4a10 construction research & innovation biogeochemistry professor mark dyer trinityhaus
TRANSCRIPT
Hanworth Case Study – Plan (after Dyer 2004)
Diesel Storage Tank (BTEX)
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl Benzene
Xylene
Solvent Bath (TCE)
Trichloroethene
and
Metal Salts
CN-
Cr VI
MNA : Natural Processes
Source
Groundwater Flow
Monitoring boreholesoDispersion & Diffusion
oSorption
oBiodegradation
LNAPL’s
DNAPL’s
Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA)
Target
Evidence of Natural Attenuation
Evidence of NATURAL ATTENUATION
oReduction of aqueous concentration with distance (or gaseous)
oShrinking of plume with time
oAppearance of biodegradation by-products (e.g. dechlorination of TCE)
oDepletion of alternative electron acceptors (e.g. oxygen, nitrate, ferric iron, sulphate ions)
PlumeSource
No 1 : Evidence of Biodegradation
Evidence of NATURAL ATTENUATION
oAppearance of biodegradation by-products (e.g. dechlorination of TCE
Plume
Eg. Biodegradation at Philips Factory Zwolle NL
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
PCE TCE cis-DCE VC Ethene
Aqueous concentration (µg/l)
68,000 17,000 32,000 6,825 3,451
Zwolle NL: Evidence of strong biodegradation
906 (14-15)
0.0
300.0
600.0
900.0
1200.0
0 9 17 33 43 59
week
µm
ol/
l
Ethane
Ethene
VC
cis-DCE
TCE
PCE
906 (14-15)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 9 17 33 43 59
week
rela
tiv
e c
on
trib
uti
on
(on
mo
lar
ba
sis
) Ethane
Ethene
VC
cis-DCE
TCE
PCE
Presentation of results in relative molar concentration
No2 Depletion of Alternative Electron Acceptors
Evidence of NATURAL ATTENUATION
oDepletion of alternative electron acceptors close to source (e.g. oxygen, nitrate, ferric iron, sulphate ions)
sulphate nitrateferric iron
oxygen
Gradual reduction in redox potential towards the source of pollution due to consumption of electron
acceptors by bacteria
Depletion of alternative electron acceptors
nitrate
ferric iron
Tim
eEg. Progressive depletion of electron acceptors
sulphateferric iron
nitrate oxygen
oxygen
No 3 Reduction in Aqueous Concentration
Evidence of NATURAL ATTENUATION
oReduction of aqueous concentration with distance (or gaseous)
oShrinking of plume with time
PlumeSource
Mechanisms:- Advection, Dispersion and Sorption
Distance or time from source
Rela
tive C
on
cen
trati
on
C
/Co
1.0
0.5
0.0
ADVECTION
Advection, Dispersion and Sorption
Distance or time from source
Rela
tive C
on
cen
trati
on
C
/Co
1.0
0.5
0.0
DISPERSION by tortuously & friction through pore space resulting in relative reduction but no overall reduction in mass of pollutant
Advection, Dispersion and Sorption
Distance or time from source
Rela
tive C
on
cen
trati
on
C
/Co
1.0
0.5
0.0
SORPTION onto soil and organic matter resulting in an overall reduction of aqueous concentration & retardation
Advection, Dispersion and Sorption
Distance or time from source
Rela
tive C
on
cen
trati
on
C
/Co
1.0
0.5
0.0
SORPTION onto soil and organic matter resulting in an overall reduction of aqueous concentration & retardation
Adsorption onto the surface of clay particles or negative charged carboxylic acids (C-COOH) or alcohols (C-OH) for humus colloidAbsorption into organic matter (humus)
Advection, Dispersion and Sorption
Distance or time from source
Rela
tive C
on
cen
trati
on
C
/Co
1.0
0.5
0.0
SORPTION onto soil and organic matter resulting in an overall reduction of aqueous concentration & retardation
