6001 bollinger canyon rd

5
February 25, 2015 Lydia Beebe Corporate Secretary & Chief Governance Officer Chevron Corporation 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd. San Ramon, CA 94583 Dear Ms. Beebe, We write to you to express concern about the lack of public disclosure of physical risks due to climate change at Chevron’s coastal refineries. As investors who are exposed to climate change risks in our portfolios, the leading science- based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world, and the leading nonprofit working with investors, companies and public interest groups to accelerate the adoption of sustainable business practices, we have called on both policy makers and companies to take action to disclose and prepare for risks posed by climate change in addition to working to mitigate climate change. Left unaddressed, climate change is expected to cause significant physical impacts with serious implications for investors and businesses as well as the environment. Indeed, the physical effects of climate change are already being felt. The year 2014 saw a record number of natural catastrophes, with more than 90% of the 980 events related to extreme weather and climate. These events caused total economic losses of more than $110 billion and insured losses of more than $31 billion. 1 As noted in a letter sent to you by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) on December 22, 2014 (below), to which UCS has received no response, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued guidance in 2010 that outlines expectations from companies in reporting on “material” regulatory, physical, and indirect risks, as well as opportunities related to climate change. It appears that Chevron recognizes that climate change poses a host of risks and must be addressed. However, as detailed in the previous letter and in a new UCS report, Stormy Seas, Rising Risks: What Investors Should Know About Climate Change Impacts at Oil Refineries 2 , Chevron has disclosed no physical risks from climate change in its SEC Form 10-K filing, despite the vulnerability of its coastal refineries. The report finds apparent risk from the physical impacts of climate change, particularly enhanced storm surge and sea level rise, at Chevron’s Pascagoula, Mississippi refinery. 1 2015 Munich Re, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE. As of January 2015. 2 Union of Concerned Scientists. 2015. Stormy Seas, Rising Risks: What Investors Should Know About Climate Change Impacts at Oil Refineries. Online at ucsusa.org/risingrisks.

Upload: others

Post on 02-Jan-2022

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd

 

 

 

 

 

!

Investors and environmentalists for sustainable prosperity

99 Chauncy Street X Boston MA, 02111-1703 X�TEL 617-247-0700 X�FAX 617-267-5400 www.ceres.org

February 25, 2015

Lydia Beebe Corporate Secretary & Chief Governance Officer Chevron Corporation 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd. San Ramon, CA 94583 Dear Ms. Beebe, We write to you to express concern about the lack of public disclosure of physical risks due to climate change at Chevron’s coastal refineries. As investors who are exposed to climate change risks in our portfolios, the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world, and the leading nonprofit working with investors, companies and public interest groups to accelerate the adoption of sustainable business practices, we have called on both policy makers and companies to take action to disclose and prepare for risks posed by climate change in addition to working to mitigate climate change. Left unaddressed, climate change is expected to cause significant physical impacts with serious implications for investors and businesses as well as the environment. Indeed, the physical effects of climate change are already being felt. The year 2014 saw a record number of natural catastrophes, with more than 90% of the 980 events related to extreme weather and climate. These events caused total economic losses of more than $110 billion and insured losses of more than $31 billion.1 As noted in a letter sent to you by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) on December 22, 2014 (below), to which UCS has received no response, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued guidance in 2010 that outlines expectations from companies in reporting on “material” regulatory, physical, and indirect risks, as well as opportunities related to climate change. It appears that Chevron recognizes that climate change poses a host of risks and must be addressed. However, as detailed in the previous letter and in a new UCS report, Stormy Seas, Rising Risks: What Investors Should Know About Climate Change Impacts at Oil Refineries2, Chevron has disclosed no physical risks from climate change in its SEC Form 10-K filing, despite the vulnerability of its coastal refineries. The report finds apparent risk from the physical impacts of climate change, particularly enhanced storm surge and sea level rise, at Chevron’s Pascagoula, Mississippi refinery.

                                                                                                                         1  2015  Munich  Re,  Geo  Risks  Research,  NatCatSERVICE.  As  of  January  2015.  2  Union  of  Concerned  Scientists.  2015.  Stormy  Seas,  Rising  Risks:  What  Investors  Should  Know  About  Climate  Change  Impacts  at  Oil  Refineries.  Online  at  ucsusa.org/risingrisks.  

Page 2: 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd

As you are aware, Hurricane Katrina caused major damage and extended shut down of the Pascagoula refinery in 2005. Risk of such events in the future is likely to grow. Diminished refining utilization rates, downtime or closure of facilities due to direct damage, danger to employees, releases of environmental contamination, disruption in supply chains and distribution centers, and/ or power supply due to storm surge or sea level rise could have a material impact on production and related cash flows. We would welcome the opportunity to hear your response and speak with you about the UCS report and this inquiry. Please contact Andrew Logan, Director, Oil and Gas Program at Ceres at 617-247-0700 ext. 133 or [email protected] and Gretchen Goldman, Lead Analyst in the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists, at 202-331-6942 or [email protected]. We will share your letter with the other signers or coordinate a phone call if you wish. Thank you for your time and attention to these important issues. Sincerely, Bennett Freeman Senior Vice President, Sustainability Research and Policy Calvert Investments Stephen Viederman, Chair Finance Committee Christopher Reynolds Foundation Julie Fox Gorte, Ph.D Senior Vice President for Sustainable Investing Pax World Management LLC Timothy Smith Director of Environmental Social and Governance Shareowner Engagement Walden Asset Management Andrew Logan Director, Oil and Gas Program Ceres Andrew Rosenberg, PhD Director Center for Science and Democracy Union of Concerned Scientists

