6. electrical - ijeeer - an investigation on use of power system - bhuwan singh

8/10/2019 6. Electrical - Ijeeer - An Investigation on Use of Power System - Bhuwan Singh

1/18

www.tjprc.org [email protected]

International Journal of Electrical andElectronics Engineering Research (IJEEER)ISSN(P): 2250-155X; ISSN(E): 2278-943XVol. 4, Issue 4, Aug 2014, 55-72 TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.

AN INVESTIGATION ON USE OF POWER SYSTEM STABILIZER ON TRANSIENT

STABILITY OF POWER SYSTEM

BHUWAN PRATAP SINGH 1, M. P. SHARMA 2 & VISHU GUPTA 3

1M. Tech Student, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India2AEN, RVPNL, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

3Assistant Professor, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the effect of Power System Stabilizers (PSS) on transient stability of power system after

occurrence of fault in power system. Studies have been carried out without and with PSS in AVR for a thermal power plant

having 8 nos. identical generating units. A dynamic model of the RajWest Lignite Thermal Power Plant situated in the

Western Rajasthan is adopted to simulate the effect of PSS for damping of power system oscillations. Simulation studies

indicate that AVR having supplementary control signal from PSS, transient stability of power system increase.

Power oscillations damp out faster. Frequency of generators reach in steady state condition in lesser time. With PSS,

maximum swing in power angle and power swing in transmission lines also reduce.

KEYWORDS: Power System Stabilizers, Thermal Power Plant, Raj West Lignite Thermal Power

INTRODUCTION

Power System Stabilizers (PSS) are the most well-known and efficient devices to damp the power system

oscillations caused by interruptions. The transient stability of a system can be improved by providing suitably tuned power

system stabilizers on selected generators to provide damping to critical oscillatory modes. Suitably tuned Power System

Stabilizers (PSS), will introduce a component of electrical torque in phase with generator rotor speed deviations resulting

in damping of low frequency power oscillations in which the generators are participating. The input to stabilizer signal may

be one of the locally available signals such as changes in rotor speed, rotor frequency, accelerating power, electrical power

output of generator or any other suitable signal. This stabilizing signal is compensated for phase and gain to result in

adequate component of electrical torque that results in damping of rotor oscillations and thereby enhance power

transmission and generation capabilities. Constantly increasing intricacy of electric power systems, has enhanced interests

in developing superior methodologies for Power System Stabilizers (PSS). Transient and dynamic stability considerations

are among the main issues in the reliable and efficient operation of power systems. Low Frequency Oscillation (LFO)

modes have been observed when power systems are interconnected by weak tie-lines. The LFO mode, with weak damping,

is also called the electromechanical oscillation mode, and it usually happens in the frequency range of 0.1 to 2 Hz.

PSSs are the most efficient devices for damp out these oscillations.

POWER SYSTEM DATA

8135 MW Lignite based pit head Rajwest power plant is situated in Barmer District of Rajasthan. All units are

generating power at 13.8 kV voltage level. The two units are stepped up to 220 kV voltage level through 2x160 MVA,


2/18

56 Bhuwan Pratap Singh, M. P. Sharma & Vishu Gupta

Impact Factor (JCC): 5.9638 Index Copernicus Value (ICV): 3.0

13.8/220 kV generating transformers and the remaining six units are stepped up to 400 kV voltage level through 6 x 160

MVA, 13.8/400 kV generating transformers. Further 400 kV and 220 kV busses inside the plant are interconnected through

an ICT of 1315 MVA, 400/220 kV. Then the power is evacuated to Jodhpur 400/220 kV, Barmer 400/220/132 kV,

and Dhaurimanna 220/132 kV grid substations through 220 kV and 400 kV transmission lines. The following are the majorinterconnections with the Rajwest power plant to the Rajasthan grid

400kV Interconnections

400 kV S/C twin moose conductor line from Rajwest 400/220 kV substation to Barmer 400/220/132 kV

substation with a line length of 15.311 km.

