3295-infobrief
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 3295-infobrief](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022021215/577d33c51a28ab3a6b8bb0bb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
8/8/2019 3295-infobrief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3295-infobrief 1/12
CIFOR infobriefs provide concise,accurate, peer-reviewed inormationon current topics in orest research
No. 34, December 2010 www.cior.cgiar.org
Introduction
A strong interest in biouels has arisen out o a preoccupation
with the security o energy supply and global climate
change in industrialised countries, and rom an unavourablebalance o trade and interest in capturing value in the
global carbon market by developing countries (Energy
Commission 2006; MEWD 2008; República de Moçambique
The local social and environmental impacts of biofuel feedstock expansionA synthesis of case studies from Asia, Africa and Latin America
L. German, G. Schoneveld, M. Skutch, R. Andriani, K. Obidzinski and P. Pacheco with H. Komarudin,
A. Andrianto, M. Lima and A.A.B Dayang Norwana
Key points
Six case studies were conducted in southeast Asia, sub-Saharan Arica and Latin America representing dierent eco-
regions, business models and local stakeholder groups. Findings suggest:
1. Many o the purported ecological and rural livelihood beneits o the biouel industry have not materialised.
• Widespread deorestation, the ailure o many companies to deliver on promises, heavy reliance by
companies on short-term employees, barriers to market entry, and risks borne by outgrowers have
undermined the industry’s promise.
• For the biouel sector to deliver on its promise o mitigating climate change, government policies explicitly
channelling biouels towards the orest rontier must give way to regulated expansion o industrial-scale
plantations to avoid conversion o carbon-rich orest lands. Expansion o smallholder production models
should also be accompanied by services to improve yields o both seed and oil.
2. Uneven local livelihood impacts are the norm.
• The winners tend to be those who can most aord upront investments in eedstock cultivation and
plantation employees. The losers tend to be customary land users whose livelihoods are undermined by
plantation expansion and who ace the greatest diiculty in capturing beneits.
• Action is needed to protect both customary land users and smallholders, who bear a disproportionate
cost o the emerging industries. This includes strengthening the voice o customary land users in land
negotiations. It also means ensuring they are able to capture employment and other beneits and do not
have to give up traditional livelihoods or the sake o ormal employment. The government should also
restrict outgrower contracting until the production system is proven to be viable, ensure contracts are
mutually beneicial to growers and investors, and support poorer households to overcome barriers to
market entry.
2009). These actors have placed biouels irmly on the map
o global land use change. Much o this change is occurring
in developing countries where larger tracts o land may
be accessed at lower economic and opportunity costs
(Mathews 2007). This has led to the penetration o biouel
eedstocks into rural communities and orested landscapes
in many poor countries. Expansion o biouel eedstock
production in developing countries is widely embraced by
![Page 2: 3295-infobrief](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022021215/577d33c51a28ab3a6b8bb0bb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
8/8/2019 3295-infobrief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3295-infobrief 2/12
No. 20No. 34December 2010
2
government as a means to develop the rural economy—
through the engagement o outgrowers and through the
stimulus provided by oreign direct investment to rural
inrastructure and employment generation (Andrade and
Miccolis 2010; MEWD 2008; República de Moçambique 2009;
Timnas BBN 2006).
The environmental costs o biouel eedstock expansion are
generally viewed by its proponents as either insigniicant—
due to the limited economic and ecological value o existing
vegetation and land uses—or worth bearing due to the
anticipated uture beneits (MAPA 2006). Yet, limited data
exists to demonstrate the extent to which anticipated
beneits are likely to accrue. In such a situation, debates are
easily polarised into those ‘or’ and those ‘against’ biouels.
While the biouel sector is still in its early stages in some case-study countries and these indings are preliminary, it is clear
that biouel eedstock production can bring both concrete
beneits to local livelihoods and signiicant costs (see also
McCarthy 2010). The result will depend on the production
models employed (smallholder or industrial scale), the
governance conditions in place, and which ‘local stakeholder
group’ you belong to (employees or customary land users).
Building on case studies rom Arica (Ghana, Zambia), Asia
(Indonesia, Malaysia) and Latin America (Brazil, Mexico),
this brie explores how impacts on dierent social groups
and environmental variables vary and tries to distil the
conditions under which positive and negative impacts
become maniest.
Overview of case studies
The research sought to capture the impacts o biouel
development in diverse contexts and rom a range o
perspectives. Case study analyses were thereore conducted
in dierent eco-regions or a range o business models
(industrial eedstock plantations, outgrower schemes, hybrids
and independent growers). They also sought to capture
dierentiated impacts o biouel development on plantation
employees, small-scale eedstock growers (those cultivating
independently and those on contract), households losing
land to plantation development, and other actors aected
indirectly by eedstock expansion. The case study locations,business models, and stakeholder groups surveyed are
summarised in Table 1.
