5.1. introductionshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/65312/11/11_chapter 5.p… · from the...
TRANSCRIPT
166
CHAPTER -V
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
5.1. INTRODUCTION
Analysis of data means studying the tabulated data in order to determine the
inherent facts or meanings. “Analysis of the data is an important as any other
components of the research process” Gays (1976). “Research data become
meaningful in the process of being analyzed and interpreted regardless of how well
the study is conducted, appropriate conclusions” Mouly (1964). It involves
breaking down existing complex factors into simpler parts together in new
arrangements for the purpose of interpretation. This serves the following main
functions, such as,
1. To reproduce the raw data meaningful
2. To test “hypothesis” or “Null hypothesis” whichever may be proved or
falsified.
3. To obtain significant results out of the data collected according to the
assumption of the samples and
4. To estimate the parameter whichever applicable.
The data collected by the investigator is tabulated and the interpretations are
given below.
5.2. IMPORTANCE AND USES OF DATA COLLECTION
Analyzing the data is very important part of research. It‟s a skilled work It
demands a deep and intensive knowledge on the part of the researcher about the
167
data to be analyzed. It‟s through systematic analysis that the important
characteristics which are hidden in the data are revealed and valid generalizations
are drawn. It‟s vivid that to bring out the hidden data in the study the systematic
analysis is essential. It is done systematically the study becomes worthwhile and
contributes something to the existing knowledge. Without analyzing the data
interpretation is impossible. True analysis leads to a correct interpretation. They
are interrelated the task of analysis incompletes without interpretation. In fact
analysis of data and interpretation of data are complementary to each other. The
end product of analysis is the setting up of certain general conclusions while the
interpretation deals with what these conclusions really mean. For a successful
study, the task of analysis and interpretation should be deigned before the data are
actually collected (Saravanavel , 2005).
A true data analysis is helpful to bring out newer facts. The researcher has to
see the fact from all angles. Larger divisions of material should be broken down
into smaller units and rearranged in new combinations to discover new factors and
relationships. Data should be studied from as mange angles as possible to find out
new and newer facts (Kulbir singh sidhu, 2006).
5.3. DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS
The scores obtained from processing data are classified according to variables
of the study and basic statistics are calculated. The description of basic data is
presented in this section.
168
Table -7 I Psychological Sex Role Orientation
Statistical values of Psychological sex role orientation
Boys Girls
Masculinity femininity Masculinity femininity
N 150 150 150 150
Mean 70.2533 42.7067 37.2267 70.4267
Std. Error of
Mean
.86105 .49873 .59469 .63106
Median 71.0000 43.0000 36.0000 70.0000
Mode 76.00 42.00 36.00 79.00
Std. Deviation 10.54564 6.10814 7.28347 7.72892
Skewness -.436 -.278 -.111 -.317
Kurtosis .053 .186 -.772 -.099
From the above table it is noted that Mean of Masculinity of Boys is higher
when compared to girls and Femininity mean of Girls is higher than boys. Boys
Masculinity, Boys femininity, girls femininity Mean, girls masculinity Median
mode does not lie in the same plane. Skewness of the variables are negatively
skewed, Kurtosis is platykurtic.
169
Table – 8 I .Occupational Aspiration
Statistical values of Occupational aspiration
Boys Girls
Idealistic
aspiration
Realistic
aspiration
Idealistic
aspiration
Realistic
aspiration
N 150 150 150 150
Mean 22.4133 25.1600 27.8933 28.4867
Std. Error of
Mean
.54335 .52012 .44381 .59774
Median 24.0000 25.0000 26.0000 28.5000
Mode 15.00(a) 35.00 25.00 35.00(a)
Std. Deviation 6.65465 6.37011 5.43559 7.32078
Skewness .274 .179 .181 .130
Kurtosis -.493 -.504 -.534 .285
From the above table it is noted that Mean of idealistic aspiration of girls is
higher when compared to boys and realistic aspiration mean of Girls is higher than
boys. Boys idealistic, Boys realistic, girls idealistic Mean, girls realistic Median
mode does not lie in the same plane, Skewness of the variables are positively
skewed, Kurtosis to the above data is Platykutic.
170
Table – 9 I Cooperation Competition
Statistical values of Cooperation Competition
Boys Girls
cooperation competition cooperation competition
N 150 150 150 150
Mean 19.3267 18.4667 19.8800 19.5600
Std. Error of Mean .39680 .39148 .41168 .42162
Median 19.0000 18.0000 20.0000 20.0000
Mode 17.00(a) 16.00(a) 23.00 24.00
Std. Deviation 4.85977 4.79467 5.04200 5.16374
Skewness .005 .234 -.177 -.102
Kurtosis -.971 -.870 -1.058 -1.145
From the above table it is noted that Mean of cooperation of girls is higher
when compared to boys and competitive mean of Girls is higher than boys. Boys
cooperation, Boys competition, girls cooperation, Mean, girls competition, Median
mode does not lie in the same plane. Boys cooperation and competition variables
are positively skewed, and girls cooperation and competition variables are
negatively skewed. Kurtosis to the above data is Platykutic.
