4 a gree ccitf_documenting the economic benefits of soil health management for farmers
TRANSCRIPT
DRAFT CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION
1www.foodandagpolicy.org
Linking Existing Data on Conservation and Risk:An AGree Strategy to Drive Adoption of Conservation PracticesSoil & Water Conservation Society Conference | July 27, 2015
www.foodandagpolicy.org
1. Overview of AGree2. AGree’s Conservation and Crop Insurance Task Force
a. Objectiveb. Membershipc. Strategyd. Data Challengese. Current Effortsf. Maintaining Data Confidentialityg. Potential Outcomes
3. Q&A
Presentation Roadmap
2
www.foodandagpolicy.org
AGree’s Key ChallengesMeet future demand for food Strengthen farms and communities to improve livelihoods
Improve nutrition and public health Conserve and enhance water, soil, and habitat
3
4www.foodandagpolicy.org
Three Phases of AGree
1• Established a unique voice (diverse leaders
and brand) and trusted platform for dialogue
2• Develop consensus recommendations • Identify advocacy and action priorities • Identify implementation partners, funders,
and coalitions
3• Support and build out coalitions, and
advocate for policy change• Catalyze and advance “proof of concept”
projects• Serve as a platform for dialogue,
collaboration, and innovative thinking4
www.foodandagpolicy.org
1. Immigration Reform2. Working Landscapes3. Food & Nutrition4. International
Development5. Research & Innovation6. Local Food7. Risk Management8. Next Generation
Eight Integrated Initiatives
6
www.foodandagpolicy.org
Use the federal crop insurance program to drive broader adoption of conservation practices
CCITF Objective:
8
9www.foodandagpolicy.org
• Barry Barnett: Mississippi State University• Rich Bowman: The Nature Conservancy• Larry Clemens: The Nature Conservancy• Keith Coble: Mississippi State University• Neil Conklin: Farm Foundation• Craig Cox: Environmental Working Group• Randy Dell: The Nature Conservancy• Kristin Weeks Duncanson: Duncanson
Growers• Viola Glenn: Rural Advancement Foundation• Nick Goeser: National Corn Growers
Association, Soil Health Partnership• Ferd Hoefner: National Sustainable Agriculture
Coalition• Bruce Knight: Strategic Conservation
Solutions, Former Chief of NRCS• Doug Lawrence: Blackwoods Group• Carl Mattson: George Mattson Farms, Inc.
• Stephanie Mercier: Farm Journal Foundation, Former Chief Economist for the Senate Agriculture Committee
• Sarah Mine: Datu Research• James Moseley: AGree Co-Chair, Former Deputy
Secretary of USDA• Rob Myers: Midwest Regional SARE
Coordinator, University of Missouri• James Robinson: Rural Advancement
Foundation• Susan Schmidt: Cargill Crop Insurance Agency• Zeke Spears: K COE Isom∙• Ryan Stockwell: National Wildlife Federation• Wally Tyner: Purdue University• Paul Wolfe: National Sustainable Agriculture
Coalition• Josh Woodard: Cornell University• Fred Yoder: Ohio Corn Growers Association
9
CCITF Members:
www.foodandagpolicy.org
Examine ways that crop insurance could recognize the risk reduction benefits of conservation practices
First hurdle = analyzing data to assess how…
10
CCITF Strategy:
Conservation Practice
Adoption
• Yield• Yield variability• Crop resilience to
extreme weather• Soil health• Other
environmental indicators
Impacts:
www.foodandagpolicy.org
Existing USDA datasets on crop insurance payment and loss history, yield, soil health, weather, and other environmental indicators could be integrated and analyzed to assess the risk reduction impacts of conservation practices.
This sort of data is collected by multiple USDA agencies, including:
– ERS– FSA– NRCS– RMA– Others
11
Data Challenges:
However, the data exists in multiple databases and is collected at various temporal and spatial scales. It cannot be easily integrated for analysis.
www.foodandagpolicy.org
12
Sampling of USDA Datasets:
Dataset Agency Relevant Variables
Dataset Collection
PeriodFrequency Observations Public or
Private Unit Level
Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Data
NRCSConservation
practices implemented
Established in 1996; expanded
in 2002
Annual enrollment for up to 10-year
contracts
151,589 contracts on 58.1 million areas in
2009-2012Public and
Private
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Watershed Assessment Study (WAS)
NRCS, in partnership with ARS, FSA, and others
Soil; Water; Climate; Land management;
Socio-economic data
Includes data from 14
ag research watersheds
Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP) Data
NRCSConservation
practices implemented
Established in 2008
Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS)
ERS & NASS
Conservation program
participation; Use of certain
conservation practices
Started in 1996 Annually5,000 fields and
30,000 farms surveyed each year
Private Field
www.foodandagpolicy.org
1. Supporting research by Cornell University Professor Joshua Woodard to provide evidence for the correlation between adoption of conversation practices and risk reduction
2. Engaging leadership and senior staff at multiple USDA agencies to facilitate the integration and analysis of existing datasets containing publicly available and confidential data in order to assess the risk reduction impacts of certain conservation practices, conservation systems, or enhanced soil health
13
Current CCITF Efforts:
www.foodandagpolicy.org
Some of the data that would need to be integrated and analyzed in order to evaluate the risk reduction impacts of conservation practices is confidential, field- and farm-level data.
However, data analysis could be facilitated while maintaining full data confidentiality. Several options exist, including:– A researcher could be placed under contract or work
under a cooperative agreement with one or more USDA agencies
– A data warehouse could enable analysts to query confidential data without the ability to view confidential, identifying information
14
Maintaining Data Confidentiality:
www.foodandagpolicy.org
Findings from such a data integration and analysis effort could help support:– Changes to the federal crop insurance program– The business case for producers to adopt
conservation practices– Industry supply chain sustainability standards– Carbon and ecosystem services markets
15
Potential Outcomes: