3720chestnut - phila.gov submission... · residences near transit and in a building equipped with...

CIVIC DESIGN REVIEWPhiladelphia City Planning Commission

JULY 2018

3720CHESTNUT

CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW | 3720CHESTNUT | JULY 2018 | SITIO architecture + urbanism 2

3720CHESTNUT

DESIGN ARCHITECTSITIO ARCHITECTURE + URBANISM2001 MARKET ST, STE 2500PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

EXECUTIVE ARCHITECTNELCO ARCHITECTURE INC1700 MARKET STREET, STE 2005PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSTUDIO BRYAN HANES340 N. 12 STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107

CIVIL ENGINEERURBAN ENGINEERS530 WALNUT STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

OWNEREM CHESTNUT VENTURE101 W. ELM STCONSHOHOCKEN, PA 19428

DEVELOPEREPG URBAN MULTIFAMILY101 W. ELM STCONSHOHOCKEN, PA 19428


CONTENTS

CDR Application

Existing Site Context

Existing Site Survey

Complete Streets Checklist

Illustrative Site Plan

Site Plan

Landscape Plan

Floor Plans

Elevations

Site Sections

Renderings

Massing

Solar Studies

Sustainability

Materials

Public Space Diagram

4

5

9

10

18

19

20

21

26

30

32

35

37

38

39

40

PROJECT SUMMARY

3720 Chestnut Street is a multifamily residential mixed-use project located

between Chestnut and Sansom Streets, mid-block between 37th and 38th

Street in University City. The project site consists of 26,546 s.f. that are part

of a broader 59,575 s.f. unity of use site which also encompasses the Penn/

Drexel Newman Center and the St. Agatha - St. James Parish. The site is zoned

CMX-4, Community Commercial Mixed-Use, the building being designed

within the zoning requirements. The project at 3720 Chestnut consists of a

427,1000 g.s.f., 30-story tower that will house 420 apartments along with its

support and amenity spaces, 4,000 s.f. of retail fronting Chestnut Street, and

underground parking for 40 vehicles and 142 bicycles.

The tower has two entrances off Chestnut Street and Samson Street that are

connected to a landscaped garden that links both streets at the pedestrian

level. The landscaped area also ties the streetscape to the retail spaces

fronting Chestnut Street. The base of the tower consists of two masonry-

clad volumes that flank the void of a double-height lobby which is focused on

gardens to the east and west of the space. The mixed-use high-rise building is

designed as a “tower-in-the-garden”, connecting Sansom Street and Chestnut

Street along a nicely planted and vibrant pedestrian promenade. Sited on a

block that is book-ended by two churches, the building enhances its context,

blending tenant amenities with public open space and retail through a series

of finely-scaled terraces, decks, and gardens.

The cladding on the base’s two volumes contrast and complement each other,

the north facing volume is a shell clad in light masonry, the south volume

is clad in a medium-dark masonry. The material palette is in-keeping with

the quality of the materials found in the adjacent institutional and religious

buildings. Above the base the materials transition to an equally contrasting

and complementing palette of metal and glass. The glass is of two types: the

glass at the north side of the building is a clear to blue glass with a hint of

reflectivity, the glass at the south end is a darker slightly grey glass which adds

depth and weight to the contrasting volume.

The redevelopment of the site will result in the incorporation of several

sustainable elements that will greatly enhance the quality and beauty of the

surrounding environment. The impervious asphalt paving that now covers

most of the site will be eliminated and replaced with a combination of in ground

landscaping and pervious paving, to manage stormwater and dramatically

reduce the heat island effect of current site conditions. The building will be

developed using sustainable materials and in accordance and potentially

exceeding ASHRAE energy standards. The project will provide hundreds of

residences near transit and in a building equipped with car share, green vehicles

and bike parking – and within walking distance to employment, services and

amenities – to support and foster sustainable and healthy lifestyles.

CDR PROJECT APPLICATION FORM

L&I APPLICATION NUMBER:

What is the trigger causing the project to require CDR Review? Explain briefly.

PROJECT LOCATION

CONTACT INFORMATION

Planning District: Council District:

Address:

Is this parcel within a Master Plan District? Yes No

Applicant Name: Primary Phone:

Email: Address:

Property Owner: Developer

Architect:

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE

Philadelphia, PA 19103

[email protected]

(215) 268-3822

Third Council District

857650

The project greater than 100 dwelling units.

2001 Market Street, Suite 2500

EPG Urban Chestnut, LLC

SITIO architecture + urbanism

3720 Chestnut Street

University City - SW

Philadelphia, PA 19104

EPG Urban Multifamily, L.P.