Environmental impacts
Direct and indirect deorestation
Given that the main impetus o biouel expansion is the
potential to mitigate climate change, it is important to look
at the extent to which biouel expansion is contributing to
deorestation and whether the purported climate beneits
are in act achieved. This is particularly important as one
o the underlying motivations o biouel programmes in
Table 1. Summary of case study countries, business models and stakeholder groups
Country Business model Local stakeholders
Brazil Industrial-scale plantation+ independent growers
Sorriso site (cerrado biome): independent growers (large- and small-scale, landreorm settlements)
Northern Mato Grosso site (Amazon transition zone): independent growers(medium scale)
Santarem site (Amazon biome): independent growers (medium scale)
Ghana Industrial-scale plantation Pru District site: customary land owners and users (dierentiated into indigenousand migrant amilies); employees
Indonesia Hybrid (industrial-scaleplantation + outgrowers)
Manokwari, Papua, site: all
Boven Digoel, Papua, site: all except or independent growers
West Kalimantan site: all
Malaysia Industrial-scale plantation+ independent growers
Sabah site: employees; independent growers; aected neighbours
Mexico Outgrower (socialimpacts) + industrial-scaleplantation (ecologicalimpacts)
Chiapas site: employees (on smallholder arms); outgrowers
Michoacán site: employees; outgrowers
Yucatán site: none (ocus on environmental impacts o industrial scale plantation)
Zambia Outgrower Chinsali site: outgrowers contracted to company, without NGOa-supported
market linkagesMungwi site: outgrowers contracted to company, with NGO support oralternative markets
a. NGO = nongovernmental organisation
![Page 3: 3295-infobrief](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022021215/577d33c51a28ab3a6b8bb0bb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
8/8/2019 3295-infobrief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3295-infobrief 3/12
No. 34December 2010
3
case-study countries is the reduction o carbon emissions
by providing a ‘green’ alternative to ossil diesel uel (Chin
in press; German and Schoneveld in press; Skutsch et al.
in press).
Industrial-scale plantations. The expansion o industrial-
scale eedstock plantations was ound to be directly
associated with deorestation. In the dry orests o the cerrado
biome in Brazil, there has been large-scale deorestation rom
soya expansion since the 1980s as a direct consequence
o government policy (Lima and Skutsch in press). In Mato
Grosso, cropping, largely or soya, is responsible or 16–20%
o deorestation (Morton et al . 2006), although most soya
is destined or ood and odder. Using national blending
targets and diverse methods or allocating the burden o
direct deorestation to biodiesel (relative value and weight o primary products, and area igures), the sector’s contribution
to deorestation in Mato Grosso is estimated to be 1.5–6.4%
(Skutsch et al . in press).
In the Santarem site, only a small percentage o the 28 000
ha o soya expansion occurring rom 1996 to 2008 came at
the expense o primary orest; much o the remainder was
opened in secondary orest or allow areas (Skutsch et al . in
press). In the West Kalimantan site, 94% o the 5266 ha o oil
palm expansion has occurred at the expense o peat swamp
orest. In Ghana, 46% o plantation expansion has occurred
at the expense o dry orest and 31% at the expense o allow vegetation.
Data on indirect deorestation are largely qualitative.
In Indonesia, oil palm plantations were ound to cause
degradation in adjacent orest areas by displacing timber
extraction activities (e.g. or construction, ire wood) and
concentrating these activities in remaining orests. In
Malaysia, the only orest remaining is ound within orest
reserves, which are partially degraded due to small-scale
logging, hunting, land clearing or agriculture and periodic
ires (Dayang Norwana et al . in press). One o these reserves
remains in relatively good condition, however, with sightings
o orang-utan, sun bears, wild boar, mouse deer and
barking deer. Yet even here, an aerial survey conducted
between 2002 and 2003 showed a 90% decline in orang-
utan numbers based on population estimates in the early
1980s (SFD 2005). In Ghana, displacement o prime cropland
(yam, groundnuts and minor cash crops), high-value orest
products (shea nut, locust bean or dawa dawa, charcoal,
medicinal plants, mushrooms, game) and allow landessential to the continuity o the bush-allow agricultural
system were also beginning to place increased pressure on
surrounding orest areas. Charcoal burning is also expected
to intensiy as households turn to alternative livelihood
activities ollowing land loss (Schoneveld et al . in press). Loss
o allow land is also likely to shorten cropping cycles, thus
undermining soil ertility.
In all sites, plantations are also due to expand—with
corresponding eects on orests and livelihoods as much
o the area within concessions is either mature orest (as in
Indonesia) or mixed land uses consisting o agricultural plots,orest and allow (as in Ghana).
Smallholder biouel production. Zambia was the one
country case study where land use change associated with
Table 2. Summary of direct land use changes for industrial-scale plantations
Sitea Year
operationsinitiated
Concession area
(ha)
Area developed
(ha)
Area deforestedb
(ha)
Forest type
Mato Grosso, Brazil Various Various 5 075 079
(2007)
540 000
(2001–2004)
Dry orest
(cerrado)
Pru District, Ghana 2008 14 500 800
(by 2009)
368 orest +
248 allow
(by 2009)
Dry orest(orest–savannahtransition zone)
West Kalimantan,Indonesia
1994 13 605 5266c
(by 2009)
4949
(by 2009)
Secondary peatswamp orest
Boven Digoel,Papua, Indonesia
1998 34 000 17 000
(by 2010)
11 300
(by 2008)
Primary humidtropical rain orest
Yucatán, Mexico 2007 12 000 at time o research; approx. 20000 by end o 2010
2500 at time o research; approx.5000 by end o 2010
Most o the area planted,but density o the clearedorest varied greatly
Secondary dryorest (acahual)
a. Deorestation analyses or Indonesia’s Manokwar i site and the Malaysian site are not yet nal. b. With the exception o Ghana, only a portion o this area is rom the biouel industry because much o the production o oil palm and soya is destined or the ood market. c. The gure in the 2004environmental impact assessment is 5713 ha; however, we used analyses o satellite imagery to match the dates o the two estimates (ha developed,ha deorested).
![Page 4: 3295-infobrief](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022021215/577d33c51a28ab3a6b8bb0bb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
8/8/2019 3295-infobrief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3295-infobrief 4/12
No. 20No. 34December 2010
4
smallholder systems was assessed. Signiicant deorestation
was ound to occur—with 22% o respondents claiming
direct deorestation o mature orest due to biouel
expansion and 20% indirect deorestation rom the relocation
o displaced ood crops (German et al . in press). Inormant
recall data suggests that or every 1000 ha o jatropha grown
on smallholders’ ields in the study site, an estimated 310
ha o mature orest and 196 ha o allow land was cleared.
