3.4 biological resources - acgov.org...2013/11/01 · alameda county community development agency...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1
October 2014ICF 00323.08
3.4 Biological Resources ForthepurposeofthisEIR,biologicalresourcescomprisevegetation,wildlife,naturalcommunities,andwetlandsandotherwaters.Potentialbiologicalresourceimpactsassociatedwiththeprogramandthetwoindividualprojectsareanalyzed.PotentialimpactsaredescribedquantitativelyandqualitativelyinSection3.4.2,EnvironmentalImpacts.Thissectionalsoidentifiesspecificanddetailedmeasurestoavoid,minimize,orcompensateforpotentiallysignificantimpactsonbiologicalresources,wherenecessary.
3.4.1 Existing Conditions
Regulatory Setting
Federal
Endangered Species Act
PursuanttothefederalEndangeredSpeciesAct(ESA),USFWSandtheNationalMarineFisheriesService(NMFS)haveauthorityoverprojectsthatmayresultintakeofaspecieslistedasthreatenedorendangeredundertheact.TakeisdefinedundertheESA,inpart,askilling,harming,orharassing.Underfederalregulations,takeisfurtherdefinedtoincludehabitatmodificationordegradationthatresults,orisreasonablyexpectedtoresult,indeathorinjurytowildlifebysignificantlyimpairingessentialbehavioralpatterns,includingbreeding,feeding,orsheltering.Ifalikelihoodexiststhataprojectwouldresultintakeofafederallylistedspecies,eitheranincidentaltakepermit,underSection10(a)oftheESA,orafederalinteragencyconsultation,underSection7oftheESA,isrequired.Severalfederallylistedspecies—vernalpoolfairyshrimp(Branchinectalynchi),longhornfairyshrimp(Branchinectalongiantenna),vernalpooltadpoleshrimp(Lepiduruspackardi),Californiatigersalamander(Ambystomacaliforniense),Californiared‐leggedfrog(Ranadraytonii),Alamedawhipsnake(Masticophislateraliseuryxanthus),andSanJoaquinkitfox(Vulpesmacrotismutica)—havethepotentialtobeaffectedbyactivitiesassociatedwiththeGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsaswellassubsequentrepoweringprojects.Accordingly,suchprojectswouldrequireconsultationwithUSFWSasdescribedabove.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
TheFishandWildlifeCoordinationAct,asamendedin1964,wasenactedtoprotectfishandwildlifewhenfederalactionsresultinthecontrolormodificationofanaturalstreamorbodyofwater.Thestatuterequiresfederalagenciestotakeintoconsiderationtheeffectthatwater‐relatedprojectswouldhaveonfishandwildliferesources.ConsultationandcoordinationwithUSFWSandtheCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife(CDFW)arerequiredtoaddresswaystopreventlossofanddamagetofishandwildliferesources,andtofurtherdevelopandimprovetheseresources.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
TheMigratoryBirdTreatyAct(MBTA)domesticallyimplementsaseriesofinternationaltreatiesthatprovideformigratorybirdprotection.TheMBTAauthorizestheSecretaryoftheInteriortoregulatethetakingofmigratorybirds.Theactfurtherprovidesthatitisunlawful,exceptas
![Page 2: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐2
October 2014ICF 00323.08
permittedbyregulations,“topursue,take,orkillanymigratorybird,oranypart,nestoreggofanysuchbird…”(16USC703).Thisprohibitionincludesbothdirectandindirectacts,althoughharassmentandhabitatmodificationarenotincludedunlesstheyresultindirectlossofbirds,nests,oreggs.ThecurrentlistofspeciesprotectedbytheMBTAcanbefoundintheNovember1,2013FederalRegister(78FR65844–65864).Thislistcomprisesseveralhundredspecies,includingessentiallyallnativebirds.Permitsfortakeofnongamemigratorybirdscanbeissuedonlyforspecificactivities,suchasscientificcollecting,rehabilitation,propagation,education,taxidermy,andprotectionofhumanhealthandsafetyandofpersonalproperty.TakeofnongamemigratorybirdscannotbeauthorizedthroughtheMBTAfortheprogramorPattersonPassandGoldenHillsprojects.USFWSpublishesalistofbirdsofconservationconcern(BCC)toidentifymigratorynongamebirdsthatarelikelytobecomecandidatesforlistingunderESAwithoutadditionalconservationactions.TheBCClistisintendedtostimulatecoordinatedandcollaborativeconservationeffortsamongfederal,state,tribal,andprivateparties.
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
TheBaldandGoldenEagleProtectionAct(BGEPA)(16USC668)prohibitstakeanddisturbanceofindividualsandnests.Takepermitsforbirdsorbodypartsarelimitedtoreligious,scientific,orfalconrypursuits.However,theBGEPAwasamendedin1978toallowminingdeveloperstoapplytoUSFWSforpermitstoremoveinactivegoldeneagle(Aquilachrysaetos)nestsinthecourseof“resourcedevelopmentorrecovery”operations.Withthe2007removalofbaldeaglefromtheESAlistofthreatenedandendangeredspecies,USFWSissuednewregulationstoauthorizethelimitedtakeofbaldeagles(Haliaeetusleucocephalus)andgoldeneaglesundertheBGEPA,wherethetaketobeauthorizedisassociatedwithotherwiselawfulactivities.AfinalEaglePermitRulewaspublishedonSeptember11,2009(74FR46836–46879;50CFR22.26).
Apermitauthorizeslimited,non‐purposefultakeofbaldeaglesandgoldeneagles,andcanbeappliedforbyindividuals,companies,governmentagencies(includingtribalgovernments),andotherorganizationstoallowdisturbanceoforotherwisetakeeaglesinthecourseofconductinglawfulactivities,suchasoperatingutilitiesandairports.UnderBGEPA,takeisdefinedas“pursue,shoot,shootat,poison,wound,kill,capture,trap,collect,destroy,molestordisturb.”Disturbisdefinedintheregulationsas“toagitateorbotherabaldorgoldeneagletoadegreethatcauses,orislikelytocause,basedonthebestscientificinformationavailable:(1)injurytoaneagle;(2)adecreaseinitsproductivity,bysubstantiallyinterferingwithnormalbreeding,feeding,orshelteringbehavior;or(3)nestabandonment,bysubstantiallyinterferingwithnormalbreeding,feeding,orshelteringbehavior.”Mostpermitsissuedunderthenewregulationsauthorizedisturbance.Inlimitedcases,apermitmayauthorizethephysicaltakeofeagles,butonlyifeveryprecautionisfirsttakentoavoidphysicaltake.
USFWSissuedtheEagleConservationPlanGuidance(ECPGuidance)intendedtoassistpartiestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateadverseeffectsonbaldandgoldeneagles(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2013a).TheEagleGuidancecallsforscientificallyrigoroussurveys,monitoring,assessment,andresearchdesignsproportionatetotherisktoeagles.TheEagleGuidancedescribesaprocessbywhichwindenergydeveloperscancollectandanalyzeinformationthatcouldleadtoaprogrammaticpermittoauthorizeunintentionaltakeofeaglesatwindenergyfacilities.USFWSrecommendsthateagleconservationplansbedevelopedinfivestages.Eachstagebuildsonthepriorstage,suchthattogethertheprocessisaprogressive,increasinglyintensivelookatlikelyeffectsoneaglesofthedevelopmentandoperationofaparticularsiteandconfiguration.AdditionalrefinementstotheEagleGuidanceareexpectedatsomepointinthefuture.Todate,one
![Page 3: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐3
October 2014ICF 00323.08
programmaticeagletakepermithasbeenissuedbyUSFWSonJune31,2014(http://www.fws.gov/cno/conservation/migratorybirds.html).
Clean Water Act
WetlandsandotherwatersoftheUnitedStatesareprotectedunderSection404oftheCleanWaterAct(CWA).AnyactivitythatinvolvesanydischargeofdredgedorfillmaterialintowatersoftheUnitedStates,includingwetlands,issubjecttoregulationbytheU.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineers(USACE).WatersoftheUnitedStatesisdefinedtoencompassnavigablewatersoftheUnitedStates;interstatewaters;allotherwaterswheretheiruse,degradation,ordestructioncouldaffectinterstateorforeigncommerce;tributariesofanyofthesewaters;andwetlandsthatmeetanyofthesecriteriaorareadjacenttoanyofthesewatersortheirtributaries.WetlandsaredefinedunderSection404asthoseareasthatareinundatedorsaturatedbysurfacewaterorgroundwateratafrequencyanddurationsufficienttosupport,andthatundernormalcircumstancesdosupport,aprevalenceofvegetationtypicallyadaptedforlifeinsaturatedsoilconditions.Jurisdictionalwetlandsmustmeetthreewetlanddelineationcriteria.
Theysupporthydrophyticvegetation(i.e.,plantsthatgrowinsaturatedsoil).
Theyhavehydricsoiltypes(i.e.,soilsthatarewetormoistenoughtodevelopanaerobicconditions).
Theyhavewetlandhydrology(i.e.,conditionsofflooding,inundation,orsaturationthatsupportwetlandcommunities).
Executive Order 11990: Protection of Wetlands
ExecutiveOrder11990(May24,1977)establishedtheprotectionofwetlandsandripariansystemsastheofficialpolicyofthefederalgovernment.Theexecutiveorderrequiresallfederalagenciestoconsiderwetlandprotectionasanimportantpartoftheirpolicies;takeactiontominimizethedestruction,loss,ordegradationofwetlands;andpreserveandenhancethenaturalandbeneficialvaluesofwetlands.
Federal Noxious Weed Act and Code of Federal Regulations (Title 7, Part 360)
TheselawsandregulationsareprimarilyconcernedwiththeintroductionoffederallydesignatednoxiousweedplantsorseedsacrosstheUnitedStates’internationalborders.TheFederalNoxiousWeedAct(7USC2801–2813)alsoregulatestheinterstatemovementofdesignatednoxiousweedsundertheU.S.DepartmentofAgriculture’spermitsystem.
Executive Order 11312: Invasive Species
ExecutiveOrder11312(February3,1999)directsallfederalagenciestopreventandcontroltheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativespeciesinacost‐effectiveandenvironmentallysoundmannertominimizetheireffectsoneconomic,ecological,andhumanhealth.Theexecutiveorderwasintendedtobuilduponexistinglaws,suchasNEPA,theNonindigenousAquaticNuisancePreventionandControlAct,theLaceyAct,thePlantPestAct,theFederalNoxiousWeedAct,andESA.TheexecutiveorderestablishedanationalInvasiveSpeciesCouncilcomposedoffederalagenciesanddepartments,aswellasasupportingInvasiveSpeciesAdvisoryCommitteecomposedofstate,local,andprivateentities.Thecouncilandadvisorycommitteeoverseeandfacilitateimplementationoftheexecutiveorder,includingpreparationoftheNationalInvasiveSpecies
![Page 4: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐4
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ManagementPlan.FederalactivitiesaddressinginvasiveaquaticspeciesarenowcoordinatedthroughthiscouncilandthroughtheNationalAquaticNuisanceSpeciesTaskForce.
State Plans, Policies, and Regulations
California Environmental Quality Act
CEQAistheregulatoryframeworkbywhichCaliforniapublicagenciesidentifyandmitigatesignificantenvironmentalimpacts.Aprojectnormallyhasasignificantenvironmentalimpactonbiologicalresourcesifitsubstantiallyaffectsarareorendangeredspeciesorthehabitatofthatspecies,substantiallyinterfereswiththemovementofresidentormigratoryfishorwildlife,orsubstantiallydiminisheshabitatforfish,wildlife,orplants.TheStateCEQAGuidelinesdefinerare,threatened,andendangeredspeciesasthoselistedunderESAortheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct(CESA)oranyotherspeciesthatmeetthecriteriaoftheresourceagenciesorlocalagencies(e.g.,speciesofspecialconcern,asdesignatedbyCDFW).TheguidelinesstatethattheleadagencypreparinganEIRmustconsultwithandreceivewrittenfindingsfromCDFWconcerningprojectimpactsonspecieslistedasendangeredorthreatened.TheeffectsofaproposedprojectontheseresourcesareimportantindeterminingwhethertheprojecthassignificantenvironmentalimpactsunderCEQA.
California Endangered Species Act
CESA(CaliforniaFishandGameCodeSections2050–2116)statesthatallnativespeciesoffishes,amphibians,reptiles,birds,mammals,invertebrates,andplantsandtheirhabitatsthatarethreatenedwithextinctionandthoseexperiencingasignificantdeclinethat,ifnothalted,wouldleadtoathreatenedorendangereddesignationwillbeprotectedorpreserved.
UnderSection2081oftheCaliforniaFishandGameCode,anincidentaltakepermitfromCDFWisrequiredforprojectsthatcouldresultinthetakeofaspeciesthatisstate‐listedasthreatenedorendangered.UnderCESA,takeisdefinedasanactivitythatwoulddirectlyorindirectlykillanindividualofaspecies.Thedefinitiondoesnotincludeharmorharass,asdoesthedefinitionoftakeunderESA.Consequently,thethresholdfortakeunderCESAishigherthanthatunderESA.Forexample,habitatmodificationisnotnecessarilyconsideredtakeunderCESA.
Fully Protected Species
Sections3511,3513,4700,and5050oftheCaliforniaFishandGameCodepertaintofullyprotectedwildlifespecies(birdsinSections3511and3513,mammalsinSection4700,andreptilesandamphibiansinSection5050)andstrictlyprohibitthetakeofthesespecies.CDFWcannotissueatakepermitforfullyprotectedspecies,exceptundernarrowconditionsforscientificresearchortheprotectionoflivestock,orifaNaturalCommunityConservationPlan(NCCP)hasbeenadopted.
California Native Plant Protection Act
TheCNPPAof1977gavetheCaliforniaFishandGameCommissiontheauthoritytolistplantspeciesasrareorendangeredandauthorizedthemtoadoptregulationsprohibitingimportationofrareandendangeredplantsintoCalifornia,takeofrareandendangeredplants,andsaleofrareandendangeredplants.TheCNPPAprohibitstake,possession,transportation,exportation,importation,orsaleofrareandthreatenedplants,exceptasaresultofagriculturalpractices,firecontrolmeasures,timberoperations,mining,oractionsofpublicagenciesorprivateutilities.Private
![Page 5: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐5
October 2014ICF 00323.08
landownersarealsoexemptfromtheprohibitionagainstremovingrareandendangeredplants,althoughtheymustprovide10‐daynoticetoCDFWbeforeremovingtheplants.TheCNPPPAhasmostlybeensupersededbyCESA.
California Rare Plant Rankings
CDFWmaintainslistsofplantsofspecialconcerninCalifornia,inadditiontothoselistedasthreatenedorendangered.ThesespecieshavenoformalprotectionunderCESA,butthevaluesandimportanceoftheselistsarewidelyrecognized.PlantswithaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1A,1B,and2meetthedefinitionsofSection1901oftheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeandmayqualifyforstatelisting.Accordingly,forpurposesofthisanalysis,suchplantspeciesareconsideredrareplantspursuanttoSection15380ofCEQA.
Protection of Birds and Raptors
Section3503oftheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeprohibitsthekillingofbirdsand/orthedestructionofbirdnests.Section3503.5prohibitsthekillingofraptorspeciesand/orthedestructionofraptornests.Typicalviolationsincludedestructionofactivebirdandraptornestsasaresultoftreeremoval,andfailureofnestingattempts(lossofeggsand/oryoung)asaresultofdisturbanceofnestingpairscausedbynearbyhumanactivity.Section3513prohibitsanytakeorpossessionofbirdsdesignatedbytheMBTAasmigratorynongamebirdsexceptasallowedbyfederalrulesandregulationspursuanttotheMBTA.CDFWcannotissuepermitsunderMBTAforthetakeofbirdsbytheprogramortheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojects.
Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code
Sections1600–1603oftheCaliforniaFishandGameCodestatethatitisunlawfulforanypersonoragencytosubstantiallydivertorobstructthenaturalfloworsubstantiallychangethebed,channel,orbankofanyriver,stream,orlakeinCaliforniathatsupportswildliferesources,ortouseanymaterialfromthestreambeds,withoutfirstnotifyingCDFW.ALakeandStreambedAlterationAgreement(LSAA)mustbeobtainedifeffectsareexpectedtooccur.Theregulatorydefinitionofastreamisabodyofwaterthatflowsatleastperiodicallyorintermittentlythroughabedorchannelhavingbanksandthatsupportswildlife,fish,orotheraquaticlife.Thisdefinitionincludeswatercourseshavingasurfaceorsubsurfaceflowthatsupportsorhassupportedriparianvegetation.CDFW’sjurisdictionwithinalteredorartificialwaterwaysisbasedonthevalueofthosewaterwaystofishandwildlife.
Porter‐Cologne Water Quality Control Act
UnderthePorter‐CologneAct,watersofthestatefallunderjurisdictionofthenineRegionalWaterQualityControlBoards(RWQCBs).Underthisact,eachRWQCBmustprepareandperiodicallyupdatewaterqualitycontrolbasinplans.Eachbasinplansetsforthwaterqualitystandardsforsurfacewaterandgroundwater,aswellasactionstocontrolnonpointandpointsourcesofpollution.ProjectsthataffectwetlandsorwatersmustmeetthewastedischargerequirementsoftheRWQCB.PursuanttoCWASections401,anapplicantforaSection404permittoconductanyactivitythatmayresultindischargeintonavigablewatersmustprovideacertificationfromtheRWQCBthatsuchdischargewillcomplywithstatewaterqualitystandards.AspartofthewetlandspermittingprocessunderSection404,aprojectapplicantwouldberequiredtoobtainawaterqualitycertificationfromtheapplicableRWQCB.
![Page 6: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐6
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Section13050ofthePorter‐CologneAct(CaliforniaWaterCode,Division7)authorizestheStateWaterResourcesControlBoardandtherelevantRegionalWaterQualityControlBoard(inthecaseoftheAPWRA,theCentralValleyandSanFranciscoBayWaterBoards)toregulatebiologicalpollutants.TheCaliforniaWaterCodegenerallyregulatesmoresubstancescontainedindischarges,anddefinesdischargestoreceivingwatersmorebroadlythantheCWAdoes.
California Wetlands Conservation Policy
ThegoalsoftheCaliforniaWetlandsConservationPolicy,adoptedin1993(ExecutiveOrderW‐59‐93),are“toensurenooverallnetloss,andachievealong‐termnetgaininthequantity,quality,andpermanenceofwetlandsacreageandvaluesinCalifornia,inamannerthatfosterscreativity,stewardship,andrespectforprivateproperty”;toreduceproceduralcomplexityintheadministrationofstateandfederalwetlandsconservationprograms;andtomakerestoration,landownerincentiveprogramsandcooperativeplanningeffortstheprimaryfocusofwetlandsconservation.
Regional and Local Plans, Policies, and Regulations
East County Area Plan
LanduseplanningintheeasternportionofAlamedaCountyisgovernedbytheECAP,whichwasadoptedbytheCountyinMay1994.InNovember2000,theAlamedaCountyelectorateapprovedMeasureD,theSaveAgricultureandOpenSpaceLandsInitiative,whichamendedportionsoftheCounty’sGeneralPlan,includingtheECAP(AlamedaCounty2000).TheOpenSpaceElementoftheECAPaddressessensitivelandsandregionallysignificantopenspace,includingbiologicalresources.WindfarmsareaddressedintheSpecialLandUsessectionoftheECAP.
East Alameda County Conservation Strategy
TheEastAlamedaCountyConservationStrategy(EACCS)isacollaborativeeffortamongseverallocal,state,andfederalagenciesintendedtoprovideaneffectivevoluntaryframeworktoprotect,enhance,andrestorenaturalresourcesineasternAlamedaCounty,whileimprovingandstreamliningtheenvironmentalpermittingprocessforimpactsresultingfrominfrastructureanddevelopmentprojects(ICFInternational2010).TheEACCSisintendedtofocusonimpactsonbiologicalresourcessuchasendangeredandotherspecial‐statusspeciesandsensitivehabitattypes(e.g.,wetlands,ripariancorridors,rareuplandcommunities).TheEACCSwillultimatelyenablelocalprojectstocomplywithstateandfederalregulatoryrequirementswithinaframeworkofcomprehensiveconservationgoalsandobjectives,andwillfacilitateimplementationusingconsistentandstandardizedmitigationrequirements.ByimplementingtheEACCS,localagencieswillbeabletomoreeasilyaddressthelegalrequirementsrelevanttothesespecies.
TheEACCSstudyareaencompasses271,485acres,orapproximately52%ofAlamedaCountyintheupperAlamedaCreekwatershedofthecentralcountyarea,andtheeast‐facingslopesoftheAltamontHills.ThecitiesofDublin,Livermore,andPleasantonarewithintheEACCSstudyarea.ThewesternboundaryoftheEACCSstudyareafollowsthewesternedgeoftheAlamedaCreekwatershed,andthenorthern,southern,andeasternboundariesfollowtheAlamedaCountylinewithitsadjacentcounties.TheEACCSstudyareaincludestheprogramarea.
AfinaldraftoftheEACCSwascompletedinOctober2010andreleasedtothepublicinMarch2011.OnMay31,2012,USFWSissuedtheProgrammaticBiologicalOpinionfortheEastAlamedaCounty
![Page 7: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐7
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ConservationStrategy(referenceNo.08ESMFOO‐2012‐F‐0092‐1)(ProgrammaticBO).Installation,operation,andmaintenanceofwindenergyprojectsareidentifiedascoveredinfrastructureprojectsundertheProgrammaticBO.However,avianandbateffectsassociatedwiththesetypesofprojectsarenotcoveredundertheProgrammaticBO.IndividualprojectsmaybeappendedtotheProgrammaticBOiftheyareconsistentwiththeEACCS,occurwithintheEACCSstudyarea,andareacoveredactivity.TheProgrammaticBOdoesnotprovideincidentaltakeauthorization;therefore,individualprojectsappendedtotheProgrammaticBOwillbegrantedindividualtakecoverageaspartoftheproject’sSection7consultationprocess.BecausetheEACCSisdesignedtobeanadaptivemanagementprocess,theProgrammaticBOmaybeamendedinthefuture,oranewBOmaybewritteniftherearesubstantivechangestotheEACCS.
ForprojectswhereUSACEisnotthefederalleadagencyforSection7consultationorwhereSection10consultationisrequired,consistencywiththeProgrammaticBOwillenableotherfederalagenciesandnonfederalapplicantstostreamlinetheirindividualESAconsultationsbyutilizingpreapprovedmitigationstandardsandfocusingmitigationinconservationpriorityareas.
EACCSdevelopmentincludedinputandreviewbyCDFWtoaddressimpactsonstate‐listedspecies.ConsistencywiththeEACCSalsoaidsinstreamliningCESApermitcomplianceforprojectimpactsonstate‐listedspecies.
AlthoughparticipationintheEACCSbyapplicantsisvoluntary,AlamedaCountyparticipatesinthestrategyandconsidersittobethebestavailableinformationwhenconsideringtheimpactsofproposedprojectsonthefullrangeofprotectedwildlife,plants,andhabitats.
2007 Settlement Agreement
In2007,Audubon,CARE,andthreewindenergycompanies(AES,NextEra,andEnXco)enteredintoaSettlementAgreementtoresolvelitigationregardingtheCounty’s2005issuanceofCUPapprovalsofcontinuedwindenergyoperations.The2007SettlementAgreement,includingExhibitG‐1(modifiedfromthe2005CUPs),requiresparticipantstodevelopanNCCPorasimilaragreementto“addressthelong‐termoperationofwindturbinesattheAPWRAandtheconservationofimpactedspeciesofconcernandtheirnaturalcommunities.”Inparticular,the2007SettlementAgreementcommittedtheparticipatingwindcompaniestoachievea50%reductioninavianfatalitiesfromanestimatedbaselineofannualfatalitiesoffourfocalspecies(goldeneagle,burrowingowl[Athenecunicularia],Americankestrel[Falcosparverius],andred‐tailedhawk[Buteojamaicensis])throughtheimplementationoftheAvianWildlifeProtectionProgramandSchedule(AWPPS)asestablishedin2005andmodifiedin2007.The2007SettlementAgreementandtheamendedAWPPSrequiredtheimplementationofvariousmanagementactions,includingseasonalshutdownofturbinesandremovalofturbinesdeemedtobe“high‐risk”turbines,untilthe50%reductiongoalwasachieved.TheAWPPSrequiredtheestablishmentoftheAlamedaCountyAvianFatalityMonitoringTeam(AFMT).TheAFMTwaschargedwithdevelopingandimplementing—underthesupervisionanddirectionoftheScientificReviewCommittee—aprogramtomonitorturbine‐relatedavianfatalityratesanduseoftheAPWRAbybirdsofmanagementconcern.Underthe2007SettlementAgreement,theemphasisoftheAFMTwasdirectedtothefourfocalspecies,anditsworkwascentraltoevaluationofprogresstowardachievingthe50%reductiongoalestablishedbytheSettlementAgreement.
AsanalternativetotheNCCPcalledforintheSettlementAgreement,theCountypreparedthisPEIRwithmitigationmeasurestoprovideaframeworkforreviewandapprovalofwindprojectsintheAPWRAandtopromoteconservationmeasurestobenefitavianspecies.AsdescribedinSection
![Page 8: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐8
October 2014ICF 00323.08
1.2.4,ConditionalUsePermits,theCountydevelopedadraftAvianProtectionProgram(APP)toprovideaframeworkandprocessforwindenergyprojectstoaddressapplicablestatutes(e.g.,MBTAandBGEPA)throughtherepoweringprocess.TheAPPprovidedabroadevaluationofexistingenvironmentalconditions,birduse,andavianfatalitiesintheprogramarea.Itfocusedonavianmortalityassociatedwithrepoweringprojects—specificallyconstruction,operation,monitoring,andmitigation.ThekeyprovisionsoftheAPPwereincorporatedintotheprogram‐levelmitigationmeasuresofthisPEIR.Projectproponentswillbeexpectedtodevelopproject‐specificAPPs,incorporatingmitigation,monitoring,andadaptivemanagementstrategiesassetforthinthisPEIR.
2010 Settlement Agreement
OnDecember3,2010,Audubon,CARE,NextEra,thePeopleoftheStateofCalifornia,andtheAttorneyGeneralenteredintoasettlementagreement.Therepoweringscheduleinthe2010SettlementAgreemententailedNextErarepoweringold‐generationturbinesunderitscurrentownershipintheAPWRAassoonascommerciallyreasonable,inthreeorfewerphases,witheachphasecomprisingupto80MWandeachphaseundergoingCEQAreviewbymeansofanEIR.Phase1wastheVascoWindsprojectinContraCostaCounty;Phases2and3wouldbeprojectsintheAlamedaCountyportionoftheAPWRA.Eachphaseofrepoweredturbinesissubjectto3yearsofpostconstructionfatalitymonitoring,usingthefocalspeciesidentifiedinthe2007SettlementAgreementaswellasbatsasbenchmarksforevaluatingeffectivenessofrepowering.Theagreementisstructuredsuchthateachphaseofrepoweringisintendedtoinformthesitingofturbinesinsubsequentphases.Mitigationfeestocompensateforongoingbirdandbatfatalitieswerealsoestablishedintheagreement.NextEraistheonlywindoperatorintheAPWRAthatwasapartytothe2010SettlementAgreement.WhiletheCountyisnotapartytothe2010SettlementAgreementandthereforehasnoresponsibilitiesundertheagreement,therepowering,conservation,andmonitoringmeasuresintheagreementwerereviewedandincorporatedintothemitigationmeasuresinthePEIRasdeemedappropriatebytheCounty.
Environmental Setting
Theprogramareaischaracterizedbyrollinghillswithelevationsrangingfrom256to1,542feetabovemeansealevel.Windfarmoperations,livestockgrazingand,toalesserextent,drylandfarming(graincrops)aretheprimarylandusesintheprogramarea.
Theprogramareacontains19landcovertypesthatweremappedduringpreparationoftheEACCS.LandcovertypesintheprogramareaarelistedinTable3.4‐1andshowninFigure3.4‐1.LandcovertypesintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasarelistedinTables3.4‐2and3.4‐3andshowninFigures3.4‐2and3.4‐3,respectively.MappingresourcesusedfortheEACCSincludeddigitalorthophotographyfrom2005and2007,previouslymappedwetlandsfrom2001,USFWSwetlandsinventorydatalayer,andfieldverificationsurveysconductedbyICFin2010.DrainagedatafromU.S.GeologicalSurveyNationalHydrographyDatasetfrom2012wereaddedtothesedatasetstocreateFigures3.4‐1through3.4‐3.Theplantcommunitiesandassociatedwildlifeineachlandcovertypeintheprogramareaaredescribedbelow.Existingturbinesmaynotbepresentinalllandcovertypesdescribedbelow;however,alllandcovertypesaredescribedbecauseitisassumedthatrepoweringactivitiescouldhaveimpactsonanylandcovertypewithintheprogramarea.LandcovertypesthatarepresentwithintheGoldenHillsorPattersonPassprojectareasaresonotedinthelandcoverdescriptionsbelow.Mostrecently,EDFREconductedhabitatassessmentsforspecial‐statusspeciesandadelineationofwatersoftheUnitedStates,includingwetlands,thatUSACEhas
![Page 9: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐9
October 2014ICF 00323.08
verified.AreportdetailingtheresultsoftheEDFREbiologicalsurveyandwetlanddelineationisincludedinAppendixCofthisPEIR.
Table 3.4‐1. Approximate Acreages of Land Cover Types in the Program Area
LandCover AmountinProgramArea(acres)
Annualgrassland 39,375.79
Alkalimeadow/scald 555.06
Rockoutcrop 42.05
Northernmixedchaparral/chamisechaparral 28.65
Northerncoastalscrub/Diablansagescrub 74.51
Mixedevergreenforest/oakwoodland 582.18
Blueoakwoodland 163.61
Foothillpine–oakwoodland 21.11
Mixedwillowriparianscrub 39.27
Mixedriparianforestandwoodland 9.93
Alkaliwetland 483.17
Seasonalwetland 82.76
Perennialfreshwatermarsh 5.01
Canal/Aqueduct 158.21
Ponds 53.74
Reservoirs 176.58
Drainages Notcalculated
Cropland 4.55
DevelopedandDisturbed 1,502.58
Total 43,358.76
Table 3.4‐2. Approximate Acreages of Land Cover Types in the Golden Hills Project Area
LandCover AmountinProjectArea(acres)
Annualgrassland 4,287.08
Alkalimeadow/scald 145.69
Mixedwillowriparianscrub 6.54
Alkaliwetland 37.13
Seasonalwetland 0.09
Ponds 2.89
Drainages Notcalculated
DevelopedandDisturbed 0.71
Total 4,480.13
![Page 10: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐10
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐3. Approximate Acreages of Land Cover Types in the Patterson Pass Project Area
LandCover AmountinProjectArea(acres)
Annualgrassland 939.81
Mixedwillowriparianscrub 4.00
Seasonalwetland 1.41
Perennialfreshwatermarsh 4.99
Ponds 0.84
Drainages 0.81
Total 951.86
Grassland
Grasslandconsistsofherbaceousvegetationdominatedbygrasses,althoughfloweringforbsareoftenaconspicuouscomponentoftheplantcover.MostofthegrasslandintheprogramareaischaracterizedasCaliforniaAnnualGrassland.Twootherhabitats,alkalimeadowandrockoutcrops,areinterspersedassmallpatcheswithinthegrasslandmatrixandare,accordingly,includedinanddiscussedascomponentsofthegrasslandhabitat.
Grassland Plant Communities
California Annual Grassland
Californiaannualgrasslandisfoundthroughouttheprogramarea,occupyingapproximately39,375.79acres.Californiaannualgrasslandisanherbaceousplantcommunitydominatedbynonnativeannualgrasses(Holland1986:36–37;SawyerandKeeler‐Wolf1995:40–41).ThedominantspeciesaremostlynonnativegrassesfromtheMediterraneanbasin,suchassoftchess(Bromushordeaceus),redbrome(Bromusmadritensissubsp.rubens),Mediterraneanbarley(Hordeummarinumvar.gussoneanum),wildoats(Avenaspp.),ripgutbrome(Bromusdiandrus),Italianryegrass(Festucaperennis[Loliummultiflorum]),andrat‐tailfescue(Festucamyuros).Inthespring,manyoftheannualgrasslandsareinterspersedwithdiversenativewildflowerstypicaloftheinnerCoastRanges.Commonlyfoundspeciesofwildflowersinthesegrasslandsincludelupine(Lupinusspp.),fiddleneck(Amsinckiaspp.),popcornflower(Plagiobothrysspp.),bigheronbill(Erodiumbotrys),redstemmedfilaree(E.cicutarium),Californiapoppy(Eschscholziacalifornica),owl’s‐clover(CastillejaandTriphysariaspp.),andclarkia(Clarkiaspp.).Special‐statusplantspeciesthatmaybefoundinthisplantcommunityincludelarge‐floweredfiddleneck(Amsinckiagrandiflora),bigtarplant(Blepharizoniaplumosa),round‐leavedfilaree(Californiamacrophylla),Lemmon’sjewelflower(Caulanthuslemmonii),diamond‐petaledCaliforniapoppy(Eschscholziarhombipetala),shiningnavarretia(Navarretianigelliformisssp.radians),andcaper‐fruitedtropidocarpum(Tropidocarpumcapparideum).
AnnualgrasslandisalsothedominantlandcovertypeintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas,withannualgrasslandconstituting96%(4,287.08acres)and99%(934.06acres)oftheprojectareas,respectively.
Alkali Meadow
Alkalimeadowoccursinscatteredpatchestotalingapproximately555.06acresinthecentralandnorthernportionsoftheprogramarea.Alkalimeadowisaperennialgrasslandcommunitythat
![Page 11: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐11
October 2014ICF 00323.08
occursonalkalisoils(Holland1986:42–43;SawyerandKeeler‐Wolf1995:78–79).Dominantspeciesinalkalimeadowincludesaltgrass(Distichlisspicata),wildbarley(Hordeumspp.),andalkaliryegrass(Elymustriticoides).Theassociatedherbcoverconsistsofhalophytes,includingsaltbush(Atriplexspp.),alkaliheath(Frankeniasalina),alkaliweed(Cressatruxillensis),alkalimallow(Malvellaleprosa),andcommonspikeweed(Centromadiapungens).AlkalimeadowisconsideredasignificantnaturalcommunitybyCDFWbecauseofitsrarityandthepressingthreatstotheremnantcommunitiesfromovergrazingandlanduseconversion(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013a).Special‐statusplantspeciesthatmaybefoundinthisplantcommunityincludeSanJoaquinspearscaleandrecurvedlarkspur.
Alkalimeadowcomprisesapproximately3%(145.69acres)oftheGoldenHillsprojectarea.ThereisnoalkalimeadowinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Rock Outcrop
Rockoutcropsarefrequentlyencounteredinsomegrasslands,andapproximately42.05acresarepresentintheprogramarea.Theseoutcropsareexposuresofbedrockthattypicallylacksoilandhavesparsevegetation.Withintheprogramarea,severaltypesofrockoutcropsarepresentandarederivedfromsedimentaryandmetamorphicsources.ThegreatestconcentrationofrockoutcropsoccursnearBrushyPeakRegionalPreserve,althoughotherrockoutcropsareinthevicinityofTeslaRoad.Onespecial‐statusplantspecies,raylessragwort(Packeraindecora),maybefoundinthisplantcommunity.
Common Wildlife Associations
Characteristicwildlifespeciesingrasslandsincludereptilessuchaswesternfencelizard(Sceloporusoccidentalis),commongartersnake(Thamnophissirtalis),andwesternrattlesnake(Crotalisviridis);mammalssuchasblack‐tailedjackrabbit(Lepuscalifornicus),Californiagroundsquirrel(Spermophilusbeecheyi),westernharvestmouse(Reithrodontomysmegalotis),Californiavole(Microtuscalifornicus),andcoyote(Canislatrans);andbirdssuchasred‐tailedhawk,Americankestrel,barnowl(Tytoalba),andwesternmeadowlark(Sturnellaneglecta).Severalcommonbatspecies,suchascanyonbat(Parastrellushesperus),canroostinrockyoutcropsandforageovergrassland.
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesassociatedwithgrasslandsincludegoldeneagle,Swainson’shawk,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike(Laniusludovicianus),SanJoaquinkitfox,andAmericanbadger(Taxideataxus).Californiared‐leggedfrogandCaliforniatigersalamanderusegrasslandsasmovementandaestivation(summerhibernation)habitat.Alamedawhipsnakeisknowntousegrasslandsadjacenttoshrublandsandrockoutcropsforbreedingandrefugia.Pallidbat(Antrozouspallidus)isknowntoroostincrevicesinrockoutcropsandforageoversurroundinggrassland.Annualgrasslandalsoprovidesimportantforaginghabitatfornorthernharrier(Circuscyaneus)andwhite‐tailedkite(Elanusleucurus).
Scrub/Chaparral
Chaparralcommunitiesaredominatedbydenselypackedandnearlyimpenetrabledrought‐adaptedevergreenwoodyshrubs,6.5–13feettall,thatpossesssmall,thick,leathery,sclerophyllousleaves(Hanes1977:419;Holland1986:20–21).Coastalscrubcommunities,incomparison,aregenerallycharacterizedbylowshrubs,usually1.5–6.5feettallwithsoftnon‐scerophyllousleaves,andinterspersedwithgrassyopenings(Holland1986).Twoscrub/chaparralplantcommunitiesare
![Page 12: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐12
October 2014ICF 00323.08
presentintheprogramarea:northernmixedchaparral/chamisechaparralandnortherncoastalscrub/Diablansagescrub.
Scrub/Chaparral Plant Communities
Northern Mixed Chaparral/Chamise Chaparral
Northernmixedchaparral/chamisechaparraloccupiesapproximately28.65acresinthesouthernendoftheprogramarea.Northernmixedchaparralmayinterminglewithnortherncoastalscrub/Diablansagescrub,foothillpine‐oakwoodlands,andmixedevergreenforest/oakwoodland.
Dominantshrubsinthiscommunityintheprogramareaincludechamise(Adenostomafasciculatum),manzanita(Arctostaphylossp.),scruboak(Quercusberberidifolia),andceanothus(Ceanothussp.).Otherimportantspeciesaretoyon(Heteromelesarbutifolia),coffeeberry(Rhamnuscalifornica),madrone(Arbutusmenziesii),Californiabay(Umbellulariacalifornica),birchleafmountain‐mahogany(Cercocarpusbetuloides),poison‐oak(Toxicodendrondiversilobum),bushmonkeyflower(Mimulusaurantiacus),andCaliforniayerbasanta(Eriodictyoncalifornicum).Somechaparralstandsmaybealmostentirelycomposedofdensestandsofchamise.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthisplantcommunityintheprogramarea.
Northern Coastal Scrub/Diablan Sage Scrub
Northerncoastalscrub/Diablansagescruboccupiesapproximately74.51acresinthesouthernportionoftheprogramarea.Northerncoastalscrub/Diablansagescrubintheprogramareaiscomposedprimarilyofevergreenshrubswithanherbaceousunderstoryinopenings.Northerncoastalscrub/DiablansagescrubcommunitiesaredominatedbyCaliforniasagebrush(Artemisiacalifornica)andblacksage(Salviamellifera),withassociatedspeciesincludingcoyotebrush(Baccharispilularis),toyon,big‐berrymanzanita(Manzanitaglauca),Californiabuckwheat(Eriogonumfasciculatum),poison‐oak,Californiayerbasanta,andbushmonkeyflower(Holland1986:8–10).Rockoutcropsarealsopresentinthisplantcommunity.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthisplantcommunityintheprogramarea.
Common Wildlife Associations
Commonwildlifespeciesthatusechaparralandscrubhabitatsintheprogramareaincludegophersnake(Pituophismelanoleucus),westernrattlesnake,westernfencelizard,brushrabbit(Sylvilagusbachmani),Californiapocketmouse(Perognathuscalifornicus),spottedskunk(Spilogalegracilis),muledeer,coyote,andbobcat(Lynxrufus).Commonbirdspeciesincludemourningdove(Zenaidamacroura),Californiaquail(Callipeplacalifornica),Anna’shummingbird(Calypteanna),westernscrub‐jay(Aphelocomacalifornica),Bewick’swren(Thryomanesbewickii),Californiatowhee(Pipilocrissalis),lessergoldfinch(Carduelispsaltria),foxsparrow(Passerellailiaca),white‐crownedsparrow(Zonotrichialeucophrys),anddark‐eyedjunco(Juncohyemalis).
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesknowntooccurinchaparralandnortherncoastalscrubcommunitiesincludeAlamedawhipsnakeandloggerheadshrike.ChaparralandnortherncoastalscrubaretheprimaryhabitatsforAlamedawhipsnake,whichbreeds,forages,andthermoregulatesinthishabitat.Contiguousstandsarenecessarytosupportviablepopulationsofthisspeciesthroughoutitsrange.Loggerheadshrikesareknowntonestandforageinscrubhabitatswithlowdensitiesofshrubcanopycover.
![Page 13: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐13
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Woodland
Theprogramareacontainsthreewoodlandplantcommunities:mixedevergreenforest/oakwoodland,blueoakwoodland,andfoothillpine‐oakwoodland.TheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasdonotsupportanywoodlandplantcommunities.
Woodland Plant Communities
Mixed Evergreen Forest/Oak Woodland
Mixedevergreenforest/oakwoodlandisthemostcommonwoodlandcommunityintheprogramarea,occupyingapproximately582.18acresatthesouthendoftheprogramarea.Mixedevergreenforest/oakwoodlandischaracterizedbyadiverseoverstoryoftendominatedbycoastliveoak(Quercusagrifolia)(Holland1986:86;SawyerandKeeler‐Wolf1995:241–242).Associatedco‐dominantspeciescanincludeblueoak(Q.douglasii),valleyoak(Q.lobata),Californiabay,madrone,Californiabuckeye(Aesculuscalifornica),andblackoak(Q.kelloggii).Whereshrubby,theunderstoryconsistsofpatchesoftoyon,poison‐oak,andscruboak.Wheremoreopen,theunderstorytypicallyconsistsofannualgrassesandshade‐tolerantperennials,suchasyerbabuena(Clinopodiumdouglasii)andcommonsnowberry(Symphoricarposalbus).Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthisplantcommunityintheprogramarea.
Blue Oak Woodland
Thereareapproximately163.61acresofblueoakwoodlandscatteredthroughoutthesouthernhalfoftheprogramarea.Thislandcovertypicallyoccursinthelow‐tomid‐elevationhillsinslightlydriermicroclimates.Blueoakwoodlandisdominatedbyblueoak,ahighlydrought‐tolerantspeciesadaptedtogrowthonthinsoilsinthedryfoothills.Californiabuckeyeandfoothillpine(Pinussabiniana)areassociatedtreespeciesinthiscommunity.Theunderstoryofblueoakwoodlandvariesfromshrubbytoopen.Understoryspeciestypicallyincludeannualgrasses,hollyleafcherry(Prunusilicifolia),poison‐oak,andcoffeeberry.SomeblueoakwoodlandalliancesareconsideredbyCDFWtobesensitivecommunities(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2010).Onespecial‐statusplantspecies,shiningnavarretia,occursinthisplantcommunityintheprogramarea.
Foothill Pine‐Oak Woodland
Foothillpine‐oakwoodlandoccupiesapproximately21.11acresinthesouthernportionoftheprogramarea.Thecanopyisdominatedbyfoothillpineandblueoak(Holland1986:77).Oaksbecomemoreprevalentatlowerelevations,oftenformingaclosedcanopylayerbelowtheemergentpines,andtheunderstorylacksanappreciableshrublayer.Associatedcanopyspeciesincludeinteriorliveoak,coastliveoak,andCaliforniabuckeye.Associatedshrubspeciesincludeceanothusspecies,bigberrymanzanita,Californiacoffeeberry,poison‐oak,silverlupine(Lupinusalbifrons),blueelderberry,Californiayerbasanta,rockgooseberry(Ribesquercetorum),andCaliforniaredbud(Cercisoccidentalis).Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthiscommunityintheprogramarea.
Common Wildlife Associations
Characteristicwildlifespeciesthatcanbefoundinwoodlandhabitatsincludegophersnake, westernfencelizard,red‐tailedhawk,Americankestrel,barnowl,greathornedowl(Bubovirginianus),acornwoodpecker(Melanerpesformicivorus),Nuttall’swoodpecker(Picoidesnuttallii),northernflicker(Colaptesauratus),white‐breastednuthatch(Sittacarolinensis),Californiaquail,spottedtowhee(Pipilomaculatus),Bewick’swren,bushtit(Psaltriparusminimus),bigbrownbat
![Page 14: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐14
October 2014ICF 00323.08
(Eptesicusfuscus),Californiamyotis(Myotiscalifornicus),deermouse(Peromyscusmaniculatus),westerngraysquirrel(Sciurusgriseus),muledeer,andcoyote.
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesthatmaybefoundinoakwoodlandsincludeCaliforniatigersalamander,Alamedawhipsnake,goldeneagle,loggerheadshrike,hoarybat,pallidbat,westernredbat(Lasiurusblossevillii),SanJoaquinkitfox,andAmericanbadger.Californiatigersalamandersuseburrowsinthegrassyunderstoryofopenwoodlandsforaestivationandrefugia.Alamedawhipsnakemayuseoakwoodlandformovementbetweenchaparralandcoastalscrubhabitats.Goldeneaglesandloggerheadshrikesusevalleyoakwoodlandandotherwoodlandsforroosting,nesting,andforaging.Hoarybat,pallidbat,andwesternredbatroostinwoodlandsandforageabovethecanopy,inforestopenings,andalongforestedges.SanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgermayuseopenvalleyoakwoodlandfordenning,foraging,andmovement.
Riparian
Withintheprogramarea,theriparianlandcovertypeoccursalongcreeksandaroundopenwaterbodies.Riparianvegetationintheprogramareaconsistoftwocommunitytypes:mixedwillowriparianscrubandmixedriparianforestandwoodland.Atthestatelevel,riparianplantcommunitiesareconsideredsensitivebecauseofthesubstantialreductionintheiramountandrange,andfortheirvalueashabitatforalargenumberofplantandwildlifespecies.
Riparian Plant Communities
Mixed Willow Riparian Scrub
Mixedwillowriparianscruboccupiesapproximately39.27acresinandalongthemarginsoftheactivechannelofintermittentandperennialdrainages.Intheprogramarea,thisplantcommunityisfoundalongPattersonRunanddrainagesnorthtoI‐580.
Conditionsinthemixedwillowriparianscrubcommunitycanrangefromopenwell‐developedcanopieswithminimalunderstorytodenseareasdominatedprimarilybyunderstoryspecieswithlittletonocanopy.Yellowwillow(Salixlasiandra),redwillow(S.laevigata),arroyowillow(S.lasiolepis),andnarrowleafwillow(exigua)arethedominantcanopyspeciesinthishabitat.Scrubcommunitiestypicallyconsistofscatteredwillowsandmulefat(Baccharissalicifolia),whichoccurinandalongthemarginsofopensandywashes.Understorydevelopmentinthiscommunitytypeiscontrolledbycanopydensity.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthisplantcommunityintheprogramarea.
Mixedwillowriparianscrubcomprisesapproximately0.1%(6.54acres)oftheGoldenHillsprojectareaand0.4%(4.00acres)ofthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Mixed Riparian Forest and Woodland
Mixedriparianforestandwoodlandoccupiesapproximately9.93acresinthesouthernportionoftheprogramarea.ItoccursalongsectionsofArroyoSecoalongTeslaRoad,ArroyoVallenearHaysCamp,CorralHollowCreekanditstributaries,andFairchildGulchandDeadmanGulchinElyarCanyon.
Mixedriparianforestandwoodlandcommunitiesaresimilartomixedwillowriparianscrubintermsofhabitatrequirements.Theyarefoundinandalongthemarginsoftheactivechannelonintermittentandperennialdrainages.Generally,nosinglespeciesdominatesthecanopy,and
![Page 15: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐15
October 2014ICF 00323.08
compositionvarieswithelevation,aspect,hydrology,andchanneltype.ThemajorcanopyspeciesincludeCaliforniasycamore,valleyoak,coastliveoak,redwillow,andCaliforniabay.AssociatedtreesandshrubsincludeCaliforniablackwalnut,otherspeciesofwillow,Californiabuckeye,Fremontcottonwood,andbigleafmaple.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthiscommunityintheprogramarea.
Common Wildlife Associations
WildlifespeciesthatareoftenassociatedwithriparianhabitatsincludeamphibianssuchasSierrantreefrog(Pseudacrissierrae),Californianewt(Tarichatorosa),westernaquaticgartersnake(Thamnophiscouchii),red‐shoulderedhawk(Buteolineatus),Wilson’swarbler(Wilsoniapusilla),spottedtowhee,Bullock’soriole(Icterusbullockii),long‐tailedweasel(Mustelafrenata),grayfox(Urocyoncinereoargenteus),raccoon(Procyonlotor),andyumamyotis(Myotisyumanensis).
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesassociatedwithriparianforestandscrubincludeCaliforniared‐leggedfrog,Swainson’shawk,westernredbat,Townsend’sbig‐earedbat(Corynorhinustownsendii),andhoarybat.Californiared‐leggedfrogsuseriparianhabitattypesforbreeding,foraging,andrefugia.Swainson’shawksnestandroostinriparianforest,andhoaryandwesternredbatsusethishabitatforroostingandforaging.Townsend’sbig‐earedbatsareknowntoforagealongripariancorridorswhenappropriateroosthabitatisnearby.
Wetland
Thewetlandlandcovertypeincludesareassubjecttoseasonalorperennialfloodingorponding,orthatpossesssaturatedsoilconditionsandthatsupportpredominantlyhydrophyticor“water‐loving”herbaceousplantspecies(Cowardinetal.1979).Becausewetlandsareperiodicallywaterlogged,theplantsgrowinginthemmusttoleratelowlevelsofsoiloxygenassociatedwithwaterloggedorhydricsoils.Thepresenceofflood‐tolerantspeciesoftenindicatesthatasiteisawetlandevenifthegroundappearstobedryformostoftheyear,orifhydrologicinfluencesarelessobvious.
Thewetlandlandcovertypeintheprogramareaconsistsofthreecommunities:alkaliwetland,seasonalwetland(includingvernalpools),andperennialfreshwatermarsh.Ingeneral,wetlandsareconsideredasensitivebioticcommunitybecauseoftheirlimiteddistributionandtheirimportancetospecial‐statusplantandwildlifespeciesstatewide.
Wetland Plant Communities
Alkali Wetland
Alkaliwetlandsoccupyapproximately483.17acresintheprogramarea.Alkaliwetlandssupportpondedorsaturatedsoilconditionsandoccurasperennialorseasonallywetfeaturesonalkalisoils.Alkaliwetlandsoccurprimarilyalongstreamchannelswherealkalisoilsarepresent.Intheprogramarea,thisplantcommunityoccursalongAltamontCreek,thesouthsideofI‐580,andinseveraldrainagessouthoftheAlameda/ContraCostaCountylineandwestofBethanyReservoir.TheonlysiteinAlamedaCounty(besidestheSpringtownAlkaliSink)thatsupportslargeareasofalkalisoilsandintactstandsofvalleysinkscrubandalkaligrasslandisanareaofapproximately267acresinthenortheasterncornerofthecounty.ThesiteoccursneartheintersectionofKelsoandBrunsRoadsbetweentheDelta‐MendotaCanalandtheCaliforniaAqueduct.
![Page 16: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐16
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Thevegetationofalkaliwetlandsiscomposedofhalophyticplantspeciesadaptedtobothwetlandconditionsandhighsalinitylevels.Typicalspeciesincludesaltgrass,alkaliheath,andcommonspikeweed.Theassociatedherbcoverconsistsofhalophytes,includingsaltbush,alkaliheath,seepweed,alkaliweed,andsaltmarshsandspurry(Spergulariamarina).Standsofiodinebushmayalsobepresent.Special‐statusplantspeciesthatoccurinthisplantcommunityintheprogramareaincludebrittlescale(Atriplexdepressa),SanJoaquinspearscale(A.joaquinana),lessersaltscale(A.minuscula),andrecurvedlarkspur(Delphiniumrecurvatum).
Alkaliwetlandcomprisesapproximately0.8%(37.13acres)oftheGoldenHillsprojectarea.AlkaliwetlandsarenotpresentinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Seasonal Wetlands
Seasonalwetlandsoccupyapproximately82.76acresscatteredthroughouttheprogramarea,withseverallargeseasonalwetlandcomplexes(i.e.,groupsofmanysmallpoolsorwetlands)occurringalongroadwaysanddrainagebottomsinthevicinityofAltamontPass.Thiscommunityoftenoccursadjacenttoalkaliwetland.
Seasonalwetlandsarefreshwaterwetlandsthatsupportpondedorsaturatedsoilconditionsduringwinterandspringandaredrythroughthesummerandfalluntilfall/winterrainfallbeginstosaturatethesoil.Vernalpoolsareatypeofseasonalwetlandthatpondwateronthesurfaceforextendeddurationsduringwinterandspringanddrycompletelyduringlatespringandsummerduetoanunderlyinghardpan.Thishardpanrestrictsthepercolationofwaterandcreatesa“perched”seasonalwatersource.Theysupportatypicalfloralargelycomposedofnativewetlandplantspecies.VernalpoolsineasternAlamedaCountyoccurindistinctivetopographywithlowdepressionsmixedwithhummocksormounds.Thesedepressionsfillwithrainwaterandrunofffromadjacentareasduringthewinterandmayremaininundatedduringthespringtoearlysummer.VernalpoolsarefoundeastandnorthofLivermoreandnortheastofBethanyReservoir.
Vegetationtypicallyassociatedwithotherseasonalwetlandsconsistsofwetlandgeneralists,suchashyssoploosestrife(Lithiumhyssopifolia),cocklebur(Xanthiumstrumarium),Mediterraneanbarley,andItalianryegrass.Uplandspeciessuchassoftchess,blackmustard(Brassicanigra),redstemmedfilaree,andcommontarweed(Holocarphavirgata)canalsooccur.Commonspeciesinseasonalwetlandswithintheprojectareaincludewatercress(Rorippasp.),waterspeedwell(Veronicaanagallis‐aquatica),andsmartweeds(Polygonumspp.).Noknownoccurrencesofspecial‐statusplantshavebeendocumentedinthiscommunityintheprogramarea.Mostofthespecial‐statusplantsintheprogramareavicinitydonotoccurinseasonalwetlands;however,onespecies—alkalimilk‐vetch(Astragalustenervar.tener)—occursonthemarginsofalkalivernalpools.
Seasonalwetlandcomprisesapproximately0.02%(0.09acre)oftheGoldenHillsprojectareaand0.1%(1.32acres)ofthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Perennial Freshwater Marsh
Perennialfreshwatermarshoccupiesapproximately5.01acresoftheprogramarea.Perennialfreshwatermarshoccursprimarilyinsmallpatchesalongstreamcoursesordrainagesandattheedgesofsomeponds.Intheprogramarea,perennialfreshwatermarshispresentinthenortheastportionoftheprogramareanearBrunsRoad.
Perennialfreshwatermarshisdominatedbyemergentherbaceousplants(reeds,sedges,grasses)witheitherintermittentlyfloodedorperenniallysaturatedsoils(Holland1986:48–49).Inthe
![Page 17: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐17
October 2014ICF 00323.08
programarea,plantspeciesassociatedwithperennialfreshwatermarshincludewillows,saltgrass,Mediterraneanbarley,Italianryegrass,rabbitsfootgrass(Polypogonsp.),nutsedge(Cyperuseragrostis),willowweed(Polygonumlapathifolium),watercress,Balticrush(Juncusbalticus),narrow‐leavedcattail(Typhaangustifolia),ricecutgrass(Leersiaoryzoides),bur‐reed(Sparganiumeurycarpum),alkalibulrush(Bolboschoenusrobustus),stingingnettle(Urticadioicassp.holosericea),willowherb(Epilobiumciliatum),celery‐leavedbuttercup(Ranunculusscleratus),small‐floweredsaltcedar(Tamarixparviflora),andperennialpeppergrass(Lepidiumlatifolium).Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthisplantcommunityintheprogramarea.
NoperennialfreshwatermarshoccursintheGoldenHillsprojectarea.
Perennialfreshwatermarshcomprisesapproximately0.5%(4.99acres)ofthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Common Wildlife Associations
Alkaliandseasonalwetlandsprovideimportanthabitatforavarietyofaquaticinvertebratesandamphibians,whichprovidefoodsourcesforvariousbirdspecies.Perennialfreshwatermarshisanimportanthabitatforawidevarietyofwildlifespecies.Wildlifespeciesthatoccurinorusefreshwatermarshforbreedingorcoverincludewesternpondturtle(Actinemysmarmorata),severalgartersnakespecies,greatblueheron(Ardeaherodias),greategret(Ardeaalba),mallard(Anasplatyrhynchos),killdeer(Charadriusvociferus),greateryellowlegs(Tringamelanoleuca),muledeer,andcoyote.Seasonalwetlandsarecommonlyusedbyavarietyofwildlifeduringthewetseason,includingSierrantreefrog,Californiatoad(Bufoboreas),black‐neckedstilt(Himantopusmexicanus),Americanavocet(Recurvirostraamericana),red‐wingedblackbird(Agelaiusphoeniceu),white‐tailedkite,andnorthernharrier.Numerousspeciesofbatsforageoverfreshwaterwetland,includingMexicanfree‐tailedbat(Tadaridabrasiliensismexicanus).
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesassociatedwithalkaliand/orseasonalwetlandsincludelonghornfairyshrimp,vernalpoolshrimp,vernalpooltadpoleshrimp,curved‐foothygrotusdivingbeetle(Hygrotuscurvipes),Californiatigersalamander,Californiared‐leggedfrog,andhoarybat.Longhornfairyshrimp,vernalpoolfairyshrimp,andvernalpooltadpoleshrimparedependentonephemeralwetlandssuchasvernalpoolsandalkaliwetlands.CaliforniatigersalamandersuseseasonalwetlandsthatholdwateruntilAprilorlaterandperennialfreshwatermarshforbreedingandlarvaldevelopment.Californiared‐leggedfrogsuseseasonalwetlandsandfreshwatermarshforrefugiaandbreeding.Perennialfreshwatermarshispotentialhabitatforwesternpondturtle.Hoarybatsforagenearoroverwetlands.
Aquatic
Theaquaticlandcovertypeconsistsofopenwaterhabitatssuchasreservoirs,rivers,streams,canals,andponds(includingquarryandstockpondsthatdonottypicallysupportemergentvegetation).Aquatichabitatintheprogramareacomprisescanal/aqueducts,ponds,reservoirs,andstreams.
Aquatic Plant Communities
Canal/Aqueduct
Canal/aqueductencompassesapproximately158.21acresoftheprogramarea.PortionsoftheCaliforniaAqueductandtheDeltaMendotaCanal,aswellasotherirrigationcanals,arepresentin
![Page 18: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐18
October 2014ICF 00323.08
theprogramarea.Becausethesefeaturesareintendedtomovewaterbetweenareas,theyareoftenmanagedforminimalvegetationtoenhancetheflowofwaterthroughthechannels.Canalsandaqueductstypicallyconveylargeamountsofwaterandcontaindeepwaterwithswiftflowyear‐round.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthiscommunityintheprogramarea.
Canal/aqueductisnotpresentintheGoldenHillsorPattersonPassprojectareas.
Ponds
Pondsoccupyapproximately53.74acresoftheprogramareaandweredefinedasperennialorseasonalwaterbodieslessthan20acresinsize.Pondsarescatteredthroughouttheprogramarea.Pondsmayhavevaryingamountsofemergent,submerged,and/orfloatingvegetation,dependingonthelengthofinundationandleveloflivestockgrazing.
Themajorityofthepondsintheprogramareaaresmallstockpondswithlittleornovegetationthatprovidewaterforlivestock.Plantsoftenassociatedwithpondsincludefloatingplantssuchasduckweed(Lemnaspp.)orrootedplantssuchascattails,bulrushes,sedges,rushes,watercress,andwaterprimrose.
Stockpondsareoftensurroundedbypasturewithgrazinglivestock.Immediatelyadjacenttothestockpond,soilmaybeexposedbecauseofthecontinuedpresenceoflivestock.Stockpondsinungrazedareasorthathavebeenprotectedfromgrazingmaybesurroundedbywetlandvegetationincludingwillows,cattails,reeds,bulrushes,sedges,andtules(Scirpuscalifornicus).Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthiscommunityintheprogramarea.
Pondsconstituteapproximately0.06%(2.89acres)oftheGoldenHillsprojectareaand0.1%(0.84acre)ofthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Reservoirs
Thereservoirlandcovertypeencompassesapproximately176.58acresoftheprogramarea.Reservoirsweredefinedasbeinglargerthan20acres.Reservoirsareopenwaterbodiesthatarehighlymanagedforwaterstorage,watersupply,floodprotection,orrecreationaluses.BethanyReservoiristheonlyreservoirintheprogramarea.ThereservoirservesasaforebayfortheSouthBayPumpingPlantandaconveyancefacilityinthisreachoftheCaliforniaAqueduct.
Plantsoftenassociatedwithreservoirsincludethoseplantscommontodeepwatersystems.Algaearethepredominantplantlifefoundintheopenwatersofreservoirs.Dependingonreservoirtemperature,waterlevel,andotherenvironmentalconditions,algalbloomsmayoccur,resultinginthickalgalmatsonthesurfaceofthereservoir.Ifthereservoiredgesareshallow,plantspeciessimilartothosefoundinpondsmaybepresent.Ifthereservoirhassteeperedges,waterdepthandfluctuationsinreservoirheightmaypreventtheestablishmentofvegetation.Uplandandripariantreesthatwerenotremovedduringconstructionofthereservoirorthatwereplantedafterwardmaybepresentalongtheperimeterofthereservoir.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthiscommunitytypeintheprogramarea.
DrainagesTherearenumerousperennial,intermittent,andephemeraldrainagesintheprogramarea.Becausethesearelinearfeatures,theareaofdrainageintheprogramareawasnotcalculated.MajordrainageswithintheprogramareaincludeBrushyCreek,AltamontCreek,MountainHouseCreek,CorralHollowCreek,andPattersonRun.Largerdrainagesoftenhaveriparianvegetationalongthem(seethediscussionoftheriparianlandcovertypeabove).Theriparianplant
![Page 19: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐19
October 2014ICF 00323.08
compositionandwidthoftheripariancorridorvarydependingonchannelslope,magnitudeandfrequencyofchannelandoverbankflows,andthefrequency/durationoffloodingflowsthatinundatethebroaderfloodplain.Willowsmaybecomeestablishedin‐channelinareasofsedimentdeposition,unlesssuppressedbyintensivegrazing.
Intermittent,ephemeral,andpotentiallyperennialdrainagesarepresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TheacreageofdrainageswasnotcalculatedfortheprogramareaortheGoldenHillsprojectareabecausenodelineationofwaterswasconductedfortheseareas.
AwetlanddelineationwaspreparedforthePattersonPassproject,and0.85acreofdrainageswasmappedinthePattersonPassprojectareaaspartofthewetlanddelineation.
Common Wildlife Associations
Openwatersupportsavarietyofducksincludingmallard,green‐wingedteal,cinnamonteal(Anascyanoptera),gadwall(A.strepera),Americanwigeon(A.americana),andAmericancoot.Manyspeciesofcommonandspecial‐statusbats,includingyumamyotisandsilver‐hairedbat(Lasionycterisnoctivagans),forageonemergentaquaticinvertebratesandobtainfreshwaterfromopenwaterhabitats.
Whilecanalsandaqueductscanserveasloafinghabitatforsomewaterfowlspecies,theygenerallydonothavemuchhabitatvalue.Becausethesewaterwaysaresowideanddeep,theyalsocreatebarrierstomovementonthelandscapeforterrestrialspecies.However,thesefeaturesmayprovidetheopenexpansesofwaternecessaryforbatspeciesthatdrinkonthewingandlackthemaneuverabilitytoaccesssmallerwatersources,suchaswesternmastiffbat(Eumopsperotis).
Pondsattractmanybirdsthatarenormallyfoundintheadjacentgrasslands;forexample,Californiaquail,mourningdove,andbarnandcliffswallows(HirundorusticaandH.pyrrhonota)allrequiredailywaterandareknowntousepondsaswatersources.Pondsthatcontaineithersubmergedoremergentvegetationareofparticularimportancetonativeamphibiansasbreedinghabitat.Inperennialponds,nonnativebass(Micropterusssp.)andbullfrog(Lithobatescatesbeianus)arecommonandareoftenprevalentwildlifespecies.Raccoonsforagealongtheedgesofpondsforadultandlarvalamphibians,fish,andcrayfish.
