

jec

t c

ou

ld c

au

se

a

su

bsta

nti

al ad

ve

rse c

han

ge in

th

e

sig

nif

ican

ce o

f an

his

tori

cal re

so

urc

e o

r a

un

iqu

e a

rch

aeo

log

ical re

so

urc

e a

s d

efi

ned

in

§21083.2

of

the C

EQ

A s

tatu

tes a

nd

§15064.5

of

the S

tate

CE

QA

Gu

idelin

es.

PS

4.4

-1

In the e

vent th

at an

y p

rehis

toric o

r his

toric s

ubsurf

ace

arc

ha

eolo

gic

al fe

atu

res o

r d

ep

osits, in

clu

din

g loca

lly

dark

ened s

oil

(“m

idden”)

, th

at could

conceal cultura

l deposits, anim

al bone, obsid

ian, and/o

r m

ort

ar

are

dis

covere

d d

uring c

onstr

uction-r

ela

ted e

art

h-m

ovin

g

activitie

s, all

gro

und-d

istu

rbin

g a

ctivity w

ithin

50 feet of

the

reso

urc

es s

hall

be

ha

lte

d a

nd

the

City o

f R

io V

ista

C

om

munity D

evelo

pm

ent D

epart

ment shall

be n

otified b

y

the p

roje

ct applic

ant. T

he p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

reta

in a

qualif

ied a

rchaeolo

gis

t to

surv

ey a

nd e

valu

ate

the fin

d.

The C

om

munity D

evelo

pm

ent D

epart

ment shall

consult

with t

he q

ualif

ied a

rcheolo

gis

t to

assess the s

ignific

ance o

f th

e fin

d. Im

pacts

to a

ny s

ignific

ant re

sourc

es s

hall

be

mitig

ate

d to a

less-t

han-s

ignific

ant le

vel th

rough d

ata

re

covery

or

oth

er

meth

ods d

ete

rmin

ed a

dequate

by a

qualif

ied a

rchaeolo

gis

t and that are

consis

tent w

ith t

he

Secre

tary

of th

e Inte

rior's S

tandard

s for

Arc

haeolo

gic

al

Do

cu

me

nta

tio

n.

LS

4.4

-2

Th

e p

rop

os

ed

pro

jec

t c

ou

ld d

istu

rb a

ny

hu

man

rem

ain

s, in

clu

din

g t

ho

se in

terr

ed

o

uts

ide o

f fo

rmal cem

ete

ries.

PS

4.4

-2

If h

um

an r

em

ain

s a

re d

iscovere

d o

n the p

roje

ct site d

uring

any p

hase o

f constr

uction, all

gro

und-d

istu

rbin

g a

ctivity

within

50 feet of th

e r

em

ain

s s

hall

be h

alted im

media

tely

, a

nd

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

Co

mm

un

ity D

eve

lop

me

nt

Depart

ment and the C

ounty

coro

ner

shall

be n

otified

imm

edia

tely

. If

the r

em

ain

s a

re d

ete

rmin

ed b

y t

he C

ounty

coro

ner

to b

e N

ative A

merican, th

e N

ative A

merican

He

rita

ge

Co

mm

issio

n (

NA

HC

) sh

all

be

no

tifie

d w

ith

in

24 h

ours

, and the g

uid

elin

es o

f th

e N

AH

C s

hall

be a

dhere

d

to in the tre

atm

ent and d

ispositio

n o

f th

e r

em

ain

s. T

he

pro

ject applic

ant shall

als

o r

eta

in a

pro

fessio

nal

arc

ha

eolo

gis

t w

ith

Na

tive

Am

erica

n b

urial e

xp

erie

nce

to

conduct a fie

ld investigation o

f th

e s

pecific

site a

nd c

onsult

with t

he M

ost Lik

ely

Descendant, if an

y, id

entified b

y the

NA

HC

. A

s n

ecessary

, th

e a

rch

aeolo

gis

t m

ay p

rovid

e

pro

fessio

nal assis

tance to the M

ost Lik

ely

Descendant,

inclu

din

g the e

xcavation a

nd r

em

oval of th

e h

um

an

rem

ain

s. T

he

City s

ha

ll b

e r

espo

nsib

le fo

r a

pp

rova

l o

f re

com

mended m

itig

ation a

s it deem

s a

ppro

priate

, ta

kin

g

account of th

e p

rovis

ions o

f S

tate

law

, as s

et fo

rth in C

EQ

A

Gu

idelin

es S

ectio

n 1

50

64

.5(e

) a

nd

Pu

blic

Re

so

urc

es C

od

e

Section 5

097.9

8. T

he p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

imple

ment

LS

Page 13: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-1

3

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

appro

ved m

itig

ation m

easure

s, to

be v

erified b

y t

he C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

Com

munity D

evelo

pm

ent D

epart

ment, b

efo

re the

resum

ption o

f gro

und-d

istu

rbin

g a

ctivitie

s w

ithin

50 feet of

where

the r

em

ain

s w

ere

dis

covere

d.

4.4

-3

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

dir

ectl

y o

r in

dir

ectl

y d

estr

oy a

un

iqu

e p

ale

on

tolo

gic

al

reso

urc

e o

r sit

e o

r a u

niq

ue g

eo

log

ic

featu

re.

PS

4

.4-3

S

ho

uld

pa

leo

nto

logic

al o

r u

niq

ue

ge

olo

gic

al re

so

urc

es b

e

dis

covere

d o

n the p

roje

ct site d

uring a

ny p

hase o

f constr

uction, all

gro

und d

istu

rbin

g a

ctivitie

s s

hall

cease

within

100 feet

of th

e s

ite o

f th

e d

iscovery

and the C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

Com

munity D

evelo

pm

ent D

epart

ment shall

be

notified im

media

tely

. T

he p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

reta

in a

qualif

ied p

ale

onto

logis

t to

pro

vid

e a

n e

valu

ation o

f th

e fin

d

and to p

rescribe m

itig

ation m

easure

s to r

educe im

pacts

to

a less-t

han-s

ignific

ant le

vel.

In c

onsid

ering a

ny s

uggeste

d

mitig

ation p

roposed b

y the c

onsultin

g p

ale

onto

logis

t, the

City o

f R

io V

ista

Co

mm

unity D

eve

lop

me

nt D

epa

rtm

en

t shall

dete

rmin

e w

heth

er

avoid

ance is n

ecessary

and

feasib

le in lig

ht of fa

cto

rs s

uch a

s the n

atu

re o

f th

e fin

d,

pro

ject desig

n, costs

, specific

pla

n p

olic

ies a

nd land u

se

assum

ptions, and o

ther

consid

era

tions. If avoid

ance is

unnecessary

or

infe

asib

le, oth

er

appro

priate

measure

s

(e.g

., d

ata

reco

very

) shall

be institu

ted. W

ork

ma

y p

roceed

on o

ther

part

s o

f th

e p

roje

ct site, as d

efined b

y the C

ity a

nd

the p

ale

onto

logis

t, w

hile

mitig

ation for

pale

onto

logic

al

resourc

es is c

arr

ied o

ut.

LS

4.4

-4

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

oth

er

de

ve

lop

men

t in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, co

uld

cau

se a

su

bsta

nti

al ad

ve

rse c

han

ge

in t

he s

ign

ific

an

ce o

f an

his

tori

cal re

so

urc

e,

un

iqu

e a

rch

aeo

log

ical re

so

urc

e, o

r h

um

an

re

main

s a

s d

efi

ned

in

§21083.2

of

the C

EQ

A

sta

tute

s a

nd

§15064.5

of

the S

tate

CE

QA

G

uid

elin

es.

PS

4.4

-4

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

s 4

.4-1

and 4

.4-2

. LS

4.4

-5

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

oth

er

de

ve

lop

men

t in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, co

uld

dir

ectl

y o

r in

dir

ectl

y d

estr

oy a

un

iqu

e

pale

on

tolo

gic

al re

so

urc

e o

r sit

e o

f a u

niq

ue

geo

log

ic f

eatu

re.

PS

4.4

-5

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.4

-3.

LS

Page 14: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-1

4

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

4.5

Geo

log

y a

nd

So

ils

4.5

-1

Th

e p

rop

os

ed

pro

jec

t c

ou

ld e

xp

ose

pe

op

le

or

str

uctu

res t

o a

dve

rse im

pacts

in

vo

lvin

g

lan

dslid

es d

ue t

o s

ub

sta

nti

al ero

sio

n.

PS

4.5

-1

Imple

ment soil

sta

bili

ty r

ecom

mendations p

rovid

ed in the

Engeo, In

c. geote

chnic

al explo

ration r

eport

during

excavation, gra

din

g, fill

activitie

s, etc

., o

n s

lopes w

ithin

the

pro

ject site. M

easure

s inclu

de, but are

not lim

ited to:

(1)

rem

oval of all

org

anic

s a

nd d

ebris fro

m fill

mate

rials

, (2

) re

moval of soft s

oils

, (3

) com

paction o

f soils

prior

to fill

pla

cem

ent, (

4)

co

mpaction o

f tr

ench b

ackfills

, (5

) lim

itin

g

final slo

pe g

radie

nts

to 2

:1 (

horizonta

l:vert

ical) o

r flatter

for

slo

pes less than 1

0 feet in

heig

ht, (

6)

limitin

g s

lope

gra

die

nts

to 3

:1 for

slo

pes e

xceedin

g 1

0 feet in

heig

ht,

(7)

use o

f perm

anent dra

inage m

easure

s to inte

rcept

surf

ace w

ate

r in

filtra

tion, (8

) re

vie

w o

f gra

din

g p

lans to

ensure

more

deta

iled r

ecom

mendations, (9

) build

ing

setb

acks fro

m s

lopes a

ccord

ing to m

inim

um

UB

C

requirem

ents

, (1

0)

constr

uction o

f re

tain

ing w

alls

, etc

. T

he

most appro

priate

and e

ffective m

easure

s s

hall

be

dete

rmin

ed b

y a

qualif

ied p

roje

ct engin

eer

and r

evie

wed

and a

ppro

ved b

y t

he C

ity P

lannin

g D

epart

ment prior

to the

issuance o

f gra

din

g p

erm

its.

LS

4.5

-2

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

is lo

cate

d o

n

ex

pan

siv

e s

oil

s, w

hic

h c

ou

ld c

rea

te

su

bsta

nti

al ri

sks t

o lif

e o

r p

rop

ert

y.

PS

4.5

-2

The p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

incorp

ora

te a

ppro

priate

re

com

mendations m

ade in the g

eote

chnic

al explo

ration

report

(E

ngeo, In

c., S

epte

mber

2003)

into

pro

ject desig

n

and g

radin

g a

nd e

xcavation p

lans to r

educe im

pacts

associa

ted w

ith d

evelo

pm

ent of th

e p

roposed p

roje

ct on

expansiv

e s

oils

. M

easure

s to r

educe the e

ffects

of

develo

pm

ent on e

xpansiv

e s

oils

inclu

de, but are

not lim

ited

to: (

1)

the u

tiliz

ation o

f post-

tensio

ned m

at fo

undations for

sin

gle

fa

mily

re

sid

en

ce

s w

ith

in th

e p

rop

ose

d p

roje

ct a

nd

(2

) specific

eart

hw

ork

com

paction a

nd (

3)

mois

ture

re

com

mendations to r

educe the d

am

agin

g e

ffects

of

expansiv

e s

oils

. T

he m

ost effective a

nd a

ppro

priate

m

easure

s, alo

ng w

ith a

ny a

dditio

nal m

easure

s that m

ay b

e

deem

ed a

ppro

priate

shall

be d

ete

rmin

ed b

y a

qualif

ied

ge

ote

ch

nic

al e

ng

ine

er.

