7 17 13 0204 71437 065630 63341 email to lindsay stamped

7/28/2019 7 17 13 0204 71437 065630 63341 email to Lindsay stamped

1/23

request for Lindsay's fax to RJC Clifton of 3/5/13

RE: Notice of Appearances filed in which cases?

From: Zach Coughlin([email protected])Sent: Wed 7/17/13 2:53 PM

To: Robert Lindsay ([email protected])

21 attachments

7 8 13 6 19 13 stamped first pt ex 1 in 61383 0204 65630 7143763341 67980 72675 Notice Motion Request global resolutionhandwritten on dockets.pdf (2.1 MB) , 1 11 13 correct formatting 0204067980 1048 12420 email to Lindsay RBL.pdf (292.1 KB) , 1 17 13

0204 email to Lindsay 067980.pdf (744.0 KB) , 1 17 13 email thatwas also faxed to [email protected] Lindsay 0204067980.pdf (159.6 KB) , 1 18 13 to 3 15 13 emails between Coughlinand Lindsay 0204 AO12-01 063341 067980 065630 71437 printed

just from coughlin to lindsay.pdf (3.0 MB) , 2 21 13 0204 063341067980 email to WCDA DDA Young and Lindsay update on

NNAHMS request for continuance of 2 25 12 Hearing in 063341.pdf(164.9 KB) , 2 25 13 email from Lindsay's re update on NNAHMS

indicating DDA Young informed her hearing on 2 25 13 wascancelled.pdf (190.0 KB) , 3 5 13 0204 0204 AO12-01 065630067980 063341 Lindsay fax cover sheet for letter to Clifton seekingcontinuance of 3 5 13 Show Cause Hearing in AO12-01, Pear.pdf(404.4 KB) , 3 11 13 0204 071437 063341 Motion to RemoveLindsay as Co-Counsel 2 25 13 OSC 2 1 13 DAS arrest.pdf (924.1KB) , 3 12 13 0204 063341 071437 067980 AO12-01 Fax cover sheetfrom RJC Lori Townsend to Lindsay's Office Minutes from OSC

addressed getting mental eval and Administrative Order, silent onBailiffs manufacture DAS missed check in.pdf (637.5 KB) , 5 23 130204 063341 ao1201 071437 Motion to Remove Bruce Lindsay, Esq.as atty of record and notice of appeal of any orders purporting tocontinue Admin Order RJC.pdf (710.8 KB) , 7 2 12 0204 RJCeviction 1048 RCR12-067980 Case Summary Docket Lindsaynumerous continuances 6 14 12 5 Day UD Notice fraudulent and listedSparks JC NRS 40.253.pdf (378.5 KB) , 12 28 12 R Bruce Lindsay$700 bill for representation in 067980 failed to move for competency

Docket 62337 Document 2013-21067


2/23

eval prior to 1 22 13 trial date in 065630.pdf (381.4 KB) , 5 16 130204 067980 Docket as of update since 4 1 13.pdf (361.1 KB) , 5 1613 0204 063341 Docket as of OCR.pdf (1783.5 KB) , 5 16 13 0204065630 complete as of.pdf (1501.0 KB) , 2 25 13 to 3 14 13 0204071437 65630 63341 67980 all emails from Lindsay'[email protected] address.pdf (2.1 MB) , 5 16 13 0204

71437 Docket as of OCR.pdf (303.5 KB) , 5 16 13 0204 067980Docket as of update since 4 1 13.pdf (361.1 KB) , 5 16 13 0204063341 Docket as of OCR.pdf (1783.5 KB) , 5 16 13 0204 065630complete as of.pdf (1501.0 KB)

Dear Law Office of R. Bruce Lindsay,

I am writing to request a copy of the fax that was read to me over the phone

that your office sent RJC Judge Clifton on 3/5/13. Please note that on theattached docket for that matter, therein is listed a 3/5/13 Order to Show CauseHearing.

Whether Mr. Lindsay was directly made appointed counsel pursuant to someNCJC Canon 2 Rule 2.13 "Administrative Appointment" or not, he appearedin the matter, and, therefore, was required to obtain an Order, in writing,allowing his withdrawal, before his non-appearance at the 3/19/13 Trial inRCR2012-065630 would be acceptable.

Further, as to being "reinstated" into DAS in RCR2013-071437, that wouldimply Coughlin was ever instated into DAS in that matter to begin with, and,given that such matter was only given a case number on 3/14/13, and thealleged "reinstatement" was ordered on 3/11/13, such is not possible. Further,for a criminal case matter such as RCR2013-071437 there needs to be acharging document, and the associated probable cause sheet and arrest report,or citation. Please provide that. Without that, there really is no "case" for Mr.Linsday to be quadruple billing on. That is, getting paid four times to donothing once. A real 401K (4 times to do nothing ("0") once ("1"), 'kay?

Whether Mr. Lindsay agreed to appear on RCR2012-065630 in considerationfor some acquiescence on Coughlin's part to Lindsay partaking in such a 401Kapproach to Administrative Appointments, on the condition that the globalresolution (resolving all criminal matters (ie, Lindsay has never been given


3/23

permission to appear in the matter of the 12/20/12 "Administrative Order2012-01 In the Matter of Zachary Coughlin", no matter which case the RJCshoehorns such into, then move it out of, then gives a new criminal casenumber on 3/14/13, etc.) in which Coughlin has ever been a party in the RJCin a manner which would result in Coughlin having no SCR 111(6) "serious"offense convictions, and in accord with the 8/27/12 plea bargain deal

Coughlin accepted.

ON 3/14/13 Lindsay's Office wrote "I need to clarify with you that Mr. Lindsay wasappointed to the following cases in Court to wit;

RCR2013-71437 the contempt charges that you were reinstated into DAS and CCP

RCR2011-063341 petty larceny matter that you were already convicted on but again for the contempt of

court matters."

The thing is both Lindsay and the RJC/WCDA need to be clear as to what "contempt of court matters" fit intowhich case, and in which "case" (as RCR2013-071437 is an example of the judiciary attempting to usurp the

executive branch's prosecutorial charging function) is any "reinstating" to DAS even possible (not to mention

that "reinstating" Coughlin into CCP when he was never placed in CCP in the first place is a logical fallacy).

RCR 12-067980 obstructing justice and resisting case that has been set for a pretrial on April 16, 2013.