While land use changes associated with smallholder-based
production were not quantiied in Indonesia, oil palm was
also ound to displace ormer cropland (rubber plantations,
pineapple groves, maize), secondary orest and allow land.
In the Mexican state o Michoacán there was evidence
that woody vegetation (secondary orest) was being
cleared and taken out o the shiting agricultural system or
jatropha cultivation. It is interesting to note that or jatrophacultivated in dry orest, net negative carbon balances can be
observed—depending on the age o cleared vegetation.
Carbon impacts
Whether biouels have a net positive or negative eect
on carbon stocks will depend on the below- and above-
ground carbon stocks in the existing vegetation, land
clearing practices (e.g. whether all vegetation is cleared,
whether vegetation is burnt) and carbon stocks in biouel
plantations that replace it. The observed land use change o
greatest concern to global climate change mitigation is the
conversion o peat swamp orest to oil palm, which has beenestimated to result in a carbon debt o 1294–3452 mg CO2
per ha (Fargione et al. 2008). Estimates or the time required
to return to levels o carbon in the original ecosystem (the
so-called ‘carbon payback time’) or these orests range rom
423 to 692 years (Danielsen et al. 2008; Fargione et al. 2008)—
something which will never occur in practice due to the
declining productivity o aging oil palm plantations. Even the
carbon debt induced through tropical rainorest conversion
in southeast Asia would take longer to repay (an estimated
86 years) than the useul lie o oil palm.
For soya in Brazil, carbon debts range rom an estimated
737 mg CO2 per ha or the Amazon biome to 85 mg or the
cerrado, with payback times o 319–37 years, respectively
(Fargione et al. 2008). It is interesting to note that even
or jatropha cultivated in dry orest, net negative carbon
balances can be observed—depending on the age o cleared
vegetation. Carbon balances assessed in the Yucatán site
in Mexico suggest carbon payback times o 8–53 years,
depending on the age o the dry orest or acahual cleared
(Skutsch et al. in press). I jatropha replaces mature acahual ,
a positive carbon balance is never likely to be achieved
because the useul lie o jatropha is around 20 years, ater
which it would be cut and replaced. I a complete lie cycle
analysis were to be conducted, including other greenhousegas emissions, the climate mitigation potential o jatropha
would be urther undermined by N2O emissions associated
with ertiliser use (Skutsch et al. in press).
The ´carbon ootprint´ o any biouel eedstock is signiicantly
dependent on yield. This is o particular concern or
jatropha, which exhibits highly variable yields o both seed
(agronomic productivity) and oil (percentage o oil yield
during crushing)—depending on the genetic material used,
the business model (smallholder or industrial-scale), the
presence and quality o extension services and harvesting
practices (German et al. in press). Higher yielding production
is much more eicient rom a carbon point o view, even
though it requires higher carbon inputs (Skutsch et al. in
press). These dierences have a signiicant eect on the yield
o crude jatropha oil per hectare and (or jatropha produced
at the expense o orest cover) on the deorestation ‘cost’o any unit o uel produced. Given the dierences in
yield between small-scale and industrial-scale plantations
in Zambia, German et al. (in press) show the ecological
importance o more stringent environmental controls on
industrial-scale orest conversion and providing technical
services to smallholders. For local ecological and land use
conditions, the least amount o orest clearance per tonne
o biouel can be obtained rom large‐scale plantations
where orest clearance is kept to a minimum—due in
large part to the higher yields. I on the other hand primary
miombo woodland continues to be cleared or industrial-
scale eedstock production, the deorestation eects o biouel production can be less or smallholders—provided
mid‐range yields o around 1.6 tonnes per hectare can
be guaranteed.
Other localised environmental impacts
Diverse local stakeholder groups also highlighted a
number o other environmental impacts associated with
industrial-scale plantations. Residents in all sites in Indonesia
and Malaysia expressed concern over air pollution rom
plantations and mills and declining water quality in natural
waterways or swamps (Andriani et al. in press; Dayang
Norwana et al. in press). Declining water quality results rom
increased erosion and siltation, heavy use o pesticides,
discharge o eluent rom the mills and (in the West
Kalimantan site) rom the increased incidence o looding
resulting rom the destruction o natural drainage in
peatlands. Only in Sabah did local residents recognise actors
other than oil palm expansion, such as upstream logging.
Yet in this site residents also had the most detailed accounts
o pollution o waterways, stating that the river water is no
longer potable and has to be iltered beore use, the river
water ‘turns blackish when eluent is discharged rom mills’
and the river surace ‘looks oily’. They also cited incidences
o dead ish loating in the river. In several sites, residents link
these changes to oil palm-induced deorestation. In BovenDigoel, Papua, residents also blamed plantation expansion
![Page 5: 3295-infobrief](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022021215/577d33c51a28ab3a6b8bb0bb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
8/8/2019 3295-infobrief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3295-infobrief 5/12
No. 34December 2010
5
or the expansion o waterlogged areas, which they believe
are responsible or observed increases in malaria and
yellow ever.
Local social and economic impacts
Processes o land transer orindustrial-scale plantations
Latin American experiences. The processes o large-scale
land transer to investors vary considerably across research
sites. In Brazil and Mexico, the processes observed involved
mostly voluntary transactions between land ‘sellers’ and
‘buyers’, and must be contrasted with land acquisition
processes in the other countries. In the case study sites in
Mexico, jatropha is expanding either through its adoption by
smallholders or by large-scale estates. In the Yucatán, where
the only industrial-scale plantation model was observed,
jatropha is being grown by companies on large private
ranches previously used by absentee landlords or low
intensity and low-proit grazing, and thereore is not resulting
in the displacement o smallholder producers or production.
