6-1623009

Upload: get3oenz

Post on 04-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    1/13

    EXHIBIT 15

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    2/13

    EXHIBIT 15

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    3/13

    2006 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.The information contained herein is subject to change without notice

    Blackbird

    Strategic RationaleFebruary 26th, 2009

    ****Draft****

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    4/13

    Itanium Based Plans

    Scenario A: Current POR BCS plan to support Tukwila, Poulson and Kittson

    Excludes any revenue or investments for x86

    TS support plan for above

    R&D plan estimated through FY14

    Includes $88M payment to Intel for FY09-FY12

    Scenario B: Adjusted Plan Removes any future development after Tukwila; includes no

    assumptions for Poulson and Kittson TS support plans trend with hardware reductions

    Assumes no payments to Intel effective FY09

    2 8 December 2011

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    5/13

    FY09 FY14 Combined BCS & TS

    ($B) Scenario A:Current POR

    Scenario B:No further IPFdevelopment

    Delta

    Total Revenue $30.8 $22.8 ($8.0)

    Gross Margin $14.2 $9.7 ($4.5)

    IPF R&D $1.4 .5 ($.9)

    Net Profit $12.841.6%

    $9.240.3%

    ($3.6)45.3%

    3 8 December 2011

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    6/13

    4 8 December 2011

    Revenue Cumulative 6Yr ($8.0B) Profit Cumulative 6Yr ($3.6B)

    Scenario A: Scenario B:

    Profit net of $912M R&D savings

    $0

    $250

    $500

    $750

    $1,000

    $1,250

    $1,500

    $1,750

    $2,000

    $2,250

    $2,500

    $2,750

    $3,000

    $3,250

    $3,500

    FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14

    BCSeN - POR NED-POR TS-POR BCSeN-Adj NED-Adj TS-Adj

    $0

    $250

    $500

    $750

    $1,000

    $1,250

    $1,500

    FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14

    BCSeN-POR NED-POR TS-POR BCSeN-Adj NED-Adj TS-Adj

    FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14

    BCSeN $0 ($437) ($1,502) ($1,827) ($1,301) ($920)

    NED $0 ($151) ($143) ($67) ($100) ($84)

    TS $0 ($60) ($149) ($272) ($452) ($501)

    Total $0 ($648) ($1,794) ($2,166) ($1,854) ($1,504)

    Revenue DeltaFY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14

    BCSeN $88 ($174) ($692) ($810) ($700) ($522)

    NED $0 ($86) ($79) ($36) ($51) ($41)

    TS ($0) ($21) ($52) ($98) ($159) ($175)

    Total $88 ($281) ($823) ($944) ($910) ($739)

    Profit Delta - Gross Margin Less Busin ess Owned R&D

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    7/13

    Strategic Rationale Summary (1 of )

    HP is committed to the Unix market which has a long future withsignificant product and services pull through. Solaris is the leadingUnix in the US, HP-UX is the leading Unix everywhere else; thecombination provides choice with little overlap in the market.

    We like the Solaris franchise and believe the combination of Solarisand our strength in Enterprise computing and x86 will provideimportant choice points for the market.

    Suns storage based on Solaris/ZFS is consistent with our IndustryStandard Storage roadmap and accelerates our plans to ride the x86

    technology curve and provide full-featured Entry to Enterprise levelstorage based on industry standard gear

    Cost synergies

    5 8 December 2011

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    8/13

    Strategic Rationale Current Situation

    HP-UX is on a death march due to inevitable Itanium trajectory Companion TS attach business declines precipitously but with a

    longer tail than the product business

    No replacement for 45% revenue and 60% of GM for the TS business

    TS Value is tied to HP-UX and we do not have a go-forward

    x86 is on a credible trajectory to fulfill all aspects of RISC within 5years

    Going forward, HP will not own the software IP stack upon which tobuild value the hardware stack gets commoditized

    Cisco owns IOS stack

    Microsoft owns AZURE stack

    NetApps owns OnTap stack

    VMWare building out its own software stack

    We are behind in IP control points in storage even afteracquisitions

    6 8 December 2011

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    9/13

    Strategic Rationale - Upside We get the leading UNIX and the only viable x86 UNIX with strong ISV support

    Control point to build significant value and IP

    Gain ownership of virtualization stack for x86

    Allows us to build capabilities without any dependence or need for VMWare

    Combination of leading x86 (Proliant) with leading UNIX very powerful

    Very loyal customer base who love the Blackbird technology

    Make it a two horse race in the enterprise: Solaris and Windows (which both run best

    on our platforms) Windows Server cannot optimize performance & RAS the way we can with Solaris on x86

    Unify and simplify efforts around the software and x86 for compute & storageconvergence driving a consistent architecture to be more cost competitive

    Become the reference storage platform for next generation IM applications

    We put significant pressure on the pure-play storage business model

    We gain the next generation storage platform

    Isolate pure-play vendors

    Expand the c-Class franchise by moving all SPARC and UNIX to Blades plus Storage

    HP has the IP for hardware RAS on x86

    Solaris delivers the software components for true enterprise applications

    Gain sales capabilities skewed to value-selling with strong customer and ISV

    partnerships7 8 December 2011

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    10/13

    Storage Convergence Opportunity

    Move the conversation to c-Class blades forstorage

    Solaris is the platform for server/storage

    8 8 December 2011

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    11/13

    Networking

    Blackbird does not have fully developednetworking assets as originally thought

    Cisco does have dependencies on Solaris andwould now be dependent on us

    Blackbird did have nascent thoughts in certainareas of networking we could develop

    HP has the ability to use Solaris as the switch

    operating system for advanced networkingcapabilities

    Opportunity to accelerate some plans in edgetechnologies

    9 8 December 2011

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    12/13

    Impact of BB acquired by IBM

    They consolidate their platforms on a single OS and previoustransitive acquisitions makes it easy for customers to move apps,consistent with their open source messaging

    Saves their x86 business from disaster

    Puts IBM in the game as a storage platform

    Isolates and exposes HP-UX as 3rd tier player, accelerates ourdecline (product/service) as customers look to consolidate vendors

    Control of Java as part of websphere tips IBM into the dominantposition

    Extends mainframe franchise, with a full software stack from the OS

    thru the middleware to the apps

    Gives them a cloud platform

    10 8 December 2011

  • 7/30/2019 6-1623009

    13/13

    Blackbird Current Situation

    Unix market maturing and x86 is ramping to RISC capabilities

    Services: 45% of revenue and 60% GM comes from Unix

    Infrastructure converging for server/storage/software

    Strategic Rationale

    Gain strong OS stack and make it a two-horse race (Windows/Solaris) for x86platforms with HP control of IP and value-add

    Unify, simplify and focus efforts on common building blocks and software stack

    Game changing storage architecture isolate pure play vendors

    Expand blade franchise to be the data center infrastructure

    Add value sales and service capabilities with loyal customers and solid ISV base

    Strategic Risks

    If purchased by another System Vendor: same consolidation play plus gains a

    compelling middleware position If we purchase: Microsoft reacts and elevates a different x86 vendor to strategic

    partner

    Negatives

    Networking assets are marginal

    Software assets are of little value to HP and need to be divested

    11 8 December 2011