7. error and bias-2010-2012

Upload: ivan-alan

Post on 03-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    1/18

    Company

    Logo

    ERROR AND BIAS IN OBSERVATIONLilik Zuhriyah

    20 April 2012

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    2/18

    1

    2

    3

    4

    Sources of error and bias

    Practical issues in reducingbias and error

    Assessment the consistency of

    information

    Effects of misclassification onstudy results

    Sub Topics

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    3/18

    Introduction

    Assessing error and bias is the first step in

    the critical appraisal of a study

    Error (Non-differential error) = inaccuracy

    which is similar in the different groups ofsubjects being compared

    Ex : bleeding, volume of breastmilk

    Bias = inaccuracy which is different in sizeor direction in one of the groups under

    study than in the others

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    4/18

    Types of Error

    Random Error

    Systematic Error = Bias

    any systematic error in the design,conduct or analysis of study that results in

    a mistaken estimate of an exposureseffect on the risk of disease (Gordis,1996)

    If the result of study close to the correctvalue, it has little error.

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    5/18

    True value of factor

    1. Random variation

    2. Biological variation

    True value of factor at the point of measurement

    3. Performance of the instrument used to measure the factor : bias due to the

    influence of the subjects being assessed or bias due to the influence of the

    observers

    4. Recording of the results

    5. Computation of the results

    Value of the variable used in the study

    Sources of Error and of Bias

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    6/18

    VALIDITY RELIABILITY RELATIONSHIP

    Valid Tidak Valid

    Reliabel A : Robin Hood

    scenario: Your measure

    is both reliable and valid

    B : Consistent

    but wrong

    Tidak

    Reliabel

    C : Seldom hit the

    center of the target but,on average, you are

    getting the right answer

    for the group (but not

    very well for individuals.

    In this case, you get a

    valid group estimate,

    but you are inconsistent

    D : Your hits

    spread acrossthe target and

    you are

    consistently

    missing the

    center. In this

    case, your

    measure neither

    reliable nor valid

    Matriks sasaran tembak (Bulls eye) (Murti, 2003 p 181 & Greenberg, 1996 p. 134)

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    7/18

    VALIDITY RELIABILITY RELATIONSHIP

    Validity and reliability are separate ideas, in fact, theyre

    related to each other

    If the spots are less scattered, it show less variability and

    more precision (Confidence Intervals)

    Confidence intervals are a numericmeasure of the range

    within which such variation is likely tooccur. The 95%confidence intervals represent the range within which we

    are likelyto find the underlying true treatment effect.

    The greater the precision the narrower the confidence

    intervals. The greater precision results from larger sample sizes

    and consequent larger numberof events.

    C versus A show increased random error (error)

    B & D versus A & C show systematic error (bias)

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    8/18

    Relation of Systematic Error & Random Error to

    Study Size

    Systematic Error

    Random Error

    Study Size

    E

    r

    r

    o

    r

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    9/18

    Sources of Bias

    Selection Bias

    The way the subjects have been selected

    Information Bias

    The way the study variables are measured

    Confounding

    Sourcesof bias

    Some confounding factor that is not completely controlled

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    10/18

    Selection Bias

    When the association between exposure anddisease differs for those who participate andthose who do not participate in the study

    Example :

    New Screening Test to detect colon Cancer

    Volunteer Vs Non Volunteer

    Surveillance bias Disease maybe better in the monitored

    population than in the general population

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    11/18

    Information Bias

    Bias may be introduced in the way information

    is abstracted from medical, employment or

    other records or from the manner in which

    interviewers ask questions.

    Ex : case control study of pancreaticcancer. The respondent is a family member

    Non response are generally not a

    representative group.

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    12/18

    Evaluation of Bias

    The evaluation of bias is subjective :Presence of bias

    Its direction and potential magnitude of

    effects on the results : Positive (OR target pop > OR sourcepop) or negative (OR target pop < ORsource pop)

    Towards (underestimate) or away from(overestimate) null hypothesis

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    13/18

    Bias in Case Control Studies

    Ensuring that cases and controls are assessed by

    the same observer or group of observers, and bythe same methods used under the same

    circumstances

    Need additional observation (recording) :

    the length of time taken for examination/

    interviews

    the interviewers assessment of the cooperation

    of the subject and the degree of difficultyexperienced with some of the key questions

    Asking the subjects / interviewer whether they

    aware of any relationship

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    14/18

    Practical Issues in Reducing Bias and Error

    The main approach to minimize error and

    bias :

    The definition of the item to be recorded

    The choice of methods of measurementThe standardization of procedures

    Quality control of all aspects of data

    gathering and processing

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    15/18

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    16/18

    Assessment of bias and error

    ASSESSMENT OF OBSERVATION BIAS AND ERROR

    What is the definition of the factor being

    assessed ?

    Is it the same for each group ?

    Is it appropriate to the hypothesis ?

    What is the same method of

    assessment ?

    Instrument used

    Observer making the assessment

    Circumstances of use

    Subjects circumstances

    Subjects knowledge and cooperation

    Are the methods of assessment similar

    for each group ?

    Are the subjects, or the observers,aware of the groping of the subjects

    when the assessment is made?

    How accurate and reliable is the

    method of assessment?

    When is the observation made ?In calendar time

    In relation to the hypothesis

    Is it the same for each group

    How are the data handled ?

    Recording and coding

    computation

    Are the methods the same for each

    group ?

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    17/18

    Bias, and Methods to control bias

    The most important source of bias arevariation in the subjects response to themethod of assessment, and variation in theobservers response.

    The general principle for minimizing bias isto ensure that the methods used are appliedin the same mannerand with the same careto all subjects

    Double blind (possible in clinical trial, but nopossible in prospective design) is to reduceerror

  • 7/28/2019 7. ERROR AND BIAS-2010-2012

    18/18

    Company

    Logo

    [email protected]