Apparently the case that is going to trial on Tuesday 03-19-13, is Case No. RCR2012-065630 and as you

indicated the Judge specifically stated that no additional counsel would be appointed on this case,"

Hopefully, Mr. Lindsay is aware that there are other circumstances wherein he could appear as attorney ofrecord, beyond just being appointed by "Dave" (as Mr. Linsday referred to Judge Clifton in suddenly

explaining the welching on the "global resolution" that Mr. Lindsay and his assistant Diana Simms explained

to Coughlin that both RJC Judges Pearson and Clifton and the WCDA's Office DDA Young had agreed to,

when Coughlin queried Lindsay as to why, if there was a global resolution done, there was still going to be a

trial held on 3/19/13 in RCR2012-065630).

Further the 2006 LA Times article on Administrative Appointments and the problems associated therewith

in the judiciary in Nevada and the changes in Nevada law that such glaring consternation begat has become

exceedingly relevant in the context of Mr. Lindsay's appearance as attorney of record in these matters (the

excuse that Lindsay was only "appointed" in RCR2012-065630 for the 2/13/13 hearing on some alleged

Order to Show Cause (please provide a complete copy of the discovery, charging document, and rest of

the file in that matter) does not fly where Sims admits that Lindsay appeared as attorney of record in that

matter, and sent a 3/5/13 fax to the RJC addressed to Judge Clifton, baring the case number RCR2012-

065630 seeking a continuance of the 3/5/13 hearing on the Order to Show Cause (again, the entry in the

docket of RCR2012-065630 of a 3/5/13 Order to Show Cause hearing is extremely problematic for both

the RJC and Mr. Linsday, and is integral to the misconduct issues arising in the appeal of that matter in

CR13-0614).


4/23

Simply put, being court appointed is not the only manner in which Lindsay may appear in a matter, and once

he appears (as he did in RCR2012-065630, at least as early as the 3/5/13 fax to the RJC seeking a

continuance of the 3/5/13 Order to Show Cause Hearing listed in the docket therein (see NRS 4.240

docket entries in justice courts are prima facie evidence of fact) he is bound by the Rules of Professional

Conduct, which would apply to his failure to appear at the 3/19/13 trial in that matter, not to mention his

completely welching on the "global resolution", his failing to appear at any of the CCP hearings (despite his

express indication that he would), and his indicating to Coughlin both before, during, and after, the 3/11/13

Order to Show Cause hearing(s) that nothing more than a two week continuance as to any of the mattersbeing addressed was being ordered, and that a global resolution had been agreed to by the WCDA, which

Lindsay also indicated had been approved by both RJC Judges Pearson and Clifton (and the welshing on

that deal no makes extraordinarily suspect the RJC's contention that it need not proved the alleged

"contempt" or "probation violation" in RCR2011-063341 (which is an entirely specious charge, and the

RJC's now seeking to characterize such 2/1/13 arrest as one premised upon a warrant, when, clearly, the

Arrest Report and Declaration of Probable Cause by DAS Officer Wickman and Ramos reveals a listing of

NRS 211A.125, the warrantless arrest of a probationer statue (and where the "warrant #" box is crossed

out, and considering the docket in RCR2011-063341 clearly reveals the warrant issued on 1/9/13 was

clearly withdrawn on 1/10/13...meaning there was no "warrant arraignment" on 2/4/13, and the fact that

such DAS arrest occurred at 7:02 pm, as listed on the Arrest Report, makes such a wrongful arrest in

violation of NRS 171.136's restriction against warrantless misdemeanor arrests between the hours of 7 am

and 7 pm, not to mention that the alleged "probable cause" for such arrest is entirely suspect given the

multitude of issues respecting the specious allegations that Coughlin "failed to check in" with DAS on either

1/2/13 or 1/23/13...)

NRS 22.030 Summary punishment of contempt committed in immediate view and presence of court;

affidavit or statement to be filed when contempt committed outside immediate view and presence of

court; disqualification of judge.

2. If a contempt is not committed in the immediate view and presence of the court or judge at

chambers, an affidavit must be presented to the court or judge of the facts constituting the contempt, or

a statement of the facts by the masters or arbitrator

Further, the extent to which then Chief Judge Sferrazza's 12/20/12 Administrative Order (now, allegedly, a

criminal case in RCR2013-071437) blatantly misstates Art. 6 Sec. 6 of the Constitution of the State of

Nevada (such authority is accorded to "District courts", not "Nevada courts", and further, as to the

11/28/12 Order by then Chief Judge Sferrazza in "ALL CASES ALL DEPARTMENTS" barring Coughlin

from fax filing with the RJC, citing to JCRRT 10 when JCRRT 2 clearly reveals that such local rules do not

apply to either landlord tenant matters or criminal cases, makes that Administrative Order, the 2/25/13

Order to Show Cause stemming from it, and Bruce Lindsay, Esq.'s 401K approach to "representation" all

the more dubious and deserving of consternation, particularly given that extremely blase attitude of all

involved with respect to ameliorating the damages done by such apparent misconduct, made worse by the

RJC's failure to provide Coughlin the 2/4/13 and 2/5/13 JAVS recordings he has request (law of the case

incident to the IFP Order on file therein makes the unattributed refusal by some RJC Clerk (likely Robbin

Baker) to process and provide such JAVS recording, extremely suspect, especially considering the import


5/23

of the CR13-0552 Petition for Writ of Mandamus that Coughlin filed to address the NRS 178.405

violations in RCR2012-065630, and concomitant, potential SCR 111(6) "serious" offense conviction

stemming therefrom).

Further the unattributed and dubious allegations in the 2/25/13 Order to Show Cause require someone put

such assertions in an affidavit under NRS 22.030(2)

03/05/2013: CANCELED Order 10 Show Cause (2:00 PM) (Judicial Officer: Pearson, Scott) Vacated (that isthe actual docket entry in RCR2012-065630)

Further, the extent to which the WCDA and RJC gave Lindsay continuance after continuance in RCR2012-

067980 where Coughlin was routinely denied any continuances he requested (and, especially where on

2/5/13, the WCDA and both Judges Pearson and Clifton violated NRS 178.405's mandatory stay pending

the outcome of a competency evaluation dictate...which is made all the more dubious given the RJC's

repeated failure to turn over the JAVS recording of those 2/5/13 hearings before Judge Pearson (the first

one at 8:30 am, where Judge Pearson entered an Order for Competency Evaluation requiring Judge Clifton

stay the trial in RCR2013-065630, and the second hearing, where WCDA Z. Young was somehow able to

summon Judge Pearson for an Emergency Hearing to Set Aside such Order, despite NRS 178.405 makingsuch Motion forbidden (and the State wants to whine about such order being garnered "ex parte" at the

2/5/13 8:30 am hearing, well...show up, State, don't rely on DAS Officers to commit the unauthorized

practice of law on your behalf (they are witnesses, they belong were witnesses belong, not at the

prosecutors table making argument).

