340b for ryan white grantees by william von oehsen principal powers pyles sutter & verville, pc...
TRANSCRIPT
340B For Ryan White Grantees
byWilliam von Oehsen
PrincipalPowers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC
2012 Ryan White Grantee Meeting
November 27, 2012Washington, DC
Overview
I. 340B Primer III. 340B Reform Legislation - Background - Medicaid changes - Covered entities - Integrity provisions - Calculating ceiling price - Recertification - Covered entity restrictions - Contract pharmacies IV. Audits
II. Covered Entity Restrictions - Duplicate discounts - Anti-diversion
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Primer: Background
340B drug discount program requires pharmaceutical manufacturers participating in the Medicaid program to provide discounts on covered outpatient drugs purchased by federally-funded clinics and other safety net providers referred to as “covered entities” (CEs)
The rights and obligations of CEs and manufacturers are set forth in Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA)
Section 1927 of the Social Security Act (SSA) requires manufacturers to enter into a pharmaceutical pricing agreement (PPA) with the Secretary of HHS as a condition of Medicaid and Medicare Part B covering the companies’ outpatient drugs
Under the PPA, a manufacturer agrees to provide discounts and otherwise comply with 340B requirements
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Primer: Background (cont’d)
Program is administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) through the Office of Pharmacy Affairs (OPA)Because several aspects of the 340B program depend on interpretation and application of SSA provisions (e.g. average manufacturer price, best price, etc.), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) also plays a significant role in 340B program administrationTwo HRSA contractors: Prime Vendor Program (PVP) and Pharmacy Support Services Center (PSSC)
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Primer: Covered Entities
Originally 12 categories of CEs: – high-Medicaid disproportionate share (DSH) hospitals
owned by or under contract with state or local government– community health centers– ADAPs– AIDS, TB and STD clinics– family planning clinics– and other PHSA grantees
The non-hospital CEs are only permitted to purchase and use 340B-discounted drugs within the scope of their 340B-qualifying federal grants
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Primer: Covered Entities (cont’d)
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) added five new categories of hospitals eligible for 340B:– Free-standing children’s hospitals with DSH adjustment >
11.75% – Free-standing cancer hospitals with DSH adjustment >
11.75%– Critical access hospitals – Sole community hospitals and rural referral centers with
DSH adjustment ≥ 8%All 340B hospitals must either be publicly owned or be a private nonprofit contracting with a state or local government to provide indigent care
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B ceiling price = average manufacturer price (AMP) minus unit rebate amount (URA)Special procedures for calculating 340B price for new drugs:– Manufacturers must estimate a new drug’s 340B ceiling
price for the first 3 quarters that the drug is on the market
– After 3 quarters, manufacturers will have AMP and best price data to calculate the ceiling price
Penny prices – Under informal HRSA policy, if URA exceeds AMP, then the manufacturer must charge a penny for the drug
340B Primer: Calculating Ceiling Price
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Primer: Covered Entity Restrictions
Medicaid billing procedures may need to be adjusted to avoid manufacturers giving duplicate discountsUse of 340B drugs limited to “patients” of CEHRSA and manufacturers may audit CEsPenalties applicable to CEs:– Corrective action– Discount refunds, with interest if violation is knowing and
intentional– Disenrollment if violation is knowing, intentional,
systematic and egregious– Criminal sanctions under Prescription Drug Marketing Act
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Primer: Contract Pharmacies