171
Table – 10 IV Cultural Determination
Statistical values of Cultural Determination
Boys Girls
Cultural
conformity
Cultural
rebellion
Cultural
conformity
Cultural
rebellion
Mean 36.7800 32.3667 34.2400 30.3867
Std. Error of Mean .88945 .91980 .97736 .87382
Median 40.0000 30.0000 34.0000 28.5000
Mode 49.00 20.00 20.00(a) 21.00
Std. Deviation 10.89355 11.26521 11.97014 10.70206
Skewness -.349 .398 -.004 .395
Kurtosis -1.403 -1.304 -1.700 -1.214
From the above table it is noted that Mean of Boys cultural conformity and
cultural rebellion are higher when compared to Girls cultural conformity and
cultural rebellion. Boys cultural conformity, Boys cultural rebellion Mean, girls
cultural conformity, girls cultural rebellion, Mean, Median, mode does not lie in
the same plane. Skewness of the variables are positively skewed, Kurtosis to the
above data is Platykutic.
172
Table – 11 IV Students Learning Orientation
STATISTICAL VALUES OF LEARNING ORIENTATION – ST BOYS
PEDOL ADOL INJOL APAL INVOL EXOL SIGOL
N 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Mean 22.9867 20.1267 22.1200 20.7733 21.7133 21.1133 21.2333
Std. Error of
Mean .32329 .43610 .42188 .33859 .38464 .37081 .37962
Median 23.0000 21.0000 24.0000 20.0000 23.5000 21.0000 20.0000
Mode 23.00 24.00 25.00 20.00 24.00 20.00(a) 18.00
Std. Deviation 3.95950 5.34111 5.16691 4.14688 4.71089 4.54144 4.64934
Skewness -.791 -.161 -.425 .007 -.384 .039 .140
Kurtosis .442 -1.381 -1.115 -.892 -1.059 -1.077 -1.332
Table – 12 Statistical values of Students Learning Orientation - ST Girls
PEDOL ADOL INJOL APAL INVOL EXOL SIGOL
N 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
Mean 21.9667 19.1800 20.7533 20.6533 21.7667 21.1733 21.4000
Std. Error of Mean .36483 .38682 .41954 .33297 .37820 .39297 .37411
Median 22.5000 19.0000 20.5000 20.0000 24.0000 20.0000 21.0000
Mode 20.00(a) 24.00 15.00 20.00 24.00 27.00 18.00
Std. Deviation 4.46826 4.73750 5.13827 4.07807 4.63198 4.81294 4.58184
Skewness -.391 -.008 -.089 .103 -.498 .053 .173
Kurtosis -.268 -1.421 -1.353 -1.025 -.944 -1.177 -1.369
173
From the above tables it is noted that Mean of ST Boys Personal
Development Orientation Learning (PEDOL) is higher when compared to ST girls,
ST Boys of Assessment Domination in Learning (ADOL) is higher when
compared to ST girls, ST Boys of Intrinsic orientation in Job getting and Learning
(INJOL) is higher when compared to ST girls, ST Boys of Apathy in Learning
(APAL) is higher when compared to ST girls, ST girls of Involvement in Learning
(INVOL) is higher when compared to ST boys, ST Girls of Extrinsic Orientation
in Learning (EXOL) is higher when compared to ST boys, and ST Girls of
Significant other orientation in Learning (SIGOL) is higher when compared to ST
boys.
ST Boys and ST Girls Median, Mode and Std. Error of Students Learning
Orientation does not lie in the same plane. ST Boys Apathy in Learning (APAL)
and Extrinsic Orientation in Learning (EXOL) are positively skewed, whereas
other Learning Orientation variables are negatively skewed.
ST Girls Apathy in Learning (APAL), Extrinsic Orientation in Learning
(EXOL) and Significant other Orientation in Learning (SIGOL) are positively
skewed, and other Learning Orientation variables are negatively skewed. Kurtosis
to the above data is Platykutic.
174
Table – 13 Educational Achievement of Scheduled Tribe Students
Statistical Values of Educational Achievement of ST Students
educational
achievement boys
educational
achievement girls
N 150 150
Mean 304.9467 310.4867
Std. Error of Mean 4.44715 5.23440
Median 310.0000 325.0000
Mode 327.00 324.00
Std. Deviation 54.46627 64.10800
Skewness -.137 -.403
Std. Error of Skewness .198 .198
Kurtosis -.879 -.974
Std. Error of Kurtosis .394 .394
From the above table it is noted that Mean of Scheduled Tribe Girls is
higher when compared to ST Boys in Educational Achievement. Scheduled Tribe
Boys Educational achievement Median, Mode, Std. Deviation does not lie in the
same plane, Skewness of the variables are negatively skewed, Kurtosis to the
above data is Platykurtic.