T

he

se

me

asu

res s

hall

be

re

vie

we

d

and a

ppro

ved b

y t

he C

ity P

lannin

g D

epart

ment prior

to the

issuance o

f gra

din

g p

erm

its.

LS

Page 15: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-1

5

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

4.5

-3

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

oth

er

de

ve

lop

men

t w

ith

in t

he C

ity o

f R

io

Vis

ta, co

uld

exp

ose p

eo

ple

or

str

uctu

res t

o

ad

vers

e im

pacts

in

vo

lvin

g t

he p

lacem

en

t o

f s

tru

ctu

res

on

ex

pa

ns

ive

so

ils

an

d

lan

dslid

es d

ue t

o s

ub

sta

nti

al ero

sio

n,

wh

ich

co

uld

cre

ate

su

bs

tan

tia

l im

pa

cts

to

life

or

pro

pert

y.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.6

Hazard

s a

nd

Hazard

ou

s M

ate

rials

4.6

-1

Th

e p

rop

os

ed

pro

jec

t c

ou

ld e

xp

ose

pe

op

le

to p

ote

nti

al h

ealt

h h

azard

s b

y d

em

olish

ing

b

uild

ing

s o

n t

he p

roje

ct

sit

e t

hat

co

uld

co

nta

in a

sb

esto

s a

nd

/or

lead

-based

pain

t.

PS

4.6

-1

Prior

to d

em

olit

ion o

f an

y s

tructu

res locate

d o

n the p

roje

ct

site, th

e p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

reta

in a

Cal O

SH

A c

ert

ifie

d

lead-b

ased p

ain

t and A

CB

M c

ontr

acto

r to

conduct a r

isk

assessm

ent of

all

str

uctu

res o

n-s

ite c

onstr

ucte

d p

rior

to

1978 for

the p

resence o

f A

CB

Ms a

nd/o

r le

ad-b

ased p

ain

t.

If A

CB

Ms a

nd/o

r le

ad-b

ased p

ain

t are

dete

rmin

ed to e

xis

t on s

ite, th

e c

ontr

acto

r shall

pre

pare

a s

ite-s

pecific

AC

BM

and lead h

azard

contr

ol pla

n. If

the p

lan c

alls

for

the

rem

oval of A

CB

Ms a

nd lead-b

ased p

ain

ts p

rior

to

dem

olit

ion a

ctivitie

s, A

CB

M r

em

oval m

eth

ods m

ay inclu

de,

but are

not lim

ited to: d

ry s

trip

pin

g, w

et contr

olle

d

str

ippin

g, hig

h p

ressure

wa

ter

jettin

g, and a

ir m

anagem

ent

for

hot str

ippin

g. P

ain

t re

moval m

eth

ods m

ay inclu

de, but

are

not lim

ited to

: u

se o

f a h

eat gun, to

ols

equip

ped w

ith

HE

PA

exh

au

st ca

pa

bili

ty,

we

t scra

pin

g, a

nd

che

mic

al

rem

overs

. If re

moval is

no

t deem

ed n

ecessary

prior

to

dem

olit

ion, th

e p

lan s

hall

make o

ther

recom

mendations for

the c

onta

inm

ent of an

y A

CB

Ms o

r le

ad-b

ased p

ain

t m

ate

rials

that m

ay b

e r

ele

ased into

the e

nvironm

ent during

dem

olit

ion a

ctivitie

s, as w

ell

as a

ppro

priate

dis

posal

meth

ods. T

he p

lan s

hall

als

o p

rovid

e s

pecific

instr

uctions

for

pro

vid

ing p

rote

ctive c

loth

ing a

nd g

ear

for

abate

ment

pers

onnel.

LS

Waste

s fro

m a

bate

ment and d

em

olit

ion a

ctivitie

s s

hall

be

m

anaged a

nd d

isposed o

f at a landfill(

s)

licensed to a

ccept

AC

BM

s a

nd lead-b

ased w

aste

. O

nce a

ll abate

ment

measure

s h

ave b

een im

ple

mente

d, th

e p

roje

ct applic

ant

shall

pro

vid

e w

ritten d

ocum

enta

tion to the C

ity that A

CB

M

and lead-b

ased p

ain

t te

sting a

nd a

bate

ment, if necessary

, has b

een c

om

ple

ted in a

ccord

ance w

ith a

ll fe

dera

l, s

tate

, and local la

ws a

nd r

egula

tions,

inclu

din

g: le

ad-b

ased p

ain

t

Page 16: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-1

6

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

exposure

guid

elin

es p

rovid

ed in “

Guid

elin

es for

the

Evalu

ation a

nd C

ontr

ol of Lead B

ased P

ain

t H

azard

s in

Housin

g”

by t

he U

.S. D

epart

ment of H

ousin

g a

nd U

rban

Develo

pm

ent (H

UD

), C

onstr

uction S

afe

ty O

rder

1532.1

fr

om

Title

8 o

f th

e C

alif

orn

ia C

ode o

f R

egula

tions (

CC

R),

and the C

alif

orn

ia D

epart

ment of H

ealth S

erv

ices.

4.6

-2

Co

nstr

ucti

on

an

d/o

r o

ccu

pan

cy o

f th

e

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

co

uld

exp

ose p

eo

ple

to

so

urc

es o

f p

ote

nti

al h

ealt

h h

azard

s, su

ch

as s

oil o

r g

rou

nd

wate

r co

nta

min

ati

on

, fr

om

p

ast

uses o

n-

or

off

-sit

e.

PS

4

.6-2

a)

Prior

to issuin

g g

radin

g p

erm

its, a P

hase II E

SA

shall

be

pre

pare

d b

y t

he p

roje

ct applic

ant in

accord

ance w

ith

pro

fessio

nal sta

ndard

s, as r

ecom

mended in the P

hase I E

SA

.

Th

e P

hase

II E

SA

sh

all

furt

he

r e

va

lua

te th

e R

EC

s id

en

tifie

d

in the P

hase I E

SA

and o

ther

pote

ntial risks that m

ay h

ave

resulted in s

oil

and/o

r gro

undw

ate

r conta

min

ation a

t th

e

pro

ject site. T

he P

hase II E

SA

shall

inclu

de s

oil

sam

plin

g to

be c

onducte

d a

t each o

f th

e s

ites o

f th

e R

EC

s identified in the

Phase I E

SA

, in

clu

din

g the E

spers

on H

om

este

ad, in

the a

rea

of each o

f th

e a

bove-g

round s

tora

ge tanks, th

e s

tora

ge y

ard

on the E

spers

on H

om

este

ad, and the s

tora

ge s

ilos o

n the

Esp

ers

on

Ho

meste

ad

. T

he

Ph

ase

II E

SA

sh

all

als

o

investigate

the p

ote

ntial fo

r soil

conta

min

ation r

esultin

g fro

m

the u

se o

f pesticid

es a

nd/o

r herb

icid

es thro

ughout th

e p

roje

ct

site.

LS

A w

ork

pla

n for

and r

esults o

f th

e investigation s

hall

be

subm

itte

d b

y t

he p

roje

ct applic

ant to

the C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

P

lannin

g D

epart

ment fo

r re

vie

w a

nd a

ppro

val. T

he r

esults o

f th

e s

tud

y s

hall

identify

recom

mended m

easure

s to r

educe

pote

ntial risks, if a

ny,

to indiv

idua

ls a

nd the e

nvironm

ent th

at

could

occur

during s

ite d

evelo

pm

ent or

futu

re o

ccupancy.

R

em

edia

tion

me

asu

res r

eco

mm

en

de

d b

y t

he

Ph

ase

II E

SA

and w

ork

pla

n s

hall

be c

arr

ied o

ut to

the s

atisfa

ction the C

ity

of R

io V

ista

Pla

nnin

g D

epart

ment prior

to issuin

g g

radin

g

perm

its.

b)

In the e

vent th

at pre

vio

usly

unid

entified s

oil

or

gro

undw

ate

r conta

min

ation, U

ST

s, or

oth

er

featu

res o

r m

ate

rials

that could

pre

sent a thre

at to

hum

an h

ealth o

r th

e e

nvironm

ent are

dis

covere

d d

uring e

xcavation a

nd g

radin

g o

r constr

uction

activitie

s, all

constr

uction w

ithin

the p

roje

ct site s

hall

cease

imm

edia

tely

, an

d the a

pplic

ant shall

reta

in a

qualif

ied

pro

fessio

nal to

evalu

ate

the typ

e a

nd e

xte

nt of th

e h

azard

ous

mate

rials

conta

min

ation a

nd m

ake a

ppro

priate

Page 17: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-1

7

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

recom

mendations, in

clu

din

g, if n

ecessary

, th

e p

repara

tion o

f a s

ite r

em

edia

tion p

lan. P

urs

uant to

Section 2

5401.0

5 (

a)(

1)

of th

e C

alif

orn

ia H

ealth a

nd S

afe

ty C

ode, th

e p

lan s

hall

inclu

de: a

pro

posal in

com

plia

nce w

ith a

pplic

ation law

, re

gula

tions, and s

tandard

s for

conducting a

site investigation

and r

em

edia

l action, a s

chedule

for

the c

om

ple

tion o

f th

e s

ite

investigation a

nd

rem

edia

l action, and a

pro

posal fo

r an

y

oth

er

rem

edia

l actions p

roposed to r

espond to the r

ele

ase o

r th

reate

ned r

ele

ase o

f hazard

ous m

ate

rials

at th

e p

ropert

y.

Work

within

the p

roje

ct site s

hall

not pro

ceed u

ntil all

ide

ntifie

d h

aza

rds a

re m

an

ag

ed

to

th

e s

atisfa

ctio

n o

f th

e C

ity

an

d th

e S

ola

no

Co

un

ty E

nviro

nm

en

tal M

an

agem

en

t D

epart

ment.

c)

In the e

vent site investigation a

nd/o

r re

media

tion a

re

required, th

e a

pplic

ant shall

ensure

pre

para

tion o

f a s

ite-

specific

health a

nd s

afe

ty p

lan t

hat m

eets

the inte

nt of O

SH

A

hazard

ous m

ate

rials

wo

rker

requir

em

ents

(C

CR

Title

8).