In Brazil, the establishment o large-scale soya arms is largely
occurring through voluntary sale o land, although this
has led in some cases to the consolidation o landholdings
and displacement o smaller-scale ranching (Lima and
Skutsch in press).
Experience in sub-Saharan Arica. In Ghana and Zambia,processes o large-scale land transer are subject to a number
o problems due to both the ormal procedures o land
transer and irregularities in practice. By law, customary rights
are recognised in both countries and chies may concede
or decline large-scale land leases or permanent transer
o ownership. Yet in practice, chies are unskilled in such
‘high-stake’ negotiations, are easily swayed by promises o
‘development’, and oten lack the political savvy and legal
literacy to negotiate avourable terms. In both countries,
land ministries and investment promotion agencies play
a role in acilitating investor access to land by negotiating
with chies on their behal (and establishing land banks), but
only in Zambia were these processes observed to be directly
involved in acilitating land transers. In Ghana, where chies
are given discretionary powers on matters pertaining to land,
investors were largely negotiating directly with chies and
ormalising agreements with the assistance o independently
hired lawyers.
Irregularities in land transers involved both customary
authorities and the State. In Ghana, or example, many
plantations operate outside government purview, precluding
the government’s ability to regulate investor practices so as
to leverage more sustainable and equitable outcomes. Only
a small minority o oreign companies in Ghana were ound
to have registered at the appropriate government agencies
and to have obtained the mandatory environmental
permits. Furthermore, while customary land users and recent
migrants were orced to relinquish armland, allow andcommunal orestland to investors, in most plantations the
aected households were neither consulted nor inormed
ahead o time. Chies were instead ound to enter into
long-term lease agreements o 25–50 years, on terms which
were largely unknown to customary land users. Deerence
to chiely authority has meant that such actions largely go
unchallenged by land losing households.
In contrast to the Ghana case, in Zambia the principle o ree,
prior and inormed consent was more oten compromised
by government agencies than private investors. Government
oicials rom the Ministry o Lands or investment promotionagencies were proactively involved in negotiating large-
scale land transers with chies. Unlike Ghana, most o
these transers involved permanent transer o land rom
customary to statutory tenure, whereby the State becomes
the land owner and the party allocating land to investors on
a leasehold basis—oten or a period o 99 years. While some
chies reported having been coerced, others seem to have
bowed to State authority with the belie that the State knows
best and would operate in the interest o the people.1 In
addition to customary land users oregoing the opportunity
to negotiate terms o agreement with companies, this
process also leads to the permanent loss o customary land
to the government. No cases o compensation or land
Table 3. Examples of compensation payments to customary leaders in Papua, Indonesia
Site Area of select land deals (ha) Compensation (US$)
Manokwari, Papua 14 800 300 000
5 500 0
Boven Digoel, Papua 14 000 100 000
8 000 Compensation or sago (US$ 0.5 per tree)and timber (US$ 1 per m3) onlya
a. While it is unclear how much was actually paid in compensation, the equivalent value—based on yield estimates—was about US$ 300 000 ortimber and sago alone (Andriani et al. in press).
1 In Ghana, one company was ound to have hired ‘agronomic consultants’ rom the district oce o the Ministry o Agriculture, thereby lendinglegitimacy to the process in the eyes o aected households.
![Page 6: 3295-infobrief](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022021215/577d33c51a28ab3a6b8bb0bb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
8/8/2019 3295-infobrief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3295-infobrief 6/12
No. 20No. 34December 2010
6
loss were identiied, as land allocation to investors was
negotiated ‘or the purposes o development’.
Southeast Asian experience. In Indonesia and Malaysia,
plantation establishment has also led to the displacement
o customary land uses and users. While customary land
rights are in theory recognised in both countries, they are
only recognised with ormal title. In Malaysia, all land that
is not privately owned or awarded as ‘native land’ belongs
to the State, requiring ormal land titles or native claims
to be legally recognised (Dayang Norwana et al. in press).
O respondents, 77% indicated that their amilies were not
consulted in advance o land transers. Those who were
aware in advance were only notiied through a letter rom
the village head. Others were consulted by the company
on issues related to security and road access but not aboutland transers.
In Indonesia, land transer was observed to occur either
through government intervention or through direct
negotiations between companies and customary land users.
More oten than not, land transers involved some orm
o ormal compensation (Andriani et al. in press). Forms o
compensation included cash payments or land, displaced
orest products or labour, and establishment o ‘plasma’
schemes in which households are paid or the harvest o
resh ruit bunches on land managed by the company.
In both sites in Papua, compensation, when paid, was
given to tribal chies. Yet the scale o compensation varied
according to the negotiating skills o customary leaders
(Table 3). This also led to subsequent dissatisaction with
compensation levels, with some customary leaders pushing
or additional compensation. Problems also ensued rom
the governance o compensation by customary leaders.
Several cases o internal conlict associated with the lack o
transparency in the distribution o these unds were reported
by aected households. In one site, 92% o respondents
reported not receiving any compensation, despite reported
land compensation payments.
Sites vary in terms o how customary land users and migrant
communities are dierently aected by these developments.
In Indonesia, migrant households were less aected by
industrial-scale biouel expansion as they had received ormal
land titles through government-inanced ‘transmigration’
schemes and were less dependent on orests or their
livelihoods than customary land users. In Ghana, on the
other hand, migrant households were ar less likely to receive
replacement land than native inhabitants, and this land was
three times smaller on average (Schoneveld et al. in press).
Impacts on employeesIn order to explore whether the biouel sector is delivering
on its stated aims o stimulating rural development
through employment generation, it is important to look
at both job creation and job quality. It is also important
to understand the beneits o employment relative to the
activities displaced by industrial-scale plantations and other
employment opportunities.
In most cases, concrete livelihood beneits were observed
rom employment. In Brazil, where the industry is most
advanced, job quality is relatively good—with a daily
wage o US$ 20 or temporary labourers, and salary plus
commission ollowing the harvest or permanent employees.