Reservoirsprovidefoodforsomeraptors,whichmayalsonestinnearbytrees.Shoreandwadingbirdsincludingkilldeer,black‐neckedstilt,greateryellowlegs,andseveralgullspeciesmaybefoundinandattheedgesofreservoirs.Reservoirsprovidehabitatforsomenativefishsuchashitch,Sacramentoblackfish,Californiaroach,andSacramentosucker,butmorecommonlysupportnonnativefishsuchasbluegill,sunfish,brownbullhead,carp,goldfish,andlargemouthbass.Reservoirscanalsoprovidesuitablerearinghabitatfornonmigratoryrainbowtroutifconditionsarefavorable.
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesthatmaybefoundinoruseponds,streams,themarginsofreservoirs,ortheinletswherestreamsflowintoreservoirsincludeCaliforniatigersalamander,Californiared‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle,andtricoloredblackbird.Tricoloredblackbirdsrelyonvegetationassociatedwithponds(cattailsandbulrush)fornesting.Westernredbat,hoarybat,Townsend’sbig‐earedbat,andsilver‐hairedbatcouldforageaboveordrinkfromcanalsoraqueducts.
![Page 20: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐20
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Cropland
Cropland Plant Communities
Thecroplandlandcovertypeencompassesallareaswherethenativevegetationhasbeenclearedforirrigatedagriculturaluseordrylandfarming.Thiscommunitydoesnotincluderangeland,whichisoftencharacterizedasanagriculturallanduse(mostrangelandintheprogramareaisclassifiedasannualgrassland).Approximately4.55acresofcroplandispresentinthenortheastcorneroftheprogramarea.Nospecial‐statusplantsoccurinthislandcovertypeintheprogramarea.
Common Wildlife Associations
Somenativewildlife,suchassmallmammals,certainraptors,andmigratorywaterfowl,utilizecroplandseasonallyoryear‐round.Year‐roundactivitytendstobeconcentratedalongthemarginsofactivefarmlandwherevegetationislessdisturbedorwheretreesandshrubstendtooccur(someareplanteddeliberatelyaswindbreaks).Openfieldsthatareirrigatedforforagecropsarealsousedbywildlife.Cultivatedagricultureisbisectedbystreams,ditches,andchannels.Someamphibiansandreptilesutilizetheselinearaquaticfeaturesandtheadjacentuplandhabitat.
Special‐statuswildlifespeciesexpectedtobefoundinoralongtheedgesofcroplandareburrowingowl,white‐tailedkite,loggerheadshrike,Swainson’shawk,andgoldeneagle.SanJoaquinkitfoxesandAmericanbadgersmaymovethroughorforagealongtheedgesofcroplandsifitoccursnearsuitablegrasslandareas.CaliforniatigersalamandersandCaliforniared‐leggedfrogsmaymovethroughcroplandstoreachsuitablebreedingandaestivationhabitat.
Developed and Disturbed
Approximately1,502.58acresofthedevelopedanddisturbedlandcovertypearepresentintheprogramarea.Developedlandcomprisesalltypesofdevelopmentforresidential,commercial,industrial,transportation,landfill,landscaping,andrecreationaluses(e.g.,siteswithstructures,pavedsurfaces,horticulturalplantings,golfcourses,andirrigatedlawns).Developedanddisturbedlandsintheprogramareaincluderuderalland,urban/suburbandevelopment,ruralresidential,landfill,golfcourses/urbanparks,andwindturbinesandassociatedinfrastructure.
Developed and Disturbed Plant Communities
Ruderalareasareperiodicallydisturbedandarecharacterizedbysparsenonnative,typicallyweedyvegetation.Mostruderalareasarevacantparcelssurroundedbydevelopedareas.Wherevegetationispresent,ruderallandcoverisdominatedbyamixtureofnonnativeannualgrassesandweedyspecies,suchasblackmustard(Brassicanigra),thistles(Cirsiumspp.),andwildradish(Raphanussativa),thattendtocolonizequicklyafterdisturbance.
Vegetationfoundinotherdevelopedlandsisusuallyintheformoflawns,landscaping,andplantedstreettrees(e.g.,elm,ash,liquidambar,pine,palm).Theruralresidentiallandsmayalsoincludesmallareasofirrigatedpasture.
Landfillsarehighlydisturbedareaswhileinuse.Afteralandfillisclosedandcapped,itmaybereturnedtonaturalcommunitytypesthroughplantingandmanagement.
![Page 21: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐21
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Common Wildlife Associations
Developedanddisturbedareasprovidelimitedhabitatforwildlifebutareoftenknowntosupportcommonurban‐dwellingspeciessuchasnorthernmockingbird(Mimuspolyglottos),rockpigeon(Columbalivia),mourningdove,housesparrow(Passerdomesticus),housefinch(Carpodacusmexicanus),westernscrub‐jay,Botta’spocketgopher(Thomomysbottae),Californiagroundsquirrel,housemouse(Musmusculus),blackrat(Rattusrattus),andcoyote.Semi‐developedareascontaininggrass,trees,orwatersources(smallpondsandditches)maysupportadditionalwildlifespecies.Mexicanfree‐tailedbatisknowntoformlargecoloniesinurbanbuildingsandbridges,andothercommonspecies,suchasbigbrownbat,arefoundinresidentialatticsandornamentaltreesincityparks.Thesespeciesaretypicallygeneralizedopportunisticforagersthatarehighlytolerantofhumanactivity.
Whiledevelopedlandscapesdonotprovidehigh‐qualityhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies,somedevelopedareasmaybeusedforforagingandmovement.SanJoaquinkitfoxes,goldeneagles,andloggerheadshrikesmaymovethroughand/orforageinruderalareas,golfcourses/urbanparks,andornamentalwoodlands.Burrowingowlsmayuseruderalareas,urban/suburban,andgolfcoursesforforagingandbreeding.CaliforniatigersalamandersandCaliforniared‐leggedfrogsmaymigratethroughsomedevelopedareasbetweenhabitatpatches.CaliforniatigersalamandersandCaliforniared‐leggedfrogsmayalsousegolfcoursesifpondsarepresentonornearthegolfcourseandsuitableuplandhabitatisnearby.Somespecial‐statusbatsmayuseartificialstructuresassociatedwithurbanlandscapes—suchasbuildings,bridges,andtunnels—formaternityroosts.Pallidbatsareknowntoroostincrevicesinbridgesorbuildings,andTownsend’sbig‐earedbatshavebeenfoundinopenspacesinabandonedbuildings,tunnelsandotherartificialstructures.
Special‐Status Species
Special‐statusspeciesareplantsandanimalsthatarelegallyprotectedunderESA,CESA,orotherregulations;andspeciesthatareconsideredsufficientlyrarebythescientificcommunitytoqualifyforsuchlisting.Special‐statusspeciesaredefinedasfollows.
SpeciesthatarelistedorproposedforlistingasthreatenedorendangeredunderESA(50CFR17.11[listedanimals];50CFR17.12[listedplants];andvariousnoticesintheFederalRegister.
SpeciesthatarecandidatesforpossiblefuturelistingasthreatenedorendangeredunderESA(77FR69993,November21,2012).
SpeciesthatarelistedorproposedforlistingbytheStateofCaliforniaasthreatenedorendangeredunderCESA(14CCR670.5).
SpeciesthatmeetthedefinitionsofrareorendangeredunderCEQA(StateCEQAGuidelinesSection15380).
PlantslistedasrareundertheCNPPA(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlifeCommission1900etseq.).
PlantswithaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1A,1B,2A,and2B(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013).
AnimalslistedasCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcernonCDFW’sSpecialAnimalsList(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2011).
![Page 22: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐22
October 2014ICF 00323.08
AnimalsthatarefullyprotectedinCalifornia(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlifeCommission3511[birds],4700[mammals],5050[amphibiansandreptiles],and5515[fish]).
BatsidentifiedasmediumorhighpriorityontheWesternBatWorkingGroupregionalpriorityspeciesmatrix(WesternBatWorkingGroup2007).
APWRAfocalspecies.
SpeciesoflocalconservationconcernintheAPWRA.
Special‐Status Plants
Thirty‐sixspecialstatusplantspeciesoccurinorwithin5milesoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b)(Table3.4‐4).Twenty‐fourofthespeciesarenotknowntooccurintheprogramarea(i.e.,theyoccurwithinthe5‐mileradiusbutnotwithintheprogramareaboundary)andarenotdiscussedfurther.Thefollowingdiscussionfocusesonthe12speciesthatoccurintheprogramarea.
Large‐Flowered Fiddleneck
Large‐floweredfiddleneckisstate‐andfederallylistedasendangered,withaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.Historically,itwasknownfromtheMountDiablofoothillsinContraCosta,Alameda,andSanJoaquinCounties,butitiscurrentlyknownonlyfromtwonaturaloccurrencesnearCorralHollowRoadinSanJoaquinCounty(KelleyandGanders2012:454;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Large‐floweredfiddleneckgrowsingrasslands,generallyonnorth‐facingslopes.Asinglepopulationwasknownfromtheprogramarea,locatedonLawrenceLivermoreLaboratory’sSite300testarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Thisoccurrenceappearstohavebeenextirpatedbyerosionandhasnotbeenobservedsince1997(Carlsenetal.2012).Californiaannualgrasslandsintheprogramareaarepotentialhabitatforthisspecies.
Brittlescale
BrittlescalehasnofederalorstatelistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.2.ItispresentalongthewesternsideoftheGreatValleyfromGlenntoMercedCountiesandinthesmallvalleysoftheinnerCoastRanges,includingtheLivermoreValley(Zacharias2012:633–634;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Atthelandscapelevel,brittlescaleoccursinthebroadfloodbasinsofthevalleyfloorandonalluvialfansassociatedwiththemajordrainagesdrainingfromtheinnerCoastRangefoothills.Itgrowsiniodinebushscrubandalkaligrasslandsonthemarginsofvernalpools,swales,slickspots,andscalds.Itisgenerallyfoundatlowelevationsbuthasbeencollectedupto1,055feetabovesealevel.BrittlescalehasbeenreportedintheprogramareafromscaldsinthevicinityofAltamontPassRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Potentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinalkaliwetlandsintheprogramarea;alkaliwetlandsoccurintheGoldenHillsprojectareabutnotinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
San Joaquin Spearscale
SanJoaquinspearscalehasnofederalorstatelistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.2.ItoccursalongthewesternsideoftheGreatValleyfromGlenntoFresnoCountiesandinthesmallvalleysoftheinnerCoastRanges,includingtheLivermoreValley(Zacharias2012:634;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).ItoccursinthebroadfloodbasinsofthevalleyfloorandonalluvialfansassociatedwiththemajordrainagesdrainingfromtheinnerCoastRanges
![Page 23: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Table 3.4‐4. Special‐Status Plant Species Known or with Potential to Occur in the Altamont Pass Wind Repowering Program Area Page 1 of 4
CommonNameScientificName
StatusaFederal/State/CRPR Distribution Habitat OccurrenceinProgramArea
Sharsmith’sonionAlliumsharsmithii
–/–/1B.3 MountHamiltonRange Rockyserpentineslopes,inchaparralorcypresswoodland;bloomsMarch–May
NearestoccurrencesonCedarMountain;programareaoutsideknownrangeofspecies
Large‐floweredfiddleneckAmsinckiagrandiflora
E/E/1B.1 HistoricallyknownfromMountDiablofoothillsinContraCosta,Alameda,andSanJoaquincounties;currentlyknownfromtwonaturaloccurrences
Valleygrasslandslopesbelow1,200feet;bloomsApril–May
Occursinprogramarea
Alkalimilk‐vetchAstragalustenervar.tener
–/–/1B.2 SouthernSacramentoValley,northernSanJoaquinValley,eastSanFranciscoBayArea
Grassyflatsandvernalpoolmargins,onalkalisoils;bloomsMarch–June
NearestoccurrencesinLivermoreValley,ByronHotSprings(bothoccurrencesextirpated)
HeartscaleAtriplexcordulata
–/–/1B.2 CentralValleyfromColusaCountytoKernCounty
Alkaligrassland,alkalimeadow,alkaliscrub;bloomsMay–October
Occurrencerecordsnearprogramareabasedonmisidentifications
BrittlescaleAtriplexdepressa
–/–/1B.2 WesternandeasternCentralValleyandadjacentfoothillsonwestsideofCentralValley
Alkaligrassland,alkalimeadow,andalkaliscrub
Occursinprogramarea
SanJoaquinsaltbushAtriplexjoaquiniana
–/–/1B.2 EasternSanFranciscoBayArea,westedgeofCentralValleyfromGlennCountytoFresnoCounty
Alkalimeadow,alkaligrassland,saltbushscrub;bloomsApril–September
Occursinprogramarea
LessersaltscaleAtriplexminuscula
–/–/1B.1 SanJoaquinValleyfromMercedCountytoKernCounty;ButteCounty
Alkalisinkandsandyalkalinesoilsingrasslands,between65–325feet;bloomsMay–October
Occursinprogramarea
BigscalebalsamrootBalsamorhizamacrolepis
–/–/1B.2 ScatteredoccurrencesintheCoastRangesandSierraNevadafoothills
Fieldsandrockyhillsides,below2,000feet;grassland,foothillwoodland;bloomsMarch–June
NearestoccurrenceinLivermore(occurrenceextirpated)
BigtarplantBlepharizoniaplumosa
–/–/1B.1 InteriorCoastRangefoothillsfromContraCostaCountytoStanislausCounty
Annualgrassland,ondryhillsandplains,between50–1,500feet;bloomsJuly–October
Occursinprogramarea
Round‐leavedfilareeCaliforniamacrophylla
–/–/1B.1 ScatteredoccurrencesintheGreatValley,southernNorthCoastRanges,SanFranciscoBayArea,SouthCoastRanges,ChannelIslands,TransverseRanges,andPeninsularRanges
Grasslands,onfriableclaysoils;blooms;March–May
Occursinprogramarea
![Page 24: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Table 3.4‐4. Continued Page 2 of 4
CommonNameScientificName
StatusaFederal/State/CRPR Distribution Habitat OccurrenceinProgramArea
MountDiablofairylanternCalochortuspulchellus
–/–/1B.2 EndemictoContraCostaCounty Cismontanewoodland;chaparral;bloomsApril–June
NearestoccurrenceinLosVaqueroswatershed
ChaparralharebellCampanulaexigua
–/–/1B.2 SanFranciscoBayregion;northerninnersouthCoastRanges;Alameda,ContraCosta,SanBenito,SantaClara,andStanislausCounties
Rockyareasinchaparral,usuallyonserpentinite;bloomsMay–June
NearestoccurrencesonCedarMountain;programareaoutsideknownrangeofspecies
Lemmon'sjewelflowerCaulanthuslemmonii
–/–/1B.2 SoutheastSanFranciscoBayArea,souththroughtheSouthCoastRangesandadjacentSanJoaquinValley
Dryexposedslopesingrasslandsandpinyon‐juniperwoodland,between260–4,000feet;bloomsMarch–May
Occursinprogramarea
Congdon'sspikeweedCentromadiaparryisubsp.Congdonii
–/–/1B.2 EastSanFranciscoBayArea,SalinasValley,LosOsosValley
Annualgrassland,onlowerslopes,flats,andswales,sometimesonalkalineorsalinesoils,below560feet;bloomsJune–November
Occurrencerecordsinprogramareabasedonmisidentifications
Hispidbird’s‐beakChloropyronmollesubsp.Hispidum
–/–/1B.1 ScatteredlocationsinSanJoaquinValleyfromSolanoCountytoKernCounty
Meadow,grassland,playa;onalkalinesoils,below500feet;bloomsJune–September
NearestoccurrenceinLivermore
Palmatebird’s‐beakChloropyronpalmatum
E/E/1B.1 LivermoreValleyandscatteredlocationsintheCentralValleyfromColusatoFresnoCounty
Alkalinegrasslands,chenopodscrub;bloomsMay–October
NearestoccurrenceinLivermore
MountHamiltonthistleCirsiumfontinalevar.campylon
–/–/1B.2 EastSanFranciscoBayArea Serpentineseepsandstreams;bloomsApril–October
NearestoccurrencesonCedarMountain;programareaoutsideknownrangeofspecies
LivermoretarplantDeinandrabacigalupii
–/–/1B.2 EndemictoAlamedaCounty(LivermoreValley)
Alkaligrassland;bloomsJune–October
NearestoccurrenceinLivermore
HospitalCanyonlarkspurDelphiniumcalifornicumvar.interius
–/–/1B.2 EasternSanFranciscoBayArea,northernSouthCoastRange;CarmelValley
Moistravinesandslopesinwoodlands;bloomsMarch–May
Nearestoccurrencessouthofprogramarea
RecurvedlarkspurDelphiniumrecurvatum
–/–/1B.2 SanJoaquinValleyandinteriorvalleysoftheSouthCoastRanges,fromContraCostaCountytoKernCounty
Subalkalinesoilsinannualgrassland,saltbushscrub;bloomsMarch–May
Occursinprogramarea
![Page 25: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Table 3.4‐4. Continued Page 3 of 4
CommonNameScientificName
StatusaFederal/State/CRPR Distribution Habitat OccurrenceinProgramArea
Diamond‐petaledCaliforniapoppyEschscholziarhombipetala
–/–/1B.1 InteriorfoothillsofSouthCoastRangesfromContraCostaCountytoStanislausCounty;CarrizoPlaininSanLuisObispoCounty
Grassland,chenopodscrub;onclaysoils,wheregrasscoverissparseenoughtoallowgrowthoflowannuals;bloomsMarch–May
Occursinprogramarea
TalusfritillaryFritillariafalcata
–/–/1B.2 SanFranciscoBayArea,InteriorSouthCoastRanges
Chaparral,oakwoodland,coniferousforest,onserpentinetalus;bloomsMarch–May
NearestoccurrencesonCedarMountain;programareaoutsideknownrangeofspecies
DiablohelianthellaHelianthellacastanea
–/–/1B.2 SanFranciscoBayArea Atchaparral/oakwoodlandecotone,ofteninpartialshade,onrockysoils,between80–3,800feet;bloomsApril–June
NearestoccurrencesonCedarMountain
Brewer’sdwarfflaxHesperolinonbreweri
–/–/1B.2 KnownonlyfromContraCosta,Napa,andSolanocounties
Serpentineslopesinchaparralandgrasslands;bloomsMay–July
NearestoccurrenceinLosVaqueroswatershed
TehamaCountywesternflaxHesperolinontehamense
–/–/1B.3 NorthernandcentralinteriorNorthCoastRanges:Tehama,GlennCounties
Chaparral,foothillwoodland,onserpentine;100–1,000m;bloomsMay–July
NearestoccurrencesonCedarMountain;nohabitatinprogramarea
CaliforniahibiscusHibiscuslasiocarpus
–/–/1B.2 ScatteredsmalllocationsincentralCalifornia,fromButtetoSanJoaquinCounty
Freshwatermarshalongriversandsloughs;bloomsAugust–September
NearestoccurrencesnearCliftonCourtForebay
LomaPrietahoitaHoitastrobilina
–/–/1B.1 SanFranciscoBayArea Oakwoodland,riparianwoodland,chaparral,onserpentinite;bloomsMay–October
NearestoccurrenceonCedarMountain
MountHamiltoncoreopsisLeptosynehamiltonii
–/–/1B.2 DiabloRange Steepshaletalusslopes;bloomsMarch–May
NearestoccurrenceonCedarMountain
Mason’slilaeopsisLilaeopsismasonii
–/R/1B.1 Sacramento/SanJoaquinRiverdelta Freshwaterorbrackishmarsh,intidalzone;bloomsApril–October
NearestoccurrencesnearCliftonCourtForebay
DeltamudwortLimosellaaustralis
–/–/2.1 ContraCosta,Sacramento,SanJoaquin,andSolanoCounties
Marshesandswamps;bloomsMay–August
NearestoccurrencesnearCliftonCourtForebay
ShowymadiaMadiaradiata
–/–/1B.1 ScatteredpopulationsintheinteriorfoothillsoftheSouthCoastRanges
Oakwoodland,grassland;slopesbelow3,000feet;bloomsMarch–May
NearestoccurrencesnearCorralHollow
![Page 26: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Table 3.4‐4. Continued Page 4 of 4
CommonNameScientificName
StatusaFederal/State/CRPR Distribution Habitat OccurrenceinProgramArea
ShiningnavarretiaNavarretianigelliformissubsp.radians
–/–/1B.2 InteriorfoothillsofSouthCoastRangesfromMercedCountytoSanLuisObispoCounty
Mesicareaswithheavyclaysoils,inswalesandclayflats;inoakwoodland,grassland;between650–3,300feet;bloomsMay–June
Occursinprogramarea
HairlesspopcornflowerPlagiobothrysglaber
–/–/1A CoastalvalleysfromMarinCountytoSanBenitoCounty
Alkalinemeadows;bloomsApril–May
NearestoccurrenceinLivermore(extirpated)
RaylessragwortSenecioaphanactis
–/–/2.2 ScatteredlocationsinCentralWesternCaliforniaandSouthwesternCalifornia,fromAlamedaCountytoSanDiegoCounty
Oakwoodland,coastalscrub;opensandyorrockyareas;bloomsJanuary–April
Occursinprogramarea
SalinecloverTrifoliumdepauperatumvar.hydrophilum
–/–/1B.2 SacramentoValley,centralwesternCalifornia
Saltmarsh,mesicalkalineareasingrasslands,vernalpools,below990feet(300m);bloomsApril–June
NearestoccurrenceinLivermore
Caper‐fruitedtropidocarpumTropidocarpumcapparideum
–/–/1B.1 HistoricallyknownfromthenorthwestSanJoaquinValleyandadjacentCoastRangefoothills
Grasslandsinalkalinehillsbelow500feet;bloomsMarch–April
Occursinprogramarea
a Statusexplanations:
Federal– = nostatus.E = listedas“endangered”underthefederalEndangeredSpeciesAct.
State– = nostatus.E = listedas“endangered”undertheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct.R = listedas“rare”undertheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct.
CaliforniaRarePlantRank1A = plantspresumedextinctinCalifornia.1B = rare,threatened,orendangeredinCaliforniaandelsewhere.2 = rare,threatened,orendangeredinCalifornia,butmorecommonelsewhere.0.1 = seriouslyendangeredinCalifornia.0.2 = fairlyendangeredinCalifornia.0.3 = notveryendangeredinCalifornia.
![Page 27: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐23
October 2014ICF 00323.08
foothills.Itgrowsiniodinebushscrub,alkalimeadow,andalkaligrasslands.Itisgenerallyfoundatlowelevations,buthasbeencollectedupto820feetabovesealevel.Intheprogramarea,SanJoaquinspearscalehasbeenrecordedinalkaliwetlandsalongAltamontPassRoad,BrunsRoad,andMountainHouseRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Potentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinalkaliwetlandsintheprogramarea;alkaliwetlandsoccurintheGoldenHillsprojectareabutnotinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Lesser Saltscale
LessersaltscalehasnofederalorstatelistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.ItisknownprimarilyfromtheSanJoaquinValleyandtheLivermoreValley,althoughotherdisjunctoccurrenceshavebeenreportedinButteandwesternAlamedaCounties(Zacharias2012:634–636;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Lessersaltscaleoccursinvalleysinkscrubandalkaligrasslandhabitatsonsandy,alkalisoils,oftenonthemarginsofslickspotsoralkalinerainpools.Intheprogramarea,lessersaltscalehasbeenreportedfromalkaliwetlandsalongDyerRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Potentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinalkaliwetlandsintheprogramarea;alkaliwetlandsoccurintheGoldenHillsprojectareabutnotinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Big Tarplant
BigtarplanthasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.ItisknownfromtheeasternSanFranciscoBayAreaandthenorthwesternSanJoaquinValley(Baldwin2012).Bigtarplantoccursinannualgrasslandonclaytoclay‐loamsoils,usuallyonslopesandofteninburnedareas,below1,500feet.Intheprogramarea,bigtarplantoccursinthevicinityofCorralHollowRoadandtheMidwaySubstation(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).PotentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinCaliforniaannualgrasslandintheprogramarea,includingintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Round‐Leaved Filaree
Round‐leavedfilareehasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.ItisknownfromscatteredoccurrencesintheCentralValley,southernNorthCoastRanges,SanFranciscoBayArea,SouthCoastRanges,ChannelIslands,TransverseRanges,andPeninsularRanges(Alarcónetal.2012;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Itoccursingrasslandsandopen,grassyareasinoakwoodland.Intheprogramarea,round‐leavedfilareeisknownfromsixoccurrencesalongCorralHollowRoad,atLawrenceLivermoreLaboratory’sSite300testarea,alongAltamontPassRoad,atMountainHouse,andinthehillseastofAltamontPassRoadandDyerRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).PotentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinCaliforniaannualgrasslandintheprogramarea,includingtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Lemmon’s Jewelflower
Lemmon’sjewelflowerhasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.ItrangesfromthesoutheasternSanFranciscoBayareasouthintotheSouthCoastRangesandadjacentSanJoaquinValley,fromAlamedatoVenturaCounties(Al‐Shehbaz2012:538;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Lemmon’sjewelflowergrowsondryexposedslopesingrasslandsandpinyon‐juniperwoodlands,generallybetween260and4,000feetabovesealevel.Intheprogramarea,oneoccurrenceisknownfromthevicinityofCorralHollowRoad(California
![Page 28: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐24
October 2014ICF 00323.08
DepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).PotentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinCaliforniaannualgrasslandintheprogramarea,includingintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Recurved Larkspur
RecurvedlarkspurhasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.2.RecurvedlarkspurwasformerlywidespreadintheCentralValleyfromColusatoKernCounties,althoughithasbeenextirpatedfromtheSacramentoValley(KoontzandWarnock2012:1411;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Itoccursinchenopodscrubandgrasslandsonpoorlydrained,fine,alkalinesoils(KoontzandWarnock2012:1411).Intheprogramarea,oneoccurrenceofrecurvedlarkspurisknownfromalkaligrasslandsalongBrunsRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Plantcommunitiesintheprogramareathatmayprovidehabitatforrecurvedlarkspurarealkalimeadowandalkaliwetlands.AlkaliwetlandsintheGoldenHillsprojectareamayprovidehabitatforrecurvedlarkspur;therearenoalkaliwetlandsinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Diamond‐Petaled California Poppy
Diamond‐petaledCaliforniapoppyhasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.ThisspecieswasknownhistoricallyfromtheinteriorfoothillsoftheNorthandSouthCoastRangesbutiscurrentlyknownfromonlythreelocationsinAlamedaandSanLuisObispoCounties(HannanandClark2012:984;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Diamond‐petaledCaliforniapoppygrowsinclaysoilswithinCaliforniaannualgrassland.Intheprogramarea,diamond‐petaledCaliforniapoppyisknownfromtwolocationsatLawrenceLivermoreLaboratory’sSite300testarea,northofCorralHollowRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).PotentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinCaliforniaannualgrasslandintheprogramarea,includingintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Shining Navarretia
ShiningnavarretiahasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.2.ThisspeciesrangesthroughouttheSouthCoastRanges,althoughadditionaloccurrencesarereportedfromthecentralSanJoaquinValley(Johnson2012:1066;CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).Shiningnavarretiagrowsonclaysoilsingrasslandsandoakwoodland,sometimesinassociationwithdryingdepressions.Intheprogramarea,shiningnavarretiaisknownfromasingleoccurrenceatLawrenceLivermoreLaboratory’sSite300testarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).PotentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinCaliforniaannualgrasslandintheprogramarea,includingtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas,andinblueoakwoodland,whichdoesnotoccurintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Rayless Ragwort
RaylessragworthasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof2.2.ItisknownfromscatteredlocationsintheCaliforniaCoastRangessouthofSanFranciscoBay,theTransverseRanges,southwestCalifornia(includingSantaCruzIsland),andBajaCalifornia(Preston2000).Itisfoundinareaswithlowvegetationcoveringrasslandandcoastalscrub,onvarioussubstrates:clay,coarsesand,rockoutcrops(includingserpentinite),andsoilswithhighgypsumcontentorhighalkalinity(Preston2000).Intheprogramarea,raylessragwortisknownfromasingleoccurrenceinthevicinityofCorralHollowRoad(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife
![Page 29: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐25
October 2014ICF 00323.08
2013b).Rockoutcropsintheprogramareaarepotentialhabitatforthisspecies.RockoutcropsdonotoccurintheGoldenHillsorPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Caper‐Fruited Tropidocarpum
Caper‐fruitedtropidocarpumhasnostateorfederallistingstatusbuthasaCaliforniaRarePlantRankof1B.1.ItwashistoricallyknownfromthenorthwestSanJoaquinValleyandadjacentDiabloRangefoothills,butalloftheseoccurrencesarebelievedtobeextirpated.IthasrecentlybeenreportedtooccurinFresno,Monterey,andSanLuisObispoCounties.Itgrowsonclaysoilsingrasslands.Intheprogramarea,caper‐fruitedtropidocarpumisknownfromasingleoccurrencenearMountainHouse(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).PotentialhabitatforthisspeciesoccursinCaliforniaannualgrasslandintheprogramarea,includingintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareas.
Special‐Status Wildlife
BasedontheUSFWSspecieslist(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2013b);CNDDB(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c)recordssearchforthequadranglesoverlappingtheprogramarea(Altamont,CedarMountain,ByronHotSprings,CliftonCourtForebay,andMidway);andfatalityrecordsfromAPWRAfatalitymonitoring,36special‐statuswildlifespecieswereidentifiedashavingpotentialtooccurintheprogramarea.Ofthese35species,9weredeterminedtohavelowornopotentialtooccurintheprogramareaandarenotdiscussedfurther(Table3.4‐5);26ofthe35speciesareknowntooccurorhaveamoderatetohighlikelihoodofoccurringwithintheprogramareabecausesuitablehabitatispresent(longhornfairyshrimp,vernalpoolfairyshrimp,vernalpooltadpoleshrimp,valleyelderberrylonghornbeetle[Desmoceruscalifornicusdimorphus],curved‐foothygrotusdivingbeetle,Californiatigersalamander,westernspadefoot[Speahammondii],Californiared‐leggedfrog,foothillyellow‐leggedfrog[Ranaboylii],westernpondturtle,Blainville’s[coast]hornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,SanJoaquincoachwhip[Masticophisflagellumruddocki],white‐tailedkite,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,tricoloredblackbird,littlebrownbat,westernredbat,hoarybat,pallidbat,Americanbadger,andSanJoaquinkitfox).Inadditiontothese26species,threespecies(baldeagle,Townsend’sbig‐earedbat,andsilver‐hairedbat)wereaddedtothistablebasedonsuitablehabitatconditionsandprofessionaljudgment.ItshouldbenotedthattheCNDDBisapresence‐onlydatabasethatdependsonvoluntarysubmissionofspecieslocationdataandisnotacompletedatabaseofspecieslocations.
AllwildlifespeciesconsideredarelistedinTable3.4‐5,whichpresentstheirregulatorystatus,distribution,habitatrequirements,andarationalefortheirpotentialtooccurintheprogramarea.The29special‐statuswildlifespeciesthatareknowntooccurorhaveamoderatetohighpotentialtooccurintheprogramareaarediscussedbrieflybelow.
Inadditiontohabitatconditions,APWRAfatalitydata,andCNDDBdata,informationfromavianusesurveysoftheprogramareacollectedbytheAFMTwasusedtoevaluatethepotentialforspecial‐statusbirdstooccurintheprogramareaandtobepotentiallyadverselyaffectedbyconstructionandoperationofnewwindturbines.Collectionofavianusedatawasinitiatedin2004andinvolvessamplingavianpresenceat70–90observationpointsdistributedthroughouttheAPWRAfor10–30minutesateachobservationpoint.ThemethodsusedtoestimateavianfatalityratesandtomeasureandmonitoravianuseoftheprogramareaaredetailedintheAltamontPassWindResourceAreaBirdFatalityStudy,BirdYears2005–2011(ICFInternational2013).
![Page 30: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐26
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Longhorn Fairy Shrimp
Longhornfairyshrimpisfederallylistedasendangered.TherangeoflonghornfairyshrimpisrestrictedtotheeasternedgeofthecentralCoastRanges.ThespecieshasbeenfoundinthefoothillgrasslandswestofTracy,atKestersonNationalWildlifeRefugeinMercedCounty,andnearSodaLakeinSanLuisObispoCounty(EriksenandBelk1999:91).
Longhornfairyshrimphavebeenfoundinclear‐waterdepressionalpoolsinsandstoneoutcrops,ingrasslandpools,andinpoolsinvalleysaltbushscrub.ThespecieshasbeenobservedfromlateDecembertomid‐Mayinpoolsthatarefilledbywinterandspringrains.Inhabitedpoolsinsandstoneoutcropstendtobeverysmallwithclearwaterandlowlevelsofsolublesubstances.Clay‐andgrass‐bottomedpoolsthatlonghornfairyshrimpinhabitarecleartofairlyturbid.Poolswherelonghornfairyshrimpoccurareprobablyshort‐lived(approximately3weeks).Larvaehatchsoonafterpoolsfillandwatertemperatureisapproximately10ºC.Longhornfairyshrimpneedwatertemperaturesof15–20ºCtoattainmaturity.Maturationisachievedin23daysunderoptimalconditions,but43daysismoretypical(EriksenandBelk1999:91‐92).
Intheprogramarea,seasonalwetlandsandrockoutcropsprovidesuitablehabitatforlonghornfairyshrimp.ThereisoneCNDDBrecordforanoccurrenceoflonghornfairyshrimpinthenortheastportionoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Thereisanadditionalrecordforanoccurrenceoflonghornfairyshrimpwithin0.5milenorthoftheprogramarea.LonghornfairyshrimpisalsoknowntooccurneartheprogramareaatBrushyPeakPreserve(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2007:3).Criticalhabitatforlonghornfairyshrimpislocatedinthenorthwestportionoftheprogramarea(Figure3.4‐4).
Grass‐bottomseasonalpoolsandrockoutcroppoolsthataresuitableforlonghornfairyshrimpmaybepresentwithintheGoldenHillsprojectarea.OneseasonalwetlandinthePattersonPassprojectareaprovidessuitablehabitatforlonghornfairyshrimp.AlthoughrockoutcropsarepresentinthePattersonPassprojectarea,theydonotcontainsuitablepoolhabitatforlonghornfairyshrimp.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesoflonghornfairyshrimpineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).ThereisnodesignatedcriticalhabitatforlonghornfairyshrimpintheGoldenHillsorPattersonPassprojectareas(Figure3.4‐4).
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp
Vernalpoolfairyshrimpisfederallylistedasthreatened.ThespeciesisfoundfromShastaCountyinthenorththroughouttheCentralValleytoTulareCountyandwesttothecentralCoastRanges.DisjunctpopulationsoccurinSanLuisObispo,SantaBarbara,andRiversideCounties(EriksenandBelk1999:92,125).Vernalpoolfairyshrimpinhabitsandstonedepressionpoolsandvernalpoolsingrasslandhabitats.Vernalpoolfairyshrimparemostcommonlyfoundingrassormud‐bottomedswales,earthslumps,orbasalt‐flowdepressionpoolsinunplowedgrasslands(Engetal.1990:257).Thechemicalcompositionofthehabitatandwatertemperaturevariationsresultingfrompoolsfillingatdifferenttimesanddistributionofpoolsalongaltitudinalandlongitudinalgradientsarethemostimportantfactorsindeterminingthedistributionofdifferentspeciesoffairyshrimp(Engetal.1990:273).Vernalpoolfairyshrimpalsooccurinotherwetlandsthatprovidehabitatcharacteristicssimilartothoseofvernalpools;theseotherwetlandsincludealkalinerainpools,rockoutcroppools,andsomedisturbedandconstructedsites(59FR48136–48153,September16,1994;EriksenandBelk1999:93).Occupiedhabitatsrangeinsizefrom6‐square‐footpuddlestopoolsexceeding24acres.Suitablepoolsmuststayinundatedlongenoughforvernalpoolfairyshrimptocompletetheirlifecycle,whichtypicallytakes3–6weeks(EriksenandBelk1999:93).Vernalpoolfairyshrimpis
![Page 31: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Table 3.4‐5. Special‐Status Wildlife Species Known or with Potential to Occur in the Altamont Pass Wind Repowering Program Area Page 1 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
Invertebrates
ConservancyfairyshrimpBranchinectaconservatio
E/–/– DisjunctoccurrencesinSolano,Merced,Tehama,Ventura,Butte,andGlennCounties
Large,deepvernalpoolsinannualgrasslands
Low—suitablehabitatmaybepresentbutnotknowntooccurinAlamedaCounty.
LonghornfairyshrimpBranchinectalongiantenna
E/–/– EasternmarginofcentralCoastRangesfromContraCostaCountytoSanLuisObispoCounty;disjunctpopulationinMaderaCounty
Small,clearpoolsinsandstonerockoutcropsofcleartomoderatelyturbidclay‐orgrass‐bottomedpools
High—suitablehabitatpresentintheprogramarea;knownpopulationatBrushyPeakPreservenearprogramarea;designatedcriticalhabitatforthespeciesoverlapswithasmallportionoftheprogramarea.
VernalpoolfairyshrimpBranchinectalynchi
T/–/– CentralValley,centralandsouthCoastRangesfromTehamaCountytoSantaBarbaraCounty;isolatedpopulationsalsoinRiversideCounty
Commoninvernalpools;alsofoundinsandstonerockoutcroppools
High—alkaliandseasonalwetlandsintheprogramareaprovidepotentialhabitatforthespecies;occurrencesknowninprogramarea.
VernalpooltadpoleshrimpLepiduruspackardi
T/–/– ShastaCountysouthtoMercedCounty Vernalpoolsandephemeralstockponds
High—programareaiswithinthespeciesknownrangeandstockpondsandalkaliwetlandsintheprogramareaprovidepotentialhabitatforthespecies.Notknowntooccurinprogramarea.
ValleyelderberrylonghornbeetleDesmoceruscalifornicusdimorphus
T/–/– Streamsidehabitatsbelow3,000feetabovesealevelthroughouttheCentralValley.
Riparianandoaksavannahabitatswithelderberryshrubsandstreamsidehabitatsbelow3,000feetabovesealevel.Elderberryshrubisthehostplant.
Moderate—projectareasupportselderberryshrubs,butnoCNDDBoccurrencesinprogramarea.
Curved‐foothygrotusdivingbeetleHygrotuscurvipes
–/–/– KelloggCreekwatershedandonesitenearOakley,ContraCostaCountyandAlamedaCounty
Aquatic;smallseasonalpoolsandwetlandsandsmallpoolsleftindrycreekbeds,associatedwithalkaline‐tolerantvegetation
High—suitablehabitatinprogramarea;severalCNDDBoccurrencesinnorthwesternportionofprogramarea.
![Page 32: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 2 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
Fish
GreensturgeonAcipensermedirostris
T/SSC/– InmarinewatersofthePacificOceanfromtheBeringSeatoEnsenada,Mexico.InriversfromBritishColumbiasouthtotheSacramentoRiver,primarilyintheKlamath/TrinityandSacramentoRivers.
Primarilymarine,usinglargeanadromousfreshwaterriversandassociatedestuariesforspawningandrearing.
None—outsideofspeciesknownrangeandnosuitablehabitatintheprogramarea.
DeltasmeltHypomesustranspacificus
T/T/– PrimarilyintheSacramento–SanJoaquinEstuary,buthasbeenfoundasfarupstreamasthemouthoftheAmericanRiverontheSacramentoRiverandMossdaleontheSanJoaquinRiver;rangeextendsdownstreamtoSanPabloBay.
OccursinestuaryhabitatintheDeltawherefreshandbrackishwatermixinthesalinityrangeof2–7partsperthousand(Moyle2002).
None—outsideofspeciesknownrange.
CentralCaliforniaCoaststeelheadOncorrhynchusmykiss
T/–/– CoastaldrainagesalongthecentralCaliforniacoast.
Ananadromousfishthatspawnsandspendsaportionofitslifeininlandstreams,typicallymaturingintheopenocean
None—outsideofspeciesknownrangeandnosuitablehabitatintheprogramarea.
CentralValleysteelheadOncorrhynchusmykiss
T/–/– SacramentoandSanJoaquinRiverandtheirtributaries.
Ananadromousfishthatspawnsandspendsaportionofitslifeininlandstreams,typicallymaturingintheopenocean
None—noperennialstreamssuitableforanadromousfisharepresentintheprogramarea.
CentralValleyspring‐runChinooksalmonOncorhynchustshawytscha
T/T/– UpperSacramentoRiverandtributariesofFeatherandYubaRivers
Occursinwell‐oxygenated,cool,riverinehabitatwithwatertemperaturesfrom8.0to12.5°C.Habitattypesareriffles,runs,andpools.Coldwaterpoolsareneededforholdingadults(Moyle2002.)
None—outsideofspeciesknownrange.
SacramentoRiverwinter‐runChinooksalmonOncorhynchustshawytscha
E/E/– MainstemSacramentoRiverbelowKeswickDam(Moyle2002)
Occursinwell‐oxygenated,cool,riverinehabitatwithwatertemperaturesfrom8.0to12.5°C.Habitattypesareriffles,runs,andpools.(Moyle2002.)
None—outsideofspeciesknownrange.
![Page 33: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 3 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
Amphibians
CaliforniatigersalamanderAmbystomacaliforniense
T/T/– CentralValley,includingSierraNevadafoothills,uptoapproximately1,000feet,andcoastalregionfromSonomaCountysouthtoSantaBarbaraCounty
Smallponds,lakes,orvernalpoolsingrasslandsandoakwoodlandsforbreedingandlarvaldevelopment;rodentburrows,rockcrevices,orfallenlogsforcoverforadultsandjuvenilesforsummerdormancy.
High—specieshasbeendocumentedatnumerouslocationswithinandneartheprogramarea.Alluplandandsuitableaquatichabitatswithintheprogramareaareconsideredpotentiallyoccupied.
WesternspadefootSpeahammondii
–/SSC/– SierraNevadafoothills,CentralValley,CoastRanges,coastalcountiesinsouthernCalifornia
Shallowstreamswithriffles;seasonalwetlands,suchasvernalpoolsinannualgrasslandsandoakwoodlands
High—programareaiswithinthespeciesknownrangeandsuitablehabitatispresentintheprogramarea.
Californiared‐leggedfrogRanadraytonii
T/T/– FoundalongthecoastandcoastalmountainrangesofCaliforniafromMendocinoCountytoSanDiegoCountyandintheSierraNevadafromButteCountytoStanislausCounty.
Permanentandsemipermanentaquatichabitats,suchascreeksandcold‐waterponds,withemergentandsubmergentvegetation;mayestivateinrodentburrows,soilcracks,ordownedlogsduringdryperiods
High—specieshasbeendocumentedatnumerouslocationswithinandneartheprogramarea;alluplandandsuitableaquatichabitatswithintheprogramareaareconsideredpotentiallyoccupied.Theprogramareaisentirelywithindesignatedcriticalhabitatforthespecies.
Foothillyellow‐leggedfrogRanaboylii
–/SSC/– OccursintheKlamath,Cascade,northCoast,southCoast,Transverse,andSierraNevadaRangesuptoapproximately1,800meters(6,000feet).
Creeksorriversinwoodland,forest,mixedchaparral,andwetmeadowhabitatswithrockandgravelsubstrateandlowoverhangingvegetationalongtheedge.Usuallyfoundnearriffleswithrocksandsunnybanksnearby.
Moderate—streamswithintheprogramareathatcontainsuitablesubstrateandcovercouldsupportthespecies;CNDDBrecordsforoccurrenceswithin2milesoftheprogramarea.
![Page 34: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 4 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
Reptiles
WesternpondturtleActinemysmarmorata
–/SSC/– ThewesternpondturtleisuncommontocommoninsuitableaquatichabitatthroughoutCalifornia,westoftheSierra‐Cascadecrestandabsentfromdesertregions,exceptintheMojaveDesertalongtheMojaveRiveranditstributaries.
Occupiesponds,marshes,rivers,streams,andirrigationcanalswithmuddyorrockybottomsandwithwatercress,cattails,waterlilies,orotheraquaticvegetationinwoodlands,grasslands,andopenforests.Nestsaretypicallyconstructedinuplandhabitatwithin0.25mileofaquatichabitat.
High—suitableaquaticanduplandnestinghabitatintheprogramarea;tablehabitat;knowntooccurinandneartheprogramarea.
Blainville’s(Coast)hornedlizardPhyrnosomablainvillii
–/SSC/– SacramentoValley,includingfoothills,southtosouthernCalifornia;CoastRangessouthofSonomaCounty;below1,200meters(4,000feet)innorthernCalifornia.
Grasslands,brushlands,woodlands,andopenconiferousforestwithsandyorloosesoil;requiresabundantantcoloniesforforaging
High—suitablehabitat(grasslandandwoodland)ispresentthroughouttheprogramareaalthoughsuitablesubstrateconditionsmaynotbepresentthroughouttheprogramarea;knowntooccurinandneartheprogramarea.
SilveryleglesslizardAnniellapulchra
–/SSC/– AlongtheCoast,Transverse,andPeninsularRangesfromContraCostaCountytoSanDiegoCountywithspottyoccurrencesintheSanJoaquinValley;elevationrangeextendsfromsealeveltoabout5,100feet.
Occursinmoistwarmloosesoilwithplantcover.Moistureisessential.Habitatconsistofsparselyvegetatedareasofbeachdunes,chaparral,pine‐oakwoodlands,desertscrub,sandywashes,andstreamterraceswithsycamores,cottonwoods,oroaks.Leaflitterundertreesandbushesinsunnyareas,anddunesstabilizedwithbushlupineandmockheatheroftenindicatesuitablehabitat.Usesurfaceobjectssuchasrocks,boards,driftwood,andlogsforcover.
Low—limitedsuitablehabitatinprogramareaandsoilmoistureconditionsunlikely.
![Page 35: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 5 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
GiantgartersnakeThamnophisgigas
T/T/– CentralValleyfromthevicinityofBurrelinFresnoCountytonearChicoinButteCounty.ExtirpatedfromareassouthofFresno.
Sloughs,canals,low‐gradientstreams,andfreshwatermarsheswherethereisapreybaseofsmallfishandamphibians.Alsoirrigationditchesandricefields.Requiresgrassybanksandemergentvegetationforbaskingandareasofhighgroundprotectedfromfloodingduringwinter.
None—programareaisoutsideofspeciesrangeexceptforextremenortheastcornerofprogram;nosuitablehabitatispresentintheprogramareaandnonearbyoccurrences.
AlamedawhipsnakeMasticophislateraliseuryxanthus
T/T/– RestrictedtoAlamedaandContraCostaCounties;fragmentedintofivedisjunctpopulationsthroughoutitsrange
Valleys,foothills,andlowmountainsassociatedwithnortherncoastalscruborchaparralhabitat;requiresrockoutcropsforcoverandforaging
High—suitablegrasslandhabitatispresentthroughouttheprogramareabutvegetationassociations(scrubandchaparral)androckoutcropsaremorelimited;knowntooccurinandneartheprogramarea.Designatedcriticalhabitatforthespeciesoverlapsaportionoftheprogramarea.
SanJoaquincoachwhipMasticophisflagellumruddocki
–/SSC/– FromColusacountyintheSacramentoValleysouthwardtothegrapevineintheSanJoaquinValleyandwestwardintotheinnercoastranges.AnisolatedpopulationoccursatSutterButtes.Knownelevationalrangefrom20to900meters.
Occursinopen,dry,vegetativeassociationswithlittleornotreecover.Itoccursinvalleygrasslandandsaltbushscrubassociations.Oftenoccursinassociationwithmammalburrows
High—suitablegrasslandhabitatispresentwithintheprogramarea;knowntooccurinandneartheprogramarea.
![Page 36: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 6 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
Birds
White‐tailedkiteElanusleucurus
–/FP/– LowlandareaswestofSierraNevadafromtheheadoftheSacramentoValleysouth,includingcoastalvalleysandfoothillstowesternSanDiegoCountyattheMexicoborder
Lowfoothillsorvalleyareaswithvalleyorliveoaks,riparianareas,andmarshesnearopengrasslandsforforaging
High—speciesisknowntooccurintheprogramareaandislikelytoforageintheprogramarea.Largetreessuitablefornestingarelimited.
BaldeagleHaliaeetusleucocephalus
P/E,FP/– NestsinSiskiyou,Modoc,Trinity,Shasta,Lassen,Plumas,Butte,Tehama,Lake,andMendocinoCountiesandintheLakeTahoeBasin;reintroducedintocentralcoast;winterrangeincludestherestofCalifornia,exceptthesoutheasterndeserts,veryhighaltitudesintheSierraNevada,andeastoftheSierraNevadasouthofMonoCounty
InwesternNorthAmerica,nestsandroostsinconiferousforestswithin1mileofalake,reservoir,orstream,ortheocean
Moderate—suitablenestingandforaginghabitatpresentatBethanyReservoir;notknowntooccurintheprogramareabutmaynest,forage,ormovethroughit.
NorthernharrierCircuscyaneus
–/SSC/– ThroughoutlowlandCalifornia;hasbeenrecordedinfallathighelevations
Grasslands,meadows,marshes,andseasonalandagriculturalwetlandsprovidingtallcover
High—suitablenestingandforaginghabitatispresentthroughouttheprogramarea;knowntooccurintheprogramarea.
Swainson’shawkButeoswainsoni
–/T/– LowerSacramentoandSanJoaquinValleys,KlamathBasin,andButteValley.HighestnestingdensitiesoccurnearDavisandWoodland,YoloCounty.
Nestsinoaksorcottonwoodsinornearriparianhabitats.Foragesingrasslands,irrigatedpastures,andgrainfields.
High—speciesisknowntooccurintheprogramareabutislargelyaCentralValleyspeciesandislesslikelytoforageintheprogramarea.Largetreessuitablefornestingarelimited.
GoldeneagleAquilachrysaetos
P/FP/– FoothillsandmountainsthroughoutCalifornia;uncommonnonbreedingvisitortolowlandssuchastheCentralValley
Nestsincliffsandescarpmentsortalltrees;foragesinannualgrasslands,chaparral,oroakwoodlandsthatprovideabundantmediumandlarge‐sizedmammalsforprey
High—suitablenestingandforaginghabitatpresent;knowntooccurinprogramarea.
![Page 37: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 7 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
WesternburrowingowlAthenecunicularia
–/SSC/– LowlandsthroughoutCalifornia,includingtheCentralValley,northeasternplateau,southeasterndeserts,andcoastalareas;rarealongsouthcoast
Level,open,dry,heavilygrazedorlowstaturegrasslandordesertvegetationwithavailableburrows
High—suitablenestingandforaginghabitatispresentthroughouttheprogramarea;numerousknownoccurrencesthroughouttheprogramarea.
LoggerheadshrikeLaniusludovicianus
–/SSC/– ResidentandwintervisitorinlowlandsandfoothillsthroughoutCalifornia;rareoncoastalslopenorthofMendocinoCounty,occurringonlyinwinter
Prefersopenhabitatswithscatteredshrubs,trees,posts,fences,utilitylines,orotherperches.Nestsindenselyfoliagedtreesorshrubs
High—suitablenestingandforaginghabitatpresent;knowntooccurinprogramarea;nestinghabitatislimitedtoareasthatsupportshrubsandtrees.
TricoloredblackbirdAgelaiustricolor
–/SSC/– PermanentresidentintheCentralValleyfromButteCountytoKernCounty;breedsatscatteredcoastallocationsfromMarinCountysouthtoSanDiegoCountyandatscatteredlocationsinLake,Sonoma,andSolanoCounties;rarenesterinSiskiyou,Modoc,andLassenCounties
Nestsindensecoloniesinemergentmarshvegetation,suchastulesandcattails,oruplandsiteswithblackberries,nettles,thistles,andgrainfields;habitatmustbelargeenoughtosupport50pairs;probablyrequireswateratornearthenestingcolony
High—suitablenestingandforaginghabitatpresent;knowntooccurinprogramarea;nestinghabitatislimitedtoareasthatsupportlargerexpansesofemergentfreshwatermarshandblackberry.
Mammals
LittlebrownbatMyotislucifugus
–/–/WBWGModerate
FoundthroughoutthenorthernportionofCalifornia,primarilyathigherelevations.
Oftenassociatedwithconiferousforest.Requiresnearbywater.Roostsinhollowtrees,rockoutcrops,buildings,andoccasionallyminesandcaves.
High—mayroost,forageordrinkintheprogramarea.Assumingidentificationwascorrect,thisspecieshasbeendocumentedinfatalityrecordsatAPWRA.
Silver‐hairedbatLasionycterisnoctivagans
–/–/WBWGModerate
FoundfromtheOregonbordersouthalongthecoasttoSanFranciscoBayandalongtheSierraNevadaandGreatBasinregiontoInyoCounty.AlsooccursinsouthernCaliforniafromVenturaandSanBernardinoCounties.southtoMexico.HasbeenrecordedinSacramento,Stanislaus,MontereyandYoloCounties
Duringspringandfallmigrationsthesilver‐hairedbatmaybefoundanywhereinCalifornia.Summerhabitatsincludecoastalandmontaneconiferousforests,valleyfoothillwoodlands,pinyon‐juniperwoodlands,andvalleyfoothillandmontaneriparianhabitats.Roostsinhollowtrees,snags,buildings,rockcrevices,caves,andunderbark.
Moderate—mayroost,forageordrinkintheprogramarea;fewfatalityrecordsfromwindfarmsintheDelta,approximately25milesnorth/northwest.Thisspecieshasbeenacousticallydocumentedataneighboringwindfarm(Pandion2010).
![Page 38: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 8 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
WesternredbatLasiurusblossevillii
–/SSC/WBWGHigh
CoastalareasfromtheSanFranciscoBayareasouth,plustheCentralValleyandsurroundingfoothills,withalimitednumberofrecordsfromsouthernCalifornia,extendingasfareastaswesternRiversideandcentralSanDiegocounties,upperSacramentoRivernearDunsmuir,SiskiyouCounty.
Foundprimarilyinriparianandwoodedhabitats.Occursatleastseasonallyinurbanareas.Dayroostsintreeswithinthefoliage.FoundinfruitorchardsandsycamoreriparianhabitatsintheCentralValley.
High—mayroost,forageordrinkintheprogramarea.DocumentedinfatalityrecordatAPWRA.
HoarybatLasiuruscinereus
–/–/WBWGModerate
OccursthroughoutCaliforniafromsealevelto13,200feet.Statewideinwoodedareas.WinterinsouthernCalifornia.
Primarilyroostsinforestedhabitats.Alsofoundinriparianareasandinparkandgardensettingsinurbanareas.Dayroostswithinfoliageoftrees.
High—mayroost,forageordrinkintheprogramarea.DocumentedinfatalityrecordatAPWRA.
Townsend’sbig‐earedbatCorynorhinustownsendii
–/SSC/WBWGHigh
WidespreadthroughoutCalifornia,fromlowdeserttomid‐elevationmontanehabitats.
Roostsincaves,tunnels,mines,buildings,andothercave‐likespaces.Willnightroostinmoreopensettings,includingunderbridges.
Moderate—Mayroostincavesorstructureswithinoradjacenttotheprogramarea;couldforageordrinkwithinprogramarea.
PallidbatAntrozouspallidus
–/SSC/WBWGHigh
OccursthroughoutCaliforniaexceptthehighSierrafromShastatoKernCountyandthenorthwestcoast,primarilyatlowerandmidelevations(upto6,000feet).
Occursinavarietyofhabitatsfromdeserttoconiferousforest.Mostcloselyassociatedwithoak,mixedconifer,redwood,andgiantsequoiahabitatsinnorthernCaliforniaandoakwoodland,grassland,anddesertscrubinsouthernCalifornia.Reliesheavilyontreesforroostsbutalsousescaves,mines,bridges,andbuildings.
High—mayroost,forageordrinkintheprogramarea;onerecordforanoccurrencewithin5milesoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013b).
![Page 39: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Table 3.4‐5. Continued Page 9 of 9
CommonNameScientificName
StatusFederal/State/Other GeographicDistribution HabitatRequirements
LikelihoodtoOccurintheProgramArea
AmericanbadgerTaxideataxus
–/SSC InCalifornia,badgersoccurthroughoutthestateexceptinhumidcoastalforestsofnorthwesternCaliforniainDelNorteandHumboldtCounties
Occursinawidevarietyofopen,aridhabitatsbutaremostcommonlyassociatedwithgrasslands,savannas,mountainmeadows,andopenareasofdesertscrub;theprincipalhabitatrequirementsforthespeciesappeartobesufficientfood(burrowingrodents),friablesoils,andrelativelyopen,uncultivatedground.
High—suitablegrasslandhabitatthroughouttheprogramarea;knowntooccurwithinandneartheprogramarea.
SanJoaquinkitfoxVulpesmacrotismutica
E/T PrincipallyoccursintheSanJoaquinValleyandadjacentopenfoothillstothewest;recentrecordsfrom17countiesextendingfromKernCountynorthtoContraCostaCounty
Saltbushscrub,grassland,oak,savanna,andfreshwaterscrub.
High—suitablegrasslandhabitatispresentthroughouttheprogramarea;althoughrecentsightingsarelimited,thespecieshasbeendocumentedatseverallocalitieswithinandneartheprogramarea.
a Statusexplanations:
Federal
E = listedasendangeredunderthefederalEndangeredSpeciesAct.T = listedasthreatenedunderthefederalEndangeredSpeciesAct.– = nolisting.
State
E = listedasendangeredundertheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct.T = listedasthreatenedundertheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct.FP = fullyprotectedundertheCaliforniaFishandGameCode.SSC = speciesofspecialconcerninCalifornia.– = nolisting.
Other
WesternBatWorkingGroup(WBWG)Priority
High = speciesareimperiledorathighriskofimperilment.Moderate = thisdesignationindicatesalevelofconcernthatshouldwarrantcloserevaluation,moreresearch,andconservationactionsofboththespeciesand
possiblethreats.Alackofmeaningfulinformationisamajorobstacleinadequatelyassessingthesespecies'statusandshouldbeconsideredathreat.
![Page 40: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐27
October 2014ICF 00323.08
notfoundinriverine,marine,orotherpermanentwaters(59FR4813648153,September16,1994).
Alkaliandseasonalwetlandsintheprogramareaprovidesuitablehabitatforvernalpoolfairyshrimp.ThereisoneCNDDBrecordforanoccurrenceofvernalpoolfairyshrimpinthenorthwestportionoftheprogramareaandfiveadditionalrecordsforoccurrencesthatarewest,north,andnortheastoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Thereisnodesignatedcriticalhabitatforvernalpoolfairyshrimpwithintheprogramarea(Figure3.4‐4).
AlkaliandseasonalwetlandsthatprovidesuitablehabitatforvernalpoolfairyshrimpmaybepresentwithintheGoldenHillsprojectarea;however,habitatsurveyshavenotbeenconducted.OneseasonalwetlandinthePattersonPassprojectareaprovidessuitablehabitatforvernalpoolfairyshrimp.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofvernalpoolfairyshrimpineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp
Vernalpooltadpoleshrimpisfederallylistedasendangered.ThisspeciesisaCaliforniaCentralValleyendemicspecies,withthemajorityofpopulationsintheSacramentoValley.VernalpooltadpoleshrimphasalsobeenreportedfromtheSacramentoRiverDeltaeastofSanFranciscoBayandfromscatteredlocalitiesintheSanJoaquinValleyfromSanJoaquintoMaderaCounties(Rogers2001:1002).
Vernalpooltadpoleshrimpoccurinawidevarietyofseasonalhabitatsincludingvernalpools,pondedclayflats,alkalinepools,ephemeralstocktanks,androadsideditches.Habitatswherevernalpooltadpoleshrimphavebeenobservedrangeinsizefromsmall(lessthan25squarefeet),clear,vegetatedvernalpoolstohighlyturbidalkaliscaldpoolstolarge(morethan100acres)winterlakes(Helm1998:134–138;Rogers2001:1002–1005).Thesepoolsandotherephemeralwetlandsmustdryoutandbeinundatedagainforthevernalpooltadpoleshrimpcyststohatch.Thisspecieshasnotbeenreportedinpoolsthatcontainhighconcentrationsofsodiumsalts,butmayoccurinpoolswithhighconcentrationsofcalciumsalts(Helm1998:134–138;Rogers2001:1002–1005).
Seasonalwetlandsandephemeralpondsintheprogramareathatremaininundatedforaminimumof6–8weekswouldprovidesuitablehabitatforvernalpooltadpoleshrimp.AlthoughtherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofvernalpooltadpoleshrimpintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),theprogramareaislocatedwithintheirknownrange.Thereisnodesignatedcriticalhabitatforvernalpooltadpoleshrimpwithintheprogramarea.
SeasonalwetlandsandephemeralpondsthatprovidesuitablehabitatforvernalpooltadpoleshrimpmaybepresentwithintheGoldenHillsprojectarea.OneareaofperennialfreshwatermarshinthePattersonPassprojectareaprovidessuitablehabitatforvernalpooltadpoleshrimp.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofvernalpooltadpoleshrimpineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle
Valleyelderberrylonghornbeetleisfederallylistedasthreatened.OnOctober2,2012,USFWSproposedtoremovevalleyelderberrylonghornbeetlefromthefederallistofendangeredandthreatenedspecies(77FR60237–60276).Theproposedrule,ifmadefinal,wouldalsoremovethedesignationofcriticalhabitatforthesubspecies.ThepubliccommentperiodontheproposeddelistingendedDecember3,2012,andwasextendedthroughJanuary23,2013(78FR4812–4813).
![Page 41: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐28
October 2014ICF 00323.08
USFWSwillreviewcommentsandmakeafinaldeterminationontheproposedrule.Thereisnoofficialtimeperiodforthisdetermination;untilitismade,thebeetleretainsitsprotectedstatusandcriticalhabitatdesignation.
ThecurrentknownrangeofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleextendsthroughoutCalifornia’sCentralValleyandassociatedfoothillsfromaboutthe3,000‐footcontourontheeastandthewatershedoftheCentralValleyonthewest(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1999:1).Valleyelderberrylonghornbeetleisdependentonitshostplant,elderberry,whichisacommoncomponentofripariancorridorsandadjacentuplandareasintheCentralValley(Barr1991:5).
Valleyelderberrylonghornbeetlehasfourstagesoflife:egg,larva,pupa,andadult.Femalesdepositeggsonoradjacenttothehostelderberry.Eggproductionvaries;femaleshavebeenobservedtolaybetween16and180eggs.Eggshatchwithinafewdaysofbeingdeposited.Larvaeemergeandboreintothewoodofthehostplant,creatingalongfeedinggalleryinthepithoftheelderberrystem.Thelarvaefeedonthepithoftheplantfor1–2years.Whenalarvaisreadytopupate,itchewsanexitholetotheoutsideofthestemandthenplugsitwithfrass.Thelarvathenretreatsintothefeedinggalleryandconstructsapupalchamberfromwoodandfrass.ThelarvaemetamorphosebetweenDecemberandApril;thepupalstagelastsaboutamonth.Theadultremainsinthechamberforseveralweeksaftermetamorphosisandthenemergesfromthechamberthroughtheexithole.Adultsemergebetweenmid‐Marchandmid‐June,thefloweringseasonoftheplant.Adultsfeedonelderberryleavesandmatewithintheelderberrycanopy(Talleyetal.2006:7‐9).
Elderberryshrubsintheprogramareaprovidesuitablehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.Elderberryshrubsmaybeassociatedwiththemixedriparianforestandwoodland,mixedwillowriparianscrub,blueoakwoodland,foothillpine‐oakwoodland,mixedevergreenforestoakwoodland,andgrasslandlandcovertypes.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleintheprogramarea.TheclosestrecordisforthreeadultsobservedatLawrenceLivermoreNationalLaboratorySite300(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
ElderberryshrubsmaybepresentintheGoldenHillsprojectareaandwouldprovidesuitablehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.Elderberryshrubsmaybeassociatedwiththemixedwillowriparianscrubandgrasslandlandcovertypes.AnICFbiologistfound39elderberryshrubsinthePattersonPassprojectareaduringasurveytoassesshabitatsforspecial‐statusspeciesinNovember2013.Severaloftheshrubshadvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleexitholes.
Curved‐Footed Hygrotus Diving Beetle
Curved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetledoesnothaveanystateorfederalstatusbutisconsideredrareunderCEQA.IntheNovember15,1994NoticeofReview(50FR58982–59028),USFWSconcludedthatcurved‐foothygrotusdivingbeetlewaspossiblyappropriateforlistingasthreatenedorendangeredbutlackingpersuasivedatatosupportaproposalforlisting.Itsstatustrendwaslistedasunknown.