Further, the email from Lindsay's office of 3/14/13 fails to acknowledge the appointment of Lindsay in

RCR2012-065630 (whether limited to the 2/13/13 Order to Show Cause hearing or not).

Further, the email Lindsay's Motion to Withdraw in RCR2012-067980 was not granted, making even moreproblematic the fact that Lindsay threatened to murder Coughlin on 3/16/13 by asserting that he would "rip

each of your limbs off your body" to Coughlin over the telephone.

Luckily, there is still an argument that the RJC has jurisdiction over some of these matters given the tolling

motions Coughlin filed in these various cases prevented the RJC from being divested of jurisdiction to undo

all this damages done by it and R. Bruce Lindsay, Esq.

Please provide a complete copy of all of Coughlin's case files.

Of course, all of Coughlin's assertions are fully supported by Lindsay's own written correspondence to

Coughlin:

"Re: Notice of Appearances filed in which cases?? From: Robert Lindsay ([email protected])

This sender is in your safe list. Sent: Wed 3/13/13 8:57 AM To: Zach Coughlin ([email protected])

Dear Zach: Thank you for the email. Please note that I am working on putting together three separate files

with case numbers and discovery . I will contact the court this morning and talk with them regarding the

upcoming court dates (especially tuesday) and then I will call you this morning."


6/23

"Re: proposal that might be your office some more money and resolve this whole thing.? From: Robert

Lindsay ([email protected]) This sender is in your safe list. Sent: Tue 3/05/13 11:03 AM To:

Zach Coughlin ([email protected]) Zack I did not receive the email with the five page

attachment. I will be faxing the letter I read to you before lunch so I was hoping to get that attachments. From:

Zach Coughlin To: Robert Lindsay ;

"[email protected]" ; "[email protected]"

; "[email protected]" ;



"[email protected]" Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:14 PM

Subject: proposal that might be your office some more money and resolve this whole thing. Dear Mr. Lindsay

and WCDA's Office, I respectfully submit this in the hopes that a global deal..."

"Re: proposal that might be your office some more money and resolve this whole thing.? From: Robert

Lindsay ([email protected]) This sender is in your safe list. Sent: Thu 2/28/13 10:40 AM To:

Zach Coughlin ([email protected]) Zach I don't even know where to begin. You have the right

idea here and then you just keep going on and on. Can you please contact our office so that we can make an

appointment to have you come in and go over all of the facts and documents. 324-3333 or 230-4697. The

sooner the better. From: Zach Coughlin To: Robert Lindsay





; "[email protected]" Sent:

Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:14 PM Subject: proposal that might be your office some more money and

resolve this whole thing. Dear Mr. Lindsay and WCDA's Office, I respectfully submit this in the hopes that a

global deal..."

"

Re: update on NNAHMS, request for continuance

of 2/25/13 Hearing in 067980

From: Robert Lindsay([email protected]) This sender is inyour safe list.

Sent: Mon 2/25/13 1:57 PM

To: Zach Coughlin ([email protected])

Zach: Please do not second guess me when I tell you I have things handled. There is no need for you to

cause more confusion. It does not help. You wanted the continuance I told you I would take care of it and I

did. You going into the court after the fact does not look good. Your next court date is for March 11,

2013 for the Order to show cause hearing and the Pretrial on the resisting arrest. In addition the other two
https://bay148.mail.live.com/mail/options.aspx?subsection=6&n=1000670959&selection=rbrucelindsaylaw%40yahoo.com


7/23

tpo violations are scheduled for March 6, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. I will be in touch with the Court to verify if the

DA actually filed charges. So relax and lets work together like we said we would.

From: Zach Coughlin To: Robert Lindsay Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 4:50 PMSubject: RE: update on NNAHMS, request for continuance of 2/25/13 Hearing in

067980..."

"Re: update on NNAHMS, request for continuance of 2/25/13 Hearing in 067980?From: Robert Lindsay ([email protected]) This sender is in yoursafe list. Sent: Sun 2/24/13 2:53 PM To: Zach Coughlin([email protected]) Yes both of the cases have been continued. I willcall Robin in the morning and reset them for a couple weeks out. I explained to

Zach that you are doing everything possible to get on your feet and that you areworking with NAHMS as well as counseling etc. If you do everything required byDAS over the next few weeks maybe when you go to court on the probationviolation it will work out so that the violation is dismissed or time served. Hang inthere your doing well, try to breathe and stay out of trouble ok!!! ... From: Zach Coughlin To: Robert Lindsay Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 10:10 PMSubject: RE: update on NNAHMS, request for continuance of 2/25/13 Hearing in067980 Hi Diana, I am not sure I ever had your phone number beyond the one for

your office listed at http://www.nvbar.org/. When you wrote, below, "Zach I got acall from Zach and your hearing has been continued. Please call me" Does thatmean my hearing in 11-063341 on the DAS Probation Violation (arrest of 2/2/13alleging that I failed to check in on 1/3/13/ and 1/23/13, $500 cash bail posted)Show Cause to show why my probation on a 180 suspended sentence should notbe revoked has been continued AS WELL? That's the hearing I really wantedcontinued because, as specifically mentioned by Judge Pearson at a 2/3/13Show Cause hearing on the morning of 2/3/13 (I was bailed out at 1 am andfound out about the hearing when I called the RJC to inquired about the start time

of my continued trial in a different case in 12-065630...that DAS hearing in063341 was incorrectly noticed on my Jail Release papers for 2/5/13 orsomething...At that 2/3/13 Hearing I got an Order for Competency Evaluation fromPearson, then went and provided that to Judge Clifton at the resumption of the065630 trial immediately thereafter, which, under NRS 178.405, required Cliftonto suspend the trial in 065630. Of course, he did not. He has demonstrated awillingness to fail to apply the law as written in certain instances, invariably to thebenefit of the State. Somehow, Judge Clifton then allowed DDA a recess to go to


8/23

the counter and request and Emergency Hearing before Judge Pearson to havethat Order for Competency Evaluation entered an hour before in 063341 vacated.DDA Young was successful in getting a hearing and having that Order vacated.Judge Pearson was evasive during that hearing when questioned as to whetherhe had extra-judicial discussions with Clifton (whom had just exited the Bench inCourtroom D long enough for Judge Pearson to hold the Emergency Hearing toVacate his just entered Order for Competency Evaluation, which he claimed tohave been reviewing, unprompted, following his entry of that Order, in hischambers, unprompted...)...."

"Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:37:16 -0800From:[email protected]: Re: update on NNAHMS, request forcontinuance of 2/25/13 Hearing in 067980To: [email protected] Zach Igot a call from Zach and your hearing has been continued. Please call me From:Zach Coughlin To: "[email protected]"

; "[email protected]"; "[email protected]" Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:08 PMSubject: update on NNAHMS, request for continuance of 2/25/13 Hearing in067980 Dear Mr. Lindsay and DDA Young, I am writing to request from DDAYoung a stipulation to a continuance of the 2/25/3 Show Cause Hearing in063341, which I understand may have been combined with 067980, so I amcopying Mr. Lindsay...."

