45 th annual alaska surveying & mapping conference february 21-25, 2011 hilton anchorage hotel...

29
45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska Part II: GRAV-D Airborne Survey Update Daniel R. Roman and Vicki A. Childers

Upload: neil-wilkins

Post on 23-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference

February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling

in Alaska

Part II: GRAV-D Airborne Survey Update

Daniel R. Roman and Vicki A. Childers

Page 2: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Survey Priority Order

• Alabama test region• Puerto Rico/US Virgin Islands• Gulf of Mexico (except Florida)• Alaska• Eastern US Seaboard (& FL)/Great Lakes • Western US Seaboard• Hawaii, Guam/CNMI, American Samoa• Interior CONUS• Aleutian Islands

Page 3: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

GRAV-D Airborne Surveys

• Gulf of Mexico 2008-09 (AL08, LA08, LA09, TX09)

• Puerto Rico/US Virgin Islands 2009 (PV09)• Alaska 2008-11 (AK08, AK09, AK10-01, AK10-

02, AK10-03)• California 2011 (CA11-01)

- 11 surveys, ~10% of total area flown45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-12003

Page 4: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Gulf of Mexico Surveys

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-12004

Page 5: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Gulf of Mexico Preliminary Gravity

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-12005

Page 6: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Puerto Rico/US Virgin Islands

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-12006

Page 7: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Preliminary Gravity Puerto Rico

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-12007

Page 8: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

California 2011

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-12008

Page 9: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

California

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-12009

Page 10: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Alaska Surveys

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-120010

2008

2009 20102010&11

2011 Plan

2011 Plan

Fairbanks

Anchorage

Page 11: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-120011

AK Preliminary Gravity

Page 12: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Basic Airborne Operations

• Instrumentation:– Relative gravity meter aboard aircraft– Inertial measurement unit– GNSS receivers included in both instruments– GPS base stations (three for redundancy)

• Gravity tie– New absolute measurement– Relative tie to meter height in plane

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-120012

Page 13: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

GRAV-D Team• Vicki Childers• Theresa Diehl• Sandy Preaux• Justin Dahlberg• Greg Watson• Tim Wilkins• Carly Weil (not pictured)• Also pictured NOAA

pilots Scott Price and Mark Sweeney

2010 NGS Convocation 13

Page 14: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Field Capability

• Developing the project from scratch• Instrumentation

– Acquisition, engineering, installation, troubleshoot

• Operating procedures• Data Handling

– QC: equipment working, data quality sufficient– Metadata creation, data archival, shipment to HQ

14

Page 15: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Field Capacity: Challenges

• Field team depth• Need a dedicated aircraft

– Present NOAA capacity is limited

– Need both a long- and a shorter-range aircraft

– Mods for USGS magnetometer

• Needed instrumentation – Inertial measurement unit– Electronics racks

Page 16: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Data Processing: Software Development

• GPS processing– GrafNav

– Kinematic GPS Challenge

• Gravity data processing– Aerograv Problem

– Newton software

– Programmer has created user-friendly version for 2.0

Newton 2.0

Page 17: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Airborne Data Flow

Page 18: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

GRAV-D Web Page

• Program events are recorded here

• Survey progress will be displayed

• Plan to make data and software available here

18

http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/

grav-d

Page 19: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Project Challenges

• Optimum survey heights: 5Kft, 20kft, 35kft?– Alabama AL08 tested flights at all three altitudes– Downward continued noise amplified 7 times in

35kft data, 2 times in 20kft data– Comparisons of gravity field recovery with EGM08

continued to h=0 shows poor results at 35kft

• 20,000 ft was identified as best height– Still above most weather– Aliasing issues can be dealt with

Page 20: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Newton 1.0 ResidualsΔg: +NGS ‘A-EGMs’ (N=1080) vs. Terr. (h=0m)

35,000 ft 20,000 ft 5,000 ft

Page 21: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Improvements to GPS Processing?

• GPS Challenge produced 15 solutions from 9 groups

• We will look to use the software that yields the best results

• GrafNav will continue to be field QC software

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-120021

Page 22: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Improvements to Gravity Processing

• Thorough analysis of all aspects of gravity data processing

• Rigorous treatment of all corrections• Final challenges remain:

– Off-level correction– Low-pass filtering

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-120022

Page 23: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Early Version Data Residualswith AGM08

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-120023

Page 24: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

AK08 Residual Gravity Profiles

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-120024

As compare

d with

Min = -50.76Max = 31.46Mean = 1.52 SD = 4.42

Ori

gin

al

Page 25: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Early Version Crossover Errors

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-120025

Page 26: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Crossover Plots for AK08

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-120026

As compare

d with

Min = -12.90Max = 12.03Mean = -0.19SD = 4.29 mGalO

rigin

al

Page 27: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

AK08 Residual Gravity Profiles

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-120027

Lines 121-124

(Airborne – EGM08)

Page 28: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

AK08 vs EGM08

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-120028

EGM08AK08

Page 29: 45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in

Break time!

Next up: Geoid Modeling

45th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011

Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in Alaska

Thursday, 0800-120029