Theknownrangeofthecurved‐foothygrotusdivingbeetleislimitedtoContraCostaandAlamedaCounties(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Littleinformationisavailableforthecurved‐foothygrotusdivingbeetle.Thespeciesisknowntoinhabitvernalandseasonalpoolsandwetlands(EssigMuseumofEntomology2013),aswellasstockponds,irrigationcanals,roadsideditches,poolsincreeksandcreekswithslowflows(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Bothlarvalandadultlifestagesarepredaceousand,likeotherspeciesinthefamily,winged
![Page 42: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐29
October 2014ICF 00323.08
adultscandispersebetweenhabitats(PowellandHogue1979).Reasonsfordeclineofthespeciesincludelossofhabitattodevelopmentandnon‐targeteffectsofmosquitocontrol(EssigMuseumofEntomology2013).
Seasonalwetlands,ponds,andsomecreeksintheprogramareamayprovidesuitablehabitatforcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle.TherearethreeCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleinthenorthwestportionoftheprogramareaandeightadditionalrecordsforoccurrencesthatarewest,north,andeastoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Seasonalwetlands,ponds,andsomecreeksmayprovidesuitablehabitatforcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleintheGoldenHillsprojectarea.PondsandsomecreeksmayprovidesuitablehabitatforthisbeetleinthePattersonPassprojectarea.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleineitheroftheprojectareas;howeveroneoftheoccurrencesintheprogramareaisjustoutsideoftheGoldenHillsprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
California Tiger Salamander
TheCentralCaliforniadistinctpopulationsegmentofCaliforniatigersalamander(whichoverlapswiththeprogramarea)isfederallylistedasthreatened(50CFR47212–47248,August4,2004).Californiatigersalamanderisalsostate‐listedasthreatened(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2011).
CaliforniatigersalamanderisendemictotheSanJoaquin–SacramentoRivervalleys,borderingfoothills,andcoastalvalleysofcentralCalifornia(BarryandShaffer1994:159).Californiatigersalamanderisalowlandspeciesrestrictedtograsslandsandlowfoothillregionswhereitsbreedinghabitatoccurs(JenningsandHayes1994:14).Breedinghabitatconsistsoftemporarypondsorpools,slowerportionsofstreams,andsomepermanentwaters(Stebbins2003:153–154).Permanentaquaticsitesareunlikelytobeusedforbreedingunlesstheylackfishpredators(JenningsandHayes1994:14).Californiatigersalamandersalsorequiredry‐seasonrefugesitesinthevicinityofbreedingsites(within1mile)(JenningsandHayes1994:14).Californiagroundsquirrel(Spermophilusbeecheyi)burrowsareimportantrefugesitesforadultsandjuveniles(Loredoetal.1996:283–284).
AdultCaliforniatigersalamandersmovefromsubterraneanrefugesitestobreedingpoolsduringrelativelywarmlatewinterandspringrains(JenningsandHayes1994:12).BreedinggenerallyoccursfromDecemberthroughMarch(Stebbins2003:154).Developmentthroughmetamorphosisrequires3–6months(69FR47215).Metamorphosedjuvenilesleavetheirpondsinthelatespringorearlysummerandmovetoterrestrialrefugesitesbeforeseasonalpondsdry(Loredoetal.1996:282).However,inlatefall1993,onelarvaloverwinteringsalamanderwasobservedinMontereyCountyandmanyoverwinteringsalamanderswereobservedinthreeperennialstockpondsinContraCostaCountyfrom1998to2001(Alvarez2004:344).
Ponds,longerlastingseasonalwetlands,andportionsofdrainagesintheprogramareamayprovidesuitablebreedinghabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,andsurroundinggrasslandsandoakwoodlandprovidesuitableuplandrefugeanddispersalhabitat.Therearenumerous(morethan20)CNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofCaliforniatigersalamanderintheprogramarea.Themajorityoftheseoccurrencesareinthenorthernportionoftheprogramarea.Therearemorethan70additionalrecordsforoccurrencesofCaliforniatigersalamandersurroundingtheprogramarea
![Page 43: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐30
October 2014ICF 00323.08
(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).ThereisnodesignatedcriticalhabitatforCaliforniatigersalamanderintheprogramarea.
PondsandpooledportionsofdrainagesintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasprovidesuitablebreedinghabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,andsurroundinggrasslandsprovidesuitableuplandrefugeanddispersalhabitat.LongerlastingseasonalwetlandsintheGoldenHillsprojectareamayalsoprovidesuitablehabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander.ThereareCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofCaliforniatigersalamanderinbothprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Western Spadefoot
WesternspadefootisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.Westernspadefootisalowlandtoadthatoccursinwashes,riverfloodplains,alluvialfans,playas,andalkaliflatswithinvalleyandfoothillgrasslands,openchaparral,andpine‐oakwoodlands.Itbreedsinquietstreamsandtemporaryrainpools.Westernspadefootprefershabitatswithopenvegetationandshortgrasseswherethesoilissandyorgravely(Stebbins2003:203).Westernspadefoottoadsspendaconsiderableportionoftheyearundergroundinburrows(Zeineretal.1988:56).Dependingontemperatureandrainfall,egglayingoccursbetweenlateFebruaryandlateMay.Eggshatchwithin6days,andlarvaldevelopmentcanbecompletedwithin3–11weeks(JenningsandHayes1994:94)Recentlymetamorphosedtoadsdisperseafterspendingafewhoursordaysatthepondmargin(Zeineretal.1988:56).
Seasonalwetlands,pooledportionsofdrainages,andephemeralpondsintheprogramareathatremaininundatedforaminimumof4weekswouldprovidesuitablehabitatforwesternspadefoot.AlthoughtherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofwesternspadefootintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),theprogramareaiswithintheirknownrange.
Seasonalwetlands,pooledportionsofdrainages,andephemeralpondsthatprovidesuitablehabitatforwesternspadefootmaybepresentintheGoldenHillsprojectarea.OneseasonalwetlandandtwopooledareasinadrainageprovidesuitablehabitatforwesternspadefootinthePattersonPassprojectarea.TherearenoCNDDBoccurrencesofwesternspadefootineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
California Red‐Legged Frog
Californiared‐leggedfrogisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcernandisfederallylistedasthreatened.ThetaxonisknownfromisolatedlocationsintheSierraNevada,NorthCoast,andnorthernTransverseRanges.ItisrelativelycommonintheSanFranciscoBayAreaandalongthecentralcoast.Californiared‐leggedfrogisbelievedtobeextirpatedfromtheflooroftheCentralValley(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2002a:5).
Californiared‐leggedfrogsuseavarietyofhabitats;theseincludevariousaquatic,riparian,anduplandhabitats(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2002a:12).However,Californiared‐leggedfrogsmaycompletetheirentirelifecycleinapondorotheraquaticsitethatissuitableforalllifestages(66FR14626).Californiared‐leggedfrogsinhabitmarshes;streams;lakes;ponds;andother,usuallypermanent,sourcesofwaterthathavedenseriparianvegetation(Stebbins2003:225).Habitatconsistsofdeep(atleast2.5feet)stillorslow‐movingwaterwithshrubbyriparianvegetation(willows[Salixsp.],tules[Scirpussp.],orcattails[Typhasp.])(JenningsandHayes1994:64).Californiared‐leggedfrogsarehighlyaquaticandspendthemajorityoftheirlivesintheriparian
![Page 44: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐31
October 2014ICF 00323.08
zone(BrodeandBury1984:32).Adultsmaytakerefugeduringdryperiodsinrodentholesorleaflitterinriparianhabitats(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2002a:14).
Californiared‐leggedfrogsbreedfromNovemberthroughAprilandtypicallylaytheireggsinclustersaroundaquaticvegetation(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2002a:16).LarvaeundergometamorphosisbetweenJulyandSeptember,3.5–7monthsafterhatching(66FR14626).However,larvaehavebeenobservedtotakemorethan1yeartocompletemetamorphosisinfourcountiesincentralcoastCalifornia(Fellersetal.2001:156).
Ponds,perennialmarsh,seasonalwetlands,drainages,andmixedwillowriparianscrubintheprogramareaprovidesuitablebreedingand/orforaging/dispersalhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrog,andsurroundinggrasslandsandoakwoodlandprovidesuitableuplandrefugeanddispersalhabitat.Therearenumerous(morethan40)recordsforoccurrencesofCaliforniared‐leggedfrogthroughouttheprogramarea.TherearemanyadditionalCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofCaliforniared‐leggedfrogsurroundingtheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TheentireprogramareaiswithindesignatedcriticalhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrog.
Ponds,perennialmarsh,seasonalwetlands,drainages,andmixedwillowriparianscrubwithintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasprovidesuitablebreedingand/orforaging/dispersalhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrog,andsurroundinggrasslandsprovidesuitableuplandrefugeanddispersalhabitat.ThereareCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofCaliforniared‐leggedfroginbothprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasarelocatedentirelywithindesignatedcriticalhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrog(Figure3.4‐4).
Foothill Yellow‐Legged Frog
Foothillyellow‐leggedfrogisdesignatedasaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.Historically,foothillyellow‐leggedfrogsoccurredinthecoastalfoothillsandmountainsfromtheOregonbordersouthtoLosAngelesCountyandintheSierraNevadafoothillssouthtoKernCounty(Zweifel1955:215;Stebbins2003:232).ThecurrentrangeexcludescoastalareassouthofnorthernSanLuisObispoCountyandfoothillareassouthofFresnoCountywherethespeciesisapparentlyextirpated(JenningsandHayes1994:67–69).Thespeciescanoccurfromsealevelto6,000feetabovesealevel(Stebbins2003:232).Foothillyellow‐leggedfrogsoccupyrockydrainagesinvalley‐foothillhardwood,valley‐foothillhardwood‐conifer,valley‐foothillriparian,ponderosapine,mixedconifer,coastalscrub,mixedchaparral,andwetmeadowtypesofhabitat(Zeineretal.1988:86).Thestreambedisusuallygravellyorsandyandthestreamgradientisgenerallynotsteep(Zweifel1955:221).Foothillyellow‐leggedfrogsaretypicallyfoundnearwater,especiallynearriffleswithrocksnearbyandsunnybanks(Stebbins2003:232).Foothillyellow‐leggedfrogsareactivefromlateFebruaryorearlyMarchthroughsummerandintothefall(Zweifel1955:226).Thespeciesbreedsfrommid‐MarchtoMayafterthehigh‐waterstageinstreamshaspassedandlesssedimentisbeingconveyed(Stebbins1954:130).
Perennialandintermittentdrainagesandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheprogramareamayprovidesuitablehabitatforfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesoffoothillyellow‐leggedfrogwithintheprogramarea;howevertherearetworecordsforoccurrencesthataresouthandsouthwestoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
![Page 45: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐32
October 2014ICF 00323.08
PerennialandintermittentdrainagesandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasmayprovidesuitablehabitatforfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesoffoothillyellow‐leggedfrogineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Western Pond Turtle
WesternpondturtleisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.InCalifornia,therangeisdiscontinuouslydistributedthroughoutthestatewestoftheCascade‐Sierrancrest(JenningsandHayes1994:99).Aquatichabitatsusedbywesternpondturtlesincludeponds,lakes,marshes,rivers,streams,andirrigationditcheswithamuddyorrockybottomingrassland,woodland,andopenforestareas(Stebbins2003:250).Westernpondturtlesspendaconsiderableamountoftimebaskingonrocks,logs,emergentvegetation,mudorsandbanks,orhuman‐generateddebris(Jenningsetal.1992:11).Westernpondturtlesmovetouplandareasadjacenttowatercoursestodepositeggsandoverwinter(JenningsandHayes1994:98).Turtleshavebeenobservedoverwinteringseveralhundredmetersfromaquatichabitat.Inthesouthernportionoftherangeandalongthecentralcoast,westernpondturtlesareactiveyear‐round.Intheremainderoftheirrange,theseturtlestypicallybecomeactiveinMarchandreturntooverwinteringsitesbyOctoberorNovember(Jenningsetal.1992:11).
Ponds,reservoirs,BrushyCreek,andportionsofotherdrainagesintheprogramareamayprovidesuitableaquatichabitatforwesternpondturtle.Theymayalsodepositeggsinmixedwillowriparianscruborgrasslandareasnearaquatichabitatintheprogramarea.TherearetwoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofwesternpondturtlewithintheprogramareaandmanyadditionalrecordsforoccurrenceswithin5milesoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
PondsandportionsofdrainagesintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasmayprovidesuitableaquatichabitatforwesternpondturtle.TheymayalsodepositeggsinmixedwillowriparianscruborgrasslandareasnearaquatichabitatintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofwesternpondturtleineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Blainville’s (Coast) Horned Lizard
Blainville’shornedlizardisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.Althoughfragmented,therangeofBlainville’shornedlizardgenerallyextendsalongthePacificcoastfromBajaCaliforniawestofthedesertsandtheSierraNevada,northtotheBayArea,andinlandasfarnorthasShastaReservoir.ItalsooccursontheKernPlateaueastofthecrestoftheSierraNevada(CaliforniaHerps.com2013).Thespeciesoccursbetweensealevelandanelevationof8,000feet(Stebbins2003:301).
Blainville’shornedlizardoccupiesavarietyofhabitats,includingareaswithanexposedgravelly‐sandysubstratesupportingscatteredshrubs,chamisechaparral,annualgrassland(JenningsandHayes1994:132),broadleafwoodland,andconiferforest(Stebbins2003:300).Theyaremostcommoninlowlandsalongsandywasheswithscatteredshrubsforcover.Habitatrequirementsincludeopenareasforbasking;patchesoffine,loosesoilwhereitcanburyitself;andantsandotherinsectprey(Stebbins2003:300–301).Forextendedperiodsofinactivityorhibernation,hornedlizardsoccupysmallmammalburrowsorburrowintoloosesoilsundersurfaceobjects(Zeineretal.1988:48).Blainville’shornedlizardshavebeenobservedtobeactivebetweenAprilandOctober,andhatchlingsfirstappearinJulyandAugust(JenningsandHayes1994:130).
![Page 46: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐33
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Portionsofgrassland,chaparral,andoakwoodlandintheprogramareaprovidesuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard.TherearethreeCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofBlainville’shornedlizardinthesoutheastportionoftheprogramarea,andadditionalrecordsforoccurrencesoutsideoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
PortionsofgrasslandintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasmayprovidesuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,buttherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofBlainville’shornedlizardineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Alameda Whipsnake
Alamedawhipsnakeisstateandfederallylistedasthreatened.TheAlamedawhipsnakeisasubspeciesoftheCaliforniawhipsnake.TheNorthAmericandistributionfortheCaliforniawhipsnakeincludesNorthernCaliforniawestoftheSierranCrestanddeserttocentralBajaCalifornia.Thisspeciesisfoundprimarilyinthefoothillsbutitsrangeextendsintodeciduousandpineforestsofmountains.(Stebbins2003:353–354.)Historically,AlamedawhipsnakeprobablyoccurredwithintheentirecoastalscrubandoakwoodlandcommunitiesthroughouttheEastBayinContraCosta,Alameda,andpartsofSanJoaquinandSantaClaraCounties.Currently,itsdistributionencompassesfiveseparatepopulationswithlittleornointerchangewithinthesesamecounties(70FR60608–60656,October18,2005).
Alamedawhipsnakesareprimarilyfoundwithinamixtureofhabitattypescontainingscrub/shrubcommunities,withasignificantportionofannualgrassland,andotherwoodedhabitatssuchasblueoak‐foothillpine,blueoakwoodland,coastaloakwoodland,valleyoakwoodland,ripariancommunities,orrockoutcrops.Theywillalsomoveintoadjacentgrassland,oaksavannah,andoccasionally,oak‐baywoodlandhabitats.Alamedawhipsnakespreferhabitatswithwoodydebrisandexposedrockoutcrops,whichprovidebaskingareas,shelterfrompredators,andanabundanceofwesternfencelizards,whichareamajorpreyitemofthissnake.Thesubspecieshasbeenobservedtoregularlymove200meters(656feet)fromscrubandchaparralandwillremainingrasslandsforseveralhourstoweeksatatime.Grasslandsareusedextensivelyduringthebreedingseason(MarchthroughJuly).Malesnakesusegrasslandareasextensivelyduringthematingseasonandfemalesnakesusegrasslandsaftermating,possiblytosearchforegg‐layingsites.(70FR60610,October18,2005.)
Annualgrassland,scrub,chaparral,oakwoodland,andmixedwillowriparianscrubintheprogramareaprovidesuitablehabitatforAlamedawhipsnake.TherearesevenCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofAlamedawhipsnakealongtheeasternportionoftheprogramareaandnumerousadditionalrecordsforoccurrencesoutsidebutneartheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).DesignatedcriticalhabitatforAlamedawhipsnakeislocatedinthesoutheastportionoftheprogramarea(Figure3‐4‐4).
AnnualgrasslandandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasmayprovidesuitablehabitatforAlamedawhipsnake.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofAlamedawhipsnakeineitheroftheprojectareas;howeverthereareseveralrecordsforoccurrencesjustsoutheastoftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).AnICFbiologistconductedhabitatassessmentsforspecial‐statusspeciesinthePattersonPassprojectareaanddeterminedthatAlamedawhipsnakehasalowpotentialtooccurtherebecauseofthedistancetoscrubandchaparralhabitats,whicharetheprimaryhabitatsforthespecies.ThereisnodesignatedcriticalhabitatforAlamedawhipsnakeintheGoldenHillsorPattersonPassprojectareas(Figure3.4‐4).
![Page 47: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐34
October 2014ICF 00323.08
San Joaquin Coachwhip
TheSanJoaquincoachwhip(whipsnake)isoneofsixsubspeciesofthecoachwhipthathasaknownrangeextendingfromColusaCountyintheSacramentoValley,southtotheGrapevineinKernCountyintheSanJoaquinValley,andwesttotheinnerSouthCoastRanges.AnisolatedpopulationoccursintheSutterButtes.Thetaxonisknowntooccurfrom65to2,950feetabovesealevel.SanJoaquincoachwhiplivesinopen,dryvegetativeassociationswithlittleornotreecover.InthewesternSanJoaquinValley,coachwhipinhabitsgrasslandandsaltbushscrubassociations,andisknowntoclimbbushessuchassaltbushtoviewpreyandpredators.MammalburrowsareusedbySanJoaquincoachwhipsforrefugeandlikelyasovipositionsites.Coachwhipsubspecieswillnotemergefromburrowsuntilnear‐surfacetemperaturesreach280Coneitheradailyorseasonalbasis.Forthisreason,emergencetendstobelateintheseason(ApriltoearlyMay)andlaterinthemorning(10–11a.m.),althoughyoungerindividualsmayemergeearlierintheday.Thesubspeciesprimarilyeatslizardsandrobsthenestsofbirdsandmammals,butmayalsoeatcarrion.Landconversionfromgrasslandandgrassland/scrubhabitattoagriculturehasremovedhabitatandeliminatedthefoodbaseandmammalburrowassociationsonwhichthecoachwhipdependsforrefuge.UrbandevelopmentanddroughthavealsobeenimplicatedinthedepletionandfragmentationofSanJoaquincoachwhippopulations(JenningsandHayes1994:162–164).
AnnualgrasslandintheprogramareaprovidessuitablehabitatforSanJoaquincoachwhip.ThereisoneCNDDBrecordforanoccurrenceofSanJoaquincoachwhipalongtheeasternportionoftheprogramareaandtworecordsforoccurrenceseastandwestoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
AnnualgrasslandintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasprovidessuitablehabitatforSanJoaquincoachwhip.TherearenoCNDDBoccurrencesofSanJoaquincoachwhipineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
White‐Tailed Kite
White‐tailedkiteisfullyprotectedundertheCaliforniaFishandGameCode.White‐tailedkitesgenerallyinhabitlow‐elevationgrassland,savannah,oakwoodland,wetland,agricultural,andriparianhabitats.Somelargeshrubsortreesarerequiredfornestingandforcommunalroostingsites.Nesttreesrangefromsmall,isolatedshrubsandtreestotreesinrelativelylargestands(Dunk1995).White‐tailedkitesmakenestsoflooselypiledsticksandtwigs,linedwithgrassandstraw,nearthetopofdenseoaks,willows,andothertreestands.ThebreedingseasonlastsfromFebruarythroughOctoberandpeaksbetweenMayandAugust.White‐tailedkitesforageinundisturbed,opengrassland,meadows,farmland,andemergentwetlands(Zeineretal.1990a:120).
Foraginghabitatandasmallamountofsuitablenestinghabitatforwhite‐tailedkitesarepresentintheprogramarea.TheCNDDBliststworecordsofwhite‐tailedkitenestsinthenortheastandsoutheastportionsoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c)andTwoadditionalrecordswithin2milessouthwestoftheprogramarea.
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitatforwhite‐tailedkiteispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TherearenoCNDDBoccurrencesofwhite‐tailedkitenestsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).White‐tailedkiteshavebeendocumentedforaginginbothprojectareasduring2005–2011avianusesurveysconductedbytheAFMT(AlamedaCountyunpublisheddata).
![Page 48: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐35
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Bald Eagle
Baldeagleisstate‐listedasendangeredandisprotectedundertheMBTA,theBGEPA,andseveralsectionsoftheCaliforniaFishandGameCode.BaldeagleisapermanentresidentanduncommonwintermigrantinCalifornia(Zeineretal.1990a:122).Baldeaglesbreedatcoastalareas,rivers,lakes,andreservoirswithforestedshorelinesorcliffsinnorthernCalifornia.Winteringbaldeaglesareassociatedwithaquaticareascontainingsomeopenwaterforforaging.Baldeaglesnestintreesinmatureandoldgrowthforeststhathavesomehabitatedgeandaresomewhatclose(within1.25miles)towaterwithsuitableforagingopportunities.Althoughnestscanbecloser,theaveragedistanceofbaldeagleneststohumandevelopmentanddisturbanceismorethan1,640feet(Buehler2000:6).ThebreedingseasonisFebruarythroughJuly(Zeineretal.1990a:122).
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitat(BethanyReservoir)forbaldeagleispresentintheprogramarea.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofbaldeaglenestsorwinteringbaldeaglesinorneartheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),althoughtheAFMThasdocumentedthemflyingthroughtheprogramareawithincreasingfrequency.
SuitablenestingandforaginghabitatforbaldeaglemaybepresentintheGoldenHillsprojectareanearBethanyReservoir.NosuitablenestingorforaginghabitatispresentinthePattersonPassprojectarea,butbaldeaglesmayforageinorflythroughthisarea.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofbaldeaglenestsorwinteringbaldeaglesineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TheAFMThasdetectedbaldeaglesfourtimesinthevicinityoftheGoldenHillsprojectareawithinthelast4years,butnotinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
Northern Harrier
NorthernharrierisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.Northernharrierisayear‐roundresidentthroughouttheCentralValleyandisoftenassociatedwithopengrasslandhabitatsandagriculturalfields.Nestsarefoundonthegroundintall,denseherbaceousvegetation(MacWhirterandBildstein1996).NorthernharriernestsfromApriltoSeptember,withpeakactivityinJuneandJuly.Thebreedingpopulationhasbeenreduced,particularlyalongthesoutherncoast,throughthedestructionofwetlandhabitat,nativegrassland,andmoistmeadowsandthroughtheburningandplowingofnestingareasduringearlystagesofbreeding(Zeineretal.1990a:124).
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitatfornorthernharrierispresentintheprogramarea.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofnorthernharriernestswithintheprogramarea;thereisonerecordforanestwithin2milesnortheastoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TheAFMThasdocumentednorthernharriersforaginginallmonthsoftheyearthroughouttheprogramarea.
SuitablenestinghabitatmaybepresentandsuitableforaginghabitatispresentfornorthernharrierintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.AlthoughtherearenoCNDDBrecordsofnorthernharriernestsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),theAFMThasdocumentednorthernharriersyear‐roundintheAPWRAasnotedabove.
Swainson’s Hawk
Swainson’shawkisastate‐listedthreatenedspeciesandaspeciesoflocalconservationconcern.Swainson’shawksforageingrasslands,grazedpastures,alfalfaandotherhaycrops,andcertaingrainandrowcroplands.Vineyards,orchards,rice,andcottoncropsaregenerallyunsuitablefor
![Page 49: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐36
October 2014ICF 00323.08
foragingbecauseofthedensityofthevegetation(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame1992:41).ThemajorityofSwainson’shawkswinterinSouthAmerica,althoughsomewinterintheUnitedStates.Swainson’shawksarriveinCaliforniainearlyMarchtoestablishnestingterritoriesandbreed(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame1994).Theyusuallynestinlarge,maturetrees.Mostnestsites(87%)intheCentralValleyarefoundinriparianhabitats(Estep1989:35),primarilybecausetreesaremoreavailablethere.Swainson’shawksalsonestinmatureroadsidetreesandinisolatedtreesinagriculturalfieldsorpastures.ThebreedingseasonisfromMarchthroughAugust(Estep1989:12,35).
AlthoughsuitablenestingandforaginghabitatforSwainson’shawksispresentintheprogramarea,Swainson’shawksmoretypicallyoccurinflatterrainandrarelyoccurinthefoothillsoftheCoastRanges.ThereisoneCNDDBrecordofaSwainson’shawknestinthenortheasternportionoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),andEastBayRegionalParkDistrict(EBRPD)reportedaSwainson’shawknestingintheprogramarea(Bartonpers.comm.).Thereare11additionalCNDDBrecordsofSwainson’shawknestseastandnortheastoftheprogramarea,includingonethatisjustoutsideoftheprogramarea.Swainson’shawkhasbeendocumentedasafatalityonlyonceinmorethan7yearsofintensivefatalitymonitoring(ICFInternational2013),andonly11sightingsofSwainson’shawkshavebeenrecordedintheprogramareainmorethan7yearsofavianusemonitoringconductedthroughouttheprogramareabytheAFMT(AlamedaCountyunpublisheddata).
ForaginghabitatandasmallamountofsuitablenestinghabitatforSwainson’shawksispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofSwainson’shawknestsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),and,asnotedabove,theAFMThasrarelyobservedSwainson’shawksintheAPWRA.
Red‐Tailed Hawk
Red‐tailedhawkisnotastate‐orfederallylistedspecies.However,itisprotectedundertheMBTAandtheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeandisanAPWRAfocalspecies.Red‐tailedhawksoccurinCaliforniathroughouttheyear.Largenumbersofmigratoryandwinteringred‐tailedhawksentertheCentralValleyfromOctoberthroughFebruary,substantiallyaugmentingthepopulationoccurringwithinthestate.Migratory,wintering,andresidentred‐tailedhawksinhabitCaliforniainopenareas,suchasgrasslands,agriculturalfields,pastures,andopenbrushhabitats,thatareinterspersedwithpatchesoftreesorstructurallysimilarfeaturesfornesting,perching,androosting(PoliteandPratt1990).Thisspeciesisprimarilyasit‐and‐waitpredatorthatrequireselevatedperchsitesforhunting;however,red‐tailedhawkscanalsobeseensoaringoveropenlandscapesandswoopingforprey.Theirdietincludesawidevarietyofsmalltomedium‐sizedmammals,birds,andsnakes,withoccasionalinsectsandfreshcarrion(PrestonandBeane1993).Nestlocationsvarywithvegetationandtopography.1InthewesternUnitedStates,satellitetrackingindicatesthatadultred‐tailedhawksshowhighfidelitytotheirsummerandwinterrangesandtomigrationroutes(GoodrichandSmith2008).
WhiletheCNDDBdoesnotcontainrecordsforred‐tailedhawks,previousstudiesfoundtheprogramareaandthesurroundingregiontobeanimportantwinterforagingareaandmigrationcorridorforraptors,includingred‐tailedhawks(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame1993).
1Observationsofnestingred‐tailedhawksintheAPWRAin2005to2006wereconfirmedinthefieldbyJones&StokeswildlifebiologistJuliaCamp.
![Page 50: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐37
October 2014ICF 00323.08
NaturalperchesfromwhichthisspecieshuntswerescarcebeforedevelopmentoftheAPWRA.Turbinesandtransmissiontowers,poles,andlinesprovideabundantperchesandmayhaveresultedinasubstantialincreaseinwinteringred‐tailedhawksintheprogramareaoverhistoricnumbers(OrloffandFlannery1992).
Golden Eagle
GoldeneagleisfullyprotectedundertheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeandisanAPWRAfocalspecies.ItisalsoprotectedbytheMBTA,theBGEPA,andseveralsectionsoftheCaliforniaFishandGameCode.
Goldeneagleisayear‐roundresidentthroughoutmuchofCalifornia.ThespeciesdoesnotbreedinthecenteroftheCentralValleybutbreedsinmuchoftherestofthestate.Goldeneaglestypicallyoccurinrollingfoothills,mountainareas,sage‐juniperflats,anddeserts(Zeineretal.1990a:142–143).InCalifornia,goldeneaglesnestprimarilyinopengrasslandsandoak(Quercusspp.)savannabutwillalsonestinoakwoodlandandopenshrublands.Goldeneaglesforageinopengrasslandhabitats(Kochertetal.2002:6).Preferredterritorysitesincludethosethathaveafavorablenestsite,adependablefoodsupply(smalltomediummammals,includinggroundsquirrels,andbirds),andbroadexpansesofopencountryforforaging.Hillyormountainouscountrywheretakeoffandsoaringaresupportedbyupdraftsisgenerallypreferredtoflathabitats(Johnsgard1990:262).IntheinteriorcentralCoastRangesofCalifornia,goldeneaglesfavoropengrasslandsandoaksavanna,withlessernumbersinoakwoodlandandopenshrublands.IntheDiabloRangeofCalifornia,allexceptafewpairsnestintreesinoakwoodlandandoaksavannahabitatsduetoalackofsuitablerockoutcropsorcliffs.Nesttreespeciesincludeseveraloakspecies(Quercusspp.),foothillpine(PinussabianianaandP.coulteri),Californiabaylaurel(Umbellulariacalifornica),eucalyptus(Eucalyptusspp.),andwesternsycamore(Platanusracemosa).Afewpairsofeaglesnestonelectricaltransmissiontowerstraversinggrasslands(Huntetal.1999:13).
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitatforgoldeneagleispresentintheprogramarea.TheAPWRAhasbeenreportedtocontainahigherdensityofgoldeneaglesthananywhereelseintheworld(HuntandHunt2006).ThePredatoryBirdResearchGroupestimatedthatatleast70activegoldeneagleterritoriesexistedwithin19milesoftheprogramarea,basedonannualsurveysfromJanuary1994toDecember1997(Huntetal.1999).Theseterritorieswereresurveyedandoccupancyverifiedin2005(HuntandHunt2006).Thegoldeneaglepopulationwithin19milesoftheAPWRAincludessevengoldeneagleterritories/breedingareaswithintheLosVaqueroswatershed.Nestsurveysandmonitoringhavebeenconductedwithinthewatershedfrom1994to2013,and26goldeneagleneststructureshavebeendocumentedduringthisperiod.Sixofthesevenbreedingareaswereoccupiedbygoldeneaglepairsduring2013(CaliforniaEnvironmentalServices2014).Moreover,EBRPDreportedthreehistoricandonerecentgoldeneaglenestswithintheprogramareaandtwoadditionalnestswithin2milesoftheprogramarea(Bartonpers.comm.).TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofgoldeneaglenestswithintheprogramarea;however,thereare10recordsofnestswithin3.5milesnorthandnorthwestoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Inearly2014,ground‐basedsurveysforgoldeneagleswereinitiatedinanexpandedareatocollectinformationonsiteoccupancyandnestingsuccessofthebroaderpopulationofgoldeneaglesintheDiabloMountains.ThisstudyisacollaborativeeffortledbytheU.S.GeologicalSurvey,withtheoverallobjectivebeingtodevelopandevaluatesurveyandmonitoringmethodsforestimatingtrendsinoccurrenceandnestingsuccessofgoldeneagles(U.S.GeologicalSurvey2013).Theresultsofthe2014surveyshavenotyetbeenpublished.
![Page 51: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐38
October 2014ICF 00323.08
GoldeneagleisunlikelytonestatPattersonPassbecausethelargerwillowtreespresentarelocatedinadeepravineanddonotofferanopenviewofthelandscape.SuitablenestinghabitatforgoldeneaglemaybepresentintheGoldenHillsprojectarea,andgoldeneaglesmayforageineitherprojectarea.TheCNDDBlistsnooccurrencesofgoldeneaglenestsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
ResearchofthegoldeneaglepopulationintheAPWRAhasrevealedittobestablebutwithreducedresilienceduetoturbine‐relatedmortality.Hunt(2002)examineddatacollectedovera7‐yearperiodbetween1994and2002thatincludedthemonitoringof60–70activeterritorieswithin30kilometers(19miles)oftheAPWRA.In2005,theseterritorieswerefoundstilltobe100%occupied(HuntandHunt2006).TheconclusionsofthesestudieswerethatthegoldeneaglepopulationintheAPWRAregionremainsstable(Hunt2002;HuntandHunt2006).Inaddition,thestudiesfoundnoincreaseinthenumberofactivelybreedingsubadults,indicatingthatthereareenoughfloaterstobufferanylossofbreedingadults(Hunt2002;HuntandHunt2006).TheconclusionofastablegoldeneaglepopulationintheAPWRAvicinitywassupportedbytheresultsofapopulationdynamicsmodelthatusedreproductionratesandfatalityrates,amongothervariables(Hunt2002).However,themodelresultsalsosuggestedthatthenumberofestimatedannualfatalitiesusedinthemodel,50individuals,couldnotbesustainedbythenumberofbreedingadultswhenconsideringthelossofreproductivepotentialincurredbyeacheaglefatality(HuntandHunt2006).AlthoughthevacantterritoriesarefilledbyfloatersandsubadultstostabilizetheAPWRApopulation,theAPWRAvicinitycanbeconsideredapopulationsinkbecausethepopulationdemandsaflowofrecruitsfromoutsidetheareatofillbreedingvacanciesastheyoccur.
HuntandHunt(2006)recommendedfuturestudiesoftheAPWRAgoldeneaglepopulationstobetterunderstandlong‐termtrends.TheU.S.GeologicalSurveyiscurrentlyconductingapopulationinventoryintheAPWRAregion(U.S.GeologicalSurvey2013)tobuildonpreviousresearchbyexpandingsurveysofterritoryoccupancyandnestingsuccesstoincludethebroaderpopulationofgoldeneaglesintheDiabloMountains.Theobjectivesofthestudyareto(1)estimatethebreedingandnonbreedingpopulationandmeasurereproductivesuccess,(2)evaluategoldeneagledetectabilitybasedontemporalandsurveymethodologyfactors,and(3)recommendstrategiesforimprovinggoldennestingsuccessandmethodstomonitortrends(U.S.GeologicalSurvey2013).ThisstudywillhelptoinformfuturemanagementofgoldeneaglesintheAPWRAandsurroundingregion.
American Kestrel
Americankestrelisnotastate‐orfederallylistedspecies.However,itisprotectedundertheMBTAandtheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeandisanAPWRAfocalspecies.TheNorthAmericanBreedingBirdSurveyhasdetectedsignificantdeclinesofAmericankestrelpopulationsinmanyareasoftheUnitedStates,includingCalifornia(SmallwoodandBird2002).
Americankestrelsarefoundinavarietyofopentosemi‐openhabitats,includingmeadows,grasslands,deserts,earlyfieldsuccessionalcommunities,openparkland,agriculturalfields,andbothurbanandsuburbanareas(SmallwoodandBird2002).GrinnellandWythe(1927)describedAmericankestrelasacommonresidentthroughouttheSanFranciscoBayregion.Americankestrelsarecavitynesters,usingtress,snags,rockcrevices,cliffs,banks,andbuildings(PoliteandAhlborn1990).Theydisplaystrongsitefidelitytobreedingterritoriesandwinteringareas;however,littleinformationexistsregardingtheactualdelineationofterritorysize.Thebreedingseasonin
![Page 52: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐39
October 2014ICF 00323.08
CaliforniaoccursbetweenlateFebruaryandAugust,withegglayingoccurringfrommid‐MarchtolateJune(SmallwoodandBird2002).
Americankestrelsforageonawidevarietyofinsects,includinggrasshoppers,cicadas,beetles,dragonflies,butterflies,andmoths;smallrodents,especiallyvolesandmice;andsmallbirds(Sherrod1978).Americankestrelsareperchandpounceorhoverandpouncepredators,rarelypursuingpreyonwing(PoliteandAhlborn1990);theytendtoperchloweraswindspeedincreases(SmallwoodandBird2002).
WhiletheCNDDBdoesnotcontainrecordsforAmericankestrel,previousstudiesintheregionhavefoundtheprogramareavicinitytobeanimportantwinterforagingareaandmigrationcorridorforraptors,includingAmericankestrels(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame1993).NaturalperchesfromwhichthisspecieshuntswerescarcebeforedevelopmentoftheAPWRA.Turbinesandtransmissiontowers,poles,andlinesprovideabundantperchesandhavelikelyresultedinasubstantialincreaseinAmericankestrelnumbersintheAPWRAoverhistoricnumbers(OrloffandFlannery1992).
Prairie Falcon
Prairiefalconisnotastate‐orfederallylistedspecies.However,itisprotectedundertheMBTAandtheCaliforniaFishandGameCodeandisaspeciesoflocalconservationconcernintheAPWRAduetothehighnumberofrecordedfatalities.PrairiefalconinhabitsaridenvironmentsofwesternNorthAmericainopenplainsandshrub‐steppedesertswithcliffs,bluffs,orrockoutcroppings.Anefficientandspecializedpredatorofmedium‐sizeddesertmammalsandbirds,prairiefalconsrangewidely,searchinglargeareasforpatchilydistributedprey.Nesting,postnesting,andwinteringrangesaregenerallywidelyseparated,withmovementsbetweenrangesbeingpotentiallydependentonseasonalavailabilityofprey.Thesediurnalhunterspreypredominantlyongroundsquirrels,smallbirds,reptiles,andinsects.Huntingstrategiesincludestill‐huntingfromperches,soaring,andlowactiveflight(Phipps1979).Prairiefalconsnestoncliffswitheagles,ravens,andred‐tailedhawks,buthavealsobeenknowntousetrees,caves,buildings,andtransmissionlines(Nelson1974;Pitcher1977;HaakandDenton1979;MacLarenetal.1984;Roppeetal.1989;Bunnelletal.1997).
TheCNDDB(2013c)liststwoprairiefalconoccurrenceswithintheprogramarea,and11morewithin10milesoftheprogramareaboundary.Twenty‐sixobservationsofprairiefalconswererecordedduringfixedpointsurveysaroundtheDiabloWindsrepoweringprojectfrom2005to2007(WesternEcosystemsTechnology2008).AtleastfourrecentknownnestsiteshavebeenidentifiedwithintheAPWRAandatleasttwowithin2milesoftheprogramarea.AtelemetrystudyconductedbyEastBayRegionalParksDistrict(unpublisheddata)hasdocumentedextensiveuseoftheprogramareabyprairiefalconsnestingmorethan10milesfromtheprogramarea(FinalPEIRAppendixE,CommentLA‐1‐46).
Barn Owl
Barnowlisnotastate‐orfederallylistedspecies.However,itisontheDFGWatchList,isprotectedundertheMBTAandtheCaliforniaFishandGameCode,andisaspeciesoflocalconservationconcernintheAPWRA.BarnowlisfoundthroughoutmostoftheUnitedStates,exceptinthenorthernportionsoftheRockies,midwest,andnortheast(Martietal.2005).WithinCalifornia,thisspeciesisayear‐roundresidentrangingfromsealevelto5,500feet,preferringhabitatingrasslands,agriculturalfields,chaparral,andmarshesandotherwetlandareas.Barnowlsnestinawidevarietyofcavities,naturalandartificial,suchastrees,cliffs,caves,riverbanks,churchsteeples,
![Page 53: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐40
October 2014ICF 00323.08
barnlofts,haystacks,andnestboxes.Thespecies’breedingnumbersseemlimitedbytheavailabilityofnestcavitiesnearadequatedensitiesofprey.Mosthuntingoccurswhileflyingabout5–15feetabovethegroundinopenhabitats,usingexcellentlow‐lightvisionandsoundtodetectprey(Marti1974;Bunnetal.1982).Barnowlsoccasionallyhuntfromperchesandfeedprimarilyonmice,rats,voles,pocketgophers,andgroundsquirrels.Theyalsoconsumeshrews,insects,crustaceans,reptiles,amphibians,andbirds,includingmeadowlarksandblackbirds(Polite1990).
ThebarnowlbreedingseasoninCaliforniaoccursbetweenJanuaryandNovember,withegglayingpotentiallyoccurringduringmostmonths,asbarnowlstypicallyhavetwobroodsayear(Polite1990;Martietal.2005).Reproductivesuccessvarieswithage,priorbreedingexperience,preyavailability,andweather(Martietal.2005).Barnowlsdefendonlytheimmediatevicinityofthenest,allowingtwoormorepairstonestincloseproximityandsharethesameforaginghabitat.
Thereisnosignificantcontinent‐widebarnowlpopulationtrend.PopulationdeclineshavebeenevidentintheMidwestandNortheast,whilewesternU.S.populationsappeartobemostlystable.Localthreatsordeclinesdonotposeamajorconservationproblemfromaglobalperspective(NatureServe2012).TheCNDDBdoesnotcontainrecordsforbarnowlsastheyarenotastate‐orfederallylistedspecies.Studiesofwind‐turbine‐relatedfatalitiesintheAPWRAhavefoundnumerousbarnowls,suggestingthisspeciesisfairlycommoninportionsoftheprogramarea.BarnowlsareparticularlycommonintheareasofBrushyPeakandVascoCavesRegionalPreserves,usingavailablerockoutcrops,palmtrees,andstructuresfornestingandroosting(EastBayRegionalParksDistrict2000).
Western Burrowing Owl
WesternburrowingowlisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcernandanAPWRAfocalspecies.Westernburrowingowlisayear‐roundresidentintheCentralValley,SanFranciscoBayregion,CarrizoPlain,andImperialValley.Theyoccurprimarilyingrasslandhabitatsbutmayalsooccurinlandscapesthatarehighlyalteredbyhumanactivity.Suitablehabitatmustcontainburrowswithrelativelyshortvegetationandminimalamountsofshrubsortallervegetation.Westernburrowingowlmayalsooccurinagriculturalareasalongroads,canals,ditches,anddrains.TheymostcommonlynestandroostinCaliforniagroundsquirrelburrows,butmayalsouseburrowsdugbyotherspecies,aswellasculverts,pilesofconcreterubble,andpipes.ThebreedingseasonisMarchtoAugust,butcanbeginasearlyasFebruary.Duringthebreedingseason,owlsforageneartheirburrowsbuthavebeenrecordedhuntingupto1.7milesaway.Rodentpopulations,particularlyCaliforniavolepopulations,maygreatlyinfluencesurvivalandreproductivesuccessofCaliforniaburrowingowls(ShufordandGardali2008:219,221).
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitatforwesternburrowingowlispresentintheprogramarea.Thereare30recordsforoccurrencesofbreedingand/orwinteringowlsintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Themajorityoftheserecordsareinthenorthernportionoftheprogramarea.Therearemorethan40additionalCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofburrowingowlsurroundingtheprogramarea.Moreover,westernburrowingowlfatalitieshavebeendocumentedduringAPWRAfatalitysurveys(ICFInternational2013).ArecentstudyconductedundertheauspicesoftheAFMTproducedanestimateoftheAPWRA‐widebreedingseasonpopulationofburrowingowlsofapproximately635pairs(90%confidenceinterval368–903,P228)(Smallwoodetal.2011).
SuitablenestingandforaginghabitatforwesternburrowingowlispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TherearetwoCNDDBrecordsofoccurrencesofburrowingowlinthe
![Page 54: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐41
October 2014ICF 00323.08
PattersonPassprojectareaandoneCNDDBrecordforburrowingowlintheGoldenHillsprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).BurrowingowlshavebeendocumentedinboththeGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareasduringavianusesurveysconductedbytheAFMT(AlamedaCountyunpublisheddata).
Loggerhead Shrike
LoggerheadshrikeisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcernandaspeciesoflocalconservationconcernintheAPWRA.InCalifornia,therangeofloggerheadshrikeextendsthroughoutmostofthestateexceptfortheheavilyforestedareasofthecoastalslope,CoastRanges,KlamathandSiskiyoumountains,SierraNevadaandsouthernCascades,andhighelevationsoftheTransverseRanges.Loggerheadshrikesbreedinshrublandsandopenwoodlandswithgrasscoverandbareground.Theysearchforpreyfromtallshrubs,trees,fences,andpowerlines,andfrequentlyimpaletheirpreyonsharp,thorny,ormulti‐stemmedplantsandbarbed‐wirefences.Loggerheadshrikesforageinopenareaswithshortgrassesandforbsorbareground.(ShufordandGardali2008:274)Nestsarebuiltintreesorshrubswithdensefoliageandareusuallyhiddenwell.ThenestingperiodforloggerheadshrikesisMarchthroughJune(Zeineretal.1990a:546).
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitatforloggerheadshrikeispresentintheprogramarea.TherearethreeCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofloggerheadshrikenestsinthesoutheastportionoftheprogramarea.TherearefouradditionalCNDDBrecordsforoccurrenceseast,southeast,andsouthwestoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).LoggerheadshrikefatalitieshavebeendocumentedduringAPWRAfatalitysurveys(ICFInternational2013),andloggerheadshrikesareregularlydocumentedintheprogramareaduringavianusesurveysconductedbytheAFMT(AlamedaCountyunpublisheddata).
SuitableforaginghabitatforloggerheadshrikeispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas,andsuitablebreedinghabitatmaybepresent.AlthoughtherearenoCNDDBrecordsofloggerheadshrikenestsineitheroftheprojectareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c),loggerheadshrikesareregularlydocumentedinportionsofbothprojectareasduringavianusesurveysconductedbytheAFMT(AlamedaCountyunpublisheddata).
Tricolored Blackbird
TricoloredblackbirdisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.TricoloredblackbirdisahighlycolonialspeciesthatislargelyendemictoCalifornia.Tricoloredblackbirdbreedingcolonysitesrequireopen,accessiblewater;aprotectednestingsubstrate,includingeitherflooded,thorny,orspinyvegetation;andasuitableforagingspaceprovidingadequateinsectpreywithinafewmilesofthenestingcolony.Tricoloredblackbirdbreedingcoloniesoccurinfreshwatermarshesdominatedbytulesandcattails,inHimalayanblackberries(Rubusarmeniacus),andinsilageandgrainfields(BeedyandHamilton1997:3–4).ThebreedingseasonisfromlateFebruarytoearlyAugust(BeedyandHamilton1999).Tricoloredblackbirdforaginghabitatsinallseasonsincludeannualgrasslands,dryseasonalpools,agriculturalfields(suchaslargetractsofalfalfawithcontinuousmowingschedules,andrecentlytilledfields),cattlefeedlots,anddairies.Tricoloredblackbirdsalsoforageoccasionallyinriparianscrubhabitatsandalongmarshborders.Weed‐freerowcropsandintensivelymanagedvineyardsandorchardsdonotserveasregularforagingsites.Mosttricoloredblackbirdsforagewithin3milesoftheircolonysitesbutcommutedistancesofupto8mileshavebeenreported(BeedyandHamilton1997:5).
![Page 55: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐42
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Surveysduringthe1990s(Hamiltonetal.1995;BeedyandHamilton1997;Hamilton2000)confirmedasignificantdecliningtrendinCaliforniapopulationssincethe1930s,withaparticularlydramaticdeclinenotedafter1994.Statewidesurveysconductedduringthe2000sindicatesomerecoveryfromthe1999low;however,thepopulationincreaseshaveprimarilybeenlimitedtotheSanJoaquinValleyandtheTulareBasin(KyleandKelsey2011).Atotalof145,135tricoloredblackbirdswerecountedduringthemostrecent(2014)statewidesurvey,withMadera,Placer,Sacramento,andTulareCountiesaccountingforabout64%ofthetotalpopulationinApril2014(Meese2014:6,8).Thenumberoftricoloredblackbirdsstatewidedecreasedfromapproximately395,000in2008to259,000in2011,adeclineof34%Breedingsurveysconductedbetween1994and2011documentedtricoloredblackbirdpopulationsthatfluctuatedfromjustunder100,000birdstonearly400,000birds(KyleandKelsey2011).From2011to2014,thenumberoftricoloredblackbirdsdeclinedby44%,fromapproximately259,000to145,000.Thedeclineintricoloredblackbirdsfrom2008to2014was64%.Whilethenumberoftricoloredblackbirdsisdownstatewide,declinesaremostpronouncedintheSanJoaquinValley(78%declinebetween2008and2014)andalongtheCentralCoast(91%declinebetween2008and2014).Conversely,populationsinSacramentoCountyandtheSierraNevadaFoothillshaveincreasedby145%since2008.Overall,therateofdeclineappearstobeaccelerating,andadditionaleffortstoreducetherateofdeclinemaybenecessary(Meese2014:6–7,13–15).
Suitablenestingandforaginghabitatfortricoloredblackbirdispresentintheprogramarea.TherearetwoCNDDBrecordsoftricoloredblackbirdnestingcoloniesintheprogramarea.Thesenestingcoloniesarelocatedinthenorth‐centralportionoftheprogramareaandjustsoutheastofBethanyReservoir.Thereisoneadditionalrecordforatricoloredblackbirdcolonyapproximately1.5mileseastoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TricoloredblackbirdhasalsobeendocumentedduringAPWRAfatalitysurveys(ICFInternational2013).
SuitableforaginghabitatfortricoloredblackbirdispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas,andsuitablebreedinghabitatmaybepresent.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsoftricoloredblackbirdnestingcoloniesineitheroftheprojectareas;however,thereisonerecordforanestingcolonynearBethanyReservoirjustoutsidetheGoldenHillsprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Little Brown Bat
LittlebrownbatisconsideredamoderatepriorityspeciesinCaliforniabytheWesternBatWorkingGroup(2007).Thespeciesoccursprimarilyinmid‐toupperelevationsinCalifornia.ItisassociatedwithwoodlandhabitatsinbothurbanandwildernessareasbutmayoccuranywhereinCaliforniaduringseasonalmovements.Littlebrownbatsforageoverwaterandalongwoodlandedges.Theyuseawidevarietyofcreviceandcavity‐typeroostsitesintrees,buildings,otherartificialstructures,androckformationsandcaves,andrelyonnightroostsbetweenforagingbouts(Anthonyetal.1981:151).Maternitycoloniescancontainseveralhundredbats.Thespeciescongregatesinmatingswarmsinthefall,thoughmatingcontinuesinhibernaculathroughoutthewinter.Littlebrownbatshibernateincavesandabandonedmines,potentiallyinlargeaggregations.
Suitableforaginghabitatforlittlebrownbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsandotheraquatichabitatsintheprogramarea.Smallamountsofsuitableroostinghabitatmaybepresentintheprogramareaaswell.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsoflittlebrownbatroostsintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c);however,asinglelittlebrownbatfatalityhas
![Page 56: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐43
October 2014ICF 00323.08
beententativelyidentifiedintheprogramareaduringAPWRAfatalitysurveys(ICFInternational2013).
AsmallamountofsuitableroostinghabitatmaybepresentinthegoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.However,giventhecurrentlyknownelevationpreferencesandrangeforthisspeciesinCalifornia,itisunlikelythatanylocationintheAPWRAcontainshibernaculaorsignificantmaternityroostinghabitat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsoflittlebrownbatroostsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c);nevertheless,littlebrownbatsmayforageinorflythroughbothprojectareas.
Silver‐Haired Bat
Silver‐hairedbatisconsideredamoderatepriorityspeciesinCaliforniabytheWesternBatWorkingGroup(2007).Silver‐hairedbatsoccurprimarilyinthenorthernportionofCaliforniaandathigherelevationsinthesouthernandcoastalmountainranges(BrownandPierson1996)butmayoccuranywhereinCaliforniaduringtheirspringandfallmigrations.Theyareassociatedwithcoastalandmontaneconiferousforests,valleyfoothillwoodlands,pinyon‐juniperwoodlands,andvalleyfoothillandmontaneriparianhabitats(Zeineretal.1990b:54).Silver‐hairedbatsroostintreesalmostexclusivelyinthesummer,andmaternityrooststypicallyarelocatedinwoodpeckerhollowsoringapsunderbark.Maternalcoloniesrangefromseveraltoabout75individuals(BrownandPierson1996).
Suitableforaginghabitatforsilver‐hairedbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsandotheraquatichabitatsintheprogramarea.Treesintheprogramareamayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforsilver‐hairedbat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofsilver‐hairedbatroostsintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Suitableforaginghabitatforsilver‐hairedbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.Treesintheprojectareasmayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforsilver‐hairedbat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofsilver‐hairedbatroostsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Western Red Bat
WesternredbatisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcernandisconsideredahighpriorityspeciesinCaliforniabytheWesternBatWorkingGroup(2007).ItoccursthroughoutmuchofCaliforniaatlowerelevations.Itisfoundprimarilyinriparianandwoodedhabitatsbutalsooccursseasonallyinurbanareas(BrownandPierson1996).Westernredbatsroostinthefoliageoftreesthatareoftenlocatedontheedgeofhabitatsadjacenttostreams,fields,orurbanareas.ThisspeciesbreedsinAugustandSeptemberandyoungareborninMaythroughJuly(Zeineretal.1990b:60).
Suitableforaginghabitatforwesternredbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsandotheraquatichabitatsintheprogramarea.Treesandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheprogramareamayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforwesternredbat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofwesternredbatroostsintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c);however,westernredbathasbeendocumentedintheprogramareaduringAPWRAfatalitysurveys(ICFInternational2013).
SuitableforaginghabitatforwesternredbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.Treesandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheproject
![Page 57: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐44
October 2014ICF 00323.08
areasmayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforwesternredbat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofwesternredbatroostsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Hoary Bat
HoarybatisconsideredamoderatepriorityspeciesinCaliforniabytheWesternBatWorkingGroup(2007).HoarybatsoccurthroughoutCaliforniabutarethoughttohaveapatchydistributioninthesoutheasterndeserts(Zeineretal.1990b:62).Hoarybatsarefoundprimarilyinforestedhabitats,includingriparianforests,andmayoccurinparkandgardensettingsinurbanareas.Dayroostsitesareinthefoliageofconiferousanddeciduoustrees(BrownandPierson1996).Woodlandswithmediumtolargetreeswithdensefoliageprovidesuitablematernityroostsites(Zeineretal.1990b:62).Matingoccursinthefall,andafterdelayedfertilization,youngarebornMay–June(Zeineretal.1990b:62;BrownandPierson1996).
Suitableforaginghabitatforhoarybatsispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsandotheraquatichabitatsintheprogramarea.Treesandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheprogramareamayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforhoarybat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofhoarybatroostsintheprogramarea;however,thereisonehistoricrecordofaroostnearLakedelValle,southwestoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Inaddition,hoarybathasbeendocumentedintheprogramareaduringAPWRAfatalitysurveys(ICFInternational2013)andinacousticsurveysattheVascoWindrepoweringsite(PandionSystems2010;Szewczak2013).
SuitableforagingandpotentiallysuitableroostinghabitatforhoarybatsispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.Treesandmixedwillowriparianscrubintheprojectareasmayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforhoarybat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofhoarybatroostsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Townsend’s Big‐Eared Bat
Townsend’sbig‐earedbatisacandidatespeciesforlistingundertheCaliforniaEndangeredSpeciesAct,isaCaliforniastatespeciesofspecialconcern,andahighpriorityspeciesundertheWesternBatWorkingGroup’sconservationprioritymatrix(WesternBatWorkingGroup2007).Townsend’sbig‐earedbatoccursthroughoutCaliforniabutdistributionappearstobelimitedbytheavailabilityofcavern‐likerooststructures.Townsend’sbig‐earedbatshavebeenfoundinawidevarietyofhabitatsfromdeserttoriparianandcoastalwoodland,buttheyarefoundingreatestnumbersinareaswithcavern‐formingrockorabandonedmines(WesternBatWorkingGroup2005).Townsend’sbig‐earedbatsroostindome‐likespacesincavesormines,wheretheyroosthangingintheopenfromtheceiling.Theyhavealsobeenknowntousecavern‐likespacesinabandonedbuildingsorbridges,andinthebasalhollowsinlargecoastredwoodtrees(Mazurek2004:60).Matingoccursinfallandspring,andpupsareborninlatespringtoearlysummer(PiersonandRainey1998:2).Maternityroostsizevaries,andmaycontainonlyafeworuptoseveralhundredindividuals.Thespeciesisbelievedtoberelativelysedentary,hibernatingincavesandminesnearsummermaternityroosts,thoughseasonalmovementsarenotwellunderstood.Townsend’sbig‐earedbatsmayhavehibernatedhistoricallyinaggregationsofthousandsofindividuals(PiersonandRainey1998:1).Theyarehighlysensitivetoroostdisturbance.
SuitableforaginghabitatforTownsend’sbig‐earedbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsandotheraquatichabitatsintheprogramarea.Smallamountsofsuitableroostinghabitatmaybepresentintheprogramareaaswell.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofTownsend’sbig‐earedbat
![Page 58: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐45
October 2014ICF 00323.08
roostsintheprogramarea;howeverthereisonerecordofaroostsitesouthwestoftheprogramareanearLakedelValle(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
ItisunlikelythatsuitableroostinghabitatforTownsend’sbig‐earedbatispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas;however,Townsend’sbig‐earedbatsmayforageinorflythroughbothoftheseprojectareas.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofTownsend’sbigearedbatroostsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Pallid Bat
PallidbatisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcernandisconsideredahighpriorityspeciesinCaliforniabytheWesternBatWorkingGroup(2007).ItisfoundthroughoutmostofCaliforniaatlowtomiddleelevations(6,000feet).Pallidbatsarefoundinavarietyofhabitatsincludingdesert,brushyterrain,coniferousforest,andnon‐coniferouswoodlands.Daytimeroostsitesincluderockoutcrops,mines,caves,hollowtrees,buildings,andbridges.Nightroostsarecommonlyunderbridgesbutarealsoincavesandmines(BrownandPierson1996).HibernationmayoccurduringlateNovemberthroughMarch.PallidbatsbreedfromlateOctoberthroughFebruary(Zeineretal.1990b:70)andoneortwoyoungareborninMayorJune(BrownandPierson1996).
Suitableforaginghabitatforpallidbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsandotheraquatichabitatsintheprogramarea.Smallamountsofsuitableroostinghabitatmaybepresentintheprogramareaaswell.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofpallidbatroostsintheprogramarea;howevertherearetworecordsforoccurrencessouthwestoftheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
SuitableforaginghabitatforpallidbatispresentalongdrainagesandoverpondsintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.Treesintheprojectareasmayprovidesuitableroostinghabitatforpallidbat.TherearenoCNDDBrecordsofpallidbatroostsineitherprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
American Badger
AmericanbadgerisaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern.InCalifornia,AmericanbadgersoccurthroughoutthestateexceptinhumidcoastalforestsofnorthwesternCaliforniainDelNorteandHumboldtCounties.Americanbadgersoccurinawidevarietyofopen,aridhabitatsbutmostcommonlyareassociatedwithgrasslands,savannas,andmountainmeadows.Theyrequiresufficientfood(burrowingrodents),friablesoils,andrelativelyopen,uncultivatedground.(Williams1986:66–67.)Badgersdigburrows,whichareusedforcoverandreproduction.Thespeciesmatesinsummerandearlyautumn,andyoungareborninMarchandearlyApril.(Zeineretal.1990b:312.)
SuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforAmericanbadgerispresentintheprogramarea.Thereareeightrecordsforoccurrencesofbadgersintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TherearefouradditionalCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofAmericanbadgeroutsidebutneartheprogramarea.
SuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforAmericanbadgerispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TherearetwoCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofAmericanbadgerintheGoldenHillsprojectarea,andanadditionaloccurrencejustoutsideit(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).TherearenoCNDDBrecordsforAmericanbadgerinthePattersonPassprojectarea.
![Page 59: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐46
October 2014ICF 00323.08
San Joaquin Kit Fox
TheSanJoaquinkitfoxisstate‐andfederallylistedasendangered.SanJoaquinkitfoxesoccurinsomeareasofsuitablehabitatontheflooroftheSanJoaquinValleyandinthesurroundingfoothillsoftheCoastRanges,SierraNevada,andTehachapiMountainsfromKernCountynorthtoContraCosta,Alameda,andSanJoaquinCounties(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1998).Since1998,thepopulationstructurehasbecomemorefragmented,withsomeresidentsatellitepopulationshavingbeenlocallyextirpated;thoseareashavebeenusedbydispersingkitfoxesratherthanresidentanimals(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2010:15).ThelargestextantpopulationsofkitfoxareinKernCounty(ElkHillsandBuenaVistaValley)andSanLuisObispoCountyintheCarrizoPlainNaturalArea(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1998).
NaturalhabitatsforSanJoaquinkitfoxincludealkalisink,alkaliflat,andgrasslands.SanJoaquinkitfoxesmayuseagriculturallandssuchasrowcrops,orchards,andvineyardstoalimitedextent,buttheyareunabletooccupyfarmlandonalong‐termbasis.(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2010:19–21.)SanJoaquinkitfoxesusuallypreferareaswithloose‐texturedsoilssuitablefordenexcavation(Orloffetal.1986:62)butarefoundonvirtuallyeverysoiltype(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1998:129).Wheresoilsmakediggingdifficult,kitfoxesmayenlargeormodifyburrowsbuiltbyotheranimals,particularlythoseofCaliforniagroundsquirrels(Orloffetal.1986:63;U.S.FishandWildlifeService1998:127).Structuressuchasculverts,abandonedpipelines,andwellcasingsmayalsobeusedasdensites(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1998:127).
ThebreedingseasonbeginsduringSeptemberandOctoberwhenadultfemalesbegintocleanandenlargenatalorpuppingdens.LittersoftwotosixpupsarebornbetweenlateFebruaryandlateMarch.(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1998:126.)
SuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxispresentintheprogramarea.Thereare11recordsforoccurrencesofSanJoaquinkitfoxintheprogramarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).Themajorityoftheoccurrencesareinthenorthandeasternportionsoftheprogramarea.Thereare15additionalCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofSanJoaquinkitfoxoutsidebutneartheprogramarea.
SuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxispresentintheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectareas.TherearethreeCNDDBrecordsforoccurrencesofSanJoaquinkitfoxintheGoldenHillsprojectareaandoneinthePattersonPassprojectarea(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife2013c).
Birds and Bats Subject to Turbine‐Related Mortality
Inadditiontothespecial‐statuswildlifespeciesdiscussedabove,severalnon‐special‐statusspeciesofbirdsandbatsareconsideredinthisEIRbecauseoftheirpotentialtobekilledbyoperatingwindturbines.Batsareparticularlyvulnerablebecauseoftheirlowreproductiverateandsusceptibilitytoturbine‐relatedmortality.Pastandexistingturbine‐relatedavianandbatmortalityandmonitoringarediscussedbelowtoprovidecontextfortheturbine‐relatedavianandbatmortalityimpactdiscussions.
Avian Mortality and Monitoring
TheAPWRAsupportsabroaddiversityofresident,migratory,andwinteringbirdspeciesthatregularlymovethroughthearea(OrloffandFlannery1992).Inparticular,diurnalraptors(eagles
![Page 60: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐47
October 2014ICF 00323.08
andhawks)usetheprevailingwindsandupdraftsforsoaringandglidingduringdailytravel,foraging,andmigration.Birdspassingthroughtherotorplaneofoperatingwindturbinesareatriskofbeinginjuredorkilled.MultiplestudiesofavianmortalityintheAPWRAshowthatsubstantialnumbersofgoldeneagles,red‐tailedhawks,Americankestrels,burrowingowls,barnowls,andadiversemixofnon‐raptorspeciesarekilledeachyearinturbine‐relatedincidents(HowellandDiDonato1991;OrloffandFlannery1992;Howell1997;SmallwoodandThelander2004;ICFInternational2013).