T

he

pla

n s

hall

be

pre

pare

d b

y a

qualif

ied p

rofe

ssio

nal prior

to the

com

mencem

ent of site-d

istu

rbin

g a

ctivitie

s a

ssocia

ted w

ith

the investigation a

nd/o

r re

media

tion. T

he p

lan s

hall

pro

vid

e

for

the identification, evalu

ation, contr

ol of safe

ty a

nd h

ealth

hazard

s, and e

merg

ency r

esponse to h

azard

ous w

aste

opera

tions. P

urs

uant to

the r

equirem

ents

of sta

te a

nd federa

l la

w,

the s

ite-s

pecific

health a

nd s

afe

ty p

lan m

ay r

equire, but

would

not be lim

ited to: the u

se o

f pers

onal pro

tective

equip

ment, o

nsite c

ontr

ols

(e.g

., c

ontinuous a

ir q

ualit

y

monitoring)

during c

onstr

uction, and o

ther

pre

cautions a

s

dete

rmin

ed to b

e n

ecessary

by t

he p

lan p

repare

r.

d)

Prior

to the issuance o

f gra

din

g p

erm

its, an investigation s

hall

confirm

the p

resence o

f fo

rmer

septic s

yste

ms a

t th

e

Espers

on H

om

este

ad. If th

e h

om

este

ad d

oes in fact conta

in

form

er

septic s

yste

ms, th

ese s

yste

ms s

hall

be

abandoned

under

perm

it fro

m, and to the s

atisfa

ction o

f, the S

ola

no

County

Environm

enta

l M

anagem

ent D

epart

ment.

e)

During s

ite p

repara

tion a

ctivitie

s s

uch a

s g

radin

g a

nd

excavation, exte

rnal corr

osio

n c

ontr

ol m

easure

s s

uch a

s, but

not lim

ited to, th

e u

se o

f pro

tective c

oating o

n p

ipe e

xte

riors

and the u

se o

f cath

odic

pro

tection s

yste

ms s

hall

be u

sed b

y

the p

roje

ct contr

acto

r to

pre

vent corr

osio

n d

am

age to e

xis

ting

pip

elin

es that m

ay b

ecom

e u

neart

hed d

uring these a

ctivitie

s.

Page 18: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-1

8

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

These a

ctivitie

s s

hall

be m

onitore

d b

y the S

ola

no C

ounty

E

nvironm

enta

l M

anagem

ent D

epart

ment.

4.6

-3

Co

nstr

ucti

on

an

d/o

r o

ccu

pan

cy o

f th

e

pro

po

sed

pro

jec

t w

ou

ld in

vo

lve

th

e r

ou

tin

e

use, sto

rag

e, an

d t

ran

sp

ort

ati

on

of

hazard

ou

s m

ate

rials

, w

hic

h c

ou

ld c

reate

a

healt

h h

aza

rd o

r p

ote

nti

al h

ealt

h h

azard

.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.6

-4

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

resu

lt in

p

ote

nti

ally s

ign

ific

an

t h

azard

s t

o

resid

en

ces a

nd

sch

oo

ls d

ue t

o t

he n

atu

ral

gas e

xtr

acti

on

acti

vit

ies w

ith

in t

he p

roje

ct

sit

e.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.6

-5

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

resu

lt in

p

ote

nti

ally s

ign

ific

an

t h

azard

s t

o

resid

en

ces a

nd

sch

oo

ls d

ue t

o t

he

pre

sen

ce o

f n

atu

ral g

as t

ran

sm

issio

n

facilit

ies w

ith

in t

he p

roje

ct

sit

e.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.6

-6

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

is lo

cate

d w

ith

in t

wo

m

iles o

f th

e R

io V

ista

Mu

nic

ipal

Air

po

rt,

wh

ich

co

uld

resu

lt in

a s

afe

ty h

azard

.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.6

-7

Imp

lem

en

tati

on

of

the p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

exp

ose

se

ns

itiv

e r

ec

ep

tors

to

in

cre

ased

evac

uati

on

ris

ks u

nd

er

em

erg

en

cy c

on

dit

ion

s.

PS

4

.6-7

C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

sh

all

no

t is

su

e o

ccu

pa

ncy b

uild

ing

pe

rmits

beyond the 1

,931st re

sid

ential un

it u

ntil th

e p

roje

ct

applic

ant coord

inate

s w

ith t

he C

ity F

ire C

hie

f and the

So

lan

o C

ou

nty

OE

S to

en

su

re p

roje

ct co

mplia

nce

with

th

e

appro

ved c

ounty

Em

erg

ency E

vacuation P

lan. A

ny

applic

ant re

vis

ions to the e

vacuation p

lan w

ould

be s

ubje

ct

to the r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val of th

e C

ity F

ire C

hie

f and

So

lan

o C

ou

nty

OE

S.

LS

4.6

-8

Co

nstr

ucti

on

an

d/o

r o

ccu

pan

cy o

f th

e

pro

po

sed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h o

ther

pro

jects

in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, co

uld

exp

ose p

eo

ple

to

so

urc

es o

f p

ote

nti

al

healt

h h

azard

s, su

ch

as a

sb

esto

s

co

nta

inin

g b

uild

ing

mate

rials

, le

ad

-based

p

ain

t, a

nd

so

il o

r g

rou

nd

wate

r co

nta

min

ati

on

, fr

om

past

uses o

n-

or

off

-sit

e.

PS

4.6

-8

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

s 4

.6-1

and 4

.6-2

. LS

Page 19: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-1

9

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

4.6

-9

Co

nstr

ucti

on

an

d/o

r o

ccu

pan

cy o

f th

e

pro

po

sed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h t

he

de

velo

pm

en

t o

f o

the

r p

roje

cts

in

an

d

aro

un

d t

he C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, w

ou

ld in

vo

lve

the r

ou

tin

e u

se, sto

rag

e, an

d t

ran

sp

ort

ati

on

o

f h

azard

ou

s m

ate

rials

, w

hic

h c

ou

ld c

reate

a h

ealt

h h

azard

or

po

ten

tial h

ealt

h h

azard

.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.6

-10

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

oth

er

de

velo

pm

en

t in

th

e C

ity, co

uld

resu

lt

in p

ote

nti

ally s

ign

ific

an

t h

azard

s r

ela

ted

to

th

e e

xtr

ac

tio

n a

nd

tra

ns

mis

sio

n o

f n

atu

ral g

as.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.6

-11

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

oth

er

pro

jects

in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, w

ou

ld r

esu

lt in

th

e d

evelo

pm

en

t o

f re

sid

en

tial, c

om

merc

ial, a

nd

sch

oo

l u

ses

wit

hin

tw

o m

iles o

f th

e R

io V

ista

Mu

nic

ipal

Air

po

rt, w

hic

h c

ou

ld r

esu

lt in

a s

afe

ty

hazard

fo

r p

eo

ple

resid

ing

an

d w

ork

ing

w

ith

in t

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.6

-12

Cu

mu

lati

ve d

eve

lop

men

t, in

clu

din

g t

he

pro

po

sed

pro

ject,

co

uld

aff

ect

imp

lem

en

tati

on

an

ad

op

ted

em

erg

en

cy

evacu

ati

on

pla

n.

PS

4

.6-1

2

City o

f R

io V

ista

sh

all

no

t is

su

e o

ccu

pa

ncy b

uild

ing

pe

rmits

be

yo

nd

th

e 1

,93

1st r

esid

ential unit u

ntil th

e p

roje

ct

applic

ant coord

inate

s w

ith t

he C

ity F

ire C

hie

f and the

So

lan

o C

ou

nty

OE

S to

en

su

re p

roje

ct co

mplia

nce

with

th

e

appro

ved c

ounty

Em

erg

ency E

vacuation P

lan. A

ny

applic

ant re

vis

ions to the e

vacuation p

lan w

ould

be s

ubje

ct

to the r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val of th

e C

ity F

ire C

hie

f and

So

lan

o C

ou

nty

OE

S.

LS

4.7

Hyd

rolo

gy a

nd

Wate

r Q

uality

4.7

-1

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

in

cre

ase p

eak

run

off

ra

tes

an

d v

olu

me

s w

hic

h c

ou

ld

exceed

th

e c

ap

acit

y o

f lo

cal d

rain

ag

es a

nd

re

su

lt in

on

- an

d o

ff-s

ite f

loo

din

g h

azard

s.

PS

4

.7-1

a)

Prior

to issuance o

f a g

radin

g p

erm

it, th

e a

pplic

ant shall

pre

pare

a F

inal D

rain

age M

aste

r P

lan for

all

on-

and o

ff-s

ite

dra

ina

ge

fa

cili

tie

s (

inclu

din

g w

ate

r qualit

y facili

ties -

BM

Ps)

shall

be p

repare

d a

nd s

ubm

itte

d to the C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

D

epart

ment of P

ublic

Work

s a

nd

the C

om

munity

Develo

pm

ent D

epart

ment (C

ity)

for

revie

w a

nd a

ppro

val. T

he

Fin

al D

rain

ag

e M

aste

r P

lan

sha

ll d

em

on

str

ate

th

at p

ea

k flo

ws

from

develo

ped a

reas w

ould

not exceed p

re-d

evelo

pm

ent

conditio

ns a

nd s

hall

be in c

onfo

rmance w

ith th

e r

equirem

ents

of R

io V

ista

’s G

enera

l P

lan p

olic

ies a

nd g

uid

elin

es for

desig

n

LS

Page 20: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-2

0

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

of dra

inage facili

ties a

nd the c

rite

ria u

sed in the S

ola

no

County

Hydro

log

y M

anual th

at

are

in e

ffect at th

e tim

e o

f su

bm

itta

l. T

he

Dra

ina

ge

Pla

ns s

ha

ll in

clu

de

at a

min

imu

m,

written te

xt addre

ssin

g e

xis

ting c

onditio

ns, th

e e

ffects

of

pro

ject im

pro

vem

ents

, all

appro

priate

calc

ula

tions, a

wate

rshed m

ap, pote

ntial in

cre

ases in d

ow

nstr

eam

flo

ws a

nd

volu

mes, pro

posed o

n-s

ite a

nd o

ff-s

ite im

pro

vem

ents

, on-s

ite

wa

ter

qualit

y fa

cili

ties, effectiveness o

f w

ate

r q

ualit

y B

MP

s,

opera

tion a

nd m

ain

tenance r

esponsib

ilities, in

spection

schedule

s, and r

eport

ing r

equirem

ents

. T

he F

inal D

rain

age

Ma

ste

r P

lan

sha

ll b

e p

repa

red

by a

Re

gis

tere

d C

ivil

Eng

ine

er

an

d s

ha

ll in

clu

de

sp

ecific

s r

eg

ard

ing

th

e tim

ing

of

imp

lem

en

tatio

n.

b)

Fundin

g a

nd im

ple

menta

tion for

the m

ain

tenance o

f re

quired

dra

inage facili

ties s

hall

be p

rovid

ed b

y a

Hom

eow

ners

A

ssocia

tion, C

om

munity S

erv

ices D

istr

ict, o

r oth

er

responsib

le e

ntity

to b

e d

ete

rmin

ed a

ppro

priate

by t

he C

ity

prior

to c

onstr

uction.

4.7

-2

Co

nstr

ucti

on

acti

vit

ies f

or

the

pro

po

sed

p

roje

ct

co

uld

resu

lt in

sed

imen

t an

d o

ther

co

nstr

ucti

on

-rela

ted

po

llu

tan

ts e

nte

rin

g

local d

rain

ag

es.

PS

4

.7-2

a)

Any p

roje

ct

with

in the D

RH

PU

D w

ith g

round d

istu

rbance

exceedin

g o

ne-a

cre

that is

subje

ct to

the S

tate

NP

DE

S

Genera

l C

onstr

uction P

erm

it s

ha

ll obta

in s

uch p

erm

it fro

m the

CV

RW

QC

B a

nd s

hall

pro

vid

e to the C

ity e

vid

ence o

f a S

tate

-is

sued N

PD

ES

Genera

l C

onstr

uction P

erm

it n

um

ber

or

filin

g

of a N

otice o

f In

tent and fees p

rior

to s

tart

of co

nstr

uction.

LS

b)

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.5

-1 (

slo

pe s

tabili

ty a

nd

ero

sio

n c

ontr

ol fr

om

Section 4

.5 –

Geolo

gy a

nd S

oils

).