Page 3: 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd

December 22, 2014

Patricia E. Yarrington Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Chevron Corporation 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd. San Ramon, CA 94583 Dear Ms. Yarrington, I am writing to you on behalf the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). UCS is a leading science based non-profit working to integrate science into public decision making. In particular, I am writing to inquire about Chevron’s policies and disclosures regarding financial risks related to climate change. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recognized the financial impacts of climate change when it issued Interpretive Guidance on climate disclosure in February 2010, responding to more than 100 institutional investors representing $7 trillion seeking regular reporting from companies on these risks. The Guidance outlines expectations from companies in reporting on “material” regulatory, physical, and indirect risks, as well as opportunities related to climate change. These expectations include the following related to climate change impacts on severe weather.

“Significant physical effects of climate change, such as effects on the severity of weather (for example, floods or hurricanes), sea levels, the arability of farmland, and water availability and quality, have the potential to affect a registrant’s operations and results. For example, severe weather can cause catastrophic harm to physical plants and facilities and can disrupt manufacturing and distribution processes. . . . Possible consequences of severe weather could include: For registrants with operations concentrated on coastlines, property damage and disruptions to operations, including manufacturing operations or the transport of manufactured products; . . . Registrants whose businesses may be vulnerable to severe weather or climate related events should consider disclosing material risks of, or consequences from, such events in their publicly filed disclosure documents”3.

Sea level rise (SLR) projections from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) are that the Gulf of Mexico is likely to see at least one to three feet of SLR in the next 100 years, with some coastal areas potentially seeing up to 1.7 feet in the next 25 years4,5. Galveston, Texas has already experienced more than a foot of sea level rise in the

                                                                                                                         3  http://www.sec.gov/rules/interp/2010/33-­‐9106.pdf  4  http://stateofthecoast.noaa.gov/vulnerability/localthreat.html  5  Climate  Central  custom  data  provided  to  the  Union  of  Concerned  Scientists    

Page 4: 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd

past 50 years.6 Added to the SLR risk posed to coastal facilities is storm surge which has been as high as 28 feet above normal tide levels in recent hurricanes7. Storm surges and SLR are an apparent physical financial risk due to climate change for vulnerable Chevron facilities, such as the Pascagoula, Mississippi and Kapolei, Hawaii refineries. Diminished refining utilization rates, downtime or closure of these facilities due to direct damage to the facility, danger to employees, disruption in supply chains and distribution centers, and/ or power supply due to storm surges or SLR could have a material impact on production and related cash flows. This was made evident by the major damage and extended shut down of the Pascagoula, Mississippi refinery in 2005 as a result of Hurricane Katrina.8 Though the Chevron annual report filed using form 10-K on February 21, 2014 notes possible “disruptions at refineries or chemical plants resulting from unplanned outages due to severe weather,” the only direct discussion of climate impacts is on regulation expenses:

“Continued political attention to issues concerning climate change, the role of human activity in it, and potential mitigation through regulation could have a material impact on the company’s operations and financial results.”9

While Chevron’s disclosure of this and other current and potential material impacts of climate change mitigation and adaptation requirements in the company’s disclosure through form 10-K is useful, specific disclosure regarding the company’s awareness of and preparation for material risks related to storm surges or SLR should also be included, along with estimates of the potential financial costs that will be incurred. This type of information is essential for investors and of interest to members of the public, especially communities living near such facilities.

UCS notes Chevron’s consideration of climate change risks on the Chevron website: “Chevron shares the concerns of governments and the public about climate change risks and recognizes that the use of fossil fuels to meet the world’s energy needs is a contributor to rising greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the earth’s atmosphere. We believe that taking prudent, practical and cost effective action to address climate change risks is the right thing to do. Mitigation of GHG emissions, adaptation to climate change and continuation of scientific and technological research should all be considered.”10

In this spirit, UCS would welcome the opportunity to discuss the potentially material impact that climate-related storm surges and SLR may have on Chevron’s coastal refining operations and to consider how the company’s disclosures related to the SEC’s guidance on climate risk may be enhanced to reflect the importance of these issues. We would welcome the opportunity to discuss the details of this inquiry further. Please contact Gretchen Goldman, Lead Analyst in the Center for Science and Democracy at the

                                                                                                                         6  http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=8771510    7  http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/surge/#FACTS  8  http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/22/business/RITA-­‐FACTBOX.html?_r=0    9  http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/93410/000009341014000011/cvx-­‐123113x10kdoc.htm  10  http://www.chevron.com/globalissues/climatechange/    

Page 5: 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd

Union of Concerned Scientists, at 202-331-6942 or [email protected]. Thank you for your time and attention to these important issues. Sincerely,

Gretchen Goldman, Ph.D. Lead Analyst Center for Science and Democracy Union of Concerned Scientists cc: Wesley E. Lohec Vice President, Health, Environment and Safety Chevron Corporation Andrew Rosenberg, Ph.D. Director Center for Science and Democracy Union of Concerned Scientists Christina Carlson Policy Research Assistant Center for Science and Democracy Union of Concerned Scientists