3rd of 3 part training series
DESCRIPTION
Improving dwm p2+ data quality. 3rd of 3 Part Training Series. Outline. QA/QC Analysis What Customers Want Measurement Errors Hot and Cold Checks Top Six List of Errors Training. What customers want. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
3rd of 3 Part Training Series
Christopher Woodall
IMPROVING DWM P2+ DATA QUALITY
OUTLINE
QA/QC AnalysisWhat Customers WantMeasurement Errors
Hot and Cold ChecksTop Six List of ErrorsTraining
WHAT CUSTOMERS WANT
A uniform DWM sample design
applied across the entire United
States producing per acre estimates
of fuels, carbon, and wildlife
habitat
N
445
225
90
270
135
360
180
3
2
1
315
MEASUREMENT ERRORS
Establishing TransectsFWD CountsSlope versus Horizontal
DistancesCWD Transect DiameterCWD Decay Class and
SpeciesCorrect Units for Duff and
LitterSample Status for DWM
components
Hot checks
MEASUREMENT ERRORS
Number 1 priority is matching data and determining adherence to MQO’s
Number 2 priority is determining cause for errors…then correcting cause
Cold/Blind Checks
MEASUREMENT ERROR PROPAGATION
CWDDuff/Litter
FWD
Slash
Shrub/Herb
Transect
Database Processin
g Algorithm
s
Core TableMeasurement errors have varying
magnitudes of effect
MEASUREMENT ERROR SIMULATION
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
5 10 15
Varia
tion
in T
otal
Ton
nage
Est
imat
es (%
)
Simulated Variation (%)
Effect of 5, 10, 15% variation in down woody material measurement variables on total per acre tonnage estimates
FWD - 1-hr Count
Litter - Depth
CWD - Tran. Length
FWD - Tran. Length
Slash - Height
CWD - Diameter
Duff - Depth
SIMULATION CONCLUSIONS
Measurement variables whose errors least affect core table outputs: CWD decay classes, transect lengths, litter depth, and FWD counts
Measurement variables whose errors most affect core table outputs: duff depths, CWD diameter, and slash pile metrics
FIA’s Top Six LeastWanted DWM Errors
1. CWD Diameters2. FWD Counts3. Duff Depths4. Litter Depths5. Slash Compacted Height6. Sample Status/Missing Data
CWD DIAMETERS
Crews mistakenly record CWD diameters to tenth of inch…used to P2 plots
Only measure to nearest inch!!
≠
FWD COUNTS
FWD Doesn’t Account for much Biomass
However,
FWD Accounts for Much of the Flash Fuels and Fire Behavior
DUFF DEPTH
Duff is the heaviest down woody material per unit volume
Make sure your measurements (and units) are correct!
LITTER DEPTH
Much lighter than duff…however is usually much deeper
Don’t mistakenly enter the litter depth for duff depth
SLASH PILE COMPACTED HEIGHT
Transect
Compacted Height =1 ft
Potentially 1 foot of solid wood covering site
Be sure about compacted height!
Non-forest land is technically sampled…there is no DWM on it since DWM only occurs in forest conditions
Various Tiers of Sample Status…typically only snow or water can obstruct measurementTransect sample status = CWD cannot be measured nor anything else
FWD sample status = Only if snow or water obstruct
Duff/Litter sample status = Only if snow or water obstruct
APPROPRIATE USE OF SAMPLE STATUS
Situation can occur where CWD is sampled (transect sample status=1) but FWD and duff/litter cannot be sampled due to water obstruction (FWD sample status=1 and duff/litter sample status=1)
APPROPRIATE USE OF SAMPLE STATUS
Transect sample status = 0
CWD, FWD, Duff/litter not sampled
Transect sample status = 1
CWD maybe sampled
FWD and Duff/litter sample status = 0
TRAINING
PROBLEM AREAS
Problem: Field crews disturb the CWD too much trying to determine decay class or if segmentedCorrection: Although field crews must disturb CWD pieces in order to acquire measurements, try to keep disturbance to a minimum
PROBLEM AREAS
Problem: Field crews mistakenly enter extra digit for CWD diameter (40 instead of 4 inches)
Correction: Unless PDR’s catch them, be sure of very large CWD diameters
PROBLEM AREAS
If CWD piece ends in water, treat as if
underground, measure piece to
water edge
PROBLEM AREAS
Problem: Crews dig through litter hunting down pieces of FWDCorrection: Crews should only tally obvious FWD pieces, namely those on litter surfaceProblem: Crews aren’t tallying FWD pieces hung up in slash/saplings Correction: Crews should tally all FWD pieces from forest floor up to 6 feet above ground
PROBLEM AREAS
Problem: Crews either include too much of the litter layer or upper soil mineral horizons in estimation of duff depthCorrection: Crews should be absolutely sure of what is duff, litter, and mineral horizons. Be absolutely sure of duff measurements!!
PROBLEM AREAS
Duff Depths:
1) Identify duff from mineral soil2) Don’t include moss or litter
material3) Use duff/litter sample method
code to indicate if you measured or estimated duff/litter
ORGANIZING TRAINING SESSION
1) Part 1: Introduction to DWM2) Part 2: Field Methods3) Part 3: Improving DWM Data
Quality4) Certification Test
1) Stations (test optional)2) Go over one subplot together as group3) Trainees do at least one subplot on
their own – hot audit and/or compare results
Classroom
Field
BRINGING IT ALL TOGETHER
1) Pick training location where many conditions classes and sampling scenarios exist (see word file)
2) Use powerpoint files to sculpt training session so trainees have understanding of why we need quality DWM data, what we use it for, the theory behind the sampling design, field methods, and problem areas
3) Setting up a quality station course can reduce questions during actual field season – may conduct test
SAMPLE DESIGN CHANGES
The DWM Indicator must be responsive to customer needs and improving science/techniques…Don’t assume your ideas are insignificant, you collect the data, assume you know best and pass ideas upwards…
Submit your suggestions [email protected]
P2+ sample design very different from P3 in some aspects
We listened to field crews and dropped some infuriating measurements (e.g., fuelbed height)
However, this new protocol has not been used across country yet…
If you encounter any problem please let supervisor’s know ASAP
FINAL WORD
QUESTIONS?
Blast from past2004 National P3 TrainingPrescott, AZ