4.7

-3

Op

era

tio

n o

f th

e p

rop

os

ed

pro

jec

t w

ou

ld

resu

lt in

urb

an

po

llu

tan

ts e

nte

rin

g lo

cal

dra

ina

ge

s, w

hic

h c

ou

ld e

xc

eed

or

vio

late

w

ate

r q

uality

sta

nd

ard

s.

PS

4

.7-3

a)

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

s 4

.7-1

(a)

and (

b).

b)

P

roje

ct-

rela

ted s

torm

wa

ter

dis

charg

es a

re s

ubje

ct to

all

applic

able

requirem

ents

of th

e N

ational P

ollu

tan

t D

ischarg

e

Elim

ination S

yste

m (

NP

DE

S)

Phase II pro

gra

m. B

MP

s s

hall

be d

esig

ned to m

itig

ate

(m

inim

ize, in

filtra

te, filter,

or

treat)

sto

rmw

ate

r ru

noff in a

ccord

ance w

ith A

ttachm

ent 4 o

f th

e

City’s

NP

DE

S M

unic

ipal S

torm

wate

r P

erm

it (

Sta

te W

ate

r R

esou

rces C

ontr

ol B

oard

NP

DE

S G

enera

l P

erm

it N

o.

CA

S000004).

A

ll B

MP

s for

wa

ter

qualit

y p

rote

ction, sourc

e

contr

ol, a

nd tre

atm

ent contr

ol shall

be d

evelo

ped in

accord

ance w

ith the C

alif

orn

ia S

torm

wate

r Q

ualit

y

LS

Page 21: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-2

1

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

Associa

tion S

torm

wa

ter

Best M

anagem

ent P

ractice

Handbook for

Constr

uction a

nd N

ew

Develo

pm

ent/

Redevelo

pm

ent (o

r oth

er

sim

ilar

sourc

e a

ppro

ved b

y the C

ity)

for

the a

pplic

able

type o

f develo

pm

ent and/o

r im

pro

vem

ent.

The B

MP

s s

hall

be d

esig

ned to m

itig

ate

(m

inim

ize, in

filtra

te,

filter,

or

treat)

sto

rmw

ate

r ru

noff. F

low

or

volu

me b

ased p

ost-

co

nstr

uctio

n B

MP

s s

ha

ll b

e d

esig

ne

d a

t a

min

imu

m in

accord

ance w

ith c

rite

ria b

ased in the C

AS

QA

Handbook.

Pro

vis

ions s

hall

be inclu

ded for

long-t

erm

main

tenance o

f B

MP

s. A

ll B

MP

s s

hall

reflect th

e B

est A

vaila

ble

T

echnolo

gie

s (

BA

T)

availa

ble

at th

e tim

e o

f im

ple

menta

tion

and s

hall

reflect site-s

pecific

lim

itations. T

he C

ity s

hall

make

the fin

al dete

rmin

ations a

s t

o the a

ppro

priate

ness o

f th

e

BM

Ps p

roposed for

each p

roje

ct.

4.7

-4

Th

e p

rop

os

ed

pro

jec

t c

ou

ld r

ed

uce

g

rou

nd

wate

r re

ch

arg

e a

nd

aff

ect

gro

un

dw

ate

r q

uality

.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.7

-5

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

the b

uild

ou

t o

f th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

’s

wate

rsh

ed

s, co

uld

resu

lt in

sto

rmw

ate

r p

eak f

low

s a

nd

vo

lum

es t

hat

co

uld

resu

lt in

o

n-

or

off

-sit

e f

loo

din

g.

PS

4.7

-5

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.7

-1(a

) and (

b).

LS

4.7

-6

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

the b

uild

ou

t o

f th

e C

ity G

en

era

l P

lan

, w

ou

ld

resu

lt in

deg

rad

ati

on

of

wate

r q

uality

fro

m

sto

rmw

ate

r ru

no

ff.

PS

4.7

-6

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

s 4

.7-2

(a)

and (

b)

and

4.7

-3(a

) and (

b).

L

S

4.7

-7

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

oth

er

de

velo

pm

en

t in

th

e S

ola

no

Su

bb

asin

, co

uld

im

pact

gro

un

dw

ate

r re

ch

arg

e r

ate

s

an

d q

uality

.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.8

Lan

d U

se a

nd

Ag

ricu

ltu

ral R

eso

urc

es

4.8

-1

Imp

lem

en

tati

on

of

the p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

co

uld

co

nfl

ict

wit

h t

he R

io V

ista

Gen

era

l P

lan

, R

io V

ista

Zo

nin

g O

rdin

an

ce

, S

ola

no

C

ou

nty

Gen

era

l P

lan

, o

r o

ther

ap

plicab

le

po

licie

s.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

Page 22: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-2

2

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

4.8

-2

De

ve

lop

men

t o

f th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

cre

ate

in

co

mp

ati

ble

uses s

uch

th

at

the

pro

du

cti

vit

y o

f ad

jacen

t ag

ricu

ltu

ral la

nd

is

su

bsta

nti

ally r

ed

uced

or

that

the r

esu

ltin

g

resid

en

tial u

ses

are

ad

ve

rsely

aff

ecte

d b

y

ag

ricu

ltu

ral acti

vit

ies.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.9

No

ise

4.9

-1

Co

nstr

ucti

on

of

the p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

te

mp

ora

rily

in

cre

ase a

mb

ien

t n

ois

e le

ve

ls.

LS

4.9

-1 T

he p

rim

e c

ontr

acto

r shall

ensure

that th

e f

ollo

win

g m

easure

s

are

im

ple

mente

d d

uring a

ll phase

s o

f pro

ject constr

uction:

LS

a

) C

on

str

uctio

n a

ctivitie

s s

ha

ll com

ply

with

th

e R

io V

ista

M

unic

ipal C

ode, in

clu

din

g c

om

plia

nce w

ith o

pera

tional hours

fo

r constr

uction e

quip

ment of 7:0

0 a

.m. to

7:0

0 p

.m.

b)

Locate

fix

ed c

onstr

uction e

quip

ment, s

uch a

s c

om

pre

ssors

and g

enera

tors

, and c

onstr

uction s

tagin

g a

reas a

s far

as

possib

le (

with a

min

imum

dis

tance o

f 50 feet)

fro

m n

earb

y

sensitiv

e r

ecepto

rs. S

hro

ud o

r shie

ld a

ll im

pact to

ols

and

muffle

or

shie

ld a

ll in

take a

nd e

xhaust port

s o

n p

ow

er

constr

uction e

quip

ment w

ithin

50 f

eet of sensitiv

e r

ecepto

rs.

c)

Desig

nate

a d

istu

rbance c

oord

inato

r and c

onspic

uously

post

this

pers

on's

num

ber

aro

und the p

roje

ct site a

nd in a

dja

cent

public

spaces. T

his

dis

turb

ance c

oord

inato

r w

ill r

eceiv

e a

ll public

com

pla

ints

about constr

uction n

ois

e d

istu

rbances a

nd

will

be r

esponsib

le for

dete

rmin

ing the c

ause o

f th

e c

om

pla

int,

and im

ple

ment any feasib

le m

easure

s to b

e taken to a

llevia

te

the p

roble

m, in

clu

din

g, fo

r exam

ple

, use o

f te

mpora

ry n

ois

e

attenuation m

echanis

ms s

uch a

s the e

rection o

f te

mpora

ry

sound w

alls

, esta

blis

hm

ent of short

term

constr

uction

setb

acks, use o

f nois

e c

ontr

ol bla

nkets

, and the u

se o

f equip

ment m

uffle

rs, in

ord

er

to r

educe n

ois

e o

n e

xis

ting

sensitiv

e r

ecepto

rs.

4.9

-2

Co

nstr

ucti

on

of

the p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

te

mp

ora

rily

in

cre

ase le

ve

ls o

f g

rou

nd

bo

rne

vib

rati

on

.

LS

4.9

-2

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

s 4

.9-1

(a)

thro

ugh (

c).

LS

Page 23: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-2

3

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

4.9

-3

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

cre

ate

tr

an

sp

ort

ati

on

no

ise t

hat

co

uld

aff

ect

exis

tin

g r

ecep

tors

.

S

4.9

-3

The p

roje

ct sponsor

shall

be r

equired to p

rovid

e n

ois

e

attenuation to S

ierr

a A

venue b

etw

een the p

roje

ct site a

nd

Dro

uin

Drive. N

ois

e a

ttenuation s

hall

be a

chie

ved w

ith t

he

imple

menta

tion o

f open g

rade a

sphalt, w

hic

h p

rovid

es

appro

xim

ate

ly a

2 to 3

dB

A d

ecre

ase in tra

ffic

nois

e level,

in o

rder

to r

educe the p

roje

ct’s c

ontr

ibution to tra

ffic

nois

e

in this

are

a.

LS

4.9

-4

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

cre

ate

tr

an

sp

ort

ati

on

no

ise t

hat

co

uld

aff

ect

pro

po

sed

resid

en

tial re

cep

tors

ad

jacen

t to

S

R 1

2.

PS

4

.9-4

a)

The p

roje

ct develo

per

shall

ensure

that nois

e levels

at th

e

exte

rio

r a

rea

s o

f th

e p

rop

ose

d d

eta

ch

ed

(sin

gle

fa

mily

) re

sid

en

tia

l u

nits m

ee

ts th

e C

ity’s

65

dB

A s

tan

da

rd. F

ina

l desig

n s

hould

inclu

de a

t le

ast a 4

-foot berm

and a

six

-foot

wall

or

a 2

-foot

berm

and a

n 8

-foot

wall

com

bin

ation w

here

th

e s

etb

ack to the b

erm

is a

dja

cent to

the r

oadw

ay r

ight-

of-

wa

y a

nd there

is a

t le

ast a 6

5-f

oot setb

ack to the r

esid

ential

wa

lls; or

som

e o

ther

com

bin

ation o

f berm

s,

wa

lls, and

setb

acks that ensure

the e

xte

rior

nois

e levels

at th

e c

losest

de

tach

ed

(sin

gle

-fa

mily

) re

sid

en

tia

l u

nits a

re 6

5 d

BA

or

less.

LS

b)

The p

roje

ct develo

per

shall

ensure

that in

terior

nois

e levels

at

the p

roposed d

eta

ched (

sin

gle

fam

ily)

resid

ential units m

eets

th

e C

ity’s

45 d

BA

sta

ndard

, by incorp

ora

ting s

ite d

esig

n a

nd

insula

tion featu

res to m

eet th

is s

tandard

.

c)

If e

xte

rior-

to-inte

rior

nois

e r

eduction featu

res for

resid

ential

str

uctu

res r

equires inopera

ble

or

clo

sed w

indow

s to m

eet th

e

nois

e s

tandard

, a m

echanic

al ventila

tion s

yste

m m

eeting

Uniform

Build

ing C

ode r

equirem

ents

must be p

rovid

ed.

4.9

-5

Sta

tio

nary

so

urc

es a

sso

cia

ted

wit

h t

he

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

wo

uld

in

cre

ase a

mb

ien

t n

ois

e le

vels

at

ex

isti

ng

an

d p

rop

os

ed

re

cep

tors

.