Untilrecently,attemptstoreduceavianfatalitiesintheAPWRAhavefocusedprimarilyontwomanagementactions:theshutdownofturbinesduringthewinterperiodwhenuseoftheareabyred‐tailedhawks,goldeneagles,andAmericankestrelsishighest,andtheremovalofturbinesdeterminedtoposethehighestcollisionriskbasedonhistoryoffatalities,topographicpositionoftheturbine,andotherfactors(SmallwoodandSpiegel2005a,2005b,2005c;ICFInternational2013).Whiletheseactionshavemetwithsomesuccess,theireffectivenesshasbeenlessthanexpectedforreasonsthatarenotyetclear.However,anincreasingbodyofevidencesuggeststhatrepowering—inthiscasethereplacementofnumerousolder,smallerturbineswithfewernewer,largerturbines—couldresultinasubstantialreductioninavianfatalities.UsingthefirstfewyearsofdatafromtheAlamedaCountyAvianFatalityMonitoringProgram,SmallwoodandKaras(2009)concludedthatthemosteffectivewaytoreduceturbine‐relatedavianfatalitiesintheAPWRAistorepower.EvidencecollectedtodatefromthethreesitesintheAPWRAthathavebeenrepoweredsuggeststhatthelargermodernturbinescausesubstantiallyfewerturbine‐relatedavianfatalitiesthantheoldergenerationturbines(Brownetal.2013;ICFInternational2013),althoughitshouldbepointedoutthattwoofthethreesitesinvolvedhadmuchsmallerturbinesthanthoseproposedforuseintheprogram.TheScientificReviewCommittee(SRC)fortheAPWRAhasalsoproducedguidelinesforsitingwindturbinestoreduceavianfatalitiesintheAPWRA.TheSRCevaluatedtopographic,windpattern,birdbehavior,andturbinesitingvariablesrelatedtohazardousconditionstoprovideguidancetothewindcompaniestoreduceaviancollisionhazards(AlamedaCountyScientificReviewCommittee2010).
ThemonitoringprogramestablishedbytheSettlementAgreementdescribedinChapter1ofthisEIRandconductedbytheAlamedaCountyAFMThasresultedinconsiderableinformationonwhichtobaseconclusionsabouttheeffectsoftheAPWRA‐wideprogramandtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassrepoweringprojects.Themonitoringprogramhasbeenrunningcontinuouslysince2005,andannualestimatesofturbine‐relatedavianfatalityratesandestimatesofthetotalnumberofbirdskilledeachyearareavailableforeachbirdyearfrom2005through2011.AbirdyearstartsonOctober1andendsonSeptember30andisnamedforthecalendaryearinwhichitstarts.Birdyearsareusedasthebasisforanalysisbecausetheybetterreflectthetimingofavianmovementsandecologythandocalendaryears(ICFInternational2013).
Bat Fatality and Monitoring
TheAPWRAsupportshabitattypessuitableformaternity,foraging,andmigrationforspecial‐statusandcommonbats.Severalofthesespeciesaresusceptibletodirectmortalitythroughcollisionorotherinteractionswithwindturbines.FivespeciesofbathavebeendocumentedasfatalitiesintheAPWRA:littlebrownbat,Californiamyotis,westernredbat,hoarybat,andMexicanfree‐tailedbat(Table3.4‐6)(InsigniaEnvironmental2012:47–48;ICFInternational2013:3‐3).HoarybatsandMexicanfree‐tailedbatshavemadeupthemajorityofdocumentedfatalities;westernredbat,anothermigratoryspeciesandaCaliforniaspeciesofspecialconcern,hassustainedthethirdhighestnumberofdocumentedfatalities.
![Page 61: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐48
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Otherthanfatalityrecords,occurrencedataforbatspeciesintheAPWRAarelimited,andexpectationsofpresencearegenerallybasedonknownrangesandhabitatassociations.However,preliminaryanalysisofpre‐andpostconstructionacousticsurveydatafromtherecentlyrepoweredVascoWindsfacilityintheContraCostaCountyportionoftheAPWRAdocumentsthepresenceoffouradditionalspecies(bigbrownbat,silver‐hairedbat,canyonbat,andYumamyotis).Acousticsurveysindicatedbatactivityinallthreeseasonsinwhichsurveyswereconducted,withaspikeinactivityinthefall(PandionSystems2010;Szewczak2013).Mexicanfree‐tailedbatandhoarybatcomprisedthemajorityoftheacousticdetections(PandionSystems2010).
Relativelylittleisknownaboutbatbiologyasitrelatestofatalityriskatwindenergyfacilities.Limitedknowledgeofsuchfactorsasmigration,matingbehavior,behavioraroundturbines,andseasonalmovementsimpedeeffortstopredictriskofturbinecollision.StudiesatwindenergyfacilitiesinNorthAmericagenerallyshowstrongseasonalandspecies‐compositionpatternsinbatfatalities,withthebulkoffatalitiesconsistingofmigratoryspeciesandoccurringinlatesummertomid‐autumn.AsinotherpartsofNorthAmerica,themajorityofdocumentedfatalitiesintheAPWRAhaveoccurredduringthefallmigrationseasonandhaveconsistedofmigratorybatspecies.
Historically,thenumberofbatfatalitiesdetectedaspartoftheavianfatalitymonitoringprogramatold‐generationturbinesintheAPWRAhasbeenextremelylow,dueatleastinparttothemonitoringprogram’sdesign,whichhasfocusedonbirdmortality.Aspreviousstudymethodswerenotdesignedtogeneratedefensiblebatmortalityrates,andasnewgenerationturbinesmayposenovelthreatstobats,assumptionsofspeciesvulnerabilitybasedonextrapolationfromtheolderturbinetechnologiespresentintheAPWRAarenotnecessarilyvalid(CaliforniaBatWorkingGroup2006).
Calculatingadjustedbatfatalityratesatoldgenerationturbinesusingdatacollectedundertheearlyavianmonitoringprogramisproblematicbothbecausethesamplesizeislowandbecausemonitoringandanalysismethodswerenotdesignedtodetectandadjustforthesetypesoffatalities.Intheirpapergrapplingwithcomparisonsoffatalityratesbetweenold‐generationturbinesattheAPWRAandearlyrepoweringprojects,SmallwoodandKaras(2009)illustratedthesepointsbyacknowledgingthatalloftheirold‐generationbatfatalityestimatesarelikelybiasedlow(2009:1065)andthatdifferencesobservedincomparisonsofvariousbatfatalityestimates,eventhoseasseeminglysignificantas800%,couldnotbestatisticallydefendedduetothesmallsamplesizesinvolved(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1066–67).
Batfatalityratesavailableforold‐generationturbinesattheAPWRAareasfollows.Fortheearlieryears,covering1998–2002andacombinationofturbinemodels,nameplatecapacities,anddesigns,SmallwoodandKaraspresentedabatfatalityrateestimateof0.115(SE+‐0.073)batdeaths/MW/year(2009:1066).Formorerecentold‐generationturbinemonitoringyears(2005–2007),SmallwoodandKaraspresentedabatfatalityrateestimateof0.263(SE+_0.172)batdeaths/MW/year,(usedasthebaselineinthisPEIR)(2009:1066).
BatfatalityratesdocumentedatthethreerepoweredprojectsintheAPWRAvary.Theserateswerealsogeneratedusingdifferentsearcheffortsanddifferentadjustmentcalculations,makingdirectcomparisonproblematic,despitethecommonmetricreported.FortheDiabloWindsEnergyProject(2005–2007),SmallwoodandKaras(2009:1067)reportedabatfatalityrateestimateof0.783(SE+‐0.548)/MW/year;fortheBuenaVistaWindFarm(2008‐2010),InsigniaEnvironmental(2012:ES‐3)reportedabatfatalityraterangeof0.48–1.08/MW/year,dependingoncalculationmethods;forthefirstyearoftheVascoWindsrepoweringproject(2012–2013),Brownetal.(2013:35–36)reported
![Page 62: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐49
October 2014ICF 00323.08
abatfatalityraterangeof0.663(SE+‐0.486)to2.281(SE+‐1.06)/MW/year,withthe“bestestimate”ratereportedas1.679(SE+‐0.801)/MW/year(2013:39).
Consistentacrossalldocumentedrates,thoughmethodsusedtogeneratetheseratesvary,isthatreportedbatfatalityratesincreasedwhenold‐generationturbineswerereplacedbynewer,largerturbines(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1068).TurbinesusedinfuturerepoweringprojectsarelikelytobesimilarinsizetotheVascoWindsturbinesbutmuchlargerthantheDiabloWindsandBuenaVistaturbinesinbothoverallsizeandratednameplatecapacity.Inameta‐analysisofbatfatalitiesatnumerouswindenergyfacilitiesinNorthAmerica,Barclayetal.foundthatbatfatalityincreasedexponentiallywithincreasingturbineheight(2007:384).
ThelimiteddataavailablefortheprogramareaandvicinitysuggestthepotentialforsimilarspeciescompositionandtemporalpatternsofbatmortalitytothosethathavebeendocumentedattheVascoWindsrepoweringprojectandatotherfourth‐generationwindenergyfacilities,suchasthoseintheMontezumaHillsWindResourceArea.
Table 3.4‐6. Raw Bat Fatalities by Species Detected in Standardized Searches at Various APWRA Monitoring Projects
Species 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
APWRAMonitoringa
Hoarybat 0 2 1 0 2 0 5
Mexicanfree‐tailedbat 0 1 1 1 1 0 4
Westernredbat 0 1 1 1 0 0 3
Littlebrownbat 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
Unidentifiedbat 0 2 1 1 1 2 7
Totalbats 0 6 4 3 5 3 21
BuenaVistaRepoweringProjectb
Hoarybat 1 5 3 9
Mexicanfree‐tailedbat 0 1 2 3
Californiamyotis 0 0 1 1
Totalbats 1 6 6 13
VascoWindsRepoweringProject,YearOnec
Hoarybat 10
Mexicanfree‐tailedbat 7
Westernredbat 1
Unidentifiedbat 1
Totalbats 19
Sources:APWRA:ICFInternational2013:3‐3;BuenaVista:InsigniaEnvironmental2012:47‐8.Note:Fatalitiesareshownforallyearsforwhichmonitoringdataareavailable.a Variable:upto417MWinstalled,turbineheightsof60–164feet.b 38MWinstalled,turbineheightsof147–196feet.MonitoringresultsfromFebruary2008toJanuary2011.
c 78MWinstalled,turbineheightsof263feet.MonitoringresultsfromMay2012–May2013.
![Page 63: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐50
October 2014ICF 00323.08
3.4.2 Environmental Impacts
Methods for Analysis
Thissectiondescribesthemethodsandassumptionsusedtodeterminethedirectandindirectimpactsoftheprogramandthetwospecificprojectsonbiologicalresources.Thegeneralmethodsforanalysisarefollowedbydiscussionsofthemethodsusedtoevaluateandquantifyavianandbatfatalityimpacts.Themethodsforanalysisofimpactsonbiologicalresourcesarebasedonprofessionalstandardsandinformationcitedthroughoutthissection.Thekeyeffectswereidentifiedandevaluatedbasedontheenvironmentalcharacteristicsoftheprogramandprojectareasandtheexpectedmagnitude,intensity,anddurationofactivitiesrelatedtotheconstructionandoperationoftheprogramandthePattersonPassandGoldenHillsprojects.
Directimpactsarethoseeffectsthataredirectlycausedbyprojectconstructionandoperation(eveniftheresultingeffectbecomesapparentovertime).Indirectimpactsarethoseeffectsofaprojectthatoccureitherlaterintimeoratadistancefromtheprojectlocationbutarereasonablyforeseeable,suchasconversionofwetlandstouplandsfromdiversionofupstreamwatersources.Directandindirectimpactscanbeeitherpermanentortemporary.Impactsonlandcoveraregenerallyconsideredtemporarywhenthelandcoverisrestoredtopreconstructionconditionswithin1year.
Theactivitieslistedbelowcouldhavedirecteffectsonbiologicalresources.
Vegetationclearing;grading;excavating/trenching;andconstructionofcranepads,turbinefoundations,andbatchplants.
Constructionofnewdirtorgravelroadsandwideningofexistingroads.
Temporarystockpilingandsidecastingofsoil,constructionmaterials,orotherconstructionwastes.
Soilcompaction,dust,andwaterrunofffromconstructionsites.
Increasedvehicletraffic.
Short‐termconstruction‐relatednoise(fromequipment)andvisualdisturbance.
Degradationofwaterqualityindrainagesandotherwaterbodiesresultingfromconstructionrunoffcontainingpetroleumproducts.
Introductionorspreadofinvasiveplantspecies.
Operationofwindturbines.
Reclamationoflandscape.
Maintenanceoffirebreaksandroads.
Theconditionslistedbelowareexamplesofindirecteffectsonbiologicalresources.
Permanentalterationstolightandnoiselevels.
Damagethroughtoxicityassociatedwithherbicidesandrodenticides.
![Page 64: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐51
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Mostofthebiologicalimpactsassociatedwithrepoweringactivitiesanalyzedinthissectionaredirectimpacts.Whereindirectimpactswouldresultfromsuchactivities,theyaresoidentifiedintheimpactdiscussion.
Permanentdirecteffectsonbiologicalresourceswerequantifiedusingtheestimatedamountoflandcoverthatwouldbeconvertedasaresultofconstructionofnewfacilities.Temporaryeffectsonbiologicalresourceswerequantifiedusingtheestimatedamountoflandcoverthatwouldbetemporarilydisturbedduringprojectconstructionbutwouldberestoredtopreprojectconditionswithin1yearofdisturbance.
Fortheprogram,specificlocationsoffacilitiesandroadsarenotavailable.Toestimatepermanentandtemporaryimpactacreagesintheprogramarea,impactinformationderivedfromtheGoldenHillsprojectdescriptionwasusedtocalculateaveragepermanentandtemporaryareasofdisturbanceforan80MWprojectusingturbinessimilartothoseproposedfortheprogram.Thesestandardizedareasofimpactwereappliedtothespecificationsoftheprogram(seeChapter2,ProgramDescription).Thetotalamountsofpermanentandtemporaryimpactswerethenallocatedtothevariouslandcovertypesbasedontheproportionoftheprogramareacomprisingeachlandcovertype.Accordingly,theestimatedpermanentandtemporarylandcoverimpactsareproportionaltotheamountofeachlandcovertypeintheprogramarea.TheseestimatedimpactsareshowninTable3.4‐7.
![Page 65: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐52
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐7. Estimated Permanent and Temporary Impacts on Land Cover Types in the Program Areaa
LandCoverType
AmountinProgramArea(acres)
PercentofTotalProgramArea
PermanentImpactEstimate(acres)b
TemporaryImpactEstimate(acres)c
Alt1 Alt2 Alt1 Alt2
Annualgrassland 39,381.63 90.83 598.57 645.80 526.81 568.60
Alkalimeadow 555.06 1.28 8.44 9.10 7.42 8.01
Rockoutcrop 42.05 0.001 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Northernmixedchaparral/chamisechaparral
28.65 0.0007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Northerncoastalscrub/Diablansagescrub
74.51 0.002 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Mixedevergreenforest/oakwoodland
582.18 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06
Blueoakwoodland 163.61 0.004 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03
Foothillpine–oakwoodland 21.11 0.0005 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mixedwillowriparianscrub 39.27 0.0009 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Mixedriparianforestandwoodland
9.93 0.0002 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Alkaliwetland 483.17 1.11 7.31 7.89 6.44 6.95
Seasonalwetland 81.44 0.002 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Perennialfreshwatermarsh 0.01 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Canal/Aqueduct 158.21 0.004 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03
Ponds 54.19 0.001 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Reservoirs 176.58 0.004 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03
Drainagesd – – – – – –
Cropland 4.55 0.0001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DevelopedandDisturbed 1,502.58 0.03 0.20 0.21 0.17 0.19
a Theseimpactestimatesdonotincludeoffsetoflandcoverthatisreturnedtonaturalconditionsfromremovaloffacilitiesandroads.Therefore,acreagesofimpactsarelikelytobelowerthanthoseshownhere.
b Percentoftotalprogramareamultipliedby659acres(Alternative1)and711acres(Alternative2)oftotalpermanentimpactsassociatedwiththeprogram.
c Percentoftotalprogramareamultipliedby580acres(Alternative1)and626acres(Alternative2)oftotaltemporaryimpactsassociatedwiththeprogram.
d Acreagewasnotcalculatedforimpactsondrainages.Typically,suchimpactsaremeasuredinlinearfeet;theseimpactswillbequantifiedwhendesigndrawingsareavailable.
Itshouldbenotedthatsitingconsiderationsduringdesignanddevelopmentofindividualprojectsandimplementationofavoidanceandminimizationmeasureswouldlikelymodifysuchimpacts.Forexample,becausemostroadsandfacilitieswouldnotbeconstructedinlowareaswheremostpondsandwetlandsarelocated,permanentlossoftheselandcovertypesisnotanticipated.Additionally,impactestimatesdonottakeintoaccountthatsomedevelopedareasmaybereturnedtonatural
![Page 66: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐53
October 2014ICF 00323.08
conditions;suchrestorationwouldoffsettheacreagesofaffectedlandcover.Consequently,theestimatesinTable3.4‐7likelyexceedtheactualimpactsthatwouldresultfromconstruction.
LandcoverimpactsassociatedwiththeGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsweredeterminedbyoverlayingthefootprintoftheproposedprojectcomponentsonthemappedlandcovertypesandcalculatingtheareaofeachlandcovertypethatwouldbepermanentlyandtemporarilyaffected.Permanentandtemporaryimpactsonlandcover(andspecial‐statusspecieshabitat)resultingfromtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojectsareshowninTables3.4‐8and3.4‐9,respectively.
Table 3.4‐8. Estimated Permanent and Temporary Impacts on Land Cover Types in the Golden Hills Project Area (acres)a
LandCover Permanent
Temporary
AssociatedWildlifeSpeciesConstruction Decommissioning
Annualgrassland
124.89 91.80 28.47(existingturbines)117.00(roads)
Californiatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle,Blainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,SanJoaquincoachwhip,white‐tailedkite,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,tricoloredblackbird,Americanbadger,SanJoaquinkitfox,non–special‐specialstatusmigratorybirds
Alkalimeadow 0.30 3.69 – Sameasannualgrassland
Ponds 0.15 0.00 – Vernalpooltadpoleshrimp,curved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle,Californiatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle
Drainagesb – – Curved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle,Californiatigersalamander,Californiared‐leggedfrog,foothillyellow‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle
a Theseimpactestimatesdonotincludeoffsetoflandcoverthatisreturnedtonaturalconditionsfromremovaloffacilitiesandroads.Therefore,acreagesofimpactsarelikelytobelowerthanthoseshownhere.
b Acreagewasnotcalculatedforimpactsondrainages.Typically,suchimpactsaremeasuredinlinearfeet;theseimpactswillbequantifiedwhendesigndrawingsareavailable.
![Page 67: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐54
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐9. Permanent and Temporary Impacts (acres) on Land Cover Types in the Patterson Pass Project Area (acres)a
LandCover Permanent
Temporary
AssociatedWildlifeSpeciesConstruction Decommissioning
Annualgrassland
15.59 56.38 12.34(existingturbines)66.00(roads)
Californiatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle,Blainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,SanJoaquincoachwhip,white‐tailedkite,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,tricoloredblackbird,Americanbadger,SanJoaquinkitfox,non–special‐specialstatusmigratorybirds
SeasonalWetland
– 0.01 – Longhornfairyshrimp,vernalpoolfairyshrimp,vernalpooltadpoleshrimp,curved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle,westernspadefoot
Perennialfreshwatermarsh
– 0.02 – Californiatigersalamander,Californiared‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle
Drainages 0.01 0.03 – Curved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle,Californiatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,foothillyellow‐leggedfrog,westernpondturtle
a Theseimpactestimatesdonotincludeoffsetoflandcoverthatisreturnedtonaturalconditionsfromremovaloffacilitiesandroads.Therefore,acreagesofimpactsarelikelytobelowerthanthoseshownhere.
Potentialindirectimpactsresultingfromtheprogramandthetwoprojectswereevaluatedqualitativelyfortworeasons:(1)indirectimpactswouldoccurfartherfromtheprojectareaorlaterintime,and(2)evaluatingindirecteffectsquantitativelywouldbehighlyspeculative.
Avian Fatality Analysis Methods
Fatality Rates
Estimatingthenumberofbirdskilledatwindenergyfacilitiesisarapidlydevelopingfield,withavarietyofmetrics,methods,andestimatorsusedtoquantifyturbine‐relatedavianfatalities.Mostcommonlyusedestimatorsfirstcalculatetherateatwhichbirdsarekilled.Historically,themostcommonlyusedratehasbeenthenumberofbirdskilledpermegawatt(MW)peryear,whereMWsaremeasuredastheratednameplatecapacitiesoftheturbines.Theratednameplatecapacityofaturbineistheamountofpoweritcangenerateunderitsidealconditions(differentturbinesaredesignedtooperatemostefficientlyunderdifferentconditions).
ThenumberoffatalitiesperMWperyearhasbeenusedmostoftenbecauseitfacilitatescomparisonsacrossanumberofdifferentturbinetypeswithdifferentsizesandratednameplatecapacities.However,thenumberofbirdskilledperturbineperyearisbeingusedmoreoftenatfacilitiesusingmodernturbinesbecausetheselargerturbinesarereachingasizeatwhichahigher
![Page 68: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐55
October 2014ICF 00323.08
densityofturbinesisnolongerfeasible.Consequently,thenumberoftowersbecomesrelativelymoreimportantthantheactualratedcapacity.
Regardlessofthemetricused,thefatalityrate(expressedeitherperMWorperturbine)isthenmultipliedbyeitherthetotalnumberofMWsinthefacilityorthetotalnumberofturbinesinthefacility,respectively,toobtaintheestimateofthetotalnumberofbirdskilledeachyearatthefacility.
ThebaselineestimateofthenumberofbirdskilledannuallyforeachprojectandfortheprogramareawasbasedonthetotalnumberofMWsthatwereinstalled(referredtoasthetotalinstalledcapacity)atthetimetheNoticeofPreparationforthisPEIRwasfiled.TheinstalledcapacityatthetimetheNOPwasfiledwas329MWfortheprogramarea,80.5MWfortheGoldenHillsprojectarea,and21.8MWforthePattersonPassprojectarea(theprogramareatotalincludesthecapacityofthetwoprojectareas).
Forthefatalityrates,theaverageoftheannualestimatesofeachfatalityratefromthe2005–2011birdyears(n=7years)providedbytheAlamedaCountyAvianFatalityMonitoringProgram(ICFInternational2013)wasbasedonold‐generationturbinesonly(i.e.,resultsfromtheDiabloWindsandBuenaVistaturbineswereexcludedbecausetheyarenotconsideredold‐generationturbines).Thisaveragewasusedbecausetheannualfatalityratesvaryconsiderablyfromyeartoyear.
Theanalysiswasbasedonfivegroupsofspecies:focalspecies,speciesoflocalconservationconcern,raptors(includingowlsandturkeyvultures),non‐raptors,andallbirds.Focalspeciesweredefinedinthe2007SettlementAgreementasAmericankestrel,burrowingowl,goldeneagle,andred‐tailedhawkforthepurposeofmeasuringthereductioninraptorfatalitiesresultingfromimplementationofmanagementactions.Fouradditionalspecies(loggerheadshrike[Californiaspeciesofspecialconcern],prairiefalcon[CDFWWatchList],Swainson’shawk[listedasthreatenedunderCESA],andbarnowl)wereaddedfortheanalysesinthisPEIRbecauseofahighfatalityrate,generalconcernsabouttheconservationstatusofthesespecies,orboth.
ICFbiologistscomparedthebaselinenumberoffatalitiesforeachspeciesandspeciesgroupcalculatedasoutlinedabovetothenumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurasaresultofrepowering.Thenumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurasaresultofrepoweringwasbasedonthe417and450MWcapsforthetwoprogramalternativesandonthesizeofeachoftheprojectsmeasuredinMWsasoutlinedintheprojectdescription.TheratesusedtocalculatethenumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurasaresultofrepoweringwerederivedfromtheratesatthreerepoweringprojectsintheAPWRAthatusenewer,repoweredturbines:DiabloWinds,BuenaVista,andVascoWinds.DiabloWindscomprisesthirty‐one660kWturbines,BuenaVistathirty‐eight1MWturbines,andVascoWindsthirty‐four2.3MWturbines(InsigniaEnvironmental2012;Brownetal.2013;ICFInternational2013).Althoughthereisconsiderablerangeinturbinesizesamongthesethreeprojects,theyareallconsiderednew‐generationturbinesrelativetotherestoftheturbinesinstalledintheAPWRA.Theannualfatalityrates(expressedasfatalitiesperMWperyear)forthesethreerepoweringprojectsarepresentedinTable3.4‐10,alongwiththeaverageoftheannualfatalityratesatnonrepoweredturbinesforcomparison.However,itshouldbenotedthattherateestimatesavailablefromnew‐generationrepoweredturbinesintheAPWRAmaynotberepresentativeofratesthatwouldoccuratotherlocationsintheAPWRA.Thisisbecausethethreeexistingrepoweredprojectsiteseachhavedifferentturbinetypesandarelocatedinthreerelativelysmall,distinctareaswithsite‐specificgeographic,topographic,andotherecologicalconditions,andbecausetheprimaryspeciesofconcernarenotevenlydistributedthroughouttheAPWRA.
![Page 69: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐56
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐10. Annual Adjusted Fatality Rates for Nonrepowered and Repowered APWRA Turbines
Species/Group Nonrepowereda
Repowered
DiabloWindsb BuenaVistac VascoWindsd
Americankestrel 0.59 0.09 0.15 0.30
Barnowl 0.24 0.02 0.00 0.03
Burrowingowl 0.78 0.84 – 0.05
Goldeneagle 0.08 0.01 0.04 0.03e
Loggerheadshrike 0.19 0.00 – –
Prairiefalcon 0.02 – 0.00 –
Red‐tailedhawk 0.44 0.20 0.10 0.25
Swainson’shawk 0.00 – – –
Allraptors 2.43 1.21 0.31 0.64
Allnativenon‐raptors 4.50 2.51 1.01 2.09
Notes: fatalityratesreflectannualfatalitiesperMW.“–”denotesthatnofatalitiesweredetected.“0.00”signifiesthat,althoughfatalitiesweredetected,therateislowerthantwosignificantdigits.
a Averageof2005–2011birdyears.b Averageof2005–2009birdyears.c Averageof3years(2007–2009).d Valuesfromfirstyearofmonitoring(2013).e ValueupdatedbasedoninformationprovidedbyNextEraEnergyResourcesonJuly21,2014.Valueprovidedisanaverageoftheadjustedratesfrommonitoringyears1(0.016)and2(0.048).
Potential Biases in the Avian Fatality Analysis Methods
Severalfactorsconfoundthecomparisonofavianfatalityratesbetweenold‐andnew‐generationturbines.Thefatalityratesfromnonrepoweredturbineswereobtainedwhilemanagementactionswerebeingimplementedtoreduceavianfatalities.Theseactionsincludedtheshutdownofturbinesduringthewinterperiod,atimewhenwindsarelowestbutavianuseoftheareaishighestforthreeofthefourfocalspecies.Inaddition,hazardousturbineswerebeingremovedduringtheperiodofdatacollection.Theseactionsincombinationresultedinareductionofavianfatalityrates,tendingtounderestimatethedifferencesbetweenold‐generationturbinesandnewerturbinesbecausethenewerturbinesarenotshutdownduringthewinterperiodandnoneweredeemedhazardousenoughtowarrantremoval.
Thefatalityratesfromtwoofthethreerepoweredprojectsareassociatedwithturbinesconsiderablysmallerthanthoselikelytobeusedinallfuturerepoweringprojects.Evidencecollectedtodatesuggeststhatavianfatalityratesmaydecreaseasturbinesizeincreases(SmallwoodandKaras2009).Consequently,theseratesmaybebiasedhighrelativetotheturbineslikelytobeusedinthetwoprojectsdescribedinthisPEIRandfutureprojectsimplementedintherestoftheAPWRA.Inaddition,thereisconsiderablevariationincollisionriskacrossthevarioustopographiesandgeographiesoftheAPWRA,presumablydueinparttovariationsinabundanceanduseoftheseareasbydifferentspecies.Forexample,burrowingowlswereknowntobeabundantintheareaaroundtheDiabloWindsturbineswhentheywereinstalled,andthusthereisarelativelyhighrate(fornew‐generationturbines)offatalitiesattheseturbines.Conversely,noburrowingowlfatalitiesweredetectedintheBuenaVistaprojectareainthe3yearsoffatalitymonitoringafterrepowering.Thus,thefatalityratesatthethreerepoweredprojectsitesmaynotbe
![Page 70: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐57
October 2014ICF 00323.08
representativeofthefatalityrateslikelytooccuratotherrepoweringprojectsites.Becauseofthevariationbetweentheseprojects,fatalityratesfromallthreeprojectswereusedtoprovidearangeintheestimatesoftotalannualfatalitieslikelytooccurasaresultofrepowering.
Finally,oneofthebiggestdifferencesamongallstudiesisvariationindetectionprobability.Detectionprobabilityasitisusedherereferstotheprobabilitythataturbine‐relatedfatalityisactuallydetected.Therearevariouswaysofmeasuringdetectionprobability,themostcommonbeingtheuseofcarcassplacementtrialstomeasuretherateatwhichcarcassesareremovedfromthesearchareaandtherateatwhichsearchersdetectcarcassesgiventhattheyarestillpresent.Detectionprobabilityvariesamongsearchers,habitattypes,seasons,years,andmanyotherfactors.TheAlamedaCountyAvianFatalityMonitoringProgrammeasureddetectionprobabilitiesinonlyoneyear,andtheseprobabilitieswereusedtoestimatethenumberofkilledbirdsinallyearsofthestudy.Ifdetectionprobabilityvariesconsiderablyacrossyears,suchvariationcanalsoconfoundtoanunknowndegreecomparisonsoffatalityratesandestimatesoftotalfatalitiesacrossprojects.
Differencesinsearchradiusmayconstituteanadditionalbiasaffectingtheanalysis.Thereissomedebateinthescientificcommunityregardingtheappropriatesearchradii;consequently,fatalityratesfornew‐generationturbinesmayhaveapotentialandasyetunknownbias.
Bat Fatality Analysis Methods
Fatality Rates
TheassessmentofbatspeciespotentiallyatriskisbasedonareviewofexistingbatfatalitydatafortheAPWRA,speciesoccurrencedatainandaroundtheprogramandprojectareas,thecurrentunderstandingofthosespecies’susceptibilitytofourth‐generationturbine–relatedmortality,andknowntrendsinbatfatalitiesatwindenergyfacilitiesingeneral.
Methodsusedtoconducttheanalysisweresimilartothoseusedtoassessthepotentialimpactsonavianspecies.ThetotalinstalledcapacityatthetimetheNOPforthisPEIRwasfiledwasusedtoestimatethebaselinenumberoffatalitiesthatwouldoccuriftheold‐generationturbinesweretocontinueoperatingwithoutanyrepowering.ThisvaluewasmultipliedbythefatalityrateforbatsprovidedbySmallwoodandKaras(2009:1066)usingdatafromtheAFMTforthe2005–2007birdyearstoobtainestimatesoftotalbatfatalitiesperyearfortheprogramandthetwoprojects.Thesenumberswerecomparedtothenumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurifold‐generationturbineswerereplacedwithnewer,modernturbines.Thenumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurasaresultofrepoweringwasbasedonthe417MWcapfortheprogramareaandthesizeofeachoftheprojectsmeasuredinMWsasoutlinedintheprojectdescription.
Estimatesofbatfatalityratesfromseveralsourceswereusedtoprovidearangeofbatfatalityestimatesthatcouldoccurasaresultofrepowering.Theprimarysource,VascoWinds,wassupplementedwithbatfatalityrateestimatesfromthetwootherrepoweringprojectsintheAPWRA—DiabloWindsandBuenaVista—bothofwhichusedturbinessmallerthanthoseusedincurrentandfuturerepoweringprojects.BatfatalityratesfromthenearbyMontezumaHillsWindResourceAreawerealsousedbecausethisisthenearestarea—beyondVascoWinds—wherefourth‐generationturbinesareinoperation.Theresultantrangeofpossiblefatalityrateswascomparedtothebaselineestimatesoftotalfatalitiesforthetwoprojectareasandtheprogramarea.
![Page 71: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐58
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Potential Biases in the Bat Fatality Analysis Methods
Althoughthebestavailableevidencewasusedtoestimatethenumberofbatfatalitiespotentiallyresultingfromimplementationoftheproposedprogramandprojects,thereismoreuncertaintyintheseestimatesthanthereisforbirdfatalityestimates.BecausetheAlamedaCountyAvianFatalityProgramwasnotdesignedtocountbats,thebaselinefatalityrateislikelyunderestimated.Moreover,becauseVascoWindsisnotrepresentativeoftheentireprogramarea,extrapolationofresultsfromthissitetootherareasshouldbeinterpretedwithcaution.Finally,thenearbyMontezumaHillsWindResourceArea,whilesharingsomelandusecharacteristics(e.g.,grazing),supportsmoredrylandfarmingthantheAPWRAandhasadifferenttopographicalprofile.
Determination of Significance
Thebasisfordeterminingwhenagivenimpactexceedsthethresholdofsignificance—thatis,whenithasasubstantialadverseeffect—wasdeterminedbytheprofessionaljudgmentofqualifiedbiologists.Underlong‐establishedCEQApracticeandprinciple,suchdeterminationsarederivedfromcomparisonwiththebaselineofexistingconditions,asthefocusofCEQAison“substantialadverseeffect”asachangefromexistingconditions.Theanalysisofimpactsonbiologicalresources,andinparticularonavianspeciesintheprogramarea,accordingly,entailedthecomparisonoftheexistingconditionofregularandmoreorlesspredictablelevelsofavianmortalityassociatedwiththeexistingwindturbines—thebaselinemortalityratedefinedaboveinAvianFatalityAnalysisMethods—withtheanticipatedorcalculatedprojectionofthemortalityratethatwouldresultfromimplementationoftheprogramorprojects.Wheretheprojectedratewouldexceedthebaselinerate,theimpactwouldtypicallybesignificant;iftheprojectedrateisbelowthebaselinerate,theimpactwouldtypicallybeconsideredlessthansignificant.TheCountyconsideredseveralissuesinvolvinguseofthetypicaldeterminationofsignificanceoutlinedabove.
Thebaselineconditionisonethatalreadyresultsinasubstantialnumberofavianfatalities,whichinitselfconstitutesasignificantimpact.
Avianmortalityconsistsofaseriesoftemporal,moment‐to‐momentevents;accordingly,itcannotbeviewedasaconstantinthewaythatotherbaselineenvironmentalconditions,suchaspresenceofexistinghabitatareas,landscapefeatures,oranearthquakefault,canbeviewed.
Estimationoffatalityratesfromexistingandnew‐generationturbinesis,asdiscussedintheimpactanalysis,variableanduncertain.
Adeterminationofsignificancewouldbeappropriateifwindturbineoperationscouldviolatespecificlawsandregulations(e.g.,ESA,CESA,MBTA)thatarenottiedtomortalityrates.
Commitmentswereagreedtobythemajorityofthewindoperators,documentedinthe2007SettlementAgreement,toachievea50%reductioninavianfatalitiesofannualfatalitiesoffourfocalspecies(goldeneagle,burrowingowl,Americankestrel,andred‐tailedhawk)throughimplementationoftheAvianWildlifeProtectionProgramandSchedule(AWPPS)asestablishedin2005andmodifiedin2007.
Accordingly,inviewoftheforegoingconsiderations,thefactthatevenreducedavianfatalitiescouldviolatespecificlawsandregulations,andtheconservationapproachdescribedinthe2007SettlementAgreement,theCountyhasdeterminedthatthethresholdofsignificanceforimpactsonavianspeciesiseffectivelyanylevelofavianmortalityabovezero.
![Page 72: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐59
October 2014ICF 00323.08
InaccordancewithAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theprogramalternativesandthePattersonPassandGoldenHillsprojectswouldbeconsideredtohaveasignificanteffectiftheprogramorprojectwouldresultinanyoftheconditionslistedbelow.
Haveasubstantialadverseeffect,eitherdirectlyorthroughhabitatmodifications,onanyspeciesidentifiedasacandidate,sensitive,orspecial‐statusspeciesinlocalorregionalplans,policies,orregulations,orbytheCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlifeorU.S.FishandWildlifeService.
Haveasubstantialadverseeffectonanyriparianhabitatorothersensitivenaturalcommunityidentifiedinlocalorregionalplans,policies,orregulations,orbytheCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlifeorU.S.FishandWildlifeService.
HaveasubstantialadverseeffectonfederallyprotectedwetlandsasdefinedbySection404oftheCleanWaterAct(including,butnotlimitedto,marshes,vernalpools,coastalwetlands,etc.)throughdirectremoval,filling,hydrologicalinterruption,orothermeans.
Interferesubstantiallywiththemovementofanynativeresidentormigratoryfishorwildlifespeciesorwithestablishednativeresidentormigratorywildlifecorridors,orimpedetheuseofnativewildlifenurserysites.
Substantiallyreducethehabitatofacommonplantorwildlifespecies,causeaplantorwildlifepopulationtodropbelowself‐sustaininglevels,orthreatentoeliminateaplantoranimalcommunity.
Conflictwithanylocalpoliciesorordinancesprotectingbiologicalresources,suchasatreepreservationpolicyorordinance.
ConflictwiththeprovisionsofanadoptedHCP,NCCP,orotherapprovedlocal,regional,orstatehabitatconservationplan.
Impacts and Mitigation Measures
ThefollowingdiscussionassessespotentialimpactsonbiologicalresourcesresultingfromimplementationoftheprogramandtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassprojects.Wildlifespecieswithsimilarhabitatuse(e.g.,tree‐nestingspecies)weregroupedintheimpactdiscussionsbelow.
MitigationmeasuresforpotentialimpactsoftheprogramandPattersonPassandGoldenHillsprojectsweredevelopedtobeconsistentwiththeavoidance,minimization,andmitigationmeasuressetforthintheEastAlamedaCountyConservationStrategy(EACCSorConservationStrategy).TheConservationStrategywasdevelopedtoassistwithenvironmentalcompliancerequirementsofESA,CESA,CEQA,NEPA,andotherapplicablelawsforallprojectswithintheareacoveredbythestrategythatwouldhaveimpactsonbiologicalresources.TheConservationStrategyestablishesgoalsandobjectivesandacompensationprogramtooffsetimpactsfromprojectsinthecoveredarea.TheprogramarealieswithintheareacoveredbytheConservationStrategy.Whereapplicable,thegoalsandobjectivesintheConservationStrategywereusedtodevelopmitigationmeasurestominimizepotentialimpactsresultingfromtheprogramandtheindividualprojectsaddressedinthisEIR.Likewise,compensatorymitigationfortheprogramandindividualprojectsreferstomitigationratiosfromtheConservationStrategy.IntheeventthattakeauthorizationisobtainedforanyspecieslistedunderESA,CESA,orBGEPA,avoidance,minimization,andcompensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewiththeauthorizationinconsultationwithUSFWSand/orCDFW.ImplementationofstateandfederalrequirementscontainedinsuchauthorizationwillconstitutecompliancewithcorrespondingmeasuresinthisPEIR.
![Page 73: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐60
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐1a‐1:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsorhabitatoccupiedbyspecial‐statusplants—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Ground‐disturbingactivitiesassociatedwithAlternative1couldresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsortheirhabitat.Directeffectsincludethoseeffectswhereplantsmayberemoved,damaged,orcrushed(seedlings)byground‐disturbingactivities,themovementorparkingofvehicles,and/ortheplacementofequipmentandsupplies.Grounddisturbancecankillordamagematureindividualsoreliminatetheirhabitat.Excavationalterssoilpropertiesandmaycreateconditionsunsuitableforthegrowthofsomespeciesorfavortheirreplacementbyotherspecies.Therootsofshrubsandotherperennialspeciesaresusceptibletodamagefromsoilcompactionbyequipmentorconstructionmaterials.Possibleindirecteffectsonplantscouldresultfromerosionthatdegradeshabitatoraccidentalignitionofafirethatdamagesorkillsindividuals.Becausetheseground‐disturbingactivitiescouldhavesubstantialadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantspecies,thisimpactissignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1ewouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusplantspecies
Projectproponentswillconductsurveysforthespecial‐statusplantspecieswithinandadjacenttoallprojectsites.Allsurveyswillbeconductedbyqualifiedbiologistsinaccordancewiththeappropriateprotocols.
Special‐statusplantsurveyswillbeconductedinaccordancewithProtocolsforSurveyingandEvaluatingImpactstoSpecialStatusNativePlantPopulationsandNaturalCommunities(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2009)duringtheseasonthatspecial‐statusplantspecieswouldbeevidentandidentifiable—i.e.,duringtheirbloomingseason.Nomorethan3yearspriortoground‐disturbingrepoweringactivitiesandduringtheappropriateidentificationperiodsforspecial‐statusplants(Table3.4‐4),aqualifiedbiologist(asdeterminedbyAlamedaCounty)willconductfieldsurveyswithindecommissioningworkareas,proposedconstructionareas,andtheimmediatelyadjacentareastodeterminethepresenceofhabitatforspecial‐statusplantspecies.TheprojectproponentwillsubmitareportdocumentingthesurveyresultstoAlamedaCountyforreviewandapprovalpriortoconductinganyrepoweringactivities.Thereportwillincludethelocationanddescriptionofallproposedworkareas,thelocationanddescriptionofallsuitablehabitatforspecial‐statusplantspecies,andthelocationanddescriptionofothersensitivehabitats(e.g.,vernalpools,wetlands,riparianareas).Additionally,thereportwilloutlinewhereadditionalspeciesand/orhabitat‐specificmitigationmeasuresarerequired.Thisreportwillprovidethebasisforanyapplicablepermitapplicationswhereincidentaltakeoflistedspeciesmayoccur.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
ProjectproponentswillensurethatthefollowingBMPs,inaccordancewithpracticesestablishedintheEACCS,willbeincorporatedintoindividualprojectdesignandconstructiondocuments.
Employeesandcontractorsperformingdecommissioningandreclamationactivitieswillreceiveenvironmentalsensitivitytraining.Trainingwillincludereviewofenvironmental
![Page 74: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐61
October 2014ICF 00323.08
laws,mitigationmeasures,permitconditions,andotherrequirementsthatmustbefollowedbyallpersonneltoreduceoravoideffectsonspecial‐statusspeciesduringconstructionactivities.
Environmentaltailboardtrainingswilltakeplaceonanas‐neededbasisinthefield.Thesetrainingswillincludeabriefreviewofthebiologyofthecoveredspeciesandguidelinesthatmustbefollowedbyallpersonneltoreduceoravoidnegativeeffectsonthesespeciesduringdecommissioningandreclamationactivities.Directors,managers,superintendents,andthecrewleaderswillberesponsibleforensuringthatcrewmemberscomplywiththeguidelines.
Vehiclesandequipmentwillbeparkedonpavement,existingroads,andpreviouslydisturbedareastotheextentpracticable.
Offroadvehicletravelwillbeavoided.
Materialwillbestockpiledonlyinareasthatdonotsupportspecial‐statusspeciesorsensitivehabitats.
Gradingwillberestrictedtotheminimumareanecessary.
Priortoground‐disturbingactivitiesinsensitivehabitats,projectconstructionboundariesandaccessareaswillbeflaggedandtemporarilyfencedduringconstructiontoreducethepotentialforvehiclesandequipmenttostrayintoadjacenthabitats.
Vehiclesorequipmentwillnotberefueledwithin100feetofawetland,stream,orotherwaterwayunlessabermedandlinedrefuelingarea(i.e.,acreatedbermmadeofsandbagsorotherremovablematerial)isconstructed.
Erosioncontrolmeasureswillbeimplementedtoreducesedimentationinnearbyaquatichabitatwhenactivitiesarethesourceofpotentialerosion.Plasticmonofilamentnetting(erosioncontrolmatting)orsimilarmaterialcontainingnettingwillnotbeusedattheproject.Acceptablesubstitutesincludecoconutcoirmattingortackifiedhydroseedingcompounds.
Significantearthmoving‐activitieswillnotbeconductedinriparianareaswithin24hoursofpredictedstormsoraftermajorstorms(definedas1‐inchofrainormore).
Thefollowingwillnotbeallowedatornearworksitesforprojectactivities:trashdumping,firearms,openfires(suchasbarbecues)notrequiredbytheactivity,hunting,andpets(exceptforsafetyinremotelocations).
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
Wheresurveysdeterminethataspecial‐statusplantspeciesispresentinoradjacenttoaprojectarea,directandindirectimpactsoftheprojectonthespecieswillbeavoidedthroughtheestablishmentofactivityexclusionzones,withinwhichnoground‐disturbingactivitieswilltakeplace,includingconstructionofnewfacilities,constructionstaging,orothertemporaryworkareas.Activityexclusionzonesforspecial‐statusplantspecieswillbeestablishedaroundeachoccupiedhabitatsite,theboundariesofwhichwillbeclearlymarkedwithstandardorangeplasticconstructionexclusionfencingoritsequivalent.Theestablishmentofactivityexclusionzoneswillnotberequiredifnoconstruction‐relateddisturbanceswilloccurwithin250feetof
![Page 75: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐62
October 2014ICF 00323.08
theoccupiedhabitat.ThesizeofactivityexclusionzonesmaybereducedthroughconsultationwithaqualifiedbiologistandwithconcurrencefromCDFWbasedonsite‐specificconditions.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
Allprojectproponentswillavoidorminimizetemporaryandpermanentimpactsonspecial‐statusplantsthatoccuronprojectsitesandwillcompensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies.Althoughallimpactsonlarge‐floweredfiddleneck,diamond‐petaledCaliforniapoppy,andcaper‐fruitedtropidocarpumwillbeavoided,impactsonotherspecial‐statusplantspecieswillbeavoidedtotheextentfeasible,andanyunavoidableimpactswillbeaddressedthroughcompensatorymitigation.
Whereavoidanceofimpactsonaspecial‐statusplantspeciesisinfeasible,lossofindividualsoroccupiedhabitatofaspecial‐statusplantspeciesoccurrencewillbecompensatedforthroughtheacquisition,protection,andsubsequentmanagementinperpetuityofotherexistingoccurrencesata2:1ratio(occurrencesimpacted:occurrencespreserved).TheprojectproponentwillprovidedetailedinformationtotheCountyandCDFWonthelocationofthepreservedoccurrences,qualityofthepreservedhabitat,feasibilityofprotectingandmanagingtheareasin‐perpetuity,responsibilityparties,andotherpertinentinformation.Ifsuitableoccurrencesofaspecial‐statusplantspeciesarenotavailableforpreservation,thentheprojectwillberedesignedtoremovefeaturesthatwouldresultinimpactsonthatspecies.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
Allprojectproponentswillretainaqualifiedbiologist(asdeterminedbyAlamedaCounty)toconductperiodicmonitoringofdecommissioning,repowering,andreclamationactivitiesthatoccuradjacenttosensitivebiologicalresources(e.g.,special‐statusspecies,sensitivevegetationcommunities,wetlands).MonitoringwilloccurduringinitialgrounddisturbancewheresensitivebiologicalresourcesarepresentandweeklythereafterorasdeterminedbytheCountyincoordinationwithaqualifiedbiologist.Thebiologistwillassistthecrew,asneeded,tocomplywithallprojectimplementationrestrictionsandguidelines.Inaddition,thebiologistwillberesponsibleforensuringthattheprojectproponentoritscontractorsmaintainexclusionareasadjacenttosensitivebiologicalresources,andfordocumentingcompliancewithallbiologicalresources–relatedmitigationmeasures.
ImpactBIO‐1a‐2:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsorhabitatoccupiedbyspecial‐statusplants—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Ground‐disturbingactivitiesassociatedwithAlternative2couldresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsortheirhabitat.DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Directeffectsincludethosewhereplantsmayberemoved,damaged,orcrushed(seedlings)byground‐disturbingactivities,themovementorparkingofvehicles,and/ortheplacementofequipmentandsupplies.Grounddisturbancecankillordamagematureindividualsoreliminatetheirhabitat.Excavationalterssoilpropertiesandmaycreateconditionsunsuitableforthegrowthofsomespeciesorfavortheirreplacementbyotherspecies.Therootsofshrubsandotherperennial
![Page 76: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐63
October 2014ICF 00323.08
speciesaresusceptibletodamagefromsoilcompactionbyequipmentorconstructionmaterials.Possibleindirecteffectsonplantscouldresultfromerosionthatdegradeshabitatoraccidentalignitionofafirethatdamagesorkillsindividuals.Becausetheseground‐disturbingactivitiescouldhavesubstantialadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantspecies,thisimpactissignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1ewouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
ImpactBIO‐1b:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsorhabitatoccupiedbyspecial‐statusplants—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Ground‐disturbingactivitiesassociatedwiththeGoldenHillsProjectcouldresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsortheirhabitat.Directeffectsincludethoseeffectswhereplantsmayberemoved,damaged,orcrushed(seedlings)byground‐disturbingactivities,themovementorparkingofvehicles,and/ortheplacementofequipmentandsupplies.Grounddisturbancecankillordamagematureindividualsoreliminatetheirhabitat.Excavationalterssoilpropertiesandmaycreateconditionsunsuitableforthegrowthofsomespeciesorfavortheirreplacementbyotherspecies.Therootsofshrubsandotherperennialspeciesaresusceptibletodamagefromsoilcompactionbyequipmentorconstructionmaterials.Possibleindirecteffectsonplantscouldresultfromerosionthatdegradeshabitatoraccidentalignitionofafirethatdamagesorkillsindividuals.Becausetheseground‐disturbingactivitiescouldhavesubstantialadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantspecies,thisimpactissignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1ewouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
![Page 77: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐64
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
ImpactBIO‐1c:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsorhabitatoccupiedbyspecial‐statusplants—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Ground‐disturbingactivitiesassociatedwiththePattersonPassProjectcouldresultinadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsortheirhabitat.Directeffectsincludethoseeffectswhereplantsmayberemoved,damaged,orcrushed(seedlings)byground‐disturbingactivities,themovementorparkingofvehicles,and/ortheplacementofequipmentandsupplies.Grounddisturbancecankillordamagematureindividualsoreliminatetheirhabitat.Excavationalterssoilpropertiesandmaycreateconditionsunsuitableforthegrowthofsomespeciesorfavortheirreplacementbyotherspecies.Therootsofshrubsandotherperennialspeciesaresusceptibletodamagefromsoilcompactionbyequipmentorconstructionmaterials.Possibleindirecteffectsonplantscouldresultfromerosionthatdegradeshabitatoraccidentalignitionofafirethatdamagesorkillsindividuals.Becausetheseground‐disturbingactivitiescouldhavesubstantialadverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantspecies,thisimpactissignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1ewouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
![Page 78: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐65
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐2a‐1:Adverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsandnaturalcommunitiesresultingfromtheintroductionandspreadofinvasiveplantspecies—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitieshavethepotentialtofacilitatetheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesbyremovingvegetationanddisturbingsoils.Constructionvehiclesandmachineryareprimaryvectorsforthespreadofsuchspecies.Invasivespeciescompetewithnativespeciesforresourcesandcanalternaturalcommunitiesbyinfluencingfireregimes,hydrology(e.g.,sedimentationanderosion),lightavailability,nutrientcycling,andsoilchemistry(RandallandHoshovsky2000).Invasivespeciesalsohavethepotentialtoharmhumanhealthandtheeconomybyadverselyaffectingnaturalecosystems,recreation,agriculturallands,anddevelopedareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2008).Theintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesasaresultofactivitiesassociatedwiththeprogramwouldconstituteasignificantindirectimpact.However,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐2,BIO‐5c,andWQ‐1wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐2:Preventintroduction,spread,andestablishmentofinvasiveplantspecies
Toavoidandminimizetheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspecies,allprojectproponentswillimplementthefollowingBMPs.
Constructionvehiclesandmachinerywillbecleanedpriortoenteringtheconstructionarea.Cleaningstationswillbeestablishedattheperimeteroftheconstructionareaalongallconstructionroutesorimmediatelyoffsite.
Vehicleswillbewashedonlyatapprovedareas.Nowashingofvehicleswilloccuratjobsites.
Todiscouragetheintroductionandestablishmentofinvasiveplantspecies,seedmixturesandstrawusedwithinnaturalvegetationwillbeeitherricestraworweed‐freestraw,asallowedbystateandfederalregulationofstormwaterrunoff.
Inaddition,theprojectproponentswillprepareandimplementerosionandsedimentcontrolplanstocontrolshort‐termandlong‐termerosionandsedimentationeffectsandtorestoresoilsandvegetationinareasaffectedbyconstructionactivities(MitigationMeasuresBIO‐1bandWQ‐1).Priortoinitiatinganyconstructionactivitiesthatwillresultintemporaryimpactsonnaturalcommunities,arestorationandmonitoringplanwillbedevelopedfortemporarilyaffectedhabitatsineachprojectarea(MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c).RestorationandmonitoringplanswillbesubmittedtotheCountyandCDFWforapproval.Theseplanswillincludemethodsforrestoringsoilconditionsandrevegetatingdisturbedareas,seedmixes,monitoringandmaintenanceschedules,adaptivemanagementstrategies,reportingrequirements,andsuccesscriteria.Followingcompletionofprojectconstruction,theprojectproponentswillimplementtherevegetationplanstorestoreareasdisturbedbyprojectactivitiestoaconditionofequalorgreaterhabitatfunctionthanoccurredpriortothedisturbance.
![Page 79: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐66
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
Seediscussiononpages3.4‐78and3.4‐79.
MitigationMeasureWQ‐1:ComplywithNPDESrequirements
Seediscussiononpages3.9‐8and3.9‐9.
ImpactBIO‐2a‐2:Adverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsandnaturalcommunitiesresultingfromtheintroductionandspreadofinvasiveplantspecies—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitieshavethepotentialtofacilitatetheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesbyremovingvegetationanddisturbingsoils.Constructionvehiclesandmachineryareprimaryvectorsforthespreadofsuchspecies.Invasivespeciescompetewithnativespeciesforresourcesandcanalternaturalcommunitiesbyinfluencingfireregimes,hydrology(e.g.,sedimentationanderosion),lightavailability,nutrientcycling,andsoilchemistry(RandallandHoshovsky2000).Invasivespeciesalsohavethepotentialtoharmhumanhealthandtheeconomybyadverselyaffectingnaturalecosystems,recreation,agriculturallands,anddevelopedareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2008).Theintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesasaresultofactivitiesassociatedwiththeprogramwouldconstituteasignificantindirectimpact.EffectsunderAlternative2wouldbethesameasthoseunderAlternative1.Althoughtheareaofdisturbancewouldbe8%greaterunderAlternative2,theseverityoftheeffectsofintroductionandspreadofinvasiveplantspeciesdoesnotnecessarilycorrelatedirectlytothearealextentofdisturbance,butrathertothepracticesthatfacilitateintroduction.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐2wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐2:Preventintroduction,spread,andestablishmentofinvasiveplantspecies
ImpactBIO‐2b:Adverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsandnaturalcommunitiesresultingfromtheintroductionandspreadofinvasiveplantspecies—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitieshavethepotentialtofacilitatetheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesbyremovingvegetationanddisturbingsoils.Constructionvehiclesandmachineryareprimaryvectorsforthespreadofsuchspecies.Invasivespeciescompetewithnativespeciesforresourcesandcanalternaturalcommunitiesbyinfluencingfireregimes,hydrology(e.g.,sedimentationanderosion),lightavailability,nutrientcycling,andsoilchemistry(RandallandHoshovsky2000).Invasivespeciesalsohavethepotentialtoharmhumanhealthandtheeconomybyadverselyaffectingnaturalecosystems,recreation,agriculturallands,anddevelopedareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2008).TheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesasaresultofactivitiesassociatedwiththeGoldenHillsProjectwouldconstituteasignificantindirectimpact.However,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐2wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
![Page 80: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐67
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐2:Preventintroduction,spread,andestablishmentofinvasiveplantspecies
ImpactBIO‐2c:Adverseeffectsonspecial‐statusplantsandnaturalcommunitiesresultingfromtheintroductionandspreadofinvasiveplantspecies—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitieshavethepotentialtofacilitatetheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesbyremovingvegetationanddisturbingsoils.Constructionvehiclesandmachineryareprimaryvectorsforthespreadofsuchspecies.Invasivespeciescompetewithnativespeciesforresourcesandcanalternaturalcommunitiesbyinfluencingfireregimes,hydrology(e.g.,sedimentationanderosion),lightavailability,nutrientcycling,andsoilchemistry(RandallandHoshovsky2000).Invasivespeciesalsohavethepotentialtoharmhumanhealthandtheeconomybyadverselyaffectingnaturalecosystems,recreation,agriculturallands,anddevelopedareas(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2008).TheintroductionandspreadofinvasivenonnativeplantspeciesasaresultofactivitiesassociatedwiththePattersonPassProjectwouldconstituteasignificantindirectimpact.However,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐2wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐2:Preventintroduction,spread,andestablishmentofinvasiveplantspecies
ImpactBIO‐3a‐1:Potentialmortalityoforlossofhabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonlonghornfairyshrimp,vernalpoolfairyshrimp,vernalpooltadpoleshrimp(vernalpoolbranchiopods),andcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleortheirhabitats.Themajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines;consequently,lossofpotentialvernalpoolbranchiopodandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlehabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided.However,directimpactsonhabitatassociatedwithroadconstructionorwideningandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromsomeconstructionactivities.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonalkaliwetland,seasonalwetland,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleareshowninTable3.4‐7.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforthebeetlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Constructionactivitiessuchasexcavation,grading,orstockpilingofsoil,couldfill,remove,orotherwisealtersuitablehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleandcouldresultininjuryormortalityofthesespecies.Suchground‐disturbingactivitiesmaybeassociatedwithinstallationofpowercollectionandcommunicationsystemsandroadconstructionandwidening.Vernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlescouldalsobeinjuredorkilledifvehiclesorconstructionequipmentaredriventhroughoccupiedhabitat,orifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsentertheirhabitat.Changesinhydrologyorsedimentationofhabitatfromerosionassociatedwithprojectconstructioncouldalterthesuitabilityofhabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleandcouldcausemortality.
Operationandmaintenanceactivitiesmayalsoresultinimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsortheirhabitats.Useofherbicidesnearoccupiedhabitatcouldresultinmortalityorreducedfitnessof
![Page 81: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐68
October 2014ICF 00323.08
vernalpoolbranchiopods(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1996).Herbicideorpesticideusenearorupstreamofsuitablehabitatforcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlecouldresultinmortalityorreducedfitnessofthebeetle.Roadandfirebreakmaintenancemayalsoresultindegradationofhabitatorinjuryormortalityofvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetles.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheprojectcouldreducethelocalpopulationsoffederallylistedvernalpoolbranchiopodsandararebeetlespeciesthroughdirectmortalityandhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,andBIO‐3bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
Nomorethan3yearspriortoground‐disturbingrepoweringactivities,aqualifiedbiologist(asdeterminedbyAlamedaCounty)willconductfieldsurveyswithindecommissioning,repowering,andrestorationworkareasandtheirimmediatesurroundingstodeterminethepresenceofhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies.TheprojectproponentwillsubmitareportdocumentingthesurveyresultstoAlamedaCountyforreviewpriortoconductinganyrepoweringactivities.Thereportwillincludethelocationanddescriptionofallproposedworkareas,thelocationanddescriptionofallsuitablehabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies,andthelocationanddescriptionofothersensitivehabitats(e.g.,vernalpools,wetlands,riparianareas).Additionally,thereportwilloutlinewhereadditionalspecies‐and/orhabitat‐specificmitigationmeasuresarerequired.Thisreportmayprovidethebasisforanyapplicablepermitapplicationswhereincidentaltakemayoccur.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3b:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
Wheresuitablehabitatforlistedvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleareidentifiedwithin250feet(oranotherdistanceasdeterminedbyaqualifiedbiologistbasedontopographyandothersiteconditions)ofproposedworkareas,thefollowingmeasureswillbeimplementedtoensurethattherepoweringprojectsdonothaveadverseimpactsonlistedvernalpoolbranchiopodsorcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle.ThesemeasuresarebasedonmeasuresfromtheEACCS,withsomemodificationsandadditions.Additionalconservationmeasuresorconditionsofapprovalmayberequiredinapplicableprojectpermits(e.g.,ESAincidentaltakepermit).
Avoidalldirectimpactsonsandstonerockoutcropvernalpools.
Grounddisturbancewillbeavoidedfromthefirstdayofthefirstsignificantrain(1inchormore)untilJune1,oruntilpoolsremaindryfor72hoursandnosignificantrainisforecastonthedayofsuchgrounddisturbance.
Ifvernalpools,clayflats,alkalinepools,ephemeralstocktanks(orponds),sandstonepools,orroadsideditchesarepresentwithin250feetoftheworkarea(oranotherappropriate
![Page 82: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐69
October 2014ICF 00323.08
distanceasdeterminedbyaqualifiedbiologistonthebasisoftopographyandothersiteconditions),thebiologistwillstakeandflaganexclusionzonepriortoconstructionactivities.Thewidthoftheexclusionzonewillbebasedonsiteconditionsandwillbethemaximumpracticabledistancethatensuresprotectionofthefeaturefromdirectandindirecteffectsoftheproject.Exclusionzoneswillbeestablishedaroundfeatureswhethertheyarewetordryatthetime.Theexclusionzonewillbefencedwithorangeconstructionzoneanderosioncontrolfencing(tobeinstalledbyconstructioncrew).
Noherbicidewillbeappliedwithin100feetofexclusionzones,exceptwhenappliedtocutstumpsorfrilledstemsorinjectedintostems.Nobroadcastapplicationswillbeallowed.
Avoidmodifyingorchangingthehydrologyofaquatichabitats.
Minimizetheworkareaforstreamcrossingsandconductworkduringthedryseason(June1throughthefirstsignificantrainofthefall/winter).
Installutilitycollectionlinesacrossperennialcreeksbyboringunderthecreek.
Whereimpactscannotbeavoidedorminimized,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewithmitigationratiosandrequirementsdevelopedundertheEACCS(AppendixC).Intheeventthatanincidentaltakepermitisrequired,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewiththetermsofthepermitinconsultationwithUSFWS.
ImpactBIO‐3a‐2:Potentialmortalityoforlossofhabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Constructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleortheirhabitats.Themajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines;consequently,lossofpotentialvernalpoolbranchiopodandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlehabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided.However,directimpactsonhabitatassociatedwithroadconstructionorwideningandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromsomeconstructionactivities.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonalkaliwetland,seasonalwetland,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleareshowninTable3.4‐7.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforthebeetlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Constructionactivitiessuchasexcavation,grading,orstockpilingofsoil,couldfill,remove,orotherwisealtersuitablehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleandcouldresultininjuryormortalityofthesespecies.Suchground‐disturbingactivitiesmaybeassociatedwithinstallationofpowercollectionandcommunicationsystemsandroadconstructionandwidening.Vernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlescouldalsobeinjuredorkilledifvehiclesorconstructionequipmentaredriventhroughoccupiedhabitat,orifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsentertheirhabitat.Changesinhydrologyorsedimentationofhabitatfromerosionassociatedwithprojectconstructioncouldalterthesuitabilityofhabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleandcouldcausemortality.
