36340 nas pg5 18 p3.qxp:34828 nas code of practice

2
November 2018 PG5:18 Purchasing guidelines for: Aluminium Beams The purpose of this guidance note is to detail best purchasing practice for Aluminium beams. If beams are sourced from an NASC compliant company, as demonstrated by the NASC CoP assessment report, then no further action is required, other than a visual inspection of your supplierʼs certificate of product compliance with the NASC CoP product audit (a list of suppliers and products may be found on the NASC website). If the beams are not sourced from an NASC compliant company, then the guidelines below should be followed. Test data is the criteria to which the product is independently tested as seen on the test report example opposite, & should consist of: • Annual testing on Aluminium Beams for all suppliers/manufacturers, as follows: • Chemical analysis. • Mechanical analysis. • Outside diameter & wall thickness dimension. • Weld testing to ISO 10042:2018 min level D and should take into account the following: - Visual & LPI of 4 x 90 degree & 4 obtuse angle welds. - 2 x macro weld inspections. - HAZ zones & buckling resistance. • Annual tests must be by a UKAS accredited facility or TUV/SGS. ** If a current international welding approval is in place, [Eg, ISO 3834-2, or EN 1090-1/3] then weld testing to ISO 10042:2018 is not required. TEST DATA INTRODUCTION Client: Page 2 of 4 Date of test: 4 September 2017 MI No.: XXXX Specification: BS EN 755-2:2008 EN AW- Description: Identity: Test methods: National Access and Scaffolding Confederation (NASC) Ltd., 12 Bridewell Place, Comments: Chemical Analysis carried out under the cover of UKAS Testing No. 0136. Summary: The tube sample tested met the tensile and chemical analysis requirements for BS EN 755-2:2008 EN AW-6082-T6. 1off Welded Aluminium Alloy Beam, nominally 48.3mm OD main supports with brace struts, XXXX, 2.0 Metre Lattice Beam (450) Fracture Description: Clean Fracture Chemical Analysis Comments: Extensometer number E95063, calibrated to BS EN ISO 9513:2012 class 0.5, was used for these tests. The straining rate up to 3% strain was 0.25%/sec. After 3% the speed increased to a crosshead displacement rate of 2.50mm/min Test machine calibrated to class 1.0 requirements of BS EN ISO 7500-1:2004: Procedure: TP01c-1, BS EN ISO 6892-1:2016 A, EMT, ICP OES Inspection Authority: N/A - End of Test Results - Date of receipt: Reference No.: Order No.: London EC4V 6AP 31 August 2017 XXXXX NASC/XXX ‘25 287 XXXX 216’ Tests performed by: Witnessed by: Certificate approved by: Signed......................................... Date......................... M. Smith, Section Leader Note - The test results detailed above apply only to the sample(s) of material submitted to the laboratory. L. Jarvis, D. Johnson XXXX The Test Laboratory, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxx xxXxxxxxxxx xxxx email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.xxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxx Registered in England No. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx xxx xxxxxxxxxxxx Certificate of Test The Test Laboratory 6082-T6 Stress El RA % % Load Stress Load GL CSA Size Mark mm mm kN 13.21 5.65 √So 13.14 267 250 min 290 min 8 min 306 14.5 - - - - kN mm 2 N/mm 2 N/mm 2 49.52 12.38 x 4.00 1 2 Si Mark Identity Principal Tube Parent Material Fe Cu Mn Mg Cr Element (%) Zn Ti Al Base 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.66 0.40 0.07 0.25 0.83 Identity/Position Specification: BS EN 755-2:2008 EN AW-6082-T6 Longitudinal tensile from principal tube Tensile Test(s) Dimensions Max Stress