400 kV D/C twin moose conductor line from Rajwest 400/220 kV substation to Jodhpur 400/220 kV substation

with a line length of 220 km.

1 315 MVA, 400/220 kV Interconnecting transformer at Rajwest power plant.

220kV Interconnections

220 kV D/C zebra conductor line from Rajwest 400/220 kV substation to Barmer 400/220/132 kV substation with

a line length of 15.311 km.

220 kV S/C zebra conductor line from Rajwest 400/220 kV substation to Dhaurimanna 220/132 kV substation

with a line length of 90 km.

Figure 1 gives the interconnection diagram in the vicinity of the Raj West power plant

Figure 1: Interconnection Diagram in the Vicinity of the Raj West Power Plant

Network Reduction

In order to study the local modes of oscillations where the Rajwest power plant generators oscillates with the rest

of the Rajasthan system, it is sufficient to reduce the network at the boundary busses i.e. Barmer 220 kV and 400kV,


3/18

An Investigation on Use of Power System Stabilizer on Transient Stability of Power System 57


Dhaurimanna 220 kV and Jodhpur 400 kV with the dynamic equivalents. In the process of network reduction,

some fictitious transformers are also added at the boundary busses based on the fault levels at the boundary buses.

Three Phase Fault Levels at Boundary Buses

To arrive at the equivalent impedance at the boundary buses, three phases to ground fault is created at the

boundary busses with the full system and the contribution from the other braches which are of no interest (not represented

in reduced network) and to be represented in the equivalents are calculated and represented in the equivalent system.

Table 1 shows the three phases to ground fault contribution from all branches connected to the specified buses.

Table 1: 3- Fault Current at the Boundary Buses

S. No. Fault at Bus3-Phase Faultwith ReducedSystem in kA

3-Phase Faultwith Full

System in kA1 Barmer 220 kV 18.893 17.854

2 Dhaurimanna220 kV 8.722 8.462

3 Jodhpur 400 kV 14.216 13.4334 Barmer 400 kV 12.163 11.096

Single line diagram of power system network with load flow study results is placed in figure 2.

Figure 2: Single Line Diagram of Power System for Simulation

Transmission Line Parameters

Based on data available on transmission design followed by RRVPNL, per kilometer line parameters are given in

Table 2


4/18



Table 2: Transmission Line Parameters

S. NoDescription Conductor Type

Conductor Type Twin Moose Zebra Panther1 Voltage Rating 400 220 132

2 Positive sequence resistance in ohm/km/ckt 0.029792 0.0748746 0.16221743 Positive sequence reactance in ohm/km/ckt 0.332 0.3992516 0.38611584 Positive sequence half line charging

susceptance in mho/km/ckt (B/2)1.734375 e-006 1.466942 e-006 1.46349 e-006

5 Zero sequence resistance in ohm/km/ckt 0.16192 0.219976 0.40563076 Zero sequence reactance in ohm/km/ckt 1.24 1.339228 1.62217447 Zero sequence half line charging

susceptance in mho/km/ckt (B/2)1.12e-006 9.20041e-007 1.317141e-007

Generator Parameters

There are total 8 units of 135 MW rating at the Rajwest power plant. Generator parameters are same for all

generators. Generator parameter are given in Table 3.

Table 3: Generator Parameters

S. No Parameter Description Value1 MW rating 1352 MVA rating 158.83 No. of units 84 Rated voltage in kV 13.85 Rated power factor 0.85 (Lag)6 Armature Resistance (Ra) in pu (Stator Resistance per phase at 75 C) 1.02565e-37 Negative Sequence Reactance (Unsaturated) 0.19 pu