S

4.9

-5

The p

roje

ct develo

per

shall

ensure

that m

echanic

al

equip

ment in

sta

lled for

resid

ential and c

om

merc

ial

bu

ildin

gs a

nd

tru

ck lo

adin

g a

rea

s s

ha

ll b

e lo

ca

ted

as fa

r aw

ay fro

m r

esid

ential re

cepto

rs a

s feasib

le, and s

hall

inclu

de p

roper

shie

ldin

g s

uch that nois

e levels

at th

e

clo

sest re

sid

ential re

cepto

r w

ould

be b

elo

w 4

5 d

BA

Leq for

me

ch

anic

al eq

uip

me

nt a

nd

belo

w 5

0 d

BA

Leq for

truck

loa

din

g a

rea

s.

LS

4.9

-6

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

pla

ce

resid

en

ts a

dja

cen

t to

gas w

ell b

uff

er

are

a a

t th

e p

roje

ct

sit

e.

S

4.9

-6

The p

rim

e c

ontr

acto

r shall

ensure

that one o

r all

of th

e

follo

win

g m

easure

s a

re im

ple

mente

d for

resid

ential units

adja

cent to

a w

ell

site b

uffer

are

a a

s d

esig

nate

d o

n the

pro

posed s

ite p

lan:

LS

Page 24: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-2

4

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

a)

Com

ply

with the

Rio

Vis

ta M

unic

ipal C

ode b

y p

rovid

ing

exte

rior-

to-inte

rior

nois

e r

eduction featu

res for

the r

esid

ential

str

uctu

res a

dja

cent to

the 1

50 f

oot of th

e s

etb

ack a

rea for

a

well

site to a

ssure

that in

terior

nois

e levels

are

30 d

BA

or

less

within

bedro

om

s a

nd 3

5 d

BA

in o

ther

room

s.

b)

In o

rder

to c

om

ply

with the C

ity’s

Munic

ipal C

ode s

tandard

s,

the follo

win

g n

ois

e a

ttenuation m

easure

could

be

imple

mente

d: incre

ase the r

esid

ential setb

ack, re

quire the

constr

uction o

f te

mpora

ry n

ois

e b

arr

iers

such a

s s

ound w

alls

or

berm

, or

pro

vis

ion o

f la

ndscapin

g featu

res inclu

din

g thic

k

tree lin

es a

long the p

erim

ete

r of th

e w

ell

sites.

c)

If e

xte

rior-

to-inte

rior

nois

e r

eduction featu

res for

hig

h d

ensity

resid

en

tia

l str

uctu

res r

eq

uire

s ino

pe

rab

le o

r clo

se

d w

ind

ow

s

to m

eet th

e n

ois

e s

tandard

, a m

echanic

al ventila

tion s

yste

m

meeting U

niform

Build

ing C

ode r

equirem

ents

must be

pro

vid

ed.

4.9

-7

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

no

t exp

ose

resid

en

ts w

ith

in t

wo

miles o

f th

e R

io V

ista

A

irp

ort

to

no

ise le

ve

ls i

n e

xcess o

f th

e

sta

nd

ard

s.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.9

-8

Co

nstr

ucti

on

of

the p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

te

mp

ora

rily

ad

d t

o c

um

ula

tive

no

ise le

ve

ls

in t

he v

icin

ity o

f th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

sit

e.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.9

-9

Incre

ases in

tra

ffic

asso

cia

ted

wit

h t

he

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

wo

uld

cre

ate

no

ise t

hat

co

uld

co

mb

ine w

ith

oth

er

road

way n

ois

e

an

d a

ffect

sen

sit

ive

recep

tors

.

S4.9

-9

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.9

-3.

LS

4.1

1 P

ub

lic

Se

rvic

es

4.1

1-1

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

resu

lt in

an

in

cre

ased

dem

an

d f

or

po

lice p

rote

cti

on

serv

ices, re

qu

irin

g n

ew

or

exp

an

ded

po

lice

facilit

ies t

he c

on

str

ucti

on

of

wh

ich

co

uld

cau

se s

ign

ific

an

t en

vir

on

men

tal eff

ects

.

S4.1

1-1

P

rior

to p

roje

ct constr

uction, th

e p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

pay

the m

unic

ipal fa

cili

ties f

ee tow

ard

the d

evelo

pm

ent of

adequate

polic

e facili

ties a

s r

equired b

y S

ection 3

.36.0

20

of th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

Munic

ipal C

ode. T

he p

roje

ct

applic

ant shall

als

o p

ay a

n a

dditio

nal fe

e to e

nsure

adequate

fundin

g is a

vaila

ble

to c

onstr

uct a n

ew

polic

e

facili

ty p

rior

to t

he d

evelo

pm

ent of 450 u

nits.

LS

Page 25: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-2

5

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

4.1

1-2

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

futu

re d

eve

lop

men

t in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, w

ou

ld r

esu

lt in

an

in

cre

ased

dem

an

d f

or

po

lic

e p

rote

cti

on

se

rvic

es

, in

clu

din

g t

he

co

nstr

ucti

on

of

new

po

lice f

acilit

ies, w

hic

h

co

uld

cau

se

sig

nif

ica

nt

en

vir

on

men

tal

eff

ects

.

S

4.1

1-2

Im

ple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.1

1-1

. LS

4.1

1-3

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

resu

lt in

an

in

cre

ased

dem

an

d f

or

fire

pro

tecti

on

an

d

em

erg

en

cy r

esp

on

se s

erv

ice

s, re

qu

irin

g

new

or

exp

an

ded

fir

e f

acilit

ies, th

e

co

ns

tru

cti

on

of

wh

ich

co

uld

ca

us

e

sig

nif

ican

t en

vir

on

men

tal eff

ects

.

S

4.1

1-3

P

rior

to p

roje

ct constr

uction, th

e p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

pay

the m

unic

ipal fa

cili

ties f

ee tow

ard

the d

evelo

pm

ent of

adequate

fire facili

ties, sta

ff, and e

quip

ment as r

equired b

y

Section 3

.36.0

20 o

f th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

Munic

ipal C

ode.

The p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

als

o p

ay a

n a

dditio

nal fe

e to

ensure

adequate

fundin

g is a

vaila

ble

to c

onstr

uct a n

ew

fire

facili

ty p

rior

to o

r com

ple

tion o

f firs

t phase.

LS

4.1

1-4

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

futu

re d

eve

lop

men

t in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, w

ou

ld r

esu

lt in

an

in

cre

ased

dem

an

d f

or

fire

pro

tec

tio

n a

nd

em

erg

en

cy r

es

po

ns

e

serv

ices, in

clu

din

g t

he c

on

str

ucti

on

of

new

p

olice f

acilit

ies

wh

ich

co

uld

cau

se

sig

nif

ican

t en

vir

on

men

tal eff

ects

.

S

4.1

1-4

Im

ple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.1

1-3

. LS

4.1

1-5

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

gen

era

te s

olid

w

aste

th

at

co

uld

ex

ce

ed

th

e p

roje

cte

d

cap

acit

y o

f th

e lan

dfi

ll t

hat

wo

uld

serv

e t

he

pro

ject.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.1

1-6

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

futu

re d

eve

lop

men

t in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, w

ou

ld g

en

era

te s

oli

d w

as

te t

ha

t c

ou

ld

exceed

th

e p

roje

cte

d c

ap

acit

y o

f th

e lan

dfi

ll

that

wo

uld

serv

e t

he C

ity.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.1

1-7

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

gen

era

te

ad

dit

ion

al ele

men

tary

, m

idd

le, an

d h

igh

sch

oo

l stu

den

ts in

th

e R

ive

r D

elt

a U

nif

ied

S

ch

oo

l D

istr

ict

that

wo

uld

req

uir

e t

he

co

nstr

ucti

on

of

new

, o

r exp

an

sio

n o

f exis

tin

g s

ch

oo

l fa

cilit

ies w

ith

th

e p

ote

nti

al

to r

esu

lt in

sig

nif

ican

t en

vir

on

men

tal

eff

ects

.

PS

4.1

1-7

T

he p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

pay s

chool m

itig

ation fees to the

RD

US

D for

the c

onstr

uction o

r expansio

n o

f school

facili

ties w

hic

h w

ould

be r

equired to a

ccom

modate

stu

dents

genera

ted b

y t

he p

roposed p

roje

ct.

LS

Page 26: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-2

6

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

4.1

1-8

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

futu

re d

eve

lop

men

t in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, co

uld

gen

era

te a

dd

itio

nal stu

den

ts in

th

e

Riv

er

De

lta

Un

ifie

d S

ch

oo

l D

istr

ict

that

wo

uld

req

uir

e t

he c

on

str

ucti

on

of

new

, o

r exp

an

sio

n o

f exis

tin

g s

ch

oo

l fa

cilit

ies.

PS

4.1

1-8

Im

ple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.1

1-7

. LS

4.1

1-9

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

resu

lt in

th

e

need

to

co

nstr

uct

new

, o

r exp

an

ded

exis

tin

g N

eig

hb

orh

oo

d P

ark

s.

PS

4.1

1-9

P

rior

to p

roje

ct constr

uction, th

e p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

pay

in-lie

u fees a

nd the N

eig

hborh

ood P

ark

and R

ecre

ation

Fa

cili

tie

s fe

e w

hic

h w

ou

ld fu

nd

1.4

gro

ss a

cre

s o

f N

eig

hborh

ood P

ark

.

LS

OR

Prior

to fin

al desig

n r

evie

w,

the p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

inclu

de o

n the fin

al te

nta

tive m

ap a

nd larg

e lot m

ap, 1.4

gro

ss a

cre

s o

f N

eig

hborh

ood P

ark

.

4.1

1-1

0

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

resu

lt in

th

e

need

to

co

nstr

uct

new

, o

r exp

an

d e

xis

tin

g

Co

mm

un

ity P

ark

s.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.1

1-1

1

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

resu

lt in

th

e

need

to

co

nstr

uct

new

, o

r exp

an

d e

xis

tin

g

trails.

S

4.1

1-1

1 P

rior

to p

roje

ct constr

uction, th

e p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

pay

the P

ark

and R

ecre

ation F

acili

ties fee for

trails

whic

h w

ould

fu

nd e

ither

5.8

mile

s o

f tr

ails

or

17.3

gro

ss a

cre

s o

f tr

ail

corr

idor,

wh

ichever

is g

reate

r.

LS

OR

Prior

to fin

al desig

n r

evie

w,

the p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

inclu

de o

n the fin

al te

nta

tive m

ap a

nd larg

e lot m

ap, either

5.8

mile

s o

f tr

ails

or

17.3

gro

ss a

cre

s o

f tr

ail

corr

idor,

w

hic

hever

is g

reate

r.

4.1

1-1

2

Th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

futu

re d

eve

lop

men

t in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, w

ou

ld r

esu

lt in

a s

ub

sta

nti

al p

hysic

al

dete

rio

rati

on

of

exis

tin

g a

rea p

ark

s a

nd

re

cre

ati

on

al fa

cilit

ies, o

r cre

ate

a n

eed

fo

r co

nstr

ucti

on

or

exp

an

sio

n o

f re

cre

ati

on

al

facilit

ies b

eyo

nd

wh

at

was a

nti

cip

ate

d in

th

e G

en

era

l P

lan

an

d/o

r P

ark

s M

aste

r P

lan

.