"Re: sorry for the delayFrom: Robert Lindsay ([email protected])Sent: Wed 2/20/13 12:06 PMTo: Zach Coughlin ([email protected]); [email protected]([email protected])...

From: Zach Coughlin To: "[email protected]" ;"[email protected]" Sent: Friday, February 8, 2013 2:21 AMSubject: FW: sorry for the delay

I need to see something out of your office soon. So far I got Bruce failing to file aMotion for Order for Competency Evaluation and stipping to everything to makeDDA Young's routine easier...and generally seeming out of it, and he hasprovided absolutely zero legal advice so far...zip...nothing. Please respond to my


9/23

written requests below. I need to know what your office is willing to doimmediately, otherwise its time to refund the $700.00Zachary Barker Coughlin1471 E. 9th St. Reno, NV 89512 Tel and Fax: 949 667 [email protected]: [email protected]: [email protected]: sorryfor the delayDate: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:45:21 -0800Dear Mr. Lindsay,

https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=43084638F32F5F28%21118

Please find very relevant materials to the defense of this case attached and at theabove link. I have scanned everything therein for viruses and it is 100% safe andvirus free.

Sorry for the delay, I am not flaking on you, its just been hectic, i'll get to getting it

scanned and returned, very busy addressing a recent Order of the NNDB seekingto disbar me, but I will get to it.

I don't want much, okay. Just a few simple things.If you get me this stuff, as far asI am concerned, we are straight (assuming you don't pull a Jim Leslie and insiston remaing on my case as long as possible to purposefully torpedo it....) Therewas talk of Cape Fear with Leslie well before he moved to withdraw and got aTPO, and now an EPO (though courthouse sanctuary doctrine makes the

"service" thereof rather suspect. Leslie was not all "terrified" back then...Whatchanged? Oh, that's right, he was finished puttin' in work for the County (ie,makign sure I got convicted on both counts in 063341, thanks to his making theNRS 171.136 (or trying to, at least, ...he failed) citizen's arrest arguments thatwent completely over DDA Young head (or, more likely DDA Young just couldn'tstomach anymore of the farce and chose not to make such arguments to thetirbunal). Can you serve the WCDA with request for discovery and subpoena theRJC and WCSO for the following (assuming the won't just copy the stuff anprovide it all nice'n'easy like):

certified audio transcripts of the following hearings in the RJC:

1. 7/5/12 in RJC Rev2012-001048 hearing granting a default victory incident to a6/28/12 motion to set aside the fraudulently procurred 6/27/12 Lockotu Order atthe rental where the 067980 arrest occurred.2. 7/31/12 hearing in rjc rev2012-001048 before Judge Pearson (this was ahearing noticed on 7/23/12 to address my Motion to Set Aside the 6/27/12eviction Order signed by Judge Schroeder despite my 6/26/12 email and fax to
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=43084638F32F5F28%21118


10/23

the RJC, SJC, WCSO, and City of Reno regarding my filign the Tenant's Answerin the SJC, and the deficiencies in the 5 day notice. (please see the attachedpolice report by the RPD incident to the pretextual (and Soldal v. Cook Coviolating, not that it matters, this is nevada after all) arrest shortly upon my bailingout on the 067980 charge in RMC 12 CR 12420(wherein the "approach" by theRPD (to which RPD Sargent Sifre incidates some level of complicity between theRPD and RJC in a recording only recently propound by the WCDA just 2 judicialdays before the 12/11/12 Trial stemming from the 1/14/12 misuse of 911 arrest inrcr2012-065630 (a witness just sadly passed away unexpectedly 2 days after theDA complete his direct examination of her, EComm's Kariann Beechler).

2.1 the audio transcript of the one hearing in REV 2012-075658 Zach Coughlinvs Jeff Nichols. This is relevant to 067980 because its another eviction scenarioand establishes a pattern and practice by the RPD, WCSO and RJC to refuse touphold my rights while aggressively applying an overly rigid and formulaic

application of rules to me as a pro se tenant, and even going beyond that, somemight say, at times. Please, this one is important, I need it. A former WCSODeputy pu

3. I would like you to serve on the WCDA a request for discovery and also asubpoena/FOIA (I know, NRS Open Records REquest) on ECOMM for any 911calls, RPD Dispatch calls from civilians, or recordings between the RPD or wcsoor Reno sparks Indian colony Police or dispatch/ECOMM in any way connected

to me, Zach Coughlin, or suspected to be connected to me. I am not going to askfor much more, if you get me all that, I'll be good, if not...I'll be tedious.

4. any and all recordings made by anyone (RPD, WCSO, Northwinds Staff,bystanders, and especially Jeff Chandler or Ryan WRay or anyone elseassociate with Nevada Court Services) of ANY interactions with me in any wayconnected to Northwinds Apartments and my tenancies there (i had three rentals,units 29, 45, and 71). Please have served a subpoena duces tecum on NevadaCourt Services directed to anythign (documentation, recordings, etc) related toZach Coughlin and serve a witness subpoena on NCS's Ryan Wray (might havestopped working there, but still subpoena him please) as well as Jeff Chandler.

5. The RMC audio transcript of the (it woudl cost my $35 i don't have, and theyprobably have to waive the fee for you, the RJC does when Leslie and the WCPDrequest recordings) 7/5/12 unnoticed bail hearing in RMC 12 CR 12420 whereinmy bail was impermissibly raise from a bondable $1,415 to a cash only $3,000 for


11/23

charges that were plainly manufacture anyways.6. the 12/3/12 Trial audio transcript in RMC 12 CR 12420.7. the 12/18/12 audio transcript of the hearing in 067980 (the case you are on)wherein Jim Leslie (without DDA Young there) was able to get some thingsdone...you likely are required to, or at least, might want to, have this anyways.... Idont' necessarily need the hard copies (you can sign up for a free hotmailaccount at www.outlook.com and skydrive them to me, its totally easy, or I canpick them up, copy them, and deliver them to you...i just dont' have the moneyand the court's nickel and dime me like crazy).8. The 12/6/12 filing in the appeal of an associated RJC prosecution in rcr2012-063341 (it is the Record on Appeal, basically, but I think they titled it "Notice ofAppeal" on the docket...and the RJC has failed to provide me a copy of it...noteven the brand new filings listing the index of documents included in that 12/6/12filing (which is basically a Notice of Appeal). YES, IT is relevant to this case...itgoes to conflicts analysis to both the RJC (even across departments, especially

given some admission by Clifton as to looking over "submission on subpoenas"from that 063341 case before Sferrazza, on the record in 065630...DDA Young isan efiler and could easily email you that 20 mb or so 12/6/12 Notice of Appeal(804 page) filign in CR12-2025 (the appeal of rcr2011-063341, the first of 10arrest/incarcerations of me since 8/20/11).