Proof Stress Rp 0.2% SPECIMEN 008 EN A 8 EN A alysis carried out under the cov lysis carried out under the cov mple tested met the tensile and le tested met the tensile and main supports with brac main supports with brac brated to BS EN ISO 9513:201 rated to BS EN ISO 9513 /sec. After 3% the speed increa sec. After 3% the speed incr BS EN ISO 7500-1:2004: S EN ISO 7500-1:2 MT, ICP OES T, ICP OES SP SP med pproved b ............... detailed above apply only to the sample detailed above apply only L S S S CI ME EC PE PE PE PE IM IM CIM CIM ME ME M CI CIM E Load Lo Stress tress Load Load mm m kN kN 13.21 21 5.65 5 65 √So So 5.65 .6 65 267 250 25 m - - kN kN N/mm N/mm 2 2 2 Si Fe Fe Cu M E 0.07 0.07 0.25 0.25 0.83 0.83 Max Stress Max Stres Proof Stress Stress Rp 0.2% 2% EC E PE PE Client: Page 1 of 4 Date of test: 4 September 2017 MI No.: XXXX Specification: BS EN 755-2:2008 EN AW- Description: Identity: Test methods: National Access and Scaffolding Confederation (NASC) Ltd., 12 Bridewell Place, System: Type II, method C, form E Batch Number: M612130 Batch Number: M612130 Cleaning Agent: Johnson and Allen JAC-2 Cleaner INSPECTION DETAILS RESULTS LIQUID PENETRANT INSPECTION REPORT Penetrant: Johnson and Allen JAP Penetrant Penetrant remover: Johnson and Allen JAC-2 Cleaner Developer: Johnson and Allen JAD Developer Viewing conditions Comments B N.S.I. B N.S.I. B N.S.I. B N.S.I. B N.S.I. B N.S.I. B N.S.I. B N.S.I. Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Summary: The welds examined by LPI met the requirements of BS EN ISO 10042:2005 Level B Accept/ ISO 10042:2005 Assessment criteria: As required by the test standard, assessment has been conducted in line with BS EN Surface Reject White Light measured at: 1130 LUX Development time (minutes): 15 Penetration time (minutes): 15 Identification number: N/A Viewing equipment: Halogen Arc Lamp Material surface condition: As welded Batch Number: H1455 Batch Number: D1071 1off Welded Aluminium Alloy Beam, nominally 48.3mm OD main supports with brace struts, XXXX, 2.0 Metre Lattice Beam (450) Procedure: TP28, BS EN ISO 3452-1:2013 - End of Test Results - Date of receipt: Reference No.: Order No.: London EC4V 6AP 31 August 2017 XXXXX NASC/XXX ‘25 287 XXXX 216’ Tests performed by: Witnessed by: Certificate approved by: Signed......................................... Date......................... M. Smith, Section Leader Note - The test results detailed above apply only to the sample(s) of material submitted to the laboratory. L. Jarvis, D. Johnson XXXX QUALITY MANAGEMENT The Test Laboratory, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxx xxXxxxxxxxx xxxx email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.xxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxx Registered in England No. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx xxx xxxxxxxxxxxx Certificate of Test The Test Laboratory 6082-T6 S Acce Acc ds exam d S S S Accept Accep S S Accept ccep pt S SP Accept Acce ept S SP Accept ept P S SP Accept ccept P S SP Accept Accept P S PE Accept A B B PE PE PE PEC per per Viewing c win Accept pt cept/ cept/ 2005 05 iteria: As required by the test st teria: As required by the test 05 05 Level Level Reject Reje White White EC PE C PE CIM ner er Development tim pment CI CIM Penetration time (minut Penetration time (minu CI IM Identification number: N/A Identification number: N Viewing equipment: Halogen A wing equipment: Halogen I ME al surface condition: As welded e condition: As welde ME S MEN 008 EN A EN A REPORT REPORT D main supports with brac D main supports with brac E ME ME M IM CIM C PE PE P SP SP SP SP S S