PS

4.1

1-1

2 Im

ple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.1

1-9

. LS

Page 27: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-2

7

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

4.1

2 T

ran

sp

ort

ati

on

an

d C

irc

ula

tio

n

4.1

2-1

U

nd

er

Exis

tin

g P

lus P

roje

ct

co

nd

itio

ns t

he

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

wo

uld

su

bsta

nti

ally

incre

ase t

rip

s a

lon

g e

xis

tin

g r

oad

way

seg

men

ts.

PS

4

.12

-1

a)

The C

ity, in

coord

ination w

ith S

TA

, shall

cre

ate

a r

egio

nal

fundin

g p

rogra

m that

would

esta

blis

h a

nd c

olle

ct fa

ir s

hare

contr

ibutions fro

m n

ew

develo

pm

ent pro

jects

tow

ard

s n

eeded

unfu

nded r

oad im

pro

vem

ents

alo

ng S

R 1

2 in c

onju

nction w

ith

the S

TA

SR

12 E

ast P

rioritization a

nd Im

ple

menta

tion

Str

ate

gy.

SU

b)

Upon e

sta

blis

hm

ent of th

is n

ew

regio

nal fu

ndin

g p

rogra

m, th

e

pro

ject applic

ant shall

contr

ibute

fair-s

hare

funds tow

ard

s t

he

imple

menta

tion o

f th

e follo

win

g im

pro

vem

ents

in a

ccord

ance

to the tim

ing identified in T

able

4.1

2-9

:

i.

Wid

en

th

e s

ectio

n o

f S

R 1

2 b

etw

ee

n S

R 1

13

an

d

Sum

mers

et D

rive fro

m o

ne to tw

o lanes in e

ach

dire

ction

.

ii.

W

iden the s

ection o

f S

R 1

2 b

etw

een S

R 8

4 a

nd S

R

16

0 fro

m o

ne

to

tw

o la

ne

s in

each

dire

ction

by e

ith

er

wid

enin

g the e

xis

ting b

ridge o

ver

the S

acra

mento

R

iver

or

by c

onstr

ucting a

new

bridge o

ver

the r

iver.

c)

The p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

contr

ibute

fair-s

hare

funds tow

ard

s

the r

egio

nal m

unic

ipal serv

ices fund. C

ity s

taff s

hall

ensure

th

at all

funds a

re d

irecte

d to

ward

s the follo

win

g im

pro

vem

ent:

i.

Wid

en the s

ection o

f S

R 1

2 b

etw

een S

um

mers

et

Drive a

nd C

hurc

h R

oad fro

m o

ne to tw

o lanes in

ea

ch

dire

ctio

n w

ith

a r

ais

ed

lan

dsca

ped

me

dia

n,

curb

s a

nd g

utters

, sid

ew

alk

s, bik

e lanes, and tra

nsit

pullo

uts

.

ii.

W

ide

n th

e s

ectio

n o

f S

R 1

2 b

etw

ee

n C

hu

rch

Ro

ad

and M

ain

Str

eet fr

om

one to t

wo

lanes in e

ach

direction w

ith a

rais

ed landscaped m

edia

n to lim

it

left-t

urn

in a

nd o

ut access a

nd c

urb

s a

nd g

utters

, sid

ew

alk

s, bik

e lanes, and tra

nsit p

ullo

uts

.

iii

. W

iden the s

ection o

f S

R 1

2 b

etw

een M

ain

Str

eet

and G

ard

iner

Wa

y fro

m o

ne to tw

o lanes in e

ach

direction w

ith a

rais

ed landscaped m

edia

n to lim

it

left-t

urn

in a

nd o

ut access a

nd c

urb

s a

nd g

utters

, sid

ew

alk

s, bik

e lanes, and tra

nsit p

ullo

uts

.

Page 28: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-2

8

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

iv

. W

iden the s

ection o

f S

R 1

2 b

etw

een G

ard

iner

Way

and S

R 8

4 fro

m o

ne to tw

o lanes in e

ach d

irection

with a

rais

ed landscaped m

edia

n to lim

it left-t

urn

in

and o

ut access a

nd c

urb

s a

nd g

utters

, sid

ew

alk

s,

bik

e lanes, and tra

nsit p

ullo

uts

.

d)

The C

ity s

hall

add a

fundin

g m

echanis

m to the e

xis

ting C

IP to

pro

vid

e a

cir

cula

tory

connection fro

m the p

roje

ct to

7th S

treet

or

2nd S

treet via

the p

roposed c

om

munity p

ark

stu

bbed

roadw

ay. T

he a

pplic

ant shall

be r

equired to p

ay its

fair fees

tow

ard

s t

he im

pro

vem

ents

.

4.1

2-2

U

nd

er

Exis

tin

g P

lus P

roje

ct

co

nd

itio

ns t

he

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

wo

uld

su

bsta

nti

ally

incre

ase d

ela

y a

t exis

tin

g a

nd

pro

po

sed

in

ters

ecti

on

s.

PS

4

.12

-2

a)

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

s 4

.12-1

(a)

thro

ugh (

c).

b)

Upon e

sta

blis

hm

ent of th

is n

ew

regio

nal fu

ndin

g p

rogra

m, th

e

pro

ject applic

ant shall

contr

ibute

fair-s

hare

funds tow

ard

s t

he

imple

menta

tion o

f th

e follo

win

g a

dditio

nal im

pro

vem

ents

.

The im

pro

vem

ents

should

be m

ade in a

ccord

ance w

ith t

he

tim

ing s

chedule

pro

vid

ed in T

able

4.1

2-1

1:

LS

i.

Insta

ll a tra

ffic

sig

nal, r

estr

ipe the s

outh

bound

appro

ach, and w

iden the n

ort

hbound, eastb

ound,

an

d w

estb

ou

nd

ap

pro

ach

es to

th

e S

R 1

2/S

R 1

13

in

ters

ection to p

rovid

e the follo

win

g lane

configura

tions:

O

ne left-t

urn

lane a

nd a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the n

ort

hbound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane a

nd a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the s

outh

bound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane a

nd a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the e

astb

ound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, one thro

ugh lane, and a

fre

e

right-

turn

lane o

n the w

estb

ound a

ppro

ach

ii.

In

sta

ll a

tra

ffic

sig

na

l a

nd

wid

en

th

e n

ort

hb

ou

nd

, south

bound, eastb

ound, and w

estb

ound a

ppro

aches

to the S

R 1

2/C

hurc

h R

oad inte

rsection to p

rovid

e the

follo

win

g la

ne

co

nfig

ura

tion

s:

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, one thro

ugh lane, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the n

ort

hbound a

ppro

ach

Page 29: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-2

9

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

O

ne left-t

urn

lane a

nd a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the s

outh

bound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, tw

o t

hro

ugh lanes, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the e

astb

ound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, one thro

ugh lane, and a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the

westb

ound a

ppro

ach

iii

. In

sta

ll a tra

ffic

sig

nal and w

iden the n

ort

hbound,

eastb

ound, and w

estb

ound a

ppro

aches to the S

R

12/”

C”

Str

eet in

ters

ection to p

rovid

e the follo

win

g

lane c

onfigura

tions:

O

ne left-t

urn

lane a

nd a

rig

ht-

turn

lane o

n the

nort

hbound a

ppro

ach

T

wo thro

ugh lanes a

nd a

rig

ht-

turn

lane o

n the

eastb

ound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane a

nd tw

o thro

ugh lanes o

n the

westb

ound a

ppro

ach

iv

. In

sta

ll a r

ais

ed landscaped m

edia

n a

long S

R 1

2 a

nd

clo

se the left-t

urn

lane o

n the n

ort

hbound a

ppro

ach

to the S

R 1

2/D

rouin

Drive inte

rsection to r

estr

ict le

ft-

out access fro

m D

rouin

Drive. W

iden the e

astb

ound

and w

estb

ound a

ppro

aches to the S

R 1

2/D

rouin

D

rive

in

ters

ection

to

pro

vid

e th

e fo

llow

ing

la

ne

configura

tions:

O

ne thro

ugh lane a

nd a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the e

astb

ound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane a

nd tw

o thro

ugh lanes o

n the

westb

ound a

ppro

ach

v.

Insta

ll a s

econd thro

ugh lane o

n S

R 1

2 in b

oth

directions thro

ugh the inte

rsection o

f S

R 1

2/M

ain

S

treet-

Hill

sid

e T

err

ace.

vi.

Insta

ll a r

ais

ed landscaped m

edia

n o

n S

R 1

2 to

restr

ict le

ft o

ut a

ccess fro

m G

ard

iner

Way o

n th

e

south

bound a

ppro

ach to the S

R 1

2/G

ard

iner

Wa

y

inte

rsection a

nd insta

ll a s

econd thro

ugh lane o

n S

R

12 in b

oth

directions.

Page 30: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-3

0

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

vii.

In

sta

ll a

ra

ised

la

nd

sca

pe

d m

edia

n o

n S

R 1

2 to

re

str

ict le

ft o

ut a

ccess fro

m N

ort

h 5

th S

treet on the

nort

hbound a

nd s

outh

bound a

ppro

aches to the

SR

12

/No

rth

5th S

treet in

ters

ection a

nd insta

ll a

second thro

ugh lane o

n S

R 1

2 in b

oth

directions.

viii

. In

sta

ll a r

ais

ed landscaped m

edia

n o

n S

R 1

2 to

restr

ict le

ft o

ut a

ccess fro

m V

irgin

ia S

treet and a

second thro

ugh lane o

n S

R 1

2 in b

oth

directions

thro

ugh the inte

rsection o

f S

R 1

2/V

irgin

ia D

rive.

ix

. W

ide

n th

e e

astb

ou

nd

an

d w

estb

ou

nd

ap

pro

ach

es to

th

e S

R 1

2/S

R 8

4 inte

rsection to p

rovid

e the follo

win

g

lane c

onfigura

tions:

T

wo thro

ugh lanes a

nd a

rig

ht-

turn

lane o

n the

eastb

ound a

ppro

ach

T

wo thro

ugh lanes a

nd a

rig

ht-

turn

lane o

n the

westb

ound a

ppro

ach

x.

Wid

en the e

astb

ound a

nd n

ort

hbound a

ppro

aches to

the S

R 1

2/S

R 1

60 inte

rsection to p

rovid

e the

follo

win

g la

ne

co

nfig

ura

tion

s:

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, tw

o t

hro

ugh lanes, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the e

astb

ound a

ppro

ach

T

wo left-t

urn

lanes, one thro

ugh lanes, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the n

ort

hbound a

ppro

ach

4.1

2-3

U

nd

er

Exis

tin

g P

lus P

roje

ct

co

nd

itio

ns t

he

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

co

uld

fail t

o p

rovid

e

ad

eq

uate

sp

ace f

or

tran

sit

facilit

ies.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.1

2-4

U

nd

er

Baselin

e P

lus P

roje

ct

co

nd

itio

ns, th

e

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

wo

uld

su

bsta

nti

ally

incre

ase t

rip

s a

lon

g e

xis

tin

g r

oad

way

seg

men

ts.

S

4.1

2-4

a)

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

s 4

.12-1

(a)

thro

ugh (

d).

b)

Upon e

sta

blis

hm

ent of th

is n

ew

regio

nal fu

ndin

g p

rogra

m, th

e

pro

ject applic

ant shall

contr

ibute

fair-s

hare

funds tow

ard

s t

he

imple

menta

tion o

f th

e follo

win

g im

pro

vem

ents

:

SU

i.

Wid

en

th

e s

ectio

n o

f S

R 1

2 b

etw

ee

n S

R 1

13

an

d

Sum

mers

et D

rive fro

m o

ne to tw

o lanes in e

ach

direction a

nd a

dd a

media

n.