![Page 83: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐70
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Operationandmaintenanceactivitiesmayalsoresultinimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsortheirhabitats.Useofherbicidesnearoccupiedhabitatcouldresultinmortalityorreducedfitnessofvernalpoolbranchiopods(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1996).Herbicideorpesticideusenearorupstreamofsuitablehabitatforcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlecouldresultinmortalityorreducedfitnessofthebeetle.Roadandfirebreakmaintenancemayalsoresultindegradationofhabitatorinjuryormortalityofvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetles.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheprojectcouldreducethelocalpopulationsoffederallylistedvernalpoolbranchiopodsandararebeetlespeciesthroughdirectmortalityandhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,andBIO‐3bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3b:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
ImpactBIO‐3b:Potentialmortalityoforlossofhabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceoftheGoldenHillsprojectonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlewouldbesimilartothosedescribedabovefortheprogram.Themajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines;consequently,lossofpotentialvernalpoolbranchiopodandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlehabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided.However,directimpactsonhabitatassociatedwithroadconstructionorwideningandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromsomeconstructionactivities.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonalkaliwetland,seasonalwetland,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleareshowninTable3.4‐8.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforthebeetlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheprojectcouldreducethelocalpopulationsoffederallylistedvernalpoolbranchiopodsandararebeetlespeciesthroughdirectmortalityandhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,andBIO‐3bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
![Page 84: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐71
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3b:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
ImpactBIO‐3c:Potentialmortalityoforlossofhabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Theseasonalwetlandthatprovidessuitablehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlewouldnotbefilledorremoved.However,mortalityoftheseaquaticspeciescouldoccurifoilorothercontaminantsenterthewetlandduringconstruction.Additionally,theseasonalwetlandcouldbeindirectlyaffectedifthehydrologyofthewetlandismodifiedasaresultofprojectconstruction.Smallareasofotherseasonalwetlandsandstream/freshwatermarshthatmayprovidesuitablehabitatforcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlewouldbetemporarilyaffectedduringconstructionofcollectorlines.Noneofthepondsthatprovidesuitablehabitatforcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetlewouldbefilledorremoved.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonseasonalwetlandandstream/freshwatermarshthatmayprovidehabitatforvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetleareshowninTable3.4‐9.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheprojectcouldreducethelocalpopulationsoffederallylistedvernalpoolbranchiopodsandararebeetlespeciesthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,andBIO‐3bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3b:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
ImpactBIO‐4a‐1:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Removalofhabitat(elderberryshrubs)andpotentialinjuryormortalityofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleassociatedwithremovalofelderberryshrubswouldbeconsidereddirecteffectsonthespecies.Trimmingofelderberrybranches1inchormoreindiametercouldalsoresultininjuryormortalityofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.Becausevalleyelderberrylonghornbeetlelarvaemayfeedontherootsofelderberries,disturbanceofelderberryrootswithintheshrubdriplinecouldalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Reductionofwaterinfiltrationtoelderberryshrubscausedbychangesintopographyorcompactionofsoilfromconstructioncouldresultinreducedshrubvigor/vitalityandanassociateddecreaseinshoot,leaf,andflowerproductionand
![Page 85: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐72
October 2014ICF 00323.08
couldultimatelyreducethesuitabilityoftheshrubstoprovidehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.
Operationsandmaintenanceactivitiessuchasuseofherbicidesmayalsoaffectvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleoritshabitat.Valleyelderberrylonghornbeetlescouldbeindirectlyaffectedifthereisalossofconnectivitybetweenelderberryshrubswhenelderberriesorassociatedvegetationisremoved.Removalofsuchvegetationcouldresultingapsinvegetationthataretoowideforbeetlestocrossbecauseoftheirfairlylimitedmovementdistances(Talleyetal.2006),resultinginseparationofindividualsorreducingthepossibilityofcolonizationofadjacentareas.Althoughmoreresearchisneeded,valleyelderberrylonghornbeetleshavebeenobservedtoflyamileormoreincontiguousorfairlycontiguoushabitat,andexitholeshavebeenobservedonisolatedshrubs0.25mile(0.4kilometer)ormorefromthenextnearestelderberry(Arnoldpers.comm.).Becauseelderberriesareexpectedtobewidelyseparatedduetothelimitedamountofriparianhabitatintheprogramarea,theremovalofanyelderberryshrubscouldconstituteasignificantimpact.Anyoftheseimpactscouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizeofafederallylistedspeciesthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐4a,andBIO‐4bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
IfitisdeterminedthroughpreconstructionsurveysconductedpursuanttoMitigationMeasureBIO‐3athatelderberryshrubsarepresentwithinproposedworkareasorwithin100feetoftheseareas,thefollowingmeasureswillbeimplementedtoensurethattheproposedprojectdoesnothaveasignificantimpactonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.
Avoidremovalofelderberryshrubs.
Elderberryshrubs/clusterswithin100feetoftheconstructionareathatwillnotberemovedwillbeprotectedduringconstruction.Aqualifiedbiologist(i.e.,withelderberry/VELBexperience)willmarktheelderberryshrubsandclustersthatwillbeprotectedduringconstruction.Orangeconstructionbarrierfencingwillbeplacedattheedgeofthebufferareas.ThebufferareadistanceswillbeproposedbythebiologistandapprovedbyUSFWS.Noconstructionactivitieswillbepermittedwithinthebufferzoneotherthanthoseactivitiesnecessarytoerectthefencing.Signswillbepostedevery50feet(15.2meters)alongtheperimeterofthebufferareafencing.Thesignswillcontainthefollowinginformation:Thisareaishabitatofthevalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle,athreatenedspecies,andmustnotbedisturbed.ThisspeciesisprotectedbytheEndangeredSpeciesActof1973,asamended.Violatorsaresubjecttoprosecution,fines,andimprisonment.
![Page 86: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐73
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Bufferareafencesaroundelderberryshrubswillbeinspectedweeklybyaqualifiedbiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesandmonthlyafterground‐disturbingactivitiesuntilprojectconstructioniscompleteoruntilthefencesareremoved,asapprovedbythebiologicalmonitorandtheresidentengineer.Thebiologicalmonitorwillberesponsibleforensuringthatthecontractormaintainsthebufferareafencesaroundelderberryshrubsthroughoutconstruction.BiologicalinspectionreportswillbeprovidedtotheprojectproponentandUSFWS.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
IfelderberryshrubscannotbeavoidedandprotectedasoutlinedinMitigationMeasure4a,theprojectproponentwillobtainanincidentaltakepermitfromUSFWSandcompensateforthelossofanyelderberryshrubs.Surveysofelderberryshrubstobetransplantedwillbeconductedbyaqualifiedbiologistpriortotransplantation.SurveyswillbeconductedinaccordancewiththeConservationGuidelinesfortheValleyElderberryLonghornBeetle(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1999).Surveyresultsandananalysisofthenumberofelderberryseedlings/cuttingsandassociatednativeplantsbasedonthesurveyresultswillbesubmittedtoUSFWSinabiologicalassessmentoranHCP.Afterreceiptofanincidentaltakepermitandbeforeconstructionbegins,theprojectproponentwillcompensatefordirecteffectsonelderberryshrubsbytransplantingshrubsthatcannotbeavoidedtoaUSFWS‐approvedconservationarea.Elderberryseedlingsorcuttingsandassociatednativespecieswillalsobeplantedintheconservationarea.Eachelderberrystemmeasuring1inchormoreindiameteratgroundlevelthatisadverselyaffected(i.e.,transplantedordestroyed)willbereplaced,intheconservationarea,withelderberryseedlingsorcuttingsataratiorangingfrom1:1to8:1(newplantingstoaffectedstems).Thenumbersofelderberryseedlings/cuttingsandassociatedripariannativetrees/shrubstobeplantedasreplacementhabitataredeterminedbystemsizeclassofaffectedelderberryshrubs,presenceorabsenceofexitholes,andwhethertheshrubliesinariparianornonriparianarea.Stockofeitherseedlingsorcuttingswouldbeobtainedfromlocalsources.
AtthediscretionofUSFWS,shrubsthatareunlikelytosurvivetransplantationbecauseofpoorconditionorlocation,oraplantthatwouldbeextremelydifficulttomovebecauseofaccessproblems,maybeexemptedfromtransplantation.Incaseswheretransplantationisnotpossible,minimizationratioswouldbeincreasedtooffsettheadditionalhabitatloss.
TherelocationoftheelderberryshrubswillbeconductedaccordingtoUSFWS‐approvedproceduresoutlinedintheConservationGuidelines(U.S.FishandWildlifeService1999).Elderberryshrubswithintheprojectconstructionareathatcannotbeavoidedwillbetransplantedduringtheplant’sdormantphase(Novemberthroughthefirst2weeksofFebruary).Aqualifiedbiologicalmonitorwillremainonsitewhiletheshrubsarebeingtransplanted.
Evidenceofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleoccurrenceintheconservationarea,theconditionoftheelderberryshrubsintheconservationarea,andthegeneralconditionoftheconservationareaitselfwillbemonitoredoveraperiodof10consecutiveyearsorfor7yearsovera15‐yearperiodfromthedateoftransplanting.TheprojectproponentwillberesponsibleforfundingandprovidingmonitoringreportstoUSFWSineachoftheyearsinwhichamonitoringreportisrequired.AsspecifiedintheConservationGuidelines,thereportwillincludeinformationontimingandrateofirrigation,growthrates,andsurvivalratesandmortality.
![Page 87: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐74
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐4a‐2:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Removalofelderberryshrubsandpotentialinjuryormortalityofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleassociatedwithremovalofelderberryshrubswouldbeconsidereddirecteffectsonthespecies.Trimmingofelderberrybranches1inchormoreindiametercouldalsoresultininjuryormortalityofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.Becausevalleyelderberrylonghornbeetlelarvaemayfeedontherootsofelderberries,disturbanceofelderberryrootswithintheshrubdriplinecouldalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Reductionofwaterinfiltrationtoelderberryshrubscausedbychangesintopographyorcompactionofsoilfromconstructioncouldresultinreducedshrubvigor/vitalityandanassociateddecreaseinshoot,leaf,andflowerproductionandcouldultimatelyreducethesuitabilityoftheshrubstoprovidehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.
Operationsandmaintenanceactivitiessuchasuseofherbicidesmayalsoaffectvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetleoritshabitat.Valleyelderberrylonghornbeetlescouldbeindirectlyaffectedifthereisalossofconnectivitybetweenelderberryshrubswhenelderberriesorassociatedvegetationisremoved.Removalofsuchvegetationcouldresultingapsinvegetationthataretoowideforbeetlestocrossbecauseoftheirfairlylimitedmovementdistances(Talleyetal.2006),resultinginseparationofindividualsorreducingthepossibilityofcolonizationofadjacentareas.Althoughmoreresearchisneeded,valleyelderberrylonghornbeetleshavebeenobservedtoflyamileormoreincontiguousorfairlycontiguoushabitat,andexitholeshavebeenobservedonisolatedshrubs0.25mile(0.4kilometer)ormorefromthenextnearestelderberry(Arnoldpers.comm.).Becauseelderberriesareexpectedtobewidelyseparatedduetothelimitedamountofriparianhabitatintheprogramarea,theremovalofanyelderberryshrubscouldconstituteasignificantimpact.Anyoftheseimpactscouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizeofafederallylistedspeciesthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐4a,andBIO‐4bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
![Page 88: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐75
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐4b:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
IfelderberryshrubsarepresentintheGoldenHillsprojectarea,theycouldbeaffectedbyprojectconstructionandoperation.Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceoftheGoldenHillsprojectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.Removalofhabitat(elderberryshrubs),injuryormortalityofbeetles,cuttingelderberrybranchesorrootsthatare1inchormoreindiameter,andchangesinhydrologywoulddirectlyaffectvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.Thebeetlemayalsobeindirectlyaffectedbyoperationsandmaintenanceactivitiessuchasuseofherbicidesorthroughthelossofconnectivitybetweenelderberryshrubswhenshrubsorassociatedvegetationareremoved.Becauseelderberriesareexpectedtobewidelyseparatedduetothelimitedamountofriparianhabitatintheprojectvicinity,theremovalofanyelderberryshrubscouldconstituteasignificantimpact.Anyoftheseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizeofafederallylistedspeciesthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐4a,andBIO‐4bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
ImpactBIO‐4c:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Noneofthe39elderberryshrubsinthePattersonPassprojectareawouldberemovedinordertoconstructtheproject.Oneoftheshrubsislocatedwithin100feetofaconstructionaccessroadandcouldbesubjectedtoincreasedlevelsofdustduringconstruction,potentiallyleadingtoreducedvigoroftheshrubandconsequentlyaffectingvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.However,accordingtoTalleyetal.(2006b:654–655),anexperimentalongtheAmericanRiverParkway(SacramentoCounty)showedthatconditionsofelderberryshrubsassociatedwithdustfromnearbytrailsandroads(pavedanddirt)didnotaffectthepresenceofvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle.Thebeetlemayalsobeindirectlyaffectedbyoperationsandmaintenanceactivitiessuchasuseofherbicides,whichcouldharmelderberryshrubsand/orthebeetle.Impactsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetlewouldbesignificantbecausesuchimpactscouldreducethelocalpopulationsizeofafederallylistedspeciesthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐4a,andBIO‐4bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
![Page 89: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐76
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
ImpactBIO‐5a‐1:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,andfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,andfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog(collectivelyreferredtoasspecial‐statusamphibians)ortheirhabitats(seasonalwetland,freshwatermarsh,mixedwillowriparianscrub,ponds,drainages,andsurroundinguplandareas).Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonseasonalwetland,freshwatermarsh,mixedwillowriparianscrub,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforspecial‐statusamphibiansareshowninTable3.4‐7.ImpactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrogandfoothillyellow‐leggedfrogcouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.ThemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceonsuitableuplandgrasslanddispersalandaestivationhabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,andCaliforniared‐leggedfrog.Aquatichabitatsforspecials‐statusamphibianswouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.
Constructionactivitiessuchasexcavation,grading,orstockpilingofsoil,couldfill,removeorotherwisealtersuitablehabitatforspecial‐statusamphibiansorresultininjuryormortalityofindividualamphibians.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofuplandhabitatthatresultsindamageoreliminationofsuitableaestivationburrows.Specificactivitiesthatmayaffectthesespeciescouldincludeinstallationofpowercollectionandcommunicationsystems,turbineconstruction,roadinfrastructureconstruction/maintenanceandupgrades,meteorologicaltowerinstallationandremoval,temporarystagingareaset‐up,andreclamationactivities.Special‐statusamphibianscouldbeinjuredorkilledifvehiclesorconstructionequipmentaredriventhroughoccupiedhabitat,orifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsenterhabitat.Changesinhydrologyorsedimentationofhabitatfromerosionassociatedwithprojectconstructioncouldalterthesuitabilityoftheirhabitatorcausemortality.
Operationandmaintenanceactivitiesmayalsoresultinimpactsonspecial‐statusamphibiansortheirhabitats.Travelonmaintenanceroadsduringtherainyseasonorwhenamphibiansaredispersingcouldresultinmortalityofindividuals.Roadandfirebreakmaintenancecouldresultindegradationofhabitatorinjuryormortalityofspecial‐statusamphibians.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizesoffederallylistedandsensitive
![Page 90: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐77
October 2014ICF 00323.08
amphibiansthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐5athroughBIO‐5cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
AllprojectproponentswillensurethatBMPsandotherappropriatemeasures,inaccordancewithmeasuresdevelopedfortheEACCS,beincorporatedintotheappropriatedesignandconstructiondocuments.ImplementationofsomeofthesemeasureswillrequirethattheprojectproponentobtainincidentaltakepermitsfromUSFWS(Californiared‐leggedfrogandCaliforniatigersalamander)andfromCDFW(Californiatigersalamanderonly)beforeconstructionbegins.Additionalconservationmeasuresorconditionsofapprovalmayberequiredinapplicableprojectpermits(e.g.,ESAorCESAincidentaltakeauthorization).TheapplicantwillcomplywiththeStateofCaliforniaStateWaterResourcesControlBoardNPDESconstructiongeneralrequirementsforstormwater.
Ground‐disturbingactivitieswillbelimitedtodryweatherbetweenApril15andOctober31.Noground‐disturbingworkwilloccurduringwetweather.Wetweatherisdefinedaswhentherehasbeen0.25inchofrainina24‐hourperiod.GrounddisturbingactivitieshaltedduetowetweathermayresumewhenprecipitationceasesandtheNationalWeatherService72‐hourweatherforecastindicatesa30%orlesschanceofprecipitation.Noground‐disturbingworkwilloccurduringadry‐outperiodof48hoursaftertheabovereferencedwetweather.
Whereapplicable,barrierfencingwillbeinstalledaroundtheworksitetopreventamphibiansfromenteringtheworkarea.Barrierfencingwillberemovedwithin72hoursofcompletionofwork.
Beforeconstructionbegins,aqualifiedbiologistwilllocateappropriaterelocationareasandpreparearelocationplanforspecial‐statusamphibiansthatmayneedtobemovedduringconstruction.TheproponentwillsubmitthisplantoUSFWSandCDFWforapprovalaminimumof2weekspriortothestartofconstruction.
Aqualifiedbiologistwillconductpreconstructionsurveysimmediatelypriortoground‐disturbingactivities(includingequipmentstaging,vegetationremoval,grading).Thebiologistwillsurveytheworkareaandallsuitablehabitatswithin300feetoftheworkarea.Ifindividuals(includingadults,juveniles,larvae,oreggs)arefound,workwillnotbeginuntilUSFWSand/orCDFWiscontactedtodetermineifmovingtheselife‐stagesisappropriate.Ifrelocationisdeemednecessary,itwillbeconductedinaccordancewiththerelocationplan.IncidentaltakepermitsarerequiredforrelocationofCaliforniatigersalamander(USFWSandCDFW)andCaliforniared‐leggedfrog(USFWS).Relocationof
![Page 91: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐78
October 2014ICF 00323.08
westernspadefootandfoothillyellow‐leggedfrogrequiresaletterfromCDFWauthorizingthisactivity.
Nomonofilamentplasticwillbeusedforerosioncontrol.
Allprojectactivitywillterminate30minutesbeforesunsetandwillnotresumeuntil30minutesaftersunriseduringthemigration/activeseasonfromNovember1toJune15.SunriseandsunsettimesareestablishedbytheU.S.NavalObservatoryAstronomicalApplicationsDepartmentforthegeographicareawheretheprojectislocated.
Vehicleswillnotexceedaspeedlimitof15mphonunpavedroadswithinnaturallandcovertypes,orduringoffroadtravel.
Trenchesorholesmorethan6inchesdeepwillbeprovidedwithoneormoreescaperampsconstructedofearthfillorwoodenplanksandwillbeinspectedbyaqualifiedbiologistpriortobeingfilled.Anysuchfeaturesthatareleftopenovernightwillbesearchedeachdaypriortoconstructionactivitiestoensurenocoveredspeciesaretrapped.Workwillnotcontinueuntiltrappedanimalshavemovedoutofopentrenches.
Workcrewsortheonsitebiologicalmonitorwillinspectopentrenches,pits,andunderconstructionequipmentandmaterialleftonsiteinthemorningandeveningtolookforamphibiansthatmayhavebecometrappedorareseekingrefuge.
Ifspecial‐statusamphibiansarefoundintheworkareaduringconstructionandcannotordonotmoveoffsiteontheirown,aqualifiedbiologistwhoisUSFWSand/orCDFW‐approvedunderabiologicalopinionand/orincidentaltakepermitforthespecificproject,willtrapandmovespecial‐statusamphibiansinaccordancewiththerelocationplan.Relocationofwesternspadefootandfoothillyellow‐leggedfrogrequiresaletterpermitfromCDFWauthorizingthisactivity.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
Whereimpactsonaquaticanduplandhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibianscannotbeavoidedorminimized,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewithmitigationratiosandrequirementsdevelopedundertheEACCS(AppendixC).Intheeventthattakeauthorizationisrequired,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewiththetermsoftheauthorizationinconsultationwithUSFWSand/orCDFW.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
Within30dayspriortoanygrounddisturbance,aqualifiedbiologistwillprepareaGrasslandRestorationPlanincoordinationwithCDFWandsubjecttoCDFWapproval,toensurethattemporarilydisturbedannualgrasslandsandareasplannedfortheremovalofpermanentroadsandturbinepadareasarerestoredtopreprojectconditions.TheGrasslandRestorationPlanwillincludebutnotbelimitedtothefollowingmeasures.
Gravelwillberemovedfromareasproposedforgrasslandrestoration.
Tothemaximumextentfeasible,topsoilwillbesalvagedfromwithinonsiteworkareaspriortoconstruction.Importedfillsoilswillbelimitedtoweed‐freetopsoilsimilarintexture,chemicalcomposition,andpHtosoilsfoundattherestorationsite.
Whereappropriate,restorationareaswillbeseeded(hydroseedingisacceptable)toensureerosioncontrol.Seedmixeswillbetailoredtocloselymatchthatofreferencesite(s)within
![Page 92: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐79
October 2014ICF 00323.08
theprogramareaandshouldincludenativeornaturalized,noninvasivespeciessourcedwithintheprojectareaorfromthenearestavailablelocation.
Reclaimedroadswillberestoredinsuchawayastopermanentlypreventvehiculartravel.
Theplanwillincludearequirementtomonitorrestorationareasannually(betweenMarchandOctober)forupto3yearsfollowingtheyearofrestoration.Therestorationwillbeconsideredsuccessfulwhenthepercentcoverforrestoredareasis70%absolutecoveroftheplanted/seededspeciescomparedtothepercentabsolutecoverofnearbyreferencesites.Nomorethan5%relativecoverofthevegetationintherestorationareaswillconsistofinvasiveplantspeciesratedas“high”inCal‐IPC’sCaliforniaInvasivePlantInventoryDatabase(http://www.cal‐ipc.org).Remedialmeasuresprescribedintheplanwillincludesupplementalseeding,weedcontrol,andotheractionsasdeterminednecessarytoachievethelong‐termsuccesscriteria.Monitoringmaybeextendedifnecessarytoachievethesuccesscriteriaorifdroughtconditionsprecluderestorationsuccess.Otherperformancestandardsmayalsoberequiredastheyrelatetospecial‐statusspecieshabitat;thesewillbeidentifiedincoordinationwithCDFWandincludedintheplan.TheprojectproponentwillprovideevidencethatCDFWhasreviewedandapprovedtheGrasslandRestorationPlan.Additionally,theprojectproponentwillprovideannualmonitoringreportstotheCountybyJanuary31ofeachyear,summarizingthemonitoringresultsandanyremedialmeasuresimplemented(ifanyarenecessary)duringthepreviousyear.
ImpactBIO‐5a‐2:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,andfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Constructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonspecial‐statusamphibiansortheirhabitats(seasonalwetland,freshwatermarsh,mixedwillowriparianscrub,ponds,drainages,andsurroundinguplandareas).Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonseasonalwetland,freshwatermarsh,mixedwillowriparianscrub,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforspecial‐statusamphibiansareshowninTable3.4‐7.ImpactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrogandfoothillyellow‐leggedfrogcouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.ThemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceonsuitableuplandgrasslanddispersalandaestivationhabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,andCaliforniared‐leggedfrog.Aquatichabitatsforspecials‐statusamphibianswouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.
Constructionactivitiessuchasexcavation,grading,orstockpilingofsoil,couldfill,removeorotherwisealtersuitablehabitatforspecial‐statusamphibiansorresultininjuryormortalityofindividualamphibians.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofuplandhabitatthatresultsindamageoreliminationofsuitableaestivationburrows.Specificactivitiesthatmayaffectthesespeciescouldincludeinstallationofpowercollectionandcommunicationsystems,turbineconstruction,roadinfrastructureconstruction/maintenanceandupgrades,meteorologicaltowerinstallationandremoval,temporarystagingareaset‐up,andreclamationactivities.Special‐
![Page 93: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐80
October 2014ICF 00323.08
statusamphibianscouldbeinjuredorkilledifvehiclesorconstructionequipmentaredriventhroughoccupiedhabitat,orifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsenterhabitat.Changesinhydrologyorsedimentationofhabitatfromerosionassociatedwithprojectconstructioncouldalterthesuitabilityoftheirhabitatorcausemortality.
Operationandmaintenanceactivitiesmayalsoresultinimpactsonspecial‐statusamphibiansortheirhabitats.Travelonmaintenanceroadsduringtherainyseasonorwhenamphibiansaredispersingcouldresultinmortalityofindividuals.Roadandfirebreakmaintenancecouldresultindegradationofhabitatorinjuryormortalityofspecial‐statusamphibians.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizesoffederallylistedandsensitiveamphibiansthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐5athroughBIO‐5cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
ImpactBIO‐5b:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,andfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.ThemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceonpotentialuplandgrasslanddispersalandaestivationhabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,andCaliforniared‐leggedfrog.Aquatichabitatsforspecials‐statusamphibianswouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonseasonalwetland,mixedwillowriparianforest,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforspecial‐statusamphibiansareshowninTable3.4‐8.ImpactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrogandfoothillyellow‐leggedfrogcouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizesoffederallylistedandsensitiveamphibiansthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐5athroughBIO‐5cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
![Page 94: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐81
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
ImpactBIO‐5c:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,Californiared‐leggedfrog,andfoothillyellow‐leggedfrog—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceofthePattersonPassProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.ThemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceonpotentialuplandgrasslanddispersalandaestivationhabitatforCaliforniatigersalamander,westernspadefoot,andCaliforniared‐leggedfrog.Aquatichabitatsforspecials‐statusamphibianswouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonseasonalwetland,mixedwillowriparianforest,andpondsthatmayprovidehabitatforspecial‐statusamphibiansareshowninTable3.4‐9.ImpactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforCaliforniared‐leggedfrogandfoothillyellow‐leggedfrogcouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Theseimpactswouldbesignificantbecausetheycouldreducethelocalpopulationsizesoffederallylistedandsensitiveamphibiansthroughdirectmortalityorhabitatloss.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,Bio‐3,BIO‐5athroughBIO‐5cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
![Page 95: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐82
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐6a‐1:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforwesternpondturtle—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonwesternpondturtleoritshabitats(ponds,reservoirs,drainages,andsurroundingriparianandgrasslandareas).Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonponds,reservoirs,riparian,andgrasslandthatmayprovidehabitatforwesternpondturtleareshowninTable3.4‐7.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforwesternpondturtlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Becausethemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines,suitableaquatichabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.
Aquaticandupland(overwintering,nesting)habitatforwesternpondturtlemayberemovedortemporarilydisturbedbyconstructionactivities.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofaquaticoruplandnestinghabitat.Westernpondturtlescouldalsobeinjuredorkilledifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsenterhabitat.Declinesinpopulationsofwesternpondturtlethroughoutthespecies’rangehavebeendocumented(JenningsandHayes1994).Lossofindividualsintheprogramareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthespecies.Thelossofuplandnestingsitesoreggswouldalsodecreasethelocalpopulation.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant,butimplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐6wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐6:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforwesternpondturtleandmonitorconstructionactivitiesifturtlesareobserved
IfitisdeterminedthroughpreconstructionsurveysconductedpursuanttoMitigationMeasureBIO‐3athatsuitableaquaticoruplandhabitatforwesternpondturtleispresentwithinproposedworkareas,thefollowingmeasures,consistentwithmeasuresdevelopedfortheEACCS,willbeimplementedtoensurethattheproposedprojectdoesnothaveasignificantimpactonwesternpondturtle.
Oneweekbeforeandwithin24hoursofbeginningworkinsuitableaquatichabitat,aqualifiedbiologist(onewhoisfamiliarwithdifferentspeciesofturtles)willconductsurveysforwesternpondturtle.Thesurveysshouldbetimedtocoincidewiththetimeofdayandyearwhenturtlesaremostlikelytobeactive(duringthecoolerpartofthedaybetween8a.m.and12p.m.duringspringandsummer).Priortoconductingthesurveys,thebiologistshouldlocatethemicrohabitatsforturtlebasking(logs,rocks,brushthickets)anddeterminealocationtoquietlyobserveturtles.Eachsurveyshouldincludea30‐minutewaittimeafterarrivingonsitetoallowstartledturtlestoreturntoopenbaskingareas.The
![Page 96: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐83
October 2014ICF 00323.08
surveyshouldconsistofaminimum15‐minuteobservationperiodforeachareawhereturtlescouldbeobserved.
Ifwesternpondturtlesareobservedduringeithersurvey,abiologicalmonitorwillbepresentduringconstructionactivitiesintheaquatichabitatwheretheturtlewasobserved.Thebiologicalmonitoralsowillbemindfulofsuitablenestingandoverwinteringareasinproximitytosuitableaquatichabitatandwillperiodicallyinspecttheseareasfornestsandturtles.
Ifoneormorewesternpondturtlesarefoundintheworkareaduringconstructionandcannotordonotmoveoffsiteontheirown,aqualifiedbiologistwillremoveandrelocatetheturtletoappropriateaquatichabitatoutsideandawayfromtheconstructionarea.RelocationofwesternpondturtlerequiresaletterfromCDFWauthorizingthisactivity.
ImpactBIO‐6a‐2:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforwesternpondturtle—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Constructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonwesternpondturtleoritshabitats(ponds,reservoirs,drainages,andsurroundingriparianandgrasslandareas).Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonponds,reservoirs,riparian,andgrasslandthatmayprovidehabitatforwesternpondturtleareshowninTable3.4‐7.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforwesternpondturtlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Becausethemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines,suitableaquatichabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.
Aquaticandupland(overwintering,nesting)habitatforwesternpondturtlemayberemovedortemporarilydisturbedbyconstructionactivities.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofaquaticoruplandnestinghabitat.Westernpondturtlescouldalsobeinjuredorkilledifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsenterhabitat.Declinesinpopulationsofwesternpondturtlethroughoutthespecies’rangehavebeendocumented(JenningsandHayes1994).Lossofindividualsintheprogramareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthespecies.Thelossofuplandnestingsitesoreggswouldalsodecreasethelocalpopulation.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant,butimplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐6wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
![Page 97: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐84
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐6:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforwesternpondturtleandmonitorconstructionactivitiesifturtlesareobserved
ImpactBIO‐6b:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforwesternpondturtle—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonponds,mixedwillowriparianscrub,andgrasslandthatmayprovidehabitatforwesternpondturtleareshowninTable3.4‐8.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforwesternpondturtlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Becausethemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines,suitableaquatichabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.
Aquaticandupland(overwintering,nesting)habitatforwesternpondturtlemayberemovedortemporarilydisturbedbyconstructionactivities.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofaquaticoruplandnestinghabitat.Westernpondturtlescouldalsobeinjuredorkilledifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsenterhabitat.Declinesinpopulationsofwesternpondturtlethroughoutthespecies’rangehavebeendocumented(JenningsandHayes1994).Lossofindividualsintheprojectareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthespecies.Thelossofuplandnestingsitesoreggswouldalsodecreasethelocalpopulation.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant,butimplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐6wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐6:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforwesternpondturtleandmonitorconstructionactivitiesifturtlesareobserved
ImpactBIO‐6c:Potentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforwesternpondturtle—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceofthePattersonPassProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonponds,mixedwillowriparianscrub,andgrasslandthatmayprovidehabitatforwesternpondturtleareshowninTable3.4‐9.Impactsondrainagesthatmayprovidepotentialhabitatforwesternpondturtlecouldnotbeestimatedbecausethesefeatureshavenotyetbeendelineated.Becausethemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelines,suitableaquatichabitatwouldgenerallybeavoided;however,directimpactsonhabitatandimpactsonwaterqualitycouldresultfromroadconstructionorwideningactivities.
![Page 98: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐85
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Aquaticandupland(overwintering,nesting)habitatforwesternpondturtlemayberemovedortemporarilydisturbedbyconstructionactivities.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofaquaticoruplandnestinghabitat.Westernpondturtlescouldalsobeinjuredorkilledifgasoline,oil,orothercontaminantsenterhabitat.Declinesinpopulationsofwesternpondturtlethroughoutthespecies’rangehavebeendocumented(JenningsandHayes1994).Lossofindividualsintheprojectareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthespecies.Thelossofuplandnestingsitesoreggswouldalsodecreasethelocalpopulation.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant,butimplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,andBIO‐6wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐6:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforwesternpondturtleandmonitorconstructionactivitiesifturtlesareobserved
ImpactBIO‐7a‐1:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhip—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhiportheirhabitats(grassland,chaparral,oakwoodland,andscrub).Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrassland,chaparral,oakwoodland,andscrubthatmayprovidehabitatforthesespeciesareshowninTable3.4‐7.Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelinesandthatlossofchaparral,oakwoodland,andscrubhabitatwouldbeminimal.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofhabitat.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Blainville’shornedlizardhasdisappearedfromportionsofitsrangeandcontinuestobethreatenedbydevelopmentinotherportionsofitsrange(JenningsandHayes1994:132).Alamedawhipsnakeisstate‐andfederallylistedasthreatenedbecauseofhabitatlossandfragmentationresultingfromurbandevelopment(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2002b:69).SanJoaquincoachwhiphasarestrictedgeographicrangeandisthreatenedbycontinuedconversionofitshabitattocroplandandurbandevelopment(JenningsandHayes1994:164).Lossofindividualsintheprogramareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsofthesespeciesandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,andBIO‐7bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevelbyreducingthepotentialforinjuryandmortalityofindividuals,restoringdisturbedhabitat,andcompensatingforpermanenthabitatloss.
![Page 99: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐86
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
WheresuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,orSanJoaquincoachwhipisidentifiedinproposedworkareas,allprojectproponentswillensurethatBMPsandotherappropriatemeasures,inaccordancewithmeasuresdevelopedfortheEACCS,beincorporatedintotheappropriatedesignandconstructiondocuments.ImplementationofsomeofthesemeasureswillrequirethattheprojectproponentobtainincidentaltakepermitsfromUSFWSandCDFW(Alamedawhipsnake)beforeconstructionbegins.Additionalconservationmeasuresorconditionsofapprovalmayberequiredinapplicableprojectpermits(i.e.,ESAincidentaltakepermit).
Aqualifiedbiologistwillconductpreconstructionsurveysimmediatelypriortoground‐disturbingactivities(e.g.,equipmentstaging,vegetationremoval,grading)associatedwiththeprogram.IfanyBlainville’shornedlizards,Alamedawhipsnakes,orSanJoaquincoachwhipsarefound,workwillnotbeginuntiltheyaremovedoutoftheworkareatoaUSFWS‐and/orCDFW‐approvedrelocationsite.IncidentaltakepermitsfromUSFWSandCDFWarerequiredforrelocationofAlamedawhipsnake.RelocationofBlainville’shornedlizardandSanJoaquincoachwhiprequiresaletterfromCDFWauthorizingthisactivity.
Nomonofilamentplasticwillbeusedforerosioncontrol.
Whereapplicable,barrierfencingwillbeusedtoexcludeBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhip.Barrierfencingwillberemovedwithin72hoursofcompletionofwork.
Workcrewsoranonsitebiologicalmonitorwillinspectopentrenchesandpitsandunderconstructionequipmentandmaterialsleftonsiteforspecial‐statusreptileseachmorningandeveningduringconstruction.
Grounddisturbanceinsuitablehabitatwillbeminimized.
Vegetationwithintheproposedworkareawillberemovedpriortograding.Priortoclearingandgrubbingoperations,aqualifiedbiologistwillclearlymarkvegetationwithintheworkareathatwillbeavoided.Vegetationoutsidetheworkareawillnotberemoved.Wherepossiblehandtools(e.g.,trimmer,chainsaw)willbeusedtotrimorremovevegetation.Allvegetationremovalwillbemonitoredbythequalifiedbiologisttominimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusreptiles.
Ifspecial‐statusreptilesarefoundintheworkareaduringconstructionandcannotordonotmoveoffsiteontheirown,aqualifiedbiologistwhoisUSFWS‐and/orCDFW‐approved
![Page 100: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐87
October 2014ICF 00323.08
underanincidentaltakepermitforthespecificprojectwilltrapandmovetheanimal(s)toaUSFWSand/orCDFW‐approvedrelocationarea.IncidentaltakepermitsfromUSFWSandCDFWarerequiredforrelocationofAlamedawhipsnake.RelocationofBlainville’shornedlizardandSanJoaquincoachwhiprequiresaletterfromCDFWauthorizingthisactivity.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
Whereimpactsonhabitatforspecial‐statusreptilescannotbeavoidedorminimized,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewithmitigationratiosandrequirementsdevelopedundertheEACCS(AppendixC).IntheeventthatincidentaltakepermitsarerequiredforAlamedawhipsnake,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewiththetermsofpermitsinconsultationwithUSFWSandCDFW.
ImpactBIO‐7a‐2:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhip—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.ConstructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhiportheirhabitats(grassland,chaparral,oakwoodland,andscrub).Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrassland,chaparral,oakwoodland,andscrubthatmayprovidehabitatforthesespeciesareshowninTable3.4‐7.Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelinesandthatlossofchaparral,oakwoodland,andscrubhabitatwouldbeminimal.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofhabitat.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Blainville’shornedlizardhasdisappearedfromportionsofitsrangeandcontinuestobethreatenedbydevelopmentinotherportionsofitsrange(JenningsandHayes1994:132).Alamedawhipsnakeisstate‐andfederallylistedasthreatenedbecauseofhabitatlossandfragmentationresultingfromurbandevelopment(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2002b:69).SanJoaquincoachwhiphasarestrictedgeographicrangeandisthreatenedbycontinuedconversionofitshabitattocroplandandurbandevelopment(JenningsandHayes1994:164).Lossofindividualsintheprogramareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsofthesespeciesandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,andBIO‐7bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevelbyreducingthepotentialforinjuryandmortalityofindividuals,restoringdisturbedhabitat,andcompensatingforpermanenthabitatloss.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
![Page 101: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐88
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
ImpactBIO‐7b:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhip—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrassland,chaparral,oakwoodland,andscrubthatmayprovidehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,orSanJoaquincoachwhipareshowninTable3.4‐8.Itisanticipatedthatthemajorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelinesandthatlossofchaparral,oakwoodland,andscrubhabitatwouldbeminimal.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofhabitat.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Lossofindividualsintheprojectareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsofthesespeciesandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact,butimplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,andBIO‐7bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
ImpactBIO‐7c:PotentialdisturbanceormortalityofandlossofsuitablehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,andSanJoaquincoachwhip—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceofthePattersonPassProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.EstimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrasslandandmixedwillowriparianscrubthatmayprovidehabitatforBlainville’shornedlizard,Alamedawhipsnake,orSanJoaquincoachwhipareshowninTable3.4‐9.Itisanticipatedthatthe
![Page 102: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐89
October 2014ICF 00323.08
majorityofconstructionactivitieswouldtakeplaceongrasslandhabitatalongridgelinesandthatlossofmixedwillowriparianscrubhabitatwouldbeminimal.Potentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjurybyequipment,entrapmentinopentrenchesorotherprojectfacilities,andremovalordisturbanceofhabitat.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Lossofindividualsintheprojectareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsofthesespeciesandlowerreproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,andBIO‐7bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
ImpactBIO‐8a‐1:Potentialconstruction‐relateddisturbanceormortalityofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitiesduringthenestingseason(generallyFebruary1–August31)ofwhite‐tailedkite,baldeagle,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,andtricoloredblackbirdcouldresultindirecteffectsonthesespecies,aswellasonnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds,iftheyarenestingintheprogramarea.Suitablenestinghabitatmaybepresentinnearlyalllandcovertypesintheprogramarea.Removalofgrassland,burrows,wetlandandmarshvegetation,andtreesorshrubswithactivenestsandconstructiondisturbanceduringthebreedingseasonmayresultinnestabandonmentandsubsequentlossofeggsoryoung.Becausetheplacementofwindturbineswouldgenerallybeonthetopsofhillsandridgelinesintheprogramareawheretreesarenotgenerallypresent,thenumberoftreestoberemovedisexpectedtobeverylow.Exclusionofburrowingowlsfromtheirburrowsduringthenon‐nestingseasonaspartofeffortstoavoidorminimizesomeformsofdirecttakecouldresultinharmofburrowingowls.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitableforaginghabitat(grassland,cropland,alkalimeadowandscald,andwetlands)forspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐7.Suchlossescouldaffectthelocalpopulationofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐8a,andBIO‐8bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
![Page 103: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐90
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusnestingbirds
Wheresuitablehabitatispresentforraptorswithin1mile(within2milesforgoldeneagles)andfortree/shrub‐andground‐nestingmigratorybirds(non‐raptors)within50feetofproposedworkareas,thefollowingmeasureswillbeimplementedtoensurethattheproposedprojectdoesnothaveasignificantimpactonnestingspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds.
Removesuitablenestinghabitat(shrubsandtrees)duringthenon‐breedingseason(typicallySeptember1–January31)fornestingbirds.
Totheextentfeasible,avoidconstructionactivitiesinornearsuitableoroccupiednestinghabitatduringthebreedingseasonofbirds(generallyFebruary1–August31).
Ifconstructionactivities(includingvegetationremoval,clearing,andgrading)willoccurduringthenestingseasonformigratorybirds,aqualifiedbiologistwillconductpreconstructionnestingbirdsurveyswithin7dayspriortoconstructionactivities.Theconstructionareaanda1‐milebufferwillbesurveyedfortree‐nestingraptors(exceptforgoldeneagles),anda50‐footbufferwillbesurveyedforallotherbirdspecies.
Surveystolocateeaglenestswithin2milesofconstructionwillbeconductedduringthebreedingseasonpriortoconstruction.A1‐mileno‐disturbancebufferwillbeimplementedforconstructionactivitiestoprotectnestingeaglesfromdisturbance.ThroughcoordinationwithUSFWS,theno‐disturbancebuffermaybereducedto0.5mileifconstructionactivitiesarenotwithinline‐of‐sightofthenest.
Ifanactivenest(otherthangoldeneagle)isidentifiednearaproposedworkareaandworkcannotbeconductedoutsidethenestingseason(February1–August31),ano‐activityzonewillbeestablishedaroundthenestbyaqualifiedbiologistincoordinationwithUSFWSand/orCDFW.Fencingand/orflaggingwillbeusedtodelineatetheno‐activityzone.Tominimizethepotentialtoaffectthereproductivesuccessofthenestingpair,theextentoftheno‐activityzonewillbebasedonthedistanceoftheactivitytothenest,thetypeandextentoftheproposedactivity,thedurationandtimingoftheactivity,thesensitivityandhabituationofthespecies,andthedissimilarityoftheproposedactivitytobackgroundactivities.Theno‐activityzonewillbelargeenoughtoavoidnestabandonmentandwillbebetween50feetand1milefromthenest,orasotherwiserequiredbyUSFWSand/orCDFW.
![Page 104: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐91
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
Wheresuitablehabitatforwesternburrowingowlisinorwithin500feetofproposedworkareas,thefollowingmeasureswillbeimplementedtoavoidorminimizepotentialadverseimpactsonburrowingowls.
Tothemaximumextentfeasible(e.g.,wheretheconstructionfootprintcanbemodified),constructionactivitieswithin500feetofactiveburrowingowlburrowswillbeavoidedduringthenestingseason(February1–August31).
Aqualifiedbiologistwillconductpreconstructiontakeavoidancesurveysforburrowingowlnolessthan14dayspriortoandwithin24hoursofinitiatingground‐disturbingactivities.Thesurveyareawillencompasstheworkareaanda500‐footbufferaroundthisarea.
Ifanactiveburrowisidentifiednearaproposedworkareaandworkcannotbeconductedoutsidethenestingseason(February1–August31),ano‐activityzonewillbeestablishedbyaqualifiedbiologistincoordinationwithCDFW.Theno‐activityzonewillbelargeenoughtoavoidnestabandonmentandwillextendaminimumof250feetaroundtheburrow.
Ifburrowingowlsarepresentatthesiteduringthenon‐breedingseason(September1–January31),aqualifiedbiologistwillestablishano‐activityzonethatextendsaminimumof150feetaroundtheburrow.
Ifthedesignatedno‐activityzoneforeitherbreedingornon‐breedingburrowingowlscannotbeestablished,awildlifebiologistexperiencedinburrowingowlbehaviorwillevaluatesite‐specificconditionsand,incoordinationwithCDFW,recommendasmallerbuffer(ifpossible)and/orothermeasurethatstillminimizesdisturbanceoftheowls(whileallowingreproductivesuccessduringthebreedingseason).Thesite‐specificbuffer(and/orothermeasure)willconsiderthetypeandextentoftheproposedactivityoccurringneartheoccupiedburrow,thedurationandtimingoftheactivity,thesensitivityandhabituationoftheowls,andthedissimilarityoftheproposedactivitytobackgroundactivities.
Ifburrowingowlsarepresentinthedirectdisturbanceareaandcannotbeavoidedduringthenon‐breedingseason(generallySeptember1throughJanuary31),burrowingowlsmaybeexcludedfromburrowsthroughtheinstallationofone‐waydoorsatburrowentrances.Aburrowingowlexclusionplan,preparedbytheprojectproponent,mustbeapprovedbyCDFWpriortoexclusionofowls.One‐waydoors(e.g.,modifieddryerventsorotherCDFW‐approvedmethod)willbeleftinplaceforaminimumof1weekandmonitoreddailytoensurethattheowl(s)havelefttheburrow(s).Excavationoftheburrowwillbeconductedusinghandtools.Duringexcavationoftheburrow,asectionofflexibleplasticpipe(atleast3inchesindiameter)willbeinsertedintotheburrowtunneltomaintainanescaperouteforanyanimalsthatmaybeinsidetheburrow.Owlswillbeexcludedfromtheirburrowsasalastresortandonlyifotheravoidanceandminimizationmeasurescannotbeimplemented.
Avoiddestructionofunoccupiedburrowsoutsidetheworkareaandplacevisiblemarkersnearburrowstoensurethattheyarenotcollapsed.
Conductongoingsurveillanceoftheprojectsiteforburrowingowlsduringprojectactivities.Ifadditionalowlsareobservedusingburrowswithin500feetofconstruction,theonsitebiologicalmonitorwilldetermine,incoordinationwithCDFW,iftheowl(s)areorwouldbeaffectedbyconstructionactivitiesandifadditionalexclusionzonesarerequired.
![Page 105: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐92
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐8a‐2:Potentialconstruction‐relateddisturbanceormortalityofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Constructionactivitiesduringthenestingseason(generallyFebruary1–August31)ofwhite‐tailedkite,baldeagle,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,andtricoloredblackbirdcouldresultindirecteffectsonthesespecies,aswellasonnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds,iftheyarenestingintheprogramarea.Suitablenestinghabitatmaybepresentinnearlyalllandcovertypesintheprogramarea.Removalofgrassland,burrows,wetlandandmarshvegetation,andtreesorshrubswithactivenestsandconstructiondisturbanceduringthebreedingseasonmayresultinnestabandonmentandsubsequentlossofeggsoryoung.Becausetheplacementofwindturbineswouldgenerallybeonthetopsofhillsandridgelinesintheprogramareawheretreesarenotgenerallypresent,thenumberoftreestoberemovedisexpectedtobeverylow.Exclusionofburrowingowlsfromtheirburrowsduringthenon‐nestingseasonaspartofeffortstoavoidorminimizesomeformsofdirecttakecouldresultinharmofburrowingowls.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitableforaginghabitat(grassland,cropland,alkalimeadowandscald,andwetlands)forspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐7.Suchlossescouldaffectthelocalpopulationofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐8a,andBIO‐8bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
ImpactBIO‐8b:Potentialconstruction‐relateddisturbanceormortalityofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitiesduringthenestingseason(generallyFebruary1–August31)ofwhite‐tailedkite,baldeagle,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,andtricoloredblackbirdcouldresultindirecteffectsonthesespecies,aswellasonnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds,iftheyarenestingintheprojectarea.Suitablenesting
![Page 106: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐93
October 2014ICF 00323.08
habitatmaybepresentinnearlyalllandcovertypesintheprojectarea.Removalofgrassland,burrows,wetlandandmarshvegetation,andtreesorshrubswithactivenestsandconstructiondisturbanceduringthebreedingseasonmayresultinnestabandonmentandsubsequentlossofeggsoryoung.Becausetheplacementofwindturbineswouldgenerallybeonthetopsofhillsandridgelinesintheprogramareawheretreesarenotgenerallypresent,thenumberoftreestoberemovedisexpectedtobeverylow.Exclusionofburrowingowlsfromtheirburrowsduringthenon‐nestingseasonaspartofeffortstoavoidorminimizesomeformsofdirecttakecouldresultinharmofburrowingowls.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitableforaginghabitat(grassland,cropland,alkalimeadowandscald,andwetlands)forspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐8.Suchlossescouldaffectthelocalpopulationofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐8a,andBIO‐8bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
ImpactBIO‐8c:Potentialconstruction‐relateddisturbanceormortalityofspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusmigratorybirds—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionactivitiesduringthenestingseason(generallyFebruary1–August31)ofwhite‐tailedkite,northernharrier,Swainson’shawk,goldeneagle,westernburrowingowl,loggerheadshrike,andtricoloredblackbirdcouldresultindirecteffectsonthesespecies,aswellasonnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds,iftheyarenestingintheprojectarea.Suitablenestinghabitatmaybepresentinnearlyalllandcovertypesintheprojectarea.Removalofgrassland,burrows,wetlandvegetation,andtreesorshrubswithactivenestsandconstructiondisturbanceduringthebreedingseasonmayresultinnestabandonmentandsubsequentlossofeggsoryoung.Becausetheplacementofwindturbineswouldgenerallybeonthetopsofhillsandridgelinesintheprogramareawheretreesarenotgenerallypresent,thenumberoftreestoberemovedisexpectedtobeverylow.Exclusionofburrowingowlsfromtheirburrowsduringthenon‐nestingseasonaspartofeffortstoavoidorminimizesomeformsofdirecttakecouldresultinharmofburrowingowls.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitableforaginghabitat(grassland,mixedwillowriparianscrub,andwetlands)forspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐9.Suchlossescouldaffectthelocalpopulationofspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds.This
![Page 107: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐94
October 2014ICF 00323.08
wouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐8a,andBIO‐8bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
ImpactBIO‐9a‐1:Permanentandtemporarylossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowlandforaginghabitatfortricoloredblackbirdandotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Implementationoftheprogramwouldresultinthetemporaryandpermanentlossofgrasslandthatprovidessuitableforaginghabitatforburrowingowlandanumberofotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds.BecauseofthelimiteduseoftheprogramareabySwainson’shawksforforaging,nocompensationisproposedforthelossofforaginghabitatforSwainson’shawk.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitablegrasslandforaginghabitatforburrowingowl,tricoloredblackbird,andotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐7.Thelossofgrasslandforaginghabitatforspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdswouldbecompensatedthroughimplementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐5b(forspecial‐statusamphibians)and/orthroughthestandardizedmitigationratiosfornonlistedspeciesdevelopedfortheEACCS(AppendixC).
CDFWhasdeterminedthatcompensationisrequiredforpermanentlossofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitat(i.e.,whereburrowingowlshavebeendocumentedtooccupyburrowsinthepreceding3years).Permanentlossofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitatcouldaffectthelocalpopulationandwouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐5b,BIO‐5c,andBIO‐9wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowl
Ifconstructionactivitieswouldresultintheremovalofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitat(determinedduringpreconstructionsurveysdescribedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐8a),this
![Page 108: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐95
October 2014ICF 00323.08
habitatlosswillbemitigatedbypermanentlyprotectingmitigationlandthroughaconservationeasementorbyimplementingalternativemitigationdeterminedthroughconsultationwithCDFWasdescribedinitsStaffReportonBurrowingOwlMitigation(CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame2012:11–13).TheprojectproponentwillworkwithCDFWtodevelopthecompensationplan,whichwillbesubjecttoCountyreviewandapproval.
ImpactBIO‐9a‐2:Permanentandtemporarylossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowlandforaginghabitatfortricoloredblackbirdandotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Implementationoftheprogramwouldresultinthetemporaryandpermanentlossofgrasslandthatprovidessuitableforaginghabitatforburrowingowlandanumberofotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds.BecauseofthelimiteduseoftheprogramareabySwainson’shawksforforaging,nocompensationisproposedforthelossofforaginghabitatforSwainson’shawk.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitablegrasslandforaginghabitatforburrowingowl,tricoloredblackbird,andotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐7.Thelossofgrasslandforaginghabitatforspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdswouldbecompensatedthroughimplementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐5b(forspecial‐statusamphibians)and/orthroughthestandardizedmitigationratiosfornonlistedspeciesdevelopedfortheEACCS(AppendixC).
CDFWhasdeterminedthatcompensationisrequiredforpermanentlossofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitat(i.e.,whereburrowingowlshavebeendocumentedtooccupyburrowsinthepreceding3years).Permanentlossofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitatcouldaffectthelocalpopulationandwouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐5b,BIO‐5c,andBIO‐9wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowl
ImpactBIO‐9b:Permanentandtemporarylossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowlandforaginghabitatfortricoloredblackbirdandotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirds—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldresultinthetemporaryandpermanentlossofgrasslandthatprovidessuitableforaginghabitatforburrowingowl,tricoloredblackbird,andanumberofotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitablegrasslandforaginghabitatforburrowingowl,tricoloredblackbird,andotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐8.Thelossofgrasslandforaginghabitatforspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdswouldbecompensatedthroughimplementationofMitigationMeasure5b(forspecial‐statusamphibians)and/orthroughthestandardizedmitigationratiosfornon‐listedspeciesdevelopedfortheEACCS(AppendixC).
![Page 109: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐96
October 2014ICF 00323.08
CDFWhasdeterminedthatcompensationisrequiredforpermanentlossofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitat(i.e.,whereburrowingowlshavebeendocumentedtooccupyburrowsinthepreceding3years).Permanentlossofoccupiedhabitatcouldaffectthelocalpopulationandwouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐5b,BIO‐5c,andBIO‐9wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowl
ImpactBIO‐9c:Permanentandtemporarylossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowlandforaginghabitatfortricoloredblackbirdandotherspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusbirds—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionofthePattersonPassProjectwouldresultinthetemporaryandpermanentlossofgrasslandthatprovidessuitableforaginghabitatforburrowingowl,tricoloredblackbird,andanumberofotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusmigratorybirds.Estimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsonsuitablegrasslandforaginghabitatforburrowingowl,tricoloredblackbird,andotherspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdsareshowninTable3.4‐9.Thelossofgrasslandforaginghabitatforspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusbirdswouldbecompensatedthroughimplementationofMitigationMeasure5b(forspecial‐statusamphibians)and/orthroughthestandardizedmitigationratiosfornon‐listedspeciesdevelopedfortheEACCS(AppendixC).
CDFWhasdeterminedthatcompensationisrequiredforpermanentlossofoccupiedburrowingowlhabitat(i.e.,whereburrowingowlshavebeendocumentedtooccupyburrowsinthepreceding3years).Permanentlossofoccupiedhabitatcouldaffectthelocalpopulationandwouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐5candBIO‐9wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofoccupiedhabitatforwesternburrowingowl
ImpactBIO‐10a‐1:PotentialinjuryormortalityofandlossofhabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerortheirgrasslandhabitat.EstimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrasslandthatprovidesuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerareshowninTable3.4‐7.Inadditiontothepermanentandtemporaryremovalofhabitat,otherpotentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromconstructionvehiclesorheavyequipment,directmortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromdencollapseandsubsequentsuffocation,temporarydisturbancefromnoiseandhumanpresenceassociatedwithconstruction
![Page 110: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐97
October 2014ICF 00323.08
activities,andharassmentofindividualsbyconstructionpersonnel.Additionally,exposedpipes,largeexcavatedholes,ortrenchesthatareleftopenafterconstructionhasfinishedforthedaycouldentrapSanJoaquinkitfoxesorAmericanbadgers.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.SanJoaquinkitfoxisfederallylistedasendangeredandstate‐listedasthreatenedbecauseofhabitatlossresultingfromagriculturaldevelopment,infrastructureconstruction,andurbandevelopment(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2010:25).Americanbadgerhasexperienceddrasticdeclines,particularlyintheCentralValley,andhasbeenextirpatedfrommanyareasinsouthernCalifornia(Williams1986:66).Lossofindividualsintheprogramareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsofthesespeciesandreducereproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐10a,andBIO‐10bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
WheresuitablehabitatispresentforSanJoaquinfitfoxandAmericanbadgerinandadjacenttoproposedworkareas,thefollowingmeasures,consistentwithmeasuresdevelopedintheEACCS,willbeimplementedtoensurethatproposedprojectsdonothaveasignificantimpactonSanJoaquinkitfoxorAmericanbadger.ImplementationofsomeofthesemeasureswillrequirethattheprojectproponentobtainincidentaltakepermitsfromUSFWSandCDFW(SanJoaquinkitfox)beforeconstructionbegins.ImplementationofstateandfederalrequirementscontainedinsuchauthorizationmayconstitutecompliancewithcorrespondingmeasuresinthisPEIR..
Tothemaximumextentfeasible,suitabledensforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerwillbeavoided.
Allprojectproponentswillretainqualifiedapprovedbiologists(asdeterminedbyUSFWS)toconductapreconstructionsurveyforpotentialSanJoaquinkitfoxdens(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2011).ResumesofbiologistswillbesubmittedtoUSFWSforreviewandapprovalpriortothestartofthesurvey.
PreconstructionsurveysforAmericanbadgerswillbeconductedinconjunctionwithSanJoaquinkitfoxpreconstructionsurveys.
AsdescribedinU.S.FishandWildlifeService2011,thepreconstructionsurveywillbeconductednolessthan14daysandnomorethan30daysbeforethebeginningofgrounddisturbance,oranyactivitylikelytoaffectSanJoaquinkitfox.ThebiologistswillconductdensearchesbysystematicallywalkingtransectsthroughtheprojectareaandabufferareatobedeterminedincoordinationwithUSFWSandCDFW.Transectdistanceshouldbebased
![Page 111: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐98
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ontheheightofvegetationsuchthat100%visualcoverageoftheprojectareaisachieved.Ifapotentialorknowndenisfoundduringthesurvey,thebiologistwillmeasurethesizeoftheden,evaluatetheshapeofthedenentrances,andnotetracks,scat,preyremains,andrecentexcavationsatthedensite.Thebiologistswillalsodeterminethestatusofthedensandmapthefeatures.DenswillbeclassifiedinoneofthefollowingfourdenstatuscategoriesdefinedbyUSFWS(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2011).
Potentialden:Anysubterraneanholewithinthespecies’rangethathasentrancesofappropriatedimensionsandforwhichavailableevidenceissufficienttoconcludethatitisbeingusedorhasbeenusedbyakitfox.Potentialdensinclude(1)anysuitablesubterraneanhole;or(2)anydenorburrowofanotherspecies(e.g.,coyote,badger,redfox,groundsquirrel)thatotherwisehasappropriatecharacteristicsforkitfoxuse;oranartificialstructurethatotherwisehasappropriatecharacteristicsforkitfoxuse.
Knownden:AnyexistingnaturaldenorartificialstructurethatisusedorhasbeenusedatanytimeinthepastbyaSanJoaquinkitfox.Evidenceofusemayincludehistoricalrecords;pastorcurrentradiotelemetryorspotlightingdata;kitfoxsignsuchastracks,scat,and/orpreyremains;orotherreasonableproofthatagivendenisbeingorhasbeenusedbyakitfox(USFWSdiscouragesuseofthetermsactiveandinactivewhenreferringtoanykitfoxdenbecauseagreatpercentageofoccupieddensshownoevidenceofuse,andbecausekitfoxeschangedensoften,withtheresultthatthestatusofagivendenmaychangefrequentlyandabruptly).
Knownnatalorpuppingden:Anydenthatisused,orhasbeenusedatanytimeinthepast,bykitfoxestowhelpand/orreartheirpups.Natal/puppingdensmaybelargerwithmorenumerousentrancesthandensoccupiedexclusivelybyadults.Thesedenstypicallyhavemorekitfoxtracks,scat,andpreyremainsinthevicinityoftheden,andmayhaveabroaderapronofmatteddirtorvegetationatoneormoreentrances.Anatalden,definedasadeninwhichkitfoxpupsareactuallywhelpedbutnotnecessarilyreared,isamorerestrictiveversionofthepuppingden.Inpractice,however,itisdifficulttodistinguishbetweenthetwo;therefore,forpurposesofthisdefinitioneithertermapplies.
Knownatypicalden:AnyartificialstructurethathasbeenorisbeingoccupiedbyaSanJoaquinkitfox.Atypicaldensmayincludepipes,culverts,anddiggingsbeneathconcreteslabsandbuildings.
WrittenresultsofthesurveyincludingthelocationsofanypotentialorknownSanJoaquinkitfoxdenswillbesubmittedtoUSFWSwithin5daysfollowingcompletionofthesurveyandpriortothestartofgrounddisturbanceorconstructionactivities.
Afterpreconstructiondensearchesandbeforethecommencementofrepoweringactivities,exclusionzoneswillbeestablishedasmeasuredinaradiusoutwardfromtheentranceorclusterofentrancesofeachden.Repoweringactivitieswillbeprohibitedorgreatlyrestrictedwithintheseexclusionzones.Onlyessentialvehicularoperationonexistingroadsandfoottrafficwillbepermitted.Allotherrepoweringactivities,vehicleoperation,materialandequipmentstorage,andothersurface‐disturbingactivitieswillbeprohibitedintheexclusionzones.Barrierfencingwillberemovedwithin72hoursofcompletionofwork.Exclusionzoneswillbeestablishedusingthefollowingparameters.
![Page 112: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐99
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Potentialandatypicaldens:Atotaloffourorfiveflaggedstakeswillbeplaced50feetfromthedenentrancetoidentifythedenlocation.
Knownden:Orangeconstructionbarrierfencingwillbeinstalledbetweentheworkareaandtheknowndensiteataminimumdistanceof100feetfromtheden.Thefencingwillbemaintaineduntilconstruction‐relateddisturbanceshaveceased.Atthattime,allfencingwillberemovedtoavoidattractingsubsequentattentiontotheden.
Natal/puppingden:USFWSwillbecontactedimmediatelyifanatalorpuppingdenisdiscoveredinorwithin200feetoftheworkarea.
AnyoccupiedorpotentiallyoccupiedbadgerdenwillbeavoidedbyestablishinganexclusionzoneconsistentwithaSanJoaquinkitfoxpotentialburrow(i.e.,fourorfiveflaggedstakeswillbeplaced50feetfromthedenentrance).
Incaseswhereavoidanceisnotareasonablealternative,limiteddestructionofpotentialSanJoaquinkitfoxdensmaybeallowedasfollows.
Natal/puppingdens:NatalorpuppingdensthatareoccupiedwillnotbedestroyeduntiltheadultsandpupshavevacatedthedensandthenonlyafterconsultationwithUSFWS.Removalofnatal/puppingdensrequiresincidentaltakeauthorizationfromUSFWSandCDFW.
Knowndens:Knowndenswithinthefootprintoftheactivitymustbemonitoredfor3dayswithtrackingmediumoraninfraredcameratodeterminecurrentuse.Ifnokitfoxactivityisobservedduringthisperiod,thedenshouldbedestroyedimmediatelytoprecludesubsequentuse.Ifkitfoxactivityisobservedduringthisperiod,thedenwillbemonitoredforatleast5consecutivedaysfromthetimeofobservationtoallowanyresidentanimaltomovetoanotherdenduringitsnormalactivity.Useofthedencanbediscouragedbypartiallypluggingitsentrance(s)withsoilinsuchamannerthatanyresidentanimalcanescapeeasily.Onlywhenthedenisdeterminedtobeunoccupiedwillthedenbeexcavatedunderthedirectionofabiologist.Ifthefoxisstillpresentafter5ormoreconsecutivedaysofmonitoring,thedenmaybeexcavatedwhen,inthejudgmentofthebiologist,itistemporarilyvacant,suchasduringthefox’snormalforagingactivities.RemovalofknowndensrequiresincidentaltakeauthorizationfromUSFWSandCDFW.
Potentialdens:Ifincidentaltakepermitshavebeenreceived(fromUSFWSandCDFW),potentialdenscanberemoved(preferablybyhandexcavation)bybiologistorunderthesupervisionofabiologistwithoutmonitoring,unlessotherrestrictionswereissuedwiththeincidentaltakepermits.Ifnotakeauthorizationshavebeenissued,thepotentialdenswillbemonitoredasiftheyareknowndens.Ifanydenwasconsideredapotentialdenbutwaslaterdeterminedduringmonitoringordestructiontobecurrentlyorpreviouslyusedbykitfoxes(e.g.,kitfoxsignisfoundinside),thenallconstructionactivitieswillceaseandUSFWSandCDFWwillbenotifiedimmediately.
Nighttimeworkwillbeminimizedtotheextentpossible.Thevehicularspeedlimitwillbereducedto10milesperhourduringnighttimework.
Pipes,culverts,andsimilarmaterialsgreaterthan4inchesindiameterwillbestoredsoastopreventwildlifespeciesfromusingtheseastemporaryrefuges,andthesematerialswillbeinspectedeachmorningforthepresenceofanimalspriortobeingmoved.
![Page 113: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐100
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Arepresentativeappointedbytheprojectproponentwillbethecontactforanyemployeeorcontractorwhomightinadvertentlykillorinjureakitfoxorwhofindsadead,injured,orentrappedkitfox.Therepresentativewillbeidentifiedduringenvironmentalsensitivitytraining(MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b)andhis/hernameandphonenumberwillbeprovidedtoUSFWSandCDFW.Uponsuchincidentorfinding,therepresentativewillimmediatelycontactUSFWSandCDFW.
TheSacramentoUSFWSofficeandCDFWwillbenotifiedinwritingwithin3workingdaysoftheaccidentaldeathorinjuryofaSanJoaquinkitfoxduringproject‐relatedactivities.Notificationmustincludethedate,time,andlocationoftheincident,andanyotherpertinentinformation.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
WherepermanentimpactsonhabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgercannotbeavoidedorminimized,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewithmitigationratiosandrequirementsdevelopedundertheEACCS(AppendixC).IntheeventthatincidentaltakepermitsarerequiredforSanJoaquinkitfox,compensatorymitigationwillbeundertakeninaccordancewiththetermsofpermitsinconsultationwithUSFWSandCDFW.