8 Potier Reactance 0.24 pu9 Zero Sequence Reactance (Unsaturated) 0.19 pu10 Direct Axis Reactance (Xd) (unsaturated) 2.21 pu11 Direct Axis Transient Reactance (Xd') (Unsaturated) 0.24 pu12 Direct Axis Sub- Transient Reactance (Xd") (Unsaturated) 0.18 pu13 Quadrature Axis Reactance (Xq) (unsaturated) 2.072 pu14 Quadrature Axis Transient Reactance (Xq') (Unsaturated) 0.391 pu15 Direct Axis Sub- Transient Reactance (Xq") (Unsaturated) 0.195 pu16 Direct Axis Transient Open Circuit Time Constant (Tdo) (Unsaturated) 9.34 s17 Direct Axis Sub Transient Open Circuit Time Constant (Tdo) (Unsaturated) 0.017 s18 Quadrature Axis Transient Open Circuit Time Constant (Tqo) (Unsaturated) 0.904 s19 Quadrature Axis Sub Transient Open Circuit Time Constant (Tqo) (Unsaturated) 0.034 s

20Generator Inertia Constant H (Generator +turbine + governor +excitation system) inMJ/MVA 2.51

21 NGT Voltage rating 13.8/.240kV22 NGR 0.46 ohms

Generator Transformer Details

Raj west Power Plant two units are stepped up to 220 kV level through 13.8/220 kV generating transformers and

the remaining units are stepped up to 400 kV level through 13.8/400 kV generating transformers. The 13.8/220 kV and

13.8/400 kV generator transformer details is given in Table 4.


5/18



Table 4: Details of 13.8/220 kV and 13.8/400 kV Generating Transformer

Parameters Specification Specification

Transformer NameGenerator

Transformer (13.8

kV/230 kV)

Generator Transformer(13.8 kV/ 420 kV)

MVA Rating 160 160Primary Voltage in kV 13.8 13.8Secondary Voltage in kV 230 230% Positive sequence Impedance 12.5 12.5% Zero sequence Impedance 11.25 11.25

Winding Configuration Delta / Stargrounded Delta / Star grounded

Type of tap changer (On load or Off load) Off Load tapchanger Off Load tap changer

TapPosition

Total no of taps 5 5Nominal tap 3 3Set tap 3 2

Minimum & Maximum Tap range in pu(or) % 5% 5%

TapVoltage

Minimum voltage in kV 218.5 399Maximum voltage in kV 241.5 441

Exciter System Details

The main function of AVR is to automatically adjust the field current of the synchronous generator to maintain

the terminal voltage within continuous capability of the generator. All the generating units have the identical excitation

systems i.e. AC excitation system (Field controlled alternator rectifier excitation system). The rectifier in this excitation

system is stationary and is fed from the generator terminal. The voltage regulator controls the firing angles of the thyristors

and converts AC in to appropriate DC. This DC supply is fed to field winding of the alternator through slip rings.

The block diagram of the excitation system in the figure 3.

Figure 3: Block Diagram of Excitation System

The Excitation system parameters are same for all units i.e. the generators which are stepped up to 220 kV voltage

level as well as the generators stepped up to 400 kV voltage level. Excitation parameters are given in table 5.

Table 5: Excitation System Parameters

Constant Name Parameter ValueKA Exciter Gain 25TR Amplifier time constant in s 0.02TA Integral Time Constant 8.335

TS Gate Control Unit andConverter Time Constant 0.005

Uk max Maximum voltage in pu 7.42Uk min Minimum voltage in pu -5.7


6/18



Power System Stabilizer (PSS)

High performance excitation systems are essential for maintaining steady state and transient stability of modern

synchronous generators, apart from providing fast control of the terminal voltage. But the fast acting exciters with high

AVR gain can contribute to oscillatory instability in the power systems. This type of instability is characterized by low

frequency (0.1 to 3 Hz) power oscillations which can persist (or even grow in magnitude) for no apparent reasons.