Page 31: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-3

1

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

ii.

W

iden the s

ection o

f S

R 1

2 b

etw

een S

R 8

4 a

nd S

R

16

0 fro

m o

ne

to

tw

o la

ne

s in

each

dire

ction

by e

ith

er

wid

enin

g the e

xis

ting b

ridge o

ver

the S

acra

mento

R

iver

or

by c

onstr

ucting a

new

bridge o

ver

the r

iver.

iii

. W

iden the s

ection o

f M

ain

Str

eet betw

een S

R 1

2

and S

ierr

a A

venue to a

tw

o-lane a

rterial by a

ddin

g a

cente

r tw

o-w

ay left-t

urn

lane.

iv

. W

iden the s

ection o

f M

ain

Str

eet fr

om

Sie

rra A

venue

to 7

th S

treet to

a tw

o-lane a

rterial by a

ddin

g a

cente

r tw

o-w

ay le

ft-t

urn

la

ne

.

c)

The p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

contr

ibute

fair-s

hare

funds tow

ard

s

the r

egio

nal m

unic

ipal serv

ices fund. C

ity s

taff s

hall

ensure

th

at all

funds a

re d

irecte

d to

ward

s the follo

win

g im

pro

vem

ent:

i.

Wid

en the s

ection o

f S

R 1

2 b

etw

een S

um

mers

et

Drive a

nd C

hurc

h R

oad fro

m o

ne to tw

o lanes in

ea

ch

dire

ctio

n a

nd

ad

d a

ra

ise

d m

ed

ian

.

ii.

W

ide

n th

e s

ectio

n o

f S

R 1

2 b

etw

ee

n C

hu

rch

Ro

ad

and M

ain

Str

eet fr

om

one to t

wo

lanes in e

ach

dire

ction

an

d a

dd

a r

ais

ed

me

dia

n.

iii

. W

iden the s

ection o

f S

R 1

2 b

etw

een M

ain

Str

eet

and G

ard

iner

Wa

y fro

m o

ne to tw

o lanes in e

ach

dire

ction

an

d a

dd

a r

ais

ed

me

dia

n.

iv

. W

iden the s

ection o

f S

R 1

2 b

etw

een G

ard

iner

Way

and S

R 8

4 fro

m o

ne to tw

o lanes in e

ach d

irection

an

d a

dd

a r

ais

ed

me

dia

n.

4.1

2-5

U

nd

er

Baselin

e P

lus P

roje

ct

co

nd

itio

ns t

he

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

wo

uld

su

bsta

nti

ally

incre

ase t

rip

s a

lon

g e

xis

tin

g a

nd

pro

po

sed

in

ters

ecti

on

s.

S

4.1

2-5

a)

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

s 4

.12-2

(b)

and (

c).

b)

Upon e

sta

blis

hm

ent of th

is n

ew

regio

nal fu

ndin

g p

rogra

m, th

e

pro

ject applic

ant shall

contr

ibute

fair-s

hare

funds tow

ard

s t

he

imple

menta

tion o

f th

e follo

win

g a

dditio

nal im

pro

vem

ents

:

LS

i.

Insta

ll a tra

ffic

sig

nal and w

iden the n

ort

hbound,

south

bound, eastb

ound, and w

estb

ound a

ppro

aches

to the S

R 1

2/S

R 1

13 inte

rsection to p

rovid

e the

follo

win

g la

ne

co

nfig

ura

tion

s:

O

ne left-t

urn

lane a

nd a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the n

ort

hbound a

ppro

ach

Page 32: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-3

2

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

T

wo left-t

urn

lanes a

nd a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the s

outh

bound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, one thro

ugh lane, and a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the

eastb

ound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, tw

o t

hro

ugh lanes, and a

fr

ee r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the w

estb

ound a

ppro

ach

ii.

R

estr

ipe the e

astb

ound a

ppro

ach to the S

R 1

2/

Sum

mers

et D

rive inte

rsection to p

rovid

e o

ne left-t

urn

la

ne a

nd tw

o thro

ugh lanes, th

e w

estb

ound

appro

ach to p

rovid

e tw

o thro

ug

h lanes a

nd a

rig

ht-

turn

lane, and e

ither

restr

ipe the s

outh

bound

appro

ach to p

rovid

e tw

o left-t

urn

lanes a

nd a

rig

ht-

turn

lane w

ith o

verlap p

hasin

g o

r w

iden the

eastb

ound a

ppro

ach to p

rovid

e tw

o left-t

urn

lanes

and tw

o thro

ugh lanes.

iii

. W

iden the n

ort

hbound, south

bound, eastb

ound, and

westb

ound a

ppro

aches to the S

R 1

2/C

hurc

h R

oad

inte

rsection to p

rovid

e the follo

win

g lane

configura

tions:

T

wo left-t

urn

lanes, one thro

ugh lane, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the n

ort

hbound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, one thro

ugh lane, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the s

outh

bound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, tw

o t

hro

ugh lanes, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the e

astb

ound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, tw

o t

hro

ugh lanes, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the w

estb

ound a

ppro

ach

iv

. W

iden the n

ort

hbound, south

bound, eastb

ound, and

we

stb

ound a

ppro

aches to the S

R 1

2/”

C”

Str

eet

inte

rsection to p

rovid

e the follo

win

g lane

configura

tions:

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, one thro

ugh lane, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the n

ort

hbound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, one thro

ugh lane, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the s

outh

bound a

ppro

ach

Page 33: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-3

3

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, tw

o t

hro

ugh lanes, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the e

astb

ound a

ppro

ach

T

wo left-t

urn

lanes, tw

o thro

ugh lanes, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the w

estb

ound a

ppro

ach

v.

Insta

ll a tra

ffic

sig

nal and w

iden the n

ort

hbound,

south

bound, eastb

ound, and w

estb

ound a

ppro

aches

to the S

R 1

2/D

rouin

Drive inte

rsection to p

rovid

e the

follo

win

g la

ne

co

nfig

ura

tion

s:

O

ne left-t

urn

lane a

nd a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the n

ort

hbound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane a

nd a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the s

outh

bound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, one thro

ugh lane, and a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the

eastb

ound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, one thro

ugh lane, and a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the

westb

ound a

ppro

ach

vi.

Insta

ll a s

econd thro

ugh lane o

n S

R 1

2 in b

oth

directions a

nd w

iden the n

ort

hbound a

nd

south

bound a

ppro

aches to the S

R12/M

ain

Str

eet-

Hill

sid

e T

err

ace

in

ters

ection

to

pro

vid

e th

e fo

llow

ing

la

ne c

onfigura

tions:

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, one thro

ugh lane, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the n

ort

hbound a

ppro

ach

O

ne left-t

urn

lane a

nd a

share

d thro

ugh/r

ight-

turn

lane o

n the s

outh

bound a

ppro

ach

vii.

In

sta

ll a

ra

ised

la

nd

sca

pe

d m

edia

n o

n S

R 1

2 to

re

str

ict le

ft o

ut a

ccess fro

m G

ard

iner

Way o

n th

e

south

bound a

ppro

ach to the S

R 1

2/G

ard

iner

Wa

y

inte

rsection a

nd insta

ll a s

econd thro

ugh lane o

n S

R

12 in b

oth

directions.

viii

. In

sta

ll a r

ais

ed landscaped m

edia

n o

n S

R 1

2 to

restr

ict le

ft o

ut a

ccess fro

m N

ort

h 5

th S

treet on the

nort

hbound a

nd s

outh

bound a

ppro

aches to the

SR

12

/No

rth

5th S

treet in

ters

ection a

nd insta

ll a

second thro

ugh lane o

n S

R 1

2 in b

oth

directions.

Page 34: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-3

4

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

ix

. In

sta

ll a

ra

ised

la

nd

sca

pe

d m

edia

n o

n S

R 1

2 to

re

str

ict le

ft o

ut a

ccess fro

m V

irgin

ia S

treet and insta

ll a s

econd thro

ugh lane o

n S

R 1

2 in b

oth

directions

thro

ugh the S

R 1

2/V

irgin

a D

rive Inte

rsection.

x.

Insta

ll a s

econd thro

ugh lane o

n S

R 1

2 in b

oth

directions thro

ugh the S

R 1

2/S

R 8

4 inte

rsection.

xi.

Wid

en

th

e e

astb

ou

nd

an

d w

estb

ou

nd

ap

pro

ach

es to

th

e S

R 1

2/S

R 1

60 inte

rsection to p

rovid

e the

follo

win

g la

ne

co

nfig

ura

tion

s:

O

ne left-t

urn

lane, tw

o t

hro

ugh lanes, and a

right-

turn

lane w

ith o

verlap p

hasin

g o

n the

eastb

ound a

ppro

ach.

T

wo left-t

urn

lanes, one thro

ugh lanes, and a

right-

turn

lane o

n the n

ort

hbound a

ppro

ach.

4.1

2-6

U

nd

er

Baselin

e P

lus P

roje

ct

co

nd

itio

ns t

he

pro

po

sed

pro

ject

co

uld

fail t

o p

rovid

e

ad

eq

uate

sp

ace f

or

tran

sit

facilit

ies.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.1

2-7

U

nd

er

Cu

mu

lati

ve c

on

dit

ion

s t

he p

rop

osed

p

roje

ct

wo

uld

su

bsta

nti

ally c

on

trib

ute

to

th

e in

cre

ased

tra

ffic

vo

lum

es o

n e

xis

tin

g

road

way s

eg

men

ts.

S

4.1

2-7

a)

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.1

2-1

(a)

and (

d).

b)

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.1

2-4

(b)

and (

c).

SU

4.1

2-8

U

nd

er

Cu

mu

lati

ve c

on

dit

ion

s, th

e p

rop

osed

p

roje

ct

wo

uld

su

bs

tan

tia

lly i

nc

rea

se

de

lays

at

exis

tin

g a

nd

pro

po

sed

in

ters

ecti

on

s.

S

4.1

2-8

a)

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.1

2-1

(a)

thro

ugh (

c).

b)

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.1

2-2

(b)

and (

c).

LS

c)

Imple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.1

2-5

(c).

4.1

2-9

U

nd

er

Cu

mu

lati

ve c

on

dit

ion

s t

he p

rop

osed

p

roje

ct

co

uld

fail t

o p

rovid

e a

deq

uate

sp

ace

for

tran

sit

facilit

ies.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.1

3 P

ub

lic U

tiliti

es

4.1

3-1

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject’

s d

em

an

d f

or

wate

r co

uld

exceed

exis

tin

g a

va

ilab

le w

ate

r su

pp

lies.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

Page 35: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-3

5

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

4.1

3-2

T

he in

cre

ased

wate

r d

em

an

d r

esu

ltin

g f

rom

th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

resu

lt in

th

e

co

nstr

ucti

on

of

new

or

exp

an

sio

n o

f exis

tin

g f

acilit

ies, w

hic

h c

ou

ld r

esu

lt in

ad

vers

e p

hysic

al im

pacts

to

th

e

en

vir

on

men

t.