Upload: others

Post on 02-Oct-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 36340 NAS PG5 18 p3.qxp:34828 NAS code of practice

November 2018

PG5:18Purchasing guidelines for: Aluminium Beams

The purpose of this guidance note is to detail best purchasing practice for Aluminium beams. If beams aresourced from an NASC compliant company, as demonstrated by the NASC CoP assessment report, then nofurther action is required, other than a visual inspection of your supplierʼs certificate of product compliancewith the NASC CoP product audit (a list of suppliers and products may be found on the NASC website). Ifthe beams are not sourced from an NASC compliant company, then the guidelines below should befollowed.

Test data is the criteria to which the product is independently tested as seen on the test report example opposite, & should consist of:

• Annual testing on Aluminium Beams for all suppliers/manufacturers, as follows:

• Chemical analysis.

• Mechanical analysis.

• Outside diameter & wall thickness dimension.

• Weld testing to ISO 10042:2018 min level Dand should take into account the following:- Visual & LPI of 4 x 90 degree & 4 obtuse

angle welds.

- 2 x macro weld inspections.

- HAZ zones & buckling resistance.

• Annual tests must be by a UKAS accredited facility or TUV/SGS.

** If a current international welding approval isin place, [Eg, ISO 3834-2, or EN 1090-1/3] then weld testing to ISO 10042:2018 is not required.

TEST DATA

INTRODUCTION

Client:

Page 2 of 4

Date of test: 4 September 2017

MI No.:

XXXX

Specification: BS EN 755-2:2008 EN AW-

Description:

Identity:

Test methods:

National Access and Scaffolding Confederation (NASC) Ltd., 12 Bridewell Place,

Comments: Chemical Analysis c

arried out under the cover of UKAS Testing No. 0136.

Summary: The tube sample tested met the tensile and chemical analysis requirements fo

r BS EN 755-2:2008 EN AW-6082-T6.

1off Welded Aluminium Alloy Beam, nominally 48.3mm OD main supports w

ith brace

struts, XXXX, 2.0 Metre Lattice Beam (450)

Fracture Description: Clean Fracture

Chemical AnalysisComments: E

xtensometer number E95063, calibrated to BS EN ISO 9513:2012 class 0.5, was used for these tests.

The straining rate up to 3% stra

in was 0.25%/sec. After 3% the speed increased to a crosshead displacement rate of 2.50mm/minTest machine calibrated to class 1.0 requirements of BS EN ISO 7500-1:2004:

Procedure: TP01c-1, BS EN ISO 6892-1:2016 A, EMT, ICP OES

Inspection Authority: N/A

- End of Test Results -

Date of receipt:

Reference No.:

Order No.:

London EC4V 6AP

31 August 2017

XXXXX

NASC/XXX

‘25 287 XXXX 216’

Tests performed by:

Witnessed by:

Certificate approved by:

Signed..............

..............

.............

Date..............

...........

M. Smith, Section Leader

Note - The test results d

etailed above apply only to the sample(s) of material submitted to the laboratory.

L. Jarvis, D. Johnson

XXXXQUALITY MANAGEMENT

The Test Laboratory, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxx xxXxxxxxxxx xxxx email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.xxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxx

Registered in England No. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx xxx xxxxxxxxxxxx

Certificate of Test

The Test Laboratory

6082-T6

StressEl

RA

%%

Load

Stress

Load

GL

CSA

Size

Mark

mm

mmkN

13.215.65√So

13.14

267

250min

290min

8min

30614.5

-

-

-

-

kN

mm2

N/mm2

N/mm2

49.52

12.38 x 4.00

1

2SiMark

Identity

Principal Tube Parent Material

FeCu

MnMg

CrElement (%

) ZnTi

Al

Base

0.02

0.03

0.01

0.66

0.40

0.07

0.25

0.83

Identity/Position

Specification: BS EN 755-2:2008 EN AW-6082-T6

Longitudinal tensile from

principal tube

Tensile Test(s)

Dimensions

Max Stress

Proof Stress

Rp 0.2%

SP

EC

IME

N

008 EN A8 EN A

alysis carried out under the cov

lysis carried out under the cov

mple tested met the tensile and

ple tested met the tensile and

main supports with brac

main supports with brac

brated to BS EN ISO 9513:201

rated to BS EN ISO 9513

/sec. After 3% the speed increa

sec. After 3% the speed incr

BS EN ISO 7500-1:2004:

S EN ISO 7500-1:2MT, ICP OES

T, ICP OES

SP

SP

med

pproved b

..............