This type of instability can endanger system security and limit power transfer. The major factors that contribute to the

instability are

Loading of the generator or Tie line

Power transfer capability of transmission lines

Power factor of the generators (Leading power factor operation is more problematic than the lagging power

factor)

AVR gain

A cost effective and satisfactory solution to the problem of oscillatory instability is to provide damping for

generator rotor oscillations. This is conveniently done by providing Power System Stabilizers (PSS) which are

supplementary controllers in the excitation systems. This supplementary signal is derived from rotor velocity, frequency,

electrical power or combination of these variables.

PSS Block Diagram

The block diagram of PSS used in the Rajwest power plant is shown in Figure 4. All the units in power plant have

the same type of PSS.

Figure 4: PSS Block DiagramThe input to the PSS is electrical power (active) which is derived from the terminal of the generator.

Each synchronous generator has the same input arrangement and the output of the PSS will act as a supplementary signal

to AVR as shown in Figure 5. The PSS block diagram consists of Wash out circuit, dynamic lead lag compensators, and a

limiter to limit the absolute value of PSS output.


7/18



Figure 5: AVR with PSS Block Diagram

Washout Circuit

The washout circuit is provided to eliminate steady state bias in the output of PSS which will modify the generator

terminal voltage. The PSS is expected to respond only to transient variations in the input signal and not to the DC offsets in

the signal. The washout circuit acts essentially as a high pass filter and it must pass all frequencies that are of interest.

Dynamic Compensator

The dynamic compensator consists of lead lag (phase) compensator blocks. The phase compensation block

provides the appropriate phase lead characteristic to compensate for the phase lag between exciter input and the generator

electrical (air-gap) torque. The dynamic compensator as shown in Figure 4 has two lead lag stages and has the following

transfer function.

There are two design criteria for the lead lag circuit namely,

The time constants, T1 to T4 in the above equation are to be chosen from the requirements of the phase

compensation to achieve desired damping torque.

The gain of the PSS is to be chosen to provide adequate damping of all critical modes under various operating

conditions. It is to be noted that PSS is tuned at a particular operating condition (full load condition with strong or

weak AC system) which is most critical. Although PSS may be tuned to give optimum damping under such

condition, the performance will not be optimal under other conditions.

Limiter

The output of the PSS must be limited to prevent the PSS acting to counter the action of the AVR. For example,

when load rejection takes place, the AVR acts to reduce the terminal voltage when PSS action calls for higher value of the

terminal voltage. It may be desirable to trip the PSS in case of load rejection. The negative limit of PSS output is of

importance during back swing of the rotor (after initial acceleration is over). The AVR action is required to maintain the

voltage (and thus prevent loss of synchronism) after the angular separation has increased. The PSS action in the negative

direction must be curtailed more than in the positive direction. For this purpose, the PSS available at the Rajwest Power


8/18



plant has the following setting limits and is same for all the generating units. The parameters for the PSS and its settable

range with actual settings are tabulated in Table 6.

Table 6: PSS Parameter Settings Range

Parameter Description Unit Range Actual SettingsT1 Filter Time constant s 0.003~0.02 0.01

TW1 Washout Time Constant s 0.01~15 5Ks1 PSS Gain Factor pu 0.1~100 -30TL1 Time constant of conditioning network s 0.01~10 0.02TL2 Time constant of conditioning network s 0.01~10 0.01TL3 Time constant of conditioning network s 0.01~10 0.02TL4 Time constant of conditioning network s 0.01~10 0.01

Usmax Upper limit of stabilizing Value pu 100% +1.0Usmin Lower limit of stabilizing Value pu 100% 1.0

Governor Parameters

The block diagrams of governor-turbine model for 8x135 MW machines are as shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7

respectively. The time constants associated with governor and turbine system are shown in Table 7.

