6.6.07 fibrinolytic therapy in stemi falk
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
1/24
A 63-yo non-English-speaking woman comes to the ED b/cof severe, steady precordial discomfort that began 14hours ago. She thought that the CP may have beenindigestion, but she had no relief with an antacid. She
has a h/o HTN. She is taking no medication. Her HR is92/min, and her BP is 150/90. Her chest and cardiacexam is normal. Her EKG shows 3-mm STE in V2-V6.She is given a chewable ASA, morphine 4mg IV,metoprolol 5mg IV, and NTG 20mcg/min IV w/ a
decrease in her CP intensity from severe to moderate. Ahospital in the next county (1.5h away by ambulance)recently established a program that provides 24hangioplasty services.
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
2/24
Which of the following should be considered
in the decision of whether to refer this
patient for treatment?A) Angioplasty (with or without stenting) has a
better outcome than thrombolysis in thispatient
B) Thrombolysis has a better outcome than
angioplasty (with or without stenting) in thispatient
C) Thrombolysis and angioplasty (with or withoutstenting) are equivalent in outcome for this
patientD) Neither thrombolysis nor angioplasty (with orwithout stenting) should be performed in thispatient
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
3/24
74yo female is admitted w/ 3h of crushing substernal CP.She has a h/o L carotid occlusion w/ hemiparesisoccurring 3 months ago. She also has a h/o mild HTN,hyperlipidemia, and DM complicated by neuropathy and
retinopathy. Her meds include coumadin, atenolol, andpravastatin. In the ED, she has a Vfib arrest and issuccessfully converted to NSR after receiving 2 min ofCPR. Her EKG shows SR w/ 3-mm STE in V2-V6. Theresults of initial laboratory tests are within normal limits,
except for an elevated PT w/ and INR of 1.8.
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
4/24
Which of the following represent an absolute
contraindication to the use of a thrombolytic agent
in this patient?
A) L carotid occlusion w/ hemiparesis 3
months ago
B) CPR for 2 minutes
C) Patient age>70 years
D) Patient on coumadin with an INR of 1.8
E) Diabetic retinopathy
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
5/24
Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI
June 6, 2007
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
6/24
90% of patients w/ acute STEMI have complete
occlusion of culprit artery
PCI preferred if performed w/in 90 minutes of
presentation or if transfer to neighboringinstitution for PCI can occur w/in 30-60 min.
Thombolytic therapy is the alternative treatment
Not as effective in non-STEMI as the infarct-related artery is not totally occluded in 60-85% of
cases
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
7/24
EFFICACY
Benefit first demonstrated w/ streptokinase(GISSI-2 and ISIS-2 trials). ISIS-2 showedcombination of ASA and streptokinase reducedmortality from 10.2% (placebo) to 7.2%.
GUSTO-I: alteplase superior to streptokinase(although more expensive)
ASSENT-2 and GUSTO-III: newer agents like
tenecteplase, reteplase, lanoteplase aseffective as alteplase but have significantly lowerincidence of noncerebral bleeding complicationsand need for transfusion.
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
8/24
Time to presentation
Survival benefit greatest when lytics administeredwithin first 4 hours after onset of symptoms,particularly within the first 70 minutes.
Mortality benefit less likely at 13-18 hours.
There MAY be benefit in patients presenting>12hours if patient has on-going stuttering chestpain.
AHA recommendations (2004): administer
lytics if no contraindications w/in 12 hr ofsymptom onset; reasonable to administer at12-24 hr if continuing symptoms orpersistent ST elevation on EKG.
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
9/24
Long-term survival
Long-term benefit primarily seen in
patients who achieved TIMI 3 flow w/ lytic
administration. Vessel opening (TIMI 2 or
3) reported in 60-87% of patients receivinglytics, but normalization (TIMI 3) in only
50-60% of arteries. Only TIMI 3 flow
associated w/ improved LV function andsurvival.
***Note: TIMI 3 flow is achieved in ~90% of patients treated with primary PCI.
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
10/24
Other prognostic indicatorspositive
predictors of one-year mortality
Demographics: older age (>55), lowerweight (115), longerQRS (>125), lower EF/heart failure,cardiogenic shock
Presence of cardiac risk factors such assmoking, HTN, prior CVA
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
11/24
CONTRAINDICATIONS
It is estimated that 20-30% of
patients ineligible for
thrombolytic therapy
This is what we missed on the in-service!!
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
12/24
ABSOLUTE contraindications
Previous ICH
Known structural cerebral vascular lesion
Known malignant intracranial neoplasm
Ischemic CVA within 3 months prior
Suspected aortic dissection Active bleeding or bleeding diathesis
Significant closed-head or facial trauma within 3 monthsprior
ADVANCED AGE IS NOT A MAJOR CONTRAINDICATION FORTHROMBOLYTICS!
although pts >75y/o may get less overall benefit.