.

detailed above apply only to the sample

detailed above apply only

L

SSSC

IME

EC

PE

PE

PE

PE

IMIMC

IMC

IMME

ME

MC

IC

IME

LoadLo

Stresstress

LoadLoad

mmmkNkN

13.21215.655 65√So√So5.65.665

267

25025m

--

kNkN

N/mmN/mm

22

2

Si

FeFeCu

M

E

0.070.07

0.250.25

0.830.83

Max Stress

Max Stres

Proof StressStress

Rp 0.2%2%

EC

EP

EP

EClient:

Page 1 of 4

Date of test: 4 September 2017MI No.: XXXXSpecification: BS EN 755-2:2008 EN AW-

Description:

Identity:Test methods:

National Access and Scaffolding Confederation (NASC) Ltd., 12 Bridewell Place,

System: Type II, method C, form E

Batch Number: M612130

Batch Number: M612130

Cleaning Agent: Johnson and Allen JAC-2 Cleaner

INSPECTION DETAILS

RESULTS

LIQUID PENETRANT INSPECTION REPORT

Penetrant: Johnson and Allen JAP Penetrant

Penetrant remover: Johnson and Allen JAC-2 Cleaner

Developer: Johnson and Allen JAD Developer Viewing conditions

CommentsAccept

Accept B N.S.I.B N.S.I.B N.S.I.B N.S.I.B N.S.I.B N.S.I.B N.S.I.B N.S.I.

AcceptAcceptAcceptAcceptAcceptAcceptAccept

AcceptAcceptAcceptAcceptAcceptAcceptAcceptAccept

Summary: The welds examined by LPI met the requirements of BS EN ISO 10042:2005 Level B

Accept/

ISO 10042:2005Assessment criteria: As required by the test standard, assessment has been conducted in line with BS EN

Surface

LevelReject

White Light measured at: 1130 LUX

Development time (minutes): 15

Penetration time (minutes): 15Identification number: N/AViewing equipment: Halogen Arc Lamp

Material surface condition: As welded

Batch Number: H1455

Batch Number: D1071

1off Welded Aluminium Alloy Beam, nominally 48.3mm OD main supports with bracestruts, XXXX, 2.0 Metre Lattice Beam (450)

Procedure: TP28, BS EN ISO 3452-1:2013

- End of Test Results -

Date of receipt:Reference No.:Order No.:

London EC4V 6AP31 August 2017XXXXXNASC/XXX

‘25 287 XXXX 216’

Tests performed by: Witnessed by:

Certificate approved by:

Signed......................................... Date.........................

M. Smith, Section Leader

Note - The test results detailed above apply only to the sample(s) of material submitted to the laboratory.

L. Jarvis, D. Johnson

XXXX

QUALITY MANAGEMENT

The Test Laboratory, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxx xxXxxxxxxxx xxxx email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.xxxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxx

Registered in England No. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx xxx xxxxxxxxxxxx

Certificate of Test

The Test Laboratory

6082-T6

SAcceAccds examdSSSAcceptAccepSS

Acceptcceppt

SSPAcceptAcceept

SSPAccepteptP

SSPAcceptcceptP

SSP

AcceptAccept

PSPEAcceptA BB

PE

PE

PE

PEC

perper Viewing cwin

Acceptptcept/cept/

200505iteria: As required by the test stteria: As required by the test 0505

LevelLevelRejectReje

White White

EC

PEC

PECIMnerer Development timpment

CI

CIM

Penetration time (minutPenetration time (minu

CIIM

Identification number: N/AIdentification number: NViewing equipment: Halogen Awing equipment: Halogen

IMEal surface condition: As weldede condition: As welde

MES

MEN

008 EN A EN A

REPORTREPORT

D main supports with bracD main supports with brac

EM

EM

EMIM

CIM

CPE

PE

PSP

SP

SP

SP

SS

Page 2: 36340 NAS PG5 18 p3.qxp:34828 NAS code of practice

N A S CNASC, 4TH FLOOR, 12 BRIDEWELL PLACE, LONDON EC4V 6AP

TEL: 020 7822 7400 FAX: 020 7822 [email protected] www.nasc.org.uk

MATERIAL CERTIFICATION

Whilst every effort has been made to provide reliable and accurate information, we would welcome any corrections to information provided by the Writer whichmay not be entirely accurate, therefore and for this reason, the NASC or indeed the Writer, cannot accept responsibility for any misinformation posted.

