5g radio access technology - ieee 5g summit · 5g radio access technology kumar balachandran...
TRANSCRIPT
5G Radio Access Technology
Kumar BalachandranPrincipal Research EngineerEricsson Research
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit Seattle | 2016-11-05 | Page 2
• Very high traffic capacity
• High data rates everywhere
• Very low latency
• Ultra-high reliability and availability
• Massive number of devices
• Very low device cost and energy consumption
• Very high network energy performance
• ...
5G Wireless Access
More than just enhanced mobile broadband
Connectivity anywhere and anytime for anyone and anything
Flexibility for new applications and usage cases
A wide range of requirements and capabilities
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit, Seattle| 2016-11-05 | Page 2
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit Seattle | 2016-11-05 | Page 3
5G Radio Access
NRTight
interworkingEvolution of LTE
Evolution of existing technology + New radio-access technology
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit, Seattle| 2016-11-05 | Page 3
1Latency
reductionsLAAMulti-antennaenhancements
Enhanced MTC
V2X
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit Seattle | 2016-11-05 | Page 4
Proposals
Rel-14
NR – 3GPP timeplan2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Rel-13 Rel-15 Rel-16
5G SI(s)
Rel-17
Requirements Specifications
Vision, feasibility Requirements Specs
NR Phase1 NR Phase2
Acceleration
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit Seattle | 2016-11-05 | Page 5
NR – Key technology features
Access/backhaulintegration
Direct
device-to-deviceconnectivity
Massive antennaconfigurations
Ultra-lean designExtension to higher frequency bands
Multi-site connectivity/coordinationOFDM-based
physical layer
Minimize network transmissions not directly related to user data delivery
1 GHz 3 GHz 10 GHz 30 GHz 100 GHz
4G
5G
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit, Seattle| 2016-11-05 | Page 5
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit Seattle | 2016-11-05 | Page 6
› Lower frequencies: Mainly FDD– Co-existence with existing deployments– Avoid TDD-specific interference
› Higher frequencies: Mainly TDD– Easier to find unpaired spectrum supporting very wide transmission bandwidth– Higher degree of channel reciprocity Additional beam-forming possibilities– Enabling dynamic assignment of downlink/uplink resources
Duplex arrangement
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit, Seattle| 2016-11-05 | Page 6
Page 7
› Lower frequencies: – Similar antenna configurations as LTE– Bandwidth limited Spatial multiplexing (data rates) and multi-user MIMO (capacity) more important– Evolution/refinement of LTE multi-antenna transmission
› Higher frequencies: – Very large number of controllable antenna elements– Typically plenty of bandwidth Beam-forming for coverage more important– Need coverage for all transmissions, including control, system information, random access, ….– Mobility between beams rather than between cells– Also beam-forming at the device side
Multi-antenna transmissionNR
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit, Seattle| 2016-11-05 | Page 7
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit, Seattle| 2016-11-05 | Page 8
Radio Network Evaluations
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit Seattle | 2016-11-05 | Page 9
Assumptions
LTE– 20MHz FDD– 4x4 MIMO Peak rate ~400 Mbps
NR– 200MHz TDD at 28GHz – 2x4 SU-MIMO, 90% DL Peak rate ~1.4 Gbps– Total of 32 BS antennas
› LTE and NR using the same sites
› Over-the-roof-top deployment– ISD = 235 m or ISD = 127 m
› Only outdoor users
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit Seattle | 2016-11-05 | Page 10
Downlink peak Throughput
Limited throughput in some outdoor areas
Close to peak throughput in most outdoor areas
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit Seattle | 2016-11-05 | Page 11
Gains from interworking
Interworking improves achievable throughput
5G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit Seattle | 2016-11-05 | Page 125G Radio Access | Public | IEEE 5G Summit, Seattle| 2016-11-05 | Page 12
› NR offers a new air interface for 5G operation in all IMT bands – New frame structure– Better support for large antenna arrays than LTE– Lean design with self-contained frame
› System evaluations highlight the need for new spectrum– Denser networks are needed for good standalone operation– Operation at higher bands (e.g. at 28 GHz ) benefits from coverage in lower bands (<6 GHz)– Good quality of experience will need wider system bandwidth for coverage bands
Summary