175
5.4. INFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
The formulated research hypotheses were statistically tested for null form of the
Hypotheses.
TESTING OF HYPOTHESES
Hypothesis 1
Scheduled Tribe boys have higher Masculinity than Femininity
Table - 14
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
Boys of Psychological Sex-Role Orientation
Psychological
Sex Role
orientation
N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value p-value
Result
at 0.05
level
Masculinity 150 70.25 10.54 0.86105
27.884 0.00 Significant
Femininity 150 42.70 6.10 0.49873
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 27.884 is greater
than table t-value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of significance.
The „null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is not accepted. Hence the above
hypothesis “Scheduled Tribe boys have higher Masculinity than femininity” is
accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that Scheduled Tribe boys have higher Masculinity than
Femininity.
176
Hypothesis 2
Scheduled tribe girls have higher Femininity than Masculinity
Table - 15
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
Girls of Psychological Sex Role Orientation
Psychological
Sex Role
orientation
N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value p-value
Result
at 0.05 level
Masculinity 150 37.22 7.28 0.59469
38.288 0.00 Significant
Femininity 150 70.42 7.73 0.63106
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 38.288 is greater
than tabulated t-value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of
significance. The „null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is not accepted. Hence
the above hypothesis “Scheduled tribe girls have higher femininity than
Masculinity” is accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that Scheduled tribe girls have higher Femininity than Masculinity.
177
HYPOTHESIS 3
Scheduled Tribe boys differ from Scheduled Tribe girls in their idealistic
occupational aspiration.
Table - 16
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
Boys and Girls with respect to idealistic occupational aspiration
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value p-value
Result
at 0.05
level
Boys 150 22.41 6.65 0.54335
7.81 0.00 Significant
Girls 150 27.89 5.43 0.44381
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 7.81 is greater
than tabulated t-value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of
significance. The „null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is not accepted. Hence
the above hypothesis “Scheduled Tribe boys differ from Scheduled Tribe girls
in their idealistic occupational aspiration” is accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that Scheduled Tribe boys differ from Scheduled Tribe
girls in their idealistic occupational aspiration. Schedule Tribe girls have
higher idealistic occupational aspiration than Scheduled Tribe boys.
178
Hypothesis 4
Scheduled Tribe boys differ from Scheduled Tribe girls in their realistic
occupational aspiration
Table - 17
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of
ST Boys and Girls with respect to realistic occupational aspiration
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value p-value
Result
at 0.05 level
Boys 150 25.16 6.37 0.52012
4.198 0.00 Significant
Girls 150 28.48 7.32 0.59774
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 4.198 is greater
than tabulated t-value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of
significance. The „null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is not accepted. Hence
the above hypothesis “Scheduled Tribe boys differ from Scheduled Tribe girls
in their realistic occupational aspiration” is accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that Scheduled Tribe boys differ from Scheduled Tribe girls in
their realistic occupational aspiration. Scheduled Tribe girls have higher
realistic Occupational Aspiration than Scheduled Tribe boys.
179
HYPOTHESIS 5
Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled girls differ in their co-operation variable
Table - 18
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
boys and ST girls in Co operation variable
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value
p-
value
Result at
0.05 level
Boys 150 19.33 4.86 .39680
0.968
0.334 Not
Significant Girls 150 19.88 5.04 .41168
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 0.968 is less
than tabulated t-value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of
significance. The „null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is accepted. Hence the
above hypothesis “Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their
co-operation variable” is not accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled Tribe girls do not
differ in their co-operation variable.
180
HYPOTHESIS 6
Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled girls differ in their competition disposition
Table - 19
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
boys and ST girls in competition disposition
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value
p-
value
Result at
0.05 level
Boys 150 18.46 4.79 .39148
1.900
0.058 Not
Significant Girls 150 19.56 5.16 .42162
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 1.900 is less
than tabulated t-value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of
significance. Hence the above hypothesis “Scheduled tribe boys and scheduled
girls differ in their competition variable” is not accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled Tribe girls do not
differ in their competition variable.
HYPOTHESIS 7
Scheduled Tribe boys differ from scheduled tribe girls in their cultural
conformity of cultural determination
181
Table - 20
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
boys and ST girls in cultural conformity of cultural determination
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value
p-
value
Result at
0.05 level
Boys 150 36.78 10.89 0.88945
1.922
0.056 Not
Significant Girls 150 34.24 11.97 0.97736
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 1.922 is less
than tabulated t-value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of
significance. The „null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is not accepted.