Please subpoena Nevada Court Services Ryan Wray (he may not work thereanymore, but he was present at the scene of the arrest and, obviously, along withNorthwinds Manager Duane Jakobs (who testified on that 7/31/12 audio

transcript I am requesting you obtain and copy me on in rev2012-001048 aboutthe events in question in 067980) participated in attempted break in an fraudulentDeclaration of Service of the 6/14/12 5 Day UD Notice.

9. Lastly, please serve the RJC Custodian of Records a Subpoena duces tecumfor all records/fax logs/information/documentation related to any faxing of Ordersby RJC Judges to the WCSO between October 24th, 2011 and November 2nd2011 (each fax has a job number, etc. I want a sequential printout or log of thosefaxes as it goes to whether the RJC, in accord with its admitted policy, faxed tothe WCSO the two different ORders by Judge SFerrazza related to the Eviction (a10/25/11 "Eviction ORder and Decision" and a 10/27/11 "Findings of Fact,Conclusions of Law, and ORder for Summary Eviction". I need to know if andwhen such items were faxed or transmitted to the WCSO...it is very relevant giventhe same WCSO Deputy Machen conducted the lockout on 11/1/11 from myformer home law office, according to the locksmith, REno Carson Messengerreceipts, the transcript of th 6/18/12 criminal trespass trial in RMC 11 Cr 26405(sworn testimony of Casey Baker, eSq. and Richard G. HIll, eSq.) demonstrates


12/23

that the WCSO's Office is being obstructive, as is the RJC (whom failed to complywith my SCR 105(4)/SCR 119 properly issued and served supboena andsubpoena decus tecums of 10/30/12 in the formal disciplinary matter (espeicallyconsiering the 4/11/12 volunteering of information and documents by RJC judgessecretary Lori Townsend), and further specify the subpoena duces tecum is forthe "file stamped cover page" of any filign by Couglin in RJC rev2012-000374.

10. the audio transcript of the 8/7/12 TPO Hearing in RJC RCP2012-000287)for Milan Krebs v. Zach Coughlin (Krebs was NOrthwinds Apts maintenance man(the one doing the sawzalling to the metal door of unit 29 incident to the arrest in067980...He testified under oath the matters of material direct relevane to thedefense of this case. This is a no brainer, and the fact that Leslie continuouslyrefused to obtain a copy of this hearing (again, the RJC waives the $35 fee for thwCPD...so what was Leslie's excuse? That Northwind's Apartments sent himsome photgraphs of a microwave? Please. Jim Leslie is a joke. That might be

relevant to an evictio hearing, but not to a NRS 199.280 defense. What Krebstestified to at that TPO extension hearing on cross examination is obviouslyextremely relevant, particularly where there was extensive questioning directed tothe circumstances of the arrest in 067980.

11. Lastly, a subpoena duces tecum on the Custodian of Records for the Renomuni Court and the Custodian of Records for the City of REno Marshals for anyan all documentation, marshal's reports, or recordings (Thompsons admitted tomakign at least on on or about 3/22/12) in any way related to Coguhlin (obviously,

there shoudl be an arrest report from the 2/27/12 direct contempt arrest whereinMarshal Harley, as testified to by Judge Nash Holmes at my disciplinary hearingon 11/14/12 via her hearsay of what Harley told her, has apparently alleged some"disassemblign of a recording device and hiding a component of it in the restroomduring arestroom break that was begrudingly granted immediately after Holmesbegan interrogating Coughlin about hwether he was "recording the proceedings"and or whether he "had a recording device", upon which, alleged Holmes,Coughlin immediately got "all squirmy and begged to use the restroom"....Okay,lets see the documentation, marshal's report etc. for anything, but especiallyincluding that. IF they move to QUash I want be copied on it (please copy me onanything anyone sends you ever in any way related to me) as I have someauthority and opposition work I woudl like for you to at least consider incident toany reply you may wish to file....this is relevant. RJC Clifton signed an ORder forCompetency eval on 2/27/12 at 1:31 pm...JUDge Nash holmes could nto be foundby her staff at that time, despite the traffic citaiton trial connected to Richard G.Hill, Esq.'s office and the trespass arrest being schedule to occur then...bothHOlmes and Clifton were mysteriously transferred criminal cases involving


13/23

Coughlin on 2/27/12...both are lifelong prosecutors, formerly Holmes was Clifton'sboss from about 91 to 94 ish (not to mention Linda Gardner was a coworker (see54844 and 60302), and Nash Holmes 3/14/12 grievance against Coughli nto theSBN admits to communications with the WCPD about Coughlin.12. please subpoena duces tecum the WCPD as to anything in any way relatedto HOlmes admission regarding the WCPD in her 3/14/12 grievance...

13. Lastly, please serve a subpoena duces tecum on the custodian of REcordsfor Richard G. HIll, ESq. and his former associates new firm in Kentucky, CaseyD. Baker, Esq's Baker and Baker or whatever tey call themsleves narrowlytailored to any documentation, recordings, or information baring on when and iftheir office provided the two different eviction ORders to the wcso office (Baker'stestimony at the 6/18/12 crimnal trespass trial (there is an oficial transcript at telink) sheds some light on this vis a vis October 28th, 2011...and familiarzieyourslef with the void/stale order concept incident to NRS 40.253's requirement

that the lockout be done "within 24 hours" of "receipt of the order"....by theWCSO...the same deputy makign the arrest in 067980 conducted that lockoutand filed a fraudulent affidavit of service on 11/7/11 alleging to have "personallyserved" me...which his supervisor was ofrced to admit, in writing, he did not, butrather merely posted the order on the door (hill lied at the 6/18/12 trespass trial intestying "they posted it to the door because you ran away" despite that beingcompletely false, and where HIll admits he was not even present that day, and hisassociate completely failes to back up hill's baseless, defamatory accusation (oneof many by Hill).

And that's it. You do all that and provide a reasonable return and attempt tocounter all the bs MOtions to Quash sure to ensue, and we are straight. You canmove to withdraw and I will give you glowing review, I promise. Hell, I will evendraft all these subpoenas for your approval and the oppositions to the motions toquash if you like, and provide the authority in support of them. But I need you toissue the subpoenas and have them served, and get the recordings, etc....even ifthey make you pay for them, none of this adds up to more than $200 (perhapsyou can file a notice of appearance, if an efiler on the cr12-2025 under somejustification that is is necessary to the defense herein or I would allow you toappear as co-counsel provided you dont' insist on hijacking things..., butobviously paying $1 page for all 804 pages hard copy from aint goign to work....

