39-610 title 1 heat-based solar technologies mengpin ge justin glier fraser kitchell andrew kuo...
TRANSCRIPT
39-610 Title 1
Heat-Based Solar Technologies
Mengpin GeJustin Glier
Fraser Kitchell
Andrew KuoSanchit WarayChenlu Zhang
39-610 Title2
Concentrating Solar Collectors
Image courtesy of Solarpower.com
Image courtesy of U.S. Department of Energy Image courtesy of BBC
Image courtesy of Gizmag.com
39-610 Title4
Concentrating Solar Collectors
Image courtesy of Solarpower.com
Image courtesy of U.S. Department of Energy Image courtesy of BBC
Image courtesy of Gizmag.com
39-610 Title6
Concentrating Solar Collectors
Image courtesy of Solarpower.com
Image courtesy of U.S. Department of Energy Image courtesy of BBC
Image courtesy of Gizmag.com
39-610 Title7
Power Tower
• Several demonstration projects worldwide
• Heat collection through heliostats
• Store heat through molten salt
• Less prone to intermittency• Steam cycle generates
electricity• Can be supplemented by
combined cycle gas turbines
39-610 Title8
Concentrating Solar Collectors
Image courtesy of Solarpower.com
Image courtesy of U.S. Department of Energy Image courtesy of BBC
Image courtesy of Gizmag.com
39-610 Title9
Life Cycle AssessmentEconomic cost& Environmental impact
Manufacturing of materials and components • Solar field
• Tower • Storage system • Buildings• Power block
Construction activities
• Cranes• Transports
Operation and maintenance
• Electricity • Natural gas • Water
Dismantling activities
• Dismantling cranes
• Transports to landfill
• Land filling
Solar Thermal Power Plant
Energy
Resources
Emissions
Electricity to the grid
System Boundary
Fig. Life cycle of a solar thermal power plantg CO2 equiv./kW h Central Tower Parabolic trough Solar field 5.61 7.88Power block 0.64 0.5Storage system 9.49 14.6Tower 0.04
Buildings 1.03 0.46Construction 0.18 0.34Decommissioning 0.000431 0.0198Subtotal 17 24Operation 186 161Total 203 185
Table. GHG emission in the life cycle of the solar thermal power plants in g CO2 equiv./kW h
Table: Cumulative energy demand in the life cycle of the solar thermal power plants in MJ/kW h
39-610 Title10
Life Cycle AssessmentEconomic cost
r: discount rateN: # of years of plant operationICi: investment cost
land& equipment construction labor engineering and other
services grid connection permits, financing, etc.
OMi: Routine Operating & Maintenance CostsFCi: Fuel CostEi: Net Energy Produced and Sold *footnote i means in year i.*This expression assumes that the discount rate is fixed
Fig. Estimate of typical LCOE for CSP plants, for moderate and high levels of DNI, compared to a cost forecast of conventional electricity generation.
Figure : Total Installed Cost Breakdown of 100 MW Parabolic Trough and Solar Tower*Parabolic trough system has 13.4 hours of thermal energy storage and solar tower system 15 hours
39-610 Title11
Materials Technology in CSPReflector materials
Requ
irem
ents
:
High specular reflectivity (>90%);Durability under tough outdoor service conditions (>20 years plant lifetime);Low manufacturing cost in large volume (<10.80/m2 )Easy curving and structural rigidity;
To d
ate
solu
tion:
Bla
ck-s
liver
ed
glas
s re
flect
or
Dra
wba
cks:
High accuracy curving of glass by thermal sagging or elastic defromation is expensiveThin glass(<1mm) easier to curve and lower in cost, but too fragile and difficult to handleSliver supply shortage
Alte
rnati
ve re
flect
or sy
stem
Al or Al/Ag coatingpolished Al substrate; top protective layer of anodization or polymerPolymer substrate with silver coating and poly protectionSubstrate Materials:•polyethylene terephthalate (PET)
•PET laminated to stainless-steel foil
•chrome-plated carbon steel strip.
Top Protective Layer (0.5-4 μm Al2O3)
Reflective Layer (100 nm Ag)Metal Back Layer (50 nm Cu)
Substrate (PET) or Chrome-Plated Steel (203 μm, 8 mils)
Fig. Structure of advanced solar reflective material.