You need to check that a material test certificate from the manufacturer/supplier are available for all aluminium beam tube.Below is an example of a material test certificate, which will detail the following information:

The British or Europeanspecification/standard, EN 755-2 6082T6.• The specification/standard should be clearly

identifiedon the test certificate.

• The test certificate will detail that it is to therequirements of:EN 10204:2001 section 3.1.

You need to check that each beam is permanently marked on the surface with th e following information:

• Year of manufacture.• Registered trade mark, or the manufacturerʼs name.• NASC member companies name, [when the original

manufacturer is not an NASC member].

Product Quality Approval Certificate

EN10204:3.1

Ref No., XX123456789 Page No., 1/1

FM 824-llb

XXXX0123

/BS 1139

EN573-3:2013BS EN775-9:2001/BS

0.8610.7-1.3

0.4-1.0

0.6-1.2

0.50

0.10

0.20

0.25

0.10

ExaminedStandard

Color

Amount/Weight

Custome Order No./Mill Order No.

Testing Reference

UnitItem No.

Si

Mg

Fe

Cu

Mn

Zn

Zn

Ti

Ni

Pb

Bi

Zr

Al

Tensile Strength

Yield Strength

Elongation (50mm)

Brinell Hardness

Chemical

Analysis

Mechanical

Property

Conclusion

0.647

0.138

0.020

0.462

0.017

0.011

0.017

312

4.10+0.2/-0.10mm

Test Result

Remark

Prepared by Issue date: 2017-12-28 (YY/MM/PD)Approved by

This certificate (and Copy) will not be effective without the stamp of testing department. Testing result of this certificate only

Integrated Result: Pass Not Pass

Drift Test

2# SizeSize

1# Size1#

2#

Test Result: Passed

The above tests have been certified to BS1139

HBW

%

MPa

MPa

wt%

Ø48.30±0.50

281

11.0

101.0

48.17

4.06

ll

ll

ll

ll

ll

Mill Finish

1350pcs/16883.64kg

EN755-2 6082T6Alloy-Temper

l

8.1 m

Example Scaffold Services Ltd

XX10-000-00123Licence No.

Heat No.

Extent

Customer Name

Product Section No.UK0000001(AA1)

AAA Aluminium (China) Limited

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

NGOK

responsible for the same lot of product supplied by our company.

/

*

.*

hC(muinimulAAAA

87654321XXoNfeR

detimiL)anih

98

tcudorP

1.3:40201NE

fitreClavorppAytilauQt

etacif

1/1oNegaP

.oNnoitceStcudorP

emaNremotsuC

tnetxE

NtH

87654321XX,.oNfeR

)1AA(1000000KU

secivreSdlofffacSelpmaxE

m1.8

l

98

dtL

repmeTTe-yollA

oNredrOlliM/redrOemotsuC

roloC

//

N

r 2-557NE

6

N1

N/

Ns

Nc

Np

N0

N5

N3

N1

NFlliM

.o.oN XXXX

N

N

6T2806

g

Nk

N4

N6

N3

N8

N8

N6

NhsiniF

3210X

bll-428MF

1/1,.oNegaP

N

.oNtaeH

.oNecneciL

*

32100-000-01XX

l

uC

eF

gM

iS

.oNmetI

MM

tinU

erefeRgnitseTTe

hgieWWe/tnuomA

adnatS

0

M1

M0

M0

M5

M.

M0

M2.1-6.0

3.1-7.0

*

. U

M

EEEM

EM

EM

EM

EEN

EN

ENN

ME

6

N1

N/

Ns

Nc

Np

N0

N5

N3

N1

N0E2E0E0E8E3E1E.E0E7

EN4

EN6

EN.