HRSA recognized the difficulties facing 340B covered entities that lack in-house pharmacies (11,000 as of late 1996)In 1996, HRSA issued guidelines approving the use of contract pharmacies to dispense 340B drugs and requiring manufacturers to offer 340B pricing on drugs dispensed by contract pharmacies to 340B-eligible patientsPatients may choose to obtain drugs from any pharmacy, not just the contract pharmacy The covered entity must use a “ship to/bill to” arrangement so that drugs are purchased by the CE but sent to the contract pharmacy
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Primer: Contract Pharmacies (cont’d)
The CE is responsible for the contract pharmacy’s compliance with 340B requirementsThe CE must self-certify to HRSA that the contract pharmacy arrangement meets 340B program requirementsEffective April 5, 2010, the 340B contract pharmacy program was expanded such that CEs are no longer limited to one contract pharmacy arrangement. See 75 Fed. Reg. 10272 (3/5/10).Right of HRSA and manufacturers to audit CEs extends to their contract pharmacy arrangements
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
CE Restrictions: Duplicate Discounts
CEs usually must change their Medicaid billing practices for 340B drugs but are not required by the government to change their billing practices for other payersWith respect to Medicaid, CEs generally have to bill at actual acquisition cost (AAC) or reduced rates for 340B drugs dispensed by pharmacies for self-administrationThe sole reason that CEs must adjust their Medicaid billing practices is to protect manufacturers from the duplicate discount problem
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
Manufacturer
State MedicaidAgency
CoveredEntity
Step 5: Manufacturer pays rebate on 340B drug
Step 4: State submits rebate request
Step 3: CE bills Medicaid for 340B drug
Medicaid patientStep 2: 340B drug is dispensed to Medicaid patient
Step 1: Manufacturer sells drug at 340B discount
CE Restrictions: Duplicate Discounts (cont’d)
STEPS 1 AND 5 = DUPLICATE DISCOUNT
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
CE Restrictions: Duplicate Discounts (cont’d)
Options Covered Entity Procedures
State Medicaid Procedures
Medicaid Carve-In
Bills state at AAC or reduced rate and submits pharmacy’s Medicaid billing number to HRSA for posting on website
Using HRSA’s exclusion file, state excludes from rebate requests any claims paid under billing number posted on HRSA website
Medicaid Carve-Out
Purchases its Medicaid outpatient drugs outside 340B program, withholds billing number from HRSA website and bills Medicaid at regular non-340B rates
State includes covered entity’s claims in rebate request files
Shared SavingsSame as carve-in option except covered entity and state enter into alternative billing and payment arrangement
Pays enhanced dispensing fee or rates above 340B AAC
CE Restrictions: Anti-Diversion
“A covered entity shall not resell or otherwise transfer the [340B-discounted] drug to a person who is not a patient of the entity.” PHSA 340B(a)(5)(B)HRSA has established a three-pronged test for evaluating whether an individual falls within the definition of a “patient.” 61 Fed. Reg. 55,156 (10/24/96)An individual is not a “patient” if the only service received from the CE is the dispensing of a drug or drugs for subsequent self-administration or administration in the home setting. 61 Fed. Reg. 55,156 (10/24/96)
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
CE Restrictions: Anti-Diversion (cont’d)
1. The CE has established a relationship with the individual, such that the covered entity maintains records of the individual’s health care; and
2. The individual receives health care services from a health care professional who is either employed by the covered entity or provides health care under contractual or other arrangements (e.g. referral for consultation) such that responsibility for the care provided remains with the covered entity; and
3. The individual receives a health care service or range of services from the covered entity which is consistent with the service or range of services for which grant funding or federally-qualified health center look-alike status has been provided to the entity.
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
CE Restrictions: Anti-Diversion (cont’d)
ADAP patients – an individual registered in a state operated or funded AIDS drug purchasing assistance program receiving financial assistance under title XXVI of the PHSA will be considered a “patient” of the covered entity for purposes of this definition if so registered as eligible by the state program.