I really appreciate any help you can provide.


14/23

Sifre's admissions as to said complicity may provide a basis for your filing aMotion to conflict out the rjc and the wcda's office (in addition to DDA Kandaras'involvement in the turning over of my smartphone and data card to the City ofReno Marshals and the RMC in 11 TR 26800, as admitted to by WCSO Hodge tome, in front of local attorney Pam Willmore (I was arrested incidnet to a contemptfinding at the 2/27/12 trial before judge Nash Holmes, and it was not until after myproperty was booked into my personal secured property and well after any timefor a "search incident to arrest" that the WC Jail released to the RMC and itsMarshals on 2/28/12 my property, which was returned 37 days later wiped of alldata incident to an Order of 3/30/12 that seems to have clearly be responsive to afiling by me in NVB 10-05104 before Judge Nash Holmes and Washoe LegalServices Exec. Director Elcano 1977 McGeorge SOL classmate, NVB Judge B.Beesley....all three of whom testified at my 11/14/12 formal disciplinary hearing at

the SBN, despite SCR 105(2)(c) being desecrated in every way imaginable,another Mirching to besmirch the judicial system in Nevada. DDA Kandaras is onthe NNDB and refuses to deny that she or David Hamilton, Esq. (Richard G. Hill,Esq.'s best friend) were on my screening Panel. This IS revelvant to what youare getting seven bones for, under a conflict or disqualification analysis (I wouldlike a reason why this case was transferred on 2/27/12 from Judge Lynch, sameday another case in the RMC was transferred to jUdge Holmes (the 1/12/12custodial arrest for jaywalkign cuz richard g. hill said to cas in rmc 12 CR 12420.

7/5/12 in RJC Rev2012-001048 (this is the summary eviction from the very unit#29 rental at Northwinds Apartment, 1680 Sky Mountain Drive that I was arrestedat on 6/28/12 in the matter you were assigned and contracted to handle for$700.00). I did not attend the hearing because I was rearrested on 7/3/12 by theReno Police Department just blocks from Northwinds Apartments in RMC 12 CR12420 (a custodial arrest involving three charges, one, a simple traffic citation forfailure to secure a load on one's vehicle (they allege an empty plastic storage tubfell off my vehicle), two, no proof of vehicle insurance (despite RPD Officer AlanWeaver admitting that I showed him a high resolution pdf of my then currentUSAA auto insurance on a 4.7 inch smart phone screen...he said it had to be apaper printout), and three, "disturbing the peace" based upon the criminalcomplaint signed by Northwind's Apartments maintenance man, 23 year old MilanKrebs (whom obtained a TPO against me from the RJC in RCP2012-000287 on7/5/12 after the RPD fraudulently urged Krebs to apply for one incident to the7/3/12 arrest, as further confirmed by the commentary by the same RPD SargentSifre (only finally propounded to me following a 12/5/12 email from the WCDAinforming me of the availability of such discovery


15/23

please let me know, in writing, and with specifics, whether or not you will move, inwriting, to obtain the above indicated materials, and provide an indication of howsoon you will do so, with proof thereof. Sorry to have to ask for that, but time is ofthe essence and I need to know if this is going to work out with you or not. If itdoes, I will absolutely credit you for being a faithful defender of the SixthAmendment, and maybe more.

Sincerely,

Zach Coughlin1471 E. 9th St.Reno, NV 89512Tel and Fax: 949 [email protected]"

Sincerely,

Zachary Barker Coughlin 1471 E. 9th St. Reno, NV 89512 Tel and Fax: 949 667

7402 [email protected]

PS:

"

Re: Notice of Appearances filed in which cases?


Sent: Wed 3/13/13 8:57 AM



with case numbers and discovery .

I will contact the court this morning and talk with them regarding the upcoming court dates (especially

tuesday) and then I will call you this morning...."
https://bay148.mail.live.com/mail/options.aspx?subsection=6&n=859483888&selection=rbrucelindsaylaw%40yahoo.commailto:[email protected]


16/23

"

Re: Notice of Appearances filed in which cases?


Sent: Wed 3/13/13 8:57 AM



with case numbers and discovery .

I will contact the court this morning and talk with them regarding the upcoming court dates (especiallytuesday) and then I will call you this morning.

From: Zach Coughlin To: Robert Lindsay Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 4:29 PMSubject: Notice of Appearances filed in which cases

Dear Mr Lindsay,

Would you please communicate with me a bit more with regard to what theoverall plan is, the contigencies, worst case, best case, etc. For instance, whatif no global resolution is worked out by 3/19/13, the trial date for 12-065630before Judge Clifton...."

Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:33:53 -0700

From: [email protected]: Re: Notice of Appearances filed in which cases?

To: [email protected]

Dear Mr. Coughlin:

I need to clarify with you that Mr. Lindsay was appointed to the following cases in Court to wit;

RCR2013-71437 the contempt charges that you were reinstated into DAS and CCP
https://bay148.mail.live.com/mail/options.aspx?subsection=6&n=859483888&selection=rbrucelindsaylaw%40yahoo.com


17/23

RCR2011-063341 petty larceny matter that you were already convicted on but again for the contempt of

court matters.

RCR 12-067980 obstructing justice and resisting case that has been set for a pretrial on April 16, 2013.

Apparently the case that is going to trial on Tuesday 03-19-13, is Case No. RCR2012-065630 and as you

indicated the Judge specifically stated that no additional counsel would be appointed on this case, as you

had one appointed and they withdrew, you then requested to represent yourself. I believe this accurate.

Mr. Lindsay would like to schedule an appointment with you for Friday March 15, 2013 to go over these

matters. However, you need to make sure to take your medication and be in a rational state of mind when

you meet with him.

Also, Mr. Lindsay informed you that you were to provide a list of the medications that you are currently

taking as well as the name of the psychologist that will be performing the evaluation with and that you are

suppose to meeting with regularly.

Furthermore Zach: Please do not send me a large email I simply need you to pleas just follow the

instructions as outlined above and make an appointment with our office. I apologize for any confusion, but

as I specifically informed you a couple of days ago I needed to review our files and consult with Mr.

Lindsay before offering any information and have now done so.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation.

Diana Sims

Legal Assistant to

ROBERT BRUCE LINDSAY

From: Zach Coughlin To: Robert Lindsay Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 4:29 PMSubject: Notice of Appearances filed in which cases?

