38912985 structural unemployment oct2010

Upload: luis-dutra

Post on 10-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 38912985 Structural Unemployment Oct2010

    1/2

    October 07, 2010

    E co n o m i cs Gr o u p

    John Silvia, Chief Economist [email protected] 704-374-7034

    Anika R. Khan, [email protected] 704-715-0575

    Job Seekers Ratio by IndustryRatio - Unemployed / Job Openings, Recovery: 2001 vs. 2009

    20.1

    6.8

    5.2

    2.7

    2.7

    4.5

    10.9

    5.4

    3.2

    1.9

    0.8

    2.4

    0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0

    Construction

    Manufacturing

    Trade, Transportation,and Utilities

    Professional andBusiness Services

    Education and HealthServices

    Leisure andHospitality

    2001 Recovery2009 Recovery

    As of July 2010(2001 recovery is based on

    13 months into the expansion)

    Peak Unemployment Rate by Industry

    Percent, NSA, Recession: 2001 vs. 2007

    13.0%

    10.5%

    11.3%

    14.2%

    6.7%

    12.4%

    14.0%

    7.4%

    6.9%

    6.6%

    10.0%

    4.4%

    9.1%

    27.1%

    0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%

    Construction

    Manufacturing

    Wholesale & RetailTrade

    Trans. and Utilities

    Leisure & Hospitality

    Edu. and HealthServices

    Prof. and BusinessServices

    2001 Recession2007 Recession

    Our Two Cents on Structural UnemploymentIn August, the unemployment rate rose to 9.6 percent, but it has beenstubbornly around this elevated level or higher for well over a year.Economists and policymakers have been engaged in heated debates aboutthe underlying cause for the sustained levels of joblessness. Much of thediscussion has focused on structural unemployment. Structural

    unemployment suggests there is a fundamental mismatch in the number of people who want to work and the number of jobs that are available for theirskills. The presence of structural unemployment means there are no easy fixes and any recovery in the labor market could be agonizingly slow.Structural Unemployment by Industry If we look at the number of unemployed workers to job openings by industry, we find the ratio of job seekers seems to be in line with theprevious recovery. The construction industry, however, is a clear outlier with more than 20 unemployed workers qualified for each job opening, which is almost twice the number of job seekers from the previousexpansion. Even the manufacturing sector, which was also hard hit,remains roughly in line with the previous expansion at almost sevenunemployed workers per job opening. This suggests there are signs of

    structural unemployment in the construction industry where workers skillsare not easily adaptable elsewhere. Another way to determine whetherskills match is to compare the peak unemployment rate in the currentrecession to the 2001 recession. Again, the construction sector is anobvious outlier with the peak unemployment rate reaching a staggering 27percent, which is almost double the peak rate in the previous downturn.

    A Closer Look at Construction JobsHow can we further check the existence of structural unemployment in theconstruction sector? Wage rigidity is yet another way to test for structuralunemployment. Sticky wages occur when firms ration scarce jobs, and wages adjust sluggishly to the supply and demand of labor. Nominalconstruction average hourly earnings grew at a fairly consistent clip beginning in 2006 when the series began. Since the start of the year,

    earnings appear to have flattened in real and nominal terms, which couldsuggest some wage rigidity. To be sure, we would need to see theconstruction industry recovering without an improvement in employment. As we are only a little more than a year into the recovery, such analysis isstill too premature; the cause could be cyclical versus structural. If there isindeed an issue of structural unemployment, what is the impact?Construction jobs make up only 4.3 percent of the overall labor market, soany impact would be limited. The loss of skills, however, by the 2.1 millionconstruction workers during the downturn is an obstacle to growth.

    Construction Average Hourly EarningsIn Dollars, Real (CPI Adj.) vs. Nominal, Seasonally Adjusted

    $21.0

    $22.0

    $23.0

    $24.0

    $25.0

    $26.0

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010$21.0

    $22.0

    $23.0

    $24.0

    $25.0

    $26.0

    Real Average Hourly Earnings: Aug @ $25.2Nominal Average Hourly Earnings: Aug @ $25.2

    Source: U.S. Department of Labor and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

    Structural Unemployment: Fact, Fiction or Too Early to Tell? M u c h h a s b e e n d i sc u s s ed a b o u t t h e o b s t i n a t e ly h i g h u n e m p l o y m e n t r a t e . I s s t ru c t u r a l u n e m p l o y m e n t t h ea n s w e r ? A n i n d u s t r y a n a l y s i s s h o w s n o b r o a d - b a s ed e v i d e n c e, b u t i t m a y b e t o o e a r ly t o t e ll .

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/8/2019 38912985 Structural Unemployment Oct2010

    2/2

    Wells Fargo Securities, LLC Economics Group

    Diane Schumaker-Krieg Global Head of Research& Economics

    (704) 715-8437(212) 214-5070

    [email protected]

    John E. Silvia, Ph.D. Chief Economist (704) 374-7034 [email protected]

    Mark Vitner Senior Economist (704) 383-5635 [email protected]

    Jay Bryson, Ph.D. Global Economist (704) 383-3518 [email protected] Anderson, Ph.D. Senior Economist (612) 667-9281 [email protected]

    Eugenio Aleman, Ph.D. Senior Economist (612) 667-0168 [email protected]

    Sam Bullard Senior Economist (704) 383-7372 [email protected]

    Anika Khan Economist (704) 715-0575 [email protected]

    Azhar Iqbal Econometrician (704) 383-6805 [email protected]

    Ed Kashmarek Economist (612) 667-0479 [email protected]

    Tim Quinlan Economist (704) 374-4407 [email protected]

    Wells Fargo Securities Economics Group publications are produced by Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, a U.S broker-dealerregistered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, and theSecurities Investor Protection Corp. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, distributes these publications directly and throughsubsidiaries including, but not limited to, Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank N.A, Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC,and Wells Fargo Securities International Limited. The information and opinions herein are for general information useonly. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC does not guarantee their accuracy or completeness, nor does

    Wells Fargo Securities, LLC assume any liability for any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions. Such information and opinions are subject to change without notice, are for generalinformation only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sales of any security oras personalized investment advice. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC is a separate legal entity and distinct from affiliated

    banks and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company 2010 Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.

    SECURITIES: NOT FDIC-INSURED NOT BANK-GUARANTEED MAY LOSE VALUE