5 data traps to avoid when testing your value proposition design

14
5 Data Traps to Avoid when testing your Value Proposition Design

Upload: wiley-publishers

Post on 18-Nov-2014

2.900 views

Category:

Data & Analytics


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Avoid failure by thinking critically about your data. Avoid these 5 data traps and create products and services customers want. Based on Value Proposition Design by Alexander Osterwalder, Yves Pigneur, Greg Bernarda & Alan Smith. More info: http://bit.ly/1tbBCH6. #vpdesign

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

5Data Traps to Avoidwhen testing your ValueProposition Design

Page 2: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

Overview of the Testing Process

Extract Hypotheses Prioritize Hypotheses Design Test Prioritize Test

Run Tests Capture Learnings Make Progress

Page 3: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

Avoid failure by thinkingcritically about your data.Experiments can’t predict futuresuccesses with 100% accuracy.

Page 4: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

trap #1

False Positive Traprisk: Occurs when your testing data misleads you to conclude, for example, that your customer has a pain, when in fact that is not true.

Page 5: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

trap #1

False Positive Traptips: Test “the circle” before you test “the square”. Understand what’s relevant to customers and avoid being misled by positive signals for irrelevant value propositions.Design different experiments for the samehypothesis before making important decisions.

Page 6: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

trap #2

False Negative Traprisk: Not seeing things that are there.Occurs when your experiment fails to detect, for example, a customer job it was designed to unearth.

Page 7: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

trap #2

False Negative Traptips: Make sure your test is adequate.Dropbox initially tested customer interest with Google Adwords. They invalidated their hypotheses because the ads didn’t perform. Yet, people didn’t search because it was a new market, not for a lack of interest.

Page 8: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

trap #3

The “Local Maximum” Traprisk: Missing out on the real potential.Occurs when you conduct experiments that optimize around a local maximum, while ignoring the larger opportunity. Positive testing feedback might get you stuck with a much less profitable model while there is a more profitable one.

Page 9: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

trap #3

The “Local Maximum” Traptips: Focus on learning rather than optimizing. Don’t hesitate to go back to designing better alternatives if the testing data is positive, but the numbers feel like they should be better.

Page 10: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

trap #4

The “Exhausted Maximum” Traprisk: Overlooking limitations (e.g. of a market). Occurs when you think an opportunity is larger than it is in reality.

Page 11: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

trap #4

The “Exhausted Maximum” Traptips: Design tests that prove the potentialbeyond the immediately addressed test subjects.

Page 12: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

trap #5

The Wrong Data Traprisk: Searching in the wrong place.Occurs when you abandon an opportunity because you are looking at the wrong data.

Page 13: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

trap #5

The Wrong Data Traptip: Go back to designing other alternatives before you give up.

Page 14: 5 Data Traps to Avoid When Testing Your Value Proposition Design

trap #5

Create products and services customer want. Start with your best value proposition.

www.strategyzer.com/value-proposition-design#vpdesign