Protective Layer of anodization or polymer)
Aluminum or aluminum/silver coating
Polished aluminum substrate
Poly protection(methyl methacrylate)
Silver coating
Polymer substrate
39-610 Title12
Hig
h-effi
cien
cy R
anki
ne
stea
m p
lant
s
Requisite• High-
temperature components-Receiver
• >600°C, 200–300 bar pressure
Tube materials for high-temperature receivers •Inconel•similar high-quality stainless steel
•Nickel alloys, which tend to be very expensive.
Spec
tral
ly s
elec
tive
abso
rber
coa
ting
Challenge• From today’s
400-500°C, vacuum protected operation
• Future direct steam systems at >600°C tower-top receiver and no vacuum envelope.
• Stable under an oxidizing and humid atmosphere at high operating temperature.
Materials• multilayer and
cermet composites
Air (
gas
turb
ine)
pla
nts
Requisite• 800-1,400°C;
maintain 30 bar pressure
• High cost tubular •Expensive high-tem metals(e.g., Nickel-based)
•operates at lower end of range;• High thermal
conductivity of tube wall
•ceramic tubes; SiC• Mechanical strength
and robustness• under thermal
shock and various mechanical loads (wind forces, thermal expansion, etc.).
• joining and sealing the ceramic elements
Volu
met
ric re
ceiv
er
Requisite•Transparent window•sustain high internal pressure and temperature
Challenge•devitrification (loss of transparency),
•Polluted by contact with traces of alkali metals or other chemicals
Materials• fused quartz•only when shaped in an appropriate convex form
•select-ive coating that rejects IR radiation);
•alternative glassy materials
Materials Technology in CSPAbsorber/receiver materials
39-610 Title13
Mat
eria
ls re
quire
men
t for
Hea
t-tr
ansf
er &
ther
mal
sto
rage
in a
sol
id
med
ium
:
Broader range of liquid phaseHigh specific heat and thermal conductivityLow viscosity across temperature rangeStability under thermal cycling and high temperatureChemical compatibility with pipe and tank materials such as stainless steel.Low cost
HTF
Synthetic oil•Trough plants • Limits steam temperature to
about 390°C, reduce operating temperature and cycle efficiency.
Direct steam generation(two-phase flow system)•Power tower and linear Fresnel
System but not in parabolic-trough plants
Molten nitrate saltTower systems•Up tp 560°C steam temperature
& Easy heat storage without separate heat transfer to other medium
•Difficulties in site management and protection against freezing at 240°C,
Alternative HTFs (pressurized CO2, some ionic liquids) •Early research phase
Stor
age
Mat
eria
ls
Molten nitrate salt(mixture of NaNO3 and KNO3) •Sensible heat with restricted 280–560°C range
Concrete and crushed rock:• low cost but low thermal conductivity
Graphite•excellent thermal conductivity at higher cost
Cons
umpti
on a
nd C
ost
If CSP reaches 8000 TWh/year in 2050:Consume up to 50-120% of today’s nitrate salt production
Materials Technology in CSPHeat-transfer fluids & Storage materials
Original
•wet-cooled•mined nitrates
salts• two-tank,
thermal energy storage (TES) system
•26g CO2eq per kWh&
•0.40 Mjeq/kWh of energy
•4.7L/kWh water
•1 year EPBT
Alternative
•Dry-cooling• Synthetically
derived nitrate salt
•Thermocline TES
• Increase CO2& CED by 8%
•Reduce LC water consumption by 77%
Source: HITTITE
39-610 Title14
References
• Resource: Fundamentals of materials for energy and environmental sustainability Edited by: Ginley, David S.; Cahen, David © 2012 Cambridge University Press
• Burkhardt, J., G. Heath, and C. Turchi. 2011. Life Cycle Assessment of a Parabolic Trough Concentrating Solar Power Plant and the Impacts of Key Design Alternatives. Environmental Science & Technology. 45: 2457–2464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es1033266
• Yolanda Lechon, Cristina de la Rua, and Rosa Saez, “Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Electricity Production by Solarthermal Power Plants in Spain,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 130, no. 2 (May 0, 2008): 021012-7. http://lca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/lcainfohub/study.vm?sid=207