The project has greater than 100,000 s.f. of new gross floor area.

Antonio Fiol-Silva, FAIA

SITE CONDITIONS

SITE USES

COMMUNITY MEETING

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT HEARING

Community meeting held: Yes No

If yes, please provide written documentation as proof.

If no, indicate the date and time the community meeting will be held:

Present Use:

Proposed Use:

Area of Proposed Uses, Broken Out by Program (Include Square Footage and # of Units):

Proposed # of Parking Units:

Site Area:

Existing Zoning: Are Zoning Variances required? Yes No

ZBA hearing scheduled: Yes No NA______

If yes, indicate the date hearing will be held:

Date:

Penn/Drexel Newman Catholic Center

Total area: 427,100 g.s.f. Area consits of: 400,100 s.f. of residential (including 420 units and common/service/amenity areas), 4,000 s.f. of retail, and 23,000 s.f. of parking areas.

40 car parking spaces total (Includes: 2 accesible spaces [1 car & 1 van], 4 car share spaces, and 3 electric car spaces). Additionally, owner has secured 75 parking spaces at the adjacent garage at 38th & Walnut/Sansom. 142 class 1B bicycle parking spaces.

-

(Project site is within a 59,575 s.f. unity of use area).26,546 s.f. / 0.61 acres.

CMX-4

Residential Mixed-Use

Date: 6/13/18 Time: 6pm

EM Chestnut Venture, LLC

CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW | 3720CHESTNUT | JULY 2018 | SITIO architecture + urbanism 4CDR APPLICATION |

CDR APPLICATION

X


EXISTING SITE CONTEXT

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

DREXEL UNIVERSITY

RITTENHOUSE SQUARE

SITE



CENTER CITY

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSLYVANIA

DREXEL UNIVERSITY

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSLYVANIA MEDICAL CENTER

WHARTON

UNIVERSITY CITY SCIENCE CENTER

PENN PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER

30TH STREET AMTRAK STATION

SCHULYKILL YARDS

SITE



AERIAL VIEW VIEW FROM SOUTH EAST

VIEW FROM NORTH EAST

VIEW FROM SOUTH WEST

VIEW FROM NORTH WEST

CHESTNUT STREET

38

TH

ST

RE

ET

37

TH

ST

RE

ET

SANSOM STREET

Chestnut St

Sansom St

38

th S

T

37

th S

T



11

2

2

3

3

4

4


EXISTING SITE SURVEY

DEVELOPMENT SITE

ZONING LOT


COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST

COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission

1

INSTRUCTIONS This Checklist is an implementation tool of the Philadelphia Complete Streets Handbook (the “Handbook”) and enables City engineers and planners to review projects for their compliance with the Handbook’s policies. The handbook provides design guidance and does not supersede or replace language, standards or policies established in the City Code, City Plan, or Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

The Philadelphia City Planning Commission receives this Checklist as a function of its Civic Design Review (CDR) process. This checklist is used to document how project applicants considered and accommodated the needs of all users of city streets and sidewalks during the planning and/or design of projects affecting public rights‐of‐way. Departmental reviewers will use this checklist to confirm that submitted designs incorporate complete streets considerations (see §11‐901 of The Philadelphia Code). Applicants for projects that require Civic Design Review shall complete this checklist and attach it to plans submitted to the Philadelphia City Planning Commission for review, along with an electronic version.

The Handbook and the checklist can be accessed at http://www.phila.gov/CityPlanning/projectreviews/Pages/CivicDesignReview.aspx

PRELIMINARY PCPC REVIEW AND COMMENT:

DATE

FINAL STREETS DEPT REVIEW AND COMMENT:

DATE


2

INSTRUCTIONS (continued) APPLICANTS SHOULD MAKE SURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:

� This checklist is designed to be filled out electronically in Microsoft Word format. Please submit the Word version of the checklist. Text fields will expand automatically as you type.

� All plans submitted for review must clearly dimension the widths of the Furnishing, Walking, and Building Zones (as defined in Section 1 of the Handbook). “High Priority” Complete Streets treatments (identified in Table 1 and subsequent sections of the Handbook) should be identified and dimensioned on plans.

� All plans submitted for review must clearly identify and site all street furniture, including but not limited to bus shelters, street signs and hydrants.

� Any project that calls for the development and installation of medians, bio‐swales and other such features in the right‐of‐way may require a maintenance agreement with the Streets Department.

