68th ohio state university symposium on molecular spectroscopy june 17–21, 2013 sf 6 the forbidden...
TRANSCRIPT
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
SF6THE FORBIDDEN BAND UNVEILED
V. BOUDON, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne, UMR 5209 CNRS-Université de Bourgogne, 9. Av. A. Savary, BP 47870, F-21078 Dijon Cedex, France
L. MANCERON, Ligne AILES – Synchrotron SOLEIL, L’Orme des Merisiers, F-91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France and Institut des Sciences Moléculaires d’Orsay, UMR 8214 CNRS-Université Paris-Sud, Bât. 210, 91405, Orsay Cedex, France
F. KWABIA-TCHANA, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques, UMR CNRS 7583, Université Paris-Est Créteil et Université Paris-Diderot, 61 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94010 Créteil Cedex, France
P. ROY, Ligne AILES – Synchrotron SOLEIL, L’Orme des Merisiers, F-91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
Contents
I. The SF6 molecule and its ν6 mode
II. Far-IR spectroscopy at SOLEIL
III. Theoretical model
IV. Band analysis and simulation
V. Perspectives for SF6 hot bands
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
I. The SF6 molecule and its ν6 mode
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)
C3
C4
Point group: Oh
ν1 ν2 ν3 ν4 ν5 ν6
A1g Eg F1u F1u F2g F2u
Stretching Stretching Stretching Bending Bending Bending
Raman Raman IR IR Raman Inactive
775 cm-1 643 cm-1 948 cm-1 615 cm-1 523 cm-1 347 cm-1
Normal modes of vibration :
Small rotational constant: B0 ≈ 0.091 cm–1
v6 = 1 is the lowest vibrational level and thus generates hot bands.
But the ν6 fundamental band is, in first approximation, inactive.
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
Vibrational level population
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
Observing ν6?
Hypothesis:
ν4 / ν6 Coriolis interaction
Prediction for ν6 intensity:
6 orders of magnitude lower than ν3
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
II. Far-IR spectroscopy at SOLEIL
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
AILES beamline at SOLEILHigh Resolution Absorption Spectroscopy in the Far-IR
Synchrotron beam entrance
Interferometer
Multipass cell
Bolometer detectors
Maximum spectral resolution = 0.001 cm-1
Spectral range= 7-1000 cm-1
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
Coolable log-path gas cell
Adapted optics for long path ( < 150m)
Four compartment chamber:• Sample gas • Convection-cooling gas (He)• Liquid Nitrogen reservoir• Insulating vacuum
1m
Accurate far infrared high resolution spectra of diluted gas samples and mixture at temperatures : 400 – 90K
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
III. Theoretical model
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
Theoretical model – Tensorial formalism
Systematic expansion of effective Hamiltonian and transition moment up to any order and for any polyad scheme, thanks to group theory and tensorial methods
All interactions are automatically included
Vibrational extrapolation
Global analyses
Parameters Rotation Vibration
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
Perturbation-induced dipole moment• Coriolis interaction between ν6 and ν4 does not give convincing results
• There must be a more complicated interaction pattern• Anyway, contact transformation induces new terms in the dipole moment
• We can explain the ν6 structure with a degree one rotational dipole
moment operator (Herman-Wallis type), then considering the band as
isolated:
This term leads to a complex branch structure, which we do observe!
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
The ν6 complex branch system
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
IV. Band analysis and simulation
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
The ν6 band at high-resolution: overview
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
The ν6 band at high-resolution: P branch
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
The ν6 band at high-resolution: Q branch
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
The ν6 band at high-resolution: R branch
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
Fit results: seven ν6 parameters determined
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
Detail in the branch structure (I)
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
Detail in the branch structure (II)
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
Energy levels
Good sampling of all branches
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
V. Perspectives for SF6 hot bands
68th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 17–21, 2013
Toward hot band elucidation
• The ν3+ν6 level is not accessible (too
weak Raman band)
• ν3+ν6–ν4 difference band could be
observed (and ν4 is well known), but is
very weak in a difficult spectral region
• ν3+ν2–ν2 and ν3+ν1–ν1 already done!