Figure 6: Block Diagram of Governor Model for 135 MW Generator

Figure 7: Block Diagram of Turbine Model for 135 MW Generator

Table 7: Steam Turbine Data for 135 MW Generator

S. No Constant Description Value1 Droop Droop 0.052 T1 T1 in seconds 0.33 T2 Servo motor time constant in s 24 K1 Power extraction at HP turbine 0.35 K2 Power extraction at IP turbine 0.3976 K3 Power extraction at LP turbine 0.3037 Thp HP section time constant in second 0.18 Tip IP section time constant in second 10.12

9 Tlp LP section time constant in second 0.1410 Pmax Maximum power limit in pu 1.111 Pmin Minimum power limit in pu 0.01


9/18



SIMULATION RESULTS

Faults of varying severity are simulated and stability of RWPL generators is investigated without and with PSS.

Plots of following parameters are analyzed:-

Electrical power output of generators

Swing curve of generators

Frequency variation of generators

The terminal voltage of generators

The field voltage in pu

The power flow on 220 kV D/C Rajwest-Jodhpur line

The power flow on 400 kV D/C Rajwest-Jodhpur line

Case 1: Single line to ground fault at Rajwest 220 kV bus created at 1.0 sec and cleared at 1.16 sec

Plots for foresaid disturbance are placed from figure 8 to figure 14.

Figure 8: Electric Power Variation of Generators (G1 + G2) without and with PSS

Figure 9: Swing Curve of Generators (G1 + G2) without and with PSS


10/18



Figure 10: Frequency Variation of Generators (G1 + G2) without and with PSS

Figure 11: Terminal Voltage Variation of Generators (G1 + G2) without and with PSS

Figure 12: Electric Field Voltage Variation of Generators (G1 + G2) without and with PSS


11/18



Figure 13: Power Flow on 220 kV D/C Raj West-Barmer Line without and with PSS

Figure 14: Power Flow on 400 kV D/C Raj West-Jodhpur Line without and with PSS

Case 2: Single line to ground fault at Rajwest 220 kV bus created at 1.0 sec and cleared at 1.16 sec with

opening of one circuit of 220 kV D/C RajWest LTPS-Barmer line


Figure 15: Electric Power Variation of Generators (G1 + G2) without and with PSS


12/18



Figure 16: Swing Curve of Generators (G1 + G2) without and with PSS

Figure 17: Frequency Variation of Generators (G1 + G2) without and with PSS

Figure 18: Terminal Voltage Variation of Generators (G1 + G2) without and with PSS


13/18



Figure 19: Electric Field Voltage Variation of Generators (G1 + G2) without and with PSS



Case 3: Single line to ground fault at Rajwest 400 kV bus created at 1.0 sec and cleared at 1.16 sec



14/18



Figure 22: Electric Power Output Variation of Generators (G3 to G6) without and with PSS

Figure 23: Swing Curve of Generators (G3 to G6) without and with PSS

Figure 24: Frequency Variation of Generators (G3 to G6) without and with PSS


15/18



Figure 25: Terminal Voltage Variation of Generators (G3 to G6) without and with PSS

Figure 26: Electric Field Voltage Variation of Generators (G3 to G6) without and with PSS



16/18




OBSERVATIONS

With PSS, initial peak in the electrical power output is slightly more than without PSS due to the fact that under

faulty condition, the voltage is reduced and at the same time active power output also reduces. Since the AVR and

PSS action under this condition is to increase the power output of the generator. This is due to the peculiar design

of the AVR-PSS module where in the output signal of the PSS is added at the field voltage rather than at the

generator reference voltage. But it is also noted that, the oscillations in the electrical power output subsequent to

the first peak are better damped. The oscillations in the electrical power are damped in lesser time with PSS as

compared to without PSS.

Swing curves indicate that with PSS, maximum oscillation in power angle of generators are reduce in first as well

as subsequent swings. The oscillations in the generators power angle are damped in lesser time with PSS as

compared to without PSS.

Frequency curves indicate that oscillations in the generators frequency is reduce in first as well as subsequent

swings. The oscillations in the generators frequency are damped in faster with PSS.

With PSS, generator field voltage is increase due to addition of PSS output in the AVR output so that oscillations

in the generator speed are damped out.

With PSS, there is a lesser reduction in generators terminal voltage as compared to without PSS.