� ADA curb‐ramp designs must be submitted to Streets Department for review

� Any project that significantly changes the curb line may require a City Plan Action. The City Plan Action Application is available at http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/survey‐and‐design‐bureau/city‐plans‐unit . An application to the Streets Department for a City Plan Action is required when a project plan proposes the:

o Placing of a new street; o Removal of an existing street; o Changes to roadway grades, curb lines, or widths; or o Placing or striking a city utility right‐of‐way.

Complete Streets Review Submission Requirement*: EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, should be at an identified standard engineering scale

o FULLY DIMENSIONED o CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS/LAYBY LANES o TREE PITS/LANDSCAPING o BICYCLE RACKS/STATIONS/STORAGE AREAS o TRANSIT SHELTERS/STAIRWAYS

PROPOSED CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, should be at an identified standard engineering scale o FULLY DIMENSIONED, INCLUDING DELINEATION OF WALKING, FURNISHING, AND BUILDING ZONES AND

PINCH POINTS o PROPOSED CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS/LAYBY LANES o PROPOSED TREE PITS/LANDSCAPING o BICYCLE RACKS/STATIONS/STORAGE AREAS o TRANSIT SHELTERS/STAIRWAYS

*APPLICANTS PLEASE NOTE: ONLY FULL‐SIZE, READABLE SITE PLANS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ADDITIONAL PLANS MAY BE REQUIRED AND WILL BE REQUESTED IF NECESSARY



3

GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION 1. PROJECT NAME

3720 Chestnut Street 2. DATE

April 16th 2018 3. APPLICANT NAME

EPG Urban Chestnut LLC 4. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION

5. PROJECT AREA: list precise street limits and scope Site is bounded by Chestnut Street to the North, Sansom Street to the South. 38th Street to the west and University of Pennsylvania’s Greenfield Center to the east.

6. OWNER NAME EPG Urban Chestnut LLC

7. OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION Jeremy Small

8. ENGINEER / ARCHITECT NAME Sitio Architecture + Urbanism

9. ENGINEER / ARCHITECT CONTACT INFORMATION Antonio Fiol‐Silva

10. STREETS: List the streets associated with the project. Complete Streets Types can be found at www.phila.gov/map under the “Complete Street Types” field. Complete Streets Types are also identified in Section 3 of the Handbook. STREET FROM TO COMPLETE STREET TYPE Chestnut Street 37th Street 38th Street Walkable Commerical Corridor Sansom Street 37th Street 38th Street Local 38th Street Sansom Street Chestnut Street Urban Arterial

11. Does the Existing Conditions site survey clearly identify the following existing conditions with dimensions? a. Parking and loading regulations in curb lanes adjacent to the site YES NO b. Street Furniture such as bus shelters, honor boxes, etc. YES NO N/A c. Street Direction YES NO d. Curb Cuts YES NO N/A e. Utilities, including tree grates, vault covers, manholes, junction

boxes, signs, lights, poles, etc. YES NO N/A

f. Building Extensions into the sidewalk, such as stairs and stoops YES NO N/A

APPLICANT: General Project Information Additional Explanation / Comments:

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: General Project Information Reviewer Comments:


4

PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.3) 12. SIDEWALK: list Sidewalk widths for each street frontage. Required Sidewalk widths are listed in Section 4.3 of the

Handbook. STREET FRONTAGE TYPICAL SIDEWALK WIDTH

(BUILDING LINE TO CURB) Required / Existing / Proposed

CITY PLAN SIDEWALK WIDTH Existing / Proposed

Chestnut Street 12’ / 18’ / 18’ 18’ / 18’ Sansom Street 10’ / 10’ / 10’ 10’ / 10’ 38th Street 12’ / 11’ / 11’ 11’ / 11’ / / /

13. WALKING ZONE: list Walking Zone widths for each street frontage. The Walking Zone is defined in Section 4.3 of the Handbook, including required widths. STREET FRONTAGE WALKING ZONE

Required / Existing / Proposed Chestnut Street 6’ / 11’‐9” / 11’‐9” Sansom Street 5’ / 6’‐2” / 6’‐2” 38th Street 5’‐6” / 5’‐5” / 5’‐5” / /

14. VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS: list Vehicular Intrusions into the sidewalk. Examples include but are not limited to; driveways, lay‐by lanes, etc. Driveways and lay‐by lanes are addressed in sections 4.8.1 and 4.6.3, respectively, of the Handbook. EXISTING VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT Chestnut Street Driveway 13’ 140’ East of 38th and

Chestnut Streets Sansom Street Driveway 27’‐6” 180’ East of 38th and

Sansom Streets 38th Street 20’ 47’ North of 38th and

Sansom Streets

PROPOSED VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT Sansom Street 24’ 158’ East of 38th and

Sansom Streets Sansom Street 24’ 192’ East of 38th and

Sansom Streets


EM CHESTNUT VENTURE, LLC



5

PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (continued) DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

15. When considering the overall design, does it create or enhance a pedestrian environment that provides safe and comfortable access for all pedestrians at all times of the day?