Adsorption onto the surface of clay particles for metal ions
Absorption into organic matter for organic pollutants (BTEX)
Adsorption Isotherms
Cs (g/g)
Ceq (g/L)
Linear
Langmuir
Ci
Ceq
Cs = [(Ci – Ceq) x volume of liquid]/weight of soil
Hypothetical Batch Test
Ci (g/L) Ceq(g/L)
Wt (g)
Cs(g/g)
250 77.3 20.42 1.69
500 150.57 20.42 3.42
1000 297.04 20.42 6.89
1500 510.1 20.42 9.70
2000 603.05 20.42 13.68
3800 1198.7 20.42 25.48
6000 2300.5 20.42 36.23
9000 3560.7 20.24 53.27
Ci
Ceq
Cs = [(Ci – Ceq) x volume of liquid]/weight of soil
Cs = [(250 – 77.3) x 0.2]/20.42 = 1.69 (g/g)
200 ml of influent
Hypothetical Batch Test
Ci (g/L) Ceq(g/L)
Wt (g)
Cs(g/g)
250 77.3 20.42 1.69
500 150.57 20.42 3.42
1000 297.04 20.42 6.89
1500 510.1 20.42 9.70
2000 603.05 20.42 13.68
3800 1198.7 20.42 25.48
6000 2300.5 20.42 36.23
9000 3560.7 20.24 53.27
Ci
Ceq
Cs = [(Ci – Ceq) x volume of liquid]/weight of soil
Cs = [(250 – 77.3) x 0.2]/20.42 = 1.69 (g/g)
200 ml of influent
Hypothetical Batch Test
Ci (g/L) Ceq(g/L)
Wt (g)
Cs(g/g)
250 77.3 20.42 1.69
500 150.57 20.42 3.42
1000 297.04 20.42 6.89
1500 510.1 20.42 9.70
2000 603.05 20.42 13.68
3800 1198.7 20.42 25.48
6000 2300.5 20.42 36.23
9000 3560.7 20.24 53.27
Ci
Ceq
Cs = [(Ci – Ceq) x volume of liquid]/weight of soil
Cs = [(250 – 77.3) x 0.2]/20.42 = 1.69 (g/g)
200 ml of influent
Hypothetical Batch Test
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Ceq (ug/L)
Cs
(ug
/g)
Hypothetical Batch Tests – Partition Coefficient Kd
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Ceq (ug/L)
Cs
(ug
/g)
Partition Coefficient Kd Kd = Cs/Ceq
From batch test data Kd = 31.5/2000 = 0.0158 (L/g)
Estimated Partition Coefficient
However Kd can also be calculated using
Kd = Koc x Foc
where: Koc = soil sorption coefficient normalised for total organic contentFoc = fraction of total organic content
Example (see handout tables for Foc and Koc)
Clays Foc = 0.2
Benzene Koc = 87.1 L/kg
Kd = 87.1 x 0.2 L/kgKd = 17.42 L/kg ( or 0.0174 L/g)
Self Assessment Q’s
SAQ5(a)Describe the physical, geochemical and biological mechanisms involved in the natural attenuation of petroleum fuels and chlorinated solvents in an aquifer. (b)Explain the different mechanisms involved in absorption and adsorption of organic pollutants to soil particles. Used sketches where applicable to illustrate bonding mechanism and mention relevant minerals. (c)Use the following data from a soil batch test to calculate the sorbed concentration (g/g), plot a linear isotherm and calculate the sorption coefficient Kd . The weight of soil is 40.42g and the volume of the aqueous solution is 200 ml.
Initial Concentration (g/l) Equilibrium Concentration (g/l)
250 77.3
500 150.57
1000 297.04
1500 510.10
2000 603.05
3800 1198.7
6000 2300.5
9000 3560.7
Self Assessment Q’s
SAQ6A spillage of petroleum fuels and chlorinated solvent (trichloroethylene) has taken place at an industrial site. The results from chemical analyses of groundwater samples from 3 boreholes are shown below. Comment on evidence or potential for natural attenuation at each boreholes.
Parameters Borehole 1 Borehole 2 Borehole 3
pH 7.5 7.2 11.0
DOC (%) 4.5 45 3.9
Redox (mV) -150 +139 -160
TOC (mg/l) 23.5 22.0 23.9
Nitrate (mg/l) 4.0 17.0 5.0
Sulphate (mg/l) 25.0 18.0 21.0
Tetrachloroethene (g/l)
39 2250 2150
Trichloroethene (g/l)
130 1900 1800
Cis-dichloroethene (g/l)
6120 125 122
Trans-dichloroethene (g/l)
49 650 625
Vinyl Chloride (g/l) 16300 95 71