ImpactBIO‐10a‐2:PotentialinjuryormortalityofandlossofhabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.ConstructionactivitiesintheprogramareacouldresultindirecteffectsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerortheirgrasslandhabitat.EstimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrasslandthatprovidesuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerareshowninTable3.4‐7.Inadditiontothepermanentandtemporaryremovalofhabitat,otherpotentialdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromconstructionvehiclesorheavyequipment,directmortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromdencollapseandsubsequentsuffocation,temporarydisturbancefromnoiseandhumanpresenceassociatedwithconstructionactivities,andharassmentofindividualsbyconstructionpersonnel.Additionally,exposedpipes,largeexcavatedholes,ortrenchesthatareleftopenafterconstructionhasfinishedforthedaycouldentrapSanJoaquinkitfoxesorAmericanbadgers.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.SanJoaquinkitfoxisfederallylistedasendangeredandstate‐listedasthreatenedbecauseofhabitatlossresultingfromagriculturaldevelopment,infrastructureconstruction,andurbandevelopment(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2010:25).Americanbadgerhasexperienceddrasticdeclines,particularlyintheCentralValley,andhasbeenextirpatedfrommanyareasinsouthernCalifornia(Williams1986:66).Lossofindividualsintheprogramareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsofthesespeciesandreducereproductivepotential,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐10a,andBIO‐10bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
![Page 114: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐101
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
ImpactBIO‐10b:PotentialinjuryormortalityofandlossofhabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.EstimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrasslandthatprovidesuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerareshowninTable3.4‐8.Inadditiontothepermanentandtemporaryremovalofhabitat,otherdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromconstructionvehiclesorheavyequipment,directmortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromdencollapseandsubsequentsuffocation,temporarydisturbancefromnoiseandhumanpresenceassociatedwithconstructionactivities,andharassmentofindividualsbyconstructionpersonnel.Additionally,exposedpipes,largeexcavatedholes,ortrenchesthatareleftopenafterconstructionhasfinishedforthedaycouldentrapSanJoaquinkitfoxesorAmericanbadgers.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Lossofindividualsintheprojectareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsand/orlowerthereproductivepotentialofSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐10a,andBIO‐10bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
![Page 115: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐102
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
ImpactBIO‐10c:PotentialinjuryormortalityofandlossofhabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Impactsfromconstruction,operation,andmaintenanceofthePattersonPassProjectwouldbesimilartothosedescribedfortheprogram.EstimatedpermanentandtemporaryimpactsongrasslandthatprovidesuitabledenningandforaginghabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadgerareshowninTable3.4‐9.Inadditiontothepermanentandtemporaryremovalofhabitat,otherdirectimpactsincludemortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromconstructionvehiclesorheavyequipment,directmortalityorinjuryofindividualsfromdencollapseandsubsequentsuffocation,temporarydisturbancefromnoiseandhumanpresenceassociatedwithconstructionactivities,andharassmentofindividualsbyconstructionpersonnel.Additionally,exposedpipes,largeexcavatedholes,ortrenchesthatareleftopenafterconstructionhasfinishedforthedaycouldentrapSanJoaquinkitfoxesorAmericanbadgers.Operationandmaintenanceactivities,suchasroadandfirebreakmaintenance,mayalsoresultininjuryormortalityofindividuals.Lossofindividualsintheprojectareacoulddiminishthelocalpopulationsand/orlowerthereproductivepotentialofSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger,contributingtothefurtherdeclineofthesespecies.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3,BIO‐5c,BIO‐10a,andBIO‐10bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
ImpactBIO‐11a‐1:Avianmortalityresultingfrominteractionwithwindenergyfacilities—programAlternative1:417MW(significantandunavoidable)
Theoperationofwindenergyfacilitieshasbeenshowntocauseavianfatalitiesthroughcollisionswithwindturbinesandpowerlinesandthroughelectrocutiononpowerlines.
Mostcollectionlinesforfirst‐andsecond‐generationturbinesareabovegroundfacilities.Asrepoweringprojectsareimplemented,oldcollectionsystemswouldberemovedandnewcollectionsystemswouldbeinstalled.Themajorityofnewcollectionlinesassociatedwiththeprogramwouldbeundergrounded,reducingtheriskofavianfatalityfromelectrocutionorcollisionwithpowerlines.
![Page 116: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐103
October 2014ICF 00323.08
DiabloWinds,BuenaVista,andVascoWindsaretheonlyrepoweredprojectsintheAPWRAforwhichestimatesofavianfatalityratesareavailable.Basedontheseestimates,aviancollisionriskisexpectedtobesubstantiallyreducedwhenolder‐generationturbinesarereplacedbynewer,largerturbineswiththesametotalratednameplatecapacity(Table3.4‐10).However,whiletheavailableevidencesuggeststhatrepoweringcouldsubstantiallyreduceturbine‐relatedavianfatalitiesbelowthelevelsdocumentedforoldergenerationturbines,avianfatalitieswouldcontinuetooccur.Moreover,whilerepoweringisintendedtoreducefatalities,enoughuncertaintyremainsinlightofproject‐andsite‐specificdatatowarrantaconservativeapproachintheimpactanalysis.Accordingly,thecontinuedorincreasedlossofbirds(includingspecial‐statusspecies)atarateexceedingthebaselineratewouldbeasignificantadverseimpact.Thereisalsoevidencethattherepoweringprogramwouldresultincontinuedavianmortalityinconflictwithspecificlawsandregulations(e.g.,ESA,CESA,MBTA)thatarenotbasedonmortalityrates,asdescribedaboveinDeterminationofSignificance,andwiththeobjectivesofthe2007SettlementAgreementthatboundthewindenergyoperatorsandtheCountytoprovidestrategiesandmeasurestoconserveavianspeciesofconcernandtheirhabitats.Thisconflictisconsideredasignificantimpactonprotectedandspecial‐statusavianspecies,andadoptingaconservativeexpectationthatsomelevelofavianmortalitywillcontinueevenwiththeimplementationofeveryfeasiblemitigationmeasureandconservationstrategy,thiswouldbeasignificantandunavoidableimpact.
ItshouldbenotedthatturbinesusedinfuturerepoweringprojectsarelikelytobeofsimilarsizetotheVascoWindsturbinesbutmuchlargerthantheDiabloWindsandBuenaVistaturbinesinbothoverallsizeandratednameplatecapacity.Thereisevidencetosuggestthatlargerturbines—likethoseusedintheVascoWindsproject—couldresultinadditionaldecreasesinavianfatalityratesforbirdspeciescurrentlykilledintheAPWRA(SmallwoodandKaras2009).However,itisalsopossiblethatlargerturbinesmaynegativelyaffectadifferentsuiteofbirdspeciesthathavebeenrelativelyunaffectedbyolder(i.e.,smaller)turbines.Inaddition,fatalityratesintheAPWRAarehighlyvariable(thatis,becausetheydifferacrossyears,turbinestypes,geographies,andtopographies,speciesimpactsmaydifferbetweensitesduetodifferentlevelsofuse)andpotentiallyimprecise(Smallwoodetal2010.;ICFInternational2013).Nonetheless,thesethreerepoweringprojectsrepresentthebestavailableinformationtounderstandthepotentialforavianfatalitiesassociatedwithrepowering;accordingly,datafromtheseprojectswereusedtoformthebasisforavianfatalityestimates.TheestimatedchangesassociatedwithAlternative1areshowninTable3.4‐11anddiscussedbelow.Postconstructionmonitoring,oncetheturbinesareinoperation,willprovidedatatoquantifytheactualextentofchangeinavianfatalitiesfromrepoweringandtheextentofavianfatalityforprojectsintheprogramarea,andwillcontributetothebodyofknowledgesupportingfutureanalyses.
![Page 117: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐104
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐11. Estimated Annual Avian Fatalities for Existing and Repowered Program Area—Alternative 1 (417 MW)
Species
EstimatedAnnualFatalitiesforProgramArea
Nonrepowered
Repowered
AverageAnnualFatalities
DiabloWindsa
BuenaVistab
VascoWindsc,d
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
Americankestrel 194.2 37.5 81 62.6 75 123.8 36
Barnowl 79.5 8.3 90 0.0 100 13.8 83
Burrowingowl 255.1 350.3 ‐37 0.0 100 20.9 92
Goldeneagle 26.6 4.2 84 16.7 44 13.3 50
Loggerheadshrike 61.8 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Prairiefalcon 6.6 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Red‐tailedhawk 144.5 83.4 42 41.7 71 102.6 29
Swainson’shawk 0.5 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Allraptors 799.9 504.6 37 129.3 84 267.7 67
Allnativenon‐raptors 1,482.0 1,046.7 29 421.2 81 873.2 41
Note:fatalityratesreflectannualfatalities(95%confidenceinterval).a DiabloWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.b BuenaVistafatalityratesextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.c VascoWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.dVascoWindsfatalityrateforgoldeneaglebasedonupdatedinformationreceivedfromNextEraEnergyResourcesonJuly21,2014,andextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.
AmericanKestrel.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,afullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated38–124Americankestrelfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualfatalitiesby36–81%.
TheNorthAmericanpopulationofAmericankestrelsisestimatedatmorethan4,000,000birds,representing75%oftheglobalpopulation.PopulationshavedeclinedoverthewesternU.S.sincethe1980s,pronouncedlysosincethe1990s(HawkMountain2007).ThistrendisalsoapparentforCalifornia’sfoothillandCentralValleypopulations(Saueretal.2008).NorthAmericanBreedingBirdSurvey(BBS)dataindicateadeclineinAmericankestrelsforCoastalCaliforniaandthestateasawhole(Saueretal.2011),asdoChristmasBirdCountdataforCalifornia(NationalAudubonSociety2011).
BasedontheestimatedannualfatalitiesinTable3.4.11,adverseeffectsonAmericankestrelfromwindturbineswouldsubstantiallydecreasewithrepoweringintheprogramarea.Inaddition,MitigationMeasuresBIO‐11candBIO‐11fwillfurtherlimitpreyavailabilityandreducethenumberofpotentialperchsitesintheprogramarea,potentiallyreducingtheexposureofAmericankestrelstoturbinehazards.Furthermore,therotor‐sweptareaofrepoweredturbineswouldbehigheroffthegroundthanthatofexistingturbines,potentiallyreducingtherisktokestrels,astheyaregenerallyperchandpouncepredators,perchinglowerinhigherwindspeeds(SmallwoodandBird2002).ConsideringthatAmericankestrelfatalitiesarelikelytosubstantiallydeclinewithrepowering(Smallwoodetal.2009;Smallwood2010;ICFInternational2012),repoweringtheprogramareaisunlikelytohaveadverseimpactsonAmericankestrelsatthepopulationlevel.
![Page 118: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐105
October 2014ICF 00323.08
BarnOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,afullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated8–14barnowlfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualfatalitiesby83–90%.
BarnowlsarecommoninCaliforniawithastablepopulationinthestate(AudubonCalifornia2010).AlthoughBBSresultsmayindicateadecliningpopulationinthestate,thedataareoflimitedcreditabilityduetosamplingdeficiencies(Saueretal.2011).BarnowlsareusedthroughoutCaliforniaforrodentcontrolinorchardsandvineyards(BarnOwlBoxCompany2012).Itisuncertainwhattheeffectofrepoweringtheprogramareawouldhaveonlocalbarnowlpopulations.Thehigherrotor‐sweptareaofrepoweredturbinesmayreducetheriskofturbinecollision,asmosthuntingisdoneinlowquarteringflightsatabout1.5–4.5meters(5–15feet)abovetheground(Martietal.2005).MitigationMeasureBIO‐11cwouldalsoreducetheperchavailabilityintheprogramarea.Itisunclearwhattheeffectsoftheestimated8–14turbine‐relatedfatalitiesofbarnowlsperyearwouldhaveonthelocalpopulation,butthespecies’relativeabundanceinthestatewouldindicatethatfatalitiesasaresultofrepoweringwouldbeunlikelytohaveadverseimpactsonthespeciesatthepopulationlevel.
BurrowingOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,afullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated30–350burrowingowlfatalitiesperyear—achangerangingfroma92%decreasetoa37%increaseinfatalities.ThisfatalityestimateisbasedondatafromDiabloWindsandVascoWindsbecausenoburrowingowlfatalitiesweredetectedatBuenaVista.Currentevidencesuggeststhatburrowingowlfatalityratesarenotreducedbythetransitionfromold‐tonew‐generationturbinestothesameextentasthefatalityratesofotherspecies.Theincreaseinenergyproductionfrom329MWto417MWwouldlikelyresultinasmallestimatedincreaseinburrowingowlfatalitiesperyear.
FocusedsurveysinContraCostaCountyin2006on3.3squaremilesand2007on4.4squaremilesintheAPWRAfound56pairsand67pairs,respectively(BarclayandHarman2008unpublisheddata),suggestingthattheAPWRAcouldsupportseveralhundredpairsofburrowingowlsdistributedinclusters.Smallwoodetal.’s(2012)surveysin2011and2012estimatedapproximately500–600breedingpairs,rangingindensityfrom0toapproximately28breedingpairspersquarekilometer.SincethisspecieshasbeenextirpatedfrommuchoftheSanFranciscoBayArea,itisbelievedthattheAPWRAmaysupportthelargestnumberofbreedingpairsintheBayArea(BarclayandHarman2008unpublisheddata).StudiesofburrowingowlsintheAPWRAhavesuggestedthatturbine‐relatedmortalitiesmayloweradultandjuvenilesurvivorshipsufficientlysuchthatthelocalpopulationisnotself‐sustaininginsomeyears(Smallwoodetal.2008),butrecentsurveysindicatethatburrowingowlabundanceintheAPWRAmaybemuchgreaterthanpreviouslyestimated(Smallwoodetal.2012).Agrowingbodyofcircumstantialevidenceindicatesthatmanyoftheburrowingowlfatalitiesfoundduringfatalitysurveysareduetopredationratherthanturbinecollision.Becauseofthisconfoundingeffect,thepotentialreductioninturbine‐relatedburrowingowlfatalitiesmaybeunderestimatedbecauseoftheinabilitytodistinguishfatalitiesresultingfrompredationfromthosecausedbyturbinecollision(ICFInternational2013).
GoldenEagle.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,afullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated4–17goldeneaglefatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualfatalitiesby44–84%.
PortionsoftheDiabloRangeinsouthernAlamedaCountyandeasternContraCostaCountysupportsomeofthehighestknowndensitiesofgoldeneaglenestingterritoriesintheworld(HuntandHunt
![Page 119: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐106
October 2014ICF 00323.08
2006).Inthepast15years,severalcomprehensivestudies,discussedbelow,estimatedterritoryoccupancy(numberofbreedingpairs);assessedreproductiverates;andmonitoredjuvenile,subadult,andfloater2rangeandmortality.
Hunt(2002)examineddatacollecteddataovera7‐yearperiodbetween1994and2002thatincludedthemonitoringof60–70activeterritorieswithin30km(11.6miles)oftheAPWRA.In2005,theseterritorieswerefoundtostillbe100%occupied(HuntandHunt2006).Theconclusionsofthesestudieswerethatthegoldeneaglepopulationremainsstable(Hunt2002;HuntandHunt2006).Inaddition,thestudiesfoundnoincreaseinthenumberofactivelybreedingsubadults,indicatingthatthereareenoughfloaterstobufferanylossofbreedingadults(Hunt2002;HuntandHunt2006).TheconclusionofastablegoldeneaglepopulationintheAPWRAvicinityissupportedbytheresultsofapopulationdynamicsmodelthatusedreproductionratesandfatalityrates,amongothervariables(Hunt2002).However,themodelresultsalsosuggestedthatthenumberofestimatedannualfatalitiesusedinthemodel,50individuals,couldnotbesustainedbythenumberofbreedingadultswhenconsideringthelossofreproductivepotentialincurredbyeacheaglefatality(HuntandHunt2006).AlthoughthevacantterritoriesarefilledbyfloatersandsubadultstostabilizetheAPWRApopulation,becausethepopulationdemandsaflowofrecruitsfromoutsidetheareatofillbreedingvacanciesastheyoccur,theAPWRAcanbeconsideredapopulationsink.Theresearchersconclude,therefore,thatturbine‐relatedmortalityreducestheresilienceofthelocalgoldeneaglepopulation.
Table3.4.11showsanestimated4–17fatalitiesperyearinafullyrepoweredprogramarea,orbetween8and36%ofthe50fatalitiesestimatedfortheHunt(2002)model.Itisnotpossibletodeterminetheproportionofthesefatalitiesthatwouldconsistofindividualsfromthelocalpopulation.However,theseannualfatalityestimates,whencomparedtocurrentconditions,wouldindicatethatrepoweringtheprogramareawouldreducegoldeneaglefatalitiesandincreasethepotentialforrestoringaself‐sustaininglocalbreedingpopulation.Theimplementationofmitigationmeasuresdescribedbelow—includingMitigationMeasureBIO‐11e,whichwouldrequirethatexistingpowerlinesassociatedwithraptorstrikesberetrofittedtoberaptor‐safe—wouldfurtherreducegoldeneaglefatalitiesintheprogramarea.
LoggerheadShrike.NodocumentedfatalitiesofloggerheadshrikeshaveoccurredattheDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWindsprojects(Table3.4‐10),althoughloggerheadshrikesareregularlydetectedinthevicinityoftheDiabloWindsturbines.Thelackofdocumentedfatalitiesmaysuggestareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesatthesesites.
AccordingtoShufordandGardali(2008),loggerheadshrikewasanabundantresidentintheSanFranciscoBayregionintheearlytwentiethcentury.However,birdshavebeenextirpatedlocallyorreducedinnumbersbyhabitatloss(ShufordandGardali2008).BBSdataforCalifornia’sshrikepopulationshowanegativetrendfrom1968to2010(Saueretal.2011).Giventhelackofdocumentedfatalitiesatrepoweredfacilitiesintheprogramarea,itisdifficulttoquantifytheeffectsofafullyrepoweredprogramareaontheregionalloggerheadshrikepopulation.MinimizingavailableperchesthroughMitigationMeasureBIO‐11candincreasingtheheightoftherotor‐sweptareaofrepoweredturbinesmayreducetheriskofturbinecollisionsforshrikes,astheymostlytakepreyontheground(Yosef1996).Carefulmonitoringoffatalitiesandimplementingmonitoring
2Ajuvenileis3–15monthsofage,asubadultis1–3yearsofage,andafloaterisanonbreeding,nonterritorialadultindividualmorethan4yearsofage(Hunt2002).
![Page 120: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐107
October 2014ICF 00323.08
protocolsthatarelikelytodetectloggerheadshrikefatalitieswillbeimportantforunderstandingimpactsonthisspeciesandimplementingadaptivemanagementmeasures,asappropriate.
PrairieFalcon.FatalityestimatesatrepoweredsitesarenotavailableforprairiefalconbecausenofatalitieshavebeendocumentedatDiabloWindsorVascoWindsandonlyonefatalityhasbeenrecordedatBuenaVista(Table3.4‐10).Consequently,itisdifficulttoestimatetheannualfatalitiesthatwouldresultfromafullyrepoweredprogramarea.Thelackofdocumentedfatalitiesmaysuggestareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesatthesesites.However,thenonrepoweredfatalityrateforprairiefalconisalreadyrelativelylow(0.02fatality/MW/year),suggestingthatthecollisionriskforthisspeciesislow.Prairiefalconsarepresentmostlyinwinter,andthebaselinefatalityrateismeasuredduringaperiodwhentheseasonalshutdownhasbeenineffect.Repoweredturbinesarenotanticipatedtoshutdowninwinter.
AcrossNorthAmerica,theprairiefalconpopulationisstablebutexperiencinglocaldeclines;inCalifornia,thespeciesisvulnerabletoextirpation(NatureServe2012).Withintheprogramareaanditsvicinity,thespeciesissomewhatrare,withlessthanthreeyearlysightingsintheregionduringsummerBBScountsfrom2006to2010(Saueretal.2011).State‐wide,however,BBStrendsmayindicateanincreaseinabundance,althoughthedataareoflimitedvalueduetothesmallsamplesize(Saueretal.2011).Giventhelackofdocumentedfatalitiesatrepoweredfacilitiesintheprogramarea,itisdifficulttoquantifytheeffectsofafullyrepoweredprogramareaontheregionalprairiefalconpopulation.Prairiefalconsuseavarietyofforagingflightcharacteristics,includinghighsoaring,makingitdifficulttohypothesizehowrepoweredturbinesmayaffecttheriskofturbinecollision.Carefulmonitoringoffatalitiesandimplementingmonitoringprotocolsthatarelikelytodetectprairiefalconfatalitieswillbeimportantforunderstandingimpactsonthisspeciesandimplementingadaptivemanagementmeasures,asappropriate.
Red‐TailedHawk.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,thefullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated42–103red‐tailedhawkfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreasetheaverageannualfatalitiesby29–71%.
Anestimated89%oftheglobalpopulationofred‐tailedhawks(approximately1,960,000breedingbirds)isfoundinNorthAmerica(HawkMountain2007).PopulationshaveremainedstableorincreasedthroughoutmostofthewesternUnitedStatessincethe1980s,growing1.5%inCaliforniabetween1983and2005(HawkMountain2007;Saueretal.2008).Californiafoothillpopulationshaveremainedstablesince1968,whiletheCentralValleypopulationhassignificantlyincreased(Saueretal.2008).
Althoughasubstantialnumberofred‐tailedhawkfatalitiesoccurintheAPWRA,theannualfatalitieshaveshownagenerallydecreasingtrendsince2005,althoughnotastatisticallysignificantdecline(ICFInternational2012)andarepredictedtocontinuetodeclineasrepoweringproceedsintheAPWRA(Smallwood2010;ICFInternational2012).Theyearlyfatalitiesforred‐tailedhawkspresentedinTable3.4.11coincidewiththeseotherstudies,suggestingthatrepoweringtheprogramareaislikelytocontinuetoreducethenumberofred‐tailedhawkskilledeachyear.Consideringthatthered‐tailedhawkpopulationinCaliforniahasgrownwhiletheAPWRAhasbeeninoperation,continuedoperationofrepoweredturbinesintheprogramareaisunlikelytohaveanypopulation‐levelimpactsonred‐tailedhawk.
Swainson’sHawk.OnlyoneSwainson’shawkfatalityhasbeenrecordedintheAPWRA,yieldinganannualestimatedfatalityrateofapproximatelyzero(Table3.4‐10).NoSwainson’shawkfatalitiesweredetectedatDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWinds.Basedonthelowestimatedfatality
![Page 121: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐108
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ratefromnonrepoweredsites,thelackoffatalitiesdetectedatrepoweredsites,andtherelativelylowuseoftheAPWRAbySwainson’shawks,itisexpectedthatthefatalityrateforSwainson’shawkwouldremainlowundertheprogram.
Swainson’shawkisoneoftwo(theotherissandhillcrane)state‐listedspeciesthathasarecordedfatalityintheAPWRA(ICFInternational2012).Whiletheprogramareadoesnotprovidehigh‐valuenestingorforaginghabitatfortheSwainson’shawk,neighboringagriculturalareasinthenortheasternmostcornerofAlamedaCountyandnorthoftheAPWRAinContraCostaCountydoprovideprimeforaginghabitat,andSwainson’shawkmaycrossintotheprogramareaoccasionally.TheAudubonSociety(2007)includesSwainson’shawkonitsWatchListasadecliningorrarespeciesofnationalconservationconcern.EvidencefromeggcollectionssuggeststhattheCaliforniapopulationhasbeenreducedbyasmuchas90%fromitsestimatedhistoricallevels(Bloom1980).ThisseverepopulationdeclineintheCentralValleyofCaliforniaiscorroboratedbymicrosatelliteanalysesofDNAthatsuggestthatthedeclinehastakenplaceover68–75generations,orabout200years,correspondingwiththetimeofEuropeansettlement(AudubonSociety2007;Hulletal.2008).BasedonmigrationcountsinVeraCruz,Mexico,thepresentglobalpopulationmayapproach1millionindividuals(HawkWatchInternational2009).TheCaliforniapopulationisestimatedatmore1,900nestingpairs,95%ofwhichareintheCentralValley(Andersonetal.2007).TheBBSreportsarisingCaliforniapopulationsincesurveysbeganin1968,butalsoreportsthatimportantdeficienciesintheunderlyingdatamaymakethesetrendsinaccurate(Saueretal.2011).
TheverysmallnumberofestimatedfatalitiesintheprogramareacomparedtothesizeofthelocalpopulationeastoftheprogramareaintheCentralValleyindicatesthatturbine‐relatedfatalitiesintheprogramareaareunlikelytohaveanadverseeffectonthelocalSwainson’shawkpopulation.Theimplementationofsubsequentproject‐levelavianuseandfatalitystudiesdescribedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11gwillcontinuetoprovidedataforassessingtheeffectofturbineoperationontheSwainson’shawkpopulationinthearea.
Raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,afullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated129–505raptorfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualraptorfatalitiesby37–84%.
Nativenon‐raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐11,afullyrepowered417MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated421–1,047nativenon‐raptorfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreasetheaverageannualfatalitiesby29–81%.
Asdescribedabove,forallavianspeciesanalyzed,afullyrepoweredprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoreduceestimatedfatalityrates.However,fatalitieswouldstillbeexpectedtoresultfromtheoperationoftherepoweredturbines,anduncertaintysurroundingtheaccuracyoftheestimatedfatalityratesandthetypesofspeciespotentiallyaffectedremains.Consideringthisinformation,anddespitetheanticipatedreductionsinavianimpactscomparedtothebaselinerates,theCountyhasdeterminedtouseaconservativeapproachfortheimpactassessment,concludingthatturbine‐relatedfatalitiescouldconstituteasubstantialadverseeffectonavianspeciesbecausetheratesforsomeorallofthespeciescouldbegreaterthanthebaselinerates.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11athroughBIO‐11iwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.Thesemeasures,whichindividualprojectproponentswouldberequiredtocarryoutasappropriateinlightofproject‐specificconditions,werederivedfromtheEACCS,basedonestablishedpractice,ordevelopedinthecontextoftheprogram’sconservationobjectives.
![Page 122: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐109
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11a:Prepareaproject‐specificavianprotectionplan
Allprojectproponentswillprepareaproject‐specificAPPtospecifymeasuresandprotocolsconsistentwiththeprogram‐levelmitigationmeasuresthataddressavianmortality.Theproject‐specificAPPswillinclude,ataminimum,thefollowingcomponents.
Informationandmethodsusedtositeturbinestominimizerisk.
Documentationthatappropriateturbinedesignsarebeingused.
Documentationthatavian‐safepracticesarebeingimplementedonprojectinfrastructure.
Methodsusedtodiscouragepreyforraptors.
Adetaileddescriptionofthepostconstructionavianfatalitymonitoringmethodstobeused(consistentwiththeminimumrequirementsoutlinedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g).
Methodsusedtocompensateforthelossofraptors(consistentwiththerequirementsofMitigationMeasureBIO‐11h).
Eachprojectapplicantwillprepareandsubmitadraftproject‐specificAPPtotheCounty.ThedraftAPPwillbereviewedbytheTACforconsistencyandtheinclusionofappropriatemitigationmeasuresthatareconsistentwiththePEIRandrecommendedforapprovalbytheCounty.EachprojectapplicantmusthaveanapprovedFinalAPPpriortocommercialoperation.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
Sitingofturbines—usinganalysesoflandscapefeaturesandlocation‐specificbirduseandbehaviordatatoidentifylocationswithreducedcollisionrisk—mayresultinreducedfatalities(Smallwoodetal.2009).Allprojectproponentswillconductasitingprocessandprepareasitinganalysistoselectturbinelocationstominimizepotentialimpactsonbirdandbatspecies.Proponentswillutilizeexistingdataaswellascollectnewsite‐specificdataaspartofthesitinganalysis.
ProjectproponentswillutilizecurrentlyavailableguidelinessuchastheAlamedaCountySRCguidelinesforsitingwindturbines(AlamedaCountySRC2010)and/orothercurrentlyavailableresearchorguidelinestoconductsitinganalysis.Additionally,projectproponentswillusetheresultsofprevioussitingeffortstoinformtheanalysisandsitingmethodsasappropriatesuchthatthescienceofsitingcontinuestobeadvanced.Allprojectproponentswillcollectfielddatathatidentifyorconfirmthebehavior,utilization,anddistributionpatternsofaffectedavianandbatspeciespriortotheinstallationofturbines.Projectproponentswillcollectandutilizeavailableexistinginformation,includingbutnotnecessarilylimitedto:sitingreportsandmonitoringdatafrompreviouslyinstalledprojects;publisheduseandabundancestudiesandreports;andtopographicfeaturesknowntoincreasecollisionrisk(trees,riparianareas,waterbodies,andwetlands).
Projectproponentswillalsocollectandutilizeadditionalfielddataasnecessarytoinformthesitinganalysisforgoldeneagle.AsrequiredinMitigationMeasureBIO‐8a,surveyswillbeconductedtolocategoldeneaglenestswithin2milesofproposedprojectareas.Sitingofturbineswithin2milesofanactiveoralternativegoldeneaglenestoractivegoldeneagleterritorywillbebasedonasite‐specificanalysisofriskbasedontheestimatedeagleterritories,conductedinconsultationwithUSFWS.
![Page 123: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐110
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Projectproponentswillutilizemethods(i.e.,computermodels)toidentifydangerouslocationsforbirdsandbatsbasedonsite‐specificriskfactorsinformedbytheinformationdiscussedabove.Theprojectproponentswillcompiletheresultsofthesitinganalysesforeachturbineanddocumenttheseintheproject‐levelAPP,alongwiththespecificlocationofeachturbine.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
Useofturbineswithcertaincharacteristicsisbelievedtoreducethecollisionriskforavianspecies.Projectproponentswillimplementthedesign‐relatedmeasureslistedbelow.
Turbinedesignswillbeselectedthathavebeenshownorthataresuspectedtoreduceavianfatalities,basedontheheight,color,configuration,orotherfeaturesoftheturbines.
Turbinedesignwilllimitoreliminateperchingopportunities.Designswillincludeatubulartowerwithinternalladders;externalcatwalks,railings,orladderswillbeprohibited.
Turbinedesignwilllimitoreliminatenestingorroostingopportunities.Openingsonturbineswillbecoveredtopreventcavity‐nestingspeciesfromnestingintheturbines.
LightingwillbeinstalledonthefewestnumberofturbinesallowedbyFAAregulations,andallpilotwarninglightswillfiresynchronously.Turbinelightingwillemployonlyredordualred‐and‐whitestrobe,strobe‐like,orflashinglights(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2012).Alllightingonturbineswillbeoperatedattheminimumallowableintensity,flashingfrequency,andquantityallowedbyFAA(Gehringetal.2009;U.S.FishandWildlifeService2012).DurationbetweenflasheswillbethelongestallowablebytheFAA.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
Allprojectproponentswillapplythefollowingmeasureswhendesigningandsitingturbine‐relatedinfrastructure.Thesemeasureswillreducetheriskofbirdelectrocutionandcollision.
Permanentmeteorologicalstationswillavoiduseofguywires.Ifitisnotpossibletoavoidusingguywires,thewireswillbeatleast4/0gaugetoensurevisibilityandwillbefittedwithbirddeterrentdevices.
AllpermanentmeteorologicaltowerswillbeunlitunlesslightingisrequiredbyFAA.Iflightingisrequired,itwillbeoperatedattheminimumallowableintensity,flashingfrequency,andquantityallowedbyFAA.
Totheextentpossible,allpowerlineswillbeplacedunderground.However,linesmaybeplacedabovegroundimmediatelypriortoenteringthesubstation.Allabovegroundlineswillbefittedwithbirdflightdivertersorvisibilityenhancementdevices(e.g.,spiraldampingdevices).Whenlinescannotbeplacedunderground,appropriateavianprotectiondesignsmustbeemployed.Asaminimumrequirement,thecollectionsystemwillconformwiththemostcurrenteditionoftheAvianPowerLineInteractionCommitteeguidelinestopreventelectrocutions.
Lightingwillbefocuseddownwardandminimizedtolimitskywardillumination.Sodiumvaporlampsandspotlightswillnotbeusedatanyfacility(e.g.,laydownareas,substations)exceptwhenemergencymaintenanceisneeded.Lightingatcollectionfacilities,includingsubstations,willbeminimizedusingdowncastlightingandmotion‐detectiondevices.Theuseofhigh‐intensitylighting;steady‐burningorbrightlightssuchassodiumvapor,quartz,
![Page 124: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐111
October 2014ICF 00323.08
orhalogen;orotherbrightspotlightswillbeminimized.Wherelightingisrequireditwillbedesignedfortheminimumintensityrequiredforsafeoperationofthefacility.Greenorbluelightingwillbeusedinplaceofredorwhitelighting.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
Anyexistingpowerlinesinaspecificprojectareathatareownedbythewindprojectoperatorandthatareassociatedwithelectrocutionofaneagleorotherraptorwillberetrofittedwithin30daystomakethemraptor‐safeaccordingtoAvianPowerLineInteractionCommitteeguidelines.Allotherexistingstructurestoremaininaprojectareaduringrepoweringwillberetrofitted,asfeasible,accordingtospecificationsofMitigationMeasureBIO‐11cpriortorepoweredturbineoperation.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11f:Discouragepreyforraptors
Allprojectproponentswillapplythefollowingmeasureswhendesigningandsitingturbine‐relatedinfrastructure.Thesemeasuresareintendedtominimizeopportunitiesforfossorialmammalstobecomeestablishedandtherebycreateapreybasethatcouldbecomeanattractantforraptors.
Rodenticidewillnotbeutilizedontheprojectsitetoavoidtheriskofraptorsscavengingtheremainsofpoisonedanimals.
Boulders(rocksmorethan12inchesindiameter)excavatedduringprojectconstructionmaybeplacedinabovegroundpilesintheprojectareasolongastheyaremorethan500meters(1,640feet)fromanyturbine.Existingrockpilescreatedduringconstructionoffirst‐andsecond‐generationturbineswillalsobemovedatleast500meters(1,640feet)fromturbines.
Gravelwillbeplacedaroundeachtowerfoundationtodiscouragesmallmammalsfromburrowingnearturbines.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11g:Implementpostconstructionavianfatalitymonitoringforallrepoweringprojects
Apostconstructionmonitoringprogramwillbeconductedateachrepoweringprojectforaminimumof3yearsbeginningonthecommercialoperationdate(COD)oftheproject.Monitoringmaycontinuebeyond3yearsifconstructioniscompletedinphases.Moreover,iftheresultsofthefirst3yearsindicatethatbaselinefatalityrates(i.e.,nonrepoweredfatalityrates)areexceeded,monitoringwillbeextendeduntiltheaverageannualfatalityratehasdroppedbelowbaselinefatalityratesfor2years,andtoassesstheeffectivenessofadaptivemanagementmeasuresspecifiedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11i.Anadditional2yearsofmonitoringwillbeimplementedatyear10(i.e.,thetenthanniversaryoftheCOD).ProjectproponentswillprovideaccesstoqualifiedthirdpartiesauthorizedbytheCountytoconductanyadditionalmonitoringaftertheinitial3‐yearmonitoringperiodhasexpiredandbeforeandaftertheadditional2‐yearmonitoringperiod,providedthatsuchadditionalmonitoringutilizesscientificallyvalidmonitoringprotocols.
Atechnicaladvisorycommittee(TAC)willbeformedtooverseethemonitoringprogramandtoadvisetheCountyonadaptivemanagementmeasuresthatmaybenecessaryiffatalityratessubstantiallyexceedthosepredictedfortheproject(asdescribedbelowinMitigationMeasure
![Page 125: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐112
October 2014ICF 00323.08
BIO‐11i).TheTACwillhaveastandingmeeting,whichwillbeopentothepublic,every6monthstoreviewmonitoringreportsproducedbyoperatorsintheprogramarea.Inthesemeetings,theTACwilldiscussanyissuesraisedbythemonitoringreportsandrecommendtotheCountynextstepstoaddressissues,includingschedulingadditionalmeetings,ifnecessary.
TheTACwillcompriserepresentativesfromtheCounty(includingoneormoretechnicalconsultants,suchasabiostatistician,anavianbiologist,andabatbiologist),andwildlifeagencies(CDFW,USFWS).AdditionalTACmembersmayalsobeconsidered(e.g.,arepresentativefromAudubon,alandownerintheprogramarea,arepresentativeoftheoperators)atthediscretionoftheCounty.TheTACwillbeavoluntaryandadvisorygroupthatwillprovideguidancetotheCountyPlanningDepartment.Tomaintaintransparencywiththepublic,allTACmeetingswillbeopentothepublic,andnoticeofmeetingswillbegiventointerestedparties.
TheTACwillhavethreeprimaryadvisoryroles:(1)toreviewandadviseonprojectplanningdocuments(i.e.,project‐specificAPPs)toensurethatproject‐specificmitigationmeasuresandcompensatorymitigationmeasuresdescribedinthisPEIRareappropriatelyandconsistentlyapplied,(2)toreviewandadviseonmonitoringdocuments(protocolsandreporting)forconsistencywiththemitigationmeasures,and(3)toreviewandadviseonimplementationoftheadaptivemanagementplans.
ShouldfatalitymonitoringrevealthatimpactsexceedthebaselinethresholdsestablishedinthisPEIR,theTACwilladvisetheCountyonrequiringimplementationofadaptivemanagementmeasuresasdescribedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11i.TheCountywillhavethedecision‐makingauthority,asitistheorganizationissuingtheCUPs.However,theTACwillcollaborativelyinformthedecisionsoftheCounty.
Operatorsarerequiredtoprovideforavianusesurveystobeconductedwithintheprojectareaboundariesforaminimumof30minutesduration.SurveyorswillbequalifiedandtrainedandsubjecttoapprovalbytheCounty.
Carcasssurveyswillbeconductedateveryturbineforprojectswith20orfewerturbines.Forprojectswithmorethan20turbines,suchsurveyswillberequiredataminimumof20turbines,andasampleoftheremainingturbinesmaybeselectedforcarcasssearches.Theoperatorwillberequiredtodemonstratethatthesamplingschemeandsamplesizearestatisticallyrigorousanddefensible.Wheresubstantialvariationinterrain,landcovertype,management,orotherfactorsmaycontributetosignificantvariationinfatalityrates,thesamplingschemewillbestratifiedtoaccountforsuchvariation.Thesurveyprotocolforsetsandsubsetsofturbines,aswellasproposedsamplingschemesthatdonotentailasearchofallturbines,mustbeapprovedbytheCountyinconsultationwiththeTACpriortothestartofsurveys.
Thesearchintervalwillnotexceed14daysfortheminimumof20turbinestobesurveyed;however,thesearchintervalfortheadditionalturbines(i.e.,thoseexceedingthe20‐turbineminimum)thataretobeincludedinthesamplingschememaybeextendedupto28daysorlongerifrecommendedbytheTAC.
Theestimationofdetectionprobabilityisarapidlyadvancingfield.Carcassplacementtrials,broadlydefined,willbeconductedtoestimatedetectionprobabilityduringeachyearofmonitoring.Samplesizeswillbelargeenoughtopotentiallydetectsignificantvariationbyseason,carcasssize,andhabitattype.
![Page 126: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐113
October 2014ICF 00323.08
OperatorswillberequiredtosubmitcopiesofallrawdataformstotheCountyannually,willsupplyrawdatainareadilyaccessibledigitalformattobespecifiedbytheCounty,andwillpreparerawdataforinclusionasappendicesintheannualreports.TheintentistoallowtheCountytoconductindependentanalysesandmeta‐analysesofdataacrosstheAPWRA,andtosupplythesedatatotheregulatoryagenciesifrequested.
AnnualreportssubmittedtotheCountywillprovideasynthesisofallinformationcollectedtodate.Eachreportwillprovideanintroduction;descriptionsofthestudyarea,methods,andresults;adiscussionoftheresults;andanysuitablerecommendations.Reportswillproviderawcountsoffatalities,adjustedfatalityrates,andestimatesofproject‐widefatalitiesonbothaperMWandperturbinebasis.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11h:Compensateforthelossofraptorsandotheravianspecies,includinggoldeneagles,bycontributingtoconservationefforts
Discussion
Severaloptionstocompensateforimpactsonraptorsarecurrentlyavailable.Somearetargetedtobenefitcertainspecies,buttheymayalsohavebenefitsforotherraptorandnon‐raptorspecies.Forexample,USFWS’sECPGuidelinescurrentlyoutlineacompensatorymitigationstrategyforgoldeneaglesusingtheretrofitofhigh‐riskpowerpoles(polesknownorsuspectedtoelectrocuteandkilleagles).Thegoalofthisstrategyistoeliminatehazardsforgoldeneagles.However,becausethepolesarealsodangerousforotherlargeraptors(e.g.,red‐tailedhawk,Swainson’shawk),retrofittingthemcanbenefitsuchspeciesaswellaseagles.
Similarly,althoughtheretrofittingofelectricalpolesmayhavebenefitsforlargeraptors,suchanapproachmayprovideminimalbenefitsforsmallerraptorssuchasAmericankestrelandburrowingowl.Consequently,additionalmeasureswouldberequiredcomponentsofanoverallmitigationpackagetocompensateforimpactsonraptorsingeneral.
TheSecretaryoftheInteriorissuedOrder3330onOctober31,2013,outlininganewapproachtomitigationpoliciesandpracticesoftheDepartmentoftheInterior.Thisapproachrecognizesthatcertainstrategiesaimedatsomespecies(e.g.,raptors)canprovidesubstantialbenefittoothers(e.g.,non‐raptors)andtotheecologicallandscapeasawhole.Thelandscape‐scaleapproachtomitigationandconservationeffortsisnowcentraltotheDepartment’smitigationstrategy.AlthoughtheOrderwasintendedforusebyfederalagenciesandassuchisnotdirectlyapplicabletotheCounty,itisevidentthatsuchanapproachwouldlikelyhavethegreatestmitigationbenefits,especiallywhenconsideringongoingandlong‐termimpactsfromwindenergyprojects.
Withtheseconsiderationsinmind,theCountyhasoutlinedseveraloptionsthatarecurrentlyavailabletocompensateforimpactsonraptorsandotheravianspecies.Theoptionsdiscussedbelowarecurrentlyconsideredacceptableapproachestocompensationforimpactsonraptorsandotherspecies.Althoughnoteveryoptionisappropriateforallspecies,itishopedthatastimeproceeds,amorecomprehensivelandscape‐levelapproachtomitigationwillbeadoptedtobenefitabroadersuiteofspeciesthanmightbenefitfrommorespecies‐specificmeasures.TheCountyrecognizesthatthescienceofraptorconservationandtheunderstandingofwind‐wildlifeimpactsarecontinuingtoevolveandthatthesuiteofavailablecompensationoptionsmayconsequentlychangeoverthelifeoftheproposedprojects.
![Page 127: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐114
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Conservation Measures
Topromotetheconservationofraptorsandotheravianspecies,projectproponentswillcompensateforraptorfatalitiesestimatedwithintheirprojectareas.Mitigationwillbeprovidedin10‐yearincrements,withthefirstincrementbasedontheestimates(raptors/MW/year)providedinthisPEIRfortheVascoWindsProject(Table3.4‐10)ortheproject‐specificEIRforfutureprojects.TheVascoWindsfatalityrateswereselectedbecausetheVascoturbinesarethemostsimilartothoselikelytobeproposedforfuturerepoweringprojectsandconsequentlyrepresentthebestavailablefatalityestimates.Eachprojectproponentwillconductpostcon‐structionfatalitymonitoringforatleast3yearsbeginningatprojectstartup(dateofcommercialoperation)andagainfor2yearsatyear10,asrequiredunderMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g,toestimatetheaveragenumberofraptorstakeneachyearbyeachindividualproject.Theprojectproponentwillcompensateforthisnumberofraptorsinsubsequent10‐yearincrementsforthelifeoftheproject(i.e.,three10‐yearincrements)asoutlinedbelow.MitigationMeasureBIO‐11galsorequiresadditionalfatalitymonitoringatyear10oftheproject.Theresultsofthefirst3yearsofmonitoringand/orthemonitoringatyear10mayleadtorevisionsoftheestimatedaveragenumberofraptorstaken,andmitigationprovidedmaybeadjustedaccordinglyonaone‐timebasiswithineachofthefirsttwo10‐yearincrements,basedontheresultsofthemonitoringrequiredbyMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g,inconsultationwiththeTAC.
Priortothestartofoperations,projectproponentswillsubmitforCountyapprovalanavianconservationstrategy,aspartoftheproject‐specificAPPoutlinedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11a,outliningtheestimatednumberofraptorfatalitiesbasedonthenumberandtypeofturbinesbeingconstructed,andthetypeortypesofcompensationoptionstobeimplemented.Projectproponentswillusetheavianconservationstrategytocraftanappropriatestrategyusingabalancedmixoftheoptionspresentedbelow,aswellasconsideringnewoptionssuggestedbythegrowingbodyofknowledgeduringthecourseoftheprojectlifespan,assupportedbyaResourceEquivalencyAnalysis(REA)(seeexampleinAppendixC)orsimilartypeofcompensationassessmentacceptabletotheCountythatdemonstratestheefficacyofproposedmitigationforimpactsonraptors.
TheCountyPlanningDirector,inconsultationwiththeTAC,willconsider,basedontheREA,whethertheproposedavianconservationstrategyisadequate,includingconsiderationofwhethereachavianmitigationplanincorporatesalandscape‐scaleapproachsuchthattheconservationeffortsachievethegreatestpossiblebenefits.Compensationmeasuresasdetailedinanapprovedavianconservationstrategymustbeimplementedwithin1yearofthedateofcommercialoperations.AvianconservationstrategieswillbereviewedandmayberevisedbytheCountyevery10years,andonaone‐timebasisineachofthetwo10‐yearincrementsbasedonthemonitoringrequiredbyMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g.
Retrofittinghigh‐riskelectricalinfrastructure.USFWS’sECPGuidelinesoutlineacompensatorymitigationstrategyusingtheretrofitofhigh‐riskpowerpoles(polesknownorsuspectedtoelectrocuteandkilleagles).USFWShasdevelopedanREA(U.S.FishandWildlifeService2013a)asatooltoestimatethecompensatorymitigation(numberofretrofits)requiredforthetakeofeagles.TheREAtakesintoaccountthecurrentunderstandingofeaglelifehistoryfactors,theeffectivenessofretrofittingpoles,theexpectedannualtake,andthetimingofimplementationofthepoleretrofits.Theprojectproponentsmayneedtocontractwithautilityorathird‐partymitigationaccount(suchastheNationalFishandWildlifeFoundation)toretrofitthenumberofpolesneededas
![Page 128: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐115
October 2014ICF 00323.08
demonstratedbyaproject‐specificREA.Ifcontractingdirectly,theprojectproponentwillconsultwithutilitycompaniestoensurethathigh‐riskpoleshavebeenidentifiedforretrofitting.Proponentswillagreeinwritingtopaytheutilityowner/operatortoretrofittherequirednumberofpowerpolesandmaintaintheretrofitsfor10yearsandwillprovidetheCountywithdocumentationoftheretrofitagreement.Thefirstretrofitswillbebasedontheestimatednumberofeaglefatalitiesasdescribedaboveinthismeasureorasdevelopedintheproject‐specificEIRforfutureprojects.Subsequentnumbersofretrofitsrequiredforadditional10‐yeardurationswillbebasedontheresultsofproject‐specificfatalitymonitoringasoutlinedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g.Iffewereaglefatalitiesareidentifiedthroughthemonitoring,thenumberoffuturerequiredretrofitsmaybereducedthroughaproject‐specificREA.Althoughretrofittingpoleshasnotbeenidentifiedasappropriatemitigationforotherlargeraptors,theywouldlikelybenefitfromsuchefforts,asthey(particularlyred‐tailedandSwainson’shawks)constitutethelargestnon‐eaglegrouptosufferelectrocutiononpowerlines(AvianPowerLineInteractionCommittee2006).
MeasuresoutlinedinanapprovedEagleConservationPlanandBirdandBatConservationStrategy.ProjectproponentsmayelecttoapplyforprogrammaticeagletakepermitsfromUSFWS.TheprogrammaticeagletakepermitprocesscurrentlyinvolvespreparationofanECPandaBirdandBatConservationStrategy(BBCS).TheECPspecifiesavoidanceandminimizationmeasures,advancedconservationpractices,andcompensatorymitigationforeagles—conditionsthatmeetUSFWS’scriteriaforissuanceofapermit.TheBBCSoutlinesmeasuresbeingimplementedbytheapplicanttoavoidandminimizeimpactsonmigratorybirds,includingraptors.Ifprogrammaticeagletakepermitsareobtainedbyprojectproponents,thosepermitterms,includingthemeasuresoutlinedintheapprovedECPandBBCS,mayconstituteanappropriateconservationmeasureforestimatedtakeofgoldeneaglesandotherraptors,providedsuchtermsaredeemedbytheCountytobecomparabletoormoreprotectiveofraptorsthantheotheroptionslistedherein.
Contributetoraptorconservationefforts.Projectproponentswillcontributefunds,intheamountof$580/raptorfatality,in10‐yearincrementstolocaland/orregionalconservationeffortsdesignedtoprotect,recover,andmanagelandsforraptors,ortoconductresearchinvolvingmethodstoreduceraptorfatalitiesorincreaseraptorproductivity.The$580amountisbasedontheaveragecosttorehabilitateoneraptorattheCaliforniaRaptorCenter,affiliatedwiththeUCDavisSchoolofVeterinaryMedicine,whichreceivesmorethan200injuredorillraptorsannually(Stedmanpers.comm.).Ten‐yearinstallmentsaremoreadvantageousthanmorefrequentinstallmentsforplanningandbudgetingpurposes.
Thefundswillbecontributedtoanentityorentitiesengagedintheseactivities,suchastheEastBayRegionalParkDistrictandtheLivermoreAreaRegionalParkDistrict.Conservationeffortsmayincludeconstructingandinstallingnestboxesandperches,conductinganawarenesscampaigntoreducetheuseofrodenticide,andconductingresearchtobenefitraptors.ThespecificconservationefforttobepursuedwillbesubmittedtotheCountyforapprovalaspartoftheavianconservationstrategyreviewprocess.ThedonationreceiptwillbeprovidedtotheCountyasevidenceofpayment.
Thefirstcontributionsforanygivenprojectwillbebasedontheestimatednumberofraptorfatalitiesasdescribedaboveinthismeasureorasdevelopedintheproject‐specificEIRforfutureprojects.Fundsforsubsequent10‐yearinstallmentswillbeprovidedonthebasisoftheaverageannualraptorfatalityratesdeterminedthroughpostconstruction
![Page 129: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐116
October 2014ICF 00323.08
monitoringefforts,allowingforaone‐timeadjustmentwithineach10‐yearincrementaftertheresultsofthemonitoringeffortsareavailable.Iffewerraptorfatalitiesaredetectedthroughthemonitoringeffort,thesecondinstallmentamountmaybereducedtoaccountforthedifferencebetweenthefirstestimatednumbersandthemonitoringresults.
Contributetoregionalconservationofraptorhabitat.ProjectproponentsmayaddressregionalconservationofraptorhabitatbyfundingtheacquisitionofconservationeasementswithintheAPWRAoronlandsinthesameeco‐regionoutsidetheAPWRA,subjecttoCountyapproval,forthepurposeoflong‐termregionalconservationofraptorhabitat.Landsproposedforconservationmustbewell‐managedgrazinglandssimilartothoseonwhichtheprojectshavebeendeveloped.Projectproponentswillfundtheregionalconservationandimprovementoflands(throughhabitatenhancement,leadabatementactivities,eliminationofrodenticides,and/orothermeasures)usinganumberofacresequivalenttotheconservationbenefitoftheraptorrecoveryandconservationeffortsdescribedabove,orasdeterminedthroughaproject‐specificREA(seeexampleREAinAppendixC).Theconservationlandsmustbeprovidedforcompensationofaminimumof10yearsofraptorfatalities,as10‐yearincrementswillminimizethetransactioncostsassociatedwiththeidentificationandconservationoflands,therebyincreasingoverallcosteffectiveness.Theconservationeasementswillbeheldbyanorganizationwhosemissionistopurchaseand/orotherwiseconservelands,suchasTheTrustforPublicLands,TheNatureConservancy,CaliforniaRangelandTrust,ortheEastBayRegionalParksDistrict.TheprojectproponentswillobtainapprovalfromtheCountyregardingtheamountofconservedlands,anyenhancementsproposedtoincreaseraptorhabitatvalue,andtheentityholdingthelandsand/orconservationeasement.
OtherConservationMeasuresIdentifiedintheFuture.Asnotedabove,additionalconservationmeasuresforraptorsmaybecomeavailableinthefuture.ConservationmeasuresforraptorsarecurrentlybeingdevelopedbyUSFWSandnongovernmentalorganizations(e.g.,AmericanWindWildlifeInstitute)—forexample,activitiesservingtoreducesuchfatalitieselsewhere,andenhancingforagingandnestinghabitat.Additionaloptionsforconservationcouldincludepurchasingcreditsatanapprovedmitigationbank,creditsfortheretirementofwindfarmsthatareparticularlydangeroustobirdsorbats,thecurtailmentofpreyeliminationprograms,andhunter‐educationprogramsthatremovesourcesofleadfromtheenvironment.Underthisoption,theprojectproponentmaymakealternativeproposalstotheCountyforconservationmeasures—basedonanREAorsimilarcompensationassessment—thattheCountymayacceptasmitigationiftheyaredeemedbytheCountytobecomparabletoormoreprotectiveofraptorspeciesthantheotheroptionsdescribedherein.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
IffatalitymonitoringdescribedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11gresultsinanestimatethatexceedsthepreconstructionbaselinefatalityestimates(i.e.,estimatesatthenonrepoweredturbinesasdescribedinthisPEIR)foranyfocalspeciesorspeciesgroup(i.e.,individualfocalspecies,allfocalspecies,allraptors,allnon‐raptors,allbirdscombined),projectproponentswillprepareaproject‐specificadaptivemanagementplanwithin2monthsfollowingtheavailabilityofthefatalitymonitoringresults.Theseplanswillbeusedtoadjustoperationandmitigationtotheresultsofmonitoring,newtechnology,andnewresearchtoensurethatthebestavailablescienceisusedtominimizeimpactstobelowbaseline.Project‐specificadaptivemanagement
![Page 130: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐117
October 2014ICF 00323.08
planswillbereviewedbytheTAC,revisedbyprojectproponentsasnecessary,andapprovedbytheCounty.TheTACwilltakecurrentresearchandthemosteffectiveimpactreductionstrategiesintoaccountwhenreviewingadaptivemanagementplansandsuggestingmeasurestoreduceimpacts.Theproject‐specificadaptivemanagementplanswillbeimplementedwithin2monthsofapprovalbytheCounty.Theplanswillincludeasteppedapproachwherebyanadaptivemeasureormeasuresareimplemented,theresultsaremonitoredforsuccessorfailureforayear,andadditionaladaptivemeasuresareaddedasnecessary,followedbyanotheryearofmonitoring,untilthesuccesscriteriaareachieved(i.e.,estimatedfatalitiesarebelowthebaseline).Projectproponentsshouldusethebestmeasuresavailablewhentheplanispreparedinconsiderationofthespecificadaptivemanagementneeds.Forexample,ifonlyonethresholdisexceeded,suchasgoldeneaglefatalities,theplanandmeasuresusedwilltargetthatspecies.AssetforthinotheragreementsintheAPWRA,projectproponentsmayalsofocusadaptivemanagementmeasuresonindividualormultipleturbinesifthoseturbinesareshowntocauseasignificantlydisproportionatenumberoffatalities.
Ingeneral,thefollowingtypesofmeasureswillbeconsideredbytheTAC,intheordertheyarepresentedbelow;however,theTACmayrecommendanyoftheseorothermeasuresthatareshowntobesuccessfulinreducingtheimpact.
ADMM‐1:VisualModifications.Theprojectproponentcouldpaintapatternonaproportionoftheturbineblades.TheproportionandthepatternofthebladestobepaintedwillbedeterminedbytheCountyinconsultationwiththeTAC.USFWSrecommendstestingmeasurestoreducemotionsmear—theblurringofturbinebladesduetorapidrotationthatrendersthemlessvisibleandhencemoreperiloustobirdsinflight.Suggestedtechniquesincludepaintingbladeswithstaggeredstripesorpaintingonebladeblack.Theprojectproponentwillconductfatalitystudiesonacontrollednumberofpaintedandunpaintedturbines.TheprojectproponentwillcoordinatewiththeTACtodeterminethelocationofthepaintedturbines,buttheintentistoimplementthismeasureinareasthatappeartobecontributingmosttothehighnumberoffatalitiesdetected.
ADMM‐2:Anti‐PerchingMeasures.TheCountywillconsultwiththeTACregardingtheuseofanti‐perchingmeasurestodiscouragebirduseofthearea.TheTACwillusethemostrecentresearchandinformationavailabletodetermine,onacase‐by–casebasis,ifanti‐perchingmeasureswillbeaneffectivestrategytoreduceimpacts.Ifdeterminedtobefeasible,anti‐perchingdeviceswillbeinstalledonartificialstructures,excludingutilitypoles,within1mileofprojectfacilities(withlandownerpermission)todiscouragebirduseofthearea.
ADMM‐3:PreyReduction.Theprojectproponentwillimplementapreyreductionprogramaroundthemosthazardousturbines.Examplesofpreyreductionmeasuresmayincludechangesingrazingpracticestomakethearealessdesirableforpreyspecies,activereductionthroughdirectremovalofpreyspecies,orothermeasuresprovidedtheyareconsistentwithmanagementgoalsforthreatenedandendangeredspecies.
ADMM‐4:ImplementationofExperimentalTechnologies.Projectproponentscandeployexperimentaltechnologiesattheirfacilitiestotesttheirefficacyinreducingturbine‐relatedfatalities.Examplesmayinclude,butarenotlimitedto,visualdeterrents,noisedeterrents,andactiveradarsystems.
ADMM‐5:TurbineCurtailment.Ifpostconstructionmonitoringindicatespatternsofturbine‐causedfatalities—suchasseasonalspikesinfatalities,topographicorotherenvironmental
![Page 131: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐118
October 2014ICF 00323.08
featuresassociatedwithhighnumbersoffatalities,orotherfactorsthatcanpotentiallybemanipulatedandthatsuggestthatcurtailmentofaspecificturbine’soperationwouldresultinreducingfutureavianfatalities—theprojectoperatorcancurtailoperationsoftheoffendingturbineorturbines.CurtailmentrestrictionswouldbedevelopedincoordinationwiththeTACandbasedoncurrentlyavailablefatalitydata,usedata,andresearch.
ADMM‐6:Cut‐inSpeedStudy.Changesincut‐inspeedcouldbeconductedtoseeifchangingcut‐inspeedsfrom3meterspersecondto5meterspersecond(forexample)wouldsignificantlyreduceavianfatalities.TheproponentwillcoordinatewiththeTACindeterminingthefeasibilityofthemeasurefortheparticularspeciesaffectedaswellastheamountofthechangeinthecut‐inspeed.
ADMM‐7:Real‐TimeTurbineCurtailment.Theprojectproponentcanemployareal‐timeturbinecurtailmentprogramdesignedinconsultationwiththeTAC.Theintentwouldbetodeployabiologisttomonitoronsiteconditionsandissueacurtailmentorderwhenraptorsarenearoperatingturbines.Alternatively,radar,video,orothermonitoringmeasurescouldbedeployedinplaceofabiologicalmonitorifthereisevidencetoindicatethatsuchasystemwouldbeaseffectiveandmoreefficientthanuseofahumanmonitor.
ImpactBIO‐11a‐2:Avianmortalityresultingfrominteractionwithwindenergyfacilities—programAlternative2:450MW(significantandunavoidable)
Theoperationofwindenergyfacilitieshasbeenshowntocauseavianfatalitiesthroughcollisionswithwindturbinesandpowerlinesandthroughelectrocutiononpowerlines.
Mostcollectionlinesforfirst‐andsecond‐generationturbinesareabovegroundfacilities.Asrepoweringprojectsareimplemented,oldcollectionsystemswouldberemovedandnewcollectionsystemswouldbeinstalled.Themajorityofnewcollectionlinesassociatedwiththeprogramwouldbeundergrounded,reducingtheriskofavianfatalityfromelectrocutionorcollisionwithpowerlines.
DiabloWinds,BuenaVista,andVascoWindsaretheonlyrepoweredprojectsintheAPWRAforwhichestimatesofavianfatalityratesareavailable.Basedontheseestimates,aviancollisionriskmaybesubstantiallyreducedwhenolder‐generationturbinesarereplacedbynewer,largerturbineswiththesametotalratednameplatecapacity(Table3.4‐10).However,whiletheavailableevidencesuggeststhatrepoweringcouldsubstantiallyreduceturbine‐relatedavianfatalitiesbelowthelevelsdocumentedforoldergenerationturbines,avianfatalitieswouldcontinuetooccur.Moreover,whilerepoweringisintendedtoreducefatalities,enoughuncertaintyremainsinlightofproject‐andsite‐specificdatatowarrantaconservativeapproachintheimpactanalysis.Accordingly,thecontinuedlossofbirds(includingspecial‐statusspecies)ataratepotentiallygreaterthantheexistingbaselinefatalityratesisconsideredasignificantandunavoidableimpact.
ItshouldbenotedthatturbinesusedinfuturerepoweringprojectsarelikelytobeofsimilarsizetotheVascoWindsturbinesbutmuchlargerthantheDiabloWindsandBuenaVistaturbinesinbothoverallsizeandratednameplatecapacity.Thereisevidencetosuggestthatlargerturbines—likethoseusedintheVascoWindsproject—couldresultinadditionaldecreasesinavianfatalityratesforbirdspeciescurrentlykilledintheAPWRA(SmallwoodandKaras2009).However,itisalsopossiblethatlargerturbinesmaynegativelyaffectadifferentsuiteofbirdspeciesthathavebeenrelativelyunaffectedbyolder(i.e.,smaller)turbines.Inaddition,fatalityratesintheAPWRAarehighlyvariable(thatis,becausetheydifferacrossyears,turbinestypes,geographies,and
![Page 132: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐119
October 2014ICF 00323.08
topographies,speciesimpactsmaydifferbetweensitesduetodifferentlevelsofuse)andpotentiallyimprecise(Smallwoodetal.2010;ICFInternational2013).Nonetheless,thesethreerepoweringprojectsrepresentthebestavailableinformationtounderstandthepotentialforavianfatalitiesassociatedwithrepowering;accordingly,datafromtheseprojectswereusedtoformthebasisforavianfatalityestimates.TheestimatedchangesassociatedwithAlternative2areshowninTable3.4‐12anddiscussedbelow.Postconstructionmonitoring,oncetheturbinesareinoperation,willprovidedatatoquantifytheactualextentofchangeinavianfatalitiesfromrepoweringandtheextentofavianfatalityforprojectsintheprogramarea,andwillcontributetothebodyofknowledgesupportingfutureanalyses.
Table 3.4‐12. Estimated Annual Avian Fatalities for Existing and Repowered Program Area—Alternative 2 (450 MW)
Species
EstimatedAnnualFatalitiesforProgramArea
Nonrepowered
Repowered
AverageAnnualFatalities
DiabloWindsa
BuenaVistab
VascoWindsc,d
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
Americankestrel 194.2 40.5 79 67.5 65 133.7 31
Barnowl 79.5 9.0 89 0.0 0 14.9 81
Burrowingowl 255.1 378.0 ‐48 0.0 100 22.5 91
Goldeneagle 26.6 4.5 83 18.0 32 14.4 46
Loggerheadshrike 61.8 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Prairiefalcon 6.6 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Red‐tailedhawk 144.5 90.0 38 45.0 69 110.7 23
Swainson’shawk 0.5 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Allraptors 799.9 544.5 32 139.5 83 288.9 64
Allnativenon‐raptors 1,482.0 1,129.5 24 454.5 69 942.3 36
Note:fatalityratesreflectannualfatalities(95%confidenceinterval).a DiabloWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.b BuenaVistafatalityratesextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.c VascoWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.dVascoWindsfatalityrateforgoldeneaglebasedonupdatedinformationreceivedfromNextEraEnergyResourcesonJuly21,2014,andextrapolatedtotheoverallprogramarea.