YES NO YES NO

APPLICANT: Pedestrian Component Additional Explanation / Comments: Existing Walking Zones to remain. A pedestrian accessible path on the eastern extent of the development will traverse the site between Chestnut and Sansom Streets. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Pedestrian Component Reviewer Comments:


6

BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.4) 16. BUILDING ZONE: list the MAXIMUM, existing and proposed Building Zone width on each street frontage. The Building

Zone is defined as the area of the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the building face, wall, or fence marking the property line, or a lawn in lower density residential neighborhoods. The Building Zone is further defined in section 4.4.1 of the Handbook. STREET FRONTAGE MAXIMUM BUILDING ZONE WIDTH

Existing / Proposed Chestnut Street 2’‐5” / 2’‐5” Sansom Street 0’ / 0’ 38th Street 1’‐2” / 1’‐2” /

17. FURNISHING ZONE: list the MINIMUM, recommended, existing, and proposed Furnishing Zone widths on each street frontage. The Furnishing Zone is further defined in section 4.4.2 of the Handbook. STREET FRONTAGE MINIMUM FURNISHING ZONE WIDTH

Recommended / Existing / Proposed Chestnut Street 4’‐0” / 5’‐6” / 5’‐6” Sansom Street 3’‐6” / 3’‐8” / 3’‐8” 38th Street 4’‐0” / 5’‐2” / 5’‐2” / /

18. Identify proposed “high priority” building and furnishing zone design treatments that are incorporated into the design plan, where width permits (see Handbook Table 1). Are the following treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?

DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

Bicycle Parking YES NO N/A YES NO Lighting YES NO N/A YES NO Benches YES NO N/A YES NO Street Trees YES NO N/A YES NO Street Furniture YES NO N/A YES NO

19. Does the design avoid tripping hazards? YES NO N/A YES NO

20. Does the design avoid pinch points? Pinch points are locations where the Walking Zone width is less than the required width identified in item 13, or requires an exception

YES NO N/A YES NO




7

BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (continued)

APPLICANT: Building & Furnishing Component Additional Explanation / Comments: Eight (8) new street trees are proposed in the furnishing zone along Chestnut Street in front of the proposed residential tower. New bike parking locations between each tree is proposed. Existing light poles along Chestnut and Sansom street are proposed to be replaced with new LED light bulbs. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Building & Furnishing Component Reviewer Comments:

21. Do street trees and/or plants comply with street installation requirements (see sections 4.4.7 & 4.4.8)

YES NO N/A YES NO

22. Does the design maintain adequate visibility for all roadway users at intersections?

YES NO N/A YES NO


8

BICYCLE COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.5) 23. List elements of the project that incorporate recommendations of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, located online at

http://phila2035.org/wp‐content/uploads/2012/06/bikePedfinal2.pdf No recommendations incorporated at this time. Parking protected Bicycle lane already exists on Chestnut Street.

24. List the existing and proposed number of bicycle parking spaces, on‐ and off‐street. Bicycle parking requirements are provided in The Philadelphia Code, Section 14‐804. BUILDING / ADDRESS REQUIRED

SPACES ON‐STREET Existing / Proposed

ON SIDEWALK Existing / Proposed

OFF‐STREET Existing / Proposed

St. Agatha Church ‐ 3728 Chestnut St 3 0 / 0 2 / 2 0 / 0 Netter Building – 111 S. 38th St 3 0 / 0 3 / 3 6 / 0 Rectory – 3728 Chestnut St 2 0/ 0 1 / 1 0 / 0 Residential Tower – 3720 Chestnut 140 0 / 0 1 / 20 0 / 152

25. Identify proposed “high priority” bicycle design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that are

incorporated into the design plan, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority” elements identified and dimensioned on the plan?

DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL

Conventional Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO Buffered Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO Bicycle‐Friendly Street YES NO N/A YES NO

26. Does the design provide bicycle connections to local bicycle, trail, and transit networks?

YES NO N/A YES NO

27. Does the design provide convenient bicycle connections to residences, work places, and other destinations?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Bicycle Component Additional Explanation / Comments: 3720 Chestnut Residential Tower will benefit from having an existing parking‐protected bike lane already in place on the north cartway side of Chestnut Street. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Bicycle Component Reviewer Comments:




9

CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.6) DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

28. Does the design limit conflict among transportation modes along the curb?

YES NO YES NO

29. Does the design connect transit stops to the surrounding pedestrian network and destinations?

YES NO N/A YES NO

30. Does the design provide a buffer between the roadway and pedestrian traffic?

YES NO N/A YES NO

31. How does the proposed plan affect the accessibility, visibility, connectivity, and/or attractiveness of public transit? Proposed design will improve pedestrian connectivity to the SEPTA Bus Lines 21. The pedestrian walkway along the east side of the proposed development will give pedestrians access from Sansom street to Chestnut street to continue to the SEPTA bus stop at 37th and Chestnut Streets.