With PSS, Power oscillations in transmission lines are less as compared to without PSS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this paper simulation studies have been carried out for a thermal power plant having 8 nos. identical units for

different types of faults to find out the effect of power system stabilizers on transient stability of power system. Studies

have been performed without and with PSS for different types of faults in the power system. Simulation studies indicate

that AVR having supplementary control signal from PSS, transient stability of power system increase. Power oscillations

damp out faster. Frequency of generators reach in steady state condition in lesser time. With PSS, maximum swing in

power angle and power swing in transmission lines are also reduce.


17/18



REFERENCES

1. K. R. Padiyar, Power system dynamics, stability & control, (Book), BS Publications, 2006.

2. Prabha Kundur, Power system stability & control, (Book), Tata McGraw Hill, 2007.

3. E. V. Larsen, P. Swann, Applying Power system stabilizers, Part I, II and III, IEEE Transactions on Power

Apparatus & systems, Vol. PAS 100, No.6, pp 3017-3046, June 1981.

4. Y. Hsu, S. Shyue, C. Su, Low frequency oscillations in longitudinal systems: experience with dynamic stability

of Taiwan power system, IEEE Trans., Vol. PWRS-2, No. 1, February 1987, pp. 92-100.

5. B. E. Elliason, D. J. Hill, Damping structure and sensitivity in the NORDEL power system, IEEE Trans. on

Power Systems, Vol. 7, NO. 1, 1992, pp. 97-105.

6. Chung-Liang Chang, Chuan-Sheng Liu, Chun-Kuang KO, Experience with power system stabilizers in a

longitudinal power system, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 10, No. 1, February 1995. pp. 539-545.

7. F. Aboytes, G. Arroyo, Application of static VAR compensators in longitudinal power systems, IEEE Trans.

On Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-102, No. 10, October, 1983, pp. 3460-3466

8. F. P. deMello and C. Concordia, "Concepts of Spmnous Machine Stability as Affected by Excitation Control".

IEEE Transadions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS88-4, April 19. pp 316-330.

9. P. L. Dandeno. A. N. Karas. K. R. McClymont and W. Watson. "Effect of High-speed Rectifier Excitation

Systems on Generator Stability Limits". IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS87-1.

January 1 9 6 8, pp 190-201

10. W. Watson and G. Manchur. "Experience with Supplementary Damping Signals for Generator Static Excitation

Systems". IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus & Systems, Vol. PAW-1, Jan/Feb. 1973, pp 199-204.

AUTHORS DETAILS

Mr. Bhuwan Pratap Singh has received his B. Tech degree in Electrical Engineering from Rajasthan Technical

University, Kota in 2011. He is currently pursuing M. Tech.(Power System) from Suresh Gyan Vihar University,

Jaipur (email: [email protected] )


18/18



Dr. M. P. Sharma received the B. E. degree in Electrical Engineering in 1996 Govt. Engineering College, Kota,

Rajasthan and M. E. degree in Power Systems in 2001 and Ph. D. degree in 2009 from Malaviya Regional

Engineering College, Jaipur (Now name as MNIT). He is presently working as Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan

Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd., Jaipur. He is involved in the system studies of Rajasthan power system for

development of power transmission system in Rajasthan and planning of the power evacuation system for new

power plants. His research interest includes Reactive Power Optimization, Power System Stability, Islanding of

power system, reduction of T&D losses and protection of power system.(email:[email protected])

Ms Vishu Gupta has finished her bachelor of science in Electrical Engineering(B. S. S.E) in 2009 and Master of

Science in Electrical Engineering(M. S. E. E.) in 2012 from the University of Idaho, Mascow, Idaho, USA. She is

currently working in Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur, India as an Assistant Professor in the department of

Electrical Engineering. Research interest includes low power consumption in power electronics devices,

embedded system application in power system and power electronics.

6. electrical - ijeeer - an investigation on use of power system - bhuwan singh

Documents