Hence the above hypothesis “Scheduled tribe boys differ from scheduled tribe
girls in their cultural conformity of cultural determination” is not accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that Scheduled tribe boys do not differ from scheduled tribe
girls in their cultural conformity of cultural determination.
182
HYPOTHESIS 8
Scheduled Tribe boys differ from scheduled tribe girls in their cultural rebellion of
cultural determination
Table - 21
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
boys and ST girls in cultural rebellion of cultural determination
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value
p-
value
Result at
0.05 level
Boys 150 32.37 11.26 0.91980
1.561
0.120 Not
Significant Girls 150 30.38 10.70 0.87382
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 1.561 is less
than tabulated t-value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of
significance. The „null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is not accepted.
Hence the above hypothesis “Scheduled Tribe boys differ from scheduled tribe
girls in their cultural rebellion of cultural determination” is not accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that Scheduled Tribe boys do not differ from scheduled tribe
girls in their cultural rebellion of cultural determination.
183
HYPOTHESIS 9
Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their personal
development orientation.
Table - 22
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
boys and Girls in personal development orientation
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value
p-
value
Result at
0.05 level
Boys 150 22.99 3.96 .32329
2.092
0.037 Significant
Girls 150 21.97 4.47 .36483
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 2.092 is greater
than tabulated value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of significance.
The „null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is not accepted. Hence the above
hypothesis “Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their personal
development orientation” is accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that Scheduled tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in
their personal development orientation. Scheduled Tribe boys are higher than
Scheduled Tribe girls in their personal development Orientation.
184
HYPOTHESIS 10
Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their Assessment
domination in learning.
Table - 23
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
boys and Girls in Assessment domination in learning
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value
p-
value
Result at
0.05 level
Boys 150 20.13 5.34 .43610
1.624
0.105 Not
Significant Girls 150 19.18 4.74 .38682
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 1.624 is less
than tabulated value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of significance.
The „null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is not accepted. Hence the above
hypothesis “Scheduled tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their
Assessment domination in learning” is not accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that ST boys and girls are at equal level in their Assessment
domination in learning.
185
HYPOTHESIS 11
Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their intrinsic
orientation in job getting and Learning.
TABLE-24
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
boys and Girls in their intrinsic orientation in job getting and Learning
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value
p-
value
Result at
0.05 level
Boys 150 22.12 5.17 .42188
2.297
0.022 Significant
Girls 150 20.75 5.14 .41954
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 2.297 is greater
than tabulated t-value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of
significance.
The „null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is accepted. Hence the above
hypothesis “Scheduled tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their intrinsic
orientation in job getting and learning” is accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that Scheduled tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in
their intrinsic orientation in job getting and Learning. Scheduled Tribe boys are
higher in their intrinsic orientation in Job getting and learning.
186
HYPOTHESIS 12
Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their Apathy in learning.
Table- 25
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
boys and Girls in their Apathy in learning
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value
p-
value
Result at
0.05 level
Boys 150 20.77 4.15 .33859
0.253
0.801 Not
Significant Girls 150 20.65 4.07 .33297
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 0.253 is less
than tabulated t-value 1.96 for 299degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of significance.
The „null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is not accepted. Hence the above
hypothesis “Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their Apathy
in learning” is not accepted.
Conclusion
It is concluded Scheduled tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls do not differ
in their Apathy in learning.
187
Hypothesis 13
Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their Involvement in
Learning.
Table - 26
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
boys and Girls in their Involvement in Learning
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value
p-
value
Result at
0.05 level
Boys 150 21.71 4.71 .38464
0.09
0.921 Not
Significant Girls 150 21.77 4.63 .37820
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 0.09 is less than
tabulated t-value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of significance. The
„null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is not accepted. Hence the above
hypothesis “Scheduled tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their
Involvement in Learning” is not accepted.
Conclusion
It is concluded Scheduled tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls do not differ
in their Involvement in Learning.
188
HYPOTHESIS 14
Scheduled tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their Extrinsic orientation
in Learning
Table - 27
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
boys and Girls in their Extrinsic orientation in Learning
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value
p-
value
Result at
0.05 level
Boys 150 21.11 4.54 .37081
0.111
0.912 Not
Significant Girls 150 21.17 4.81 .39297
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 0.111 is less
than tabulated t-value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of
significance. The „null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is not accepted. Hence
the above hypothesis “Scheduled tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their
Extrinsic orientation in Learning” is not accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded Scheduled tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls do not differ
in their Extrinsic orientation in Learning.
189
HYPOTHESIS 15
Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their Significant other
orientation in Learning.