YES NO

APPLICANT: Curbside Management Component Additional Explanation / Comments: The proposed curbline to remain as is. The proposed development to eliminate an existing curb‐cut and maintain existing parking along the south curbline of Chestnut Street. The removed curb‐cut will eliminate vehicle intrusion through the south footway in Chestnut Street allowing for a safer pedestrian environment in the sidewalk. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Curbside Management Component Reviewer Comments:


10

VEHICLE / CARTWAY COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.7) 32. If lane changes are proposed, , identify existing and proposed lane widths and the design speed for each street

frontage; If not, go to question No. 35 STREET FROM TO LANE WIDTHS

Existing / Proposed DESIGN SPEED

/ / / /

DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

33. What is the maximum AASHTO design vehicle being accommodated by the design?

No Lane Changes Proposed, N/A

YES NO

34. Will the project affect a historically certified street? An inventory of historic streets(1) is maintained by the Philadelphia Historical Commission.

YES NO YES NO

35. Will the public right‐of‐way be used for loading and unloading activities?

YES NO YES NO

36. Does the design maintain emergency vehicle access? YES NO YES NO

37. Where new streets are being developed, does the design connect and extend the street grid?

YES NO N/A YES NO

38. Does the design support multiple alternative routes to and from destinations as well as within the site?

YES NO N/A YES NO

39. Overall, does the design balance vehicle mobility with the mobility and access of all other roadway users?

YES NO YES NO

APPLICANT: Vehicle / Cartway Component Additional Explanation / Comments: Existing Cartway conditions to remain.

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Vehicle / Cartway Component Reviewer Comments: (1) http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/images/uploads/documents/Historical_Street_Paving.pdf




11

URBAN DESIGN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.8) DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

40. Does the design incorporate windows, storefronts, and other active uses facing the street?

YES NO N/A YES NO

41. Does the design provide driveway access that safely manages pedestrian / bicycle conflicts with vehicles (see Section 4.8.1)?

YES NO N/A YES NO

42. Does the design provide direct, safe, and accessible connections between transit stops/stations and building access points and destinations within the site?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Urban Design Component Additional Explanation / Comments: Two retail storefronts are proposed in front of the new residential tower. A front plaza area will have benches and tables within the property to create an inviting, social atmosphere.

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Urban Design Component Reviewer Comments:


12

INTERSECTIONS & CROSSINGS COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.9) 43. If signal cycle changes are proposed, please identify Existing and Proposed Signal Cycle lengths; if not, go to question

No. 48. SIGNAL LOCATION EXISTING

CYCLE LENGTH PROPOSED CYCLE LENGTH

DEPARTMENTAL

APPROVAL

44. Does the design minimize the signal cycle length to reduce pedestrian wait time?

YES NO N/A YES NO

45. Does the design provide adequate clearance time for pedestrians to cross streets?

YES NO N/A YES NO

46. Does the design minimize pedestrian crossing distances by narrowing streets or travel lanes, extending curbs, reducing curb radii, or using medians or refuge islands to break up long crossings? If yes, City Plan Action may be required.

YES NO N/A YES NO

47. Identify “High Priority” intersection and crossing design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that will be incorporated into the design, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority” design treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?

YES NO

Marked Crosswalks YES NO N/A YES NO Pedestrian Refuge Islands YES NO N/A YES NO Signal Timing and Operation YES NO N/A YES NO Bike Boxes YES NO N/A YES NO

48. Does the design reduce vehicle speeds and increase visibility for all modes at intersections?

YES NO N/A YES NO

49. Overall, do intersection designs limit conflicts between all modes and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety?

YES NO N/A YES NO

APPLICANT: Intersections & Crossings Component Additional Explanation / Comments: No Signal Changes proposed at this time.