Dear Mr. Lindsay,

Would you please communicate with me a bit more with regard to what the

overall plan is, the contigencies, worst case, best case, etc. For instance,what if no global resolution is worked out by 3/19/13, the trial date for 12-065630 before Judge Clifton.

I like you personally, Bruce, and Diana too, but I am frustrated. Everytime Igo into court I don't know if I will be allowed to go home that day. I haveoffered the County, the WCDA, etc., etc. everything I could think they want,but no deals get done...the WCDA is shielding DDA Young from any emails,


18/23

faxes, voice mails from me (See the letter ADA Helzer recently resent), whichI think impermissibly attempts to absolve him of his obligations under theRPC. I am very unhappy about what happened on 2/13/13 (not a huge deal,but I am working on a brief to save my law license, and five days in jaildoesn't help). Its not clear to me what happened yesterday before JudgePearson. I can chill out, but how about seeking clarification as to what

occurred, and if, in fact, I am now subject to some 3 year probation requiringme to check in with CCP, in addition, to checking in with DAS, everyweek...how is that a good deal for me? Keep me out of jail? From what?What was I in danger of going to jail over? An allegation of calling thewrong number at the RJC to check the time for a hearing? Hardly colorablefor the RJC to assert a justification for 6 months in jail? What else? A DASprobation violation? Well, did I have an email from DAS Officer Brownexcusing such violation? Was the arrest after 7pm in violation of NRS

171.136? I dont' like going to court, checking in with probation, givingpeople my medical records. These are positives. Having limites on my abilityto travel, to move...Giving the RJC leverage to put me back in jail should Ipoint out how their various egregiously incorrect under the law eviction ordercontributed mightily to a tremendously painful and unhappy 18 months of mylife. And you, so far, have always assumed I was wrong, and that they onlyway is to give up any leverage I have, for....what? 5 days in jail for being lateto court (no consultation with you prior to appearing before Judge Clifton is

hardly "representation"...If some binding order issued yesterday from JudgePearson, its not as though I received any analysis from you before hand. Thatis why I didn't agree to anything beyond a two week continuance, which I wasyou confirmed in my initial phone call to you afterwards, then, later, youchanged your position and asserted something else...I think we need to worktogether here, and that, if you really think about it, neither you nor I "agreed"to any such consent Order that Judge Pearson for the WCDA may allegedoccurred. Further, any such Order was issued in AO12-01...which is not even

a "case", nor was it issued upon "a properly made motion"....as such, and CCPOrder is void...somehow I think we could influence Judge Pearson to adoptthat viewpoint to whatever extent he does not yet...But I am not even sure heentered an order, or "rendered", etc...I need something in writing telling mewhat, if anything, I am required to do to comply with any such "Order" shouldit be the case that there is one. If there is, I want to file a motion to stayprobation, correct illegal sentence, notice of appeal thereto, etc., and the timeframe is extremely limited. Maybe Judge Pearson would rather "clarify"


19/23

things than have a Notice of Appeal filed divesting him of the ability to do so.

It seems you feel that going in to CCP would be a good thing, that it likelywouldn't be three years in duration, would provide me an opportunity to sellmyself to Judge Pearson more, etc...But that's assumign stupid things don'thappen, like me being late to a check-in, continued issues with a Bailiff or

two, ADA Helzer telling DAS Officer Ramos to arrest me when he needsleverage on something (if that is what happened), etc., etc. It just doesn'tseem that thought out to go, in two weeks, and enter some CCP ConsentOrder to dispose of two rather dubious Show Cause Orders or ProbationViolations...Were were the witnesses yesterday? No witnesses, nocontempt...so that adds credence to the view that yesterday was more of astatus conference in which no orders issued, an certainly not a CCP obligationfor 3 years where the only discernible benefit to the client is getting an Order

paying for a Dr. Yasar evaluation when such an Order was already renderedon 2/2/13 (Pearson has just failed to have a check cut...). I dont' need mymeds paid for by CCP, NNAHMS is doing that, and my future psychiatristvisits are paid for too. So any consenting to an Order that anyone alleges youdid yesterday on behalf of your client would not be supportable much under atheory that your client obtained much benefit from it...beyond a dubiousassertion that jail time was likely. At some point the RJC Judges have toconsider the PR on the horizon attendant to any jailing me for 6 months

incident to a RJC Bailiff detaining me just long enough for DAS to close itsdoors on 1/23/13, upon which some suspect revocation of probation wouldbe based...

Will you please email me or fax me something in writing indicating, by casenumber, which cases you are attorney of record for me on, and to whatextent? I have been told by your office and the RJC, and the WCDA's Officethat you are my attorney of record in 12-065630, for which the Trial is set to

occur on 3/19/13 at 8:30 am. If that is the case, I would like to meet withyou and prepare for trial, and your being listed as attorney of record thereinhas now limited my ability to have subpoenas issued, to make filings, etc.My understanding of the hearing yesterday before Judge Pearson is that it wasa combination hearing involving three separate and distinct matters:12-067980, the case in which you are listed as attorney of record by the RJC,though the Motion I filed on 12/3/12 therein has never been addressed by theRJC


20/23

AO12-01, the "case" wherein the "Caption" reads "In the AdministrativeMatter of Zachary Coughlin...Administrative Order 12-01" from which the12/20/12 "Administrative Order 12-01" by then Chief Judge Sferrazza issued,though service thereof I believe should be quashed, as, should be, the 2/25/13Order to Show Cause that shares the same "caption", and11-063341, the iPhone petty larceny conviction case currently on appeal in

CR12-2025 (where I was granted In Forma Pauperis status on 1/9/13 andhave an Order (see attached) requiring the preparation of some 15 hours oftrial transcripts).

I believe the AO12-01 of 2/25/13 is void for lack of jurisidiction and for theother reasons set out in my various attached filings. Please note tPlease indicate whether you were compensated by anyone in any way for yourappearing in 12-065630 on 2/13/13 and how you came to appear at such

hearing, whether such hearing involved criminal or civil contempt, andwhether you are attorney of record on the appeal thereof (please see theNotice of Appeal I filed in that matter on 2/25/13, within the 10 days underNRS 189.010, as to the 5 day summary incarceration Order for some type ofcontempt...I gather. Given you were late to court yesterday, I noted that youwere not taken into custody following the hearing and yourself subject tosuch a Contempt Hearing). Please indicate when, and in exactly what matters,and to what extent, you have complied with the local rules with respect to

filing a notice of appearance in any of my cases. I am sorry to come across asso formal and technical, but there are significant consequences to me possiblein these various matters.

Given the proximity of the 3/19/13 Trial date in 12-065630 and yourstatement to me on the phone today, that you could not speak with me aboutany of the matters for which you are listed as my attorney of record, including

the case wherein there is a trial date on calendar of 3/19/13 at 8:30 am, Ibelieve it is necessary for a stipulation to a continuance be sought from DDAYoung and and Order granting such continuance from the RJC.