Table - 28
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
boys and Girls in their Significant other orientation in Learning
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value
p-
value
Result at
0.05 level
Boys 150 21.23 4.65 .37962
0.313
0.755 Not
Significant Girls 150 21.40 4.58 .37411
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 0.313 is less
than tabulated t-value for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of significance. The
„null hypothesis that no difference exists‟ is not accepted. Hence the above
hypothesis “Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their
Significant other orientation in Learning” is not accepted.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded Scheduled tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls do not differ
in their Significant other orientation in Learning.
190
HYPOTHESIS 16
Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled tribe girls differ in their Educational
achievement.
Table - 29
Mean, Standard Deviation, Standard Error Mean and Calculated t-value of ST
Boys and Girls
Gender N Mean S.D. Std.Error t-value Result
Boys 150 304.9467 54.46627 4.44715
0.807
NS Girls 150 310.4867 64.10800 5.23440
** Significance at 0.05 level, NS- Not Significant
From the above table it is noted that the calculated t- value 0.807 is less
than tabulated t-value 1.96 for 299 degrees of freedom at 0.05 level of
significance. Hence the above hypothesis “Scheduled Tribe boys and scheduled
tribe girls differ in their Educational achievement” is Not Significant.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that Scheduled tribe boys and girls do not differ in their
educational achievement.
191
HYPOTHESIS 17
Significant correlation exists between masculinity and Educational achievement of
Scheduled Tribe boys
Table - 30
Correlation value of masculinity and Educational achievement of ST boys
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
.155
0.058
Not Significant
Masculinity 150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.155 is which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 17 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists no significant correlation between masculinity and Educational
achievement of Scheduled tribe boys.
192
HYPOTHESIS 18
Significant correlation exists between Femininity and Educational achievement of
Scheduled tribe girls.
Table - 31
Correlation value of femininity and Educational achievement of ST girls
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
.025
0.757
Not Significant
Femininity 150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.025 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 18 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists no significant correlation between femininity and Educational
achievement of Scheduled tribe girls.
193
Hypothesis 19
Significant correlation exists between idealistic aspiration disposition and
Educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
Table - 32
Correlation value of idealistic aspiration and Educational Achievement of ST boys
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
.030
0.716
Not Significant
Idealistic
aspiration
150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.030 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 19 is not
accepted.
Conclusion
There exists no significant correlation between idealistic aspiration disposition
and Educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
194
HYPOTHESIS 20
Significant correlation exists between idealistic aspiration disposition and
Educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe girls
Table - 33
Correlation value of idealistic aspiration and Educational Achievement of ST girls
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
0.252
0.002
Significant
Idealistic
aspiration
150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.252 which is
significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 20 is accepted
CONCLUSION
There exists significant correlation between idealistic aspiration disposition and
Educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe girls.
195
HYPOTHESIS 21
Significant correlation exists between realistic aspiration disposition and
Educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
Table - 34
Correlation value of realistic aspiration and Educational Achievement of ST boys
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
.031
0.707
Not Significant
Realistic
aspiration
150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.031 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 21 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists no significant correlation between realistic aspiration disposition and
Educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
196
HYPOTHESIS 22
Significant correlation exists between realistic aspiration disposition and
Educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe girls.
Table - 35
Correlation value of realistic aspiration and Educational Achievement of ST girls
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
0.068
0.407
Not
Significant Realistic
aspiration
150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.068 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 22 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists no significant correlation between realistic aspiration disposition and
Educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe girls.
197
HYPOTHESIS 23
Significant correlation exists between co-operative disposition and Educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
Table - 36
Correlation value of co-operative disposition and Educational achievement of ST
boys
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
.129
0.115
Not Significant
Co-operative
Disposition
150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.115 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 23 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists no significant correlation between co-operative disposition and
Educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
198
HYPOTHESIS 24
Significant correlation exists between co-operative disposition jand Educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe girls
Table - 37
Correlation value of co-operative disposition and Educational achievement of ST
girls
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
.063
0.442
Not Significant
Co-operative
Disposition
150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.063 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 24 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists no significant correlation between co-operative disposition and
Educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe girls.
199
HYPOTHESIS 25
Significant correlation exists between competition disposition and Educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
Table - 38
Correlation value of competition disposition and Educational achievement of ST
boys
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
.054
0.514
Not Significant
Competition
Disposition
150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.054 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 25 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists no significant correlation between competition disposition and
Educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
200
HYPOTHESIS 26
Significant correlation exists between competition disposition and Educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe girls
Table – 3 9
Correlation value of competition disposition and Educational achievement of ST
girls
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
.184
0.024
Significant
Competition
Disposition
150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.184 which is
significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 26 is accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists significant correlation between competition disposition and
Educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe girls.