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Intersections & Crossings Component Reviewer Comments:




13

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

APPLICANT Additional Explanation / Comments:

DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW Additional Reviewer Comments:



EXISTING SITE

ST. AGATHAST. JAMES CHURCH

CHURCHRECTORY

THE NETTER CENTER

EXISTINGNEWMAN CENTER

DEVELOPMENT SITE

ZONING LOT

ENTRY

ENTRY

PARKINGENTRY

SERVICEENTRY


ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN

3720 CHESTNUT SITE UPENN SITEST. JAMES-ST. AGATHA CHURCH

& THE NETTER CENTER


CHURCH

RECTORY

3720CHESTNUT

THE NETTER CENTER

DEVELOPMENT SITE

ZONING LOT

SANSOM STREET

38TH

STR

EE

T (S

R 0

013)

37TH

STR

EE

T

CHESTNUT STREET (SR 003)

205'

-4"

15'-1

"

48'-9"

17'-7"83'

24' 24'

5'-6"' FURNISHING ZONE11'-9"' WALKING ZONE

6'-2"' WALKING ZONE3'-8"' FURNISHING ZONE

5'-5"' WALKING ZONE5'-2"' FURNISHING ZONE

11'

11'

GENERAL NOTES

Date:Drawn By:Checked By:

Job No:

SEALS

- SITIO LLC - ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDCOPYRIGHTAll ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by this drawing and written material appearing hereinconstitute the original and unpublished work of SITIO, LLC and the same may not be duplicated, used or disclosed to anyperson, firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the architect.

2018

DESCRIPTIONDATEREV #

Scale:

ARCHITECT:

2001 MARKET STREET, SUITE 2500PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103t. 215.268.3820 f. 215.268.3821

CONSULTANTS

CIVIL ENGINEERINGURBAN ENGINEERS, INC.530 WALNUT STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19106PHONE: (215) 922-8081

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, FIRE

LOCATION:

CLIENT:

1"=20'

1/12

/201

8 5:

08:3

7 P

MT:

\Pro

ject

s\20

1728

0223

.000

_Exe

ter\W

orki

ng\D

WG

\She

et S

et\B

uild

ing\

Stre

ets

Zoni

ngS

ubm

issi

on

MJTJAB

03/01/182017280223.000

3720 CHESTNUTSTREET

3720 CHESTNUT STPHILADELPHIA PA 19104

EPG URBANMULTIFAMILY LLC

ZONING SITE PLAN

ZSD-0

SITE LOCATION MAPBUILDING RENDERING

SITE PLAN NOTES

LIGHTING NOTES

3' PATHWAY BOLLARD 12' PEDESTRIAN POLE


DEVELOPMENT SITE

ZONING LOT


LANDSCAPE PLAN

3720 CHESTNUT SITE UPENN SITEST. JAMES-ST. AGATHA CHURCH

& THE NETTER CENTER


CHURCH

RECTORY

3720CHESTNUT

THE NETTER CENTER

DEVELOPMENT SITE

ZONING LOT


FLOOR PLANGROUND FLOOR AT SANSOM ST

PARKINGENTRY

SANSOM STREET BUILDING ENTRY

CHURCH RECTORY

THE NETTER CENTER

SERVICEENTRY

220’-7 1/4”

84

’-8

”


FLOOR PLANGROUND FLOOR AT CHESTNUT ST

CHESTNUT STREET BUILDING ENTRY

CHURCH RECTORY

THE NETTER CENTER

197’-2 1/2”

93

’- 0

1/2

”


FLOOR PLAN2ND FLOOR AMENITY + RESIDENTIAL

AMENITY TERRACE

COOL DOWN

FITNESS

STUDY

MEETING RM

LOUNGE

CO-WORKING

IT

M

W

OPEN TO BELOW

TR

1 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT

2 BEDROOMUNIT

2 BEDROOMUNIT

STUDIO

202’-11 1/2”

10

4’-

0”


FLOOR PLANTYPICAL RESIDENTIAL PLAN

TR

IT

2 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT

2 BEDROOMUNIT

2 BEDROOMUNIT

2 BEDROOMUNIT

STUDIO

STUDIOSTUDIOSTUDIO

203’-5”

65

’-4

”

65

’-2

”


FLOOR PLAN29TH FLOOR AMENITY PLAN

TR

RESIDENT LOUNGE

M

AMENITY DECK

W

STOR

IT

2 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT

1 BEDROOMUNIT 2 BEDROOM

UNIT

STUDIO

STUDIO STUDIOPOOL

65

’-4

”

100’-1 3/4”69’-3 1/4”


29’- 0” AFG

317’- 0” AFG

80’- 0” AFG +/-

343’- 0” AFG SANSOM ST

NORTH ELEVATION

B

A

C

A

A

D

15’0’ 30’ 60’ 120’