Additionally, I have my medication and pyschiatrist viists paid for byNNAMHS. I have no interest in joining a CCP with the RJC, much less for 3years. You indicated to me that nothing occurred in court at the combinationhearing yesterday (which,. from my understanding combined the Show Cause


21/23

Order of 2/25/13 incident to the 12/20/12 Administrative Order 12-01...which I have called "case number AO12-01...and I object to such Orderbe recharacterized at this point as being incident to 11-063341 (There was aShow Cause Hearing, continued from 2/25/13 in 11-063341 that was to takeplace yesterday 3/11/13, though it did not take place as far as I know, and anyOrder that was entered (I did not agree to any Order being entered, and you

represented to me that no Orders were going to be entered in any matter orcase being addressed in court yesterday 3/11/13 incident to the 9 amcombination hearing of that date beyond a 2 week continuance being entered,sufficient to allow you and I and DDA Young to work together towards aglobal resolution, involving both the matters in which you are attorney ofrecord, and to which I have so consented to you being attorney of record, andthose where you and I are co-counsel, and those where I am self representing,whichever the case may be (and at this point, that seems to be up for debate

and in the eye of the beholder).

Please indicate whether you will be seeking a continuance as to the 3/19/12Trial date at 8:30 am in 12-065630 before Judge Clifton, and, if not, whenyou and I can meet to address matters related thereto.

NNAHMS is paying for my medication and future psychiatrist visits, and I amstarting counseling there with a psychologist. As such, I don't know why it

would be necessary to provide my prescription records. I would like the RJCto fulfill the Order rendered on 2/2/13 that it would pay for a mental healthevaluation with my private psychiatrist (Dr. Suat Yasar) whom I have gone tofor years, and who, thus, I feel would be able to provide a more in depth andbetter mental health evaluation.

To the extent that during the hearing yesterday (I was only able to speak withyou very, very briefly yesterday prior to the 9:00 am hearing, given your

arriving at 9:20 am for yesterday's hearing, which was set for 9:00 am). Iwould like to consult with you further regarding the possibilities of enteringthe RJC's CCP program, though at this point, I don't see how doing suchprovides much benefit to me beyond being subject to more Orders To ShowCause should I fail to appear to a check in or arrive late. I have no interest inbeing subject to such a program for 36 months. I do not believe I consentedto any Order being entered which would place me in such a CCP program for36 months or require me to check in at the RJC asecondtime per week in


22/23

addition to my usual Wednesday DAS check ins. You mentioned somepossibile benefit of being enrolled in the CCP program or, in the future, aftermore consulation and informed consent being garned from me, upon any suchConsent Order being entered requiring me to participate in the CCP program,as involving having my medications and psychiatrist visits paid for. However,NNAHMS is currently providing such a service, and NNAHMS does not

subject me to Order to Show Cause if I am late to an appointment, and givenmy ADHD/ADD and Major Depressive Disorder diagnosis, being late fromtime to time is a distinct possibility.

If your understanding of what occurred in court yesteday before JudgePearson is different than mine, please let me know in writing. I know I wascrying in court and very distraught and indicated to you that I had not had my

medication in two days, and I feel that likely augured towards your movingfor a Competency Evaluation or otherwise seeking a stay of theproceedings...further, you were provided the 2/2/13 Order for CompetencyEvaluation by Judge Pearson, and even where Judge Pearson may havepurported to set aside such Order only an hour after entering it, I don't believehe has the jurisdiction to do that, but rather, that I must be examined by a amental health care professional with the requisite certifcation to perform suchevaluations prior to any matter, in any department of the RJC proceeding.

While I granted you a limited right to pursue a global resolution in a civilcontext of the various matters involved here, in a co-counsel arrangement inwhich I retain final say on everything, including your continue participation inany such matters (and, in the proper order, and prior to giving up any leverageI may have, I am in favor of you being compensated by the State as much andin as many cases as possible, just not before a deal is worked out in a civil

context disposing of these various matters and where, any subsequent filingby you of a notice of appearance in a criminal matter is as my co-counsel).

Sincerely,

Zach Coughlin


23/23

Zachary Barker Coughlin 1471 E. 9th St. Reno, NV 89512 Tel and Fax: 949 667

7402 [email protected]

Zach has 11 filesto share with you on SkyDrive. To view them, click the links below.

2 25 12 0204 Order to Show Cause Order 2012-01 RJC Sferrazza Pearson.pdf

2 25 13 Notice of Appeal of Order of 2 13 12 5 Day Incarceration for Contempt 065630 0204.pdf

2 25 13 Request to RJC Chief Judge Pearson for Order for Yasar Evaluation.pdf

2 28 13 0204 063341 WCDA DDA Hezler 2 25 13 letter with new handwritten note remailed threatening

TRO TPO.pdf

2 28 13 0204 AO12-01 Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Document to 2 25 13 Order in

AO12-01 for 3 5 13 Hearing by 4pm on 2 28 13.pdf

2 28 13 0204 RJC AO12-01 Motion for Extension of Time to Filed Responsive Document to 2 25 13 Order

in AO12-01 re Right to Counsel.pdf

3 1 13 0204 063341 Coughlin's Motion to for Check for Dr. Yaser Pursuant to Order Rendered on 2 1313 , Subm of Proposed Order for Mental Eval.pdf

3 1 13 0204 AO12-01 Coughlin's Motion to Dismiss Show Cause Order Lack Specificity Insuff Service, Mtn

for Continuance of 3 5 13 Hearing, Set Aside AO12-01 Void Lack Juris 067980 063341 065630.pdf

3 11 13 0204 063341 067980 AO12-01 filign in relation to what occurred before Judge Pearson

today.pdf

12 3 12 067980 Motion to Substitute Out Leslie and Conflict out wcda wcpd motion for mistrial notice of

leslie and young's failure to hold msc on 11 20 12.pdf

12 20 12 438pm RJC Chief Judge Sferrazza 12-01 Administrative Order 0204 063341 065630 067980

1048 607 599 074328 ocrd tagged.pdf

Download all
https://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=downloadaszip&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217545&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217545&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217544&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217544&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217543&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217543&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217546&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217546&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217547&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217547&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217542&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217542&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217540&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217540&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217539&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217539&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217537&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217537&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217538&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217538&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217541&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=self&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217541&parid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMailhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&page=browse&resid=43084638F32F5F28%217536&authkey=%21ACiIm5Xq6PZbu_o&Bpub=SDX.SkyDrive&Bsrc=SkyMail&sc=Documentsmailto:[email protected]