Third prong of patient definition does not apply to 340B hospitals
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Reform: Medicaid Changes
PPACA extended Medicaid rebate program to drugs covered by managed care organizations (MCOs) unless purchased through 340B– Provision prohibiting duplicate discounts is different from
fee-for-service provision– CEs believe burden is on states, not CEs, to implement
HHS must provide guidance describing options for billing 340B drugs to Medicaid
Proposed AMP rule would extend Medicaid AAC reimbursement proposal to 340B drugs although CMS is apparently open to shared savings options
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Reform: Integrity Provisions
HHS must issue regulations to establish formal dispute resolution processCurrent process is voluntary and outcomes are not legally bindingMust exhaust this process before proceeding to courtBoth manufacturers and CEs must use this processHRSA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) soliciting public input. 75 Fed. Reg. 57233 (9/20/10)Proposed rule has not been issued yet
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Reform: Integrity Provisions (cont’d)
HHS is also required to make 340B ceiling prices available to CEs, e.g., via a password-protected databaseHHS must develop a system for verifying the accuracy of 340B price calculations– Methodology and standards for calculating ceiling
prices must be developed and published– Government must regularly compare its ceiling price
calculations with manufacturer-reported prices– HHS must perform “spot checks” of sales transactions– Pricing discrepancies must be researched and remedied
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Reform: Integrity Provisions (cont’d)
Drug manufacturers must allocate drugs in short supply proportionally between 340B and non-340B providersRefunds are owed to CEs in the event of an overcharge, including when AMP and best price are restated – PVP has a product to help with true-upsHHS is required to issue guidance on the refund processManufacturers are subject to civil monetary penalties for knowing and intentional overchargesHRSA received comments pursuant to another pending ANPRM. 75 Fed. Reg. 57230 (9/20/10)
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Reform: Recertification
Focus of recertification is that CE information on OPA database is accurate and up to date
Hospital recertification process was recently completed, although OPA granted extensions to some hospitals
Two-step process in which hospitals had to:– Correct information for existing sites and/or decertify sites that
no longer exist or use 340B drugs– Certify that hospital meets eight 340B compliance standards
Both SNHPA and SNHPA members have objected to scope of eight recertification statements and process used to establish them
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Reform: Recertification (cont’d)
Per Recertification Guide on OPA website, CEs are required to certify that:– CE has continuously met all 340B eligibility requirements
since enrolling in 340B– CE will disclose to OPA any material breach of a 340B
requirement; failure to do so could result in CE remitting to manufacturer the 340B discount
– All information on database is complete, accurate, and correct
– CE maintains auditable records– CE has systems in place to reasonably ensure compliance
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Reform: Recertification (cont’d)
Contact information regarding recertification questions:– Pharmacy Services Support Center (PSSC) Help Line:
(202) 449-9473– HRSA: [email protected]
Helpful links– http://hrsa.gov/opa/policyreleases.htm– http://pssc.aphanet.org/faqs/340b-recertification-faqs/– http://healthcarecommunities.org/FAQs.aspx?id=4294971
289
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Reform: Recertification (cont’d)
Make sure covered entity and child sites are registered correctlyYou must register all off-site locations, even if they are not purchasing drugs Pharmacies are not registered as child sites; they are listed as “ship to” sites insteadIf pharmacies are owned by separate legal entity from CE, than they should be registered as contract pharmacies rather than “ship to” sites
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
340B Reform: Recertification (cont’d)
Regarding “ship to” requirement:– If pharmacy is located within CE, it can be listed as a
“ship to” address but not required– Standalone pharmacies must be listed as “ship to”
address for CE parent or child site (whichever one they primarily serve)
– If pharmacy is serving many different sites (e.g., a parent and several child sites), it should be listed as “ship to” address for parent site
Can be helpful in avoiding duplicate discount problems
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
New OPA Registration Deadlines
Effective October 1, there are shorter time periods in which to enroll in the program
Registration Period Start DateOct 1-15 Jan 1Jan 1-15 Apr 1Apr 1-15 July 1July 1-15 Oct 1
Applies to registration of covered entities, outpatient facilities and contract pharmacy
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]
Update on Audits
As with other federal health care programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, 340B providers are now subject to auditsGovernment audits started in January51 audits completed in 2012 – 5 are “targeted”At least 4 final reports issued; no adverse findingsAudits are now also being conducted by manufacturersWhat we have learned so far:– important to have written policies and procedures– HRSA acknowledges patient definition is difficult to apply
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC Bill von Oehsen(202) 466-6550 [email protected]