334’- 0” AFG CHESTNUT

CLEAR GLAZING

TINTED GLAZING

METAL PANEL

STONE MASONRY

BRICK MASONRY

PERFORATED SCREEN

PAINTED CONCRETE

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

MATERIALS


G

C/A

C/A

B

A

A

D

E

15’0’ 30’ 60’ 120’

SOUTH ELEVATION334’- 0” AFG CHESTNUT

300’-0” AFG

29’- 0” AFG

317’- 0” AFG


80’- 0” AFG +/-

MATERIALS

CLEAR GLAZING

TINTED GLAZING

METAL PANEL

STONE MASONRY

BRICK MASONRY

PERFORATED SCREEN

PAINTED CONCRETE

A

B

C

D

E

F

G


300’- 0” AFG

29’- 0” AFG

317’- 0” AFG


80’- 0” AFG +/-

EAST ELEVATION

15’0’ 30’ 60’ 120’

B

A

A

C/A

C/A

B

A

E D

F E

A

F


MATERIALS

CLEAR GLAZING

TINTED GLAZING

METAL PANEL

STONE MASONRY

BRICK MASONRY

PERFORATED SCREEN

PAINTED CONCRETE

A

B

C

D

E

F

G


EXISTINGNETTERCENTER

300’- 0” AFG

29’- 0” AFG

317’- 0” AFG


80’- 0” AFG +/-

WEST ELEVATION

G

A

B

A

A

A

D

E F E

C/A

E

C/A

B

A

15’0’ 30’ 60’ 120’


MATERIALS

CLEAR GLAZING

TINTED GLAZING

METAL PANEL

STONE MASONRY

BRICK MASONRY

PERFORATED SCREEN

PAINTED CONCRETE

A

B

C

D

E

F

G


SITE SECTIONS

300’- 0” AFG

29’- 0” AFG

317’- 0” AFG


80’- 0” AFG +/-

15’0’ 30’ 60’ 120’

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY

CIRCULATION

RESIDENTIAL

MEP/UTILITY

PARKING

RETAIL

PROGRAM

343’- 0” AFG SANSOM


SITE SECTIONS

300’- 0” AFG

29’- 0” AFG

317’- 0” AFG

80’- 0” AFG +/-

15’0’ 30’ 60’ 120’

343’- 0” AFG SANSOM334’- 0” AFG CHESTNUT

RESIDENTIAL AMENITY

CIRCULATION

RESIDENTIAL

MEP/UTILITY

PARKING

RETAIL

PROGRAM


RENDERINGS

VIEW FROM CHESTNUT STREET

CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW | 3720CHESTNUT | JULY 2018 | SITIO architecture + urbanism 34VIEW FROM SANSOM STREET


MASSING

AERIAL VIEW FROM NORTH/EAST AERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTH/EAST


MASSING

AERIAL VIEW FROM NORTH/WEST AERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTH/WEST


SOLAR ANALYSISWINTER SOLSTICE SPRING SOLSTICE SUMMER SOLSTICE AUTUMN SOLSTICE

6:00 AM

12:00 PM

6:00 PM

SANSOM ST

CHESTNUT ST

SANSOM ST

CHESTNUT ST

SANSOM ST

CHESTNUT ST

Civic Design Review, Philadelphia Sustainability Questionnaire

Categories Benchmark

Meets or Exceeds the Benchmark (yes or no)?

If yes, please describe how or reference the applicable document in the CDR

submission.

Location and Transportation

Access to Quality Transit

Locate a functional entry of the project within a ¼-mile (400-meter) walking distance of existing or planned bus, streetcar, or rideshare stops, bus rapid transit stops, light or heavy rail stations.

Reduced Parking Footprint

All new parking areas to be located in the rear yard of the property or under the building, and unenclosed or uncovered parking areas are 40% or less of the site area.

Green Vehicles

Designate 5% of all parking spaces used by the project as preferred parking for green vehicles or car share vehicles. Clearly identify and enforce for sole use by car share or green vehicles, which include plug-in electric vehicles and alternative fuel vehicles.

Bike Share StationIncorporate a bike share station in coordination with and conformance to the standards of Philadelphia Bike Share.

Sustainable Sites

Pervious Site Surfaces

Provides vegetated and/or pervious open space that is 30% or greater of the site's Open Area, as defined by the zoning code. Vegetated and/or green roofs can be included in this calculation.

Rainwater Management

Conform to the stormwater requirements of the Philadelphia Water Department(PWD) and either: A)Develop a green street and donate it to PWD, designed and constructed in accordance with the PWD Green Streets Design Manual, OR B) Manage additional runoff from adjacent streets on the development site, designed and constructed in accordance with specifications the PWD Stormwater Management Regulations

Heat Island Reduction (excluding roofs)

Reduce the heat island effect through either of the following strategies for 50% or more of all on-site hardscapes: A) Hardscapes that have a high reflectance, an SRI>29. B) Shading by trees, structures, or solar panels.