PS

4.1

3-2

P

rior

to the issuance o

f build

ing p

erm

its, th

e p

roje

ct

applic

ant shall

pa

y “

fair s

hare

” fe

es in a

ccord

ance w

ith t

he

City o

f R

io V

ista

Wa

ter

Ma

ste

r P

lan

fe

e s

ch

edu

le, p

aya

ble

to

the C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

Depart

ment of P

ublic

Wo

rks to

contr

ibute

tow

ard

the d

evelo

pm

ent of ne

w g

rou

ndw

ate

r w

ells

an

d w

ate

r d

istr

ibu

tio

n in

frastr

uctu

res th

at

wo

uld

e

xp

an

d a

nd

im

pro

ve

th

e C

ity’s

wa

ter

su

pp

ly s

yste

m,

wh

ich

w

ould

enable

the s

yste

m to

serv

e the p

roposed p

roje

ct

thro

ugh b

uild

out.

LS

4.1

3-3

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject’

s d

em

an

d f

or

wate

r,

in a

dd

itio

n t

o t

he d

em

an

d f

or

wate

r re

su

ltin

g f

rom

oth

er

de

ve

lop

men

t w

ith

in t

he

Cit

y o

f R

io V

ista

, co

uld

exceed

ava

ilab

le

so

urc

es o

f w

ate

r su

pp

lies.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.1

3-4

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

oth

er

de

ve

lop

men

t w

ith

in t

he C

ity o

f R

io

Vis

ta, co

uld

resu

lt in

th

e n

eed

fo

r th

e

co

nstr

ucti

on

of

new

wa

ter

infr

astr

uctu

re,

wh

ich

co

uld

cau

se

ad

ve

rse

en

vir

on

me

nta

l eff

ects

.

PS

4.1

3-4

Im

ple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.1

3-2

. LS

4.1

3-5

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

gen

era

te

ad

dit

ion

al w

aste

wate

r fl

ow

s t

hat

wo

uld

exceed

th

e C

ity’s

waste

wate

r co

llecti

on

, tr

eatm

en

t, o

r d

isp

osal cap

acit

y, w

hic

h

co

uld

vio

late

CV

RW

QC

B t

reatm

en

t re

qu

irem

en

ts. T

his

wo

uld

resu

lt in

th

e

need

fo

r exp

an

sio

n o

f exis

tin

g o

r co

nstr

ucti

on

of

new

facilit

ies o

f in

frastr

uctu

re.

PS

4

.13

-5

a)

Prior

to a

ppro

vin

g a

ny a

dditio

nal hookups to the N

ort

hw

est

Waste

wate

r T

reatm

ent P

lant beyond the 4

50 E

DU

s

pre

vio

usly

appro

ved for

the p

roje

ct, the C

ity s

hall

insure

that

Phase II im

pro

vem

ents

are

com

ple

te a

nd o

pera

tional.

b)

The p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

coord

inate

with the C

ity t

o

dete

rmin

e a

“fa

ir s

hare

” fe

e c

ontr

ibution tow

ard

the

develo

pm

ent of P

hase II of th

e N

ort

hw

est W

aste

wate

r T

reatm

ent P

lant.

LS

4.1

3-6

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

oth

er

de

ve

lop

men

t in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, w

ou

ld g

en

era

te a

dd

itio

nal w

aste

wate

r fl

ow

s

that

wo

uld

exceed

th

e C

ity’s

waste

wate

r co

llecti

on

, tr

eatm

en

t, o

r d

isp

osal cap

acit

y,

wh

ich

co

uld

vio

late

CV

RW

QC

B t

rea

tme

nt

req

uir

em

en

ts. T

his

wo

uld

resu

lt in

th

e

need

fo

r exp

an

sio

n o

f exis

tin

g o

r co

nstr

ucti

on

of

new

facilit

ies.

S

4.1

3-6

Im

ple

ment M

itig

ation M

easure

4.1

3-5

. LS

Page 36: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-3

6

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

4.1

3-7

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

re

qu

ire t

he

co

nstr

ucti

on

of

new

facilit

ies t

o p

rovid

e

ele

ctr

ical serv

ice, w

hic

h c

ou

ld r

esu

lt in

sig

nif

ican

t en

vir

on

men

tal eff

ects

.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.1

3-8

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject

wo

uld

re

qu

ire t

he

co

nstr

ucti

on

of

new

facilit

ies t

o p

rovid

e

natu

ral g

as s

erv

ice, w

hic

h c

ou

ld r

esu

lt in

sig

nif

ican

t en

vir

on

men

tal eff

ects

.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.1

3-9

T

he p

rop

osed

pro

ject,

in

co

mb

inati

on

wit

h

futu

re d

eve

lop

men

t in

th

e C

ity o

f R

io V

ista

, co

uld

exceed

th

e e

lectr

ical o

r n

atu

ral g

as

su

pp

ly a

nd

tra

nsm

issio

n c

ap

ab

ilit

ies.

LS

N

on

e r

eq

uir

ed

. N

A

4.1

4 G

lob

al C

lim

ate

Ch

an

ge

4.1

4-1

D

evelo

pm

en

t o

f th

e p

rop

osed

pro

ject

co

uld

p

ote

nti

ally r

esu

lt in

a c

um

ula

tively

co

nsid

era

ble

in

cre

men

tal co

ntr

ibu

tio

n t

o

the s

ign

ific

an

t cu

mu

lati

ve i

mp

act

of

glo

bal

clim

ate

ch

an

ge.

S

4.1

4-1

a)

At th

e tim

e o

f a

pplic

ation fo

r desig

n r

evie

w for

a p

roje

ct of

more

than 1

0 u

nits o

r a c

om

merc

ial develo

pm

ent of over

50,0

00 s

f, the C

ity s

hall

require the p

roje

ct applic

ant to

subm

it

an E

nerg

y C

onserv

ation P

lan. T

he p

lan s

hall

describe the

techniq

ues a

nd p

rogra

ms to b

e e

mplo

yed in the d

evelo

pm

ent

of th

e p

roje

ct to

achie

ve e

nerg

y c

onserv

ation. T

hese

pro

gra

ms s

hall

inclu

de, but shall

not be lim

ited to, either:

SU

P

art

icip

ation in the P

G&

E E

nerg

y S

tar

Perf

orm

ance

Meth

od. T

his

meth

od is a

vaila

ble

to b

uild

ers

of sin

gle

-fa

mily

hom

es th

at are

at le

ast 15 p

erc

ent m

ore

energ

y

effic

ient th

an r

equired b

y the 2

005 T

itle

24 E

nerg

y C

ode

an

d m

ee

t a

ll U

S E

PA

sp

ecific

atio

ns. P

art

icip

atin

g

build

ers

becom

e p

art

of th

e C

alif

orn

ia E

nerg

y S

tar

New

H

om

es P

rogra

m, and their h

om

es e

arn

the E

nerg

y S

tar

label. In

cre

menta

l in

centives c

an a

lso b

e e

arn

ed b

y

addin

g e

nerg

y e

ffic

ient applia

nces a

nd/o

r lig

hting to

hom

es.

OR

P

art

icip

ation in the N

ew

Sola

r H

om

es P

art

ners

hip

(N

SH

P)

Perf

orm

ance M

eth

od. T

his

meth

od is a

vaila

ble

to

build

ers

of sin

gle

-fam

ily h

om

es that are

at le

ast

15 p

erc

ent m

ore

effic

ient th

an r

equired b

y the 2

005 T

itle

24 E

nerg

y C

ode a

nd m

eet all

US

EP

A s

pecific

ations. A

second tie

r of part

icip

ation is a

vaila

ble

to s

ingle

-fam

ily

hom

es that exceed T

itle

24 b

y 3

5 p

erc

ent, d

em

onstr

ate

Page 37: 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES · A number of project impacts identified in the EIR were found to have no impact or a less-than-significant impact, requiring no mitigation

LS

= L

ess th

an

Sig

nific

an

t P

S =

Po

ten

tia

lly S

ignific

an

t

S =

Sig

nific

an

t S

U =

Sig

nific

an

t a

nd

Un

avoid

able

N

A =

No

t A

pp

lica

ble

N

I =

No Im

pact

Del R

io H

ills P

lann

ed U

nit D

evelo

pm

ent

3-3

7

Dra

ft E

nvironm

enta

l Im

pact

Report

Decem

ber

2008

P:\P

roje

cts

- W

P O

nly

\5124

4.0

0 D

el R

io H

ills\!

DE

IR\3

.0 S

um

mT

able

.doc

TA

BL

E 3

-1

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F I

MP

AC

TS

AN

D M

ITIG

AT

ION

ME

AS

UR

ES

Imp

act

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce P

rio

r to

Mit

igati

on

M

itig

ati

on

Measu

re(s

)

Le

vel o

f S

ign

ific

an

ce A

fter

Mit

igati

on

a 4

0 p

erc

ent re

duction in c

oolin

g load, and inclu

de s

ola

r genera

tion a

s a

n o

ption for

bu

ye

rs. B

oth

tie

rs r

equire

that all

applia

nces p

rovid

ed b

y the b

uild

er

must be

Energ

y S

tar

qu

alif

ied. B

uild

ers

ma

y a

lso q

ualif

y f

or

additio

nal sola

r in

centives thro

ugh the C

EC

’s N

SH

P.

b)

The C

ity a

nd th

e p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

wo

rk togeth

er

to

pu

blis

h a

nd

dis

trib

ute

an

En

erg

y R

eso

urc

e C

onse

rva

tio

n

Guid

e d

escribin

g m

easure

s indiv

iduals

can take to incre

ase

energ

y e

ffic

iency a

nd c

onserv

ation p

rior

to the o

ccupation o

f th

e first re

sid

ential unit. T

he a

pplic

ant shall

be r

esponsib

le for

fun

din

g th

e p

rep

ara

tio

n o

f th

e G

uid

e. T

he

City w

ill b

e

responsib

le for

the d

istr

ibution o

f th

e g

uid

e. T

he E

nerg

y

Resourc

e C

onserv

ation G

uid

e s

hall

be u

pdate

d e

very

5 y

ears

and d

istr

ibute

d a

t th

e p

ublic

perm

it c

ounte

r.

c)

The p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

pay for

an initia

l in

sta

llment of

Lig

ht E

mitting D

iode (

LE

D)

traffic

lig

hts

in a

ll S

pecific

Pla

n

are

a tra

ffic

lig

hts

.

d)

The p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

develo

p a

tre

e p

lanting p

rogra

m

whic

h inclu

des the p

lanting o

f tr

ees that can a

bsorb

CO

2.

e)

The p

roje

ct applic

ant shall

coord

inate

with tra

nsit o

ffic

ials

on

a r

evis

ed tra

nsit s

yste

m p

lan w

hic

h w

ould

pro

vid

e p

ublic

tr

ansit s

erv

ice w

ithin

the p

roposed s

ite, im

pro

ve p

ublic

tra

nsit

access to a

nd fro

m the p

roposed p

roje

ct, a

nd p

rovid

e r

ide

sharing p

rogra

ms.

f)

T

he C

ity s

hall

require that

energ

y e

ffic

ient lig

hting fix

ture

s,

inclu

din

g flu

ore

scent lig

ht be u

sed in r

esid

ential and

com

merc

ial str

uctu

res w

ithin

th

e p

lan a

rea.

g

) T

he

pro

ject a

pp

lica

nt sh

all

inclu

de

lig

ht co

lore

d r

oo

fin

g

mate

rials

and r

oad m

ate

rials

to a

ddre

ss “

urb

an h

eat is

land”

effect.

h)

Imple

ment all

mitig

ation m

easure

s identified in S

ection 4

.2-

Air Q

ualit

y.