AmericanKestrel.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,afullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated41–138Americankestrelfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualfatalitiesby31–79%.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheAmericankestrelpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
BarnOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,afullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated9–15barnowlfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualfatalitiesby81–89%.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringonthebarnowlpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
![Page 133: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐120
October 2014ICF 00323.08
BurrowingOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,afullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated23–378burrowingowlfatalitiesperyear—achangerangingfroma91%decreasetoa48%increaseinfatalities.ThisfatalityestimateisbasedondatafromDiabloWindsandVascoWindsbecausenoburrowingowlfatalitiesweredetectedatBuenaVista.Currentevidencesuggeststhatburrowingowlfatalityratesarenotreducedbythetransitionfromold‐tonew‐generationturbinestothesameextentasthefatalityratesofotherspecies.Theincreaseinenergyproductionfrom329MWto450MWwouldlikelyresultinasmallestimatedincreaseinburrowingowlfatalitiesperyear.However,agrowingbodyofcircumstantialevidenceindicatesthatmanyoftheburrowingowlfatalitiesfoundduringfatalitysurveysareduetopredationratherthanturbinecollision.Becauseofthisconfoundingeffect,thepotentialreductioninturbine‐relatedburrowingowlfatalitiesmaybeunderestimatedbecauseoftheinabilitytodistinguishfatalitiesresultingfrompredationfromthosecausedbyturbinecollision(ICFInternational2013).ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheburrowingowlpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
GoldenEagle.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,afullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated5–18goldeneaglefatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualfatalitiesby32–83%.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringonthegoldeneaglepopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
LoggerheadShrike.NodocumentedfatalitiesofloggerheadshrikeshaveoccurredattheDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWindsprojects(Table3.4‐10),althoughloggerheadshrikesareregularlydetectedinthevicinityoftheDiabloWindsturbines.Thelackofdocumentedfatalitiesmaysuggestareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesatthesesites.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheloggerheadshrikepopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
PrairieFalcon.FatalityestimatesatrepoweredsitesarenotavailableforprairiefalconbecausenofatalitieshavebeendocumentedatDiabloWindsorVascoWindsandonlyonefatalityhasbeenrecordedatBuenaVista(Table3.4‐10).Therefore,itisdifficulttoestimatetheannualfatalitiesthatwouldresultfromafullyrepoweredprogramarea.Thelackofdocumentedfatalitiesmaysuggestareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesatthesesites.However,thenonrepoweredfatalityrateforprairiefalconisalreadyrelativelylow(0.02fatality/MW/year),suggestingthatthecollisionriskforthisspeciesislow.Prairiefalconoccursmostlyinwinter,andthebaselinefatalityrateismeasuredduringaperiodwhentheseasonalshutdownhasbeenineffect.Repoweredturbinesdonotshutdowninwinter.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheprairiefalconpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Red‐TailedHawk.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,thefullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated45–111red‐tailedhawkfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreasetheaverageannualfatalitiesby23–69%.Thepotentialimpactofrepoweringonthered‐tailedhawkpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Swainson’sHawk.ThereisonlyonerecordedSwainson’shawkfatalityintheAPWRA,resultinginanannualestimatedfatalityrateofapproximatelyzero(Table3.4‐10).NoSwainson’shawkfatalitiesweredetectedatDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWinds.Basedonthelowestimatedfatalityratefromnonrepoweredsites,thelackoffatalitiesdetectedatrepoweredsites,andtherelativelylowuseoftheAPWRAbySwainson’shawks,itisexpectedthatthefatalityratefor
![Page 134: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐121
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Swainson’shawkwouldremainlowundertheprogram.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheSwainson’shawkpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,afullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated140–545raptorfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreaseaverageannualraptorfatalitiesby32–83%.
Nativenon‐raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐12,afullyrepowered450MWprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated455–1,130nativenon‐raptorfatalitiesperyear.Basedontheseestimates,theprogramcoulddecreasetheaverageannualfatalitiesby24–69%.
Asdescribedabove,forallavianfocalspeciesanalyzed,afullyrepoweredprogramareawouldbeexpectedtoreduceestimatedfatalityrates.However,fatalitieswouldstillbeexpectedtoresultfromtheoperationoftherepoweredturbines,anduncertaintysurroundingtheaccuracyoftheestimatedfatalityratesandthetypesofspeciespotentiallyaffectedremains.Consideringthisinformation,anddespitetheanticipatedreductionsinavianimpactscomparedtothebaselinerates,theCountyhasdeterminedtouseaconservativeapproachfortheimpactassessment,concludingthatturbine‐relatedfatalitiescouldconstituteasubstantialadverseeffectonavianspeciesbecausetheratesforsomeorallofthespeciescouldbegreaterthanthebaselinerates.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11athroughBIO‐11iwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11a:Prepareaproject‐specificavianprotectionplan
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11f:Discouragepreyforraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11g:Implementpostconstructionavianfatalitymonitoringforallrepoweringprojectsandimplementadaptivemanagementmeasuresasnecessary
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11h:Compensateforthelossofraptorsandotheravianspecies,includinggoldeneagles,bycontributingtoconservationefforts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
ImpactBIO‐11b:Avianmortalityresultingfrominteractionwithwindenergyfacilities—GoldenHillsProject(significantandunavoidable)
TheoperationofrepoweredturbinesintheGoldenHillsprojectareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinareductioninavianfatalitiesbelowthenumberestimatedtooccurfromnonrepoweredturbines.However,asdiscussedaboveinImpactBIO‐11a‐1,repoweringwouldnoteliminateavianturbine‐relatedfatalities,considerableuncertaintysurroundingthecomparativedatasetremains,and
![Page 135: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐122
October 2014ICF 00323.08
fatalitiesfromturbinecollisionwouldstillconstituteasignificantandunavoidableimpact.Theestimatedreductioninannualfatalitiesdiffersbyspeciesandspeciesgroup.ThesereductionsarepresentedinTable3.4‐13andsummarizedbelow.
Table 3.4‐13. Estimated Annual Avian Fatalities for Existing and Repowered Golden Hills Project Area
Species
EstimatedAnnualFatalitiesforProgramArea
Nonrepowered
Repowered
AverageAnnualFatalities
DiabloWindsa BuenaVistab
VascoWindsc,d
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
Americankestrel 47.5 8.0 83 13.3 72 26.3 45
Barnowl 19.4 1.8 91 – – 2.9 85
Burrowingowl 62.4 74.3 ‐19 0.0 100 4.4 93
Goldeneagle 6.5 0.9 86 3.5 46 2.8 57
Loggerheadshrike 15.1 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Prairiefalcon 1.6 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Red‐tailedhawk 35.4 17.7 50 8.8 75 21.7 39
Swainson’shawk 0.1 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Allraptors 195.7 107.0 45 27.4 86 56.8 71
Allnativenon‐raptors 362.6 221.9 39 89.3 75 185.1 49
Note:fatalityratesreflectannualfatalities(95%confidenceinterval).a DiabloWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtotheGoldenHillsprojectarea.b BuenaVistafatalityratesextrapolatedtotheGoldenHillsprojectarea.c VascoWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtotheGoldenHillsprojectarea.dVascoWindsfatalityrateforgoldeneaglebasedonupdatedinformationreceivedfromNextEraEnergyResourcesonJuly21,2014,andextrapolatedtotheGoldenHillsprojectarea.
AmericanKestrel.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated8–26Americankestrelfatalitiesperyear—a45–83%decrease.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheAmericankestrelpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
BarnOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimatedtwotothreebarnowlfatalitiesperyear—an85–91%decrease.ThisfatalityestimateisbasedonfatalityratesfortheDiabloWindsandVascoWindsprojects;fatalityestimatesforbarnowlwerenotavailablefromtheBuenaVistaproject.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringonthebarnowlpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
BurrowingOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated4–74burrowingowlfatalitiesperyear—achangerangingfroma91%decreasetoa19%increaseinfatalities.
![Page 136: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐123
October 2014ICF 00323.08
However,agrowingbodyofcircumstantialevidenceindicatesthatmanyoftheburrowingoffatalitiesfoundduringfatalitysurveysareduetopredationratherthanturbinecollision.Becauseofthisconfoundingeffect,thepotentialreductioninturbine‐relatedburrowingowlfatalitiesmaybeunderestimatedbecauseoftheinabilitytodistinguishfatalitiesresultingfrompredationfromthosecausedbyturbinecollision.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheburrowingowlpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
GoldenEagle.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinfromlessthanonetofourgoldeneaglefatalitiesperyear—a46–86%decrease.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringonthegoldeneaglepopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
LoggerheadShrike.NodocumentedfatalitiesofloggerheadshrikeshaveoccurredattheDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWindsprojects(Table3.4‐13),althoughloggerheadshrikesareregularlydetectedinthevicinityoftheDiabloWindsturbines.ThelackofdocumentedfatalitiessuggeststhattheremaybeareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesattheGoldenHillsprojectsite.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheloggerheadshrikepopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
PrairieFalcon.FatalityestimatesatrepoweredsitesarenotavailableforprairiefalconbecausenofatalitieshavebeendocumentedatDiabloWindsorVascoWindsandonlyonefatalityhasbeenrecordedatBuenaVista(Table3.4‐13).Therefore,itisdifficulttoestimatetheannualfatalitiesthatwouldresultfromtherepoweredGoldenHillsproject.ThelackofdocumentedfatalitiessuggeststheremaybeareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesattheGoldenHillsprojectsite.However,thenonrepoweredfatalityrateforprairiefalconisalreadyrelativelylow(0.02fatality/MW/year),suggestingthatthecollisionriskforthisspeciesislow.Prairiefalconoccursmostlyinwinter,andthebaselinefatalityrateismeasuredduringaperiodwhentheseasonalshutdownhasbeenineffect.Repoweredturbinesdonotshutdowninwinter.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheprairiefalconpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Red‐TailedHawk.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsProjectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated9–22red‐tailedhawkfatalitiesperyear—a35–75%decrease.Thepotentialimpactofrepoweringonthered‐tailedhawkpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Swainson’sHawk.ThereisonlyonerecordedSwainson’shawkfatalityintheAPWRA,resultinginanannualestimatedfatalityrateofapproximatelyzero(Table3.4‐13).NoSwainson’shawkfatalitiesweredetectedatDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWinds.Basedonthelowestimatedfatalityratefromnonrepoweredsites,thelackoffatalitiesdetectedatrepoweredsites,andtherelativelylownumberofdetectionsduringavianusesurveysconductedbytheAFMT(AlamedaCountyunpublisheddata),itisexpectedthatthefatalityrateforSwainson’shawkwouldremainnearzeroattherepoweredGoldenHillsproject.ThepotentialimpactofrepoweringontheSwainson’shawkpopulationwouldbesimilartothatdescribedinImpactBIO‐11a‐1.
Raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated27–107raptorfatalitiesperyear—a45–86%decrease.
![Page 137: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐124
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Nativenon‐raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐13,therepowered88.4MWGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated89–222nativenon‐raptorfatalitiesperyear—a39–75%decrease.
Asdescribedabove,forallavianfocalspeciesanalyzed,therepoweredGoldenHillsprojectwouldbeexpectedtoreduceestimatedfatalityrates.However,fatalitieswouldstillbeexpectedtoresultfromtheoperationoftherepoweredturbines,anduncertaintysurroundingtheaccuracyoftheestimatedfatalityratesandthetypesofspeciespotentiallyaffectedremains.Consideringthisinformation,anddespitetheanticipatedreductionsinavianimpactscomparedtothebaselinerates,theCountyhasdeterminedtouseaconservativeapproachfortheimpactassessment,concludingthatturbine‐relatedfatalitiescouldconstituteasubstantialadverseeffectonavianspeciesbecausetheratesforsomeorallofthespeciescouldbegreaterthanthebaselinerates.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐12athroughBIO‐12jwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11a:Prepareaproject‐specificavianprotectionplan
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11f:Discouragepreyforraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11g:Implementpostconstructionavianfatalitymonitoringforallrepoweringprojectsandimplementadaptivemanagementmeasuresasnecessary
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11h:Compensateforthelossofraptorsandotheravianspecies,includinggoldeneagles,bycontributingtoconservationefforts
TheCountyanticipatesthatthemitigationfeesrequiredbythe2010AgreementtoRepowerTurbinesattheAltamontPassWindResourceAreawillsatisfythismitigationmeasurefortheGoldenHillsProject.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
ImpactBIO‐11c:Avianmortalityresultingfrominteractionwithwindenergyfacilities—PattersonPassProject(significantandunavoidable)
TheoperationofrepoweredturbinesinthePattersonPassprojectareawouldbeexpectedtoresultinareductioninestimatedavianfatalityrateincomparisonwiththefatalityestimatesfromnonrepoweredturbines.However,asdiscussedaboveinImpactBIO‐11a‐1and11a‐2,repoweringwouldnoteliminateavianturbine‐relatedfatalities,considerableuncertaintysurroundingthecomparativedatasetremains,andfatalitiesfromturbinecollisionwouldstillresultinasignificantandunavoidableimpact.Theestimatedreductioninannualfatalitiesdiffersbyspeciesandspeciesgroup.ThesereductionsarepresentedinTable3.4‐13andsummarizedbelow.
![Page 138: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐125
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐14. Estimated Annual Avian Fatalities for Existing and Repowered Patterson Pass Project Area
Species
EstimatedAnnualFatalitiesforProgramArea
Nonrepowered
Repowered
AverageAnnualFatalities
DiabloWindsa BuenaVistab
VascoWindsc,d
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
AverageAnnualFatalities
%Decrease
Americankestrel 12.9 1.8 86 3.0 77 5.9 54
Barnowl 5.2 0.4 92 – – 0.7 87
Burrowingowl 16.9 16.6 2 0.0 100 1.0 94
Goldeneagle 1.8 0.2 89 0.8 56 0.6 67
Loggerheadshrike 4.1 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Prairiefalcon 0.4 0.0 100 0.0 100 0.0 100
Red‐tailedhawk 9.6 4.0 59 2.0 79 4.9 49
Swainson’shawk 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0
Allraptors 53.1 24.0 55 6.1 88 12.7 76
Allnativenon‐raptors 98.4 49.7 49 20.0 80 41.5 58
Note:fatalityratesreflectannualfatalities(95%confidenceinterval).a DiabloWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtothePattersonPassprojectarea.b BuenaVistafatalityratesextrapolatedtothePattersonPassprojectarea.c VascoWindsfatalityratesextrapolatedtothePattersonPassprojectarea.dVascoWindsfatalityrateforgoldeneaglebasedonupdatedinformationreceivedfromNextEraEnergyResourcesonJuly21,2014andextrapolatedtothePattersonPassprojectarea.
AmericanKestrel.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimatedtwotosixAmericankestrelfatalitiesperyear—a54–86%decrease.
BarnOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinlessthanonebarnowlfatalityperyear—an87–92%decrease.
BurrowingOwl.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated1–17burrowingowlfatalitiesperyear—a2–94%decreaseinfatalities.ThisfatalityestimateisbasedondatafromDiabloWindsandVascoWinds;noburrowingowlfatalitiesweredetectedatBuenaVista.
However,agrowingbodyofcircumstantialevidenceindicatesthatmanyoftheburrowingoffatalitiesfoundduringfatalitysurveysareduetopredationratherthanturbinecollision.Becauseofthisconfoundingeffect,thepotentialreductioninturbine‐relatedburrowingowlfatalitiesmaybeunderestimatedbecauseoftheinabilitytodistinguishfatalitiesresultingfrompredationfromthosecausedbyturbinecollision.
GoldenEagle.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinlessthanonegoldeneaglefatalityperyear—a56–89%decrease.
LoggerheadShrike.NodocumentedfatalitiesofloggerheadshrikeshaveoccurredattheDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWindsprojects(Table3.4‐14),althoughloggerheadshrikesare
![Page 139: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐126
October 2014ICF 00323.08
regularlydetectedinthevicinityoftheDiabloWindsturbines.ThelackofdocumentedfatalitiessuggeststhattheremaybeareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesatthePatternPassprojectsite.
PrairieFalcon.FatalityestimatesatrepoweredsitesarenotavailableforprairiefalconbecausenofatalitieshavebeendocumentedatDiabloWindsorVascoWindsandonlyonefatalityhasbeenrecordedatBuenaVista(Table3.4‐14).Therefore,itisdifficulttoestimatetheannualfatalitiesthatwouldresultfromtherepoweredPattersonPassproject.ThelackofdocumentedfatalitiessuggeststhattheremaybeareducedleveloffatalityfromtherepoweredturbinesatthePattersonPassprojectsite.However,thenonrepoweredfatalityrateforprairiefalconisalreadyrelativelylow(0.02fatality/MW/year),suggestingthatthecollisionriskforthisspeciesislow.Prairiefalconoccursmostlyinwinter,andthebaselinefatalityrateismeasuredduringaperiodwhentheseasonalshutdownhasbeenineffect.Repoweredturbinesdonotshutdowninwinter.
Red‐TailedHawk.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimatedtwotofivered‐tailedhawkfatalitiesperyear—a49–79%decrease.
Swainson’sHawk.ThereisonlyonerecordedSwainson’shawkfatalityintheAPWRA,resultinginanannualestimatedfatalityrateofapproximatelyzero(Table3.4‐14).NoSwainson’shawkfatalitiesweredetectedatDiabloWinds,BuenaVista,orVascoWinds.Basedonthelowestimatedfatalityratefromnonrepoweredsitesandthelackoffatalitiesdetectedatrepoweredsites,itisexpectedthatthefatalityrateforSwainson’shawkwouldremainlowattherepoweredPattersonPassprojectsite.
Raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated6–24raptorfatalitiesperyear—a55–88%decrease.
Nativenon‐raptors.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,therepowered19.8MWPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoresultinanestimated20–50nativenon‐raptorfatalitiesperyear—a49–80%decrease.
Asdescribedabove,forallavianfocalspeciesanalyzed,therepoweredPattersonPassprojectwouldbeexpectedtoreduceestimatedfatalityrates.However,fatalitieswouldstillbeexpectedtoresultfromtheoperationoftherepoweredturbines,anduncertaintysurroundingtheaccuracyoftheestimatedfatalityratesandthetypesofspeciespotentiallyaffectedremains.Consideringthisinformation,anddespitetheanticipatedreductionsinavianimpactscomparedtothebaselinerates,theCountyhasdeterminedtouseaconservativeapproachfortheimpactassessment,concludingthatturbine‐relatedfatalitiescouldconstituteasubstantialadverseeffectonavianspeciesbecausetheratesforsomeorallofthespeciescouldbegreaterthanthebaselinerates.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant.Implementationofthemitigationmeasureslistedbelowwouldreducethisimpactbutnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11athroughBIO‐11iwouldreducethisimpactbutnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11a:Prepareaproject‐specificavianprotectionplan
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
![Page 140: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐127
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11f:Discouragepreyforraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11g:Implementpostconstructionavianfatalitymonitoringforallrepoweringprojectsandimplementadaptivemanagementmeasuresasnecessary
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11h:Compensateforthelossofraptorsandotheravianspecies,includinggoldeneagles,bycontributingtoconservationefforts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
ImpactBIO‐12a‐1:Potentialmortalityordisturbanceofbatsfromroostremovalordisturbance—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Severalspeciesofbothcommon(Myotisspp.)andspecial‐status(westernredbat,pallidbat,Townsend’sbig‐earedbat)batsareknowntooccurorcouldoccurinoraroundtheprogramarea,andcouldusetheareaforforaging,dispersal,andmigration.Batsmayuserockoutcrops,trees,buildings,bridges,andotherstructuresintheprogramareaasmaternityormigratorystopoverroosts.Permanentwaterbodiesandstocktanksinandadjacenttotheprogramareaprovidesourcesoffreshwaterforbothresidentandmigratorybats.
Constructionanddecommissioningofturbinescouldresultindisturbanceorlossofactivebatrooststhroughincreasedtraffic,noise,lighting,andhumanaccess.Removalordisturbanceoftrees,rockoutcrops,debrispiles,outbuildings,orotherartificialstructurescouldresultinremovalofroosthabitatandmortalityofbatsusingthestructureasaroost.Severalspeciesofbataresensitivetodisturbanceandmayabandonflightlessyoung,ortheymaysimplynotreturntotheroostoncedisturbed,resultinginthelossofthatroostashabitatforthelocalpopulation.Becausesomebatsroostcolonially,removalofspecial‐statusspecies’rooststructuresinaroost‐limitedhabitatcouldresultinthelossofasignificantportionofthelocalbatpopulation.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐3,BIO‐12a,andBIO‐12bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
Priortodevelopmentofanyrepoweringproject,aqualifiedbatbiologistwillconductaroosthabitatassessmenttoidentifypotentialcolonialroostsitesofspecial‐statusandcommonbatspecieswithin750feetoftheconstructionarea.Ifsuitableroostsitesaretoberemovedorotherwiseaffectedbytheproposedproject,thebatbiologistwillconducttargetedroostsurveys
![Page 141: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐128
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ofallidentifiedsitesthatwouldbeaffected.Becausebatactivityishighlyvariable(bothspatiallyandtemporally)acrossthelandscapeandmaymoveunpredictablyamongseveralroosts,severalseparatesurveyvisitsmayberequired.Surveyswillberepeatedatdifferenttimesofyearifdeemednecessarybythebatbiologisttodeterminethepresenceofseasonallyactiveroosts(hibernacula,migratorystopovers,maternityroosts).Appropriatefieldmethodswillbeemployedtodeterminethespecies,type,andvulnerabilityoftheroosttoconstructiondisturbance.Methodswillfollowbestpracticesforroostsurveyssuchthatspeciesarenotdisturbedandadequatetemporalandspatialcoverageisprovidedtoincreaselikelihoodofdetection.
Roostsurveysmayconsistofbothdaylightsurveysforsignsofbatuseandevening/nightvisit(s)toconductemergencesurveysorevaluatethestatusofnightroosts.Surveytimingshouldbeadequatetoaccountforindividualbatsorspeciesthatmightnotemergeuntilwellafterdark.
Methodsandapproachesfordeterminingroostoccupancystatusshouldincludeacombinationofthefollowingcomponentsasthebiologistdeemsnecessaryfortheparticularroostsite.
Passiveand/oractiveacousticmonitoringtoassistwithspeciesidentification.
Guanotrapstodetermineactivitystatus.
Night‐visionequipment.
Passiveinfraredcameratraps.
Atthecompletionoftheroostsurveys,areportwillbeprepareddocumentingareassurveyed,methods,results,andmappingofhigh‐qualityhabitatorconfirmedroostlocations.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
Activebatroostswillnotbedisturbed,andwillbeprovidedaminimumbufferof500feetwherepreexistingdisturbanceismoderateor750feetwherepreexistingdisturbanceisminimal.ConfirmationofbufferdistancesanddeterminationoftheneedforabiologicalmonitorforactivematernityroostsorhibernaculawillbeobtainedinconsultationwithCDFW.Ataminimum,whenanactivematernityroostorhibernaculumispresentwithin750feetofaconstructionsite,aqualifiedbiologistwillconductaninitialassessmentoftheroostresponsetoconstructionactivitiesandwillrecommendbufferexpansioniftherearesignsofdisturbancefromtheroost.
Structures(naturalorartificial)showingevidenceofsignificantbatusewithinthepastyearwillbeleftinplaceashabitatwhereverfeasible.Shouldsuchastructureneedtoberemovedordisturbed,CDFWwillbeconsultedtodetermineappropriatebuffers,timingandmethods,andcompensatorymitigationforthelossoftheroost.
Allprojectproponentswillprovideenvironmentalawarenesstrainingtoconstructionpersonnel,establishbuffers,andinitiateconsultationwithCDFWifneeded.
Artificialnightlightingwithin500feetofanyroostwillbeshieldedandangledsuchthatbatsmayenterandexittheroostwithoutartificialilluminationandtheroostdoesnotreceiveartificialexposuretovisualpredators.
Treeandvegetationremovalwillbeconductedoutsidethematernityseason(April1–September15)toavoiddisturbanceofmaternitygroupsoffoliage‐roostingbats.
![Page 142: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐129
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Ifamaternityroostorhibernaculumispresentwithin500feetoftheconstructionsitewherepreexistingdisturbanceismoderateorwithin750feetwherepreexistingdisturbanceisminimal,aqualifiedbiologicalmonitorwillbeonsiteduringgroundbreakingactivities.
ImpactBIO‐12a‐2:Potentialmortalityordisturbanceofbatsfromroostremovalordisturbance—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Severalspeciesofbothcommon(Myotisspp.)andspecial‐status(westernredbat,pallidbat,Townsend’sbig‐earedbat)batsareknowntooccurorcouldoccurinoraroundtheprogramarea,andcouldusetheareaforforaging,dispersal,andmigration.Batsmayuserockoutcrops,trees,buildings,bridges,andotherstructuresintheprogramareaasmaternityormigratorystopoverroosts.Permanentwaterbodiesandstocktanksinandadjacenttotheprogramareaprovidesourcesoffreshwaterforbothresidentandmigratorybats.
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Constructionanddecommissioningofturbinescouldresultindisturbanceorlossofactivebatrooststhroughincreasedtraffic,noise,lighting,andhumanaccess.Removalordisturbanceoftrees,rockoutcrops,debrispiles,outbuildings,orotherartificialstructurescouldresultinremovalofroosthabitatandmortalityofbatsusingthestructureasaroost.Severalspeciesofbataresensitivetodisturbanceandmayabandonflightlessyoung,ortheymaysimplynotreturntotheroostoncedisturbed,resultinginthelossofthatroostashabitatforthelocalpopulation.Becausesomebatsroostcolonially,removalofspecial‐statusspecies’rooststructuresinaroost‐limitedhabitatcouldresultinthelossofasignificantportionofthelocalbatpopulation.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐3,BIO‐12a,andBIO‐12bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
ImpactBIO‐12b:Potentialmortalityordisturbanceofbatsfromroostremovalordisturbance—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionanddecommissioningofturbinescouldresultindisturbanceorlossofactivebatrooststhroughincreasedtraffic,noise,lightingorhumanaccess.Removalordisturbanceoftrees,rockoutcrops,debrispiles,outbuildings,orotherartificialstructurescouldresultinremovalofroosthabitatandmortalityofbatsusingthestructureasaroost.Severalspeciesofbataresensitivetodisturbanceandmayabandonflightlessyoung,ortheymaysimplynotreturntotheroostoncedisturbed,resultinginthelossofthatroostashabitatforthelocalpopulation.Becausesomebatsroostcolonially,removalofspecial‐statusspecies’rooststructuresinaroost‐limitedhabitatcould
![Page 143: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐130
October 2014ICF 00323.08
resultinthelossofasignificantportionofthelocalbatpopulation.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐3,BIO‐12aandBIO‐12bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
ImpactBIO‐12c:Potentialmortalityordisturbanceofbatsfromroostremovalordisturbance—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Constructionanddecommissioningofturbinescouldresultindisturbanceorlossofactivebatrooststhroughincreasedtraffic,noise,lightingorhumanaccess.Removalordisturbanceoftrees,rockoutcrops,debrispiles,outbuildings,orotherartificialstructurescouldresultinremovalofroosthabitatandmortalityofbatsusingthestructureasaroost.Severalspeciesofbataresensitivetodisturbanceandmayabandonflightlessyoung,ortheymaysimplynotreturntotheroostoncedisturbed,resultinginthelossofthatroostashabitatforthelocalpopulation.Becausesomebatsroostcolonially,removalofspecial‐statusspecies’rooststructuresinaroost‐limitedhabitatcouldresultinthelossofasignificantportionofthelocalbatpopulation.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐3,BIO‐12aandBIO‐12bwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
ImpactBIO‐13a‐1:Potentialforconstructionactivitiestotemporarilyremoveoralterbatforaginghabitat—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificant)
Constructionofrepoweringprojectscoulddegradebatforaginghabitatbyreplacingvegetationwithnonvegetatedlandcovertypes.Projectconstructionwouldcreateatemporaryincreaseintraffic,noise,andartificialnightlightingintheprogramarea,reducingtheextentoflandscapeavailableforforaging.However,theamountoflandscapereturnedtoforaginghabitatintheprocessofdecommissioningthefirst‐andsecond‐generationturbineswouldoffsettheamountofforaginghabitatlosttorepoweringactivities.Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
![Page 144: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐131
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactBIO‐13a‐2:Potentialforconstructionactivitiestotemporarilyremoveoralterbatforaginghabitat—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificant)
Constructionofrepoweringprojectscoulddegradebatforaginghabitatbyreplacingvegetationwithnonvegetatedlandcovertypes.DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Projectconstructionwouldcreateatemporaryincreaseintraffic,noise,andartificialnightlightingintheprogramarea,reducingtheextentoflandscapeavailableforforaging.However,theamountoflandscapereturnedtoforaginghabitatintheprocessofdecommissioningthefirst‐andsecond‐generationturbineswouldoffsettheamountofforaginghabitatlosttorepoweringactivities.Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐13b:Potentialforconstructionactivitiestotemporarilyremoveoralterbatforaginghabitat—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificant)
ConstructionoftheGoldenHillsProjectcoulddegradebatforaginghabitatbyreplacingvegetationwithnonvegetatedlandcovertypes.Projectconstructionwouldcreateatemporaryincreaseintraffic,noise,andartificialnightlightingintheprogramarea,reducingtheextentoflandscapeavailableforforaging.However,theamountoflandscapereturnedtoforaginghabitatintheprocessofdecommissioningthefirst‐andsecond‐generationturbineswouldoffsettheamountofforaginghabitatlosttorepoweringactivities.Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐13c:Potentialforconstructionactivitiestotemporarilyremoveoralterbatforaginghabitat—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificant)
ConstructionofthePattersonPassProjectcoulddegradebatforaginghabitatbyreplacingvegetationwithnonvegetatedlandcovertypes.Projectconstructionwouldcreateatemporaryincreaseintraffic,noise,andartificialnightlightingintheprogramarea,reducingtheextentoflandscapeavailableforforaging.However,theamountoflandscapereturnedtoforaginghabitatintheprocessofdecommissioningthefirst‐andsecond‐generationturbineswouldoffsettheamountofforaginghabitatlosttorepoweringactivities.Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐14a‐1:Turbine‐relatedfatalitiesofspecial‐statusandotherbats—programAlternative1:417MW(significantandunavoidable)
Residentandmigratorybatsflyinginandthroughtheprogramareamaybekilledbycollisionwithwindturbinebladesorotherinteractionwiththewindturbinegenerators.
Insufficientdataarecurrentlyavailabletodevelopaccuratefatalityestimatesforindividualbatspecies.FivebatspecieshavebeendocumentedinfatalitymonitoringprogramsintheAPWRA(InsigniaEnvironmental2012:48;Brownetal.2013:23;ICFInternational2012:3‐3),ofwhichtwo(westernredbatandhoarybat)arespecial‐statusspecies.Extrapolatingfromexistingfatalitydataandfromtrendsobservedatotherwindenergyfacilitieswherefourth‐generationturbinesareinoperation,itappearslikelythatfatalitieswouldoccurpredominantlyinthelatesummertomid‐fallmigrationperiod;thatfatalitieswouldconsistmostlyofmigratorybats,particularlyMexicanfree‐tailedbatandhoarybat;thatfatalitieswouldoccursporadicallyatothertimesofyear;andthatfatalitiesofoneormoreotherspecieswouldoccurinsmallernumbers.
![Page 145: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐132
October 2014ICF 00323.08
DiabloWinds,BuenaVista,andVascoWindsaretheonlyrepoweredprojectsintheAPWRAforwhichestimatesofbatfatalityratesareavailable.Whiletheseratesvarywidely(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1067;InsigniaEnvironmental2012:65;Brownetal.2013:39),basedontheseestimates,batcollisionriskincreasessubstantiallywhenold‐generationturbinesarereplacedbynewer,largerturbines(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1068).TurbinesusedinfuturerepoweringprojectsarelikelytobesimilarinsizetotheVascoWindsturbinesbutmuchlargerthantheDiabloWindsandBuenaVistaturbinesinbothoverallsizeandratednameplatecapacity.ThereisevidencetosuggestthatlargerturbinessimilartothoseusedintheVascoWindsprojectwillresultinadditionalincreasesinbatfatalityratesforthosebatspeciescurrentlykilledintheAPWRA.
Somehypothesesfortheincreasedcollisionrisktomigratorybatspeciesatfourth‐generationturbinesaresummarizedbelow.
Batstendnottoflyathighwindspeeds.Thelowerwindspeedsatwhichfourth‐generationturbinesareabletoproducepowercreatemoreoverlapinthetimethatturbinesareoperatingandbatsareintheair.Inseveralstudies,themajorityoffatalitiesoccurredonnightsoflowerwindspeed(lessthan5.5meters/second[m/s])(Arnettetal.2008:73;Goodetal.2012:iv).Thiscorrelationsuggestsapossiblesourcefortheincreasedriskthatfourth‐generationturbinesposetobats.
Migratorytree‐roostingbatsmaybeattractedtothetubulartowerstructureofnewerturbines;thisattractionmayberelatedtomatingbehaviorduringmigration(Arnettetal.2008:73;Cryan2008:1).
Echolocationpulsesmaynotbeusedduringopen‐airmigratoryflight,ornotusedasoften,resultinginbatsbeingunawareofthehazardpresentedbytheturbineblades(Kunzetal.2007:319).
Foraging,wateracquisition,roostselection,ormatingbehaviorduringmigrationseasonmaybringbatsthroughtherotor‐sweptareaoftallerturbinesmoreoften(CryanandBarclay2009:1333).
Tallerturbineshavebeendocumentedtokillmorebats.Theincreasedheightoffourth‐generationturbinesputstherotor‐sweptareaintobatflightpaths(Barclayetal2007:384).
Table3.4‐15providesacomparisonoftheestimatednumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurifold‐generationturbinesareallowedtocontinueoperatingattheircurrentlevelandtheestimatednumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurafterrepoweringoftheprogramareaandthetwoprojectareas.Duetothehighdegreeofuncertaintyinbatfatalityestimates,arangeofestimatesbasedonavailabledataispresented.Thelowestestimateisderivedfromthebestestimaterateof1.679fatalities/MW/yearreportedforthefirstyearofmonitoringattheVascoWindsrepoweringproject(Brownetal.2013:39).Theupperendofthisrangeiscalculatedusingthebatfatalityrateof3.92fatalities/MW/yearreportedfortheShilohIprojectintheMontezumaHillsWindResourceArea.Thebaselineestimateisderivedfromthebatfatalityrateof0.263fatalities/MW/yearreportedfortheAPWRAfor2005–2007(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1066).AsshowninTable3.4‐15,annualestimatedbatfatalitiesintheprogramareafromimplementationofAlternative1areanticipatedtoincreasefromthecurrentestimateof87to700–1,635fatalities.
![Page 146: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/146.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐133
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Table 3.4‐15. Estimated Range of Annual Bat Fatalities
StudyArea Capacity(MW) BaselineFatalitiesa PredictedFatalitiesb
Existingprogramarea 329 87 –
ProgramAlternative1 417 110 700–1,635
ProgramAlternative2 450 118 756–1,764
GoldenHills 88.4 23 148–347
PattersonPass 19.8 5 33–78a EstimateoftotalbaselinefatalitiesarebasedontheSmallwoodandKarasfatalityrateof0.263fatalities/MW/yearderivedfrom2005–2007monitoringattheAPWRA.
b EstimateoftotalpredictedfatalitiesarebasedonfatalityratesfromtheVascoWindsrepoweringproject(1.679fatalities/MW/year),andfromthemultiyearaverageratesfromtheShilohIprojectintheMontezumaHillsWRA(3.92fatalities/MW/year).
Despitethehighlevelofuncertaintyinestimatesofbatfatalityrates,allavailabledatasuggestthatrepoweringwouldresultinasubstantialincreaseinbatfatalities.Thedegreeofincreasemaybeinfluencedbythefollowingfactors.
Turbineplacementinareasofhighautumnbatactivityoralongmigrationroutes.
Turbineplacementalongcommutingflywaystokeyresources(e.g.,roosts,water,foraginghabitat).
Behavioroftheturbinemodelbeforeitcutsin(i.e.,whetherbladesareallowedtospinatlowerwindspeeds)(Goodetal.2012:v).
MitigationMeasuresBIO‐14athroughBIO‐14ewouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
Allprojectproponentswillusethebestinformationavailabletositeturbinesandtoselectfromturbinemodelsinsuchamannerastoreducebatcollisionrisk.Thesitingandselectionprocesswilltakeintoaccountbatuseoftheareaandlandscapefeaturesknowntoincreasecollisionrisk(trees,edgehabitats,riparianareas,waterbodies,andwetlands).Measuresincludebutarenotlimitedtositingturbinesthegreatestdistancefeasibleupto500meters(1,640)feetfromstillorflowingbodiesofwater,riparianhabitat,knownroosts,andtreestands(CaliforniaBatWorkingGroup2006:6).
Togeneratesite‐specific“bestinformation”toinformturbinesitingandoperationdecisions,abathabitatassessmentandroostsurveywillbeconductedintheprojectareatoidentifyandmaphabitatofpotentialsignificancetobats,suchaspotentialroostsites(treesandshrubs,significantrockformations,artificialstructures)andwatersources.TurbinesitingdecisionswillincorporaterelevantbatusesurveydataandbatfatalityrecordspublishedbyotherprojectsintheAPWRA.RoostsurveyswillbecarriedoutaccordingtothemethodsdescribedinMitigationMeasure‐BIO‐12a.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14b:Implementpostconstructionbatfatalitymonitoringprogramforallrepoweringprojects
![Page 147: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/147.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐134
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Ascientificallydefensible,postconstructionbatfatalitymonitoringprogramwillbeimplementedtoestimateactualbatfatalitiesanddetermineifadditionalmitigationisrequired.Bat‐specificmodificationstothe3‐yearpostconstructionmonitoringprogramdescribedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g,developedinaccordancewithCEC2007andwithappropriaterecommendationsfromCaliforniaBatWorkingGroupguidelines(2006),willbeimplemented.
InadditiontotherequirementsoutlinedinMitigationMeasureBIO‐11g,thefollowingtwobat‐specificrequirementswillbeadded.
IncludeontheTACatleastonebiologistwithsignificantexpertiseinbatresearchandwindenergyimpactsonbats.
Conductbatacousticsurveysconcurrentlywithfatalitymonitoringintheprojectareatoestimatenightly,seasonal,orannualvariationsinrelativeactivityandspeciesusepatterns,andtocontributetothebodyofknowledgeonseasonalbatmovementsandrelationshipsbetweenbatactivity,environmentalvariables,andturbinefatality.Shouldemergingresearchsupporttheapproach,thesedatamaybeusedtogeneratesite‐specificpredictivemodelstoincreasetheprecisionandeffectivenessofmitigationmeasures(e.g.,theseason‐specific,multivariatemodelsdescribedbyWellerandBaldwin2011:11).Acousticbatsurveyswillbedesignedanddataanalysisconductedbyqualifiedbiologistswithsignificantexperienceinacousticbatsurveytechniques.Methodswillbeinformedbythelatestavailableguidelines(CaliforniaEnergyCommissionguidelines,2007);CaliforniaBatWorkingGroupguidelines,2006),exceptwherebestavailablesciencesupportstechnologicalormethodologicalupdates.High‐quality,sensitiveacousticequipmentwillbeusedtoproducedataofsufficientqualitytogeneratespeciesidentifications.Surveydesignandmethodswillbescientificallydefensibleandwillinclude,ataminimum,thefollowingelements.
Acousticdetectorswillbeinstalledatmultiplestationstoadequatelysamplerangeofhabitatsintheprojectareaforbothresidentandmigratorybats.Thenumberofdetectorarraysinstalledperprojectsitewillincorporateemergingresearchonthedensityofdetectorsrequiredtoadequatelymeetsamplinggoalsandinformmitigationapproaches(WellerandBaldwin2011:10).
AcousticdetectorarrayswillsamplemultipleairspaceheightsincludingasclosetotherepoweredrotorsweptareaaspossibleVerticalstructuresusedformountingmaybepreexistingormaybeinstalledfortheproject(e.g.,temporaryorpermanentmeteorologicaltowers).
SurveyswillbeconductedsuchthatdataarecollectedcontinuouslyfromearlyJulytoearlyNovembertocovertheactivitytransitionfrommaternitytomigrationseasonanddetermineifthereiselevatedactivityduringmigration.Surveyseasonmaybeadjustedtomoreaccuratelyreflectthefullextentofthelocalmigrationseasonand/orseason(s)ofgreatestlocalbatfatalityrisk,ifscientificallysounddatasupportdoingso.
Anticipatedadaptivemanagementgoals,suchasdeterminingjustifiabletimeframestoreducerequiredperiodsofcut‐inspeedadjustments,willbereviewedwiththeTACandincorporatedindesigningtheacousticmonitoringanddataanalysisprogram.
Modificationstothefatalitysearchprotocolwillbeimplementedtoobtainbetterinformationonthenumberandtimingofbatfatalities(e.g.,Johnstonetal.2013:85).Modificationswillincludedecreasesinthetransectwidthandsearchintervalforaperiodoftimecoincidingwithhigh
![Page 148: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/148.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐135
October 2014ICF 00323.08
levelsofbatmortality,i.e.,thefallmigrationseason(roughlyAugusttoearlyNovember,orasappropriateintheviewoftheTAC).Thenatureofbat‐specifictransectdistanceandsearchintervalswillbedeterminedinconsultationwiththeTACandwillbeguidedbyscientificallysoundandpertinentdataonratesofbatcarcassdetectionatwindenergyfacilities(e.g.,Johnstonetal.2013:54–55)andsite‐specificdatafromAPWRArepoweringprojectfatalitymonitoringprogramsasthesedatabecomeavailable.
OthermethodstoachievethegoalsofthebatfatalitymonitoringprogramwhileavoidingprohibitivecostsmaybeconsideredsubjecttoapprovalbytheTAC,ifthesemethodshavebeenpeerreviewedandevidenceindicatesthemethodsareeffective.Forexample,ifprojectproponentswishtohavetheoptionofalteringsearchmethodologytoanewlydevelopedmethod,suchassearchingonlyroadsandpads(Goodetal.2011:73),astatisticallyrobustfieldstudytoindextheresultsofthemethodologyagainststandardsearchmethodswillbeconductedconcurrentlytoensuresite‐specific,long‐termvalidityofthenewmethods.
Finally,detectionprobabilitytrialswillutilizebatcarcassestodevelopbat‐specificdetectionprobabilities.Careshouldbetakentoavoidintroducingnoveldiseasereservoirs;suchavoidancewillentailusingonsitefatalitiesorusingcarcassesobtainedfromwithinareasonablyanticipatedflightdistanceforthatspecies.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14c:Prepareandpublishannualmonitoringreportsonthefindingsofbatuseoftheprojectareaandfatalitymonitoringresults
Annualreportsofbatuseresultsandfatalitymonitoringwillbeproducedwithin3monthsoftheendofthelastdayoffatalitymonitoring.Special‐statusbatspeciesrecordswillbereportedtoCNDDB.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
InconcertwithMitigationMeasureBIO‐14b,allprojectproponentswilldevelopadaptivemanagementplanstoensureappropriate,feasible,andcurrentincorporationofemerginginformation.Thegoalsoftheadaptivemanagementplansaretoensurethatthebestavailablescienceandemergingtechnologiesareusedtoassessimpactsonbats,andthatimpactsareminimizedtothegreatestextentpossiblewhilemaximizingenergyproduction.
Theproject‐specificadaptivemanagementplanswillbeusedtoadjustoperationandmitigationtoincorporatetheresultsofprojectareamonitoringandnewtechnologyandresearchresultswhensufficientevidenceexiststosupportthesenewapproaches.TheseplanswillbereviewedbytheTACandapprovedbytheCounty.Alladaptivemanagementmeasureswillbeimplementedwithinareasonabletimeframe,sufficienttoallowthemeasurestotakeeffectinthefirstfallmigrationseasonfollowingtheyearofmonitoringinwhichtheadaptivemanagementthresholdwascrossed.ADMMsmaybemodifiedbytheCountyinconsultationwiththeTACtotakeintoaccountcurrentresearch,site‐specificdata,andthemosteffectiveimpactreductionstrategies.ADMMswillincludeascientificallydefensible,controlledresearchcomponentandminimumpost‐implementationmonitoringtimetoevaluatetheeffectivenessandvalidityofthemeasures.Theminimummonitoringtimewillconsistofthreesequentialfallseasonsofthebat‐specificmortalitymonitoringprogramcoveringthe3–4monthsoftheyearinwhichthehighestbatmortalityhasbeenobserved:likelyAugust–November.Thestartandenddatesofthe3–4monthsofbat‐specificmortalitymonitoringperiodwillbebasedonexistingfatalitydataandinconsultationwiththeTAC.
![Page 149: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/149.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐136
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Determiningafatalitythresholdtotriggeradaptivemanagementisnotstraightforward,asinsufficientinformationexistsonthestatusandvitalityofthepopulationsofmigratorybatspeciessubjecttomortalityintheAPWRA.ThelowestimateofanticipatedbatfatalityratesisfromtheVascoWindsprojectintheAPWRA.Applyingthisrateprogrammaticallywouldresultinanestimateof21,000batskilledoverthe30‐yearlifeoftheprogram.ThehighestimateisfromtheMontezumaHillsWindResourceArea.Applyingthisrateprogrammaticallywouldresultinanestimateof49,050batskilledoverthe30‐yearlifeoftheprogram.Batsareslowtoreproduce,andturbinesmaybemorelikelytokilladultbatsthanjuveniles,suggestingthataconservativeapproachiswarranted.Accordingly,aninitialadaptivemanagementthresholdwillbeestablishedusingthelowfatalityestimates,or1.679fatalities/MW/year,toensurethatthemostconservativetriggerforimplementationofadaptivemanagementmeasuresisadopted.
Ifpostconstructionfatalitymonitoringresultsinapointestimateforthebatfatalityratethatexceedsthe1.679fatalities/MW/yearthresholdbyastatisticallysignificantamount,then,inconsultationwiththeTAC,ADMM‐7andADMM‐8(describedbelow)forbatswillbeimplemented.
Itisimportanttonotethatneitherthehighnorthelowestimatespeakstotheabilityofbatpopulationstowithstandtheassociatedlevelsoftake.TheinitialfatalityratethresholdtriggeringadaptivemanagementmaybemodifiedbytheTACifappropriateandifsuchadaptationissupportedbythebestavailablescience.
TheTACmaydirectimplementationofadaptivemanagementmeasuresforotherappropriatereasons,suchasanunexpectedlyandmarkedlyhighfatalityrateobservedforanybatspecies,orspecial‐statusspeciesbeingkilledinunexpectedlyhighnumbers.
ADMMsforbatsmaybeimplementedusingasteppedapproachuntilnecessaryfatalityreductionsarereached,andmonitoringmethodsmustberevisedasneededtoensureaccuratemeasurementoftheeffectivenessoftheADMMs.AdditionalADMMsforbatsshouldbedevelopedasnewtechnologiesorsciencesupportsdoingso.
ADMM‐7:SeasonalTurbineCut‐inSpeedIncrease.Cut‐inspeedincreasesofferthemostpromisingandimmediatelyavailableapproachtoreducingbatfatalitiesatfourth‐generationwindturbines.Reductionsinfatalities(53–87%)wereobservedwhenincreasingmodernturbinecut‐inspeedto5.0–6.5m/s(Arnettetal.2009:3;Goodetal.2012:iii).Whileimplementingthismeasureimmediatelyuponaproject’scommencementwouldlikelyreducebatfatalities,thatassumptionisnotyetsupportedbyconclusivedata.Moreover,withoutestablishingbaselinefatalityatrepoweredprojects,therewouldbenowaytodeterminetheeffectivenessoftheapproachorwhetherthecostsofincreasedcut‐inspeeds(andconsequentpowergenerationreductions)wereprovidingfatalityreductions.
Cut‐inspeedincreaseswillbeimplementedasoutlinedbelow,witheffectivenessassessedannually.
Theprojectproponentwillincreasecut‐inspeedto5.0m/sfromsunsettosunriseduringpeakmigrationseason(generallyAugust–October).Ifthisisineffective,theprojectproponentwillincreaseturbinecut‐inspeedbyannualincrementsof0.5m/suntiltargetfatalityreductionsareachieved.
![Page 150: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/150.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐137
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Theprojectproponentmayrefinesite‐specificmigrationstartdatesonthebasisofpre‐andpostconstructionacousticsurveysandongoingreviewofdatesoffatalityoccurrencesformigratorybatsintheAPWRA.
Theprojectproponentmayrequestashorterseasonofrequiredcut‐inspeedincreaseswithsubstantialevidencethatsimilarlevelsofmortalityreductioncouldbeachieved.ShouldresourceagenciesandtheTACfindthereissufficientsupportforashorterperiod(aslowas8weeks),evidenceinsupportofthisshorterperiodwillbedocumentedforthepublicrecordandtheshorterperiodmaybeimplemented.
Theprojectproponentmayrequestshorternightlyperiodsofcut‐inspeedincreaseswithsubstantialevidencefromdefensibleonsite,long‐termpostconstructionacousticsurveysindicatingpredictablenightlytimeframeswhentargetspeciesappearnottobeactive.Targetspeciesareheredefinedasmigratorybatsoranyotherspeciesappearingrepeatedlyinthefatalityrecords.
Theprojectproponentmayrequestexceptionstocut‐inspeedincreasesforparticularweathereventsorwindpatternsifsubstantialevidenceisavailablefromonsiteacousticorothermonitoringtosupportsuchexceptions(i.e.,allavailableliteratureandonsitesurveysindicatethatbatactivityceasesduringspecificweathereventsorotherpredictableconditions).
Intheabsenceofdefensiblesite‐specificdata,mandatorycut‐inspeedincreaseswillcommenceonAugust1andcontinuethroughOctober31,andwillbeineffectfromsunsettosunrise.
ADMM‐8:EmergingTechnologyasMitigation.Theprojectproponentmayrequest,withconsultationandapprovalfromagencies,replacementoraugmentationofcut‐inspeedincreaseswithdevelopingtechnologyoranothermitigationapproachthathasbeenproventoachievesimilarbatfatalityreductions.
Theprojectproponentmayalsorequestthesecondtierofadaptivemanagementtobetheadoptionofapromisingbutnotfullyproventechnologyormitigationmethod.TheserequestsaresubjecttoreviewandapprovalbytheTACandmustincludeacontrolledresearchcomponentdesignedbyaqualifiedprincipalinvestigatorsothattheeffectivenessofthemethodmaybeaccuratelyassessed.
Someexamplesofsuchemergingtechnologiesandresearchareasthatcouldbeincorporatedinadaptivemanagementplansarelistedbelow.
Theuseofacousticdeterrents(Arnettetal.2013:1).
Theuseofaltitude‐specificradar,nightvisionand/orothertechnologyallowingbatusemonitoringandassessmentofat‐riskbatbehavior(Johnstonetal.2013:90‐91)ifresearchintheseareasadvancessufficientlytoalloweffectiveapplicationofthesetechnologies.
Applicationofemergingpeer‐reviewedstudiesonbatbiology(suchasstudiesdocumentingmigratorycorridorsorbatbehaviorinrelationtoturbines)thatsupportspecificmitigationmethods.
![Page 151: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/151.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐138
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14e:Compensateforexpensesincurredbyrehabilitatinginjuredbats
Thecostofreasonable,licensedrehabilitationeffortsforanyinjuredbatstakentowildlifecarefacilitiesfromtheprogramareawillbeassumedinfullbyprojectproponents.
ImpactBIO‐14a‐2:Turbine‐relatedfatalitiesofspecial‐statusandotherbats—programAlternative2:450MW(significantandunavoidable)
Residentandmigratorybatsflyinginandthroughtheprogramareamaybekilledbycollisionwithwindturbinebladesorotherinteractionwiththewindturbinegenerators.
Insufficientdataarecurrentlyavailabletodevelopaccuratefatalityestimatesforindividualbatspecies.FivebatspecieshavebeendocumentedinfatalitymonitoringprogramsintheAPWRA(InsigniaEnvironmental2012:48;Brownetal.2013:23;ICFInternational2012:3‐3),ofwhichtwo(westernredbatandhoarybat)arespecial‐statusspecies.Extrapolatingfromexistingfatalitydataandfromtrendsobservedatotherwindenergyfacilitieswherefourth‐generationturbinesareinoperation,itappearslikelythatfatalitieswouldoccurpredominantlyinthelatesummertomid‐fallmigrationperiod;thatfatalitieswouldconsistmostlyofmigratorybats,particularlyMexicanfree‐tailedbatandhoarybat;thatfatalitieswouldoccursporadicallyatothertimesofyear;andthatfatalitiesofoneormoreotherspecieswouldoccurinsmallernumbers.
DiabloWinds,BuenaVista,andVascoWindsaretheonlyrepoweredprojectsintheAPWRAforwhichestimatesofbatfatalityratesareavailable.Whiletheseratesvarywidely(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1067;InsigniaEnvironmental2012:65;Brownetal.2013:39),basedontheseestimates,batcollisionriskincreasessubstantiallywhenold‐generationturbinesarereplacedbynewer,largerturbines(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1068).TurbinesusedinfuturerepoweringprojectsarelikelytobesimilarinsizetotheVascoWindsturbinesbutmuchlargerthantheDiabloWindsandBuenaVistaturbinesinbothoverallsizeandratednameplatecapacity.ThereisevidencetosuggestthatlargerturbinessimilartothoseusedintheVascoWindsprojectwillresultinadditionalincreasesinbatfatalityratesforthosebatspeciescurrentlykilledintheAPWRA.
Somehypothesesfortheincreasedcollisionrisktomigratorybatspeciesatfourth‐generationturbinesaresummarizedbelow.
Batstendnottoflyathighwindspeeds.Thelowerwindspeedsatwhichfourth‐generationturbinesareabletoproducepowercreatemoreoverlapinthetimethatturbinesareoperatingandbatsareintheair.Inseveralstudies,themajorityoffatalitiesoccurredonnightsoflowerwindspeed(lessthan5.5meters/second[m/s])(Arnettetal.2008:73;Goodetal.2012:iv).Thiscorrelationsuggestsapossiblesourcefortheincreasedriskthatfourth‐generationturbinesposetobats.
Migratorytree‐roostingbatsmaybeattractedtothetubulartowerstructureofnewerturbines;thisattractionmayberelatedtomatingbehaviorduringmigration(Arnettetal.2008:73;Cryan2008:1).
Echolocationpulsesmaynotbeusedduringopen‐airmigratoryflight,ornotusedasoften,resultinginbatsbeingunawareofthehazardpresentedbytheturbineblades(Kunzetal.2007:319).
![Page 152: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/152.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐139
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Foraging,wateracquisition,roostselection,ormatingbehaviorduringmigrationseasonmaybringbatsthroughtherotor‐sweptareaoftallerturbinesmoreoften(CryanandBarclay2009:1333).
Tallerturbineshavebeendocumentedtokillmorebats.Theincreasedheightoffourth‐generationturbinesputstherotor‐sweptareaintobatflightpaths(Barclayetal2007:384).
Table3.4‐15providesacomparisonoftheestimatednumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurifold‐generationturbinesareallowedtocontinueoperatingattheircurrentlevelandtheestimatednumberoffatalitiesexpectedtooccurafterrepoweringoftheprogramareaandthetwoprojectareas.Duetothehighdegreeofuncertaintyinbatfatalityestimates,arangeofestimatesbasedonavailabledataispresented.Thelowestestimateisderivedfromthebestestimaterateof1.679fatalities/MW/yearreportedforthefirstyearofmonitoringattheVascoWindsrepoweringproject(Brownetal.2013:39).Theupperendofthisrangeiscalculatedusingthebatfatalityrateof3.92fatalities/MW/yearreportedfortheShilohIprojectintheMontezumaHillsWindResourceArea.Thebaselineestimateisderivedfromthebatfatalityrateof0.263fatalities/MW/yearreportedfortheAPWRAfor2005–2007(SmallwoodandKaras2009:1066).AsshowninTable3.4‐15,annualestimatedbatfatalitiesintheprogramareafromimplementationofAlternative2areanticipatedtoincreasefromthecurrentestimateof87to756–1,764fatalities.
Despitethehighlevelofuncertaintyinestimatesofbatfatalityrates,allavailabledatasuggestthatrepoweringwouldresultinasubstantialincreaseinbatfatalities.Thedegreeofincreasemaybeinfluencedbythefollowingfactors.
Turbineplacementinareasofhighautumnbatactivityoralongmigrationroutes.
Turbineplacementalongcommutingflywaystokeyresources(e.g.,roosts,water,foraginghabitat).
Behavioroftheturbinemodelbeforeitcutsin(i.e.,whetherbladesareallowedtospinatlowerwindspeeds)(Goodetal.2012:v).
MitigationMeasuresBIO‐14athroughBIO‐14ewouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14b:Implementpostconstructionbatfatalitymonitoringprogramforallrepoweringprojects
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14c:Prepareandpublishannualmonitoringreportsonthefindingsofbatuseoftheprojectareaandfatalitymonitoringresults
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14e:Compensateforexpensesincurredbyrehabilitatinginjuredbats
ImpactBIO‐14b:Turbine‐relatedfatalitiesofspecial‐statusandotherbats—GoldenHillsProject(significantandunavoidable)
![Page 153: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/153.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐140
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ResidentandmigratorybatsflyinginandthroughtheGoldenHillsprojectareamaybekilledbycollisionwithwindturbinebladesorotherinteractionwiththewindturbinegenerators.Repoweringintheprojectareawouldintroduceincreasedfatalityrisk,particularlytomigratorybats.
Extrapolatingfromexistingfatalitydataandfromtrendsobservedatotherwindenergyfacilitieswherefourth‐generationturbinesareinoperation,itappearslikelythatfatalitieswouldoccurpredominantlyinthelatesummertomid‐fallmigrationperiod;thatfatalitieswouldconsistmostlyofmigratorybats,particularlyMexicanfree‐tailedbatandhoarybat;thatfatalitieswouldoccursporadicallyatothertimesofyear;andthatfatalitiesofoneormoreotherspecieswilloccurinsmallernumbers.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,annualestimatedbatfatalitiesintheGoldenHillsprojectareaareanticipatedtoincreasefromthecurrentestimateof23to148–347fatalities.MitigationMeasuresBIO‐14athroughBIO‐14ewouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14b:Implementpostconstructionbatfatalitymonitoringprogramforallrepoweringprojects
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14c:Prepareandpublishannualmonitoringreportsonthefindingsofbatuseoftheprojectareaandfatalitymonitoringresults
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14e:Compensateforexpensesincurredbyrehabilitatinginjuredbats
ImpactBIO‐14c:Turbine‐relatedfatalitiesofspecial‐statusandotherbats—PattersonPassProject(significantandunavoidable)
ResidentandmigratorybatsflyinginandthroughthePattersonPassprojectareamaybekilledbycollisionwithwindturbinebladesorotherinteractionwiththewindturbinegenerators.Repoweringintheprojectareawouldintroduceincreasedfatalityrisk,particularlytomigratorybats.
Extrapolatingfromexistingfatalitydataandfromtrendsobservedatotherwindenergyfacilitieswherefourth‐generationturbinesareinoperation,itappearslikelythatfatalitieswouldoccurpredominantlyinthelatesummertomid‐fallmigrationperiod;thatfatalitieswouldconsistmostlyofmigratorybats,particularlyMexicanfree‐tailedbatandhoarybat;thatfatalitieswouldoccursporadicallyatothertimesofyear;andthatfatalitiesofoneormoreotherspecieswilloccurinsmallernumbers.AsshowninTable3.4‐14,annualestimatedbatfatalitiesinthePattersonPassprojectareaareanticipatedtoincreasefromthecurrentestimateof5to33–78fatalities.MitigationMeasuresBIO‐14athroughBIO‐14ewouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel;accordingly,thisimpactisconsideredsignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
![Page 154: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/154.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐141
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14b:Implementpostconstructionbatfatalitymonitoringprogramforallrepoweringprojects
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14c:Prepareandpublishannualmonitoringreportsonthefindingsofbatuseoftheprojectareaandfatalitymonitoringresults
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14e:Compensateforexpensesincurredbyrehabilitatinginjuredbats
ImpactBIO‐15a‐1:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonalkalimeadow—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingofexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroadstoaccommodatedecommissionandrepoweringactivities.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldconsistoffillofalkalimeadowatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldinvolvealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduringroadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintainexistinghydrology.However,lossofalkalimeadowhabitatasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐15wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐15:Compensateforthelossofalkalimeadowhabitat
Ifalkalimeadowhabitatisfilledordisturbedaspartofarepoweringproject,theprojectproponentwillcompensateforthelossofthishabitattoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.Compensationratioswillbebasedonsite‐specificinformationanddeterminedthroughcoordinationwithstateandfederalagencies(CDFW,USFWS,USACE).Unlessspecifiedotherwisebyaresourceagency,thecompensationwillbeataminimum1:1ratio(1acrerestoredorcreatedforevery1acrefilled)andmaybeacombinationofonsiterestoration/creation,offsiterestoration,andmitigationcredits.Arestorationandmonitoringplanwillbedevelopedandimplemented.Theplanwilldescribehowalkalimeadowhabitatwillbecreatedandmonitored.
ImpactBIO‐15a‐2:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonalkalimeadow—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingofexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroadstoaccommodatedecommissionandrepoweringactivities.DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldconsistoffillofalkalimeadowatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldinvolvealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduring
![Page 155: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/155.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐142
October 2014ICF 00323.08
roadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintainexistinghydrology.However,lossofalkalimeadowhabitatasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐15wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐15:Compensateforthelossofalkalimeadowhabitat
ImpactBIO‐15b:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonalkalimeadow—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Alkalimeadowcomprisesapproximately3%(145.69acres)oftheGoldenHillsprojectarea.Roadinfrastructureupgradesthatcouldaffectthishabitatwouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingofexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroadstoaccommodatedecommissionandrepoweringactivities.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldconsistoffillofalkalimeadowatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldinvolvealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduringroadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintainexistinghydrology.However,lossofalkalimeadowhabitatasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.BecausespecificdesignshavenotbeendevelopedfortheGoldenHillsproject,itisnotpossibletoquantifythiseffect.However,ifalkalimeadowisaffectedbyroadinfrastructureupgrades,itwouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐15wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐15:Compensateforthelossofalkalimeadowhabitat
ImpactBIO‐15c:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonalkalimeadow—PattersonPass(noimpact)
BecausenoalkalimeadowoccursinthePattersonPassprojectarea,therewouldbenoimpact.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐16a‐1:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonriparianhabitat—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingofexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroadstoaccommodatedecommissionandrepoweringactivities.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Lossofriparianhabitatasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐16wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
Ifriparianhabitatisfilledorremovedaspartofaproject,theprojectproponentwillcompensateforthelossofriparianhabitattoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.Compensationratioswillbebasedonsite‐specificinformationanddeterminedthrough
![Page 156: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/156.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐143
October 2014ICF 00323.08
coordinationwithstateandfederalagencies(CDFW,USFWS,USACE).Thecompensationwillbeataminimum1:1ratio(1acrerestoredorcreatedforevery1acrefilled)andmaybeacombinationofonsiterestoration/creation,offsiterestoration,andmitigationcredits.Arestorationandmonitoringplanwillbedevelopedandimplemented.Theplanwilldescribehowriparianhabitatwillbecreatedandmonitored.
ImpactBIO‐16a‐2:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonriparianhabitat—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingofexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroadstoaccommodatedecommissionandrepoweringactivities.DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Lossofriparianhabitatasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐16wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
ImpactBIO‐16b:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonriparianhabitat—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingofexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroadstoaccommodatedecommissionandrepoweringactivities.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Lossofriparianhabitatasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.BecausespecificdesignshavenotbeendevelopedfortheGoldenHillsproject,itisnotpossibletoquantifythiseffect.However,ifriparianhabitatisaffectedbyroadinfrastructureupgrades,itwouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐16wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
ImpactBIO‐16c:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonriparianhabitat—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Undercurrentdesign,noriparianhabitatwouldbeaffectedbyroadinfrastructureupgrades.However,iffinaldesignwouldresultinriparianhabitatbeingaffectedbyroadinfrastructureupgrades,itwouldbeasignificantimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐16wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
ImpactBIO‐17a‐1:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultindirectadverseeffectsoncommonhabitats—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificant)
Ground‐disturbingactivitieswouldresultinthepermanentlossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingnewpermanentfacilitiesandthetemporarylossofcommonhabitatsasaresultof
![Page 157: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/157.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐144
October 2014ICF 00323.08
constructingtemporaryfacilitiesandlandscapereclamation.Theseactivitieswouldcreateminorchangesintotalacreageofcommonhabitatsintheprojectarea,primarilyintheannualgrasslandplantcommunity.
