3.2 resource management approach in heterogeneous wireless access networksv1
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
1/22
Resource Management Approach in
Heterogeneous Wireless Access etworksBased on IEEE1900.4 Architecture
Min ShengThe State Key Lab. of IS & Information Science Institute,
Xidian University
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
2/22
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
3/22
Introduction and Background Diverse coexisting Radio Access Technologies (RATs) with cognitive
ability are the most important features of future wireless systems,
which form heterogeneous cognitive wireless networks .
Ryan W. Thomas IEEE Communications Magazine December 2006 CognitiveNetworks: Adaptation and Learning to Achieve End-to-End Performance Objectives
A cognitive network is a network with
a cognitive process that can perceivecurrent network conditions, and then
plan, decide and act on those
conditions. The network can learn
from these adaptations and use them
to make future decisions, all while
taking into account end-to-end goals.
OBSERVE
Monitoring
Discovery
PLA
Optimization
ACT
Reconfiguration
Profiles Policies
Context Dicision
GOALS
Feedback- ew Knowledge
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
4/22
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
5/22
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
6/22
Resource Management Approach under IEEE1900.4 Architecture
Heterogeneous Wireless etwork scenario
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
7/22
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
8/22
Resource Management Approach under IEEE1900.4 Architecture
Inter-network resource allocation
RA ResourceReservation
Access etwork Selection
RRM
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
9/22
Inter-network Resource Allocation
Objective of inter-network resource allocation Allocate bandwidth dynamically compatible with the
network environment to a particular service area from
each of the available networks in that service areas so that all of the service providers are satisfied.
When the network environment changes, such as the trafficintensity and the distribution of users, the system resources arereallocated
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
10/22
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
11/22
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
12/22
Inter-network Resource Allocation B. Maximum etwork Resource Utility In each resource allocation process, we use a utility function of
throughput
Where is the utility of network i for an allocated bandwidth of b
to connection x . Parameters w and are constants indicating thescale and the shape of the utility function .
( ), log( )con
i xU w b =
1B
l
2m
Bm
2B
l
1B
c
2B c
3m
4m
5m
2c
4c
( ),con
i xU
The total available bandwidth in these networks are B m , B
c1 , B c2 , B l1 , and B l2 , respectively. Let m i denote the
amount of bandwidth offered by WMAN to area i , letc2 and c 3 denote bandwidth offered by cellular network
to area 2 and area 3, and let c 4 and c 5 denote bandwidthoffered by cellular network to area 4 and area 5, andlet B l1 and B l2 denote the amount of bandwidth
available from WLANs in area 3 and area 5.
5
1i m
i
m B=
=
2 3 1cc c B+ =
4 5 2cc c B+ =
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
13/22
Inter-network Resource Allocation The total utility of the entire network can be obtained from
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
2 2 3 3 111 2 3
1 2 3
4 4 5 5 24 5
4 5
log log log
( , )
log log
l
tol i i
l
m c m c Bm
U m c w
m c m c B
+ + + + + = + + + + +
(1)
To maximize total utility, an optimization problem is
formulated as follows:Maximize : ( , )tol i iU m c
Subject to :5
2 3 4 5 21
, ,i m cl ci
m B c c B c c B
=
= + = + =
1 2
2 2 3 4 5 2 2
1 2
3 2 3 4 5 3 1 2 1
1 4
4 2 3 4 5 4 4
51
5 2 3 4 5 5 2 4 2
32
2 2 2 3 1 2 1
0
0
0
0
0
total
m
total
m c l
total
m
total
m c l
total
c l
U
m B m m m m m cU
m B m m m m m B c B
U
m B m m m m m c
U
m B m m m m m B c B
U
c m c m B c B
= =
+ = = + +
= = +
= = + + = =
+ + +
54
4 4 4 5 2 4 2
0total c l
U
c m c m B c B
= = + + +
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
14/22
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
15/22
RAN Resource Reservation Wiener models have been proven effective in modeling stochastic
processes that are similar in nature to the amount of resourcesrequired for future handoff calls, i.e., stochastic processes wherethe values of the random variables are affected by a large number of independent or weakly dependent factors, each with a relatively
small impact.
( ) ( ) R R t R t t t t = = +
The resources required byhandoff calls in a RAN which is
a stochastic processPrediction timeinterval
standard normalrandom variable
constant parameters
A normal random variable with ( , ).t t
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
16/22
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
17/22
RAN Resource Reservation CDP handoff call dropping probability
Pr ( ) 1ob R L CDP =
Pr ( ) 1 R u t L u t
ob CDP t t
=
2R ~ N( , )t t ~ (0,1) R u t
t
( )t L L
= + Exp CDP=2%,
CDP=3%
2.3 L t t = +
0.5 L t t = +
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
18/22
Access Network Selection Based on the current available resource for handoff
connections or new connections, access network selection will be done.
When a connection arrivals, it will select a RAN which has the
maximum residual resource according to current network resource allocation and reservation. If no RANs residualresources are satisfied its requirement, this connection is
rejected by the system.
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
19/22
Evaluation of proposed solution
1 2 3 4 50.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
N e w
A r r
i v a l
C a
l l D r o p p o
i n g
P r o
b a
b i l i t y
Areas in System
= 14, CRRM = 14, RRM = 28, CRRM = 28, RRM = 42, CRRM = 42, RRM
1 2 3 4 50.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.020
0.022
0.024
0.026
H a n
d o
f f C a
l l D r o p p
i n g
P r o
b a
b i l i t y
Area in System
= 14, CRRM
= 14, RRM = 28, CRRM = 28, RRM = 42, CRRM = 42, RRM
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
20/22
Evaluation of proposed solution
56789101112131415
5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
05
1015
2030
4050
600
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
x 10 4
Resource utility v.s call arrival rate Total users in system
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
21/22
Conclusions How to increase the system resource utility is a
challenging problem. Based on the prediction of thehandoff call arrival rate and the variation of traffic indifferent hours, we present a new resource management
approach coordinating with IEEE1900.4 architecture ,which can reserve system resource dynamically and re-allocat for each RAN, so that the performance of systems
is increased. .
-
8/6/2019 3.2 Resource Management Approach in Heterogeneous Wireless Access Networksv1
22/22
22
T T hh aa nn kk ss !!