In Malaysia, 77% o respondents elt that employment
had improved their incomes and livelihood conditions,
with many employees provided with ree housing and
access to better social services. In Indonesia, experiences o
employees were more mixed. In the West Kalimantan site,the majority o employees claimed a net positive impact on
their livelihoods. However, almost hal the respondents in
Boven Digoel claimed to have been negatively aected by
employment. Employees stated that during recruitment, they
were promised higher salaries and better acilities. Many now
have no choice but to continue to work on plantations as
they have relocated their amilies to plantation sites (Andriani
et al. in press). In Ghana, 67% o respondents considered
plantation employment to have had a net positive impact
on their livelihoods despite very recent employment. In
Mexico, the only place where employment beneits rom
small-scale eedstock production were assessed, jatrophacultivation has reportedly driven up local wage rates. At
US$ 7.70 a day, this is nearly double the national minimum
wage. Employees particularly appreciated the act that the
work is more constant than with ood crops (e.g. requiring
regular weeding), providing steady income lows. This group
o respondents rated their l ivelihood gains more highly than
any other group, even small-scale eedstock growers (Skutsch
et al. in press).
In most sites where respondents claimed livelihood
improvements rom employment, increased income was
stated as a key reason. In Malaysia, they also included
improved education or their children. In Ghana, however,incomes were not reported to have improved; rather, it was
more regular income lows that employee households cited
as the key beneit relative to pre-employment livelihood
activities. Regularity o income lows was a cited beneit to
employees in Indonesia and Malaysia as well.
In addition to looking at the quality o employment, it is
important to look at employment levels relative to displaced
land uses. In the Brazilian cerrado, employment levels
on soya estates are very low due to the high degree o
mechanisation. A typical 5000 ha arm was ound to employ
as ew as 10 permanent (skilled) and 15 temporary workers(1 ull-time and 1.5 temporary per 500 ha) (Lima and Skutsch
in press). While the market chain generates additional
![Page 7: 3295-infobrief](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022021215/577d33c51a28ab3a6b8bb0bb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
8/8/2019 3295-infobrief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3295-infobrief 7/12
No. 34December 2010
7
employment, with the exception o Brazil (where ranching
employs ewer people per area than soya), employment
levels were ound to be ar less than those associated with
displaced land uses. In Ghana, greater returns to land are
also acquired rom displaced land uses than rom ormal
employment. Employment levels were approximately one
employee per 6.7 ha o plantation area. Yams were ound to
generate around 110% the per hectare value o employment.
Employment would compare ar less avourably i the
value o other displaced crops and orest products were
considered (Schoneveld et al. in press).
With countries leasing large tracts o land in the name o
employment, it is important that anticipated employment
levels be critically reassessed.
Impacts on small-scale eedstock producers
Another key aim o policy makers has been to enhance
rural incomes through smallholder participation in biouel
eedstock production. This type o production was observed
in Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico and Brazil.
In cases where smallholders are engaged in eedstock
production in well-established biouel industries, concrete
beneits are generally observed. In Indonesia, small-scale
eedstock armers—present in the Manokwari and West
Kalimantan sites—mostly reported positive livelihood
impacts rom oil palm cultivation (Andriani et al. in press; seealso Feintrenie 2010; Rist et al. 2010). This was attributed to
higher incomes and related improvements in housing, to
an expansion o social networks and to road construction
(largely associated with industrial-scale operations). A larger
number o armers engaged in plasma schemes reported
positive impacts on livelihoods. Some respondents said
these beneits resulted rom the company sharing part o the
labour burden associated with oil palm cultivation.
In Manokwari, Indonesia, 2 ha out o every 2.5 ha received
rom the government through the transmigration scheme
were used as collateral or loans to establish oil palm
plantations. Ater 10 to 15 years, more than 85% o these
armers were able to repay their loans and have their
ownership certiicates to land and plantations (used as
collateral) returned to them. Also, oil palm ownership
certiicates can be used as guarantees to secure loans or
additional business ventures.
In Malaysia, livelihood improvements or small-scale growers
were associated with increased income, a shit away rom
traditional revenue streams and more lexible working hours
(Dayang Norwana et al. in press).2
In Brazil, armers producing eedstock or industrial-scale
operations under the ‘Social Fuel Seal’ programme are
clearly beneiting rom a policy which provides biodiesel
producers with incentives to source their raw materials rom
smallholders and ‘amily arms’ (deined as arms o less
than 100 ha). However, the high cost o providing technical
support to small arms means that settlements in which
individual landholdings are much less than 100 hectares are
not o interest to companies, who thereore pick and choose
which land reorm settlement they ´adopt´. The economies
o scale associated with large-scale production have also
led to considerable consolidation o land holdings in these
resettlement areas (Lima and Skutsch in press).
In the Amazon transition zone, high transport costs
and restricted access to credit (or which land titles arerequired) have limited the expansion o soya. In Santarem,
credit is the major barrier to expansion, since both land
titles and a certiicate showing that no deorestation
has occurred are needed. In the cerrado zone, many o
the smaller landholdings distributed under the agrarian
reorm programme are too small to compete in the soya
market, even in a protected market created by government
support programmes.
In cases where smallholders are engaged in eedstock
production in emerging biouel industries, no real beneits
have materialised. This is the case in the emerging jatrophaindustry in Mexico and Zambia. Findings rom both countries
suggest very low proit margins or jatropha armers (German
et al. in press; Skutsch et al. in press). In Mexico, economic
returns per ha rom jatropha were ound to be attractive
partially due to a government subsidy to oset establishment
costs in the irst two years. However, i the costs o labour are
actored in, the sales price would scarcely cover input costs,
even taking the subsidy into account.
In Zambia, one company had reportedly abandoned armers
entirely, delivering only seed and technical support out o
many promised beneits. Eorts to provide an alternative
market to armers, supported by nongovernmentalorganisations, while too new to evaluate, had contributed
about US$ 15 per annum to average household incomes.
When actoring in labour, costs were ound to be
considerably higher than beneits.
In both sites, early payments (government subsidies
in Mexico, and the promise o loans and payments by
processing companies in Zambia) were ound to be key
actors motivating armers to invest in jatropha. As the
industry is very new in both countries, it still remains to
be seen whether armers will ind jatropha cultivation a
2 Once plantations are established, work on oil palm is reportedly more fexible than traditional livelihood activities, alleviating the work load or men.Furthermore, better established growers can aord to hire daily labourers to carry out plantation work, leaving time or small-scale business ventures.
![Page 8: 3295-infobrief](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022021215/577d33c51a28ab3a6b8bb0bb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8/8/2019 3295-infobrief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3295-infobrief 8/12
No. 20No. 34December 2010
8
worthwhile economic pursuit. Barriers to market entry were
also ound in these sites. In Chiapas, jatropha armers were
ound to have larger average landholdings and in Michoacán,
81% o armers were identiied as being o average income
or wealthy (Lima and Skutsch in press). Given the newness
o the programme, relative wealth is a driver rather than a
consequence o involvement. Land, labour and lack o land
title were ound to limit involvement by some households.
It is important to note that small-scale armers were ound
to be bearing much o the risk associated with an emerging
and largely untested jatropha industry. In Mexico and
Zambia, armers contracted to private companies had signed
agreements committing to sell only to these companies,
yet the purchase price and the basis or calculating this
price were never established (German et al. in press; Skutschet al. in press). In Mexico, while armers had to commit
to selling only to the contracting company there was no
counter-clause guaranteeing the company requirement to
purchase seed. In Zambia, such a counter-clause did exist,
but inormally contracted technical agents were ound
to have signed on the company’s behal, with associated
commitments by the company unlikely to be upheld in
courts o law. In Michoacán and the two Zambian sites,
technicians employed by the government programme
and companies contracting outgrowers were quick to
persuade armers o the high yield and economic beneits o
jatropha cultivation, yet in neither country have they actuallypurchased any o the product despite several seasons
o production.
Responses have been mixed, with select armers in both
countries pulling up or neglecting their plantations because
the company had not come to collect seeds and others
continuing to invest with the hope o uture returns. The
inancial instability o jatropha outgrower companies and
the market thus poses a risk to armers. In Michoacán one
company acting as an intermediary in the government-
sponsored programme pulled out, and in both countries
inancial problems let some companies unable to uphold
their commitments to outgrowers.
Food security concerns
In most sites where smallholders adopted biouel eedstocks,
some ood crops were displaced. In Chiapas, two thirds o
jatropha armers interviewed had converted maize or other
ood crops, while almost a third had converted pasture land.
In Michoacán, small-scale jatropha cultivation was ound
to displace both permanent ields and shiting agricultural
plots (both in use and under allow) where maize had been
grown. In Indonesia, jatropha was ound to displace cash
crops such as rubber and pineapple. In Zambia, where ood
security eects were looked at in greater detail, 58% o respondents were ound to have integrated jatropha into
permanent agricultural plots. Another 39% o households
had opened allow and orest areas, taking these out o
the shiting agricultural system. Yet despite these changes,
due to the practice o intercropping jatropha with existing
ood crops, only 39% o respondents indicated that ood
crops such as millet, cassava, maize and groundnuts were
displaced rom by jatropha. Many households established
new plots or these crops elsewhere, some o them on
more ertile land. However, disaggregating the data showed
that some households had experienced a decline in ood
production due to land use changes or labour shortages. It
is also important to consider that negative eects on ood
crop production may increase over time in intercropped
ields as jatropha begins to crowd out ood crops. Based on
our research, ood security seems to be a more signiicant
concern in areas dominated by industrial-scale plantations
and where land consolidation is occurring.
Impacts on customary land owners and users
Displacement o customary land uses. The most negative
impacts o biouel eedstock expansion have been those
associated with the displacement o customary livelihoods
resulting rom large-scale land transer to investors.
This has not occurred in the Brazilian and Mexican sites.
Economic losses stem rom the loss o both agricultural and
orest incomes.
In the Malaysian site, all land has now been converted
to oil palm except or areas set aside as orest reserves(Dayang Norwana et al. in press). In addition to loss o land
or rice arming, deorestation has led to the widespread
abandonment o orest-based livelihood activities such as
hunting and extraction o non-timber orest products. Those
who continue to hunt have to travel urther and deeper into
the orest to ind game. Furthermore, as many customary
land users no longer own land, they are more dependent
on hunting, gathering and ishing than beore, making
deorestation and declines in water quality more keenly elt.
Most households who lost land to the company continue
to ish as a key component o their livelihood portolio.
However, water pollution has led to a decline in landings
and related incomes. The reduced ish catch and inability to
continue planting rice has resulted in the need to purchase
much o their ood, undermining household ood security.
Results are similar in Indonesia, where decreased orest
cover has resulted in a reduction in access to orest products
and in the practice o shiting agriculture (Andriani et al. in
press). Households have either abandoned these activities
altogether and shited to other livelihood activities, or
suered the increased labour burden o having to walk
longer distances to collect orest products or to open new
ields or shiting cultivation. Those involved in logging
and sawmill employment have had to abandon theirormer livelihood activities entirely due to dwindling orest
resources. All respondent groups reliant on orest products
![Page 9: 3295-infobrief](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022021215/577d33c51a28ab3a6b8bb0bb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
8/8/2019 3295-infobrief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3295-infobrief 9/12
No. 34December 2010
9
and services have had to shit to on-arm activities (or those
who still owned land) or to o-arm work. They also have
to purchase orest products they once sourced or ree (e.g.
wood or construction, ruit).
