42187714 living on internet time
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
1/16
Living on Internet Time
Presented by: Group O
Ragini Iyer
Rishabh KhandharSandeep Agarwal
Sria Majumdar
Sushant Gupta
Abhishek Singh
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
2/16
Objective
Product development at various companies
Comparison of Software development models
Contemporary models of development
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
3/16
Netscape
Netscape Navigator- the first mover
Engineering team driven project
Role of users and news groups
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
4/16
Yahoo
Beginning- surfers travel the net
Product testing
Scalability
Rewriting the whole program to a different programming language
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
5/16
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
6/16
Net Dynamics
Provided tools to help develop web pages with links to companys internal database
Net dynamics 2.0 team
Programming language
Working with other companies beta software
Studio and runtime team
Software integrated into working system each day
Launch announcement
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
7/16
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
8/16
MicrosoftEntered late in the explorer market
Product Specification Market Analysis and Discussion with focus groups
Product Development Aimed at enhancing flexibility and responsiveness
Project Manager Technology integrator
Iterative Approach Functional and Priority Development
Driven by internal feedback (Developer Extensive Users) - Risk Mitigation
Three version of explorer in 9 months
Time - key performance variable to be managed to attain improved cost andquality
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
9/16
Microsoft Development Cycle
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
10/16
Performance Measures
Frequency of new product
Time from conception to market
Estimation planningTime to Market
Engineering hours per project Cost of material and tooling
Projection v/s OutputProductivity
User friendliness
Performance and customer satisfaction Continuous improvementQuality
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
11/16
Common Features
Each Aware of/Engaged in Competitive
Benchmarking
Each Used Effective Prototyping/Beta Models(Microsofts Approach More Internally Focused)
Aware of Interoperability
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
12/16
DifferencesPhilosophy, Culture, and Development Process
Size of Development Staffs and Resources
Microsofts Total-System-Solution Mindset
Microsoft Sought to Expand Competencies
Heavyweight Team Structure (Microsoft) vs. Lightweight(Yahoo!)
Net Dynamics Philosophy of Open Architecture Based onStandards
Netscapes Heavy Focus on Early Releases Before FeatureRelease
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
13/16
Learning from the Case
Role of process refinement
Role of good management
Customer needs and satisfaction
Importance of feedback system
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
14/16
Waterfall Model
Spiral Model
Rapid Application Development
Incremental model
Agile Approach
Lean Development
IBM Rational Unified Process
V model
Software Development Models
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
15/16
Process Improvement Models
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)
ISO 9000
ISO 15504 : Software Process Improvement
Capability Determination (SPICE)
-
7/29/2019 42187714 Living on Internet Time
16/16
THANK YOU