Alllandsdisturbedbyinfrastructureinstallationorremovalwouldbereturnedtopreprojectconditions.Ateachreclamationsite,thetopographywouldbecontourgraded(ifnecessaryandifenvironmentallybeneficial),stabilized,andreseededwithanappropriateseedmixturetomaintainslopestability.ReclamationactivitieswouldbeguidedbyareclamationplandevelopedincoordinationwiththeCountyandotherapplicableagencies.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐17a‐2:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultindirectadverseeffectsoncommonhabitats—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificant)
Ground‐disturbingactivitieswouldresultinthepermanentlossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingnewpermanentfacilitiesandthetemporarylossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingtemporaryfacilitiesandlandscapereclamation.Theseactivitieswouldcreateminorchangesintotalacreageofcommonhabitatsintheprojectarea,primarilyintheannualgrasslandplantcommunity.
DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Alllandsdisturbedbyinfrastructureinstallationorremovalwouldbereturnedtopreprojectconditions.Ateachreclamationsite,thetopographywouldbecontourgraded(ifnecessaryandifenvironmentallybeneficial),stabilized,andreseededwithanappropriateseedmixturetomaintainslopestability.ReclamationactivitieswouldbeguidedbyareclamationplandevelopedincoordinationwiththeCountyandotherapplicableagencies.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐17b:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultindirectadverseeffectsoncommonhabitats—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificant)
Ground‐disturbingactivitieswouldresultinthepermanentlossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingnewpermanentfacilitiesandthetemporarylossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingtemporaryfacilitiesandlandscapereclamation.Theseactivitieswouldcreateminorchangesintotalacreageofcommonhabitatsintheprojectarea,primarilyintheannualgrasslandplantcommunity.
Alllandsdisturbedbyinfrastructureinstallationorremovalwouldbereturnedtopreprojectconditions.Ateachreclamationsite,thetopographywouldbecontourgraded(ifnecessaryandifenvironmentallybeneficial),stabilized,andreseededwithanappropriateseedmixturetomaintainslopestability.ReclamationactivitieswouldbeguidedbyareclamationplandevelopedincoordinationwiththeCountyandotherapplicableagencies.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐17c:Potentialforground‐disturbingactivitiestoresultindirectadverseeffectsoncommonhabitats—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificant)
![Page 158: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/158.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐145
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Ground‐disturbingactivitieswouldresultinthepermanentlossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingnewpermanentfacilitiesandthetemporarylossofcommonhabitatsasaresultofconstructingtemporaryfacilitiesandlandscapereclamation.Theseactivitieswouldcreateminorchangesintotalacreageofcommonhabitatsintheprojectarea,primarilyintheannualgrasslandplantcommunity.
Alllandsdisturbedbyinfrastructureinstallationorremovalwouldbereturnedtopreprojectconditions.Ateachreclamationsite,thetopographywouldbecontourgraded(ifnecessaryandifenvironmentallybeneficial),stabilized,andreseededwithanappropriateseedmixturetomaintainslopestability.ReclamationactivitieswouldbeguidedbyareclamationplandevelopedincoordinationwiththeCountyandotherapplicableagencies.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactBIO‐18a‐1:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonwetlands—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingoftheexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroads.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldincludefillofwetlandsatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldincludealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduringroadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughtheimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintainexistinghydrology.However,lossofwetlandsasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
Ifwetlandsarefilledordisturbedaspartofaproject,theprojectproponentwillcompensateforthelosstoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.Compensationratioswillbebasedonsite‐specificinformationanddeterminedthroughcoordinationwithstateandfederalagencies(CDFW,USFWS,USACE).Thecompensationwillbeataminimum1:1ratio(1acrerestoredorcreatedforevery1acrefilled)andmaybeacombinationofonsiterestoration/creation,offsiterestoration,andmitigationcredits.Arestorationandmonitoringplanwillbedevelopedandimplemented.Theplanwilldescribehowwetlandswillbecreatedandmonitored.
ImpactBIO‐18a‐2:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonwetlands—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingoftheexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroads.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldincludefillofwetlandsatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldincludealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduringroadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughtheimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintain
![Page 159: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/159.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐146
October 2014ICF 00323.08
existinghydrology.DirecteffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.However,lossofwetlandsasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
ImpactBIO‐18b:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonwetlands—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingoftheexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroads.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldincludefillofwetlandsatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldincludealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduringroadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughtheimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintainexistinghydrology.However,lossofwetlandsasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
ImpactBIO‐18c:Potentialforroadinfrastructureupgradestoresultinadverseeffectsonwetlands—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Roadinfrastructureupgradeswouldincludegrading,widening,andregravellingoftheexistingroadsandconstructionofnewroads.Culvertswouldbeupgradedforexistingroads,andnewculvertswouldbeinstalledfornewroads.Directeffectswouldincludefillofwetlandsatlocationswhereroadscrossingthehabitatwouldbewidened.Indirecteffectscouldincludealteredhydrologyorrunoffofsedimentandothersubstancesduringroadconstructionactivities.Someeffects,suchasthoseduetorunoff,wouldbeavoidedandminimizedthroughtheimplementationoferosioncontrolBMPsandpostconstructionreclamation.Installationofnewandupgradedculvertswouldmaintainexistinghydrology.However,lossofwetlandsasaresultofdirectfillwouldbeasubstantialadverseeffectonasensitivenaturalcommunity.Thiswouldbeasignificantimpact;however,implementationofMitigationMeasureBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoalevelless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
ImpactBIO‐19a‐1:Potentialimpactonthemovementofanynativeresidentormigratorywildlifespeciesorestablishednativeresidentormigratorywildlifecorridors,andtheuseofnativewildlifenurserysites—programAlternative1:417MW(significantandunavoidable)
Manycommonwildlifespecies(e.g.,groundsquirrels,voles,deer,coyote,raccoon,skunk)andspecial‐statuswildlifespecies(e.g.,Californiared‐leggedfrog,Alamedawhipsnake,American
![Page 160: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/160.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐147
October 2014ICF 00323.08
badger)arelikelytooccurinandmovethroughtheprogramarea.Constructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeprogramandfencingofworkareasmaytemporarilyimpedewildlifemovementthroughtheworkareaorcauseanimalstotravellongerdistancestoavoidtheworkarea.Thiscouldresultinhigherenergyexpenditureandincreasedsusceptibilitytopredationforsomespeciesandisapotentiallysignificantimpact.Becausetheconstructionperiodforindividualprojectsintherepoweringprogramwouldbe9monthsforatypical80MWproject,itwouldlikelyencompassthemovement/migrationperiodforsomespecies(e.g.,Californiatigersalamandermovementto/frombreedingponds).Inparticular,smalleranimals,whoseenergyexpenditurestotravelaroundoravoidtheareawouldbegreaterthanforlargeranimals,couldbemoreseverelyaffected.Uponcompletionoftheprogram,thenewwindturbineswouldbespacedapartandwouldnotbeabarriertoon‐the‐groundwildlifemovement.Additionally,therewouldbefewerturbinesontheground,andanetincreaseintheamountofnaturalareawouldresultfromtherestorationofdecommissionedturbinepadsandfoundations.Thisremovalofturbinesandincreaseofnaturalareawouldpartiallycompensateforthisimpact.Asdiscussedaboveforspecial‐statusspecies,theprogramhasthepotentialtoaffectnativewildlifenurserysites(i.e.,breedingareas).Becausecommonspeciesmayalsousethesebreedingareas,theymayalsobeaffectedbytheprogram.Thiswouldconstituteasignificanteffect.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐5a,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,andBIO‐10awouldavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwildlifenurseryareasforspecial‐statusandcommonwildlifespecies.
Asdiscussedabove,theoperationofwindturbinesafterrepoweringwouldadverselyaffectraptors,otherbirds,andbatsmigratingthroughandwinteringintheprogramareabecausetheycouldbeinjuredorkillediftheyflythroughtherotorplaneofoperatingwindturbines.Asdiscussedabove,thiswouldbeasignificantandunavoidableimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11b,BIO‐11c,BIO‐11d,BIO‐11e,BIO‐11i,BIO‐12a,BIO‐12b,BIO‐14a,andBIO‐14dwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel.Accordingly,thisimpactwouldbesignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
![Page 161: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/161.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐148
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
ImpactBIO‐19a‐2:Potentialimpactonthemovementofanynativeresidentormigratorywildlifespeciesorestablishednativeresidentormigratorywildlifecorridors,andtheuseofnativewildlifenurserysites—programAlternative2:450MW(significantandunavoidable)
EffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Manycommonwildlifespecies(e.g.,groundsquirrels,voles,deer,coyote,raccoon,skunk)andspecial‐statuswildlifespecies(e.g.,Californiared‐leggedfrog,Alamedawhipsnake,Americanbadger)arelikelytooccurinandmovethroughtheprogramarea.Constructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeprogramandfencingofworkareasmaytemporarilyimpedewildlifemovementthroughtheworkareaorcauseanimalstotravellongerdistancestoavoidtheworkarea.Thiscouldresultinhigherenergyexpenditureandincreasedsusceptibilitytopredationforsomespeciesandisapotentiallysignificantimpact.Becausetheconstructionperiodforindividualprojectsintherepoweringprogramwouldbe9monthsforatypical80MWproject,itwouldlikelyencompassthemovement/migrationperiodforsomespecies(e.g.,Californiatigersalamandermovementto/frombreedingponds).Inparticular,smalleranimals,whoseenergyexpenditurestotravelaroundoravoidtheareawouldbegreaterthanforlargeranimals,couldbemoreseverelyaffected.Uponcompletionoftheprogram,thenewwindturbineswouldbespacedapartandwouldnotbeabarriertoon‐the‐groundwildlifemovement.Additionally,therewouldbefewerturbinesonthe
![Page 162: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/162.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐149
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ground,andanetincreaseintheamountofnaturalareawouldresultfromtherestorationofdecommissionedturbinepadsandfoundations.Thisremovalofturbinesandincreaseofnaturalareawouldpartiallycompensateforthisimpact.Asdiscussedaboveforspecial‐statusspecies,theprogramhasthepotentialtoaffectnativewildlifenurserysites(i.e.,breedingareas).Becausecommonspeciesmayalsousethesebreedingareas,theymayalsobeaffectedbytheprogram.Thiswouldconstituteasignificanteffect.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐5a,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,andBIO‐10awouldavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwildlifenurseryareasforspecial‐statusandcommonwildlifespecies.
Asdiscussedabove,theoperationofwindturbinesafterrepoweringwouldadverselyaffectraptors,otherbirds,andbatsmigratingthroughandwinteringintheprogramareabecausetheycouldbeinjuredorkillediftheyflythroughtherotorplaneofoperatingwindturbines.Asdiscussedabove,thiswouldbeasignificantandunavoidableimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11b,BIO‐11c,BIO‐11d,BIO‐11e,BIO‐11j,BIO‐12a,BIO‐12b,BIO‐14a,andBIO‐14dwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel.Accordingly,thisimpactwouldbesignificantandunavoidable.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
![Page 163: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/163.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐150
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
ImpactBIO‐19b:Potentialimpactonthemovementofanynativeresidentormigratoryfishorwildlifespeciesorwithestablishednativeresidentormigratorywildlifecorridors,orimpedetheuseofnativewildlifenurserysites—GoldenHillsProject(significantandunavoidable)
Manycommonwildlifespecies(e.g.,groundsquirrels,voles,deer,coyote,raccoon,skunk)andspecial‐statuswildlifespecies(e.g.,Californiared‐leggedfrog,Alamedawhipsnake,Americanbadger)arelikelytooccurinandmovethroughtheGoldenHillsprojectarea.ConstructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeGoldenHillsProjectandfencingofworkareasmaytemporarilyimpedewildlifemovementthroughtheworkareaorcauseanimalstotravellongerdistancestoavoidtheworkarea.Thiscouldresultinhigherenergyexpenditureandincreasedsusceptibilitytopredationforsomespeciesandisapotentiallysignificantimpact.Becausetheconstructionperiodisanticipatedtolast9months,itwouldlikelyencompassthemovement/migrationperiodforsomespecies(e.g.,Californiatigersalamandermovementto/frombreedingponds).Inparticular,smalleranimals,whoseenergyexpenditurestotravelaroundoravoidtheareawouldbegreaterthanforlargeranimals,couldbemoreseverelyaffected.Uponcompletionofprojectconstruction,thenewwindturbineswouldbespacedapartandwouldnotbeabarriertoon‐the‐groundwildlifemovement.Additionally,therewouldbefewerturbinesontheground,andanetincreaseintheamountofnaturalareawouldresultfromtherestorationofdecommissionedturbinepadsandfoundations.Thisremovalofturbinesandincreaseofnaturalareawouldpartiallycompensateforthisimpact.Asdiscussedaboveforspecial‐statusspecies,theGoldenHillsProjecthasthepotentialtoaffectnativewildlifenurserysites(i.e.,breedingareas).Becausecommonspeciesmayalsousethesebreedingareas,theymayalsobeaffectedbytheproject.Thiswouldconstituteasignificanteffect.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐5a,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,andBIO‐10awouldavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwildlifenurseryareasforspecial‐statusandcommonwildlifespecies.
Asdiscussedabove,theoperationofwindturbinesafterrepoweringwouldadverselyaffectraptors,otherbirds,andbatsmigratingthroughandwinteringintheprojectareabecausetheycouldbeinjuredorkillediftheyflythroughtherotorplaneofoperatingwindturbines.Thiswouldbeasignificantandunavoidableimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11b,BIO‐11c,BIO‐11d,BIO‐11e,BIO‐11i,BIO‐12a,BIO‐12b,BIO‐14a,andBIO‐14dwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
![Page 164: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/164.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐151
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
![Page 165: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/165.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐152
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
ImpactBIO‐19c:Potentialimpactonthemovementofanynativeresidentormigratoryfishorwildlifespeciesorwithestablishednativeresidentormigratorywildlifecorridors,orimpedetheuseofnativewildlifenurserysites—PattersonPassProject(significantandunavoidable)
Manycommonwildlifespecies(e.g.,groundsquirrels,voles,deer,coyote,raccoon,skunk)andspecial‐statuswildlifespecies(e.g.,Californiared‐leggedfrog,Alamedawhipsnake,Americanbadger)arelikelytooccurinandmovethroughthePattersonPassprojectarea.ConstructionactivitiesassociatedwiththePattersonPassProjectandfencingofworkareasmaytemporarilyimpedewildlifemovementthroughtheworkareaorcauseanimalstotravellongerdistancestoavoidtheworkarea.Thiscouldresultinhigherenergyexpenditureandincreasedsusceptibilitytopredationforsomespeciesandisapotentiallysignificantimpact.Becausetheconstructionperiodisanticipatedtolast6–9months,itwouldlikelyencompassthemovement/migrationperiodforsomespecies(e.g.,Californiatigersalamandermovementto/frombreedingponds).Inparticular,smalleranimals,whoseenergyexpenditurestotravelaroundoravoidtheareawouldbegreaterthanforlargeranimals,couldbemoreseverelyaffected.Uponcompletionofprojectconstruction,thenewwindturbineswouldbespacedapartandwouldnotbeabarriertoon‐the‐groundwildlifemovement.Additionally,therewouldbefewerturbinesontheground,andanetincreaseintheamountofnaturalareawouldresultfromtherestorationofdecommissionedturbinepadsandfoundations.Thisremovalofturbinesandincreaseofnaturalareawouldpartiallycompensateforthisimpact.Asdiscussedaboveforspecial‐statusspecies,thePattersonPassProjecthasthepotentialtoaffectnativewildlifenurserysites(i.e.,breedingareas).Becausecommonspeciesmayalsousethesebreedingareas,theymayalsobeaffectedbytheproject.Thiswouldconstituteasignificanteffect.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1b,BIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐5a,BIO‐5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,andBIO‐10awouldavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwildlifenurseryareasforspecial‐statusandcommonwildlifespecies.
Asdiscussedabove,theoperationofwindturbinesafterrepoweringwouldadverselyaffectraptors,otherbirds,andbatsmigratingthroughandwinteringintheprojectareabecausetheycouldbeinjuredorkillediftheyflythroughtherotorplaneofoperatingwindturbines.Thiswouldbeasignificantandunavoidableimpact.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐11b,BIO‐11c,BIO‐11d,BIO‐11e,BIO‐11i,BIO‐12a,BIO‐12b,BIO‐14a,andBIO‐14dwouldreducethisimpact,butnottoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Conductpreconstructionsurveysforhabitatforspecial‐statuswildlifespecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
![Page 166: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/166.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐153
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon–special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11b:Siteturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11c:Useturbinedesignsthatreduceavianimpacts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11d:Incorporateavian‐safepracticesintodesignofturbine‐relatedinfrastructure
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11e:Retrofitexistinginfrastructuretominimizerisktoraptors
MitigationMeasureBIO‐11i:Implementanavianadaptivemanagementprogram
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12a:Conductbatroostsurveys
MitigationMeasureBIO‐12b:Avoidremovingordisturbingbatroosts
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14a:Siteandselectturbinestominimizepotentialmortalityofbats
MitigationMeasureBIO‐14d:Developandimplementabatadaptivemanagementplan
ImpactBIO‐20a‐1:Conflictwithlocalplansorpolicies—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
TheECAPencouragesthepreservationofareasknowntosupportspecial‐statusspecies,nonetlossofriparianandseasonalwetlands,andprotectionofexistingriparianwoodlandhabitat.Additionally,theECAPhasseveralpoliciesrelatedtowindfarms,includingestablishingamitigationprogramtominimizetheimpactsofwindturbineoperationsonbirdpopulations.Lossofspecial‐statusspeciesandtheirhabitat,lossofalkalimeadow,lossofriparianhabitat,andlossofexistingwetlandsasaresultofimplementingtheprogramwouldbeinconflictwiththesepolicies.Thisimpactissignificant;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐4b,BIO5athrough5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐7b,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,BIO‐9,BIO10a,BIO‐10b,andBIO‐15,BIO‐16,andBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevelbecausethesemeasuresrequiretheprojectapplicanttominimizeimpactsonhabitatforspecial‐statusspeciesand
![Page 167: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/167.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐154
October 2014ICF 00323.08
compensateforthepermanentlossofsuitablehabitat,aswellastoensurethatanyimpactsonriparianandwetlandsarecompensatedfortoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.ThemitigationmeasuresfortheimpactsofwindturbineoperationsonbirdpopulationsfromtherepoweringprogramareconsistentwiththeestablishmentofamitigationprogramrecommendedbytheECAP.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofforaginghabitatforwesternburrowingowl
![Page 168: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/168.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐155
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐15:Compensateforthelossofalkalimeadowhabitat
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
ImpactBIO‐20a‐2:Conflictwithlocalplansorpolicies—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
TheECAPencouragesthepreservationofareasknowntosupportspecial‐statusspecies,nonetlossofriparianandseasonalwetlands,andprotectionofexistingriparianwoodlandhabitat.Additionally,theECAPhasseveralpoliciesrelatedtowindfarms,includingestablishingamitigationprogramtominimizetheimpactsofwindturbineoperationsonbirdpopulations.Lossofspecial‐statusspeciesandtheirhabitat,lossofalkalimeadow,lossofriparianhabitat,andlossofexistingwetlandsasaresultofimplementingtheprogramwouldbeinconflictwiththesepolicies.TheeffectsunderAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseunderAlternative1,excepttheoverallareaofdisturbancewouldbelargerbecausetheincreasednumberofturbinesandassociatedinfrastructurewouldentailanestimated8%increaseintotaldisturbancearea.Thisimpactissignificant;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐4b,BIO5athrough5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐7b,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,BIO‐9,BIO10a,BIO‐10b,andBIO‐15,BIO‐16,andBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevelbecausethesemeasuresrequiretheprojectapplicanttominimizeimpactsonhabitatforspecial‐statusspeciesandcompensateforthepermanentlossofsuitablehabitat,aswellastoensurethatanyimpactsonriparianandwetlandsarecompensatedfortoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.ThemitigationmeasuresfortheimpactsofwindturbineoperationsonbirdpopulationsfromtherepoweringprogramareconsistentwiththeestablishmentofamitigationprogramrecommendedbytheECAP.
ImpactBIO‐20b:Conflictwithlocalplansorpolicies—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
TheECAPencouragesthepreservationofareasknowntosupportspecial‐statusspecies,nonetlossofriparianandseasonalwetlands,andprotectionofexistingriparianwoodlandhabitat.Additionally,theECAPhasseveralpoliciesrelatedtowindfarms,includingestablishingamitigationprogramtominimizetheimpactsofwindturbineoperationsonbirdpopulations.Lossofspecial‐statusspeciesandtheirhabitat(ImpactsBIO‐1bthroughBIO‐10b),lossofalkalimeadow(ImpactBIO‐15b)lossofriparianhabitat(ImpactBIO‐16b),andlossofexistingwetlands(ImpactBIO‐18b)asaresultofimplementingtheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbeinconflictwiththesepolicies.Thisimpactissignificant;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐4b,BIO5athrough5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐7b,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,BIO‐9,BIO10a,BIO‐10b,andBIO‐15,BIO‐16,andBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevelbecausethesemeasuresrequiretheprojectapplicanttominimizeimpactsonhabitatforspecial‐statusspeciesandcompensateforthepermanentlossofsuitablehabitat,aswellasensurethatanyimpactson
![Page 169: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/169.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐156
October 2014ICF 00323.08
riparianandwetlandsarecompensatedfortoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.ThemitigationmeasuresfortheimpactsofwindturbineoperationsonbirdpopulationsfromtherepoweringprogramareconsistentwiththeestablishmentofamitigationprogramrecommendedbytheECAP.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofforaginghabitatforwesternburrowingowl
![Page 170: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/170.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐157
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐15:Compensateforthelossofalkalimeadowhabitat
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
ImpactBIO‐20c:Conflictwithlocalplansorpolicies—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
TheECAPencouragesthepreservationofareasknowntosupportspecial‐statusspecies,nonetlossofriparianandseasonalwetlands,andprotectionofexistingriparianwoodlandhabitat.Lossofspecial‐statusspeciesandtheirhabitat(ImpactsBIO‐1cthroughBIO‐6c),lossofalkalimeadow(ImpactBIO‐15c)lossofriparianhabitat(ImpactBIO‐16c),andlossofexistingwetlands(ImpactBIO‐18c)asaresultofimplementingthePattersonPassProjectwouldbeinconflictwiththesepolicies.Thisimpactissignificant;however,implementationofMitigationMeasuresBIO‐1athroughBIO‐1e,BIO‐3a,BIO‐4a,BIO‐4b,BIO5athrough5c,BIO‐7a,BIO‐7b,BIO‐8a,BIO‐8b,BIO‐9,BIO10a,BIO‐10b,andBIO‐15,BIO‐16,andBIO‐18wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevelbecausethesemeasuresrequiretheprojectapplicanttominimizeimpactsonhabitatforspecial‐statusspeciesandcompensateforthepermanentlossofsuitablehabitat,aswellasensurethatanyimpactsonriparianandwetlandsarecompensatedfortoensurenonetlossofhabitatfunctionsandvalues.
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1a:Conductsurveystodeterminethepresenceorabsenceofspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1b:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1c:Avoidandminimizeimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspeciesbyestablishingactivityexclusionzones
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1d:Compensateforimpactsonspecial‐statusplantspecies
MitigationMeasureBIO‐1e:Retainabiologicalmonitorduringground‐disturbingactivitiesinenvironmentallysensitiveareas
MitigationMeasureBIO‐3a:Implementmeasurestoavoid,minimize,andmitigateimpactsonvernalpoolbranchiopodsandcurved‐footedhygrotusdivingbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4a:Implementmeasurestoavoidorprotecthabitatforvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
![Page 171: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/171.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐158
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureBIO‐4b:Compensatefordirectandindirecteffectsonvalleyelderberrylonghornbeetle
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusamphibians
MitigationMeasureBIO‐5c:Restoredisturbedannualgrasslands
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7a:Implementbestmanagementpracticestoavoidandminimizeeffectsonspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐7b:Compensateforlossofhabitatforspecial‐statusreptiles
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8a:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonspecial‐statusandnon‐special‐statusnestingbirds
MitigationMeasureBIO‐8b:Implementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐9:Compensateforthepermanentlossofforaginghabitatforwesternburrowingowl
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10a:ImplementmeasurestoavoidandminimizepotentialimpactsonSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐10b:CompensateforlossofsuitablehabitatforSanJoaquinkitfoxandAmericanbadger
MitigationMeasureBIO‐16:Compensateforthelossofriparianhabitat
MitigationMeasureBIO‐18:Compensateforthelossofwetlands
ImpactBIO‐21a‐1:ConflictwithprovisionsofanadoptedHCP/NCCPorotherapprovedlocal,regional,orstatehabitatconservationplan—programAlternative1:417MW(noimpact)
TherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsapplicabletotheprogramarea.TheEACCS,whilenotaformalHCP,providesguidancefortheprojectplanningandpermittingprocesstoensurethatimpactsareoffsetinabiologicallyeffectivemanner.Asnotedabove,themitigationmeasuressetforthinthisPEIRarebasedonmeasuresfromtheEACCS,withsomemodificationsandadditions.BecausetherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsfortheprogramareaandtheprogramwouldnotconflictwiththeEACCS,therewouldbenoimpact.
ImpactBIO‐21a‐2:ConflictwithprovisionsofanadoptedHCP/NCCPorotherapprovedlocal,regional,orstatehabitatconservationplan—programAlternative2:450MW(noimpact)
TherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsapplicabletotheprogramarea.TheEACCS,whilenotaformalHCP,providesguidancefortheprojectplanningandpermittingprocesstoensurethatimpactsareoffsetinabiologicallyeffectivemanner.Asnotedabove,themitigationmeasuressetforthinthis
![Page 172: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/172.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐159
October 2014ICF 00323.08
PEIRarebasedonmeasuresfromtheEACCS,withsomemodificationsandadditions.BecausetherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsfortheprogramareaandtheprogramwouldnotconflictwiththeEACCS,therewouldbenoimpact.
ImpactBIO‐21b:ConflictwithprovisionsofanadoptedHCP/NCCPorotherapprovedlocal,regional,orstatehabitatconservationplan—GoldenHillsProject(noimpact)
TherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsapplicabletotheGoldenHillsprojectarea.TheEACCS,whilenotaformalHCP,providesguidancefortheprojectplanningandpermittingprocesstoensurethatimpactsareoffsetinabiologicallyeffectivemanner.Asnotedabove,themitigationmeasuressetforthinthisPEIRarebasedonmeasuresfromtheEACCS,withsomemodificationsandadditions.BecausetherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsfortheprojectareaandtheGoldenHillsProjectwouldnotconflictwiththeEACCS,therewouldbenoimpact.
ImpactBIO‐21c:ConflictwithprovisionsofanadoptedHCP/NCCPorotherapprovedlocal,regional,orstatehabitatconservationplan—PattersonPassProject(noimpact)
TherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsapplicabletothePattersonPassprojectarea.TheEACCS,whilenotaformalHCP,providesguidancefortheprojectplanningandpermittingprocesstoensurethatimpactsareoffsetinabiologicallyeffectivemanner.Asnotedabove,themitigationmeasuressetforthinthisPEIRarebasedonmeasuresfromtheEACCS,withsomemodificationsandadditions.BecausetherearenoadoptedHCP/NCCPsfortheprojectareaandthePattersonPassProjectwouldnotconflictwiththeEACCS,therewouldbenoimpact.
3.4.3 References Cited
Printed References
AlamedaCounty.Unpublisheddata.AvianUseDatabase.InformationgatheredaspartoftheongoingAvianFatalityMonitoringProgram.
———.2000.EastCountyAreaPlan.AdoptedMay1994.ModifiedbypassageofMeasureD,effectiveDecember22,2000.Oakland,CA.
AlamedaCountySRC.2010.GuidelinesforSitingWindTurbinesRecommendedforRelocationtoMinimizePotentialCollision‐RelatedMortalityofFourFocalRaptorSpeciesintheAltamontPassWindResourceArea.May23.AlamedaCountySRCDocumentP‐70.Available:http://www.altamontsrc.org/alt_doc/p70_src_relocation_guidelines.pdf.
Alarcón,M.,C.Aedo,andC.Navarro.2012.California.Page818inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Al‐Shehbaz,I.A.2012.Caulanthus.Pages535–538inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Alvarez,J.A.2004.OverwinteringCaliforniaTigerSalamander(Ambystomacaliforniense)Larvae.HerpetologicalReview35(4):344.
![Page 173: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/173.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐160
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Anderson,R.L.,J.L.Dinsdale,andR.Schlorff.2007.CaliforniaSwainson'sHawkInventory:2005–2007.FinalReport.Sacramento,CA:DepartmentofFishandGameResourceAssessmentProgram,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
Anthony,E.L.P.,M.H.Stack,andT.H.Kunz.1981.NightRoostingandtheNocturnalTimeBudgetoftheLittleBrownBat,Myotislucifugus:EffectsofReproductiveStatus,PreyDensity,andEnvironmentalConditions.Oecologia51(2):151–156.
Arnett,E.B.,W.K.Brown,W.P.Erickson,J.K.Fiedler,B.L.Hamilton,T.H.Henry,A.Jain,G.D.Johnson,J.Kerns,R.R.Koford,C.P.Nicholson,T.J.O’Connell,M.D.Piorkowski,andR.D.Tankersley,Jr.2008.PatternsofBatFatalitiesatWindEnergyFacilitiesinNorthAmerica.JournalofWildlifeManagement72(1):61–78.
Arnett,E.B.,C.D.Hein,M.R.Schirmacher,M.M.P.Huso,andJ.M.Szewczak.2013.EvaluatingtheEffectivenessofanUltrasonicAcousticDeterrentforReducingBatFatalitiesatWindTurbines.PLOSONE8(6):e65794.
Arnett,E.B.,MSchirmacher,M.M.P.Huso,andJ.P.Hayes.2009.EffectivenessofChangingWindTurbineCut‐inSpeedtoReduceBatFatalitiesatWindFacilities—2008AnnualReport.April.AnnualreportsubmittedtotheBatsandWindEnergyCooperative.Austin,TX:BatConservationInternational.
AudubonSociety.2007.The2007AudubonWatchList.Available:http://birds.audubon.org/2007‐audubon‐watchlist.Accessed:May21,2014.
AudubonCalifornia.2010.BarnOwlNamedAudubonCalifornia’s2010BirdoftheYear:HugeWrite‐inEffortLandsWinsitforPopularOwlSpecies.YubaNet.com.December14.Available:http://yubanet.com/california/Barn‐Owl‐named‐Audubon‐California‐s‐2010‐Bird‐of‐the‐Year.php.AccessedMay21,2014.
AvianPowerLineInteractionCommittee.2006.SuggestedPracticesforAvianProtectiononPowerLines:TheStateoftheArtin2006.PIERFinalProjectReportCEC‐500‐2006‐022.Washington,DC,andSacramento,CA:EdisonElectricInstitute,APLIC,andtheCaliforniaEnergyCommission.
Baldwin,B.2012.Blepharizonia.P.262inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Barclay,R.M.R.,E.F.Baerwald,andJ.C.Gruver.2007.VariationinBatandBirdFatalitiesatWindEnergyFacilities:AssessingtheEffectsofRotorSizeandTowerHeight.CanadianJournalofZoology85:381–387.
BarnOwlBoxCompany.2009.BarnOwlsbyUSStates.Available:http://www.barnowlbox.com/us‐barn‐owl.html#california_barn_owls.AccessedMay21,2014.
Barr,C.B.1991.TheDistribution,Habitat,andStatusoftheValleyElderberryLonghornBeetle:Desmoceruscalifornicusdimorphus.U.S.FishandWildlifeService.Sacramento,CA.
Barry,S.J.,andH.B.Shaffer.1994.TheStatusoftheCaliforniaTigerSalamander(Ambystomacaliforniense)atLagunita:A50‐YearUpdate.JournalofHerpetology24(2):159–164.
![Page 174: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/174.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐161
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Beedy,E.C.,andW.J.Hamilton,III.1997.TricoloredBlackbirdStatusUpdateandManagementGuidelines.PreparedforU.S.FishandWildlifeService,MigratoryBirdsandHabitatPrograms,andCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,BirdandMammalConservationProgram.
———.1999.TricoloredBlackbird(Agelaiustricolor).InA.Poole,(ed.).TheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Ithaca:CornellLabofOrnithology.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/423.Accessed:February12,2012.
Bloom,P.H.1980.TheStatusoftheSwainson’sHawkinCalifornia.PreparedforTheResourcesAgency:DepartmentofFishandGameandUnitedStatesDepartmentoftheInterior,BureauofLandManagement.
Brode,J.M.,andR.B.Bury.1984.TheImportanceofRiparianSystemstoAmphibiansandReptiles.Pages30–36inR.E.WarnerandK.M.Hendrix(eds.).CaliforniaRiparianSystemsEcology,Conservation,andProductiveManagement.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Brown,P.E.,andE.D.Pierson.1996.NaturalHistoryandManagementofBatsinCaliforniaandNevada.WorkshopsponsoredbytheWesternSectionofTheWildlifeSociety.November13–15.
Brown,K.,K.S.Smallwood,andB.Karas.2013.VascoAvianandBatMonitoringProject2012–2013AnnualReport.Final.September.PreparedbyVentusEnvironmentalSolutions,Portland,OR.PreparedforNextEraEnergyResources,Livermore,CA.
Buehler,D.A.2000.BaldEagle.InA.Poole,(ed.).TheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Ithaca:CornellLabofOrnithology.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/506.
Bunn,D.S.,A.B.Warburton,andR.D.S.Wilson.1982.TheBarnOwl.Vermillion,SD:ButeoBooks.
Bunnell,S.T.,C.M.White,D.Paul,andS.D.Bunnell.1997.StickNestsonaBuildingandTransmissionTowersUsedforNestingbyLargeFalconsinUtah.GreatBasinNat.57:263–267.
Marti,C.D.1974.FeedingEcologyofFourSympatricOwls.Condor76:5–61.CaliforniaBatWorkingGroup.2006.GuidelinesforAssessingandMinimizingImpactstoBatsatWindEnergyDevelopmentSitesinCalifornia.September.
CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.1992.1992AnnualReportontheStatusofCaliforniaState‐ListedThreatenedandEndangeredAnimalsandPlants.Sacramento,CA.
———.1993.LosVaquerosProject‐FishandWildlifeImpacts.AStatusReport.
———.1994.StaffReportRegardingMitigationforImpactstoSwainson’sHawk(Buteoswainsoni)intheCentralValleyofCalifornia.Sacramento,CA.November1.
———.2008.CaliforniaAquaticInvasiveSpeciesManagementPlan.January.Sacramento,CA.
———.2009.ProtocolsforSurveyingandEvaluatingImpactstoSpecialStatusNativePlantPopulationsandNaturalCommunities.November24.Available:http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/survey_monitor.html.
———.2010.ListofVegetationAlliancesandAssociations.September.VegetationClassificationandMappingProgram.Sacramento,CA.Available:http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/vegcamp/natural_comm_list.asp.Accessed:December10,2013.
![Page 175: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/175.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐162
October 2014ICF 00323.08
———.2011.SpecialAnimalsList.Available:http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/pdfs/SPAnimals.pdf.Accessed:January2011.
———.2012.StaffReportonBurrowingOwlMitigation.StateofCaliforniaNaturalResourcesAgency.March7.
CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandWildlife.2013a.CaliforniaNaturalDiversityDatabase,RareFind4.(May3,2013update).Reportforalkalimeadow.Sacramento,CA.Accessed:May2013.
———.2013b.CaliforniaNaturalDiversityDatabase,RareFind4.(May3,2013update).Sacramento,CA.Searchof7.5‐minuteMidway,Altamont,CedarMountain,ByronHotSprings,andCliftonCourtForebayquadranglesforspecial‐statusplants.Sacramento,CA.Accessed:May2013.
———.2013c.CaliforniaNaturalDiversityDatabase,RareFind4.(July2,2013update).Sacramento,CA.Searchof7.5‐minuteMidway,Altamont,CedarMountain,ByronHotSprings,andCliftonCourtForebayquadranglesforspecial‐statusanimals.Sacramento,CA.Accessed:July26,2013.
CaliforniaEnergyCommissionandCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.2007.CaliforniaGuidelinesforReducingImpactstoBirdsandBatsfromWindEnergyDevelopment.October.CommissionFinalReport.CEC‐700‐2007‐008‐CMF.CaliforniaEnergyCommission,RenewablesCommittee,andEnergyFacilitiesSitingDivision,andCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,ResourcesManagementandPolicyDivision.
CaliforniaEnvironmentalServices.2014.LosVaquerosWatershed2013AnnualGoldenEagleMonitoringReport.January.SanRamon,CA.PreparedforContraCostaWaterDistrict,Concord,CA.
CaliforniaHerps.com.2013.AGuidetotheAmphibiansandReptilesofCalifornia.RangeinformationforPhrynosomablainvillii,Blainville'sHornedLizard(CoastHornedLizard).Accessed:April8,2013.
CaliforniaRaptorCenter.2011.AdmissionsStatistics.Available:http://www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/calraptor/rescue_rehabilitation/admissions_stats.cfm.Accessed:November9,2011.
Carlsen,T.M.,L.E.Paterson,T.M.Alfaro,andS.D.Gregory.2012.RarePlantMonitoringandRestorationattheLawrenceLivermoreNationalLaboratoryExperimentalTestSite,Site300,ProjectProgressReport2007through2011.LLNL‐TR‐585933.Livermore,CA:LawrenceLivermoreNationalLaboratory.
Cowardin,L.M.,V.Carter,F.C.Golet,andE.T.LaRoe.1979.ClassificationofWetlandsandDeepwaterHabitatsoftheUnitedStates.OfficeofBiologicalServices,FishandWildlifeService,U.S.DepartmentoftheInterior,Washington,D.C.
Cryan,P.M.2008.MatingBehaviorasaPossibleCauseofBatFatalitiesatWindTurbines.April.JournalofWildlifeManagement72(3):845–849.
Cryan,P.M.,andR.M.R.Barclay.2009.CausesofBatFatalitiesatWindTurbines:HypothesesandPredictions.JournalofMammalogy90(6):1330–1340.
CurryandKerlinger,LLC.2009.AvianMonitoringStudyandRiskAssessmentfortheShilohIIIWindPowerProject,SolanoCounty,California.December.McLean,VA.PreparedforenXco,Inc.,Tracy,CA.
![Page 176: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/176.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐163
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Dunk,J.R.1995.White‐TailedKite(Elanusleucurus).InA.Poole,(ed.).TheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Ithaca:CornellLabofOrnithology.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/178.
EastBayRegionalParksDistrict.2000.VascoCavesRegionalPreserveResourceManagementPlan.PreparedbyEastBayRegionalParksDistrictPlanning/StewardshipDepartmentinCooperationwithContraCostaWaterDistrict.Oakland,CA.
Eng,L.L,D.Belk,andC.H.Eriksen.1990.CalifornianAnostraca:Distribution,Habitat,andStatus.JournalofCrustaceanBiology10(2):247–277.
Eriksen,C.H.,andD.Belk.1999.FairyShrimpsofCalifornia’sPuddles,Pools,andPlayas.Eureka,CA:MadRiverPress.
EssigMuseumofEntomology.2013.California’sEndangeredInsects:Curve‐FootedDivingBeetle.EssigMuseumofEntomology,UniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley.Available:http://essig.berkeley.edu/endins/hygcurve1.htm.Accessed:August5,2013.
Estep,J.A.1989.Biology,Movements,andHabitatRelationshipsoftheSwainson’sHawkintheCentralValleyofCalifornia,1986–1987.CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,NongameBirdandMammalSection.Sacramento,CA.
Fellers,G.M.,A.Launer,G.Rathbun,S.Bobzien,J.Alvarez,D.Sterner,R.B.Seymour,andM.Westphal.2001.OverwinteringTadpolesintheCaliforniaRed‐LeggedFrog(Ranaauroradraytonii).HerpetologicalReview32(3):156157.
Gehring,J.,P.Kerlinger,andA.M.ManvilleII.2009.CommunicationTowers,Lights,andBirds:SuccessfulMethodsofReducingtheFrequencyofAvianCollisions.EcologicalApplications19:505–514.
Good,R.E.,W.Erickson,A.Merrill,S.Simon,K.Murray,K.Bay,andC.Fritchman.2011.BatMonitoringStudiesattheFowlerRidgeWindEnergyFacility,BentonCounty,Indiana—April13–October15,2010.January28.PreparedforFowlerRidgeWindFarm.Cheyenne,WY:WesternEcoSystemsTechnology,Inc.
Good,R.E.,A.Merrill,S.Simon,K.Murray,andK.Bay.2012.BatMonitoringStudiesattheFowlerRidgeWindFarm,BentonCounty,Indiana—April1–October31,2011.January31.PreparedforFowlerRidgeWindFarm.Bloomington,IN:WesternEcoSystemsTechnology,Inc.
Goodrich,L.J.,andJ.Smith.2008.RaptorMigrationinNorthAmerica.InK.L.Bildstein,J.Smith,andE.Ruelas(eds.),TheStateofNorthAmerica’sBirdsofPrey(.SeriesinOrnithologyNumber3.Orwigsburg,PA:HawkMountainSanctuary,.
Haak,B.A.,andS.J.Denton.1979.SubterraneanNestingbyPrairieFalcon.RaptorRes.13:121–122.
Hamilton,W.J.,III.2000.TricoloredBlackbird2000SurveyandPopulationAnalysis.PreparedforU.S.FishandWildlifeService,Portland,OR.
Hanes,T.L.1977.CaliforniaChaparral.Pages41–469inM.G.BarbourandJ.Major(eds.).TerrestrialVegetationofCalifornia.NY:JohnWileyandSons.
![Page 177: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/177.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐164
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Hannan,G.L.,andC.Clark.2012.Eschscholzia.Pages982–984inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.),TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
HawkMountain.2007.ConservationStatusReportsfortheAmericanKestrelandRed‐TailedHawk.Available:http://www.hawkmountain.org/raptorpedia/hawks‐at‐hawk‐mountain/hawk‐species‐at‐hawk‐mountain/hawk‐species‐at‐hawk‐mountain/page.aspx?id=344.Accessed:May14,2014.
Helm,B.1998.BiogeographyofEightLargeBranchiopodsEndemictoCalifornia.Pages124–139inC.W.Witham,E.T.Bauder,D.Belk,W.R.Ferren,Jr.,andR.Ornduf(eds.).Ecology,Conservation,andManagementofVernalPoolEcosystems—Proceedingsfroma1996Conference.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaNativePlantSociety.285pages.
Holland,R.F.1986.PreliminaryDescriptionsoftheTerrestrialNaturalCommunitiesofCalifornia.CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,Sacramento,CA.
Howell,J.A.1997.AvianMortalityatRotorSweptAreaEquivalents,AltamontPassandMontezumaHills,California.TransactionsoftheWesternSectionoftheWildlifeSociety33:24–29.
Howell,J.A.,andJ.E.DiDonato.1991.AssessmentofAvianUseandMortalityRelatedtoWindTurbineOperations,AltamontPass,AlamedaandContraCostaCounties,California,September1998throughAugust1989.Final.SubmittedtoU.S.Windpower,Inc.Livermore,CA.
Hull,J.M.,R.Anderson,M.Bradbury,J.A.Estep,andH.B.Ernest.2008.PopulationStructureandGeneticDiversityinSwainson’sHawks(ButeoSwainsoni):ImplicationsforConservation.ConservationGenetics9(2):305–316.
Hunt,G.2002.TheTrendofGoldenEagleTerritoryOccupancyintheVicinityoftheAltamontPassWindResourceArea:2005Survey.PreparedfortheCaliforniaEnergyCommission,contract500‐01‐032,tothePredatoryBirdResearchGroup,UniversityofCalifornia,SantaCruz.
Hunt,G.,andT.Hunt.2006.TheTrendofGoldenEagleTerritoryOccupancyintheVicinityoftheAltamontPassWindResourceArea:2005Survey.PreparedfortheCaliforniaEnergyCommission,contract500‐01‐032,tothePredatoryBirdResearchGroup,UniversityofCalifornia,SantaCruz,CA.ReporttoCaliforniaEnergyCommission,Sacramento,CA.
Hunt,W.G.,R.E.Jackman,T.L.Brown,D.E.Driscoll,andL.Culp.1999.APopulationStudyofGoldenEaglesintheAltamontPassWindResourceArea:PopulationTrendAnalysis1994–1997.PreparedfortheNationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory,subcontractXAT‐6‐16459‐01tothePredatoryBirdResearchGroup,UniversityofCalifornia,SantaCruz.
ICFInternational.2010.EastAlamedaCountyConservationStrategy.Final.October.(ICF00906.08.)SanJose,CA.PreparedforEastAlamedaCountyConservationStrategySteeringCommittee,Livermore,CA.
———.2012.AltamontPassWindResourceAreaBirdFatalityStudy,BirdYears2005–2010.October.(ICF00904.08.)Sacramento,CA.PreparedforAlamedaCountyCommunityDevelopmentAgency,Hayward,CA.
![Page 178: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/178.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐165
October 2014ICF 00323.08
———.2013.AltamontPassWindResourceAreaBirdFatalityStudy,BirdYears2005–2011.November.M87.(ICF00904.08.)Sacramento,CA.PreparedforAlamedaCountyCommunityDevelopmentAgency,Hayward,CA.
InsigniaEnvironmental.2012.FinalReportfortheBuenaVistaAvianandBatMonitoringProject:February2008toJanuary2011.September.PaloAlto,CA.PreparedforContraCostaCounty,Martinez,CA.
Jennings,M.R.,andM.P.Hayes.1994.AmphibianandReptileSpeciesofSpecialConcerninCalifornia.RanchoCordova,CA:CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
Jennings,M.R.,M.P.Hayes,andD.C.Holland.1992.APetitiontotheU.S.FishandWildlifeServicetoPlacetheCaliforniaRed‐LeggedFrog(Ranaauroradraytonii)andtheWesternPondTurtle(Clemmysmarmorata)ontheListofEndangeredandThreatenedWildlifeandPlants.
Johnsgard,P.A.1990.Hawks,EaglesandFalconsofNorthAmerica:BiologyandNaturalHistory.WashingtonandLondon:SmithsonianInstitutionPress.
Johnson,L.A.2012.Navarretia.Pages1062–1068inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Johnston,D.S.,J.A.Howell,S.B.Terrill,N.Thorngate,J.Castle,J.P.Smith(H.T.Harvey&Associates);T.J.Mabee,J.H.Plissner,N.A.Schwab,P.M.Sanzenbacher,andC.M.Grinnell(ABR,Inc.).2013.BirdandBatMovementPatternsandMortalityattheMontezumaHillsWindResourceArea.June.CEC‐500‐2013‐015.Available:http://www.solanocounty.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid=10104.PreparedbyH.T.Harvey&Associates.PreparedfortheCaliforniaEnergyCommission.
Kelley,R.N.,andF.R.Ganders.2012.Amsinckia.Pages453–454inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Kochert,M.N.,K.Steenhof,C.L.McIntyre,andE.H.Craig.2002.GoldenEagle(Aquilachrysaetos).InA.PooleandF.Gill(eds.).TheBirdsofNorthAmerica,No.684.Philadelphia,PA:TheBirdsofNorthAmerica,Inc.
Koontz,J.A.,andM.J.Warnock.2012.Delphinium.Pages1136–1142inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Kunz,T.H.,E.B.Arnett,W.P.Erickson,A.R.Hoar,G.D.Johnson,R.P.Larkin,M.D.Strickland,R.W.Thresher,andM.D.Tuttle.2007.EcologicalImpactsofWindEnergyDevelopmentonBats:Questions,ResearchNeeds,andHypotheses.FrontiersinEcologyandtheEnvironment5(6):315–324.
Kyle,K.,andR.Kelsey.2011.Resultsofthe2011TricoloredBlackbirdStatewideSurvey.AudubonCalifornia,Sacramento,CA.Available:http://tricolor.ice.ucdavis.edu/downloads.
Loredo,I.,D.VanVuren,andM.L.Morrison.1996.HabitatUseandMigrationBehavioroftheCaliforniaTigerSalamander.JournalofHerpetology30(2):282–285.
![Page 179: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/179.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐166
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Maclaren,P.A.,D.E.Runde,andS.Anderson.1984.ARecordofTree‐NestingPrairieFalconsinWyoming.Condor86:487–488.
MacWhirter,R.B.,andK.L.Bildstein.1996.NorthernHarrier(Circuscyaneus).InA.PooleandF.Gill,(eds.).TheBirdsofNorthAmerica,No.210.Philadelphia,PA:TheAcademyofNaturalSciencesandWashington,DC:TheAmericanOrnithologists’Union.
Marti,C.D.,A.F.Poole,andL.R.Bevier.2005.BarnOwl(Tytoalba).InA.PooleandF.Gill(eds.),TheBirdsofNorthAmericaIthaca:CornellLabofOrnithology.RetrievedfromtheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/001.Accessed:May19,2014.
Meese,R.J.2014.Resultsofthe2014TricoloredBlackbirdStatewideSurvey.July31.Davis,CA:UniversityofCalifornia,Davis,DepartmentofEnvironmentalScienceandPolicy.
Mazurek,M.J.2004.AMaternityRoostofTownsend’sBig‐EaredBats(Corynorhinustownsendii)inCoastRedwoodBasalHollowsinNorthwesternCalifornia.NorthwesternNaturalist85:60–62.
NationalAudubonSociety.2011.TheChristmasBirdCountHistoricalResults[Online].Available:http://www.christmasbirdcount.org.AccessedDecember12,2012.
NatureServe.2012.NatureServeExplorer:AnOnlineEncyclopediaofLife[webapplication].Version7.1.NatureServe,Arlington,VA.Available:http://www.natureserve.org/explorer.Accessed:May19,2014.
Nelson,R.W.1974.PrairieFalcons:NestingAttemptonaBuildingandEffectofWeatheronCourtshipandIncubation.RaptorResearchFoundationEthologyInformationExchange1:10–12.Orloff,S.,andA.Flannery.1992.WindTurbineEffectsonAvianActivity,HabitatUse,andMortalityinAltamontPassandSolanoCountyWindResourceArea.ReporttoCaliforniaEnergyCommission,Sacramento,CA.SantaCruz,CA:BiosystemsAnalysis,Inc.
Orloff,S.,F.Hall,andL.Spiegel.1986.DistributionandHabitatRequirementsoftheSanJoaquinKitFoxintheNorthernExtremeofTheirRange.TransactionsoftheWesternSectionoftheWildlifeSociety22:60–70.
PandionSystems,Inc.2010.AltamontVascoRepower—AcousticBatMonitoringPreliminaryFindings.October8.AppendixCofVascoWindsRepoweringProjectFinalEnvironmentalImpactReport.StateClearinghouseNo.2010032094.April2011.Martinez,CA:ContraCostaCountyDepartmentofConservationandDevelopment.
Phipps,K.B.1979.HuntingMethods,HabitatUseandActivityPatternsofPrairieFalconsintheSnakeRiverBirdsofPreyNaturalArea,Idaho.Master'sThesis.WesternIllinoisUniversity,Macomb.
Pierson,E.D.,andW.E.Rainey.1998.Distribution,Status,andManagementofTownsend’sBig‐EaredBat(Corynorhinustownsendii)inCalifornia.May.BMCPTechnicalReportNumber96‐7.FinalReportforContractNo.FG7129.SubmittedNovember1994toWildlifeManagementDivision,BirdandMammalConservationProgram.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
Pitcher,E.J.1977.NestSiteSelectionforPrairieFalcons.Auk94:371.
![Page 180: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/180.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐167
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Polite,C.1990.California’sWildlife:Barnowl.CaliforniaWildlifeHabitatRelationshipsSystem,Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaInteragencyWildlifeTaskGroup,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
Polite,C.,andG.Ahlborn.1990.AmericanKestrel.Editor:S.Bailey.CaliforniaWildlifeHabitatRelationshipsSystem,CaliforniaInteragencyWildlifeTaskGroup,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.Available:http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cwhr/cawildlife.aspx.Accessed:May19,2014.
Polite,C.,andJ.Pratt.1990.California’sWildlife:Red‐TailedHawk.CaliforniaWildlifeHabitatRelationshipsSystem,Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaInteragencyWildlifeTaskGroup,CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
Powell,J.A.,andC.L.Hogue.1979.CaliforniaInsects.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Preston,R.E.2000.NoteworthyCollections:California.Madroño47:138.
Preston,C.R.,andR.D.Beane.1993.Red‐TailedHawk(Buteojamaicensis).InA.PooleandF.Gill(eds.),TheBirdsofNorthAmerica.Ithaca:CornellLabofOrnithology.RetrievedfromtheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/052.Accessed:May2014.
Randall,J.M.,andM.C.Hoshovsky.2000.California’sWildlandInvasivePlants.Pages11–19inC.C.Bossard,J.M.Randall,andM.C.Hoshovsky(eds.).InvasivePlantsofCalifornia’sWildlands.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Rogers,C.2001.RevisionoftheNearcticLepidurus(Notostraca).JournalofCrustaceanBiology21(4):991–1006.
Roppe,J.A.,S.M.Siegel,andS.E.Wilder.1989.PrairieFalconNestingonTransmissionTowers.Condor91:711–712.
Sauer,J.R.,J.E.Hines,andJ.Fallon.2008.TheNorthAmericanBreedingBirdSurvey,ResultsandAnalysis1966–2007.Version5.15.2008.Laurel,MD:USGSPatuxentWildlifeResearchCenter.
Sauer,J.R.,J.E.Hines,J.E.Fallon,K.L.Pardieck,D.J.Ziolkowski,Jr.,andW.A.Link.2011.TheNorthAmericanBreedingBirdSurvey,ResultsandAnalysis1966–2010.Version12.07.2011.Laurel,MD:USGSPatuxentWildlifeResearchCenter.
Sawyer,J.O.,andT.Keeler‐Wolf.1995.AManualofCaliforniaVegetation.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaNativePlantSociety.
Sherrod,S.K.1978.DietsofNorthAmericanFalconiforms.JournalofRaptorResearch12:49–121.
Shuford,W.D.,andT.Gardali(eds.).2008.CaliforniaBirdSpeciesofSpecialConcern:ARankedAssessmentofSpecies,Subspecies,andDistinctPopulationsofBirdsofImmediateConservationConcerninCalifornia.StudiesofWesternBirdsNo.1.WesternFieldOrnithologists,Camarillo,CA,andCaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,Sacramento,CA.
Smallwood,J.A.,andD.M.Bird.2002.AmericanKestrel(Falcosparverius).InA.PooleandF.Gill(eds.),TheBirdsofNorthAmerica.Ithaca:CornellLabofOrnithology;retrievedfromtheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/602.Accessed:May2014.
![Page 181: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/181.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐168
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Smallwood,K.S.,2010.BaselineAvianandBatFatalityRatesattheTresVaquerosWindProject,ContraCostaCounty,California.ReporttotheEastBayRegionalParkDistrict.,2010.
Smallwood,K.S.,D.A.Bell,S.A.Snyder,J.E.Didonato.2010.NovelScavengerRemovalTrialsIncreaseWindTurbine–CausedAvianFatalityEstimates.JournalofWildlifeManagement74(5):1089–1097.
Smallwood,K.S.,andB.Karas.2009.AvianandBatFatalityRatesatOld‐GenerationandRepoweredWindTurbinesinCalifornia.JournalofWildlifeManagement73(7):1062–1071.
Smallwood,K.S.,andL.Neher.2010.SitingRepoweredWindTurbinestoMinimizeRaptorCollisionsattheTresVaquerosWindProject,ContraCostaCounty,California.April.Draft.PreparedfortheEastBayRegionalParkDistrict.
Smallwood,K.S.,L.Neher,andD.A.Bell.2009.Map‐BasedRepoweringandReorganizationofaWindResourceAreatoMinimizeBurrowingOwlandOtherBirdFatalities.October.Energies2:915–943.
Smallwood,K.S.,L.A.Neher,D.A.Bell,J.E.DiDonato,B.R.Karas,S.A.Snyder,andS.R.Lopez.2008.RangeManagementPracticestoReduceWindTurbineImpactsonBurrowingOwlsandOtherRaptorsintheAltamontPassWindResourceArea,California.CaliforniaEnergyCommission,PIEREnergy‐RelatedEnvironmentalResearchProgram.CEC‐500‐2008‐080.
Smallwood,K.S.,L.Neher,andJ.Mount.2011.NestingBurrowingOwlDistributionandAbundanceintheAltamontPassWindResourceArea,California.September16.P228.PreparedfortheAltamontPassWindResourceAreaScientificReviewCommittee.Available:http://www.altamontsrc.org/.Accessed:November26,2013.
Smallwood,S.,andL.Spiegel.2005a.AssessmenttoSupportanAdaptiveManagementPlanfortheAPWRA.January19.CEC‐releasedTechnicalReport.
———.2005b.PartialRe‐AssessmentofanAdaptiveManagementPlanfortheAPWRA:AccountingforTurbineSize.March25.CEC‐releasedTechnicalReport.
———.2005c.CombiningBiology‐BasedandPolicy‐BasedTiersofPriorityforDeterminingWindTurbineRelocation/ShutdowntoReduceBirdFatalities.June1.CEC‐releasedTechnicalReport.
Smallwood,K.S.,andC.G.Thelander.2004.DevelopingMethodstoReduceMortalityintheAltamontPassWindResourceArea.FinalReportbyBioResourceConsultantstotheCaliforniaEnergyCommission,PublicInterestEnergyResearch—EnvironmentalArea500‐01‐019.
Stebbins,R.C.1954.AmphibiansandReptilesofWesternNorthAmerica.NewYork,NY:McGraw‐HillBookCompany,Inc.
———.2003.WesternReptilesandAmphibians.ThirdEdition.NewYork,NY:HoughtonMifflinCompany.
Szewczak,J.M.2013.AcousticBatSurveyatVascoWinds,LLCWindArea2012.September.AttachmenttoFinal2012–2013AnnualReport,AvianandBatMonitoringProject,VascoWinds,LLC.PreparedforVentusEnvironmentalSolutions,Portland,OR.
![Page 182: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/182.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐169
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Talley,T.S.,D.Wright,M.Holyoak.2006.Assistancewiththe5‐YearReviewoftheValleyElderberryLonghornBeetle(Desmoceruscalifornicusdimorphus).UnitedStatesFishandWildlifeService.Sacramento,CA.
U.S.FishandWildlifeService.1996.ProgrammaticFormalEndangeredSpeciesActConsultationonIssuanceof404PermitsforProjectswithRelativelySmallEffectsonListedVernalPoolCrustaceanswithintheJurisdictionoftheSacramentoFieldOffice,California.February28.1‐1‐96‐F‐1.IssuedbyEcologicalServices,SacramentoFieldOffice,Sacramento,CA.
———.1998.RecoveryPlanforUplandSpeciesoftheSanJoaquinValley,California.Region1,Portland,OR.
———.1999.ConservationGuidelinesfortheValleyElderberryLonghornBeetle.SacramentoFishandWildlifeOffice,Sacramento,CA.RevisedJuly9.
———.2002a.RecoveryPlanfortheCaliforniaRed‐LeggedFrog(Ranaauroradraytonii).Portland,OR.
———.2002b.DraftRecoveryPlanforChaparralandScrubCommunitySpeciesofSanFranciscoBay,California.November.Portland,OR.
———.2007.LonghornFairyShrimp(Branchinectalongiantenna)5‐YearReview:SummaryandEvaluation.PreparedbytheSacramentoFishandWildlifeOffice.Sacramento,CA.
———.2010.SanJoaquinKitFox(Vulpesmacrotismutica)5‐YearReview:SummaryandEvaluation.PreparedbytheSacramentoFishandWildlifeOffice.Sacramento,CA.
———.2011.U.S.FishandWildlifeServiceStandardizedRecommendationsforProtectionoftheEndangeredSanJoaquinKitFoxpriortoorduringGroundDisturbance.January.Sacramento,CA:SacramentoFishandWildlifeOffice.Available:http://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/survey‐protocols‐guidelines/Documents/kitfox_standard_rec_2011.pdf.Accessed:December12,2013.
———.2012.U.S.FishandWildlifeServiceLand‐BasedWindEnergyGuidelines.March23.OMBControlNo1018‐0148.
———.2013a.EagleConservationPlanGuidance:Module1—Land‐BasedWindEnergy.Version2.April.DivisionofMigratoryBirdManagement.Available:http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle_guidance.html.Lastupdated:June27,2014.
———.2013b.ListofFederal,EndangeredandThreatenedSpeciesthatOccurinormaybeAffectedbyProjectsintheU.S.GeologicalSurvey7.5‐MinuteMidway,Altamont,CedarMountain,ByronHotSprings,CliftonCourtForebayQuadrangles.LastRevised:September18,2011.Available:www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/spp_lists/auto_list.cfm.Accessed:July1,2013.
U.S.GeologicalSurvey.2013.EstimationofSiteOccupancyandNestingSuccessofGoldenEaglesintheDiabloMountainsofCentralCalifornia.August.InformationBrief.ForestandRangelandEcosystemScienceCenter.
WesternBatWorkingGroup.2005.Townsend’sBig‐EaredBat.Speciesaccountdevelopedforthe1998RenoBiennialMeeting;updatedatthe2005PortlandBiennialMeeting.OriginalaccountbyRickSherwin;2005updatebyAntoinettePiaggio.Available:http://www.wbwg.org.Accessed:December20,2013.
![Page 183: 3.4 Biological Resources - ACGOV.org...2013/11/01 · Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis Biological Resources APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐1 October](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022043014/5fb1640b2b98c46dae0e7fb9/html5/thumbnails/183.jpg)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Biological Resources
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.4‐170
October 2014ICF 00323.08
———.2007.RegionalBatSpeciesPriorityMatrix.Available:http://www.wbwg.org/spp_matrix.html.
Weller,T.J.,andJ.A.Baldwin,2011.UsingEcholocationMonitoringtoModelBatOccupancyandInformMitigationsatWindEnergyFacilities.TheJournalofWildlifeManagement9999:1–13;2011;DOI:10.1002/jwmg.260.
WesternEcoSystemsTechnology,Inc.2008.DiabloWindsWildlifeMonitoringProgressReport,March2005–February2007.August.Cheyenne,WY.
Williams,D.F.1986.MammalianSpeciesofConcerninCalifornia.CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGameReport86‐1.CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame,Sacramento,CA.112pages.
Yosef,R.1996.LoggerheadShrike(Laniusludovicianus).InA.PooleandF.Gill(eds.),TheBirdsofNorthAmerica.Ithaca:CornellLabofOrnithology;RetrievedfromtheBirdsofNorthAmericaOnline.Available:http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/231.Accessed:May2014.
Zacharias,E.H.2012.Atriplex.Pages630–638inB.G.Baldwin,D.H.Goldman,D.J.Keil,R.Patterson,T.J.Rosatti,andD.H.Wilken(eds.).TheJepsonManual:VascularPlantsofCalifornia.SecondEdition.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Zeiner,D.C.,W.F.Laudenslayer,Jr.,andK.E.Mayer(eds.).1988.California’sWildlife.VolumeI:AmphibiansandReptiles.CaliforniaStatewideWildlifeHabitatRelationshipsSystem.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
———.1990a.California’sWildlife.VolumeII:Birds.CaliforniaStatewideWildlifeHabitatRelationshipsSystem.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
———.1990b.California’sWildlife.VolumeIII:Mammals.CaliforniaStatewideWildlifeHabitatRelationshipsSystem.Sacramento,CA:CaliforniaDepartmentofFishandGame.
Zweifel,R.G.1955.Ecology,Distribution,andSystematicsofFrogsoftheRanaboyleiGroup.UniversityofCaliforniaPublicationsinZoology54(4):207–292.
Personal Communications
Arnold,RichardA.,PhD.2011.Entomologist,EntomologicalConsultingServicesLtd.,PleasantHill,CA.August22and23,2011—WrittencommentsontheDraftSupplementalBiologicalAssessmentforPG&E’sValleyElderberryLonghornBeetleConservationProgram.
Barton,Chris.2014.ActingEnvironmentalProgramsManager.July21,2014—LettertoSandraRivera,AssistantPlanningDirector,AlamedaCountywithcommentsontheAPWRARepoweringDraftEIR.
Stedman,Bret.Manager,CaliforniaRaptorCenter,UCDavis.December13,2012—EmailcorrespondencewithLucasBare,ICFInternational,Englewood,CO.