In Ghana, signiicant livelihood declines were observed
within two years o plantation establishment due to
the loss o agricultural land and displacement o orest-
based livelihoods (Schoneveld et al. in press). The
average household lost more than three quarters o their
landholdings by the end o 2009. Furthermore, only 26%
o households had been able to acquire replacement land
at the time o research. The replacement land constituted
only 12.6% o initial landholdings, resulting in severely
compromised agricultural incomes (Schoneveld et al. in
press). An estimated 50% o households acquiring new landound the replacement land to be o poorer quality.
Barriers to land replacement were both cultural and
biophysical, with migrant households experiencing greater
diiculty securing new land rom chies. Much remaining
land was waterlogged, rocky or ar rom settlements. Due to
the loss o access to land, the vast majority o respondents
reported declining contributions o orest and agricultural
activities to household livelihood portolios (98% and 73%,
respectively). Signiicant losses in women’s income streams
were also observed through the destruction o ‘minor’ crops
during plantation establishment and marked declines in theavailability o dawadawa and shea butter. O respondents,
73% perceived net declines in their standard o living as a
result o plantation expansion.
In Brazil, the only reported eect on customary land uses was
the progressive displacement o the timber industry to the
cerrado, and the gradual demise o cattle ranches in the soya
rontier (Lima and Skutsch in press).
In some sites, such losses are countered with signiicant
livelihood beneits. However, only in select sites is this
believed to have resulted in net livelihood improvements.
In Malaysia, customary land users noted signiicant beneitsrom the establishment o oil palm plantations in the area.
These included improved road access and increased job
opportunities, with at least 30% o respondents having
household members working as unskilled labourers at the
plantations. The greatest concern thereore lies with those
who have not been ensured ormal employment or other
economic opportunities to compensate or their losses.
In sites where biouel expansion has occurred through
smallholder-based production models, negative impacts
rom the displacement o customary land uses were not
considered to be signiicant.
Beneit lows to aected households. In Ghana, while
employees welcome the company and the more regular
income streams derived rom employment, only 4% o
land losing households had secured employment at the
time o research, despite their declared interest in ormal
employment (Schoneveld et al. in press). In the three villages
aected by the early phase o plantation expansion, only 1
in 11 households were ound to have a household member
employed by the company. This represents only 13% o
the plantation labour orce at the time o research, despite
a verbal agreement between the paramount chie and
the company to provide preerential employment to all
aected households.
In Indonesia and Malaysia alike, the majority o jobs on
plantations were also ound to go to migrants rom outsideaected communities, rom other provinces3 or—as in the
case o Sabah—other countries (Andriani et al. in press;
Dayang Norwana et al. in press). In the case o Indonesia,
local residents tend to be given low-paid jobs as unskilled
labourers. Their skills base and work ethic are oten
considered inadequate by managers, and most o them were
ound to be unable to secure or retain jobs on plantations.
Those with positive employment experience were ound
to be largely transmigrants. In Boven Digoel, those with
adequate capital or high positions in traditional communities
were ound to be better able to capture the opportunities
presented by oil palm.
Prevalence o social confict
With the notable exception o Malaysia, where plantations
are certiied by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil,
cases o social conlict associated with oil palm expansion
were common. The most prevalent and signiicant sources
o conlict or concern (in cases where deerence to authority
precludes conlict) were related to land transers and the
distribution o beneits (land compensation, employment).
Conlicts over land transers resulted rom either
disagreement over the decision to sell or transer land,
or over the management o revenues derived rom land
transers. In Indonesia, one o the most contentious issues
has been dierential compensation payments among
customary authorities and land users (Andriani et al. in press).
This has led to unresolved social tension in all sites. The other
conlict derives rom government allocation o customary
land to transmigrants. Conlict was mostly observed in
plasma areas near the nucleus estate, where ormer land
owners have demanded the return o their land. While
repeated mediation attempts by local government agencies
have been largely unsuccessul, one case was observed in
Manokwari where a proit sharing mechanism had been put
into place as a orm o compensation to customary land
3 In one site in Indonesia, Manokwari, only 8% o employees were ound to be o the indigenous Arak ethnic group (Andriani et al. 2010).
![Page 10: 3295-infobrief](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022021215/577d33c51a28ab3a6b8bb0bb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
8/8/2019 3295-infobrief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3295-infobrief 10/12
No. 20No. 34December 2010
10
owners. In addition to conlict between native and migrant
communities, discontent is also oriented towards the
government, whom native Papuans perceive as being biased
towards transmigrants. Tensions between native and migrant
communities over land transer were also observed in Ghana,
where recent migrants perceived their land to have been
speciically targeted or plantation development.
A number o conlicts surrounding beneit distribution
mechanisms were also observed. The main issue related to
employee–company relations, notably inequitable or non-
preerential hiring practices (Andriani et al. in press; Skutsch
et al. in press). This is common where companies provide
equal or greater employment opportunities to workers rom
outside aected communities, whom displaced communities
eel are less entitled. In West Kalimantan, a conlict betweencommunity members and the company over employment
policies was successully resolved through dialogue,
leading to a reduction in the number o migrant workers
employed and greater employment opportunities or long-
time residents.
In Indonesia, conlict has also arisen over the distribution o
opportunities to participate in the plasma scheme. In West
Kalimantan, this orm o conlict was ound to aect relations
between those receiving and those not receiving plasma as
compensation or land loss (Andriani et al. in press). Finally,
conlicts can also emerge in relation to the impacts o ormalemployment on social obligations and the burden that
must be borne by others. In Ghana, or instance, conlict
ensued when plantation employees ailed to participate in
communal works. This conlict escalated to such an extent
that police intervention was required (Schoneveld et al.
in press).