201
HYPOTHESIS 27
Significant correlation exists between cultural conformity and Educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
Table - 40
Correlation value of cultural conformity and Educational achievement of ST boys
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
0.169
0.039
Significant
Cultural
conformity
150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.169 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 27 is
accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists significant correlation between cultural conformity and Educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
202
HYPOTHESIS 28
Significant correlation exists between cultural conformity and Educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe girls
Table - 41
Correlation value of cultural conformity and Educational achievement of ST girls
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
.215
0.008
Significant
Cultural
conformity
150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.215 which is
significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 28 is accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists significant correlation between cultural conformity and Educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe girls.
203
HYPOTHESIS 29
Significant correlation exists between cultural rebellion and Educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
Table - 42
Correlation value of cultural rebellion and Educational achievement of ST boys
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
0.016
0.843
Not Significant
Cultural
rebellion
150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.016 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 29 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists no significant correlation between cultural rebellion and Educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
204
HYPOTHESIS 30
Significant correlation exists between cultural rebellion and Educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe girls.
Table - 43
Correlation value of cultural rebellion and Educational achievement of ST girls
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
150
.192
0.019
Significant
Cultural
rebellion
150
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value 0.215 which is
significant at 0.05 level for 149 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 30 is accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists significant correlation between cultural rebellion and Educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe girls.
205
HYPOTHESIS 31
Significant correlation exists between personal development orientation and
educational achievement of scheduled tribe students.
Table - 44
Correlation value of educational achievement and personal development
orientation Scheduled Tribe students
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
300
.091
0.116
Not
Significant Personal development
orientation
300
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value is 0.91 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 299 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 31 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists no significant correlation between personal development
orientation and Educational achievement of scheduled tribe students.
206
HYPOTHESIS 32
Significant correlation exists between Assessment domination in Learning and
Educational achievement of scheduled tribe students.
Table - 45
Correlation value of Educational achievement and Assessment domination in
Learning of Scheduled Tribe Students
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
300
.065
0.265
Not
Significant Assessment domination
in Learning
300
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value is .065 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 299 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 32 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists no significant correlation between Assessment domination in
Learning and Educational achievement of scheduled tribe students.
207
HYPOTHESIS 33
Significant correlation exists between intrinsic orientation in job getting and
Learning and educational achievement of scheduled tribe students.
Table - 46
Correlation value of Educational Achievement and intrinsic orientation in job
getting and Learning of Scheduled Tribe Students
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
300
.009
0.872
Not
Significant Intrinsic orientation in
job getting and Learning
300
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value is .009 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 299 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 33 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
There exists no significant correlation between intrinsic orientation in job
getting and Learning and educational achievement of scheduled tribe students.
208
HYPOTHESIS 34
Significant correlation exists between Apathy in learning and educational
achievement of scheduled tribe students.
Table - 47
Correlation value of educational achievement and Apathy in learning of ST
Students
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
300
.056
0.336
Not
Significant Intrinsic orientation in
job getting and Learning
300
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value is .056 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 299 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 34 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
Therefore it is concluded that there exists no significant correlation between
Apathy in learning and educational achievement of scheduled tribe students.
209
HYPOTHESIS 35
Significant correlation exists between Involvement in Learning and educational
achievement of scheduled tribe students.
Table - 48
Correlation value of Educational achievement and Involvement in Learning of
Scheduled Tribe Student
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
300
.089
0.125
Not
Significant Involvement in
Learning
300
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value .089 is which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 299 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 35 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
Therefore it is concluded that there exists no significant correlation between
Involvement in Learning and educational achievement of scheduled tribe students.
210
HYPOTHESIS 36
Significant correlation exists between Extrinsic orientation in Learning and
educational achievement of scheduled tribe students.
Table - 49
Correlation value of Educational achievement and extrinsic orientation in Learning
of Scheduled Tribe Students
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
300
.099
0.087
Not
Significant Extrinsic orientation in
Learning
300
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value .099 is which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 299 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 36 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
Therefore it is concluded that there exists no significant correlation between
Extrinsic orientation in Learning and educational achievement of scheduled tribe
students.
211
HYPOTHESIS 37
Significant correlation exists between Significant other orientation in Learning
and educational achievement of scheduled tribe students.
Table - 50
Correlation value of Educational achievement and Significant other orientation in
Learning of Scheduled Tribe Students
Variable N r-value p-value Result at 0.05
level
Educational
Achievement
300
.010
0.982
Not
Significant Significant other
orientation in Learning
300
From the above table it is noted that the calculated r- value is .010 which is
not significant at 0.05 level for 299 degrees of freedom. Hypothesis 37 is not
accepted.
CONCLUSION
Therefore it is concluded that there exists no significant correlation between
Significant other orientation in Learning and educational achievement of
scheduled tribe students.
212
5.5. CALCULATION OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS
The investigator calculated the Regression Analysis for the following variables
and tabulated the findings. They are
1. Regression between idealistic aspiration and Educational achievement of
girls.
2. Regression between composition disposition and Educational achievement
of girls.