Philadelphia City Planning Commission

Yes - Surface parking will be removed and all parking will be located under the building.

No - A bike share station is locatednearby, on 38th & Sansom Street.

Yes - Turf, plantings and permeable pavers account for some 10,000 sf of total 15,000 sf of open space on site.

Yes - Three spaces are provided for electric vehicles and four spaces are provided for car share vehicles.

Yes - SEPTA has bus stops at: 38th & Chestnut and 37th & Chestnut and a trolley stop at 36th F Chestnut.

Yes- The project meets the design re-quirements from PWD. Developing a Green Street in the R.O.W. is not feasible due to multiple existing utilties in the footway of Chestnut St. Sansom St. has multiple utility laterals entering the site prohibiting stormwater mana-gement in the footway as well. The site constraints prevent managing additional R.O.W. stormwater.

Yes - The project employs concrete unit pavers with finishes and colors that meet the >29 SRI requirement. The bluestone pavers at the north of the site will also be light enough to meet surface reflection requirements.The tower, as well as the many pro-posed trees along the sloped garden-walk will provided abundant shade.

Civic Design Review, Philadelphia Sustainability Questionnaire

Categories Benchmark

Meets or Exceeds the Benchmark (yes or no)?

If yes, please describe how or reference the applicable document in the CDR

submission.

Water Efficiency

Outdoor Water Use

Maintain on-site vegetation without irrigation. OR, reduce the watering requirements to at least 50% from the calculated baseline for the site's peak watering month.

Energy and Atmosphere

Energy Commissioning

Acquire a separate, independent commissioning service to insure that the energy related systems are installed, calibrated, and perform as intended.

Energy Performance

The project will reduce energy consumption by: Achieving 10% energy saving or more from an established baseline using ASHRAE standard 90.1-2010, OR by conforming to ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide for Commercial Buildings.

On-Site Renewable Energy

Produce renewable energy on-site that will provide at least 3% of the project's anticipated energy usage.

Innovation

InnovationAny other sustainable measures that could positively impact the public realm.

Philadelphia City Planning Commission

Yes - The project will meet code established energy minimums. Design team will evaluate additional energy savings above code minimum.

No - Energy commissioning is not being considered at this time, but it Is not being ruled out.

No - Additional innovation measures Are not being considered at this time, but they are not being ruled out.

No - On-site renewable energy is not being considered at this time, but it Is not being ruled out.

Yes - The projectʼs soil mixes and depths will likely require some irrigation, but it will reach 50% reduction in water use.


SUSTAINABILITY


MATERIALS

METAL PANEL

CLEARGLAZING

TINTED GLAZING

BRICKMASONRY

CLEARGLAZING

STONEMASONRY

PERFORATED SCREEN

TOTAL SITE SF: 59,575PUBLIC SPACE AS DRAWN SF: 12,511% of OPEN SPACE: 21%

1 TREE/1000 SF OF PUBLIC SPACE=13 TREES

15 TREES PROPOSED

THE PLAN DESIGN WILL COMPLY WITH THE FLOOR AREA BONUS REQUIREMENTS FOR

PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PER ZONING CODE SECTION 14-702(6)(A), INCLUDING:

• Minimum 21% of 59,575 SF lot area (12,511 SF) to be provided as public open space.

• Public space open to sky (except for arbors and trellises)

• Public space includes minimum 5,000 sq. ft. of contiguous area

• Public space complies with requirements of Americans with Disabilities Act

• No more than 50% of public space shall be located more than three ft. above sidewalk

• Public space shall not be used for vehicle movements

• Minimum of 30% of public space shall be landscaped

• At least one tree shall be provided for every 1,000 sq. ft. of public space

• Outdoor lighting shall be provided in accordance with code requirements

• Public space connected with sidewalk

• Public space shall be open at least from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily

• Public space shall receive natural light during the day


PUBLIC SPACE DIAGRAMST. AGATHAST. JAMES CHURCH

CHURCH

RECTORY

3720CHESTNUT

THE NETTER CENTER

DEVELOPMENT SITE

ON-SITE PUBLIC SPACE(PROVIDED PER ZONING CODE SECTION 14-702(6)(A))

ON-SITE PUBLIC SPACE(PROVIDED PER ZONING CODE SECTION 14-702(6)(A))

ZONING LOT LINE

3720chestnut - phila.gov submission... · residences near transit and in a building equipped with...

Documents