A number o conlicts were also observed within smallholder-
based production schemes. In Zambia, a conlict was
observed between growers and local technical agents
hired by outgrower companies. Being the only company
‘representatives’ let behind, these agents bore most o
the social burden o company withdrawal (German et al. inpress). In one case, growers threatened to take the technical
agent to court or ailing to deliver on company promises. A
second set o issues, observed in Mexico, involved shits in
customary natural resource management practices—such
as the diversion o water rom cattle to nurseries, and the
destruction o jatropha by reely grazing cattle (Skutsch et al.
in press). These appear to be exceptions, rather than the rule.
Interestingly in Sabah, where a company has made
considerable eort to protect its global reputation (e.g.
through compliance with RSPO standards), there was no
mention o conlict among community members or between
local residents and the company.
Conclusions
This synthesis points to two key sets o indings. First,
many o the purported beneits o the biouel industryhave not materialised in the cases researched. Widespread
orest conversion during biouel expansion has reduced
the climate mitigation beneits o the industry while
undermining customary livelihoods. The rural development
beneits associated with ormal employment and small-
scale eedstock production have also been disappointing in
many sites. Reasons include the ailure o companies to live
up to their promises (or poorly communicated promises),
high levels o temporary employment, barriers to market
entry, and—as in the cases o Mexico and Zambia—
widespread mobilisation o outgrowers to bear the risks o an
unproven industry.
The second set o indings relates to the uneven local
livelihood impacts. A socially disaggregated analysis clearly
points to mature industries having both winners and losers.
In several cases, but most notably in Brazil, the winners
are those actors who can aord to bear the up-ront costs
o investment that enable them to break into the market.
In other cases, such as Malaysia and West Kalimantan, the
winners are the employees. In most cases, the losers are
customary land owners.
Land losers can also experience net beneits i compensation
meets or exceeds the value o displaced land uses, beneits
are governed to the advantage o all land losing households,
and losses are compensated with preerential employment
and services. However, these conditions are rarely observed
in practice. In the absence o preerential policies or support
services by companies or government, households which
lose the most rom such developments will continue to
have the most diiculty capturing opportunities associated
with them.
A number o lessons may be derived rom these early
indings, to enable the emerging biouels industry to better
deliver on its promises. The irst set o indings relates togoverning the environmental impacts o biouels. For the
biouel sector to deliver on its promise to mitigate climate
change, it is essential that the expansion o industrial-scale
plantations does not occur at the expense o mature orest.
Furthermore, to minimise the negative environmental
ootprint o smallholder-based eedstock production, it will
also be important to ensure adequate services are provided
to enhance yields o both seed (in the ield) and oil (in
the actory). It will also be important to raise awareness
on the role o environmental standards in buyer markets,
and the conditions under which net climate beneits have
been achieved.
![Page 11: 3295-infobrief](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022021215/577d33c51a28ab3a6b8bb0bb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
8/8/2019 3295-infobrief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3295-infobrief 11/12
![Page 12: 3295-infobrief](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022021215/577d33c51a28ab3a6b8bb0bb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
8/8/2019 3295-infobrief
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/3295-infobrief 12/12
No. 20No. 34December 2010
www.cifor.cgiar.org www.ForestsClimateChange.org
Center for International Forestry ResearchCIFOR advances human wellbeing, environmental conservation and equity by conducting research to inorm policiesand practices that aect orests in developing countries. CIFOR is one o 15 centres within the Consultative Group onInternational Agricultural Research (CGIAR). CIFOR’s headquarters are in Bogor, Indonesia. It also has oces in Asia, Aricaand South America
12
This report was produced with the inancial assistance o the European Union, under the project, ‘Bioenergy, sustainability and
trade-os: can we avoid deorestation while promoting bioenergy?’ European Community Contribution Agreement EuropeAid/
ENV/2007/143936/TPS.
The project aims to contribute to sustainable bioenergy development that beneits local people in developing countries, minimises
negative impacts on local environments and rural livelihoods, and contributes to global climate-change mitigation. The project will
achieve this by producing and communicating policy-relevant analyses that can inorm government, corporate and civil society
decision making related to bioenergy development and its eects on orests and livelihoods. The project is managed by CIFOR and
implemented in collaboration with the Council on Scientiic and Industrial Research, South Arica, Joanneum Research, Austria, the
Universidad Autónoma de México, and the Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden. The views expressed in this brie can in no way
be taken to relect the oicial opinion o the European Union.
dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings o
the National Academy o Science 103(39): 14637-14641.República de Moçambique 2009 Resolução no. 22/2009,
Política e Estratégia de Biocombustíveis. República de
Moçambique, Maputo.
Rist, L., Feintrenie, L. and Levant, P. 2010 The livelihood impacts
o oil palm: smallholders in Indonesia. Biodiversity
Conservation , doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9815-z.
Schoneveld, G.C., German, L.A. and Nukator, E. In press.
Biouel eedstock plantations in Ghana: a case analysis o
environmental and socio-economic impacts. CIFOR working
paper. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
SFD (Sabah Forestry Department) 2005 Conservation Areas
Inormation and Monitoring System. http://www.orest.sabah.gov.my/caims/ (30 October 2010).
Skutsch, M., de los Rios, E., Solis, S., Riegelhaupt, E., Hinojosa,
D., Gerert, S., Gao, Y. and Masera, O. In press. Jatropha in
Mexico: a grounded assessment o environmental and
social impacts o a biouel programme. CIFOR working
paper. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
Timnas BBN 2006 Pengembangan Bahan Bakar Nabati di
Indonesia, Makalah disajikan pada Workshop Nasional Bisnis
Biodiesel dan BioEthanol di Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia,
21 November.