3. Regression between cultural conformity and Educational achievement of
girls.
4. Regression between cultural rebellion and Educational achievement of girls
and
5. Regression between cultural conformity and Educational achievement of
boys.
REGRESSION 1 TABLE - 51
Regression between idealistic aspiration and Educational achievement of girls
R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
.252(a) .063 .057 62.25389
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 38784.538 1 38784.538 10.008 .002(a)
Residual 573580.935 148 3875.547
Total 612365.473 149
CONCLUSION
From the above table it is noted that idealistic aspiration and Educational
achievement of girls is statistically correlated. Idealistic aspiration contributes 6%
for Educational achievement of girls.
213
REGRESSION 2 TABLE - 52
Regression between Competition disposition and Educational achievement of girls
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .184(a) .034 .027 63.22903
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 20674.798 1 20674.798 5.171 .024(a)
Residual 591690.676 148 3997.910
Total 612365.473 149
CONCLUSION
From the above table it is noted that Competition disposition and Educational
achievement of girls is statistically correlated. Competition disposition contributes
3% for Educational achievement of girls.
214
REGRESSION 3 TABLE - 53
Regression between cultural conformity and Educational achievement of girls
R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
.215(a) .046 .040 62.81752
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 28351.388 1 28351.388 7.185 .008(a)
Residual 584014.085 148 3946.041
Total 612365.473 149
CONCLUSION
From the above table it is noted that cultural conformity and Educational
achievement of girls is statistically correlated. Cultural conformity contributes 6%
for Educational achievement of girls.
215
REGRESSION 4 TABLE - 54
Regression between Cultural rebellion and Educational achievement of girls
R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
.192(a) .037 .030 63.13211
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 22487.332 1 22487.332 5.642 .019(a)
Residual 589878.141 148 3985.663
Total 612365.473 149
CONCLUSION
From the above table it is noted that cultural rebellion and Educational
achievement of girls is statistically correlated. Cultural rebellion contributes 4%
for Educational achievement of girls.
216
REGRESSION 5 TABLE - 55
Regression between Cultural conformity and Educational achievement of boys
R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
.169(a) .029 .022 53.86552
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 12598.465 1 12598.465 4.342 .039(a)
Residual 429421.108 148 2901.494
Total 442019.573 149
Conclusion
From the above table it is noted that cultural conformity and Educational
achievement of boys is statistically correlated. Cultural conformity contributes 3%
for Educational achievement of boys.
217
5.6 DISCUSSION - PSYCHOLOGICAL SEX ROLE ORIENTATION
It has been found in the study that Scheduled Tribe boys are high in
masculinity. The Scheduled Tribe girls are high in femininity. This sex role
orientation is a confirmation of their tribal culture and traditional beliefs of a
closed culture. The physical build up, strength and valor necessary for tribal
males in occupations like hunting, agriculture are associated with their
masculinity, where as the tribal females tending cattle, gathering forest
products and bearing and caring children along with household work are
associated with femininity roles. This finding is supported by the finding
reported by Rodney Cate and Alan I. Sugawara (1986) that high school male
students perceived themselves to be more physiologically competent than
females; males high on masculinity perceived themselves to be more
socially competent and to have higher general self esteem than those low on
masculinity.
The provision of Universalisation of education and availability of schools
in Tribal areas, have made achievement of Scheduled Tribe students above
average (mean scores 304.95 for Scheduled Tribe boys and mean score
310.49 for Scheduled Tribe girls) in Shervarayan hill range. According to
the present study, no significant correlation is found between masculinity
and educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys as well as Scheduled
Tribe girls.
218
The present finding has no support from the finding reported by
Narinderbal (1981) who found that the intention of females to go in for
higher education had nothing to do with their sex role attitude.
OCCUPATIONAL ASPIRATION
It is found in the present study that Scheduled Tribe boys are lower in
Idealistic Aspiration as well as Realistic Aspiration than the Scheduled tribe
girls.
The scholarship and special provisions to encourage tribal girls
education has effect their occupational aspiration concerning immediately on
completing studies or at their future age of attaining 30 years. This is not
found in the Scheduled Tribe boys who have relatively low occupational
aspiration.
It is found that when Scheduled Tribe boys are considered, idealistic
aspiration or realistic aspiration have no significant correlation with their
educational achievement. But in case of girls, significant correlation is
found with their idealistic aspiration whereas no significant correlation is
found between realistic aspiration with respective educational achievement.
Earlier research findings who serve partial support are: Khuwaid –
Ur-Rahman Khan (2006) reported that boys and girls studying in senior
secondary schools have almost the same occupational aspiration. High level
of occupational aspirations in Scheduled Tribe boys and girls (Annaraja and
Ponnambala Thiagarajan); Wendy Papper, 2007 reporting Australian High
219
School Students generally held higher occupational status aspirations;
Devroop Karendra (2012) reporting the student‟s aspired more prestigious
occupations but expected to be employed in occupations less prestigious
when considering realities in the job market.