E0

EN

ecne

th

d

Era d

ENe

ENn

ENi

ENm

ENa

ENx

ENE

EN1

EN6

EN8

EN.

EN0

ENB

N/

N1

N0

N0

N2

N:

N9

N-

N5

N7

N7

NN

NESB

1

NS

NB

N/

NEN

MEN

NNNNNNN GN

g

Nk

N4

N6

N.

N3

N8

N8

N6

N noisulcnNoNCNS

N3102:3

N-

N3

N7

N5

NN

NE

N9

N3

N1

NKNONNN GNKNONNNGNKO

GNKO

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNO

O

NONNNNONNNN3

sisylanA

lacimehC

CCCCECbP

iN

iT

nZ

nZ

nM

uC

EC

CCCCCI

CIMIMMM

Cl

lI%

Ct

Cw

C0IM1IM.IM0

CIM5IM2IM.IM0

CIM

0

IM2

IM.

IM0

IM0

M1

M.

M0

M0

M.

M1

M-

M4

M.

M0

M

ECIM

ME

MMMMMMME

ME

l

l

710.0

110.0

710.0

264.0

0E2E0E.E0EM

E

GNKO

GNKO

GNKO

GNKO

GNKO

GNKO

GNKOO

O

O

O

O

O

O

SSSytreporP

lacinahceM

SSS

EC

EC

EC

EESPPPE

PEEC

EC

EC

EC

sPsPePnPdPrPaPHPlSPl

SPe

SPn

SPi

SPr

SPB

SP)PmPmP0P5P(PnPoPiPt

SPa

SPg

SPn

SPo

SPl

SPE

SP

h

PEt

PEg

PEn

PEe

PEr

PEt

PES

PEd

Pl

Pe

Pi

PY

Ph

PEt

PEg

PEn

PEe

PEr

PEt

PES

PEe

Pl

Pi

Ps

Pn

Pe

PT

PTe

Pl

PA

PrZ

iB

PPPSP

SP

SPEC

CCCEECCCC

l

l

l

aEPEMEaEPEME%

WBH

EC

l

l

l

0101

0.11

182

213

GNKO

GNKO

GNKO

GNKO

GNKO

GNKO

GNKOO

O

O

O

O

O

O

SSSSSSSobaehT

eSRSt Ss Se ST STe SeziS

sSeSTSTeSt Sf Si Sr SD Sk SrameR SSSeRtseTTek

SSP

S otdeifitrecneebevahstsetevo

dSeSsSsSaSPS:StSlSuSsS#S2S#

SP1

SPePzPiPSP#

SP1

SP

eziS#S2StSsS:tluseRdetargetnI

ssendPrPaPHPlSPl

SPe

SPn

SPi

SPr

SPB

SP

SSP

SP

SP

dessaP:tlus

05.0±03.84Ø

WBH

9311SB

ssaPtoNssaP

mm01.0-/2.0+01.4

60.4

71.84

0.101

0

0

GNKO

GNKO

GNKOO

O

O

na(etacifitrecsihT

vorppA

tluseRtseTTe

ehtrofelbisnopser

wevitceffffeebtonlliw)ypoCdn

ybdev erP

deilppustcudorpfotolemase

pedgnitsetfopmatsehttuohtiw

ybderape

.ynapmocruoyb

sihtfotlusergnitseT.tnemtrap

21-7102:etadeussI 2017

ylnoetacifitrec

)DP/MM/YY(82-2 PDM/

MARKING REQUIREMENTS

• Beam components & basic dimensions.• Load tables, stating a factor of safety of at least 1.65.

• Is the correct plan bracing specified.• Are the E & I figures, self-weight & alloy specified.• Are the maximum moment & shear forces stated.

• Permissible loads calculated in accordance with EN1999:2007, is this specified and are calculationsavailable. Or, has data been obtained from physicaltesting to EN 12811 part 3.

USER GUIDE/DATA SHEET

Is there an aluminium beam guide/data sheet available which in includes the following information:

Note: Marking location can vary