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
13/24
RELATIVE contraindications
Poorly controlled or chronic sustained HTN
Ischemic CVA >3 months prior
Dementia
Traumatic or prolonged CPR or major surgery within
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
14/24
Adjunctive anti-coagulation
Thrombin inhibition enhances coronarythrombolysis and limits reocclusion; thereforeanti-coagulation is administered to most patientsreceiving lytics.
Alteplase, reteplase, tenecteplase: UFH at60units/kg bolus followed by 12u/kg/hr gtt;maintain PTT b/w 50-70 sec for 48hr.
LMWH also effective w/ tenecteplase, although
dont use it in pts>75 y/o (increased risk of ICH)or those w/ Cr>2.5 in men or Cr>2.0 in women.
? benefit of UFH or LMWH in streptokinase,anistreplase, urokinase.
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
15/24
Plavix
CLARITY-TIMI 28 and COMMIT/CCS-2
demonstrated improved outcomes when
plavix given before thrombolytic therapy.
300mg loading dose followed by 75mg
daily
In patients>75, risk of ICH not clear with
300mg loading dose vs 75mg loading
dose
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
16/24
GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors
Two large trials failed to shows survival
benefit with combination therapy (GP
IIb/IIIa with thrombolytics) compared to
conventional thrombolytic therapy, andbleeding was increased.
DO NOT administer concurrent GP IIb/IIIa
inhibitors with thrombolytics!
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
17/24
Assessment of response
Relief of symptoms
Maintenance or restoration of
hemodynamic and/or electrical stability
Reduction of at least 50% of initial ST
segment injury pattern on a follow-up EKG
60-90 min after initiation of therapy
Serial measurements of cardiac
biomarkers
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
18/24
PCI after thrombolytics???
This issue remains unresolved
3 possible scenarios
*Facilitated PCIlytic drug given prior to planned
PCI in attempt to achieve an open infarct-relatedartery before arrival of cath lab
*Adjunctive PCIPCI performed within hours after
thrombolysis*Early elective PCIPCI performed within a few
days after thrombolysis
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
19/24
A 63-yo non-English-speaking woman comes to the ED b/cof severe, steady precordial discomfort that began 14hours ago. She thought that the CP may have beenindigestion, but she had no relief with an antacid. She
has a h/o HTN. She is taking no medication. Her HR is92/min, and her BP is 150/90. Her chest and cardiacexam is normal. Her EKG shows 3-mm STE in V2-V6.She is given a chewable ASA, morphine 4mg IV,metoprolol 5mg IV, and NTG 20mcg/min IV w/ a
decrease in her CP intensity from severe to moderate. Ahospital in the next county (1.5h away by ambulance)recently established a program that provides 24hangioplasty services.
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
20/24
Which of the following should be considered
in the decision of whether to refer this
patient for treatment?A) Angioplasty (with or without stenting) has a
better outcome than thrombolysis in thispatient
B) Thrombolysis has a better outcome than
angioplasty (with or without stenting) in thispatient
C) Thrombolysis and angioplasty (with or withoutstenting) are equivalent in outcome for this
patientD) Neither thrombolysis nor angioplasty (with orwithout stenting) should be performed in thispatient
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
21/24
Which of the following should be considered
in the decision of whether to refer this
patient for treatment?
A) Angioplasty (with or without stenting)
has a better outcome than
thrombolysis in this patient
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
22/24
74yo female is admitted w/ 3h of crushing substernal CP.She has a h/o L carotid occlusion w/ hemiparesisoccurring 3 months ago. She also has a h/o mild HTN,hyperlipidemia, and DM complicated by neuropathy and
retinopathy. Her meds include coumadin, atenolol, andpravastatin. In the ED, she has a Vfib arrest and issuccessfully converted to NSR after receiving 2 min ofCPR. Her EKG shows SR w/ 3-mm STE in V2-V6. Theresults of initial laboratory tests are within normal limits,
except for an elevated PT w/ and INR of 1.8.
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
23/24
Which of the following represent an absolute
contraindication to the use of a thrombolytic agent
in this patient?
A) L carotid occlusion w/ hemiparesis 3
months ago
B) CPR for 2 minutes
C) Patient age>70 years
D) Patient on coumadin with an INR of 1.8
E) Diabetic retinopathy
-
7/28/2019 6.6.07 Fibrinolytic Therapy in STEMI FALK
24/24
Which of the following represent an absolute
contraindication to the use of a thrombolytic agent
in this patient?
A) L carotid occlusion w/ hemiparesis 3
months ago