It is noted in the present study that Idealistic Aspiration contributes 6
% for educational achievement of girls of Scheduled Tribe. It indicates that
their future orientation of occupation is reflection of educational
achievement.
COOPERATION- COMPETITION
It is found in the present study that Scheduled Tribe boys as well as
girls have almost same level of cooperation competition disposition and
hence no significant differences in this variable. No significant correlation
is found for Scheduled Tribe boys between cooperation and educational
achievement; competition and educational achievement and for Scheduled
Tribe girls between cooperation and educational achievement. But for
Scheduled Tribe girls a significant correlation is found between competition
and educational achievement.
The inner urge of Scheduled Tribe girls to compete with others or
with own self and achieve educationally is indicated which may not be
apparent in Scheduled Tribe boys.
Mark Van Vugt et al (2007) reported men responding more strongly
than women to intergroup threats, men cooperated in their group if their
220
group was competing with other groups. This is not supporting the present
finding.
The reported findings have emphasized cooperative learning among
students (Jeanne Gibbs 1987, Robert Slavin, 1995) not similar to present
finding. Also, Johnson, David W. (2000) „s finding that eight cooperative
learning methods had a significant positive impact on student achievement
is contrary to the finding of the present study.
Karen Swisher (1990)‟s finding that American Indian are schooled in
our atmosphere of individualism whereas many Indian children are raised in
atmosphere that stresses cooperation and de-emphasizes competition is also
not supporting the present findings.
CULTURAL DETERMINATION
It is found in the present study that Scheduled Tribe boys and
Scheduled Tribe girls have slightly higher cultural conformity than cultural
rebellion and when statistically tested the differences are not significant. No
significant correlations are found between cultural conformity and
educational achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys as well as Scheduled
Tribe girls, where as significant correlation is found for Scheduled Tribe
girls between cultural rebellion and educational achievement not found to be
significantly correlated between cultural rebellion and educational
achievement of Scheduled Tribe boys.
221
This is rather in tune with traditional sex role orientation of
masculinity of Scheduled Tribe boys and femininity of Scheduled Tribe
girls. Inspite of modern trends in technology, educational development and
exposure to non-tribal environment , the scheduled tribe boys are confined in
their culture. Only Scheduled Tribe girls show slight rebellion as an affect
of education they received.
Narinderbal (1981) reported more conservative the female students
the more they were traditionally in sex role attitude; falies sorting high on
ego strength,were high on non-traditional sex role attitude are similar yet
different from the present findings. The finding of the present study
indicating cultural rebellion contribute 4% to the educational achievement of
scheduled tribe girls whereas cultural conformity contributes 6% to the
educational achievement of scheduled tribe girls.
STUDENT LEARNING ORIENTATION
It is found from the present study that Scheduled Tribe boys and Scheduled
Tribe girls are average in the seven components of student learning orientation
namely Personal Development Orientation Learning (PEDOL), Assessment
Domination in Learning (ADOL), Intrinsic Orientation in Job getting & Learning
(INJOL), Apathy in Learning (APAL) , Involvement in Learning (INVOL) ,
Extrinsic Orientation in Learning (EXOL) and Significant other orientation in
Learning (SIGOL). Significant differences an found in mean scores of ST boys
and ST girls , ST boys being higher than ST girls in PEDOL and INJOL. No
222
significant differences are found between ST boys and ST girls in ADOL, APAL,
INVOL, EXOL and SIGOL. The cognitive aspect of learning orientation with
reference to ST boys personal Development orientation to learning and intrinsic
orientation in job getting and learning others, media, teachers etc. This might be
the reason for ST boys being higher than ST girls. When relationship among
variables is considered no significant relationship is found between each
component of student learning orientation namely PEDOL, ADOL, INJOL,
APAL, INVOL, EXOL and SIGOL and educational achievement of schedule tribe
students.
5.7. SUMMARY
In this chapter descriptive and inferential analysis was presented. Differential and
Co relational nature of the analysis was discussed. The regression analysis reveals
the educational achievement do not depend on masculinity of boys, femininity of
girls, idealistic aspiration disposition of boys, realistic aspiration of boys, realistic
aspiration of girls, cooperative disposition of boys, cooperative disposition of girls,
competition disposition of boys, cultural rebellion of boys, PEDOL, ADOL,
INJOL, APAL, INV OL, EXOL, SIGOL and the educational achievement is
related with idealistic aspiration of girls, competition disposition of girls, cultural
conformity of girls, cultural rebellion of girls and cultural conformity of boys.
In the next chapter, summary of the study and implications of main findings
followed by recommendations and suggestions for further study.